virginia independence program · 036 charles city 3 9 33% 097 king and queen 0 10 0% ... 147 prince...

VIRGINIA

INDEPENDENCE

PROGRAM

MONTHLY REPORT Including Graphs of Statewide Trends

October 2013

Prepared by:

Virginia Department of Social Services November 25, 2013

Monthly Report, October 2012

Table of Contents

Work Participation Estimates (from the VDSS data warehouse) i-vi (A work participation estimate percent should not be compared to a percent in a

work activity in the main body of the report which includes only clients in VIEW

and does not consider the number of hours in a work activity during a month)

TANF, TANF-UP Case Activity...................…... 1

Graphs of Case Activity………………………… at end

VIEW Work Activity

Statewide ...................................…... 4

Graphs of Statewide Activity………. at end

EDD1...........................................…... 8

EDD2...........................................…... 9

EDD3...........................................…... 10

EDD4...........................................…... 11

EDD5 & EDD18................................ 12

EDD6………..............................…… 13

EDD7............................................….. 14

EDD8............................................….. 15

EDD9..............................................… 16

EDD10................................................ 17

EDD11............................................… 18

EDD14............................................… 19

EDD1..............................................… 20

EDD3..............................................… 21

EDD11............................................… 22

EDD15............................................… 23

EDD17............................................… 24

VIEW Year to Date Rankings.............................. 25-27

VIEW Cumulative Rankings…………………… 28-30

VIEW Timeliness Measures.............................… 31-39

Child Support Enforcement..............................… 40

Diversion……………………………………….. 41

VIEW Definition Sheet and Endnotes................. 42-44

Research Unit, VA Dept of Social Services, November 2013

i Estimated Work Participation Rates for October

These are estimated locality October 2013 work participation rates that include

clients receiving either TANF or VIEW Transitional Payments (VTP). The official

participation rate will be calculated by the Federal Administration for Children

and Families from more complete files that are submitted quarterly. The

estimated October statewide rate is 44% with a numerator of 6,880 and a

denominator of 15,629.

FIPS

Code Locality

Num-

erator

Denom-

inator

Particip-

ation

Percent

FIPS

Code Locality

Num-

erator

Denom-

inator

Particip-

ation

Percent

001 Accomack 19 67 28% 061 Fauquier 22 50 44%

003 Albemarle 35 72 49% 063 Floyd 8 20 40%

005 Alleghany/Covington 22 44 50% 065 Fluvanna 8 21 38%

007 Amelia 6 21 29% 067 Franklin County 43 100 43%

009 Amherst 13 36 36% 069 Frederick 26 50 52%

011 Appomattox 23 56 41% 071 Giles 10 20 50%

013 Arlington 65 109 60% 073 Gloucester 14 42 33%

015 Augusta/S'ton/W'boro 110 217 51% 075 Goochland 9 12 75%

017 Bath 0 0 N/A 077 Grayson 6 18 33%

019 Bedford County/City 38 97 39% 079 Greene 6 16 38%

021 Bland 2 5 40% 081 Greensville/Emporia 43 98 44%

023 Botetourt 2 13 15% 083 Halifax 24 83 29%

025 Brunswick 23 55 42% 085 Hanover 36 62 58%

027 Buchanan 29 60 48% 087 Henrico 238 724 33%

029 Buckingham 15 35 43% 089 Henry/Martinsville 85 220 39%

031 Campbell 56 136 41% 091 Highland 0 0 N/A

033 Caroline 34 89 38% 093 Isle of Wight 14 52 27%

035 Carroll 26 42 62% 095 James City 32 82 39%

036 Charles City 3 9 33% 097 King and Queen 0 10 0%

037 Charlotte 11 36 31% 099 King George 16 25 64%

041 Chesterfield/Col Hgts 204 465 44% 101 King William 7 19 37%

043 Clarke 1 3 33% 103 Lancaster 9 20 45%

045 Craig 0 4 0% 105 Lee 62 118 53%

047 Culpeper 49 94 52% 107 Loudoun 55 133 41%

049 Cumberland 8 30 27% 109 Louisa 33 59 56%

051 Dickensen 12 22 55% 111 Lunenburg 8 28 29%

053 Dinwiddie 13 48 27% 113 Madison 2 7 29%

057 Essex 18 39 46% 115 Mathews 7 12 58%

059 Fairfax/Falls Church 319 636 50% 117 Mecklenburg 19 69 28%

Estimated Work Participation Rates, cont. ii

The work participation rate is calculated by determining the number of TANF and VTP recipients who are considered to be

“work-eligible individuals.” The cases containing these client become the “denominator.” To determine the numerator,

activities of each of the work eligible persons is examined to estimate if Federal work participation requirements are met for

the month. While not complex, the requirements are fairly detailed. They are enumerated in the reauthorization of the

Temporary Assistance for Needy Families Program, Interim Final Rule as promulgated by the Department of Health and

Human Services, Administration for Children and Families. The rate presented here is the all families rate, i. e. the overall

rate, including VTP..

FIPS

Code Locality

Num-

erator

Denom-

inator

Particip-

ation

Percent

FIPS

Code Locality

Num-

erator

Denom-

inator

Particip-

ation

Percent

119 Middlesex 26 52 50% 187 Warren 33 67 49%

121 Montgomery 56 119 47% 191 Washington 34 74 46%

125 Nelson 3 13 23% 193 Westmoreland 12 29 41%

127 New Kent 11 23 48% 195 Wise 60 134 45%

131 Northampton 25 61 41% 197 Wythe 13 36 36%

133 Northumberland 5 11 45% 199 York/Poquoson 41 88 47%

135 Nottoway 30 75 40% 510 Alexandria 100 181 55%

137 Orange 12 29 41% 520 Bristol 87 127 69%

139 Page 7 20 35% 540 Charlottesville 83 183 45%

141 Patrick 14 51 27% 550 Chesapeake 266 541 49%

143 Pittsylvania 34 78 44% 590 Danville 67 204 33%

145 Powhatan 10 18 56% 620 Franklin City 10 56 18%

147 Prince Edward 45 77 58% 630 Fredericksburg 50 106 47%

149 Prince George 4 41 10% 640 Galax 14 26 54%

153 Prince William 287 523 55% 650 Hampton 360 709 51%

155 Pulaski 22 64 34% 670 Hopewell 16 155 10%

157 Rappahannock 3 8 38% 680 Lynchburg 120 284 42%

159 Richmond County 11 23 48% 683 Manassas 30 56 54%

161 Roanoke County 43 121 36% 685 Manassas Park 6 13 46%

163 Rockbridge/BV/Lex 14 38 37% 700 Newport News 394 830 47%

165 Rockingham/H'burg 63 123 51% 710 Norfolk 606 1,148 53%

167 Russell 40 106 38% 720 Norton 12 27 44%

169 Scott 41 75 55% 730 Petersburg 110 294 37%

171 Shenandoah 5 20 25% 740 Portsmouth 227 559 41%

173 Smyth 42 92 46% 750 Radford 13 48 27%

175 Southampton 22 49 45% 760 Richmond City 516 1,324 39%

177 Spotsylvania 93 217 43% 770 Roanoke City 160 480 33%

179 Stafford 52 141 37% 800 Suffolk 87 184 47%

181 Surry 7 20 35% 810 Virginia Beach 226 444 51%

183 Sussex 20 49 41% 830 Williamsburg 14 27 52%

185 Tazewell 49 102 48% 840 Winchester 19 46 41%

iii Estimated TANF only Work Participation Rates for October


only clients receiving TANF. The official participation rate for these cases will be

calculated by the Federal Administration for Children and Families from more

complete files that are submitted quarterly. The estimated October statewide rate

is 38% with a numerator of 5,351 and a denominator of 13,962. VTP only

estimates are on pages v and vi.

FIPS

Code Locality

Num-

erator

Denom-

inator

Particip-

ation

Percent

FIPS

Code Locality

Num-

erator

Denom-

inator

Particip-

ation

Percent


003 Albemarle 23 60 38% 063 Floyd 6 18 33%







017 Bath 0 0 N/A 077 Grayson 6 18 33%



023 Botetourt 2 13 15% 083 Halifax 21 79 27%







036 Charles City 0 6 0% 097 King and Queen 0 10 0%




045 Craig 0 4 0% 105 Lee 56 112 50%





057 Essex 16 37 43% 115 Mathews 6 11 55%


Estimated TANF Only Work Participation Rates, cont. iv

The work participation rate is calculated by determining the number of TANF recipients who are considered to be

“work-eligible individuals.” The cases containing these client become the “denominator.” To determine the numerator,

activities of each of the work eligible persons is examined to estimate if Federal work participation requirements are met for

the month. While not complex, the requirements are fairly detailed. They are enumerated in the reauthorization of the

Temporary Assistance for Needy Families Program, Interim Final Rule as promulgated by the Department of Health and

Human Services, Administration for Children and Families. The rates presented here are for the TANF all family rate not

including VTP.

FIPS

Code Locality

Num-

erator

Denom-

inator

Particip-

ation

Percent

FIPS

Code Locality

Num-

erator

Denom-

inator

Particip-

ation

Percent




127 New Kent 10 21 48% 195 Wise 44 118 37%




137 Orange 10 26 38% 520 Bristol 79 119 66%

139 Page 7 20 35% 540 Charlottesville 61 159 38%












165 Rockingham/H'burg 37 96 39% 710 Norfolk 523 1,063 49%

167 Russell 34 100 34% 720 Norton 10 25 40%



173 Smyth 34 84 40% 750 Radford 12 47 26%

175 Southampton 15 40 38% 760 Richmond City 444 1,234 36%






v Estimated VTP only Work Participation Rates for October


only clients receiving VTP. The official participation rate for these cases will be

calculated by the Federal Administration for Children and Families from more

complete files that are submitted quarterly. The estimated October statewide rate

is 92% with a numerator of 1,529 and a denominator of 1,687. TANF only

estimates are on pages iii and iv.

FIPS

Code Locality

Num-

erator

Denom-

inator

Particip-

ation

Percent

FIPS

Code Locality

Num-

erator

Denom-

inator

Particip-

ation

Percent


003 Albemarle 12 12 100% 063 Floyd 2 2 100%







017 Bath 0 0 N/A 077 Grayson 0 0 N/A



023 Botetourt 0 0 N/A 083 Halifax 3 4 75%







036 Charles City 3 3 100% 097 King and Queen 0 0 N/A




045 Craig 0 0 N/A 105 Lee 6 6 100%





057 Essex 2 2 100% 115 Mathews 1 1 100%


Estimated VTP Only Work Participation Rates, cont. vi

All VTP recipients are considered to be “work-eligible individuals.” Thus, all VTP cases are in the “denominator.” To

determine the numerator, job follow-up entries are reviewed to estimate if Federal work participation requirements are met for

the month. The basic requirement for VTP recipients is employment for at least 30 hours per week. The requirement is

contained in the reauthorization of the Temporary Assistance for Needy Families Program, Interim Final Rule as promulgated

by the Department of Health and Human Services, Administration for Children and Families. The rates presented here are

also sometimes referred to as the rates for the maintenance of effort program caseload. .

FIPS

Code Locality

Num-

erator

Denom-

inator

Particip-

ation

Percent

FIPS

Code Locality

Num-

erator

Denom-

inator

Particip-

ation

Percent




127 New Kent 1 2 50% 195 Wise 16 16 100%




137 Orange 2 3 67% 520 Bristol 8 8 100%

139 Page 0 0 N/A 540 Charlottesville 22 24 92%












165 Rockingham/H'burg 26 27 96% 710 Norfolk 83 85 98%

167 Russell 6 6 100% 720 Norton 2 2 100%



173 Smyth 8 8 100% 750 Radford 1 1 100%

175 Southampton 7 9 78% 760 Richmond City 72 90 80%






TANF

TANF-UP

Case Activity 1

•The database indicates that of the 2,256 closed cases, 808 were VIEW cases at closure, of which 540 closed with

employment. Of the VIEW cases, 203 were closed after 24 months participation, and of those, 144 closed with

employment. A case that is indicated to have been closed after 24 months may be reinstated for various reasons.

•The database indicates that of the 199 closed cases, 93 were VIEW cases at closure, of which 63 closed with

employment. Of the VIEW cases, 21 were closed after 24 months participation, and of those 19 closed with

employment. A case that is indicated to have been closed after 24 months may be reinstated for various reasons.

