urban school superintendents: characteristics, tenure, and

12
Urban school superintendents hold one of the most important and challenging jobs in America’s education system. In this era of accountability and standards, superintendents are charged with making visible and rapid improvements in the academic achievement of the nation’s most vulnerable children. They must break down barriers to reform and build capacity for quality teaching and learning in their schools. They must unite parents, educators, school boards, and business and community leaders behind a clear and coherent vision of instructional purpose. Amidst the highly politicized environments of big city school districts, superintendents must serve as collaborators, visionaries, good communicators, and agents of change. Given this backdrop, the Council of the Great City Schools (CGCS) prepared this report to improve public understanding of employment patterns and demographic t rends among the nation’s urban superintendents. The organization has been surveying its member districts approximately every two years since 1997. This, the Council’s seventh report on urban superintendents, presents the results of the 2010 survey. CGCS represents the nation’s largest urban school districts. Though there are approximately 17,000 school districts in the country, the Council’s 65 districts serve approximately 7.2 million of America’s 48.7 million K-12 students (14 percent), and approximately one-third of the nation’s low-income students, students of color, and English language learners. With such a disproportionate number of low-income and minority students, urban school superintendents clearly face a greater set of challenges than their counterparts throughout the rest of the nation. METHODOLOGY The Council of the Great City Schools surveyed its member districts in the spring and summer of 2010 to determine the characteristics of big city school superintendents for the 2009-2010 school year. This report contains the results of that survey. Surveys were sent to superintendents and their secretaries using an online survey tool. The surveys were sent out beginning in May 2010 with reminders by email in June and July and by phone in August to ensure the highest response rate possible. Respondents were asked to provide information on the gender, race/ethnicity, salary, benefits, bonuses, and previous work experience of their district’s superintendent. Surveys were received from 56 of the 65 CGCS member districts (86 percent), and all responses were included in this analysis. All data presented in this publication are reported in summary form. The data presented in this survey have a number of important limitations. No tests of statistical significance were conducted on changes over time, nor are standard errors of measurement included in this report. We relied solely on the information reported by the districts themselves. Furthermore, the survey sample consists only of districts that submitted responses, and is largely the same but not identical to the samples represented in past reports. Urban School Superintendents: Characteristics, Tenure, and Salary Seventh Survey and Report Fall 2010

Upload: others

Post on 18-Dec-2021

3 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: Urban School Superintendents: Characteristics, Tenure, and

Urban school superintendents hold one of the most important and challenging jobs in America’s education system.

In this era of accountability and standards, superintendents are charged with making visible and rapid improvements

in the academic achievement of the nation’s most vulnerable children. They must break down barriers to reform and

build capacity for quality teaching and learning in their schools. They must unite parents, educators, school boards,

and business and community leaders behind a clear and coherent vision of instructional purpose. Amidst the highly

politicized environments of big city school districts, superintendents must serve as collaborators, visionaries, good

communicators, and agents of change.

Given this backdrop, the Council of the Great City Schools (CGCS) prepared this report to improve public

understanding of employment patterns and demographic trends among the nation’s urban superintendents. The

organization has been surveying its member districts approximately every two years since 1997. This, the Council’s

seventh report on urban superintendents, presents the results of the 2010 survey.

CGCS represents the nation’s largest urban school districts. Though there are approximately 17,000 school districts

in the country, the Council’s 65 districts serve approximately 7.2 million of America’s 48.7 million K-12 students

(14 percent), and approximately one-third of the nation’s low-income students, students of color, and English

language learners. With such a disproportionate number of low-income and minority students, urban school

superintendents clearly face a greater set of challenges than their counterparts throughout the rest of the nation.

METHODOLOGY

The Council of the Great City Schools surveyed its member districts in the spring and summer of 2010 to determine

the characteristics of big city school superintendents for the 2009-2010 school year. This report contains the results

of that survey. Surveys were sent to superintendents and their secretaries using an online survey tool. The surveys

were sent out beginning in May 2010 with reminders by email in June and July and by phone in August to ensure the

highest response rate possible. Respondents were asked to provide information on the gender, race/ethnicity, salary,

benefits, bonuses, and previous work experience of their district’s superintendent.

Surveys were received from 56 of the 65 CGCS member districts (86 percent), and all responses were included in

this analysis. All data presented in this publication are reported in summary form.

The data presented in this survey have a number of important limitations. No tests of statistical significance were

conducted on changes over time, nor are standard errors of measurement included in this report. We relied solely on

the information reported by the districts themselves. Furthermore, the survey sample consists only of districts that

submitted responses, and is largely the same but not identical to the samples represented in past reports.

