v20_11 financial institutions fair value survey

Upload: kevin-smith

Post on 14-Apr-2018

214 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

  • 7/30/2019 V20_11 Financial Institutions Fair Value Survey

    1/20

    I. First Pass: Equity- Changes, But Not What Youd Expect.......................................... 1

    II. Second Pass: Assets & Liabilities- More Of The Above ...................................................................... 6

    III. Taking Fair Values At Face Value- Only Thing You Can Do ............................................................. 10

    Table of Contents

    President: Jack Ciesielski

    Research Co-ordinator: Paula Tanabe, CPA

    Research Associate: Melissa Herboldsheimer, CPA

    Administration: Brenda Rappold

    R.G. Associates is:

    THE ANALYST'S

    ACCOUNTING OBSERVERJack T. Ciesielski, CPA, CFA

    Volume 20, No. 11 September 26, 201

    Fair Value Reporting: A Financial Institutions SurveyA year ago, the FASBs proposal for revamping financial instrument accounting was the burning accounting iss

    of the day. In the end, the FASB got singed by the fire. In the face of staunch opposition to the proposal from just about eve

    quarter -preparers, regulators, and even investors - the FASB pulled in its horns and moved to a more IFRS-like stanc

    one that perpetuates amortized cost as the fundamental measure for financial instruments.

    Theres a good chance that the FASBs new-yet- old-fashioned approach may be re-exposed for comment: its muc

    different than the May 2010 financial instruments proposal. One thing thats unlikely to change are the quarterly fair valu

    disclosures for financial instruments. In fact, they might be staked out parenthetically in the balance sheet - a much mo

    investor-friendly treatment than their current burial in the footnotes.

    Whether theyre on the face of the balance sheet or tucked into the footnotes, theres still information in them f

    investors to consider. What follows here is a survey of the differences between amortized cost and fair value for the 453 no

    REIT financial institutions contained in the Russell 3000.

    I. First Pass: Equity

    Imagine an alternate reality where the FASB required all financial instruments to be reported at fair value - just lik

    it wanted to do a year ago. The key to that alternate reality is contained in the footnotes each quarter; the fair values of a

    financial instruments remains a required disclosure for companies of all stripes. Enterprising investors can revise balan

    sheets to reflect all financial instruments at fair value, include an estimated tax effect, and observe the net impact on equit

    Owing to the composition of their assets, financial institutions experience a greater impact from this exerci

    than other industries. This survey focuses only on financial institutions because theyre the richest vein of disclosures

    be mined. The table below summarizes the effects of the mark-to-market exercise on the common equity of the 453 no

    REIT financial institutions in the Russell 3000.

    At 2Q2011:

    ($inmillions) #

    CommonEquity: FVMarks/

    Reported

    Equity

    FinancialLeverageBasedOn:

    ReportedNetFairValue

    Marks

    Adjustedfor

    FVMarks

    Adjusted

    Equity

    Reported

    Equity Differenc

    CommercialBanks 170 $398,954.8 ($24,828.1) $374,126.7 6.2% 10.01 9.41 0.6

    RegionalBanks 165 233,868.9 (16,402.1) 217,466.8 7.0% 9.68 9.04 0.64

    DiversifiedBanks 5 165,085.9 (8,426.0) 156,659.9 5.1% 10.47 9.95 0.52

    DiversifiedFinancialServices 23 613,678.7 (25,462.2) 588,216.5 4.1% 11.23 10.79 0.44

    Thrifts&MortgageFinance 51 45,490.3 (106.1) 45,384.2 0.2% 7.91 7.74 0.17

    Insurance 106 766,114.4 (6,457.6) 759,656.8 0.8% 6.31 6.23 0.08

    CapitalMarkets 86 325,628.0 (1,223.1) 324,404.9 0.4% 9.53 9.49 0.04

    ConsumerFinance 17 62,906.8 2,141.1 65,047.9 3.4% 10.01 10.36 (0.35

    GrandTotal 453 $2,212,773.0 ($55,936.0) $2,156,837.0

    2.5% 8.92 8.70 0.22

    Copyright2011,R.G.Associates,Inc.TheAnalystsAccountingObserverisatrademarkofR.G.Associates,Inc.

    ForpurposesofclientsofR.G.Associates,Inc.only.Reproductionprohibitedwithoutpermission.Seenoteonbackpage.

  • 7/30/2019 V20_11 Financial Institutions Fair Value Survey

    2/20

    -2-

    The table is sorted in descending order of the effect of fair values upon each financial industrys category of commo

    equity (the fair value marks to common equity column) and also in terms of each industrys financial leverage (total asse

    divided by common equity). As might be expected, banks experience the greatest impact on capital from the restateme

    exercise. At the other end of the range, the capital markets firms experience the least capital impact, because they wide

    employ fair value reporting of assets and liabilities by default.

    The purpose of restating the shareholders equity is to make something analytically useful from th

    information. Fair values may be suspect, especially when theyre notbased on quoted prices of securities trading in activ

    liquid markets - when based on models developed by the reporting companies. Yet overstatement of values does not see

    to be a problem, at least on the first pass. If anything, the financial instruments fair values seem to be saying that there

    overstatement present in amortized cost amounts. Assets on financial institutions balance sheets are not likely to fetch the

    stated amount in a sale, even though managers hope to realize such amounts someday.

    Fair value reporting is not perfect, but neither is amortized cost reporting. At least fair value reporting gives investo

    an idea of what a balance sheet is worth in the here and now, and not in terms of some hoped-for future values. Knowin

    what the assets of a firm might fetch in a current market gives investors a more informed view of a firms liquidity - an

    a better base from which to build investment decisions. Capital levels are a fine yardstick for measuring a firms ability

    withstand losses, but liquidity is another important aspect of a firms ability to survive catastrophes. Capital adequacy

    merely an illusion if assets arent worth their stated value when the need arises to liquidate them.

    Fair value reporting improves the investors picture of liquidity when it shows the values that assets might actual

    fetch in the marketplace and when it shows the values at which liabilities could actually be settled. Some critics deride

    as theoretical values because the firms managers dont intendto liquidate the assets or settle the liabilities. While tru

    a managements intention to hold securities until they return to amortized cost doesnt make them any more realistic tha

    their fair values - even if theyre only estimates of fair value rather than values observed in active, liquid markets.

    More observations from the table:

    Fairvaluedisclosureshaveappearedinthefootnotesofquarterly

    financial statements for the last several years. To compare fair

    valuesof financial instruments to reportedvalues,a surveywas

    madeofthefairvaluedisclosuresfor453financialinstitutionsinthe

    Russell3000,excludingREITS,attheendofthesecondquarter.

    Asagroup,therestatementofbalancesheetstothefairvalues

    reportedbyfirmsfortheirfinancialinstrumentsresultedinacutto

    commonequity about2.5%intheaggregate,andariseinfinancial

    leverageof22basispoints.

    Withintheaggregate,therewasplentyofvariation.Theregional

    bankgroupsawa7.0%dropincommonequity,whiletheconsumer

    finance group saw a 3.4% increase in equity due to four large

    beneficiariesoffairvaluetreatment.

    DespitewidespreadoppositiontoFASBsplanstointroducefai

    valueaccountingtobalancesheets,therestatementtofairvalue

    wasrelativelybenign.Only190firmssawdeclines inequityasa

    result, while 166 firms saw common equity increases. The

    remaindershowednochange.

    Asurprisingnumberoffirmssawincreasesinassets:267ofthem

    Only76sawmarkdownsonafairvaluebasis unexpectedlylowin

    aperiodofeconomicdistress.Therestshowednochange.

    The samepatternexisted for liabilities:moreof the liabilitie

    increasedonafairvaluebasis,indicatingfavorablecreditstanding

    DuetoalongexistingflawinGAAP,fairvaluesforassetsmigh

    notbeagenuineexitvaluecalculation,whichmightexplainsome

    ofthehigherfairvalues.

    Executive Summary

    AccountingStandardCodification8251050requiresfirmstodisclosethefairvaluesofallfinancialinstruments.UsingDirectEdga

    software,the10QdisclosureswereisolatedforallnonREITfinancialfirmsintheRussell3000.(Whilemanyconsiderthemtobeavarietyoffinancialinstitutions,REITshavecomparativelylittlebywayoffinancialinstrumentsintheirassetbase,sotheywere

    excludedfromthedatabasetokeepthestudyfocusedonthefinancialfirmsmostlikelytoprovidefairvaluedisclosureexamples.

    Totalassetsandtotalliabilitiesatfairvalueweredeterminedbyadjustingreportedamounts(sourcedfromS&PsResearchInsigh

    database)forthedifferencesbetweenreportedandfairvalues.A35%taxeffectwasdeterminedonthenetassetandliabilit

    differencesbetweenfairvalueandreportedvalues;wherethenettaxeffectresultedinanasset,totalassetsatfairvaluewere

    increasedfortheestimateddeferredtaxasset,andwhenthenettaxeffectresultedinaliability,totalliabilitieswereincreasedfo

    theestimateddeferredliability.Thesumofalldifferenceswasnettedagainststockholdersequitytodeterminetheeffectoffai

    valuereportingoncapital.

    Themethodologyencompassesallthatinvestorscandowithmeredisclosuresoffairvalues.Thetaxratemightdifferwidelyfrom

    firmtofirm;moreimportantly,thequalityofthedisclosuresprobablyvariesfromfirmtofirm.Thepointofthestudyistosee

    whatdirectionfairvaluereportingmightleadinvestors:tobevaguelyright,ratherthanexactlywrong.Whilenotassatisfying

    asfullfairvaluereportingbyfirms,ithastobesufficientfornow.

    Methodology

  • 7/30/2019 V20_11 Financial Institutions Fair Value Survey

    3/20

    -3-

    Capital effects of fair value reporting vary by the kind of bank. Regional banks, with a larger concentration

    assets in loans than their diversified big brothers, show the greatest markdowns in equity and the greatest increase i

    financial leverage. Below, the regional banks with financial leverage increases of 1.00 or more.

    Regional Banks: Largest Negative Capital Impact At 2Q2011

    Common

    Equity: FV

    Marks/

    Reported

    Equity

    FinancialLeverage

    Based

    On:

    ($inmillions) Reported

    NetFairValue

    Marks

    Adjustedfor

    FVMarks

    Adjusted

    Equity

    Reported

    Equity Difference

    RegionalBanks $233,868.9 ($16,402.1) $217,466.9 7.0% 9.68 9.04 0.6

    SunBancorp 298.8 (170.0) 128.8 56.9% 23.67 10.75 12.9

    Popular 3,913.9 (2,236.4) 1,677.5 57.1% 22.02 9.97 12.0

    WesternAllianceBancorp 483.3 (163.9) 319.4 33.9% 19.89 13.47 6.4

    RegionsFinancial 13,489.0 (5,533.5) 7,955.6 41.0% 15.8 9.7 6.1

    PeoplesBancorp 200.7 (75.3) 125.3 37.5% 13.98 8.98 5.0

    PrivateBancorp 1,021.0 (312.0) 709.0 30.6% 16.67 11.87 4.8

    AssociatedBancCorp 2,741.1 (1,100.0) 1,641.1 40.1% 12.82 8.04 4.7

    SCBTFinancial 371.1 (104.3) 266.8 28.1% 14.04 10.35 3.6

    ValleyNationalBancorp 1,311.2 (326.2) 985.024.9% 14.72 11.04 3.6

    CapitalCityBankGroup 260.5 (64.4) 196.1 24.7% 12.93 9.98 2.9

    Stellarone 404.3 (126.9) 277.3 31.4% 10.16 7.26 2.9

    TCFFinancial 1,769.6 (345.4) 1,424.2 19.5% 13.29 10.64 2.6

    HuntingtonBancshares 4,890.1 (922.0) 3,968.1 18.9% 13.16 10.85 2.3

    OrrstownFinancialServices 153.4 (29.4) 124.0 19.2% 12.16 9.98 2.1

    SandySpringBancorp 423.7 (81.4) 342.3 19.2% 10.36 8.53 1.8

    WestCoastBancorp 264.4 (47.3) 217.2 17.9% 11.04 9.31 1.7

    FirstHorizonNational 2,681.4 (467.0) 2,214.4 17.4% 11.03 9.34 1.6

    BridgeCapitalHoldings 123.6 (20.7) 102.9 16.7% 9.98 8.36 1.6

    OrientalFinancialGroup 656.4 (80.6) 575.7 12.3% 12.4 10.79 1.6

    SuntrustBanks 19,488.0 (3,091.4) 16,396.6 15.9% 10.32 8.83 1.4

    ZionsBancorp 4,583.7 (531.0) 4,052.711.6% 12.65 11.21 1.4

    UnitedCommunityBanks 666.8 (80.0) 586.7 12.0% 12.47 11.11 1.3

    BancorpRhodeIsland 133.5 (12.1) 121.5 9.0% 13.46 12.12 1.3

    Firstmerit 1,550.4 (205.3) 1,345.1 13.2% 10.53 9.25 1.2

    HanmiFinancial 198.4 (17.0) 181.4 8.6% 14.91 13.67 1.2

    EnterpriseBancorp 122.4 (11.3) 111.1 9.2% 13.15 12.01 1.1

    FifthThirdBancorp 12,203.0 (1,423.5) 10,779.5 11.7% 10.21 9.08 1.1

    Keycorp 9,446.0 (987.4) 8,458.7 10.5% 10.47 9.4 1.0

    BankoftheOzarks 389.1 (34.7) 354.4 8.9% 11.37 10.35 1.0

    Contrast those results with the entire diversified banks group shown below: only one of them - Wells Fargo - sa

    its equity decline from restating financial instruments at fair value. Oddly, more of them saw equity increases - not the kin

    of result to be expected from fair value reporting, judging by the uproar from the bankers over last years FASB proposa

