u.s. air force capital investment programs - c.ymcdn.com · us air force capital investment...
TRANSCRIPT
I n t e g r i t y - S e r v i c e - E x c e l l e n c e
Headquarters U.S. Air Force
US Air ForceCapital Investment Programs
1
Robert Gill, P.E.Office of the Air Force Civil Engineer
Facility Management DivisionHQ USAF/A7CF7 January, 2013
I n t e g r i t y - S e r v i c e - E x c e l l e n c e
Overview
Strategic Landscape
AF Priorities
AF Civil Engineer Organization
Funding Profiles
FY12/13 MILCON
MILCON Initiatives
Construction Acquisition
2
I n t e g r i t y - S e r v i c e - E x c e l l e n c e…In a Fiscally-Constrained Environment
Defense Strategic Guidance
“I do not believe that we have to choose between our national security and our fiscal security…We have made America safer, but we must not rest until we have made America safe—today and tomorrow.”
– Secretary of Defense Leon Panetta, 20 Nov 12
Prevail in today’s wars
Deter and defeat aggression
Effectively operate in Cyberspace, Space, and across all domains
Maintain a safe and effective nuclear deterrent
Protect the homeland
Preserve the force…avoid hollowing out the force
3
I n t e g r i t y - S e r v i c e - E x c e l l e n c e
Air Force Priorities
Continue to Strengthen the Nuclear Enterprise
Partner With the Joint & Coalition Team to Win Today’s Fight
Develop and Care for Airmen & Their Families
Modernize Our Air and Space Inventories, Organizations and Training
Recapture Acquisition Excellence
Installations Underpin These Priorities and Contributions 4
Enduring Air Force Contributions Air & Space Superiority, Cyberspace Assurance Able to hold any target at risk Responsive intelligence, surveillance, and reconnaissance Able to rapidly move people and cargo anywhere in the world Command & Control to conduct operations rapidly, effectively, and efficiently
CSAF FocusWin the FightStrengthen the Team
Shape the Future
I n t e g r i t y - S e r v i c e - E x c e l l e n c e
Installations Enable Enduring Air Force Contributions
Installations Power projection platforms--
CONUS, OCONUS, expeditionary Enable air & space superiority Assure Cyberspace access Provide infrastructure necessary
to hold targets at risk anywhereacross the globe
Facilitate ISR exploitation Host robust C2 networks Build partnerships with allies &
developing nations by forwardbasing US forces
“Air bases are a determining factor in the success of air operations.The two-legged stool of men and planes would topple over without this equally important third leg.” General of the Air Force Henry H. “Hap” Arnold 5
I n t e g r i t y - S e r v i c e - E x c e l l e n c e
AF Civil Engineer Priorities
Build Ready EngineersProvide more effective Civil Engineer expeditionary and emergency response and management capabilities to meet current and emerging Air Force and CCDR requirements.
Build Sustainable InstallationsDevelop sustainable installations by implementing asset management principles for built and natural assets.
Build Great LeadersOrganize, develop, enable, and retain a trained and capable Total Force Civil Engineer team ready to meet current and emergent mission requirements
Our “Proud Heritage”… to a “Promising Future”
I n t e g r i t y - S e r v i c e - E x c e l l e n c e
Housing
AF Civil EngineersPrimary Functions
7
Installation Engineering
Emergency Services Environmental and Energy
Expeditionary EngineeringCE Strategic Plan
I n t e g r i t y - S e r v i c e - E x c e l l e n c e