Urban School Superintendents: Characteristics, Tenure, and Salary Seventh Survey and Report

Winter 2010 Fall 2010

Page 2: Urban School Superintendents: Characteristics, Tenure, and

Council of the Great City Schools

HIGHLIGHTS

Demographics1

As of 2010, approximately 47 percent of superintendents from CGCS member districts identified themselves

as White, 41 percent as Black, and 11 percent as Hispanic. These percentages appear to be similar to those in

1999, when 42 percent of CGCS superintendents identified themselves as White, 43 percent as Black, and 15

percent as Hispanic. (Figure 1)

As of 2010, approximately 74 percent of CGCS superintendents were men. Thirty-eight percent of CGCS

superintendents were White males, 27 percent were Black males, and 9 percent were Hispanic males.

(Figures 1 and 2)

As of 2010, approximately 27 percent of CGCS superintendents were women. Fourteen percent of CGCS

superintendents were Black females, 9 percent were White females, 2 percent were Hispanic females, and 2

percent were Asian females. (Figure 2)

Tenure

The average tenure of current CGCS superintendents increased from 2.33 years in 1999 to 3.64 years in

2010.2 This is a marked increase of 56 percent from 1999 when average tenure was at the lowest point ever

recorded by CGCS. (Figure 3)

Twenty-nine percent of CGCS superintendents in 2010 have been in office for five or more years, up from

12 percent in 1999. (Figure 4)

Sixty-three percent of CGCS superintendents in 2010 have been in office between one and five years, up

from 52 percent in 1999. (Figure 4)

Nine percent of CGCS superintendents in 2010 have been in office for one year or less, down from 36

percent in 1999. (Figure 4)

The average tenure of the immediate past CGCS superintendents was 5.1 years in 2010.

Previous Work Experience

In 2010, most CGCS superintendents – 91 percent – worked in the K-12 education sector prior to their

appointment as superintendent. (Figure 5)

Accountability

Eighty-six percent of CGCS superintendents are accountable to their school boards. Five percent are

accountable to both the school board and the mayor. Another four percent are accountable to the mayor only

and five percent have other forms of accountability. (Figure 6)

Salaries

Average CGCS superintendent salaries have increased from roughly $154,000 in 1999 to approximately

$239,000 in 2010. Accounting for inflation (by reporting in 2010 dollars), average CGCS superintendent

salaries have increased from $201,000 in 1999 to $239,000 in 2010. These changes reflect a real increase in

earnings of 19 percent since 1999. (Figure 7)

1 Calculations may not sum to 100 due to rounding

2 Tenure is defined as the length of time the current superintendent has been in office as of July 1, 2010.

2

Page 3: Urban School Superintendents: Characteristics, Tenure, and

Urban School Superintendents: Characteristics, Tenure, and Salary

Salaries in 2010 for CGCS superintendents ranged from $157,000 to $329,000. The majority (54 percent) of

CGCS superintendents earned $250,000 or more per year in 2010. The distribution of superintendent salaries

since 19993 is displayed in Figure 8.

CGCS superintendent salaries appear to vary somewhat by tenure. In 2010, the average salary for a CGCS

superintendent with five or more years experience was approximately $245,000, the average salary for those

with between one and five years experience was approximately $241,000, and the average salary of those

superintendents with one year or less experience was about $207,000.4 (Figure 9)

Average CGCS superintendent salaries appear to vary substantially according to the size of the district. The

average salary for a CGCS superintendent with fewer than 50,000 students was $208,000. In a district with

between 50,000 and 100,000 students the average salary was $253,000. In a district with between 100,000

and 200,000 students the average salary is $275,000. And in a district with 200,000 or more students the

average salary was $273,000. Figure 10 reports 2010 average CGCS superintendent salary by student

enrollment.

In 2010, average salaries of Black and White superintendents were similar,5 while the average salary for

male superintendents was roughly $10,000 more than the average salary of female superintendents. (Figure

11)

According to the available data, the average CGCS superintendent salary in 2008 was comparable to that of

their counterparts nationwide. The latest year for which comparable data are available is the 2008-2009

school year. In 2008-2009, the average salary across all district superintendents with 25,000 students or more

was $225,222 while the CGCS average was $228,388 for that same year. (Figure 12)6

Benefits and Bonuses

About 39% of responding superintendents reported receiving financial bonuses or pay-for-performance

provisions. Where benefits were reported, the amount of the annual bonus or pay-for-performance provision

in 2010 ranged from $5,000 to $65,000.

Seventy-three percent of CGCS superintendents reported having access to a car or receiving a car allowance,

73 percent reported having an IRA/403b or other retirement account, and two percent reported received a

housing allowance in 2010.

The average benefits package for CGCS superintendents was valued at approximately $141,000 in 2010.

3 Previous salaries (1999- 2008) in this Figure have not been adjusted for inflation.

4 Previous salaries (1999- 2008) in this Figure have not been adjusted for inflation.

5 Salary results for Hispanic superintendents are not reported due to the small sample size.

6 ERS, 2009.

3

Page 4: Urban School Superintendents: Characteristics, Tenure, and

Council of the Great City Schools

DISCUSSION

Several patterns, trends, and relationships relating to employment and demographics have emerged through the

course of this analysis.

