vabodiut_s2574608_astrobiology_seti
TRANSCRIPT
![Page 1: VABodiut_S2574608_Astrobiology_SETI](https://reader034.vdocuments.site/reader034/viewer/2022042907/5874ec471a28ab917a8b5cc3/html5/thumbnails/1.jpg)
Astrobiology and SETI:
The Search for Extraterrestrial Intelligence
Victor-Andrei Bodiut, S2574608
Coordinator: prof. dr. Peter Barthel
Course: Astrobiology – Minor Astronomy through Space and Time
University of Groningen
17-04-2016
Figure 2 – Center of the Milky Way
Figure 1 – Very Large Array, New Mexico – “Listening the Skies”
![Page 2: VABodiut_S2574608_Astrobiology_SETI](https://reader034.vdocuments.site/reader034/viewer/2022042907/5874ec471a28ab917a8b5cc3/html5/thumbnails/2.jpg)
As suggested by its name, astrobiology is the biology
of the universe. It studies life outside Earth, how it got there,
what it looks like and how it will evolve. For these reasons,
astrobiology is a very big interdisciplinary field, with scientists
from physics, biology, geology, astronomy, chemistry,
ecology, sociology and more, all working together to find an
answer to arguably the biggest question ever asked by
humanity: are we alone? The SETI Institute (Search for
Extraterrestrial Intelligence) has been tackling this issue for
some decades now. A great team of ~ 150 scientists, together with engineers, computer
programmers and technical staff is divided in three centers: the center for SETI research, the
Carl Sagan center for studying life on and off Earth and the Education and Public Outreach
(EPO) center.
Tasks of the EPO center include educating the larger public and passionate people
onto the topic of extraterrestrial life, teaching in academia or developing SETI in the social
media.
The Carl Sagan center involves the majority of the institute’s members. Their focus
involves speculating about how life should look like in different mediums (bio-signatures),
how life generates and spreads and the necessary conditions for life (i.e. if life could survive in
worlds without sunlight, without water or in sub-zero temperatures).
Within the solar system, there are a few “hot-spots” that show
very promising for microbial life (perhaps even complex life).
For instance, scientists are trying to figure out if Mars contains
microbial life under the soil. Figure 3 shows a self-portrait of
NASA's Curiosity Mars rover at "Namib Dune", where the
rover's activities included scuffing into the dune with a wheel
and scooping samples of sand for laboratory analysis.
It is almost a consensus in the astrobiology community that
some sort of liquid is a necessary prerequisite for life to
evolve. Water is by far the most prominent candidate. Recent
discoveries show that water is quite abundant in the
observable universe, existing at present on 3 distinct objects in
our solar system alone – Earth, Europa and Enceladus and
used to exist on another 2 – Mars and Venus.
Figure 3 - Self-portrait of NASA's Curiosity rover
Figure 2 – SETI Institute, California
![Page 3: VABodiut_S2574608_Astrobiology_SETI](https://reader034.vdocuments.site/reader034/viewer/2022042907/5874ec471a28ab917a8b5cc3/html5/thumbnails/3.jpg)
Thus, the ocean of water under the frozen
surface of Europa, one of Jupiter’s moons is
of great interest (see Figure 4). The fact that
its icy surface is without craters, very young in
appearance (in fact ever-changing) points
towards a liquid ocean beneath. Its
magnetism indicates a probable iron-nickel
core and seems to confirm the existence of
water.
But, although water is extremely important in
the discussion of life elsewhere, astrobiologists are proposing other liquids as well, such as
ammonia, liquid methane and even sulfuric acid or formaldehyde. It is quite hard to believe
that such toxic substances could harbor life. However, when keeping an open-mind, one can
speculate that these types of substances are only toxic to us because we have evolved in a
watery world. Other organisms may evolve in
fundamentally different environments and,
perhaps, find water as toxic.
Enceladus, a moon of Saturn is showing cryo-
volcanoes, volcanoes that spurt volatiles such as
water, methane or ammonia, instead of molten
rock/lava (see Figure 5). There are chances that
these spurts could contain organic structures.