$268B PRVNearly the GDP of Peru
10M Acres of LandTwice the size of
New Jersey
As of FY99/4
75,800 HomesArlington/Alexandria
Combined
69,500 Dorm Rooms1 ½ times Doubletree Hotels
Family Housing Air Force Installations Airfields
102 Million Square YardsCould pave a highway from
Philadelphia to Boston
Dormitories
Plant Replacement Value
626M Sq Ft of Buildings88 Microsoft Corporations
Facilities
8The Air Force Installation is a Force Enabler
AF Civil EngineersPhysical Plant Profile
8
I n t e g r i t y - S e r v i c e - E x c e l l e n c e
Offutt AFB
Tinker AFBAltus AFB
JB San Antonio (Lackland)
Scott AFB
Keesler AFB
Otis ANGB
Shaw AFB
Moody AFB
Tyndall AFB
JB Lewis‐McChord
Fairchild AFB
Beale AFB
Travis AFB
Vandenberg AFBEdwards AFBLos Angeles AFB
March ARB
Nellis AFB
Luke AFB
Davis‐Monthan AFB
Kirtland AFB
Cannon AFB
Holloman AFB
Hill AFB
Mountain Home AFB
Malmstrom AFB
FE Warren AFB
Buckley AFB
USAF AcademySchriever AFB
Peterson AFB
Minot AFB
Grand Forks AFB
Ellsworth AFB
McConnell AFB
Vance AFB
Sheppard AFBDyess AFB
Goodfellow AFB
Laughlin AFBJB San Antonio (Randolph)
Whiteman AFB
Little Rock AFB
Barksdale AFB
Columbus AFB
Grissom ARB
Arnold AFB
Maxwell AFB
Wright Patterson AFB
Hanscom AFBWestover ARB
JB McGuire‐Dix‐LakehurstDover AFB
JB Langley‐Eustis
Seymour Johnson AFB
Pope AFB
JB CharlestonDobbins ARB
Robins AFB
MacDill AFB
Patrick AFB
Eglin AFB
HurlburtField
JB Andrews
Selfridge ANGB
JB Anacostia‐Bolling
Eielson AFB
JB Elmendorf‐Richardson
Homestead ARB
9
Major AF InstallationsCONUS
Creech AFB
JB Pearl Harbor‐Hickam
McEntire JNGB
NAS JRB Fort Worth
Rickenbacker ANGB
Stewart ANGBVolk Field ANGB
I n t e g r i t y - S e r v i c e - E x c e l l e n c e 10
Major AF InstallatoinsUSAFE Locations
Sigonella
I n t e g r i t y - S e r v i c e - E x c e l l e n c e 11
Major AF InstallationsPACAF Locations
I n t e g r i t y - S e r v i c e - E x c e l l e n c e
0100200300400500600
FY08 FY09 FY10 FY11 FY12 FY13 FY14 FY15 FY16$M
(T
ota
l F
orc
e)
12
0
500
1,000
1,500
2,000
2,500
3,000
FY08 FY09 FY10 FY11 FY12 FY13 FY14 FY15 FY16
$M (T
otal
For
ce)
Operations & Maintenance Funding Profile
Facility Sustainment Restoration & Modernization
Environmental Quality
90% 90% 90% 93%80% 75% 77%
$M (T
otal
For
ce)
Facility Operations
PBFocus FundsMigration InMigration Out
73%73%
Funded to Compliance
0
500
1,000
1,500
2,000
FY08 FY09 FY10 FY11 FY12 FY13 FY14 FY15 FY16
-Dorms & Energy Focus Funds: FY10-15 -Airfield & Consolidation Focus Fund:
FY12 only
0
1,000
2,000
3,000
FY08 FY09 FY10 FY11 FY12 FY13 FY14 FY15 FY16
$M
(T
ota
l F
orc
e)
90% 99%91% 93%
83% 83% 83%96% 84%
80% Funding
I n t e g r i t y - S e r v i c e - E x c e l l e n c e
$0M$500M
$1,000M$1,500M$2,000M$2,500M$3,000M$3,500M
08 09 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17
AF PB COCOM Support Congressional Adds Supp / OCO ARRA
Enacted + FY12 PB FY13 PB
MILCONFunding Profile (Total Force)
As of 21 Sept 2011; includes Blue TOA only
13
I n t e g r i t y - S e r v i c e - E x c e l l e n c e
050
100150200250300350400
47%
32%
9%
11%
P&D * $18.6M P-341 $18.2M
F-22 Mission Facilities $14.8M Operations / Training / Support $57.7M
F-35 Mission Facilities $13.5M HC/C-130 Facilities $38.6M
B-52 Facilities $4.6M
Air Force Permanent Party Dorms $42.5M
Develop and Care for Airmen and Their Families $42.5M
STRATCOM Replacement Fac - Incr 2 $161.0M MQ-9 Mission Facilities $25.0M
Partner with the Joint and Coalition Team to Win Today’s Fight $186.0M