On some dimensions, the demographics of urban superintendents have become more diverse over time. Currently,

more women are superintendents in CGCS member districts than was the case in 1999. The largest increase is

among White women, who went from zero percent of the CGCS superintendents in 1999 to 9 percent in 2010.

However, there was a slight decrease in the percent of Hispanic and Black female superintendents.

According to the data, CGCS superintendents are staying in their districts for longer periods of time. The tenure of

current CGCS superintendents has gradually increased over time, from a low of 2.3 years in 1999 to an average of

3.64 years in 2010. Moreover, the average tenure of the immediate past CGCS superintendents was 5.1 years in

2010.

Additionally, the average CGCS superintendent salary in 2008 was similar to that of their counterparts nationwide.

In 2008-2009, the average salary across district superintendents with 25,000 students or more was $225,222 while

the CGCS average was $228,388 for that same year.

While superintendent salary does not appear to have a simple linear relationship with tenure, there does appear to be

a relationship between superintendent salary and district enrollment. In short, superintendents in larger districts tend

to earn more money, suggesting that the financial compensation for big-city superintendents varies according to the

magnitude of the job itself.

REFERENCES

Council of Great City Schools (2008). Urban School Superintendents: Characteristics, Tenure, and Salary.

Urban Indicator. Winter 2008.

Council of Great City Schools (2003). Urban School Superintendents: Characteristics, Tenure, and Salary.

Urban Indicator 7(1), 1-7.

Educational Research Service. (2009). Salaries and Wages Paid Professional and Support Personnel in Public

Schools, 2008-09. Arlington VA.

4

Page 5: Urban School Superintendents: Characteristics, Tenure, and

Urban School Superintendents: Characteristics, Tenure, and Salary

0%

5%

10%

15%

20%

25%

30%

35%

40%

45%

White

Male

White

Female

Black

Male

Black

Female

Hispanic

Male

Hispanic

Female

Asian

Male

Asian

Female

42%

0%

25%

18%

11%

4%

0% 0%

38%

9%

27%

14%

9%

2%0%

2%

Per

cen

t o

f S

up

erin

ten

den

ts

Figure 1. Race/Ethnicity and Gender of CGCS Superintendents:

1999 and 2010

1999

2010

White Male

38%

White

Female

9%

Black Male

27%

Black Female

14%

Hispanic

Male

9%

Hispanic Female

2%

Asian Female

2%

Figure 2. Race/Ethnicity and Gender of CGCS Superintendents in

2010*

*Calculations may not sum to 100 due to rounding

5

Page 6: Urban School Superintendents: Characteristics, Tenure, and

Council of the Great City Schools

0

0.5

1

1.5

2

2.5

3

3.5

4

1999 2001 2003 2006 2008 2010

2.332.50

2.803.10

3.503.64

Yea

rs i

n P

osi

tio

nFigure 3. Average Tenure of Current CGCS Superintendents:

1999, 2001, 2003, 2006, 2008, and 2010

0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%

70%

1999 2001 2003 2006 2008 2010

36%

22%

31%33% 33%

9%

52%

64%

54%

42%

49%

63%

12%15% 15%

25%

18%

29%

Per

cen

t o

f S

up

erin

ten

den

ts

Figure 4. Percent of Current CGCS Superintendents by Tenure:

1999, 2001, 2003, 2006, 2008, and 2010

1 year of less

Between 1 and 5 years

5 years or more

6

Page 7: Urban School Superintendents: Characteristics, Tenure, and

Urban School Superintendents: Characteristics, Tenure, and Salary

7%

2%

91%

5%

5%

5%

2%

Private Sector

Law

K-12 Education

Non Profit Sector

Higher Education

Government (Municipal, State, or Federal)

Military

Figure 5. Prior Work Experience of CGCS Superintendents in

2010

School Board

86%

School Board and

Mayor

5%

Mayor

4%

Other

5%

Figure 6: CGCS Superintendents Accountability Structure in

2010

7

Page 8: Urban School Superintendents: Characteristics, Tenure, and

Council of the Great City Schools

$-

$50,000.00

$100,000.00

$150,000.00

$200,000.00

$250,000.00

1999 2001 2003 2006 2008 2010

$154K

$176K

$189K

$208K

$228K$239K

Av

era

ge

An

nu

al

Sa

lary

Figure 7. Average Annual Salary of CGCS Superintendents:

1999, 2001, 2003, 2006, 2008, and 2010

Adjusted for Inflation (2010

dollars)

