violence, governance, development soas/mo ibrahim foundation governance for development in africa...
TRANSCRIPT
Violence, Governance, Development
SOAS/Mo Ibrahim FoundationGovernance for Development in
AfricaMauritius, 2014
CAUSE or CONSEQUENCE?
Plenty to discuss
• What are the analytical connections between governance and violence?
• How big a problem is violence?
• How are violence and development linked?
1. Governance and violence
Violence/Governance• The allocation of ‘violence rights’
– the feud– Class privilege– State monopoly
• Violence, taxation, and state formation – still valid?
• Incomplete monopolies of violence• Managing the violence problem
– Coalitions/settlements– Economic development and rents
Violence/governance
• Violence reflects lack of governance?
• Violence reflects governance?– Violent rules of the game
• Violence as source of governance?
Violence/governance/states
• North, Wallis and Weingast: bad governance (rent distribution to elites) ensures that violence reduces value of elite privileges, persuades them to lay down arms, creates better governance (managing the V problem)
• Contrast with OA societies: force subject to rule, impersonal access to opportunity
• Giustozzi – primitive accumulation of force, followed by consolidation
2. Trends, levels, classificationIs it in the indicators? Expert opinion or official data?
Peace and Conflict, 2010, CIDCM
Spagat, Restrepo and Vargas
Source: Moser & McIlwaine, World Development, 2006
Implications
• Violence is pervasive, multi-faceted
• Violence is difficult to measure
• Hobbes, Hobsbawm, Hardt and Negri
• Continuum of violence
3. Violence and Development I
From Hirschman to Hirshleifer
• The Passions and the Interests…Hirschman argued that this was a historical curiosity
• However, the argument rose again in different form: war is development in reverse
• The way of Coase vs the way of Macchiavelli
• Or ‘greed’ vs ‘grievance
G.r.i.e.vance
• Growth (5 years before onset)• Repression (elections, press freedom, etc)• Inequality (Gini coefficient)• Ethnicity (ELF)
G.r.e.ed
• Goodies (% of primary commodity exports in GDP)
• Rascals (% of 15-24 year old males in population)
• Education (number of years average schooling)
How to overcome constraints on collective action
• Direct, material rewards, now, to individuals• Coercion• Norms & ideology• Joint production (Kriger; Kalyvas) of violence by local
and national, outside and inside communities – intimacy
• Whatever’s easiest (economic or social endowments) but this will shape the form of conflict (Weinstein)
Friendly Fire?
• Regressing endogenous variables on endogenous variables
• Failing to reflect anything in the last 25 years of economic theory or technique
• Conclusions not justified by findings• Might be published in an IR journal but not in
a 3rd rate economics journal.
4. Post-conflict aid
The triple transition & rising post-conflict aid
• The liberal peace thesis• The idea that aid to post-conflict societies is
more effective than other aid• The idea of international public bads• The idea that there is a vacuum at the end of
the war and it is an opportunity for dramatic change.
World Bank Post-Conflict Reconstruction Lending, 1980-98
0
1000
2000
3000
4000
5000
6000
year
US
$ m
illio
n
Africa post-conflict East Asia & Pacific post-conflictSuth Asia post-conflict Europe & Central Asia post-conflictMiddle East & North Africa post-conflict Latin America & Caribbean post-conflict
Aid volatility coefficient
From Boyce and Forman (2011), “Financing Peace” – WDR input paper
From Boyce and Forman (2011), “Financing Peace” – WDR input paper
From Boyce and Forman (2011), “Financing Peace” – WDR input paper
5. Violence and development II
Violence as development in forward gear
• The mafia in Sicily: throwback or functional to capitalist development and global integration?
• Colombia – bananas, palm oil (not the usual ‘conflict commodities, though those too
• Angola 1961• American civil war• Mozambique and the mechanism of primitive
accumulation
Where to?
• Guided by the possibilism of Keynes and Hirschman, rather than by ‘mindless theorising’ or ideology/fantasy, the real challenges are to distinguish scope for positive change in conflict.
• And in post-conflict:– How to pay for the peace– How to produce the peace– How to work for peace