vibration_course_section1
DESCRIPTION
Vibration_Course_Section1TRANSCRIPT
Noise and Vibration Control
UG Course Noise and Vibration ControlCourse Objectives:To provide the student with a basic understanding of fundamental
concepts in noise and vibration control engineering. This would enable the student to analyze sound fields and to
determine the effects of different noise sources in machinery and engineered products with respect to human behavior and safety.
To be able to utilize these concepts in order to design machines or products that are quiet and functional
To be able to identify and correct potentially hazardous sound levels in the workplace or in any other noisy environment.
Credits: 4 Weekly Engagement: 3-1-2/2 Course Teacher: VHS
Indian Institute of Technology Roorkee
Noise and Vibration Control
References:Mats Abom et al, Sound and Vibration, KTH, Stockholm, 2006.S S Rao, Mechanical Vibration, (4th Edition) Pearson Education, Delhi, 2004.J S Rao and K Gupta, Theory and Practice of Mechanical Vibration, (2nd Edition) New Age International Publishers, New Delhi, 1999.de Silva, Vibration: Fundamentals and Practice, (2nd Edition) CRC Taylor & Francis, FL USA, 2007.Fahy, F.J. and Walker, J.G.,’ Fundamentals of Noise and Vibration, E & FN, Spon, 1998
Indian Institute of Technology Roorkee 2/58
Noise and Vibration Control
Contents:
Review of Vibration Fundamentals from a Practical Perspective.
Structural DampingExpanded Understanding of Vibration Isolation.Sounds in Ducts. Industrial Noise and Vibration Control. Fluid Machine Noise and Vibration Control.Noise and Vibration in Pipes and Ducts. Vehicle Noise and Vibration Control.Active Noise and Vibration Control.
Case Study.
Indian Institute of Technology Roorkee 3/58
Noise and Vibration Control
1. Review of Vibration fundamentals from a practical perspective
Indian Institute of Technology Roorkee 4/58
Noise and Vibration Control
Need for study
All mechanical systems composed of mass, stiffness and damping elements exhibit vibratory response when subject to time-varying disturbances. The prediction and control of these disturbances is fundamental to the design and operation of mechanical equipment.
Indian Institute of Technology Roorkee5/58
Noise and Vibration Control
Terminology
Mechanical system. A mechanical system is composed of distributed elements which exhibit characteristics of mass, elasticity and damping.Degrees of freedom. The number of degrees of freedom of a system is equal to the number of independent coordinate positions required to completely describe the motionof the system.System response. All mechanical systems exhibit some form of vibratory response when excited by either internal or external forces. This motion may be irregular or mayrepeat itself at regular intervals, in which case it is called periodic motion.Period. The period T is the time taken for one complete cycle of motion.
Indian Institute of Technology Roorkee6/58
Noise and Vibration Control
Terminology
Harmonic motion is the simplest form of periodic motion whereby the actual or observed motion can be represented by oscillatory functions such as the sine and the cosine functions. Motion that can be described by a continuous sine or cosine function is called steady state.
Frequency is the number of cycles per second (also called hertz) of the motion and is the reciprocal of the period. Therefore frequency is specified by
Indian Institute of Technology Roorkee7/58
Noise and Vibration Control
Examples of SDOF
Indian Institute of Technology Roorkee8/58
Noise and Vibration Control
Examples of SDOF
Translatory
Rotatory
Flexural
swinging
Indian Institute of Technology Roorkee9/58
Noise and Vibration Control
Review of Vibration fundamentals
Single degree of freedom
The common techniques for the analysis are1. The energy method, 2. Newton's law of motion,3. The frequency response method4. The superposition theorem
Indian Institute of Technology Roorkee10/58
Noise and Vibration Control
Single Degree of Freedom Systems
Figure 2 shows a mechanical single degree-of-freedom (“sdof”) system consisting of a rigid mass m, a spring with spring rate k, and a viscous damper with a damping coefficient dv. The spring and the viscous damper are located between the mass and the foundation, and are considered to be massless. That implies that the forces on the opposing endpoints of each are equal and oppositely directed, for both elements.
κ dv
m
x(t)F (t)
Figure 2 Single Degree-of-Freedom System.