Total Statewide

TANF Case Activity Oct-13 Oct-12

Change from

Oct-12 Jun-95

Change from

Jun-95

Applications Received1

5,370 6,297 -15% 4,807 12%

Applications Denied or

Otherwise Disposed Of 4,072 4,574 -11% 1,658 146%

Applications Approved 2,032 2,410 -16% 2,820 -28%

Cases Closed * 2,256 2,434 -7% 4,476 -50%

Cases at End of Month 28,280 30,683 -8% 67,995 -58%

Cases Paid During

Month2

29,138 31,746 -8% 70,403 -59%

Total Statewide

TANF-UP Case

Activity Oct-13 Oct-12

Change from

Oct-12 Jun-95

Change from

Jun-95

Applications Received1

494 648 -24% 338 46%

Applications Denied or

Otherwise Disposed Of 430 444 -3% 232 85%

Applications Approved 218 232 -6% 81 169%

Cases Closed * 199 239 -17% 107 86%

Cases at End of Month 1,470 1,615 -9% 321 358%

Cases Paid During

Month2

1,559 1,753 -11% 394 296%

Statewide - Status through October 31, 2013

Work Activity of all enrolled in VIEW Since Program Implementation 7/1/95

VIEW Work Activity

TANF Cases as of the end of 10/31/13 and Work Activity as of 10/31/13

4

See pp 42-44

Work Activity of all enrolled July 1, 2013 – October 31, 2013, Year to Date

C u r r e n t D a t a

Total

State

Total

ED 1

Total

ED 2

Total

ED 3

Total

ED 4

Total

ED 5

Total

ED 6

Total

ED 7

Total

ED 8

Total

ED 9

Total

ED10

Total

ED11

Total

ED12

Total

ED13

Total

ED14

Total

ED15

Total

ED16

Total

ED17

Total

ED18

TANF Cases End of Month10

30,190 1,588 950 2,384 819 438 3,298 373 604 1,174 1,358 986 4,806 1,028 419 3,117 1,077 5,497 274

Total Enrolled in VIEW 11,863 602 365 809 284 177 1,383 139 296 492 403 428 1,848 518 165 1,247 427 2,158 122

Part. in a Work Activity 9,138 472 306 563 206 144 1,125 101 255 370 308 344 1,385 370 128 1,006 292 1,689 74

% of Enrolled 77% 78% 84% 70% 73% 81% 81% 73% 86% 75% 76% 80% 75% 71% 78% 81% 68% 78% 61%

Part. Assigned to Inactive 120 2 0 10 1 7 8 12 6 4 0 7 15 6 5 15 3 18 1

Participants Employed 6,340 318 199 452 187 89 720 72 185 250 186 192 962 281 108 670 216 1,194 59

% of Enrolled 53% 53% 55% 56% 66% 50% 52% 52% 63% 51% 46% 45% 52% 54% 65% 54% 51% 55% 48%

Full Time 4,893 235 153 358 160 79 550 60 131 165 139 135 720 208 86 503 182 984 45 Part Time 1,447 83 46 94 27 10 170 12 54 85 47 57 242 73 22 167 34 210 14

Average Wage6

$8.41 $7.95 $7.80 $8.21 $8.22 $8.43 $9.68 $8.51 $8.47 $8.05 $7.94 $8.16 $8.53 $8.67 $8.09 $8.27 $8.56 $8.12 $7.84

Average Monthly Earnings7

$1,118 $1,051 $1,019 $1,117 $1,148 $1,147 $1,270 $1,161 $1,097 $992 $1,067 $1,073 $1,128 $1,127 $1,111 $1,094 $1,210 $1,088 $1,062

C u m u la t i v e D a t a

Total

State

Total

ED 1

Total

ED 2

Total

ED 3

Total

ED 4

Total

ED 5

Total

ED 6

Total

ED 7

Total

ED 8

Total

ED 9

Total

ED10

Total

ED11

Total

ED12

Total

ED13

Total

ED14

Total

ED15

Total

ED16

Total

ED17

Total

ED18

Individuals Referred 294,771 17,901 11,065 22,027 8,684 5,732 36,834 4,178 6,432 11,079 13,509 8,585 39,195 9,524 3,923 28,313 9,930 55,180 2,680

Total Enrolled in VIEW5

227,682 13,848 9,315 17,044 6,756 4,304 28,484 3,166 4,999 9,205 10,826 6,724 30,811 7,105 2,949 21,546 7,766 40,827 2,007

Part. in a Work Activity 217,603 13,343 8,947 16,215 6,579 4,073 27,436 3,049 4,888 8,698 10,476 6,443 29,585 6,701 2,767 20,473 7,402 38,589 1,939

% of Total Enrolled 96% 96% 96% 95% 97% 95% 96% 96% 98% 94% 97% 96% 96% 94% 94% 95% 95% 95% 97%

Participants Employed 153,012 8,631 5,987 11,469 4,705 2,777 19,882 2,118 3,727 6,295 6,594 4,085 20,806 4,663 1,858 14,817 5,273 28,205 1,120


Average Wage6

$7.28 $6.32 $6.44 $7.19 $7.28 $7.47 $8.81 $7.58 $7.51 $6.73 $6.49 $6.91 $7.46 $8.04 $7.12 $7.15 $7.12 $6.96 $6.85


$957 $832 $869 $963 $966 $996 $1,164 $997 $951 $865 $862 $886 $993 $1,027 $905 $929 $959 $907 $858

Three Months Employment9

66% 67% 62% 60% 67% 63% 71% 64% 63% 64% 63% 65% 70% 65% 58% 66% 65% 67% 72%

State Fiscal Year to Date

Total

State

Total

ED 1

Total

ED 2

Total

ED 3

Total

ED 4

Total

ED 5

Total

ED 6

Total

ED 7

Total

ED 8

Total

ED 9

Total

ED10

Total

ED11

Total

ED12

Total

ED13

Total

ED14

Total

ED15

Total

ED16

Total

ED17

Total

ED18

Individuals Referred 10,646 521 348 938 324 151 1,186 127 246 375 508 389 1,459 403 138 1,202 382 1,855 94

Total Enrolled in VIEW 18,111 875 599 1,337 505 280 2,056 198 440 750 671 672 2,688 743 240 2,051 626 3,214 166

Part. in a Work Activity 15,572 810 547 1,108 447 232 1,771 166 413 656 585 592 2,252 615 202 1,764 505 2,769 138


Participants Employed 9,724 460 323 724 329 150 1,110 112 285 416 299 318 1,424 414 152 1,056 318 1,748 86


Average Wage6

$8.46 $7.90 $7.85 $8.28 $8.29 $8.42 $9.89 $8.65 $8.74 $8.11 $8.01 $8.22 $8.53 $8.69 $8.06 $8.28 $8.40 $8.15 $7.82


$1,097 $1,033 $1,015 $1,115 $1,138 $1,148 $1,279 $1,155 $1,048 $981 $1,031 $1,043 $1,102 $1,098 $1,009 $1,069 $1,164 $1,058 $972


70% 73% 64% 61% 63% 68% 75% 74% 73% 65% 56% 69% 73% 69% 69% 73% 63% 71% 84%

EDD1 - Southwest Region: Status through October 31, 2013


VIEW Work Activity


8

See pp 42-44


Cumulative Data

Total

EDD1 Buchanan Dickenson Lee Russell Scott Tazewell Wise Norton

Individuals Referred 17,901 1,729 1,220 2,522 2,473 1,768 3,424 4,190 575

Total Enrolled in VIEW 3, 5

13,848 1,315 953 1,951 2,000 1,309 2,614 3,249 457

Participants in a Work Activity 13,343 1,237 898 1,938 1,900 1,283 2,526 3,141 420

% of Total Enrolled 96% 94% 94% 99% 95% 98% 97% 97% 92%

Participants Employed 8,631 706 574 1,270 1,202 757 1,749 2,037 336


Average Wage6

$6.32 $6.48 $6.34 $6.12 $6.48 $6.62 $6.22 $6.34 $6.14


$832 $846 $842 $799 $858 $889 $820 $834 $756


67% 65% 54% 72% 67% 77% 66% 66% 71%


Total


Individuals Referred 521 45 12 94 76 49 101 128 16

Total Enrolled in VIEW 3

875 87 30 189 112 100 137 194 26

Participants in a Work Activity 810 84 26 182 95 88 136 177 22


Participants Employed 460 43 20 93 42 51 85 110 16


Average Wage6

$7.90 $8.04 $7.76 $7.89 $7.83 $7.69 $7.83 $8.01 $8.20


$1,033 $1,041 $1,122 $967 $969 $952 $1,034 $1,143 $931


73% 81% 79% 73% 67% 89% 81% 63% 67%

Current Data

Total



1,588 169 65 287 217 157 261 379 53


602 55 20 144 84 74 92 117 16


% of Enrolled 78% 100% 85% 78% 79% 68% 92% 62% 81%

Participants Assigned to Inactive 2 0 1 1 0 0 0 0 0


% of Enrolled 53% 53% 70% 49% 35% 53% 71% 50% 81%

Full T ime 235 15 12 52 21 23 52 51 9

Part T ime 83 14 2 18 8 16 13 8 4

Average Wage6

$7.95 $8.41 $7.81 $8.07 $7.86 $7.59 $7.83 $7.91 $8.43


$1,051 $1,127 $1,105 $1,026 $979 $964 $1,050 $1,128 $1,034

EDD2 – Bristol-Galax Region: Status through October 31, 2013


VIEW Work Activity


9

See pp 42-44


Current Data

Total

EDD2 Bland Carroll Grayson Smyth Wash. Wythe Bristol Galax


950 14 98 38 198 196 112 237 57


365 2 40 14 67 58 32 132 20


% of Enrolled 84% 50% 80% 43% 88% 86% 72% 91% 75%



% of Enrolled 55% 0% 45% 29% 64% 62% 56% 53% 50%

Full T ime 153 N/A 17 3 36 26 15 49 7

Part T ime 46 N/A 1 1 7 10 3 21 3

Average Wage6

$7.80 N/A $7.59 $7.66 $7.76 $8.06 $7.76 $7.81 $7.48


$1,019 N/A $1,076 $1,013 $1,090 $966 $1,177 $964 $896

Cumulative Data

Total


Individuals Referred 11,065 275 1,470 693 1,945 1,927 1,623 2,376 756


9,315 206 1,216 563 1,645 1,607 1,292 2,122 664

Participants in a Work Activity 8,947 194 1,124 524 1,593 1,567 1,268 2,048 629


Participants Employed 5,987 122 807 367 960 1,014 862 1,440 415


Average Wage6

$6.44 $6.36 $6.23 $6.43 $6.32 $6.67 $6.41 $6.52 $6.37


$869 $873 $835 $861 $871 $899 $849 $876 $886


62% 55% 54% 61% 63% 58% 67% 62% 69%


Total


Individuals Referred 348 4 31 10 78 61 44 108 12


599 5 67 20 122 89 57 202 37





Average Wage6

$7.85 $7.63 $7.67 $7.73 $7.88 $7.88 $7.77 $7.92 $7.72


$1,015 $914 $1,049 $1,109 $1,102 $986 $1,055 $963 $928


64% 40% 58% 55% 56% 73% 82% 65% 44%

EDD3 – Roanoke Region: Status through October 31, 2013


VIEW Work Activity


10

See pp 42-44


Current Data

Total

EDD3

Alleghny/

Covngton

Bote-

tourt Craig Floyd

Franklin

County Giles

Mont-

gomery Pulaski

Roanoke

County Radford

Roanoke

City


2,384 97 35 8 52 211 50 294 172 268 83 1,114


809 37 11 3 19 89 13 110 38 102 37 350

Participants in a Work Activity 563 32 3 1 15 74 12 90 29 81 25 201

% of Enrolled 70% 86% 27% 33% 79% 83% 92% 82% 76% 79% 68% 57%

Participants Assigned to Inactive 10 1 0 0 0 0 0 4 0 2 2 1

Participants Employed 452 23 3 1 9 44 11 84 20 53 22 182

% of Enrolled 56% 62% 27% 33% 47% 49% 85% 76% 53% 52% 59% 52%

Full T ime 358 20 3 1 7 32 11 70 18 41 19 136

Part T ime 94 3 0 0 2 12 0 14 2 12 3 46

Average Wage6

$8.21 $8.10 $8.83 $9.00 $8.81 $8.57 $7.51 $8.24 $7.93 $8.16 $7.66 $8.22


$1,117 $1,123 $1,355 $1,559 $1,214 $1,152 $1,042 $1,133 $1,154 $1,076 $1,005 $1,115

Cumulative Data

Total

EDD3

Alleghny/

Covngton

Bote-

tourt Craig Floyd

Franklin

County Giles

Mont-

gomery Pulaski

Roanoke

County Radford

Roanoke

City

Individuals Referred 22,027 1,207 371 99 569 1,956 560 3,110 1,907 2,423 871 8,954


17,044 923 236 56 420 1,515 405 2,553 1,519 1,957 680 6,780

Participants in a Work Activity 16,215 889 208 55 402 1,364 397 2,511 1,454 1,836 650 6,449