Salary Not Adjusted

$201K

$217K$224K

$224K

$231K

0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%

70%

1999 2001 2003 2006 2008 2010

13%

9% 10%7% 6%

0%

67%

51%

41% 40%

28% 27%

15%

24%

34%

26%

20% 20%

6%

16% 15%

26%

46%

54%

Per

cen

t o

f S

up

erin

ten

den

ts

Figure 8. Percent of CGCS Superintendents by Salary Range:

1999, 2001, 2003, 2006, 2008, and 2010*$100,000 to $149,999

$150,000 to 199,999

200,000 to 249,999

250,000 or more

* These salaries are not adjusted for inflation

8

Page 9: Urban School Superintendents: Characteristics, Tenure, and

Urban School Superintendents: Characteristics, Tenure, and Salary

$0

$50,000

$100,000

$150,000

$200,000

$250,000

1999 2001 2003 2006 2008 2010

$1

92

K

$2

08

K

$1

92

K $2

10

K $2

27

K

$2

07

K

$1

73

K $1

95

K $2

14

K

$2

01

K

$2

48

K

$2

41

K

$2

40

K

$2

08

K

$2

04

K

$2

15

K

$2

14

K

$2

45

K

Av

era

ge

An

nu

al

Sa

lary

Figure 9. Average Annual Salary of CGCS Superintendents by Tenure:

1999, 2001, 2003, 2006, 2008, and 2010

1 year or less

Between 1 and 5 years

5 years or more

$-

$50,000

$100,000

$150,000

$200,000

$250,000

$300,000

1999 2001 2003 2006 2008 2010

$1

61

K

$1

73

K

$1

80

K

$1

84

K

$1

97

K

$2

08

K

$1

78

K $1

98

K

$2

11

K

$2

16

K

$2

26

K $2

53

K

$2

18

K

$2

24

K

$2

43

K

$2

28

K

$2

71

K

$2

75

K

$2

34

K

$2

41

K

$2

43

K

$2

47

K

$2

86

K

$2

73

K

Av

era

ge

An

nu

al

Sa

lary

Figure 10. Average Annual Salary of CGCS Superintendents by

School District Enrollment: 1999, 2001, 2003, 2006, 2008, and 2010

Less than 50,000

50,000 to 99,999

100,000 to 199,999

200,000 or more

9

Page 10: Urban School Superintendents: Characteristics, Tenure, and

Council of the Great City Schools

$220,000

$230,000

$240,000

$250,000

White Black Male Female

$238,000

$233,000

$242,000

$232,000

Ave

rage

An

nu

al S

alar

yFigure 11. Average Annual Salary of CGCS Superintendents

by Race/Ethnicity and Gender in 2010*

$200,000

$205,000

$210,000

$215,000

$220,000

$225,000

$230,000

$235,000

$240,000

$245,000

$250,000

CGCS Superintendents Superintendents Nationwide

$228,388 $225,222

Figure 12. Average Annual Salary of CGCS Superintendents

Compared with Superintendents in Districts Nationwide

with 25,000 or More Students in 2008-09

(from ERS)

*Salary results for Hispanic superintendents are not reported due to the small sample size.

10

Page 11: Urban School Superintendents: Characteristics, Tenure, and

Urban School Superintendents: Characteristics, Tenure, and Salary

Albuquerque

Anchorage

Atlanta

Austin

Baltimore

Birmingham

Boston

Broward County

Buffalo

Charlotte-Mecklenburg

Cincinnati

Clark County

Cleveland

Columbus

Dallas

Dayton

Denver

Duval County

East Baton Rouge

Forth Worth

Fresno

Greensboro

Hillsborough County

Houston

Indianapolis

Jackson

Kansas City

Little Rock

Long Beach

Los Angeles

Louisville

Memphis

Miami-Dade

Milwaukee

Minneapolis

Nashville

New York City

Newark

Omaha

Orlando

Palm Beach County

Philadelphia

Pittsburgh

Portland

Providence

Richmond

Rochester

Sacramento

San Diego

San Francisco

Shreveport

St. Louis

St. Paul

Toledo

Washington, DC

Wichita

Surveys were received from the following districts:

11

Page 12: Urban School Superintendents: Characteristics, Tenure, and

The Council of the Great City Schools is a coalition of 65 of the nation’s largest

urban school systems. The mission of the Council is to advocate for urban

public schools and to assist them in their improvement. To meet that mission,

the Council provides services to its members in the areas of legislation,

research, communications, curriculum and instruction, and management.

The Research Department of the Council of the Great City Schools publishes

Urban Indicator, which explores timely and pertinent issues facing urban

education.

INDICATOR STAFF

Michael Casserly Sharon Lewis Renata Uzzell

Executive Director Director of Research Research Manager

Amanda Horwitz Candace Simon

Research Manager Research Manager

Council of the Great City Schools

1301 Pennsylvania Ave, NW

Suite 702

Washington DC 20004

www.cgcs.org