Continue to Strengthen the Nuclear Enterprise $4.6M
Modernize our Air, Space, & Cyberspace Inventories, Orgs &Trng $124.6M
Must Pay $36.8M$M
FY13 MILCON Requirements $394.5M
14
1%
I n t e g r i t y - S e r v i c e - E x c e l l e n c e
FY13 MILCONProjects
15
STATE BASE TITLEPROGRAM COST
($000)GEORGIA FORT STEWART AIR SUPPORT OPERATIONS CENTER 7250NORTH DAKOTA MINOT B‐52 Add/Alter Munitions AGE Facility 4600ARKANSAS LITTLE ROCK C‐130J FLIGHT SIMULATOR ADDITION 4178ARKANSAS LITTLE ROCK C‐130J FUEL SYSTEMS MAINTENANCE HANGAR 26000GREENLAND THULE DORMITORY (48 PN) 24500TEXAS LACKLAND DORMITORY (96 RM) 18000ITALY AVIANO F‐16 MISSION TRAINING CENTER 9400FLORIDA TYNDALL F‐22 ADD/ALT HANGAR FOR LOW OBSERVABLE/COMPOSITE REPAIR 14750UTAH HILL F‐35 ADAL Building 118 for Flight Simulator 4000UTAH HILL F‐35 ADAL HANGAR 45W/AMU 7250UTAH HILL F‐35A Modular Storage Magazines 2280GEORGIA MOODY HC‐130J SIMULATOR FACILITY 8500NEW MEXICO HOLLOMAN MQ‐9 MAINTENANCE HANGAR 25000UNKNOWN WORLDWIDE UNSPECIFIED SANITARY SEWER LIFT/PUMP STATION 2000NEBRASKA OFFUTT STRATCOM Replacement Fac ‐ Incr 2 161000GREENLAND THULE Thule Consolidation 1 39000
I n t e g r i t y - S e r v i c e - E x c e l l e n c e
“Deliberate pause" in FY13 MILCON investment Force structure adjustments under review - awaiting final
decisions Continued investment at minimum levels
Prevents mission stoppage Places highest priority on new mission bed down (e.g., F-35, F-22, MQ-9) Maintains incrementally funded projects supporting COCOM priorities
(e.g., STRATCOM, PACOM) Planning and Design scaled appropriately
Mitigation measures Sustainment maintained at 80% of FSM in FY13 Impacts to R&M accounts minimized
FY13 MILCONInvestment Strategy
16
I n t e g r i t y - S e r v i c e - E x c e l l e n c e
MILCON InitiativesCost Reduction
MILCON “Process” IPT (CM): Portfolio Approach to MILCON Planning & Programming Project Definition Acquisition Strategy Project Management Submittal Review & Approval Configuration Control
MILCON “Product” IPT (TD): Govt vs. Commercial Costs Legal / Regulatory Cost Drivers AT/FP Cost Drivers UFC, Design Guide Review Weapon System FRD Development Type II vs. Type V Construction Elmendorf After Action Report Lessons
Schedule 12 Aug – Finalize IPT CONOPS Aug/Sep – Meet w/ USACE, NAVFAC 30 Sep – Draft Findings/Recommendations 15 Dec – Brief POAM to AFCEE/CL 30 Dec – Brief POAM to AF/A7C Nov/Dec – Brief 2-Star Interface
AF/A7C: “Achieve 25% Reduction in MILCON Costs”
I n t e g r i t y - S e r v i c e - E x c e l l e n c e
MILCON Initiatives Process Improvement
Project Control: Project Management Playbook HAF-AFCEE MILCON Management Plan AFCEE Change Control Plan A7C Cost Control Policy Memo NexGen IT Configuration (Tririga)
AF-Agent InterfacesBIM-Tririga Interface
Strategic Communication: Annual AFCEE, Agent & MAJCOM PMRs Leadership for Execution, Awards and
Partnership (LEAP) Weekly Activity Report
Performance Measurement: PDRI
Tri-Service Ribbon Cutter Metrics
Composite Balanced Scorecard
Deliver Disciplined Execution…Every Time
I n t e g r i t y - S e r v i c e - E x c e l l e n c e
MILCON Initiatives Standardization
Standard RFPs: Child Dev Centers Security Forces Operations Permanent Party Dorms Fire Stations Fitness Centers Medium Body Aircraft – Hangar/Backshops Medium Body Aircraft – Squad Ops/AMU
Standard BIM Dynamic Prototypes: Building blocks for major facility types
Developing in parallel with Std RFPs
