united nations development assistance framework (undaf ...the undaf translates these into a common...
TRANSCRIPT
United Nations Development Assistance Framework (UNDAF)
for the Kyrgyz Republic2012-2016
Bishkek, March 2011
United Nationsin the Kyrgyz Republic
The Governmentof the Kyrgyz Republic
United Nations Development Assistance Framework (UNDAF)for the Kyrgyz Republic 2012 - 2016
Executive Summary
Section I: Introduction
Section II: UNDAF Results
Pillar 1: Peace and Cohesion, Effective Democratic Governance and Human Rights
Pillar 2: Social Inclusion and Equity
Pillar 3: Inclusive and Sustainable Job-Rich Growth for Poverty Reduction
Section III: Indicative Resource Requirements
Section IV: Implementation
Section V: Monitoring and Evaluation
Acronyms and Abbreviations
Annexes
Annex A: UNDAF Results Matrix
Peace and Cohesion, Effective Democratic Governance and Human Rights
Social Inclusion and Equity
Inclusive and Sustainable Job-Rich Growth for Poverty Reduction
Annex B: UNDAF Monitoring and Evaluation Calendar
2
3
5
6
8
10
12
12
13
14
15
15
15
19
23
29
Table of Contents
2United Nations Development Assistance Framework (UNDAF)for the Kyrgyz Republic 2012 - 2016
The United Nations Development Assistance Framework (UNDAF) is the result of an ongoing consultative process intended to analyze how the United Nations can most effectively respond to the Kyrgyz Republic’s national priorities and needs in a transitional context that has been affected by conflict. It is guided by the goals and targets of the Mil-lennium Declaration, which has been endorsed by the Government and national programmes/plans, and by other rel-evant documents, including strategic addresses by the President of the Kyrgyz Republic, the Government Programme approved by Jogorku Kenesh (Parliament) of the Kyrgyz Republic in December 2010, Action Plan “Economy and Security” to implement the Program of the Government of the Kyrgyz Republic endorsed by the Government in Janu-ary 2011. The UNDAF translates these into a common operational framework for development activities upon which individual United Nations organizations will formulate their actions for the period 2012-2016.
Peace and stability toward sustainable development represents the cornerstone for the UNDAF; under this over-arching goal, three inter-related areas of cooperation have emerged as particularly critical for United Nations support to the people and Government of the Kyrgyz Republic during this five-year period: (1) Peace and Cohesion, Effective Democratic Governance, and Human Rights, including deepening State-building, security and justice for all; (2) Social Inclusion and Equity, encompassing issues of social protection, food security, education and health; and (3) Inclusive and Sustainable Job-Rich Growth for Poverty Reduction, with particular attention to women and youth, as well as to vulnerable groups and disaster-prone communities. In all three, the United Nations Country Team of-fers comparative advantages with regard to achieving further tangible progress toward the Millennium Development Goals, drawing on its values, successful global knowledge base, best practices and lessons learnt; its strong normative mandate and track record in the Kyrgyz Republic; its neutrality; and its ability to encourage efficient coordination and facilitate accountability among donors.
Executive Summary
3United Nations Development Assistance Framework (UNDAF)for the Kyrgyz Republic 2012 - 2016
Every person in the Kyrgyz Republic deserves a life free from poverty and from fear, conducted in security and dignity. At the same time, hundreds of thousands of people in the coun-try have yet to realise such rights or to build upon equitable opportunities to fully develop their human potential. Yet the impact will be devastating if the Kyrgyz Republic falters in its nation building; the country can be rendered even more vulnerable to the divisiveness and social instability that have characterized its recent years.
Since its independence in 1991, the Kyrgyz Republic has struggled to attain lasting democracy and civic freedom. Moreover, since 2005, insecurity and violence have been recurrent, arising from the weakness of post-independence political institutions, inter-regional tensions over public re-source allocations, among others, and inter-ethnic conflict. Elections for Parliament in 2007 and President in 2009 were found deficient by international observers and citizens alike, leading to widespread public dissatisfaction. A concentra-tion of power in the presidential administrative apparatus weakened Ministries, and thus Government checks and bal-ances. This culminated in a popular overthrow of the regime in April 2010, as well as significant inter-ethnic conflict the following June, that highlight the need for reconciliation and cohesion to be addressed and firmly embedded in all gover-nance approaches in the interests of national stability. Hu-man security remains fragile, with chronic vulnerabilities not only to conflict between communities and individuals, but also to poverty, undernutrition, unsustainable livelihoods, unfulfilled human rights, poor health, and recurrent natural disasters.
Peace and stability toward sustainable development thus rep-resents the cornerstone for this United Nations Development Assistance Framework (UNDAF). The UNDAF formulates a common strategic plan for the United Nations Country Team in the Kyrgyz Republic for 2012-2016, in support of na-tional development, the global Millennium Declaration and the Millennium Development Goals (MDGs) to reduce pov-erty. But peace and stability toward sustainable development, in its broadest sense, represents far more than the absence of conflict: It demands that the United Nations Country Team help the people of the Kyrgyz Republic – of whom more than two-thirds live in rural areas – to develop the building blocks of sustainable livelihoods; to develop a national infrastruc-ture that allows the society and the Government to resolve conflicts internally and with their own skills, institutions and resources; to address fundamental social inequities and expand access to quality education, health care and other basic social services; and to achieve gender equality, human
rights and youth development that will underpin long-term sustainable and peaceful development of the society. While this will require a breadth and depth of resources and com-mitment unprecedented among public administrations, in so doing, the Kyrgyz Republic could truly become a model for successful peace-building and development.
This is daunting in a country such as the Kyrgyz Republic, where rural dwellers, women and youth remain especially at risk of poverty despite the country’s past successes in reduc-ing overall poverty. Many of the nation’s 5.2 million people are still severely challenged in terms of human development, subject to a challenged social safety net and dependent on a fast-depleting natural resource base as well as susceptible to constant natural disasters such as earthquakes, landslides, mudflows and floods. Lack of employment opportunities represents a particularly serious obstacle: Women’s share in the economically active population is steadily declining, with higher levels of unemployment than men and lower salaries as well. Similarly, the Kyrgyz Republic’s youth already face high unemployment, low skills levels and lack of opportuni-ties for participation in society. All these issues represent seri-ous challenges to ensuring peace and stability toward sustain-able development.
Yet the people of the Kyrgyz Republic have high expectations for tangible improvements in their daily lives. The focus must be on allowing the widest possible range of people to have confidence in their future in order for peace and stability to prevail. Relevant strategies for the 20-member United Na-tions Country Team (UNCT)1 will continue to be developed through this “lens” of peace and stability toward sustainable development, within a wider human security context. The Kyrgyz Republic has focused its recent development agenda, detailed in the Country Development Strategy 2009-2011, on four strategic priority pillars: (1) strength-ening of economic potential; (2) governance efficiency; (3) socially oriented development; and (4) environmental safety. Building on this document, and in light of the events of 2010 and the naming of a new Government, a new national devel-opment plan is being formulated as the overarching national strategy for reducing poverty and vulnerability. Priorities for the initial six months, as outlined in a draft of the plan, are: (1) to ensure national unity and civil security, guaranteeing the rights and freedoms of the people; (2) to re-establish State governance throughout the country; and (3) to gradu-ally achieve a turnaround from economic crisis. In turn, mid-term socioeconomic objectives encompass: (1) consolidating inter-ethnic tolerance and public security; (2) ensuring eco-
I. Introduction
1 The United Nations is represented in the Kyrgyz Republic by FAO, ILO, IOM, OHCHR, UNAIDS, UNDP, UNFPA, UNHCR, UNICEF, UNIDO, UNODC, UNV, WFP and WHO. Non-resident Agencies include OCHA, IAEA, UNECE, UNEP, UNESCAP, UNESCO, UN WOMEN and UNRCCA.
4United Nations Development Assistance Framework (UNDAF)for the Kyrgyz Republic 2012 - 2016
nomic development, reducing unemployment and enhanc-ing international economic cooperation; (3) improving State governance; and (4) deepening social development and en-vironmental protection. The draft Concept of Ethnic Policy and Integration, being formulated under the supervision of a key department within the Presidential Office, likewise com-plements these priorities, as does the Law on the Republican Budget for 2011 and Forecasts for 2012-2013.
Despite the post-crisis environment, the UNDAF results from a consultative, comprehensive and dynamic strategic priority-setting process, while providing a framework for future collaboration. High levels of participation and con-sultation have occurred not only within the UNCT, but also in close cooperation with the Interim Government of the Kyrgyz Republic and line Ministries, as well as with the new Government formed after parliamentary elections in October 2010. As part of this process, a Strategic Prioritiza-tion Retreat (SPR) on 18-19 November 2010 built on key national challenges in the Kyrgyz Republic that were high-lighted in the Country Analysis and identified main poten-tial areas of support by United Nations Agencies, Funds and Programmes.
At the SPR, the following three interlinked areas thus were ultimately identified as pillars for priority national devel-opment challenges to be addressed by the United Nations Country Team:
Peace and Cohesion, Effective Democratic Governance, and Human RightsSocial Inclusion and EquityInclusive and Sustainable Job-Rich Growth for Poverty Reduction
Crosscutting themes of gender equality, youth, human rights, environment and Disaster Risk Reduction have been selected to further underpin interventions in all three pillars and are mainstreamed throughout.
After the UNCT agreed about the definitions and substan-tive context of the three pillars, UNDAF Working Groups were established for each pillar, chaired by UNCT members. The Working Groups, with Government counterparts, have been essential to UNDAF preparations and have functioned as information exchange and discussion fora, further refining draft outcomes and indicators. The finalized UNDAF results matrix was agreed upon with the Government in February 2011 following the meeting with the Prime Minister of the Kyrgyz Republic. At the same time, this framework is a liv-ing document, one flexible enough to respond to the Kyrgyz Republic’s rapidly evolving political, social and economic context.
Overall, the critical importance of consolidating peace and
stability in the Kyrgyz Republic has been highlighted by all stakeholders; achievement of this can be sustained in part through a “One UN” approach on key issues such as energy shortages and food security, linking the UNDAF to peace-building efforts while also delivering development results on the ground balanced with support at the centre2. Indeed, the need for coordinated action is particularly important for a country such as the Kyrgyz Republic, which confronts ex-traordinary constraints and uncertainties despite much prog-ress in implementing complex State-building processes. Also critical is taking into account the importance of youth and women, as well as other crucial groups such as internal mi-grants and persons reintegrating in their communities after internal or external displacement, in maintaining stability. Selection of common United Nations development issues, arising from the wide consultations on the design of the UN-DAF, thus has been determined by the following criteria: (1) impact on peace and stability; (2) impact on social cohesion and regional disparities; (3) magnitude of the issue; (4) align-ment with national priorities; and (5) comparative advantage in addressing root causes, which the United Nations can pro-vide by drawing on its neutrality and strong normative man-date, its successful global knowledge base, and its ability to facilitate efficiency and accountability among donors.
Building on lessons learnt during the last UNDAF cycle, this UNDAF is intended to actively support national priorities; be better targeted and focused; be achievable and inspiring; and, above all, have impact. Overall, therefore, the UNCT goal is swift convergence in planning – designing certain interventions collaboratively and sharing these plans as an integrated whole, allowing the United Nations to be an ac-tive, coordinated and responsive partner with the people and Government of the Kyrgyz Republic.
2 In the Kyrgyz Republic’s highly transitional situation, it is unclear whether the United Nations will be able to fully Deliver as One (DaO) during the UNDAF period, although the UNCT supports the principles of DaO.
5United Nations Development Assistance Framework (UNDAF)for the Kyrgyz Republic 2012 - 2016
As indicated in Section I, United Nations cooperation in the Kyrgyz Republic for the period 2012-2016 will have the overall objective of underscoring peace and stability for sustainable development, and will not be “business as usual.” Critically, the UNCT will sustain and attempt to increase coordination and complementarity with other development partners to support the Government in implementing UN-DAF priorities.
Foremost among the key UNCT strategies to be pursued is that of fundamentally strengthened capacity development for the country, focused on development outcomes, proper management of human resources, and adequate financial re-sources and tools. With the capacity development paradigm representing the heart of United Nations work, this positions Agencies well vis-à-vis the Government in support of the 2005 Paris Declaration on Aid Effectiveness and the results of the 2007 Triennial Comprehensive Policy Review. This long-term process thus gives tangible expression to the con-cept of national ownership, enabling more informed choices and decisions at both organizational and individual levels while emphasizing the importance of motivation as a driver of change.
Capacity development will be linked with the Kyrgyz Repub-lic’s overall need for addressing inequities through an effective shift toward decentralization. This will offer new opportuni-ties not only in the political landscape, but also the bureau-cratic and institutional landscapes. Decentralization is critical because many of the country’s destabilizing issues – poverty and food insecurity among them – are most pronounced at sub-national level, in the oblasts. Decentralization and an em-phasis on sub-national programming thus can help overcome the divide between the capital, or more privileged areas, and the rest of the country. This also will entail improving the tar-geting of funding, technical assistance, and development and humanitarian aid more generally. Complementarities, ability to “scale up” initiatives, and impact and cost effectiveness also will be taken into account. Considering the post-crisis con-text in the country, the United Nations will ensure that its interventions are conflict-sensitive to avoid negative impacts and maximize positive impacts toward promoting peace and stability.
Communication for Development (C4D) will be given ex-plicit priority as an upstream component of programme development and delivery to ensure success in accelerating progress on the MDGs. Overall, C4D – behaviour change communication, communication for social change, and ad-vocacy communication – is about people, who are the driv-ers of their own development and agents in setting normative
development goals and standards; as such, it can contrib-ute to sustainable change for the benefit of the poorest and most vulnerable in the Kyrgyz Republic, including all ethnic groups, IDPs and youth, women and children who have been directly or indirectly affected by violence. Establishment of a crosscutting, active and effective C4D Working Group will provide an important coordination mechanism for greater UNCT coherence and prioritized support in this area, incor-porating C4D from the outset to diagnose and respond to key issues during the UNDAF cycle.
