ventricular depolarization in ischemic heart disease.value

114
Ventricular Depolarization in Ischemic Heart Disease.Value of Electrocardiography in Assessment of Severity and Extent of Acute Myocardial Ischemia. Ringborn, Michael 2013 Link to publication Citation for published version (APA): Ringborn, M. (2013). Ventricular Depolarization in Ischemic Heart Disease.Value of Electrocardiography in Assessment of Severity and Extent of Acute Myocardial Ischemia. Cardiology. Total number of authors: 1 General rights Unless other specific re-use rights are stated the following general rights apply: Copyright and moral rights for the publications made accessible in the public portal are retained by the authors and/or other copyright owners and it is a condition of accessing publications that users recognise and abide by the legal requirements associated with these rights. • Users may download and print one copy of any publication from the public portal for the purpose of private study or research. • You may not further distribute the material or use it for any profit-making activity or commercial gain • You may freely distribute the URL identifying the publication in the public portal Read more about Creative commons licenses: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/ Take down policy If you believe that this document breaches copyright please contact us providing details, and we will remove access to the work immediately and investigate your claim. Download date: 18. Oct. 2021

Upload: others

Post on 18-Oct-2021

15 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: Ventricular Depolarization in Ischemic Heart Disease.Value

LUND UNIVERSITY

PO Box 117221 00 Lund+46 46-222 00 00

Ventricular Depolarization in Ischemic Heart Disease.Value of Electrocardiography inAssessment of Severity and Extent of Acute Myocardial Ischemia.

Ringborn, Michael

2013

Link to publication

Citation for published version (APA):Ringborn, M. (2013). Ventricular Depolarization in Ischemic Heart Disease.Value of Electrocardiography inAssessment of Severity and Extent of Acute Myocardial Ischemia. Cardiology.

Total number of authors:1

General rightsUnless other specific re-use rights are stated the following general rights apply:Copyright and moral rights for the publications made accessible in the public portal are retained by the authorsand/or other copyright owners and it is a condition of accessing publications that users recognise and abide by thelegal requirements associated with these rights. • Users may download and print one copy of any publication from the public portal for the purpose of private studyor research. • You may not further distribute the material or use it for any profit-making activity or commercial gain • You may freely distribute the URL identifying the publication in the public portal

Read more about Creative commons licenses: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/Take down policyIf you believe that this document breaches copyright please contact us providing details, and we will removeaccess to the work immediately and investigate your claim.

Download date: 18. Oct. 2021

Page 2: Ventricular Depolarization in Ischemic Heart Disease.Value
Page 3: Ventricular Depolarization in Ischemic Heart Disease.Value

Ventricular Depolarization in Ischemic Heart Disease

Value of Electrocardiography in Assessment of

Severity and Extent of Acute Myocardial Ischemia

Michael Ringborn, MD

Doctoral Thesis

2013

Department of Cardiology Clinical Sciences, Lund

Faculty of Medicine Lund University

Sweden

Page 4: Ventricular Depolarization in Ischemic Heart Disease.Value

The public defense of this thesis will, with due permission from the Faculty of Medicine at Lund University, take place at Segerfalksalen, Wallenberg Neurocentrum, BMC, on Friday 5 April 2013, at 9:30 a.m. Cover: Myocardial perfusion single photon emission computed tomography (SPECT) images from patients in the STAFF III population representing occlusion of right coronary artery (RCA), left anterior descending artery (LAD) and left circumflex coronary artery (LCX), respectively (from left to right). Examples of ECG-analysis methods applied in this thesis; high-frequency QRS components (HF-QRS), QRS-slopes as well as standard ECG. ISSN 1652-8220 ISBN 978-91-87449-10-9 Lund University, Faculty of Medicine Doctoral Dissertation Series 2013:40 Department of Cardiology, Skåne University Hospital, Lund SE-221 85 LUND, Sweden Clinical Sciences, Lund University, Center for Integrative Electrocardiology at Lund University (CIEL), LUND, Sweden Thoracic Center, KARLSKRONA, Sweden Printed by: Printfabriken, KARLSKRONA, Sweden Copyright © Michael Ringborn 2013 [email protected]

Page 5: Ventricular Depolarization in Ischemic Heart Disease.Value

This thesis is dedicated to my dear wife Helena and our wonderful children William, Hugo and Ella.

Page 6: Ventricular Depolarization in Ischemic Heart Disease.Value
Page 7: Ventricular Depolarization in Ischemic Heart Disease.Value
Page 8: Ventricular Depolarization in Ischemic Heart Disease.Value

v

Table of contents

List of original publications .................................................................... viiiAbstract ....................................................................................................... ixSammanfattning på svenska ..................................................................... xiAbbreviations ........................................................................................... xiv1 Introduction ........................................................................................... 1

1.1 Ischemic heart disease .............................................................................. 11.1.1 Epidemiology ...................................................................................... 11.1.2 Pathophysiology .................................................................................. 21.1.2.1 Coronary arteriosclerotic plaque formation ........................................ 21.1.2.2 Ischemia on the myocardial cell level ................................................. 21.1.3 Clinical manifestations and classification of ischemic heart disease .. 31.1.4 Diagnosis of acute MI ......................................................................... 41.1.5 Acute management and treatment of STEMI ...................................... 51.1.6 Determinants of final infarct size ........................................................ 61.1.6.1 Myocardium at risk (MaR) .................................................................. 61.1.6.2 Myocardial protection and severity of ischemia ................................. 6

1.2 Anatomy, electrophysiology and myocardial ischemia ......................... 81.2.1 Basic electrophysiological principles .................................................. 81.2.1.1 Electrophysiology at the cellular level: the action potential ............... 81.2.1.2 Ventricular propagation of the depolarization wavefront ................. 101.2.2 Electrocardiography (ECG) ............................................................... 121.2.3 ECG changes during acute ischemia ................................................. 14

1.3 Depolarization changes during ischemia .............................................. 181.3.1 Standard, 12-lead ECG ...................................................................... 191.3.1.1 QRS amplitude changes .................................................................... 191.3.1.2 The Sclarovsky-Birnbaum ischemia grading .................................... 201.3.1.3 QRS prolongation .............................................................................. 231.3.1.4 QRS changes and myocardial infarction ........................................... 231.3.1.5 Selvester QRS score .......................................................................... 251.3.2 High frequency QRS analysis based on the 12-lead ECG system .... 261.3.3 QRS slope analysis based on 12-lead ECG system ........................... 271.3.4 QRS evaluation by vectorcardiography (VCG) ................................ 28

Page 9: Ventricular Depolarization in Ischemic Heart Disease.Value

vi

1.4 Myocardial Single Photon Emission Computed Tomography (SPECT) ........................................................................................................... 29

1.4.1 Radioactive tracers: Tc-99m Sestamibi ............................................. 291.4.2 Tomographic imaging acquisition ..................................................... 30

2 Aims of the thesis ................................................................................. 313 Materials and methods ....................................................................... 33

3.1 Study populations ................................................................................... 333.1.1 “STAFF III” population .................................................................... 333.1.2 “STRESS” population ....................................................................... 343.1.3 “MONAMI” population .................................................................... 34

3.2 Ethical considerations ............................................................................ 34

3.3 ECG analysis and processing ................................................................ 353.3.1 ECG acquisition ................................................................................ 353.3.2 Standard 12-lead ECG analysis ......................................................... 363.3.2.1 Selvester QRS scoring (Study I) ....................................................... 383.3.2.2 Sclarovsky-Birnbaum ischemia grading (Study IV) ......................... 403.3.3 QRS slope analysis (Study III) .......................................................... 403.3.4 High-Frequency QRS (HF-QRS) analysis (Studies I, II) .................. 433.3.4.1 Preprocessing .................................................................................... 443.3.4.2 Signal averaging-noise reduction ...................................................... 443.3.4.3 Band-pass filtering ............................................................................ 453.3.4.4 HF-QRS quantification ..................................................................... 45

3.4 Myocardial SPECT perfusion imaging ................................................ 463.4.1 Studies II and III ................................................................................ 463.4.1.1 Acquisition ........................................................................................ 463.4.1.2 Image analysis ................................................................................... 473.4.2 Study IV ............................................................................................ 483.4.2.1 Acquisition ........................................................................................ 483.4.2.2 Image analysis ................................................................................... 48

3.5 Statistical methods ................................................................................. 49

4 Results and Discussion ........................................................................ 514.1 Results ..................................................................................................... 51

4.1.1 HF-QRS in patients with and without old MI (Study I) .................... 514.1.2 HF-QRS to quantify acute ischemia (Study II) ................................. 534.1.3 QRS slope analysis to quantify acute ischemia (Study III) ............... 564.1.4 Ischemia severity grading in STEMI patients (Study IV) ................. 59

4.2 Discussion ................................................................................................ 64

Page 10: Ventricular Depolarization in Ischemic Heart Disease.Value

vii

4.2.1 General clinical considerations ......................................................... 644.2.2 Depolarization changes in relation to extent (MaR) and severity of ischemia by SPECT ....................................................................................... 644.2.3 Ischemia grades and “terminal QRS distortion” in relation to MaR, severity and evolving infarct in acute STEMI ............................................... 694.2.4 Depolarization changes by HF-QRS and standard ECG in relation to prior MI ......................................................................................................... 72

5 Conclusions .......................................................................................... 756 Acknowledgements .............................................................................. 777 References ............................................................................................ 79Appendix .................................................................................................... 95

Study I

Study II Study III

Study IV

Supplementary Technical Study

Page 11: Ventricular Depolarization in Ischemic Heart Disease.Value

viii

List of original publications

I. Ringborn M, Pahlm O,Wagner GS, Warren SG, Pettersson J. The absence of high-frequency QRS changes in the presence of standard electrocardiographic QRS changes of old myocardial infarction. Am Heart J 2001; 141(4):573-579.

II. Ringborn M, Pettersson J, Persson E, Warren SG, Platonov P, Pahlm O,

Wagner GS. Comparison of high-frequency QRS components and ST-segment elevation to detect and quantify acute myocardial ischemia. J Electrocardiol 2010; 43(2):113-120.

III. Ringborn M, Romero D, Pueyo E, Pahlm O , Wagner GS, Laguna P,

Platonov PG. Evaluation of depolarization changes during acute myocardial ischemia by analysis of QRS slopes. J Electrocardiol 2011; 44(4):416-424.

IV. Ringborn M, Birnbaum Y, Nielsen SS, Kaltoft AK, Bøtker HE, Pahlm O,

Wagner GS, Platonov PG , Terkelsen CJ. Pre-hospital evaluation of electrocardiographic grade 3 ischemia predicts infarct progression and final infarct size in ST elevation myocardial infarction patients treated with primary percutaneous coronary intervention. In manuscript.

Supplementary Technical Publication I. Romero D, Ringborn M , Laguna P , Pahlm O, Pueyo E. Depolarization

changes during acute myocardial ischemia by evaluation of QRS slopes: standard lead and vectorial approach. IEEE Trans Biomed Eng 2011; 58(1):110-120.

Studies I, II and III, as well as Supplementary Technical Study, are reprinted with kind permission from the publishers.

Page 12: Ventricular Depolarization in Ischemic Heart Disease.Value

ix

Abstract

Background In patients with symptoms compatible with acute myocardial infarction (MI), early triage by ECG in the pre-hospital phase by ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) criteria is important for direct transport of these patients to a regional center for primary percutaneous coronary intervention (pPCI). The time from first medical contact to pPCI should, due to present guidelines, be no longer than two hours. One main determinant of final infarct size (IS), in addition to myocardium at risk (MaR) and time to treatment, is the severity of ischemia, which relates to the rate of progression of the infarction wavefront. Presently, no assessment of severity is made. Patients with severe ischemia may have changes within the QRS complex in addition to ST-T changes, making it possible to identify these high-risk patients. QRS changes are, however more difficult to determine and to quantify correctly as compared to the changes within the ST segment.

Aims and methods The overall objective was to increase the understanding of depolarization changes during myocardial ischemia and to evaluate whether these changes have possible clinical implications in patients with acute MI. Different QRS methods are applied in patients during ischemia produced by elective, prolonged PCI as well as during STEMI, and comparisons are made with conventional ECG parameters as well as single-photon emission computed tomography (SPECT) images.

Results and conclusions Study I compared the computer-derived high-frequency QRS components (HF-QRS) in patients with and without standard ECG changes indicative of old MI. In contrast to previous findings we found that HF-QRS cannot differentiate between patients with and without old MI. Study II tested the ability of HF-QRS versus conventional ST-segment measurements to detect and quantify myocardial ischemia, as determined by SPECT, in a group of patients undergoing elective balloon PCI. We showed that HF-QRS can provide valuable information both for detecting acute ischemia and for quantifying MaR and its severity. Study III evaluated a potentially more readily available (compared with HF-QRS) new marker of ventricular depolarization distortion, which is based on calculation of up- and downslope within the QRS complex, in patients undergoing

Page 13: Ventricular Depolarization in Ischemic Heart Disease.Value

x

coronary intervention that includes temporary occlusion of a coronary artery. We found that in particular the downward slope between R and S waves better correlates with ischemia than conventional QRS parameters, as quantified by SPECT, and thus can be of value in risk stratification of patients with ischemia in addition to conventional ST-segment analysis.

Study IV, in a large cohort of STEMI patients, assessed the value of the conventional Sclarovsky-Birnbaum ischemia grading system that includes terminal QRS distortion in addition to ST elevation, on pre-hospital ECG and its dynamic behavior during transport time to the PCI center for prediction of final infarct size and salvage, as estimated by SPECT imaging. The study explored the temporal behavior of the ischemia grading and showed the strong association of ischemia grade assessed from pre-hospital ECG, as well as the dynamic patterns, with infarct size, independent of ST-segment analysis. It also demonstrated the importance of early intervention, which was found to be particularly important in patients who had advanced, QRS-based ischemia grade.

Page 14: Ventricular Depolarization in Ischemic Heart Disease.Value

xi

Sammanfattning på svenska

Bakgrund Den medicinska utvecklingen har varit stark under de senaste åren vad gäller akut omhändertagande av patienter med misstänkt hjärtinfarkt. Snabb teknisk utveckling inom området för kateterburen koronarkärlsintervention (PCI) och framsteg inom farmakologisk behandling har bidragit till allt bättre vårdresultat. Omedelbar och korrekt beslutsprocess har kommit att bli alltmer avgörande för att rädda hotad hjärtmuskelvävnad, och därmed avsevärt påverka patientens framtida liv. Beslut bör tas redan prehospitalt, för triagering av patienterna antingen till lokalt sjukhus eller till regionalt PCI-center. Detta ställer mycket höga krav på tillförlitlig diagnostisk.

Den undersökning som ger mest information i den akuta situationen är 12-avlednings EKG, som är ett enkelt, lättillgängligt och icke-invasivt diagnosredskap vid sidan om patientens sjukdomshistoria och aktuella symtom. I den akuta situationen ses vanligen ingen diagnostiskt värdefull information i hjärtspecifika blodprover. Den förhärskande metoden att upptäcka akut hjärtinfarkt är att studera förändringar under repolarisationen (ST-T-sträckan) på EKG. Om vissa EKG-kriterier uppfylls för ST-sträckan (sk STEMI-kriterier), bör patienten helst så snart som möjligt behandlas med primär PCI. Detta kan ofta innebära lång transport av patienten till ett sjukhus där PCI kan utföras. I enlighet med både amerikanska och europeiska riktlinjer bör man eftersträva att patienterna får sådan behandling inom 2 timmar från första EKG där STEMI-kriterier verifierats. Telemedicin med digital överföring av akuta EKG tagna i patientens hem, i ambulansen alternativt på lokalt sjukhus underlättar för att effektivisera denna process.

Idag ges alla patienter liknande avlastande behandling under transporten. Vissa patienter har emellertid mera allvarlig syrebrist (ischemi) i hjärtat än andra, vilket får till följd att en större andel av hjärtmuskelvävnaden utsatt för syrebrist kommer att gå under (infarcera) per tidsenhet innan man kommer till PCI-behandlingen. Genom att även analysera andra delar av hjärtcykeln med EKG (depolarisationen, dvs QRS komplexet), finns det möjligheter att identifiera dessa högriskpatienter och i framtiden eventuellt kunna skräddarsy mera intensiv, kompletterande behandling redan under transporten. Denna kunskap skulle kunna nyttjas i stor omfattning och adderas till utvecklingen av akut hjärtinfarktbehandling globalt.

Övergripande syfte och ingående patientgrupper Avhandlingens övergripande mål var att utvärdera metoder för att extrahera mer information från EKG-signalen under depolarisationen (QRS-komplexet), som

Page 15: Ventricular Depolarization in Ischemic Heart Disease.Value

xii

additivt diagnostiskt hjälpmedel till dagens repolarisationsanalys (ST-T sträckan). I de olika delarbetena studerades patienter med olika typer av akut ischemi, dels i en mindre population under planerad och kontrollerad ballongvidgning av ett kranskärl (Studie II och III), dels i en betydligt större patientgrupp med akut pågående hjärtinfarkt (STEMI) i Studie IV. I dessa populationer fanns multipla kliniska variabler liksom kvantifiering av graden av ischemi med myokardscintigrafi (SPECT). I Studie I analyserades patienter dessutom under vilobetingelser avseende olika typer av QRS-förändringar som tyder på äldre hjärtinfarkt.

Generellt sett är QRS-förändringar svårare att karakterisera och mäta än de som ses under ST-sträckan. Inom QRS-komplexet i ett standard-EKG kan man mäta skillnader i amplitud av ingående komponenter samt deras durationer. Båda, men i synnerhet den sistnämnda har felkällor, varför det finns behov av ett mera övergripande och tillförlitligt QRS-mått. I denna avhandling har QRS-komplexet analyserats utifrån både konventionellt, standard-EKG, samt de två mer tekniskt avancerade analysmetoderna högfrekvens-EKG (HF-QRS) och QRS-slope metoden. Dessa metoder värderades under akut ischemi, pågående och tidigare infarkt. Den förstnämnda, standard-EKG baserade metoden, sk Sclarovsky-Birnbaum (S-B) graderingen av ischemi, värderar allvarlighetsgraden av ischemi under ett akut hjärtinfarktskede. Denna metod är sedan tidigare beskriven, men har ännu inte kommit att användas i klinisk praxis.

Specifika mål Delarbete I: Studera om man med hjälp av HF-QRS metoden han differentiera mellan patienter med en tidigare genomgången hjärtinfarkt och de som inte haft någon infarkt, där själva infarktdiagnosen verifierats med vanligt standard-EKG.

Delarbete II: Värdera om förändringar av HF-QRS vid akut ischemi är associerade till dess utbredning och allvarlighetsgrad.

Delarbete III: Studera hur den, jämfört med HF-QRS- metoden, mindre bruskänsliga och mera kliniskt lättillgängliga QRS-slope- metoden, kan användas för att värdera utbredning och allvarlighetsgrad av akut ischemi.

Delarbete IV: Undersöka hur depolarisationförändringarna som ingår i S-B graderingen av ischemi varierar över tid (från ambulans-EKG till EKG taget senare på mottagande sjukhus just innan PCI behandlingen). Vidare studera det kliniska värdet av tidig hjärtinfarktgradering, dels utifrån ambulans-EKG, men även värdet av själva dynamiken under transporten fram till PCI behandlingen. Testa om denna EKG-information relaterar till faktisk allvarlighetsgrad, dvs hastighet av infarktutveckling och behandlingsresultatet av akut PCI inklusive slutlig infarktstorlek.

Page 16: Ventricular Depolarization in Ischemic Heart Disease.Value

xiii

Fynd och sammanfattning Studie I visade att vid värdering av en större patientpopulation och med fler EKG- avledningar jämfört med tidigare, liknande studier, kunde vi, till skillnad från tidigare resultat, med hjälp av HF-QRS inte differentiera mellan patienter med och utan tecken till tidigare hjärtinfarkt.

I Studie II fann vi att högfrekvenskomponenter inom QRS komplexet sjunker vid ischemi. Graden av förändringen visar signifikant korrelation med både utbredning och svårighetsgrad av ischemin kvantifierad med SPECT med högre korrelationskoefficient än konventionella ST-förändringar.

Med den betydligt mera bruståliga och därmed mera kliniskt lättillgängliga QRS-slope metoden, kunde vi i Studie III konstatera att förändringar i synnerhet vad gäller nedåtgående lutningen av R vågen uppvisar signifikant korrelation med både utbredning och svårighetsgrad av ischemin kvantifierad med SPECT, som är starkare än för övriga, konventionella QRS parametrar i standard-EKG och adderar information till ST-analys.

Studie IV visade att “QRS distortion”, som ingår i den allvarligaste grad 3 i S-B ischemigradering, uppvisar en dynamik mellan ambulans-EKG och EKG precis innan PCI-behandlingen. Patienter med grad 3-ischemi redan vid tidig EKG värdering i ambulansen, liksom de som uppvisade en dynamik där de bibehöll eller utvecklade denna grad under transporten, utvecklade större infarkter än de som inte hade dessa EKG-förändringar. Detta trots motsvarande storlek av det ischemiska området och samma tid från symtomdebut till PCI behandling. Vidare kunde vi konstatera att det är avhängigt graden av ischemi hur snabbt infarkten utvecklar sig, och hur stor del av det hotade hjärtmuskelområdet man därigenom kan rädda med hjälp av att öppna det stängda kranskärlet med PCI. Patienter som behandlades inom 2.5 timmar från symtomdebut uppvisade samma behandlingseffekt av PCI oavsett ischemigrad. Vid behandling senare än 2.5 timmar såg vi däremot sämre resultat för den grupp av patienter som hade grad 3 ischemi på ambulans EKG jämfört med patienter som hade grad 2 ischemi.

Avhandlingen visar att uttalad akut ischemi ger förändringar under själva depolarisationen som kan kvantifieras. Då analysmetoden för HF-QRS är relativt bruskänslig och därmed kräver avancerad medelvärdesberäkning, testades en nyutvecklad QRS-slopemetod, som vi bedömer kunna ge likvärdig information på ett mera lättillgängligt och tillförlitligt sätt. Den lämpar sig främst för att följa förändringar under pågående EKG-monitorering, men kan även nyttjas i bedömning av ett enskilt EKG om det finns ett tidigare, jämförande EKG. Resultaten från Studie IV indikerar att grad 3-ischemi som noteras tidigt kan indikera allvarlig ischemi med snabb infarktutveckling. Fler studier behövs både för att vidare applicera QRS-slope metoden i ett mera kliniskt sammanhang och för att få ytterligare förståelse för hur förändringar i den senare delen av QRS-komplexet bäst kan nyttjas för riskvärdering av patienter med akut hjärtinfarkt.

Page 17: Ventricular Depolarization in Ischemic Heart Disease.Value

xiv

Abbreviations

ACC American College of Cardiology ACS Acute Coronary Syndrome AHA American Heart Association AMI Acute Myocardial Infarction ATP Adenosine Triphosphate BBB Bundle Branch Block BMI Body Mass Index CABG Coronary Artery By-pass Graft surgery DS Down-Slope of the R wave ECG Electrocardiogram ESC European Society of Cardiology HF-QRS High-Frequency QRS components IS Infarct Size LAD Left Anterior Descending coronary artery LBBB Left Bundle Branch Block LCX Left Circumflex coronary artery LV Left Ventricle LVEF Left Ventricular Ejection Fraction LVH Left Ventricular Hypertrophy MaR Myocardium at Risk MI Myocardial Infarct MPI Myocardial Perfusion Imaging MONAMI The ST-MONitoring in AMI patients registry MRI Magnetic Resonance Imaging NSTEMI Non ST-Elevation Myocardial Infarction PCI Percutaneous Coronary Intervention pPCI Primary Percutaneous Coronary Intervention RBBB Right Bundle Branch Block RCA Right Coronary Artery RMS Root-Mean-Square S-B grade Sclarovsky-Birnbaum ischemia grade SD Standard Deviation SPECT Single Photon Emission Computed Tomography Spont STR Spontaneous ST- segment Resolution before PCI

Page 18: Ventricular Depolarization in Ischemic Heart Disease.Value

xv

STEMI ST-Elevation Myocardial Infarction STM ST level at J+1/16 of the average RR interval STR ST- segment Resolution 99mTc Technetium-99m TIMI Thrombolysis In Myocardial Infarction TMVG Trans Membrane Voltage Gradient TnT Troponin T TS Terminal Slope US Up-Slope of the R wave VCG Vectorcardiography

Page 19: Ventricular Depolarization in Ischemic Heart Disease.Value

xvi

Page 20: Ventricular Depolarization in Ischemic Heart Disease.Value

1

1 Introduction

1.1 Ischemic heart disease

1.1.1 Epidemiology Ischemic heart disease (IHD) is the number one cause of death in low-, middle- and high income countries1. According to WHO more than seven million people die worldwide each year from IHD, about 12.8% of all deaths2. The 2012 European Cardiovascular Disease statistics reports IHD to account for 1.8 million deaths per year in Europe, and is the single most common cause of death. It is estimated that 22% of women and 20% of men will die from this disease3. From the 2010 Heart Disease and Stroke Statistics update of the American Heart Association it was reported that IHD is responsible for about one-third of all deaths in individuals over 35 years of age in the US4.

The mortality rate due to IHD has declined in countries with developed economies and health care systems during the last few decades, mainly due to improvements in therapy, including acute initial medical treatment for acute coronary syndromes (ACS), acute reperfusion management of acute myocardial infarction (AMI), secondary preventive measures after AMI, therapy for heart failure, and revascularization for chronic, stable angina pectoris. Other reasons are increased attention to risk factors like cholesterol levels, systolic blood pressure, smoking prevalence and physical inactivity5. The overall decline in IHD-caused mortality during the last decades in the US has been estimated at about 60-65%, whereas in Europe approximately 30%6.

Despite decreased mortality rates in some regions, it is however, expected to increase in other, developing countries. Furthermore, in many developed countries many risk factors have increased, and in the US the increase in body-mass index (BMI) and prevalence of diabetes, hypertension and hypercholesterolemia are challenging the positive trend7. Furthermore, because of the changing demographic situation worldwide with a growing proportion of elderly people we will probably encounter great challenges managing an increasing total number of people with IHD.

Page 21: Ventricular Depolarization in Ischemic Heart Disease.Value

Michael Ringborn, M.D.

2

1.1.2 Pathophysiology

1.1.2.1 Coronary arteriosclerotic plaque formation The underlying pathophysiologic process consists of arteriosclerosis development in the coronary artery wall. It is a complicated process mediated through both lipid accumulation and complex inflammatory activity8, involving many different cell types including monocytes, T lymphocytes, endothelial and smooth muscle cells.

