venous thromboembolism

41
Venous Thromboembolism Denise Watt January 3, 2002

Upload: amalie

Post on 08-Feb-2016

39 views

Category:

Documents


2 download

DESCRIPTION

Venous Thromboembolism. Denise Watt January 3, 2002. Outline. epidemiology pathophysiology risk factors diagnosis clinical labs diagnostic imaging algorithms treatment. Case 1. Rural ED 72 yo male fever, SOB, pleuritic CP x 2 days HR 110, bp 140/90, RR 22, sat 90% - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: Venous Thromboembolism

Venous Thromboembolism

Denise WattJanuary 3, 2002

Page 2: Venous Thromboembolism

Outline

epidemiology pathophysiology risk factors diagnosis

• clinical• labs• diagnostic imaging• algorithms

treatment

Page 3: Venous Thromboembolism

Case 1

Rural ED 72 yo male fever, SOB, pleuritic CP x 2 days HR 110, bp 140/90, RR 22, sat 90% CXR unremarkable what test/Rx?

Page 4: Venous Thromboembolism

Case 2

55 yo man sudden central CP, SOB, presyncope HR 120, bp 90/70, RR 30, sats 88% ECG: sinus tach what tests/Rx?

Page 5: Venous Thromboembolism

Case 3

33 yo healthy woman, 34 wks GA syncope at home EMS called asystolic arrest en route CPR x 5 min what do you do?

Page 6: Venous Thromboembolism

Epidemiology

Lifetime incidence VTE 2-5%• PE: 0.5/1,000/year• DVT: 1/1,100/year

PE mortality:• 10% die in 1st hour• 30% untreated• 2-8% if anticoagulated

>50% PEs undiagnosed

Page 7: Venous Thromboembolism

Risk Factors

Primary• Factor V leiden• Antithrombin III

deficiency• Prot C deficiency• Prot S deficiency• hyperhomo-

cysteinemia• anticardiolipin Ab• dysfibrinogenemia

Secondary• age• trauma / surgery• malignancy• immobilization• stroke• smoking• obesity• OCP/HRT• lupus anticoagulant• pregnancy• hyperviscosity• heart failure

Page 8: Venous Thromboembolism

Risk Factors

50% without risk factors OCP/HRT: 3x baseline risk

• 0.3/10,000/yr; 15/10,000/yr• higher in 3rd gen progesterones

pregnancy: 5x baseline risk• 75% DVT antepartum, 66% PE

postpartum

Page 9: Venous Thromboembolism

Pathophysiology:Source of VTE

• most start in calf, extend proximally• 70% PE have DVT evidence at autopsy• 70-90% known source: IVC, ileofemoral or

pelvic veins, 10-20% SVC• incidence of PE from DVT

• calf: 46%• thigh: 67%• pelvic: 77%

• other: UE, jugular, mesenteric, cerebral

Page 10: Venous Thromboembolism

Consequences of PE

Hemodynamic• tachycardia• hypotension• RV overload and

dilation CVP LV preload myocardial flow • pulmonary HTN• pul A-V shunts

Respiratory• hyperventilation• PA HTN compliance• atelectasis• broncho-

constriction airway resistance

Page 11: Venous Thromboembolism

Clinical Presentation:DVT

Calf-popliteal• 80-90%, many asymptomatic• pain & swelling• spreads proximally

Ileofemoral• pain in buttock, groin• thigh swelling• 10-20% cases

Page 12: Venous Thromboembolism

Clinical Prediction Model for DVTWells et al. Ann Int Med, 1997

Score Active cancer 1 Paralysis,plaster immobilization

1

Immobilzation 1 Leg tenderness of deep veins

1

Entire leg swollen 1 Calf swelling >3cm 1 Pitting edema 1 Dilated superficial veins 1 Alternative diagnosis for DVT

-2

Page 13: Venous Thromboembolism

Clinical Model for DVT

Pre-test probability Score

High 3

Moderate 1 or 2

Low 0

Page 14: Venous Thromboembolism

Incidence of DVT by Clinical Probability

0102030405060708090

100

Low Mod High Overall

Wells, 1997Perrier, 1999

Page 15: Venous Thromboembolism

Clinical Presentation of PE:The great pretender

SOB, CP or tachypnea in 97% individual s+s not sensitive/specific peripheral (distal vessel)