A more effective and systematic approach to harness the potential of volunteerism also will be accorded special em-phasis, given its similar potential to accelerate achievement of the MDGs. As a result, various forms of volunteerism – including enhanced civic engagement across a wide range of sectors, advocacy, service to others, and self-help – will be leveraged to nurture a strong sense of mutual trust and cohe-sion. In turn, this can significantly promote broad-based na-tional ownership, gender equality, inclusive participation and sustainability. Supporting volunteerism for peace and devel-opment through, for example, assisting the re-generation of social capital and livelihoods during national reconciliation constitutes a particularly important comparative advantage of the UNCT.
At the same time, promoting better distribution of develop-ment benefits to ensure social inclusion and equity is impera-tive, given that inequalities in access to delivery of quality services have been among the root causes of recent political crises. At least in the initial post-crisis phase, however, devel-opment interventions may still need to be supplemented by humanitarian initiatives to obtain sustainable stabilization. Finally, further developing the capacity of the Government in ensuring “statistical literacy” – incorporating strengthened analysis and use of quality data for sound policy decisions – will be crucial for making development plans effective.
These key strategies will be further refined during the UN-DAF implementation through the coordination mechanisms discussed in Section V. Some may require collaborative or joint programming or funding. In all, they are expected to give rise to:
Better balance between policy development and effective delivery Better balance between development of the centre and its institutions, and the districtsClear geographic focus on rural or more vulnerable areas
II. UNDAF Results
6United Nations Development Assistance Framework (UNDAF)for the Kyrgyz Republic 2012 - 2016
Increasing empowerment of actors in the Kyrgyz Republic, including youth, women, non-Government and civil society organisations, to lead the processIncreasing commitment to social inclusion, particularly for youth, women and vulnerable groupsImproved analytical capacity and better ability to design and target social safety net interventions to ensure more effective and efficient use of resourcesStronger focus on UNDAF monitoring and evaluation mechanisms
The development outcomes to be achieved by the United Na-tions in the Kyrgyz Republic UNDAF 2012-2016 are briefly described below. The complete Results and Resources Frame-work is detailed in Annex I.
The Kyrgyz Republic’s vulnerability to conflict is rooted in weak governance and the State’s inability to secure a suffi-ciently inclusive political process and provide cost-effective services. This includes the capacity to rule by law, ensure secu-rity, and protect and respond to rights for men, women, chil-dren and youth, as well as specific vulnerable groups. While some progress has been made, gaps remain in civil and po-litical, as well as economic, labour, social and cultural rights; however, the country has formally expressed support for these rights through its ratification of some 50 United Nations hu-man rights treaties and all ILO Core Conventions, even as implementation requires strengthening. At the same time, the maturity of the system to convey the voice of the people through social dialogue requires further development.
Outcome 1: A national infrastructure for peace (at local, regional and national levels), involving gov-ernment, civil society, communities and individuals, effectively prevents violent conflict and engages in peace-building
Outcome 2: By the end of 2016, the Government of the Kyrgyz Republic fulfills key recommendations of the Universal Periodic Review, Treaty Bodies and Special Procedures, as well as other obligations un-der human rights laws and treaties, to ensure better protection of human rights.
Outcome 3: By 2016, national and local authorities apply rule of law and civic engagement principles in provision of services, with active participation of civil society
National Priorities: Strengthen unity of the nation and ensure public security; increase efficiency and responsibility of State governance
Relevant MDGs:MDG 1: Eradicate extreme poverty and hungerMDG 2: Achieve universal primary educationMDG 3: Promote gender equality and empower womenMDG 4: Reduce child mortalityMDG 5: Improve maternal healthMDG 6: Combat HIV/AIDS, malaria and other diseasesMDG 7: Ensure environmental sustainabilityMDG 8: Develop a global partnership for development
Pillar 1: Peace and Cohesion, Effective Democratic Governance, and Human Rights
The impact of the 2010 Constitution on governance could be significant, with the Government headed by a Prime Minis-ter answerable to Parliament and the concentration of pow-er in the hands of the President reduced. Strong assistance to Parliament and its committees, the Government and its structures, and civil servants alike will be needed to support effective democratic governance. Despite constitutional and institutional reform of the judiciary, such reform has yet to be systematized, so that independence of this key branch of Government continues to represent a major concern.
Addressing these issues will help to mitigate numerous de-velopment challenges, especially at sub-national level, that threaten peace and stability: a limited pool of skilled and trained human resources, particularly among youth; under-developed democratic systems, processes, attitudes and be-haviors; and lack of a clear legal and regulatory framework. In turn, all this ultimately has resulted in lack of a clear vision for State institutions; weak capacity for planning and unreliable service delivery; and need for stronger interaction among the organs of sovereignty. Public confidence in institutions re-
7United Nations Development Assistance Framework (UNDAF)for the Kyrgyz Republic 2012 - 2016
quires further strengthening, as do mechanisms for external oversight and budget execution.
Lastly, the participation of women, youth, minorities and vulnerable groups in politics and decision making, including peace-building efforts, has been insufficient. Critically, a sys-temic approach is necessary to assign responsibility for gen-der mainstreaming within public administration and local self-government bodies. At the same time, the new Constitu-tion offers encouragement in this area through its chapter on human rights, special article on equal rights and opportuni-ties of men and women, and guarantees of gender equality in political participation and social life.
Critical to UNCT initiatives during the UNDAF cycle will be the proactive, participatory and inclusive concept of In-frastructure for Peace, aiming at strengthening national pro-cesses, policies and institutions that can improve the ability of the society to prevent and manage conflicts and promote so-cial cohesion. This involves developing mechanisms for coop-eration among all relevant stakeholders in peace-building by promoting cooperative problem solving for conflicts, as well as strengthening communities, civil society and Government institutions to resolve conflicts internally and with their own skills, institutions and resources.
This will build on a number of initiatives already under way (e.g., Youth Friendly Centers, Oblast Advisory Committees, Women Peace Committees and Water Use Associations) that can serve as important elements for such an infrastructure. The support to peace committees and oblast-level conflict resolution mechanisms will help to bridge political divides and transform conflicts, with an emphasis on women and youth. Principles of mediation and arbitration, along with peace education, will be prioritized. Other key groups in such peace processes may include water associations, thereby ensuring equitable distribution of water among communities and mitigating a potent source of conflict. Dialogue will be encouraged between State institutions and civil society re-garding the design and implementation of policies related to conflict prevention, while Government and civil society ca-pacities will be built to better monitor and respond to violent conflict. Media development interventions will be under-taken aiming at changing knowledge, attitudes and practices relating to tolerance and human rights.
Overall, under this UNDAF pillar it will be imperative to en-sure that real and sustainable capacity development of people in the Kyrgyz Republic takes place in a wide range of gover-nance areas, including the security and justice sectors, as well as in gender-focused analysis, planning and budgeting. The United Nations is committed to building partnerships in ex-isting structures that can clarify roles and responsibilities for more effective service delivery. Importance will be given to not only skills building for the people, but also to changing institutional attitudes and behaviors to emphasize the values and principles of democratic institutions. A decentralized government system with a sound institutional framework re-specting human rights can significantly reinforce peace and
stability through enhancing local participation in Govern-ment decision-making processes.
Thus, the United Nations also looks to assist in creating social cohesion not only “horizontally” – between various social groups – but also “vertically,” between the Government and people, making Government more inclusive. For example, re-newed support to strengthening of the national Ombudsman Institution, undertaken jointly by OHCHR, UNDP, UNH-CR, UNICEF and UN Women, is expected to enhance rule of law and promote human rights. Continuing support to ensure fulfillment of 168 key recommendations of the 2010 UPR, of which the Government has accepted 152, also will be critical to strengthening the national human rights record. In addition, active implementation of an effective National Youth Policy or implementation of gender-sensitive early warning mechanisms for prevention and management of conflicts can further support the consolidation of peace and stability. Safeguarding the rights of internal migrants, asylum seekers, refugees and stateless persons and promoting their legal, economic and social integration will also support social cohesion. Special attention will be paid to creating an accessi-ble, functioning justice system for all children in contact with the law, including child victims, witnesses and offenders. In addition, the outreach of national institutions for the elimi-nation of the worst forms of child labour will be increased through effective upscaling of available tools and models of intervention as well as capacity building of partners.
The UNCT as a whole has several comparative advantages in supporting the Kyrgyz Republic to effectively address the component of political maturity, dialogue and tolerance, as well as that of governance and other disparities. In particular, the United Nations’ longstanding presence and engagement throughout the country, paired with the breadth and depth of expertise and capacity across all sectors, and particularly in democratic governance, peace-building and human rights, can serve the country well. Thus, the UNCT is collectively well-placed to address the strengthening of State institutions and their practices and to support mechanisms for national unity and stability. This will, however, require coherent, par-ticipatory planning, effective implementation, and consis-tent, proactive communication.
National partners are expected to include, among others, key Ministries and Government agencies, particularly the Min-istry of Foreign Affairs, Ministry of Education and Science, Ministry of Interior, Ministry of Youth Affairs, Ministry of Justice, National Statistical Committee. This also will include the President’s Office, the Government’s Office, Parliament and its Committees, the Central Electoral Commission, the Supreme Court and other courts of the national justice system, the State Agency of Execution of Punishment, the General Prosecutor Office, the State Agency for Local Self-Governance, and the Ombudsman Office. Also included will be national non-Government and civil society organizations, the media, the private sector, the National Confederation of Employers, and the Federation of Trade Unions. Internation-al partners will include the donor community, international non-Government organizations.
8United Nations Development Assistance Framework (UNDAF)for the Kyrgyz Republic 2012 - 2016
Outcome 1: By 2016, vulnerable groups benefit from improved social protection, namely:
Food security; MCH/RH services;Nutrition; Education, STI/HIV/TB; Social protection services and benefits
National Priorities: Develop the social sector; ensure social obligations
Relevant MDGs:MDG 1: Eradicate extreme poverty and hungerMDG 2: Achieve universal primary educationMDG 3: Promote gender equality and empower womenMDG 4: Reduce child mortalityMDG 5: Improve maternal healthMDG 6: Combat HIV/AIDS, malaria and other diseasesMDG 7: Ensure environmental sustainabilityMDG 8: Develop a global partnership for develop-ment
Pillar 2: Social Inclusion and Equity
Attainment of the highest standard of education, health, nutrition, water, sanitation and hygiene, and social welfare services are fundamental rights. Yet although many of the Kyrgyz Republic’s key human development indicators have improved since independence, many remain unacceptably high, particularly with regard to under-5 and maternal mor-tality. Chronic undernutrition among children and women, resulting from food insecurity, inadequate caring practices, and health and sanitation environments, likewise is disturb-ingly prevalent. All this highlights not only the inhibiting of these rights but also the consolidation of peace and stability for sustainable development. The April and June 2010 events highlight the need to strengthen access to and delivery of ba-sic services in local communities as a way of alleviating social tensions, as well as underscored the lack of comprehensive quality services for victims of violence. Significant dispari-ties exist between regions and between rural and urban areas, even as the capacity of local governments to deliver services and provide the necessary infrastructure is severely limited. Gender inequality in social services remains a barrier to social justice and development, while youth are often confronted with adult issues but have limited access to resources.
For improved social inclusion and equity, three interlinked strategic challenges will need to be addressed: (1) access and availability; (2) eroded infrastructure; and (3) insufficient
skills among service providers. Economic barriers primar-ily relate to costs and affordability, while many geographical barriers also exist, with some linked to continuing insecurity. Legal barriers – for example, restrictions to documentation and registration, as well as corruption – also limit access. Administrative barriers encompass a need for strengthened attention to vulnerable groups and rural areas, as well as in-sufficient budget allocations. The role of non-State actors in the sector remains underdeveloped.
Challenges in achieving quality education are particularly crucial given the Kyrgyz Republic’s overwhelmingly young population. Key issues here include not only a need for im-proved teacher credentials and infrastructure, but also signifi-cantly better student performance standards. Regional imbal-ances remain pronounced, and a large percentage of young people do not continue to secondary education; poverty is a key reason for dropping out of school. Skills mismatches with the labour market must be remedied.
For its part, the health sector confronts important and com-plex challenges to improve health outcomes, including reach-ing out to the entire population with stronger community mobilization, given that about 10 percent of the population still does not have access to health care services. Both updat-ing of delivery methods and addressing the needs for decen-tralized management and more appropriate infrastructure are priorities.
Despite considerable progress in maternal health, the country retains one of the highest Maternal Mortality Ratios among former Soviet republics – a rate that appears to be increasing. The global economic and food crises threaten to exacerbate an already serious problem of anaemia and micronutrient de-ficiencies among children in the Kyrgyz Republic. Stunting is a serious public health problem, with a national prevalence of 13.7 percent and particularly high prevalence in certain re-gions. Water-borne illnesses also remain a major issue, arising from poor water quality and intermittent supply a particu-lar need exists to strengthen the roles of women and youth role in health-related decision-making processes as well as in health management and policymaking.
The HIV epidemic in the Kyrgyz Republic, as in other East-ern European and Central Asian countries, is the fastest-growing epidemic in the world. Driven by Injecting Drug Use (IDU), high rates of HIV prevalence can be observed among key populations at higher risk to HIV exposure; although na-tional HIV prevalence is low, estimated at 0.1 percent, among IDU the prevalence rate is 14.3 percent, according to sentinel surveillance data for 2009, and 7 percent among prisoners. Some 3 in 4 new infections during recent years have occurred in people younger than age 30. A tuberculosis epidemic, com-pounded by the growing threat of multi-drug resistant tuber-culosis, also presents a major challenge to the country’s health
9United Nations Development Assistance Framework (UNDAF)for the Kyrgyz Republic 2012 - 2016
care system and to economic development. Despite impres-sive gains, deviation from international treatment standards, interruptions in drug supply, poor patient compliance with treatment, and poor infection control have all contributed to this serious problem.
Critically, the design and set-up of a comprehensive food secu-rity monitoring system is essential to ensure that widespread overall food security needs and shocks are monitored so that programmes are relevant and incorporated into policies. About 1.4 million people – one-third of the country – are food-insecure, including 15 percent severely food-insecure; vulnerable groups including the elderly, informal migrants, residents of State institutions, the homeless, the sick and in-firm, children living in large households, and those suffering from extreme poverty remain disproportionately affected, with more affected from frequent natural disasters and low resilience due to lack of livelihood opportunities. At the same time, stunting, micronutrient deficiency and anaemia also re-main critical nutrition issues that must be urgently addressed. The UNCT will use targeted food security programmes as invaluable components to mitigate natural disasters, improve access to education, rebuild or create agricultural infrastruc-ture, create or bolster livelihoods, and reinforce social safety nets for the most vulnerable, all as part of peace-building.