% of Total Enrolled 95% 96% 88% 98% 96% 90% 98% 98% 96% 94% 96% 95%

Participants Employed 11,469 646 106 28 273 936 237 1,992 960 1,441 471 4,379


Average Wage6

$7.19 $6.95 $7.46 $7.29 $7.09 $7.12 $7.12 $7.04 $6.87 $7.69 $7.07 $7.26


$963 $848 $952 $1,053 $943 $956 $956 $947 $951 $1,039 $912 $978


60% 58% 53% 59% 54% 58% 53% 64% 54% 58% 62% 62%


Total

EDD3

Alleghny/

Covngton

Bote-

tourt Craig Floyd

Franklin

County Giles

Mont-

gomery Pulaski

Roanoke

County Radford

Roanoke

City

Individuals Referred 938 37 15 1 19 82 16 117 67 81 38 465


1,337 63 19 3 26 151 16 176 78 157 60 588

Participants in a Work Activity 1,108 56 11 2 21 130 15 153 67 129 45 479


Participants Employed 724 39 7 1 12 70 12 128 41 79 32 303


Average Wage6

$8.28 $8.32 $9.02 $9.00 $8.79 $8.37 $7.59 $8.39 $8.00 $8.37 $7.79 $8.26


$1,115 $1,093 $1,279 $1,548 $1,158 $1,126 $990 $1,181 $1,130 $1,056 $974 $1,113


61% 62% 33% 100% 50% 70% 53% 66% 57% 59% 70% 58%

EDD4 - Harrisonburg Region: Status through October 31, 2013


VIEW Work Activity


11

See pp 42-44


Current Data

Total

EDD4

Aug/S'ton/

W'boro Bath Highland

Rockbridge

/BV/Lex

Rockingham

/HBurg


819 479 5 2 78 255


284 170 0 0 24 90

Participants in a Work Activity 206 111 N/A N/A 21 74

% of Enrolled 73% 65% #VALUE! N/A 88% 82%

Participants Assigned to Inactive 1 0 N/A N/A 0 1

Participants Employed 187 105 N/A N/A 17 65

% of Enrolled 66% 62% N/A N/A 71% 72%

Full T ime 160 89 N/A N/A 14 57

Part T ime 27 16 N/A N/A 3 8

Average Wage6

$8.22 $8.07 N/A N/A $7.94 $8.52


$1,148 $1,133 N/A N/A $998 $1,211

Cumulative Data

Total

EDD4

Aug/S'ton/


Rockbridge

/BV/Lex

Rockingham

/HBurg

Individuals Referred 8,684 4,650 80 23 753 3,178


6,756 3,679 51 8 564 2,454

Participants in a Work Activity 6,579 3,608 51 8 520 2,392

% of Total Enrolled 97% 98% 100% 100% 92% 97%

Participants Employed 4,705 2,473 32 6 398 1,796


Average Wage6

$7.28 $7.26 $6.56 $7.79 $6.82 $7.41


$966 $966 $717 $784 $871 $989


67% 67% 61% 83% 67% 68%


Total

EDD4

Aug/S'ton/


Rockbridge

/BV/Lex

Rockingham

/HBurg

Individuals Referred 324 181 1 0 19 123


505 304 1 0 34 166

Participants in a Work Activity 447 261 1 N/A 29 156

% of Total Enrolled 89% 86% 100% N/A 85% 94%

Participants Employed 329 192 0 N/A 23 114

% of Total Enrolled 65% 63% 0% N/A 68% 69%

Average Wage6

$8.29 $8.08 N/A N/A $8.28 $8.63


$1,138 $1,090 N/A N/A $1,063 $1,229


63% 59% N/A N/A 65% 68%

EDDS 5 & 18 – Winchester/Eastern Shore Regions: Status through October 31, 2013


VIEW Work Activity


12

See pp 42-44


Current Data

Total

EDD5 Clarke Frederick Page Shen. Warren Winchester

Total

EDD18 Accomack Nhampton


438 11 119 57 44 113 94 274 174 100


177 0 61 32 11 33 40 122 58 64

Participants in a Work Activity 144 N/A 42 28 9 32 33 74 37 37

% of Enrolled 81% N/A 69% 88% 82% 97% 83% 61% 64% 58%

Participants Assigned to Inactive 7 N/A 2 1 2 0 2 1 1 0

Participants Employed 89 N/A 27 16 6 19 21 59 28 31

% of Enrolled 50% N/A 44% 50% 55% 58% 53% 48% 48% 48%

Full T ime 79 N/A 25 16 5 16 17 45 22 23

Part T ime 10 N/A 2 0 1 3 4 14 6 8

Average Wage6

$8.43 N/A $9.04 $8.37 $8.97 $7.46 $8.41 $7.84 $7.94 $7.75


$1,147 N/A $1,285 $1,152 $1,251 $974 $1,092 $1,062 $1,090 $1,038

Cumulative Data

Total


Total


Individuals Referred 5,732 220 1,271 860 691 1,370 1,320 2,680 1,711 969


4,304 134 956 703 426 1040 1045 2,007 1,256 751

Participants in a Work Activity 4,073 124 894 687 413 963 992 1,939 1,223 716

% of Total Enrolled 95% 93% 94% 98% 97% 93% 95% 97% 97% 95%

Participants Employed 2,777 77 545 488 252 697 718 1,120 636 484


Average Wage6

$7.47 $7.56 $7.86 $7.39 $6.86 $7.50 $7.40 $6.85 $6.91 $6.77


$996 $1,005 $1,026 $998 $945 $1,011 $975 $858 $865 $851


63% 58% 61% 60% 69% 69% 59% 72% 65% 80%


Total


Total


Individuals Referred 151 5 36 24 7 42 37 94 68 26


280 3 96 39 19 57 66 166 89 77

Participants in a Work Activity 232 1 73 38 16 51 53 138 76 62


Participants Employed 150 1 48 21 11 31 38 86 43 43


Average Wage6

$8.42 $12.00 $8.59 $8.74 $8.86 $7.90 $8.24 $7.82 $7.84 $7.80


$1,148 $1,909 $1,226 $1,215 $1,302 $1,008 $1,062 $972 $1,015 $928


68% 33% 70% 59% 64% 83% 64% 84% 75% 97%

EDD6 – Northern Virginia Region: Status through October 31, 2013


VIEW Work Activity


13

See pp 42-44


Current Data

Total

EDD6 Arlington Fairfax Loudoun

Prince

William Alexandria Manassas

Manassas

Park


3,298 196 1,321 207 1,015 374 143 42


1,383 73 520 130 447 170 36 7

Participants in a Work Activity 1,125 63 454 94 335 140 32 7

% of Enrolled 81% 86% 87% 72% 75% 82% 89% 100%

Participants Assigned to Inactive 8 0 1 2 3 2 0 0

Participants Employed 720 42 262 73 232 81 27 3

% of Enrolled 52% 58% 50% 56% 52% 48% 75% 43%

Full T ime 550 20 205 46 187 66 24 2

Part T ime 170 22 57 27 45 15 3 1

Average Wage6

$9.68 $9.42 $9.55 $10.54 $9.68 $9.72 $8.98 $7.94


$1,270 $1,078 $1,270 $1,292 $1,308 $1,245 $1,295 $992

Cumulative Data

Total


Prince


Manassas

Park

Individuals Referred 36,834 3,038 13,152 2,655 11,775 4,175 1,572 467


28,484 2,387 9,950 2,114 9,189 3,291 1,210 343

Participants in a Work Activity 27,436 2,366 9,577 2,018 8,814 3,142 1,178 341

% of Total Enrolled 96% 99% 96% 95% 96% 95% 97% 99%

Participants Employed 19,882 1,705 6,649 1,619 6,598 2,298 777 236


Average Wage6

$8.81 $8.38 $8.88 $9.41 $8.86 $8.48 $8.31 $8.22


$1,164 $1,074 $1,169 $1,214 $1,198 $1,085 $1,112 $1,098


71% 69% 69% 72% 70% 77% 70% 78%


Total


Prince


Manassas

Park

Individuals Referred 1,186 79 462 78 374 139 41 13


2,056 114 775 175 682 231 61 18

Participants in a Work Activity 1,771 98 693 148 560 204 53 15


Participants Employed 1,110 65 403 100 384 115 36 7


Average Wage6

$9.89 $9.67 $9.90 $10.95 $9.68 $9.97 $9.61 $7.83


$1,279 $1,164 $1,274 $1,394 $1,280 $1,259 $1,324 $1,105


75% 59% 75% 81% 76% 85% 58% 100%

VIEW Work Activity 14

EDD7 - Culpeper Region: Status through October 31, 2013



See pp 42-44


Cumulative Data

Total

EDD7 Culpeper Fauquier Madison Orange Rapp.

Individuals Referred 4,178 1,631 1,222 386 827 112


3,166 1,197 939 287 669 74

Participants in a Work Activity 3,049 1,153 923 277 626 70


Participants Employed 2,118 776 648 172 479 43


Average Wage6

$7.58 $7.58 $7.93 $7.22 $7.25 $7.42


$997 $981 $1,037 $1,006 $965 $971


64% 66% 69% 60% 60% 46%

Current Data

Total



373 170 74 25 89 15


139 73 32 9 21 4

Participants in a Work Activity 101 56 21 6 16 2

% of Enrolled 73% 77% 66% 67% 76% 50%

Participants Assigned to Inactive 12 2 7 0 2 1

Participants Employed 72 42 15 3 12 0

% of Enrolled 52% 58% 47% 33% 57% 0%

Full T ime 60 36 10 3 11 N/A

Part T ime 12 6 5 0 1 N/A

Average Wage6

$8.51 $8.47 $8.49 $9.00 $8.56 N/A


$1,161 $1,134 $1,170 $1,414 $1,181 N/A


Total




198 107 46 14 26 5





Average Wage6

$8.65 $8.63 $8.92 $7.96 $8.40 $10.50


$1,155 $1,138 $1,231 $1,067 $1,089 $1,580


74% 78% 77% 13% 88% 100%

EDD8 - Charlottesville Region: Status through October 31, 2013


VIEW Work Activity


15

See pp 42-44


Current Data

Total

EDD8 Albemarle Fluvanna Greene Louisa Nelson CVille


604 129 44 30 102 35 264


296 48 19 15 41 12 161

Participants in a Work Activity 255 46 16 13 35 8 137

% of Enrolled 86% 96% 84% 87% 85% 67% 85%

Participants Assigned to Inactive 6 0 1 0 0 1 4

Participants Employed 185 36 12 9 31 7 90

% of Enrolled 63% 75% 63% 60% 76% 58% 56%

Full T ime 131 31 10 4 21 6 59

Part T ime 54 5 2 5 10 1 31

Average Wage6

$8.47 $8.75 $7.92 $7.77 $8.26 $7.95 $8.61


$1,097 $1,257 $1,030 $919 $1,137 $1,091 $1,046

Cumulative Data

Total


Individuals Referred 6,432 1,512 301 494 1020 339 2,766


4,999 1,100 217 356 762 241 2,323

Participants in a Work Activity 4,888 1,074 212 338 739 238 2,287

% of Total Enrolled 98% 98% 98% 95% 97% 99% 98%

Participants Employed 3,727 794 141 268 483 147 1,894


Average Wage6

$7.51 $7.92 $8.01 $7.40 $7.73 $7.85 $7.34


$951 $1,021 $1,074 $913 $983 $1,022 $923


63% 58% 61% 56% 63% 63% 66%


Total


Individuals Referred 246 67 12 12 31 15 109


440 74 30 25 66 19 226





Average Wage6

$8.74 $9.02 $9.64 $8.16 $8.46 $7.72 $8.73


$1,048 $1,239 $1,277 $889 $981 $965 $984


73% 77% 71% 92% 79% 43% 72%

EDD9 - Lynchburg Region: Status through October 31, 2013


VIEW Work Activity


16

See pp 42-44


Current Data

Total

EDD9 Amherst Appom. Bedford Campbell Lynchburg


1,174 87 102 207 240 538


492 24 52 80 121 215


% of Enrolled 75% 71% 94% 78% 74% 71%



% of Enrolled 51% 54% 52% 48% 45% 55%

Full T ime 165 11 21 27 36 70

Part T ime 85 2 6 11 18 48

Average Wage6

$8.05 $8.29 $8.64 $8.10 $8.24 $7.77


$992 $1,210 $1,116 $988 $1,020 $927

Cumulative Data

Total


Individuals Referred 11,079 1,026 869 2,239 2,582 4,363


9,205 822 762 1,795 2,223 3,603

Participants in a Work Activity 8,698 780 750 1,669 2,093 3,406


Participants Employed 6,295 546 534 1,164 1,527 2,524


Average Wage6

$6.73 $6.94 $6.42 $6.80 $6.92 $6.63


$865 $885 $883 $863 $903 $838


64% 59% 56% 60% 63% 68%


Total




750 34 65 116 203 332





Average Wage6

$8.11 $8.35 $8.40 $8.06 $8.19 $8.00


$981 $1,162 $1,097 $950 $982 $943


65% 58% 79% 57% 65% 68%

EDD10 - Danville Region: Status through October 31, 2013


VIEW Work Activity


17

See pp 42-44


Current Data

Total

EDD10 Halifax

Henry/

Martinsville Patrick Pittsylvania Danville


1,358 199 422 91 219 427


403 53 157 52 39 102


% of Enrolled 76% 55% 75% 90% 82% 80%



% of Enrolled 46% 32% 53% 42% 46% 45%

Full T ime 139 12 60 11 15 41

Part T ime 47 5 23 11 3 5

Average Wage6

$7.94 $8.52 $7.80 $7.86 $7.49 $8.21


$1,067 $1,136 $1,035 $987 $928 $1,191

Cumulative Data

Total

EDD10 Halifax

Henry/


Individuals Referred 13,509 2,074 3,646 1,326 2,232 4,231


10,826 1,717 2,807 1,144 1,701 3,457

Participants in a Work Activity 10,476 1,657 2,691 1,079 1,674 3,375


Participants Employed 6,594 955 1,788 768 910 2,173


Average Wage6

$6.49 $6.45 $6.90 $6.37 $6.49 $6.23


$862 $851 $941 $826 $875 $812


63% 59% 64% 74% 59% 61%


Total

EDD10 Halifax

Henry/




671 80 234 79 90 188





Average Wage6

$8.01 $8.66 $7.81 $7.85 $7.86 $8.24


$1,031 $1,154 $962 $973 $1,010 $1,140


56% 50% 55% 62% 46% 60%

EDD11 - Southside Region: Status through October 31, 2013


VIEW Work Activity


18

See pp 42-44


Current Data

Total

EDD11 Amelia

Bruns-

wick

Bucking-

ham Charlotte

Cumber-

land

Gr'nsville

Emporia

Lunen-

burg

Mecklen-

burg

Notto-

way

Pr.

Edward


986 65 93 64 78 57 149 55 165 131 129


428 30 48 19 41 26 66 23 51 56 68

Participants in a Work Activity 344 23 39 13 36 21 58 16 39 37 62

% of Enrolled 80% 77% 81% 68% 88% 81% 88% 70% 76% 66% 91%

Participants Assigned to Inactive 7 5 0 0 0 0 1 1 0 0 0

Participants Employed 192 16 21 9 21 11 25 5 21 32 31

% of Enrolled 45% 53% 44% 47% 51% 42% 38% 22% 41% 57% 46%

Full T ime 135 12 16 8 16 6 14 5 15 23 20

Part T ime 57 4 5 1 5 5 11 0 6 9 11

Average Wage6

$8.16 $8.56 $8.10 $8.64 $8.54 $9.02 $7.91 $8.00 $8.23 $7.69 $7.98


$1,073 $1,080 ##### $1,167 $1,043 $1,203 $936 $1,123 $1,191 $993 $1,079


Total

EDD11 Amelia

Bruns-

wick

Bucking-

ham Charlotte

Cumber-

land

Gr'nsville

Emporia

Lunen-

burg

Mecklen-

burg

Notto-

way

Pr.

Edward

Individuals Referred 389 21 45 30 22 16 53 19 67 63 53


672 36 81 42 55 38 105 33 77 103 102

Participants in a Work Activity 592 30 70 37 50 35 99 27 69 78 97

% of Total Enrolled 88% 83% 86% 88% 91% 92% 94% 82% 90% 76% 95%

Participants Employed 318 21 35 18 23 19 51 13 37 53 48


Average Wage6

$8.22 $8.77 $8.07 $8.73 $8.35 $8.97 $8.02 $7.98 $8.26 $7.99 $8.06


$1,043 $1,117 ##### $1,230 $891 $1,178 $906 $985 $1,083 $1,012 $1,104


69% 44% 90% 39% 79% 70% 79% 61% 55% 76% 69%

Cumulative Data

Total

EDD11 Amelia

Bruns-

wick

Bucking-

ham Charlotte

Cumber-

land

Gr'nsville

Emporia

Lunen-

burg

Mecklen-

burg

Notto-

way

Pr.