From D-B to “Adapt-Build” and “BIM-Build”
Standardized Project Definition: Standard Design Instructions Emphasis on project definition Robust site characterization efforts Minimize surprises
Reduce County Options…Get the Jump on Projects
I n t e g r i t y - S e r v i c e - E x c e l l e n c e
AFCEE Initiatives FY12/13 BIM-Build Projects
FY Agent Base Project TitlePA ($000) per
DD1391
Estimated Completion
Date Current Status
2012 Seattle FairchildWing
Headquarters$13,600,000 30‐Sep‐12
Initial draft RFP review meeting complete
2013 MobileCape
Canaveral
Range Communications
Facility$20,000,000 30‐Sep‐13 RFP design kick‐off meeting
complete
I n t e g r i t y - S e r v i c e - E x c e l l e n c e
AFCEC InitiativesFY12 Standardization
Project Title Std‐RFP DP/Std Dsgn*
CriteriaDoc
AF Corporate Facilities Standards Mar‐13Security Forces Operations Facility Mar‐13 Done DoneMilitary Working Dog Kennel Dec‐13 Jun‐13 w/DPDormitory Done Done DG DoneFitness Center Mar‐13 Done Update Sep‐13Visiting Quarters Mar‐13 Done UFC DoneFire Station Mar‐13 Mar‐13 UFC DoneChild Development Center Done Done Sep‐13KC‐46 Squad Ops / Life Support / AMU Mar‐13 Done DoneKC‐46 Hangars (3 types: MX, Fuel, Corrosion) Mar‐13 Done DoneKC‐46 Flight Simulator Mar‐13 Done DoneKC‐46 Fuselage/Boom Operator Trainer Mar‐13 Done Done
21
I n t e g r i t y - S e r v i c e - E x c e l l e n c e
AFCEC InitiativesFY13 Standardization
Project Title Std‐RFP DP/Std Dsgn
CriteriaDoc
Administrative Facility Sep‐13 Sep‐13 UFC DoneAir Traffic Control Tower / RAPCON Sep‐13 Sep‐13 Mar‐13Civil Engineer Squadron Facility Sep‐13 Sep‐13Consolidated Communications Facility Sep‐13 Sep‐13UAS ‐ Squadron Operations Facility Sep‐13 Sep‐13UAS ‐Maintenance Hangar/Shops Sep‐13 Sep‐13Fighter ‐Maintenance Hangar/Shops Sep‐13 Sep‐13Fighter ‐ Engine Maintenance Facility Sep‐13 Sep‐13AGE Maintenance/Storage Facility Sep‐13 Sep‐13Supply Operations & Warehouse Sep‐13 Sep‐13Wing Intel / SCIF Facility Sep‐13 Sep‐13Confinement Facility Sep‐13 Sep‐13Visitor Control Center Sep‐13 Sep‐13Vehicle Search Facility Sep‐13 Sep‐13
FY13 STATUS: All project SOWs complete, awaiting AE fee estimates
22
I n t e g r i t y - S e r v i c e - E x c e l l e n c e
AFCEC InitiativesFY14 Standardization Projected
Project Title Std‐RFP DP/Std Dsgn
CriteriaDoc
Vehicle Maintenance Facility Sep‐14 Sep‐14GOV Fuel Station & POL Operations Sep‐14 Sep‐14Consolidated Mission Support Facility Sep‐14 Sep‐14Munitions Storage Facility Sep‐14 Sep‐14Munitions Maintenance Facility Sep‐14 Sep‐14AMC Passenger Terminal Sep‐14 Sep‐14 AMC Guide DoneAMC Freight Terminal Sep‐14 Sep‐14AETC Technical Training Facility Sep‐14 Sep‐14AETC Flying Training Facility Sep‐14 Sep‐14Chapel Facility Sep‐14 Sep‐14 Update FC Sep‐14Community Center Sep‐14 Sep‐14Youth / Teen Center Sep‐14 Sep‐14 UFC Done
23
I n t e g r i t y - S e r v i c e - E x c e l l e n c e
MILCON Initiatives Energy Leadership
Add Value to Projects…Cost Effectively
MILCON Energy Mandates: Energy Policy Act of 2005 (EPAct 2005)
30% reduction over ASHRAE 90.1 (2007)
Energy Independence & Security Act, 2007 55% reduction in fossil fuel use by 2010
EO 13514 NetZero Buildings by 2030
New UFC consolidates Federal mandates and incorporates sections of ASHRAE 189.1
LEED Performance: FY09 LEED results… AF goal = 5% certified 46 Silver certification, 4 Gold certification 65% - eligible projects (50/76 projects)
