vice chancellor’s retreat mona campus august 2009 1
TRANSCRIPT
1
PROGRESS AND CHALLENGES IN AGRICULTURE
Vice Chancellor’s RetreatMona CampusAugust 2009
2
Small island states with limited land masses
Relatively high labour costs
Vestiges of our historical past linked to an aversion to agriculture
Dependence on an oil/gas economy in T&T and a move away from agriculture towards the service sector (mainly tourism ) in most of the other CARICOM countries
The Binding Constraints *
3
Lack of an aggressive breed of innovative agripreneurs
Periodical exposure to environmental stress (flooding, hurricanes and drought)
Decline in productivity of the land, labour and management in the agricultural sector resulting in a weakened capacity to supply food competitively.
The Binding Constraints
4
Ineffective policies with respect to the sustainable use of the environmental resources
Poor/non-consistent national/regional agricultural policies
Loss of preferential export markets for agricultural products(sugar, banana
5
Absence of both a well developed transportation infrastructure and relevant marketing institutions posing restrictions on intra-regional agricultural trade
Poor agronomic and forestry management practices that result in soil erosion leading to environmental degradation in general
Weak diversification efforts out of the plantation economy
Inadequate number of appropriately trained human resource
The Binding Constraints
6
Historical emphasis on export of primary products as against value added products along the value chain
Lack of an effective land use policy and land tenure for farmers
Poor rural physical infrastructure
The Binding Constraints
7
Limited awareness of issues related to global environmental changes and their full implications
Weak Intellectual Property Rights (IPR) system. This limits the scientific community to take advantages of any window of opportunity
Lack of agricultural risk insurance (agriculture is inherently a risky business)
The Binding Constraints
8
The propensity to set up counterpart institutions when they appear not to be functioning as expected without examining the real causes and applying corrective surgery. The existing institutions are then left to “die a natural death
Ineffective technical support for farmers(breakdown of extension services)
Lack of financial support for applied agricultural research and development (R&D)
Slow rate of introduction of and support for the application of new technologies
The Binding Constraints
9
WHAT IS YOUR ASSESSMENT OF UWI’S CONTRIBUTION TO REGIONAL AGRICULTURE?
HOW COULD UWI IMPROVE ITS SUPPORT TO REGIONAL AGRICULTURE IN LIGHT OF THE BINDING CONSTRAINTS ?
FINDINGS OF TWO DAY WORKSHOP ON THE WAY FORWARD FOR CARIBBEAN AGRICULTURE(12/08)
10
Majority of agricultural personnel in Min. of Agriculture, agencies, private sector are UWI graduates(a success)
However, THE NUMBER being trained has declined over the years. Possible reasons???
Decline of agriculture in the region Rising cost of UWI training Increase in scholarship grants at foreign
institutions(eg Cuba)
STAKEHOLDERS VIEWS
11
Widespread perception that UWI students have good theoretical knowledge but often lack the practical competencies to function in the current caribbean agricultural environment
STAKEHOLDERS VIEWS
12
Graduates have not seen themselves as agricultural entrepreneurs which in part has led to the decline of agriculture in the region
Graduates not nurtured in an innovative environment and hence incapable of functioning in an innovation based society-creating innovation, technology development and having the entrepreneurial skills ,support and confidence to establish successful SME’s and add value along the agri-food change
STAKEHOLDERS VIEWS
13
The curriculum has not adequately changed to reflect the changing global environment, changing regional agricultural realities, or the changing S&T environment
UWI degrees have not set themselves philosophically apart from those offered by the other technical institutions
Programmes provide limited opportunities to learn from real life problem situations(internships, inter-institutional research programmes etc)
STAKEHOLDERS VIEWS
14
Inadequate MSc programme offerings to meet the needs of a modern regional agricultural system
MSc programmes not stakeholder driven
Need for more short courses delivered by the distance mode
Need to train more extension personnel
Research degrees should be based on practical problems or incubator models
STAKEHOLDERS VIEWS(POSTGRADUATE PROGRAMMES)
15
According to CARICOM:
UWI’S MANDATE- Human Resource Development
CARDI’S MANDATE- R&D
This contradicts with global realities where successful agri-enterprises are developed through multidisciplinary research teams and University –private sector collaboration
STAKEHOLDERS VIEWS
16
Lack of strong links with other CARICOM states (St. Augustine campus- a T&T focus)
Research not prioritized
Research not stakeholder-driven, not readily adoptable, not transmitted to end users
Research not along the entire agri-food chain
STAKEHOLDERS VIEWS(Research, Innovation and Outreach
17
Withdrawal of outreach personnel from the various CARICOM territories without a suitable alternative system
Research has not adequately incorporated futuristic technologies (gene technology, nanotechnology)in their research agenda
STAKEHOLDERS VIEWS
18
Graduate students not functioning in an innovation based environment, lacks entrepreneurial training
Graduate students do not perform well in multidisciplinary teams
STAKEHOLDERS VIEWS
19
UWI does not support the continuous education and training of agricultural officers or farmers
Inadequate distance programmes for further education and training
Lack of frequent regional workshops bringing experts from various fields to address problems faced in the region
STAKEHOLDERS VIEWS (Short Courses)
20
UWI should be actively involved in analysis of global and regional food and technology issues ,innovation policy, land policy or sustainability issues etc and provide policy support to CARICOM governments
Lack of services in sanitary/phytosanitary diagnostic services, certification services, regulatory systems etc
Lack of active involvement in commodity groups
STAKEHOLDERS VIEWS( Policy/industry support)
21
PROGRESS BEING MADE IN ADDRESSING
THESE BINDING CONSTRAINTS AND STAKEHOLDERS PERCEPTION
22
Could the present structure and
available
resources effectively respond to these
challenges?
