urban land institute – fall 2010
DESCRIPTION
Urban Land Institute – Fall 2010. Deleveraging and Recapitalization of Commercial Real Estate. November 4, 2009. $450. $397.0. $400. $353.6. $213.4b Shortfall. $322.8. $350. $290.0. $300. $106.4b Shortfall. $139.2b Shortfall. $170.0b Shortfall. $250. $ billions. $200. $150. - PowerPoint PPT PresentationTRANSCRIPT
Urban Land Institute – Fall 2010
Deleveraging and Recapitalization of Commercial Real Estate
November 4, 2009
2
ULI – Deleveraging Commercial REULI – Deleveraging Commercial RE
$0
$50
$100
$150
$200
$250
$300
$350
$400
$450
2009E 2010E 2011E 2012E
$ b
illio
ns
Banks Insurance Co's CMBS Total*
$290.0$322.8
$353.6
$397.0
Best Case
Originations1
Cumulative Shortfalls 2009-2012: $629 billion
$106.4b
Shortfall
$139.2b
Shortfall
$170.0b
Shortfall
$213.4b
Shortfall
High Volume of Near Term Debt Maturities
1 Origination projections based on the average 4-year historical gross originations from all non-CMBS lenders (excludes HUD/Gov’t).
* CMBS total includes both fixed and floating rate loans to first maturity.
Source: Wachovia, Commercial Mortgage Alert
Refinancing poses significant challenges due to more strict underwriting standards and declining fundamentals.
The CMBS market remains closed and few alternatives have emerged to replicate its peak origination volume.
Limited credit availability will cause refinancing shortfalls.
3
ULI – Deleveraging Commercial REULI – Deleveraging Commercial RE
Aggressive Underwriting Standards of the Past Pose Significant Challenges
CMBS Loan Maturities by Vintage Loans in Special Servicing as % of CMBS Outstanding
$5.67 $5.68 $5.94 $6.45 $6.88 $7.23$8.32
$10.14
$12.78$14.38
$17.11
$20.30
$24.52
$37.05
$40.53
$47.87$49.92
6.15%5.84%
4.96%
4.49%
2.95%
2.48%
2.04%1.71%
1.51%1.20%
0.97%0.85%0.80%0.75%0.69%0.65%0.65%
$0.0
$10.0
$20.0
$30.0
$40.0
$50.0
$60.0
Apr
-08
May
-08
Jun-
08
Jul-0
8
Aug
-08
Sep
-08
Oct
-08
Nov
-08
Dec
-08
Jan-
09
Feb
-09
Mar
-09
Apr
-09
May
-09
Jun-
09
Jul-0
9
Aug
-09
($ in
Billi
ons)
0.0%
1.0%
2.0%
3.0%
4.0%
5.0%
6.0%
7.0%
UPB % of CMBS
Source: RealpointSource: Wachovia Securities
Cumulative 2004-08:
$122 billion
4
ULI – Deleveraging Commercial REULI – Deleveraging Commercial RE
The Need to Deleverage May Force Sales and Recapitalizations
Original Equity: $20MM (gone)
Debt Written Off: $15MM
Swap Breakage Cost: ?
Additional Equity to Refinance at 60% of Today’s Value: $26MM
Refinancing Conundrum Declining Fundamentals
The forced deleveraging of commercial real estate will cause current owners to recapitalize their investment or force sales.
Pricing down 35–50% from peak valuations.
Cap rates have increased 200-300 bps (+/-).
Rents have declined 25% (+/-).
5
ULI – Deleveraging Commercial REULI – Deleveraging Commercial RE
Rebound of RMZ Helping REITs Recapitalize
MS PRICE Index (RMZ) 2007 - 2009
300
400
500
600
700
800
900
1000
1100
1200
1300
Jan-0
7
Mar
-07
May
-07
Jul-0
7
Sep-0
7
Nov-07
Jan-0
8
Mar
-08
May
-08
Jul-0
8
Sep-0
8
Nov-08
Jan-0
9
Mar
-09
May
-09
Jul-0
9
Sep-0
9
1 Assumes 45% leverage at January 2007.Source: Bloomberg
~45% Leverage
~60% Leverage
51.3%
28.2%Asset Value1
RMZ
98.5% Increase from March
300
400
500
600
700
800
900
1000
1100
1200
1300
Jan-0
7
Mar
-07
May
-07
Jul-0
7
Sep-0
7
Nov-07
Jan-0
8
Mar
-08
May
-08
Jul-0
8
Sep-0
8
Nov-08
Jan-0
9
Mar
-09
May
-09
Jul-0
9
Sep-0
9300
400
500
600
700
800
900
1000
1100
1200
1300
Jan-0
7
Mar
-07
May
-07
Jul-0
7
Sep-0
7
Nov-07
Jan-0
8
Mar
-08
May
-08
Jul-0
8
Sep-0
8
Nov-08
Jan-0
9
Mar
-09
May
-09
Jul-0
9
Sep-0
9
1 Assumes 45% leverage at January 2007.Source: Bloomberg
~45% Leverage
~60% Leverage
51.3%
28.2%Asset Value1
RMZ
98.5% Increase from March
$521
$2,838 $4,445 $3,428$2,644
$1,145
$2,025 $890
$650
$6,004
$4,448
$3,294
$1,145
$2,319
$1,902$440$1,141 $642
$4,703
$13,375
$2,319
$491
$533
$580
$175
$14,388
$5,335
$7,137
$817
Q4 07 Q1 08 Q2 08 Q3 08 Q4 08 Q1 09 Q2 09 Q3 09 Q4 09(QTD)IPOs FOs Converts
REITS have raised approx. $23.8 billion of public equity capital YTD.
