university of missouri–st. louis normandie & st. agnes ... · university of missouri–st....
TRANSCRIPT
University of Missouri–St. Louis Normandie & St. Agnes halls Situation. Independent consultants have estimated UMSL has more $300 million in major deferred maintenance and repair issues among 38 primary buildings and have advised UMSL officials to invest resources in its newest and most strategic facilities and remove the others. UMSL officials used the campus strategic plan and master plan to evaluate building priorities and determined that Normandie [formerly the Incarnate Word Convent built in the 1920s] and St. Agnes halls are among the facilities whose condition, location and lack of strategic value warrant demolition. It would take $11 million to address existing maintenance and repair issues in the buildings, according to our consultants. This amount does not include funds that would be needed to modify the buildings for campus use. Therefore, UMSL announced it would demolish the buildings and return the area to green space in the summer of 2014. Planning was developed in association with the neighboring Incarnate Word Academy to ensure a positive outcome for this outstanding private girls high school. Demolition of these facilities was seen as a major step forward in addressing UMSL’s maintenance and repair issues and – along with new buildings under construction – creating a long-term sustainability model for campus building maintenance. Possible sale/lease. Several area residents requested – quite logically – whether UMSL would consider selling the facilities in lieu of demolition. In response, UMSL issued a RFQ in November 2014 to offer the land for lease and buildings for sale to an entity that has a use consistent with the interests of UMSL and verifiable resources to complete the purchase and necessary renovations. UMSL said it would not be an equity participant in any proposed use. Among the restrictions in the RFQ was a usage clause as well as safeguards to protect the long-term interests of Incarnate Word Academy. An elected official from Bel-Nor was the single respondent to the RFQ. The evaluation committee ascertained that the respondent’s proposed conceptual development and financial approach differed substantially from the requirements outlined in the university’s RFQ. UMSL has reverted to its original plan to remove the buildings and return the area to green space. The campus is working with the Incarnate Word Academy to ensure it maintains access to the boiler house that provides it heating and a parking lot that provides access to a cemetery and extra parking.
History. UMSL purchased Normandie and St. Agnes halls from the Congregation of the Sisters of Charity of the Incarnate Word in 1993 for $1.2 million. The buildings sit on 5.25 acres. The buildings initially housed UMSL’s honors college and served as its first-ever residence hall. The honors college moved more than a decade ago to the Provincial House on the South Campus as its enrollment grew from 200 to now about 600. UMSL ceased using the facilities for residential students more than a decade ago when University Meadows, Mansion Hills and Oak Hall were built or bought. For several years, the two buildings housed about 6 to 8 employees of facilities planning. Those individuals moved to another location in early 2014. Ongoing costs and liabilities. The annual cost to operate Normandie and St. Agnes halls runs about $150,000. This includes utilities, standard maintenance and custodial costs. This does not include insurance or costs for "emergency" repairs such as water main breaks, major roof repairs or heating/cooling system supply issues. UMSL renovation priorities. Capital renovation priorities for UMSL include Benton-Stadler halls, Arts Administration Building, Seton Hall, Research Wing and Social Sciences and Business Building. UMSL also has considerable issues with utilities across the entire South Campus that need to be addressed. Consultants. UMSL uses ISES Corporation and Sightlines as its facilities advisors. Renovation/repairs estimates follow.
UNIVERSITY OF MISSOURI – ST. LOUIS Facility Condition Analysis Section One
ISES CORPORATION | 2165 WEST PARK COURT | SUITE N | STONE MOUNTAIN, GA 30087
1.4.1
D. FACILITY CONDITION ANALYSIS - DEFINITIONS The following information is a clarification of the Asset Report using example definitions.
1. MATERIAL AND LABOR COST FACTORS AND ADDITIONAL MARKUPS
The cost summaries and totals are illustrated by detailed projects sorted in multiple formats (shown in Sections 2 and 3). The project costs are adjusted from national averages to reflect conditions in St. Louis, Missouri using the R. S. Means City Cost Index for material / labor cost factors (2010). Typical general contractor and professional fees are also included in the project costs.
2. FACILITY CONDITION NEEDS INDEX (FCNI) (Shown in Sections 1 and 2) FCNI = Facility Condition Needs Index, Total Cost vs. Replacement Cost. The FCNI provides a life
cycle cost comparison. Facility replacement cost is based on replacement with current construction standards for the facility use type, and not original design parameters. This index gives the client a comparison within all buildings for identifying worst case / best case building conditions.
Deferred Maintenance + FCNI = Capital Renewal + Plant Adaption Plant / Facility Replacement Cost 3. PROJECT NUMBER (Shown in Sections 2 and 3)
Example: Project Number = 0001-EL-04 (unique for each independent project)
0001 - Asset Identification Number EL - System Code, EL represents Electrical 04 - Sequential Assignment Project Number by Category / System
GLOBAL MARKUP PERCENTAGES R.S. MEANS
Local Labor Index: 107.2 % of National Average
Local Materials Index: 98.6 % of National Average
General Contractor Markup: 20 % Contractor profit and overhead, bonds and insurance
Professional Fees: 16 % Arch. / Eng. Firm design fees and in-house design cost
UNIVERSITY OF MISSOURI – ST. LOUIS Facility Condition Analysis Section One
ISES CORPORATION | 2165 WEST PARK COURT | SUITE N | STONE MOUNTAIN, GA 30087
1.4.2
4. PROJECT CLASSIFICATION (Shown in Sections 2 and 3)
A. Plant / Program Adaption: Expenditures required to adapt the physical plant to the evolving needs of the institution and to changing codes or standards. These are expenditures beyond normal maintenance. Examples include compliance with changing codes (e.g. accessibility), facility alterations required by changed teaching or research methods, and improvements occasioned by the adoption of modern technology (e.g., the use of personal computer networks).
B. Deferred Maintenance: Refers to expenditures for repairs which were not accomplished as a part of normal maintenance or capital repair which have accumulated to the point that facility deterioration is evident and could impair the proper functioning of the facility. Costs estimated for deferred maintenance projects should include compliance with applicable codes, even if such compliance requires expenditures beyond those essential to affect the needed repairs. Deferred maintenance projects represent catch up expenses.
C. Capital Renewal: A subset of regular or normal facility maintenance which refers to major repairs or the replacement / rebuilding of major facility components (e.g., roof replacement at the end of its normal useful life is capital repair; roof replacement several years after its normal useful life is deferred maintenance).
5. PRIORITY CLASS (Shown in Sections 2 and 3)
PRIORITY 1 - Currently Critical (Immediate)
Projects in this category require immediate action to: a. return a facility to normal operation b. stop accelerated deterioration c. correct a cited safety hazard
PRIORITY 2 - Potentially Critical (Year One)
Projects in this category, if not corrected expeditiously, will become critical within a year. Situations in this category include:
a. intermittent interruptions b. rapid deterioration c. potential safety hazards
PRIORITY 3 - Necessary - Not Yet Critical (Years Two to Five)
Projects in this category include conditions requiring appropriate attention to preclude predictable deterioration or potential downtime and the associated damage or higher costs if deferred further.
PRIORITY 4 - Recommended (Years Six to Ten)
Projects in this category include items that represent a sensible improvement to existing conditions. These items are not required for the most basic function of a facility; however, Priority 4 projects will either improve overall usability and / or reduce long-term maintenance.
UNIVERSITY OF MISSOURI – ST. LOUIS Facility Condition Analysis Section One
ISES CORPORATION | 2165 WEST PARK COURT | SUITE N | STONE MOUNTAIN, GA 30087
1.4.3
6. CATEGORY CODE (Shown in Sections 2 and 3)
Example: Category Code = EL5A EL = System Description 5 = Component Description A = Element Description
CATEGORY CODE* SYSTEM DESCRIPTION
AC1A - AC4B Accessibility
EL1A - EL8A Electrical
ES1A - ES6E Exterior Structure
FS1A - FS6A Fire / Life Safety
HE1A - HE7A Health
HV1A - HV8B HVAC
IS1A - IS6D Interior Finishes / Systems
PL1A - PL5A Plumbing
SI1A - SI4A Site
SS1A - SS7A Security Systems
VT1A - VT7A Vertical Transportation
*Refer to the Category Code Report starting on page 1.5.1. 7. PRIORITY SEQUENCE BY PRIORITY CLASS All projects are assigned both a Priority Sequence number and Priority Class number for categorizing
and sorting projects based on criticality and recommended execution order.
Example: PRIORITY CLASS 1
Code Project No. Priority Sequence HV2C 0001HV04 01 PL1D 0001PL02 02
PRIORITY CLASS 2
Code Project No. Priority Sequence IS1E 0001IS06 03 EL4C 0001EL03 04
University of Missouri - St. LouisFacility Condition Assessment
Section One
A. Asset Summary
Built in 1929, Normandie Hall is a three-story dormitory building with a full basement. St. Agnes Hall
was added in 1960 to the east facade as an addition, but is included in a separate report. The building is
constructed of concrete on a concrete slab, with concrete floors and stone and brick facades. It has a
pitched clay tile roof, with some pitched standing seam copper and flat single-ply membrane areas. The
dorm rooms vary in size and design from floor to floor. In most cases, the single occupancy rooms are
equipped with a sink inside the rooms, and restroom and bathing facilities are shared by floor. The
building appears to have been abandoned as a dormitory, and parts are currently being used as office
space for campus architects. The south wing of the first floor consists of a large chapel. The basement
houses an abandoned kitchen, dining area, and meeting areas. Normandie Hall totals 31,540 square
feet and is located on South Campus at the University of Missouri-St. Louis in St. Louis, Missouri.
The information in this report was gathered during a site visit that concluded on September 7, 2010.
SITE
Landscaping around the building consists of grassy lawns, planting beds, and mature trees. The
landscaping is in good condition and needs no upgrades. Pedestrian paving systems are in overall fair
condition and will need replacement in the next ten years. New systems, including excavation, grading,
base compaction, and paving, are recommended. Vehicular paving systems are included in the report
for St. Agnes Hall.
EXTERIOR
Stone and brick veneer are the primary exterior finishes. While the systems are fundamentally sound,
exposure to the elements has caused some deterioration of the mortar joints and expansion joints.
Cleaning, surface preparation, selective repairs, and applied finish or penetrating sealant upgrades are
recommended to restore the aesthetics and integrity of the building envelope.
It is recommended that aged and inefficient primary and secondary entrance and service doors be
replaced. The replacement units should maintain the architectural design aspects of this facility and
should be modern, energy-efficient applications.
It is recommended that the single-pane, wood windows be upgraded to thermal-pane systems, which will
reduce the energy required to operate the building. Repair or replacement of the windowsills and trim
may also be necessary.
The single-ply membrane roofing system is not expected to outlast the scope of this analysis, and the
clay tile roof has served beyond its intended life cycle. Broken tiles and poor installation can lead to
collateral water damage to the interior of the facility. Also, the pitched standing seam copper roof is
developing stress conditions that will lead to failure if left unattended. Future budget modeling should
include a provision for the replacement of all failing roofing systems. Replace the roofs with similar
applications.
INTERIOR/FINISH SYS.
Floor finishes consist of carpet, ceramic tile, and hardwood flooring. Walls are painted plaster, and
ceilings are spline tile or painted plaster. These finishes vary in age and condition from area to area.
Floor, wall, and ceiling finish upgrades should be considered as part of any future cosmetic
improvements or major comprehensive renovation efforts.
1.1.1
University of Missouri - St. LouisFacility Condition Assessment
Section One
The condition of the interior door systems is such that door system replacement is recommended as
part of a comprehensive renovation effort. Complete demolition of the door systems and replacement
according to a code compliant plan to properly protect egress passages is recommended. Lever door
hardware and Braille signage should be included in this effort.
ACCESSIBILITY
Access to the building is provided by a ramp system on the south facade to St. Agnes Hall. From this
point, there is a crossover corridor to Normandie Hall. Once inside the building, a single passenger
elevator provides access between floors. A larger elevator in St. Agnes also provides access to each
floor by way of a connecting corridor. There are few accessible amenities in this building, so several
accessibility upgrades are recommended.
Current accessibility legislation requires that site stairs and ramps have proper handrail systems. The
stair systems around the building do not have handrails that meet modern requirements. To comply with
the intent of this legislation, it is recommended that ADA compliant, painted metal handrails be installed
at all entrances as required.
The restroom fixtures and finishes are mostly original to the year of construction or latest major
renovation. The fixtures are sound but dated and are spaced such that clearances are not ADA
compliant. A comprehensive restroom renovation, including new fixtures, finishes, partitions,
accessories, and dual level drinking fountains, is recommended. Restroom expansion may be
necessary in order to meet modern minimum fixture count and accessibility requirements.
Current accessibility legislation requires that stairs have graspable handrails on both sides, that the rails
have a specific end geometry, and that the handrails continue horizontally at the landings. In addition,
guardrails must prevent the passage of a 4 inch diameter sphere (6 inches in the triangle formed by the
lower rail and tread / riser angle). Although the stairs are compliant with the code enforced at the time of
construction until a major renovation occurs, they are deficient in handrail and guardrail design relative to
current standards. Also, the finishes on the stairs have deteriorated or are otherwise unsafe. Future
renovation efforts should include comprehensive stair railing and finish upgrades.
Interior doors lack proper door hardware and signage. Lever door hardware and Braille signage will be
included in the building-wide interior door replacement previously mentioned in the Interior Finishes
section of this report.
HEALTH
There were no reports or evidence of asbestos-containing material (ACMs) in the building. Walk-in
coolers / freezers in the basement are aging and have been in service beyond their expected life cycles.
It is recommended that they be replaced, including the mechanical systems and insulated enclosures.
FIRE/LIFE SAFETY
The paths of egress in this building are adequate with regard to fire rating. No fire / life safety issues
related to architectural features were observed during the inspection. This facility is protected by a
central fire alarm system. The point addressable panel was manufactured by Simplex and is located on
the first floor. Although the fire alarm panel has been upgraded, the system utilizes antiquated smoke
detectors, aged pull stations, and old style bell-type annunciators. It is recommended that the existing
system be replaced with a modern fire alarm system that includes a point addressable, Class A,
supervised fire alarm panel with battery backup and an annunciator. It should also include pull stations,
1.1.2
University of Missouri - St. LouisFacility Condition Assessment
Section One
audible / visible devices, smoke detectors, and heat detectors. Include a dial-up device or transponder to
notify an applicable receiving fire station of trouble or activation. Design and install the system in
accordance with current NFPA and ADA requirements.
This facility has manual chemical-type fire extinguishers and standpipe cabinets for fire suppression. It
is recommended by the NFPA that buildings such as this one contain fire sprinkler systems. To reduce
overall liability and risk of loss, light hazard, wet-pipe fire suppression should be installed throughout the
structure, including piping, sprinkler heads (as required by code), and pipe bracing. Install flow switches
and sensors that interface with the present fire alarm system (recommended fire alarm system).
The path of egress is marked with aged incandescent or fluorescent exit signs. These units appear to
provide adequate coverage, but LED exit signs are more energy efficient and require less maintenance.
It is recommended that all of the exit signs be replaced with LED units.
Emergency lighting is provided by aged twin beam, battery backup light fixtures located in corridors.
These units are showing signs of age and are recommended for replacement. Remove the existing
unitary emergency lights, and incorporate this functionality into the standard lighting systems. This can
be accomplished as part of the proposed interior lighting upgrade.
HVAC
This facility is on the campus steam loop. Steam is circulated as the heating medium or converted to
hot water by a heat exchanger located in the basement. The cooling medium is supplied by the campus
chilled water loop. The loops are believed to be fed from the Incarnate Word Boiler House.
This facility is served by a hydronic heating system, and perimeter radiators are present for heating. The
equipment appears to be aging, original units. A forced-air HVAC system with multizone air handling
units is also present. The air handling units have hot water heating coils and chilled water cooling coils.
The air distribution network furnishes constant volume air to the occupied spaces. The controls for this
system are electronic and were manufactured by Honeywell.
Supplemental HVAC is provided by a packaged unit located on-site. The unit utilizes DX cooling and
electric heat and is controlled with electronic thermostats. The packaged unit appears to be in adequate
condition, with no issues reported. Facility exhaust is provided by through-wall fans serving restrooms
and the basement mechanical room. These units vary in condition, with some showing signs of age.
The components of the HVAC system, in general, are approaching the ends of their expected life cycles.
It should be anticipated that the system will require replacement within the scope of this analysis.
ELECTRICAL
Power enters the facility at 120/208 volts through a basement electrical room. A main panel
manufactured by Federal Pacific distributes the power. The unit is rated for 400 amp service. Power is
then distributed throughout the facility to secondary electrical panels for HVAC, lighting, and general
purpose loads. The panels are a combination of new and original equipment where some renovations
have taken place. The majority of the equipment is original to the construction of the facility. To
maintain reliable service throughout the facility, it is recommended that the electrical distribution network
be upgraded. Emergency power for this facility is generated at a district site. This provision is sufficient,
and there are no emergency power generation projects recommended at this time.