Lastly, few social protection services are available and func-tioning to address the needs of the poorest and most vulner-able, including widows, orphans, people with disabilities and others. Key issues that the UNCT will help to address include a need for increased fair access; the lack of harmonization of benefits; low contribution rate, as a result of the large infor-mal economy; and unclear definitions of the poverty line and subsistence minimum. While a formal policy framework on social services is in place in the Kyrgyz Republic, implementation mechanisms are in-sufficient to ensure pro-poor and pro-vulnerable outcomes. United Nations concerns under this pillar thus will focus on strengthening policies and supporting the translation of them into delivery of integrated, quality education, health, nutrition, water/sanitation and social protection services, including occupational health and safety, at the oblast, com-munity and family levels, particularly in rural areas. Access, quality, utilization and equity of services will be emphasized, as will inter-sectoral collaboration, particularly at middle management level. Capacity development will include areas such as standardization of practices, improvement of plan-ning and budgeting, and human resource management, with a systematic approach to monitoring and evaluation institu-tionalized.
The UNCT’s comparative advantages lie largely in its core mandate of basic social services; its strong links to global expertise and international best practices; its commitment
to help the Government achieve national goals; and its re-lationship of trust with relevant Ministries. United Nations support on mainstreaming gender into the design, planning, monitoring and evaluation of social policies, and on assisting gender-based analyses and data collection, will be critical.
Partners in this area are expected to include key Ministries and Government agencies, particularly the Ministry of Health, Ministry of Education and Science, Ministry of So-cial Protection of Population, Ministry of Emergency Situa-tions, Ministry of Interior, Parliament and its Committees, the court system, Country Multi-Sectoral Coordination Committee, Mandatory Health Insurance Fund under the Government of the Kyrgyz Republic, Kyrgyz Academy of Education, State Agency for Local Self-Governance, Nation-al Physiology Centre, National AIDS Centre, and regional HIV, tuberculosis and health institutions. Non-Government organizations, the private sector and associations such as teachers’ trade unions, academic institutions, the media, HIV most-at-risk population networks and associations, and local authorities and communities also will be engaged.
International partners will encompass the donor community and international non-Government organizations, including World Bank, Global Fund to Fight AIDS, Tuberculosis and Malaria, USAID, Kf W Development Bank, Medicins sans Frontieres, International Committee of the Red Cross, Help Age International, Save the Children (UK), Danish Refugee Council, ACTED, Mercy Corps, Crisis Centre Sezim, Pub-lic Foundation Counterpart-Sheriktesh, Centre for Interna-tional Protection, and Refugee Women Centre.
10United Nations Development Assistance Framework (UNDAF)for the Kyrgyz Republic 2012 - 2016
Outcome 1: By the end of 2016, population, especially vulnerable groups, benefit from inclusive growth leading to decent and productive employ-ment and improved access to productive natural resources, markets, services and food security
Outcome 2: By end of 2016, sustainable manage-ment of energy, environment and natural resources practices is operationalized
Outcome 3: By 2016, Disaster Risk Management framework in compliance with international stan-dards established and effectively operationalized at national and local levels
National Priorities: Further develop the economy, reduce unemployment, and improve international economic cooperation with strategic partners; develop entrepreneurship and improve the business environment; protect the environment
Relevant MDGs:MDG 1: Eradicate extreme poverty and hungerMDG 3: Promote gender equality and empower womenMDG 7: Ensure environmental sustainabilityMDG 8: Develop a global partnership for develop-ment
Pillar 3: Inclusive and Sustainable Growth for Poverty Reduction
Job-rich economic growth is vital to the rights to survival, livelihood, protection and participation. The Kyrgyz Re-public has built up a liberal market economy and has sought international integration through trade and investment, no-tably through membership in the World Trade Organization. Economic growth has helped reduce poverty, but remains marred by serious economic imbalances that leave the man-ufacturing sector very weak; at the same time, the national economy is characterized by low competitiveness and insuf-ficient export potential, in part because of a lack of foreign investment. Remittances from labour migrants, which con-stitute upward of 35 percent of the Kyrgyz Republic’s Gross Domestic Product, have dropped significantly in recent years – by 60 percent between 2008 and 2009 alone – which has further impeded the economic stability of many vulnerable households, and thus, overall poverty reduction. To address these imbalances and stimulate sustainable economic growth, a need exists to diversify the production and export structure and substantially improve economic performance and com-petitiveness of enterprises.
With 32 percent of people still living in poverty and 6 percent
in extreme poverty, it remains clear that profound structural challenges must be addressed. Despite Government attempts to improve targeting of social assistance, levels of social ben-efits among the most vulnerable remain very low. Moreover, the political turmoil in 2010 further damaged already-under-developed infrastructure as well as set back broader economic reform processes.
The rural population, women and youth in particular lack employment opportunities, and overall unemployment and underemployment are rising, with internal and external la-bour migration increasing. Lack of opportunities to create capital also is affecting poverty, as is an absence of access to basic services. Households have reduced expenditures, yet more than 40 percent in 2008 reported borrowing money to meet day-to-day needs. Critically, the informal economy competes with the formal economy for labour, materials and financial resources, representing an estimated 60 percent of total employment – predominantly women – in 2007. A mis-match of labour supply and demand gives rise to the need for the pattern of economic development to change to generate more productive employment and improve labour market outcomes as well as labour productivity. Yet the wider the distribution of the fruits of development and service delivery, the greater will be the likelihood of human security, thereby consolidating peace and stability for sustainable develop-ment.
Meanwhile, since agriculture is the backbone of the rural economy, the combination of limited skills and resources in crop farming, and unregulated livestock grazing, has de-graded an alarming proportion of scarce agricultural land. Despite continued heavy dependence on irrigation, the pre-dominance of outdated, ineffective water management mech-anisms, and inefficient agronomic techniques have resulted in exceptionally inefficient water use. Competition over wa-ter and land has particularly contributed to ethnic tensions, especially in the south. Renewed investment in rural com-munities in particular will be needed to improve equitable access to natural resources, increase agricultural productivity, and stimulate trade between ethnic communities as a basis for lasting peace.
In addition, it will be critical to further enhance coordination for disaster preparedness and response, given that the Kyrgyz Republic suffers about US$35 million in damages each year from natural disasters, building on the high-level Disaster Response Coordination Unit (DRCU) already established between Government, the UNCT and other actors. This is already being supported by a joint UNCT programme, in-volving not only the Government but also the Red Cross, other international organizations, and local and international non-Government organizations. Further strengthening ca-pacities of members of the DRCU, Rapid Emergency Assess-ment and Coordination Teams (REACT) and sector groups,
11United Nations Development Assistance Framework (UNDAF)for the Kyrgyz Republic 2012 - 2016
along with development of an inter-agency contingency plan, will serve as a platform for ensuring better preparedness and response. Particular attention will be given to establishment of a national platform for Disaster Risk Reduction as a key element of disaster management, with integration into poli-cies, plans and programmes.
At the same time, a culture of preparedness for children and safety in schools has emerged as one of the Disaster Risk Re-duction priorities. Learning and education have proved to be the most effective and sustainable mechanisms for provid-ing necessary Disaster Risk Reduction knowledge to com-munities and protection tools under disaster and emergency situations. Gaps and needs in operations will need to be considered in mainstreaming Disaster Risk Reduction into education, thereby contributing to a strategic shift in mindset from a culture of reaction to a culture of prevention.
The UNCT is particularly well placed to address the complex-ities of poverty reduction in a volatile transitional environ-ment, given the breadth and depth of expertise and capacity it can draw upon at all levels of policymaking and implemen-tation throughout the Kyrgyz Republic. The United Nations has particularly gained credibility based on its ability to help the Government respond swiftly to the 2010 events. Its long-term presence and experience throughout the region is an important asset to consider given the cross-border challenges linked to conflict prevention, migration and natural resource management. The UNCT also may be well-placed to help the Government find both a degree of continuity and consisten-cy for policies, and to orient policies far more strongly toward equity and a focus on the most vulnerable and marginalized. Particular weaknesses in existing policy frameworks lie in the absence of a conflict-sensitive perspective and in insufficient linkages between, e.g., poverty, natural resource management and disaster prevention. Major challenges particularly lie in the limited awareness of linkages between poverty, the envi-ronment and social unrest.
In support of national policies, United Nations interventions thus will offer a more holistic view of poverty, recognizing en-vironment and disaster risk reduction and management as a key factor and developing a culture of participation at all lev-els. The UNCT can advise on shaping educational content to better reflect the evolving needs of the labour market, as well as assist the development of programmes on youth employ-ment and entrepreneurship and a national jobs information portal. Further, it can support the revision of bilateral agree-ments on labour migrants, with a view to fostering a more constructive approach to building skills and utilizing experi-ence and financial resources to develop the Kyrgyz Repub-lic. The UNCT also will focus on support to equitably pro-mote diversified rural livelihoods and better farming, along with pro-poor financial services, through improved policies, systems, productivity and markets. It likewise will support
strengthened community-based natural resource manage-ment, labour-intensive public works and development of a culture of resilience for response to disaster risks.
National partners in this area are expected to include, among others, key Ministries and Government agencies such as the Ministry of Economic Regulation, Ministry of Labour, Employment and Migration, Ministry of Finance, Ministry of Agriculture, Ministry of Natural Resources, Ministry of Justice, Ministry of Interior, Ministry of Social Protection of Population, Ministry of Emergency Situations, Ministry of Health, Ministry of Culture and Information, Ministry of Education, President’s Office, Parliament and its Commit-tees, State Agency for Local Self-Governance, Kyrgyz Acad-emy of Education, National Statistical Committee, Academy of Sciences, national water authorities, State Agency on En-vironment Protection and Forestry, State Agency for Quake Proof Construction, Renewable Energy Sources Director-ate, National Committee on Climate Change, and National Confederation of Employers and the Federation of Trade Unions.
Also involved will be local and regional authorities, com-munities, the private sector, national and international non-Government organizations, trade unions and employers organizations, and academic institutions. These will include the Legal Clinic Adilet, Centre for International Protection, Crisis Centre Sezim and Central Asian Crafts Support As-sociation Resource Centre.
12United Nations Development Assistance Framework (UNDAF)for the Kyrgyz Republic 2012 - 2016
The estimated financial resources required by the UNCT for its contribution to the achievement of each UNDAF Out-come are presented in the UNDAF Results Matrices in An-nex A. These contributions include (1) the financial alloca-tions by each participating United Nations organization, or direct resources; and (2) resources that organizations expect to mobilize during the UNDAF cycle in addition to their di-rect resources. The figures, while only indicative, are as accu-rate as possible at the time of the UNDAF drafting. Resource commitments will continue to be made only in Agency pro-gramme and project documents, according to the procedures and approval mechanisms of each Agency. The UNDAF budget will be reviewed and updated annually to reflect the different cycles of specialized and non-resident Agencies.
Throughout implementation of the UNDAF, the UNCT will focus on the most vulnerable groups in society, with explicit provisions for ensuring their active and effective participation in decision making as a key to fortifying peace and stability. Moreover, as noted above, to contribute to the reduction of rural-urban and regional disparities that underlie much of the poverty and conflict in the Kyrgyz Republic, the United Na-tions will target poor rural areas and specific impoverished groups. Particular importance will be given to effective links between the State and civil society.
The UNCT and United Nations Resident Coordinator will be responsible for the effectiveness of United Nations activi-ties, especially in cases where resources are combined. These arrangements will support progress toward the use of nation-al systems for implementation, management and monitoring, based on internationally recognized standards and good prac-tices. The UNCT will discuss and determine which outputs can be implemented within Joint Programmes.
Technical Working Groups will meet regularly and will serve as the main mechanism for implementing and monitoring the UNDAF, under the oversight of the UNCT [see also Section VI]. Individual Working Group workplans on collaborative activities will be developed with clear goals and objectives, to be integrated into the Annual Report and Workplan of the Resident Coordinator. Regional cooperation also will be sup-ported and encouraged with the Government, particularly in discussions on commitments to international treaties and United Nations instruments.
A number of Thematic Working Groups already contrib-ute to integration between the United Nations Agencies in
The total anticipated resources to be mobilised in support of UNDAF strategies3 in the Kyrgyz Republic amounts to approximately US$ 186,099,262 million over a five-year pe-riod. About 27 percent of the total resources will be spent within the pillar of Peace and Cohesion, Effective Democrat-ic Governance, and Human Rights ($50 954 937 million); 39 percent on Social Inclusion and Equity ($71,883,200 mil-lion); and 34 percent on Inclusive and Sustainable Job-Rich Growth for Poverty Reduction ($63,261,125 million). This reflects both national development needs and UNCT priori-ties in the Kyrgyz Republic, as well as provides for aligning United Nations cooperation with overall development assis-tance.
key thematic and crosscutting areas such as Gender Equal-ity, Youth, and HIV/AIDS. These will continue to operate as appropriate, encouraging improved coordination through enhanced information exchange, as well as joint planning and decision making.
Provisions of the UNDAF will be implemented through the Country Cooperation Frameworks and Country Pro-grammes agreed to by partner organizations in the Kyrgyz Re-public. Selection and definition of individual Agencies’ goals, outcomes and strategies will be consistent with the UNDAF. Individual Country Programmes and project documents also will specify how they contribute to UNDAF objectives and cooperation strategies.
As part of the overall United Nations commitment to encour-age national programme management and implementation, the Executive Committee of the global United Nations De-velopment Group (UNDP, UNICEF, UNFPA, WFP) will employ a Harmonized Approach to Cash Transfers (HACT) to gradually increase the use of Government systems in dis-bursing and reporting of funds through Implementing Part-ners, as well as to reduce administration costs. Along with UNICEF and UNFPA that are using a FACE (Funding Au-thorization and Certificate of Expenditure) Form, UNDP will also apply HACT modality that became a Principal Recipient of the Grants of the Global Fund to Fight AIDS, Tuberculosis and Malaria (GFATM). The previous HACT deadline for all stages of implementation has been postponed until 2012 due to the political situation in the Kyrgyz Repub-lic at the time of UNDAF formulation. Meanwhile further steps will be undertaken to integrate HACT into country programming.