    Diversified Banks Group At 2Q2011:CommonEquity: FVMarks/

    Reported

    Equity

    FinancialLeverageBasedOn:

    ($inmillions) Reported

    NetFairValue

    Marks

    Adjustedfor

    FVMarks

    Adjusted

    Equity

    Reported

    Equity Difference

    DiversifiedBanks $165,085.9 ($8,426.0) $156,659.9 5.1% 10.47 9.95 0.5

    WellsFargo 127,435.0 (9,085.7) 118,349.3 7.1% 10.61 9.89 0.7

    BancoLatinoAmericano 736.0 0.0 736.0 0.0% 7.89 7.89 0.0

    USBancorp 30,735.0 554.5 31,289.5 1.8% 10.32 10.44 (0.12

    Comerica 6,038.0 96.9 6,134.9 1.6% 8.84 8.97 (0.13

    EncoreBancshares 141.9 8.4 150.3 5.9% 9.98 10.33 (0.35

  • 7/30/2019 V20_11 Financial Institutions Fair Value Survey

    4/20

    -4-

    More surprisingly, some regional banks share that result. Below, the regional banks where application of fair valu

    reporting on financial instruments resulted in decreases of 1.0 or more in their financial leverage.

    Regional Banks: Largest Positive Capital Impact At 2Q2011CommonEquity: FVMarks/

    Reported

    Equity

    FinancialLeverageBasedOn:

    ($inmillions) Reported

    NetFairValue

    Marks

    Adjustedfor

    FVMarks

    Adjusted

    Equity

    Reported

    Equity Difference

    RegionalBanks $233,868.9

    ($16,402.1) $217,466.9

    7.0% 9.68

    9.04 0.6

    StateBancorp 125.0 67.4 192.3 53.9% 8.5 13.01 (4.51

    HamptonRoadsBankshares 161.6 32.2 193.9 19.9% 13.61 16.07 (2.46

    BridgeBancorp 78.0 16.1 94.2 20.6% 12.95 15.29 (2.34

    SeacoastBanking 124.3 19.9 144.2 16.0% 14.48 16.76 (2.28

    FirstBancorpInc 131.5 31.5 162.9 24.0% 8.76 10.78 (2.02

    TaylorCapitalGroup 103.8 5.1 108.9 4.9% 40.3 42.32 (2.02

    Banner 391.2 87.4 478.6 22.3% 8.78 10.75 (1.9

    BankofHawaii 1,003.4 197.5 1,201.0 19.7% 11.22 13.12 (1.90

    TricoBancshares 204.9 50.5 255.4 24.6% 8.78 10.62 (1.84

    FinancialInstitutions 216.3 49.4 265.7 22.9% 8.86 10.56 (1.70

    EastWestBancorp 2,146.3 364.1 2,510.4 17.0% 8.55 10.19 (1.64

    VirginiaCommerceBancorp 200.8 26.0 226.7 12.9% 12.44 13.93 (1.49

    CityHoldingCo 310.4 68.4 378.8 22.1% 7.26 8.74 (1.48

    AllianceFinancial 140.1 27.3 167.4 19.4% 9.05 10.53 (1.48

    UnivestCorpofPA 273.0 73.1 346.1 26.8% 6.13 7.54 (1.41

    EnterpriseFinlServices 204.1 21.7 225.8 10.6% 13.03 14.38 (1.35

    MerchantsBancshares 104.8 12.8 117.6 12.2% 12.31 13.65 (1.34

    StateBankFinancial 374.6 108.9 483.5 29.1% 6.07 7.38 (1.31

    WintrustFinancial 1,423.7 242.1 1,665.8 17.0% 9 10.27 (1.2

    CNBFinancial 122.2 15.0 137.2 12.3% 11.02 12.2 (1.18

    SierraBancorp 165.4 30.0 195.4 18.1% 7.04 8.14 (1.10

    The entire consumer finance group shows beneficial effects from applying fair value reporting to a

    financial instruments. Note from the first table that the entire consumer finance group saw an equity increase of 3.4% an

    a 35 basis point drop in financial leverage - another counterintuitive result from applying fair value reporting. Below, th

    17 companies comprising the group and the effects of the restatement. The groups results were dominated by four firm

    large positive effects.

    Consumer Finance Group At 2Q2011:CommonEquity: FVMarks/

    Reported

    Equity

    FinancialLeverageBasedOn:

    ($inmillions) Reported

    NetFairValue

    Marks

    Adjustedfor

    FVMarks

    Adjusted

    Equity

    Reported

    Equity Difference

    ConsumerFinance $62,906.8 $2,141.1 $65,047.8 3.4% 10.01 10.36 (0.35

    AmericanExpress 18,205.0 (1,950.0) 16,255.0 10.7% 9.16 8.12 1.0

    DiscoverFinancialServices 7,523.3 (674.8) 6,848.5 9.0% 9.43 8.43 1.0

    DollarFinancial 251.9 (26.0) 225.9 10.3% 5.99 5.32 0.6

    CashAmericaInternational 858.4 (111.8) 746.6 13.0% 2.1 1.75 0.3

    CreditAcceptance 441.9 (5.6) 436.3 1.3% 3.67 3.58 0.0

    WorldAcceptance 392.1 (1.9) 390.2 0.5% 1.7 1.69 0.0

    AdvanceAmerCashAdvance 254.7 (0.3) 254.4 0.1% 1.62 1.62 0.0

    NetspendHoldings 169.0 0.0 169.0 0.0% 1.58 1.58 0.0

    EZCorp 593.8 0.0 593.8 0.0% 1.13 1.13 0.0

    NicholasFinancial 105.6 0.0 105.6 0.0% 2.19 2.19 0.0

    GreenDot 210.6 0.0 210.6 0.0% 1.53 1.53 0.0

    ImperialHoldings 221.4 0.0 221.4 0.0% 1.32 1.32 0.0

    FirstCashFinancialServices 322.7 0.0 322.7 0.0% 1.15 1.15 0.0

    CapitalOneFinancial 28,681.0 1,469.7 30,150.7 5.1% 6.73 6.96 (0.23

    FirstMarblehead (759.6) 426.7 (332.9) 56.2% 18.58 10.64 (7.94

    Nelnet 988.8 525.0 1,513.7 53.1% 16.96 25.15 (8.19

    SLM 4,446.2

    2,490.2

    6,936.4

    56.0% 28.15

    45.06 (16.91

  • 7/30/2019 V20_11 Financial Institutions Fair Value Survey

    5/20

    -5-

    Regardless of the industry, theres a

    unexpected frequency of positive fair valu

    impacts. The table at left spells it out: there a

    almost as many firms having positive impacts

    negative impacts. When you factor in the compani

    where reported values didnt change at all (

    possibly did not report any), there were more nonegative impacts on common equity from fair valu

    reporting than negative impacts. Some of it mak

    sense: for instance, the 53 capital markets firm

    showing zero impact from transplanted fair valu

    reporting. Thats because capital markets firm

    usually employ fair value accounting as their norm

    reporting regime. Thats about the only part th

    makes sense, however.

    Looking at the fair value effects on equity alone provides a bottom-line view of how fair values differ from historic

    cost - but if you want to make more sense out ofwhy equity changed, you have to drill down into fair value differences f

    assets and liabilities separately. Heres a case where its hard to make sense out of what the fair value differences are sayinsome firms show increases in assets on a fair value basis - an improvement in financial condition - while their liabilities a

    marked down on a fair value basis, indicating that market participants believe theres a diminution of credit-standing. That

    a contradiction embedded in the footnote disclosures of 34 companies in the study. Below, the differences in asset

    liabilities and equity for the 20 firms where equity increased by 10% or more because of simultaneous asset increases an

    liability decreases.

    Where Fair Values Contradict: 2Q2011TotalAssets: TotalLiabilities: CommonEquity:

    ($inmillions)

    Reported

    Value FVDiff.

    @Fair

    Value

    Reported

    Value FVDiff.

    @Fair

    Value

    Reported

    Value FVDiff.

    @Fair

    Value

    Equity%

    Increas

    StateBancorp $1,626.1 $8.1 $1,634.3 $1,464.8 ($59.2) $1,405.6 $125.0 $67.4 $192.3 53.9

    FBLFinancialGroup 15,863.6 95.9 15,959.5 14,583.6 (419.7) 14,163.9 1,277.0 515.6 1,792.6 40.4NationalWesternLife 9,262.4 342.7 9,605.2 8,005.9 (105.5) 7,900.5 1,256.5 448.2 1,704.7 35.7

    UnivestCorpofPA 2,058.4 61.8 2,120.2 1,785.4 (11.3) 1,774.1 273.0 73.1 346.1 26.8

    FirstBancorpInc 1,417.7 9.5 1,427.2 1,261.5 (21.9) 1,239.5 131.5 31.5 162.9 24.0

    CityHoldingCo 2,713.8 35.6 2,749.4 2,403.4 (32.8) 2,370.6 310.4 68.4 378.8 22.1

    HoraceMannEducators 7,208.0 3.9 7,212.0 6,275.8 (172.2) 6,103.5 932.3 176.2 1,108.5 18.9

    SierraBancorp 1,345.9 28.6 1,374.5 1,180.5 (1.3) 1,179.1 165.4 30.0 195.4 18.1

    ViewpointFinancialGroup 2,963.9 33.2 2,997.1 2,556.9 (37.7) 2,519.2 407.0 70.9 477.9 17.4

    SeacoastBanking 2,082.9 4.2 2,087.1 1,911.7 (15.6) 1,896.1 124.3 19.9 144.2 16.0

    FirstCommonwealthFinancial 5,691.3 31.1 5,722.4 4,929.2 (76.7) 4,852.5 762.1 107.8 869.8 14.1

    VirginiaCommerceBancorp 2,797.8 23.7 2,821.4 2,530.7 (2.3) 2,528.4 200.8 26.0 226.7 12.9

    WSFSFinancial 4,151.5 15.6 4,167.1 3,775.6 (29.3) 3,746.3 375.9 44.9 420.8 11.9

    AssuredGuaranty 19,238.9 10.8 19,249.7 15,288.9 (450.5) 14,838.4 3,950.0 461.3 4,411.3 11.7

    ReinsuranceGroupofAmerica 30,659.3 404.4 31,063.6 25,334.8 (200.0) 25,134.8 5,324.5 604.3 5,928.9 11.4EnterpriseFinancialServices 2,935.4 7.5 2,942.9 2,698.4 (14.2) 2,684.3 204.1 21.7 225.8 10.6

    Thats a curious set of companies, well represented by regional banks. Its almost as if the balance sheet is in

    tug-of-war with itself. On the asset side, where estimates are used for valuations of loans and other non-liquid financi

    instruments, its as if managements are asserting that the firms assets are viable and valuable. On the liability side, it

    as if the markets are saying there could be credit problems. The next section explores more of the fair value differenc

    in assets and liabilities.

    ImpactonCommonEquity:

    Total Negative

    AllNon

    Negative Positive Zero

    CommercialBanks 170

    83

    87 84 3RegionalBanks 165 82 83 81 2

    DiversifiedBanks 5 1 4 3 1

    DiversifiedFinancialServices 23 13 10 2 8

    Thrifts&MortgageFinance 51 20 31 29 2

    Insurance 106 44 62 37 25

    CapitalMarkets 86 23 63 10 53

    ConsumerFinance 17 7 10 4 6

    453 190 263 166 97

    2Q2011Fair Value Equity Impact Summary

  • 7/30/2019 V20_11 Financial Institutions Fair Value Survey

    6/20

    -6-

    II. Second Pass: Assets & LiabilitiesThe table below contains summarized information about the total assets, total liabilities and common equity for th

    166 firms showing increases in common equity after application of fair value reporting. Fair value amounts for total asse

    and total liabilities are straight from the financial statement footnotes; deferred tax effects are reflected in the fair valu

    differences for total liabilities. Because of the combination of higher assets at fair value and/or lower liabilities at fair valu

    estimated deferred tax liabilities result. The table is sorted in descending order of fair value effect on common equity.

    Where Fair Values Increased Equity at 2Q2011:TotalAssets: TotalLiabilities: CommonEquity:

    ($inmillions) #

    Reported

    Value FVDiff. @FairValue

    Reported

    Value FVDiff.

    @Fair

    Value

    Reported

    Value FVDiff.

