update on medicare: mippa 2008 and situ v. leavitt

21
California Health Advocates (c) 2008 1 Update on Medicare: MIPPA 2008 and Situ v. Leavitt Presented August 2008 by David Lipschutz & Elaine Wong Eakin This special regional educational effort is supported by funding provided by The California Endowment.

Upload: armando-jacobs

Post on 30-Dec-2015

25 views

Category:

Documents


1 download

DESCRIPTION

Update on Medicare: MIPPA 2008 and Situ v. Leavitt. Presented August 2008 by David Lipschutz & Elaine Wong Eakin. This special regional educational effort is supported by funding provided by The California Endowment. Our Focus. California Health Advocates is dedicated to Medicare - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: Update on Medicare:  MIPPA 2008 and  Situ v. Leavitt

California Health Advocates (c) 20081

Update on Medicare: MIPPA 2008 and Situ v. Leavitt

Presented August 2008 byDavid Lipschutz & Elaine Wong Eakin

This special regional educational effort is supported by funding provided by The California Endowment.

Page 2: Update on Medicare:  MIPPA 2008 and  Situ v. Leavitt

California Health Advocates (c) 20082

Our Focus

California Health Advocates is dedicated to Medicare beneficiary advocacy and education for Californians.

www.cahealthadvocates.org

Policy – Public policy research and recommendations for improved rights and protections, partner with national Medicare organizations based in Washington D.C.

Training – Professionals and informal helpers, vibrant web resources, newsletter and regional forums

Advocacy – Bring the experience of Medicare beneficiaries to the public through media and educational campaigns with the legislative staff at federal and state levels.

Page 3: Update on Medicare:  MIPPA 2008 and  Situ v. Leavitt

California Health Advocates (c) 20083

Overview

Medicare Improvements for Patients and Providers Act (MIPPA) of 2008

Situ v. Leavitt lawsuit Center for Medicare Advocacy

(CMA) and National Senior Citizens Law Center (NSCLC)

Page 4: Update on Medicare:  MIPPA 2008 and  Situ v. Leavitt

California Health Advocates (c) 20084

History of Medicare Bills 2008 The “Medicare Improvements for Patients and

Providers Act” (S 3101) introduced on June 6, 2008 by Sen. Baucus failed to receive enough votes for cloture

The “Preserving Access to Medicare Act” (S 3118), rival bill introduced by Sen. Grassley on June 11, 2008, failed to receive consideration

The “Medicare Improvements for Patients and Providers Act” (HR 6331) passed by Congress on July 15 after both chambers voted to override President Bush’s veto

Page 5: Update on Medicare:  MIPPA 2008 and  Situ v. Leavitt

California Health Advocates (c) 20085

Highlights of MIPPA – Medicare Part B

Physician fees— Delayed 10.6% cut in reimbursement to doctors retroactive to July 1, 2008 (18 month delay). Effective January 1, 2009, 1.1% rate increase

Extends exceptions process for outpatient therapy caps (e.g. physical, speech, occupational) to December 31, 2009; retroactive to July 1, 2008

Mental health parity—Decreases beneficiary’s coinsurance for outpatient mental health services from 50% to 20% over 6 years

Page 6: Update on Medicare:  MIPPA 2008 and  Situ v. Leavitt

California Health Advocates (c) 20086

Highlights of MIPPA – Medicare Part B (contd.)

Payment incentives for providers to use electronic prescribing, 2009-2013

“Welcome to Medicare physical exam”—Extended from 6 months to 1 year, deductible waived, effective January 1, 2009

Eases addition of coverage for new preventive services through Medicare

Page 7: Update on Medicare:  MIPPA 2008 and  Situ v. Leavitt

California Health Advocates (c) 20087

Highlights of MIPPA – Medicare Advantage Plans

Phase out of Indirect Medical Education (IME) payments Teaching hospitals will still be reimbursed by Medicare, but

IME payments removed from payment to MA plans This is the only “cut” or adjustment to Medicare Advantage

payment rates in this bill Adjustment to Medicare Advantage stabilization fund

Fund created by Medicare Modernization Act to entice Regional PPOs to enter Medicare market; incentive not needed – fund reduced to $1 in 2012

Page 8: Update on Medicare:  MIPPA 2008 and  Situ v. Leavitt

California Health Advocates (c) 20088

Highlights of MIPPA – MA Plans - SNPs

Special Needs Plans (SNP) Extends authority for SNPs through 2010 Extends moratorium on offering of new

SNPs Care management

• Model of care with networks of providers• Periodic assessment of individual and plan of care

Dual eligibles and QMBs in SNP should not have to pay more copayments than if they were not in the SNP (starts 2010)

Page 9: Update on Medicare:  MIPPA 2008 and  Situ v. Leavitt

California Health Advocates (c) 20089

Highlights of MIPPA – MA Plans – SNPs (contd.)

Restrictions on Enrollment (as of Jan 1, 2010) Dual Eligible-SNPs

• Each new enrollee must meet definition of special needs.

• Each prospective enrollee must be given a written statement describing the benefits and cost-sharing under the state Medicaid program, and which of such benefits and cost-sharing are covered by the plan, and

• The plan has a contract or arrangement with the state Medicaid agency to provide Medicaid benefits.

Page 10: Update on Medicare:  MIPPA 2008 and  Situ v. Leavitt

California Health Advocates (c) 200810

Highlights of MIPPA – MA Plans – SNPs (contd.)

Restrictions on Enrollment (as of Jan 1, 2010) Institutional SNPs

• Each new enrollee must meet definition of special needs.