Moreover, it is believed that some form of life
could exist in the liquid hydrocarbon lakes on
Saturn’s moon, Titan. We know for a fact that Titan is very
similar to Earth in the sense that it has at atmosphere, clouds,
it rains, and lakes and seas form. The key difference is that the
liquid on Titan is not water, but liquid ethane, methane,
propane or dissolved nitrogen. Figure 6 depicts “Cassini’s
synthetic mosaic of Titan's North Polar Region, showing
hydrocarbon seas, lakes and tributary networks. Blue coloring
indicates low radar reflectivity areas, caused by bodies of liquid
ethane, methane and dissolved nitrogen”. In addition, liquid
water seems to be frozen in the slush beneath the crust of ice.
Figure 3 - The fascinating surface of Jupiter’s icy moon Europa
Figure 6 - Titan's North Polar Region
Figure 5 – Ice Plumes on Enceladus
Figure 4 – The Surprising Surface of Europa
![Page 4: VABodiut_S2574608_Astrobiology_SETI](https://reader034.vdocuments.site/reader034/viewer/2022042907/5874ec471a28ab917a8b5cc3/html5/thumbnails/4.jpg)
From learning about extremophiles, beings
that thrive in very harsh environmental
conditions (e.g. very high or low pressure or
temperature, very salty or alkaline mediums,
no sunlight, etc.) we have updated our
understating of life in the universe. In the last
decades “the cosmos seems to be more and
more bio-friendly” (see Figure 7 for an
example).
Lastly, a handful of people in the SETI
Institute dedicate their careers fully to finding
experimental evidence of extraterrestrial
intelligence (as opposed to non-evolved life) and settle the big question once and for all. The
SETI research center is focusing on intelligent life elsewhere that has learned to use
transmission technology to emit signals of some sort. The key question to ask here is, even if
they did/are doing/will do so, how likely is it that we will be able to detect such a signal?
There are no definitive answers or guarantees when it comes to this, but we do have an idea
about what might be required for a successful detection. The so-called Drake equation (after
American astronomer and astrophysicist Frank Drake) helps us structure the way of thinking
in this pursuit. Unlike most equations however, there is no clear-cut in the Drake equation.
We can learn more and more about each of its unknown factors and in turn make our search
more efficient and accurate, but until SETI succeeds (i.e. finds intelligent life elsewhere) or is
disproved (i.e. finds that we are the only form of intelligent life in our local part of the
universe) there will not be a definitive answer. The Drake equation attempts to estimate the
number of technological civilizations in the Milky-Way galaxy that we could have contact
with. It is usually written as in Figure 8, where:
Figure 8 – The Drake Equation
Figure 7 – Thermophiles, Yellowstone National Park
![Page 5: VABodiut_S2574608_Astrobiology_SETI](https://reader034.vdocuments.site/reader034/viewer/2022042907/5874ec471a28ab917a8b5cc3/html5/thumbnails/5.jpg)
N = The number of civilizations in The Milky Way Galaxy whose electromagnetic emissions
are detectable. This is what SETI tries to estimate.
R* = The rate of formation of stars that can have planets in a galaxy, in terms of stars/year.
Fp = The fraction of those stars with planetary systems (e.g. like the Sun has planets orbiting
around it).
Ne = The average number of planets, per solar system, with an environment suitable for life.
Fl = The fraction of suitable planets on which life actually appears.
Fi = The fraction of life bearing planets on which intelligent life emerges.
Fc = The fraction of civilizations that develop a technology that releases detectable signs of
their existence into space.
L = The longevity factor, the average length of time such civilizations release detectable
signals into space.
Although by now we know quite a
great deal about the first 3 variables of
the equation, there is still a lot of
variance in the results. A very
important aspect is the fraction of
Earth-like rocky exoplanets that has
increased exponentially with the
success of the Kepler mission (see
Figure 9). When asked in an interview
whether extraterrestrial intelligence is
possible or probable, Jill Tarter
(American astronomer and former director of the Center for SETI Research) said that from a
scientific perspective, there is no certain answer. If with increasing technology we would have
found that it is very improbable for other stars to be orbited by planets, the chances for
intelligent life elsewhere would have been almost null. However, the evidence so far shows
the contrary. There are thousands of planetary candidates from the Kepler spacecraft
mission, and around a thousand more from ground-based search. It basically looks like the
vast majority, if not all the stars have planets.