    @Fa

    Valu

    Insurance 37 $1,473,828.5 $7,601.7 $1,481,430.2 $1,319,712.7 ($2,475.4) $1,317,237.3 $154,112.7 $10,077.1 $164,189.

    CommercialBanks 84 1,269,132.0 8,471.8 1,277,603.8 1,124,067.1 3,188.8 1,127,255.9 140,266.5 5,283.1 145,549.

    RegionalBanks 81 892,650.5 6,306.4 898,956.9 787,136.3 1,683.1 788,819.4 103,351.5 4,623.4 107,974

    DiversifiedBanks 3 376,481.5 2,165.4 378,646.9 336,930.8 1,505.7 338,436.5 36,914.9 659.7 37,574

    ConsumerFinance 4 433,066.6 (3,169.6) 429,897.0 399,145.2 (8,081.1) 391,064.1 33,356.4 4,911.5 38,267.

    Thrifts&MortgageFinance 2 9 126,019.5 2,666.7 128,686.2 107,327.0 1,153.7 108,480.7 18,656.0 1,513.0 20,169.

    CapitalMarkets 10 1,444,903.2 1,197.0 1,446,100.2 1,307,474.8 (27.9) 1,307,446.9 135,420.5 1,224.9 136,645.

    DiversifiedFinancialServices 2 1,633.0 331.1 1,964.1 931.6 109.6 1,041.2 701.3 221.5 922.

    Total 166 $4,748,582.8 $17,098.7 $4,765,681.5 $4,258,658.4 ($6,132.3) $4,252,526.1 $482,513.4 $23,231.1 $505,744.

    Theres a lot that leaps out of the table. Check the column for the fair value difference of total assets: except for th

    consumer finance industry, the aggregate marks to fair value for all other industries were positive - meaning that asse

    increasedin a fair value reporting mode. Thats not what youd expect on a consistent basis.

    Next, check the column for the fair value differences for the total liabilities: theyre negative for some of th

    industries, including insurance, consumer finance, and capital markets. In total, the fair value of liabilities for firms in the

    industries were less than their recorded value - and thats not a really good thing. In todays ultra-low interest ra

    environment, if a firms debt instruments are worth less in the marketplace than their issuance price, its likely that a deb

    discount exists because of market perceptions of the firms own creditworthiness. The fair values of the debt instrumen

    implicitly state the marketplaces collective view on a firms ability to repay its debts.

    Below, the 25 regional banks with the largest absolute dollar increase in equity resulting from fair value reportin

    Note that only four - BB&T, East West Bancorp, Banner andPinnacle Financial - have lower assets at fair value.

    Regional Banks Where Fair Values Increased Equity at 2Q2011:TotalAssets: TotalLiabilities: CommonEquity:

    ($inmillions) #

    Reported

    Value FVDiff.

    @Fair

    Value

    Reported

    Value FVDiff.

    @Fair

    Value

    Reported

    Value FVDiff.

    @Fa

    Valu

    RegionalBanks 81 $892,650.5 $6,306.4 $898,957.0 $787,136.3 $1,683.1 $788,819.3 $103,351.5 $4,623.4 $107,974.

    PNCFinancial 263,117.0 3,252.0 266,369.0 228,244.0 2,760.6 231,004.6 34,225.0 491.4 34,716.

    BB&T 159,310.0 (1,017.0) 158,293.0 142,261.0 (1,400.5) 140,860.5 17,049.0 383.5 17,432.

    EastWestBancorp 21,872.7 (418.8) 21,453.9 19,643.4 (782.9) 18,860.5 2,146.3 364.1 2,510.

    WintrustFinancial 14,615.9 381.4 14,997.3 13,142.5 139.3 13,281.8 1,423.7 242.1 1,665.

    HancockHoldingCo 19,757.5 337.8 20,095.3 17,371.2 137.4 17,508.6 2,386.3 200.3 2,586.

    BankofHawaii 13,161.2 314.8 13,476.0 12,157.8 117.3 12,275.0 1,003.4 197.5 1,201.

    ColumbiaBankingSystem 4,429.1 265.6 4,694.7 3,701.5 75.8 3,777.2 727.7 189.8 917.

    CapitalSource 9,314.9 105.3 9,420.2 7,204.6 (76.7) 7,127.8 2,110.4 182.0 2,292.

    CityNational 22,526.1 296.1 22,822.2 20,398.3 134.8 20,533.2 2,127.7 161.3 2,289.

    BOKFinancial 24,238.2 213.2 24,451.3 21,546.0 96.9 21,642.9 2,692.2 116.3 2,808.

    StateBankFinancial 2,766.3 170.5 2,936.8 2,391.7 61.6 2,453.3 374.6 108.9 483.

    FirstCommonwlthFinancial 5,691.3 31.1 5,722.4 4,929.2 (76.7) 4,852.5 762.1 107.8 869.

    OldNationalBancorp 8,018.8 204.3 8,223.1 7,010.6 108.1 7,118.6 1,008.3 96.2 1,104.

    Banner 4,206.1 (3.3) 4,202.7 3,695.0 (90.7) 3,604.3 391.2 87.4 478.

    ProsperityBancshares 9,657.1 126.4 9,783.6 8,145.5 48.8 8,194.3 1,511.6 77.6 1,589.

    UnivestCorpofPA 2,058.4 61.8 2,120.2 1,785.4 (11.3) 1,774.1 273.0 73.1 346.

    CityHoldingCo 2,713.8 35.6 2,749.4 2,403.4 (32.8) 2,370.6 310.4 68.4 378.

    StateBancorp 1,626.1 8.1 1,634.3 1,464.8 (59.2) 1,405.6 125.0 67.4 192.

    UmpquaHoldings 11,459.7 85.0 11,544.7 9,785.4 22.6 9,808.0 1,674.3 62.4 1,736.

    1stSource 4,354.9 122.7 4,477.7 3,849.4 60.4 3,909.7 505.6 62.4 568.

    CommerceBancshares 19,570.9 120.1 19,690.9 17,439.3 59.8 17,499.1 2,131.6 60.3 2,191.

    GlacierBancorp 6,978.3 52.3 7,030.6 6,113.5 (2.6) 6,110.9 864.8 54.9 919.

    FNBCorp 9,857.2 70.2 9,927.3 8,654.0 15.4 8,669.4 1,203.1 54.8 1,257.

    PinnacleFinancialPartners 4,831.3 (4.8) 4,826.5 4,132.1 (55.3) 4,076.8 607.8 50.5 658.

    TricoBancshares 2,176.2 64.9 2,241.1 1,971.3 14.4 1,985.7 204.9 50.5 255.

  • 7/30/2019 V20_11 Financial Institutions Fair Value Survey

    7/20

    -7-

    Below, the entire set of companies in the insurance industry with increased equity from fair value reporting. Agai

    notice the scarcity of asset markdowns - while liability markdowns are common.

    Insurers Where Fair Values Increased Equity at 2Q2011:TotalAssets: TotalLiabilities: CommonEquity:

    ($inmillions) #

    Reported

    Value FVDiff.

    @FairValue Reported

    Value FVDiff.

    @FairValue Reported

    Value FVDiff.

    @Fa

    Valu

    Insurance 37 $1,473,828.5 $7,601.7 $1,481,430.2 $1,319,712.7 ($2,475.4) $1,317,237.3 $154,112.7 $10,077.1 $164,189.

    Life&HealthInsurance 12 971,973.8 5,795.0 977,768.8 905,108.0 (396.9) 904,711.2 66,862.6 6,191.9 73,054.

    AmericanEquityInvestmentLife 28,566.8 (257.7) 28,309.1 27,527.2 (2,776.3) 24,750.9 1,039.5 2,518.7 3,558.

    PrudentialFinancial 613,377.0 3,997.0 617,374.0 577,741.0 2,896.6 580,637.6 35,636.0 1,100.5 36,736.

    PrincipalFinancialGroup 149,278.4 439.4 149,717.8 138,610.8 (491.7) 138,119.1 10,667.5 931.1 11,598.

    FBLFinancialGroup 15,863.6 95.9 15,959.5 14,583.6 (419.7) 14,163.9 1,277.0 515.6 1,792.

    NationalWesternLife 9,262.4 342.7 9,605.2 8,005.9 (105.5) 7,900.5 1,256.5 448.2 1,704.

    ProtectiveLife 50,987.8 523.8 51,511.7 47,383.4 157.6 47,541.0 3,604.5 366.2 3,970.

    UnumGroup 58,015.8 172.6 58,188.4 48,933.0 49.3 48,982.3 9,082.8 123.3 9,206.

    StancorpFinancialGroup 18,454.4 446.0 18,900.4 16,536.1 345.3 16,881.4 1,918.3 100.7 2,019.

    PhoenixCompanies 21,377.3 0.0 21,377.3 20,214.2 (49.8) 20,164.4 1,163.1 49.8 1,212.

    KansasCityLifeIns 4,392.2 31.3 4,423.5 3,686.1 (3.1) 3,683.0 706.1 34.3 740.

    Citizens 1,040.7 (1.2) 1,039.5 800.1 (3.1) 797.0 240.5 1.9 242.

    IndependenceHolding 1,357.4 5.1 1,362.5 1,086.7 3.5 1,090.1 270.7 1.6 272.

    Property&

    Casualty

    Insurance 15 226,140.7

    238.7

    226,379.4

    187,090.1

    (1,666.8) 185,423.2

    39,050.6

    1,905.5

    40,956.

    MBIA 31,668.0 (231.0) 31,437.0 29,763.0 (928.5) 28,834.6 1,905.0 697.5 2,602.

    Allstate 129,023.0 345.0 129,368.0 110,230.0 (231.6) 109,998.5 18,793.0 576.6 19,369.

    AssuredGuaranty 19,238.9 10.8 19,249.7 15,288.9 (450.5) 14,838.4 3,950.0 461.3 4,411.

    ArgoGroupIntlHoldings 6,513.7 0.0 6,513.7 4,965.1 (78.8) 4,886.3 1,548.6 78.8 1,627.

    SelectiveINSGroup 5,369.6 50.4 5,420.0 4,268.6 21.3 4,289.9 1,101.0 29.1 1,130.

    CincinnatiFinancial 15,702.0 7.0 15,709.0 10,645.0 (15.8) 10,629.3 5,057.0 22.8 5,079.

    Amerisafe 1,152.5 27.7 1,180.3 815.3 9.7 825.0 337.2 18.0 355.

    Proassurance 4,926.6 16.6 4,943.2 2,960.2 5.8 2,966.0 1,966.4 10.8 1,977.

    UniversalInsuranceHldgs 896.7 0.0 896.7 738.5 (3.3) 735.3 158.2 3.3 161.

    HarleysvilleGroup 3,239.5 8.0 3,247.5 2,457.8 5.4 2,463.2 781.7 2.6 784.

    DonegalGroup 1,248.0 3.1 1,251.1 865.3 1.1 866.4 382.7 2.0 384.

    HilltopHoldings 947.5 1.0 948.5 306.0 (0.3) 305.7 641.5 1.3 642.

    HallmarkFinancialServices 747.1 0.0 747.1 527.5 (0.7) 526.9 219.6 0.7 220.

    EMCInsuranceGroup 1,221.0 0.0 1,221.1 857.8 (0.5) 857.3 363.2 0.6 363.MercuryGeneral 4,246.5 0.0 4,246.5 2,400.9 (0.2) 2,400.7 1,845.6 0.2 1,845.

    MultilineInsurance 6 212,309.9 1,107.5 213,417.4 179,345.0 (222.9) 179,122.1 32,964.9 1,330.4 34,295.

    GenworthFinancial 112,347.0 370.0 112,717.0 96,789.0 (107.1) 96,681.9 15,558.0 477.1 16,035.

    AmericanNationalInsurance 22,446.9 609.4 23,056.4 18,743.0 213.3 18,956.3 3,704.0 396.1 4,100.

    AmericanFinancialGroup 34,053.0 9.0 34,062.0 29,428.0 (198.4) 29,229.7 4,625.0 207.4 4,832.

    HoraceMannEducators 7,208.0 3.9 7,212.0 6,275.8 (172.2) 6,103.5 932.3 176.2 1,108.

    Assurant 26,779.8 112.8 26,892.5 21,903.8 40.7 21,944.5 4,876.0 72.1 4,948.

    HCCInsuranceHoldings 9,475.1 2.4 9,477.5 6,205.4 0.8 6,206.3 3,269.7 1.5 3,271.

    Reinsurance 4 63,404.2 460.4 63,864.6 48,169.7 (188.9) 47,980.8 15,234.5 649.3 15,883.

    ReinsuranceGroupofAmerica 30,659.3 404.4 31,063.6 25,334.8 (200.0) 25,134.8 5,324.5 604.3 5,928.

    AlterraCapitalHoldings 10,497.4 56.1 10,553.5 7,704.3 28.4 7,732.6 2,793.1 27.7 2,820.

    FlagstoneReinsuranceHld 3,243.6 0.0 3,243.6 2,279.3 (11.8) 2,267.5 964.3 11.8 976.