The interior spaces of this facility are illuminated by fixtures that utilize compact, T12, and T8 fluorescent
lamps. The fluorescent fixtures are predominantly surface-mounted applications with acrylic lenses.
Energy-efficient ballasts and lamps were retrofitted into some of the fixtures. The interior lighting is a
1.1.3
University of Missouri - St. LouisFacility Condition Assessment
Section One
combination of new and aged equipment. It is recommended that all aged interior lighting (approximately
one-third of the building) be replaced. Specify energy-efficient fixtures, and install occupancy sensors
where possible. It is also recommended that the unitary emergency lighting fixtures be removed and that
their functionality be incorporated into the new interior lighting systems.
The exterior areas adjacent to the building are illuminated by building-mounted HID lighting, decorative
wall-mounted fixtures, and stanchion-mounted fixtures. The exterior lighting systems are adequate and
in good condition. It is probable that they will outlast the purview of this report.
PLUMBING
The main incoming domestic water enters the facility on the basement floor from an adjacent facility.
Copper piping is then utilized to distribute water throughout the building. The system appears to be in
average condition, with original piping serving the majority of the building. An upgrade is recommended
to replace the original or aged domestic water piping.
The drain piping network is cast-iron, with bell-and-spigot connections and some plastic piping. It
appears to be a combination of new and aged piping where repairs have taken place, indicating that the
older piping is starting to fail. Remove the existing sanitary and storm drain piping. Install new cast-iron
drain piping networks with copper run-outs to all fixtures. Also install new floor drains, roof drains, and
traps as needed.
Domestic hot water is produced in an adjacent facility and then fed to this building by a copper piping
network. No projects are recommended for the domestic hot water system at this time. The plumbing
fixtures are ceramic and stainless steel. They appear to be original and utilize manual flush valves and
faucets. The fixtures are a combination of new and original equipment. It is recommended that all aged
or original plumbing fixtures be upgraded. This action is detailed in the Accessibility section of this
report.
A sump pump system facilitates the drainage of storm water from this facility. The system is beginning
to show signs of age and is approaching the end of its statistical life cycle. It is recommended that it be
replaced in order to preclude failure.
VERT. TRANSPORTATION
This facility is served by a hydraulic passenger elevator with a travel of four floors. The unit was installed
by Montgomery Elevator Company in 1984 and has a capacity of 1,500 pounds. The mechanical
components of this system are aged. It is recommended that this elevator be modernized within the
scope of this report. This work entails, but is not limited to, a new machine, pump, and controller.
Note: The deficiencies outlined in this report were noted from a visual inspection. ISES engineers and
architects developed projects with related costs that are needed over the next ten-year period to bring
the facility to “like-new” condition. The costs developed do not represent the cost of a complete facility
renovation. Soft costs not represented in this report include telecommunications, furniture, window
treatment, space change, program issues, relocation, swing space, contingency, or costs that could not
be identified or determined from the visual inspection and available building information. However,
existing fixed building components and systems were thoroughly inspected. The developed costs
represent correcting existing deficiencies and anticipated life cycle failures (within a ten-year period) to
bring the facility to modern standards without any anticipation of change to facility space layout or
function. Please refer to Section Three of this report for recommended Specific Project Details.
1.1.4
Detailed Project Totals
Facility Condition Assessment
System Code by Priority Class
1 2 3 4 Subtotal
Priority Classes
System DescriptionCode
System
SS038 : NORMANDIE HALL
428,558AC ACCESSIBILITY 27,293 284,775 116,490 0
475,750EL ELECTRICAL 0 0 475,750 0
1,888,928ES EXTERIOR 0 0 1,888,928 0
494,295FS FIRE/LIFE SAFETY 0 360,697 133,598 0
33,933HE HEALTH 0 0 33,933 0
1,007,784HV HVAC 0 0 1,007,784 0
1,197,454IS INTERIOR/FINISH SYS. 0 0 1,197,454 0
544,046PL PLUMBING 0 0 544,046 0
13,244SI SITE 0 0 13,244 0
278,699VT VERT. TRANSPORTATION 0 0 278,699 0
TOTALS $27,293 $645,472 $5,689,927 $0 $6,362,693
Current Replacement Value
Facility Condition Needs Index
$12,925,852
0.49
Gross Square Feet Total Cost Per Square Foot $201.73 31,540
2.1.1
Detailed Project Totals
Facility Condition Assessment
System Code by Project Class
Subtotal
Project Classes
System DescriptionCode
System
Capital Renewal Deferred Maintenance Plant Adaption
SS038 : NORMANDIE HALL
AC ACCESSIBILITY 0 0 428,558 428,558
EL ELECTRICAL 0 475,750 0 475,750
ES EXTERIOR 13,271 1,875,658 0 1,888,928
FS FIRE/LIFE SAFETY 121,485 12,114 360,697 494,295
HE HEALTH 0 33,933 0 33,933
HV HVAC 0 1,007,784 0 1,007,784
IS INTERIOR/FINISH SYS. 149,077 1,048,377 0 1,197,454
PL PLUMBING 0 544,046 0 544,046
SI SITE 0 13,244 0 13,244
VT VERT. TRANSPORTATION 0 278,699 0 278,699
TOTALS $6,362,693 $283,833 $5,289,604 $789,255
Current Replacement Value
Facility Condition Needs Index
$12,925,852
0.49
Gross Square Feet Total Cost Per Square Foot $201.73 31,540
2.1.2.2
Detailed Project Summary
Facility Condition Assessment
Priority Class - Priority Sequence
Total
Cost
Professional
Fee
Construction
CostProject Title
Pri
Seq
Pri
Cls
Project
Number
Cat.
Code
SS038 : NORMANDIE HALL
AC2A SS038AC01 BUILDING ENTRY ACCESSIBILITY UPGRADES 23,529 3,765 27,2931 1
Totals for Priority Class 1 23,529 3,765 27,293
FS3A SS038FS02 FIRE SPRINKLER SYSTEM INSTALLATION 310,946 49,751 360,6972 2
AC3E SS038AC02 RESTROOM RENOVATION 245,496 39,279 284,7752 3
Totals for Priority Class 2 556,441 89,031 645,472
FS1A SS038FS03 REPLACE AND ADD EXIT SIGNS 10,443 1,671 12,1143 4
FS2A SS038FS01 FIRE ALARM SYSTEM REPLACEMENT 104,728 16,757 121,4853 5
HE1A SS038HE01 FOOD SERVICE COLD BOX UPGRADES 29,253 4,680 33,9333 6
AC3B SS038AC03 STAIR SAFETY UPGRADES 100,423 16,068 116,4903 7
ES4B SS038ES05 PITCHED CLAY TILE ROOF REPLACEMENT 198,047 31,687 229,7343 8
ES4B SS038ES06 PITCHED COPPER ROOF REPLACEMENT 14,153 2,264 16,4173 9
ES5B SS038ES03 WINDOW REPLACEMENT 1,265,576 202,492 1,468,0683 10
ES5A SS038ES02 EXTERIOR DOOR REPLACEMENT 34,334 5,493 39,8283 11
ES2B SS038ES01 RESTORE STONE AND BRICK VENEER 104,837 16,774 121,6113 12
ES4B SS038ES04 MEMBRANE ROOF REPLACEMENT 11,440 1,830 13,2713 13
HV3A SS038HV01 HVAC SYSTEM REPLACEMENT 868,779 139,005 1,007,7843 14
EL3B SS038EL02 UPGRADE ELECTRICAL DISTRIBUTION NETWORK 338,904 54,225 393,1283 15
EL4B SS038EL01 INTERIOR LIGHTING UPGRADE 71,225 11,396 82,6213 16
IS1A SS038IS01 REFINISH FLOORING 635,250 101,640 736,8903 17
IS3B SS038IS03 REFINISH CEILINGS 125,859 20,138 145,9973 18
IS4A SS038IS04 REPLACE INTERIOR DOORS 142,664 22,826 165,4903 19
IS2B SS038IS02 REFINISH WALLS 128,515 20,562 149,0773 20
PL1A SS038PL01 WATER SUPPLY PIPING REPLACEMENT 183,633 29,381 213,0143 21
PL2A SS038PL02 DRAIN PIPING REPLACEMENT 274,617 43,939 318,5553 22
PL2B SS038PL03 REPLACE SUMP PUMP 10,756 1,721 12,4773 23
2.2.1
Detailed Project Summary
Facility Condition Assessment
Priority Class - Priority Sequence
Total
Cost
Professional
Fee
Construction
CostProject Title
Pri
Seq
Pri
Cls
Project
Number
Cat.
Code
SS038 : NORMANDIE HALL
SI4A SS038SI01 SITE PAVING UPGRADES 11,417 1,827 13,2443 24
VT7A SS038VT01 COMPREHENSIVE HYDRAULIC ELEVATOR
MODERNIZATION
240,258 38,441 278,6993 25
Totals for Priority Class 3 4,905,110 784,818 5,689,927
Grand Total: 5,485,080 877,613 6,362,693
2.2.2
Specific Project Details
Facility Condition Assessment
Section Three
Project Description
Project Number: SS038AC01 Title: BUILDING ENTRY ACCESSIBILITY
UPGRADES
Priority Sequence: 1
Priority Class: 1
System: ACCESSIBILITY
Component: BUILDING ENTRY
Element: GENERAL
Category Code: AC2A
Building Code: SS038
Building Name: NORMANDIE HALL
Subclass/Savings: Not Applicable
Code Application:
Project Class: Plant Adaption
Project Date: 10/21/2010
Project
Location: Undefined: Floor(s) 1
Project Description
Current accessibility legislation requires that site stairs and ramps have proper handrail systems. The stair
systems around the building do not have handrails that meet modern requirements. To comply with the intent of
this legislation, it is recommended that ADA compliant, painted metal handrails be installed at all entrances as
required.
ADAAG 403.6, 505
3.1.1
Specific Project Details
Facility Condition Assessment
Section Three
Project Number:
Task Cost Estimate
Task Description
SS038AC01
Unit Qnty Unit CostMaterial
Total
CostMaterial Labor
Unit Cost
Total
Labor
Cost
Project Cost
Total
Cost
Freestanding handrail system, painted LF 50 $94.88 $4,744 $156 $7,800 $12,544
Wall-mounted handrail system, painted LF 50 $52.59 $2,630 $36.87 $1,844 $4,473
$17,017Project Totals: $7,374 $9,644
$17,017Material/Labor Cost
Material Index 98.60
Labor Index 107.20
Material/Labor Indexed Cost $17,608
General Contractor Mark Up at 20.0% + $3,522
Inflation + $2,399
Construction Cost $23,529
Professional Fees at 16.0% + $3,765
Total Project Cost $27,293
3.1.2
Specific Project Details
Facility Condition Assessment
Section Three
Project Description
Project Number: SS038FS02 Title: FIRE SPRINKLER SYSTEM
INSTALLATION
Priority Sequence: 2
Priority Class: 2
System: FIRE/LIFE SAFETY
Component: SUPPRESSION
Element: SPRINKLERS
Category Code: FS3A
Building Code: SS038
Building Name: NORMANDIE HALL
Subclass/Savings: Not Applicable
Code Application:
Project Class: Plant Adaption
Project Date: 10/25/2010
Project
Location: Floor-wide: Floor(s) 1, 2, 3, B
Project Description
Install an automatic fire sprinkler system in unprotected areas throughout the facility. This includes piping,
valves, sprinkler heads, and piping supports. Install flow switches and sensors to interface with the fire alarm
system.
NFPA 1, 13, 13R, 101
3.1.3
Specific Project Details
Facility Condition Assessment
Section Three
Project Number:
Task Cost Estimate
Task Description
SS038FS02
Unit Qnty Unit CostMaterial
Total
CostMaterial Labor
Unit Cost
Total
Labor
Cost
Project Cost
Total
Cost
Install a wet-pipe sprinkler system,
including valves, piping, sprinkler heads,
piping supports, etc.
SF 31,540 $3.21 $101,243 $3.93 $123,952 $225,196
$225,196Project Totals: $101,243 $123,952
$225,196Material/Labor Cost
Material Index 98.60
Labor Index 107.20
Material/Labor Indexed Cost $232,703
General Contractor Mark Up at 20.0% + $46,541
Inflation + $31,702
Construction Cost $310,946
Professional Fees at 16.0% + $49,751
Total Project Cost $360,697
3.1.4
Specific Project Details
Facility Condition Assessment
Section Three
Project Description
Project Number: SS038AC02 Title: RESTROOM RENOVATION
Priority Sequence: 3
Priority Class: 2
System: ACCESSIBILITY
Component: INTERIOR PATH OF TRAVEL
Element: RESTROOMS/BATHROOMS
Category Code: AC3E
Building Code: SS038
Building Name: NORMANDIE HALL
Subclass/Savings: Not Applicable
Code Application:
Project Class: Plant Adaption
Project Date: 10/21/2010
Project
Location: Floor-wide: Floor(s) 1, 2, 3, B
Project Description
The restroom fixtures and finishes are mostly original to the year of construction or latest major renovation. The
fixtures are sound but dated and are spaced such that clearances are not ADA compliant. A comprehensive
restroom renovation, including new fixtures, finishes, partitions, accessories, and dual level drinking fountains, is
recommended. Restroom expansion may be necessary in order to meet modern minimum fixture count and
accessibility requirements.
ADAAG 211, 602, 604, 605, 606, 607, 608
3.1.5
Specific Project Details
Facility Condition Assessment
Section Three
Project Number:
Task Cost Estimate
Task Description
SS038AC02
Unit Qnty Unit CostMaterial
Total
CostMaterial Labor
Unit Cost
Total
Labor
Cost
Project Cost
Total
Cost
Major restroom renovation, including
fixtures, finishes, partitions, accessories,
and expansion if necessary (assumes 55
square feet of restroom area per fixture)
FIXT 40 $2,050 $82,000 $1,770 $70,800 $152,800
Dual level drinking fountain EA 4 $1,266 $5,064 $389 $1,556 $6,620
Alcove construction EA 4 $913 $3,652 $3,897 $15,588 $19,240
$178,660Project Totals: $90,716 $87,944
$178,660Material/Labor Cost
Material Index 98.60
Labor Index 107.20
Material/Labor Indexed Cost $183,722
General Contractor Mark Up at 20.0% + $36,744
Inflation + $25,029
Construction Cost $245,496
Professional Fees at 16.0% + $39,279
Total Project Cost $284,775
3.1.6
Specific Project Details
Facility Condition Assessment
Section Three
Project Description
Project Number: SS038FS03 Title: REPLACE AND ADD EXIT SIGNS
Priority Sequence: 4
Priority Class: 3
System: FIRE/LIFE SAFETY
Component: LIGHTING
Element: EGRESS LTG./EXIT SIGNAGE
Category Code: FS1A
Building Code: SS038
Building Name: NORMANDIE HALL
Subclass/Savings: Energy Conservation $120.00
Code Application:
Project Class: Deferred Maintenance
Project Date: 10/25/2010
Project
Location: Floor-wide: Floor(s) 1, 2, 3, B
Project Description
Replace the existing exit signage throughout the building, and install new exit signs as needed. The new units
should be connected to the emergency power network. LED type exit signs are recommended, because they
are energy efficient and require minimal maintenance.
NFPA 101-47
IBC 1011
3.1.7
Specific Project Details
Facility Condition Assessment
Section Three
Project Number:
Task Cost Estimate
Task Description
SS038FS03
Unit Qnty Unit CostMaterial
Total
CostMaterial Labor
Unit Cost
Total
Labor
Cost
Project Cost
Total
Cost
Replacement of existing exit signs with
LED units
EA 34 $79.00 $2,686 $89.00 $3,026 $5,712
Installation of new LED exit signs,
including all connections
EA 5 $128 $640 $241 $1,205 $1,845
$7,557Project Totals: $3,326 $4,231
$7,557Material/Labor Cost
Material Index 98.60
Labor Index 107.20
Material/Labor Indexed Cost $7,815
General Contractor Mark Up at 20.0% + $1,563
Inflation + $1,065
Construction Cost $10,443
Professional Fees at 16.0% + $1,671
Total Project Cost $12,114
3.1.8
Specific Project Details
Facility Condition Assessment
Section Three
Project Description
Project Number: SS038FS01 Title: FIRE ALARM SYSTEM REPLACEMENT
Priority Sequence: 5
Priority Class: 3
System: FIRE/LIFE SAFETY
Component: DETECTION ALARM
Element: GENERAL
Category Code: FS2A
Building Code: SS038
Building Name: NORMANDIE HALL
Subclass/Savings: Not Applicable
Code Application:
Project Class: Capital Renewal
Project Date: 10/25/2010
Project
Location: Floor-wide: Floor(s) 1, 2, 3, B
Project Description
Upgrade the existing fire alarm system with a modern application. Specify a point addressable supervised main
fire alarm panel with an annunciator. This work includes pull stations, audible and visible alarms, smoke and
heat detectors, and a wiring network. Install all devices in accordance with current NFPA and ADA
requirements. The system should be monitored to report activation or trouble to an applicable receiving station.