• pleuritic CP, ± hemoptysis, ± SOBOE central (lobar / segmental)

• SOBOE massive (main pulmonary artery)

• syncope, hypotension, shock

Page 16: Venous Thromboembolism

Clinical Prediction Model for PEWells. Ann Int Med, 1998

Score Active cancer 1.0 Hemoptysis 1.0 Recent surgery 1.5 Previous VTE 1.5 HR > 100 1.5 Clinical signs DVT 3.0 No alternate diagnosis 3.0

Pre-test probability High 6 Moderate 2.5-5.5 Low 2

Page 17: Venous Thromboembolism

Incidence of PE by Clinical Probability

01020304050607080

Low Mod High Overall

PIOPED, 1990Wells, 1998Perrier, 1999

Page 18: Venous Thromboembolism

Ancillary tests for PE

CXR:• r/o other diagnoses• ‘classic’ signs non-specific

ABG:• 20% have normal PaO2• 15-20% have normal Aa gradient

ECG: • remember???

Page 19: Venous Thromboembolism

D-dimer

degradation product of fibrin PPV poor; NPV excellent non-specific:

• +ve: surgery, trauma, hemorrhage, CA• 90% +ve >80 yrs old

most useful in ED patients NOT to r/o PE in high PTP

Page 20: Venous Thromboembolism

D-dimer AssaysVan der Graaf. Thromb Haemost, 2000.

Assay Ease of use

Sensitivity Specificity

Whole blood agglutination (SimpliRED)

++++ 80-85% 70-90%

Latex agglutination

+++ 90-95% 40-90%

Rapid ELISA ++++ 95-100% 30-60%

Page 21: Venous Thromboembolism

Diagnostic Imaging for DVT

Duplex / compression U/S• non-invasive, portable• direct visualization of veins and flow• loss of compression = DVT• 97% sensitive & specific for

symptomatic proximal/popliteal DVT• 62% sensitive for asymptomatic DVT• +ve in 30-50% PE; 5% non-dx V/Q scans

Page 22: Venous Thromboembolism

Serial Venous U/S

2 protocols: Wells & Hull may avoid angiography in ?PE 2% +ve in 2 weeks (?PE) if U/S -ve 2 weeks apart, <2% have

VTE in next 6 mos

Page 23: Venous Thromboembolism

Diagnostic Imaging for DVT

IPG• detects changes in flow before and after

cuff inflated• sensitivity 60%

Page 24: Venous Thromboembolism

Algorithm for Suspected first DVT:Perrier. Lancet, 1999

+trea t for D V T

LowD VT excluded

-D VT excluded

+trea t for D V T

Mod/H ighseria l U /S

-consider c linica l proba bility

+U /S

- D VT excluded

D -dim er

suspected D VT

Page 25: Venous Thromboembolism

Diagnostic Imaging for PE:V/Q scan

PIOPED: ventilation component adds little info

PISAPED criteria:• normal, non-diagnostic, high probability• 25%, 50%, 25% respectively• high prob: 85-90% PPV• non-diagnostic: 25% PE

interpret in context of PTP

Page 26: Venous Thromboembolism

Diagnostic Imaging for PE:Pulmonary Angiography

Gold standard (imperfect)• sens 98%, spec 95-98%

ED physicians reluctant to use:• invasive, risks, requires expertise, not

readily available, time consuming, $ relative contraindications indicated if non-invasive tests

inconclusive

Page 27: Venous Thromboembolism

Diagnostic Imaging for PE:Spiral CT

IV contrast, direct visualization subsegmental PE not well seen more specific, underlying lung dx sens depends on CT, experience wide variation in studies

• Rathbun. Ann Intern Med, 2000 (review)• sens 53-100%, spec 81-100%• poor methodolgy of studies

Page 28: Venous Thromboembolism

Spiral CT

Perrier. Ann Intern Med, 2001• sens 70%, spec 91% , 4% inconclusive• good interobserver agreement