    EverestReGroup 19,003.9 0.0 19,003.9 12,851.4 (5.4) 12,846.0 6,152.6 5.4 6,158.

    Lastly, the four companies making up the consumer finance industry. Notice that Capital One Financial andNelnhave the unusual markup of assets, while SLM andFirst Marblehead account for nearly all of the differences betwee

    reported value and fair value for liabilities.

    Consumer Finance Firms Where Fair Values Increased Equity at 2Q2011:TotalAssets: TotalLiabilities: CommonEquity:

    ($inmillions) #

    Reported

    Value FVDiff. @FairValue

    Reported

    Value FVDiff. @FairValue

    Reported

    Value FVDiff.

    @Fa

    Valu

    ConsumerFinance 4 $433,066.6 ($3,169.6) $429,897.0 $399,145.2 ($8,081.1) $391,064.1 $33,356.4 $4,911.5 $38,267.

    SLM 200,356.6 (5,109.0) 195,247.6 195,345.3 (7,599.2) 187,746.2 4,446.2 2,490.2 6,936.

    CapitalOneFinancial 199,753.0 3,043.0 202,796.0 171,072.0 1,573.4 172,645.4 28,681.0 1,469.7 30,150.

    Nelnet 24,871.5 797.0 25,668.6 23,882.7 272.1 24,154.8 988.8 525.0 1,513.

    FirstMarblehead 8,085.6 (1,900.7) 6,184.9 8,845.2 (2,327.4) 6,517.8 (759.6) 426.7 (332.

  • 7/30/2019 V20_11 Financial Institutions Fair Value Survey

    8/20

    -8-

    Surprisingly, only 76 of the firms, a mere 17% of th

    total, saw assets decrease under fair value reportin

    Marking assets to fair value (net of tax effects) increase

    total assets for 267 of the 453 in the study - 59% of all,

    rather sunny result for institutions mired in a glob

    economic swoon. Another 110 of the firms had no effect.

    Even more curious, the financial institutions such regional banks, thrifts and insurers were among the mo

    vocal opponents of FASBs proposal to increase fair valu

    reporting - yet more of each class enjoyed increased ass

    values from fair value reporting than decreases. You have

    wonder why they were so belligerent. You could also wond

    about the veracity of their fair value disclosures.

    Below, a look at the companies where the net-of-tax total asset fair values increased total assets by 3% or more

    Largest Positive Differences Between Fair Value and Reported Value: Assets

    ($inmillions) Industry

    ReportedTotal

    Assets

    Est.NetoftaxFair

    ValueDifferences

    TotalAssets

    @FairValue

    %Difference:Fa

    Value/Reporte

    PortfolioRecoveryAssociates DiversifiedFinancialServices $1,021.6 $331.1 $1,352.7 32.4StateBankFinancial CommercialBanks:Regional 2,766.3 170.5 2,936.8 6.2

    ColumbiaBankingSystem CommercialBanks:Regional 4,429.1 265.6 4,694.7 6.0

    HudsonCityBancorp Thrifts&MortgageFinance 51,778.6 2,510.2 54,288.8 4.8

    OritaniFinancial Thrifts&MortgageFinance 2,569.1 110.2 2,679.3 4.3

    NorthwestBancshares Thrifts&MortgageFinance 8,087.3 342.6 8,430.0 4.2

    WashingtonFed Thrifts&MortgageFinance 13,388.8 547.5 13,936.3 4.1

    CashAmericaInternaonal ConsumerFinance 1,504.2 60.2 1,564.5 4.0

    NationalWesternLife Insurance 9,262.4 342.7 9,605.2 3.7

    TerritorialBancorp Thrifts&MortgageFinance 1,488.2 52.2 1,540.4 3.5

    DimeCommunityBancshares Thrifts&MortgageFinance 4,092.8 141.9 4,234.7 3.5

    Nelnet ConsumerFinance 24,871.5 797.0 25,668.6 3.2

    FinancialInstitutions CommercialBanks:Regional 2,282.9 71.0 2,353.9 3.1

    AstoriaFinancial Thrifts&MortgageFinance 17,120.3 532.7 17,653.0 3.1

    UnivestCorpofPA CommercialBanks:Regional 2,058.4 61.8 2,120.2 3.0

    Fairvalueimpactonassetsisduesolelytodeferredtaxassetarisingfromfairvaluedifferenceonliabilies;nofairvalueassetdifferencesotherwis

    At the other extreme, there were firms whose total assets fair value was less than the reported value. The media

    discount on the total assets for the 76 discount firms was .70% of the reported value, in the same league as the media

    premium size of .54% for the 267 premium firms. Below, the firms with a fair value discount on total assets of 2% or mor

    Largest Negative Differences Between Fair Value and Reported Value: Assets

    ($inmillions) Industry

    Reported

    Total

    Assets

    Est.Netoftax

    FairValue

    Differences

    TotalAssets@Fair

    Value

    %Difference:Fa

    Value/Reporte

    FirstMarblehead ConsumerFinance $8,085.6 ($1,900.7) $6,184.9 23.5

    Popular CommercialBanks:Regional 39,013.3 (2,067.0) 36,946.4 5.3

    SunBancorp CommercialBanks:Regional 3,213.8 (164.8) 3,049.0 5.1

    AssociatedBancCorp CommercialBanks:Regional 22,048.5 (1,006.2) 21,042.3 4.6

    Stellarone CommercialBanks:Regional 2,935.4 (116.9) 2,818.6 4.0

    RegionsFinancial CommercialBanks:Regional 130,908.0 (5,174.5) 125,733.6 4.0

    SouthwestBancorp CommercialBanks:Regional 2,660.5 (87.0) 2,573.5 3.3

    PeoplesBancorp CommercialBanks:Regional 1,802.7 (51.0) 1,751.7 2.8

    WestCoastBancorp CommercialBanks:Regional 2,462.6 (64.7) 2,397.9 2.6

    SterlingFinancial CommercialBanks:Regional 9,241.6 (238.9) 9,002.7 2.6

    SLM ConsumerFinance 200,356.6 (5,109.0) 195,247.6 2.5

    FirstHorizonNational CommercialBanks:Regional 25,054.1 (619.0) 24,435.1 2.5

    SCBTFinancial CommercialBanks:Regional 3,839.9 (94.0) 3,745.9 2.4

    CapitalCityBankGroup CommercialBanks:Regional 2,599.3 (63.0) 2,536.2 2.4

    PrivateBancorp CommercialBanks:Regional 12,115.4 (293.6) 11,821.8 2.4

    WesternAlliance

    Bancorp Commercial

    Banks:

    Regional 6,508.1

    (155.6) 6,352.4

    2.4

    CountofFVDifferences:

    Total Negative Positive Zero

    CommercialBanks 170 62 105 3

    RegionalBanks 165 61 102 2

    DiversifiedBanks 5 1 3 1

    DiversifiedFinancialServices 23 2 12 9Thrifts&MortgageFinance 51 5 43 3

    Insurance 106 3 71 32

    CapitalMarkets 86 2 27 57

    ConsumerFinance 17 2 9 6

    453 76 267 110

    17% 59% 24%

    Where Fair Value Affects Total Assets: 2Q11

  • 7/30/2019 V20_11 Financial Institutions Fair Value Survey

    9/20

    -9-

    The liabilities fair values imply that many more of

    the financial institutions are in fine health: 269 of them

    showed higher fair values than reported values, and 97 of

    them showed no difference. Again, a cheerful outcome for

    financial institutions in the midst of global crisis. Only 19%

    of the firms showed lower fair values for their liability

    financial instruments, likely indicating a market view thattheir credit status is not as favorable as when the financial

    instruments originated.

    Its a standards flaw that disclosures provide no

    information enabling investors to discern how much of fair

    value changes is due to interest rate shifts, leaving the rest

    of the fair value change to be attributed to credit standing.

    As low as interest rates have gone - and stayed - its fair to surmise that negative comparisons between fa

    value and reported value are due to credit standing. When interest rates rise - and someday they will - it will be hard

    to get a reading on the credit message embedded in the fair values of liability financial instruments, simply because high

    interest rates will have a depressing effect on fair values. Below, a list of the firms where total liabilities show fair valu

    markdowns over 2%.Largest Negative Differences Between Fair Value and Reported Value: Liabilities

    ($inmillions) Industry

    ReportedTotal

    Liabilities

    Est.NetoftaxFair

    ValueDifferences

    TotalLiabilities@

    FairValue

    %Difference:Fa

    Value/Reporte

    FirstMarblehead ConsumerFinance $8,845.2 ($2,327.4) $6,517.8 26.3

    AmericanEquityInvtLife Insurance 27,527.2 (2,776.3) 24,750.9 10.1

    StateBancorp CommercialBanks:Regional 1,464.8 (59.2) 1,405.6 4.0

    EastWestBancorp CommercialBanks:Regional 19,643.4 (782.9) 18,860.5 4.0

    SLM ConsumerFinance 195,345.3 (7,599.2) 187,746.2 3.9

    MBIA Insurance 29,763.0 (928.5) 28,834.6 3.1

    AssuredGuaranty Insurance 15,288.9 (450.5) 14,838.4 2.9

    SouthwestBancorp CommercialBanks:Regional 2,283.6 (65.8) 2,217.8 2.9

    FBLFinancialGroup Insurance 14,583.6 (419.7) 14,163.9 2.9

    SterlingFinancial CommercialBanks:Regional 8,434.0 (238.4) 8,195.6 2.8HoraceMannEducators Insurance 6,275.8 (172.2) 6,103.5 2.7

    BankMutual CommercialBanks:Regional 2,254.0 (56.1) 2,197.9 2.5

    Banner CommercialBanks:Regional 3,695.0 (90.7) 3,604.3 2.5

    CentralPacificFinancial CommercialBanks:Regional 3,698.0 (76.2) 3,621.7 2.1

    At the other end of the spectrum, the firms in the table below increased their total liabilities under fair value reportin

    by at least 4%.

    Largest Positive Differences Between Fair Value and Reported Value: Liabilities

    ($inmillions) Industry

    Reported

    Total

    Liabilities

    Est.NetoftaxFair

    ValueDifferences

    TotalLiabilities@

    FairValue

    %Difference

    Fa

    Value/Reporte

    CashAmericaInternational ConsumerFinance $645.8 $172.1 $817.9 26.6PorolioRecoveryAssociates DiversifiedFinancialServices 463.2 115.9 579.0 25.0

    CalamosAssetManagement CapitalMarkets 143.6 16.5 160.1 11.5

    AffiliatedManagers CapitalMarkets 2,346.5 226.2 2,572.7 9.6

    LeucadiaNational DiversifiedFinancialServices 2,386.7 154.3 2,541.0 6.5

    EatonVance CapitalMarkets 1,211.1 74.7 1,285.8 6.2

    HudsonCityBancorp Thrifts&MortgageFinance 46,890.7 2,687.2 49,577.9 5.7

    NewstarFinancial DiversifiedFinancialServices 1,367.6 75.0 1,442.6 5.5

    AresCapital CapitalMarkets 1,777.3 93.0 1,870.2 5.2

    LeggMason CapitalMarkets 2,798.4 141.2 2,939.6 5.0

    Lazard CapitalMarkets 2,223.2 111.0 2,334.2 5.0

    CITGroup CommercialBanks:Regional 39,066.7 1,901.1 40,967.8 4.9

    AstoriaFinancial Thrifts&MortgageFinance 15,841.8 735.5 16,577.3 4.6

    PresidentialLife Insurance 3,210.5 131.0 3,341.5 4.1

    Fairvalueliabilitiesimpactdueonlytodeferredtaxliabilityarisingfromfairvaluedifferenceonassets;nootherfairvalueliabilitiesdifferencesexiste

    CountofFVDifferences:

    Total Negative Positive Zer

    CommercialBanks 170 48 119

    RegionalBanks 165 47 116

    DiversifiedBanks 5 1 3

    DiversifiedFinancialServices 23 1 14

    Thrifts&MortgageFinance 51 6 43

    Insurance 106 23 58 2

    CapitalMarkets 86 7 26 5

    ConsumerFinance 17 2 9

    453 87 269 9

    19% 59% 21

    Fair Value Effects On Total Liabilities: 2Q11

  • 7/30/2019 V20_11 Financial Institutions Fair Value Survey

    10/20

    -10-

    III. Taking Fair Values At Face ValueInvestors with long memories might recall the mid-1990s, when the FASB retreated from a plan to require expen

    recognition for the value of stock options issued as compensation. The half-loaf the FASB then served to investors wa

    annual disclosure of the expense in footnotes to the financial statements. The fair value situation today is fairly simila

    retreat from an objective, followed by disclosures intended to compensate for a lack of financial statement recognition.

