urban land use: lessons from the urban atlas
DESCRIPTION
Urban Land Use: lessons from the Urban Atlas. Lewis Dijkstra Deputy Head of the Analysis Unit European Commission – DG Regional Policy [email protected]. Overview. New grid based definitions Urban-rural regional typology: Urban clusters Degree of urbanisation - PowerPoint PPT PresentationTRANSCRIPT
1
REGIOREGIOgigiss
Urban Land Use: lessons from the Urban Atlas
Lewis DijkstraDeputy Head of the Analysis Unit
European Commission – DG Regional Policy
2
REGIOREGIOgigiss
Overview• New grid based definitions
– Urban-rural regional typology: Urban clusters– Degree of urbanisation– Cities and hinterland: High-density clusters
and commuting zones• Measuring urban land use
– CORINE– Soil sealing– Urban Atlas
3
REGIOREGIOgigiss
A new urban-rural regional typology• Classifying EU NUTS3 regions• A variant of the OECD methodology• Aiming to provide a consistent basis for describing
urban, intermediate and rural regions in various Commission reports and publications
• Developed by:– DG Agriculture and Rural Development– DG Regional Policy– Eurostat– DG Joint Research Centre
4
REGIOREGIOgigiss
Why a new typology?• Distortions using the OECD methodology at
NUTS3 level– Large variation in area of local
administrative units (LAU2)– Large variation in area of NUTS3 regions– Some city centres separated from
surroundings, at NUTS3 level
5
REGIOREGIOgigiss
The new typology: local level• Units: 1 km² grid cells• Population grid: registered population when
available, otherwise disaggregation grid (JRC)
• Identify population living in urban areas:– Selection of grid cells with density > 300
inh./km²– Only groups of grid cells, representing a
total population of > 5000 inhabitants– Contiguity is evaluated including diagonals
6
REGIOREGIOgigiss
7
REGIOREGIOgigiss
8
REGIOREGIOgigiss
9
REGIOREGIOgigiss
10
REGIOREGIOgigiss
What is degree of urbanisation?• Classification of all LAU2s into three
categories:– Thinly populated– Intermediate density– Densely populated
• It is used primarily in the Labour Force Survey (LFS), but also in other surveys such as Survey on Income and Living Conditions (SILC) and IT
• It is based on LAU2 density and contiguity• In use for 20 years
11
REGIOREGIOgigiss
Why a revision?• Distortions due to the large variation in
area of local administrative units (LAU2)• Revised urban-rural typology is based on a
grid based definition of rural areas which is more reliable than OECD or LFS approach
• Harmonising spatial concepts– Rural (OECD) and thinly populated areas
(LFS)– Densely populated areas (LFS) and cities
(UA)
12
REGIOREGIOgigiss
Previously: 3 conflicting definitionsUrban-Rural
TypologyDegree of
urbanisation Urban Audit
Rural LAU2 ≠ Thinly populated
Intermediate density
Densely populated ≠ Cities
13
REGIOREGIOgigissNew Proposal: Harmonised
definition based on population grid
Revised Degree of urbanisaton
Thinly populated Rural LAU2
Intermediate density
Densely populated Urban Audit Cities
14
REGIOREGIOgigiss
New Proposal: 3 Criteria 3 ClassesType of Area Criteria
Thinly populated > 50% population in rural grid cells
Intermediate density
<50% population in rural grid cells and
<50% population in high-density grid cells
Densely populated
> 50% population in high-density grid cells
15
REGIOREGIOgigiss
Definitions• Rural grid cells = cells outside urban clusters
• Urban clusters = contiguous (including diagonals) cells with a density of at least 300 inhab/km2 and a minimum of 5 000 inhabitants
• High-density clusters = contiguous (without diagonals and with gap filling) cells with a density of at least 1500 inhab/km2 and a minimum of 50 000 inhabitants
16
REGIOREGIOgigiss
Population grid• Units: 1 km² grid cells (future reference for
all population grids)• Registered population in NO, CH, HR, AT,
FI, SE, DK and NL • Elsewhere disaggregation grid v5 (JRC) • FR is creating a real 1 km2 population grid
17
REGIOREGIOgigiss
18
REGIOREGIOgigiss
19
REGIOREGIOgigiss
20
REGIOREGIOgigiss
City and hinterland definition
21
REGIOREGIOgigiss
Why a new definition?• No harmonised European definition of a
city and its functional area existed• Use the same criteria as the degree of
urbanisation• Uses commuting analysis to define
commuting zone• Consider poly-centricity by checking for
connected centres
22
REGIOREGIOgigiss
City definition• A city consists of one or more
municipalities (local administrative unit level 2 LAU2).