Restructring the SOA
23
The Present structure:
o Two Departments—o Food Productiono Agricultural Economics and
Extension(teaching also human nutrition and dietetics and human ecology)
Restructuring the SOA
24
THE PROPOSED STRUCTURE Director Departments of : Livestock Science and TechnologyCrop Science and TechnologyAgribusiness and ExtensionFood and Nutritional SciencesNatural Resource Management
Restructuring the SOA to better respond to these challenges
25
THE TROPICAL AGRICULTURE AND NATURAL RESOURCE RESEARCH INSTITUTE(Multidisciplinary research centre )
This restructuring was approved at Faculty Board/Academic Board and Campus F&GPC levels
Post of Director has been advertised at the professorial level and short list is being prepared.
RESTRUCTING THE SOA (The proposed Structure)
26
It was agreed that the director should have an input before the rest of the restructuring process is continued.
Restructuring the SOA
27
Bridging the disconnect between the Faculty of Engineering and the SOA-critical to coordinated research along the agrifood chain
The resources in Agricultural Engineering and Food Science and Technology(currently housed in FE) must be harnessed to work in sync with(integral part of) the SOA along the entire agri-food chain rather than as independent units without a common vision as occurs at present.(Principal/Deans have agreed in principle on the way foward)
Restructuring the SOA
28
Integrating the Cocoa Research Unit into the mainstream of the FSA operations .(More UGC funding would be required)
The CRU must now play a key role in providing technical support for the revitalization of the region’s cocoa industry as well as in creating value added products(Progress has started in this context)
Restructuring the SOA
29
RECALL:
Stakeholders have been highly critical of the agriculture curriculum as well as the skills and competencies of our graduates.
Graduates lack hands on experience-too theoretical
Progress Being Made (Curriculum Reform)
30
Infusion of internships in all agriculture programmes(currently the case).However, longer internship periods required
Internships being carried out in conjunction with stakeholders in the other CARICOM region (a challenge)
Serious challenge finding appropriate placements for the large number of agribusiness/agribusiness and human nutrition and dietetics as well as general agriculture students.
Progress Being Made (Curriculum Reform)
31
Length of internships need to be increased if it is going to have the desired effect.
Urgent need to move towards a four year degree programme
To effect meaningful curriculum would require significant funding for increased staffing in critical areas(eg biotechnology) as well as to upgrade the current poor laboratory facilities.
Progress Being Made (Curriculum Reform)
32
Practical skills course will no longer be confined solely to activities in the laboratories and on the University Field Station
Involvement of other stakeholders in the provision of “On Farm Training Activities ‘ of our students. (E.g. Tucker Valley Mega Farm training to commence in September,09)
Progress Being Made (Curriculum Reform)
33
New major in Tropical Landscaping from 2009
New MSc programmes in Tropical Horticulture and Biotechnology drafted and ready for approval
Other programmes being drafted include programmes in aquaponics, protected agriculture and organic farming
Progress Being Made (Curriculum Reform )
34
Criticism of SOA: Lack of outreach to other CARICOM countries
MOU with Ministry of Agriculture, Grenadao Assistance with the revitalization of their
cocoa and nutmeg industry in progress
o Upgrading of their human resource at the graduate level in specific areas at the MSc, MPhil and PhD levels. Students time will be spent between Grenada and FSA.
Progress Being Made(Greater Stakeholder Involvement)
35
MOU with CDA/Tucker Valley Mega Farm Project
Training of undergraduate students on the Mega Farm
Graduate students to pursue research projects specifically related to the Mega Farm
Collaboration in the commercialization of research done at UWI
eg production of cow pea for the school feeding programme(already in progress)-a significant achievement
Greater Stakeholder Involvement
36
Working with Caroni (1975 Ltd) in providing technical assistance in developing the 7,500 two acre farms for displaced Caroni workers
MOU with EMPRAPA(final stages).
MOU with the Guangdong Academy of Agricultural Sciences (China).This is expected to have significant impact on crop production as well as development of the UFS and the Orange Grove lands
Stakeholder Involvement
37
AGRITECH-EXPO( 04/08)
Conference on “overcoming challenges to developing a sustainable agri-food systems in the caribbean(12/08)
Caribbean workshop at arriving at a consensus on the way forward for caribbean agriculture(12/08)
Involvement in World Food Day and Candle light vigil (FAO, Min.of Agri.,10/08)
Progress being made (Stakeholder involvement)
38
Urgent need for the establishment of a “Regional Centre for research on food policy”
CARICOM mandate for UWI should be for HR development as well as research ,development and innovation.
CARDI should be the effective link between UWI and the ministries of agriculture/farmers(Dean and Executive Director has agreed in principle to this approach)
Progress Being Made (Policy )
39
Full support /team effort of the other campuses involvement in various aspects of agricultural training if we are to seriously address these challenges
Greater involvement of scientists form the three campuses in agricultural research, development and innovation- but must be strategic and forward -thinking(foresigthing)
Exploiting the resources of CACHE Working in sync with all national innovation
centres
Urgent Needs (Increase in Critical Mass)
40
Need to develop a triple helix model in which the governments, the private sector and the R&D institutions play a role towards developing a strategic, forward looking knowledge driven and technology based agricultutural sector. The governance model should be increasingly private sector driven but with collaboration with R&D institutions or innovation centres that can provide the necessary science and technology input to make the industry successful. The governments have the important role in providing an enabling environment for private sector investment
Conclusion