Indian Institute of Technology Roorkee 11/58
Noise and Vibration Control
Newton’s Second Law gives the equation of motion of the system
),)(),(()(2
2t
dttdxtxF
dttxdm x=
Fx contains the spring force, the damper force, and external exciting force
(7)
)()()( tFdt
tdxdtxF vx +−−= κ (8)
where m is mass of the body, κ is the spring constant, dv is the viscous damping coefficient, F(t) is the external excitation, x is the displacement of the mass, dx / dt its velocity, d 2x / dt2 its acceleration. These two equations lead to a second order linear differential equation with constant coefficients
)()()(2)( 202
2tgtx
dttdx
dttxd
=++ ωδ (9)
Indian Institute of Technology Roorkee 12/58
Noise and Vibration Control
in which the following simplifications have been incorporated:
mtFtg )()( =mκω =0 mdv 2=δ (10)
where ω0 is the eigenfrequency of the system, and δ is the damping constant. The solution to the differential equation consists of both a homogeneous part xp(t) that corresponds to the homogeneous differential equation, i.e., with the right hand side equal to zero, and a particular solution xp(t) that corresponds to the non-homogeneous differential equation, i.e., with the right hand side non-zero.
)()()( txtxtx ph += (11)
Because the system is linear, its particular solution, when the exciting force is described by the rotating vector Eq.(12), represents an oscillation at the excitation frequency, but with a different phase and amplitude. A reasonable assumption for xp is given by Eq.(13),
Indian Institute of Technology Roorkee 13/58
Noise and Vibration Control
tiegt ωˆ)( =gti
ptii
pp eeext ωωϕ xx ˆˆ)( ==
(12)
(13)
That assumed form, substituted into Eq.(9), provides the following result:
titip
tip
tip egeeie ωωωω ωδωω ˆˆˆ2ˆ 2
02 =++− xxx
The phase and magnitude of the complex amplitude px̂ is given by
δωωω 2)(
ˆˆ22
0 ig
p+−
=x
ϕipp exx ˆˆ =
(14)
(15)
(16)
Indian Institute of Technology Roorkee 14/58
Noise and Vibration Control
22220 )2()(
ˆˆδωωω +−
=g
px (17)
πωω
δωϕ n+−
=20
22arctan , n = 0, 1, 2, … (18)
• From Eqs.(10) and (15), it is apparent that forω « ω0, the stiffness κ determines the displacement. Thus, the low frequency response is stiffness-controlled.
• On the other hand, for ω » ω0, the mass m determines the displacement response; the high frequency response, therefore, is mass-controlled.
• Finally, for ω ≈ ω0, the value of the viscous damping coefficient dν is decisive for the displacement; the response at frequencies around the natural frequency is therefore said to be damping-controlled.
Indian Institute of Technology Roorkee 15/58
Noise and Vibration Control
The magnitude of the amplitude px̂ varies with circular frequency ω.
A normalized response, called the amplification factor φ, can be defined as
)0(ˆ)(ˆ
==
ω
ωφ
p
p
x
x⇒
20
20
220 )()(4))(1(
1
ωωωδωωφ
+−= (19)
Indian Institute of Technology Roorkee 16/58
Noise and Vibration Control
Two degree-of-freedom systems• The simple single degree-of-freedom system can be coupled to another of its kind, producing a mechanical system described by two coupleddifferential equations; to each mass, there is a corresponding equation of motion. • To specify the state of the system at any instant, we need to know time tdependence of both coordinates, x1 and x2, from which follows the designation two degree-of-freedom system.
m 1 m 2
x 1 ( t) x 2 ( t)
F 1 ( t) F 2 ( t)κ 1
d v 1
κ 2
d v 2
κ 3
d v 3
Figure 3 Two degree--of-freedom system.
Indian Institute of Technology Roorkee 17/58
Noise and Vibration Control
Newton’s second law for each mass gives
⎟⎠
⎞⎜⎝
⎛= t
dttdx
dttdx
txtxFdt
txdm x ,
)(,
)(),(),(
)( 212112
12
1 …20
⎟⎠
⎞⎜⎝
⎛= t
dttdx
dttdx
txtxFdt
txdm x ,
)(,
)(),(),(
)( 212122
22
2 …21
)()()()(
))()(()( 121
21
1212111 tFdt
tdxdt
tdxd
dttdx
dtxtxtxFx +⎟⎠
⎞⎜⎝
⎛ −−−−−−= ννκκ
…22
)()()()(
)())()(( 22
321
2232122 tFdt
tdxd
dttdx
dttdx
dtxtxtxF x +−⎟⎠
⎞⎜⎝
⎛ −+−−= ννκκ
…23
Indian Institute of Technology Roorkee 18/58
Noise and Vibration Control
Equations (20) - (23) give
+⎟⎟⎠
⎞⎜⎜⎝
⎛−++
dttdx
dttdx
ddt
tdxd
dt
txdm
)()()()( 212
112
12
1 νν
( ) )()()()( 121211 tFtxtxtx =−++ κκ …24
−+⎟⎟⎠
⎞⎜⎜⎝
⎛−−
dttdx
ddt
tdxdt
tdxd
dt
txdm
)()()()( 23
2122
22
2 νν
)()())()(( 223212 tFtxtxtx =+−− κκ …25
Matrix and vector notation can be incorporated into Eqs. (24) and (25), which is useful for generalizing to an arbitrary number of degrees-of-freedom.