The arteriosclerotic process takes decades to develop and probably starts early in life. Initially, fatty acids accumulate into the intima layer of the vessel, building up fatty streaks. This is mediated through monocytes and T lymphocytes passing through the inner endothelial layer of the vessel, into the intima, where they transform into macrophages. Through this process these cells become “foam cells”, making up the fatty streaks. Parallel to the growth of these lipid storages, complex inflammatory activities take place, leading to a necrotic inner core, which may further enlarge due to hemorrhage from vasa vasorum. On the outer border of the necrotic lipid formation it is a thin fibrous cap composed of type I collagen, macrophages, lymphocytes and smooth muscle cells, thus forming a fibroatheroma that is more or less prone to rupture9.

During the process of establishing these intimal arteriosclerotic fibroatheromas, or plaques, the lumen of the coronary vessels may become narrow, causing decreased blood flow. At some point in this process, the blood flow will not be sufficient for meeting the metabolic demand of the myocardium, thereby leading to lack of oxygen, myocardial ischemia and angina. This is the reason for stress-induced angina pectoris.

Due to structural changes and remodeling within the necrotic central lipid core, inflammatory action to the fibrous cap, thinning of the capsule as well as neovascularization, the plaque can suddenly become “vulnerable”. Such plaques are especially sensitive to mechanical stress and/or inflammatory-mediated further weakening of the collagen capsule, leading to sudden rupture10. This initiates a complex cascade with sudden activation of platelets in the blood, leading to rapid thrombus formation and compromised coronary blood flow, thus an acute coronary syndrome (ACS). The process may also include vasospasm of the affected artery, further compromising myocardial perfusion.

1.1.2.2 Ischemia on the myocardial cell level In order to maintain the highly energy-demanding contraction process and ion pump function the myocardial cells need an adequate supply of oxygen as well as fuel such as fatty acids, glucose and lactate. In the normal situation, with adequate coronary blood flow, 60–90% of the energy used for the myocardial cells in

Page 22: Ventricular Depolarization in Ischemic Heart Disease.Value

Ventricular Depolarization: ECG assessment of Severity and Extent of Acute Ischemia

3

synthesizing ATP from ADP comes from fatty acids supplied from the plasma. The rest comes from glucose and lactate.

Breakdown of ATP then releases energy to be used for the contractile process and ion pumps that handle the relaxation process and the ion homeostasis necessary for the electrophysiological guidance of the pumping process11.

With sudden coronary artery occlusion, oxygen delivery to the myocardial cells becomes insufficient in relation to the demand, thus slowing or inhibiting the aerobic, oxidative phosphorylation process of ATP in the mitochondria. This stimulates glycolysis, by which storages of glycogen in the cells are used and an accelerated anaerobic metabolism is triggered. This leads to high intracellular lactate levels and acidosis. The myocardial cells can quickly adapt to anaerobic metabolism, however with persistent lack of oxygen they gradually progress from reversible ischemia to an irreversible status, where mitochondrial function is irreversibly damaged, as well as the structure of the cell membranes, leading to cell death12.

In the mid 1970s Jennings et al.12 described a gradually increasing metabolic, and thus ischemic, severity gradient that arises within the myocardial wall from the outermost epicardial to the inner subendocardial layer. Thus the subendocardium is the portion of the myocardium wall most vulnerable to ischemia, due to: a) a generally lesser degree of contribution to this layer from the coronary vascular bed, b) ischemia-induced vasodilatation in the better perfused layers, and c) increased intra-cavital and intramural pressure, that further hampers subendocardial perfusion.

1.1.3 Clinical manifestations and classification of ischemic heart disease

The main clinical manifestation of ischemic heart disease is chest pain, often located centrally, but can be located at various sites in the thoracic region, neck, chin or upper abdomen. The symptoms can vary from very light, uncomfortable pressure to very intense pain, with or without radiation to either or both arms, neck or back. Systemic, vegetative symptoms like nausea, sweating or dizziness often occur. Atypical symptoms such as shortness of breath can also be caused by myocardial ischemia. The classification of IHD is based on stability:

1. Stable angina pectoris: Symptoms evoked by physical or emotional stress. Reversible symptoms upon rest or short-term nitrates.

2. Acute coronary syndrome (ACS): a. Unstable angina pectoris: Either very intense, newly developed

angina pectoris, or worsened and/or more easily evoked symptoms by either physical, emotional stress or at rest during the last 4 weeks.

Page 23: Ventricular Depolarization in Ischemic Heart Disease.Value

Michael Ringborn, M.D.

4

b. Acute myocardial infarction (AMI): Symptoms at rest for more than 20 minutes not alleviated by short-term nitrates. Due to the appearance on ECG patients are further stratified into two types of AMI: ST elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) and non-ST elevation myocardial infarction (NSTEMI).

ACS is an unstable coronary process in which a patient quickly can transition from unstable angina to acute MI.

1.1.4 Diagnosis of acute MI The three cornerstones for the clinical diagnosis of acute MI are: clinical symptoms, ECG findings and cardiac biochemical markers. The definitions of acute MI have been gradually updated from the traditional WHO criteria, originally published in 197913, to the more clinically based definition by the European Society of Cardiology (ESC) and the American College of Cardiology (ACC) in 200014. The latter has been further updated to the present “Third universal definition of acute MI” published in 201215. In this clinical definition, the assumed cause of the MI is the basis for classification into five different types:

Type 1: Spontaneous MI due to a pathologic process in the coronary

artery wall resulting in an intracoronary thrombus formation (most often plaque erosion/rupture).

Type 2: Ischemic imbalance secondary to various conditions such as anemia, tachy-/brady-arrhythmias, respiratory failure, etc .

Type 3: MI resulting in death, without available biochemical markers.

Type 4: Procedure-related MI after percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI), or stent thrombosis.

Type 5: Associated with coronary artery by-pass graft surgery (CABG).

In this thesis only Type 1 is considered. The criteria are as follows: Significant rise of cardiac biochemical markers and at least one of the following:

1. Symptoms of ischemia (see above). 2. ECG-findings:

a. Development of pathologic Q waves in the ECG.

Page 24: Ventricular Depolarization in Ischemic Heart Disease.Value

Ventricular Depolarization: ECG assessment of Severity and Extent of Acute Ischemia

5

b. New or presumably new ST-segment-T wave (ST-T) changes or new left bundle branch block (LBBB)

3. Coronary angiographic, or autopsy-identified intracoronary thrombus. 4. Imaging evidence of new loss of viable myocardium, or regional wall

motion abnormality. Early differentiation between unstable angina, NSTEMI and STEMI is important. Immediate recognition of STEMI patients is of particular importance, since treatment is directed towards immediate revascularization (see below). Despite improved sensitivity and specificity of cardiac biochemical markers, possibilities for early detection are limited by their delayed appearance in the blood (3-9 hours for Troponin)15. Thus, this diagnostic modality can only differentiate between unstable angina and NSTEMI. Consequently, ECG is the only immediately available diagnostic tool to identify patients with an acute need for coronary revascularization.

1.1.5 Acute management and treatment of STEMI The most important aim is to restore coronary blood flow as soon as possible to optimize myocardial salvage and patient outcome16. This is particularly important during the first few hours after symptom onset17, 18. The revascularization modalities are by either pharmaceutical, iv thrombolytic administration, or primary percutaneous coronary intervention (pPCI). In the 2009 ACC/AHA focused update19 each geographic community was recommended to develop systems to ensure prompt STEMI management, including logistical algorithms from early, pre-hospital ECG evaluation, through referral and transfer for revascularization at a high-quality pPCI-center. Increasing evidence from multiple randomized trials have shown that pPCI performed in a timely fashion is a better reperfusion strategy compared with thrombolysis in most patients. However, the complexity of factors such as patient delay (time from symptom onset to first medical contact) as well as different reasons for system delay due to both different door-to-needle, or door-to-balloon time (delay for administration of thrombolytics or applying mechanic (pPCI) revascularization), effectiveness of the treatment given (fast reperfusion by pPCI, slower by thrombolysis), logistics of patient transfer between hospitals etc., have resulted in the recommendation by the ACC/AHA and ESC that pPCI is the preferred reperfusion treatment for any STEMI patient if the procedure can be made within 120 minutes from first medical contact2, 19-22. If there is longer delay for pPCI, thrombolytic therapy could be preferred.

Until proper reperfusion treatment is achieved all patients receive administration of antiplatelet agents, beta blockers, nitrates, oxygen, morphine etc., as

Page 25: Ventricular Depolarization in Ischemic Heart Disease.Value

Michael Ringborn, M.D.

6

appropriate, to optimize myocardial perfusion and reduce the metabolic demand of the myocardial cells.

1.1.6 Determinants of final infarct size The most central determinants of final infarct size (IS), besides the time elapsed from coronary occlusion to reperfusion, are the size of the myocardium at risk (MaR) and the severity of ischemia within the MaR. The latter will determine the rate of progression of infarction development within the MaR, i.e. the more severe ischemia the more rapid progression of the wavefront of necrosis.

1.1.6.1 Myocardium at risk (MaR) MaR is mainly related to the area supplied by the occluded, infarct-related coronary artery, distal to the occlusion. Thus, both the size of the coronary artery and site of occlusion along the vessel (proximal or more distal) will determine the oxygen-deprived myocardial territory at risk for infarct development.

During the phase of an acute MI, the activated thrombotic system may result in a dynamic antegrade coronary flow where spontaneous recanalization with or without distal embolization and thrombotic re-occlusion might occur, changing the risk area. Furthermore, recruitment of collaterals may play a role in reducing the risk area, as seen below.

1.1.6.2 Myocardial protection and severity of ischemia The myocardium has an inherent ability for physiologic adaptation to ischemia that renders it more resistant to serious ischemic events and significantly delays the progression of infarct evolution. There are two main mechanisms for this adaptation process; long-term collateral development and ischemic preconditioning.

Coronary collateral formation As an adaptation to repeated episodes of myocardial ischemia collateral vessels can develop from other territories in order to improve blood flow. The mechanisms by which this is mediated are still not fully elucidated, however factors such as fibroblasts and vascular endothelial growth factors23, 24, as well as nitric oxide25 appear to be involved.

Two kinds of collateral vessels have been identified: Epicardially located, muscular collaterals, developed from

preexisting arterioles. Capillary-size collaterals, without smooth muscle cells, which can be

distributed throughout the myocardial wall26.

Page 26: Ventricular Depolarization in Ischemic Heart Disease.Value

Ventricular Depolarization: ECG assessment of Severity and Extent of Acute Ischemia

7

In humans, the presence of collaterals and/or their recruitment during a sudden, acute MI has been shown to reduce the severity of ischemia, thus resulting in limitation of final infarct size, improved post-infarction left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) as well as reducing mortality27-29.

Ischemic preconditioning This phenomenon was already reported by Murry et al. in 1986, as an observed delayed effect on infarction development upon experimental coronary occlusion in a canine preparation preceded by short, repetitive episodes of ischemia separated by periods of reperfusion30. Compared to a control group, this precondition protocol of four repetitive, 5-minute episodes of regional ischemia, each followed by 5 minutes reperfusion, resulted in a 75 percent reduction in final infarct size. These findings have been reproduced and further confirmed by several other animal experiments, in different species31-34.

In humans this phenomenon has been evaluated both in vitro35 and in vivo models from various clinical situations, as exercise stress test36, 37, elective PCI38, 39 and CABG40.

The underlying mechanisms for ischemia preconditioning are still not completely known. However, growing evidence supports the notion that this protection is not due to recruitment of collaterals30-32. Cells in the preconditioned myocardium have slower metabolism, demanding less ATP, and producing less lactate than the non-preconditioned myocardial cells41, 42. One hypothesis is attenuation of intracellular acidosis during the critical ischemia as an effect of lower intracellular glycogen levels due to its depletion in the previous, shorter ischemia episodes. However there are some conflicting results43. Most likely this intrinsic cardioprotective process is mediated through several complex pathways, also including endogenous mediators released during the brief periods of ischemia, acting on local receptors and channels. Some tentative mediators have been proposed, such as: adenosine, bradykinin, protein kinase C, reactive oxygen radicals, ATP-dependent potassium channels, etc32, 34, 44, 45.

Clinically, ischemia preconditioning is probably the cause of “warm-up angina”, i.e. improvement of stable stress-induced angina symptoms during the day due to repetitive ischemia episodes37.

However, the most important role of ischemia preconditioning is played during the acute MI situation. In numerous clinical studies, pre-infarction angina (repetitive short episodes of unstable angina within hours to days before the acute MI) has been reported to be associated with smaller infarct size, improved left ventricular function and regional wall motion, less malignant ventricular arrhythmias as well as lower both short- and long-term mortality46-48. The timing of previous angina symptoms in relation to the acute MI episode is important,

Page 27: Ventricular Depolarization in Ischemic Heart Disease.Value

Michael Ringborn, M.D.

8

since the protective effect has especially been reported in patients suffering from angina within 24-48 hours prior to the acute MI49, 50.

Methods for early identification of acute MI patients without this kind of myocardial protection, who thus have an extremely high risk for rapid evolution of necrosis within the MaR, would be of great clinical importance. This sort of risk stratification could lead to individual tailoring of the acute management, for example during transfer to pPCI. However, there are no such clinically used methods today.

Evaluation of myocardial protection/ischemia severity by ECG The effects of experimental ischemic preconditioning protocols have been evaluated by changes in the ECG. Several studies have reported changes in the repolarization phase (ST-T) with reduced ST elevation when inducing ischemia after a preconditioning protocol compared to the ones with non-preconditioned myocardium39, 51-53.

However, another, presumably more useful electrophysiological determinant of the level of protection (or severity of ischemia) is found within the depolarization phase (QRS complex). This has been reported in both experimental animal studies54 and in several human studies on STEMI patients55-58 and will be dealt with in greater detail further on.

1.2 Anatomy, electrophysiology and myocardial ischemia

1.2.1 Basic electrophysiological principles

1.2.1.1 Electrophysiology at the cellular level: the action potential The basis of myocardial electrophysiology is the inborn excitability of both the specially designed cardiac conduction system and the myocytes, as mediated by the ionic currents in the different phases of the action potential (AP) throughout the cardiac cell cycle (Figure 1.1).

In the normal situation of adequate coronary blood flow, the resting potential of the myocardial cell is between -80 and -95 mV, with the cell interior having negative charge in relation to the extracellular space. This negative potential is created by an energy demanding procedure of pumping potassium (K+) into and sodium (Na+) out of the cell (the Na+/ K+-ATPase pump), fueled by the continuous production of ATP by aerobic cell metabolism. By this process, different ion concentration levels inside and outside the cell are created, with high

Page 28: Ventricular Depolarization in Ischemic Heart Disease.Value

Ventricular Depolarization: ECG assessment of Severity and Extent of Acute Ischemia

9

concentration of intracellular K+ and lower concentration of Na+ in relation to the extracellular space. The equilibrium potential across the cell membrane is different for these ions. For K+ it is between -80 and -95mV. Thus, excess of intracellular K+ will be balanced by a passive outflow of this ion down its current in the resting phase to maintain a stable, negative intracellular potential.

The depolarization phase (Phase 0) of the AP is initiated by the sudden opening of fast, voltage-dependent Na+ channels, leading to a rapid inflow of Na+ into the cell, thus shifting (depolarizing) the interior of the cell from its negative to positive (about +45 mV) potential, which is the equilibrium potential for this specific ion. Meanwhile also slower calcium (Ca2+) channels open, producing a slight inward Ca2+ flow. Then, Phase 1 creates a small “notch”, caused by an initial outward K+ flow and a decay of the Na+ current. This is followed by the plateau comprising Phase 2, where an outward K+ flow (to passively regain its negative equilibrium potential), and inward Ca2+ and to a small degree Na+ ion-flow balance each other to a stable potential. In the following, Phase 3, a fast repolarization is taking place, thus regaining the negative, resting membrane potential, by decay of the remaining Ca2+ in-flow and, most importantly, a fast outflow of K+.

In Phase 4 the negative resting potential is maintained, again created by the Na+/ K+-ATPase pump and balanced by a slow, passive outflow of K+.

FIGURE 1.1 Different phases of the myocardial AP.

Ischemic effect on the action potential Sudden coronary occlusion and lack of oxygen quickly affects this balanced process:

The ATP dependent Na+/ K+ ATPase- pump cannot maintain the normal, negative resting potential.

Lactate acid accumulates and acidosis develops both within the cell and in the extracellular space.

K+ accumulates in the extracellular space.

Page 29: Ventricular Depolarization in Ischemic Heart Disease.Value

Michael Ringborn, M.D.

10

By these processes the AP will change in the following ways within the ischemic region59-62:

1. Reduced resting membrane potential. Thus, the extracellular space within the ischemic region becomes more negative in comparison to surroundings in this phase.

2. At a reduced membrane potential of about –50 mV, the fast Na+ channels are inactivated. Instead, the AP is elicited by an inward current of Ca2+ ions by slow inward channels, causing a delayed and slower upstroke of the AP (Phase 0).

3. Lower maximal AP amplitude. 4. Shortened duration of the AP, thus earlier repolarization.

FIGURE 1.2 Illustration of ischemia-induced changes of the different phases of the AP. Solid line represents normal AP and dashed line the situation during ischemia with reduced resting membrane potential, slower upstroke, lower amplitude and earlier repolarization. Reprinted and modified from Vincent et al.63, with permission.

These changes, illustrated in Figure 1.2, cause a voltage gradient between the ischemic area and the normal myocardium during different phases of the cardiac electrical cycle that leads to current flow between these regions.

These “currents of injury” are represented on the surface ECG by deviation of the ST segment and also have secondary effects on the QRS complex.

1.2.1.2 Ventricular propagation of the depolarization wavefront Conduction of the electrical signal is mediated by cell-to-cell propagation through gap junctions. All myocytes are capable of conduction. However, the specialized conduction system ensures an efficient propagation of the signal. The signal originating from the atria is conducted through the AV node, and rapidly through the ventricles in this specialized conduction system involving the bundle of His, the right and left bundle branches and the Purkinje network, which branches into a fine network terminating in the ventricular endocardium. The electrical and metabolic properties of these structures are slightly different from those of the

-

Page 30: Ventricular Depolarization in Ischemic Heart Disease.Value

Ventricular Depolarization: ECG assessment of Severity and Extent of Acute Ischemia

11

myocytes, e.g. by being more resistant to ischemia64-66. This has implications for the changes in the activation wavefront during severe ischemia.

Human ventricular excitation was first described in detail by Durrer et al. in the early 1970s67, and further verified by animal studies, by epicardial mapping during open heart surgery and by computer simulation by Selvester, Solomon et al68, 69. The normal ventricular activation is a rapid, balanced process that results in the normal synchronous contraction of the right and left ventricles. This normal sequence is determined by the anatomical and physiological features of the rapidly conducting Purkinje network that inserts in the endocardium at 5 major sites70, 3 of which are positioned within the left ventricle as illustrated in Figure 1.3, and the other 2 insertion sites are at the right side of the septum and the free lateral wall in the right ventricle. Activation propagates more slowly from the endocardial to the epicardial myocardial wall by the myocytes. Depolarization can be viewed as an activation wavefront that excites the myocardial wall from endo- to epicardium as well as different regions of the ventricles at specific time instants, as illustrated in Figure 1.3. First, the intraventricular septum is depolarized from left to right. Then the right and left ventricles are depolarized simultaneously, however, due to the larger mass of the LV the main vector in this phase is left oriented, mainly towards the apex. Subsequently the activation vector, at about 40 ms depolarizes the anterior free wall, thus the main vector shifts more leftward. Finally the last area to be depolarized is the basal parts of the heart.

FIGURE 1.3 Three-dimensional illustration of the left ventricular (LV) activation with respect to its timing in different layers of the myocardial wall and different segments. Modified from Selvester et al.71 with permission.

Page 31: Ventricular Depolarization in Ischemic Heart Disease.Value

Michael Ringborn, M.D.

12

1.2.2 Electrocardiography (ECG) Despite advances of cardiac biochemical marker analysis and cardiac imaging techniques in recent years, the standard 12-lead ECG is still the most important and valuable tool in the acute clinical situation evaluating a patient with ongoing symptoms compatible with acute MI. With the advanced technical, digital development of telemedicine, an ECG recording can be made already in the pre-hospital phase, in the patient´s home or in the ambulance. The ECG can be directly transmitted to the attending emergency physician or cardiologist for instant evaluation and clinical decision-making.

The electrical activity of the myocardium, as described in previous sections, produces an electrical field with a 1) magnitude and 2) direction that change during the cardiac cycle. The standard ECG provides a graphical representation of this electrical field at every instant where each specific lead registers this field from its specific location on the body surface.

There are different lead systems available, however the one most often used clinically, and considered in this thesis, is the standard, 12-lead ECG with six limb leads in the frontal plane and six precordial leads in the transverse plane, organized as in Figure 1.4. This display of the limb leads (the Cabrera format) is recommended in the 2000 European Society of Cardiology (ESC)/American College of Cardiology (ACC) guidelines for universal adoption in 12-lead ECG and has been used in Sweden for many years72.

Each lead is bipolar and records the difference between the exploring electrode and either an opposite (as for leads I, II and III), or a reference electrode (the Wilson´s central terminal) as for the “augmented leads” aVR, aVL, aVF and V1-V6. Electrical impulses moving toward the exploring electrode is registered as a positive deflection and vice versa.

FIGURE 1.4 The standard 12-lead ECG displayed in the Cabrera format. Reprinted and adapted from Pahlm-Webb et al.73 with permisson.

Page 32: Ventricular Depolarization in Ischemic Heart Disease.Value

Ventricular Depolarization: ECG assessment of Severity and Extent of Acute Ischemia

13

In Figures 1.5 and 1.6 the same lead display is shown including the time-sequence of the ventricular depolarization. FIGURE 1.5 Showing the limb leads in the frontal plane in the Cabrera lead configuration as well as the timing of the LV activation sequence. The colored lines represent areas of myocardium activated within the same 10-millisecond period. Modified from Strauss, Selvester et al.74 with permission.

FIGURE 1.6 Transverse plane showing both left and right ventricles (LV and RV) within the thorax cavity in reference to the precordial leads V1-V6. Adjusted from Strauss, Selvester et al.74 with permission.

Page 33: Ventricular Depolarization in Ischemic Heart Disease.Value

Michael Ringborn, M.D.

14

1.2.3 ECG changes during acute ischemia Due to ischemia-induced effects on the cardiac cell cycle, changes in both the repolarization and depolarization phases can be registered by the ECG.

T-wave change As an early sign of ischemia tall, hyperacute T waves, as suggested due to the local reduction of the AP duration75, may be seen. As an isolated finding, such early changes are, however, rarely seen in clinical practice, since they develop very rapidly and are shortly followed also by ST-segment deviation.

ST-segment deviation ST-segment change is the most commonly used ECG marker of ischemia. The changes in the AP described above explain the ST changes seen during acute ischemia. Both the changed resting membrane potential and earlier repolarization within the ischemic region results in ST-segment elevation seen on the ECG:

1. Diastolic injury current: The ischemic cells remain relatively depolarized

during phase 4 of the AP, thus creating a relative negative extracellular charge compared to the surrounding, normal myocardium. Therefore, during the electrical diastole, current (diastolic current of injury) will flow between ischemic and normal myocardium. ECG-leads overlying the ischemic zone will record a negative deflection during electrical diastole and produce depression of the TQ segment. However, the ECG recorders in clinical practice automatically “compensate” for any negative shift in the TQ segment, thus it appears as ST-segment elevation on the ECG. This is illustrated in Figure 1.7A.

2. Systolic injury current: In systole the other three ischemia-induced changes on the AP described above makes ischemic myocardium relatively positive in comparison to the normal surroundings. This creates a voltage gradient between normal and ischemic zones during the systolic phase such that the current-of-injury vector will be directed toward the ischemic region resulting in primary ST elevation, as demonstrated in Figure 1.7B.

Page 34: Ventricular Depolarization in Ischemic Heart Disease.Value

Ventricular Depolarization: ECG assessment of Severity and Extent of Acute Ischemia

15

FIGURE 1.7 In the upper panel AP changes due to ischemia (dashed line) are shown. In the lower panel the corresponding changes on the overlying ECG lead is demonstrated. In A) the diastolic injury current with downward displacement of the TQ segment is illustrated. In B) the early repolarization of the ischemic area, causing a systolic injury current directed toward the ischemic region is demonstrated, giving rise to a primary ST-segment elevation. Adjusted from Vincent et al.63 with permission.

In transmural ischemia the overall ST vector is usually directed toward the epicardium, thus exhibiting ST-segment elevation in leads whose positive poles are overlying the ischemic region, and reciprocal ST depression in leads whose positive poles are directed opposite to (i.e. approximately 180° away from) these leads. In ischemia mainly restricted to the subendocardial layer, on the other hand, the overall ST vector is directed toward the inner layer of the ventricular wall or cavity, displayed as ST-segment depression in the overlying ECG lead. The latter is more often present in demand ischemia, such as stress-induced ischemia or unstable angina, whereas the former is often related to supply ischemia, due to sudden coronary artery occlusion. However, the picture may vary considerably, and at many times total coronary occlusion is displayed as ST-segment depression, or no significant ST-segment changes at all. This is because the 12-lead ECG is not equally distributed around the thorax, covering all parts of the myocardium, and because of cancellation effects that may arise between two ischemic regions opposite to each other.

ST-segment elevation, as in the STEMI-guidelines, is used to identify those with acute MI who should be referred for immediate revascularization20.

A mathematical model of explanation regarding the amount of ST-segment elevation observed on a surface ECG lead with a certain location in relation to the ischemic area, is the solid angle theory76. This is illustrated in Figure 1.8.

-

Page 35: Ventricular Depolarization in Ischemic Heart Disease.Value

Michael Ringborn, M.D.

16

Basically, this model contains both spatial factors (solid angle, Ω) and nonspatial factors. The solid angle is subtending a spherical surface area about the recording electrode. The nonspatial factors include the transmembrane voltage gradient (TMVG) across the ischemic boundary, thus the current flow between the ischemic (Vm1) and nonischemic, normal myocardial cells (Vm2) during the electrical cardiac cycle (systole and diastole). K is the conductivity factor. Conductivity is determined by many factors affected by acute myocardial ischemia, such as the volume of intra- and extra-cellular space, acidosis, effects on gap-junctions, etc. Thus, the ST-segment displacement is related to the shape and the size of the ischemic area, level of TMVG in the boundary between ischemic and normal cells, and the conductivity.

FIGURE 1.8. Mathematical and pictorial characterization of the solid angle theory. The solid angle (Ω) is defined as the area of spherical surface cut off a unit sphere (inscribed about the recording electrode) by a cone formed by drawing lines from the recording electrode to every point at the boundary of interest. The ischemic boundary is a source of current flow established by portions of the heart having different transmembrane voltages between the ischemic (Vm1) and normal myocardial cells (Vm2) during the electrical cardiac cycle (systole and diastole). K is a term correcting for differences in intracellular and extracellular conductivity. Reprinted from Holland et al.76 with permission.