Edward

Individuals Referred 8,585 552 1,049 821 742 574 999 408 1,244 1,062 1,134


6,724 408 841 630 557 425 795 326 985 822 935

Participants in a Work Activity 6,443 387 838 595 519 407 765 321 942 758 911


Participants Employed 4,085 250 475 357 289 245 472 156 646 546 649


Average Wage6

$6.91 $7.54 $6.37 $7.14 $7.33 $7.45 $6.88 $6.62 $6.69 $6.91 $6.85


$886 $964 $837 $959 $920 $963 $830 $820 $847 $908 $890


65% 62% 67% 59% 58% 58% 66% 61% 67% 70% 68%

EDD12 - Richmond Region: Status through October 31, 2013


VIEW Work Activity


19

See pp 42-44


Current Data

Total

EDD12

Chesterfield/

Col Hghts Goochland Hanover Henrico Powhatan

Richmond

City


4,806 950 23 126 1,242 49 2,416


1,848 334 9 64 587 20 834

Participants in a Work Activity 1,385 249 8 48 401 17 662

% of Enrolled 75% 75% 89% 75% 68% 85% 79%



% of Enrolled 52% 55% 56% 59% 51% 60% 51%

Full T ime 720 158 4 27 209 7 315

Part T ime 242 26 1 11 92 5 107

Average Wage6

$8.53 $8.76 $9.13 $8.64 $8.75 $7.87 $8.26


$1,128 $1,221 $1,414 $1,045 $1,142 $960 $1,087


Total

EDD12

Chesterfield/


Richmond

City

Individuals Referred 1,459 301 6 38 397 21 696


2,688 508 15 92 819 28 1,226

Participants in a Work Activity 2,252 421 12 71 665 25 1,058


Participants Employed 1,424 274 6 57 439 18 630


Average Wage6

$8.53 $8.89 $8.75 $8.67 $8.68 $8.72 $8.25


$1,102 $1,204 $1,353 $1,015 $1,089 $1,109 $1,073


73% 76% 82% 77% 75% 60% 69%

Cumulative Data

Total

EDD12

Chesterfield/


Richmond

City

Individuals Referred 39,195 8,230 298 1,385 9,842 392 19,048


30,811 6,265 229 990 8,024 293 15,010

Participants in a Work Activity 29,585 6,047 219 920 7,589 276 14,534


Participants Employed 20,806 3,954 151 637 5,415 162 10,487


Average Wage6

$7.46 $7.76 $7.30 $8.27 $7.77 $7.82 $7.19


$993 $1,038 $935 $1,053 $1,026 $983 $962


70% 69% 65% 66% 67% 64% 72%

EDD13 - Fredericksburg Region: Status through October 31, 2013


VIEW Work Activity


20

See pp 42-44


Current Data

Total

EDD13 Caroline

King

George Spotsylvania Stafford Fredericksburg


1,028 175 57 369 265 162


518 97 25 188 105 103


% of Enrolled 71% 63% 92% 64% 86% 73%



% of Enrolled 54% 55% 68% 52% 48% 62%

Full T ime 208 46 15 68 39 40

Part T ime 73 7 2 29 11 24

Average Wage6

$8.67 $8.68 $8.48 $8.34 $9.39 $8.66


$1,127 $1,171 $1,312 $1,059 $1,231 $1,065


Total

EDD13 Caroline

King




743 155 38 247 168 135





Average Wage6

$8.69 $8.43 $8.76 $8.22 $9.67 $8.73


$1,098 $1,130 $1,052 $995 $1,285 $1,064


69% 83% 39% 66% 75% 65%

Cumulative Data

Total

EDD13 Caroline

King


Individuals Referred 9,524 1,447 578 2,910 2,746 1,843


7,105 1033 402 2,273 1,834 1,563

Participants in a Work Activity 6,701 977 382 2,097 1,752 1,493


Participants Employed 4,663 625 237 1,553 1,083 1,165


Average Wage6

$8.04 $7.67 $7.53 $8.02 $8.70 $7.86


$1,027 $970 $925 $1,020 $1,141 $995


65% 58% 57% 67% 68% 66%

EDD14 – Northern Neck Region: Status through October 31, 2013


VIEW Work Activity


21

See pp 42-44


Current Data

Total

EDD14 Essex

King &

Queen

King

William Lancaster Mathews Middlesex

North-

umberland

Richmond

County

West-

moreland


419 85 19 37 35 26 74 34 38 71


165 29 4 16 10 7 52 7 16 24


% of Enrolled 78% 76% 50% 88% 80% 100% 85% 43% 63% 75%

Participants Assigned to Inactive 5 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 1 2


% of Enrolled 65% 66% 50% 56% 80% 100% 73% 29% 63% 54%

Full T ime 86 19 2 6 5 6 31 2 8 7

Part T ime 22 0 0 3 3 1 7 0 2 6

Average Wage6

$8.09 $8.62 $10.01 $9.11 $8.28 $7.54 $7.45 $9.00 $8.55 $7.86


$1,111 $1,263 $1,619 $1,301 $1,017 $1,124 $1,033 $1,247 $1,192 $872


Total

EDD14 Essex

King &

Queen

King


North-

umberland

Richmond

County

West-

moreland

Individuals Referred 138 27 8 15 11 6 25 9 15 22


240 43 4 28 18 14 66 15 21 31





Average Wage6

$8.06 $8.38 $10.01 $8.72 $7.90 $7.91 $7.52 $8.77 $8.36 $7.85


$1,009 $999 $1,608 $1,214 $944 $1,059 $957 $747 $1,145 $961


69% 59% 50% 69% 44% 71% 93% 50% 62% 69%

Cumulative Data

Total

EDD14 Essex

King &

Queen

King


North-

umberland

Richmond

County

West-

moreland

Individuals Referred 3,923 602 287 354 425 218 484 344 359 850


2,949 481 192 293 334 153 361 282 221 632

Participants in a Work Activity 2,767 461 182 279 316 147 334 272 205 571


Participants Employed 1,858 322 98 175 224 102 244 160 135 398


Average Wage6

$7.12 $7.14 $7.09 $7.55 $6.91 $7.11 $7.13 $6.82 $7.13 $7.13


$905 $877 $887 $992 $864 $914 $912 $859 $938 $925


58% 49% 46% 60% 52% 70% 73% 52% 42% 65%

EDD15 - Peninsula Region: Status through October 31, 2013


VIEW Work Activity


22

See pp 42-44


Current Data

Total

EDD15

Charles

City Gloucester

James

City NewKent York/Poq Hampton

Newport

News Willmsburg


3,117 15 100 145 44 131 1,164 1,498 20


1,247 2 26 57 20 77 498 552 15

Participants in a Work Activity 1,006 1 19 48 18 62 398 449 11

% of Enrolled 81% 50% 73% 84% 90% 81% 80% 81% 73%



% of Enrolled 54% 50% 58% 65% 50% 49% 48% 59% 20%

Full T ime 503 1 13 29 9 18 164 268 1

Part T ime 167 0 2 8 1 20 75 59 2

Average Wage6

$8.27 $10.00 $7.44 $8.30 $8.51 $7.88 $8.08 $8.46 $10.03


$1,094 $1,732 $977 $1,106 $1,092 $886 $1,029 $1,168 $1,129


Total

EDD15

Charles

City Gloucester

James

City New Kent York/Poq Hampton

Newport

News Willmsburg

Individuals Referred 1,202 2 40 55 20 53 415 600 17


2,051 8 53 88 27 105 756 979 35



Participants Employed 1,056 5 31 60 13 51 364 511 21


Average Wage6

$8.28 $9.32 $7.51 $8.40 $7.43 $8.10 $8.23 $8.38 $8.51


$1,069 $1,425 $937 $1,076 $936 $864 $1,025 $1,131 $1,029


73% 100% 47% 57% 83% 68% 76% 74% 76%

Cumulative Data

Total

EDD15

Charles

City Gloucester

James


Newport

News Willmsburg

Individuals Referred 28,313 170 1,152 1,244 372 1,199 9,838 13,914 424


21,546 124 823 983 270 929 7,351 10,744 322

Participants in a Work Activity 20,473 118 761 915 259 888 7,138 10,096 298


Participants Employed 14,817 72 530 682 149 576 5,087 7,500 221


Average Wage6

$7.15 $7.23 $6.92 $7.58 $7.54 $7.40 $7.15 $7.10 $7.35


$929 $966 $855 $924 $1,020 $897 $923 $939 $915


66% 51% 57% 59% 72% 59% 64% 69% 64%

EDD16 - Petersburg Region: Status through October 31, 2013


VIEW Work Activity


23

See pp 42-44


Current Data

Total

EDD16 Dinwiddie

Prince

George Surry Sussex Hopewell Petersburg


1,077 132 70 35 66 278 496


427 22 25 19 30 133 198


% of Enrolled 68% 95% 44% 74% 73% 61% 72%



% of Enrolled 51% 68% 40% 26% 60% 42% 57%

Full T ime 182 14 8 5 16 42 97

Part T ime 34 1 2 0 2 14 15

Average Wage6

$8.56 $9.47 $7.99 $8.05 $7.99 $9.00 $8.38


$1,210 $1,551 $1,034 $1,085 $1,132 $1,242 $1,182


Total

EDD16 Dinwiddie

Prince


Individuals Referred 382 45 28 19 26 100 164

Total Enrolled in VIEW 626 35 39 37 54 188 273





Average Wage6

$8.40 $9.10 $8.04 $7.94 $7.92 $8.52 $8.40


$1,164 $1,490 $1,090 $881 $1,065 $1,146 $1,180


63% 63% 50% 60% 65% 53% 70%

Cumulative Data

Total

EDD16 Dinwiddie

Prince


Individuals Referred 9,930 1,278 903 403 782 2,477 4,087


7,766 844 679 330 632 2,006 3,275

Participants in a Work Activity 7,402 841 588 312 605 1,914 3,142


Participants Employed 5,273 555 405 228 412 1,367 2,306


Average Wage6

$7.12 $7.01 $7.59 $7.32 $7.07 $7.01 $7.12


$959 $980 $1,003 $882 $962 $938 $968


65% 58% 58% 56% 63% 63% 70%

EDD17 - Tidewater Region: Status through October 31, 2013


VIEW Work Activity


24

See pp 42-44


Current Data

Total

EDD17

Isle of

Wight

South -

ampton

Chesa-

peake

Franklin

City Norfolk Portsmouth Suffolk

VA

Beach


5,497 110 90 907 97 1,975 1,048 392 878


2,158 23 28 365 45 886 392 123 296


% of Enrolled 78% 78% 75% 79% 87% 79% 80% 69% 77%



% of Enrolled 55% 57% 57% 60% 56% 55% 52% 55% 55%

Full T ime 984 10 12 185 16 422 167 53 119

Part T ime 210 3 4 35 9 61 38 15 45

Average Wage6

$8.12 $8.04 $7.72 $8.21 $7.82 $8.02 $8.26 $8.02 $8.27


$1,088 $1,046 $1,082 $1,145 $1,100 $1,051 $1,133 $1,102 $1,065


Total

EDD17

Isle of

Wight

South -

ampton

Chesa-

peake

Franklin


VA

Beach

Individuals Referred 1,855 28 23 315 39 640 330 138 342


3,214 47 48 576 72 1,231 562 211 467

Participants in a Work Activity 2,769 39 44 489 62 1,050 495 184 406




Average Wage6

$8.15 $7.83 $7.78 $8.31 $7.92 $8.04 $8.16 $8.18 $8.31


$1,058 $979 $977 $1,102 $1,078 $1,029 $1,066 $1,064 $1,075


71% 57% 67% 71% 54% 77% 71% 68% 66%

Cumulative Data

Total

EDD17

Isle of

Wight

South -

ampton

Chesa-

peake

Franklin


VA

Beach

Individuals Referred 55,180 1,258 1,038 8,920 893 17,726 8,911 3,479 12,955


40,827 910 832 6,607 719 13,031 7,089 2,738 8,901

Participants in a Work Activity 38,589 877 798 6,300 708 12,259 6,673 2,707 8,267


Participants Employed 28,205 618 484 4,736 464 9,068 5,004 2,002 5,829


Average Wage6

$6.96 $6.96 $6.71 $7.15 $6.70 $6.85 $6.83 $6.80 $7.27


$907 $916 $836 $941 $844 $873 $909 $883 $960


67% 59% 54% 64% 64% 67% 69% 68% 69%

VIEW Rankings, Fiscal Year to Date 25

This section lists the relative state fiscal year to date rankings of localities

by Percent Enrolled who became Employed, Average Wage, and Percent

Employed Three Months after Initial Employment. Scores from 0 to 10

are also assigned and the scores averaged to calculate an overall rank.