Real Estate Equity Issuance Volume by Offering Type1
6
ULI – Deleveraging Commercial REULI – Deleveraging Commercial RE
9.8%
8.8%8.3%8.5%
7.1%
8.3%
6.2%
7.7%
7.4%7.5%
8.4%
9.6%
6.0%
7.0%
8.0%
9.0%
10.0%
11.0%
CBL MAC SPG SKT TCO WDC
Private Market Estimate Implied Trading Cap Rate
With the increase in REIT prices over the past several months an arbitrage between public and private valuations has developed.
Especially for companies in the upper quartile, implied cap rates based on current trading prices are significantly below the estimated private cap rates.
REITs are building substantial currency to take advantage of upcoming opportunities.
Public valuations are becoming compelling relative to private valuations based on current implied cap rates
Public vs. Private Valuation Arbitrage
Source: Green Street Advisors.
Public vs. Private Market Cap Rates
8.5% 8.6%8.6%
7.3%
9.3%
8.3%
8.6%
8.0%
7.2%7.6%
8.2%
7.1%6.8%
7.8%
6.0%
7.0%
8.0%
9.0%
10.0%
Mall
Apartm
ent
Health C
are
Indu
stria
l
Office
Self S
tora
ge
Strip C
ente
r
Private Market Estimate Implied Trading Cap Rate 9.9% 9.9%
8.9%
9.7%9.3%
8.0%
9.3%
7.8%
6.7%
8.4%
7.8%
8.3%
6.0%
7.0%
8.0%
9.0%
10.0%
11.0%
DDR EQY FRT KIM REG WRI
Private Market Estimate Implied Trading Cap Rate
Average: 8.5%
Average: 7.5%
Average: 9.3%
Average: 8.0%
Average: 8.5%
Average: 7.8%
7
ULI – Deleveraging Commercial REULI – Deleveraging Commercial RE
Real Estate Equity Capital Markets Remain Attractive for Issuers
REIT Forward FFO Multiples
2.0x
4.0x
6.0x
8.0x
10.0x
12.0x
14.0x
16.0x
18.0x
Q3 Q1 Q3 Q1 Q3 Q1 Q3 Q1 Q3 Q1 Q3 Q1 Q3 Q1 Q3 Q1 Q3 Q1 Q3 Q1 Q3 Q1 Q3 Q1 Q3
Average: 11.0x
1997 2001 2002 2003 2004 2006 200720051998 1999 2000 2008 2009
Source: Dealogic and FactSet. Market data as of 10/28/09. Green Street Advisors.1 Chart excludes mortgage REITs, gaming deals, and index-add transactions.
Real Estate Funds Flows
$6.8
$1.9
$6.4
$1.0
$4.7
$1.3
$0.0
$2.0
$4.0
$6.0
2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 (YTD) N
et F
und
Flo
ws
($ b
illio
ns)
0
200
400
600
800
1,000
1,200
RM
Z
RE Fund Flows RMZ
8
ULI – Deleveraging Commercial REULI – Deleveraging Commercial RE
5.5%
6.0%
6.5%
7.0%
7.5%
8.0%
8.5%
Yie
ld (
%)
REIT Unsecured Spreads & Issuance
4.0%
5.0%
6.0%
7.0%
8.0%
9.0%
10.0%
11.0%
12.0%
13.0%
14.0%
15.0%
Yie
ld (
%)
Source: Barclays Capital Live, Bloomberg.
DRE 15s, 7.50% Yield
PLD 14s, 7.75% YieldCLI 19s, 7.875% Yield
HPT 14s, 8.125% Yield
DRE 19s, 8.375% Yield
Yield curve based on Modified Adjusted Duration of 4.7 years
AVB 20s, 6.119% Yield
AVB 17s, 5.717% Yield
KIM 19s, 6.897% Yield
BDN 15s, 7.625% Yield
After gapping significantly during a long period of uncertainty and heightened risk, spreads have tightened and the market has opened for quality public names with strong liquidity positions.
The REIT Unsecured Market has Reopened
Such drastic tightening into attractive financing levels is unprecedented in the last five years
9
ULI – Deleveraging Commercial REULI – Deleveraging Commercial RE
Rising Cap Rates for Core Assets?
8.7%
6.4%
4.0%
5.0%
6.0%
7.0%
8.0%
9.0%
10.0%
11.0%
12.0%
Jan-
86
Jan-
88
Jan-
90
Jan-
92
Jan-
94
Jan-
96
Jan-
98
Jan-
00
Jan-
02
Jan-
04
Jan-
06
Jan-
08
Unlevered Returns (IRRs)
Long-term Baa
Unlevered Return Expectations on Real Estate vs Baa Rates
-100 bps
0 bps
100 bps
200 bps
300 bps
400 bps
Return Premium on Real Estate
Unlevered IRR Expectations Minus Baa Rate
As of 10/13/09
Ch
eapP
ricey
10
ULI – Deleveraging Commercial REULI – Deleveraging Commercial RE
Volume of US Sales > $25 mm ($ in billions)
$46 $62 $75
$133
$198$236
$366
$81
$16
$0
$50
$100
$150
$200
$250
$300
$350
$400
2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009YTDRetail Other
Source: Real Capital Analytics.
Limited US Sales Volume
40-50% of Post 9/11 &
Post Dot Com Bust Volume
Transaction data suggests cap rates have risen but tight credit, the general unwillingness of owners to recognize loss of value, and an amend and extend approach by existing lenders has lead to limited transactions.
However, as maturities mount, owners will be forced to sell.
Given access to capital, REITs are well positioned to take advantage of the distress.
Public markets will play a key role in digging out of this mess.
The vast majority of transactions will be sales out of special servicers and banks.
Focus is now on interim defaults vs. maturity defaults.
Peak defaults will likely be in 2010, which should result in an increase in transactions.