Indian Institute of Technology Roorkee 19/58
Noise and Vibration Control
Equations (24) and (25) are therefore expressed as
[ ] [ ] [ ] Fxdtxd
dtxd rr
rr
=⋅+⋅+⋅ KDM2
2
where
[ ] ⎥⎦
⎤⎢⎣
⎡=
2
10
0m
mM …27
…26
[ ] ⎥⎦
⎤⎢⎣
⎡+−
−+=
322
221
ννν
νννddd
dddD …28
[ ] ⎥⎦
⎤⎢⎣
⎡+−
−+=
322
221κκκ
κκκK …29
⎭⎬⎫
⎩⎨⎧
=)()(
)(2
1txtx
txr
…30
Indian Institute of Technology Roorkee 20/58
Noise and Vibration Control
⎭⎬⎫
⎩⎨⎧
=)()(
)(2
1tFtF
tFr
Once again, let the excitation forces and the particular solutions be expressed by rotating vectors
tiet ω11
ˆ)( FF =
…31
…32tiet ω
22ˆ)( FF = …33
tiet ω1p1p xx ˆ)( =
tiet ωpp xx 22 ˆ)( =
Putting (32,33,34,35) into (26) gives
…34
…35
[ ] { } [ ] { } [ ] { } { }FxKxDxM ˆˆˆˆ2 =⋅+⋅+⋅− ppp iωω …36
Indian Institute of Technology Roorkee 21/58
Noise and Vibration Control
Solving to the homogeneous equations with the force vector set equal to zero leads to the system’s eigenfrequencies. Setting, moreover, the damping matrix equal to zero, in order to obtain the undamped eigenfrequencies, the latter are found to be real. Damping, on the other hand, brings about complex-valued eigenfrequencies; the complex values contain information on both the undamped eigenfrequencies and the system damping. The eigenfrequencies ω1 and ω2 are given by the homogeneous equation
[ ] { } [ ] { } { }0ˆˆ2 =⋅+⋅− xKxMω …37
The condition for the existence of solutions to Eq. (37) is that the system determinant is identically zero, i.e.,
[ ] [ ] 0)det( 2 =+− KMω …38
Indian Institute of Technology Roorkee 22/58
Noise and Vibration Control
For a two degree-of-freedom system, Eq. (38) has two solutions corresponding to two eigenfrequencies. A system with n degrees-of-freedom has n eigenfrequencies. The eigenfrequencies of the two degree-of-freedom system are
( ) ( )21
32312122
22
232
21
221
2
32
1
212,1 24422 mmmmmm
κκκκκκκκκκκκκκκω
−−−+
++
+±
++
+=
…39
From linear algebra, it is known that there is an eigenvector corresponding to each eigenvalue (eigenfrequency). These eigenvectors are mutually independent (orthogonal), and contain information on how the system oscillates in the vicinity of their respective eigenfrequencies. The mode shapes, x1 and x2, are obtained by substituting the eigenfrequencies, i.e., the solutions of Eq. (38), into Eq. (37), yielding
Indian Institute of Technology Roorkee 23/58
Noise and Vibration Control
[ ] { } [ ] { } { }0ˆˆ 1121 =⋅+⋅− xKxMω …40
[ ] { } [ ] { } { }0ˆˆ 2222 =⋅+⋅− xKxMω …41
Indian Institute of Technology Roorkee 24/58
Noise and Vibration Control
System with an arbitrary number of degrees-of-freedom
The results from the two degree-of-freedom system can be generalized to a system with an arbitrary number of masses cascaded, i.e., coupled in series, as in Figure 5-5.