FIPS

Code Locality

Percent

Em-

ployed

Score

from

0 to 10 Rank

Average

Wage

Score

from

0 to 10 Rank

Percent

Employed

at 3

Months

Score

from

0 to 10 Rank

Average

Score Rank

001 Accomack 48.3% 5.20 91 $7.84 0.90 98 75.0% 7.14 36 4.41 76

003 Albemarle 73.0% 7.86 5 $9.02 3.48 14 77.1% 7.39 26 6.24 5

005 Alleghany/Covington 61.9% 6.67 21 $8.32 1.95 54 62.2% 5.68 75 4.77 56

007 Amelia 58.3% 6.28 35 $8.77 2.93 22 43.8% 3.57 111 4.26 87

009 Amherst 58.8% 6.33 32 $8.35 2.01 52 57.7% 5.16 88 4.50 73

011 Appomattox 60.0% 6.46 27 $8.40 2.12 42 78.6% 7.55 24 5.38 26

013 Arlington 57.0% 6.14 45 $9.67 4.90 8 59.0% 5.32 84 5.45 21

015 Augusta/S'ton/W'boro 63.2% 6.80 15 $8.08 1.42 71 59.0% 5.31 85 4.51 72

017 Bath 0.0% 0.00 119 N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A 0.00 119

019 Bedford County/City 55.2% 5.94 52 $8.06 1.38 73 56.9% 5.08 91 4.13 92

021 Bland 40.0% 4.31 106 $7.63 0.44 114 40.0% 3.14 113 2.63 117

023 Botetourt 36.8% 3.97 114 $9.02 3.48 15 33.3% 2.38 116 3.28 115

025 Brunswick 43.2% 4.65 102 $8.07 1.40 72 90.5% 8.91 8 4.99 44

027 Buchanan 49.4% 5.32 85 $8.04 1.33 75 80.8% 7.80 19 4.82 54

029 Buckingham 42.9% 4.62 103 $8.73 2.84 27 38.9% 3.02 114 3.49 111

031 Campbell 51.2% 5.52 72 $8.19 1.66 66 64.5% 5.95 70 4.38 79

033 Caroline 50.3% 5.42 76 $8.43 2.19 41 82.7% 8.02 14 5.21 31

035 Carroll 44.8% 4.82 101 $7.67 0.53 113 58.3% 5.24 87 3.53 110

036 Charles City 62.5% 6.73 17 $9.32 4.14 12 100.0% 10.00 1 6.96 2

037 Charlotte 41.8% 4.50 105 $8.35 2.01 53 79.2% 7.62 21 4.71 59

041 Chesterfield/Col Hgts 53.9% 5.81 59 $8.89 3.19 19 76.0% 7.25 33 5.42 23

043 Clarke 33.3% 3.59 116 $12.00 10.00 1 33.3% 2.38 117 5.32 29

045 Craig 33.3% 3.59 117 $9.00 3.44 16 100.0% 10.00 2 5.68 13

047 Culpeper 58.9% 6.34 31 $8.63 2.63 35 77.6% 7.44 25 5.47 19

049 Cumberland 50.0% 5.38 78 $8.97 3.37 17 70.0% 6.57 48 5.11 36

051 Dickensen 66.7% 7.18 11 $7.76 0.72 108 79.0% 7.59 22 5.17 34

053 Dinwiddie 62.9% 6.77 16 $9.10 3.65 13 62.5% 5.71 74 5.38 24

057 Essex 60.5% 6.51 25 $8.38 2.08 47 59.1% 5.32 82 4.64 65

059 Fairfax/Falls Church 52.0% 5.60 68 $9.90 5.40 6 75.1% 7.16 35 6.05 8

061 Fauquier 58.7% 6.32 33 $8.92 3.26 18 76.7% 7.33 29 5.64 15

063 Floyd 46.2% 4.97 100 $8.79 2.98 21 50.0% 4.29 102 4.08 94

065 Fluvanna 66.7% 7.18 12 $9.64 4.84 10 70.6% 6.64 46 6.22 6

067 Franklin County 46.4% 4.99 98 $8.37 2.06 49 69.7% 6.54 51 4.53 70

069 Frederick 50.0% 5.38 79 $8.59 2.54 37 69.6% 6.52 52 4.82 55

071 Giles 75.0% 8.08 3 $7.59 0.35 115 53.3% 4.67 101 4.36 81

073 Gloucester 58.5% 6.30 34 $7.51 0.18 117 47.1% 3.95 107 3.47 112

075 Goochland 40.0% 4.31 107 $8.75 2.89 25 81.8% 7.92 16 5.04 40

077 Grayson 55.0% 5.92 53 $7.73 0.66 109 54.6% 4.81 98 3.80 103

VIEW Rankings, Fiscal Year to Date, cont. 26

FIPS

Code Locality

Percent

Em-

ployed

Score

from

0 to 10 Rank

Average

Wage

Score

from

0 to 10 Rank

Percent

Employed

at 3

Months

Score

from

0 to 10 Rank

Average

Score Rank

079 Greene 60.0% 6.46 28 $8.16 1.60 68 92.3% 9.12 7 5.73 12

081 Greensville/Emporia 48.6% 5.23 89 $8.02 1.29 78 79.0% 7.59 23 4.71 60

083 Halifax 33.8% 3.63 115 $8.66 2.69 34 50.0% 4.29 103 3.54 109

085 Hanover 62.0% 6.67 20 $8.67 2.71 33 76.7% 7.34 28 5.58 17

087 Henrico 53.6% 5.77 62 $8.68 2.74 32 74.7% 7.10 38 5.20 32

089 Henry/Martinsville 53.0% 5.71 65 $7.81 0.83 103 55.5% 4.91 96 3.82 102

091 Highland N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A

093 Isle of Wight 46.8% 5.04 96 $7.83 0.88 99 56.7% 5.05 93 3.65 106

095 James City 68.2% 7.34 9 $8.40 2.12 43 56.6% 5.04 94 4.84 51

097 King and Queen 50.0% 5.38 80 $10.01 5.65 4 50.0% 4.29 104 5.11 37

099 King George 60.5% 6.52 24 $8.76 2.91 24 38.9% 3.02 115 4.15 90

101 King William 50.0% 5.38 81 $8.72 2.82 30 69.2% 6.48 55 4.90 48

103 Lancaster 77.8% 8.38 2 $7.90 1.03 90 44.4% 3.65 109 4.35 82

105 Lee 49.2% 5.30 87 $7.89 1.01 92 73.2% 6.93 41 4.41 77

107 Loudoun 57.1% 6.15 43 $10.95 7.70 2 81.4% 7.87 17 7.24 1

109 Louisa 74.2% 8.00 4 $8.46 2.25 40 79.5% 7.66 20 5.97 9

111 Lunenburg 39.4% 4.24 109 $7.98 1.20 83 61.1% 5.56 78 3.67 105

113 Madison 42.9% 4.62 104 $7.96 1.16 84 12.5% 0.00 118 1.93 118

115 Mathews 92.9% 10.00 1 $7.91 1.05 89 71.4% 6.73 43 5.93 10

117 Mecklenburg 48.1% 5.17 94 $8.26 1.82 58 55.3% 4.89 97 3.96 98

119 Middlesex 69.7% 7.51 7 $7.52 0.20 116 93.3% 9.24 6 5.65 14

121 Montogomery 72.7% 7.83 6 $8.39 2.10 46 66.1% 6.13 64 5.35 28

125 Nelson 57.9% 6.23 37 $7.72 0.63 110 42.9% 3.47 112 3.45 114

127 New Kent 48.1% 5.19 92 $7.43 0.00 118 83.3% 8.09 12 4.43 74

131 Northampton 55.8% 6.01 51 $7.80 0.81 104 96.6% 9.61 5 5.48 18

133 Northumberland 53.3% 5.74 63 $8.77 2.93 23 50.0% 4.29 105 4.32 84

135 Nottoway 51.5% 5.54 70 $7.99 1.23 82 76.5% 7.31 30 4.69 63

137 Orange 57.7% 6.21 40 $8.40 2.12 44 87.5% 8.57 10 5.64 16

139 Page 53.8% 5.80 60 $8.74 2.87 26 58.6% 5.27 86 4.65 64

141 Patrick 49.4% 5.32 86 $7.85 0.92 96 61.5% 5.60 76 3.95 100

143 Pittsylvania 37.8% 4.07 112 $7.86 0.94 95 45.7% 3.80 108 2.93 116

145 Powhatan 64.3% 6.92 14 $8.72 2.82 31 60.0% 5.43 79 5.06 39

147 Prince Edward 47.1% 5.07 95 $8.06 1.38 74 69.4% 6.50 53 4.32 85

149 Prince George 48.7% 5.25 88 $8.04 1.33 76 50.0% 4.29 106 3.62 107

153 Prince William 56.3% 6.06 50 $9.68 4.92 7 75.6% 7.22 34 6.07 7

155 Pulaski 52.6% 5.66 66 $8.00 1.25 80 56.9% 5.07 92 3.99 97

157 Rappahannock 20.0% 2.15 118 $10.50 6.72 3 100.0% 10.00 3 6.29 4

159 Richmond County 57.1% 6.15 44 $8.36 2.04 51 61.5% 5.60 77 4.60 68

161 Roanoke County 50.3% 5.42 77 $8.37 2.06 50 59.0% 5.32 83 4.26 86

163 Rockbridge/BV/Lex 67.6% 7.29 10 $8.28 1.86 57 70.0% 6.57 49 5.24 30

165 Rockingham/H'burg 68.7% 7.40 8 $8.63 2.63 36 68.3% 6.37 58 5.47 20

167 Russell 37.5% 4.04 113 $7.83 0.88 100 67.4% 6.27 61 3.73 104

169 Scott 51.0% 5.49 73 $7.69 0.57 112 88.9% 8.73 9 4.93 46

171 Shenandoah 57.9% 6.23 38 $8.86 3.13 20 63.6% 5.84 72 5.07 38

VIEW Rankings, Fiscal Year to Date, cont. 27

The rankings are displayed to provide some indication of relative standing. They are not intended to represent scaled performance measures.

Ties were resolved by carrying out the numbers to greater detail than displayed, and then if ties remained, FIPS code order was used. The

calculation of scores is done to make the determination of a combined rank more equitable. See the bottom of the endnotes on page 44 for

an explanation of how the scores are calculated.

FIPS

Code Locality

Percent

Em-

ployed

Score

from

0 to 10 Rank

Average

Wage

Score

from

0 to 10 Rank

Percent

Employed

at 3

Months

Score

from

0 to 10 Rank

Average

Score Rank

173 Smyth 54.9% 5.91 55 $7.88 0.98 93 55.8% 4.95 95 3.95 99

175 Southampton 50.0% 5.38 82 $7.78 0.77 106 66.7% 6.19 62 4.11 93

177 Spotsylvania 58.3% 6.28 36 $8.22 1.73 64 65.8% 6.09 65 4.70 61

179 Stafford 50.6% 5.45 74 $9.67 4.90 9 75.0% 7.14 37 5.83 11

181 Surry 37.8% 4.07 111 $7.94 1.12 85 60.0% 5.43 80 3.54 108

183 Sussex 46.3% 4.99 99 $7.92 1.07 86 64.7% 5.97 69 4.01 96

185 Tazewell 62.0% 6.68 19 $7.83 0.88 101 81.0% 7.82 18 5.13 35

187 Warren 54.4% 5.86 57 $7.90 1.03 91 83.3% 8.09 13 4.99 43

191 Washington 66.3% 7.14 13 $7.88 0.98 94 73.3% 6.95 40 5.03 41

193 Westmoreland 54.8% 5.91 56 $7.85 0.92 97 68.8% 6.43 56 4.42 75

195 Wise 56.7% 6.11 48 $8.01 1.27 79 63.4% 5.81 73 4.40 78

197 Wythe 54.4% 5.86 58 $7.77 0.74 107 82.4% 7.98 15 4.86 50

199 York/Poquoson 48.6% 5.23 90 $8.10 1.47 70 68.1% 6.35 59 4.35 83

510 Alexandria 49.8% 5.36 83 $9.97 5.56 5 84.6% 8.23 11 6.38 3

520 Bristol 50.5% 5.44 75 $7.92 1.07 87 65.0% 6.00 67 4.17 89

540 Charlottesville 60.2% 6.48 26 $8.73 2.84 28 72.1% 6.81 42 5.38 27

550 Chesapeake 57.3% 6.17 42 $8.31 1.93 55 71.2% 6.71 44 4.94 45

590 Danville 39.9% 4.30 108 $8.24 1.77 61 59.7% 5.39 81 3.82 101

620 Franklin City 61.1% 6.58 23 $7.92 1.07 88 54.1% 4.75 99 4.13 91

630 Fredericksburg 62.2% 6.70 18 $8.73 2.84 29 64.8% 5.97 68 5.17 33

640 Galax 56.8% 6.11 47 $7.72 0.63 111 44.4% 3.65 110 3.47 113

650 Hampton 48.1% 5.19 93 $8.23 1.75 63 76.3% 7.29 32 4.74 58

670 Hopewell 46.8% 5.04 97 $8.52 2.39 38 53.4% 4.68 100 4.03 95

680 Lynchburg 56.9% 6.13 46 $8.00 1.25 81 68.0% 6.34 60 4.57 69

683 Manassas 59.0% 6.36 30 $9.61 4.77 11 57.5% 5.14 90 5.42 22

685 Manassas Park 38.9% 4.19 110 $7.83 0.88 102 100.0% 10.00 4 5.02 42

700 Newport News 52.2% 5.62 67 $8.38 2.08 48 74.5% 7.08 39 4.93 47

710 Norfolk 53.7% 5.78 61 $8.04 1.33 77 76.8% 7.35 27 4.82 53

720 Norton 61.5% 6.63 22 $8.20 1.68 65 66.7% 6.19 63 4.83 52

730 Petersburg 54.9% 5.92 54 $8.40 2.12 45 70.2% 6.60 47 4.88 49

740 Portsmouth 49.5% 5.33 84 $8.16 1.60 69 70.7% 6.65 45 4.52 71

750 Radford 53.3% 5.74 64 $7.79 0.79 105 70.0% 6.57 50 4.37 80

760 Richmond City 51.4% 5.53 71 $8.25 1.79 60 69.2% 6.48 54 4.60 67

770 Roanoke City 51.5% 5.55 69 $8.26 1.82 59 57.7% 5.16 89 4.18 88

800 Suffolk 56.4% 6.07 49 $8.18 1.64 67 68.3% 6.38 57 4.70 62

810 Virginia Beach 57.8% 6.23 39 $8.31 1.93 56 65.7% 6.08 66 4.74 57

830 Williamsburg 60.0% 6.46 29 $8.51 2.36 39 76.5% 7.31 31 5.38 25

840 Winchester 57.6% 6.20 41 $8.24 1.77 62 64.3% 5.92 71 4.63 66

VIEW Rankings, From Inception of VIEW

This section lists the relative cumulative rankings of localities by Percent

Enrolled who became Employed, Average Monthly Earnings, and Percent

Employed Three Months after Initial Employment. Scores from 0 to 10

are also assigned and the scores averaged to calculate an overall rank.