III. Indicative Resource Requirements
IV. Implementation
3 This total does not encompass special initiatives outside the UNDAF.
13United Nations Development Assistance Framework (UNDAF)for the Kyrgyz Republic 2012 - 2016
A set of objectively verifiable and repeatable key performance indicators is essential for monitoring, evaluating and reporting on achievement. Key indicators, accompanied by baselines and targets, have been formulated for each Outcome under each of the three pillars of cooperation. To refine baselines and further refine programme strategies, several surveys will be undertaken during the UNDAF cycle. [See the Results Matrices in Annex A for comprehensive monitoring and evaluation indicators to be used. A Monitoring and Evaluation Calendar, contained in Annex B, provides a tentative schedule of all major monitoring and evaluation activities.]
At the same time, because development is a process, the UNDAF may have to be adapted to respond to changes in the Kyrgyz Republic’s economic, political or social situations. The UNCT will establish three UNDAF Monitoring and Evaluation Groups to provide continuous monitoring and evaluation mechanisms specifically for the three pillars, relying on a Results-Based Management approach.
Each UNDAF Monitoring and Evaluation Group will meet bi-annually and produce brief bi-annual reports on progress in implementation as well as opportunities and constraints still faced. Government and partner representatives will be invited once every six months to provide strategic guidance. This overall monitoring and evaluation plan will particularly show its value during UNDAF Annual Review Meetings, which will serve as the basis for tracking and reporting on UNCT performance. Annual Reviews will validate
conclusions, including lessons learnt and best practices, which should feed into policy advocacy and preparation of new Annual Work Plans. The Annual Reviews also may provide important inputs for Annual Reports for individual Agencies, the Resident Coordinator and donors, as well as data and analysis for the final UNDAF Evaluation, and may reflect on issues such as development effectiveness and joint resource mobilization.
A joint mid-term evaluation by the Government, UNCT and other partners will be conducted at the midpoint of the UNDAF cycle, synchronized as much as possible with respective Agencies’ mid-term Country Programme reviews. This will be undertaken with the objective of obtaining substantive feedback on progress toward stated outcomes for each pillar, under the overarching goal of peace and stability for sustainable development. It will focus on (1) whether the UNDAF has made the best use of the United Nations’ comparative advantages in the Kyrgyz Republic; (2) the coherence of the Agencies’ contribution toward achieving national priorities; (3) whether the UNDAF has helped achieve the selected priorities in the national development framework; and (4) impact of capacity development initiatives. In all, this will provide the opportunity for any mid-course adjustments to ensure that United Nations efforts 2012-2016 remain focused on the Kyrgyz Republic’s national priorities. In addition, achievements, lessons learnt and best practices will be disseminated, as will constraints encountered, to inform the design of the next UNDAF.
V. Monitoring and Evaluation
14United Nations Development Assistance Framework (UNDAF)for the Kyrgyz Republic 2012 - 2016
Acronyms and AbbreviationsAIDSCACBOCDSCEDAWCISCLMSCMCCDRRDRCUEFSAFAOGBVGDPGFHIVIAEAIOILOKAEKIHSLSGM&EMESMFAMoAMoCIMoESMoERMoIMoYMDGsMoJMoHMoLEMMSPPNSCNGOOCHAOHCHRUNAIDSUNCTUNDAFUNDPUNECEUNEPUNESCAPUNESCOUNFPAUNHCRUNICEFUNIDOUNODCUNOSATUNRCCAUNVUN WomenWFPWHO
Acquired Immune Deficiency SyndromeCountry AnalysisCommunity Based OrganizationsCountry Development StrategyConvention on the Elimination of All Forms of Discrimination Against WomenCommonwealth of Independent StatesChild Labour Monitoring SystemCountry Multisectoral Coordination CommitteeDisaster Risk ReductionDisaster Risk Coordination UnitEmergency Food Security AssessmentFood and Agriculture OrganizationGender-Based ViolenceGross Domestic ProductGlobal FundHuman Immunodeficiency VirusInternational Atomic Energy AgencyInternational OrganizationsInternational Labour OrganizationKyrgyz Academy of EducationKyrgyzstan Integrated Household SurveyLocal Self GovernmentMonitoring and EvaluationMinistry of Emergency SituationsMinistry of Foreign AffairsMinistry of AgricultureMinistry of Culture and InformationMinistry of Education and ScienceMinistry of Economic RegulationMinistry of InteriorMinistry of YouthMillennium Development GoalsMinistry of JusticeMinistry of HealthMinistry of Labor, Employment, and MigrationMinistry of Social Protection of PopulationNational Statistics CommitteeNon-Government OrganizationOffice for the Coordination of Humanitarian AffairsOffice of the High Commissioner for Human RightsJoint United Nations Programme on HIV/AIDSUnited Nations Country TeamUnited Nations Development Assistance FrameworkUnited Nations Development ProgrammeUnited Nations Economic Commission of EuropeUnited Nations Environment ProgrammeUnited Nations Economic and Social Commission for Asia and the PacificUnited Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural OrganizationUnited Nations Population FundUnited Nations High Commissioner for RefugeesUnited Nations Children’s FundUnited Nations Industrial Development OrganizationUnited Nations Office on Drugs and CrimeUnited Nations Operational Satellite Applications ProgrammeUnited Nations Regional Centre for Preventive Diplomacy for Central AsiaUnited Nations VolunteersUnited Nations Entity for Gender Equality and the Empowerment of WomenWorld Food ProgrammeWorld Health Organization
15
Mid
-Ter
m N
atio
nal P
rior
ities
(201
1-20
12):
Inte
r-et
hnic
tole
ranc
e and
pub
lic se
curit
y
S
tren
gthe
ning
stat
e gov
erna
nce
UN
DA
F Pi
llar A
:
Pea
ce an
d C
ohes
ion,
Effe
ctiv
e Dem
ocra
tic G
over
nanc
e and
Hum
an R
ight
s
Rel
evan
t MD
Gs:
M
DG
1: E
radi
cate
extr
eme p
over
ty an
d hu
nger
M
DG
5: I
mpr
ove m
ater
nal h
ealth
MD
G 2
: Ach
ieve
uni
vers
al p
rimar
y edu
catio
n
MD
G 6
: Com
bat H
IV/A
IDS,
mal
aria
and
othe
r dise
ases
MD
G 3
: Pro
mot
e gen
der e
qual
ity an
d em
pow
er w
omen
M
DG
7: E
nsur
e env
ironm
enta
l sus
tain
abili
tyM
DG
4: R
educ
e chi
ld m
orta
lity
M
DG
8: D
evel
op a
glob
al p
artn
ersh
ip fo
r dev
elop
men
t
Out
com
esIn
dica
tors
Targ
ets
Base
lines
Mea
ns o
f Ver
ifica
tion
Rol
e of P
artn
ers
Indi
cativ
e Res
ourc
es
Out
com
e 1:
A n
atio
nal i
nfra
-st
ruct
ure f
or p
eace
(a
t loc
al, r
egio
nal
and
natio
nal l
evel
s)
invo
lvin
g go
vern
-m
ent,
civi
l soc
iety
, co
mm
uniti
es
and
indi
vidu
als
effec
tivel
y pre
vent
s vi
olen
t con
flict
and
enga
ges i
n pe
ace
build
ing
% o
f per
sons
who
feel
se
cure
in th
eir a
rea (
indi
-ca
ting r
educ
ed te
nsio
ns
and
impr
oved
secu
rity)
an
d ha
ve co
nfide
nce i
n ap
plic
atio
n of
rule
of l
aw
and
prot
ectio
n of
hum
an
right
s
% o
f per
sons
that
per
ceiv
e K
yrgy
zsta
n as
a to
leran
t so
ciet
y with
resp
ect f
or
dive
rsity
(seg
rega
ted
data
sh
owin
g per
cent
ages
for
diffe
rent
iden
tity g
roup
s)
% o
f per
sons
that
hav
e the
pe
rcep
tion
of g
ood
inte
r-co
mm
unity
coex
isten
ce
and
coop
erat
ion
(e.g
. in
area
s suc
h as
bus
ines
s co
oper
atio
n, ed
ucat
ion,
co
mm
unity
life
etc.)
At l
east
10
% in
crea
se in
pe
rson
s who
feel
secu
re in
th
eir a
rea a
nd h
ave c
on-
fiden
ce in
appl
icat
ion
of
rule
of l
aw an
d pr
otec
tion
of h
uman
righ
ts
At l
east
10%
incr
ease
in
per
sons
that
per
ceiv
e K
yrgy
zsta
n as
a to
leran
t so
ciet
y with
resp
ect f
or
dive
rsity
(seg
rega
ted
data
sh
owin
g per
cent
ages
for
diffe
rent
iden
tity g
roup
s)
At l
east
10%
incr
ease
in
per
sons
that
hav
e the
pe
rcep
tion
of g
ood
inte
r-co
mm
unity
coex
isten
ce
and
coop
erat
ion
(e.g
. in
area
s suc
h as
bus
ines
s co
oper
atio
n, ed
ucat
ion,
co
mm
unity
life
etc.)
Cou
ntry
-wid
e K
AP
surv
ey to
be
cond
ucte
d in
20
11 m
easu
ring
perc
eptio
n of
se
curit
y and
so
cial
cohe
sion.
Qua
ntita
tive K
AP
surv
ey to
mea
sure
atti-
tude
s and
per
cept
ions
of
sam
pled
resp
on-
dent
s (co
untr
y-w
ide,
repr
esen
tativ
e sur
vey)
Key
Min
istrie
s and
Gov
ernm
ent A
genc
ies,
espe
cial
ly M
FA, M
oE, M
oI, N
SC, M
oY,
MoJ
, inc
ludi
ng P
resid
ent’s
Offi
ce, R
elig
ious
Pol
icy a
nd P
ublic
Affa
irs O
ffice
und
er
Pres
iden
t’s O
ffice
, PM
’s O
ffice
, Par
liam
ent,
Cen
tral
Ele
ctor
al C
omm
issio
n, S
upre
me
Cou
rt, S
tate
Age
ncy o
f Exe
cutio
n of
Pun
ishm
ent,
Gen
eral
Pro
secu
tor O
ffice
, Dep
art-
men
t for
Eth
nic D
evel
opm
ent,
Stat
e Age
ncy f
or L
ocal
Sel
f-Gov
erna
nce,
Mun
icip
aliti
es:
To ap
ply U
N ru
les an
d sta
ndar
ds on
juve
nile
justi
ce an
d ens
ure a
pplic
ation
of th
e rul
e of
law,
advo
cacy
, nat
ional
dial
ogue
, im
plem
enta
tion
and m
onito
ring,
partn
ersh
ip
build
ing;
deve
lopm
ent a
nd im
plem
enta
tion
of po
licies
inclu
ding
polic
ies ai
med
at
toler
ance
prom
otion
, reco
ncili
ation
and c
onfli
ct pr
even
tion,
revi
sion
of ex
istin
g leg
islat
ion, p
oten
tial o
f int
erna
tiona
l com
mitm
ents
of th
e cou
ntry
in th
e are
a of p
eace
and s
ecurit
y; in
creas
e of m
edia
tion
poten
tial p
artic
ular
ly am
ong w
omen
and y
outh
; de
velop
men
t of e
arly
warn
ing a
nd co
nflict
prev
entio
n m
echan
isms,
raisi
ng aw
aren
ess;
resto
ratio
n of
and a
ccess
to pr
ivate/
com
mer
cial a
nd st
ate e
mpl
oym
ent t
o all
citiz
ens
rega
rdles
s of e
thni
city,
resto
ratio
n of
lost i
dent
ifica
tion
and p
rope
rty do
cum
enta
tion,
im
prov
ed so
cial s
ervi
ces to
the p
opul
ation
, pov
erty
redu
ction
effor
ts, fa
ir pr
osecu
tion
of hu
man
righ
ts vi
olatio
ns.
Cou
rt, O
mbu
dsm
en O
ffice
: Ext
erna
l mon
itorin
g
Don
or co
mm
unity
: Co
ntrib
utin
g to p
eace
and d
evelo
pmen
t and
mod
erni
zed b
orde
r man
agem
ent.
IOs/
NG
Os a
s act
ors f
or p
eace
: Pr
omot
e pea
ce in
itiat
ives a
nd di
plom
atic
peac
e effo
rts; r
each
out t
o com
mun
ities;
m
obili
ze co
mm
uniti
es for
peac
e bui
ldin
g effo
rts; m
ake a
ssessm
ent o
f the
stra
tegic
docu
men
ts; en
surin
g par
ticip
ator
y app
roac
h for
elab
orat
ion of
lega
l bas
is/fra
mew
ork
docu
men
ts, in
volv
emen
t of w
omen
in pe
ace n
etwor
ks m
obili
zatio
n of
com
mun
ities
in ra
ising
awar
eness
and p
rom
otion
of id
eas o
f tole
ranc
e, clo
se m
onito
ring o
f poli
cy
impl
emen
tatio
n at
all l
evels
, poli
cy di
alog
ue; d
ata c
ollect
ion an
d mon
itorin
g, su
ppor
t to
plan
ning
and i
mpl
emen
tatio
n, ca
pacit
y bui
ldin
g, pr
omot
ion of
peac
e dia
logue
su
ppor
ting e
fforts
of th
e aut
horit
ies, p
rom
otin
g pea
ce an
d reco
ncili
ation
at al
l lev
els
thro
ugh
train
ing s
emin
ars,
awar
eness
raisi
ng ac
tiviti
es, P
B pr
ojects
fund
ing a
nd
impl
emen
tatio
n, co
mm
unity
mob
iliza
tion,
prov
ision
of h
uman
itaria
n ai
d to t
he m
ost
need
y, pr
omot
ion of
rule
of la
w, in
form
ation
shar
ing.
Med
ia: a
ware
ness
raisi
ng, m
onito
ring.