m1
x1(t)
m2
x2(t)
F1(t) F2(t) κ1
dv1
κ2
dv2
κn+1
dvn+1
mn
xn(t)
• • •
Fn(t)
Figure 5 System with n cascaded masses
Indian Institute of Technology Roorkee 25/58
Noise and Vibration Control
The equations of motion become
+⎟⎟⎠
⎞⎜⎜⎝
⎛−++
dttdx
dttdx
ddt
tdxd
dt
txdm
)()()()( 212
112
12
1 νν
( ) )()()()( 121211 tFtxtxtx =−++ κκ …42
−⎟⎟⎠
⎞⎜⎜⎝
⎛−+⎟⎟
⎠
⎞⎜⎜⎝
⎛−−
dttdx
dttdx
ddt
tdxdt
tdxd
dt
txdm
)()()()()( 323
2122
22
2 νν
…43,)())()(())()(( 2323212 tFtxtxtxtx =−+−− κκ
−⎟⎟⎠
⎞⎜⎜⎝
⎛−+⎟⎟
⎠
⎞⎜⎜⎝
⎛−− −−−
−−
− dttdx
dttdx
ddt
tdxdt
tdxd
dt
txdm nn
nnn
nn
n)()()()()( 112
121
2
1 νν
,)())()(())()(( 11121 tFtxtxtxtx nnnnnnn −−−−− =−+−− κκ …44
Indian Institute of Technology Roorkee 26/58
Noise and Vibration Control
+⎟⎟⎠
⎞⎜⎜⎝
⎛−++ −
+ dttdx
dttdx
ddt
tdxd
dt
txdm nn
nn
nn
n)()()()( 1
12
2
νν
( ) .)()()()( 11 tFtxtxtx nnnnnn =−++ −+ κκ …45
The mass matrix, damping matrix, and stiffness matrix, respectively, become
[ ]⎥⎥⎥⎥
⎦
⎤
⎢⎢⎢⎢
⎣
⎡
=
nm
mm
0000
0000
2
1
L
OM
M
L
M …46
Indian Institute of Technology Roorkee 27/58
Noise and Vibration Control
Indian Institute of Technology Roorkee
[ ]
⎥⎥⎥⎥⎥⎥⎥⎥
⎦
⎤
⎢⎢⎢⎢⎢⎢⎢⎢
⎣
⎡
+−⋅⋅⋅−+−⋅⋅
⋅•••⋅⋅⋅⋅••−⋅⋅−+−⋅⋅⋅−+
=
+
−−
1
11
3
3322
221
00
00
0
nnn
nnnnddd
dddd
ddddd
ddd
ννν
νννν
ν
νννν
ννν
D …47
[ ]
⎥⎥⎥⎥⎥⎥⎥⎥
⎦
⎤
⎢⎢⎢⎢⎢⎢⎢⎢
⎣
⎡
+−⋅⋅⋅−+−⋅⋅
⋅•••⋅⋅⋅⋅••−⋅⋅−+−⋅⋅⋅−+
=
+
−−
1
11
3
3322
221
00
00
0
nnn
nnnnκκκ
κκκκ
κκκκκ
κκκ
K …48
28/58
Noise and Vibration Control
where non-zero elements not shown in the equations are marked with a •, and zero-valued elements are marked with a ⋅. One can even allow masses to be coupled in parallel, as in Figure 6.