The fractions of existing life, intelligent life or civilizations with communication technologies
are a highly debated topic with no final answer still. The number two is crucial in this
Figure 9 – Exoplanets before Kepler (left) vs after Kepler (right)
![Page 6: VABodiut_S2574608_Astrobiology_SETI](https://reader034.vdocuments.site/reader034/viewer/2022042907/5874ec471a28ab917a8b5cc3/html5/thumbnails/6.jpg)
discussion. Until now, we have one example of life, us. It could be the case that the chemical
combinations and biology needed for life are unique on Earth. The moment we find another
independent origin of life, a different genesis, it will mean not just that life is a bit more
probable, but basically everywhere. “If you are going to have two examples of something,
you are going to have many more”.
In order to make progress, very crude estimates of the uncertainties have to be made
sometimes. It is believed that the rate of star formation R*, as well as the number of planets in
a solar system Ne are close to 10, while the fractions Fl, Fi are less than 1 (0<F<1), with Fc much
less than 1. By far the most uncertainty lies in the last variable L, the longevity factor. As the
other components multiplied are thought to yield approximately 1, some have thought that
the Drake equation can be reduced to a more parsimonious version: N = L. From this
perspective, it was realized that unless L is very large, N will be small. In other words, unless
civilizations exists, survive and send signals for a very long time, the number of detectable
civilizations will be very small. By reversing this line of thought, it is rationalized that if,
somewhere in the near future, SETI will detect an alien signal, this would instantly mean that L
is very large. Otherwise, the detection could not have been possible (i.e. highly unlikely) so
shortly. It is impossible to detect a signal unless two societies are close both in space (signal
detection possible) and time (co-temporality). Physicist Philip Morrison summarizes this idea
by stating that SETI is the archaeology of the future. By that he means that because the
speed of light is finite (~ 300.000 km/s), any detection of a distant civilization will be looking
at its past by the time the signals reach us. Furthermore, the fact that L must be large for a
successful detection to happen tells something about our own future. We will learn that we
can have a long future as an intelligent species and not destroy our planet and its inhabitants
in “a blink of a cosmic eye”.
SETI has encountered serious difficulties over the years. One example is dealing with
transient signals. If we detect momentary
signals, for a very brief time, it is very hard to
say if the signal comes from an alien technology
or our own. Moreover, any astrophysical signal,
such as gamma-ray bursts, pulsars, supernovae
or stellar collisions have to be separated from
technological signals (see Figure 10). In that
sense, the SETI research team is particularly
focusing on signals that are deliberately
engineered by an intelligent civilization, in both
radio and optical measurements.
Figure 10 – Color Coded Gamma-ray Bursts
![Page 7: VABodiut_S2574608_Astrobiology_SETI](https://reader034.vdocuments.site/reader034/viewer/2022042907/5874ec471a28ab917a8b5cc3/html5/thumbnails/7.jpg)
In the radio observations, SETI looks for narrow-
band single-channel signals, frequency
compression. Astrophysical research would emit a
range of frequencies in search for signals that
spread out across a larger bend of radio
frequencies. Similarly, the optical research at SETI
uses time-compression, searching for very short,
bright events or pulses, like some powerful laser
flash. The assumption is that nature itself seems
unable to create such events and they can only be
signs of intelligent alien technology. Still, there is an
ongoing communication between the SETI and the astronomical community, in the sense
that SETI is very curious about the anomalies or artifacts in the data from astronomy. They
are continually asking the astronomer community to keep an eye for any unexpected results
or signals (e.g. see project SERENDIP). Maybe an alien signal lies precisely in these anomalies,
just like astrophysicist Jocelyn Bell discovered radio pulsars in what were thought to be
artifacts of noise (see Figure 11). It may very well be the case that through a serendipitous
discovery of the astronomical community, we will finally say “oh yes, of course, that’s what
they’re doing”.