    This time, the best thing the FASB did was to require disclosures to be part of interim financial statements. Investo

    make judgments about the economic worth of net assets whenever they buy or sell shares of a companys stock; it mak

    sense for those net assets to reflect the most recent values for the assets and liabilities that compose shareholders equit

    The net effect of the value changes on equity can play a role in helping investors with valuation decisions, while th

    directions of the fair value changes for the different financial instruments provides investors with market-based views o

    a companys financial strength. Fair value markdowns of the assets indicate the markets think asset values are overstate

    on a historical basis; fair value markdowns of liabilities indicate that markets harbor concerns about the credit standing

    the issuer. The reverse holds true as well: fair value markups of assets indicate that markets believe that reported asset valu

    are understated, and fair value markups of liabilities indicate that markets believe the credit standing of an issuer ha

    improved since the origination of the relevant liabilities.

    There are a couple ways the disclosures could be improved, however. They dont give investors sufficie

    information to determine how much of a fair value change is due to change in interest rates. Without that information

    investors cant really get a reading on what the fair values are telling them about the other specific factors - like the credstanding of the issuer for financial instruments held as assets, or perhaps more importantly, like credit standing of th

    company itself, which would be expressed in the fair values of the liabilities of the issuer. Another major lack: deposito

    institutions, like banks, are not required to disclose fair values of their demand deposits. Given the importance of tho

    liabilities to the operations of such institutions, this could amount to a serious omission. (The counter-argument is th

    demand deposits at face value really reflect fair value already: the face value is the amount the depositor could withdra

    at any time.)

    One glaring flaw in the existing standards has to do with, of all things, how fair value is determined for presentatio

    in the footnote disclosures. The definition of fair value was supposed to have been settled when Statement 157 (now AS

    Section 820) was issued in 2006: fair value was defined as the price that would be received to sell the asset or paid

    transfer the liability (an exit price). Entities do not necessarily sell assets at the prices paid to acquire them. Similarly, entiti

    do not necessarily transfer liabilities at the prices received to assume them. Note the (added) emphasis on exit price: itwhat youd receive if you sold an asset today. That has implications for some of the asset values noted in the study.

    The problem is that Statement 157/ASC 820 did nothing to clear up an inconsistent example of the fair valu

    disclosures that has been carried forward in the accounting standards since it first appeared in Statement 107

    1991. That example (now in ASC 825-10-55-3) preceded the definition of fair value currently in effect, and it showed

    sample footnote disclosure where a bank determined fair value of other types of loans ... by discounting the future cas

    flows using the current rates at which similar loans would be made to borrowers with similar credit ratings and for the sam

    remaining maturities. That might have been a definition of fair value in 1991, but not now: its an entry value, not an ex

    value. Yet the problematic example remains in the literature, and firms are free to analogize to it. It might explain why th

    fair values of regional banks were so often higher than reported value.

    The FASB is still revamping its financial instruments accounting proposal and will likely issue an exposure dra

    because its so radically different from the original proposal, and due process is one of the organizations strong point

    One anticipated change is that the fair values will be disclosed on the face of the balance sheet: much better real estate

    in the financial statement package than the current location in the footnotes. Auditor scrutiny might ratchet upward

    items appear on the balance sheet as opposed to footnotes. One would expect that they also avail themselves of th

    opportunity to clean up the non-GAAP example thats masquerading as GAAP. The problem is that the financi

    instruments standard could take perhaps another year until issuance, with a further lag time in between issuance an

    effective date. That will leave investors with sub-par disclosures for many more quarters, and will only put them off fro

    using them in the meantime.

  • 7/30/2019 V20_11 Financial Institutions Fair Value Survey

    11/20

    -11-

    Appendix - 2Q 2011 Balance Sheet at Fair Value($inmillions) Assets: Liabilities: Equity:

    NetFV

    Marks

    Adjustedfor

    FVMarks

    FV

    Marks/

    Reported

    NetFV

    Marks

    Adjusted

    forFV

    Marks

    FV

    Marks/

    Reported

    NetFV

    Marks

    Adjustedfor

    FVMarks

    F

    Marks

    Reporte

    CapitalMarkets $1,094 $3,091,098 0.0% $2,317 $2,761,367 0.1% ($1,223) $324,405 0.4

    AssetMgmt&CustodyBanks $1,696 $1,014,546 0.2% $2,247 $861,867 0.3% ($551) $152,143 0.4

    AffiliatedManagers 79 * 5,404 1.5% 226 2,573 9.6% (147) 2,831 4.9

    AmericanCapital 0 6,333 0.0% (33) 1,759 1.8% 33 4,574 0.7

    AmeripriseFinancial 162 135,300 0.1% 656 124,566 0.5% (494) 10,734 4.4

    ApolloInvestment 0 3,055 0.0% 0 1,192 0.0% 0 1,862 0.0

    AresCapital 33 * 4,944 0.7% 93 1,870 5.2% (60) 3,074 1.9

    ArlingtonAssetInvestment 0 918 0.0% 0 708 0.0% 0 210 0.0

    ArtioGlobalInvestors 0 420 0.0% 0 256 0.0% 0 163 0.0

    BankofNewYorkMellon 793 305,499 0.3% 702 270,685 0.3% 91 34,814 0.3

    Blackrock 88 * 185,136 0.0% 252 160,630 0.2% (164) 24,506 0.7

    BlackrockKelsoCapital 0 1,033 0.0% (5) 310 1.5% 5 722 0.7

    CalamosAssetManagement 6 * 587 1.0% 17 160 11.5% (11) 427 2.5

    CapitalSouthwest 0 524 0.0% 0 4 0.0% 0 520 0.0

    CIFCDeerfield (8) 8,839 0.1% (53) 8,144 0.6% 45 695 6.9

    Cohen&Steers 0 294 0.0% 0 34 0.0% 0 259 0.0

    DiamondHillInvestmentGrp 0 37 0.0% 0 13 0.0% 0 25 0.0

    EatonVance 26 * 1,833 1.4% 75 1,286 6.2% (49) 547 8.2

    EdelmanFinancialGroup 0 347 0.0% 0 85 0.0% 0 262 0.0

    EpochHolding 0 61 0.1% 0 * 8 0.2% 0 52 0.1

    FederatedInvestors 0 1,120 0.0% 0 590 0.0% 0 530 0.0

    FifthStreetFinance 0 996 0.0% 0 284 0.0% 0 712 0.0

    FinancialEngines 0 234 0.0% 0 31 0.0% 0 203 0.0

    FranklinResources 18 12,845 0.1% 26 4,404 0.6% (8) 8,441 0.1

    GamcoInvestors 0 811 0.0% (1) 364 0.3% 1 447 0.3

    GladstoneCapital 0 273 0.0% 0 37 0.0% 0 235 0.0

    GladstoneInvestment 0 213 0.0% 0 27 0.0% 0 186 0.0

    GolubCapital 1 * 461 0.3% 4 201 1.8% (2) 260 0.9

    Harris&HarrisGroup 0 173 0.0% 0 5 0.0% 0 168 0.0

    HerculesTechGrowthCap 3 * 695 0.5% 10 277 3.7% (6) 417 1.5

    ICGGroup 0 289 0.0% 0 45 0.0% 0 244 0.0

    Invesco 16

    * 20,931

    0.1% 44

    11,762

    0.4% (29) 9,169

    0.3JanusCapitalGroup 17 * 2,686 0.6% 47 1,346 3.6% (31) 1,340 2.2

    KohlbergCapital 1 * 262 0.3% 2 69 3.6% (2) 193 0.8

    LeggMason 49 * 8,573 0.6% 141 2,940 5.0% (92) 5,633 1.6

    MainStreetCapital 0 617 0.0% 0 283 0.0% 0 335 0.0

    MCGCapital 0 1,066 0.0% 0 532 0.0% 0 534 0.0

    MedallionFinancial 0 539 0.0% 0 373 0.0% 0 166 0.0

    MedleyCapital 0 218 0.0% 0 2 0.0% 0 216 0.0

    MVCCapital 0 489 0.0% 0 74 0.0% 0 414 0.0

    NewMountainFinance 0 631 0.0% 0 190 0.0% 0 441 0.0

    NGPCapitalResources 0 290 0.0% 0 82 0.0% 0 208 0.0

    NorthernTrust 157 97,555 0.2% (117) 90,256 0.1% 274 7,300 3.9

    PennantParkInvestment 0 775 0.0% 0 261 0.0% 0 514 0.0

    Price(T.Rowe)** 1 * 3,884 0.0% 3 473 0.7% (2) 3,411 0.1

    ProspectCapital 0

    1,076

    0.0% 0

    173

    0.0% 0

    903

    0.0PzenaInvestmentMgmt 0 66 0.0% 0 22 0.0% 0 43 0.0

    SafeguardScientifics 0 415 0.0% 0 57 0.0% 0 358 0.0

    SEIInvestments 0 1,331 0.0% 0 244 0.0% 0 1,087 0.0

    SolarCapital 0 1,401 0.0% 0 554 0.0% 0 846 0.0

    StateStreet 253 190,708 0.1% 156 170,777 0.1% 97 19,431 0.5

    THLCredit 0 269 0.0% 0 3 0.0% 0 266 0.0

    TICCCapital 0 330 0.0% 0 8 0.0% 0 322 0.0

    TriangleCapital 0 487 0.0% 0 230 0.0% 0 257 0.0

    VirtusInvestment 0 151 0.0% 0 63 0.0% 0 53 0.0

    Waddell&Reed 0 * 1,045 0.0% 1 531 0.3% (1) 515 0.2

    WestwoodHoldingsGroup 0 81 0.0% 0 14 0.0% 0 67 0.0

  • 7/30/2019 V20_11 Financial Institutions Fair Value Survey

    12/20

    -12-

    ($inmillions) Assets: Liabilities: Equity:

    NetFV

    Marks

    Adjustedfor

    FVMarks

    FV

    Marks/

    Reported

    NetFV

    Marks

    Adjusted

    forFV

    Marks

    FV

    Marks/

    Reported

    NetFV

    Marks

    Adjustedfor

    FVMarks

    F

    Marks

    Reporte

    DiversifiedCapitalMarkets $0 $1,031 0.0% $0 $771 0.0% $0 $260 0.0

    HFF 0 384 0.0% 0 278 0.0% 0 106 0.0

    JMPGroup 0 648 0.0% 0 493 0.0% 0 154 0.0

    Invst.Banking&Brokerage ($602) $2,075,521 0.0% $70 $1,898,729 0.0% ($672) $172,002 0.4

    BGCPartners 0 1,829 0.0% 0 1,378 0.0% 0 452 0.0

    CowenGroup 0 1,793 0.0% 0 1,041 0.0% 0 752 0.0Duff&Phelps 0 536 0.0% 0 183 0.0% 0 353 0.0

    ETradeFinancial (708) 46,276 1.5% 376 42,548 0.9% (1,085) 3,728 22.5

    EvercorePartners 7 * 1,049 0.7% 20 562 3.7% (13) 487 2.6

    FBR&Co 0 412 0.0% 0 128 0.0% 0 284 0.0

    FXCM 0 1,250 0.0% 0 976 0.0% 0 274 0.0

    GFIGroup 2 * 1,665 0.1% 7 1,178 0.6% (4) 487 0.9

    Gleacher&Company 0 1,821 0.0% 0 1,477 0.0% 0 344 0.0

    GoldmanSachsGroup 0 936,910 0.0% 0 863,362 0.0% 0 70,448 0.0

    Greenhill&Co 0 473 0.0% 0 109 0.0% 0 317 0.0

    INTLFCStone 0 2,272 0.0% 0 2,000 0.0% 0 272 0.0

    InvestmentTechnologyGp 0 3,803 0.0% 0 3,124 0.0% 0 679 0.0

    JefferiesGroup 0 40,967 0.0% 0 37,142 0.0% 0 3,824 0.0

    KBW 0 626 0.0% 0 192 0.0% 0 434 0.0

    KnightCapitalGroup 0 6,427 0.0% 0 5,001 0.0% 0 1,426 0.0LadenburgThalmannFinlServ 0 110 0.0% 0 61 0.0% 0 49 0.0

    Lazard 39 * 3,120 1.3% 111 2,334 5.0% (72) 786 8.4

    LPLInvestmentHoldings 1 3,664 0.0% 2 2,401 0.1% (1) 1,262 0.1

    MFGlobalHoldings 0 44,832 0.0% 0 43,324 0.0% 0 1,377 0.0

    MorganStanley 0 830,747 0.0% (650) 761,954 0.1% 650 67,285 1.0

    OppenheimerHoldings 0 3,624 0.0% 0 3,124 0.0% 0 496 0.0

    OptionsxpressHoldings 0 1,617 0.0% 0 1,487 0.0% 0 129 0.0

    PiperJaffray 0 2,222 0.0% 0 1,359 0.0% 0 863 0.0

    RaymondJamesFinancial 34 15,318 0.2% 64 12,529 0.5% (30) 2,789 1.1

    Schwab(Charles) 12 97,584 0.0% 137 90,975 0.2% (125) 6,609 1.9

    StifelFinancial 1 4,515 0.0% (27) 3,190 0.8% 28 1,325 2.2

    SWSGroup 0 4,293 0.0% 0 3,933 0.0% 0 360 0.0

    TDAmeritradeHolding 11 * 15,768 0.1% 30 11,656 0.3% (20) 4,112 0.5

    CommercialBanks ($10,621) $3,745,377

    0.3% $14,207

    $3,344,865

    0.4% ($24,828) $374,127

    6.2

    DiversifiedBanks ($2,079) $1,639,943 0.1% $6,347 $1,470,167 0.4% ($8,426) $156,660 5.1