ADAAG 702.1
NFPA 1, 101
3.1.9
Specific Project Details
Facility Condition Assessment
Section Three
Project Number:
Task Cost Estimate
Task Description
SS038FS01
Unit Qnty Unit CostMaterial
Total
CostMaterial Labor
Unit Cost
Total
Labor
Cost
Project Cost
Total
Cost
Fire alarm control panel(s), annunciator,
smoke and heat detectors, manual pull
stations, audible and visual alarms,
wiring, raceways, cut and patching
materials
SF 31,540 $1.52 $47,941 $0.92 $29,017 $76,958
$76,958Project Totals: $47,941 $29,017
$76,958Material/Labor Cost
Material Index 98.60
Labor Index 107.20
Material/Labor Indexed Cost $78,376
General Contractor Mark Up at 20.0% + $15,675
Inflation + $10,678
Construction Cost $104,728
Professional Fees at 16.0% + $16,757
Total Project Cost $121,485
3.1.10
Specific Project Details
Facility Condition Assessment
Section Three
Project Description
Project Number: SS038HE01 Title: FOOD SERVICE COLD BOX UPGRADES
Priority Sequence: 6
Priority Class: 3
System: HEALTH
Component: ENVIRONMENTAL CONTROL
Element: EQUIPMENT AND ENCLOSURES
Category Code: HE1A
Building Code: SS038
Building Name: NORMANDIE HALL
Subclass/Savings: Not Applicable
Code Application:
Project Class: Deferred Maintenance
Project Date: 10/25/2010
Project
Location: Room Only: Floor(s) B
Project Description
Replacement of the food service walk-in cooler / freezer systems is recommended. This includes the
mechanical systems and associated insulated enclosures. For the mechanical systems of the replacement
units, specify non-CFC / HCFC refrigerant based systems of the latest energy-efficient design.
ASHRAE 15-2004
3.1.11
Specific Project Details
Facility Condition Assessment
Section Three
Project Number:
Task Cost Estimate
Task Description
SS038HE01
Unit Qnty Unit CostMaterial
Total
CostMaterial Labor
Unit Cost
Total
Labor
Cost
Project Cost
Total
Cost
Refrigeration system, including
compressor, evaporator unit, controls,
refrigerant, and demolition of existing
equipment
SYS 1 $3,480 $3,480 $2,580 $2,580 $6,060
Replace standard cooler / freezer,
galvanized panels and insulation, 7 foot 6
inch ceiling, shelving, and vapor barrier
SF 120 $81.58 $9,790 $46.97 $5,636 $15,426
$21,486Project Totals: $13,270 $8,216
$21,486Material/Labor Cost
Material Index 98.60
Labor Index 107.20
Material/Labor Indexed Cost $21,892
General Contractor Mark Up at 20.0% + $4,378
Inflation + $2,982
Construction Cost $29,253
Professional Fees at 16.0% + $4,680
Total Project Cost $33,933
3.1.12
Specific Project Details
Facility Condition Assessment
Section Three
Project Description
Project Number: SS038AC03 Title: STAIR SAFETY UPGRADES
Priority Sequence: 7
Priority Class: 3
System: ACCESSIBILITY
Component: INTERIOR PATH OF TRAVEL
Element: STAIRS AND RAILINGS
Category Code: AC3B
Building Code: SS038
Building Name: NORMANDIE HALL
Subclass/Savings: Not Applicable
Code Application:
Project Class: Plant Adaption
Project Date: 10/21/2010
Project
Location: Floor-wide: Floor(s) 1, 2, 3, B
Project Description
Current accessibility legislation requires that stairs have graspable handrails on both sides, that the rails have a
specific end geometry, and that the handrails continue horizontally at the landings. In addition, guardrails must
prevent the passage of a 4 inch diameter sphere (6 inches in the triangle formed by the lower rail and tread /
riser angle). Although the stairs are compliant with the code enforced at the time of construction until a major
renovation occurs, they are deficient in handrail and guardrail design relative to current standards. Also, the
finishes on the stairs have deteriorated or are otherwise unsafe. Future renovation efforts should include
comprehensive stair railing and finish upgrades.
IBC 1003.3
ADAAG 505
3.1.13
Specific Project Details
Facility Condition Assessment
Section Three
Project Number:
Task Cost Estimate
Task Description
SS038AC03
Unit Qnty Unit CostMaterial
Total
CostMaterial Labor
Unit Cost
Total
Labor
Cost
Project Cost
Total
Cost
Wall-mounted handrail system per floor FLR 13 $596 $7,748 $542 $7,046 $14,794
Switchback handrail / guardrail system
per floor
FLR 13 $1,351 $17,563 $867 $11,271 $28,834
Stair tread and landing finish upgrades
per floor
FLR 13 $1,509 $19,617 $805 $10,465 $30,082
$73,710Project Totals: $44,928 $28,782
$73,710Material/Labor Cost
Material Index 98.60
Labor Index 107.20
Material/Labor Indexed Cost $75,153
General Contractor Mark Up at 20.0% + $15,031
Inflation + $10,239
Construction Cost $100,423
Professional Fees at 16.0% + $16,068
Total Project Cost $116,490
3.1.14
Specific Project Details
Facility Condition Assessment
Section Three
Project Description
Project Number: SS038ES05 Title: PITCHED CLAY TILE ROOF
REPLACEMENT
Priority Sequence: 8
Priority Class: 3
System: EXTERIOR
Component: ROOF
Element: REPLACEMENT
Category Code: ES4B
Building Code: SS038
Building Name: NORMANDIE HALL
Subclass/Savings: Energy Conservation $2,200.00
Code Application:
Project Class: Deferred Maintenance
Project Date: 10/21/2010
Project
Location: Floor-wide: Floor(s) R
Project Description
The clay tile roof is recommended for replacement, as it has served beyond its intended life cycle. Broken tiles
and poor installation can lead to collateral water damage to the interior of the facility. Replace the clay tile roof
with a similar application.
Not Applicable
3.1.15
Specific Project Details
Facility Condition Assessment
Section Three
Project Number:
Task Cost Estimate
Task Description
SS038ES05
Unit Qnty Unit CostMaterial
Total
CostMaterial Labor
Unit Cost
Total
Labor
Cost
Project Cost
Total
Cost
Tile roof SF 7,860 $10.47 $82,294 $7.96 $62,566 $144,860
$144,860Project Totals: $82,294 $62,566
$144,860Material/Labor Cost
Material Index 98.60
Labor Index 107.20
Material/Labor Indexed Cost $148,212
General Contractor Mark Up at 20.0% + $29,642
Inflation + $20,192
Construction Cost $198,047
Professional Fees at 16.0% + $31,687
Total Project Cost $229,734
3.1.16
Specific Project Details
Facility Condition Assessment
Section Three
Project Description
Project Number: SS038ES06 Title: PITCHED COPPER ROOF REPLACEMENT
Priority Sequence: 9
Priority Class: 3
System: EXTERIOR
Component: ROOF
Element: REPLACEMENT
Category Code: ES4B
Building Code: SS038
Building Name: NORMANDIE HALL
Subclass/Savings: Energy Conservation $100.00
Code Application:
Project Class: Deferred Maintenance
Project Date: 10/21/2010
Project
Location: Floor-wide: Floor(s) R
Project Description
The pitched standing seam copper roof is developing stress conditions that will lead to failure if left unattended.
The stressed roof needs to be replaced, along with all necessary flashing. Future budget modeling should
include complete replacement with a similar style roof.
Not Applicable
3.1.17
Specific Project Details
Facility Condition Assessment
Section Three
Project Number:
Task Cost Estimate
Task Description
SS038ES06
Unit Qnty Unit CostMaterial
Total
CostMaterial Labor
Unit Cost
Total
Labor
Cost
Project Cost
Total
Cost
Standing seam copper roof SF 490 $10.68 $5,233 $10.34 $5,067 $10,300
$10,300Project Totals: $5,233 $5,067
$10,300Material/Labor Cost
Material Index 98.60
Labor Index 107.20
Material/Labor Indexed Cost $10,591
General Contractor Mark Up at 20.0% + $2,118
Inflation + $1,443
Construction Cost $14,153
Professional Fees at 16.0% + $2,264
Total Project Cost $16,417
3.1.18
Specific Project Details
Facility Condition Assessment
Section Three
Project Description
Project Number: SS038ES03 Title: WINDOW REPLACEMENT
Priority Sequence: 10
Priority Class: 3
System: EXTERIOR
Component: FENESTRATIONS
Element: WINDOWS
Category Code: ES5B
Building Code: SS038
Building Name: NORMANDIE HALL
Subclass/Savings: Energy Conservation $6,500.00
Code Application:
Project Class: Deferred Maintenance
Project Date: 10/21/2010
Project
Location: Building-wide: Floor(s) 1
Project Description
It is recommended that the single-pane, wood windows be upgraded to thermal-pane systems, which will reduce
the energy required to operate the building. Repair or replacement of the windowsills and trim may also be
necessary.
Not Applicable
3.1.19
Specific Project Details
Facility Condition Assessment
Section Three
Project Number:
Task Cost Estimate
Task Description
SS038ES03
Unit Qnty Unit CostMaterial
Total
CostMaterial Labor
Unit Cost
Total
Labor
Cost
Project Cost
Total
Cost
Typical standard glazing and curtainwall
applications
SF 9,520 $59.64 $567,773 $37.95 $361,284 $929,057
$929,057Project Totals: $567,773 $361,284
$929,057Material/Labor Cost
Material Index 98.60
Labor Index 107.20
Material/Labor Indexed Cost $947,120
General Contractor Mark Up at 20.0% + $189,424
Inflation + $129,031
Construction Cost $1,265,576
Professional Fees at 16.0% + $202,492
Total Project Cost $1,468,068
3.1.20
Specific Project Details
Facility Condition Assessment
Section Three
Project Description
Project Number: SS038ES02 Title: EXTERIOR DOOR REPLACEMENT
Priority Sequence: 11
Priority Class: 3
System: EXTERIOR
Component: FENESTRATIONS
Element: DOORS
Category Code: ES5A
Building Code: SS038
Building Name: NORMANDIE HALL
Subclass/Savings: Not Applicable
Code Application:
Project Class: Deferred Maintenance
Project Date: 10/21/2010
Project
Location: Building-wide: Floor(s) 1
Project Description
It is recommended that aged and inefficient primary and secondary entrance and service doors be replaced. The
replacement units should maintain the architectural design aspects of this facility and should be modern,
energy-efficient applications.
Not Applicable
3.1.21
Specific Project Details
Facility Condition Assessment
Section Three
Project Number:
Task Cost Estimate
Task Description
SS038ES02
Unit Qnty Unit CostMaterial
Total
CostMaterial Labor
Unit Cost
Total
Labor
Cost
Project Cost
Total
Cost
High traffic door system LEAF 2 $2,060 $4,120 $2,082 $4,164 $8,284
Low traffic door system LEAF 7 $1,073 $7,511 $1,301 $9,107 $16,618
$24,902Project Totals: $11,631 $13,271
$24,902Material/Labor Cost
Material Index 98.60
Labor Index 107.20
Material/Labor Indexed Cost $25,695
General Contractor Mark Up at 20.0% + $5,139
Inflation + $3,501
Construction Cost $34,334
Professional Fees at 16.0% + $5,493
Total Project Cost $39,828
3.1.22
Specific Project Details
Facility Condition Assessment
Section Three
Project Description
Project Number: SS038ES01 Title: RESTORE STONE AND BRICK VENEER
Priority Sequence: 12
Priority Class: 3
System: EXTERIOR
Component: COLUMNS/BEAMS/WALLS
Element: FINISH
Category Code: ES2B
Building Code: SS038
Building Name: NORMANDIE HALL
Subclass/Savings: Not Applicable
Code Application:
Project Class: Deferred Maintenance
Project Date: 10/21/2010
Project
Location: Building-wide: Floor(s) 1
Project Description
Stone and brick veneer are the primary exterior finishes. While the systems are fundamentally sound, exposure
to the elements has caused some deterioration of the mortar joints and expansion joints. Cleaning, surface
preparation, selective repairs, and applied finish or penetrating sealant upgrades are recommended to restore the
aesthetics and integrity of the building envelope.
Not Applicable
3.1.23
Specific Project Details
Facility Condition Assessment
Section Three
Project Number:
Task Cost Estimate
Task Description
SS038ES01
Unit Qnty Unit CostMaterial
Total
CostMaterial Labor
Unit Cost
Total
Labor
Cost
Project Cost
Total
Cost
Cleaning and surface preparation SF 38,080 $0.12 $4,570 $0.23 $8,758 $13,328
Selective mortar and / or sealant repairs
(assumes 10 linear feet for every 100
square feet of envelope)
LF 3,808 $2.63 $10,015 $5.36 $20,411 $30,426
Applied finish or sealant SF 28,560 $0.23 $6,569 $0.86 $24,562 $31,130
$74,884Project Totals: $21,153 $53,731
$74,884Material/Labor Cost
Material Index 98.60
Labor Index 107.20
Material/Labor Indexed Cost $78,457
General Contractor Mark Up at 20.0% + $15,691
Inflation + $10,689
Construction Cost $104,837
Professional Fees at 16.0% + $16,774
Total Project Cost $121,611
3.1.24
Specific Project Details
Facility Condition Assessment
Section Three
Project Description
Project Number: SS038ES04 Title: MEMBRANE ROOF REPLACEMENT
Priority Sequence: 13
Priority Class: 3
System: EXTERIOR
Component: ROOF
Element: REPLACEMENT
Category Code: ES4B
Building Code: SS038
Building Name: NORMANDIE HALL
Subclass/Savings: Energy Conservation $400.00
Code Application:
Project Class: Capital Renewal
Project Date: 10/21/2010
Project
Location: Floor-wide: Floor(s) R
Project Description
The single-ply membrane roofing system is not expected to outlast the scope of this analysis. Future budget
modeling should include a provision for the replacement of all failing roofing systems. Replace this roof with a
similar application.
Not Applicable
3.1.25
Specific Project Details
Facility Condition Assessment
Section Three
Project Number:
Task Cost Estimate
Task Description
SS038ES04
Unit Qnty Unit CostMaterial
Total
CostMaterial Labor
Unit Cost
Total
Labor
Cost
Project Cost
Total
Cost
Membrane roof SF 1,470 $3.95 $5,807 $1.80 $2,646 $8,453
$8,453Project Totals: $5,807 $2,646
$8,453Material/Labor Cost
Material Index 98.60
Labor Index 107.20
Material/Labor Indexed Cost $8,562
General Contractor Mark Up at 20.0% + $1,712
Inflation + $1,166
Construction Cost $11,440
Professional Fees at 16.0% + $1,830
Total Project Cost $13,271
3.1.26
Specific Project Details
Facility Condition Assessment
Section Three
Project Description
Project Number: SS038HV01 Title: HVAC SYSTEM REPLACEMENT
Priority Sequence: 14
Priority Class: 3
System: HVAC
Component: HEATING/COOLING
Element: SYSTEM RETROFIT/REPLACE
Category Code: HV3A
Building Code: SS038
Building Name: NORMANDIE HALL
Subclass/Savings: Energy Conservation $6,690.00
Code Application:
Project Class: Deferred Maintenance
Project Date: 10/25/2010
Project
Location: Floor-wide: Floor(s) 1, 2, 3, B, R
Project Description
A complete redesign and replacement of the HVAC system is recommended. Demolish and dispose of existing
equipment. Install a new modern HVAC system with variable air volume and constant volume air distribution as
needed. This includes new air handlers, exhaust fans, ductwork, terminal units, heat exchangers, pumps,
piping, controls, and related electrical components. Specify direct digital controls for the new equipment.
Incorporate variable frequency drives into the new HVAC design as applicable.
ASHRAE 62-2004
3.1.27
Specific Project Details
Facility Condition Assessment
Section Three
Project Number:
Task Cost Estimate
Task Description
SS038HV01
Unit Qnty Unit CostMaterial
Total
CostMaterial Labor
Unit Cost
Total
Labor
Cost
Project Cost
Total
Cost
Air handlers, exhaust fans, ductwork,
VAVs, VFDs, DDCs, heat exchangers,
pumps, piping, electrical connections,
and demolition of existing equipment
SF 31,540 $8.98 $283,229 $10.97 $345,994 $629,223
$629,223Project Totals: $283,229 $345,994
$629,223Material/Labor Cost
Material Index 98.60
Labor Index 107.20
Material/Labor Indexed Cost $650,169
General Contractor Mark Up at 20.0% + $130,034
Inflation + $88,576
Construction Cost $868,779
Professional Fees at 16.0% + $139,005
Total Project Cost $1,007,784
3.1.28
Specific Project Details
Facility Condition Assessment
Section Three
Project Description
Project Number: SS038EL02 Title: UPGRADE ELECTRICAL DISTRIBUTION
NETWORK
Priority Sequence: 15
Priority Class: 3
System: ELECTRICAL
Component: SECONDARY DISTRIBUTION
Element: DISTRIBUTION NETWORK
Category Code: EL3B
Building Code: SS038
Building Name: NORMANDIE HALL
Subclass/Savings: Not Applicable
Code Application:
Project Class: Deferred Maintenance
Project Date: 10/25/2010
Project
Location: Floor-wide: Floor(s) 1, 2, 3, B
Project Description
An upgrade of the building electrical system is recommended. Aging components, such as the circuit breakers,
could serve as fire hazards if they fail to open a circuit in an overload or short circuit condition. Remove aged
electrical components and branch circuitry. Install new power panels, switches, raceways, conductors, and
devices. Provide molded case thermal magnetic circuit breakers and HACR circuit breakers for HVAC
equipment. Redistribute the electrical loads to the appropriate areas to ensure safe and reliable power to
building occupants. Provide ground fault circuit interrupter (GFCI) protection where required, and clearly label all
panels for circuit identification.