Unlike the Carl Sagan Center or the
Education and Public Outreach Center which
receive grants from NASA, NSF, etc. on a constant
basis, the Center for SETI Research is nowadays
mostly privately funded.
In 1997, SETI had to think of the best ways to
structure the funding for further research. One of
the ideas was the development of a very large
array of small-sized radio telescopes, placed
across a large surface of land. The Allen Telescope
Array has been working since 2007 with 42 operational dishes, and a total of 350 being
planned, but constantly facing funding limitations (see Figure 12).
In optical telescopes, the larger the mirrors of the telescope, the better the resolution and
sensitivity. Similarly, in radio telescopes, the larger the antenna, the more sensitive the
telescope, the fainter the signals it can detect. The interesting thing is that by placing many
small antennas and pointing them in different directions, the ATA is able to cover a very large
area of the sky at once (~ 100-200 degrees2 at any given moment). This was great news for
Figure 11 – First Observation of Pulsar Pulses
Figure 12 – The Allen Telescope Array Looking for Candidate
Alien Megastructure
![Page 8: VABodiut_S2574608_Astrobiology_SETI](https://reader034.vdocuments.site/reader034/viewer/2022042907/5874ec471a28ab917a8b5cc3/html5/thumbnails/8.jpg)
SETI. Another advantage of such a design is the
speed with which SETI can navigate through the
sky and explore targets throughout the galaxy,
making the ATA a very good telescope for
continue (24/7) imaging. Radio imaging can be
processed and ready for inspection in a matter
of hours. This speed is translated in the multi-
tasking nature of the telescope as well. ATA can,
for instance, look for a distant radio galaxy and
picture it, at the same time analyzing all the sun-
like stars in our Milky-Way that are on the same
patch of the sky as the distant galaxy. Another key
advantage of the ATA is that by changing the digital commands, one can use the telescope
in a completely different way. There are about 1000 sun-like stars within a range of 100 light-
years from us. SETI focuses on these star systems in particular. Since the Kepler mission
successfully identified planetary systems, the ATA has been focusing on the very same 100
degrees2 of the sky, specifically looking at the planets that seem suitable to foster life.
Researchers at SETI using the ATA can do their job sitting at home in their pajamas.
Everything is computerized, in the sense that program scripts are sent from any remote
location to the main server of the ATA, and the telescope will execute and respond. The
program is smart enough that whenever something interesting happens, such as an
uncommon, interesting signal, it gets followed up on until a point of high certainty. Only after
that scientists are informed and can manually check the signal. Moreover, the study-at-home
application for SETI came along and was received
with a tremendous interest by people. Figure 13
shows SETI screensaver from a home-user who
volunteered to donate computer power for signal
analysis. Nowadays, there are all kinds of home
projects that people can contribute to, such as
protein and cancer research, counting craters for
NASA and other great citizen science. If a signal is
received, say, from the Arecibo telescope in Puerto
Rico (see Figure 14) from a particular spot in the sky,
it does not necessarily mean much. It can be noise or
be some sort of interference. It has to be followed up
on. The interesting part comes if the signal persists in
Figure 13 – SETI Home Screensaver
Figure 14 - Arecibo Observatory, Puerto Rico -
![Page 9: VABodiut_S2574608_Astrobiology_SETI](https://reader034.vdocuments.site/reader034/viewer/2022042907/5874ec471a28ab917a8b5cc3/html5/thumbnails/9.jpg)
the same patch of sky when repeatedly scanning it
across time. This is where the study-at-home
enterprise plays a crucial role, as it scans again the sky
on a yearly basis and compare the data with previous
years. So far, no replication has been found.