    BancoLatinoamericanoDeCom 0 5,807 0.0% 0 5,071 0.0% 0 736 0.0

    Comerica 81 54,222 0.1% (16) 48,087 0.0% 97 6,135 1.6

    EncoreBancshares 33 1,500 2.3% 25 1,320 1.9% 8 150 5.9

    USBancorp 2,051 322,925 0.6% 1,497 289,030 0.5% 554 31,289 1.8

    WellsFargo (4,245) 1,255,489 0.3% 4,841 1,126,659 0.4% (9,086) 118,349 7.1

    RegionalBanks ($8,542) $2,105,434 0.4% $7,860 $1,874,698 0.4% ($16,402) $217,467 7.0

    1stSource 123 4,478 2.8% 60 3,910 1.6% 62 568 12.3

    1stUnitedBancorp (3) 1,258 0.2% (1) 1,047 0.1% (2) 211 0.8

    AllianceFinancial 39 1,515 2.7% 12 1,347 0.9% 27 167 19.4

    AmerisBancorp 6 2,863 0.2% 4 2,584 0.1% 3 229 1.2

    AmesNational 2 1,003 0.2% 4 875 0.5% (2) 128 1.7

    ArrowFinancial 32 1,934 1.7% 19 1,757 1.1% 13 177 7.9

    AssociatedBancCorp (1,006) 21,042 4.6% 94 19,143 0.5% (1,100) 1,641 40.1Bancfirst 24 5,292 0.5% 35 4,832 0.7% (10) 460 2.2

    Bancorp (20) 2,446 0.8% (4) 2,199 0.2% (16) 246 6.0

    BancorpRhodeIsland 17 1,635 1.0% 29 1,514 1.9% (12) 121 9.0

    Bancorpsouth 53 13,420 0.4% 56 12,176 0.5% (3) 1,244 0.2

    BankKYFinancial (3) 1,598 0.2% (2) 1,434 0.1% (2) 148 1.1

    BankofHawaii 315 13,476 2.4% 117 12,275 1.0% 198 1,201 19.7

    BankofMarinBancorp 18 1,355 1.3% 8 1,217 0.7% 10 139 7.5

    BankoftheOzarks 4 4,030 0.1% 38 3,676 1.1% (35) 354 8.9

    Banner (3) 4,203 0.1% (91) 3,604 2.5% 87 479 22.3

    BB&T (1,017) 158,293 0.6% (1,401) 140,861 1.0% 384 17,433 2.2

    BOKFinancial 213 24,451 0.9% 97 21,643 0.4% 116 2,808 4.3

  • 7/30/2019 V20_11 Financial Institutions Fair Value Survey

    13/20

    -13-

    ($inmillions) Assets: Liabilities: Equity:

    NetFV

    Marks

    Adjustedfor

    FVMarks

    FV

    Marks/

    Reported

    NetFV

    Marks

    Adjusted

    forFV

    Marks

    FV

    Marks/

    Reported

    NetFV

    Marks

    Adjustedfor

    FVMarks

    F

    Marks

    Reporte

    RegionalBanks(contd)

    BostonPrivateFinlHoldings 61 6,098 1.0% 28 5,505 0.5% 33 535 6.5

    BridgeBancorp 26 1,219 2.2% 10 1,125 0.9% 16 94 20.6

    BridgeCapitalHoldings (6) 1,028 0.6% 14 925 1.6% (21) 103 16.7

    BrynMawrBank 25 1,766 1.4% 11 1,568 0.7% 14 197 7.5

    CamdenNational 26 2,357 1.1% 22 2,135 1.0% 4 222 1.9CapeBancorp 10 1,078 0.9% 9 932 1.0% 1 146 0.7

    CapitalCityBankGroup (63) 2,536 2.4% 1 2,340 0.1% (64) 196 24.7

    Capitalsource 105 9,420 1.1% (77) 7,128 1.1% 182 2,292 8.6

    CardinalFinancial 30 2,195 1.4% 33 1,960 1.7% (3) 235 1.2

    CascadeBancorp 13 1,575 0.8% 10 1,360 0.7% 3 216 1.5

    CathayGeneralBancorp 36 10,571 0.3% 110 9,164 1.2% (75) 1,158 6.1

    CenterBancorp 5 1,313 0.4% 11 1,188 0.9% (6) 115 4.7

    CenterFinancial (7) 2,262 0.3% (27) 1,956 1.4% 21 252 8.9

    CenterstateBanks 8 2,165 0.4% 4 1,910 0.2% 4 255 1.7

    CentralPacificFinancialCp (77) 4,055 1.9% (76) 3,622 2.1% (0) 433 0.1

    CenturyBancorp 0 2,598 0.0% 0 2,443 0.0% 0 155 0.0

    ChemicalFinancial 3 5,207 0.0% 25 4,658 0.5% (22) 548 3.9

    CITGroup 722 48,732 1.5% 1,901 40,968 4.9% (1,179) 7,764 13.2

    Citizens&Northern 12 1,322 0.9% 25 1,181 2.2% (13) 140 8.6CityHoldingCo 36 2,749 1.3% (33) 2,371 1.4% 68 379 22.1

    CityNational 296 22,822 1.3% 135 20,533 0.7% 161 2,289 7.6

    CNBFinancial 21 1,513 1.4% 6 1,375 0.5% 15 137 12.3

    CobizFinancial (3) 2,415 0.1% (2) 2,208 0.1% (2) 207 0.9

    ColumbiaBankingSystem 266 4,695 6.0% 76 3,777 2.0% 190 918 26.1

    CommerceBancshares 120 19,691 0.6% 60 17,499 0.3% 60 2,192 2.8

    CommunityBankSystem 38 6,428 0.6% 81 5,741 1.4% (43) 687 5.9

    CommunityTrustBancorp 7 3,491 0.2% (16) 3,116 0.5% 23 375 6.6

    Cullen/FrostBankers 49 18,528 0.3% 20 16,321 0.1% 30 2,206 1.4

    CVBFinancial 91 6,551 1.4% 60 5,836 1.0% 32 715 4.6

    EagleBancorp 1 2,355 0.0% 6 2,143 0.3% (5) 188 2.8

    EastWestBancorp (419) 21,454 1.9% (783) 18,860 4.0% 364 2,510 17.0

    EnterpriseBancorp (10) 1,461 0.7% 1 1,350 0.1% (11) 111 9.2

    EnterpriseFinlServicesCp 8 2,943 0.3% (14) 2,684 0.5% 22 226 10.6FNBCorp 70 9,927 0.7% 15 8,669 0.2% 55 1,258 4.6

    FifthThirdBancorp (729) 110,077 0.7% 695 98,899 0.7% (1,424) 10,780 11.7

    FinancialInstitutions 71 2,354 3.1% 22 2,071 1.1% 49 266 22.9

    FirstBancorp (37) 3,297 1.1% (25) 2,957 0.8% (13) 277 4.3

    FirstBancorpInc 10 1,427 0.7% (22) 1,240 1.7% 31 163 24.0

    FirstBusey 37 3,508 1.1% 21 3,062 0.7% 16 346 4.9

    FirstCitizensBancshares (69) 20,953 0.3% 63 19,274 0.3% (132) 1,678 7.3

    FirstCmntyBancshares 26 2,232 1.2% 28 1,932 1.5% (2) 281 0.8

    FirstCommonwlthFinl 31 5,722 0.5% (77) 4,853 1.6% 108 870 14.1

    FirstFinancial 0 2,502 0.0% 10 2,169 0.5% (10) 333 2.9

    FirstFinlBancorp (3) 6,038 0.1% 14 5,334 0.3% (18) 704 2.5

    FirstFinlBankshares 0 3,841 0.0% 2 3,365 0.0% (1) 477 0.2

    FirstHorizonNational (619) 24,435 2.5% (152) 22,221 0.7% (467) 2,214 17.4

    FirstInterstateBancsystem 1 7,204 0.0% 19 6,462 0.3% (18) 691 2.6FirstLongIsland 16 1,871 0.9% 23 1,704 1.4% (7) 167 4.2

    FirstMerchants 7 4,101 0.2% (23) 3,603 0.6% 29 430 7.4

    FirstMidwestBancorp 18 8,148 0.2% 4 6,992 0.1% 14 964 1.5

    Firstmerit (179) 14,169 1.2% 26 12,823 0.2% (205) 1,345 13.2

    FultonFinancial (4) 15,963 0.0% (45) 13,969 0.3% 41 1,994 2.1

    GermanAmericanBancorp 1 1,818 0.0% 5 1,663 0.3% (4) 156 2.7

    GlacierBancorp 52 7,031 0.7% (3) 6,111 0.0% 55 920 6.3

    GreatSouthernBancorp 5 3,423 0.1% 12 3,116 0.4% (8) 250 2.9

    HamptonRoadsBankshares 42 2,639 1.6% 9 2,445 0.4% 32 194 19.9

    HancockHoldingCo 338 20,095 1.7% 137 17,509 0.8% 200 2,587 8.4

    HanmiFinancial (7) 2,704 0.3% 10 2,522 0.4% (17) 181 8.6

  • 7/30/2019 V20_11 Financial Institutions Fair Value Survey

    14/20

    -14-

    ($inmillions) Assets: Liabilities: Equity:

    NetFV

    Marks

    Adjustedfor

    FVMarks

    FV

    Marks/

    Reported

    NetFV

    Marks

    Adjusted

    forFV

    Marks

    FV

    Marks/

    Reported

    NetFV

    Marks

    Adjustedfor

    FVMarks

    F

    Marks

    Reporte

    RegionalBanks(contd)

    HeartlandFinancialUSA (12) 3,999 0.3% (12) 3,653 0.3% 0 267 0.2

    HeritageCommerce 6 1,268 0.5% (1) 1,073 0.1% 7 136 5.4

    HeritageFinancial 22 1,361 1.6% 9 1,142 0.8% 13 219 6.4

    HomeBancshares (8) 3,686 0.2% 11 3,201 0.3% (20) 435 4.3

    HudsonValleyHolding 35 2,853 1.2% 11 2,533 0.4% 24 319 8.0HuntingtonBancshares (821) 52,229 1.5% 101 47,899 0.2% (922) 3,968 18.9

    Iberiabank (131) 11,322 1.1% (122) 9,824 1.2% (9) 1,498 0.6

    IndependentBank 18 4,861 0.4% 4 4,391 0.1% 14 470 3.1

    IntlBancshares (22) 11,799 0.2% 81 10,339 0.8% (102) 1,250 7.6

    InvestorsBancorp 47 10,253 0.5% 105 9,372 1.1% (58) 881 6.2

    Keycorp (252) 88,530 0.3% 735 79,780 0.9% (987) 8,459 10.5

    LakelandBancorp 12 2,753 0.4% 17 2,508 0.7% (5) 227 2.3

    LakelandFinancial 3 2,738 0.1% 12 2,487 0.5% (9) 250 3.4

    M&TBank** (21) 77,706 0.0% 186 68,669 0.3% (207) 8,176 2.5

    MainsourceFinlGroup (20) 2,800 0.7% (10) 2,491 0.4% (11) 252 4.1

    MBFinancial (50) 9,928 0.5% (28) 8,605 0.3% (22) 1,129 1.9

    MerchantsBancshares 17 1,448 1.2% 4 1,330 0.3% 13 118 12.2

    MetroBancorp (16) 2,371 0.7% (7) 2,163 0.3% (9) 208 4.1

    MidsouthBancorp 7 1,056 0.7% 4 914 0.4% 4 123 3.0NBTBancorp 82 5,419 1.5% 73 4,875 1.5% 9 545 1.7

    NaraBancorp 41 3,008 1.4% 26 2,621 1.0% 15 322 4.7

    NationalBankshares (7) 1,028 0.7% (4) 894 0.5% (3) 134 1.9

    NationalPennBancshares 11 8,644 0.1% 89 7,589 1.2% (78) 1,055 6.9

    NorthfieldBancorp 28 2,336 1.2% 24 1,934 1.3% 4 402 1.1

    OldNationalBancorp 204 8,223 2.5% 108 7,119 1.5% 96 1,104 9.5

    OmniAmericanBancorp 11 1,339 0.9% 10 1,137 0.9% 2 203 0.8

    OrientalFinancialGroup 55 7,137 0.8% 135 6,494 2.1% (81) 576 12.3

    OrrstownFinancialServices (24) 1,508 1.6% 6 1,384 0.4% (29) 124 19.2

    PacificCapitalBancorp 18 5,854 0.3% 22 5,154 0.4% (4) 700 0.6

    PacificContinental (7) 1,222 0.6% (3) 1,048 0.3% (3) 174 1.9

    PacwestBancorp 6 5,401 0.1% 39 4,921 0.8% (32) 480 6.3

    ParkNational 39 7,368 0.5% 70 6,651 1.1% (30) 620 4.7

    ParkSterling (3) 608 0.5% 0 437 0.0% (3) 171 1.6PennsWoodsBancorp (6) 739 0.8% (8) 663 1.2% 2 76 2.4

