using biochar as a soil amendment for sustainable agriculture biochar symposium illinois sustainable...
TRANSCRIPT
Using Biochar as a Soil Amendment for Sustainable Agriculture
Biochar Symposium
Illinois Sustainable Technology Center (ISTC) June 9, 2011
W. Zheng
B.K. Sharma
K. Rajagopalan
Using Biochar as a Soil Amendment for Sustainable Agriculture
Illinois Sustainable Technology Center (ISTC)
Sustainable Agriculture Grant Program by Illinois Department of Agriculture
Grant #: SA 09-37 (2009-2010)
Project Goal
The objective of this project was to examine the potential use of biochar as a soil amendment in a typical corn field in Illinois as part of a larger goal of promoting sustainable agricultural practice. To achieve this goal, three tasks were undertaken in the project:
Biochar production and characterization: Biochar production through a low-temperature slow pyrolysis technique from a variety of waste biomass.
Removal of nutrients by biochar: The sorption kinetics and mechanisms of NH4
+ and PO43- removal by biochar were investigated.
Field trial to demonstrate the efficacy of biochar as a simple soil amendment as measured by crop yields and lowered fertilizer use in Illinois, which attempted to investigate if the use of biochar as a soil amendment could reduce chemical fertilizer use while at the same time maintaining or increasing crop yields.
Feedstock
The feedstocks used for biochar production in this study focused on three kinds of waste biomass:
Agricultural residues corn cobs corn stover;
Yard wastes walnut shells and wood chips;
By-products from bioenergydefatted dried distiller grains (DDGs)
Pyrolysis
SyngasH2, CO, CO2
Waste Biomass Pyrolysis
Bio-oil
Biochar
Pyrolysis is a most common thermochemical conversion process where biomass is heated in the absence of oxygen to yield a series of bioproducts: syngas; bio-oil; and biochar.
Schematic Diagram for Biochar Production in a Slow Pyrolyzer
.
ISTC Sustainable Biochar
Effect of Selected Feedstocks and Pyrolysis Conditions on Yields of Bioproducts
Biochar Feedstock Biochar (%) Bio-oil (%) Syngas (%)
ZW-1 Corn cob 32.2 % 45.6 % 22.2%
ZW-2 Corn stover 39.0 % 42.8 % 18.2 %
ZW-3 Defatted DDG 45.8 % 40.3 % 14.9 %
ZW-4 Pine cone 38.0 % 44.4 % 17.6 %
ZW-5 America chestnut shell
42.2 % 45.6 % 12.2 %
ZW-6-1* Wood chip 35.0 % 42.0 % 23.0 %
ZW-6-2* Wood chip 35.0 % 42.1 % 22.9 %
ZW-6-3* Wood chip 35.1 % 42.1 % 22.8 %
The yields of three bio-products produced from selected feedstocks under oxygen-limited condition for 60 min at 400 oC.*ZW-6-1, 2, and 3 refer to the feedstock pyrolyzed under 0, 2, and 5 L/min nitrogen flow.