Page 36: Ventricular Depolarization in Ischemic Heart Disease.Value

Ventricular Depolarization: ECG assessment of Severity and Extent of Acute Ischemia

17

This theory is also applicable for understanding some of the changes within the depolarization phase (QRS complex), which will be later highlighted.

Association between amount of ST changes and clinical outcome Several studies have evaluated the association between MaR and final IS (as estimated by single photon emission computed tomography (SPECT) or Selvester QRS score77) with various ST-segment measures, such as single-lead maximum ST-elevation, number of leads with ST-elevation, sum of ST-elevation among leads and sum of total ST-deviation78-84, however with conflicting results.

However, in larger cohorts various ST-segment measures have been found to predict clinical outcome after AMI85-87. In a multivariate analysis from the GUSTO-I database of 41,021 patients, the sum of absolute ST-segment deviation (both elevation and depression) of ≥1.9 mm was predictive of 30-day mortality after thrombolytic therapy85, with an odds ratio of 1.53. In a DANAMI-2 substudy Sejersten et al. showed how the sum of ST-segment deviation predicted 30-day mortality after either thrombolytic or pPCI treatment86. From the GISSI-1 trial of 8,731 patients the number of leads with ST-segment elevation related both to short- and long-term mortality87 after thrombolytic therapy.

Also, spontaneous ST-segment resolution (STR), before reperfusion therapy has been shown to predict optimal outcome in STEMI patients88, 89. Furthermore, it has been shown that post-revascularization STR of acute STEMI predicts lower mortality rate, with level of single lead, maximum ST elevation being the strongest predictor90, 91.

One problem with using the sum of ST changes or the number of leads with ST elevation in various scores is that the 12-lead ECG does not represent all myocardial regions equally. Thus, similar size of MaR in different parts of the heart will not be equally represented by the ECG in terms of ST-segment deviation among the 12 leads. Furthermore, attenuation and augmentation effects might arise due to ischemia in opposing regions. To summarize: Transmural ischemia can be detected by ST-segment elevation criteria on

the standard 12-lead ECG. ST-segment elevation provides information on the location of ischemia, thus

helping to identify the infarction related artery (IRA). Overall, there seems to be somewhat conflicting results regarding the

correlation between ST-segment evaluation and MaR and IS as determined by SPECT or QRS scoring. However, larger studies support the association between ST-segment measures and clinical outcome after AMI, although most results are after thrombolytic rather than pPCI treatment.

Page 37: Ventricular Depolarization in Ischemic Heart Disease.Value

Michael Ringborn, M.D.

18

It has not been clarified whether ST-segment evaluation provides any information about the severity of ischemia.

Myocardial ischemia and evolving infarction, however, also affects the depolarization phase of the ECG. Some changes in the early portion of the QRS complex (Q waves) have mostly been considered to represent already necrotic areas, but other, potentially reversible changes, especially in the later parts of the QRS complex may also appear during severe ischemia. These are not as well understood and usually not considered for clinical decision-making. This is the focus of this thesis and will be further elaborated on in the following sections.

1.3 Depolarization changes during ischemia If the electrical forces during ventricular depolarization suddenly change in magnitude or direction due to regional ischemia, the overall balance of the activation wavefront will change.

Within the ischemic region several different factors may contribute to changes in the depolarization phase, which can be visualized in the QRS complex:

Local, direct effects of the changes of the AP, such as decreased

resting membrane potential, slower AP upstroke, lower amplitude and shorter duration.

Ischemia-induced changes in the overall conductivity due to extracellular hyperkalemia, intra- and extracellular volume effects, changes in the properties of the gap junctions as well as possible changes of LV filling pressure etc.

Substantially delayed regional activation due to severe ischemia affecting also the Purkinje cells.

Thus the overall explanation for QRS changes in the ischemic myocardium is complex and multifactorial. Some of these effects are well correlated to and secondary to the injury current and ST-segment deviation, whereas others are related more to other, secondary effects of ischemia.

The solid angle theory76, as already described and illustrated in Figure 1.8 can serve as a model to explain some of the above mentioned factors that may affect also the R-wave amplitude level observed in a certain anatomically oriented ECG lead. The higher the conductivity factor (K), the greater R-wave amplitude will be registered on the surface ECG lead. Conductivity is affected by acute myocardial ischemia by several factors, such as changes in volume of intra- and extra-cellular space, acidosis, effects on gap-junctions etc. Overall this results in an increase in the conductivity factor, thus an increase of the R-wave amplitude.

Page 38: Ventricular Depolarization in Ischemic Heart Disease.Value

Ventricular Depolarization: ECG assessment of Severity and Extent of Acute Ischemia

19

Severe ischemia and slow conduction Although several factors may contribute to QRS changes during acute myocardial ischemia, an important pathophysiologic distinction could be made between these and QRS changes due to severe ischemia with significant effect on conduction through the ischemic area. In unprotected myocardium without well-developed collaterals or metabolic preconditioning, the response to sudden coronary occlusion is severe ischemia with rapid progress of myocardial necrosis over time. The most severe ischemia is within the subendocardial layer, but can extend throughout the myocardial wall over time.

During severe ischemia, the fast-conducting under normal circumstances, and ischemia-resistant Purkinje cell network, is also affected. This significantly slows conduction of the activation wavefront locally through the ischemic region64-66. Due to delayed activation, electrical forces heading in other directions at the instant of this area´s normal depolarization will be unopposed, whereas the later activation within the ischemic region causes the later QRS waveforms to deviate toward this region. The most important QRS changes due to this primary effect on delayed regional depolarization will thus appear in the terminal part of the QRS waveform and may prolong the overall QRS duration.

1.3.1 Standard, 12-lead ECG Depending on the lead distribution and the location of the affected myocardial region the following can be seen on the standard 12-lead ECG:

Augmentation of the R wave in leads with qR configuration overlying the ischemic region.

Decrease or total loss of the S wave in leads with an rS configuration (typically anteroseptal leads) overlying the ischemic zone.

Increase of the overall QRS duration if the ischemic area is large.

1.3.1.1 QRS amplitude changes Several experimental animal studies have reported reversible QRS-amplitude changes, such as increased R waves and decreased S waves during transient ischemia due to coronary occlusion. These QRS amplitude changes have been shown to correlate to delayed regional depolarization evaluated by simultaneous registration of the conduction velocity92-96. In humans such changes were first described by Rakita et al. in patients with Prinzmetal´s angina, due to short episodes of coronary vasospam97. They described almost instant augmentation of the R wave in leads overlying the ischemic region during Holter monitoring, followed by rapid normalization to baseline levels. Later these findings have been

Page 39: Ventricular Depolarization in Ischemic Heart Disease.Value

Michael Ringborn, M.D.

20

confirmed in studies performed during short (most often 0.5-2 minutes) episodes of elective PCI-induced transmural ischemia98-103.

In the early setting of acute MI some studies have characterized changes mostly in the terminal QRS amplitudes as well as findings of potential reversibility of Q waves104-107.

A practical limitation to the evaluation of QRS changes during acute MI, as compared to ST-segment evaluation, is an absent “isoelectric baseline”. Due to most often gradual changes of the QRS complex an earlier ECG recording in a pain-free situation under normal conditions are thus needed to make accurate comparisons as regards the ischemia-induced QRS changes. Furthermore, significant differences of electrode position, as well as changes of body position may alter the QRS morphology.

1.3.1.2 The Sclarovsky-Birnbaum ischemia grading The Sclarovsky-Birnbaum ischemia grading (S-B grading) system grades ischemia based on characteristics of the ECG in patients with STEMI (Figure 1.9). It is a “snapshot” grading system with no comparison to baseline ECGs. It defines three grades of ischemia with increasing severity as proposed by Sclarovsky and Birnbaum in the early 1990s108, 109:

Grade 1 (G1): Tall T waves with no ST elevation. Grade 2 (G2): ST elevation of ≥1 mV in ≥2 adjacent leads without

distortion of the terminal portion of the QRS complex. Grade 3 (G3): ST elevation of ≥1 mV in ≥2 adjacent leads with

terminal QRS distortion.

Terminal QRS distortion is related to the previously mentioned characteristics of more severe ischemia, thus increased R waves and diminished S waves directed towards the electrodes overlying the ischemic region. Since grade 1 is a very brief and early phase in acute MI, it is seldom seen clinically. To make the dichotomized distinction between grade 2 and 3 without a previous baseline, two different grade 3 criteria were proposed depending on the terminal QRS configuration of the ECG leads with ST elevation:

1. Complete loss of S waves in typical leads with rS configuration, such as V1-V3.

2. ST-J point to R-wave amplitude ratio of greater than 0.5 in all other leads (with qR configuration).

Page 40: Ventricular Depolarization in Ischemic Heart Disease.Value

Ventricular Depolarization: ECG assessment of Severity and Extent of Acute Ischemia

21

FIGURE 1.9. Criteria for the Sclarovsky-Birnbaum severity ischemia grading. The denotations I, II and III correspond to ischemia grade 1, 2 and 3, respectively. Loss of S wave in leads with Rs configuration and ST-J elevation larger than 50% of the R-wave height-Grade 3-is highlighted by circle and arrows, respectively. Adapted from Birnbaum et al.110 with permission.

Prior studies have shown G3 to predict higher mortality (short, medium and long term) than G2 on admission ECG in patients treated either by thrombolysis109, 111,

112 or pPCI113-115. Furthermore, G3 has been associated with larger infarct size, as estimated by cardiac biochemical marker release55-57,115-118, Selvester QRS scoring118, SPECT56,119-121 and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI)117. Birnbaum et al.56 reported significantly larger infarct size by pre-discharge SPECT in patients with G3 compared to G2, after thrombolytic therapy. The other studies evaluating ischemia grades by SPECT or MRI were after pPCI, however with small sample size117, 119-121.

Despite the numerous studies mentioned above, ischemia grading has not been routinely incorporated into clinical risk management of STEMI. Some questions still remain unanswered.

The pathophysiological mechanisms for differentiation between G2 ischemia and supposedly more severe G3 ischemia are still unclear.

Reversible QRS changes have been observed in animal experiments, in Prinzmetal´s angina, during elective PCI and in the initial phase of acute MI compared to baseline (as reported above). However, it is still unclear whether the ECG characteristics in the S-B ischemia grading involving “QRS distortion” imply

Page 41: Ventricular Depolarization in Ischemic Heart Disease.Value

Michael Ringborn, M.D.

22

that myocardial salvage is possible after reperfusion therapy administered hours after symptom onset in the STEMI situation.

One key question is whether G3 changes in STEMI reflect severely ischemic myocardium with salvage potential after reperfusion or is a sign of large, already mostly irreversible infarcted myocardium without significant salvage potential.

A consistent finding in previous ischemia grading studies has been similar time intervals from symptom onset to treatment in patients with or without “terminal QRS distortion”. Furthermore, comparable pre-treatment MaR between the grades have been seen in the limited information from SPECT or MRI117,119,120 studies, with one exception, were only patients with anterior MI were included and in which also more severe ischemia by SPECT was noted for G3121. All prior studies showed patients with G3 to have a larger final infarct size as compared to patients with G2. From these results G3 has thus been assumed to be a sign of more severe ischemia in less protected myocardium, thus more prone to rapid infarct development. Further larger studies are needed with cardiac imaging data as the gold standard for MaR and IS.

In the vast majority of previous studies only the admission ECG, close in time to the subsequent reperfusion treatment, has been considered. If the hypothesis regarding severity of ischemia and rapid infarct evolution in G3 is correct, very early identification of G3 in the pre-hospital phase is necessary in order to make a difference in treatment strategy, for example. Also, the dynamic behavior of ischemia grading between the pre-hospital ECG and ECG just prior to pPCI would be of interest to explore.

Another key factor regarding the S-B ischemia grading system is that the two separate G3 criteria may represent different pathophysiological stages along the acute MI process. The G3 criterion based on the ratio between ST-J and R-wave amplitude could be due to severe ischemia with still augmented R waves and high ST-segment elevation. However as severe ischemia within the MaR gradually progresses into larger degree of necrosis, the R-wave amplitude as well as ST-segment elevation gradually decline, thus the ratio may theoretically be unchanged although the myocardium at risk has gone further into an irreversible infarction process. The loss of the S-wave criterion, on the other hand, may be a more reliable sign of severe ischemia and not an already necrotic area since an MI within the anterior region itself is not affecting the terminal part of the QRS complex by reduction or loss of the S wave77. This ischemia grading will be further elaborated on in Study IV of this thesis.

Page 42: Ventricular Depolarization in Ischemic Heart Disease.Value

Ventricular Depolarization: ECG assessment of Severity and Extent of Acute Ischemia

23

1.3.1.3 QRS prolongation Prolongation of the QRS complex has furthermore been described as a marker of more severe ischemia with slow conduction, both in animal and human studies during PCI and acute MI54, 98, 100, 107, 122.

In a large cohort of 17,073 STEMI patients (HERO-2-trial substudies), Wong et al. reported an independent, positive relationship between QRS duration on the admission ECG and 30-day mortality for anterior infarct location. This was observed in patients presenting with, or developing RBBB, within 60 minutes after thrombolysis123, as well as, in a second study, in patients without RBBB, but with an intraventricular conduction delay124. After adjustments for confounding clinical and electrocardiographic factors (such as ST-segment elevation level and presence of Q waves), a 30-40% relative increase in 30-day mortality risk per 20 ms QRS prolongation was shown. This was, however, found only in patients with anterior infarct location, but not in inferior location.

In the clinical situation, prolongation of the QRS duration is, however, difficult to determine correctly, since ST elevation commonly obscures the delineation between the end of depolarization and the beginning of repolarization.

1.3.1.4 QRS changes and myocardial infarction According to the sequence of ventricular depolarization described above, an evolving and later manifest MI comprised of necrotic, electrically inactive cells, will affect the wave front differently depending on the size and location of the infarcted area in relation to the exploring ECG electrode.

The balanced, smooth and homogenous ventricular vector is now affected by an inactive, electrically silent area. In contrast to the previously described ischemia/severe ischemia with injury current and delayed, regional activation, changing the vector towards the ischemic area, an infarcted region moves the vector away from the area. Thus, the electrode overlying the infarcted area will not register any signals from the necrotic area, but displays a new resultant at each time interval produced by unopposed signals from the opposite wall.

Page 43: Ventricular Depolarization in Ischemic Heart Disease.Value

Michael Ringborn, M.D.

24

FIGURE 1.10 Rapid, balanced, synchronous conduction by the specialized ventricular conduction system (upper illustration) results in the normal symmetrical activation of both inferior and anterosuperior walls. In the lower picture, loss of inferior forces due to an inferior MI, while still normal anteroseptal forces, produce an imbalance and inferior Q waves (exemplified by lead aVF). Asynchronic, delayed activation of the subepicardial layers overlying the infarct blocks normal endo- to epicardial activation and may also produce a notched R wave in the MI region. Adjusted from Boineau125,with permission.

The changes seen in the QRS complex are related to the timing at which the necrotic area would normally be activated during depolarization.

Thus a Q wave will be the result in an early activated area, where the overlying electrode normally registers a positive initial deflection, but is now “seeing” more of a negative, opposite force in respect to its position initially in the depolarization phase. However due to the location, size and spatial relationship to the exploring electrodes, an MI can result in different changes in the QRS complex, including notches, or fragmentation of the QRS complex, R-wave changes, variations in the R-wave and S-wave ratio etc., as illustrated in Figures 1.10 and 1.11.

Initial force

Mean force Terminal force

Page 44: Ventricular Depolarization in Ischemic Heart Disease.Value

Ventricular Depolarization: ECG assessment of Severity and Extent of Acute Ischemia

25

FIGURE 1.11 Simulated and observed effects of small, apical posterolateral infarcts. The four panels represent the effects of a small infarct (15x20x5 mm) placed (or found) at various levels of the apical posterolateral segment of the Selvester-Solomon fine grid (1 mm3) forward simulation of the human heart and its electrical field. Lead V6 is shown, and the dotted line in each case represents normal activation without infarct. The lesion was located in the apical endocardium in the first panel and moved outward 2 mm and more basal in each of the following panels. The arrows across the top represent the time when the activation front passed the center of the infarct in each case. It is important to note, as represented by the vertical bar between the solid line of the waveform of the infarct ECG and the normal dotted line, that in each of these waveforms, the basic finding is the lost R wave. In the first panel, the early loss of the R wave is a Q wave; in the second, it is a notched R wave, etc. The larger the posterolateral infarct, the smaller the R wave in lead V6 and the broader the Q and S waves. Adapted from Selvester126 with permission.

Previously, Q waves were considered an irreversible sign of transmural infarct. However, it has been found that a Q wave that appears early during the infarct process can be a transient finding127-129, and it can also indicate a large subendocardial extent of the infarction130, 131.

1.3.1.5 Selvester QRS score Based on the normal sequence of ventricular depolarization and how it is affected by local loss of electromotive force at various locations due to an MI, Selvester et al., by meticulous computer simulations132, developed a scoring system for both detecting and quantifying a previous MI by QRS analysis of the 12-lead standard ECG77. The practical application of the system was evaluated in humans in the 1980s by Wagner et al. including validation by correlation to post-mortem

Page 45: Ventricular Depolarization in Ischemic Heart Disease.Value

Michael Ringborn, M.D.

26

findings at different infarct locations133-136. In the present 50-criteria/31-point QRS score, each point corresponds to 3% infarction of the LV myocardium. The score has been further evaluated for predicting clinical prognosis after AMI137,138, as well as correlation to infarct size determined by SPECT and MRI131,139,140.

In addition to infarct quantification, screening criteria for detection of old MIs using a subset of the criteria have been developed141. The three criteria are: 1.) Inferior MI location: in lead aVF- Q wave greater than or equal to 30 ms, 2.) Anterior MI location: In lead V2- any Q wave or R wave less than or equal to 0.1 mV and 10 ms and 3.) Posterior MI location: In lead V1- R wave greater than or equal to 40 ms. Sensitivities of 84% and 77% were found for detection of single inferior and anterior infarct locations, respectively, by using these screening criteria. The rate of false identification of MI in normal subjects was 5%141. This method was used in Study I and will be further described in the Methods section.

1.3.2 High frequency QRS analysis based on the 12-lead ECG system

High frequency QRS components (HF-QRS) In the standard ECG, by convention, only frequencies in the range 0.05-150 Hz are considered. It has been found that the signal also contains high-frequency components, in particular within the depolarization phase.

Analysis of HF-QRS (frequencies >150Hz) thus offers the possibility of visualizing changes during depolarization in the ischemic myocardial tissue not seen in the standard ECG. These HF-components have very low amplitude compared to the standard ECG (µV compared to mV).

To extract the HF-QRS, first high resolution ECG recordings both in sampling frequency and amplitude resolution are needed. In general, a sampling rate twice the highest frequency to be evaluated is needed in order to avoid distortion of the signal. Mostly HF-QRS components within the frequency range 150-250Hz has been studied. In the HF-QRS related studies in this thesis (Studies I and II), a sampling frequency of 1000 Hz and amplitude resolution of 0.6µV were used.

The signal then needs to be averaged in order to reduce the noise level, thus increasing the signal-to-noise ratio. Subsequently, the signal-averaged QRS complexes are filtered in order to retrieve the specific HF-QRS components within a certain frequency band (most often 150-250 Hz). The most common way to quantify HF-QRS is by calculation of RMS values, by which the average amplitude of the HF-signal within the entire QRS complex is determined.

The pathophysiological basis of HF-QRS changes during ischemia is still not fully understood, but considered to be related to changes of the conduction velocity between the myocardial cells and/or the specialized conduction system142,143.

Page 46: Ventricular Depolarization in Ischemic Heart Disease.Value

Ventricular Depolarization: ECG assessment of Severity and Extent of Acute Ischemia

27

Earlier studies have shown a decrease of the HF-QRS during acute myocardial ischemia from coronary occlusion in animals,144-146 and during short elective PCI in humans147-150. Furthermore, an increase of the HF-QRS has been observed during successful reperfusion by thrombolytic therapy of an acute myocardial infarction151,152. It has been reported that changes of HF-QRS is more sensitive than ST-segment deviation for detecting acute coronary artery occlusion149. None of these prior studies have, however, quantified the ischemia during coronary occlusion, or described the relationship between changes in HF-QRS and the extent (MaR) and severity of the ischemia as indicated by SPECT images.

Furthermore, studies of the levels of HF-QRS in the later, chronic phase after an acute MI comparing subgroups of individuals with and without prior MI have shown conflicting results. Both decrease and increase of HF-QRS after infarction have been reported in different bandwidths, in small samples and only in few ECG leads153-155.

Further understanding of how HF-QRS correlate to acute ischemia and their levels during situations with healed myocardial infarcts is needed.

HF-QRS analysis offers a unique possibility to evaluate information that perhaps could not be retrieved from a regular 12-lead ECG. However, it needs technically advanced methods and longer ECG recording for optimal signal-to-noise ratio.

1.3.3 QRS slope analysis based on 12-lead ECG system Hypothesizing that changes in the myocardial conduction velocity could be estimated with less advanced methods than the high resolution, signal-averaged, filtered and noise sensitive HF-QRS method, Pueyo et al. in 2008 proposed a method for evaluation of depolarization changes by analyzing the slopes of the QRS complex: upward slope between Q and R waves (US) and downward slope between R and S waves (DS)156. During coronary artery occlusion by PCI, the QRS slopes became considerably less steep than in the control situation, in particular for the DS, as a combined result of both changes of the QRS amplitudes and duration. Furthermore, the QRS slope indices showed ischemia-induced alterations of twice the magnitude of that for HF-QRS analysis and was proposed to be a more robust method of measuring dynamic depolarization changes without requirements of signal averaging and much less noise dependent156.

To make it more robust in clinical situations, further development of this methodology is needed as well as more understanding of its clinical applicability, why we addressed these aspects to Study III in this thesis, as well as in Technical Supplementary Study157 and in a pig experimental MI study158.

Page 47: Ventricular Depolarization in Ischemic Heart Disease.Value

Michael Ringborn, M.D.

28

1.3.4 QRS evaluation by vectorcardiography (VCG) In addition to the clinically most appreciated standard 12-lead ECG system applied throughout this thesis, evaluation of QRS changes can also be performed using other lead configurations and ways to represent the magnitude and direction of the electrical activation of the myocardium, such as vectorcardiography (VCG). By this method a 3-dimensional view of the electrical activation sequence is produced by the orthogonal leads X (representing the left-right axis), Y (representing the caudal-cranial axis) and Z (representing the posterior-anterior axis). By combining pairs of these, three orthogonal planes are obtained (XY-frontal plane; XZ-transverse plane and YZ-sagittal plane). At every instant throughout the cell cycle a vector with a specific magnitude and direction is plotted in space, by which a “VCG loop” is constructed. The shape, area and direction of the rotation of the loop is then analyzed. Both animal and human studies have shown QRS changes by this method to detect acute myocardial ischemia as well correlate with MaR and IS159-162. Dellborg et al. furthermore tested its feasibility and clinical application of QRS monitoring in patients during unstable angina as well in acute MI after thrombolytic therapy163-165. It is beyond the scope of this thesis to additionally explore the VCG method. However, this approach has added further evidence to the value of including depolarization changes to the overall evaluation of the ECG in acute myocardial ischemia.

Page 48: Ventricular Depolarization in Ischemic Heart Disease.Value

Ventricular Depolarization: ECG assessment of Severity and Extent of Acute Ischemia

29

1.4 Myocardial Single Photon Emission Computed Tomography (SPECT)

SPECT is the most commonly used myocardial perfusion imaging (MPI) technique, by which a radioactive tracer, injected intravenously and distributed throughout the myocardium in proportion to coronary blood flow, is visualized by subsequent gamma camera analysis. The nuclear activity measured at the image acquisition reflects the myocardial perfusion at the time of injection. The technique allows estimation of myocardial blood flow both at rest and during exercise. For years it has been widely used clinically in the setting of stress test as a mean of detecting stable, stress induced IHD as well as estimating the size and location of the ischemia.

It can also be used in the acute setting of IHD as an adjunctive tool to differentiate unstable angina and NSTEMI from non-cardiac symptoms166.

1.4.1 Radioactive tracers: Tc-99m Sestamibi Imaging of coronary perfusion is dependent on the physical properties of the radioactive tracer by its delivery to the heart as well as the uptake and retention by the myocardial cells. The optimal tracer has the following characteristics: High first-pass uptake by the myocardium. Linear relationship between uptake and perfusion. An uptake independent of metabolic status of the cell. Stable retention within the cells throughout the completed imaging

procedure. Technetium-99m labeled tracers preferably used today were developed in the late 1980s167 as to better meet the favorable characteristics above as compared to previous agents. In addition technetium-99m has both higher photon energy and a shorter half-life, resulting in improved image resolution. Studies included in this thesis utilized the Tc99m-labeled compound 99mTc-sestamibi (Cardiolite TM).

Sestamibi is a lipophilic monovalent cation (thus positively charged). This characteristic enables it to passively cross the myocardial cell membrane into the plasma and be accumulated in the mitochondria by the negative membrane potential168. Unlike previous agents (Thallium), this agent does not need help from the Na+-K+-ATPase pump in order to cross the cell membrane169. The myocardial distribution is proportional to the blood flow up to 2-3 times the resting flow levels. However, animal models have indicated a higher cell uptake relative to the blood flow at very low levels of perfusion, thus slightly underestimating the perfusion defect170.

Page 49: Ventricular Depolarization in Ischemic Heart Disease.Value

Michael Ringborn, M.D.

30

Sestamibi is stable within the myocardial cells undergoing only minimal redistribution. A clearance of less than 15% during a four hour period has been reported170. This makes it suitable for situations where the time interval from intravenous administration to acquisition of the tomographic imaging by the gamma camera is prolonged.

1.4.2 Tomographic imaging acquisition Subsequent to administration of the radionuclide agent the images are acquired by a gamma camera. Basically, when the gamma radiation emitted by the tracer hits the camera the photon energy (when interacting with a sodium iodine crystal) produces a scintillation effect, or flash of light. This is registered by photomultiplier tubes, then amplified, and the energy and spatial location of the photon are recorded. A lead collimator is positioned in the front of the detector of the camera, so only photons that hit the detector at a 90 degree angle are registered. Usually two detectors are used, set at 90 degree angles to each other. The detectors rotate around the patient and acquire at least 30 projections over a 180-degree arc. The set of planar images is subsequently reconstructed and processed by filtered back projection, iterative reconstruction and low-pass filtering to compensate for various degrees of technical artifacts, attenuation of signals, as well as to enhance the image resolution and reduce noise.

This results in a large set of transaxial images perpendicular to the long axis of the patient´s body. These images are then oriented correctly according to the heart, as to present vertical- and horizontal long-axis planes, as well as short-axis plane. From the short-axis slices polar plots, or bull´s eye images, can be constructed, which cover all left ventricular myocardium.