• If in community but requires institutional level of care, such determination must be made using a state assessment tool and by entity other than SNP.

Chronic SNPs• Each new enrollee must meet definition of special

needs.

Page 11: Update on Medicare:  MIPPA 2008 and  Situ v. Leavitt

California Health Advocates (c) 200811

Highlights of MIPPA – MA PFFS Plans

PFFS plans required to enter into contracts with providers in most areas in order to meet access standards, starting plan year 2011. Applies to counties with 2 or more non-PFFS

plans (HMO or PPO) PFFS and MSA—Required to report data

and have quality improvement programs, like other MA plans, starting 2010.

Page 12: Update on Medicare:  MIPPA 2008 and  Situ v. Leavitt

California Health Advocates (c) 200812

Highlights of MIPPA – Medicare Part D

Prompt payment to pharmacies—PDP and MA-PD sponsors required to pay clean claims to retail pharmacies within 14 days if submitted electronically Otherwise 30 days

Benzodiazepines and barbiturates—Inclusion under Part D coverage for treatment of epilepsy, cancer or chronic mental health disorder effective Jan 1, 2013.

Page 13: Update on Medicare:  MIPPA 2008 and  Situ v. Leavitt

California Health Advocates (c) 200813

Highlights of MIPPA – Marketing of MA and PD Plans

Prohibited activities (effective 2009 plan year) Unsolicited means of direct contract

• Including door-to-door, outbound telemarketing Cross selling

• Sale of non-health related products during sales and marketing of MA products

Providing meals Selling and marketing at health care settings

and educational events• Health care setting = areas where health care is

delivered (except for common areas)

Page 14: Update on Medicare:  MIPPA 2008 and  Situ v. Leavitt

California Health Advocates (c) 200814

Highlights of MIPPA – Marketing (contd.)

Limitations (effective by Nov 15, 2008, beginning of AEP) Scope of marketing appointment

• Requires advance agreement and documentation Co-branding

• Prohibits use of name or logo or a co-branded network provider on MA membership and marketing materials

Gifts of nominal value Compensation to agents and brokers

• Must follow CMS guidelines Training and testing of agents, brokers and others

• Initial and annual testing and training

Page 15: Update on Medicare:  MIPPA 2008 and  Situ v. Leavitt

California Health Advocates (c) 200815

Highlights of MIPPA – Marketing (cont.)

MA and Part D plans must include plan type in plan name as of 2010 plan year E.g. “Acme HMO”

Strengthening collaboration with states (effective 2009 plan year) Plans must use only licensed agents, abide

by appointment laws, report agent terminations and comply with state requests for information re: agent, broker, or other representative’s performance

Page 16: Update on Medicare:  MIPPA 2008 and  Situ v. Leavitt

California Health Advocates (c) 200816

Highlights of MIPPA – Low Income Programs

Qualifying Individual (QI) program extended to December 31, 2009; retroactive to July 1, 2008. QI covers Part B premiums

Increase asset level for Medicare Savings Program (MSP) eligibility to asset level for Part D Low-Income Subsidy (LIS) eligibility, effective January 1, 2010.

2008 MSP asset level 2008 LIS asset level

$4,000 individual $7,790 individual

$6,000 couple $12,440 couple

Page 17: Update on Medicare:  MIPPA 2008 and  Situ v. Leavitt

California Health Advocates (c) 200817

Highlights of MIPPA – Low Income Programs (cont.)

Income and resources for LIS eligibility—Excludes in-kind support and value of life insurance policy, effective Jan 1, 2010.

Late Enrollment Penalty (LEP) waiver—Part D late enrollment penalty waived for LIS-eligible beneficiaries, effective January 2009.Current CMS policy is being codified

Page 18: Update on Medicare:  MIPPA 2008 and  Situ v. Leavitt

California Health Advocates (c) 200818

Highlights of MIPPA – Miscellaneous

DME competitive bidding program (DMEPOS) delayed for 18 months Was set to be effective in several areas

(including Riverside, San Bernardino) as of July 1, 2008

Medigap Dept of Health and Human Services must work

with states to establish new requirements for Medigap plans

• Includes elimination of redundant plans, modification of benefit structure, and 2 new types of plans that alter cost-sharing structure

Page 19: Update on Medicare:  MIPPA 2008 and  Situ v. Leavitt

California Health Advocates (c) 200819

What’s the next round?

Celebrate the victory, but continue to work on longer term solutions.Scheduled cuts to physician

reimbursement – revise/repeal sustainable growth rate (SGR).

Medicare hospital trust fund may be insolvent by 2019.

Health care reform

Page 20: Update on Medicare:  MIPPA 2008 and  Situ v. Leavitt

California Health Advocates (c) 200820

Situ v. Leavitt

Class action lawsuit preliminarily approved by federal district court Data transfers from states more than once a month.

CMS must process data received within 1 business day.

Plans must accept best available evidence (BAE) of LIS eligibility presented by beneficiary and update the system within 72 hours.

CMS to conduct outreach and educate pharmacists about changes to point-of-sale (PoS), that pharmacists are no longer financially liable.

Page 21: Update on Medicare:  MIPPA 2008 and  Situ v. Leavitt

California Health Advocates (c) 200821

Contact Information

California Health Advocates Sacramento HQ – (916) 231-5110

5380 Elvas Avenue, Suite 104Sacramento, CA 95819

Oakland satellite office – (510) 268-8030464 7th Street, Oakland, CA 94607

Website: www.cahealthadvocates.org