28

FIPS

Code Locality

Percent

Em-

ployed

Score

from

0 to 10 Rank

Average

Monthly

Earnings

Score

from

0 to 10 Rank

Percent

Employed

at 3

Months

Score

from

0 to 10 Rank

Average

Score Rank

001 Accomack 50.6% 1.56 117 $865 2.98 92 65.2% 5.64 50 3.39 108

003 Albemarle 72.2% 7.45 11 $1,021 6.12 18 57.8% 3.87 98 5.81 26

005 Alleghany/Covington 70.0% 6.85 21 $848 2.64 102 58.2% 3.95 91 4.48 78

007 Amelia 61.3% 4.47 84 $964 4.97 41 62.0% 4.88 67 4.77 69

009 Amherst 66.4% 5.87 52 $885 3.38 81 59.4% 4.24 81 4.50 76

011 Appomattox 70.1% 6.87 19 $883 3.34 83 55.7% 3.36 105 4.52 75

013 Arlington 71.4% 7.24 15 $1,074 7.19 8 69.0% 6.56 24 6.99 6

015 Augusta/S'ton/W'boro 67.2% 6.09 43 $966 5.01 39 66.8% 6.02 39 5.71 31

017 Bath 62.7% 4.87 79 $717 0.00 120 61.3% 4.70 71 3.19 114

019 Bedford County/City 64.8% 5.44 64 $863 2.94 94 60.1% 4.40 76 4.26 88

021 Bland 59.2% 3.91 94 $873 3.13 89 55.5% 3.30 106 3.44 107

023 Botetourt 44.9% 0.00 120 $952 4.73 49 53.5% 2.83 112 2.52 118

025 Brunswick 56.5% 3.16 109 $837 2.41 108 67.3% 6.16 35 3.91 99

027 Buchanan 53.7% 2.40 113 $846 2.59 104 64.7% 5.52 52 3.50 106

029 Buckingham 56.7% 3.21 108 $959 4.86 46 59.3% 4.22 83 4.10 94

031 Campbell 68.7% 6.49 35 $903 3.74 74 63.4% 5.21 60 5.15 56

033 Caroline 60.5% 4.26 87 $970 5.09 36 58.0% 3.90 97 4.42 81

035 Carroll 66.4% 5.86 54 $835 2.38 110 53.9% 2.93 108 3.72 102

036 Charles City 58.1% 3.59 102 $966 5.02 38 50.9% 2.19 116 3.60 105

037 Charlotte 51.9% 1.90 115 $920 4.08 65 58.0% 3.92 93 3.30 109

041 Chesterfield/Col Hgts 63.1% 4.97 75 $1,038 6.45 13 69.1% 6.57 23 6.00 22

043 Clarke 57.5% 3.43 105 $1,005 5.80 23 58.0% 3.90 95 4.38 84

045 Craig 50.0% 1.39 118 $1,053 6.75 11 59.3% 4.21 85 4.12 92

047 Culpeper 64.8% 5.44 65 $981 5.30 31 66.1% 5.85 44 5.53 36

049 Cumberland 57.6% 3.48 104 $963 4.96 42 58.0% 3.91 94 4.12 93

051 Dickenson 60.2% 4.18 88 $842 2.52 106 54.4% 3.04 107 3.25 112

053 Dinwiddie 65.8% 5.69 56 $980 5.29 32 57.8% 3.87 99 4.95 61

057 Essex 66.9% 6.02 47 $877 3.21 85 48.7% 1.68 117 3.64 104

059 Fairfax/Falls Church 66.8% 5.98 49 $1,169 9.08 3 69.3% 6.64 18 7.23 5

061 Fauquier 69.0% 6.58 32 $1,037 6.44 14 68.6% 6.45 27 6.49 10

063 Floyd 65.0% 5.49 62 $943 4.55 53 53.7% 2.86 110 4.30 87

065 Fluvanna 65.0% 5.48 63 $1,074 7.17 9 61.1% 4.66 73 5.77 28

067 Franklin County 61.8% 4.61 83 $956 4.80 47 58.1% 3.93 92 4.44 80

069 Frederick 57.0% 3.30 106 $1,026 6.21 16 61.2% 4.67 72 4.73 71

071 Giles 58.5% 3.71 98 $956 4.80 48 52.6% 2.61 113 3.71 103

073 Gloucester 64.4% 5.32 69 $855 2.78 98 57.3% 3.73 102 3.94 96

075 Goochland 65.9% 5.74 55 $935 4.39 59 65.2% 5.65 49 5.26 46

077 Grayson 65.2% 5.54 60 $861 2.89 95 60.9% 4.62 74 4.35 85

29 VIEW Rankings, From Inception cont.

FIPS

Code Locality

Percent

Em-

ployed

Score

from

0 to 10 Rank

Average

Monthly

Earnings

Score

from

0 to 10 Rank

Percent

Employed

at 3

Months

Score

from

0 to 10 Rank

Average

Score Rank

079 Greene 75.3% 8.29 4 $913 3.94 69 55.8% 3.38 104 5.20 51

081 Greensville/Emporia 59.4% 3.95 93 $830 2.27 112 65.7% 5.76 46 3.99 95

083 Halifax 55.6% 2.92 110 $851 2.69 100 58.6% 4.06 88 3.22 113

085 Hanover 64.3% 5.31 70 $1,053 6.76 10 66.4% 5.94 42 6.00 21

087 Henrico 67.5% 6.16 42 $1,026 6.21 15 66.5% 5.96 41 6.11 19

089 Henry/Martinsville 63.7% 5.13 72 $941 4.49 55 64.1% 5.39 54 5.00 60

091 Highland 75.0% 8.22 5 $784 1.34 118 83.3% 10.00 1 6.52 9

093 Isle of Wight 67.9% 6.28 39 $916 4.00 66 59.0% 4.15 87 4.81 66

095 James City 69.4% 6.68 28 $924 4.16 62 59.3% 4.23 82 5.02 58

097 King and Queen 51.0% 1.67 116 $887 3.41 79 45.9% 1.00 119 2.03 120

099 King George 59.0% 3.83 97 $925 4.18 60 57.5% 3.79 101 3.93 97

101 King William 59.7% 4.05 91 $992 5.53 27 59.8% 4.33 78 4.64 72

103 Lancaster 67.1% 6.05 45 $864 2.96 93 52.0% 2.47 114 3.83 101

105 Lee 65.1% 5.51 61 $799 1.66 117 72.1% 7.30 10 4.82 65

107 Loudoun 76.6% 8.65 3 $1,214 10.00 1 72.3% 7.34 9 8.66 1

109 Louisa 63.4% 5.04 73 $983 5.35 29 63.3% 5.18 61 5.19 52

111 Lunenburg 47.9% 0.80 119 $820 2.08 114 60.8% 4.58 75 2.49 119

113 Madison 59.9% 4.10 90 $1,006 5.82 22 59.5% 4.27 80 4.73 70

115 Mathews 66.7% 5.94 51 $914 3.95 68 69.9% 6.77 16 5.55 33

117 Mecklenburg 65.6% 5.64 57 $847 2.61 103 67.0% 6.07 37 4.78 68

119 Middlesex 67.6% 6.19 41 $912 3.93 70 72.8% 7.47 7 5.86 24

121 Montgomery 78.0% 9.04 2 $947 4.63 51 63.5% 5.23 59 6.30 14

125 Nelson 61.0% 4.39 86 $1,022 6.13 17 63.0% 5.10 64 5.21 49

127 New Kent 55.2% 2.80 112 $1,020 6.09 19 72.5% 7.39 8 5.43 39

131 Northampton 64.4% 5.33 68 $851 2.69 99 80.3% 9.27 2 5.77 29

133 Northumberland 56.7% 3.23 107 $859 2.85 96 51.8% 2.41 115 2.83 117

135 Nottoway 66.4% 5.87 53 $908 3.84 73 69.7% 6.71 17 5.47 38

137 Orange 71.6% 7.29 14 $965 4.98 40 59.8% 4.35 77 5.54 35

139 Page 69.4% 6.69 26 $998 5.64 25 59.7% 4.32 79 5.55 34

141 Patrick 67.1% 6.07 44 $826 2.19 113 74.2% 7.81 6 5.36 41

143 Pittsylvania 53.5% 2.34 114 $875 3.18 87 59.3% 4.22 84 3.25 111

145 Powhatan 55.3% 2.83 111 $983 5.35 30 63.6% 5.25 58 4.48 79

147 Prince Edward 69.4% 6.69 27 $890 3.48 77 68.1% 6.33 30 5.50 37

149 Prince George 59.6% 4.02 92 $1,003 5.75 24 57.8% 3.86 100 4.54 74

153 Prince William 71.8% 7.34 12 $1,198 9.67 2 70.3% 6.87 13 7.96 2

155 Pulaski 63.2% 4.99 74 $951 4.70 50 53.6% 2.85 111 4.18 90

157 Rappahannock 58.1% 3.60 101 $971 5.10 35 46.3% 1.11 118 3.27 110

159 Richmond County 61.1% 4.42 85 $938 4.44 58 41.7% 0.00 120 2.95 116

161 Roanoke County 73.6% 7.84 7 $1,039 6.48 12 58.0% 3.90 96 6.07 20

163 Rockbridge/BV/Lex 70.6% 7.01 17 $871 3.10 90 67.1% 6.10 36 5.40 40

165 Rockingham/H'burg 73.2% 7.72 9 $989 5.47 28 67.6% 6.21 32 6.47 12

167 Russell 60.1% 4.15 89 $858 2.83 97 66.7% 6.00 40 4.33 86

169 Scott 57.8% 3.53 103 $889 3.46 78 77.2% 8.53 5 5.17 55

171 Shenandoah 59.2% 3.89 95 $945 4.59 52 68.9% 6.53 26 5.00 59

VIEW Rankings, From Inception cont. 30

The rankings are displayed to provide some indication of relative standing. They are not intended to represent scaled performance measures.

Ties were resolved by carrying out the numbers to greater detail than displayed, and then if ties remained, FIPS code order was used. The

calculation of scores was begun in May 1999 to make the determination of a combined rank more equitable. See the bottom of the endnotes

on page 44 for an explanation of how the scores are calculated.

FIPS

Code Locality

Percent

Em-

ployed

Score

from

0 to 10 Rank

Average

Monthly

Earnings

Score

from

0 to 10 Rank

Percent

Employed

at 3

Months

Score

from

0 to 10 Rank

Average

Score Rank

173 Smyth 58.4% 3.67 99 $871 3.10 91 62.6% 5.02 65 3.93 98

175 Southampton 58.2% 3.62 100 $836 2.39 109 53.9% 2.93 109 2.98 115

177 Spotsylvania 68.3% 6.39 37 $1,020 6.08 20 67.4% 6.16 34 6.21 17

179 Stafford 59.1% 3.86 96 $1,141 8.53 4 68.5% 6.43 28 6.27 16

181 Surry 69.1% 6.60 31 $882 3.31 84 56.5% 3.54 103 4.48 77

183 Sussex 65.2% 5.54 59 $962 4.92 43 63.0% 5.11 63 5.19 53

185 Tazewell 66.9% 6.01 48 $820 2.07 115 65.6% 5.75 48 4.61 73

187 Warren 67.0% 6.04 46 $1,011 5.91 21 69.3% 6.62 20 6.19 18

191 Washington 63.1% 4.97 76 $899 3.65 75 58.2% 3.96 90 4.19 89

193 Westmoreland 63.0% 4.93 77 $925 4.18 61 64.8% 5.54 51 4.88 64

195 Wise 62.7% 4.86 80 $834 2.36 111 66.3% 5.91 43 4.38 83

197 Wythe 66.7% 5.95 50 $849 2.66 101 66.9% 6.05 38 4.89 63

199 York/Poquoson 62.0% 4.67 82 $897 3.62 76 59.0% 4.15 86 4.14 91

510 Alexandria 69.8% 6.80 23 $1,085 7.40 7 77.4% 8.58 4 7.59 4

520 Bristol 67.9% 6.27 40 $876 3.20 86 62.0% 4.86 68 4.78 67

540 Charlottesville 81.5% 10.00 1 $923 4.14 64 66.0% 5.84 45 6.66 8

550 Chesapeake 71.7% 7.31 13 $941 4.50 54 64.1% 5.37 55 5.73 30

590 Danville 62.9% 4.90 78 $812 1.92 116 61.5% 4.74 70 3.85 100

620 Franklin City 64.5% 5.36 67 $844 2.56 105 63.7% 5.28 56 4.40 82

630 Fredericksburg 74.5% 8.09 6 $995 5.59 26 65.7% 5.75 47 6.48 11

640 Galax 62.5% 4.80 81 $886 3.39 80 69.1% 6.57 22 4.92 62

650 Hampton 69.2% 6.63 30 $923 4.14 63 63.7% 5.28 57 5.35 43

670 Hopewell 68.1% 6.34 38 $938 4.45 57 63.0% 5.12 62 5.30 44

680 Lynchburg 70.1% 6.86 20 $838 2.44 107 68.4% 6.41 29 5.24 48

683 Manassas 64.2% 5.27 71 $1,112 7.93 5 70.1% 6.81 15 6.67 7

685 Manassas Park 68.8% 6.52 33 $1,098 7.67 6 78.0% 8.72 3 7.64 3

700 Newport News 69.8% 6.80 24 $939 4.47 56 69.1% 6.58 21 5.95 23

710 Norfolk 69.6% 6.74 25 $873 3.13 88 67.5% 6.19 33 5.35 42

720 Norton 73.5% 7.81 8 $756 0.79 119 71.0% 7.03 12 5.21 50

730 Petersburg 70.4% 6.96 18 $968 5.04 37 70.2% 6.84 14 6.28 15

740 Portsmouth 70.6% 7.01 16 $909 3.87 72 69.3% 6.62 19 5.83 25

750 Radford 69.3% 6.65 29 $912 3.92 71 61.7% 4.80 69 5.12 57

760 Richmond City 69.9% 6.81 22 $962 4.92 44 71.6% 7.17 11 6.30 13

770 Roanoke City 64.6% 5.37 66 $978 5.25 33 62.2% 4.91 66 5.18 54

800 Suffolk 73.1% 7.70 10 $883 3.35 82 67.9% 6.29 31 5.78 27

810 Virginia Beach 65.5% 5.62 58 $960 4.89 45 69.0% 6.55 25 5.69 32

830 Williamsburg 68.6% 6.48 36 $915 3.98 67 64.2% 5.41 53 5.29 45

840 Winchester 68.7% 6.50 34 $975 5.18 34 58.6% 4.04 89 5.24 47

State Summary July 1, 2013 – October 31, 2013

EDD1 – Southwest Region: July 1, 2013 - October 31, 2013

VIEW Timeliness Measures 31

See pp 42-44

State

ED

1

ED

2

ED

3

ED

4

ED

5

ED

6

ED

7

ED

8

ED

9

ED

10

ED

11

ED

12

ED

13

ED

14

ED

15

ED

16

ED

17

ED

18

Timely Enrollment11

Total Due Since July 1, 2013 6,230 316 218 537 194 83 690 74 163 242 290 248 774 246 89 715 194 1,107 50

Cumulative % Timely Since July 1, 2013 94% 99% 98% 96% 99% 94% 93% 91% 99% 93% 98% 92% 91% 91% 91% 98% 83% 93% 98%

% Timely in October 2013 94% 99% 98% 97% 100% 93% 91% 100% 99% 99% 97% 92% 88% 92% 93% 99% 83% 95% ####

Work Activity 95 Days after Referral12

Total Possible Since July 1, 2013 1,537 81 60 131 54 16 171 14 36 56 77 77 195 56 18 170 51 266 8

Cumulative % Since July 1, 2013 97% 100% 98% 100% 100% 88% 97% 93% 100% 91% 100% 100% 96% 95% 94% 97% 96% 94% ####