These images can be either manually or automatically analyzed with regard to the location, extent (MaR) and severity of the myocardial perfusion defects (see specific methods section for Studies II-IV). Perfusion myocardial scintigraphy by 99mTc-sestamibi has proved to be a reliable method of detecting and quantifying MaR as well as final IS and salvage after reperfusion therapy in studies with acute myocardial infarction171-176. It has also been used for assessment of MaR and severity in studies of reversible ischemia induced by elective PCI177,178. Christian et al. have shown the association between 99mTc-sestamibi SPECT estimation of severity and collateral flow in animals as well as in acute MI in humans172,179.

Page 50: Ventricular Depolarization in Ischemic Heart Disease.Value

Ventricular Depolarization: ECG assessment of Severity and Extent of Acute Ischemia

31

2 Aims of the thesis

The overall objectives of this thesis were to increase the understanding of depolarization changes during myocardial ischemia and to evaluate whether these changes have possible clinical implications in patients with acute myocardial ischemia. Based on the 12-lead ECG, different methods for evaluation of depolarization were applied in ischemic situations produced by controlled, prolonged PCI on humans and in clinical STEMI situations. Comparisons were made with conventional ECG parameters as well as non-electrocardiographic quantitative measures such as SPECT. The specific aims for each study were:

Study I To compare HF-QRS in patients with and without standard ECG changes indicative of a previous MI.

Study II To test the ability of HF-QRS changes versus conventional ST-segment measurements to detect and quantify the extent and severity of myocardial ischemia, produced by acute coronary occlusion.

Study III To investigate whether the potentially more readily available (compared with HF-QRS), QRS-slopes are associated with the extent and severity of myocardial ischemia produced by temporary occlusion of a coronary artery, and test their performance against conventional ECG measures.

Study IV To study whether the Sclarovsky-Birnbaum ischemia grade on the pre-hospital ECG and its changes during transport to a PCI lab are associated with infarct size and myocardial salvage after pPCI.

Page 51: Ventricular Depolarization in Ischemic Heart Disease.Value
Page 52: Ventricular Depolarization in Ischemic Heart Disease.Value

Ventricular Depolarization: ECG assessment of Severity and Extent of Acute Ischemia

33

3 Materials and methods

3.1 Study populations Patients from three populations were studied. The STAFF III protocol was designed in order to study ECG changes during total coronary occlusion by prolonged balloon PCI as a model for the first 5 minutes of an acute MI. Quantification of ischemia was by SPECT imaging. The STRESS protocol was designed to evaluate ECG changes during ischemia evoked by a bicycle stress test and quantified by SPECT. However, only control ECG recordings before the stress test were used in this thesis. ST-monitoring in AMI patients (MONAMI) database includes three randomized trial populations of STEMI patients assigned by the pre-hospital ECG to receive pPCI180-182. Acute (before pPCI) and 30-day SPECT imaging studies were performed to estimate MaR and IS.

3.1.1 “STAFF III” population This is a dataset collected by me in Charleston, WV, USA during 1995-96. It comprises a total of 102 consecutive patients referred for elective balloon PCI with prolonged occlusion (5 minutes; before the stent era) due to stable, stress induced angina pectoris . In each patient acquisition of continuous, high resolution 12-lead ECGs were performed. The first, as a control for 5 minutes before the procedure, then during the entire PCI as well as another control, for 5 minutes at rest, after the procedure. In a subset of patients (n=40) additional acquisition of SPECT images during the procedure (tracer injection during occlusion) as well as a second, control SPECT imaging with a new tracer injection and imaging procedure the day after the procedure were performed, in order to quantify the amount of ischemia during balloon occlusion. All patients were clinically stable between the two SPECT studies.

In Studies II and III, only patients from the STAFF III population with a complete set of scintigraphic images (during PCI and the day after the procedure) were eligible. Comparisons between pre-procedural control, and dynamic occlusion ECGs were performed and correlated to SPECT data.

In Study II, a subset of 21 patients was included. Since it is essential to have as noise-free data as possible while studying the low-amplitude HF-QRS signals, very strict criteria were applied regarding noise level in the ECG signal for each of the 12 leads. In Study III, 38 patients were included.

Page 53: Ventricular Depolarization in Ischemic Heart Disease.Value

Michael Ringborn, M.D.

34

3.1.2 “STRESS” population This data was collected at the Department of Clinical Physiology in Lund 1995-97. A total of 117 consecutive patients undergoing elective bicycle stress tests with myocardial SPECT due to suspect, stable angina pectoris were enrolled. Continuous 5-minutes, 12-lead, high resolution ECG at rest before and after the stress test were acquired, as well as a “stress recording” immediately after finishing the stress test.

None of the patients in the STAFF III or STRESS populations had any clinical or ECG evidence of an acute or recent MI.

In Study I, control recordings in patients from both STAFF III and STRESS were considered. A total of 154 patients were included in the study. Patients with confounding factors in their ECG or inadequate ECG signal quality were excluded.

3.1.3 “MONAMI” population This is a database of 892 STEMI patients referred for pPCI to Skejby University Hospital, Aarhus, Denmark between 2004 and 2008180-182. An index, pre-hospital or local hospital, 12-lead ECG, as well as a pre-PCI ECG at the cath lab were recorded on each patient. Furthermore, continuous 12-lead ECG recordings during the pre-hospital phase up to 90 minutes post-pPCI were acquired. Multiple clinical parameters including basic characteristics, angiographic variables and cardiac biochemical marker (TnT) analyses were collected. In a subset of patients, acute SPECT imaging (tracer injection in the cath lab before pPCI) was performed to determine the MaR, and 30-day SPECT imaging was performed to estimate final IS.

In Study IV, a subpopulation of 401 patients with a first acute MI, no prior CABG, complete index and pre-PCI, 12-lead ECGs with good signal quality as well as 30-day SPECT imaging for estimation of final IS were included. Further exclusion criteria were QRS duration>120 ms, LBBB or RBBB on index ECG, ventricular or ventricular paced rhythm, LVH in either of the two ECGs and inverted T waves in leads with maximal ST elevation on the index ECG.

3.2 Ethical considerations The design and protocols for the “STAFF III” and “STRESS” studies were approved by the local ethics committee in Charleston, West Virginia, USA and at Lund University, Lund, Sweden, respectively. Patients in the “MONAMI database” where included in three separate clinical trials180-182, for which each protocol and design was approved by the ethics committee at Skejby University, Aarhus,

Page 54: Ventricular Depolarization in Ischemic Heart Disease.Value

Ventricular Depolarization: ECG assessment of Severity and Extent of Acute Ischemia

35

Denmark. Prior to enrolment all patients gave their written informed consent for participation in the studies.

3.3 ECG analysis and processing

3.3.1 ECG acquisition

Studies I, II and III ECGs in both the “STAFF III” and “STRESS” populations were recorded using equipment provided by Siemens-Elema AB (Solna, Sweden). For the limb leads, Mason-Likar electrode configuration was used to minimize noise levels183. The precordial leads were obtained using the standard electrode placements. The signals were digitized at a sampling rate of 1000 Hz, with an amplitude resolution of 0.6 μV.

The control recordings (Study I) were acquired continuously for 5 minutes while the patient rested in the supine position, before exercise testing (“STRESS” patients) or in the cath lab, before any catheter insertion (“STAFF III” patients). None of the patients had clinical evidence of acute myocardial ischemia during the ECG recording.

In the “STAFF III” patients, a second ECG recording was initiated approximately 1 minute before balloon inflation and then continued until approximately 4 minutes after the balloon was deflated. The coronary occlusion period was extracted for further signal processing (Study II and III). To enable accurate comparison of ECG variables between recordings, electrodes were either retained on the patient or removed, and their exact positions marked. If more than one balloon occlusion was performed during the procedure, only the first was considered, to avoid possible bias due to either persistent ischemia in the myocardium or ischemia-induced collateral recruitment and preconditioning within the area of a previous occlusion.

Study IV The index ECGs denoted as “pre-hospital ECGs” were acquired in the ambulance, or at a local hospital, before transfer to the PCI-center. A Lifepak-12 emergency care monitor (Medtronic Emergency Response Systems, Redmond, WA, USA) with Mason-Likar electrode placement183 was used for 12-lead ECG pre-hospital acquisition as well as for continuous ST-segment monitoring. On arrival at the cath lab, patients had radiolucent carbon fiber lead wire electrodes mounted (Ambu Blue Sensor QR electrodes, Ambu A/S, Ballerup, Denmark) enabling both recording of the pre-PCI ECG and also ST monitoring during and after the PCI

Page 55: Ventricular Depolarization in Ischemic Heart Disease.Value

Michael Ringborn, M.D.

36

procedure. The same monitor defibrillator (LIFEPAK 12) was used during and after pPCI. The analog ECG signals were digitized at a sampling rate of 500 Hz for processing by the GE/Marquette Medical Systems 12SL (Waukesha, WI, USA). Every 30 second, the built-in ST monitoring software automatically generated a median QRST complex for each of the 12 leads based on a 10-second interval of ECG data. From each of these median QRST complexes, the level of ST deviation at STM (J+1/16 of the average R-R interval), was stored. In the event of at least 0.1 mV change in STM for at least 2.5 minutes, the software automatically stored a complete 12-lead ECG waveform. ST monitoring was terminated 90 minutes after pPCI. All 12-lead ECGs and continuous ST-monitoring data were transferred to a personal computer and stored for subsequent analysis.

3.3.2 Standard 12-lead ECG analysis

Study II All ST-segment analyses in Study II were performed automatically with software developed by the Signal Processing Group, Department of Applied Electronics, Lund University, Sweden and additionally, manually checked by visual inspection of ECG print-outs. To make the comparison between standard ST-segment deviation and the HF-QRS, these two measurements were made at the same instant during both the control and at the end of the dynamic PCI recordings. The ST-segment measurements were made in each lead at the ST-J point + 60 ms, using the PR interval as the isoelectric level. The rationale for choosing ST-J point +60 ms was to avoid possible incorrect measurement of the ST segment, which is more likely at the J point because of the higher risk for its misdelineation. Maximal, single-lead ST elevation (ΔST elevation between PCI recording and control) was determined for each patient, as well as the calculation of the sum of ΔST deviation (both elevation and depression) among all 12 leads.

STEMI criteria from the 2000 ESC/ACC consensus document184 were used as an indication of coronary occlusion in this PCI model (except from using ST-J+60 ms instead of ST-J): Absolute ST elevation in 2 or more contiguous leads with cut points of 0.2 mV or higher in leads V1, V2, or V3, and 0.1 mV in other leads (contiguity in the frontal plane is defined by the lead sequence aVL, I, -aVR, II, aVF, and III).

Study III ST-segment analysis ST-segment measurements were made automatically with software developed by the Communications Technology Group of Aragón Institute for Engineering

Page 56: Ventricular Depolarization in Ischemic Heart Disease.Value

Ventricular Depolarization: ECG assessment of Severity and Extent of Acute Ischemia

37

Research (I3A), University of Zaragoza and CIBER-BBN, Spain (including additional manual check of ECG print-outs), in each lead at the ST-J point, using the PR interval as the isoelectric level. Absolute ST-deviation ΔSTPCI at the end of the PCI recording relative to the ST level at rest was determined for each lead. In addition, maximal, single-lead ST elevation as well as the sum of ST elevation among all leads at the end of the PCI recording were determined for each patient. Standard QRS analysis R- and S-wave amplitudes were automatically measured (by the Zaragoza, Spain software) using the PR interval as the isoelectric level. Deltas of R- and S-wave amplitudes were determined in each lead at the end of the PCI recording as compared to baseline. The QRS duration was determined by taking a global measurement from the standard 12 leads. In each beat, the earliest QRS onset and the latest QRS offset among the 12 leads were selected as the beginning and end, respectively, of the depolarization phase taken as the longest temporal projection for the electrical activity of the depolarization. In addition, a multi-lead detection rule185was applied to reduce the risk of erroneous estimation, for example, due to large simultaneous ST segment deviation or noise, as explained in detail in Study III.

Study IV For inclusion in Study IV current STEMI criteria15 had to be met by the index, pre-hospital ECG: ST elevation at the J-point in ≥2 contiguous leads of ≥0.1 mV in all leads other than V2 and V3, where cut points are ≥0.2 mV for men and ≥0.15 mV for women. These limits were manually checked.

The commercially available CodeStat Suite software (Medtronic Emergency Response System Inc, Redmond, WA, USA) was used for analysis of continuous ST monitoring data and 12-lead ECGs. Maximal ST elevation in any lead in the pre-hospital and pre-PCI ECGs were defined. Maximal cumulated ST elevation was determined by summation of the maximal pre-PCI ST elevation in each lead representing anterior ischemia (requiring ≥ 0.2mV in leads V1 -V3, and ≥ 0.1 mV in leads I, aVL, V4-V6) and in each lead representing non-anterior ischemia (≥0.1 mV required in II, III, aVF, V5-V6), respectively. In patients with non-anterior ischemia who also had lateral (formerly labeled “posterior”) ischemia, ST depression in leads V1-V4 of ≥0.1 mV were added to the maximal cumulated ST elevation. Spontaneous ST resolution from pre-hospital to the pre-PCI ECG was defined as: ST resolution to <0.1 mV in leads I, II, III, aVL, aVF, V4-V6 and <0.2 mV in V1-V3.

Post-procedural ST resolution (STR) was determined in the lead with the maximum pre-interventional ST elevation. Relative ST resolution by at least 70% within 90 minutes after the first PCI was determined, as well as the time to reach

Page 57: Ventricular Depolarization in Ischemic Heart Disease.Value

Michael Ringborn, M.D.

38

this threshold. Furthermore, absolute single-lead ST elevation was determined at 30 minutes after first PCI.

Presence of Q waves were determined in pre-hospital and pre-PCI ECGs, respectively. The Q wave definition applied was the criteria from “The third universal definition of AMI” document in 201215, as described in detail in Study IV.

3.3.2.1 Selvester QRS scoring (Study I) In Study I, the Selvester QRS scoring system77 was used to determine the presence, location and size of previous MIs as indicated by the standard 12-lead ECG. The scoring system is displayed in Figure 3.1.

Scoring was performed by two independent investigators (M.R. and G.W.) blinded to other data. Any differences were identified and adjudicated. To be considered as indicating a previous MI, the ECG had to either:

1. Meet the Anderson screening criteria set from the complete Selvester QRS scoring system141 for one or more MI locations:

a. Inferior location: In lead aVF- Q wave ≥30 ms. b. Anterior location: In lead V2- Any Q wave, or R wave ≤0.1 mV

and ≤10 ms. c. Posterior location: In lead V1- R wave ≥40 ms.

or,

2. Achieve ≥4 points from non-screening criteria, with ≥2 of these points

awarded in other leads than V4-V6186. The location of the MI was indicated by the presence of either a screening criterion, or at least 2 points from non-screening criteria. Patients meeting criteria for both inferior and posterior location were regarded as inferior. The size of the MI was determined according to the Selvester QRS scoring system as illustrated in Figure 3.1. “No MI” was defined as neither any of the Anderson screening criteria in any available cycles, nor >2 points from non-screening criteria.

Page 58: Ventricular Depolarization in Ischemic Heart Disease.Value

Ventricular Depolarization: ECG assessment of Severity and Extent of Acute Ischemia

39

FIGURE 3.1 The 50-criteria, 31 point Selvester QRS scoring system. Criteria for each lead are shown. If 2 or more criteria are met within the same box, only the one presenting the highest point is considered. Below each lead maximum lead score is shown within parenthesis. Each point corresponds to 3% of the LV myocardium. In gray circles Anderson screening criteria are marked, whereas arrows depict the respective MI location.

Posterior location

Inferior location

Anterior location

Page 59: Ventricular Depolarization in Ischemic Heart Disease.Value

Michael Ringborn, M.D.

40

3.3.2.2 Sclarovsky-Birnbaum ischemia grading (Study IV) In Study IV, the pre-hospital and pre-PCI ECGs from each patient were separately evaluated by two experienced cardiologists (M.R. and Y.B.) blinded to all clinical patient data. Any disagreement was resolved in a second round by consensus.

Grade 3 was defined as >2 adjacent leads with ST elevation and either:

1. Complete loss of S waves in leads V1 to V3 (typical leads with baseline rS configuration), or

2. ST-J point to R-wave amplitude ratio of greater than 0.5 in other leads with baseline qR configuration.

Only ECG leads meeting the STEMI threshold187 accompanied by positive T waves in leads with the largest ST-elevation were considered in the grading. Patients who met the STEMI criteria187 but not the above grade 3 criteria were classified as grade 2. Patients were furthermore divided into five subgroups according to pattern of temporal behavior of the ischemia grade between the pre-hospital and pre-PCI ECGs as described in detail in Study IV.

3.3.3 QRS slope analysis (Study III) In Study III, analysis of QRS slopes was performed. This method was first described by Pueyo et al. in 2008156, and further developed by our group, as described in detail in Supplementary Technical Study157.

Preprocessing Prior to further analysis the ECG signals were preprocessed by:

QRS detection. Normal beat selection. Baseline drift attenuation via cubic spline interpolation. Wave delineation using a wavelet-based technique, as

previously described156, 157. To reduce and compensate for low-frequency noise such as respiration modulations of the depolarization phase, a normalization procedure was applied to all the ECG signals before evaluation of the indices157.

QRS slope analysis Three QRS slopes were determined in each beat, as shown in Figure 3.2:

1. US: the upward slope of the R wave. 2. DS: the downward slope of the R wave.

Page 60: Ventricular Depolarization in Ischemic Heart Disease.Value

Ventricular Depolarization: ECG assessment of Severity and Extent of Acute Ischemia

41

3. TS: the upward, terminal slope of the S wave (only in leads V1-V3).

FIGURE 3.2 Beat example showing the delineation marks used to evaluate the QRS slopes. nON indicates QRS onset. nQ,R,S indicate time locations for the peaks of these waves, whereas nU, nD, and nT represent maximum derivatives of the slopes. Final US, DS and TS are shown by arrows.

The successive steps of slope analysis are as follows:

1. Time locations for Q-, R-, and S-wave peaks are determined by delineation and denoted by nQ, nR, and nS. Beats for which no R-wave peak was present were rejected from the analysis. A Q- and S-wave peak were identified as corresponding to the lowest signal amplitude in the time window of 2 ms after QRS onset to 2 ms before the R-wave peak, and 2 ms after R-wave peak to 2 ms before the QRS offset, respectively.

2. Time instants for the maximum absolute derivative of the slopes between the Q- and R-wave peaks and between the R-and S-wave peaks, nU and nD, respectively, are determined.

3. A line is fitted in the least squares sense to the ECG signal, in a window of 8 ms centered around the time of each of the maximum absolute derivatives nU and nD, so as to generate a slope for that particular part of the QRS complex.

US DS

TS

Page 61: Ventricular Depolarization in Ischemic Heart Disease.Value

Michael Ringborn, M.D.

42

In leads V1 to V3 with a typical S-wave peak below baseline, a third slope (TS-slope) was measured by fitting a line to the ECG signal in a window centered around the maximal derivative nT of the ECG between the S-wave peak nS and the end of the QRS complex nOFF.

If the S wave disappeared during ischemia evolution in the involved leads (V1-V3), the TS slope measurement was not evaluated for successive beats after that time instant.

One example of the evolution of the US, DS, and TS changes is shown in Figure 3.3, as well as representative beats at the beginning and end of the PCI procedure, respectively. FIGURE 3.3 Temporal evolution of the US, DS, and TS for a particular ECG recording during the PCI procedure. Initial and final beats of the recording are additionally plotted to show how they link to the corresponding slope measurements

Calculation of the QRS slope changes during PCI The slope changes were computed for each of the 12 leads, at the end of the PCI procedure in the following manner, as illustrated in Figure 3.4:

1. The dynamic QRS slope measures for all beats from the onset of occlusion until the end were blockwise averaged in subsets of 8 beats.

2. Then, a line was fitted over these averaged values in a least square sense.

Page 62: Ventricular Depolarization in Ischemic Heart Disease.Value

Ventricular Depolarization: ECG assessment of Severity and Extent of Acute Ischemia

43

3. Subsequently, the change was defined as the product of the slope ℓ of the resulting fitted line and the total duration of the PCI process156.This fitting strategy was used to reduce the effect of possible outlier measurements on the slope changes.

FIGURE 3.4 Representation of the strategy by which a line is fitted to the averaged DS values during the PCI procedure in a least square sense to reduce the effect of possible outlier measurements on the DS change computation.

Among all 12 leads, maximal positive delta of the DS deflection (positive change: DS slope getting less steep) and maximal negative change of the US deflection (negative change: US slope getting less steep) were determined for each patient. The sum of all positive deltas of the DS deflection and negative deltas of the US deflection, respectively among the 12 leads were calculated to quantify the changes.

3.3.4 High-Frequency QRS (HF-QRS) analysis (Studies I, II) In Studies I and II, the HF-QRS methodology was applied for evaluation of depolarization changes due to chronic MI and acute ischemia, respectively. In contrast to the QRS slope analysis, HF-QRS evaluation is based on very low amplitude (in µV) evaluation. Since much noise in the ECG signal lies within this high-frequency interval, it is of the outmost importance to achieve as high a signal-to-noise ratio as possible, thus exclude the noise and keep the HF-QRS

Page 63: Ventricular Depolarization in Ischemic Heart Disease.Value

Michael Ringborn, M.D.

44

components subjected to analysis. Several steps are needed to accomplish this: a) ECG acquisition with proximal lead placement (Mason-Likar), so as to reduce noise from skeletal muscle; b) longer ECG recordings than usual to perform adequate signal-averaging; c) proper signal processing techniques, including preprocessing, noise reduction and filtering procedures. The high-resolution recordings were processed off-line using software for ECG analysis developed by the Signal Processing Group, Department of Applied Electronics, Lund University, Sweden.

3.3.4.1 Preprocessing To avoid smearing of the signal during the averaging process each QRS complex needs to be as perfectly aligned as possible, to average the same point in the cardiac cycle, beat by beat. In addition, only normal beats should be selected, thus excluding beats with other morphologies.

This is achieved by template cross-correlation149, 188, 189. The template represents the predominant QRS morphology and is continuously adjusted by averaging 10 incoming beats at the time, where only beats that match the template morphologically well throughout the recording are included. The correlation coefficient was set to 0.97, which is the level used in previous studies149, 189, 190. Every incoming beat that did not match the template was discarded. Thus only beats with a cross-correlation coefficient higher than 0.97 were accepted for averaging.

3.3.4.2 Signal averaging-noise reduction For the control recording (Studies I and II), conventional blockwise averaging was applied149. Trend samples of the signal-averaged ECG were obtained every 2 seconds.

The PCI recording (Study II) was expected to be subject to considerably larger dynamic changes compared to the control ECG, and therefore a different averaging technique had to be applied. For this reason, an exponentially updated beat average was used149, 188, which makes it possible to track the morphologic changes while still providing sufficient noise reduction. For both recordings, the noise level was calculated in each lead and expressed as a root-mean-square (RMS) value in an interval of 100 milliseconds, starting 100 milliseconds after the QRS offset. To avoid any bias in the HF-QRS analysis due to noise, only very low noise levels were accepted for each lead after signal averaging. Only patients with a noise level less than or equal to 0.75 μV for each of the 12 individual leads were included in Study II. Furthermore, when comparing HF-QRS between the control and PCI recordings, only beats with similar noise level (within 0.35 μV) were

Page 64: Ventricular Depolarization in Ischemic Heart Disease.Value

Ventricular Depolarization: ECG assessment of Severity and Extent of Acute Ischemia

45

manually selected to avoid potential bias due to different noise levels. These cut-off levels have been applied previously149.

3.3.4.3 Band-pass filtering The 12-lead signal averaged ECGs in the recordings were analyzed using a Butterworth filter at the frequency interval of 150 to 250 Hz (in Study I additional, separate filtering at the frequency interval 80 to 300 Hz was performed) . Filtering was done in a forward/backward fashion191.This approach was used to provide sharper edges of the bandpass filter and to ensure linear phase of the filtering process and thus minimal distortion. An example of a signal-averaged ECG before and after filtering is illustrated in Figure 3.5. The QRS onset and offset were automatically determined from the signal averaged ECG in the standard frequency range before the filtering process145.

FIGURE 3.5 Signal-averaged ECGs at control (left panels) and during PCI (right panels) in the standard range (upper panel) and in the high-frequency range (lower panel).Vertical lines indicate the QRS duration as determined in the standard frequency range.

3.3.4.4 HF-QRS quantification The HF-QRS in each of the 12 leads were expressed as RMS values in microvolts (Figure 3.6), which is the most common means of quantifying the high-frequency content within the QRS complex.

Page 65: Ventricular Depolarization in Ischemic Heart Disease.Value

Michael Ringborn, M.D.

46

FIGURE 3.6 The RMS formula, where n is the number of measurements and Ai, i=1,…..,n, are the measured amplitudes within the entire QRS complex.

The difference in RMS values (in microvolts) between the control and the end of the PCI recording was calculated in each lead. To be considered as significant, either an absolute decrease in RMS value of more than 0.6 μV or a relative decrease of more than 20% in any lead had to be met, which have been the criteria used in previous studies 149, 151. The maximal HF-QRS reduction in any lead was determined for each patient both as an absolute (in microvolts) and as a relative value (ΔRMS/baseline RMSx100). The sum of significant HF-QRS reduction among the 12 leads was calculated for each patient both as an absolute (in microvolts) and relative value (summed significant ΔRMS/ summed baseline RMSx100).

3.4 Myocardial SPECT perfusion imaging In Studies II, III and IV, SPECT imaging was used as the gold standard for myocardial ischemia and/or final infarct size (IS) and salvage. The 99mTc-sestamibi tracer was used in all studies. Two protocols were used. An important distinction between them was the methodology regarding quantification of the perfusion defects. In Studies II and III totally reversible ischemia was studied and the patient was his/her own reference. The control image the day after the procedure was compared with the occlusion image during elective PCI178. In Study IV, on the other hand, a commercial analysis program was applied (see below), by means of which the images were compared to a large reference database182,192.

3.4.1 Studies II and III

3.4.1.1 Acquisition

Occlusion study As soon as coronary occlusion was confirmed by coronary angiography, approximately 30 mCi (1100 MBq) of 99mTc-sestamibi was injected intravenously

Page 66: Ventricular Depolarization in Ischemic Heart Disease.Value

Ventricular Depolarization: ECG assessment of Severity and Extent of Acute Ischemia

47

in each patient. The scintigraphic SPECT images were obtained within 3 hours after completion of the PCI.

A single-head rotating gamma camera (Elscint, Haifa, Israel) was used. Acquisitions were made with a high-resolution collimator in a 64 × 64 matrix, 6.9 mm pixel size, using 30 projections (25 seconds per projection) over 180° (from 45° right anterior oblique to 45° left posterior oblique). With the use of filtered back projection with a Butterworth filter, transverse sections were reconstructed, without attenuation correction. Short-axis sections were reconstructed for further analysis178.

