university of extremadura, forestry school of plasencia the role of trees for nitrate leaching after...
TRANSCRIPT
University of Extremadura, Forestry School of
Plasencia
The role of trees for Nitrate leaching after Organic and
Mineral fertilization
ML López-Díaz, G Moreno, V Rolo
Introduction
Underground water
Agriculture
Nitrate leaching
Directive 80/788/CEE
Directive 91/676/CEE
Fertilization rate
Irrigation systems
Introduction
PROBLEM
Nitrate leaching
SOLUTION
Agroforestry Systems
OrganicFertilization
Tree – pasture root system Gradual N mineralization
LIXIVIATED NITRATE
Soil Nitrate
Pasture
Fertilization Treatments
Tree
Aims
Materials and Methods
Systems
D Bare soil P Pasture S TreeSP Tree & pasture
Fertilization
NF No fertilize L Sewage Sludge M Mineral
Greenhouse experimentn = 6
120 pots: 20 cm Ø, 120 cm heightSoil: pH 4.7; 1 g N kg-1; 10 g Organic C kg-1
Materials and Methods
1 2
3
4 5
Par
amet
ers
anal
yzed
Par
amet
ers
anal
yzed
Tree Basal Diameter Pasture Production
Nitrate LixiviatedProfile of Nitrate Content
Rooting profile
Results & Discussion
NO3- Content in the Soil Profile NO3
- Content in the Soil Profile
0
20
40
60
80
100
120
0 5 10 15
Pro
fun
did
ad,
cm
NO3-, mg/kg suelo
D
P
S
SP
NO3- , mg / Kg soil
Dep
th, c
m
Systems
D Bare soil P Pasture S TreeSP Tree & pasture
0
20
40
60
80
100
120
0 1 2 3 4 5 6
Pro
fun
did
ad,
cm
NO3-, mg/kg suelo
L
M
NF
Dep
th, c
m
NO3- , mg / Kg soil
Fertilization Treatments
NF No fertilize M Mineral L Sewage Sludge
Results & Discussion
Nitrate Lixiviation and Fertilization RatesNitrate Lixiviation and Fertilization Rates
0
20
40
60
80
100
120
14-12-05 24-3-06 2-7-06 10-10-06 18-1-07 28-4-07 6-8-07 14-11-07
Fecha
Nitr
ato
, g /
m2
NF
M30
M60
L30
L60
Fertilization
Nit
rate
, g /m
2
Fertilization Treatment
20062007
AÑO*ferdos; LS Means
Current effect: F(4, 100)=90,908, p=0,0000Effective hypothesis decomposition
Vertical bars denote 0,95 confidence intervals
AÑ0 2006 AÑO 2007
NF M1 M2 L1 L2
Tratamiento de ferti l izac ión
0
50
100
150
200
250
Nitr
ato,
g /
m2
Date
Nit
rate
, g /m
2
Fertilization Treatments
NF No fertilize M Mineral L Sewage Sludge
Nitrate Lixiviation and Systems Nitrate Lixiviation and Systems
Results & Discussion
AÑO*SIST; LS Means
Current effect: F(3, 100)=23,484, p=,00000Effective hypothesis decomposition
Vertical bars denote 0,95 confidence intervals
AÑO 2006 AÑO 2007
D P S SP
SISTEMA
0
50
100
150
200
250
Nitra
tos,
g /
m2
System
Nitr
ate,
g /m
2
20062007
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
14-12-05 24-3-06 2-7-06 10-10-06 18-1-07 28-4-07 6-8-07 14-11-07
Fecha
Nitr
ato,
g /
m2
D
P
S
SP
Fertilization
Date
Nit
rate
, g /m
2
Systems
D Bare soil P Pasture S TreeSP Tree & pasture
Results & Discussion
Root systemRoot system
Tree
Pasture
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
90
100
0 2 4 6 8 10 12
Dep
th, c
m
Root Surface Density, m2 m -3
Tree
Tree + Pasture
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
90
100
0 10 20 30 40 50 60
Dep
th, c
m
Root Surface Density, m2 m -3
Pasture
Pasture + Tree
Results & Discussion
ProductionProduction
0
1000
2000
3000
4000
P SP (Pasture)
Pas
ture
yie
ld, K
g ha
-1ye
ar-1
No significant differences
0
2
4
6
8
10
12
S SP (Tree)
Bas
al D
iam
eter
, mm
No significant differences
Conclusions
The use of agroforestry systems are a good tool to control the nitrate leaching adjusting properly the fertilization rate to minimize the competitive effect
between vegetation layers
The use of agroforestry systems are a good tool to control the nitrate leaching adjusting properly the fertilization rate to minimize the competitive effect
between vegetation layers
THANKS FOR YOUR ATTENTION
Victor Rolo