virological failure to protease inhibitors in monotherapy
TRANSCRIPT
Rome, 7-9 June, 2017
Virological failure to Protease inhibitors
in Monotherapy is linked to the
presence of signature mutations in Gag
without changes in HIV-1 replication
Oscar Blanch-Lombarte
European Meeting on HIV & Hepatitis
Gag
p17 p24 p2 p7 p1 p6 Protease
Mutations Protease
Cleavage sites
Structural proteins
PI
Monotherapy Why do PIs fail?
CypA
binding
loop
Contribution of Gag mutations to PI susceptibility
Contribution of Gag mutations to PI susceptibility
AIM: to identify HIV-1 mutational patterns involved in
virological failure through the characterization of Gag
and protease genes
Gag
p17 p24 p2 p7 p1 p6 Protease
PI
Monotherapy
Why do patients with good adherence and treated with boosted PIs develop
virological failure to the treatment without mutations in the protease?
CSM
Structural proteins
Mutations Protease
Patients selection criteria
Selection criteria:
1) Initiation of PI monotherapy as ART-
simplification strategy with DRV/r or LPV/r
2) No previous PI-exposure known
3) Sustained virological suppression
(<50 copies/ml) for at least 6 months from
treatment initiation
Criteria of virological failure: Two viral
loads >50 copies/ml
520 patients who received LPV/r
or DRV/r monotherapy
511 Discarded
9 patients with VF on LPV/r
or DRV/r monotherapy
7 patients with one cross-sectional
sample in VF
2 patients with two
longitudinal samples in VF
7 plasma samples to amplify
full-length Gag-PR
4 plasma samples to amplify
full-length Gag-PR
5 Gag-PR
successfully amplified
2 Gag-PR
amplification failed
Study Subjects
4 Gag-PR
successfully amplified
Clinical follow-up and Sampling
Pt6 DRV/r
Pt1 LPV/r Pt2 LPV/r Pt4 DRV/r
Pt5 LPV/r Pt8 LPV/r
Pt9 LPV/r
Pt3 LPV/r
Pt7 LPV/r
CD
4+ T
-lym
phocyte
s/m
l V
iral lo
ad (R
NA
copie
s/m
l)
Weeks after treatment initiation
T1
T1 T1 T2
T2 T1
T1 T1 T1 T1
T1
Virological failure to DRV/r or LPV/r occurs in
absence of protease drug resistance mutations Gag
p17 p24 p2 p7 p1 p6 Protease
Protease
PatientsTime ARV
Resistance
associated
mutations
Other
mutations
Pt1 T1 LPV/r - K20T
Pt2 T1 LPV/r - -
T1 LPV/r - -
T2 LPV/r - -
T1 DRV/r - -
T2 DRV/r - A71V
Pt5 T1 LPV/r - L10V
Pt6 T1 DRV/r - -
Pt7 T1 LPV/r - -
Pt3
Pt4
Sequencing and direct comparison with HXB2
Patients Time ARV p17 p17/p24 p24 p24/p2 p2 p2/p7 p7 p7/p1 p1/p6 p6
Pt1 T1 LPV/r
E12D, R15K, K30Q, S67A,
R76K, L78V, R91K, K95R,
K103R, N126R
-A146P, S148T, V215M, T242N,
N252S, R286K, T303V, E312D- - -
Q386P,
K411R- -
S465F, Q476P,
K481Q, L483K,
Y484S, S498*
Pt2 T1 LPV/r
V7L, E12K, R15Q, K18R,
K28Q, K30R, I34L, L61I,
G62Q, R76K, T81A, T84V,
E93D, S111I
- E312D - N372G
S373P,
T375L,
M377L
I389T,
R406K- -
S465F, T471I,
E477D, P478S,
R490K
T1 R15K, K30R, E93D, K113Q -
V159I, S165N, Q199E, E203D,
I223V, G248A, N252S, E260D,
T280V, R286K, S310T, G357S
- V370A
A374S,
T375V,
I376M
I389T,
K411R- - T456S, S465L
T2 R15K, K30R, E93D, K113Q -
V159I, S165N, V168I, Q199E,
E203D, I223V, G248A, N252S,
E260D, T280V, R286K, S310T,
G357S
- V370A
A374S,
T375V,
I376M
I389T,
K411R- - T456S, S465L
T1
K28Q, E55G, R76K, E93D,
K95R, K113Q, T122P,
H124K
- L268M, R286K, A326S - -R380K,
N382H
R387K,
K388R- -
T456I, S465F,
E477G, I479T
T2
K28Q, E55G, G62E, R76K,
R91K, E93D, K95R, K113Q,
T122P, H124K
- L268M, R286K, A326S - -T375A
R380K,
N382H
R387K,
K388R- S451N
T456I, S465F,
E477G, I479T