Control study For the control study, another injection of 30 mCi (1100 MBq) 99mTc-sestamibi was administered approximately 24 hours after the PCI and the images were obtained 2 to 3 hours later with the same gamma camera and acquisition protocol as for the PCI study. All patients were clinically stable between the 2 examinations.

3.4.1.2 Image analysis The Cedars-Sinai and Emory quantitative analysis program (CEqual, ADAC Laboratories, Milpitas, CA, USA)193 was used for making volume-weighted bull's eye plots from the short-axis sections. Any loss of perfusion during the occlusion study compared to the control study was determined by an automatic procedure by comparing the bull's eye plot of the 2 studies for each patient178. The control image was used as a valuable means of obtaining information on preexisting perfusion defects and of quantifying the amount of balloon-induced changes. Two measures of myocardial ischemia were determined: extent and severity.

Extent of myocardial ischemia Reduction of perfusion by 25% or more in the occlusion study compared to the control study was used as the threshold for indicating significantly hypoperfused myocardium178. This area in the bull's eye plot was delineated, resulting in an “extent map,” representing all added slices (or volume) of the left ventricular myocardium, expressed as a percentage of the left ventricle (LV), and defining the extent of ischemia. In the thesis this measure is referred to either as “extent”, or “myocardium at risk” (MaR).

Severity of myocardial ischemia The total pixel count difference between the control and occlusion study within the delineated hypoperfused area in the “extent map” was calculated. This local

Page 67: Ventricular Depolarization in Ischemic Heart Disease.Value

Michael Ringborn, M.D.

48

perfusion loss (severity) was expressed as a percentage of the total pixel count in the control situation within the same area178.

The extent and severity of ischemia were calculated for each patient. For the purpose of detection of ischemia, extent values were used as the gold standard. For correlation with ischemia, both extent and severity were used. All nuclear data analyses were performed at the Department of Clinical Physiology, Lund University, Sweden, blinded to the ECG data.

3.4.2 Study IV

3.4.2.1 Acquisition

Acute SPECT before pPCI for extent (MaR) After admittance to the catheterization laboratory, prior to initiation of the pPCI procedure, 700 MBq (±10%) 99mTc-sestamibi was injected intravenously in each patient. The SPECT images were obtained within 8h of injection of the radionuclide, on a dual-headed rotating gamma camera with high-resolution, parallel-hole collimators (ADAC Laboratories, Forte, Milpitas, CA, USA).

SPECT at 30 days after pPCI for final IS The same protocol was used, but imaging was started 60 minutes after tracer injection. To ensure equal count statistics, acquisition time varied between 25 and 60 seconds per projection, depending on the time elapsed from tracer injection182. Images were gated at 8 frames per cardiac cycle with no scatter or attenuation correction.

3.4.2.2 Image analysis Imaging data were analyzed independently by 2 experienced nuclear cardiology readers (S.S.N. and A.K.K.), blinded to clinical data, using the commercially available automatic program Quantitative Perfusion SPECT (Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, CA, USA)192. In case of failure of the automatic quantification algorithm, methods to mask extracardiac activity and/or define the valve plane and apex of the left ventricle, were used182. MaR and IS were determined as the area of the left ventricle containing counts lower than a mean normal limit for pixels according to the rest database192. If the difference in defect size between the 2 readers exceeded 3%, a consensus reading was obtained182. In patients with data for both MaR and IS, myocardial salvage was calculated as: (MaR–IS)/MaR x100.

Page 68: Ventricular Depolarization in Ischemic Heart Disease.Value

Ventricular Depolarization: ECG assessment of Severity and Extent of Acute Ischemia

49

3.5 Statistical methods In Study I, data is expressed as mean±1 SD, unless otherwise specified. Comparisons of HF-QRS and age between the different groups of patients were performed with the Student t-test. The Fischer exact test was used to examine differences in proportions of sex in the patients groups. Statistical significance was defined as p<0.05.

In Study II, results are presented as mean ±1 SD. As small numbers of subjects and clear evidence for normal distribution could not be guaranteed, nonparametric tests were performed. Comparison among groups was made using the Mann-Whitney U test. Spearman´s rank correlation coefficient (r) was used for correlation analysis. McNemar's test was used testing significance between proportions. Statistical significance was defined as p<0.05. All statistical analyses were performed by SPSS version 16.0 for Windows (SPSS, Inc, Chicago, IL, USA).

In Study III, results are presented as mean ±1 SD. Due to the small number of patients in the study, nonparametric tests were used. Spearman´s rank correlation coefficient (r) was used for correlation analysis. Mann-Whitney U test was used for comparison between groups. Multiple linear regression analysis was used to evaluate additional values of assorted QRS changes to ST changes in predicting the extent and severity of ischemia. All these variables were considered continuous. All statistical tests were 2-sided, and significance was defined as p<0.05. The statistical analysis was performed by SPSS, version 15.0, for Windows (SPSS, Chicago, IL, USA). In Study IV, Continuous variables are presented as medians (25th-75th percentiles; valid cases). Categorical data is presented as percentage (number/valid cases). For continuous variables the Student t- test and Mann-Whitney U test were used for comparisons between groups. Chi-square test or Fishers exact test was used as appropriate for categorical variables. Kruskal-Wallis test was applied for comparisons among more than two groups. All statistical tests were 2-sided, and significance was defined as p<0.05. Univariable linear regression was performed to evaluate the association between various covariates and IS, including basic characteristics as well as ECG parameters as appropriate. All variables with p<0.2 in the univariable analysis were included in the initial multivariable regression analysis model. The variable with the highest p-value was then eliminated in each step, until a final multivariable model was achieved including only variables with p<0.05. In the multivariable analysis of the pre-hospital dynamic subgroups, group STR was used as the reference. The statistical analysis was performed by SPSS, version 19.0, for Windows (SPSS, Chicago, IL, USA).

Page 69: Ventricular Depolarization in Ischemic Heart Disease.Value
Page 70: Ventricular Depolarization in Ischemic Heart Disease.Value

Ventricular Depolarization: ECG assessment of Severity and Extent of Acute Ischemia

51

4 Results and Discussion

4.1 Results

4.1.1 HF-QRS in patients with and without old MI (Study I) With a larger population than in prior studies and with a complete set of 12 leads of high resolution ECG recordings, the HF-QRS levels among patients with and without previous MI were compared. In addition, the HF-QRS values were evaluated separately in two frequency bands (150-250 Hz and 80-300Hz). In both frequency bands the inter-individual variation in the summed HF-QRS in patients without MI as well as in those with different MI locations (anterior, inferior and posterior) was large. In the 80-300 Hz frequency band the HF-QRS values were approximately three-fold higher than the 150-250 Hz due to contribution of low frequencies.

No significant differences were seen among subgroups in the summed HF-QRS of all 12 leads, mean HF-QRS in each individual lead or in the pattern of lead distribution of the HF-QRS (Figure 4.1). The same was seen for both frequency bands. FIGURE 4.1 Mean HF-QRS (150-250 Hz frequency band) in the 12 standard leads among patients without previous MI and those with anterior, inferior, or posterior MI, respectively. There were no significant differences among groups (p-values ranging from 0.08 to 0.94).

Page 71: Ventricular Depolarization in Ischemic Heart Disease.Value

Michael Ringborn, M.D.

52

Not even the patients with the greatest standard-QRS changes of previous MI (larger MI by Selvester QRS score) could be differentiated from those with no changes from previous MI on the standard ECG. Nor could the selected healthy subjects be differentiated within the no-MI group, as shown in Figure 4.2.

FIGURE 4.2 The HF-QRS (150-250 Hz frequency band) in each individual patient without old MI and with old anterior MI (upper panel) and inferior MI (lower panel). The circles within the no MI group indicate those 4 patients who had no signs of ischemic heart disease. The circles within the anterior and inferior MI groups indicate the 3 patients within the respective group with the largest infarct size (as indicated by the highest Selvester QRS scores). Upper panel anterior MI as exemplified by lead V2; lower panel, inferior MI as exemplified by lead III. Number of patients are on the x-axis.

Page 72: Ventricular Depolarization in Ischemic Heart Disease.Value

Ventricular Depolarization: ECG assessment of Severity and Extent of Acute Ischemia

53

4.1.2 HF-QRS to quantify acute ischemia (Study II)

Detection of ischemia by HF-QRS and STEMI criteria Sixteen (76%) of 21 subjects met the HF-QRS reduction criteria, which was significantly higher than the 38% (8/21) meeting the STEMI criteria (p=0.008) as shown in Figure 4.3. Five (24%) of the 21 patients did not meet the HF-QRS criteria, all showing small extents of ischemia (mean, 6±6% of the LV myocardium; range, 0.1-15%).

FIGURE 4.3 Venn diagram showing the distribution and overlap of patients meeting the HF-QRS and STEMI criteria.

Correlation between HF-QRS reduction and ischemia We found that the amount of HF-QRS reduction correlated significantly with both the extent and severity of ischemia quantified by SPECT imaging. The highest correlation coefficient was shown for maximal, relative HF-QRS reduction in any lead (r=0.59, p=0.005 and r=0.69, p=0.001, respectively) as illustrated in Figure 4.4. Table 4.1 summarizes Spearman´s rank correlation coefficients between different HF-QRS measures and ischemia by SPECT (extent and severity). In general, the correlation coefficients were higher for severity than extent. All HF-QRS parameters showed significant correlation with ischemia except from maximal HF-QRS reduction in any lead, by which there was no correlation to the extent of ischemia.

Page 73: Ventricular Depolarization in Ischemic Heart Disease.Value

Michael Ringborn, M.D.

54

FIGURE 4.4 Spearman´s rank correlation between maximal HF-QRS reduction (%) in any lead and extent (upper panel) and severity (lower panel) of ischemia by SPECT.

Correlation between ST- segment deviation and ischemia Also, a significant correlation between both maximum single-lead ST-segment elevation as well as sum of ST-segment deviation and ischemia was found (Table 4.1), but with lower correlation coefficients than for the HF-QRS measures.

Page 74: Ventricular Depolarization in Ischemic Heart Disease.Value

Ventricular Depolarization: ECG assessment of Severity and Extent of Acute Ischemia

55

TABLE 4.1 Correlations (Spearman's rank correlation coefficients) between relative HF-QRS reduction (maximal and sum among 12 leads), absolute HF-QRS reduction (maximal and sum among 12 leads), maximal ST elevation in any lead, and sum of ST-segment deviation among 12 leads and the amount of myocardial ischemia (extent and severity). NS= non-significant. Adapted from Study II.

Page 75: Ventricular Depolarization in Ischemic Heart Disease.Value

Michael Ringborn, M.D.

56

4.1.3 QRS slope analysis to quantify acute ischemia (Study III) By the introduction of QRS slopes in 2008 by Pueyo et al.156 we learnt that this method proposes a potentially more readily available marker of ventricular depolarization distortion, as compared with HF-QRS. This method was further developed by our group as described in detail in Supplementary Technical Study157, becoming more robust, showing very low intra-individual variation in a control situation. Furthermore, we introduced a calculation for the most terminal slope for leads with an S wave (TS). In the same ischemia model as in Study III (during elective PCI) but in a larger study population, we showed that changes of the DS among the 12 standard ECG leads are generally more pronounced than US changes regardless of the coronary vessel occluded and that this measure performs equally to TS (in applicable leads V1- V3 during anterior ischemia). In previous studies, changes of the QRS slopes have not been correlated to the actual amount of ischemia or compared with other conventional ECG indices of ischemia, which were the aims of Study III.

Among patients in Study III, mean PCI occlusion time was 4.9±0.9 (range 2.4-7.3) min. As shown in Figure 4.5, the ischemia induced changes of DS were more pronounced than US in anterior leads (V1-V6) for LAD occlusions. The same was seen for RCA occlusions, as exemplified in leads II, aVF and III. There were no significant differences between the amount of change in TS and DS for LAD occlusions for the applicable leads V1-V3. FIGURE 4.5 Mean±SD of QRS slope changes for LAD (leads V1-V6) and RCA occlusions (leads II, aVF, and III). Changes in TS are shown only for leads V1 to V3 in the LAD group.

Page 76: Ventricular Depolarization in Ischemic Heart Disease.Value

Ventricular Depolarization: ECG assessment of Severity and Extent of Acute Ischemia

57

Correlation between ECG measures and SPECT Table 4.2 demonstrates the quantitative distribution of the depolarization changes as estimated by conventional parameters (R-wave amplitude changes and QRS- duration changes) as well as QRS slopes (R-wave up-slope, US as well as R-wave down-slope, DS). Furthermore the correlation between these respective changes and extent and severity of ischemia by SPECT are shown. QRS-slope changes correlated significantly with ischemia (for DS: r=0.71, p<0.0001 for extent, and r=0.73, p<0.0001 for severity). The best correlation between conventional electrocardiogram parameters and ischemia was for the sum of R-wave amplitude change (r=0.63, p<0.0001; r=0.60, p<0.0001). TABLE 4.2 Quantitative distribution of the depolarization changes: (A) DS change, (B) US change, (C) R-wave amplitude change, and (D) QRS-duration change, as well as their correlation to extent and severity of ischemia (Spearman´s rank correlation). Abbreviations: LV=left ventricle; Ra= R-wave amplitude; max= maximum; pos=positive; neg= negative; tot= total.

Page 77: Ventricular Depolarization in Ischemic Heart Disease.Value

Michael Ringborn, M.D.

58

There was also a significant correlation between the maximal ST elevation in any lead and extent and severity of ischemia: r=0.73 (p<0.0001) for both ischemia measures. The corresponding correlations for summed ST elevation among all leads were r=0.67 (p<0.0001) and r=0.73 (p<0.0001) for extent and severity, respectively. By multiple linear regression analysis, US and DS change provided the largest increase above and beyond that of the ST segment (Table 4.3) regarding explanation of the dependent variable (extent and severity). Regarding the extent of ischemia, the portion of the dependent variable explained by the independent variables, R2, increased by 12.9% after adding US and by 12.2% after adding DS. A combination of the 2 increased the prediction of extent by 14.5%. The corresponding values for the severity of ischemia were 4.0%, 7.1%, and 7.1%, respectively. The additive effect of R-wave amplitude change was lower.

TABLE 4.3 Multiple regression analysis. Prediction of extent and severity of ischemia by adding Δ of QRS slope (US and/or DS in μV/ms) or ΔR-wave amplitude changes (μV) to Δsum of ST elevation (mV). Ra=R-wave amplitude; Ra sum neg/pos=sum of the decrease/increase of Ra among all leads; Ra sum tot=sum of all changes in Ra among all leads; LV=left ventricle; arrows=increase of the explanation of the dependent variable by the added independent variable/s.

Page 78: Ventricular Depolarization in Ischemic Heart Disease.Value

Ventricular Depolarization: ECG assessment of Severity and Extent of Acute Ischemia

59

4.1.4 Ischemia severity grading in STEMI patients (Study IV)

Temporal behavior of the ischemia grades between the pre-hospital and pre-PCI ECGs Slightly more than half the patients – 53% (211/401) – were stable with a persistent ischemia grade between pre-hospital and pre-PCI ECGs. Temporal changes of ischemia grades from pre-hospital to pre-PCI ECG are displayed in Figure 4.6.

FIGURE 4.6 Overview of the initial stratification of patients into ischemia grade 2 or 3 on their pre-hospital ECG and their temporal changes between pre-hospital and pre-PCI ECG at the PCI center. Five subgroups of temporal behavior (lower panel) were defined.

Final IS by SPECT Comparison between G3 and G2 on pre-hospital ECG By first considering only the ischemia grading performed on the pre-hospital ECG and correlating G3 vs. G2 with final infarct size after pPCI, it was found that patients with G3 on the pre-hospital ECG had significantly larger IS as compared to G2 (Table 4.4). Time from symptom onset to pre-hospital ECG and to balloon was similar between these two groups, as was MaR (however in a subpopulation).

By linear regression analysis, G3 was independently associated with IS (B=3.8; p=0.006) as shown in Table 4.5. By including the presence of Q waves on the pre-hospital ECG in the initial model (otherwise the same modelling procedure), G3 remained independently associated with IS; B=3.31; p=0.016 (not shown in the Table).

Page 79: Ventricular Depolarization in Ischemic Heart Disease.Value

Michael Ringborn, M.D.

60

TABLE 4.4 Findings regarding time intervals from symptom onset to the two ECGs and treatment; coronary angiography; SPECT and biochemical marker (TnT) in patients without and with terminal QRS distortion (G2 and G3, respectively) on initial, pre-hospital ECG. Modified from Study IV. *MaR data was available for 265 patients. PCI=percutaneous coronary intervention;TIMI=thrombolysis in myocardial infarction; SPECT=single-photon emission computed tomography; MaR=myocardium at risk.

TABLE 4.5 Final model of multivariable linear regression analysis with IS as dependent variable, including co-variables at the time of pre-hospital ECG. Adjusted from Study IV.

1 See the Methods section for definition of parameters. B= unstandardized regression coefficient.

Page 80: Ventricular Depolarization in Ischemic Heart Disease.Value

Ventricular Depolarization: ECG assessment of Severity and Extent of Acute Ischemia

61

Relationship between final infarct size and ischemia grade transition during transport to the PCI center Overall, final IS differed significantly among the subgroups, with the largest IS in group G3->G3, and the smallest in group STR (Table 4.6). In a linear multivariate analysis with group STR as reference, groups G2->G2, G2->G3 and G3->G3 were independently associated with increasing IS (B=4.4; p=0.004, B=5.4; p=0.01 and B=10.2; p<0.001, respectively), but group G3->G2 was not (B=3.8; p=0.133), as seen in Table 4.7. Other variables in the final regression model associated with IS are shown in Table 4.7.

TABLE 4.6 Findings by time to treatment, coronary angiography, SPECT and biochemical markers in subgroups based on ischemia grade transition between pre-hospital and pre-PCI ECGs. Modified from Study IV. Categorical data are presented as percentage of valid cases, and continuous data as median (25th-75th percentiles). n=valid cases as specified. *Time to balloon was not available for 19 patients. †MaR and Salvage were available for 227 patients.1Comparison only among other groups than Group STR (Kruskal-Wallis). LAD=left anterior descending artery; RCA=right coronary artery; LCX=left circumflex coronary artery; other abbreviations, see Table 4.4.

Page 81: Ventricular Depolarization in Ischemic Heart Disease.Value

Michael Ringborn, M.D.

62

TABLE 4.7 The final model of multivariable linear regression analysis with IS as dependent variable, including co-variables at admission including subgroups based on the pattern of ischemia grade behavior between pre-hospital and pre-PCI ECGs (Group STR as reference). Adjusted from Study IV.

1 See the Methods section for definition of parameters.2 Group G3->G2 was not significantly, independently associated with final infarct size. B= unstandardized regression coefficient; other abbreviations, see previous tables.

Salvage by SPECT In the subgroup of 245 patients with both acute and 30-day SPECT data available (thus enabling to determine salvage), there was no significant overall difference in salvage between patients classified as G2 and G3 on their pre-hospital ECG; 63% (37-91) vs. 55% (36-81), p=0.21, as demonstrated in Table 4.8. Regarding the temporal subgroups, salvage was lowest in group G3->G3 and highest in group STR; 46%(35-70) vs. 83%(50-100), respectively, p=0.003 (Table 4.6).

Patients were divided into early- and late-treatment groups, with the cut-off set at 2.5 hours, corresponding to the 25th percentile of symptom-to-balloon time (Table 4.8). Among patients treated beyond 2.5 hours, those with G3 on the pre-hospital ECG were associated with lower salvage than G2; 48%(35-78) vs. 62% (40-87); p=0.04, whereas salvage was similar between the ischemia grades when treated early. Time intervals from symptom onset to pre-hospital ECG, as well as to balloon, were similar between G3 and G2 in both early- and late-treatment groups.

Page 82: Ventricular Depolarization in Ischemic Heart Disease.Value

Ventricular Depolarization: ECG assessment of Severity and Extent of Acute Ischemia

63

TABLE 4.8 Complete SPECT data as well as time from symptom onset to initial ECG and balloon. Comparison of patients with G2 or G3 on initial, pre-hospital ECG, stratified according to time to treatment.

Data presented as median (25th-75th percentiles).SPECT= single-photon emission computed tomography; IS=infarct size; LV=left ventricle; MaR= myocardium at risk.

Page 83: Ventricular Depolarization in Ischemic Heart Disease.Value

Michael Ringborn, M.D.

64

4.2 Discussion

4.2.1 General clinical considerations Despite more sensitive cardiac biochemical markers and fast technical development of myocardial imaging (SPECT and MRI), the ECG remains the only readily available diagnostic tool for initial evaluation of patients with suspected acute MI. Along with generally improved reperfusion strategies by pPCI and developing algorithms for early pre-hospital evaluation and transport of patients to distant PCI centers, more individualized evaluation may possibly further improve acute management. This could, for example involve the selection of patients with a high risk for rapid infarct evolution that could benefit from receiving specific “upstream” treatment before pPCI, such as pharmacological agents or mechanical pre-conditioning therapy, hypothermia or specific peri- or post-PCI myocardial protection. Selected patients could perhaps also benefit from an immediate thrombolytic reperfusion strategy if transport time to the PCI center exceeds a certain limit. A key question is then if additional clinically relevant information can be retrieved from the depolarization phase of the ECG that can add to the present ST-segment evaluation (STEMI criteria), hence providing individual information about the severity within the MaR and risk of rapid progression of irreversible infarction. Basic understanding of these depolarization changes as well as proper ways to measure and quantify them are crucial for clinical application.

In this thesis different QRS analysis methods based on the 12-lead ECG system were evaluated in a model of the first 5 minutes of total coronary occlusion as to simulate the first few minutes of an acute MI. Furthermore, we evaluated the dichotomized ischemia severity grading system, with and without “terminal QRS distortion” in addition to STEMI criteria in a large patient cohort and related these ECG patterns to final IS, MaR and salvage.

4.2.2 Depolarization changes in relation to extent (MaR) and severity of ischemia by SPECT

The prolonged elective balloon PCI procedure, used in clinical practice at the inclusion site at the time (before the stent era), offered a unique model for studying ECG changes during the first 5 minutes of acute ischemia. SPECT data were acquired for quantification of the reversible ischemia regarding its extent (MaR) and severity.

HF-QRS analysis In earlier studies HF-QRS content was shown to decrease due to ischemia144-150, and increase at successful reperfusion by thrombolytic therapy of an acute

Page 84: Ventricular Depolarization in Ischemic Heart Disease.Value

Ventricular Depolarization: ECG assessment of Severity and Extent of Acute Ischemia

65

MI151,152. None of these prior studies have, however, quantified the amount of ischemia during coronary occlusion, or described the relationship between changes in HF-QRS and the extent and severity of the ischemia as indicated by SPECT.

In Study II, we have described, for the first time, a significant correlation between the amount of HF-QRS reduction during the PCI procedure and the extent (MaR) as well as severity of ischemia. This was shown for both maximum HF-QRS reduction in any lead and for summed HF-QRS reduction among all leads. Relative as well as absolute changes were evaluated, showing similar results, except for the maximal absolute HF-QRS reduction in any lead. The reason may be the notably large inter-individual variation of HF-QRS, and when having low individual values the range in absolute terms is more limited in the correlation analysis compared to relative changes. Strict noise criteria were applied for inclusion in order to have as clean data as possible, which considerably reduced the sample size in Study II.

The common explanation for the changes seen by the HF-QRS analysis method relates to the change in conduction velocity in the myocardial cells and/or conduction fibers147-151,189. In a canine model, Watanabe et al.142 have shown that reduction of HF-QRS correlates linearly with local conduction delay induced by local administration of sodium channel blockers. By a simulated reduction of conduction velocity in a 3-dimensional heart model, Abboud et al.143 suggested that a decreased number of terminal branches in the activation process would cause more synchronized activation in the myocardium leading to reduction of the HF-QRS. A study by Trägårdh et al.194 showed HF-QRS to be significantly lower in patients with a bundle branch block than in healthy subjects.

The changes in HF-QRS seen during acute ischemia might well be due to changed properties of the cellular ion channels, gap junctions, and other basic elements of signal propagation within the myocardium. The question remains, however, whether HF-QRS changes reflect certain very high-frequency pathophysiologic alterations within the conduction system or the myocardium itself, or are merely secondary to changes of the overall QRS slopes, due to this local slowing of conduction through the ischemic region156.

In severe ischemia depolarization changes are usually confined to the later part of the QRS complex. The RMS quantification method used by our group gives an overall measure of the total high-frequency content within the QRS complex. Other ways to express the HF-QRS content have been suggested by Abboud at al. using a more morphologic evaluation148 by reduced amplitude zones (RAZ), as determined by locally minima or maxima in the HF-QRS signal. Later, this method was further developed by Schlegel et al. at the National Aeronautics and Space Administration195. These morphological methods are thus categorical and do not provide a continuous measure such as RMS. In 2011 Magrans et al. evaluated HF-QRS changes expressed as RMS values early vs. late during the QRS complex

Page 85: Ventricular Depolarization in Ischemic Heart Disease.Value

Michael Ringborn, M.D.

66

(using our STAFF III dataset) and found RMS changes in the later part to be more sensitive to ischemia. However, no correlation to SPECT was performed196.

Schlegel et al. have developed a real-time HF-QRS analysis195 with immediately available results after the ECG recording as compared to the off-line version used in Study I and II. Still the analysis method is sensitive to noise and as such less suitable in a busy clinical environment.

QRS-slope analysis In Study III, more readily available (compared with HF-QRS) markers of ventricular depolarization distortion based on calculation of up- and downslopes of the QRS complex were evaluated. These measures combine information from overall QRS duration as well as amplitudes of the R and S waves. This analysis was first introduced by Pueyo et al.156, while further development of the methodology was performed by our group as described in Supplementary Technical Study157.

In Study III we found that changes of QRS-slopes correlated significantly with SPECT measurements of ischemia, both in terms of MaR and severity. The correlation seems comparable to the one found for HF-QRS in Study II. Being less sensitive to noise as compared to HF-QRS analysis, the QRS slope method allowed more patients to be included in Study III as compared to Study II.

In Study III, in addition to QRS-slopes, conventional QRS-parameters such as R-wave amplitude and QRS duration were evaluated separately in relation to the SPECT findings. The correlation coefficients when comparing the sum of R-wave amplitude change in the overall population and the measures of ischemia were similar to those found for the sum of R wave down-slope (DS) change.

However, using regression analysis, the value of R-wave amplitude change appeared to be lower than for QRS-slope changes as to explain the dependent variables MaR and severity.

QRS duration No significant correlation between QRS prolongation and MaR or severity by SPECT was observed in Study III. This was in contrast to prior experimental findings in animals, where QRS prolongation was associated with more severe ischemia (as measured by microspheres) during ischemia, as well as less salvage at post-mortem findings54, 122, 197.