CT venography:• benefit over U/S not determined

role? • no evidence to withold Rx if CT negative• may replace angiography

Page 29: Venous Thromboembolism

Diagnostic Imaging in PE:Echocardiography

useful for patients in shock/arrest • r/o DDx: tamponade, Ao dissection, AMI

indirect evidence of PE:• RV overload, septal shift to L, TR, PA

pressure, RV wall motion abn • sens 93%, spec 81%

‘sub-massive’ PE: independent predictor of mortality (?significance)

Page 30: Venous Thromboembolism

Algorithm for suspected PE:Wells. Ann Int Med, 2001

-PE e xc lude d

+

L owD -dim e r

norm alPE e x c lude d

L ow

PE exc luded

-

se ria l U/S

+

M od D -dim er

se ria l U /S

-

a ngiogra phy

+

HighD -dim e r

- D V Tc ons ider PT P

+ D V T

non-diagnosticleg U/S

high probabi li tytrea t for PE

V /Q

M od/H ighD -dim e r

PT P

Page 31: Venous Thromboembolism

Wells’ Algorithm:Criticism

Uses SimpliRED assay: lower sens. sCT not included

• could replace angiography? Low prevalence of PE (9%) not validated by other RCTs

Page 32: Venous Thromboembolism

Treatment of VTE:Goals

reduce mortality prevent extension/recurrence restore pulmonary vascular

resistance prevent pulmonary hypertension

Page 33: Venous Thromboembolism

Treatment of VTE:Anticoagulation

Out-patient LMWH LMWH superior to UFH? (Gould 1999) out-pt Rx safe in PE (Kovacs, 2000) DVT: start Rx, definitive test in 24hr baseline B/W

Page 34: Venous Thromboembolism

Anticoagulation

Enoxaparin 1mg/kg bid or 1.5 od Tinzaparin 175 anti-Xa u/kg od start warfarin 5mg on day 1 d/c LMWH when INR >2.0 x 2 days Rx 3 mos if 1st and reversible cause 6 mos if non-reversbile indefinite if recurrent, CA, genetic

Page 35: Venous Thromboembolism

Treatment of PE:Criteria for admission

Hemodynamic instability O2 requirement surgery < 48hr risk of active bleeding history of HIT IV pain control

Page 36: Venous Thromboembolism

Treatment of massive PE

judicious fluids (500cc max) NE, dopamine, dobutamine prn O2, intubate if shock

• positive pressure worsens RV fn anticoagulation

• if no contraindications• UFH if hypotensive• PTT 1.5-2.5 x normal

Page 37: Venous Thromboembolism

Treatment of massive PE:Thrombolytics

no evidence of mortality benefit• including in cardiac arrest (case series)

no benefit in hemodynamically stable improves pul. perfusion (15% vs 2%), RV

function (34% vs. 17%) cf. heparin t-PA faster hemodynamic effect IV same as intrapulmonary 5-10% major bleed, 1-2% ICH

Page 38: Venous Thromboembolism

Thrombolytics

2 week window of opportunity!• effect with time

no advantage of t-PA bolus protocols:

• t-PA: 100mg over 2 hr• UK: 4400U/kg over 10min; rpt x 12-24hr• SK: 250,000U over 30min; 100,000 x 24h• arrest: t-PA 10mg/kg bolus x 2 q 30 min

Page 39: Venous Thromboembolism

Embolectomy

Indicated in acute, massive PE if:• contraindication to thrombolytics• unresponsive to medical mgt

moribund pt poor results no evidence cf. with thrombolytics percutaneous vs. surgical

• ?role

Page 40: Venous Thromboembolism

IVC Filters

Indications:• contraindication to anticoagulation• recurrent VTE despite anticoagulation• after surgical embolectomy

no long term adv vs. anticoagulation anticoagulate if no contraindications

• DVT and IVC occlusion

Page 41: Venous Thromboembolism

Pregnancy

V/Q safe, no breastfeed x 15hr post D-dimer in pregnancy, wide Aa angiography safer than empiric Rx LMWH in DVT, not studied in PE PE: UFH IV x 4-5 days, then s/c treat x 3 months or 6 weeks postpartum switch to oral postpartum