Pt5 T1 LPV/r
E12K, R15K, K18R, K26N,
K30R, S54A, E55D, R58K,
G62E, Q69K, V82I, A83S,
Q90K, R91N, E93D, K95T,
E99A
-
S173T, E203D, V215M, M228I,
G248T, N252S, P255A, T280V,
E312D, A340G, M347S
- V370M I376P
I389T,
V390I,
T401L,
K411R,
R429K
R429K,
K436R-
T456S, E460A,
R464K, S465F,
T470A, I479P,
D480E
Pt6 T1 DRV/rE12K, R76K, R91G, K95R,
K103R, K110C, Q117L-
I147L, V159I, S173T, I223V,
G248A, N252S, T280V, R286K,
E312D, G357S
- V370AS373P,
M378V
I389T,
K418R,
D425E
- -
S465F, E477G,
P478T, L483I,
L486W
Pt7 T1 LPV/r D121N N131H A179T, A209T, T318K - - R380KR384G,
E398QI437V - S465F, R490K
Pt3 LPV/r
Pt4 DRV/r
p17 p24 p2 p7 p6
Gag
p17 p24 p2 p7 p1 p6 Protease
Presence of previously described Gag mutations
• We identified previously described mutations associated to resistance or
exposure of PIs in CSM and in Gag structural regions
p17 p24 p2 p7 p1 p6
K436Ra,b,c
(1%)
S451Na
(1%)
R76Ka,c
(55%) I389Ta
(44%)
V370Aa
(33%)
a Mutations associated with exposure to PI in vivo b Mutations associated with exposure to PI in vitro c Mutations associated with PI resistance
I437Va,b,c
(1%) E12Kb
(33%)
T81Aa,c
(1%)
CSM
Structural proteins
Mutations
Novel Gag mutations identified by VESPA
p17 p24 p2 p7 p1 p6
*
*** *
*
p<0.01 (*)
p<0.0001 (***)
Are those mutations generated by PI treatment or are mutations naturally as polymorphism?
• Mutations at positions K95R, E203D, V215M and R286K were statistically more
prevalent in PIs treatment patients than naïve sequences
2000 HIV-1 subtype B treatment
naïve sequences of Gag
(Los Alamos sequence database)
Methods
• Cloning of recombinant virus
cDNA Gag-PR
from our patients Recombinant
virus
3’ HIV
genome
P83.10-GFP
Electroporation
GFP
gene
Harvest virus
• Generation of Gag-protease viral stocks
• Replication kinetics
Pt4
Viral replication
(Slope)
8 10
6
4
364
1
7
2
6
5
9
3
7
2
5
1
8
66
10
100
6
7
100
74
1911
179
10
2
70
100
HXB2
Gag-Pol Consensus B4
1
2
3
7
9
10
8
5
6
100
7474
0.005
Mutations in HIV-1 Gag do not affect viral replication
*** ***
**
***
**
***
*** **
I54V and V82A in PR
(mutations that affect replication
as previously described)
p<0.001 (**)
p<0.0001 (***)
Drug susceptibility to LPV and DRV
T1 T1 T1 T1 T2 T2
Pt1 Pt3 Pt4 Pt6
LPV (nM)
T1 T1 T1 T1 T2 T2
Pt1 Pt3 Pt4 Pt6
DRV (nM)
Patients ARV
Pt3 LPV/r
Pt1 LPV/r
Pt4 DRV/r
Pt6 DRV/r
Take Home Messages
We identified previously described mutations in Gag associated to resistance
or exposure to PIs in patients with VF in monotherapy.
• Gag CSM K436R (1%), I437V (1%) and S451N (1%)
• Structural regions of Gag R76K (55%), I389T (44%), E12K (33%),
V370A (33%) and T81A (1%)
Although we have limited number of patients, VESPA provided a novel
signature pattern of mutations in Gag including residues K95R, E203D,
V215M and R286K.
Most of the virus in patients with VF in PI monotherapy preserved their
replication.
We identified recombinant virus with reduced susceptibility to LPV and DRV
treatment during VF.
Gag mutations were directly involved in PIs monotherapy in the absence of
protease resistance mutations. However, additional studies are needed to
identify the specific sites involved in PI resistance.
VIRus Immune Escape and VACcine Group
Oscar Blanch-Lombarte
Alba Ruiz
Esther Jiménez-Moyano
Ruth Peña
Marta Colomer
Clara Francés
Àuria Eritja
Julia G Prado P31
José Ramón Santos
Roger Paredes
Bonaventura Clotet
Duncan Njenda
Ujjwal Neogi