FY10 LEED results AF goal = 10% certified 68 Silver certification, 5 Gold certification 100% - eligible projects (73/73 projects)
FY11+ LEED results…AF goal = 100% 100% - eligible projects
MILCON Energy Studies: FY 12: Analysis to achieve 40% reduction
5 Studies Building Envelope, Orientation, Renewables
FY13: Cost / Features to Achieve Net Zero 6 Studies Energy Generated = Energy Consumed Build on FY 12 Data; Rethink Building Process
I n t e g r i t y - S e r v i c e - E x c e l l e n c e
EPAct 05Performance Assessment
EPAct Mandate: 30% more energy efficient than ASHRAE 90.1-2007 baseline Energy intensity redux…where Life-Cycle Cost effective
FY12 Performance – met goal
100% compliant with a 10 CFR 433
81% of projects met /exceeded 30%
19% achieved less than 30%...but maximized reduction while meeting requirement to be Life Cycle Cost effective
Most projects in this category are medical, industrial, or electronic intensive facilities (e.g., cyber, intel, C2)
2540-50% doable…beyond that RE…but not yet LCC effective
I n t e g r i t y - S e r v i c e - E x c e l l e n c e
EISA 07Performance Assessment
EISA Mandate: 55% fossil fuel reduction by 2010 (2003 baseline)
65% by 2015; 80% by 2020; 90% by 2025; 100%by 2030
DOE to provide implementing guidance…none available yet
FY12 Performance – did not meet goal AF MILCON average = 32% reduction (ASHRAE 90.1)
Likely will need plant-level RE generation vs. “by-building” RE
Similar EO 13514 Mandate: Begin applying NetZero in 2020; fully NetZero by
20302640-50% doable…beyond that RE…but not yet LCC effective
I n t e g r i t y - S e r v i c e - E x c e l l e n c e
LEEDPerformance Assessment
100% of the FY10+ eligible projects seeking formal LEED certification
88 AF LEED certified facilities to date: 1 Platinum 31 Gold
NDAA included prohibition on LEED Gold and Platinum certification of FY12 projects Future NDAAs may extend the prohibition AF will seek LEED Silver certification only
27
I n t e g r i t y - S e r v i c e - E x c e l l e n c e
Construction AcquisitionMILCON Agents
FY12 MILCON 98% USACE and NAVFAC*
2% AFCEC*
75% Design-Build vs. 25% Design-Bid-Build
*Based on dollar value including MFH, UK and CENTCOM Contingency Construction
I n t e g r i t y - S e r v i c e - E x c e l l e n c e
Construction AcquisitionContinued Acquisition Reform
Competition is still king
Increased emphasis on cost as driving factor
More focus on Low-priced Technically-Acceptable end of Best Value continuum
Increased emphasis on Small Business set asides
29
I n t e g r i t y - S e r v i c e - E x c e l l e n c e
Construction AcquisitionAFCEE Contract Toolbox
Worldwide Planning, Program, & Design 08 (4PA-E08) 5 year IDIQ…$3B capacity…22 Full Scope, 7 Reduced Scope
Global Engr, Integration & Tech Assistance (GEITA Bridge) 1 yr A&AS 2-3 month options…$200M capacity…3 F&O, 1 small firm
Heavy Engineering, Repair, and Construction (HERC) 5 year IDIQ…$6 - $15B capacity…15 (19) F&O, 4 (0)-8(a) firms
Environmental, Construction, Operations & Services (ECOS09) 100% Small Business set-aside 5 year IDIQ…$350M total…$95M services…10 Small firms
Worldwide Environ Restoration and Construction 09 (WERC09) 5 year IDIQ plus 3 years for PBC…$3B capacity…23 F&O, 16 small, 3-
8(a), 2 SDVOSB
30
F&O = Full and Open
I n t e g r i t y - S e r v i c e - E x c e l l e n c e
I n t e g r i t y - S e r v i c e - E x c e l l e n c e
31
Headquarters U.S. Air ForceI n t e g r i t y - S e r v i c e - E x c e l l e n c e
Headquarters U.S. Air Force
31