UN
DP:
US$
12,
200,
000
UN
ICEF
:U
S$ 5
,000
,000
UN
ESC
O:
US$
220
,000
UN
HC
R:
U
S$ 2
,925
,000
OH
CH
R*:
U
S$ 1
,899
,335
WFP
*:
US$
300
,000
UN
V**
: U
S$ 5
32,4
30
UN
Wom
en:
U
S$ 1
,800
,000
OU
TC
OM
E 1
TO
TAL
US$
24,
876,
765
Ann
ex A
: UN
DA
F R
esul
ts M
atri
xU
ND
AF
Res
ults
and
Res
ourc
es F
ram
ewor
k 20
12-2
016:
PEA
CE
AN
D C
OH
ESIO
N, E
FFEC
TIV
E D
EMO
CR
ATIC
GO
VER
NA
NC
E A
ND
HU
MA
N R
IGH
TS
16
Out
com
esIn
dica
tors
Targ
ets
Base
lines
Mea
ns o
f Ver
ifica
tion
Rol
e of P
artn
ers
Indi
cativ
e Res
ourc
es
Out
com
e 2:
By th
e end
of 2
016,
th
e Gov
ernm
ent
of K
yrgy
zsta
n fu
lfills
key
reco
m-
men
datio
ns o
f th
e Uni
vers
al
Peri
odic
Rev
iew,
Tr
eaty
Bod
ies a
nd
Spec
ial P
roce
dure
s, an
d ot
her o
blig
a-tio
ns u
nder
the
inte
rnat
iona
l law
an
d tr
eatie
s for
the
bett
er p
rote
ctio
n of
hu
man
righ
ts
# of
com
plai
nts s
ubm
itted
U
N T
reat
y Bod
ies a
nd
Spec
ial P
roce
dure
s rel
ated
to
hum
an ri
ghts
viol
atio
ns
% o
f all
reco
mm
enda
-tio
ns an
d de
cisio
ns o
f UN
Tr
eaty
Bod
ies a
nd S
peci
al
Proc
edur
es im
plem
ente
d
Min
imum
10
indi
vidu
al
com
plai
nts s
ubm
itted
by
per
sons
und
er K
yrgy
z ju
risdi
ctio
n to
UN
Tr
eaty
Bod
ies a
nd S
peci
al
Proc
edur
es
20%
of a
ll re
com
men
-da
tions
and
dec
ision
s im
plem
ente
d
Nat
iona
l bod
y or
mec
hani
sm ta
sked
to
over
see i
mpl
emen
tatio
n of
reco
mm
enda
tions
and
deci
sions
is fu
nctio
nal
5 de
cisio
ns
of th
e UN
H
uman
Rig
hts
Com
mitt
ee
on in
divi
dual
ca
ses c
arrie
d ou
t sin
ce 1
995
(sin
ce 1
995
indi
vidu
al
com
mun
icat
ion
beca
me l
egal
)
0 de
cisio
ns
impl
emen
ted
Base
line o
n im
plem
enta
tion
of re
com
men
-da
tion
tba
Mon
itorin
g rep
orts
of
NG
Os;
stat
istic
al
data
from
the j
udic
ial
syst
em; d
ata f
rom
the
OH
CH
R G
enev
a on
the n
umbe
r of r
egis-
tere
d co
mpl
aint
s.
Mon
itorin
g rep
orts
of
OH
CH
R an
d N
GO
s; re
port
s of G
over
n-m
ent a
genc
ies t
o th
e U
N T
reat
y Bod
ies
and
Hum
an R
ight
s C
ounc
il; la
ws a
dopt
ed
in im
plem
enta
tion
of
UN
obs
erva
tions
and
reco
mm
enda
tions
Mon
itorin
g of t
he
natio
nal a
sylu
m
proc
edur
e and
refu
gee
prot
ectio
n sit
uatio
n di
rect
ly b
y UN
HC
R
and
NG
Os.
Key
Min
istrie
s and
Gov
ernm
ent A
genc
ies i
nclu
ding
Pre
siden
t’s O
ffice
: Co
ordi
natio
n of
impl
emen
tatio
n of
the r
ecom
men
datio
ns am
ong r
eleva
nt m
inist
ries
and s
tate
agen
cies;
timely
subm
ission
of re
ports
to U
PR, C
EDAW
/follo
w up
and
impl
emen
tatio
n of
reco
mm
enda
tions
; ado
ption
of im
plem
enta
tion
mech
anism
; m
onito
ring t
ools
and p
roced
ures
over
impl
emen
tatio
n; po
licy d
evelo
pmen
t and
impl
e-m
enta
tion;
impr
ovem
ent
of th
e leg
islat
ion; p
rom
otion
of h
uman
righ
ts, in
cludi
ng th
e rig
hts o
f refu
gees,
asylu
m-se
eker
s and
stat
eless
perso
ns at
all l
evels
, cap
acity
build
ing;
aw
aren
ess ra
ising
of th
e vul
nera
ble g
roup
s of p
opul
ation
on th
eir ri
ghts
as w
ell as
en
titlem
ents
to va
rious
publ
ic ser
vices
, soc
ial b
enefi
ts an
d assi
stanc
e.mai
nstre
amin
g of
child
labo
ur in
to po
licy d
ocum
ents,
supp
ort i
n in
trodu
ction
of ch
ild la
bour
mon
itorin
g sys
tem (C
LMS)
, cap
acity
deve
lopm
ent,
awar
eness
raisi
ng, s
uppo
rt in
prov
idin
g dire
ct ser
vices
to ch
ildre
n.
IOs/
NG
Os,
Trad
e Uni
ons,
Nat
iona
l Con
fede
ratio
n of
the E
mpl
oyer
s: En
surin
g par
ticip
ator
y app
roac
h for
elab
orat
ion of
repo
rts, m
onito
ring o
f im
ple-
men
tatio
n of
reco
mm
enda
tions
and i
mpl
emen
tatio
n pr
ocess
; pro
visio
n of
expe
rtise
and t
echni
cal s
uppo
rt, ca
pacit
y bui
ldin
g at a
ll lev
els; i
nfor
mat
ion sh
arin
g; ca
pacit
y de
velop
men
t, im
plem
enta
tion
of CL
MS,
capa
city d
evelo
pmen
t.
Key
Min
istrie
s and
Gov
ernm
ent A
genc
ies,
espe
cial
ly M
FA, O
mbu
dsm
an, M
inist
ry o
f Ju
stice
:Ti
mely
prep
arat
ion an
d coo
rdin
ation
on in
terna
tiona
l com
mitm
ents
in th
e are
a of
hum
an ri
ghts,
inclu
ding
the r
ights
of re
fuge
es, as
ylum
-seek
ers a
nd st
atele
ss pe
rsons
; po
licy d
evelo
pmen
t and
impl
emen
tatio
n; im
prov
emen
t th
e leg
islat
ion; r
eceivi
ng
com
plai
ns an
d pro
vide
adeq
uate
resp
onse,
impl
emen
tatio
n of
the H
R an
d mon
itorin
g;
mai
nstre
amin
g of c
hild
labo
ur in
to po
licy d
ocum
ents,
supp
ort i
n in
trodu
ction
of ch
ild
labo
ur m
onito
ring s
ystem
(CLM
S), c
apac
ity de
velop
men
t, aw
aren
ess ra
ising
, sup
port
in pr
ovid
ing d
irect
servi
ces to
child
ren.
ING
O/N
GO
: Mon
itorin
g and
impl
emen
tatio
n.
IOs/
NG
Os:
Capa
city d
evelo
pmen
t and
supp
ort t
o im
plem
enta
tion
of U
PR an
d UN
trea
ty bo
dies’
re
com
men
datio
ns re
lated
to pl
aces
of de
tentio
n an
d dru
g con
trol.
Trad
e Uni
ons,
Nat
iona
l Con
fede
ratio
n of
the E
mpl
oyer
s, N
GO
s: ca
pacit
y dev
elopm
ent,
impl
emen
tatio
n of
CLM
S.
Om
buds
man
offi
ce S
upre
me C
ourt
and
cour
ts:
Ensu
re ap
plica
tion
of th
e HR
and R
ule o
f the
Law
UN
OD
C:
U
S$ 2
,250
,000
UN
HC
R:
U
S$ 3
,412
,500
OH
CH
R*:
US$
947
,700
ILO
US$
100
,000
UN
ICEF
:
U
S$ 5
00,0
00
UN
Wom
en:
U
S$ 5
0,00
0
OU
TC
OM
E 2
TO
TAL
US$
7,5
59,5
00
17
Out
com
esIn
dica
tors
Targ
ets
Base
lines
Mea
ns o
f Ver
ifica
tion
Rol
e of P
artn
ers
Indi
cativ
e Res
ourc
es
Out
com
e 3:
By 2
016,
nat
iona
l an
d lo
cal a
utho
ri-
ties a
pply
rule
of
law
and
civi
c en
gage
men
t prin
-ci
ples
in p
rovi
sion
of se
rvic
es w
ith
activ
e par
ticip
atio
n of
civi
l soc
iety
% o
f civ
il so
ciet
y org
aniz
a-tio
ns an
d N
GO
s act
ivel
y an
d le
gally
par
ticip
atin
g in
form
ulat
ion
and
impl
e-m
enta
tion
and
M&
E of
na
tiona
l and
loca
l dev
elop
-m
ent p
olic
ies
1/4
of ci
vil o
rgan
izat
ions
an
d N
GO
s effe
ctiv
ely
and
lega
lly p
artic
ipat
e in
form
ulat
ion
and
impl
e-m
enta
tion
and
M&
E of
nat
iona
l and
loca
l de
velo
pmen
t pol
icie
s
0 ci
vil
orga
niza
tions
an
d N
GO
s pa
rtic
ipat
e eff
ectiv
ely a
nd
lega
lly in
for-
mul
atio
n an
d im
plem
enta
tion
and
M&
E of
na
tiona
l and
lo
cal d
evel
op-
men
t pol
icie
s
“Tok
tom
” Leg
al d
a-ta
base
; pol
ling s
urve
y re
sults
amon
g civ
il so
ciet
y org
aniz
atio
ns
and
NG
Os.
Key
Min
istrie
s and
Gov
ernm
ent A
genc
ies,
espe
cial
ly, M
oJ, M
oY, N
ALS
G in
clud
ing
Parli
amen
t and
its C
omm
ittee
s, G
over
nmen
t’s O
ffice
, Pre
siden
t’s O
ffice
: Po
licy d
evelo
pmen
t, co
ordi
natio
n, ad
voca
cy, a
ware
ness
raisi
ng, p
rom
otion
and
supp
ortin
g nat
ional
dial
ogue
; pro
mot
ion an
d enh
ancem
ent o
f rul
e of l
aw, g
ende
r ex
perti
se an
d gen
der r
espon
sive b
udge
ting;
law
draft
ing,
coor
dina
tion,
law
impl
emen
-ta
tion
over
sight
, pro
mot
ion an
d pro
tectio
n of
HR;
insti
tutio
nal c
apac
ity of
nat
ional
sta
keho
lder
s to e
nabl
e the
m to
enga
ge w
ith ci
vil so
ciety
orga
niza
tions
in fo
rmul
ation
an
d im
plem
enta
tion
of na
tiona
l poli
cies;
prom
otion
and e
nhan
cemen
t of r
ule o
f law
th
roug
h ad
ditio
nal l
egisl
ative
and e
xecu
tive m
easu
res;
ensu
ring i
ndivi
dual
resp
onsi-
bilit
y for
crim
inal
offen
ces an
d hum
an ri
ghts
viola
tions
in ac
cord
ance
with
the l
aw;
estab
lishi
ng le
gal b
asis
for en
gage
men
t of c
ivil s
ociet
y in
impr
ovin
g rul
e of l
aw an
d pr
ovisi
on of
serv
ices.
Don
or co
mm
unity
: Co
ntrib
ute t
o the
stre
ngth
enin
g of g
ood g
over
nanc
e at l
ocal
and n
ation
al le
vels
to en
-su
re so
cial j
ustic
e; co
ntrib
ute t
o poli
cy m
akin
g, su
ppor
t poli
cy re
form
s im
plem
enta
tion.
IOs/
NG
Os:
Facil
itate
the p
roces
s of p
rope
r esta
blish
men
t and
capa
city d
evelo
pmen
t of t
he pu
blic
auth
oriti
es an
d NG
Os; p
artic
ipat
ion in
law
draft
ing,
polic
y mak
ing;
advo
cacy
and
prom
otion
of pu
blic
awar
eness
; ens
urin
g par
ticip
ation
of w
omen
in de
cision
mak
ing
and b
udge
ting;
supp
ort t
o dev
elopm
ent o
f effi
cient
law
enfor
cemen
t bo
dies,
impl
e-m
enta
tion,
coor
dina
tion
and c
ontin
genc
y pla
nnin
g; su
ppor
t gov
ernm
ent e
fforts
in
impr
ovin
g the
rule
of la
w an
d pro
visio
n of
servi
ces; c
lose m
onito
ring o
f hum
an ri
ghts
situa
tion
and i
nfor
mat
ion sh
arin
g with
the a
utho
rities
; enh
ancem
ent o
f hum
an ri
ghts
awar
eness
amon
g the
popu
latio
n; pr
ovisi
on of
lega
l ser
vices
to en
sure
acces
s to j
ustic
e to
cont
ribut
e to e
labo
ratio
n of
polic
y/re
gula
tory
docu
men
ts.
Med
ia:
Awar
eness
raisi
ng, m
onito
r rul
e of l
aw im
plem
enta
tion,
publ
icize
HR
viola
tions
.
UN
DP:
US$
10,
600,
000
UN
OD
C:
US$
2,0
00,0
00
UN
HC
R:
U
S$ 3
,412
,500
UN
ICEF
:
U
S$ 5
00,0
00
UN
ESC
O:
US$
225
,000
UN
FPA
:U
S$ 1
,500
,000
UN
V**
: U
S$ 2
81,1
72
UN
Wom
en:
U
S$ 3
00,0
00
Cor
rupt
ion
Perc
eptio
n In
dex (
CPI
) ran
king
scor
e
# of
com
plai
nts o
n co
r-ru
ptio
n
Ran
king
scor
e of 1
00 o
r be
tter
in
(CPI
)
# of
com
plai
nts o
n co
r-ru
ptio
n tr
iple
d
164
rank
ing
scor
e in
CPI
20
10
Cor
rupt
ion
base
line s
urve
y to
be c
ondu
cted
in
201
1; su
rvey
w
ill al
so
esta
blish
a ba
selin
e on
tota
l num
ber o
f co
mpl
aint
s
Rat
ing t
hrou
gh C
PI
corr
uptio
n ba
selin
e an
d en
d-lin
e sur
veys
re
sults
; NG
O an
d ci
vil
soci
ety o
rgan
izat
ion
repo
rts
Key
Min
istrie
s and
Gov
ernm
ent A
genc
ies,
incl
udin
g Gov
ernm
ent’s
Offi
ce, P
resid
ent’s
O
ffice
, Jud
icia
ry an
d Pa
rliam
ent:
Impr
ovin
g leg
islat
ion ba
se to
fight
corr
uptio
n, ci
tizen
s’ eng
agem
ent,
creat
ing a
plat
-for
m on
nat
ional
dial
ogue
with
focu
s on
anti-
corr
uptio
n iss
ues.