Except for distant stars and galaxies, SETI does
not exclude the possibility of intelligent technology
being present in our own solar system, possibly even
analyzing or sending us signals from rather close-by
(e.g. a spacecraft). The search approach for this type of
events differs from the more broad-based general SETI
search. One of the assumptions or criteria that is supposed to differentiate between an alien
technology vs our own is that we expect a point-source signal moving across the sky. If a
point-source signal would have been coming from inside our solar-system, it would have a
totally different Doppler signature and would possibly be dismissed by the computer
programs. One step forward in this regard is to accompany the spectroscopic data with radio
imaging of the event. If, based on the radio images, the signal is still interesting, it will be
followed up on. The successor of Hubble, NASA’s James Webb Space Telescope will
investigate our solar system, in addition to looking at distant stars, galaxies and
exoplanets (see Figure 15).
Project Phoenix was SETI’s most sensitive and comprehensive search. As a
follow-up on the NASA SETI program that was once again cancelled because of
financial problems, project Phoenix was sustained 100% through private funding.
Firstly, the measurements were made in New South Wales, Australia at the Parkes
Radio Telescope, then moved to National Radio Astronomy Observatory in Green
Bank, West Virginia and ended at the world’s largest radio dish antenna in Arecibo
Observatory, Puerto Rico (see again Figure 14). Here, as an attempt to
communicate with extraterrestrial intelligence, the Arecibo Message was
transmitted to the globular cluster Messier 13 (~ 25.000 light-years away). Figure
15 displays the binary message in color, although the real message was black and
white. “It consists, among other things, of the Arecibo telescope, our solar system,
DNA, a stick figure of a human, and some of the bio-chemicals of earthly life”.
In addition, SETI has used the Very Large Array in New Mexico, University of
California's Lick Observatory and the Big Ear radio observatory in Ohio as part of the Planetary
Society's Project META.
Figure 15 - NASA's James Webb Space Telescope Project
Figure 15 – The Arecibo
Message
![Page 10: VABodiut_S2574608_Astrobiology_SETI](https://reader034.vdocuments.site/reader034/viewer/2022042907/5874ec471a28ab917a8b5cc3/html5/thumbnails/10.jpg)
Some constructive criticism regarding the messages that we’ve sent
in the Voyager twin satellites has been raised on several occasions.
The Voyager spacecraft is now at an approximate distance of
more than 134 AU (astronomical units), alone, quietly floating in
interstellar space. The contact with the spacecraft will be lost in 2025
or so and its first contact with another star is estimated in ~ 40.000
years. On the golden record (see Figure 17), we have painted the
human race as almost flawless or angel-like (for the full phonograph
records, see https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DpptII291aI ).
Figure 18 shows President Jimmy Carter’s letter on the Voyager
probe.
As we all know, that is not the case. As beautiful and brilliant as humans can be, we have also
faced wars, genocides, disease, poverty, famine, mass extinction and so on. In addition, the
message did not focus a whole lot on the other forms of
life on the planet. To provide a more comprehensive
picture of ourselves, an initiative began in 2009 to
include another “cosmic message in a bottle” on the
New Horizons spacecraft after it finished the data
transfer on the close-by pass near Pluto (for further
interest, please see the sites:
http://oneearthmessage.org/ and
https://www.newhorizonsmessage.com/).
Probability analysis says that the chances of
being the only ones are very low, but thus far there is
no proof to show otherwise. This led to the so-called
Fermi paradox. Developed by Nobel Prize laureate in
Physics, Enrico Fermi and American astrophysicist
Michael H. Hart, the Fermi paradox is basically the
apparent contradiction between the high probability
estimates (e.g. following the Drake equation) for the
existence of extraterrestrial civilizations and the lack of
observational evidence so far. The paradox is built on
several foundations. Firstly, the fact that our galaxy
alone contains billions of Sun-like stars, many of which
are much older than our solar system, thus having had
much more time for developing intelligent life. Secondly, many of these stars must be orbited
Figure 17 - Cover of the Voyager Golden
Record
Figure 18 – Jimmy Carter’s Letter on Voyager
![Page 11: VABodiut_S2574608_Astrobiology_SETI](https://reader034.vdocuments.site/reader034/viewer/2022042907/5874ec471a28ab917a8b5cc3/html5/thumbnails/11.jpg)
by Earth-like planets, and if we take Earth as a proper environment for intelligent life, this
could happen on any of these other planets. Thirdly, at one point in their development, some
of the alien civilizations should have develop space-travelling, as we are currently trying to.