In Study III, QRS prolongation was observed in 63% of the patients, whereas others showed a slight shortening during the ischemic period. Prolongation was in general more pronounced than shortening. QRS duration is, however, difficult to determine correctly, because ST elevation commonly obscures the delineation between the end of the depolarization and the beginning of repolarization.

Page 86: Ventricular Depolarization in Ischemic Heart Disease.Value

Ventricular Depolarization: ECG assessment of Severity and Extent of Acute Ischemia

67

The QRS slope methodology thus offers a more robust way to express the QRS changes as compared to the HF-QRS method, taking into consideration both changes of duration and amplitude changes of the depolarization phase.

QRS amplitudes It was beyond the scope of Study III to also report in detail on the specific R-, and S-wave amplitude changes during the PCI procedure, although they both contribute to the QRS slope changes besides the effect of the QRS duration. In general terms the US is related to R-wave amplitude and overall QRS duration, whereas the DS is related to the terminal portion of the QRS complex, incorporating variations in both R-wave amplitude and S-wave amplitude (when present), as well as possible passive effect of the ST-segment shift itself. In the correlation analysis with both MaR and severity we found higher correlation coefficients regarding changes in DS than US, thus suggesting changes of more terminal portion of the depolarization may be more relevantly associated with these SPECT measures.

In Study III, both increase and decrease of the R-wave amplitudes were seen among the 12 leads during the PCI procedure. By post hoc analysis (non-published data) of the patients with occlusion of RCA (n=21), increased R waves were observed in leads II, aVF and III by 10/21(48%), 11/21(62%) and 16/21 (76%), respectively. No relationship was seen between number of leads with R-wave amplitude augmentation and SPECT findings.

Among patients with LAD occlusion (n=8), reduction or total loss of S waves during the PCI procedure in leads V1, V2 and V3 were seen in 6/8(75%), 7/8(87%) and 7/8 (87%), respectively. The only patient with LAD occlusion that showed no reduction of the S wave amplitude had the lowest amount of ischemia by SPECT (MaR 15% of the LV, and severity by 33%) and no significant ST-segment elevation. The remaining 7 patients with various degree of either S-wave reduction or total loss of S wave had a median (25th-75th percentile) MaR of 47%(40-51) of the LV myocardium and a severity score of 48%(43-53). The one patient with total loss of S waves in leads V1 through V3 had the largest MaR and highest severity score among all patients in Study III (MaR: 65% of the LV myocardium and 62% severity).

Feasibility of QRS evaluation in the clinical setting of acute ischemia In the ambition to mimic the first minutes of an acute MI, the elective PCI model used in this thesis is unique because of its long duration of coronary occlusion, that is not possible to repeat after the introduction of stents. However, it is still far from the actual acute MI-situation with vulnerable plaque rupture and thrombotic occlusion of the coronary artery. It is, however, reasonable to think that during the balloon occlusion significant transmural ischemia with various amounts of MaR

Page 87: Ventricular Depolarization in Ischemic Heart Disease.Value

Michael Ringborn, M.D.

68

and severity was developed, with effects on both the repolarization and depolarization phases, sufficient to test these novel ECG methods for quantification of the QRS changes.

In clinical evaluation of the severity of acute ischemia using information within the depolarization phase in addition to the conventional ST-segment analysis, robust and fairly noise resistant methods are needed. Basic understanding of how different QRS variables react during coronary occlusion and how they relate to the extent and severity of ischemia are important. Analysis of QRS changes from a single, “snap-shot” ECG is more complex as compared to ST-segment evaluation, due to the lack of an “isoelectric baseline”. This makes the slope method to be most clinically applicable in a monitoring situation where the patient is its own control. With expanding digital databases with patient´s prior ECGs readily available, however, more baseline information is becoming available, in which slope measurements could be included as a standard.

To further test the feasibility of the QRS-slope method as to monitor longer periods of acute myocardial ischemia and evolving infarction, it was applied in an experimental, acute MI study in pigs158.We found the method suitable in this setting of 40 minutes LAD occlusion to track the dynamic changes of the QRS slopes in the standard 12 lead ECG.

In several studies Dellborg and colleagues evaluated a vectorcardiographic (VCG) method for its feasibility and clinical application of QRS (and ST-segment) monitoring in patients during unstable angina as well in acute MI after thrombolytic therapy163-165. However the VCG method did not gain broad clinical acceptance, and thus is seldom used today.

In the pig experimental study158 we also added analysis of VCG in order to be able to compare with the QRS slopes and prior studies using the vectorial approach. There were clear similarities between the dynamics of the vector-based QRS max parameter and Ra and up-slope of the R wave (US) during the occlusion period. However, it was not within the scope of this thesis to additionally explore the VCG-based representation of depolarization changes.

More studies are needed to apply the QRS-slope method in STEMI patients to evaluate dynamic changes relating to the depolarization due to ischemia and infarct evolution.

Page 88: Ventricular Depolarization in Ischemic Heart Disease.Value

Ventricular Depolarization: ECG assessment of Severity and Extent of Acute Ischemia

69

4.2.3 Ischemia grades and “terminal QRS distortion” in relation to MaR, severity and evolving infarct in acute STEMI

General, clinical considerations In Study IV, we evaluated the clinical value of early, pre-hospital ischemia grading during STEMI as a means of identifying patients with possible severe ischemia, prone to rapid infarct evolution and large final IS.

The ischemia grading system was developed by Birnbaum et al.109 as a means of predicting final infarct size in patients presenting with an acute MI. The grading is based on assessment of the T wave, ST-segment and the terminal part of the QRS complex. Thus, it categorizes the gradually increasing severity during acute MI, as dependent on the degree of myocardial protection, into three grades. The most severe, third grade (G3) includes “terminal QRS distortion” in addition to significant ST-segment elevation. By this categorical ischemia-grading method no baseline ECG is needed, thus providing a “snap-shot” stratification of patients with acute MI.

The “distortion” of the terminal portion of the QRS complex due to severe ischemia includes disappearance of the S waves in leads V1 to V3 (typical leads with baseline rS configuration) and augmentation of the R wave in other leads. The S-wave criterion is easy to recognize without a previous, baseline ECG. However, proper identification of increasing R-wave amplitude in leads with a typical qR configuration needs either continuous ECG monitoring of the patient or an earlier baseline ECG recording for comparison. The grade 3 criterion for these leads was a priori set to an ST-J point-to-R-wave amplitude ratio above 0.5. By performing the grading only on leads with positive T waves increases the probability of making the evaluation early in the infarction evolution process, before R-waves decrease due to infarction development.

In several studies patients with G3 at their admission ECG have been associated with larger IS as compared to patients with G2 when final IS has been estimated by cardiac biochemical marker release55,56,112,115-117,198 and Selvester QRS scoring118. In four previous studies with similar results, final IS was quantified by SPECT imaging56, 119-121. In two of these, Birnbaum et al. have reported G3 to predict larger IS by pre-discharge SPECT after thrombolytic therapy: one in a large AMI cohort (n=378)56, the other in a smaller population (n=49)120. In the other two studies using pPCI as the reperfusion strategy Billgren et al.119 found larger IS by SPECT in patients with G3 as compared to G2 in a small sample (n=79) including only 15 patients with G3, whereas similar results were found by121, (n=46).

Uncertainty remains as to whether G3 represents severe ischemia more prone to fast progression of necrosis, or is merely a sign of large MaR that has already reached a high degree of irreversible infarct development. The second G3 criteria

Page 89: Ventricular Depolarization in Ischemic Heart Disease.Value

Michael Ringborn, M.D.

70

based on the ratio between ST-J and R-wave amplitude could be due to severe ischemia with still augmented R waves and high ST-segment elevation. As severe ischemia within the MaR gradually progresses into a larger degree of necrosis, the R-wave amplitude as well as ST-segment elevation gradually decline. Although patients with negative T-waves are excluded from the ischemia grading, it is theoretically plausible however, that gradual decline of R-wave amplitude and ST-segment level due to infarct progression may either keep their relative ratio stable, or make it change due to relatively more pronounced R-wave as compared to ST-segment attenuation. Then this G3 criterion still is met, despite the MaR being far into the irreversible infarction process.

Association between grade 3 ischemia on ECG and MaR and severity by SPECT One major reason to justify the theory of G3 as a sign of more severe ischemia than G2 has been similar time to treatment and larger infarct size despite supposedly comparable MaR. There are, however some conflicting results regarding the latter. Only a few studies have evaluated MaR by myocardial perfusion imaging, all with small sample sizes (ranging between 37 and 79 patients). Two of three studies using SPECT119,120 showed no difference in MaR. Yang et al.121, however, found larger MaR in patients with G3 as compared to patients with G2 by studying only anterior MIs (n=46 patients). In agreement with previous results, we found time from symptom onset to ECG and treatment in Study IV similar between patients with G3 as compared to patients with G2. We found MaR to be similar for patients with G3 and G2 on the pre-hospital ECG, but differed significantly between the temporal groups regarding the type of dynamic change of ischemia grade from pre-hospital ECG to admission, pre-PCI ECG.

No significant difference was, however observed in MaR between patients with G3 (by pooling groups G3->G3 and G2->G3) as compared to patients with G2 (by pooling groups G2->G2 and G3->G2) when considering grading separately only of the admission ECG at the PCI center (as performed in previous studies).

MaR was, however present only in a subgroup of Study IV, and used as a means of evaluating our secondary aim of the study, salvage. Nevertheless it represents a significantly larger cohort than in prior studies, and as such lends some more support regarding previous findings of similar MaR between the ischemia grades.

In contrast to Study II and III, no severity measure by SPECT was applied in the STEMI population in Study IV. In the situation with ongoing myocardial infarction with various degrees of already necrotic areas within the MaR, such evaluation is more difficult to interpret compared to the totally reversible, PCI-induced ischemia in Studies II-III. This imaging modality cannot differentiate between viable myocardium and myocardium already infarcted. Nevertheless, residual flow

Page 90: Ventricular Depolarization in Ischemic Heart Disease.Value

Ventricular Depolarization: ECG assessment of Severity and Extent of Acute Ischemia

71

during MI can be quantified by 99mTc-sestamibi SPECT as shown by Christian et al.82,173,179,199. In addition, Yang et al.121 also evaluated residual perfusion by SPECT within the MaR as a measure of severity, and found significantly lower values in patients with G3 as compared to those with G2 at the admission ECG. Contrary to this finding, residual perfusion was similar between the two grades in the study by Billgren et al119.

Pre-hospital, temporal behavior of ischemia grades - association to IS and salvage In the vast majority of previous studies only the admission ECG, just prior to reperfusion therapy has been used to grade patients into G3 or G2 ischemia. If G3 reflects more severe ischemia with rapid infarct progression, early identification of patients with this ischemia grade would be of importance. Furthermore, insight into the temporal behavior of the grades before reperfusion therapy is a missing link in the exploration and general understanding of ischemia grades.

Being the first we thus, in Study IV, deliberately evaluated the clinical value of pre-hospital ischemia grading and explored their temporal behavior between the index, pre-hospital ECG to the pre-PCI ECG just prior to reperfusion therapy by pPCI.

In agreement with earlier reports55,56,112,115-120,198, we found grade 3 on admission, pre-PCI ECG to be associated with larger IS. The new findings by Study IV, that grade 3 ischemia also, already on the pre-hospital ECG predicts larger final IS as compared to grade 2, independent of ST-segment elevation and presence of Q waves, is an important step towards possible clinical utilization of this simple electrocardiographic “snap-shot” evaluation. Furthermore, the pattern of temporal behavior during the pre-hospital phase also predicted IS, whereby development and persistence of G3 ischemia grade (groups G2->G3 and G3->G3) appeared to be the strongest predictors of larger IS. This prediction was stronger than the prediction for the sum of ST elevation.

As the secondary aim of Study IV, salvage after pPCI was compared between ischemia grades in the subgroup of patients who had pre-PCI SPECT performed in addition to the 30-day SPECT. We found overall salvage for patients with G3 and G2 on the pre-hospital ECG to be similar, although it differed within the dynamic groups, with the highest salvage being in group STR, and the lowest – in group G3->G3. By dividing patients into early- and late-treatment groups, with the cut-off set at 2.5 hours, we found interesting differences between the two grades. Among patients treated beyond 2.5 hours, those with G3 on the pre-hospital ECG were associated with lower salvage than patients with G2, whereas salvage was similar between the ischemia grades when treated early. Time intervals from symptom onset to pre-hospital ECG, as well as to balloon, were similar between patients with the two ischemia grades in both early and late-treatment groups. This

Page 91: Ventricular Depolarization in Ischemic Heart Disease.Value

Michael Ringborn, M.D.

72

finding on the association between time to treatment and salvage may further support the theory that G3 is a sign of more severe ischemia as compared to G2, with equal salvage potential for the two grades if treated early, but lower for G3 patients than G2 patients if treated late. This corresponds to findings by Birnbaum et al.111 and Sejersten et al.113, with worse outcome for patients with G3 than for patients with G2 when treated later than 2 and 3 hours, respectively.

This secondary evaluation of subpopulations with small samples should be considered as hypothesis generating. Larger samples with SPECT-verified salvage would be needed to further test this hypothesis.

Additional studies are needed to identify ECG patterns that differentiate severe ischemia from established necrosis in the myocardium during STEMI.

Additional aspects of the present S-B ischemia grading system In Study IV, we sought to further evaluate and increase the understanding of the Sclarovsky-Birnbaum (S-B) ischemia grading with its predefined, conventional grade 3 criteria applied in previous studies.

In theory, the two different grade 3 criteria - absence of S waves in leads V1-V3, and ST-J point to R-wave amplitude ratio of >0.5 in other leads, may reflect different pathophysiologic phases along the ischemia/infarction process. Furthermore, the transition between the severity grades is gradual and continuous, so the dichotomized grading by total loss of S waves and the a priori ST-J/R-wave amplitude ratio cut-off at 0.5 may not be the most optimal. Further studies are needed both to evaluate potential pathophysiologic differences between the two present grade 3 criteria, as well as test a more gradual scale for a severity measure.

In the present study, by post-hoc analysis of patients with anterior MI location, we found one half of patients with anterior G3 on the pre-hospital ECG to meet either loss of S wave, or ST-J point/R-wave amplitude criteria. There were no significant differences between these groups as regards MaR, final IS and severity. Further separating them into the patterns of ischemia-grade changes between pre-hospital ECG and pre-PCI ECG (i.e. G3->G2 or G3->G3), there were no difference between them either regarding MaR, IS or salvage according to the specific grade 3 criterion met. However, these subgroup analyses were done on small number of patients, and larger sample sizes are needed to further elucidate whether there are significant differences between these ischemia grade 3 criteria.

4.2.4 Depolarization changes by HF-QRS and standard ECG in relation to prior MI

Clinically, a general concept has been that depolarization changes in the early part of the QRS complex by Q waves reflect a prior, transmural MI200. However, an infarct may result in various depolarization changes depending on its location, size

Page 92: Ventricular Depolarization in Ischemic Heart Disease.Value

Ventricular Depolarization: ECG assessment of Severity and Extent of Acute Ischemia

73

within the LV myocardium and degree of transmurality. An old MI located in the posterolateral wall of the left ventricle, for example, cannot, due its later representation during the depolarization wavefront, produce Q waves, but rather gives rise to prominent R waves in anteroseptal leads V1-V2. The larger the area that produces no electrical forces due to a MI scar, the more effects will result on the overall QRS vector. Also the transmurality factor has been challenged by newer techniques like MRI, thus confirming that subendocardial extent, rather than degree of transmurality relates more strongly to the presence of Q waves130,131,201.

In Study I, the ability of HF-QRS to differentiate between patients with and without previous MI as defined by standard 12-lead ECG Selvester score was evaluated.

Early attempts to characterize depolarization changes in MI other than Q waves using more high-resolution ECG recordings have reported notches and slurs, or fragmentations, of the QRS complex202-205. These “high-frequency components” were shown to be increased in patients after infarct as compared to healthy individuals. More sophisticated methods, with use of signal averaging and digital filtering techniques, later made it possible to assess intra-QRS high-frequency energy in a more quantitative and more easily measured way. Goldberger et al. were first to report that MI increases the low-amplitude QRS notching, but diminishes the total, high-frequency QRS voltage in the frequency range of 80 to 300 Hz153, 206. Others found similar results in small sample sizes, few ECG leads and various frequency bands155,207,208, whereas opposite results were reported by Novak et al209.

In Study I, a considerably larger population than in previous studies was evaluated regarding the HF-QRS content in patients with and without standard QRS changes of a previous MI, by the Selvester QRS scoring system77. In addition, HF-QRS in a complete set of 12 leads was evaluated using two different bandwidths (80-300 Hz and 150-250 Hz). In contrast to previous findings, no significant differences were observed between the two groups of patients, regardless of frequency band studied. Nor were any significant differences observed regarding location or size of the MI.

There may be several reasons for the different results in Study I as compared to earlier studies. We included a much larger cohort of patients, however the no-MI group did not constitute healthy individuals, as did previous studies. Instead, they were admitted for either stress testing or elective PCI, thus presumably having a high prevalence of IHD. Although the post hoc defined healthy subgroup within our no-MI group could not be differentiated either from the remainder of the no-MI group, or from the MI-group, it was small, which hampers definitive conclusions. To investigate this further, a subsequent study from our group by Trägårdh et al. using, in part the same cohort (STAFF III) as in Study I, was

Page 93: Ventricular Depolarization in Ischemic Heart Disease.Value

Michael Ringborn, M.D.

74

undertaken189. It showed that the HF-QRS, independent of age, sex and QRS duration, was significantly lower in patients with IHD as compared to a healthy control group. Thus, these results may infer that HF-QRS reduction by the IHD itself, as compared to healthy individuals is more important than the presence of MI or not among IHD patients.

In Study I, patients were allocated into the MI or no-MI group based on another, ECG based method. The Selvester QRS, screening criteria141, 186 have shown high sensitivity and specificity for the detection of a previous MI. Nevertheless, other results may have been found by using a non-ECG based classification of prior MI, such as SPECT or MRI.

The findings in this study are important in the sense that an infarct within the myocardium does not change the electrophysiological basis of HF-QRS more than can be explained by changes only due to IHD in general. Notably, not even patients with the largest MIs within the anterior and inferior subgroups, (24-27% and 24-30% of the LV myocardium, respectively, as determined by Selvester QRS score) could be differentiated from the ones without prior MI. This may, however, in part be due to the large inter-individual variation of HF-QRS, within which absolute differences induced by a previous MI may be concealed.

Despite large inter-individual variation seen in HF-QRS, intra-individual variation has proven to be low210. For additional and deeper understanding of the effect of a prior MI as compared to supposedly more diffuse changes due to general IHD, an evaluation of HF-QRS in IHD patients before and after the MI is needed. After an acute MI, localized formation of a fibrous scar takes place, which replaces the necrotic myocardial cells. In contrast to the localized post-MI situation, in general IHD more diffuse, interstitial fibrosis by collagenous connective tissue surrounds and separates individual myocardial muscle fibers. Furthermore there is a reduction of myofibrillar content as well as the overall gap junctions211-213. All these processes alter the conduction through the myocardium, which may be related to the lower HF-QRS content in found by Trägårdh et al189.

Based on the findings from Study I, we could thus conclude that within a population of presumed high prevalence of IHD, no significant differences in HF-QRS (in the frequency bands 80-300Hz and 150-250Hz) could be seen between patients with or without standard QRS changes of an old MI. This finding further supported the design of Study II, in which a presumably uniform HF-QRS baseline for patients included in this study could be expected, regardless of a prior MI or not.

Page 94: Ventricular Depolarization in Ischemic Heart Disease.Value

Ventricular Depolarization: ECG assessment of Severity and Extent of Acute Ischemia

75

5 Conclusions

The major conclusions are as follows: Study I: Analysis of HF-QRS cannot differentiate between patients with and without a previous MI. Study II: HF-QRS analysis may provide valuable information for both detecting acute ischemia and quantifying myocardium at risk and its severity. Study III: The QRS slopes and especially the downward slope between R- and S- waves correlate with ischemia and may have potential value in risk stratification in acute ischemia as an add-on to ST-T analysis. Study IV: In STEMI patients, grade 3 ischemia at the pre-hospital stage is a dynamic ECG characteristic that predicts larger IS and rapid infarct evolution as compared to grade 2. Further studies are needed to determine whether grade 3 ischemia represents potentially reversible severe ischemia, or whether it represents already mostly irreversible, infarcted myocardium.

Page 95: Ventricular Depolarization in Ischemic Heart Disease.Value

The studies in this thesis were supported by grants from American Heart Association, Durham, NC, USA; the Southern Healthcare Region, Lund; Blekinge Scientific Council, Karlskrona and Donation Funds at Skåne University Hospital, Lund, Sweden.

Page 96: Ventricular Depolarization in Ischemic Heart Disease.Value

Ventricular Depolarization: ECG assessment of Severity and Extent of Acute Ischemia

77

6 Acknowledgements

I would like to express my gratitude to all those who gave their support and encouragement during the work on this thesis. I greatly appreciate all your generous contributions. It could never have been accomplished without your help. I particularly want to express my gratitude to: Pyotr Platonov, my enthusiastic and brilliant supervisor. Thank you for offering and providing me with your supervision and for your faith in our ability to achieve this goal. For your positive energy and continuous willingness to provide support, despite all your other extensive scientific endeavors and commitments. My co-supervisor Olle Pahlm for always being a great support to me. For your sharp and clear mind. For many years of friendship knowing you were always there by my side when help was needed, and for your quick and valuable editing of manuscripts and this thesis. My co-supervisor Galen Wagner for being such a great research mentor. For your unconditional and enthusiastic support throughout the years. For all fruitful and great moments throughout our journeys discussing everything from electrocardiology to life in general. My co-supervisor Christian Juhl Terkelsen for introducing me to larger scale clinical trials and allowing me access to data from the great STEMI database at Skejby. For always being helpful on the numerous occasions I came to Skejby and Copenhagen. For fruitful discussions of clinical research and statistical support. Jonas Pettersson for introducing me to this research topic through the high-frequency ECG. For your positive personality, good advice and longstanding friendship. Stafford Warren for being a role model of a warm and caring clinician, a great invasive cardiologist, and unsurpassed work capacity. For your outstanding support during my year in the US, and your unlimited hospitality. For good memories and strong friendship throughout the years. Esther Pueyo, Daniel Romero and Pablo Laguna. For years of excellent collaboration between Lund and Zaragoza and for outstanding technical support. I hope our collaboration will continue as well as the collaboration between Lund and Zaragoza intensifies. Leif Sörnmo for helping us in the field of signal processing and laying the ground for a fruitful collaboration between Lund and Zaragoza. Yochai Birnbaum for excellent collaboration and for numerous of ECGs scored according to the S-B ischemia grading. I look forward to our next studies.

Page 97: Ventricular Depolarization in Ischemic Heart Disease.Value

Michael Ringborn, M.D.

78

Monica Magnusson for providing immediate assistance whenever needed and being the best research secretary imaginable. All people in The STAFF Studies Symposium organization for years of interesting, stimulating meetings around the world. For great discussions, collaboration and friendship. An extra and special thanks to Kathy Shuping, who together with Galen Wagner have been the driving forces. Colleagues at the Department of Cardiology, Lund for always making me feel welcome in the clinic and for discussions regarding my thesis. For letting me share the scientific atmosphere of the Department. Colleagues during the years at the Department of Clinical Physiology, Lund: Eva Persson, Henrik Engblom, Elin Trägårdh Johansson, Marcus Carlsson, Einar Heiberg, Martin Ugander, David Strauss, Håkan Arheden et al. for stimulating discussions regarding ischemic heart disease, ECG and cardiac imaging. All my colleagues at the Thoracic Center in Karlskrona. Special thanks to my great supervisor and mentor in clinical cardiology, Erik Ljungström as well as Sergej Scheel, both sharing my interest in electrocardiology. To all other colleagues for not being too critical of my choice of doing a PhD thesis right in the middle of my clinical career. Particular thanks to our Department head, Carl-Magnus Pripp for allowing my part-time research; Dan Westlin, and above all Malin Persson for understanding my need for focus in order to finish the thesis. All my family and wonderful friends for enriching my life, supporting me in every way and boosting my energy and wellbeing. My dear father and step mother Kent and Inge Ringborn. For always believing in me, and although from a distance, giving your best support and care. My beloved mother and father-in-law, Kerstin and Uno Persson who always are there for me and Helena, regardless for what matter. For your endless energy and total dedication to support us, which is totally amazing. For being such wonderful grandparents for William, Hugo and Ella, giving them so much love. What would we do without you? My mother Anita Ringborn for simply being the most wonderful mother imaginable! For totally unconditional love and complete, unlimited support at any time, for any reason and for all our best. For being the greatest grandparent to William, Hugo and Ella. For endless times of baby-sitting when I was always too involved in many things. Our three beautiful, loving children William, Hugo and Ella for love and being the best of our lives. I long for spending more time with you soon.

Finally, my beautiful, kind, supportive wife, best friend and soul mate Helena. For your endless patience with my long work-hours and sometimes (or mostly) distracted mind. I couldn´t have done it without you, I’m sure you know that. I love you with all of my heart!

Page 98: Ventricular Depolarization in Ischemic Heart Disease.Value

Ventricular Depolarization: ECG assessment of Severity and Extent of Acute Ischemia

79

7 References

1. Lopez AD, Mathers CD, Ezzati M, Jamison DT, Murray CJ. Global and regional burden of disease and risk factors, 2001: systematic analysis of population health data. Lancet 2006;367(9524):1747-57. 2. Steg PG, James SK, Atar D, Badano LP, Lundqvist CB, Borger MA, et al. ESC Guidelines for the management of acute myocardial infarction in patients presenting with ST-segment elevation: The Task Force on the management of ST-segment elevation acute myocardial infarction of the European Society of Cardiology (ESC). Eur Heart J 2012;33(20):2569-619. 3. Nichols M TN, Scarborough P, Luengo-Fernandez R, Leal J, Gray A, Rayner M. European Cardiovascular Disease Statistics 2012. European Heart Network, Brussels, European Society of Cardiology, Sophia Antipolis. In: European Cardiovascular Disease Statistics 2012. European Heart Network, Brussels, European Society of Cardiology, Sophia Antipolis; 2012. 4. Lloyd-Jones D, Adams RJ, Brown TM, Carnethon M, Dai S, De Simone G, et al. Executive summary: heart disease and stroke statistics--2010 update: a report from the American Heart Association. Circulation;121(7):948-54. 5. Ford ES, Ajani UA, Croft JB, Critchley JA, Labarthe DR, Kottke TE, et al. Explaining the decrease in U.S. deaths from coronary disease, 1980-2000. N Engl J Med 2007;356(23):2388-98. 6. Levi F, Lucchini F, Negri E, La Vecchia C. Trends in mortality from cardiovascular and cerebrovascular diseases in Europe and other areas of the world. Heart 2002;88(2):119-24. 7. Fox CS, Coady S, Sorlie PD, D'Agostino RB, Sr., Pencina MJ, Vasan RS, et al. Increasing cardiovascular disease burden due to diabetes mellitus: the Framingham Heart Study. Circulation 2007;115(12):1544-50. 8. Libby P, Theroux P. Pathophysiology of coronary artery disease. Circulation 2005;111(25):3481-8. 9. Kolodgie FD, Burke AP, Farb A, Gold HK, Yuan J, Narula J, et al. The thin-cap fibroatheroma: a type of vulnerable plaque: the major precursor lesion to acute coronary syndromes. Curr Opin Cardiol 2001;16(5):285-92. 10. Shah PK. Mechanisms of plaque vulnerability and rupture. J Am Coll Cardiol 2003;41(4 Suppl S):15S-22S. 11. Stanley WC, Lopaschuk GD, Hall JL, McCormack JG. Regulation of myocardial carbohydrate metabolism under normal and ischaemic conditions. Potential for pharmacological interventions. Cardiovasc Res 1997;33(2):243-57. 12. Jennings RB, Ganote CE, Reimer KA. Ischemic tissue injury. Am J Pathol 1975;81(1):179-98. 13. Nomenclature and criteria for diagnosis of ischemic heart disease. Report of the Joint International Society and Federation of Cardiology/World Health Organization task force on standardization of clinical nomenclature. Circulation 1979;59(3):607-9. 14. Alpert JS, Thygesen K, Antman E, Bassand JP. Myocardial infarction redefined--a consensus document of The Joint European Society of Cardiology/American College of Cardiology Committee for the redefinition of myocardial infarction. J Am Coll Cardiol 2000;36(3):959-69. 15. Thygesen K, Alpert JS, Jaffe AS, Simoons ML, Chaitman BR, White HD. Third Universal Definition of Myocardial Infarction. Circulation 2012;126(16):2020-2035.