Percent in October 2013 97% 100% 98% 100% 100% 88% 97% 93% 100% 91% 100% 100% 96% 95% 94% 97% 96% 94% ####

Status of Waiting List for Enrollment14

# Over 30 Days 83 1 0 2 0 1 15 4 0 0 0 1 32 6 9 0 7 5 0

Average # of Days Over 30 48 56 0 41 0 14 18 62 0 0 0 13 67 45 56 0 38 18 0

Total


Timely Enrollment11

Total Due Since July 1, 2013 316 28 6 68 46 27 60 72 9

Cumulative % Timely Since July 1, 2013 99% 100% 100% 99% 100% 96% 100% 100% 78%

% Timely in October 2013 99% 100% 100% 97% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100%


Total Possible Since July 1, 2013 81 4 2 17 7 10 15 20 6

Cumulative % Since July 1, 2013 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100%

Percent in October 2013 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100%


# Over 30 Days 1 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0

Average # of Days Over 30 56 0 0 0 0 56 0 0 0


EDD2 - Bristol-Galax Region: July 1, 2013 - October 31, 2013

EDD3 - Roanoke Region: July 1, 2013 - October 31, 2013

See pp 42-44

Total


Timely Enrollment11



% Timely in October 2013 98% N/A 100% 100% 100% 93% 100% 100% 100%



Cumulative % Since July 1, 2013 98% N/A 100% N/A 95% 100% 100% 100% 100%

Percent in October 2013 98% N/A 100% N/A 95% 100% 100% 100% 100%


# Over 30 Days 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0


Total

EDD3

Alleghny/

Covington

Bote-

tourt Craig Floyd

Franklin

County Giles

Mont-

gomery Pulaski

Roanoke

County Radford

Roanoke

City

Timely Enrollment11

Total Due Since July 1, 2013 537 26 11 1 14 53 5 60 37 52 28 250

Cumulative % Timely Since July 1, 2013 96% 96% 100% 0% 100% 100% 100% 98% 100% 98% 96% 94%

% Timely in October 2013 97% 100% 100% N/A 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 92% 95%


Total Possible Since July 1, 2013 131 6 0 0 2 15 1 13 9 12 4 69

Cumulative % Since July 1, 2013 100% 100% N/A N/A 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100%

Percent in October 2013 100% 100% N/A N/A 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100%


# Over 30 Days 2 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1

Average # of Days Over 30 41 0 0 46 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 35


EDD4 - Harrisonburg Region: July 1, 2013 - October 31, 2013

EDD5 & EDD18 - Winchester/Eastern Shore Regions: July 1, 2013 - October 31, 2013

See pp 42-44

Total

EDD4

Aug/S'ton

/W'boro Bath Highland

Rockbridge/

BV/Lex

Rockingham/

HBurg

Timely Enrollment11

Total Due Since July 1, 2013 194 113 1 0 11 69

Cumulative % Timely Since July 1, 2013 99% 100% 100% N/A 91% 99%

% Timely in October 2013 100% 100% N/A N/A 100% 100%


Total Possible Since July 1, 2013 54 25 1 0 4 24

Cumulative % Since July 1, 2013 100% 100% 100% N/A 100% 100%

Percent in October 2013 100% 100% 100% N/A 100% 100%


# Over 30 Days 0 0 0 0 0 0

Average # of Days Over 30 0 0 0 0 0 0

Total


Total


Timely Enrollment11

Total Due Since July 1, 2013 83 1 23 13 6 17 23 50 39 11

Cumulative % Timely Since July 1, 2013 94% 100% 83% 100% 100% 94% 100% 98% 97% 100%

% Timely in October 2013 93% N/A 89% 100% 100% 75% 100% 100% 100% 100%


Total Possible Since July 1, 2013 16 0 4 4 1 4 3 8 4 4

Cumulative % Since July 1, 2013 88% N/A 75% 100% 100% 100% 67% 100% 100% 100%

Percent in October 2013 88% N/A 75% 100% 100% 100% 67% 100% 100% 100%


# Over 30 Days 1 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0

Average # of Days Over 30 14 0 0 0 0 14 0 0 0 0


EDD7 - Culpeper Region: July 1, 2013 - October 31, 2013

EDD6 – Northern Virginia Region: July 1, 2013 - October 31, 2013

See pp 42-44

Total


Prince


Manassas

Park

Timely Enrollment11

Total Due Since July 1, 2013 690 51 252 45 231 76 25 10

Cumulative % Timely Since July 1, 2013 93% 100% 98% 84% 88% 97% 64% 100%

% Timely in October 2013 91% 100% 100% 76% 86% 100% 40% 100%


Total Possible Since July 1, 2013 171 15 62 14 53 18 6 3

Cumulative % Since July 1, 2013 97% 100% 100% 93% 92% 100% 100% 100%

Percent in October 2013 97% 100% 100% 93% 92% 100% 100% 100%


# Over 30 Days 15 0 0 4 1 2 8 0

Average # of Days Over 30 18 0 0 14 5 38 17 0

Total


Timely Enrollment11


Cumulative % Timely Since July 1, 2013 91% 97% 91% 100% 60% N/A

% Timely in October 2013 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% N/A



Cumulative % Since July 1, 2013 93% 100% 83% 100% 100% N/A

Percent in October 2013 93% 100% 83% 100% 100% N/A


# Over 30 Days 4 0 0 0 4 0



EDD9 - Lynchburg Region: July 1, 2013 - October 31, 2013

EDD8 - Charlottesville Region: July 1, 2013 - October 31, 2013

See pp 42-44

Total


Timely Enrollment11

Total Due Since July 1, 2013 163 43 6 9 18 10 77

Cumulative % Timely Since July 1, 2013 99% 100% 100% 89% 100% 100% 100%

% Timely in October 2013 99% 100% 100% 80% 100% 100% 100%


Total Possible Since July 1, 2013 36 9 3 0 5 3 16

Cumulative % Since July 1, 2013 100% 100% 100% N/A 100% 100% 100%

Percent in October 2013 100% 100% 100% N/A 100% 100% 100%


# Over 30 Days 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

Average # of Days Over 30 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

Total


Timely Enrollment11


Cumulative % Timely Since July 1, 2013 93% 90% 59% 89% 100% 97%

% Timely in October 2013 99% 100% 100% 100% 100% 97%



Cumulative % Since July 1, 2013 91% 100% 100% 57% 100% 94%

Percent in October 2013 91% 100% 100% 57% 100% 94%


# Over 30 Days 0 0 0 0 0 0



EDD11 – Southside Region: July 1, 2013 - October 31, 2013

EDD10 - Danville Region: July 1, 2013 - October 31, 2013

See pp 42-44

Total

EDD10 Halifax

Henry/


Timely Enrollment11









# Over 30 Days 0 0 0 0 0 0


Total

EDD11 Amelia

Bruns-

wick

Bucking-

ham Charlotte

Cumber-

land

Gr'nsville

Emporia

Lunen-

burg

Mecklen-

burg

Notto-

way Pr. Edward

Timely Enrollment11

Total Due Since July 1, 2013 248 10 28 21 13 8 33 13 47 35 40

Cumulative % Timely Since July 1, 2013 92% 100% 93% 95% 100% 88% 52% 100% 100% 100% 100%

% Timely in October 2013 92% 100% 100% 100% 100% 67% 40% 100% 100% 100% 100%


Total Possible Since July 1, 2013 77 4 4 9 5 2 17 5 15 5 11

Cumulative % Since July 1, 2013 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100%

Percent in October 2013 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100%


# Over 30 Days 1 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0

Average # of Days Over 30 13 0 0 0 0 0 13 0 0 0 0


EDD13 - Fredericksburg Region: July 1, 2013 - October 31, 2013

EDD12 - Richmond Region: July 1, 2013 - October 31, 2013

See pp 42-44

Total

EDD12

Chesterfield/

Col Hgts Goochland Hanover Henrico Powhatan

Richmond

City

Timely Enrollment11






Cumulative % Since July 1, 2013 96% 93% 100% 100% 98% 100% 96%

Percent in October 2013 96% 93% 100% 100% 98% 100% 96%


# Over 30 Days 32 2 0 0 19 1 10


Total

EDD13 Caroline

King


Timely Enrollment11









# Over 30 Days 6 4 0 2 0 0



EDD14 – Northern Neck Region: July 1, 2013 - October 31, 2013

EDD15 - Peninsula Region: July 1, 2013 - October 31, 2013

Total

EDD15

Charles

City Gloucester

James


Newport

News Willmsburg

Timely Enrollment11



% Timely in October 2013 99% N/A 100% 92% 100% 100% 100% 98% 100%






# Over 30 Days 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0


See pp 42-44

Total

EDD14 Essex

King &

Queen

King


North-

umberland

Richmond

County

West-

moreland

Timely Enrollment11

Total Due Since July 1, 2013 89 21 3 13 7 2 12 6 10 15

Cumulative % Timely Since July 1, 2013 91% 95% 33% 100% 100% 50% 92% 100% 70% 100%

% Timely in October 2013 93% 100% 0% 100% 100% N/A 100% 100% 71% 100%


Total Possible Since July 1, 2013 18 4 0 4 1 0 2 3 1 3

Cumulative % Since July 1, 2013 94% 100% N/A 100% 100% N/A 100% 100% 100% 67%

Percent in October 2013 94% 100% N/A 100% 100% N/A 100% 100% 100% 67%


# Over 30 Days 9 0 2 0 0 1 3 0 3 0

Average # of Days Over 30 56 0 46 0 0 57 101.67 0 18 0


EDD16 - Petersburg Region: July 1, 2013 - October 31, 2013

See pp 42-44

EDD17 - Tidewater Region: July 1, 2013 - October 31, 2013

Total

EDD16 Dinwiddie

Prince


Timely Enrollment11






Cumulative % Since July 1, 2013 96% 100% 80% 100% 100% 100% 96%

Percent in October 2013 96% 100% 80% 100% 100% 100% 96%


# Over 30 Days 7 0 0 0 0 3 4


Total

EDD17

Isle of

Wight

South-

hampton Chesapeake

Franklin

City Norfolk Portsmouth Suffolk VA Beach

Timely Enrollment11

Total Due Since July 1, 2013 1,107 14 11 202 25 383 202 85 185


% Timely in October 2013 95% 100% 100% 100% 100% 93% 92% 93% 96%






# Over 30 Days 5 0 0 0 0 0 3 0 2


Child Support Enforcement

Child Support Enforcement - Statewide Totals

Collections

Paternities Established

40

Oct-12 Oct-13 % Change

TANF Cases Collected 14,897 15,326 2.9%

NTANF Cases Collected 130,385 132,775 1.8%

Total Cases Collected 145,282 148,101 1.9%

TANF Collections $2,613,111 $2,679,517 2.5%

NTANF Collections $50,667,691 $51,556,460 1.8%

Total Collections $53,280,802 $54,235,977 1.8%

SFY YTD Collections $208,083,720 $211,805,184 1.8%

SFY YTD Average Collection $361.78 $362.62 0.2%

Oct-13

TANF Paternities 168

NTANF Paternities 344

Combined Paternities 512

Diversionary Assistance

41

.

October Diversionary Assistance Cases

Locality

Number of

Cases Locality

Number of

Cases

Albemarle 1 Roanoke County 4

Alleghany / Covington 1 Rockbridge / BV / Lexington 1

Amelia 1 Rockingham / H'burg 1

Amherst 2 Shenandoah 8

Appomattox 1 Spotsylvania 2

Augusta / Staunt'n / W'boro 6 Stafford 1

Bedford City 2 Warren 3

Buckingham 6 York / Poquoson 1

Chesterfield/Colonial Hgts 10 Bristol 3

Clarke 1 Charlottesville 5

Culpeper 1 Chesapeake 1

Fairfax / Falls Church 1 Franklin City 1

Fauquier 3 Fredericksburg 1

Franklin County 1 Hampton 13

Frederick 1 Hopewell 3

Gloucester 1 Lynchburg 3

Greene 1 Newport News 21

Hanover 2 Norfolk 3

Henrico 2 Petersburg 1

Henry / Martinsville 1 Portsmouth 1

James City 1 Richmond City 1

Loudoun 2 Roanoke City 8

Louisa 1 Suffolk 10

Lunenburg 1 Virginia Beach 3

Orange 1 Winchester 1

Patrick 1 Statewide 152

Definitions of Selected Terms Contained in Report

Average Monthly Earnings. This is the average monthly earnings of the unsubsidized jobs that participants obtained.

The value is calculated by multiplying the hourly wage by the weekly hours worked by 4.3 average weeks per month. For

the cumulative figures the initial wage and initial hours are used. For the current figures, the initial wage and most current

hours are used, except for the November 2001 report which used initial hours. Earlier than June 1999, wage changes that

were entered overwrote the initial wage, so prior to that date, the cumulative figures used the initial hours and the last

wage entered. With the advent of the VIEW Transitional Payment (VTP) program in October 2006 the end of month

average monthly earnings might be expected to decline somewhat because prior to VTP, cases with high earnings might

remain open for job follow-up, but after the implementation of VTP the VIEW case would be closed when the TANF case

was closed and a VTP case opened. VTP cases are not included in this report except for estimating the participation rate.

Average Wage. The average of the wages reported for each occurrence of unsubsidized employment. After June 1999 the

wage is the wage at hiring, that is, the initial wage. Prior to June 1999, that wage may have been updated if changed during

employment. After the implementation of the VIEW Transitional Payment program the end of month point in time average

wage might be expected to decline some for the same reason mentioned in the explanation of possible decline in Average

Monthly earnings, above. See note 6 on page 44.

Cases Closed with Employment. These are TANF or TANF-UP cases that are closed with an indication in the data base

of employment at the date of closure. It does not mean that the case necessarily closed because of employment. For

example, a TANF case may have an indication of closing at the client’s request, along with indication of existing

employment in VIEW. That case is counted as closed with employment.

EDD. This stands for Economic Development District. EDDs were developed during the administration of Governor

Allen. They generally are no longer in use. This report continues to refer to them because VIEW was phased in by EDD

and their use provides consistency over time.

