vapor intrusion regulatory perspective...ti rc pubshiles v i guidance astm standard e1527-05...
TRANSCRIPT
Jere “Trey” Hess, Director Brownfields & Economic Development
PPM Consultants, Inc. October 2017
VAPOR INTRUSION REGULATORY PERSPECTIVE
10/11/2017 2
WHAT’S WRONG WITH THIS PARAGRAPH?
www.ppmco.com
POP QUIZ
10/11/2017 3
WHAT’S WRONG WITH THIS PARAGRAPH?
www.ppmco.com
1.0.1 PURPOSE • The purpose of the Phase I ESA is to determine, to the extent
feasible, recognized environmental conditions associated with the property being investigated. The site assessment was performed in accordance with the “Standard Practices for a Phase I ESA Environmental Assessment Process, American Society for Testing and Materials E1527-97” and with the intent of complying with commonly accepted practices necessary to conduct “all pertinent inquiry into the previous ownership and uses of the property” under CERCLA/SARA (42 USC 9601) (35) (B).
10/11/2017 4 4
1.0.1 PURPOSE • The purpose of the Phase I ESA is to determine, to the extent
feasible, recognized environmental conditions associated with the property being investigated. The site assessment was performed in accordance with the “Standard Practices for a Phase I ESA Environmental Assessment Process, American Society for Testing and Materials E1527-97” and with the intent of complying with commonly accepted practices necessary to conduct “all pertinent inquiry into the previous ownership and uses of the property” under CERCLA/SARA (42 USC 9601) (35) (B).
• A Phase I ESA with this language was submitted to MDEQ for review on January 25, 2016
WHAT’S WRONG WITH THIS PARAGRAPH?
www.ppmco.com
10/11/2017 5
1.0.1 PURPOSE • The purpose of the Phase I ESA is to determine, to the extent feasible,
recognized environmental conditions associated with the property being investigated. The site assessment was performed in accordance with the “Standard Practices for a Phase I ESA Environmental Assessment Process, American Society for Testing and Materials E1527-97” and with the intent of complying with commonly accepted practices necessary to conduct “all pertinent inquiry into the previous ownership and uses of the property” under CERCLA/SARA (42 USC 9601) (35) (B).
5
WHAT’S WRONG WITH THIS PARAGRAPH?
www.ppmco.com
10/11/2017 6
http://www.epa.gov/brownfields/aai/ep_deffactsheet.pdf
QUALIFIED ENVIRONMENTAL PROFESSIONALS
www.ppmco.com
10/11/2017 7 7
• Licensed Professional Engineer – Chemical/Air background (Henry’s Law Constant, etc.) – Mechanical background (HVAC, remedial design, etc.) – Biological background (ecological impacts, risk assessment) – Geotechnical background (fate/transport, permeability)
• Registered Professional Geologist – Hydrogeologic (fate/transport in groundwater) – Geologic (fractures, weathering, etc.)
• Toxicology – Human Health Effects (Health & Safety, impacts on target organs,
cancer, etc.) – Ecological Effects (fish tissue analysis, etc.) – Public outreach
QUALIFIED ENVIRONMENTAL PROFESSIONALS: VI CONSIDERATIONS
www.ppmco.com
10/11/2017 8
1997 2000
ASTM Standard E1527-00 (Updated)
ASTM Standard E1527-97 for
Phase I Environmental
Site Assessments
EPA Publishes draft Vapor Intrusion
Guidance
Brownfield Revitalization
and Environmental
Restoration Act (“AAI”)
ITRC Publishes VI Guidance
ASTM Standard E1527-05
conforms to AAI Standard
2001 2002 2005 2007
REGULATORY TIMELINE
www.ppmco.com
10/11/2017 9
2008 2009
EPA OIG is concerned about
lack of final VI Guidance
ASTM Standard E2600-08 – Standard Practice for Assessment of Vapor
Intrusion Into Structures on Property Involved in Real Estate Transactions
ASTM Standard E2600-10 (Updated)
EPA commits to release final
guidance by end of 2012
EPA OSWER and OUST release draft VI and PVI guidance to
EPA regions for internal review
2010 2012
REGULATORY TIMELINE
www.ppmco.com
10/11/2017 10
2013
EPA Releases external review draft VI and PVI Guidance
ASTM Standard E1527-13 – Migration (“in vapor form”) is
defined & ASTM E2600-10 is referenced
EPA Releases Final VI and PVI Guidance
Documents ITRC publishes PVI Guidance
ASTM Updates ASTM E2600-15
2014 June 2015 December 2015
REGULATORY TIMELINE
www.ppmco.com
10/11/2017 11
February 3, 2016
EPA Opens Public Comment Period for Proposal to a add
subsurface intrusion (SsI) component to the Hazard
Ranking System for Superfund NPL Listing
April 29, 2016
Public Comment Period Closed
11
REGULATORY TIMELINE
www.ppmco.com
September 2, 2016
EPA submitted Proposed Final Rule to the White House
Office of Management &
Budget for review
10/11/2017 12
December 7, 2016
Former EPA Adm. Gina McCarthy signed rulemaking to
add “subsurface intrusion component” to HRS
January 9, 2017
Rule Published in Federal Register
12
REGULATORY TIMELINE
www.ppmco.com
May 22, 2017
Rule Took Effect
https://www.gpo.gov/fdsys/pkg/FR-2017-01-09/pdf/2016-30640.pdf
10/11/2017 13
http://vapor-intrusion.blogspot.com/
www.ppmco.com
STATE OF THE STATES
10/11/2017 14 www.ppmco.com
STATE OF THE STATES
http://vapor-intrusion.blogspot.com/
10/11/2017 15 www.ppmco.com
STATE OF THE STATES
http://vapor-intrusion.blogspot.com/
10/11/2017 16 www.ppmco.com
FLORIDA
http://vapor-intrusion.blogspot.com/
10/11/2017 17 www.ppmco.com
STATE OF THE STATES
http://vapor-intrusion.blogspot.com/
10/11/2017 18 www.ppmco.com
UNANSWERED QUESTIONS?
10/11/2017 19 www.ppmco.com
OTHER POLICY CHALLENGES
• What constitutes an immediate/imminent threat to public
health & environment? • Professional Obligations? • Re-openers? • Off-Site vs. on-site? • TCE
10/11/2017 20
QUESTIONS?
www.ppmco.com
JERE (TREY) HESS, P.E. Director, Brownfields & Economic Development [email protected] 601.953.2564