250 300 350 400 450 500 55010
20
30
40
50
60
Syngas
Bio-oil
BiocharPr
oduc
t Yie
ld (
%)
Pyrolysis Temperature (oC)
Effect of Pyrolysis Temperature on the Yields of Bioproducts
Biochar Characterization on Physicochemical Properties
Feedstock Pyrolysis
Temperature
SSA
(m2/g)
% C % H % N % O (O+N)/C O/C H/C %
Moisture
%
Ash
Corn cob 250 OC 1.86 61.16 4.96 0.82 27.82 0.353 0.341 0.973 1.32 3.92
Corn cob 300 OC 2.42 70.54 4.19 0.81 19.06 0.213 0.203 0.713 1.3 4.1
Corn cob 350 OC 3.36 72.92 3.79 0.79 16.86 0.183 0.173 0.624 1.29 4.35
Corn cob 400 OC 4.70 75.23 3.37 0.82 14.11 0.150 0.141 0.538 1.35 5.12
Corn cob 450 OC 7.79 77.84 2.95 0.86 11.45 0.120 0.110 0.455 1.35 5.55
Corn cob 500 OC 17.08 80.85 2.5 0.97 8.87 0.093 0.082 0.371 1.25 5.56
Corn cob 550 OC 30.57 82.62 2.25 0.84 7.43 0.076 0.067 0.327 1.28 5.58
Wood pellet 750 OC 105.3 81.99 1.14 0.52 3.04 0.033 0.028 0.167 4.56 8.75
Wood chip 450 OC 12.96 70.44 2.67 1.11 13.86 0.161 0.148 0.455 1.69 10.23
Defatted DDG 400 OC 1.98 64.43 3.76 7.44 10.14 0.217 0.118 0.700 1.45 12.78
Corn stover 400 OC 4.69 55.98 3.4 0.43 18.16 0.250 0.243 0.729 1.28 20.75
Pine cone 400 OC 17.92 73.88 3.21 1.33 15.31 0.171 0.155 0.521 1.32 4.95
Activated carbon 988.4 91.1 0.9 0.28 5.71 0.050 0.047 0.119 1.12 0.89
Project Goal
The objective of this project was to examine the potential use of biochar as a soil amendment in a typical corn field in Illinois as part of a larger goal of promoting sustainable agricultural practice. To achieve this goal, three tasks were undertaken in the project:
Biochar production and characterization: Biochar production through a low-temperature slow pyrolysis technique from a variety of waste biomass.
Removal of nutrients by biochar: The sorption kinetics and mechanisms of NH4
+ and PO43- removal by biochar were investigated.
Field trial to demonstrate the efficacy of biochar as a simple soil amendment as measured by crop yields and lowered fertilizer use in Illinois, which attempted to investigate if the use of biochar as a soil amendment could reduce chemical fertilizer use while at the same time maintaining or increasing crop yields.
Sorption Capacities of NH4+ and PO4
3- on Selected Biochars and a Commercial Activated Carbon
Corn
cob-
400
Corn
stov
er-4
00
DDGs-40
0
Amer
ica c
hest
nut s
hell-4
00
Pine c
one-
400
Woo
d ch
ip-40
0
Woo
d ch
ip-45
0
Woo
d pe
llet-7
50
Activa
ted
cabo
n0
0.05
0.1
0.15
0.2
0.25
0.3
Ammounium ion Cs (mmol/g)
Corn
cob-
400
Corn
stov
er-4
00
DDGs-40
0
Amer
ica c
hest
nut s
hell-4
00
Pine c
one-
400
Woo
d ch
ip-40
0
Woo
d ch
ip-45
0
Woo
d pe
llet-7
50
Activa
ted
cabo
n0
0.05
0.1
0.15
0.2
0.25
0.3
0.35
Phosphate ion Cs (mmol/g)
NH4+
PO43-
Sorption Kinetics
0 10 20 30 40 50
0.7
0.8
0.9
1.0
Am
mon
ium
Ion
Con
cent
ratio
n (m
mol
/L)
Time (hrs)
Biochar produced from wood chip at 750 oC
Biochar produced from wood chip at 450 oC
0 10 20 30 40 500.3
0.4
0.5
0.6
0.7
0.8
0.9
1.0
Phos
phat
e Io
n C
once
ntra
tion
(mm
ol/L
)
Time (hrs)
Biochar produced from wood chip at 750 oC
Biochar produced from wood chip at 450 oC
NH4+
PO43-
Sorption Kinetics
To investigate the controlling mechanisms of sorption processes, e.g., mass transfer and chemical reaction, the data obtained from this study were analyzed using two kinetic equations: the pseudo-first order equation and the pseudo-second order equation:
where Qe and Qt are the amounts of nutrients sorbed (mmol/g) at equilibrium and at time t (h), k1 and k2 are sorption rate constants of pseudo-first order and pseudo-second order, respectively. The fit of these two models was checked by the linear plot of log (Qe-Qt) versus t and t/Qt versus t, respectively, and by comparison to the regression coefficients for each expression.