NEC Articles 110, 210, 220, 230
3.1.29
Specific Project Details
Facility Condition Assessment
Section Three
Project Number:
Task Cost Estimate
Task Description
SS038EL02
Unit Qnty Unit CostMaterial
Total
CostMaterial Labor
Unit Cost
Total
Labor
Cost
Project Cost
Total
Cost
Power panels, conductors, raceways,
devices, demolition, and cut and patching
materials
SF 31,540 $3.10 $97,774 $4.65 $146,661 $244,435
$244,435Project Totals: $97,774 $146,661
$244,435Material/Labor Cost
Material Index 98.60
Labor Index 107.20
Material/Labor Indexed Cost $253,626
General Contractor Mark Up at 20.0% + $50,725
Inflation + $34,553
Construction Cost $338,904
Professional Fees at 16.0% + $54,225
Total Project Cost $393,128
3.1.30
Specific Project Details
Facility Condition Assessment
Section Three
Project Description
Project Number: SS038EL01 Title: INTERIOR LIGHTING UPGRADE
Priority Sequence: 16
Priority Class: 3
System: ELECTRICAL
Component: DEVICES AND FIXTURES
Element: INTERIOR LIGHTING
Category Code: EL4B
Building Code: SS038
Building Name: NORMANDIE HALL
Subclass/Savings: Energy Conservation $780.00
Code Application:
Project Class: Deferred Maintenance
Project Date: 10/25/2010
Project
Location: Floor-wide: Floor(s) 1, 2, 3, B
Project Description
A partial interior lighting upgrade is recommended. Replace existing aged and / or inefficient light fixtures with
modern fixtures of the latest energy-efficient design. Select lamps with the same color temperature and
rendering index for lighting uniformity. Install occupancy sensors in select areas for additional energy
conservation.
NEC Articles 210, 410
3.1.31
Specific Project Details
Facility Condition Assessment
Section Three
Project Number:
Task Cost Estimate
Task Description
SS038EL01
Unit Qnty Unit CostMaterial
Total
CostMaterial Labor
Unit Cost
Total
Labor
Cost
Project Cost
Total
Cost
High efficiency fluorescent fixtures,
occupancy sensors, and demolition of
existing lighting
SF 11,540 $2.01 $23,195 $2.46 $28,388 $51,584
$51,584Project Totals: $23,195 $28,388
$51,584Material/Labor Cost
Material Index 98.60
Labor Index 107.20
Material/Labor Indexed Cost $53,303
General Contractor Mark Up at 20.0% + $10,661
Inflation + $7,262
Construction Cost $71,225
Professional Fees at 16.0% + $11,396
Total Project Cost $82,621
3.1.32
Specific Project Details
Facility Condition Assessment
Section Three
Project Description
Project Number: SS038IS01 Title: REFINISH FLOORING
Priority Sequence: 17
Priority Class: 3
System: INTERIOR/FINISH SYS.
Component: FLOOR
Element: FINISHES-DRY
Category Code: IS1A
Building Code: SS038
Building Name: NORMANDIE HALL
Subclass/Savings: Not Applicable
Code Application:
Project Class: Deferred Maintenance
Project Date: 10/21/2010
Project
Location: Floor-wide: Floor(s) 1, 2, 3, B
Project Description
Floor finishes consist of carpet, ceramic tile, and hardwood flooring. The applications vary in age and condition
from area to area and should be upgraded as part of any future cosmetic improvements or major comprehensive
renovation efforts.
Not Applicable
3.1.33
Specific Project Details
Facility Condition Assessment
Section Three
Project Number:
Task Cost Estimate
Task Description
SS038IS01
Unit Qnty Unit CostMaterial
Total
CostMaterial Labor
Unit Cost
Total
Labor
Cost
Project Cost
Total
Cost
Carpet SF 10,090 $5.58 $56,302 $2.08 $20,987 $77,289
Ceramic tile SF 2,520 $7.54 $19,001 $11.07 $27,896 $46,897
Hardwood replacement SF 12,620 $9.49 $119,764 $17.05 $215,171 $334,935
$459,121Project Totals: $195,067 $264,055
$459,121Material/Labor Cost
Material Index 98.60
Labor Index 107.20
Material/Labor Indexed Cost $475,402
General Contractor Mark Up at 20.0% + $95,080
Inflation + $64,767
Construction Cost $635,250
Professional Fees at 16.0% + $101,640
Total Project Cost $736,890
3.1.34
Specific Project Details
Facility Condition Assessment
Section Three
Project Description
Project Number: SS038IS03 Title: REFINISH CEILINGS
Priority Sequence: 18
Priority Class: 3
System: INTERIOR/FINISH SYS.
Component: CEILINGS
Element: REPLACEMENT
Category Code: IS3B
Building Code: SS038
Building Name: NORMANDIE HALL
Subclass/Savings: Not Applicable
Code Application:
Project Class: Deferred Maintenance
Project Date: 10/21/2010
Project
Location: Floor-wide: Floor(s) 1, 2, 3, B
Project Description
Ceiling finishes consist of spline tile or painted plaster. They vary in age and condition from area to area.
Ceiling finish upgrades should be considered as part of any future cosmetic improvements or major
comprehensive renovation efforts.
Not Applicable
3.1.35
Specific Project Details
Facility Condition Assessment
Section Three
Project Number:
Task Cost Estimate
Task Description
SS038IS03
Unit Qnty Unit CostMaterial
Total
CostMaterial Labor
Unit Cost
Total
Labor
Cost
Project Cost
Total
Cost
Acoustical tile ceiling system SF 15,140 $2.21 $33,459 $3.10 $46,934 $80,393
Painted ceiling finish application SF 10,090 $0.17 $1,715 $0.85 $8,577 $10,292
$90,685Project Totals: $35,175 $55,511
$90,685Material/Labor Cost
Material Index 98.60
Labor Index 107.20
Material/Labor Indexed Cost $94,190
General Contractor Mark Up at 20.0% + $18,838
Inflation + $12,832
Construction Cost $125,859
Professional Fees at 16.0% + $20,138
Total Project Cost $145,997
3.1.36
Specific Project Details
Facility Condition Assessment
Section Three
Project Description
Project Number: SS038IS04 Title: REPLACE INTERIOR DOORS
Priority Sequence: 19
Priority Class: 3
System: INTERIOR/FINISH SYS.
Component: DOORS
Element: GENERAL
Category Code: IS4A
Building Code: SS038
Building Name: NORMANDIE HALL
Subclass/Savings: Not Applicable
Code Application:
Project Class: Deferred Maintenance
Project Date: 10/21/2010
Project
Location: Floor-wide: Floor(s) 1, 2, 3, B
Project Description
The condition of the interior door systems is such that door system replacement is recommended as part of a
comprehensive renovation effort. Complete demolition of the door systems and replacement according to a code
compliant plan to properly protect egress passages is recommended. Lever door hardware and Braille signage
should be included in this effort.
ADAAG 309.4, 703.1
3.1.37
Specific Project Details
Facility Condition Assessment
Section Three
Project Number:
Task Cost Estimate
Task Description
SS038IS04
Unit Qnty Unit CostMaterial
Total
CostMaterial Labor
Unit Cost
Total
Labor
Cost
Project Cost
Total
Cost
Interior door and frame installation, with
all hardware and accessible signage
EA 130 $385 $50,050 $412 $53,560 $103,610
$103,610Project Totals: $50,050 $53,560
$103,610Material/Labor Cost
Material Index 98.60
Labor Index 107.20
Material/Labor Indexed Cost $106,766
General Contractor Mark Up at 20.0% + $21,353
Inflation + $14,545
Construction Cost $142,664
Professional Fees at 16.0% + $22,826
Total Project Cost $165,490
3.1.38
Specific Project Details
Facility Condition Assessment
Section Three
Project Description
Project Number: SS038IS02 Title: REFINISH WALLS
Priority Sequence: 20
Priority Class: 3
System: INTERIOR/FINISH SYS.
Component: PARTITIONS
Element: FINISHES
Category Code: IS2B
Building Code: SS038
Building Name: NORMANDIE HALL
Subclass/Savings: Not Applicable
Code Application:
Project Class: Capital Renewal
Project Date: 10/21/2010
Project
Location: Floor-wide: Floor(s) 1, 2, 3, B
Project Description
Walls are painted plaster and vary in age and condition from area to area. Wall finish upgrades should be
considered as part of any future cosmetic improvements or major comprehensive renovation efforts.
Not Applicable
3.1.39
Specific Project Details
Facility Condition Assessment
Section Three
Project Number:
Task Cost Estimate
Task Description
SS038IS02
Unit Qnty Unit CostMaterial
Total
CostMaterial Labor
Unit Cost
Total
Labor
Cost
Project Cost
Total
Cost
Standard wall finish (paint, wall covering,
etc.)
SF 89,150 $0.17 $15,156 $0.85 $75,778 $90,933
$90,933Project Totals: $15,156 $75,778
$90,933Material/Labor Cost
Material Index 98.60
Labor Index 107.20
Material/Labor Indexed Cost $96,177
General Contractor Mark Up at 20.0% + $19,235
Inflation + $13,103
Construction Cost $128,515
Professional Fees at 16.0% + $20,562
Total Project Cost $149,077
3.1.40
Specific Project Details
Facility Condition Assessment
Section Three
Project Description
Project Number: SS038PL01 Title: WATER SUPPLY PIPING REPLACEMENT
Priority Sequence: 21
Priority Class: 3
System: PLUMBING
Component: DOMESTIC WATER
Element: PIPING NETWORK
Category Code: PL1A
Building Code: SS038
Building Name: NORMANDIE HALL
Subclass/Savings: Not Applicable
Code Application:
Project Class: Deferred Maintenance
Project Date: 10/25/2010
Project
Location: Floor-wide: Floor(s) 1, 2, 3, B
Project Description
Replacement of the aging water piping network is recommended. Failure to replace the water piping will result in
frequent leaks and escalating maintenance costs. Remove the existing water supply network. Install new
copper water supply piping with fiberglass insulation. Also install isolation valves, pressure regulators, shock
absorbers, backflow preventers, and vacuum breakers as needed.
IPC Chapter 6
3.1.41
Specific Project Details
Facility Condition Assessment
Section Three
Project Number:
Task Cost Estimate
Task Description
SS038PL01
Unit Qnty Unit CostMaterial
Total
CostMaterial Labor
Unit Cost
Total
Labor
Cost
Project Cost
Total
Cost
Copper pipe and fittings, valves, backflow
prevention devices, insulation, hangers,
demolition, and cut and patching
materials
SF 31,540 $1.19 $37,533 $2.97 $93,674 $131,206
$131,206Project Totals: $37,533 $93,674
$131,206Material/Labor Cost
Material Index 98.60
Labor Index 107.20
Material/Labor Indexed Cost $137,425
General Contractor Mark Up at 20.0% + $27,485
Inflation + $18,722
Construction Cost $183,633
Professional Fees at 16.0% + $29,381
Total Project Cost $213,014
3.1.42
Specific Project Details
Facility Condition Assessment
Section Three
Project Description
Project Number: SS038PL02 Title: DRAIN PIPING REPLACEMENT
Priority Sequence: 22
Priority Class: 3
System: PLUMBING
Component: WASTEWATER
Element: PIPING NETWORK
Category Code: PL2A
Building Code: SS038
Building Name: NORMANDIE HALL
Subclass/Savings: Not Applicable
Code Application:
Project Class: Deferred Maintenance
Project Date: 10/25/2010
Project
Location: Floor-wide: Floor(s) 1, 2, 3, B
Project Description
Replacement of the aging drain piping is recommended throughout the facility. Failure to replace the old piping
will result in frequent leaks and escalating maintenance costs. Remove sanitary and storm drain piping as
needed. Install new cast-iron drain piping networks with copper run-outs to the fixtures. Also install new floor
drains, roof drains, and traps.
IPC Chapters 7-11
3.1.43
Specific Project Details
Facility Condition Assessment
Section Three
Project Number:
Task Cost Estimate
Task Description
SS038PL02
Unit Qnty Unit CostMaterial
Total
CostMaterial Labor
Unit Cost
Total
Labor
Cost
Project Cost
Total
Cost
Cast-iron drain piping and fittings, copper
pipe and fittings, floor / roof drains, traps,
hangers, demolition, and cut and
patching materials
SF 31,540 $1.89 $59,611 $4.34 $136,884 $196,494
$196,494Project Totals: $59,611 $136,884
$196,494Material/Labor Cost
Material Index 98.60
Labor Index 107.20
Material/Labor Indexed Cost $205,515
General Contractor Mark Up at 20.0% + $41,103
Inflation + $27,998
Construction Cost $274,617
Professional Fees at 16.0% + $43,939
Total Project Cost $318,555
3.1.44
Specific Project Details
Facility Condition Assessment
Section Three
Project Description
Project Number: SS038PL03 Title: REPLACE SUMP PUMP
Priority Sequence: 23
Priority Class: 3
System: PLUMBING
Component: WASTEWATER
Element: PUMPS
Category Code: PL2B
Building Code: SS038
Building Name: NORMANDIE HALL
Subclass/Savings: Not Applicable
Code Application:
Project Class: Deferred Maintenance
Project Date: 10/25/2010
Project
Location: Item Only: Floor(s) B
Project Description
Replacement of the sump pump system is recommended. Remove the existing pump assembly. Install a new
sump pump system, including pit, pump, controls, alarms, piping, and electrical connections.
IPC 712
3.1.45
Specific Project Details
Facility Condition Assessment
Section Three
Project Number:
Task Cost Estimate
Task Description
SS038PL03
Unit Qnty Unit CostMaterial
Total
CostMaterial Labor
Unit Cost
Total
Labor
Cost
Project Cost
Total
Cost
Sump pump system, including pit, pump,
controls, connections, and demolition of
existing system
SYS 1 $4,630 $4,630 $3,250 $3,250 $7,880
$7,880Project Totals: $4,630 $3,250
$7,880Material/Labor Cost
Material Index 98.60
Labor Index 107.20
Material/Labor Indexed Cost $8,049
General Contractor Mark Up at 20.0% + $1,610
Inflation + $1,097
Construction Cost $10,756
Professional Fees at 16.0% + $1,721
Total Project Cost $12,477
3.1.46
Specific Project Details
Facility Condition Assessment
Section Three
Project Description
Project Number: SS038SI01 Title: SITE PAVING UPGRADES
Priority Sequence: 24
Priority Class: 3
System: SITE
Component: GENERAL
Element: OTHER
Category Code: SI4A
Building Code: SS038
Building Name: NORMANDIE HALL
Subclass/Savings: Not Applicable
Code Application:
Project Class: Deferred Maintenance
Project Date: 10/21/2010
Project
Location: Undefined: Floor(s) 1
Project Description
Pedestrian paving systems are in overall fair condition and will need replacement in the next ten years. New
systems, including excavation, grading, base compaction, and paving, are recommended.
Not Applicable
3.1.47
Specific Project Details
Facility Condition Assessment
Section Three
Project Number:
Task Cost Estimate
Task Description
SS038SI01
Unit Qnty Unit CostMaterial
Total
CostMaterial Labor
Unit Cost
Total
Labor
Cost
Project Cost
Total
Cost
Concrete pedestrian paving SF 1,200 $3.09 $3,708 $3.80 $4,560 $8,268
$8,268Project Totals: $3,708 $4,560
$8,268Material/Labor Cost
Material Index 98.60
Labor Index 107.20
Material/Labor Indexed Cost $8,544
General Contractor Mark Up at 20.0% + $1,709
Inflation + $1,164
Construction Cost $11,417
Professional Fees at 16.0% + $1,827
Total Project Cost $13,244
3.1.48
Specific Project Details
Facility Condition Assessment
Section Three
Project Description
Project Number: SS038VT01 Title: COMPREHENSIVE HYDRAULIC
ELEVATOR MODERNIZATION
Priority Sequence: 25
Priority Class: 3
System: VERT. TRANSPORTATION
Component: GENERAL
Element: OTHER
Category Code: VT7A
Building Code: SS038
Building Name: NORMANDIE HALL
Subclass/Savings: Not Applicable
Code Application:
Project Class: Deferred Maintenance
Project Date: 10/25/2010
Project
Location: Room Only: Floor(s) B
Project Description
Comprehensive modernization of the hydraulic elevator in this building is recommended. This should include the
installation of a new hydraulic machine, pump, valve, and solid state controller. Additionally, install new
operating panels, audible notification, emergency lights, hands-free phone, doors and hardware, car finishes,
roller guides, and all connections. Upgrade the pit, as necessary. Upgrade the machine room to meet current
code requirements.