    PeoplesBancorp (51) 1,752 2.8% 24 1,609 1.5% (75) 125 37.5

    PinnacleFinlPartners (5) 4,827 0.1% (55) 4,077 1.3% 51 658 8.3

    PNCFinancial 3,252 266,369 1.2% 2,761 231,005 1.2% 491 34,716 1.4

    Popular (2,067) 36,946 5.3% 169 35,219 0.5% (2,236) 1,677 57.1

    PrivateBancorp (294) 11,822 2.4% 18 10,873 0.2% (312) 709 30.6

    ProsperityBancshares 126 9,784 1.3% 49 8,194 0.6% 78 1,589 5.1

    RegionsFinancial (5,174) 125,734 4.0% 359 114,379 0.3% (5,533) 7,956 41.0

    Renasant (22) 4,237 0.5% (38) 3,742 1.0% 16 496 3.3

    RepublicBancorp 67 3,172 2.2% 49 2,707 1.8% 19 465 4.2

    S&TBancorp (13) 4,045 0.3% 11 3,477 0.3% (24) 462 5.0

    SYBancorp 20 1,964 1.0% 18 1,782 1.0% 2 181 1.4

    SandySpringBancorp (66) 3,546 1.8% 15 3,204 0.5% (81) 342 19.2

    SCBTFinancial (94) 3,746 2.4% 10 3,479 0.3% (104) 267 28.1SeacoastBanking 4 2,087 0.2% (16) 1,896 0.8% 20 144 16.0

    SierraBancorp 29 1,375 2.1% (1) 1,179 0.1% 30 195 18.1

    SignatureBank 0 13,085 0.0% 0 12,028 0.0% 0 1,057 0.0

    SimmonsFirstNational 2 3,266 0.1% 13 2,872 0.5% (11) 393 2.6

    SouthsideBancshares 21 3,136 0.7% 11 2,882 0.4% 10 254 4.0

    SouthwestBancorp (87) 2,574 3.3% (66) 2,218 2.9% (21) 288 6.9

    StateBancorp 8 1,634 0.5% (59) 1,406 4.0% 67 192 53.9

    StateBankFinancial 171 2,937 6.2% 62 2,453 2.6% 109 484 29.1

    Stellarone (117) 2,819 4.0% 10 2,520 0.4% (127) 277 31.4

    SterlingBancorp 18 2,600 0.7% 8 2,371 0.4% 9 228 4.2

    SterlingFinancial (239) 9,003 2.6% (238) 8,196 2.8% (1) 807 0.1

  • 7/30/2019 V20_11 Financial Institutions Fair Value Survey

    15/20

    -15-

    ($inmillions) Assets: Liabilities: Equity:

    NetFV

    Marks

    Adjustedfor

    FVMarks

    FV

    Marks/

    Reported

    NetFV

    Marks

    Adjusted

    forFV

    Marks

    FV

    Marks/

    Reported

    NetFV

    Marks

    Adjustedfor

    FVMarks

    F

    Marks

    Reporte

    RegionalBanks(contd)

    SunBancorp (165) 3,049 5.1% 5 2,920 0.2% (170) 129 56.9

    SuntrustBanks (3,002) 169,171 1.7% 89 152,602 0.1% (3,091) 16,397 15.9

    SusquehannaBancshares (104) 14,054 0.7% (138) 11,997 1.1% 34 2,057 1.7

    SVBFinancialGroup 40 19,406 0.2% 23 17,373 0.1% 17 2,033 0.8

    SynovusFinancial (23) 28,291 0.1% (11) 25,451 0.0% (11) 1,897 0.6TaylorCapitalGroup (6) 4,389 0.1% (11) 4,141 0.3% 5 109 4.9

    TCFFinancial 96 18,931 0.5% 442 17,506 2.6% (345) 1,424 19.5

    TexasCapitalBancshares 8 6,717 0.1% 13 6,159 0.2% (5) 559 0.9

    TompkinsFinancial 47 3,334 1.4% 35 3,022 1.2% 12 312 4.0

    TowerBancorp 12 2,538 0.5% (13) 2,257 0.6% 25 281 9.6

    TricoBancshares 65 2,241 3.0% 14 1,986 0.7% 50 255 24.6

    Trustmark 58 9,757 0.6% 9 8,515 0.1% 49 1,242 4.1

    UMBFinancial 78 12,849 0.6% 34 11,672 0.3% 44 1,177 3.8

    UmpquaHoldings 85 11,545 0.7% 23 9,808 0.2% 62 1,737 3.7

    UnionFirstMarketBankshares 14 3,866 0.4% 2 3,411 0.1% 12 420 3.0

    UnitedBankshares (44) 7,090 0.6% 32 6,362 0.5% (76) 728 9.4

    UnitedCommunityBanks (95) 7,314 1.3% (15) 6,534 0.2% (80) 587 12.0

    UnivestCorpofPA 62 2,120 3.0% (11) 1,774 0.6% 73 346 26.8

    ValleyNationalBancorp 27 14,497 0.2% 353 13,512 2.7% (326) 985 24.9VirginiaCommerceBancorp 24 2,821 0.8% (2) 2,528 0.1% 26 227 12.9

    WashingtonBankingCo (17) 1,660 1.0% (12) 1,504 0.8% (5) 156 3.1

    WashingtonTrBancorp 70 3,006 2.4% 51 2,705 1.9% 19 301 6.9

    WebsterFinancial 138 17,945 0.8% 101 16,065 0.6% 38 1,851 2.1

    Wesbanco (81) 5,344 1.5% (13) 4,790 0.3% (69) 554 11.0

    WestBancorporation 6 1,267 0.5% 1 1,143 0.1% 5 124 4.1

    WestCoastBancorp (65) 2,398 2.6% (17) 2,160 0.8% (47) 217 17.9

    WestamericaBancorp 52 4,929 1.1% 20 4,348 0.5% 32 581 5.8

    WesternAllianceBancorp (156) 6,352 2.4% 8 5,901 0.1% (164) 319 33.9

    WilshireBancorp (3) 2,678 0.1% (1) 2,390 0.1% (1) 228 0.6

    WintrustFinancial 381 14,997 2.6% 139 13,282 1.1% 242 1,666 17.0

    ZionsBancorp (99) 51,262 0.2% 432 44,880 1.0% (531) 4,053 11.6

    ConsumerFinance ($912) $651,041 0.1% ($3,054) $585,428 0.5% $2,141 $65,048 3.4

    AdvanceAmerCashAdvance 0 * 413 0.0% 0 159 0.3% (0) 254 0.1AmericanExpress 1,050 * 148,846 0.7% 3,000 132,591 2.3% (1,950) 16,255 10.7

    CapitalOneFinancial 3,043 202,796 1.5% 1,573 172,645 0.9% 1,470 30,151 5.1

    CashAmericaIntl 60 * 1,564 4.0% 172 818 26.6% (112) 747 13.0

    CreditAcceptance 20 1,602 1.3% 26 1,166 2.3% (6) 436 1.3

    DiscoverFinancialServices 1,111 64,549 1.8% 1,786 57,700 3.2% (675) 6,849 9.0

    DollarFinancial 14 * 1,354 1.0% 40 1,128 3.7% (26) 226 10.3

    EZCorp 0 669 0.0% 0 75 0.0% 0 594 0.0

    FirstCashFinancialServices 0 371 0.0% 0 49 0.0% 0 323 0.0

    FirstMarblehead (1,901) 6,185 23.5% (2,327) 6,518 26.3% 427 (333) 56.2

    GreenDot 0 322 0.0% 0 111 0.0% 0 211 0.0

    ImperialHoldings 0 292 0.0% 0 71 0.0% 0 221 0.0

    Nelnet 797 25,669 3.2% 272 24,155 1.1% 525 1,514 53.1

    NetspendHoldings 0 267 0.0% 0 98 0.0% 0 169 0.0

    NicholasFinancial 0 231 0.0% 0 126 0.0% 0 106 0.0SLM (5,109) 195,248 2.5% (7,599) 187,746 3.9% 2,490 6,936 56.0

    WorldAcceptance 1 * 663 0.2% 3 272 1.1% (2) 390 0.5

    DiversifiedFinancialServices ($15,886) $6,605,875 0.2% $9,577 $5,992,984 0.2% ($25,462) $588,216 4.1

    MultiSectorHoldings $54 $10,906 0.5% $154 $3,090 5.3% ($100) $7,816 1.3

    CompassDiversifiedHoldings 0 976 0.0% 0 429 0.0% 0 547 0.0

    LeucadiaNational 54 * 9,246 0.6% 154 2,541 6.5% (100) 6,705 1.5

    PicoHoldings 0 684 0.0% 0 120 0.0% 0 564 0.0

    OtherDiversifiedFinlServices ($16,490) $6,448,219 0.3% $8,614 $5,889,623 0.1% ($25,104) $533,922 4.5

    BankofAmerica (13,000) 2,248,319 0.6% 14 2,039,157 0.0% (13,014) 192,600 6.3

    Citigroup (4,660) 1,951,966 0.2% 6,000 1,783,981 0.3% (10,660) 167,673 6.0

    JPMorganChase&Co 1,170 2,247,934 0.1% 2,600 2,066,485 0.1% (1,430) 173,649 0.8

  • 7/30/2019 V20_11 Financial Institutions Fair Value Survey

    16/20

  • 7/30/2019 V20_11 Financial Institutions Fair Value Survey

    17/20

    -17-

    ($inmillions) Assets: Liabilities: Equity:

    NetFV

    Marks

    Adjustedfor

    FVMarks

    FV

    Marks/

    Reported

    NetFV

    Marks

    Adjusted

    forFV

    Marks

    FV

    Marks/

    Reported

    NetFV

    Marks

    Adjustedfor

    FVMarks

    F

    Marks

    Reporte

    MultilineInsurance(contd)

    HoraceMannEducators 4 7,212 0.1% (172) 6,104 2.7% 176 1,108 18.9

    Loews 194 76,263 0.3% 544 53,130 1.0% (350) 23,133 1.5

    Unitrin 15 8,197 0.2% 43 6,089 0.7% (28) 2,108 1.3

    Property&CasualtyInsurance $2,504 $1,171,179 0.2% $4,153 $817,223 0.5% ($1,650) $353,460 0.5

    Ace 182 89,436 0.2% 435 65,576 0.7% (254) 23,860 1.1Alleghany 3 * 6,619 0.1% 10 3,596 0.3% (6) 3,023 0.2

    AlliedWorldAssurance 28 * 10,885 0.3% 80 7,893 1.0% (52) 2,992 1.7

    Allstate 345 129,368 0.3% (232) 109,998 0.2% 577 19,370 3.1

    AmericanSafetyInsHldg 0 1,265 0.0% 0 941 0.0% 0 328 0.0

    Amerisafe 28 1,180 2.4% 10 * 825 1.2% 18 355 5.3

    AmtrustFinancialServices 0 5,136 0.0% 0 4,262 0.0% 0 874 0.0

    ArgoGroupIntlHoldings 0 6,514 0.0% (79) 4,886 1.6% 79 1,627 5.1

    AspenInsuranceHoldings 0 9,517 0.0% 0 6,412 0.0% 0 3,105 0.0

    AssuredGuaranty 11 19,250 0.1% (451) 14,838 2.9% 461 4,411 11.7

    AxisCapitalHoldings 19 * 18,216 0.1% 55 12,919 0.4% (36) 4,797 0.7

    Baldwin&Lyons 0 884 0.0% 0 538 0.0% 0 345 0.0

    Berkley(WR) 39 18,234 0.2% 137 14,412 1.0% (99) 3,821 2.5

    BerkshireHathaway** 1,402 384,098 0.4% 3,387 219,299 1.6% (1,985) 164,799 1.2

    Chubb 100 * 51,542 0.2% 287 35,938 0.8% (187) 15,604 1.2CincinnatiFinancial 7 15,709 0.0% (16) 10,629 0.1% 23 5,080 0.4

    CNAFinancial 85 55,859 0.2% 228 44,189 0.5% (143) 11,670 1.2

    DonegalGroup 3 1,251 0.2% 1 * 866 0.1% 2 385 0.5

    EMCInsuranceGroup 0 1,221 0.0% (1) 857 0.1% 1 364 0.2

    EmployersHoldings 0 3,498 0.0% 0 2,999 0.0% 0 499 0.0

    ErieIndemnity 0 14,723 0.0% 0 8,341 0.0% 0 6,382 0.0

    FidelityNationalFinancial 0 7,835 0.0% 0 4,303 0.0% 0 3,532 0.0

    FirstAmericanFinancial 2 5,786 0.0% 3 3,759 0.1% (1) 2,027 0.1

    FPICInsuranceGroup 2 * 974 0.2% 6 710 0.8% (4) 263 1.4

    GlobalIndemnity 0 2,239 0.0% 0 1,295 0.0% 0 943 0.0

    HallmarkFinancialServices 0 747 0.0% (1) 527 0.1% 1 220 0.3

    HanoverInsuranceGroup 5 8,987 0.1% 15 6,511 0.2% (9) 2,476 0.4

    HarleysvilleGroup 8 3,248 0.2% 5 2,463 0.2% 3 784 0.3

    HilltopHoldings 1 948 0.1% (0) 306 0.1% 1 643 0.2InfinityProperty&Cas 5 * 1,905 0.3% 16 1,248 1.3% (10) 657 1.5