Pseudo-first order Pseudo-second order
k1
(h-1)
Qe (cal)
(mmol/g)
R2 k2
(mmol/g)-1h-1
Qe (cal)
(mmol/g)
R2
NH4+
Biochar-750 0.115 7.87 x 10-30.959 68.6 2.44 x 10-2
0.999
Biochar-450 0.105 1.41 x 10-20.992 28.9 3.14 x 10-2
0.995
PO43-
Biochar-750 0.119 6.05 x 10-20.984 1.23 8.61 x 10-2
0.932
Biochar-450 0.097 5.79 x 10-20.990 0.013 4.81 x 10-1
0.006
Sorption Kinetics
Pseudo-first order and pseudo-second order sorption rate constants of NH4+ and
PO43- on two selected biochars
Sorption Isotherms of NH4+ and PO4
3- on Selected Biochars
0 5 10 15 20 25 300.00
0.05
0.10
0.15
0.20 NH4
+
Cs (
mm
ol/g
)
Ce (mmol/L)
Biochar produced from wood pellet at 750 oC
Biochar produced from wood chip at 450 oC
0 5 10 15 20 25 300.0
0.1
0.2
0.3
0.4PO
4
3-
Cs (
mm
ol/
g)
Ce (mmol/L)
Biochar produced from wood pellet at 750 oC
Biochar produced from wood chip at 450 oC
NH4+
PO43-
Sorption Isotherm
Freundlich isotherm
log Cs = log Kf + 1/n log Ce
Langmuir isotherm
Ce/Qe = 1/(bQ0) + Ce/Q0
Kf
(mmol/g) (mmo/L)-n
1/n R2 Q0
(mmol/g)
b(L/mmol)
R2
NH4+
Biochar-750 2.56 x 10-2 0.650 0.971 0.246 0.108 0.933
Biochar-450 4.12 x 10-2 0.516 0.981 0.234 0.190 0.974
PO43-
Biochar-750 5.74 x 10-2 0.795 0.895 0.576 0.140 0.835
Biochar-450 3.60 x 10-2 0.933 0.873 0.787 0.047 0.270
0
10
20
30
40
50
Biochar with DI H
2O washing
Biochar no washing
Pho
spha
te r
emov
al (
%)
Removal Mechanisms of Phosphate & Ammonium by Biochar
Analyte Units
Biochar after DI H2O washing Biochar no washing
mg/L mg/L
Sodium* < 0.6 < 0.6
Potassium* 7.7 15
Calcium* 2.8 3.8
Beryllium < 0.002 < 0.002
Boron 0.089 0.094
Magnesium 1.5 2.3
Aluminum 0.075 0.084
Silicon 2.0 1.0
Titanium 0.0027 0.0022
Vanadium < 0.001 < 0.001
Chromium 0.0032 0.0033
Manganese 0.0077 0.0055
Iron* < 0.1 0.11
Zeta potential (ζ) -21.9±3.8 -22.3±6.9
Ca2+ + PO43-
+.xH20 → Ca3(PO4)2
.xH20
Precipitation process
Surface sorption
Biochar with negatively charged surface
Sorption Mechanism of Phosphate by Biochar
XAD patterns of before and after PO43- adsorption by biochar
Ca3(PO4)2.xH20
Ca2+ + PO43-
+.xH20 → Ca3(PO4)2
.xH20
Project Goal
The objective of this project was to examine the potential use of biochar as a soil amendment in a typical corn field in Illinois as part of a larger goal of promoting sustainable agricultural practice. To achieve this goal, three tasks were undertaken in the project:
Biochar production and characterization: Biochar production through a low-temperature slow pyrolysis technique from a variety of waste biomass.