Page 99: Ventricular Depolarization in Ischemic Heart Disease.Value

Michael Ringborn, M.D.

80

16. Anderson JL, Karagounis LA, Califf RM. Metaanalysis of five reported studies on the relation of early coronary patency grades with mortality and outcomes after acute myocardial infarction. Am J Cardiol 1996;78(1):1-8. 17. Gersh BJ, Stone GW, White HD, Holmes DR, Jr. Pharmacological facilitation of primary percutaneous coronary intervention for acute myocardial infarction: is the slope of the curve the shape of the future? JAMA 2005;293(8):979-86. 18. Huber K, De Caterina R, Kristensen SD, Verheugt FW, Montalescot G, Maestro LB, et al. Pre-hospital reperfusion therapy: a strategy to improve therapeutic outcome in patients with ST-elevation myocardial infarction. Eur Heart J 2005;26(19):2063-74. 19. Kushner FG, Hand M, Smith SC, Jr., King SB, 3rd, Anderson JL, Antman EM, et al. 2009 Focused Updates: ACC/AHA Guidelines for the Management of Patients With ST-Elevation Myocardial Infarction (Updating the 2004 Guideline and 2007 Focused Update) and ACC/AHA/SCAI Guidelines on Percutaneous Coronary Intervention (Updating the 2005 Guideline and 2007 Focused Update): a Report of the American College of Cardiology Foundation/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv 2009. 20. Antman EM, Hand M, Armstrong PW, Bates ER, Green LA, Halasyamani LK, et al. 2007 focused update of the ACC/AHA 2004 guidelines for the management of patients with ST-elevation myocardial infarction: a report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines. J Am Coll Cardiol 2008;51(2):210-47. 21. Levine GN, Bates ER, Blankenship JC, Bailey SR, Bittl JA, Cercek B, et al. 2011 ACCF/AHA/SCAI Guideline for Percutaneous Coronary Intervention: a report of the American College of Cardiology Foundation/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines and the Society for Cardiovascular Angiography and Interventions. Circulation;124(23):e574-651. 22. Van de Werf F, Bax J, Betriu A, Blomstrom-Lundqvist C, Crea F, Falk V, et al. Management of acute myocardial infarction in patients presenting with persistent ST-segment elevation: the Task Force on the Management of ST-Segment Elevation Acute Myocardial Infarction of the European Society of Cardiology. Eur Heart J 2008;29(23):2909-45. 23. Fujita M, Ikemoto M, Kishishita M, Otani H, Nohara R, Tanaka T, et al. Elevated basic fibroblast growth factor in pericardial fluid of patients with unstable angina. Circulation 1996;94(4):610-3. 24. Fleisch M, Billinger M, Eberli FR, Garachemani AR, Meier B, Seiler C. Physiologically assessed coronary collateral flow and intracoronary growth factor concentrations in patients with 1- to 3-vessel coronary artery disease. Circulation 1999;100(19):1945-50. 25. Matsunaga T, Warltier DC, Weihrauch DW, Moniz M, Tessmer J, Chilian WM. Ischemia-induced coronary collateral growth is dependent on vascular endothelial growth factor and nitric oxide. Circulation 2000;102(25):3098-103. 26. Schaper W. Collateral vessel growth in the human heart. Role of fibroblast growth factor-2. Circulation 1996;94(4):600-1. 27. Lee CW, Park SW, Cho GY, Hong MK, Kim JJ, Kang DH, et al. Pressure-derived fractional collateral blood flow: a primary determinant of left ventricular recovery after reperfused acute myocardial infarction. J Am Coll Cardiol 2000;35(4):949-55. 28. Elsman P, van 't Hof AW, de Boer MJ, Hoorntje JC, Suryapranata H, Dambrink JH, et al. Role of collateral circulation in the acute phase of ST-segment-elevation myocardial infarction treated with primary coronary intervention. Eur Heart J 2004;25(10):854-8.

Page 100: Ventricular Depolarization in Ischemic Heart Disease.Value

Ventricular Depolarization: ECG assessment of Severity and Extent of Acute Ischemia

81

29. Perez-Castellano N, Garcia EJ, Abeytua M, Soriano J, Serrano JA, Elizaga J, et al. Influence of collateral circulation on in-hospital death from anterior acute myocardial infarction. J Am Coll Cardiol 1998;31(3):512-8. 30. Murry CE, Jennings RB, Reimer KA. Preconditioning with ischemia: a delay of lethal cell injury in ischemic myocardium. Circulation 1986;74(5):1124-36. 31. Schott RJ, Rohmann S, Braun ER, Schaper W. Ischemic preconditioning reduces infarct size in swine myocardium. Circ Res 1990;66(4):1133-42. 32. Liu GS, Thornton J, Van Winkle DM, Stanley AW, Olsson RA, Downey JM. Protection against infarction afforded by preconditioning is mediated by A1 adenosine receptors in rabbit heart. Circulation 1991;84(1):350-6. 33. Schulz R, Rose J, Heusch G. Involvement of activation of ATP-dependent potassium channels in ischemic preconditioning in swine. Am J Physiol 1994;267(4 Pt 2):H1341-52. 34. Schulz R, Post H, Vahlhaus C, Heusch G. Ischemic preconditioning in pigs: a graded phenomenon: its relation to adenosine and bradykinin. Circulation 1998;98(10):1022-9. 35. Walker DM, Walker JM, Pugsley WB, Pattison CW, Yellon DM. Preconditioning in isolated superfused human muscle. J Mol Cell Cardiol 1995;27(6):1349-57. 36. Maybaum S, Ilan M, Mogilevsky J, Tzivoni D. Improvement in ischemic parameters during repeated exercise testing: a possible model for myocardial preconditioning. Am J Cardiol 1996;78(10):1087-91. 37. Bogaty P, Kingma JG, Jr., Robitaille NM, Plante S, Simard S, Charbonneau L, et al. Attenuation of myocardial ischemia with repeated exercise in subjects with chronic stable angina: relation to myocardial contractility, intensity of exercise and the adenosine triphosphate-sensitive potassium channel. J Am Coll Cardiol 1998;32(6):1665-71. 38. Lambiase PD, Edwards RJ, Cusack MR, Bucknall CA, Redwood SR, Marber MS. Exercise-induced ischemia initiates the second window of protection in humans independent of collateral recruitment. J Am Coll Cardiol 2003;41(7):1174-82. 39. Deutsch E, Berger M, Kussmaul WG, Hirshfeld JW, Jr., Herrmann HC, Laskey WK. Adaptation to ischemia during percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty. Clinical, hemodynamic, and metabolic features. Circulation 1990;82(6):2044-51. 40. Yellon DM, Alkhulaifi AM, Pugsley WB. Preconditioning the human myocardium. Lancet 1993;342(8866):276-7. 41. Murry CE, Richard VJ, Reimer KA, Jennings RB. Ischemic preconditioning slows energy metabolism and delays ultrastructural damage during a sustained ischemic episode. Circ Res 1990;66(4):913-31. 42. Jennings RB, Sebbag L, Schwartz LM, Crago MS, Reimer KA. Metabolism of preconditioned myocardium: effect of loss and reinstatement of cardioprotection. J Mol Cell Cardiol 2001;33(9):1571-88. 43. Soares PR, de Albuquerque CP, Chacko VP, Gerstenblith G, Weiss RG. Role of preischemic glycogen depletion in the improvement of postischemic metabolic and contractile recovery of ischemia-preconditioned rat hearts. Circulation 1997;96(3):975-83. 44. Baines CP, Goto M, Downey JM. Oxygen radicals released during ischemic preconditioning contribute to cardioprotection in the rabbit myocardium. J Mol Cell Cardiol 1997;29(1):207-16. 45. Cleveland JC, Jr., Meldrum DR, Cain BS, Banerjee A, Harken AH. Oral sulfonylurea hypoglycemic agents prevent ischemic preconditioning in human myocardium. Two paradoxes revisited. Circulation 1997;96(1):29-32.

Page 101: Ventricular Depolarization in Ischemic Heart Disease.Value

Michael Ringborn, M.D.

82

46. Ottani F, Galvani M, Ferrini D, Sorbello F, Limonetti P, Pantoli D, et al. Prodromal angina limits infarct size. A role for ischemic preconditioning. Circulation 1995;91(2):291-7. 47. Kloner RA, Shook T, Przyklenk K, Davis VG, Junio L, Matthews RV, et al. Previous angina alters in-hospital outcome in TIMI 4. A clinical correlate to preconditioning? Circulation 1995;91(1):37-45. 48. Anzai T, Yoshikawa T, Asakura Y, Abe S, Akaishi M, Mitamura H, et al. Preinfarction angina as a major predictor of left ventricular function and long-term prognosis after a first Q wave myocardial infarction. J Am Coll Cardiol 1995;26(2):319-27. 49. Kloner RA, Shook T, Antman EM, Cannon CP, Przyklenk K, Yoo K, et al. Prospective temporal analysis of the onset of preinfarction angina versus outcome: an ancillary study in TIMI-9B. Circulation 1998;97(11):1042-5. 50. Ishihara M, Sato H, Tateishi H, Kawagoe T, Shimatani Y, Kurisu S, et al. Implications of prodromal angina pectoris in anterior wall acute myocardial infarction: acute angiographic findings and long-term prognosis. J Am Coll Cardiol 1997;30(4):970-5. 51. Leesar MA, Stoddard M, Ahmed M, Broadbent J, Bolli R. Preconditioning of human myocardium with adenosine during coronary angioplasty. Circulation 1997;95(11):2500-7. 52. Cribier A, Korsatz L, Koning R, Rath P, Gamra H, Stix G, et al. Improved myocardial ischemic response and enhanced collateral circulation with long repetitive coronary occlusion during angioplasty: a prospective study. J Am Coll Cardiol 1992;20(3):578-86. 53. Birnbaum Y, Hale SL, Kloner RA. Progressive decrease in the ST segment elevation during ischemic preconditioning: is it related to recruitment of collateral vessels? J Mol Cell Cardiol 1996;28(7):1493-9. 54. Floyd JS, Maynard C, Weston P, Johanson P, Jennings RB, Wagner GS. Effects of ischemic preconditioning and arterial collateral flow on ST-segment elevation and QRS complex prolongation in a canine model of acute coronary occlusion. Journal of Electrocardiology 2009;42(1):19-26. 55. Lee CW, Hong MK, Yang HS, Choi SW, Kim JJ, Park SW, et al. Determinants and prognostic implications of terminal QRS complex distortion in patients treated with primary angioplasty for acute myocardial infarction. Am J Cardiol 2001;88(3):210-3. 56. Birnbaum Y, Kloner RA, Sclarovsky S, Cannon CP, McCabe CH, Davis VG, et al. Distortion of the terminal portion of the QRS on the admission electrocardiogram in acute myocardial infarction and correlation with infarct size and long-term prognosis (Thrombolysis in Myocardial Infarction 4 Trial). Am J Cardiol 1996;78(4):396-403. 57. Garcia-Rubira JC, Nunez-Gil I, Garcia-Borbolla R, Manzano MC, Fernandez-Ortiz A, Cobos MA, et al. Distortion of the terminal portion of the QRS is associated with poor collateral flow before and poor myocardial perfusion after percutaneous revascularization for myocardial infarction. Coron Artery Dis 2008;19(6):389-93. 58. Celik T, Yuksel UC, Iyisoy A, Kilic S, Kardesoglu E, Bugan B, et al. The impact of preinfarction angina on electrocardiographic ischemia grades in patients with acute myocardial infarction treated with primary percutaneous coronary intervention. Ann Noninvasive Electrocardiol 2008;13(3):278-86. 59. Kleber AG, Janse MJ, van Capelle FJ, Durrer D. Mechanism and time course of S-T and T-Q segment changes during acute regional myocardial ischemia in the pig heart determined by extracellular and intracellular recordings. Circ Res 1978;42(5):603-13.

Page 102: Ventricular Depolarization in Ischemic Heart Disease.Value

Ventricular Depolarization: ECG assessment of Severity and Extent of Acute Ischemia

83

60. Kleber AG, Janse MJ, Wilms-Schopmann FJ, Wilde AA, Coronel R. Changes in conduction velocity during acute ischemia in ventricular myocardium of the isolated porcine heart. Circulation 1986;73(1):189-98. 61. Cascio WE, Johnson TA, Gettes LS. Electrophysiologic changes in ischemic ventricular myocardium: I. Influence of ionic, metabolic, and energetic changes. J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol 1995;6(11):1039-62. 62. Shaw RM, Rudy Y. Electrophysiologic effects of acute myocardial ischemia: a theoretical study of altered cell excitability and action potential duration. Cardiovasc Res 1997;35(2):256-72. 63. Vincent GM, Abildskov JA, Burgess MJ. Mechanisms of ischemic ST-segment displacement. Evaluation by direct current recordings. Circulation 1977;56(4 Pt 1):559-66. 64. Boineau JP, Blumenschein SD, Spach MS, Sabiston DC. Relationship between ventricular depolarization and electrocardiogram in myocardial infarction. J Electrocardiol 1968;1(2):233-40. 65. Dehaan RL. Differentiation of the atrioventricular conducting system of the heart. Circulation 1961;24:458-70. 66. Hackel DB, Wagner G, Ratliff NB, Cies A, Estes EH, Jr. Anatomic studies of the cardiac conducting system in acute myocardial infarction. Am Heart J 1972;83(1):77-81. 67. Durrer D, van Dam RT, Freud GE, Janse MJ, Meijler FL, Arzbaecher RC. Total excitation of the isolated human heart. Circulation 1970;41(6):899-912. 68. Solomon JC, Selvester RH. Simulation of measured activation sequence in the human heart. Am Heart J 1973;85(4):518-24. 69. Selvester RH, Solomon JC, Tolan GD. Fine grid computer simulation of QRS-T and criteria for the quantitation of regional ischemia. J Electrocardiol 1987;20 Suppl:1-8. 70. Selvester RH, Wagner NB, Wagner GS. Ventricular excitation during percutaneous transluminal angioplasty of the left anterior descending coronary artery. Am J Cardiol 1988;62(16):1116-21. 71. Selvester RH WG, Ideker RE., editor. Myocardial infarction. In: Macfarline PW, Lawrie TDV, editors. Comprehensive electrocardiology: theory and practice in health and disease. New York: Pergammon press; 1989. 72. Hancock EW, Deal BJ, Mirvis DM, Okin P, Kligfield P, Gettes LS, et al. AHA/ACCF/HRS recommendations for the standardization and interpretation of the electrocardiogram: part V: electrocardiogram changes associated with cardiac chamber hypertrophy: a scientific statement from the American Heart Association Electrocardiography and Arrhythmias Committee, Council on Clinical Cardiology; the American College of Cardiology Foundation; and the Heart Rhythm Society. Endorsed by the International Society for Computerized Electrocardiology. J Am Coll Cardiol 2009;53(11):992-1002. 73. Pahlm-Webb U, Pahlm O, Sadanandan S, Selvester RH, Wagner GS. A new method for using the direction of ST-segment deviation to localize the site of acute coronary occlusion: the 24-view standard electrocardiogram. Am J Med 2002;113(1):75-8. 74. Strauss DG, Selvester RH. The QRS complex--a biomarker that "images" the heart: QRS scores to quantify myocardial scar in the presence of normal and abnormal ventricular conduction. J Electrocardiol 2009;42(1):85-96. 75. Dressler W, Roesler H. High T waves in the earliest stage of myocardial infarction. Am Heart J 1947;34(5):627-45. 76. Holland RP, Arnsdorf MF. Solid angle theory and the electrocardiogram: physiologic and quantitative interpretations. Prog Cardiovasc Dis 1977;19(6):431-57.

Page 103: Ventricular Depolarization in Ischemic Heart Disease.Value

Michael Ringborn, M.D.

84

77. Selvester RH, Wagner GS, Hindman NB. The Selvester QRS scoring system for estimating myocardial infarct size. The development and application of the system. Arch Intern Med 1985;145(10):1877-81. 78. Persson E, Pettersson J, Ringborn M, Sornmo L, Warren SG, Wagner GS, et al. Comparison of ST-segment deviation to scintigraphically quantified myocardial ischemia during acute coronary occlusion induced by percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty. Am J Cardiol 2006;97(3):295-300. 79. Faraggi M, Steg PG, Francois D, Sarda L, Foult JM, Daou D, et al. Residual area at risk after anterior myocardial infarction: are ST segment changes during coronary angioplasty a reliable indicator? A comparison with technetium 99m-labeled sestamibi single-photon emission computed tomography. J Nucl Cardiol 1997;4(1 Pt 1):11-7. 80. Aldrich HR, Wagner NB, Boswick J, Corsa AT, Jones MG, Grande P, et al. Use of initial ST-segment deviation for prediction of final electrocardiographic size of acute myocardial infarcts. Am J Cardiol 1988;61(10):749-53. 81. Clemmensen P, Grande P, Aldrich HR, Wagner GS. Evaluation of formulas for estimating the final size of acute myocardial infarcts from quantitative ST-segment elevation on the initial standard 12-lead ECG. J Electrocardiol 1991;24(1):77-83. 82. Christian TF, Gibbons RJ, Clements IP, Berger PB, Selvester RH, Wagner GS. Estimates of myocardium at risk and collateral flow in acute myocardial infarction using electrocardiographic indexes with comparison to radionuclide and angiographic measures. J Am Coll Cardiol 1995;26(2):388-93. 83. Clements IP, Kaufmann UP, Bailey KR, Pellikka PA, Behrenbeck T, Gibbons RJ. Electrocardiographic prediction of myocardial area at risk. Mayo Clin Proc 1991;66(10):985-90. 84. Birnbaum Y, Criger DA, Wagner GS, Strasberg B, Mager A, Gates K, et al. Prediction of the extent and severity of left ventricular dysfunction in anterior acute myocardial infarction by the admission electrocardiogram. Am Heart J 2001;141(6):915-24. 85. Hathaway WR, Peterson ED, Wagner GS, Granger CB, Zabel KM, Pieper KS, et al. Prognostic significance of the initial electrocardiogram in patients with acute myocardial infarction. GUSTO-I Investigators. Global Utilization of Streptokinase and t-PA for Occluded Coronary Arteries. JAMA 1998;279(5):387-91. 86. Sejersten M, Ripa RS, Maynard C, Wagner GS, Andersen HR, Grande P, et al. Usefulness of quantitative baseline ST-segment elevation for predicting outcomes after primary coronary angioplasty or fibrinolysis (results from the DANAMI-2 trial). Am J Cardiol 2006;97(5):611-6. 87. Mauri F, Franzosi MG, Maggioni AP, Santoro E, Santoro L. Clinical value of 12-lead electrocardiography to predict the long-term prognosis of GISSI-1 patients. J Am Coll Cardiol 2002;39(10):1594-600. 88. Terkelsen CJ, Kaltoft AK, Norgaard BL, Bottcher M, Lassen JF, Clausen K, et al. ST changes before and during primary percutaneous coronary intervention predict final infarct size in patients with ST elevation myocardial infarction. J Electrocardiol 2009;42(1):64-72. 89. Rimar D, Crystal E, Battler A, Gottlieb S, Freimark D, Hod H, et al. Improved prognosis of patients presenting with clinical markers of spontaneous reperfusion during acute myocardial infarction. Heart 2002;88(4):352-6. 90. Schroder K, Wegscheider K, Zeymer U, Tebbe U, Schroder R. Extent of ST-segment deviation in a single electrocardiogram lead 90 min after thrombolysis as a predictor of medium-term mortality in acute myocardial infarction. Lancet 2001;358(9292):1479-86.

Page 104: Ventricular Depolarization in Ischemic Heart Disease.Value

Ventricular Depolarization: ECG assessment of Severity and Extent of Acute Ischemia

85

91. Schroder K, Wegscheider K, Zeymer U, Neuhaus KL, Schroder R. Extent of ST-segment deviation in the single ECG lead of maximum deviation present 90 or 180 minutes after start of thrombolytic therapy best predicts outcome in acute myocardial infarction. Z Kardiol 2001;90(8):557-67. 92. Hamlin RL, Pipers FS, Hellerstein HK, Smith CR. QRS alterations immediately following production of left ventricular free-wall ischemia in dogs. Am J Physiol 1968;215(5):1032-40. 93. Holland RP, Brooks H. The QRS complex during myocardial ischemia. An experimental analysis in the porcine heart. J Clin Invest 1976;57(3):541-50. 94. Hamlin RL, Smith CR, Hellerstein HK, Pipers FS. Alterations in QRS during ischemia of the left ventricular free-wall in goats. J Electrocardiol 1969;2(3):223-8. 95. Barnhill JE, Wikswo JP, Jr., Dawson AK, Gundersen S, Robertson RM, Robertson D, et al. The QRS complex during transient myocardial ischemia: studies in patients with variant angina pectoris and in a canine preparation. Circulation 1985;71(5):901-11. 96. David D, Naito M, Michelson E, Watanabe Y, Chen CC, Morganroth J, et al. Intramyocardial conduction: a major determinant of R-wave amplitude during acute myocardial ischemia. Circulation 1982;65(1):161-7. 97. Rakita L, Borduas JL, Rothman S, Prinzmetal M. Studies on the mechanism of ventricular activity. XII. Early changes in the RS-T segment and QRS complex following acute coronary artery occlusion: experimental study and clinical applications. Am Heart J 1954;48(3):351-72. 98. Wagner NB, Sevilla DC, Krucoff MW, Lee KL, Pieper KS, Kent KK, et al. Transient alterations of the QRS complex and ST segment during percutaneous transluminal balloon angioplasty of the left anterior descending coronary artery. Am J Cardiol 1988;62(16):1038-42. 99. Wagner NB, Sevilla DC, Krucoff MW, Pieper KS, Lee KL, White RD, et al. Transient alterations of the QRS complex and ST segment during percutaneous transluminal balloon angioplasty of the right and left circumflex coronary arteries. Am J Cardiol 1989;63(17):1208-13. 100. Surawicz B, Orr CM, Hermiller JB, Bell KD, Pinto RP. QRS changes during percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty and their possible mechanisms. J Am Coll Cardiol 1997;30(2):452-8. 101. Kornreich F, MacLeod RS, Dzavik V, Selvester RH, Kornreich AM, Stoupel E, et al. QRST changes during and after percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty. J Electrocardiol 1994;27 Suppl:113-7. 102. Charlap S, Shani J, Schulhoff N, Herman B, Lichstein E. R- and S-wave amplitude changes with acute anterior transmural myocardial ischemia. Correlations with left ventricular filling pressures. Chest 1990;97(3):566-71. 103. Sinno MC, Kowalski M, Kenigsberg DN, Krishnan SC, Khanal S. R-wave amplitude changes measured by electrocardiography during early transmural ischemia. J Electrocardiol 2008;41(5):425-30. 104. Bateman TM, Czer LS, Gray RJ, Maddahi J, Raymond MJ, Geft IL, et al. Transient pathologic Q waves during acute ischemic events: an electrocardiographic correlate of stunned but viable myocardium. Am Heart J 1983;106(6):1421-6. 105. Barnhill JE, 3rd, Tendera M, Cade H, Campbell WB, Smith RF. Depolarization changes early in the course of myocardial infarction: significance of changes in the terminal portion of the QRS complex. J Am Coll Cardiol 1989;14(1):143-9.

Page 105: Ventricular Depolarization in Ischemic Heart Disease.Value

Michael Ringborn, M.D.

