united we stand national fund sites & local united ways
TRANSCRIPT
UNITED W
E STA
ND
N AT I O N A L F U N D S I T E S & L O C A L U N I T E D W AY S
PRESENTATION AGENDA
1. Introductions and session overview
2. Case study #1 – Greenville
3. Case study #2 – Philadelphia
4. Springboards and Landmines
5. Discussion
INTRODUCTIONS & SESSION OVERVIEW
Who are you?
Where are you from?
Tell us 1 reason why you’re attending this session.
Session Objectives
• Facilitate deeper and more effective collaboration between National Fund sites and United Ways in order to sustain and scale successes.
• For sites that are not yet collaborating: provide concrete examples of collaboration and tangible steps for developing relationships.
• For sites that are working together: explore how to maximize the partnership, drive greater impacts, build on past successes and overcome stubborn obstacles
CASE STUDY #1: GREENVILLE REGION WORKFORCE COLLABORATIVE
2009/10
• Researched model• Piloted 2 cohorts of
classes• UWGC leading thought
and leveraging resources, but not taking active role
2010 - 2012
• Received NFWS grant
• Built out partners (WIB, technical college system, service providers, funders, employers)
• 2011 – UWGC becomes Fiscal Agent
2012 - 2014
• Sector expansion• System level
changes• Program growth• Pivot towards
regionalism
Lessons for UWGC
From To
Transactional Relational
Isolation Integration
Barriers Solutions
Compliance Impact
CASE STUDY #1: GREENVILLE REGION WORKFORCE COLLABORATIVE
UWGC’s 5 Lesson/Action Points
Convene
Leverage
AdvocateIntegrate
Communicate
CASE STUDY #1: GREENVILLE REGION WORKFORCE COLLABORATIVE
Action Was Is Outcomes
Convene • provided site for Board meeting•Prescriber
• leading thought, insulating and
supporting activities of GRWC, responding
to needs of GRWC•Influencer
• more meaningful relationships,
better/more efficient work, renewed energy
Leverage • No connection to campaign (not even a designation account)• Transactional
marketing
• Leadership-board champions
• Workplace Campaign alignment• Proactive Marketing
• Greater integration of Resource
Development/Marketing*
Advocate • Reactive, non-effective public policy
• Relational/human capital advocacy – city/county council, WIB, state officials
• greater influence as a workforce systems
level leader in region/state*
• technical college system funding
• sector diversification
Integrate • GRWC and other investments separated
• IDA, VITA, front end service providers
aligned to insulate and build parallel
pipeline(s)
• scale
Communicate
• UWGC staff member to GRWC ED
• multi-level communication chain
• a greater understanding of how
this works and why we are doing it
CASE STUDY #2: JOINBrief History of the JOIN Collaborative
Why build stronger ties between JOIN & United Way? Proposed Value Proposition
Phase 1- JOIN’s First Three Years• Launch Phase• Program Years 1 thru 3• Largest Funder$: Knight
Foundation
Social Innovation Fund Phase • Transition Phase• 2nd half of PY3 thru
1st half of PY5• Largest Funder $:
Social Innovation Fund
Phase 2 – JOIN’s Next Three Years• Momentum Phase• Program Years 5
thru 8• Largest Funder$:
(proposed) United Way
2008 20112009 2010 2012 2013 20152014
JOIN United Way
Track record of innovation, flexibility and entrepreneurialism in grant making, convening and research projects (ex: WPSI, ROI 360)
Brand recognition and increased regional footprint provide infrastructure through which to disseminate work
Strongly positive relationships with employer, funder and program partners
Organizational capacity (including Communications, Resource Development staff)
Product that can be used to connect with new funders and increase investment
Deep relationships in the business community that align with JOIN’s mission
JOIN’S INVESTORS WERE ASKED TO HELP EVALUATE THE VALUE PROPOSITION
And identified the following…
Strengths Natural connection to UW’s education and income work (and opportunity for many more aligned funds as a result) • Regional infrastructure presents scaling and branding opportunities • If funding can support operations, tremendous ability to sustain collaborative work
Uncertainties How do we preserve this collaborative spirit with UW taking on a more significant role? • What are the implications for the JOIN’s staff? • Will there be new staff as a result of expanded responsibilities? • How will competing internal funding priorities at UW impact JOIN’s fundraising efforts?
FY15 LOOKED DIFFERENT FOR JOIN: SOME EXAMPLES
Change Scale of impact
Program United Way’s education work enhanced connections with career and technical education practitioners and funders.
Difficult to predict at this early stage.
Staffing and responsibilities
JOIN director oversaw direction of approximately $3M in aligned funding as part of the UW gen op funding process.
Significant
Branding UW wants additional connection to the project. Ex: JOIN powered by UW; JOIN managed by UW
Uncertain: we will work with the IC to approve any co-branding.
Operations Yes. JOIN will shift to a July 1 – June 30 fiscal year.
Minimal.
SPRINGBOARDS OR LANDMINES?
Depending on your local UW and workforce collaborative, the following may represents assets or threats to your relationship. Where would you place the bubbles? How do we make as many as possible into positives?
Branding
Collective impact
Definitions
Outcomes
Defining the
populationToleranc
e for risk
Aligned resource
s
Shared agenda
DISCUSSION: UNITED OR UNTIED?
• Branding and Messaging• To logo or not to logo
• Programmatic Connections• Funder collaboratives in the context of other workforce initiatives
• Resource development •Workplace Campaigns
• Relationship Management with the Corporate Partners
• Overlapping (or not) Geographies•Butting into other UW’s territories, literally
TO CONTINUE THE CONVERSATION…
Presenter Information
Jennie Sparandara, Director
Job Opportunity Investment Network AND
Secondary & Post Secondary Education, United Way of Greater Phila & S. New Jersey
[email protected] 215.665.2434
John Young Shik Concklin, Program Investment Manager
United Way of Greenville County
[email protected] 864.467.3531