    Markel 30 * 11,495 0.3% 87 8,203 1.1% (56) 3,292 1.7

    MBIA (231) 31,437 0.7% (928) 28,835 3.1% 697 2,602 36.6

    MeadowbrookInsGroup 0 2,281 0.0% 0 1,708 0.0% 0 573 0.0

    MercuryGeneral 0 4,247 0.0% (0) 2,401 0.0% 0 1,846 0.0

    NationalInterstate 0 1,553 0.0% 0 1,222 0.0% 0 330 0.0

    NavigatorsGroup 0 3,656 0.0% 0 2,838 0.0% 0 818 0.0

    OldRepublicIntl 9 * 16,096 0.1% 26 12,141 0.2% (17) 3,955 0.4

    OnebeaconInsuranceGroup 4 * 5,578 0.1% 13 4,415 0.3% (8) 1,163 0.7

    Proassurance 17 4,943 0.3% 6 2,966 0.2% 11 1,977 0.5

    Progressive 60 * 21,867 0.3% 171 15,629 1.1% (111) 6,238 1.7

    RLI 0 2,730 0.0% 0 1,866 0.0% 0 864 0.0

    SafetyInsuranceGroup 0 1,467 0.0% 0 820 0.0% 0 646 0.0

    SeabrightHoldings 0 1,071 0.0% 0 730 0.0% 0 341 0.0SelectiveINSGroup 50 5,420 0.9% 21 4,290 0.5% 29 1,130 2.6

    StateAutoFinancial 4 2,828 0.1% 8 2,157 0.4% (4) 671 0.5

    StewartInformationServices 0 1,129 0.0% 0 673 0.0% 0 456 0.0

    TowerGroup 0 4,214 0.0% 0 3,110 0.0% 0 1,104 0.0

    Travelers 193 * 106,661 0.2% 550 82,010 0.7% (358) 24,651 1.4

    UnitedFire&Casualty 22 3,644 0.6% 61 2,978 2.1% (39) 666 5.5

    UniversalInsuranceHldgs 0 897 0.0% (3) 735 0.4% 3 161 2.1

    WhiteMtnsInsGroup 5 * 14,208 0.0% 15 10,002 0.2% (10) 4,206 0.2

    XLGroup 64 46,686 0.1% 232 36,154 0.6% (167) 10,531 1.6

    Reinsurance $669 $166,744 0.4% $293 $119,275 0.2% $376 $46,392 0.8

    AlterraCapitalHoldings 56 10,553 0.5% 28 7,733 0.4% 28 2,821 1.0

    ArchCapitalGroup 8 * 17,221 0.0% 22 12,794 0.2% (14) 4,102 0.3

    EnduranceSpecialtyHoldings 7 * 8,767 0.1% 20 6,110 0.3% (13) 2,640 0.5

  • 7/30/2019 V20_11 Financial Institutions Fair Value Survey

    18/20

    -18-

    ($inmillions) Assets: Liabilities: Equity:

    NetFV

    Marks

    Adjustedfor

    FVMarks

    FV

    Marks/

    Reported

    NetFV

    Marks

    Adjusted

    forFV

    Marks

    FV

    Marks/

    Reported

    NetFV

    Marks

    Adjustedfor

    FVMarks

    F

    Marks

    Reporte

    Reinsurance(contd)

    EnstarGroup 0 5,201 0.0% 0 3,855 0.0% 0 1,346 0.0

    EverestReGroup 0 19,004 0.0% (5) 12,846 0.0% 5 6,158 0.1

    FlagstoneReinsuranceHld 0 3,244 0.0% (12) 2,267 0.5% 12 976 1.2

    GreenlightCapitalRe 0 2,285 0.0% 0 1,515 0.0% 0 770 0.0

    MaidenHoldings 0 3,293 0.0% 0 2,534 0.0% 0 760 0.0MontpelierReHoldings 3 * 3,507 0.1% 8 1,891 0.4% (5) 1,465 0.3

    Partnerre 15 * 24,614 0.1% 42 18,009 0.2% (27) 6,569 0.4

    PlatinumUnderwritersHldg 0 4,682 0.0% 0 2,987 0.0% 0 1,696 0.0

    ReinsuranceGroupofAmerica 404 31,064 1.3% (200) 25,135 0.8% 604 5,929 11.4

    RenaissancereHoldings 5 * 8,171 0.1% 13 4,033 0.3% (8) 3,588 0.2

    TransatlanticHoldings 172 16,878 1.0% 378 12,850 3.0% (206) 4,028 4.9

    ValidusHoldings 0 8,260 0.0% 0 4,717 0.0% 0 3,543 0.0

    Thrifts&MortgageFinance $6,898 $359,018 2.0% $7,004 $313,183 2.3% ($106) $45,384 0.2

    AbingtonBancorp 4 1,181 0.4% (1) 960 0.1% 5 221 2.3

    AstoriaFinancial 533 17,653 3.1% 736 16,577 4.6% (203) 1,076 15.9

    BankMutual (27) 2,496 1.1% (56) 2,198 2.5% 29 298 10.9

    Bankfinancial 8 1,671 0.5% 4 1,416 0.3% 4 254 1.6

    Bankunited 242 11,088 2.2% 167 9,537 1.8% 75 1,551 5.1

    BeneficialMutualBancorp (39) 4,674 0.8% 9 4,098 0.2% (48) 576 7.7BerkshireHillsBancorp 6 3,231 0.2% 9 2,789 0.3% (3) 442 0.7

    BOFIHolding 32 1,693 1.9% 36 1,560 2.4% (5) 128 3.5

    BrooklineBancorp 50 3,165 1.6% 25 2,635 0.9% 26 530 5.1

    CapitolFederalFinl 205 9,938 2.1% 206 8,013 2.6% (1) 1,926 0.0

    CharterFinancial (15) 976 1.5% 17 871 2.0% (32) 105 23.2

    CliftonSavingsBancorp 33 1,169 2.9% 23 982 2.4% 10 186 5.4

    DimeCommunityBancshares 142 4,235 3.5% 99 3,844 2.6% 43 391 12.5

    DoralFinancial (106) 7,910 1.3% 125 7,277 1.8% (231) 281 45.1

    ESBFinancial 27 1,995 1.4% 23 1,812 1.3% 5 182 2.6

    ESSABancorp 21 1,115 1.9% 19 951 2.1% 2 164 1.1

    FederalAgricultureMtgCp 146 10,591 1.4% 203 10,128 2.1% (57) 406 12.4

    FirstDefianceFinancialCp 16 2,061 0.8% 15 1,792 0.8% 1 233 0.2

    FirstFinancialHoldings 42 3,344 1.3% 33 3,023 1.1% 10 321 3.1

    FirstNiagaraFinancial 48 30,937 0.2% 177 27,074 0.7% (129) 3,864 3.2FirstPactrustBancorp 12 894 1.3% 6 727 0.8% 6 167 3.8

    FlagstarBancorp (41) 12,622 0.3% (35) 11,453 0.3% (6) 1,169 0.5

    FlushingFinancial 121 4,444 2.8% 28 3,946 0.7% 93 498 22.9

    FoxChaseBancorp 5 1,093 0.5% 14 893 1.6% (9) 200 4.5

    FranklinFinancial 4 1,254 0.3% 1 1,121 0.1% 3 133 2.4

    HomeFederalBancorp 5 1,340 0.4% 7 1,144 0.6% (2) 196 1.1

    HudsonCityBancorp 2,510 54,289 4.8% 2,687 49,578 5.7% (177) 4,711 3.6

    KearnyFinancial 21 2,902 0.7% 43 2,447 1.8% (22) 455 4.6

    MeridianInterstateBancorp 26 1,950 1.3% 17 1,722 1.0% 9 228 4.0

    MGICInvestment 0 8,270 0.0% (54) 6,703 0.8% 54 1,566 3.5

    NewYorkCmntyBancorp 821 41,423 2.0% 1,339 36,381 3.8% (518) 5,042 9.3

    NorthwestBancshares 343 8,430 4.2% 161 7,021 2.3% 182 1,409 14.8

    OceanfirstFinancial 23 2,262 1.0% 16 2,042 0.8% 7 221 3.4

    OcwenFinancial 1 2,290 0.0% 8 1,341 0.6% (7) 949 0.7

    OritaniFinancial 110 2,679 4.3% 66 1,993 3.4% 44 686 6.9

    People'sUnitedFinl 451 25,773 1.8% 192 20,321 1.0% 258 5,452 5.0

    PMIGroup 0 4,014 0.0% 0 3,824 0.0% 0 191 0.0

    ProvidentFinancialServices 204 7,083 3.0% 95 6,036 1.6% 109 1,048 11.6

    ProvidentNewYorkBancorp 23 2,943 0.8% 51 2,550 2.0% (27) 393 6.5

    RadianGroup 23 6,951 0.3% 57 5,856 1.0% (34) 1,095 3.0

    RockvilleFinancial 16 1,763 0.9% 14 1,429 1.0% 2 335 0.7

    RomaFinancial 26 1,917 1.4% 23 1,699 1.4% 3 219 1.3

    TerritorialBancorp 52 1,540 3.5% 24 1,290 1.9% 28 251 12.7

  • 7/30/2019 V20_11 Financial Institutions Fair Value Survey

    19/20

    -19-

    ($inmillions) Assets: Liabilities: Equity:

    NetFV

    Marks

    Adjustedfor

    FVMarks

    FV

    Marks/

    Reported

    NetFV

    Marks

    Adjusted

    forFV

    Marks

    FV

    Marks/

    Reported

    NetFV

    Marks

    Adjustedfor

    FVMarks

    F

    Marks

    Reporte

    Thrifts&MortgageFinance(contd)

    TFSFinancial 50 10,935 0.5% 154 9,286 1.7% (104) 1,649 5.9

    TrustcoBank 89 4,159 2.2% 34 3,835 0.9% 55 324 20.4

    UnitedFinancialBancorp 36 1,646 2.2% 19 1,401 1.4% 17 245 7.6

    ViewpointFinancialGroup 33 2,997 1.1% (38) 2,519 1.5% 71 478 17.4

    Walker&Dunlop 0 681 0.0% 0 535 0.0% 0 146 0.0WashingtonFed 547 13,936 4.1% 229 11,780 2.0% 319 2,156 17.3

    WestfieldFinancial 5 1,245 0.4% 8 1,028 0.8% (4) 217 1.6

    WSFSFinancial 16 4,167 0.4% (29) 3,746 0.8% 45 421 11.9

    * Net FV Mark due to estimated deferred tax calculation.

    ** R.G. Associates, Inc. holding. See note on back page.

  • 7/30/2019 V20_11 Financial Institutions Fair Value Survey

    20/20

    R.G.Associates,Inc.

    201N.CharlesStreet,Suite806

    Baltimore,MD212014132

    Phone:(443)9774370

    Fax:(410)7832955

    Internet:[email protected]

    Website:www.accountingobserver.com

    NOTE:

    R.G.Associates,Inc.isregisteredasaninvestmentadviserwiththeStateofMaryland.NoprincipalsoremployeesR.G.Associates,Inc.haveperformedauditingorreviewengagementprocedurestothefinancialstatementsofanyofth

    companiesmentionedinthereport.NeitherR.G.Associates,Inc.,noritsprincipalsandemployees,areengagedinthepracti

    ofpublicaccountancynorhavetheyactedasindependentcertifiedpublicaccountantforanycompanywhichismentione

    herein.

    Thesereportsarebasedonsourceswhicharebelievedtobereliable,includingpubliclyavailabledocumentsfiledwi

    theSEC.However,noassuranceisprovidedthattheinformationiscompleteandaccuratenorisassuranceprovidedthata

    errorsdiscoveredlaterwillbecorrected.

    Nothinginthisreportistobeinterpretedasabuyorsellrecommendation.Theinformationhereinisprovided

    usersforassistanceinmakingtheirowninvestmentdecisions.

    R.G.Associates,Inc.,itsclients,and/oritsprincipalsandemployeesthereofmayhavepositionsinsecuritiesreferretohereinandmaymakepurchasesorsalesthereofwhilethisreportisincirculation.Atthetimeofthisreport,thesecompani

    representholdingsofR.G.Associates,Inc.clientsormanagement:

    3M CampbellSoup M&TBank Pepsico

    AbbottLabs ColgatePalmolive Manpower PriceAssociates,(T.Rowe)

    BadgerMeter DaimlerAG McGrawHill VFCorp.

    BectonDickinson DonaldsonCo.,Inc. Microsoft

    Bemis Corporation ExxonMobil Mirant