ASME A17.1
3.1.49
Specific Project Details
Facility Condition Assessment
Section Three
Project Number:
Task Cost Estimate
Task Description
SS038VT01
Unit Qnty Unit CostMaterial
Total
CostMaterial Labor
Unit Cost
Total
Labor
Cost
Project Cost
Total
Cost
Comprehensive elevator modernization LOT 1 $80,700 $80,700 $93,500 $93,500 $174,200
$174,200Project Totals: $80,700 $93,500
$174,200Material/Labor Cost
Material Index 98.60
Labor Index 107.20
Material/Labor Indexed Cost $179,802
General Contractor Mark Up at 20.0% + $35,960
Inflation + $24,495
Construction Cost $240,258
Professional Fees at 16.0% + $38,441
Total Project Cost $278,699
3.1.50
UNIVERSITY OF MISSOURI – ST. LOUIS Facility Condition Analysis Section One
ISES CORPORATION | 2165 WEST PARK COURT | SUITE N | STONE MOUNTAIN, GA 30087
1.4.1
D. FACILITY CONDITION ANALYSIS - DEFINITIONS The following information is a clarification of the Asset Report using example definitions.
1. MATERIAL AND LABOR COST FACTORS AND ADDITIONAL MARKUPS
The cost summaries and totals are illustrated by detailed projects sorted in multiple formats (shown in Sections 2 and 3). The project costs are adjusted from national averages to reflect conditions in St. Louis, Missouri using the R. S. Means City Cost Index for material / labor cost factors (2010). Typical general contractor and professional fees are also included in the project costs.
2. FACILITY CONDITION NEEDS INDEX (FCNI) (Shown in Sections 1 and 2) FCNI = Facility Condition Needs Index, Total Cost vs. Replacement Cost. The FCNI provides a life
cycle cost comparison. Facility replacement cost is based on replacement with current construction standards for the facility use type, and not original design parameters. This index gives the client a comparison within all buildings for identifying worst case / best case building conditions.
Deferred Maintenance + FCNI = Capital Renewal + Plant Adaption Plant / Facility Replacement Cost 3. PROJECT NUMBER (Shown in Sections 2 and 3)
Example: Project Number = 0001-EL-04 (unique for each independent project)
0001 - Asset Identification Number EL - System Code, EL represents Electrical 04 - Sequential Assignment Project Number by Category / System
GLOBAL MARKUP PERCENTAGES R.S. MEANS
Local Labor Index: 107.2 % of National Average
Local Materials Index: 98.6 % of National Average
General Contractor Markup: 20 % Contractor profit and overhead, bonds and insurance
Professional Fees: 16 % Arch. / Eng. Firm design fees and in-house design cost
UNIVERSITY OF MISSOURI – ST. LOUIS Facility Condition Analysis Section One
ISES CORPORATION | 2165 WEST PARK COURT | SUITE N | STONE MOUNTAIN, GA 30087
1.4.2
4. PROJECT CLASSIFICATION (Shown in Sections 2 and 3)
A. Plant / Program Adaption: Expenditures required to adapt the physical plant to the evolving needs of the institution and to changing codes or standards. These are expenditures beyond normal maintenance. Examples include compliance with changing codes (e.g. accessibility), facility alterations required by changed teaching or research methods, and improvements occasioned by the adoption of modern technology (e.g., the use of personal computer networks).
B. Deferred Maintenance: Refers to expenditures for repairs which were not accomplished as a part of normal maintenance or capital repair which have accumulated to the point that facility deterioration is evident and could impair the proper functioning of the facility. Costs estimated for deferred maintenance projects should include compliance with applicable codes, even if such compliance requires expenditures beyond those essential to affect the needed repairs. Deferred maintenance projects represent catch up expenses.
C. Capital Renewal: A subset of regular or normal facility maintenance which refers to major repairs or the replacement / rebuilding of major facility components (e.g., roof replacement at the end of its normal useful life is capital repair; roof replacement several years after its normal useful life is deferred maintenance).
5. PRIORITY CLASS (Shown in Sections 2 and 3)
PRIORITY 1 - Currently Critical (Immediate)
Projects in this category require immediate action to: a. return a facility to normal operation b. stop accelerated deterioration c. correct a cited safety hazard
PRIORITY 2 - Potentially Critical (Year One)
Projects in this category, if not corrected expeditiously, will become critical within a year. Situations in this category include:
a. intermittent interruptions b. rapid deterioration c. potential safety hazards
PRIORITY 3 - Necessary - Not Yet Critical (Years Two to Five)
Projects in this category include conditions requiring appropriate attention to preclude predictable deterioration or potential downtime and the associated damage or higher costs if deferred further.
PRIORITY 4 - Recommended (Years Six to Ten)
Projects in this category include items that represent a sensible improvement to existing conditions. These items are not required for the most basic function of a facility; however, Priority 4 projects will either improve overall usability and / or reduce long-term maintenance.
UNIVERSITY OF MISSOURI – ST. LOUIS Facility Condition Analysis Section One
ISES CORPORATION | 2165 WEST PARK COURT | SUITE N | STONE MOUNTAIN, GA 30087
1.4.3
6. CATEGORY CODE (Shown in Sections 2 and 3)
Example: Category Code = EL5A EL = System Description 5 = Component Description A = Element Description
CATEGORY CODE* SYSTEM DESCRIPTION
AC1A - AC4B Accessibility
EL1A - EL8A Electrical
ES1A - ES6E Exterior Structure
FS1A - FS6A Fire / Life Safety
HE1A - HE7A Health
HV1A - HV8B HVAC
IS1A - IS6D Interior Finishes / Systems
PL1A - PL5A Plumbing
SI1A - SI4A Site
SS1A - SS7A Security Systems
VT1A - VT7A Vertical Transportation
*Refer to the Category Code Report starting on page 1.5.1. 7. PRIORITY SEQUENCE BY PRIORITY CLASS All projects are assigned both a Priority Sequence number and Priority Class number for categorizing
and sorting projects based on criticality and recommended execution order.
Example: PRIORITY CLASS 1
Code Project No. Priority Sequence HV2C 0001HV04 01 PL1D 0001PL02 02
PRIORITY CLASS 2
Code Project No. Priority Sequence IS1E 0001IS06 03 EL4C 0001EL03 04
University of Missouri - St. LouisFacility Condition Assessment
Section One
A. Asset Summary
Built in 1960 as an addition to Normandie Hall, St. Agnes Hall is a three-story dormitory building with a
full basement. The building is constructed of concrete on a concrete slab with concrete floors and brick
facades. The roofing system consists of an unballasted, single-ply roof membrane. The dorm rooms
vary in size and design from single occupancy rooms to double occupancy rooms and apartments. In
most cases, two rooms share a common restroom with water closet and sink. Each floor has a
multi-fixture restroom with tub and showers for common use. The apartments have full baths and a
kitchen inside the unit. The basement area contains classrooms and study space for the tenants. St.
Agnes Hall totals 27,613 square feet and is attached to Normandie Hall by a connecting corridor at each
floor. It is located in South Campus at the University of Missouri-St. Louis.
Information for this report was gathered during a site inspection that concluded on September 7, 2010.
SITE
The landscaping around the building consists of grassy lawns, planting beds, and mature trees. The
landscaping is in good condition and needs no remediation. The pedestrian paving systems are in
overall poor condition and represent a liability to the University. New systems, including excavation,
grading, base compaction, and paving, are recommended. The vehicular paving systems are in fair
condition and will also need moderate upgrades.
EXTERIOR
Brick veneer is the primary exterior finish. While the brick is fundamentally sound, exposure to the
elements has caused some deterioration of the mortar joints and expansion joints. Cleaning, surface
preparation, selective repairs, and applied finish or penetrating sealant upgrades are recommended to
restore the aesthetics and integrity of the building envelope.
The single-ply membrane roofing system is not expected to outlast the scope of this analysis. Future
budget modeling should include a provision for the replacement of all failing roofing systems. Replace
this roof with a similar application.
It is recommended that the aged and inefficient exterior door systems be replaced. This
recommendation includes the metal-framed, glass primary doors and the painted metal secondary
entrance and service doors. The replacement units should maintain the architectural design aspects of
this facility. They should be modern, energy-efficient applications that will protect the interior of the
building from the elements.
It is recommended that the single-pane, metal window applications be upgraded to thermal-pane
systems. Such double-pane systems will reduce the energy required to operate the building. Repair or
replacement of the windowsills and trim may also be necessary.
INTERIOR/FINISH SYS.
The interior floor finishes consist of carpet, vinyl tile, and ceramic tile. Interior wall finishes are painted
plaster or concrete walls. The ceiling finishes consist of lay-in, acoustical or spline tile and painted
plaster ceilings. These applications vary in age and condition from area to area. Interior finish upgrades
should be considered as part of any future cosmetic improvements or major comprehensive renovation
efforts.
1.1.1
University of Missouri - St. LouisFacility Condition Assessment
Section One
The condition of the interior door systems is such that door system replacements are recommended as
part of a comprehensive renovation effort. Complete demolition of existing door systems and
replacement according to a code-compliant plan to properly protect egress passages is recommended.
Lever door hardware and Braille signage should be included in this effort.
ACCESSIBILITY
Access to the building is provided by a ramp system on the south facade near accessible parking.
Once inside the building, a single passenger elevator provides access between floors. There are few
accessible amenities in this building, and several recommendations are being made.
Current legislation related to accessibility requires that site stairs and ramps have proper handrail
systems. The west facade stairs and ramp have only one handrail that does not meet current geometry
requirements. To comply with the intent of this legislation, it is recommended that compliant, painted
metal handrails be installed at all entrances as required.
Present accessibility legislation requires that building amenities be generally accessible to all persons.
The configurations of kitchenettes and drinking fountains are barriers to accessibility. The installation of
wheelchair-accessible kitchenette cabinetry is recommended where applicable. All single-level,
refrigerated drinking fountains should be replaced with dual-level units.
The common area restroom fixtures and finishes on each floor are mostly original to the year of
construction or latest major renovation. The fixtures are sound but dated and spaced such that
clearances are not ADA compliant. A comprehensive restroom renovation, including new fixtures,
finishes, partitions, and accessories, is recommended. Restroom expansion may be necessary in order
to meet modern minimum fixture counts and accessibility legislation.
In addition to the common area restrooms, there are no accessibility dorm rooms in this residential
facility. To comply with the intent of the current accessibility legislation, it is recommended that at least
one residential unit be upgraded on each floor. This upgrade should include the installation of a
wheelchair accessible bathroom facility, specialized alarms, and the adaptation of a sleeping room.
Present legislation regarding building accessibility also requires that stairs have graspable handrails on
both sides, that the rails have a specific end geometry, and that the handrails continue horizontally at
the landings. In addition, guards must prevent the passage of a four inch diameter sphere (six inches in
the triangle formed by the lower rail and tread / riser angle). The finishes on the stairs have deteriorated
or are otherwise unsafe. Although the stairs are compliant with the code enforced at the time of
construction until a major renovation occurs, they are deficient in handrail and guard design relative to
current standards. Future renovation efforts should include comprehensive stair railing and finish
upgrades.
HEALTH
Suspected asbestos containing materials (ACMs) are believed to be limited to the original vinyl floor tile
and mastic. While currently sound and manageable in place, future renovation efforts should include
provisions to test and abate any and all ACM. A budget has been created to accomplish this
abatement.
FIRE/LIFE SAFETY
The paths of egress in this building are adequate in regard to fire rating. However, structural fire
separations are not maintained according to code requirements for new construction in select areas of
1.1.2
University of Missouri - St. LouisFacility Condition Assessment
Section One
this facility. These areas include telecom closets on each floor. Although only these instances were
noted, other fire separation compromises may exist elsewhere in this building. It is recommended that
the entire building be surveyed for similar problem areas, especially in conditions and spaces that are
similar to those that were observed. Intumescent passive firestopping and some minor structural
separation repairs should be accomplished promptly.
The facility is served by a dated zoned fire alarm system that was installed in 1960. This system utilizes
antiquated smoke detectors and aged pull stations that are located at the incorrect height for activation,
and old-style bell-type annunciators are present for notification. It is recommended that the existing
system be replaced with a modern fire alarm system that includes a point addressable, Class A,
supervised fire alarm panel with battery backup and an annunciator. It should also include pull stations,
audible / visible devices, smoke detectors, and heat detectors. Include a dial-up device or transponder to
notify an applicable receiving fire station of trouble or activation. Design and install the system in
accordance with current NFPA and ADA requirements.
This facility incorporates manual chemical-type fire extinguishers and standpipe cabinets for fire
suppression. It is recommended by NFPA that buildings contain fire sprinkler systems. Light hazard,
wet-pipe fire suppression should be installed throughout the structure, including piping, sprinkler heads
(as required by code), and pipe bracing. Install flow switches and sensors that interface with the present
or proposed fire alarm system. This installation will reduce overall liability and risk of loss.
The path of egress is marked with aged incandescent or fluorescent exit signs. The units appear to
provide adequate coverage. However, LED exit signs provide features with enhanced energy efficiency
and require less maintenance. It is recommended that all the exit signs be replaced with the LED units.
Emergency lighting is provided by aged twin beam, battery backup light fixtures located in corridors. The
units are showing signs of age and are recommended for replacement. Remove the existing unitary
emergency lights, and incorporate this functionality into the standard lighting systems. This can be
accomplished as a part of the proposed interior lighting upgrade.
HVAC
This facility is on the campus steam loop which is circulated as the heating medium. The cooling
medium is supplied by the campus chilled water loop. The loops are believed to be fed from the
Incarnate Word Boiler House.
This facility is served by a forced-air HVAC system with multi-zone air handling units that supply the
common areas. The HVAC system serving the functional spaces is a four-pipe fan coil unit network.
Minimal fresh air is introduced to the interior spaces. The air handling units have hot steam heating coils
and chilled water cooling coils. The controls for this system are electronic and were manufactured by
Honeywell. Facility exhaust is accomplished by four rooftop fans with some units appearing original.
The components of the HVAC system have aged beyond their statistical life cycles. The system is
inefficient compared to modern standards. It is recommended that the existing HVAC system be
renovated.
ELECTRICAL
Power enters the facility at 120/208 volts through a basement electrical room. A main panel
manufactured by Federal Pacific is present to distribute the power. The unit is rated for a 400 amp
service. Power is then distributed throughout the facility to secondary electrical panels for HVAC,
lighting, and general purpose loads. The panels are a combination of new and original equipment that
have had some renovations. However, the majority of the equipment is original to the construction of the
1.1.3
University of Missouri - St. LouisFacility Condition Assessment
Section One
facility. In order to maintain reliable service throughout the facility, it is recommended that the electrical
distribution network be upgraded.
The interior spaces of this facility are illuminated by fixtures that utilize compact and T8 fluorescent
lamps. The fluorescent fixtures are predominantly surface-mounted applications with acrylic lenses.
Energy-efficient ballasts and lamps were retrofitted into some of the light fixtures. The interior lighting
has generally served beyond its expected life cycle and is recommended for replacement. Specify
energy-efficient light fixtures for the new interior lighting systems, and install occupancy sensors where
possible. It is recommended that the unitary emergency lighting fixtures be removed and their
functionality incorporated into the new interior lighting systems.
The exterior areas adjacent to the building are illuminated by building-mounted HID, compact fluorescent,
and stanchion-mounted fixtures. These exterior light fixtures are currently in good condition. No
upgrades are recommended for the exterior lighting within the scope of this report.
PLUMBING
The main incoming domestic water enters the facility on the basement floor through room one. Copper
piping is then utilized to distribute water throughout the facility. The system appears to be in average
condition with original piping serving the majority of the building. An upgrade is recommended to replace
the original or aged domestic water piping.
The drain piping network consists of cast-iron that contains bell-and-spigot connections with some
plastic applications. The piping network appears to be a combination of new and aged piping where
repairs have taken place, indicating that the older piping is starting to fail. Remove the existing sanitary
and storm drain piping. Install new cast-iron drain piping networks with copper run-outs to all fixtures.
Install new floor drains, roof drains, and traps as needed.
Domestic hot water is produced in an adjacent facility. It is then fed to this building through a copper
piping network. Therefore, no upgrades are recommended for the domestic hot water for this facility for
the purview of this analysis.
The plumbing fixtures consist of ceramic and stainless steel construction and appear original. The units
utilize hand operation controls with no upgrades for ADA considerations. It is recommended that the
plumbing fixtures be upgraded. This issue is addressed in the restroom renovation detailed in the
Accessibility section of this report
VERT. TRANSPORTATION
This facility is served by a hydraulic, passenger elevator with a travel of four floors. The unit was
manufactured by Rotary Elevator in 1960. The elevator has a capacity of 3,500 pounds with a speed of
100 fpm. The mechanical components of this system are aged. It is recommended that this elevator be
modernized within the scope of this report. This upgrade entails, but is not limited to, a new machine,
pump, and controller.