Removal of nutrients by biochar: The sorption kinetics and mechanisms of NH4
+ and PO43- removal by biochar were investigated.
Field trial to demonstrate the efficacy of biochar as a simple soil amendment as measured by crop yields and lowered fertilizer use in Illinois, which attempted to investigate if the use of biochar as a soil amendment could reduce the application rates of chemical fertilizer while at the same time maintaining or increasing crop yields.
2010 Biochar Field Experiment Design
90 Feet and 36 rows
60
Feet
No Fertilizer Half Fertilizer Full Fertilizer No Fertilizer Half Fertilizer Full Fertilizer
10 feet x 0.66 feet used for biochar treatments
Biochar Application in a Corn Field
Biochar Application in Corn Field
Standard corn growing practices
http://www.istc.illinois.edu/research/biochar.cfm
ISTC Biochar Website
Biochar Application in Corn Field
0
40
80
120
160
200
240
280
Biochar-BControl
Yei
lds
of C
orn
Cro
p (b
ushe
l/acr
e)
Biochar-A
No Fertilizer 50% Fertilizer 100% Fertilizer
Nitrogen Fertilizer 0 50 % 100 %
No Biochar 139.3 a 174.3 a 173.0 a
Biochar-A 164.6 b 213.7 b 239.8 b
Biochar-B 170.9 b 194.2 b 201.3 a
Treatments SoilOrganic Matter
(%)
PhosphorusNeutral Ammonium Acetate
(exchangeable)
pH
Cation Exchange Capacity (CEC)
meq/100gNitrate-N
mg/kgP1
mg/kgP1
mg/kgK
mg/kgMg
mg/kgCa
mg/kgBefore experiment No fertilizer and no biochar 3.2 15 22 206 345 1953 5.8 16.3 19No fertilizer with biochar-A 3.6 19 23 326 274 1808 5.7 15.4 39No fertilizer with biochar-B 4.1 20 28 218 349 2046 5.7 17.3 35
50% fertilizer and no biochar 4.2 19 32 180 438 2340 5.6 20.7 32
50% fertilizer with biochar-A 4.7 27 42 358 406 2474 5.6 19.0 33
50% fertilizer with biochar-B 4.0 21 31 251 362 1986 5.2 20.8 67
100% fertilizer and no biochar 4.6 12 17 172 527 2617 6.0 21.1 34
100%fertilizer with biochar-A 4.6 22 43 195 449 2422 5.9 19.7 75
100% fertilizer with biochar-B 3.3 15 24 149 345 1878 5.4 17.6 74After experiment (at harvest)No fertilizer and no biochar 3.9 20 30 198 310 1906 5.4 15.2 21No fertilizer with biochar-A 5.0 33 46 259 318 2105 6.1 16.1 12No fertilizer with biochar-B 4.5 19 31 166 329 1915 5.8 20.1 21
50% fertilizer and no biochar 4.5 22 38 176 366 2234 5.5 18.3 32
50% fertilizer with biochar-A 5.5 40 74 342 313 2298 6.2 19.0 29
50% fertilizer with biochar-B 4.8 29 47 179 324 2077 6.1 21.3 25
100% fertilizer and no biochar 4.2 14 21 175 456 2398 5.8 17.7 58
100%fertilizer with biochar-A 5.1 35 60 239 403 2308 6.5 22.6 13
100% fertilizer with biochar-B 4.9 27 39 221 376 2247 5.9 20.9 56
Selected Soil Properties Before and After Experiments
Colleagues
Dr. Rajagopanlan, K. Dr. Kulkarni, M. Dr. Marlin, J. Monte Wilcoxon Joe Pickowitz Ed Zaborski
Dr. Sharma, B.K. John Scott Dr. Li, X. Christie Teausant Nancy Holm Brent Panno
AcknowledgmentsThis study is being supported by Illinois Department of Agriculture’s Sustainable
Agriculture Grant Program
Questions
Stay on the Stage