86

106. Bashour TT, Kabbani SS, Brewster HP, Wald SH, Hanna ES, Cheng TO. Transient Q waves and reversible cardiac failure during myocardial ischemia: electrical and mechanical stunning of the heart. Am Heart J 1983;106(4 Pt 1):780-3. 107. Surawicz B. Reversible QRS changes during acute myocardial ischemia. J Electrocardiol 1998;31(3):209-20. 108. Sclarovsky S, Mager A, Kusniec J, Rechavia E, Sagie A, Bassevich R, et al. Electrocardiographic classification of acute myocardial ischemia. Isr J Med Sci 1990;26(9):525-31. 109. Birnbaum Y, Sclarovsky S, Blum A, Mager A, Gabbay U. Prognostic significance of the initial electrocardiographic pattern in a first acute anterior wall myocardial infarction. Chest 1993;103(6):1681-7. 110. Birnbaum Y, Sclarovsky S. The grades of ischemia on the presenting electrocardiogram of patients with ST elevation acute myocardial infarction. J Electrocardiol 2001;34 Suppl:17-26. 111. Birnbaum Y, Herz I, Sclarovsky S, Zlotikamien B, Chetrit A, Olmer L, et al. Prognostic significance of the admission electrocardiogram in acute myocardial infarction. J Am Coll Cardiol 1996;27(5):1128-32. 112. Garcia-Rubira JC, Perez-Leal I, Garcia-Martinez JT, Molano F, Hidalgo R, Gomez-Barrado JJ, et al. The initial electrocardiogram pattern is a strong predictor of outcome in acute myocardial infarction. Int J Cardiol 1995;51(3):301-5. 113. Sejersten M, Birnbaum Y, Ripa RS, Maynard C, Wagner GS, Clemmensen P. Influences of electrocardiographic ischaemia grades and symptom duration on outcomes in patients with acute myocardial infarction treated with thrombolysis versus primary percutaneous coronary intervention: results from the DANAMI-2 trial. Heart 2006;92(11):1577-82. 114. Birnbaum Y, Goodman S, Barr A, Gates KB, Barbash GI, Battler A, et al. Comparison of primary coronary angioplasty versus thrombolysis in patients with ST-segment elevation acute myocardial infarction and grade II and grade III myocardial ischemia on the enrollment electrocardiogram. Am J Cardiol 2001;88(8):842-7. 115. Postma S, Heestermans T, Ten Berg JW, van Werkum JW, Suryapranata H, Birnbaum Y, et al. Predictors and outcome of grade 3 ischemia in patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction undergoing primary percutaneous coronary intervention. J Electrocardiol 2011;44(5):516-22. 116. Wolak A, Yaroslavtsev S, Amit G, Birnbaum Y, Cafri C, Atar S, et al. Grade 3 ischemia on the admission electrocardiogram predicts failure of ST resolution and of adequate flow restoration after primary percutaneous coronary intervention for acute myocardial infarction. Am Heart J 2007;153(3):410-7. 117. Weaver JC, Rees D, Prasan AM, Ramsay DD, Binnekamp MF, McCrohon JA. Grade 3 ischemia on the admission electrocardiogram is associated with severe microvascular injury on cardiac magnetic resonance imaging after ST elevation myocardial infarction. J Electrocardiol 2011;44(1):49-57. 118. Birnbaum Y, Maynard C, Wolfe S, Mager A, Strasberg B, Rechavia E, et al. Terminal QRS distortion on admission is better than ST-segment measurements in predicting final infarct size and assessing the Potential effect of thrombolytic therapy in anterior wall acute myocardial infarction. Am J Cardiol 1999;84(5):530-4. 119. Billgren T, Maynard C, Christian TF, Rahman MA, Saeed M, Hammill SC, et al. Grade 3 ischemia on the admission electrocardiogram predicts rapid progression of necrosis over time and less myocardial salvage by primary angioplasty. J Electrocardiol 2005;38(3):187-94.

Page 106: Ventricular Depolarization in Ischemic Heart Disease.Value

Ventricular Depolarization: ECG assessment of Severity and Extent of Acute Ischemia

87

120. Birnbaum Y, Mahaffey KW, Criger DA, Gates KB, Barbash GI, Barbagelata A, et al. Grade III ischemia on presentation with acute myocardial infarction predicts rapid progression of necrosis and less myocardial salvage with thrombolysis. Cardiology 2002;97(3):166-74. 121. Yang HS, Lee CW, Hong MK, Moon DH, Kim YH, Lee SG, et al. Terminal QRS complex distortion on the admission electrocardiogram in anterior acute myocardial infarction and association with residual flow and infarct size after primary angioplasty. Korean J Intern Med 2005;20(1):21-5. 122. Weston P, Johanson P, Schwartz LM, Maynard C, Jennings RB, Wagner GS. The value of both ST-segment and QRS complex changes during acute coronary occlusion for prediction of reperfusion-induced myocardial salvage in a canine model. J Electrocardiol 2007;40(1):18-25. 123. Wong CK, Gao W, Stewart RA, van Pelt N, French JK, Aylward PE, et al. Risk stratification of patients with acute anterior myocardial infarction and right bundle-branch block: importance of QRS duration and early ST-segment resolution after fibrinolytic therapy. Circulation 2006;114(8):783-9. 124. Wong CK, Gao W, Stewart RA, French JK, Aylward PE, White HD. Relationship of QRS duration at baseline and changes over 60 min after fibrinolysis to 30-day mortality with different locations of ST elevation myocardial infarction: results from the Hirulog and Early Reperfusion or Occlusion-2 trial. Heart 2009;95(4):276-82. 125. Boineau J, editor. The ECG in multiple myocardial infarction and the progression of ischemic heart disease. St Louis: CardioRhythm Inc.; 2004. 126. Selvester RH. The signal-averaged high-resolution ECG. J Electrocardiol 1995;28 Suppl:216-25. 127. Bar FW, Vermeer F, de Zwaan C, Ramentol M, Braat S, Simoons ML, et al. Value of admission electrocardiogram in predicting outcome of thrombolytic therapy in acute myocardial infarction. A randomized trial conducted by The Netherlands Interuniversity Cardiology Institute. Am J Cardiol 1987;59(1):6-13. 128. Rechavia E, Blum A, Mager A, Birnbaum Y, Strasberg B, Sclarovsky S. Electrocardiographic Q-waves inconstancy during thrombolysis in acute anterior wall myocardial infarction. Cardiology 1992;80(5-6):392-8. 129. Raitt MH, Maynard C, Wagner GS, Cerqueira MD, Selvester RH, Weaver WD. Appearance of abnormal Q waves early in the course of acute myocardial infarction: implications for efficacy of thrombolytic therapy. J Am Coll Cardiol 1995;25(5):1084-8. 130. Wu E, Judd RM, Vargas JD, Klocke FJ, Bonow RO, Kim RJ. Visualisation of presence, location, and transmural extent of healed Q-wave and non-Q-wave myocardial infarction. Lancet 2001;357(9249):21-8. 131. Engblom H, Hedstrom E, Heiberg E, Wagner GS, Pahlm O, Arheden H. Size and transmural extent of first-time reperfused myocardial infarction assessed by cardiac magnetic resonance can be estimated by 12-lead electrocardiogram. Am Heart J 2005;150(5):920. 132. Selvester RH, Solomon JC, Gillespie TL. Digital computer model of a total body electrocardiographic surface map. An adult male-torso simulation with lungs. Circulation 1968;38(4):684-90. 133. Ideker RE, Wagner GS, Ruth WK, Alonso DR, Bishop SP, Bloor CM, et al. Evaluation of a QRS scoring system for estimating myocardial infarct size. II. Correlation with quantitative anatomic findings for anterior infarcts. Am J Cardiol 1982;49(7):1604-14.

Page 107: Ventricular Depolarization in Ischemic Heart Disease.Value

Michael Ringborn, M.D.

88

134. Roark SF, Ideker RE, Wagner GS, Alonso DR, Bishop SP, Bloor CM, et al. Evaluation of a QRS scoring system for estimating myocardial infarct size. III. Correlation with quantitative anatomic findings for inferior infarcts. Am J Cardiol 1983;51(3):382-9. 135. Wagner GS, Freye CJ, Palmeri ST, Roark SF, Stack NC, Ideker RE, et al. Evaluation of a QRS scoring system for estimating myocardial infarct size. I. Specificity and observer agreement. Circulation 1982;65(2):342-7. 136. Ward RM, White RD, Ideker RE, Hindman NB, Alonso DR, Bishop SP, et al. Evaluation of a QRS scoring system for estimating myocardial infarct size. IV. Correlation with quantitative anatomic findings for posterolateral infarcts. Am J Cardiol 1984;53(6):706-14. 137. Tjandrawidjaja MC, Fu Y, Westerhout CM, Wagner GS, Granger CB, Armstrong PW. Usefulness of the QRS score as a strong prognostic marker in patients discharged after undergoing primary percutaneous coronary intervention for ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction. Am J Cardiol;106(5):630-4. 138. Jones MG, Anderson KM, Wilson PW, Kannel WB, Wagner NB, Wagner GS. Prognostic use of a QRS scoring system after hospital discharge for initial acute myocardial infarction in the Framingham cohort. Am J Cardiol 1990;66(5):546-50. 139. De Sutter J, Van de Wiele C, Gheeraert P, De Buyzere M, Gevaert S, Taeymans Y, et al. The Selvester 32-point QRS score for evaluation of myocardial infarct size after primary coronary angioplasty. Am J Cardiol 1999;83(2):255-7, A5. 140. Engblom H, Wagner GS, Setser RM, Selvester RH, Billgren T, Kasper JM, et al. Quantitative clinical assessment of chronic anterior myocardial infarction with delayed enhancement magnetic resonance imaging and QRS scoring. Am Heart J 2003;146(2):359-66. 141. Anderson WD, Wagner NB, Lee KL, White RD, Yuschak J, Behar VS, et al. Evaluation of a QRS scoring system for estimating myocardial infarct size. VI: Identification of screening criteria for non-acute myocardial infarcts. Am J Cardiol 1988;61(10):729-33. 142. Watanabe T, Yamaki M, Tachibana H, Kubota I, Tomoike H. Decrease in the high frequency QRS components depending on the local conduction delay. Jpn Circ J 1998;62(11):844-8. 143. Abboud S, Berenfeld O, Sadeh D. Simulation of high-resolution QRS complex using a ventricular model with a fractal conduction system. Effects of ischemia on high-frequency QRS potentials. Circ Res 1991;68(6):1751-60. 144. Mor-Avi V, Abboud S, Akselrod S. Frequency content of the QRS notching in high-fidelity canine ECG. Comput Biomed Res 1989;22(1):18-25. 145. Abboud S, Cohen RJ, Sadeh D. A spectral analysis of the high frequency QRS potentials observed during acute myocardial ischemia in dogs. Int J Cardiol 1990;26(3):285-90. 146. Abboud S, Smith JM, Shargorodsky B, Laniado S, Sadeh D, Cohen RJ. High frequency electrocardiography of three orthogonal leads in dogs during a coronary artery occlusion. Pacing Clin Electrophysiol 1989;12(4 Pt 1):574-81. 147. Mor-Avi V, Shargorodsky B, Abboud S, Laniado S, Akselrod S. Effects of coronary occlusion on high-frequency content of the epicardial electrogram and body surface electrocardiogram. Circulation 1987;76(1):237-43. 148. Abboud S, Cohen RJ, Selwyn A, Ganz P, Sadeh D, Friedman PL. Detection of transient myocardial ischemia by computer analysis of standard and signal-averaged high-frequency electrocardiograms in patients undergoing percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty. Circulation 1987;76(3):585-96.

Page 108: Ventricular Depolarization in Ischemic Heart Disease.Value

Ventricular Depolarization: ECG assessment of Severity and Extent of Acute Ischemia

89

149. Pettersson J, Pahlm O, Carro E, Edenbrandt L, Ringborn M, Sornmo L, et al. Changes in high-frequency QRS components are more sensitive than ST-segment deviation for detecting acute coronary artery occlusion. J Am Coll Cardiol 2000;36(6):1827-34. 150. Pettersson J, Lander P, Pahlm O, Sornmo L, Warren SG, Wagner GS. Electrocardiographic changes during prolonged coronary artery occlusion in man: comparison of standard and high-frequency recordings. Clin Physiol 1998;18(3):179-86. 151. Aversano T, Rudikoff B, Washington A, Traill S, Coombs V, Raqueno J. High frequency QRS electrocardiography in the detection of reperfusion following thrombolytic therapy. Clin Cardiol 1994;17(4):175-82. 152. Pettersson J, Wagner GS, Sornmo L, Johansson ET, Ohlin H, Pahlm O. High-frequency electrocardiogram as a supplement to standard 12-lead ischemia monitoring during reperfusion therapy of acute inferior myocardial infarction. J Electrocardiol 2010;44(1):11-7. 153. Goldberger AL, Bhargava V, Froelicher V, Covell J. Effect of myocardial infarction on high-frequency QRS potentials. Circulation 1981;64(1):34-42. 154. Novak P, Li Z, Novak V, Hatala R. Time-frequency mapping of the QRS complex in normal subjects and in postmyocardial infarction patients. J Electrocardiol 1994;27(1):49-60. 155. Bhargava V, Goldberger A. Myocardial infarction diminishes both low and high frequency QRS potentials: power spectrum analysis of lead II. J Electrocardiol 1981;14(1):57-60. 156. Pueyo E, Sornmo L, Laguna P. QRS slopes for detection and characterization of myocardial ischemia. IEEE Trans Biomed Eng 2008;55(2 Pt 1):468-77. 157. Romero D, Ringborn M, Laguna P, Pahlm O, Pueyo E. Depolarization Changes During Acute Myocardial Ischemia by Evaluation of QRS Slopes: Standard Lead and Vectorial Approach. IEEE Trans Biomed Eng 2011;58(1):110-20. 158. Romero D, Ringborn M, Demidova M, Koul S, Laguna P, Platonov PG, et al. Characterization of ventricular depolarization and repolarization changes in a porcine model of myocardial infarction. Physiol Meas 2012;33(12):1975-91. 159. Grottum P, Mohr B, Kjekshus JK. Evolution of vectorcardiographic QRS changes during myocardial infarction in dogs and their relation to infarct size. Cardiovasc Res 1986;20(2):108-16. 160. Sederholm M, Grottum P, Erhardt L, Kjekshus J. Quantitative assessment of myocardial ischemia and necrosis by continuous vectorcardiography and measurement of creatine kinase release in patients. Circulation 1983;68(5):1006-12. 161. Naslund U, Haggmark S, Johansson G, Reiz S. Ischaemia and reperfusion induced transient QRS vector changes: relationship to size of the ischaemic territory. Cardiovasc Res 1993;27(2):327-33. 162. Dellborg M, Herlitz J, Risenfors M, Swedberg K. Electrocardiographic assessment of infarct size: comparison between QRS scoring of 12-lead electrocardiography and dynamic vectorcardiography. Int J Cardiol 1993;40(2):167-72. 163. Dellborg M, Malmberg K, Ryden L, Svensson AM, Swedberg K. Dynamic on-line vectorcardiography improves and simplifies in-hospital ischemia monitoring of patients with unstable angina. J Am Coll Cardiol 1995;26(6):1501-7. 164. Dellborg M, Riha M, Swedberg K. Dynamic QRS-complex and ST-segment monitoring in acute myocardial infarction during recombinant tissue-type plasminogen activator therapy. The TEAHAT Study Group. Am J Cardiol 1991;67(5):343-9.

Page 109: Ventricular Depolarization in Ischemic Heart Disease.Value

Michael Ringborn, M.D.

90

165. Dellborg M, Topol EJ, Swedberg K. Dynamic QRS complex and ST segment vectorcardiographic monitoring can identify vessel patency in patients with acute myocardial infarction treated with reperfusion therapy. Am Heart J 1991;122(4 Pt 1):943-8. 166. Anderson JL, Adams CD, Antman EM, Bridges CR, Califf RM, Casey DE, Jr., et al. ACC/AHA 2007 guidelines for the management of patients with unstable angina/non ST-elevation myocardial infarction: a report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines (Writing Committee to Revise the 2002 Guidelines for the Management of Patients With Unstable Angina/Non ST-Elevation Myocardial Infarction): developed in collaboration with the American College of Emergency Physicians, the Society for Cardiovascular Angiography and Interventions, and the Society of Thoracic Surgeons: endorsed by the American Association of Cardiovascular and Pulmonary Rehabilitation and the Society for Academic Emergency Medicine. Circulation 2007;116(7):e148-304. 167. Wackers FJ, Berman DS, Maddahi J, Watson DD, Beller GA, Strauss HW, et al. Technetium-99m hexakis 2-methoxyisobutyl isonitrile: human biodistribution, dosimetry, safety, and preliminary comparison to thallium-201 for myocardial perfusion imaging. J Nucl Med 1989;30(3):301-11. 168. Piwnica-Worms D, Kronauge JF, Chiu ML. Uptake and retention of hexakis (2-methoxyisobutyl isonitrile) technetium(I) in cultured chick myocardial cells. Mitochondrial and plasma membrane potential dependence. Circulation 1990;82(5):1826-38. 169. Maublant JC, Moins N, Gachon P, Renoux M, Zhang Z, Veyre A. Uptake of technetium-99m-teboroxime in cultured myocardial cells: comparison with thallium-201 and technetium-99m-sestamibi. J Nucl Med 1993;34(2):255-9. 170. Glover DK, Okada RD. Myocardial kinetics of Tc-MIBI in canine myocardium after dipyridamole. Circulation 1990;81(2):628-37. 171. Gibbons RJ, Verani MS, Behrenbeck T, Pellikka PA, O'Connor MK, Mahmarian JJ, et al. Feasibility of tomographic 99mTc-hexakis-2-methoxy-2-methylpropyl-isonitrile imaging for the assessment of myocardial area at risk and the effect of treatment in acute myocardial infarction. Circulation 1989;80(5):1277-86. 172. Christian TF, Schwartz RS, Gibbons RJ. Determinants of infarct size in reperfusion therapy for acute myocardial infarction. Circulation 1992;86(1):81-90. 173. Clements IP, Christian TF, Higano ST, Gibbons RJ, Gersh BJ. Residual flow to the infarct zone as a determinant of infarct size after direct angioplasty. Circulation 1993;88(4 Pt 1):1527-33. 174. Bruce CJ, Christian TF, Schaer GL, Spaccavento LJ, Jolly MK, O'Connor MK, et al. Determinants of infarct size after thrombolytic treatment in acute myocardial infarction. Am J Cardiol 1999;83(12):1600-5. 175. Gibbons RJ, Miller TD, Christian TF. Infarct size measured by single photon emission computed tomographic imaging with (99m)Tc-sestamibi: A measure of the efficacy of therapy in acute myocardial infarction. Circulation 2000;101(1):101-8. 176. Carlsson M, Ubachs JF, Hedstrom E, Heiberg E, Jovinge S, Arheden H. Myocardium at risk after acute infarction in humans on cardiac magnetic resonance: quantitative assessment during follow-up and validation with single-photon emission computed tomography. JACC Cardiovasc Imaging 2009;2(5):569-76. 177. Haronian HL, Remetz MS, Sinusas AJ, Baron JM, Miller HI, Cleman MW, et al. Myocardial risk area defined by technetium-99m sestamibi imaging during percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty: comparison with coronary angiography. J Am Coll Cardiol 1993;22(4):1033-43.

Page 110: Ventricular Depolarization in Ischemic Heart Disease.Value

Ventricular Depolarization: ECG assessment of Severity and Extent of Acute Ischemia

91

178. Persson E, Palmer J, Pettersson J, Warren SG, Borges-Neto S, Wagner GS, et al. Quantification of myocardial hypoperfusion with 99m Tc-sestamibi in patients undergoing prolonged coronary artery balloon occlusion. Nucl Med Commun 2002;23(3):219-28. 179. Christian TF, O'Connor MK, Schwartz RS, Gibbons RJ, Ritman EL. Technetium-99m MIBI to assess coronary collateral flow during acute myocardial infarction in two closed-chest animal models. J Nucl Med 1997;38(12):1840-6. 180. Kaltoft A, Bottcher M, Nielsen SS, Hansen HH, Terkelsen C, Maeng M, et al. Routine thrombectomy in percutaneous coronary intervention for acute ST-segment-elevation myocardial infarction: a randomized, controlled trial. Circulation 2006;114(1):40-7. 181. Kelbaek H, Terkelsen CJ, Helqvist S, Lassen JF, Clemmensen P, Klovgaard L, et al. Randomized comparison of distal protection versus conventional treatment in primary percutaneous coronary intervention: the drug elution and distal protection in ST-elevation myocardial infarction (DEDICATION) trial. J Am Coll Cardiol 2008;51(9):899-905. 182. Botker HE, Kharbanda R, Schmidt MR, Bottcher M, Kaltoft AK, Terkelsen CJ, et al. Remote ischaemic conditioning before hospital admission, as a complement to angioplasty, and effect on myocardial salvage in patients with acute myocardial infarction: a randomised trial. Lancet 2010;375(9716):727-34. 183. Mason RE, Likar I. A new system of multiple-lead exercise electrocardiography. Am Heart J 1966;71(2):196-205. 184. Myocardial infarction redefined--a consensus document of The Joint European Society of Cardiology/American College of Cardiology Committee for the redefinition of myocardial infarction. Eur Heart J 2000;21(18):1502-13. 185. Laguna P, Jane R, Caminal P. Automatic detection of wave boundaries in multilead ECG signals: validation with the CSE database. Comput Biomed Res 1994;27(1):45-60. 186. Hindman NB, Schocken DD, Widmann M, Anderson WD, White RD, Leggett S, et al. Evaluation of a QRS scoring system for estimating myocardial infarct size. V. Specificity and method of application of the complete system. Am J Cardiol 1985;55(13 Pt 1):1485-90. 187. Thygesen K, Alpert JS, White HD, Jaffe AS, Apple FS, Galvani M, et al. Universal definition of myocardial infarction. Circulation 2007;116(22):2634-53. 188. Pahlm O, Sornmo L. Data processing of exercise ECG's. IEEE Trans Biomed Eng 1987;34(2):158-65. 189. Tragardh E, Pahlm O, Wagner GS, Pettersson J. Reduced high-frequency QRS components in patients with ischemic heart disease compared to normal subjects. J Electrocardiol 2004;37(3):157-62. 190. Pettersson J, Warren S, Mehta N, Lander P, Berbari EJ, Gates K, et al. Changes in high-frequency QRS components during prolonged coronary artery occlusion in humans. J Electrocardiol 1995;28 Suppl:225-7. 191. Proakis JG MD, editor. Digital signal processing – principles, algorithms and applications. Upper Saddle River (NJ): Prentice Hall; 1996. 192. Kaltoft A, Nielsen SS, Terkelsen CJ, Bottcher M, Lassen JF, Krusell LR, et al. Scintigraphic evaluation of routine filterwire distal protection in percutaneous coronary intervention for acute ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction: a randomized controlled trial. J Nucl Cardiol 2009;16(5):784-91. 193. Garcia EV, Cooke CD, Van Train KF, Folks R, Peifer J, DePuey EG, et al. Technical aspects of myocardial SPECT imaging with technetium-99m sestamibi. Am J Cardiol 1990;66(13):23E-31E.

Page 111: Ventricular Depolarization in Ischemic Heart Disease.Value

Michael Ringborn, M.D.

92

194. Tragardh E, Pettersson J, Wagner GS, Pahlm O. Reduced high-frequency QRS components in electrocardiogram leads facing an area of the heart with intraventricular conduction delay due to bundle branch block. J Electrocardiol 2007;40(2):127-32. 195. Schlegel TT, Kulecz WB, DePalma JL, Feiveson AH, Wilson JS, Rahman MA, et al. Real-time 12-lead high-frequency QRS electrocardiography for enhanced detection of myocardial ischemia and coronary artery disease. Mayo Clin Proc 2004;79(3):339-50. 196. Magrans R, Gomis P, Voss A, Caminal P. Effect of acute myocardial ischemia on different high-frequency bandwidths and temporal regions of the QRS. Conf Proc IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc;2011:7083-6. 197. Wagner GS, Johanson P, Weston P, Floyd J, Jennings R. The supplementary effect of QRS changes on the inverse relationship between ST changes and salvage: testing the Sclarovsky/Birnbaum clinical method in the basic Jennings/Reimer model. J Electrocardiol 2003;36 Suppl:13-6. 198. Garcia-Rubira JC, Garcia-Borbolla R, Nunez-Gil I, Manzano MC, Garcia-Romero MM, Fernandez-Ortiz A, et al. Distortion of the terminal portion of the QRS is predictor of shock after primary percutaneous coronary intervention for acute myocardial infarction. Int J Cardiol 2008;130(2):241-5. 199. Chareonthaitawee P, Christian TF, O'Connor MK, Berger PB, Higano ST, O'Keefe JH, et al. Noninvasive prediction of residual blood flow within the risk area during acute myocardial infarction: a multicenter validation study of patients undergoing direct coronary angioplasty. Am Heart J 1997;134(4):639-46. 200. Prinzmetal M, Shaw CM, Jr., Maxwell MH, Flamm EJ, Goldman A, Kimura N, et al. Studies on the mechanism of ventricular activity. VI. The depolarization complex in pure subendocardial infarction; role of the subendocardial region in the normal electrocardiogram. Am J Med 1954;16(4):469-89. 201. Moon JC, De Arenaza DP, Elkington AG, Taneja AK, John AS, Wang D, et al. The pathologic basis of Q-wave and non-Q-wave myocardial infarction: a cardiovascular magnetic resonance study. J Am Coll Cardiol 2004;44(3):554-60. 202. Langner PH, Jr., Geselowitz DB, Mansure FT, Lauer JA. High-frequency components in the electrocardiograms of normal subjects and of patients with coronary heart disease. Am Heart J 1961;62:746-55. 203. Reynolds EW, Jr., Muller BF, Anderson GJ, Muller BT. High-frequency components in the electrocardiogram. A comparative study of normals and patients with myocardial disease. Circulation 1967;35(1):195-206. 204. Flowers NC, Horan LG, Thomas JR, Tolleson WJ. The anatomic basis for high-frequency components in the electrocardiogram. Circulation 1969;39(4):531-9. 205. Flowers NC, Horan LG, Tolleson WJ, Thomas JR. Localization of the site of myocardial scarring in man by high-frequency components. Circulation 1969;40(6):827-34. 206. Goldberger AL, Bhargava V, Froelicher V, Covell J, Mortara D. Effect of myocardial infarction on the peak amplitude of high frequency QRS potentials. J Electrocardiol 1980;13(4):367-71. 207. Talwar KK, Rao GS, Nayar U, Bhatia ML. Clinical significance of high frequency QRS potentials in myocardial infarction: analysis based on power spectrum of lead III. Cardiovasc Res 1989;23(1):60-3.

Page 112: Ventricular Depolarization in Ischemic Heart Disease.Value

Ventricular Depolarization: ECG assessment of Severity and Extent of Acute Ischemia

93

208. Berkalp B, Baykal E, Caglar N, Erol C, Akgun G, Gurel T. Analysis of high frequency QRS potentials observed during acute myocardial infarction. Int J Cardiol 1993;42(2):147-53. 209. Daluge SM, Purifoy DJ, Savina PM, St Clair MH, Parry NR, Dev IK, et al. 5-Chloro-2',3'-dideoxy-3'-fluorouridine (935U83), a selective anti-human immunodeficiency virus agent with an improved metabolic and toxicological profile. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 1994;38(7):1590-603. 210. Batdorf NJ, Feiveson AH, Schlegel TT. Month-to-month and year-to-year reproducibility of high frequency QRS ECG signals. J Electrocardiol 2004;37(4):289-96. 211. Anderson KR, Sutton MG, Lie JT. Histopathological types of cardiac fibrosis in myocardial disease. J Pathol 1979;128(2):79-85. 212. Vanoverschelde JL, Wijns W, Depre C, Essamri B, Heyndrickx GR, Borgers M, et al. Mechanisms of chronic regional postischemic dysfunction in humans. New insights from the study of noninfarcted collateral-dependent myocardium. Circulation 1993;87(5):1513-23. 213. Peters NS, Green CR, Poole-Wilson PA, Severs NJ. Reduced content of connexin43 gap junctions in ventricular myocardium from hypertrophied and ischemic human hearts. Circulation 1993;88(3):864-75.

Page 113: Ventricular Depolarization in Ischemic Heart Disease.Value
Page 114: Ventricular Depolarization in Ischemic Heart Disease.Value

Studies I-IV

And Supplementary Technical Study