NG
Os: Ad
voca
cy, e
ngag
emen
t int
o poli
cy an
d pra
ctice
dial
ogue
, rep
resen
ting c
itize
ns fr
om
rem
ote a
reas
.
Med
ia:
Ensu
re tr
ansp
aren
cy an
d rai
sing p
ublic
awar
eness
on pu
blic
asset
s and
othe
r reso
urces
.
18
% o
f per
sons
with
ope
n ac
cess
to cr
edib
le in
form
a-tio
n on
pub
lic p
olic
y m
akin
g
At l
east
50%
of p
opul
a-tio
n w
ith o
pen
acce
ss to
qu
ality
upd
ated
pub
lic
info
rmat
ion
on p
olic
y m
akin
g thr
ough
Inte
rnet
an
d m
obile
pho
ne
Inte
rnet
use
rs
only
hav
e an
acce
ss to
pub
lic
inst
itutio
ns’
web
sites
(40%
of
the p
opul
a-tio
n in
201
0)
Rep
orts
of I
nter
net
and
mob
ile p
hone
se
rvic
e pro
vide
rs,
incl
udin
g Int
erne
t W
orld
s Sta
ts
Key
Min
istrie
s and
Gov
ernm
ent’s
Age
ncie
s, in
clud
ing P
M’s
Offi
ce, P
resid
ent’s
Offi
ce,
Judi
ciar
y and
the P
arlia
men
t Om
buds
man
: M
aint
ain
regu
lar p
ublic
com
mun
icatio
ns an
d get
feedb
ack fr
om ci
tizen
s thr
ough
m
edia
, ICT
tools
and o
ther
com
mun
icatio
n ch
anne
ls.
Civ
il so
ciet
y org
aniz
atio
ns:
Capa
city d
evelo
pmen
t of t
he K
yrgy
z citi
zens
.
Priv
ate S
ecto
r: Br
inin
g in
new
ICT
techn
ologie
s, soft
ware
deve
lopm
ent t
o ens
ure p
ublic
acces
s to
publ
ic in
form
ation
.D
onor
s: su
ppor
t poli
cy re
form
s im
plem
enta
tion.
CIIP
Med
ia: A
ware
ness
raisi
ng an
d adv
ocac
y
OU
TC
OM
E 3
TO
TAL
US$
18,
818,
672
UN
DA
F PI
LLA
R A
TO
TAL
US$
50,
954,
937
19
Mid
-Ter
m N
atio
nal P
rior
ities
(201
1-20
12):
Eco
nom
ic d
evel
opm
ent,
redu
ctio
n of
une
mpl
oym
ent a
nd en
hanc
ing
inte
rnat
iona
l eco
nom
ic co
oper
atio
n
S
ocia
l dev
elop
men
t and
envi
ronm
ent p
rote
ctio
n U
ND
AF
Pilla
r B:
S
ocia
l Inc
lusio
n an
d Eq
uity
Rel
evan
t MD
Gs:
M
DG
1: E
radi
cate
extr
eme p
over
ty an
d hu
nger
MD
G 5
: Im
prov
e mat
erna
l hea
lthM
DG
2: A
chie
ve u
nive
rsal
prim
ary e
duca
tion
MD
G 6
: Com
bat H
IV/A
IDS,
mal
aria
and
othe
r dise
ases
MD
G 3
: Pro
mot
e gen
der e
qual
ity an
d em
pow
er w
omen
MD
G 7
: Ens
ure e
nviro
nmen
tal s
usta
inab
ility
MD
G 4
: Red
uce c
hild
mor
talit
y
M
DG
8: D
evel
op a
glob
al p
artn
ersh
ip fo
r dev
elop
men
t
Out
com
esIn
dica
tors
Targ
ets
Base
lines
Mea
ns o
f Ver
ifica
tion
Rol
e of P
artn
ers
Indi
cativ
e Res
ourc
es
Out
com
e 1:
By 2
016,
vul
ner-
able
gro
ups*
ben
-efi
t fro
m im
prov
ed
soci
al p
rote
ctio
n,
nam
ely: fo
od se
curit
y;
MC
H/R
H
serv
ices
;nu
triti
on;
educ
atio
n,
STI/
HIV
/T
B;
soci
al p
rote
c-tio
n se
rvic
es
and
bene
fits
*indi
cato
rs an
d Co
untry
Pro
-gr
amm
es of
UN
Or
gani
zatio
ns
iden
tify t
he sp
ecific
vu
lnera
ble g
roup
s
% o
f com
plic
ated
del
iver
ies
Stun
ting r
ate a
mon
g ch
ildre
n un
der fi
ve
40%
10%
55.7
% 13
%
Rep
ublic
an H
ealth
In
form
atio
n C
ente
rD
HS,
MIC
S, M
DG
Pr
ogre
ss R
epor
ts an
d ot
her U
N A
naly
tical
M
ater
ials
Key
Min
istrie
s and
Gov
ernm
ent A
genc
ies,
espe
cial
ly M
oH, K
yrgy
z Cou
ntry
Mul
tisec
-to
ral C
oord
inat
ion
Com
mitt
ee (C
MC
C),
Man
dato
ry H
ealth
Insu
ranc
e Fun
d un
der
the G
over
nmen
t of t
he K
R:
Adhe
renc
e to s
tand
ards
set f
or se
rvice
s/gen
der r
espon
sive p
lann
ing a
nd bu
dgeti
ng;
prog
ram
me a
nd po
licy p
lann
ing,
deve
lopm
ent,
coor
dina
tion
impl
emen
tatio
n an
d m
onito
ring,
socia
l ser
vices
to su
ppor
t refu
gees,
asylu
m se
eker
s, re
turn
ees a
nd st
atele
ss pe
rsons
; adv
ocac
y, co
ordi
natio
n, su
rvey
impl
emen
tatio
n an
d mon
itorin
g, pr
ovid
e str
ong o
n-go
ing o
versi
ght a
nd gu
idan
ce in
a co
urse
of th
e im
plem
enta
tion
of GF
gr
ants.
Don
or co
mm
unity
: Co
ordi
natio
n of
techn
ical a
nd fin
ancia
l reso
urces
thro
ugh
exist
ing d
onor
coor
dina
tion
mech
anism
s.
IO/N
GO
s/A
cade
mic
Insti
tutio
ns/A
ssoc
iatio
ns, i
nclu
ding
Help
Age
Inte
rnat
iona
l, Sa
ve th
e Chi
ldre
n U
K, D
RC, A
CT
ED, M
ercy
Cor
ps, C
risis
Cen
ter S
ezim
, Pub
lic
Foun
datio
n C
ount
erpa
rt-S
herik
tesh
, Cen
ter f
or In
tern
atio
nal P
rote
ctio
n, R
efug
ee
Wom
en C
ente
r Dus
ti:
Infor
mat
ion ca
mpa
igns t
o ens
ure a
ware
ness
of vu
lnera
ble g
roup
s abo
ut th
e exi
sting
ser
vices
and s
ocia
l pro
tectio
n m
echan
isms;
mob
ilizin
g com
mun
ities,
awar
eness
raisi
ng
of th
e pop
ulat
ion on
thre
ats a
nd pr
even
tion
of H
IV/T
B/ST
I; he
lp to
stre
ngth
en-
ing s
ervi
ces de
liver
y to t
he h
igh ri
sk gr
oups
of po
pula
tion,
socia
l dia
logue
, sup
port
to
prog
ram
me p
lann
ing,
impl
emen
tatio
n an
d mon
itorin
g, ca
pacit
y bui
ldin
g, pr
ovisi
on
of ba
sic/es
sentia
l ser
vices
to an
d enh
ancin
g edu
catio
n op
portu
nitie
s of r
efuge
es, as
ylum
see
kers,
retu
rnee
s and
stat
eless
perso
ns; d
ata c
ollect
ion, s
tudi
es, cu
rricu
lum
deve
lop-
men
t and
trai
ning
;
Priv
ate s
ecto
r: Im
plem
enta
tion,
mon
itorin
g and
feed
back
.
Com
mun
ities
: Par
ticip
ation
and i
mpl
emen
tatio
n.
UN
DP:
US$
34,
100,
000
UN
FPA
:
U
S$ 3
,800
,000
UN
HC
R:
US$
3,9
00,0
00
UN
ICEF
:
U
S$ 2
1,00
0,00
0
UN
ESC
O:
US$
500
,000
ILO
:
US$
20,
000
UN
AID
S:
U
S$ 2
50,0
00
WFP
*:
U
S $8
,000
,000
WH
O:
US$
100
,000
UN
V**
: U
S$ 1
3,20
0
UN
Wom
en:
U
S$ 2
00,0
00
UN
DA
F R
esul
ts an
d R
esou
rces
Fra
mew
ork
2012
-201
6:SO
CIA
L IN
CLU
SIO
N A
ND
EQ
UIT
Y
20
Out
com
esIn
dica
tors
Targ
ets
Base
lines
Mea
ns o
f Ver
ifica
tion
Rol
e of P
artn
ers
Indi
cativ
e Res
ourc
es
Kyr
gyzs
tan’s
rank
ing i
n in
tern
atio
nal a
sses
smen
t on
lear
ning
achi
evem
ent
(PIS
A)
Seco
ndar
y sch
ool c
ompl
e-tio
n ra
te
Incr
ease
in ra
nkin
g 93
%
Last
pla
ce in
ra
nkin
g (67
th)
78%
PISA
, nat
iona
l MLA
st
udie
s Sc
hool
dro
p-ou
t st
udy;
MIC
S
Key
Min
istrie
s and
Gov
ernm
ent A
genc
ies,
espe
cial
ly M
inist
ry o
f Edu
catio
n an
d Sc
i-en
ce, K
yrgy
z Aca
dem
y of E
duca
tion,
Min
istry
of E
mer
genc
y Situ
atio
n:
Educ
ation
stra
tegy a
nd co
ncep
t de
velop
men
t, im
plem
enta
tion,
prog
ram
me p
lan-
ning
, adv
ocac
y, an
d coo
rdin
ation
; sur
vey
mon
itorin
g and
eval
uatio
n; re
visio
n of
curr
iculu
m, t
each
ing/
learn
ing p
roces
ses, e
duca
tion
man
agem
ent,
finan
cing;
capa
city
deve
lopm
ent,
awar
eness
raisi
ng, p
rovi
sion
of di
rect
servi
ces to
child
ren;
Parli
amen
t Edu
catio
n C
omm
ittee
: Par
liam
ent h
earin
g and
advo
cacy
.
Kyr
gyz A
cade
my o
f Edu
catio
n: C
urric
ulum
deve
lopm
ent,
in-se
rvice
and p
re-se
rvice
sta
ndar
ds de
velop
men
t.
IO/N
GO
s/A
cade
mic
insti
tutio
ns/A
ssoc
iatio
ns T
each
ers’
trad
e uni
ons,
loca
l aut
hori-
ties,
NG
Os:
Dat
a coll
ection
, stu
dies,
supp
ort t
o pla
nnin
g, im
plem
enta
tion
and m
onito
ring,
capa
city d
evelo
pmen
t; su
ppor
t in
impl
emen
tatio
n an
d mon
itorin
g of d
irect
servi
ces to
ch
ildre
n.
Priv
ate s
ecto
r: Im
plem
enta
tion,
men
torin
g and
mon
itorin
g.
% o
f elig
ible
fam
ilies
with
ch
ildre
n be
nefit
ing f
rom
po
vert
y tar
gete
d ca
sh
tran
sfers
% o
f inc
reas
e of t
arge
ted
HH
s with
bor
derli
ne an
d ad
equa
te F
ood
Con
sum
p-tio
n Sc
ore
80%
of e
xtre
me p
oor
hous
ehol
ds b
enefi
t fro
m
pove
rty t
arge
ted
cash
tr
ansfe
r
55%
of t
he m
ost v
ulne
r-ab
le h
ouse
hold
s im
prov
e th
eir f
ood
cons
umpt
ion
(upg
rade
from
poo
r to
bord
erlin
e or a
ccep
t-ab
le fo
od co
nsum
ptio
n pa
tter
n).
60%
of
extr
eme p
oor
hous
ehol
ds
don’
t ben
efit
from
pov
erty
ta
rget
ed ca
sh
tran
sfer
40%
of t
he
assis
ted
hous
e-ho
lds u
pgra
ded
from
poo
r to
bord
erlin
e or
acce
ptab
le fo
od
cons
umpt
ion
patt
ern.
.
Kyr
gyzs
tan
Inte
grat
ed
Hou
seho
ld S
urve
y (K
IHS)
, soc
ial p
rote
c-tio
n ad
min
istra
tive
reco
rds
WFP
/Gov
ernm
ent
food
secu
rity m
onito
r-in
g sys
tem
Key
Min
istrie
s and
Gov
ernm
ent A
genc
ies,
espe
cial
ly M
inist
ry o
f Soc
ial
Prot
ectio
n of
Pop
ulat
ion,
Sta
te A
genc
y of L
ocal
Sel
f- G
over
nanc
e, M
oE an
d Lo
cal G
over
nmen
t au
thor
ities
: D
evelo
pmen
t, im
plem
enta
tion
and m
onito
ring o
f poli
cy an
d stra
tegy o
n soc
ial p
rotec
-tio
n/ch
ild pr
otect
ion sy
stem
refor
m, d
ata c
ollect
ion an
d ana
lysis,
deve
lopm
ent a
nd
impl
emen
tatio
n of
legisl
ation
, stre
ngth
enin
g chi
ld pr
otect
ion an
d soc
ial p
rotec
tion
system
, tech
nica
l assi
stanc
e to t
he lo
cal s
ubdi
visio
ns; r
eferra
l, pla
nnin
g.
Parli
amen
t: Ad
voca
cy an
d ext
erna
l mon
itorin
g.
Com
mun
ities
: Ide
ntifi
catio
n, re
ferra
l, par
ticip
ation
and i
mpl
emen
tatio
n.