m 1
x 1( t)
F 1( t)κ 1
d v 1
m 4
x 4( t)
F 4( t) κ 6
d v 6
κ 2
d v 2 κ 3
d v 3
κ 4
d v 4
κ 5
d v 5
m 2
m 3
F 2( t)
F 3( t)
x 3( t)
x 2( t)
Figure 6 System with parallel coupling
Indian Institute of Technology Roorkee 29/58
Noise and Vibration Control
The equations of motion become
+⎟⎟⎠
⎞⎜⎜⎝
⎛−++
dttdx
dttdx
ddt
tdxd
dt
txdm
)()()()( 212
112
12
1 νν
( )+−++⎟⎟⎠
⎞⎜⎜⎝
⎛−+ )()()(
)()(21211
313 txtxtx
dttdx
dttdx
d κκν
( ) ,)()()( 1313 tFtxtx =−+ κ …49
−⎟⎟⎠
⎞⎜⎜⎝
⎛−+⎟⎟
⎠
⎞⎜⎜⎝
⎛−−
dttdx
dttdx
ddt
tdxdt
tdxd
dt
txdm
)()()()()( 424
2122
22
2 νν
…50,)())()(())()(( 2424212 tFtxtxtxtx =−+−− κκ
Indian Institute of Technology Roorkee 30/58
Noise and Vibration Control
−⎟⎟⎠
⎞⎜⎜⎝
⎛−+⎟⎟
⎠
⎞⎜⎜⎝
⎛−−
dttdx
dttdx
ddt
tdxdt
tdxd
dt
txdm
)()()()()( 435
3132
32
3 νν
,)())()(())()(( 3435313 tFtxtxtxtx =−+−− κκ …51
+⎟⎟⎠
⎞⎜⎜⎝
⎛−++
dttdx
dttdx
ddt
tdxd
dt
txdm
)()()()( 244
462
42
4 νν
( )+−++⎟⎟⎠
⎞⎜⎜⎝
⎛−+ )()()(
)()(24456
345 txtxtx
dttdx
dttdx
d κκν
( ) .)()()( 4345 tFtxtx =−+ κ …52
Indian Institute of Technology Roorkee 31/58
Noise and Vibration Control
The mass matrix, damping matrix and stiffness matrix, respectively, become
[ ]⎥⎥⎥⎥
⎦
⎤
⎢⎢⎢⎢
⎣
⎡
=
4
3
2
1
000000000000
mm
mm
M …53
[ ]⎥⎥⎥⎥
⎦
⎤
⎢⎢⎢⎢
⎣
⎡
++−−−+−−+−
−−++
=
65454
5533
4422
32321
00
00
ννννν
νννν
νννν
ννννν
ddddddddddddd
ddddd
D …54
[ ]⎥⎥⎥⎥
⎦
⎤
⎢⎢⎢⎢
⎣
⎡
++−−−+−−+−
−−++
=
65454
5533
4422
32321
00
00
κκκκκκκκκκκκκ
κκκκκ
K …55
Indian Institute of Technology Roorkee 32/58
Noise and Vibration Control
The general principle for generating these matrices, for systems in which the directions of forces and velocities are defined as in figures 5 and 6, can be summarized in the following way:
(i) the mass matrix is diagonal.
(ii) a diagonal element in the stiffness or damping matrix is the sum of the spring rates or damping coefficients, respectively, of all springs / dampers connected to the mass indicated by the row number of theelement.
(iii) an off-diagonal element at a specific row and column position in the stiffness or damping matrix has the opposite (negative) of the value of the spring rate or damping coefficient, respectively, for the connection between the mass indicated by the row number and that indicated by the column number.
Indian Institute of Technology Roorkee 33/58
Noise and Vibration Control
Free motion of SDOF systems
Based upon the observation that mechanical systems respond harmonically in freemotion, the solution of equation can be assumed to be of the form given b equation Therefore we assume that the actual motion can be described as
where Ar and A are real amplitudes of motion.Substitution of equation differentiating with respect totime and eliminating common terms, provides a relation for the frequency ton at which the system will naturally vibrate.
Indian Institute of Technology Roorkee 34/58
Noise and Vibration Control
Free motion of SDOF systems
This motion can also be written as
the phase angle is specified from equation
amplitude of motion that results from equation
Indian Institute of Technology Roorkee 35/58
Noise and Vibration Control
Damped motion of SDOF systems
All vibrations in realistic systems occur with some form of damping mechanism, where the energy of vibration is dissipated during a cycle of motion. The simplest form of damping is when the resisting force associated with the damping is proportional to, and acts in an opposite direction to, the velocity of the element. Thus the damping force isspecified by
where C is the damping coefficient. SDOF system with this form of damping which is called viscous damping.
Indian Institute of Technology Roorkee 36/58
Noise and Vibration Control
Damped motion of SDOF systems
response will oscillate at a damped natural frequency
The actual displacement is then given by
where the phase angle is now given by
and the real amplitude by
Indian Institute of Technology Roorkee 37/58
Noise and Vibration Control
Inclusion of damping into the relationship for the forced response modifies the resulting amplitude to
Indian Institute of Technology Roorkee 38/58
Noise and Vibration Control
The corresponding phase response is plotted in Fig. For very light damping the phase of the displacement response relative to the excitation force of the system flips through nearly a 180 ° phase change as the excitation frequency is increased through the resonance frequency.