• At least half of the city residents live in an urban centre (i.e. a cluster of high-density grid cells with the gaps filled)
• An urban centre has at least 50 000 inhabitants.
23
REGIOREGIOgigiss
City definition
24
REGIOREGIOgigiss
Hinterland definition• If 15% of employed persons living in one
city work in another city, these cities are combined into a single destination (polycentric)
• All municipalities with at least 15% of their employed residents working in a city are identified
• Municipalities surrounded by a single functional area are included and non-contiguous municipalities are dropped
25
REGIOREGIOgigiss
Hinterland definition
26
REGIOREGIOgigiss
Urban Land Use
27
REGIOREGIOgigiss
Goal and obstacles• Accurately measure urban land use,
especially at the urban fringe• CORINE is designed to mainly measure
agricultural uses, coarse resolution and does not identify low-density developed (i.e. below 50% of soil sealing)
• Soil sealing, high resolution and measures all levels of sealing, but no land use info
28
REGIOREGIOgigiss
The Urban Atlas• Designed to measure urban land use at high
resolution and at low levels of soil sealing• Providing harmonised land cover/land use
maps according to a common classification• Covering 305 major European
agglomerations, based on Urban Audit’s Larger Urban Zones
• Imagery reference year: 2006 (+/- 1 year)• Project duration: 2009-2011
29
REGIOREGIOgigiss
Main features• Thematic classes based on CORINE Land
Cover nomenclature• But more specific for built-up areas, and
less specific outside urban areas• Geometric resolution of 1:10,000• Minimum mapping unit of 0.25 ha in urban
areas, 1 ha in other areas
30
REGIOREGIOgigiss
CORINE Land Cover
31
REGIOREGIOgigiss
Urban Atlas
32
REGIOREGIOgigiss
SPOT / ALOS images
33
REGIOREGIOgigiss
Production• Mix of automatic classification and photo-
interpretation• Various data sources used, depending on
thematic classes
34
REGIOREGIOgigiss
Thematic classes• Residential areas: use of soil sealing layer
to distinguish between density classes
35
REGIOREGIOgigiss
Thematic classes• Non-residential urban areas• Detailed transport network layer (COTS)• Local maps as auxiliary source of
information
36
REGIOREGIOgigiss
Thematic classes• Other classes• Less thematic detail for agricultural,
natural and forest areas (and MMU 1 ha)
37
REGIOREGIOgigiss
Dissemination• Georeferenced layers are freely available• Data download:
http://www.eea.europa.eu/data-and-maps/data/urban-atlas
• Map viewer: http://dataservice.eea.europa.eu/map/UrbanAtlasbeta/
38
REGIOREGIOgigiss
Derived indicators• Can be exploited at the level of Urban
Audit units:– Larger Urban Zone (LUZ), kernel, city, sub-
city districts (SCD)• Land cover/use surface breakdown• Green urban areas per inhabitant• A sprawl index (ESPON project):
www.espon.eu
39
REGIOREGIOgigiss
40
REGIOREGIOgigiss
41
REGIOREGIOgigiss
42
REGIOREGIOgigiss
43
REGIOREGIOgigiss
The future of the Urban Atlas• Repeat Urban Atlas in order to create a detailed
dynamic view on urban land cover/use• Coherence with other data collection projects is
important– Census 2011– Urban Audit
• Consequences– Define imagery acquisition requirements (2011 +/- year)– Update methodology, including change detection, to be
determined– Ensure compatibility with revised Urban Audit following
new harmonised definition