And lastly, the Milky-Way galaxy could be traversed in ~ 1 million years even at the slow-
paced space travel that we can imagine at the moment, possibly even much faster by a more
advanced civilization. Thus, considering all of these, Fermi himself asked questions like
“Where is everybody?” meaning that some form of alien life should have paid us a visit so far.
Many solutions have been proposed, more or less probable, such as that there is no other
life, that we are the only ones to evolve intelligence, that civilizations destroy themselves
internally or externally, that aliens have actually found us, but decided to avoid contact, the
Zoo hypothesis that says that aliens are here, checking us all the time and so on. Phil
Morrison and Giuseppe Cocconi (fathers of SETI) wrote in the last sentence of the 1959 paper
in Nature on SETI: “Probability of success is a difficult estimate, but if we never search the
chance of success is zero”.
On a more general and sensitive note, I would like to end in Jill Tarter’s words:
“Humans have pondered, wanting to know where did we come from, why are we here, how
did we arrive, how do we fit in, where are we going. I think it’s incredibly awesome to realize
for example that the iron in the hemoglobin molecules running around your bloodstream
were actually fused deep in the heart of a massive star that blew up 8 billion years ago. And
so we are intimately connected with the cosmos, we are really star stuff. If we can learn to
step back and take that bigger look at who we are from a cosmic perspective, I hope it helps
us to realize that we’re all the same. We are all earthlings, and I think we should begin
trivializing the differences that we perceive among us that cause us to kill one another, to
wage war, to not take care of the planet in the way it should be. One of the ways you get
there is by knowing exactly what your path was, from stardust, to the planet, to life, to us, it’s
all connected”.
![Page 12: VABodiut_S2574608_Astrobiology_SETI](https://reader034.vdocuments.site/reader034/viewer/2022042907/5874ec471a28ab917a8b5cc3/html5/thumbnails/12.jpg)
References
http://www.nasa.gov/image-feature/jpl/pia20316/curiosity-self-portrait-at-martian-sand-dune
http://www.nasa.gov/image-feature/jpl/pia20021/mystery-feature-evolves-in-titans-ligeia-
mare
https://astrobiology.nasa.gov/
http://www.seti.org/node/647
http://www.seti.org/seti-institute/project/details/parkes-australia-1996
http://www.seti.org/seti-institute/project/details/project-phoenix
http://www.seti.org/seti-institute/project/details/project-phoenix
http://www.seti.org/node/662
http://www.seti.org/node/434
http://www.seti.org/node/520
http://www.seti.org/node/489
SEti.org/node/647
http://www.seti.org/seti-institute/our-work/projects/chemistry-of-life
http://voyager.jpl.nasa.gov/spacecraft/goldenrec.html
https://www.newhorizonsmessage.com/
http://www.astronomynow.com/news/n1005/24seti7a/
http://www.nasa.gov/mission_pages/swift/bursts/supergiant-stars.html
http://www.bigear.org/CSMO/Images/CS01/cs01p19al.jpg
http://www.bbc.co.uk/staticarchive/7bd200ba6ed302d3bcf581e4bcdcc2a04851291c.jpg
http://www.seti.org/sites/default/files/tiscareno-jwst-560px.jpg
http://science.nasa.gov/media/medialibrary/1999/05/17/ast23may99_1_resources/screen-
detail.gif
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Enrico_Fermi
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fermi_paradox
![Page 13: VABodiut_S2574608_Astrobiology_SETI](https://reader034.vdocuments.site/reader034/viewer/2022042907/5874ec471a28ab917a8b5cc3/html5/thumbnails/13.jpg)
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Philip_Morrison
http://www.americaspace.com/?p=88392
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Michael_H._Hart
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Search_for_extraterrestrial_intelligence
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Astrobiology
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lakes_of_Titan
http://www.space.com/26332-nasa-new-horizons-one-earth-message.html
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jill_Tarter
http://voyager.jpl.nasa.gov/spacecraft/goldenrec.html
http://oneearthmessage.org/
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Arecibo_Observatory
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Project_Phoenix_(SETI)