Don
ors:
Supp
ort t
o poli
cy di
alog
ue, c
apac
ity de
velop
men
t, im
plem
enta
tion
supp
ort,
resea
rch, m
onito
ring a
nd ev
alua
tion.
Min
istry
of
Soci
al P
rote
ctio
n of
Pop
ulat
ion,
NG
Os,
loca
l Gov
ernm
ent a
utho
ritie
s.
21
Out
com
esIn
dica
tors
Targ
ets
Base
lines
Mea
ns o
f Ver
ifica
tion
Rol
e of P
artn
ers
Indi
cativ
e Res
ourc
es
% o
f mos
t-at-r
isk p
opul
a-tio
ns (M
AR
PS) w
ho
rece
ived
an H
IV te
st in
the
last
12
mon
ths a
nd w
ho
know
thei
r res
ults
80%
52%
UN
GA
SS d
ata,
AID
S C
ente
r, Su
rvey
sC
ount
ry M
ultis
ecto
ral C
oord
inat
ion
Com
mitt
ee (C
MC
C) f
or im
plem
enta
tion
of
GFA
TM
gra
nts;
Key
Min
istrie
s and
Gov
ernm
ent A
genc
ies,
Parli
amen
t, D
P, C
omm
uni-
ties,
espe
cial
ly M
oE, M
oH an
d N
atio
nal A
IDS
Cen
tre:
O
versi
ght o
f gra
nts i
mpl
emen
tatio
n, go
vern
ance,
mon
itorin
g and
impl
emen
tatio
n of
the p
rogr
amm
es; so
cial d
ialog
ue, le
gisla
tion,
polic
y dev
elopm
ent a
nd pl
anni
ng,
data
colle
ction
, ins
titut
ional
set-u
p and
syste
ms d
evelo
pmen
t, ad
voca
cy, c
oord
inat
ion,
com
mun
icatio
n, (c
ompli
ance)
mon
itorin
g and
capa
city d
evelo
pmen
t; de
velop
men
t of
prog
ram
mes,
resou
rce m
ater
ials
and d
elive
ry of
prev
entiv
e edu
catio
n tra
inin
gs;
Reg
iona
l HIV
and
heal
th in
stitu
tions
, NG
Os:
Pl
anni
ng, i
mpl
emen
tatio
n an
d coo
rdin
ation
, adv
ocac
y mon
itorin
g.
IOs a
nd d
onor
s, es
peci
ally
, WB,
GFA
TM
, USA
ID, K
FW, M
SF:
Supp
ort t
o poli
cy di
alog
ue, c
apac
ity de
velop
men
t, im
plem
enta
tion
supp
ort,
resea
rch,
mon
itorin
g and
eval
uatio
n.
MA
RPs
net
wor
ks an
d as
soci
atio
ns:
Parti
cipat
ion an
d im
plem
enta
tion.
Med
ia: A
ware
ness
raisi
ng an
d adv
ocac
y.
Aca
dem
ia: T
each
ing a
nd pr
omot
ing H
IV/T
B/ST
I.
% o
f esti
mat
ed H
IV-
posit
ive i
ncid
ent T
B ca
ses
that
rece
ived
trea
tmen
t for
T
B an
d H
IV
80%
52%
UN
GA
SS d
ata,
data
, N
atio
nal A
IDS
Cen
ter
and
Nat
iona
l Phy
siol-
ogy C
entr
e, Su
rvey
s
Cou
ntry
Mul
tisec
tora
l Coo
rdin
atio
n C
omm
ittee
(Key
Min
istrie
s and
Gov
ernm
ent
Age
ncie
s inc
ludi
ng P
arlia
men
t, D
P, C
omm
uniti
es),
Min
istry
of H
ealth
, Nat
iona
l Ph
ysio
logy
Cen
tre,
Nat
iona
l AID
S C
entr
e:
Supp
ort p
roces
ses, s
ocia
l dia
logue
, leg
islat
ion, p
olicy
dev
elopm
ent a
nd pl
anni
ng, d
ata
colle
ction
, ins
titut
ional
set-u
p and
syste
ms d
evelo
pmen
t, ad
voca
cy, c
oord
inat
ion, c
om-
mun
icatio
n, (c
ompli
ance)
mon
itorin
g and
capa
city d
evelo
pmen
t.
IOs a
nd d
onor
s, es
peci
ally,
WB,
GFA
TM
, USA
ID, K
FW, M
SF, I
CRC
: Su
ppor
t to p
olicy
dial
ogue
, cap
acity
deve
lopm
ent,
impl
emen
tatio
n su
ppor
t, re
search
, m
onito
ring a
nd ev
alua
tion.
Reg
iona
l HIV
, TB
and
heal
th in
stitu
tions
: Pla
nnin
g, co
ordi
natio
n, im
plem
enta
tion
and
mon
itorin
g.
Com
mun
ities
: Par
ticip
ation
and i
mpl
emen
tatio
n.
Med
ia: A
ware
ness
raisi
ng an
d adv
ocac
y.
Aca
dem
ia: E
duca
tion
on H
IV/T
B iss
ues
22
% o
f GBV
surv
ivor
s who
re
ceiv
ed re
leva
nt p
acka
ge
of se
rvic
es o
ut o
f all
GBV
su
rviv
ors a
pplie
d fo
r as-
sista
nce
40%
0%St
ate a
genc
ies a
nd
rele
vant
serv
ice
prov
ider
s mon
itorin
g sy
stem
s, in
depe
nden
t su
rvey
s and
Nat
iona
l St
atist
ical
Com
mitt
ee
surv
eys
Key
Min
istrie
s and
Gov
ernm
ent A
genc
ies,
espe
cial
ly, M
oI, C
ourt
Sys
tem
, MoH
, M
inist
ry o
f So
cial
Pro
tect
ion
of P
opul
atio
n:
Adhe
renc
e to s
tand
ards
set f
or se
rvice
s/gen
der r
espon
sive p
lann
ing a
nd bu
dgeti
ng.
IOs/
NG
Os:
Infor
mat
ion ca
mpa
igns t
o ens
ure a
ware
ness
of vu
lnera
ble g
roup
s abo
ut th
e exi
sting
ser
vices
and s
ocia
l pro
tectio
n m
echan
isms;
impl
emen
tatio
n an
d coo
rdin
ation
, ad
voca
cy; m
onito
ring a
nd ev
alua
tion.
Med
ia:
Awar
eness
raisi
ng an
d adv
ocac
y aim
ed at
beha
vior
chan
ge.
UN
DA
F PI
LLA
R B
TO
TAL
US$
71,
883,
200
23
Mid
-Ter
m N
atio
nal P
rior
ities
(201
1-20
12):
Eco
nom
ic d
evel
opm
ent,
redu
ctio
n of
une
mpl
oym
ent a
nd en
hanc
ing
inte
rnat
iona
l eco
nom
ic co
oper
atio
n
S
ocia
l dev
elop
men
t and
envi
ronm
ent p
rote
ctio
nU
ND
AF
Pilla
r C:
I
nclu
sive a
nd S
usta
inab
le Jo
b-R
ich
Gro
wth
for P
over
ty R
educ
tion
Rel
evan
t MD
Gs:
M
DG
1: E
radi
cate
extr
eme p
over
ty an
d hu
nger
MD
G 5
: Im
prov
e mat
erna
l hea
lthM
DG
2: A
chie
ve u
nive
rsal
prim
ary e
duca
tion
MD
G 6
: Com
bat H
IV/A
IDS,
mal
aria
and
othe
r dise
ases
MD
G 3
: Pro
mot
e gen
der e
qual
ity an
d em
pow
er w
omen
MD
G 7
: Ens
ure e
nviro
nmen
tal s
usta
inab
ility
MD
G 4
: Red
uce c
hild
mor
talit
y
MD
G 8
: Dev
elop
a gl
obal
par
tner
ship
for d
evel
opm
ent
Out
com
esIn
dica
tors
Targ
ets
Base
lines
Mea
ns o
f Ver
ifica
tion
Rol
e of P
artn
ers
Indi
cativ
e Res
ourc
es
(per
Out
com
e)
Out
com
e 1:
By th
e end
of
2016
, pop
ulat
ion,
es
peci
ally
vu
lner
able
gro
ups,
bene
fit fr
om
incl
usiv
e gro
wth
le
adin
g to
dec
ent
and
prod
uctiv
e em
ploy
men
t and
im
prov
ed ac
cess
to
prod
uctiv
e nat
ural
re
sour
ces,
mar
kets
, se
rvic
es a
nd fo
od
secu
rity
% o
f em
ploy
ed p
erso
ns in
to
tal e
cono
mic
ally
activ
e po
pula
tion
Incr
ease
of t
he sh
are o
f em
ploy
men
t in
tota
l eco
-no
mic
ally
activ
e pop
ula-
tion
by1.
0-2.
0 pe
rcen
tage
po
ints
annu
ally
Econ
omic
ally
ac
tive p
opul
a-tio
n: 2
351
316
(C
ensu
s 200
9);
empl
oyed
: 2
111
160
(Cen
-su
s 200
9)
Nat
iona
l Sta
tisti-
cal C
omm
ittee
dat
a an
d re
port
s, M
DG
Pr
ogre
ss R
epor
ts a
nd
othe
r UN
Ana
lytic
al
Mat
eria
ls
Key
Min
istrie
s and
Gov
ernm
ent A
genc
ies,
espe
cial
ly M
inist
ry o
f Eco
nom
ic R
egul
atio
n an
d D
evel
opm
ent,
Min
istry
of L
abou
r, Em
ploy
men
t and
Mig
ratio
n, M
oF, N
ALS
G,
MoA
, SR
S, M
oJ in
clud
ing P
resid
ent’s
Offi
ce, P
arlia
men
t and
its C
omm
ittee
s and
Com
-m
issio
ns, F
ruit
Proc
essin
g Ent
erpr
ises:
Ensu
ring s
uppo
rt for
equa
l righ
ts of
wom
en an
d vul
nera
ble g
roup
s to b
enefi
t from
ex
istin
g eco
nom
ic op
portu
nitie
s, leg
islat
ion an
d poli
cy de
velop
men
t, pl
anni
ng an
d im
plem
enta
tion,
advo
cacy
, coo
rdin
ation
and m
onito
ring,
voca
tiona
l edu
catio
n sys
tem de
velop
men
t, ca
pacit
y dev
elopm
ent;
cont
ribut
e to
incre
ase
shar
e of a
gricu
lture
pr
oduc
tion
bein
g pro
cessed
and m
arke
ted, s
tabi
lize i
ncom
e; ac
cess t
o em
ploy
men
t to
refu
gees,
asylu
m se
eker
s, re
turn
ees a
nd st
atele
ss pe
rsons
.
IO/N
GO
s/ac
adem
ic in
stitu
tions
incl
udin
g Leg
al C
linic
Adi
let,
Cen
ter f
or In
tern
a-tio
nal P
rote
ctio
n, C
risis
Cen
ter S
ezim
: Su
ppor
t and
impl
emen
tatio
n of
wom
en’s e
cono
mic
right
s ini
tiativ
es at
loca
l and
co
mm
unity
leve
ls; d
ata c
ollect
ion, s
tudi
es, su
ppor
t to p
lann
ing,
impl
emen
tatio
n an
d m
onito
ring,
capa
city d
evelo
pmen
t, cu
rricu
lum
deve
lopm
ent a
nd tr
aini
ng; l
egal
/socia
l as
sista
nce,
food a
id, v
ocat
ional
trai
ning
and i
ncom
e gen
eratio
n ac
tiviti
es for
refu
gees,
as
ylum
seek
ers,
retu
rnee
s and
stat
eless
perso
ns.
Priv
ate s
ecto
r: Su
ppor
t inc
ome g
enera
tion
activ
ities
of th
e tar
get c
omm
uniti
es.
Nat
iona
l Sta
tistic
s Com
mitt
ee:
Anal
ysis o
f pov
erty
inclu
ding
child
pove
rty.
CA
CSA
RC (C
entr
al A
sian
Cra
fts S
uppo
rt A
ssoc
iatio
n R
ecou
rse C
ente
r):
Dev
elopm
ent o
f cra
fts in
dustr
y
UN
DP:
US$
15,
300,
000
UN
ICEF
:
U
S$ 1
50,0
00
UN
ESC
O:
US$
100
,000
UN
OD
C:
US$
250
,000
UN
HC
R:
U
S$ 3
,510
,000
UN
IDO
: U
S$ 2
,124
,400
WFP
*:
U
S$ 5
,000
,000
UN
ECE:
US$
100
,000
ILO
:
US
$900
,000
UN
V**
: U
S$ 6
61,2
59
UN
Wom
en:
U
S$ 2
,500
,000
UN
DA
F R
esul
ts an
d R
esou
rces
Fra
mew
ork
2012
-201
6:IN
CLU
SIV
E A
ND
SU
STA
INA
BLE
JOB
-RIC
H G
RO
WT
H F
OR
PO
VER
TY
RED
UC
TIO
N
24
Out
com
esIn
dica
tors
Targ
ets
Base
lines
Mea
ns o
f Ver
ifica
tion
Rol
e of P
artn
ers
Indi
cativ
e Res
ourc
es
(per
Out
com
e)
% o
f peo
ple l
ivin
g bel
ow
the o
ffici
al p
over
ty li
ne%
dec
reas
e of p
eopl
e liv
ing i
n po
vert
y by 2
.5-
3.0%
annu
ally
55%
of t
he m
ost v
ulne
r-ab
le h
ouse
hold
s im
prov
e th
eir f
ood
cons
umpt
ion
(upg
rade
from
poo
r to
bord
erlin
e or a
ccep
t-ab
le fo
od co
nsum
ptio
n pa
tter
n)
Pove
rty r
atio
co
nstit
uted
31
,7%
in
ac-
cord
ance
with
m
etho
dol-
ogy o
f Nat
iona
l St
atist
ical
Com
-m
ittee
. Cur
-re
ntly
Nat
iona
l St
atist
ical
Com
-m
ittee
doe
s not
pr
ovid
e dat
a lo
wer
than
leve
l of
pro
vinc
es.