Enrolled. Unduplicated number by locality of TANF recipients who were interviewed, received an individual assessment,

signed the Agreement of Personal Responsibility, and enrolled in the VIEW program. Because the count is by locality, a

recipient may be counted once in more than one locality. The fiscal year to date numbers include those who were enrolled

at the beginning of the fiscal year as well as those enrolled during the year. There are clients enrolled in VIEW who have

had their TANF case closed because VIEW policy requires that the enrollment remain open for job follow-up after

employment unless the employment meets federal work participation guidelines, in which case the VIEW case is closed

and a VIEW Transitional Payment (VTP) case is opened.

Full Time Employment. Employment at 30 hours a week or greater.

Participants Assigned to Inactive. Inactive is a status assigned to participants who cannot participate in the VIEW

program for reasons other than being exempt. Examples are unavailability of child care, unavailability of transportation,

and mental or medical problems that make participation impractical. Inactive participants are due to be reviewed each

month. While in inactive status, the 24 month time limit for TANF benefits is suspended.

Participants Employed. Total number of participants by locality who obtained an unsubsidized job, either full time or

part time. If employed more than one time, they are still only counted once, but may be counted in more than one locality.

Also, these participants may have left their job and not gotten another one. For the year to date numbers, those employed

at the beginning of the fiscal year are included as well as those who first became employed in the fiscal year.

Participants in a Work Activity. Unduplicated count by locality of persons who have been in any of the following

components: unsubsidized employment, full employment program (FEP), on-the-job training (OJT), community work

experience program (CWEP), public service program (PSP), vocational education and training, and job search/job

readiness. For example, a person who was in community work experience and then employed would be counted only once.

continued on next page

VIEW Definition Sheet 42

VIEW Definition Sheet Continued

For the year to date numbers, those in a work activity at the beginning of the fiscal year are included as well as those who

first entered a work activity in the fiscal year. Note that this is a revised definition of work activity from reports through

October 2006. The revised definition captures the activities that count toward the first 20 hours of federal participation

requirements – the core work activities. Clients who are counted as being in a core work activity must meet additional

participation rate requirements in order to be included in the work participation rate, and only VIEW clients are counted

here, not all work eligible TANF clients Thus, these percentages in a work activity are quite different from the

percentages in the TANF work participation rate.

Part Time Employment. Employment at fewer than 30 weekly hours.

Referred. Unduplicated number of TANF recipients by locality who were initially evaluated as eligible for VIEW and had

their names referred to the automated VIEW list for participation.

Relationship Between TANF and VIEW Participation. On the chart at page 5a, the column heading “Total Adults in the

Case” includes adults who are not considered to be part of the assistance unit. For example, a mother receiving SSI may be

in the case, but because she receives SSI is not considered eligible for TANF and thus is not part of the assistance unit.

Persons such as she who are not in the assistance unit are not eligible to participate in VIEW. Also included are adults who

are part of the assistance unit but exempt from VIEW

Five Months Employment. In earlier reports, this represented the percent of all participants that were employed 150 days

after their first employment. Participants who were employed in any job 150 days after their first employment were counted

in this measure.. This measure became unavailable after July 1, 2011. See note 9 on page 44.

Three Months Employment. This represents the percent of all participants that were employed 90 days after their first

employment. Participants who are employed in any job 90 days after their first employment are counted in this measure.

For year to date percents, the calculations are based on the first employment that began one year before the end of the report

month. That employment may not have been the first ever for the participant. The year to date percents were calculated

differently in reports before September 2004. Also for year to date percents, transferred cases were not counted for months

after the January 2002 report.

TANF / TANF-UP Payment Cases. Up to November 2003 these counts were taken from a monthly report with no

adjustment. After that, the monthly counts included some cases that were being paid because child support payments had

been received and were being passed on. These counts were adjusted to mostly eliminate those additional cases. Further

adjustment may be appropriate. It should also be noted that the counts include both strictly TANF cases and MOE cases for

some years. With the end of waiver provisions in July 2003, a substantial part of the caseload was placed in a state program

and funded with MOE funds. This change in July 2003 was a change in funding, not a change in eligibility requirements or

case payment amounts. It ended in September 2006 when VIEW transitional payments (VTP) were introduced.

Adjustments have been made to take out VTP cases. Also, TANF-UP cases are currently funded with only state monies.

VIEW Transitional Payments (VTP). Beginning in October 2006, VIEW Transitional Payments (VTP) were introduced.

These are payments of $50 per client per month for one year to VIEW clients that leave “regular” TANF with employment

sufficient to meet Federal work participation requirements. The employment must be maintained to be eligible for VTP.

Previously, VTP clients normally would have remained VIEW clients for five or six months of job-follow-up. Thus, the

VTP program has had a diminishing effect on some of the statistics in this report such as end of month percent employed

and average wage. See graph on page 5a.

Time That Data Represent. The data in the top sections of page 4 and pages 8 – 24 are point in time data as of the date

indicated. The year to date section represents state fiscal year to date data, with the exception of three month retention (see

above). The bottom section is cumulative from when the locality began VIEW.

General Statement About Accuracy. The report is based on an extract from the Employment Services automated system.

The extract is normally made the night of the first work day after the end of the report month. Data that staff of local social

services agencies enter into the automated system after the time of the extract are not included in the report, even though the

activity reflected actually occurred in the report month. However, that data, and the activity reflected, are included in the

reports for subsequent months. Further, because the data are entered by staff in the 120 localities, the accuracy of the data in

the data base is, of course, subject to inadvertent error.

43

Endnotes

1Applications are not necessarily acted upon in the month that they are received. Also, applications may be transferred from regular TANF to TANF-UP and vice versa as they are processed. 2 These TANF cases paid counts are prior to possible adjustment. See definition of payment cases. Note that a VIEW case may remain open for job follow-up after the corresponding TANF case closes. 3 VIEW enrolled counts do not include VTP clients 4 A case may be open in more than one locality during the time period. 5 Prior to June 1999, when individuals were transferred from one locality to another, their history was transferred as well. This may have an effect on a locality’s cumulative VIEW statistics. 6 The minimum wage rose from $6.55 to $7.25 an hour on 7/24/09. The report reflects initial wages so some effect on wages in the report was delayed. The average wage includes full and part time, unless otherwise indicated. See the definition of average wage on page 42. 7 Includes full and part time earnings. 8 This represents the percent of all participants that were first employed three months or more before the end of the report month and who were employed three months after the date of that employment. Employment may or may not have been continuous. See definition on page 43 for the revised method of calculating the year to date percentages. 9 Until the July 2011 report, this was employed after five months. However, on July 1, 2011 the number of required job follow-ups was reduced to three. Thus, data for five month job retention became unavailable. 10 Number includes TANF-UP and represents cases carried over to the next month. Note that a VIEW case may remain open for job follow-up after the corresponding TANF case closes, but with the advent of VIEW Transitional Payments (VTP) such occurrences were reduced from earlier months. 11 Enrollment is timely if done within 30 days of referral in previous month of the state fiscal year. The monthly percent includes evaluation of clients waiting in the queue. The year to date does not. 12 Placement in a work activity on the 95th day after referral was a measure of timeliness before Oct 1, 2006. The revised definition of work activity has increased the percentage from reports before November 2006. Clients whose cases have closed before the 95th day are excluded, so 100% is an attainable mark. 14 As of the morning of Nov 1, 2013. Some referrals to the waiting list are not appropriate; there may be considerable lag time in correcting them.

This report is available on the Department of Social Services web site at: http://www.dss.virginia.gov/geninfo/reports/financial_assistance/tanf.cgi The scores in the VIEW Rankings are determined by placing a locality on a scale of zero to ten in the same relative position as its place in the difference between the high and low of the measure in question. This converts all measures to a similar scale and provides a more equitable way to combine the ratings in each measure to determine a combined rank. (Questions, please call 804 726-7618.)

Comments on the format or content of the report and requests for Excel files for portions of current and past reports may be sent by e-mail to: [email protected].

44

http://www.dss.virginia.gov/geninfo/reports/financial_assistance/tanf.cgi

2

This graph illustrates the dramatic decline of the TANF caseload as VIEW was implemented. There was some sign of slowing in the

rate of decline after June 1998. Nevertheless, wide community involvement, a strong economy, and the effect of the 24 month rule

allowed the caseload to continue to fall until it was near the 30,000 level. There was little net change in the caseload from June

2000 to June 2002, but some upward movement was seen after June 2002, until 2005. The more recent trends are presumed to be a

result of economic conditions. The caseload leveled off after recession spurred growth and now is declining.

Information for this graph was taken from the Case Activity tables on page one of this report and reports of previous months.

70,797

66,819-6%

63,399-10%

57,108-19%

50,814-28%

45,188-36%

40,779-42% 39,266

-45%

36,652-48%

34,022-52%

30,452-57%

30,087-58%

29,146-59%

30,386-57%

30,361-57%

31,556-55%

31,987-55%

34,123-52%

34,535-51%

36,170-49%

35,246-50%

35,367-50%

33,610-53%

32,115-55%

30,483-57%

29,680-58%

29,404-58%

32,184-55%

34,792-51%

37,545-47%

37,397 -47%

37,628-47%

36,006-49%

35,573-50%

33,411-53%

33,202-53%

30,939-56%

30,697-57%

0

10,000

20,000

30,000

40,000

50,000

60,000

70,000

80,000

TANF and TANF-UP Cases Paid at Six Month Intervals, June 1995 through October 2013, except last month

Jun 95 thru Jun 98is a 42.4% decline.

Jun 98 thru Jun 00

25.3% decline.

A 1.5% average decline per month

for 36 months.

A 1.2% avgdecline per

mo for 24 mos.

This graph of application activity is presented as six month moving averages to produce smoother lines from which trends

may be seen and in recognition that applications are not always acted on in the month received. The trends are not dramatic,

but there seems to have been a general decline in the number of applications received until the July 2001 data. The decline

in applications received after December 2004 and the more recent changes appear to be reflected in the case load trends.

While no reason has been determined for the general decline in percent approved, an apparent reason for the very recent

decline is the availability of applications on line that offers ready access for applying to multiple assistance programs. Information for this graph was taken from the Case Activity tables on page one of this report and reports of previous months.

0.0%

10.0%

20.0%

30.0%

40.0%

50.0%

60.0%

70.0%

80.0%

90.0%

100.0%

0

1,000

2,000

3,000

4,000

5,000

6,000

7,000

Perc

en

tag

e

Nu

mb

er o

f Ap

plic

atio

ns

Percent of Applications Approved

see scale at right

Applications Approved

see scale at lef t

Applications Received with Approval Percentage Six Month Asymmetrical Moving Averages by Quarter, July 1995 through October 2013

Applications Received

see scale at lef t

5

This graph shows that the number enrolled in VIEW increased during early implementation and then generally tracked the number

of cases. The effects of recent economic conditions are apparent. A VIEW case may remain open for some months after the TANF

case closes, if job follow-up is being done and the case has not been converted to the VIEW Transitional Payment program. It is

unlikely that the number employed will ever equal the number enrolled because there are always new enrollees without

employment, and there are some enrollees in work activities, other than employment, that meet VIEW requirements. Information

for this graph was taken from the Statewide Work Activity tables on page four of this report and reports of previous months. It

includes TANF-UP

0

5,000

10,000

15,000

20,000

25,000

30,000

35,000

40,000

45,000

50,000

VIEW Participants Employed at End of Month

Enrolled in VIEW at End of Month

TANF Cases at End of Month

TANF Cases, VIEW Enrolled, and Employed VIEW ParticipantsBeginning in October 1997, the Month of VIEW Implementation Statewide Asymmetrical Three Month Moving Averages. October is the last month

5a

This chart illustrates that there are a large number of adults who are exempt from VIEW and that many of the VIEW

enrollees have had their TANF cases closed. They are now in a job follow-up phase of VIEW. They have not had their

VIEW case closed and become enrolled in the VIEW Transitional Payment program. The source of this information is a

monthly TANF extract from ADAPT and the monthly extract from ESPAS, the VIEW automated data system. The extracts

were made at the beginning of November and represent end of October data. TANF-UP is included.

30,190

26,698

15,200

11,011

156852

11,863

0

5,000

10,000

15,000

20,000

25,000

30,000

35,000

Total TANF Cases Total Adults in the Cases

VIEW Mandatory Adults in TANF

In TANF and Enrolled in VIEW

Total VIEW Volunteers

Enrolled in VIEW but not in TANF

Total Enrolled In VIEW

Chart Displaying the Relationships Between TANF and VIEW ParticipationOctober 31, 2013

6

This graph shows that the average wage has seen a general increase as the percent of VIEW employed initially

increased and then leveled. Besides employment, VIEW participants may be in various other activities or initial

assessment and job search. It is unlikely that the percent employed will rise more, and the recent economic conditions

may have caused a decline. The wages shown are generally the initial wages. When the average wage was calculated

at about the end of October it was $8.50 rather than the $8.41 initial wages used to calculate wages shown on this

graph. See page 42 of the report for an explanation of why the VIEW average wage might decline after October 2006

and note 6 on page 44 for the effect of the increase in minimum wage. Information for this graph was taken from the

Statewide Work Activity tables on page four of this report and reports of previous months.

$5.50

$5.75

$6.00

$6.25

$6.50

$6.75

$7.00

$7.25

$7.50

$7.75

$8.00

$8.25

$8.50

0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%

70%

80%A

ve

rag

e W

ag

e .

Pe

rce

nt E

mp

loye

d .

VIEW Percent Total Employed and Average Wage at End of MonthBeginning in October 1997, the Month of VIEW Implementation StatewideAsymmetrical Three Month Moving Averages. October is the last month.

Average Wagesee scale at right

Percent Employedsee scale at left

This graph illustrates an initial trend of VIEW participants obtaining a greater percent of full time jobs than part time. After

the initial months, the trend seems to be fairly level with an increase in the percent full time after TANF reauthorization which

probably reflects increased emphasis on meeting the required TANF work participation rate. The more recent changes are

presumed to be a result of economic developments and increased use of other work activities to help meet the required work

participation hours. Information for this graph was taken from the Statewide Work Activity tables on page four of this report

and reports of previous months.

0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%

70%

80%

90%

Percent of Jobs Found During a Month That Were Full Time and Percent Part TimeBeginning in October 1997, the Month of VIEW Implementation Statewide Asymmetrical Three Month Moving Averages. October is the last month

Percent Full Time Jobs

Percent Part Time Jobs

virginia independence program · 036 charles city 3 9 33% 097 king and queen 0 10 0% ... 147 prince...

Documents