Note: The deficiencies outlined in this report were noted from a visual inspection. ISES engineers and
architects developed projects with related costs that are needed over the next ten-year period to bring
the facility to “like-new” condition. The costs developed do not represent the cost of a complete facility
renovation. Soft costs not represented in this report include telecommunications, furniture, window
treatment, space change, program issues, relocation, swing space, contingency, or costs that could not
1.1.4
University of Missouri - St. LouisFacility Condition Assessment
Section One
be identified or determined from the visual inspection and available building information. However,
existing fixed building components and systems were thoroughly inspected. The developed costs
represent correcting existing deficiencies and anticipated life cycle failures (within a ten-year period) to
bring the facility to modern standards without any anticipation of change to facility space layout or
function. Please refer to Section Three of this report for recommended Specific Project Details.
1.1.5
Detailed Project Totals
Facility Condition Assessment
System Code by Priority Class
1 2 3 4 Subtotal
Priority Classes
System DescriptionCode
System
SS525 : ST AGNES HALL
407,068AC ACCESSIBILITY 13,647 121,484 271,938 0
541,878EL ELECTRICAL 0 0 541,878 0
940,378ES EXTERIOR 0 0 877,996 62,383
442,019FS FIRE/LIFE SAFETY 2,698 422,146 17,174 0
43,387HE HEALTH 0 0 43,387 0
882,306HV HVAC 0 0 882,306 0
759,418IS INTERIOR/FINISH SYS. 0 0 759,418 0
465,385PL PLUMBING 0 0 465,385 0
41,459SI SITE 0 0 41,459 0
343,217VT VERT. TRANSPORTATION 0 0 343,217 0
TOTALS $16,345 $543,630 $4,244,157 $62,383 $4,866,514
Current Replacement Value
Facility Condition Needs Index
$12,269,983
0.40
Gross Square Feet Total Cost Per Square Foot $176.24 27,613
2.1.1
Detailed Project Totals
Facility Condition Assessment
System Code by Project Class
Subtotal
Project Classes
System DescriptionCode
System
Capital Renewal Deferred Maintenance Plant Adaption
SS525 : ST AGNES HALL
AC ACCESSIBILITY 0 0 407,068 407,068
EL ELECTRICAL 0 541,878 0 541,878
ES EXTERIOR 839,595 100,783 0 940,378
FS FIRE/LIFE SAFETY 0 17,174 424,845 442,019
HE HEALTH 0 0 43,387 43,387
HV HVAC 0 882,306 0 882,306
IS INTERIOR/FINISH SYS. 130,850 628,567 0 759,418
PL PLUMBING 0 465,385 0 465,385
SI SITE 0 41,459 0 41,459
VT VERT. TRANSPORTATION 0 343,217 0 343,217
TOTALS $4,866,514 $970,445 $3,020,769 $875,300
Current Replacement Value
Facility Condition Needs Index
$12,269,983
0.40
Gross Square Feet Total Cost Per Square Foot $176.24 27,613
2.1.2.2
Detailed Project Summary
Facility Condition Assessment
Priority Class - Priority Sequence
Total
Cost
Professional
Fee
Construction
CostProject Title
Pri
Seq
Pri
Cls
Project
Number
Cat.
Code
SS525 : ST AGNES HALL
FS5C SS525FS01 ELIMINATE FIRE RATING COMPROMISES 2,326 372 2,6981 1
AC2A SS525AC01 BUILDING ENTRY ACCESSIBILITY UPGRADES 11,764 1,882 13,6471 2
Totals for Priority Class 1 14,091 2,254 16,345
FS2A SS525FS02 FIRE ALARM SYSTEM REPLACEMENT 91,689 14,670 106,3592 3
FS3A SS525FS03 FIRE SPRINKLER SYSTEM INSTALLATION 272,230 43,557 315,7872 4
AC3E SS525AC03 RESTROOM RENOVATION 104,727 16,756 121,4842 5
Totals for Priority Class 2 468,646 74,983 543,630
FS1A SS525FS04 REPLACE AND ADD EXIT SIGNS 14,806 2,369 17,1743 6
HE6F SS525HE01 INTERIOR ASBESTOS ABATEMENT 37,403 5,984 43,3873 7
AC4A SS525AC02 INTERIOR AMENITY ACCESSIBILITY UPGRADES 83,838 13,414 97,2523 8
AC4A SS525AC04 ACCESSIBILITY UPGRADES FOR RESIDENTIAL
FACILITIES
88,793 14,207 103,0003 9
AC3B SS525AC05 STAIR SAFETY UPGRADES 61,798 9,888 71,6863 10
ES5A SS525ES02 EXTERIOR DOOR REPLACEMENT 23,644 3,783 27,4273 11
ES2B SS525ES01 RESTORE BRICK VENEER 63,238 10,118 73,3563 12
ES5B SS525ES03 WINDOW REPLACEMENT 670,011 107,202 777,2133 13
HV3A SS525HV01 HVAC SYSTEM REPLACEMENT 760,609 121,697 882,3063 14
EL3B SS525EL02 UPGRADE ELECTRICAL DISTRIBUTION NETWORK 296,707 47,473 344,1813 15
EL4B SS525EL01 INTERIOR LIGHTING UPGRADE 170,429 27,269 197,6973 16
IS1A SS525IS01 REFINISH FLOORING 243,058 38,889 281,9473 17
IS3B SS525IS03 REFINISH CEILINGS 123,224 19,716 142,9403 18
IS4A SS525IS04 REPLACE INTERIOR DOORS 175,586 28,094 203,6803 19
IS2B SS525IS02 REFINISH WALLS 112,802 18,048 130,8503 20
PL1A SS525PL01 WATER SUPPLY PIPING REPLACEMENT 160,769 25,723 186,4923 21
PL2A SS525PL02 DRAIN PIPING REPLACEMENT 240,425 38,468 278,8933 22
SI4A SS525SI01 SITE PAVING UPGRADES 35,741 5,719 41,4593 23
2.2.1
Detailed Project Summary
Facility Condition Assessment
Priority Class - Priority Sequence
Total
Cost
Professional
Fee
Construction
CostProject Title
Pri
Seq
Pri
Cls
Project
Number
Cat.
Code
SS525 : ST AGNES HALL
VT7A SS525VT01 COMPREHENSIVE HYDRAULIC ELEVATOR
MODERNIZATION
295,876 47,340 343,2173 24
Totals for Priority Class 3 3,658,756 585,401 4,244,157
ES4B SS525ES04 MEMBRANE ROOF REPLACEMENT 53,778 8,604 62,3834 25
Totals for Priority Class 4 53,778 8,604 62,383
Grand Total: 4,195,271 671,243 4,866,514
2.2.2
Specific Project Details
Facility Condition Assessment
Section Three
Project Description
Project Number: SS525FS01 Title: ELIMINATE FIRE RATING COMPROMISES
Priority Sequence: 1
Priority Class: 1
System: FIRE/LIFE SAFETY
Component: EGRESS PATH
Element: SEPARATION RATING
Category Code: FS5C
Building Code: SS525
Building Name: ST AGNES HALL
Subclass/Savings: Not Applicable
Code Application:
Project Class: Plant Adaption
Project Date: 10/21/2010
Project
Location: Floor-wide: Floor(s) 1, 2, 3, B
Project Description
Structural fire separations are not maintained according to code requirements for new construction in select
areas of this facility. These areas include telecom closets on each floor. Although only these instances were
noted, other fire separation compromises may exist elsewhere in this building. It is recommended that the
entire building be surveyed for similar problem areas, especially in conditions and spaces that are similar to
those that were observed. Intumescent passive firestopping and some minor structural separation repairs should
be accomplished promptly.
IBC 711.3
3.1.1
Specific Project Details
Facility Condition Assessment
Section Three
Project Number:
Task Cost Estimate
Task Description
SS525FS01
Unit Qnty Unit CostMaterial
Total
CostMaterial Labor
Unit Cost
Total
Labor
Cost
Project Cost
Total
Cost
Minor passive firestopping efforts SF 13,810 $0.03 $414 $0.09 $1,243 $1,657
$1,657Project Totals: $414 $1,243
$1,657Material/Labor Cost
Material Index 98.60
Labor Index 107.20
Material/Labor Indexed Cost $1,741
General Contractor Mark Up at 20.0% + $348
Inflation + $237
Construction Cost $2,326
Professional Fees at 16.0% + $372
Total Project Cost $2,698
3.1.2
Specific Project Details
Facility Condition Assessment
Section Three
Project Description
Project Number: SS525AC01 Title: BUILDING ENTRY ACCESSIBILITY
UPGRADES
Priority Sequence: 2
Priority Class: 1
System: ACCESSIBILITY
Component: BUILDING ENTRY
Element: GENERAL
Category Code: AC2A
Building Code: SS525
Building Name: ST AGNES HALL
Subclass/Savings: Not Applicable
Code Application:
Project Class: Plant Adaption
Project Date: 10/21/2010
Project
Location: Undefined: Floor(s) 1
Project Description
Current legislation related to accessibility requires that site stairs and ramps have proper handrail systems. The
west facade stairs and ramp have only one handrail that does not meet current geometry requirements. To
comply with the intent of this legislation, it is recommended that compliant, painted metal handrails be installed
at all entrances as required.
ADAAG 403.6, 505
3.1.3
Specific Project Details
Facility Condition Assessment
Section Three
Project Number:
Task Cost Estimate
Task Description
SS525AC01
Unit Qnty Unit CostMaterial
Total
CostMaterial Labor
Unit Cost
Total
Labor
Cost
Project Cost
Total
Cost
Freestanding handrail system, painted
(15 feet minimum)
LF 25 $94.88 $2,372 $156 $3,900 $6,272
Wall-mounted handrail system, painted
(15 feet minimum)
LF 25 $52.59 $1,315 $36.87 $922 $2,237
$8,509Project Totals: $3,687 $4,822
$8,509Material/Labor Cost
Material Index 98.60
Labor Index 107.20
Material/Labor Indexed Cost $8,804
General Contractor Mark Up at 20.0% + $1,761
Inflation + $1,199
Construction Cost $11,764
Professional Fees at 16.0% + $1,882
Total Project Cost $13,647
3.1.4
Specific Project Details
Facility Condition Assessment
Section Three
Project Description
Project Number: SS525FS02 Title: FIRE ALARM SYSTEM REPLACEMENT
Priority Sequence: 3
Priority Class: 2
System: FIRE/LIFE SAFETY
Component: DETECTION ALARM
Element: GENERAL
Category Code: FS2A
Building Code: SS525
Building Name: ST AGNES HALL
Subclass/Savings: Not Applicable
Code Application:
Project Class: Plant Adaption
Project Date: 10/25/2010
Project
Location: Floor-wide: Floor(s) 1, 2, 3, B
Project Description
Upgrade the existing fire alarm system with a modern application. Specify a point addressable, supervised,
main fire alarm panel with an annunciator. This work includes pull stations, audible and visible alarms, smoke
and heat detectors, and a wiring network. Install all devices in accordance with current NFPA and ADA
requirements. The system should be monitored to report activation or trouble to an applicable receiving station.
ADAAG 702.1
NFPA 1, 101
3.1.5
Specific Project Details
Facility Condition Assessment
Section Three
Project Number:
Task Cost Estimate
Task Description
SS525FS02
Unit Qnty Unit CostMaterial
Total
CostMaterial Labor
Unit Cost
Total
Labor
Cost
Project Cost
Total
Cost
Fire alarm control panel(s), annunciator,
smoke and heat detectors, manual pull
stations, audible and visual alarms,
wiring, raceways, and cut and patching
materials
SF 27,613 $1.52 $41,972 $0.92 $25,404 $67,376
$67,376Project Totals: $41,972 $25,404
$67,376Material/Labor Cost
Material Index 98.60
Labor Index 107.20
Material/Labor Indexed Cost $68,617
General Contractor Mark Up at 20.0% + $13,723
Inflation + $9,348
Construction Cost $91,689
Professional Fees at 16.0% + $14,670
Total Project Cost $106,359
3.1.6
Specific Project Details
Facility Condition Assessment
Section Three
Project Description
Project Number: SS525FS03 Title: FIRE SPRINKLER SYSTEM
INSTALLATION
Priority Sequence: 4
Priority Class: 2
System: FIRE/LIFE SAFETY
Component: SUPPRESSION
Element: SPRINKLERS
Category Code: FS3A
Building Code: SS525
Building Name: ST AGNES HALL
Subclass/Savings: Not Applicable
Code Application:
Project Class: Plant Adaption
Project Date: 10/25/2010
Project
Location: Floor-wide: Floor(s) 1, 2, 3, B
Project Description
Install an automatic fire sprinkler system in unprotected areas throughout the facility. This includes piping,
valves, sprinkler heads, and piping supports. Install flow switches and sensors to interface with the fire alarm
system.
NFPA 1, 13, 13R, 101
3.1.7
Specific Project Details
Facility Condition Assessment
Section Three
Project Number:
Task Cost Estimate
Task Description
SS525FS03
Unit Qnty Unit CostMaterial
Total
CostMaterial Labor
Unit Cost
Total
Labor
Cost
Project Cost
Total
Cost
Install a wet-pipe sprinkler system,
including valves, piping, sprinkler heads,
piping supports, etc.
SF 27,613 $3.21 $88,638 $3.93 $108,519 $197,157
$197,157Project Totals: $88,638 $108,519
$197,157Material/Labor Cost
Material Index 98.60
Labor Index 107.20
Material/Labor Indexed Cost $203,729
General Contractor Mark Up at 20.0% + $40,746
Inflation + $27,755
Construction Cost $272,230
Professional Fees at 16.0% + $43,557
Total Project Cost $315,787
3.1.8
Specific Project Details
Facility Condition Assessment
Section Three
Project Description
Project Number: SS525AC03 Title: RESTROOM RENOVATION
Priority Sequence: 5
Priority Class: 2
System: ACCESSIBILITY
Component: INTERIOR PATH OF TRAVEL
Element: RESTROOMS/BATHROOMS
Category Code: AC3E
Building Code: SS525
Building Name: ST AGNES HALL
Subclass/Savings: Not Applicable
Code Application:
Project Class: Plant Adaption
Project Date: 10/21/2010
Project
Location: Floor-wide: Floor(s) 1, 2, 3, B
Project Description
The common area restroom fixtures and finishes on each floor are mostly original to the year of construction or
latest major renovation. The fixtures are sound but dated and are spaced such that clearances are not ADA
compliant. A comprehensive restroom renovation, including new fixtures, finishes, partitions, and accessories,
is recommended. Restroom expansion may be necessary in order to meet modern minimum fixture counts and
accessibility legislation.
ADAAG 604, 605, 606
3.1.9
Specific Project Details
Facility Condition Assessment
Section Three
Project Number:
Task Cost Estimate
Task Description
SS525AC03
Unit Qnty Unit CostMaterial
Total
CostMaterial Labor
Unit Cost
Total
Labor
Cost
Project Cost
Total
Cost
Major restroom renovation, including
fixtures, finishes, partitions, accessories,
and expansion if necessary (assumes 55
square feet of restroom area per fixture)
FIXT 20 $2,050 $41,000 $1,770 $35,400 $76,400
$76,400Project Totals: $41,000 $35,400
$76,400Material/Labor Cost
Material Index 98.60
Labor Index 107.20
Material/Labor Indexed Cost $78,375
General Contractor Mark Up at 20.0% + $15,675
Inflation + $10,677
Construction Cost $104,727
Professional Fees at 16.0% + $16,756
Total Project Cost $121,484
3.1.10
Specific Project Details
Facility Condition Assessment
Section Three
Project Description
Project Number: SS525FS04 Title: REPLACE AND ADD EXIT SIGNS
Priority Sequence: 6
Priority Class: 3
System: FIRE/LIFE SAFETY
Component: LIGHTING
Element: EGRESS LTG./EXIT SIGNAGE
Category Code: FS1A
Building Code: SS525
Building Name: ST AGNES HALL
Subclass/Savings: Energy Conservation $110.00
Code Application:
Project Class: Deferred Maintenance
Project Date: 10/25/2010
Project
Location: Floor-wide: Floor(s) 1, 2, 3, B
Project Description
Replace the existing exit signage throughout the building. Install new exit signs as needed. The new units
should have individual battery packs for backup power. LED exit signs are recommended because they are
energy-efficient and require minimal maintenance. Remove the existing unitary emergency lights and
incorporate this functionality into the standard lighting systems. This can be accomplished as a part of the
proposed interior lighting upgrade.