Indian Institute of Technology Roorkee 39/58
Noise and Vibration Control
Multi-degree-of-freedom (MDOF) systems
When N independent coordinates are required to completely specify the system response, the system is said to have N degrees of freedom. Such a system is also said to have multi-degrees of freedom (MDOF). When a mechanical system has many degrees of freedom it is more convenient to use a matrix representation to describe and analysesthe motion. In this section we formulate the equations of motion in matrix form.
Indian Institute of Technology Roorkee 40/58
Noise and Vibration Control
Adding Mass, Stiffness and DampingAn increase in the systems stiffness reduces the displacement amplitude proportionately. An increase in k of course implies an increased value of but this makes the approximation even more valid. At such a low frequency, any increase in the damping will have a negligible effect.
Indian Institute of Technology Roorkee 41/58
Noise and Vibration Control
Adding Mass Stiffness and Damping
Increase in the system mass (inertia) reduces the displacement amplitude proportionately. It may again be noted that an increase in m makes the approximationeven more valid. An increment in the Damping will have a negligible effect in the displacement amplitude in this range of frequency as well. This high-frequency range is termed as the inertia-controlled region.
Indian Institute of Technology Roorkee 42/58
Noise and Vibration Control
Adding Mass Stiffness and Damping
Indian Institute of Technology Roorkee 43/58
Noise and Vibration Control
Energy storage elements
Inertia (m)Consider an inertia element of lumped mass excited by force as shown in Figure. The resulting velocity is v.
Newton's second law gives
Kinetic energy stored is
Indian Institute of Technology Roorkee 44/58
Noise and Vibration Control
Spring (K)
Consider a massless spring element of lumped stiffness k , as shown in Figure One end of the spring is fixed and the other end is free. A force ‘f’ is applied at the free end
By hookes law
Elastic potential energy
Indian Institute of Technology Roorkee 45/58
Noise and Vibration Control
Gravitational potential energy
The work done in raising an object against the gravitationalenergy of the object. Consider a lumped mass as shownfrom some reference level.
Indian Institute of Technology Roorkee 46/58
Noise and Vibration Control
The Energy Method
A vibrating system is said to be conservative if, damper and external excitations are absent from the system interval's when a conservative s systems set into oscillatory motion, the mechanical energy is partly kinetic and partly potential. the kinetic energy is stored in mass due to its velocity
Indian Institute of Technology Roorkee 47/58
Noise and Vibration Control
The Energy Method
kinetic energy in Newtonian notations is
Indian Institute of Technology Roorkee 48/58
Noise and Vibration Control
The Energy Method
As is clear from the figure, the total deflection produced in the unstrained spring , work done is
the total work done in deforming the spring from
potential energy of the system is
Indian Institute of Technology Roorkee 49/58
Noise and Vibration Control
The Energy Method
the total energy in the conservative system
Differentiating with respect to time
Homogeneous second-order ordinary differential equation of motion
Indian Institute of Technology Roorkee 50/58
Noise and Vibration Control
Method Based on Newton's Second Law of Motion
The rate of change of momentum is proportional to the impressed force and takes place in the direction in which the force acts
Indian Institute of Technology Roorkee 51/58
Noise and Vibration Control
Rayleigh's MethodSince the sum of kinetic and potential energies always constant it follows from the energy method that the potential energy is maximum when the kinetic energy is zero and conversely when the kinetic energy is maximum, the potential energy must be zero.
Indian Institute of Technology Roorkee 52/58
Noise and Vibration Control
Checklist of vibration control means
Indian Institute of Technology Roorkee 53/58
Noise and Vibration Control
Checklist of vibration control means
Indian Institute of Technology Roorkee 54/58
Noise and Vibration Control
LAGRANGE'S EQUATIONSNo vibrations discussion is complete without a discussion of Lagrange's equations. All of you have already taken a dynamics class or two, which in the vast majority of cases has involved Newtonian mechanics.
Indian Institute of Technology Roorkee 55/58
Noise and Vibration Control
LAGRANGE'S EQUATIONS
LAGRANGE'S EQUATIONS is giving by
Indian Institute of Technology Roorkee 56/58
Noise and Vibration Control
LAGRANGE'S EQUATIONS
where KE and PE are the system kinetic and potential energies, respectively, and L is called the Lagrangian
Indian Institute of Technology Roorkee 57/58
Noise and Vibration Control
Thank you
Indian Institute of Technology Roorkee58/58