NFPA 101-47
IBC 1011
3.1.11
Specific Project Details
Facility Condition Assessment
Section Three
Project Number:
Task Cost Estimate
Task Description
SS525FS04
Unit Qnty Unit CostMaterial
Total
CostMaterial Labor
Unit Cost
Total
Labor
Cost
Project Cost
Total
Cost
Replacement of existing exit signs with
new battery pack LED exit signs
EA 30 $138 $4,140 $148 $4,440 $8,580
Installation of new battery pack LED exit
signs, including all connections
EA 5 $192 $960 $241 $1,205 $2,165
$10,745Project Totals: $5,100 $5,645
$10,745Material/Labor Cost
Material Index 98.60
Labor Index 107.20
Material/Labor Indexed Cost $11,080
General Contractor Mark Up at 20.0% + $2,216
Inflation + $1,509
Construction Cost $14,806
Professional Fees at 16.0% + $2,369
Total Project Cost $17,174
3.1.12
Specific Project Details
Facility Condition Assessment
Section Three
Project Description
Project Number: SS525HE01 Title: INTERIOR ASBESTOS ABATEMENT
Priority Sequence: 7
Priority Class: 3
System: HEALTH
Component: HAZARDOUS MATERIAL
Element: OTHER
Category Code: HE6F
Building Code: SS525
Building Name: ST AGNES HALL
Subclass/Savings: Not Applicable
Code Application:
Project Class: Plant Adaption
Project Date: 10/21/2010
Project
Location: Floor-wide: Floor(s) 1, 2, 3, B
Project Description
ACMs are believed to be limited to the original vinyl floor tile and mastic. While currently sound and manageable
in place, future renovation efforts should include provisions to test and abate any and all ACM.
EPA 40 CFR 61.M, 763
OSHA 29 CFR 1910.1001, 1926.1101
3.1.13
Specific Project Details
Facility Condition Assessment
Section Three
Project Number:
Task Cost Estimate
Task Description
SS525HE01
Unit Qnty Unit CostMaterial
Total
CostMaterial Labor
Unit Cost
Total
Labor
Cost
Project Cost
Total
Cost
Typical asbestos abatement of floor tile
and mastic
SF 13,810 $0.24 $3,314 $1.67 $23,063 $26,377
$26,377Project Totals: $3,314 $23,063
$26,377Material/Labor Cost
Material Index 98.60
Labor Index 107.20
Material/Labor Indexed Cost $27,991
General Contractor Mark Up at 20.0% + $5,598
Inflation + $3,813
Construction Cost $37,403
Professional Fees at 16.0% + $5,984
Total Project Cost $43,387
3.1.14
Specific Project Details
Facility Condition Assessment
Section Three
Project Description
Project Number: SS525AC02 Title: INTERIOR AMENITY ACCESSIBILITY
UPGRADES
Priority Sequence: 8
Priority Class: 3
System: ACCESSIBILITY
Component: GENERAL
Element: FUNCTIONAL SPACE MOD.
Category Code: AC4A
Building Code: SS525
Building Name: ST AGNES HALL
Subclass/Savings: Not Applicable
Code Application:
Project Class: Plant Adaption
Project Date: 10/21/2010
Project
Location: Floor-wide: Floor(s) 1, 2, 3, B
Project Description
Present accessibility legislation requires that building amenities be generally accessible to all persons. The
configurations of the kitchenettes and drinking fountains are barriers to accessibility. The installation of
wheelchair-accessible kitchenette cabinetry is recommended where applicable. All single-level, refrigerated
drinking fountains should be replaced with dual-level units.
ADAAG 211, 602, 804
3.1.15
Specific Project Details
Facility Condition Assessment
Section Three
Project Number:
Task Cost Estimate
Task Description
SS525AC02
Unit Qnty Unit CostMaterial
Total
CostMaterial Labor
Unit Cost
Total
Labor
Cost
Project Cost
Total
Cost
ADA-compliant kitchenette unit with base
cabinetry, overhead cabinetry, and
amenities
SYS 4 $5,096 $20,384 $2,082 $8,328 $28,712
Dual-level drinking fountain EA 5 $1,266 $6,330 $389 $1,945 $8,275
Alcove construction including finishes EA 5 $913 $4,565 $3,897 $19,485 $24,050
$61,037Project Totals: $31,279 $29,758
$61,037Material/Labor Cost
Material Index 98.60
Labor Index 107.20
Material/Labor Indexed Cost $62,742
General Contractor Mark Up at 20.0% + $12,548
Inflation + $8,548
Construction Cost $83,838
Professional Fees at 16.0% + $13,414
Total Project Cost $97,252
3.1.16
Specific Project Details
Facility Condition Assessment
Section Three
Project Description
Project Number: SS525AC04 Title: ACCESSIBILITY UPGRADES FOR
RESIDENTIAL FACILITIES
Priority Sequence: 9
Priority Class: 3
System: ACCESSIBILITY
Component: GENERAL
Element: FUNCTIONAL SPACE MOD.
Category Code: AC4A
Building Code: SS525
Building Name: ST AGNES HALL
Subclass/Savings: Not Applicable
Code Application:
Project Class: Plant Adaption
Project Date: 10/21/2010
Project
Location: Undefined: Floor(s) 1
Project Description
In addition to the common area restrooms, there are no accessibility dorm rooms in this residential facility.
Provisions for general accessibility of a room on each floor are recommended. These should include the
installation of a wheelchair accessible bathroom facility, specialized alarms, and the adaptation of a sleeping
room. To comply with the intent of the current accessibility legislation, it is recommended that at least one
residential unit be upgraded on each floor.
ADAAG 224, 806.1, 603, 604, 605, 606, 607, 608
3.1.17
Specific Project Details
Facility Condition Assessment
Section Three
Project Number:
Task Cost Estimate
Task Description
SS525AC04
Unit Qnty Unit CostMaterial
Total
CostMaterial Labor
Unit Cost
Total
Labor
Cost
Project Cost
Total
Cost
Sleeping room specialty alarms, etc. SYS 3 $3,307 $9,921 $1,702 $5,106 $15,027
Bath accessibility upgrade SYS 3 $8,768 $26,304 $7,854 $23,562 $49,866
$64,893Project Totals: $36,225 $28,668
$64,893Material/Labor Cost
Material Index 98.60
Labor Index 107.20
Material/Labor Indexed Cost $66,450
General Contractor Mark Up at 20.0% + $13,290
Inflation + $9,053
Construction Cost $88,793
Professional Fees at 16.0% + $14,207
Total Project Cost $103,000
3.1.18
Specific Project Details
Facility Condition Assessment
Section Three
Project Description
Project Number: SS525AC05 Title: STAIR SAFETY UPGRADES
Priority Sequence: 10
Priority Class: 3
System: ACCESSIBILITY
Component: INTERIOR PATH OF TRAVEL
Element: STAIRS AND RAILINGS
Category Code: AC3B
Building Code: SS525
Building Name: ST AGNES HALL
Subclass/Savings: Not Applicable
Code Application:
Project Class: Plant Adaption
Project Date: 10/21/2010
Project
Location: Floor-wide: Floor(s) 1, 2, 3, B
Project Description
Present legislation regarding building accessibility by the handicapped requires that stairs have graspable
handrails on both sides, that the rails have a specific end geometry, and that the handrails continue horizontally
at the landings. In addition, guards must prevent the passage of a four inch diameter sphere (six inches in the
triangle formed by the lower rail and tread / riser angle). The finishes on the stairs have deteriorated or are
otherwise unsafe. Although the stairs are compliant with the code enforced at the time of construction until a
major renovation occurs, they are deficient in handrail and guard design relative to current standards. Future
renovation efforts should include comprehensive stair railing and finish upgrades.
IBC 1003.3
ADAAG 505
3.1.19
Specific Project Details
Facility Condition Assessment
Section Three
Project Number:
Task Cost Estimate
Task Description
SS525AC05
Unit Qnty Unit CostMaterial
Total
CostMaterial Labor
Unit Cost
Total
Labor
Cost
Project Cost
Total
Cost
Wall-mounted handrail system per floor FLR 8 $596 $4,768 $542 $4,336 $9,104
Switchback handrail / guardrail system
per floor
FLR 8 $1,351 $10,808 $867 $6,936 $17,744
Stair tread and landing finish upgrades
per floor
FLR 8 $1,509 $12,072 $805 $6,440 $18,512
$45,360Project Totals: $27,648 $17,712
$45,360Material/Labor Cost
Material Index 98.60
Labor Index 107.20
Material/Labor Indexed Cost $46,248
General Contractor Mark Up at 20.0% + $9,250
Inflation + $6,301
Construction Cost $61,798
Professional Fees at 16.0% + $9,888
Total Project Cost $71,686
3.1.20
Specific Project Details
Facility Condition Assessment
Section Three
Project Description
Project Number: SS525ES02 Title: EXTERIOR DOOR REPLACEMENT
Priority Sequence: 11
Priority Class: 3
System: EXTERIOR
Component: FENESTRATIONS
Element: DOORS
Category Code: ES5A
Building Code: SS525
Building Name: ST AGNES HALL
Subclass/Savings: Not Applicable
Code Application:
Project Class: Deferred Maintenance
Project Date: 10/21/2010
Project
Location: Building-wide: Floor(s) 1
Project Description
It is recommended that aged and inefficient exterior door systems be replaced. This project includes the
metal-framed, glass primary doors and the painted metal secondary entrance and service doors. The
replacement units should maintain the architectural design aspects of this facility. They should be modern
energy-efficient applications that will protect the interior of the building from the elements.
Not Applicable
3.1.21
Specific Project Details
Facility Condition Assessment
Section Three
Project Number:
Task Cost Estimate
Task Description
SS525ES02
Unit Qnty Unit CostMaterial
Total
CostMaterial Labor
Unit Cost
Total
Labor
Cost
Project Cost
Total
Cost
High traffic door system LEAF 3 $2,060 $6,180 $2,082 $6,246 $12,426
Low traffic door system LEAF 2 $1,073 $2,146 $1,301 $2,602 $4,748
$17,174Project Totals: $8,326 $8,848
$17,174Material/Labor Cost
Material Index 98.60
Labor Index 107.20
Material/Labor Indexed Cost $17,695
General Contractor Mark Up at 20.0% + $3,539
Inflation + $2,411
Construction Cost $23,644
Professional Fees at 16.0% + $3,783
Total Project Cost $27,427
3.1.22
Specific Project Details
Facility Condition Assessment
Section Three
Project Description
Project Number: SS525ES01 Title: RESTORE BRICK VENEER
Priority Sequence: 12
Priority Class: 3
System: EXTERIOR
Component: COLUMNS/BEAMS/WALLS
Element: FINISH
Category Code: ES2B
Building Code: SS525
Building Name: ST AGNES HALL
Subclass/Savings: Not Applicable
Code Application:
Project Class: Deferred Maintenance
Project Date: 10/21/2010
Project
Location: Building-wide: Floor(s) 1
Project Description
Brick veneer is the primary exterior finish. While the brick is fundamentally sound, exposure to the elements
has caused some deterioration of the mortar joints and expansion joints. Cleaning, surface preparation,
selective repairs, and applied finish or penetrating sealant upgrades are recommended to restore the aesthetics
and integrity of the building envelope.
Not Applicable
3.1.23
Specific Project Details
Facility Condition Assessment
Section Three
Project Number:
Task Cost Estimate
Task Description
SS525ES01
Unit Qnty Unit CostMaterial
Total
CostMaterial Labor
Unit Cost
Total
Labor
Cost
Project Cost
Total
Cost
Cleaning and surface preparation SF 20,160 $0.12 $2,419 $0.23 $4,637 $7,056
Selective mortar and / or sealant repairs
(assumes 10 linear feet for every 100
square feet of envelope)
LF 2,016 $2.63 $5,302 $5.36 $10,806 $16,108
Applied finish or sealant SF 20,160 $0.23 $4,637 $0.86 $17,338 $21,974
$45,138Project Totals: $12,358 $32,780
$45,138Material/Labor Cost
Material Index 98.60
Labor Index 107.20
Material/Labor Indexed Cost $47,325
General Contractor Mark Up at 20.0% + $9,465
Inflation + $6,447
Construction Cost $63,238
Professional Fees at 16.0% + $10,118
Total Project Cost $73,356
3.1.24
Specific Project Details
Facility Condition Assessment
Section Three
Project Description
Project Number: SS525ES03 Title: WINDOW REPLACEMENT
Priority Sequence: 13
Priority Class: 3
System: EXTERIOR
Component: FENESTRATIONS
Element: WINDOWS
Category Code: ES5B
Building Code: SS525
Building Name: ST AGNES HALL
Subclass/Savings: Energy Conservation $3,400.00
Code Application:
Project Class: Capital Renewal
Project Date: 10/21/2010
Project
Location: Building-wide: Floor(s) 1
Project Description
It is recommended that the single-pane, metal window applications be upgraded to thermal-pane systems.
Such double-pane systems will reduce the energy required to operate the building. Repair or replacement of the
windowsills and trim may also be necessary.
Not Applicable
3.1.25
Specific Project Details
Facility Condition Assessment
Section Three
Project Number:
Task Cost Estimate
Task Description
SS525ES03
Unit Qnty Unit CostMaterial
Total
CostMaterial Labor
Unit Cost
Total
Labor
Cost
Project Cost
Total
Cost
Typical standard glazing and curtainwall
applications
SF 5,040 $59.64 $300,586 $37.95 $191,268 $491,854
$491,854Project Totals: $300,586 $191,268
$491,854Material/Labor Cost
Material Index 98.60
Labor Index 107.20
Material/Labor Indexed Cost $501,417
General Contractor Mark Up at 20.0% + $100,283
Inflation + $68,311
Construction Cost $670,011
Professional Fees at 16.0% + $107,202
Total Project Cost $777,213
3.1.26
Specific Project Details
Facility Condition Assessment
Section Three
Project Description
Project Number: SS525HV01 Title: HVAC SYSTEM REPLACEMENT
Priority Sequence: 14
Priority Class: 3
System: HVAC
Component: HEATING/COOLING
Element: SYSTEM RETROFIT/REPLACE
Category Code: HV3A
Building Code: SS525
Building Name: ST AGNES HALL
Subclass/Savings: Energy Conservation $5,850.00
Code Application:
Project Class: Deferred Maintenance
Project Date: 10/25/2010
Project
Location: Floor-wide: Floor(s) 1, 2, 3, B, R
Project Description
A complete redesign and replacement of the HVAC system is recommended. Demolish and dispose of existing
equipment. Install a new modern HVAC system with four-pipe fan coil units in the resident rooms and air
handling systems for the corridors and common areas. Outside air should also be delivered to the resident
rooms, in accordance with ASHRAE ventilation standards. This work includes new fan coil units, air handlers,
exhaust fans, ductwork, terminal units, heat exchangers, pumps, piping, controls, and related electrical
components. Specify direct digital controls for the new equipment.
ASHRAE 62-2004
3.1.27
Specific Project Details
Facility Condition Assessment
Section Three
Project Number:
Task Cost Estimate
Task Description
SS525HV01
Unit Qnty Unit CostMaterial
Total
CostMaterial Labor
Unit Cost
Total
Labor
Cost
Project Cost
Total
Cost
Fan coil units, air handlers, exhaust fans,
ductwork, piping, pumps, heat
exchangers, controls, terminal units, and
demolition, and disposal fees
SF 27,613 $8.98 $247,965 $10.97 $302,915 $550,879
$550,879Project Totals: $247,965 $302,915
$550,879Material/Labor Cost
Material Index 98.60
Labor Index 107.20
Material/Labor Indexed Cost $569,218
General Contractor Mark Up at 20.0% + $113,844
Inflation + $77,548
Construction Cost $760,609
Professional Fees at 16.0% + $121,697
Total Project Cost $882,306
3.1.28
Specific Project Details
Facility Condition Assessment
Section Three
Project Description
Project Number: SS525EL02 Title: UPGRADE ELECTRICAL DISTRIBUTION
NETWORK
Priority Sequence: 15
Priority Class: 3
System: ELECTRICAL
Component: SECONDARY DISTRIBUTION
Element: DISTRIBUTION NETWORK
Category Code: EL3B
Building Code: SS525
Building Name: ST AGNES HALL
Subclass/Savings: Not Applicable
Code Application:
Project Class: Deferred Maintenance
Project Date: 10/25/2010
Project
Location: Floor-wide: Floor(s) 1, 2, 3, B
Project Description
An upgrade of the building electrical system is recommended. Aging components, such as the circuit breakers,
could serve as fire hazards if they fail to open a circuit in an overload or short circuit condition. Remove existing
aged electrical components and branch circuitry. Install new power panels, switches, raceways, conductors,
and devices. Provide molded case, thermal-magnetic circuit breakers and HACR circuit breakers for HVAC
equipment. Redistribute the electrical loads to the appropriate areas to ensure safe and reliable power to
building occupants. Provide ground fault circuit interrupter (GFCI) protection where required, and clearly label all
panels for circuit identification.
NEC Articles 110, 210, 220, 230
3.1.29
Specific Project Details
Facility Condition Assessment
Section Three
Project Number:
Task Cost Estimate
Task Description
SS525EL02
Unit Qnty Unit CostMaterial
Total
CostMaterial Labor
Unit Cost
Total
Labor
Cost
Project Cost
Total
Cost
Power panels, conductors, raceways,
devices, demolition, and cut and patching
materials
SF 27,613 $3.10 $85,600 $4.65 $128,400 $214,001
$214,001Project Totals: $85,600 $128,400
$214,001Material/Labor Cost
Material Index 98.60
Labor Index 107.20
Material/Labor Indexed Cost $222,047
General Contractor Mark Up at 20.0% + $44,409
Inflation + $30,251
Construction Cost $296,707
Professional Fees at 16.0% + $47,473
Total Project Cost $344,181
3.1.30
Specific Project Details
Facility Condition Assessment
Section Three
Project Description
Project Number: SS525EL01 Title: INTERIOR LIGHTING UPGRADE
Priority Sequence: 16
Priority Class: 3
System: ELECTRICAL
Component: DEVICES AND FIXTURES
Element: INTERIOR LIGHTING
Category Code: EL4B
Building Code: SS525
Building Name: ST AGNES HALL
Subclass/Savings: Energy Conservation $1,860.00
Code Application:
Project Class: Deferred Maintenance
Project Date: 10/25/2010
Project
Location: Floor-wide: Floor(s) 1, 2, 3, B
Project Description
An interior lighting upgrade is recommended. Replace existing aged and / or inefficient light fixtures with modern
fixtures of the latest energy-efficient design. Select lamps with the same color temperature and rendering index
for lighting uniformity. Install occupancy sensors in select areas for additional energy conservation.
NEC Articles 210, 410
3.1.31
Specific Project Details
Facility Condition Assessment
Section Three
Project Number:
Task Cost Estimate
Task Description
SS525EL01
Unit Qnty Unit CostMaterial
Total
CostMaterial Labor
Unit Cost
Total
Labor
Cost
Project Cost
Total
Cost
High efficiency fluorescent fixtures,
occupancy sensors, and demolition of
existing lighting
SF 27,613 $2.01 $55,502 $2.46 $67,928 $123,430
$123,430Project Totals: $55,502 $67,928
$123,430Material/Labor Cost
Material Index 98.60
Labor Index 107.20
Material/Labor Indexed Cost $127,544
General Contractor Mark Up at 20.0% + $25,509
Inflation + $17,376
Construction Cost $170,429
Professional Fees at 16.0% + $27,269
Total Project Cost $197,697
3.1.32
Specific Project Details
Facility Condition Assessment
Section Three
Project Description
Project Number: SS525IS01 Title: REFINISH FLOORING
Priority Sequence: 17
Priority Class: 3
System: INTERIOR/FINISH SYS.
Component: FLOOR
Element: FINISHES-DRY
Category Code: IS1A
Building Code: SS525
Building Name: ST AGNES HALL
Subclass/Savings: Not Applicable
Code Application:
Project Class: Deferred Maintenance
Project Date: 10/21/2010
Project
Location: Floor-wide: Floor(s) 1, 2, 3, B
Project Description
Interior floor finishes consist of carpet, vinyl tile, and ceramic tile. The applications vary in age and condition
from area to area. Floor finish upgrades should be considered as part of any future cosmetic improvements or
major comprehensive renovation efforts.
Not Applicable
3.1.33
Specific Project Details
Facility Condition Assessment
Section Three
Project Number:
Task Cost Estimate
Task Description
SS525IS01
Unit Qnty Unit CostMaterial
Total
CostMaterial Labor
Unit Cost
Total
Labor
Cost
Project Cost
Total
Cost
Carpet SF 8,840 $5.58 $49,327 $2.08 $18,387 $67,714
Vinyl floor tile SF 11,050 $3.68 $40,664 $2.60 $28,730 $69,394
Ceramic tile SF 2,210 $7.54 $16,663 $11.07 $24,465 $41,128
$178,237Project Totals: $106,655 $71,582
$178,237Material/Labor Cost
Material Index 98.60
Labor Index 107.20
Material/Labor Indexed Cost $181,897
General Contractor Mark Up at 20.0% + $36,379
Inflation + $24,781
Construction Cost $243,058
Professional Fees at 16.0% + $38,889
Total Project Cost $281,947
3.1.34
Specific Project Details
Facility Condition Assessment
Section Three
Project Description
Project Number: SS525IS03 Title: REFINISH CEILINGS
Priority Sequence: 18
Priority Class: 3
System: INTERIOR/FINISH SYS.
Component: CEILINGS
Element: REPLACEMENT
Category Code: IS3B
Building Code: SS525
Building Name: ST AGNES HALL
Subclass/Savings: Not Applicable
Code Application:
Project Class: Deferred Maintenance
Project Date: 10/21/2010
Project
Location: Floor-wide: Floor(s) 1, 2, 3, B
Project Description
Ceiling finishes consist of lay-in, acoustical or spline tile and painted plaster ceillings. The applications vary in
age and condition. Ceiling finish upgrades should be considered as part of any future cosmetic improvements or
major comprehensive renovation efforts.
Not Applicable
3.1.35
Specific Project Details
Facility Condition Assessment
Section Three
Project Number:
Task Cost Estimate
Task Description
SS525IS03
Unit Qnty Unit CostMaterial
Total
CostMaterial Labor
Unit Cost
Total
Labor
Cost
Project Cost
Total
Cost
Acoustical tile ceiling system SF 15,460 $2.21 $34,167 $3.10 $47,926 $82,093
Painted ceiling finish application SF 6,630 $0.17 $1,127 $0.85 $5,636 $6,763
$88,855Project Totals: $35,294 $53,562
$88,855Material/Labor Cost
Material Index 98.60
Labor Index 107.20
Material/Labor Indexed Cost $92,218
General Contractor Mark Up at 20.0% + $18,444
Inflation + $12,563
Construction Cost $123,224
Professional Fees at 16.0% + $19,716
Total Project Cost $142,940
3.1.36
Specific Project Details
Facility Condition Assessment
Section Three
Project Description
Project Number: SS525IS04 Title: REPLACE INTERIOR DOORS
Priority Sequence: 19
Priority Class: 3
System: INTERIOR/FINISH SYS.
Component: DOORS
Element: GENERAL
Category Code: IS4A
Building Code: SS525
Building Name: ST AGNES HALL
Subclass/Savings: Not Applicable
Code Application:
Project Class: Deferred Maintenance
Project Date: 10/21/2010
Project
Location: Floor-wide: Floor(s) 1, 2, 3, B
Project Description
The condition of the interior door systems is such that door system replacements are recommended as part of a
comprehensive renovation effort. Complete demolition of existing door systems and replacement according to a
code-compliant plan to properly protect egress passages is recommended. Lever door hardware and Braille
signage should be included in this effort.
ADAAG 309.4, 703.1
3.1.37
Specific Project Details
Facility Condition Assessment
Section Three
Project Number:
Task Cost Estimate
Task Description
SS525IS04
Unit Qnty Unit CostMaterial
Total
CostMaterial Labor
Unit Cost
Total
Labor
Cost
Project Cost
Total
Cost
Interior door and frame installation with all
hardware and accessible signage
EA 160 $385 $61,600 $412 $65,920 $127,520
$127,520Project Totals: $61,600 $65,920
$127,520Material/Labor Cost
Material Index 98.60
Labor Index 107.20
Material/Labor Indexed Cost $131,404
General Contractor Mark Up at 20.0% + $26,281
Inflation + $17,902
Construction Cost $175,586
Professional Fees at 16.0% + $28,094
Total Project Cost $203,680
3.1.38
Specific Project Details
Facility Condition Assessment
Section Three
Project Description
Project Number: SS525IS02 Title: REFINISH WALLS
Priority Sequence: 20
Priority Class: 3
System: INTERIOR/FINISH SYS.
Component: PARTITIONS
Element: FINISHES
Category Code: IS2B
Building Code: SS525
Building Name: ST AGNES HALL
Subclass/Savings: Not Applicable
Code Application:
Project Class: Capital Renewal
Project Date: 10/21/2010
Project
Location: Floor-wide: Floor(s) 1, 2, 3, B
Project Description
Interior wall finishes consist of painted plaster or concrete walls. The applications vary in age and condition from
area to area. Wall finish upgrades should be considered as part of any future cosmetic improvements or major
comprehensive renovation efforts.
Not Applicable
3.1.39
Specific Project Details
Facility Condition Assessment
Section Three
Project Number:
Task Cost Estimate
Task Description
SS525IS02
Unit Qnty Unit CostMaterial
Total
CostMaterial Labor
Unit Cost
Total
Labor
Cost
Project Cost
Total
Cost
Standard wall finish (paint, wall covering,
etc.)
SF 78,250 $0.17 $13,303 $0.85 $66,513 $79,815
$79,815Project Totals: $13,303 $66,513
$79,815Material/Labor Cost
Material Index 98.60
Labor Index 107.20
Material/Labor Indexed Cost $84,418
General Contractor Mark Up at 20.0% + $16,884
Inflation + $11,501
Construction Cost $112,802
Professional Fees at 16.0% + $18,048
Total Project Cost $130,850
3.1.40
Specific Project Details
Facility Condition Assessment
Section Three
Project Description
Project Number: SS525PL01 Title: WATER SUPPLY PIPING REPLACEMENT
Priority Sequence: 21
Priority Class: 3
System: PLUMBING
Component: DOMESTIC WATER
Element: PIPING NETWORK
Category Code: PL1A
Building Code: SS525
Building Name: ST AGNES HALL
Subclass/Savings: Not Applicable
Code Application:
Project Class: Deferred Maintenance
Project Date: 10/25/2010
Project
Location: Floor-wide: Floor(s) 1, 2, 3, B
Project Description
Replacement of the aging water piping network is recommended. Failure to replace the water piping will result in
frequent leaks and escalating maintenance costs. Remove the existing water supply network. Install new
copper water supply piping with fiberglass insulation. Install isolation valves, pressure regulators, shock
absorbers, backflow preventers, and vacuum breakers as needed.
IPC Chapter 6
3.1.41
Specific Project Details
Facility Condition Assessment
Section Three
Project Number:
Task Cost Estimate
Task Description
SS525PL01
Unit Qnty Unit CostMaterial
Total
CostMaterial Labor
Unit Cost
Total
Labor
Cost
Project Cost
Total
Cost
Copper pipe and fittings, valves, backflow
prevention devices, insulation, hangers,
demolition, and cut and patching
materials
SF 27,613 $1.19 $32,859 $2.97 $82,011 $114,870
$114,870Project Totals: $32,859 $82,011
$114,870Material/Labor Cost
Material Index 98.60
Labor Index 107.20
Material/Labor Indexed Cost $120,315
General Contractor Mark Up at 20.0% + $24,063
Inflation + $16,391
Construction Cost $160,769
Professional Fees at 16.0% + $25,723
Total Project Cost $186,492
3.1.42
Specific Project Details
Facility Condition Assessment
Section Three
Project Description
Project Number: SS525PL02 Title: DRAIN PIPING REPLACEMENT
Priority Sequence: 22
Priority Class: 3
System: PLUMBING
Component: WASTEWATER
Element: PIPING NETWORK
Category Code: PL2A
Building Code: SS525
Building Name: ST AGNES HALL
Subclass/Savings: Not Applicable
Code Application:
Project Class: Deferred Maintenance
Project Date: 10/25/2010
Project
Location: Floor-wide: Floor(s) 1, 2, 3, B
Project Description
Replacement of the aging drain piping is recommended throughout the facility. Failure to replace the old piping
will result in frequent leaks and escalating maintenance costs. Remove sanitary and storm drain piping as
needed. Install new cast-iron drain piping networks with copper run-outs to the fixtures. Install new floor drains,
roof drains, and traps.
IPC Chapters 7-11
3.1.43
Specific Project Details
Facility Condition Assessment
Section Three
Project Number:
Task Cost Estimate
Task Description
SS525PL02
Unit Qnty Unit CostMaterial
Total
CostMaterial Labor
Unit Cost
Total
Labor
Cost
Project Cost
Total
Cost
Cast-iron drain piping and fittings, copper
pipe and fittings, floor / roof drains, traps,
hangers, demolition, and cut and
patching materials
SF 27,613 $1.89 $52,189 $4.34 $119,840 $172,029
$172,029Project Totals: $52,189 $119,840
$172,029Material/Labor Cost
Material Index 98.60
Labor Index 107.20
Material/Labor Indexed Cost $179,927
General Contractor Mark Up at 20.0% + $35,985
Inflation + $24,512
Construction Cost $240,425
Professional Fees at 16.0% + $38,468
Total Project Cost $278,893
3.1.44
Specific Project Details
Facility Condition Assessment
Section Three
Project Description
Project Number: SS525SI01 Title: SITE PAVING UPGRADES
Priority Sequence: 23
Priority Class: 3
System: SITE
Component: GENERAL
Element: OTHER
Category Code: SI4A
Building Code: SS525
Building Name: ST AGNES HALL
Subclass/Savings: Not Applicable
Code Application:
Project Class: Deferred Maintenance
Project Date: 10/21/2010
Project
Location: Undefined: Floor(s) 1
Project Description
Pedestrian paving systems are in overall poor condition and represent a liability to the University. New systems,
including excavation, grading, base compaction, and paving, are recommended. Vehicular paving systems are
in fair condition and will also need moderate upgrades.
ADAAG 502
3.1.45
Specific Project Details
Facility Condition Assessment
Section Three
Project Number:
Task Cost Estimate
Task Description
SS525SI01
Unit Qnty Unit CostMaterial
Total
CostMaterial Labor
Unit Cost
Total
Labor
Cost
Project Cost
Total
Cost
Concrete pedestrian paving (1000 sf
minimum)
SF 1,500 $3.09 $4,635 $3.80 $5,700 $10,335
Vehicular paving wear course
rehabilitation, sealcoat and striping
allowance
SY 1,300 $8.24 $10,712 $3.95 $5,135 $15,847
$26,182Project Totals: $15,347 $10,835
$26,182Material/Labor Cost
Material Index 98.60
Labor Index 107.20
Material/Labor Indexed Cost $26,747
General Contractor Mark Up at 20.0% + $5,349
Inflation + $3,644
Construction Cost $35,741
Professional Fees at 16.0% + $5,719
Total Project Cost $41,459
3.1.46
Specific Project Details
Facility Condition Assessment
Section Three
Project Description
Project Number: SS525VT01 Title: COMPREHENSIVE HYDRAULIC
ELEVATOR MODERNIZATION
Priority Sequence: 24
Priority Class: 3
System: VERT. TRANSPORTATION
Component: GENERAL
Element: OTHER
Category Code: VT7A
Building Code: SS525
Building Name: ST AGNES HALL
Subclass/Savings: Not Applicable
Code Application:
Project Class: Deferred Maintenance
Project Date: 10/25/2010
Project
Location: Room Only: Floor(s) B
Project Description
Comprehensive modernization of the hydraulic elevator in this building is recommended. Modernization should
include installation of a new hydraulic machine, pump, valve, and solid state controller. Additionally, install new
operating panels, audible notification, emergency lights, hands-free phone, doors and hardware, car finishes,
roller guides, and all connections. Upgrade the pit, as necessary. Upgrade the machine room to meet current
code requirements.
ASME A17.1
3.1.47
Specific Project Details
Facility Condition Assessment
Section Three
Project Number:
Task Cost Estimate
Task Description
SS525VT01
Unit Qnty Unit CostMaterial
Total
CostMaterial Labor
Unit Cost
Total
Labor
Cost
Project Cost
Total
Cost
Comprehensive elevator modernization LOT 1 $80,700 $80,700 $93,500 $93,500 $174,200
Hydraulic cylinder replacement LOT 1 $19,600 $19,600 $20,800 $20,800 $40,400
$214,600Project Totals: $100,300 $114,300
$214,600Material/Labor Cost
Material Index 98.60
Labor Index 107.20
Material/Labor Indexed Cost $221,425
General Contractor Mark Up at 20.0% + $44,285
Inflation + $30,166
Construction Cost $295,876
Professional Fees at 16.0% + $47,340
Total Project Cost $343,217
3.1.48
Specific Project Details
Facility Condition Assessment
Section Three
Project Description
Project Number: SS525ES04 Title: MEMBRANE ROOF REPLACEMENT
Priority Sequence: 25
Priority Class: 4
System: EXTERIOR
Component: ROOF
Element: REPLACEMENT
Category Code: ES4B
Building Code: SS525
Building Name: ST AGNES HALL
Subclass/Savings: Energy Conservation $1,900.00
Code Application:
Project Class: Capital Renewal
Project Date: 10/21/2010
Project
Location: Floor-wide: Floor(s) R
Project Description
The single-ply membrane roofing system is not expected to outlast the scope of this analysis. Future budget
modeling should include a provision for the replacement of all failing roofing systems. Replace this roof with a
similar application.
Not Applicable
3.1.49
Specific Project Details
Facility Condition Assessment
Section Three
Project Number:
Task Cost Estimate
Task Description
SS525ES04
Unit Qnty Unit CostMaterial
Total
CostMaterial Labor
Unit Cost
Total
Labor
Cost
Project Cost
Total
Cost
Membrane roof SF 6,910 $3.95 $27,295 $1.80 $12,438 $39,733
$39,733Project Totals: $27,295 $12,438
$39,733Material/Labor Cost
Material Index 98.60
Labor Index 107.20
Material/Labor Indexed Cost $40,246
General Contractor Mark Up at 20.0% + $8,049
Inflation + $5,483
Construction Cost $53,778
Professional Fees at 16.0% + $8,604
Total Project Cost $62,383
3.1.50