40%
of t
he
assis
ted
hous
e-ho
lds u
pgra
ded
from
poo
r to
bord
erlin
e or
acce
ptab
le fo
od
cons
umpt
ion
patt
ern
Nat
iona
l Sta
tistic
al
Com
mitt
ee d
ata a
nd
repo
rts,
MD
G P
rog-
ress
Rep
orts
Emer
genc
y Foo
d Se
curit
y Ass
essm
ents
(E
FSA
), K
yrgy
zsta
n In
tegr
ated
Hou
seho
ld
Surv
eys (
KIH
S)
Key
Min
istrie
s and
Gov
ernm
ent A
genc
ies,
espe
cial
ly M
inist
ry o
f Soc
ial P
rote
ctio
n of
Po
pula
tion,
loca
l gov
ernm
ent a
utho
ritie
s and
NG
Os.
Rat
io o
f GD
P to
num
ber
of w
orke
rsIn
crea
se in
GD
P pe
r w
orke
r Ba
selin
e to
be
carr
ied
out i
n 20
11
Dat
a of N
atio
nal
Stat
istic
al C
omm
ittee
da
ta an
d re
port
s
Key
Min
istrie
s and
Gov
ernm
ent A
genc
ies,
espe
cial
ly M
OLE
M, N
SC, l
ocal
auth
oriti
es:
Dat
a coll
ection
and a
nalys
is, le
gisla
tion,
capa
city a
nd in
stitu
tion
build
ing,
polic
y de
velop
men
t, im
plem
enta
tion,
mon
itorin
g and
eval
uatio
n.
Trad
e Uni
ons a
nd E
mpl
oyer
s org
aniz
atio
ns, l
ocal
auth
oriti
es:
Supp
ort t
o poli
cy de
velop
men
t, im
plem
enta
tion,
mon
itorin
g and
eval
uatio
n
Nat
iona
l Sta
tistic
s Com
mitt
ee:
Prod
ucin
g reli
able
shor
t-ter
m ec
onom
ic sta
tistic
s and
dat
a for
mon
itorin
g pro
gress
to
ward
s the
achi
evem
ent o
f the
MD
Gs,
with
a sp
ecial
focu
s on
pove
rty an
d vul
nera
ble
grou
ps.
% o
f wor
kers
with
earn
ings
at
or b
elow
the n
atio
nal
pove
rty l
ine (
the s
o ca
lled
wor
king
poo
r)
Dec
reas
ing %
of w
orke
rs
with
earn
ings
at o
r bel
ow
the n
atio
nal p
over
ty li
ne
Base
line t
o be
carr
ied
out
2011
Nat
iona
l Sta
tistic
al
Com
mitt
ee d
ata a
nd
repo
rts;
othe
r rel
evan
t re
port
Key
Min
istrie
s and
Gov
ernm
ent A
genc
ies,
espe
cial
ly M
inist
ry o
f Soc
ial P
rote
ctio
n of
Po
pula
tion,
loca
l gov
ernm
ent a
utho
ritie
s and
NG
Os
OU
TC
OM
E 1
TO
TAL
US$
30,
595,
659
25
Out
com
esIn
dica
tors
Targ
ets
Base
lines
Mea
ns o
f Ver
ifica
tion
Rol
e of P
artn
ers
Indi
cativ
e Res
ourc
es
(per
Out
com
e)
Out
com
e 2:
By en
d of
201
6 su
stai
nabl
e m
anag
emen
t of
ener
gy, e
nviro
n-m
ent a
nd n
atur
al
reso
urce
s pra
ctic
es
oper
atio
naliz
ed
% o
f peo
ple l
ivin
g in
eco
syst
ems r
esili
ent t
o cl
imat
e ch
ange
Ecos
yste
m ap
proa
ch is
in
tegr
ated
into
nat
iona
l an
d lo
cal d
evel
opm
ent
strat
egie
s.
Abs
ence
of
eco
syst
em
appr
oach
in
stra
tegi
c pl
anni
ng at
the
natio
nal a
nd
loca
l lev
els
Offi
cial
dat
a and
re
port
s of
min
istrie
s, ag
enci
es an
d lo
cal a
u-th
oriti
es; U
N re
port
s
Key
Min
istrie
s and
Gov
ernm
ent A
genc
ies,
espe
cial
ly S
tate
Age
ncy o
n En
viro
nmen
t Pr
otec
tion
and
Fore
stry (
SAEP
F), M
oE, R
enew
able
Ene
rgy S
ourc
es (R
ES) D
irect
or-
ate,
Nat
iona
l Com
mitt
ee o
n C
limat
e Cha
nge i
nclu
ding
Sta
te A
genc
y for
Pro
tect
ion
of
Envi
ronm
ent a
nd F
ores
try,
Min
istry
of C
ultu
re an
d In
form
atio
n, A
cade
my o
f Sci
ence
s: Fa
cilita
tion
and c
oord
inat
ion of
plan
ning
and i
mpl
emen
tatio
n; pr
epar
ation
of
nom
inat
ion fil
es an
d man
agem
ent p
lans
, doc
umen
tatio
n, co
nser
vatio
n, sa
fegua
rdin
g, m
anag
emen
t, m
aint
enan
ce, m
onito
ring,
educ
ation
, inf
orm
ation
and t
ouris
m.
Reg
iona
l and
loca
l aut
horit
ies:
Iden
tifyin
g need
s and
com
mun
ity ba
sed pr
ojects
e.g.
in w
ater
man
agem
ent,
ener
gy
efficie
ncy,
uran
ium
taili
ngs.
IOs a
nd N
GO
s: Ca
pacit
y dev
elopm
ent a
nd su
ppor
t to i
mpl
emen
tatio
n of
activ
ities,
deve
lopm
ent o
f ac
tion
plan
s and
impl
emen
tatio
n.
Com
mun
ities
: Com
mun
ity m
obili
zatio
n an
d par
ticip
ation
, im
plem
enta
tion.
UN
DP:
US$
13,7
00,0
00
UN
ESC
O:
US$
550,
000
UN
ECE:
U
S$55
0,00
0 U
NEP
:
US$
200,
000
WFP
*:
U
S$3,
000,
000
UN
V**
: U
S$ 7
,500
FAO
US$
6,00
0,00
0
% o
f wat
er u
se effi
cien
cy
for a
gric
ultu
ral p
rodu
ctio
n Eff
ectiv
enes
s of i
rrig
atio
n w
ater
use
by r
ural
pop
ula-
tion
is im
prov
ed
Wat
er lo
sses
in
the i
rrig
atio
n sy
stem
fro
m
the w
ater
sour
ce
to d
estin
atio
n ra
nge f
rom
20-
40%
on
aver
age
Ann
ual r
epor
ts o
f the
re
-esta
blish
ed S
tate
C
omm
ittee
on
Wat
er
Man
agem
ent a
nd
Rec
lam
atio
n
Uni
vers
ities
in co
oper
atio
n w
ith M
inist
ry o
f Edu
catio
n an
d Sc
ienc
es a
nd n
atio
nal
wat
er au
thor
ities
: In
trodu
ction
and d
elive
ring n
ew IW
RM cu
rricu
la.
Stat
e Com
mitt
ee o
n W
ater
Man
agem
ent a
nd R
ecla
mat
ion
Wat
er U
sers
Ass
ocia
tions
and
NG
Os,
agric
ultu
re b
usin
ess a
ssoc
iatio
ns
% in
crea
se o
f agr
icul
tura
l pr
oduc
tion
for m
arke
ts
and
hous
ehol
ds (H
H)
Incr
ease
in vo
lum
e of
agric
ultu
re p
rodu
ctio
nA
gric
ultu
re,
hunt
ing a
nd
fore
stry g
ross
pr
oduc
tion
- 30
65 m
illio
n U
SD in
200
8 (N
atio
nal S
tatis
-tic
Com
mitt
ee,
2010
)
107.
4% g
row
th
in vo
lum
e of
agric
ultu
re p
ro-
duct
ion,
fore
stry
and
hunt
ing i
n co
mpa
rison
to
2008
(Nat
iona
l St
atist
ic C
om-
mitt
ee, 2
010)
Offi
cial
dat
a and
re-
port
s of t
he N
atio
nal
Stat
istic
al C
omm
ittee
, U
N R
epor
ts (i
nclu
d-in
g Cro
p an
d Fo
od
Secu
rity A
sses
smen
t M
onito
ring (
CFS
AM
, EF
SA)
Key
Min
istrie
s and
Gov
ernm
ent A
genc
ies,
espe
cial
ly M
inist
ry o
f Soc
ial P
rote
ctio
n of
Po
pula
tion,
Min
istry
of A
gric
ultu
re , l
ocal
gov
ernm
ent a
utho
ritie
s and
NG
Os.
26
% re
duct
ion
in co
nsum
p-tio
n of
HC
FCs-
Hyd
ro-
chlo
roflu
oroc
arbo
ns
10%
redu
ctio
n by
201
5C
urre
nt
cons
umpt
ion
is 4
OD
S to
ns
per y
ear
Ozo
ne A
ctio
n Se
cre-
taria
t, U
NEP
Key
Min
istrie
s and
Gov
ernm
ent A
genc
ies,
espe
cial
ly M
inist
ry o
f Em
erge
ncy S
ituat
ions
, M
inist
ry o
f Ene
rgy,
Stat
e Age
ncy o
n En
viro
nmen
t Pro
tect
ion
and
Fore
stry,
Ozo
ne
Cen
tre,
NO
U:
Man
agin
g and
mon
itorin
g the
nat
ional
stra
tegy f
or ph
asin
g out
ozon
e-dep
letin
g su
bsta
nces;
repo
rting
dat
a and
und
erta
king
awar
eness
raisi
ng ac
tiviti
es.
% o
f pop
ulat
ion
bene
fitin
g fro
m n
on ca
rbon
ener
gy
sour
ces
Incr
ease
of n
on ca
rbon
en
ergy
sour
ces t
o 1%
of
tota
l ene
rgy p
rodu
ctio
n
non
carb
on
sour
ces o
f en-
ergy
repr
esen
t 0.
7 %
of t
otal
en
ergy
pro
duc-
tion
Offi
cial
dat
a and
re
port
s of t
he M
inist
ry
of E
nerg
y, R
ES D
irec-
tora
te as
wel
l as r
epor
ts
of S
HP/
RES
pro
ject
s
Key
Min
istrie
s, es
peci
ally
Min
istry
of E
nerg
y, G
over
nmen
t Age
ncie
s and
Aca
dem
ia:
Dev
elopi
ng R
ES cu
rricu
la, t
rain
ing f
or lo
cal p
opul
ation
.
OU
TC
OM
E 2
TO
TAL
US$
24,
007,
500
27
Out
com
esIn
dica
tors
Targ
ets
Base
lines
Mea
ns o
f Ver
ifica
tion
Rol
e of P
artn
ers
Indi
cativ
e Res
ourc
es
(per
Out
com
e)
Out
com
e 3:
By 2
016,
Disa
ster
R
isk M
anag
emen
t (D
RM
) fra
mew
ork
in co
mpl
ianc
e with
in
tern
atio
nal s
tan-
dard
s. es
peci
ally
th
e Hyo
go F
ram
e-w
ork
of A
ctio
n
Nat
iona
l ins
titut
iona
l, le
gal a
nd p
olic
y fra
mew
ork
for d
isast
er ri
sk re
duct
ion
(DR
R) w
ith d
ecen
tral
ized
re
spon
sibili
ties,
reso
urce
s an
d ca
paci
ties a
t all
leve
ls
Disa
ster
risk
redu
ctio
n (D
RR
) leg
al, i
nstit
utio
nal
and
polic
y fra
mew
orks
th
at fe
atur
e coh
eren
ce
and
mec
hani
sms o
f co
ordi
natio
n ad
opte
d an
d fu
nctio
nal
Nat
iona
l in
stitu
tiona
l, le
gal a
nd p
olic
y fr
amew
ork
for
disa
ster
risk
re-
duct
ion
(DR
R)
at n
asce
nt
stage
s
Dat
a and
repo
rts o
f M
inist
ry o
f Em
erge
ncy
Situ
atio
n, L
ocal
Sel
f-G
over
nmen
ts, U
N
(incl
. Disa
ster
Risk
R
educ
tion
Uni
t -
DRC
U) a
nd p
artn
ers’
repo
rts
Key
Min
istrie
s and
Gov
ernm
ent A
genc
ies,
espe
cial
ly M
inist
ry fo
r Em
erge
ncy S
itua-
tions
(MES
), N
atio
nal A
genc
y on
Loca
l Sel
f-Gov
erna
nce (
NA
LSG
) and
Par
liam
ent:
Polic
y dev
elopm
ent a
nd pl
anni
ng, i
nstit
ution
al se
t-up,
legisl
ation
deve
lopm
ent,
resp
onse
coor
dina
tion
and c
omm
unica
tion;
cont
inge
ncy p
lann
ing;
emer
genc
y pre
-pa
redn
ess.
Reg
iona
l and
loca
l aut
horit
ies:
Coor
dina
te an
d fac
ilita
te pr
ocess
es an
d stru
cture
s at t
he re
giona
l and
loca
l lev
els.
IO/N
GO
s/ac
adem
ic in
stitu
tions
:Pr
omot
e DRR
, pro
vide
supp
ort t
o pro
cesses
and s
tructu
res,
capa
city d
evelo
pmen
t; em
erge
ncy p
repa
redn
ess,
UN
DP:
US$
2,2
00,0
00
UN
ESC
O:
US$
100
,000
UN
ICEF
:
US$
1,0
00,0
00
UN
HC
R:
U
S$ 2
,340
,000
WFP
*:
U
S$3,
000,
000
UN
V**
: U
S$ 1
7,96
6
% o
f Loc
al S
elf G
over
n-m
ents’
(LSG
s) lo
cal
deve
lopm
ent p
lans
with
in
tegr
ated
disa
ster
risk
re-
duct
ion
(DR
R) s
trat
egie
s
Disa
ster
risk
redu
ctio
n (D
RR
) str
ateg
ies i
nteg
rat-
ed in
lea
st 1
0% L
ocal
Sel
f G
over
nmen
ts’ (L
SGs)
lo
cal d
evel
opm
ent p
lans
Disa
ster
risk
redu
ctio
n (D
RR
) mon
itorin
g sy
stem
esta
blish
ed an
d fu
nctio
nal (
info
rmin
g lo
cal s
ocio
-eco
nom
ic
plan
ning
) in
at le
ast 1
0%
of L
SGs
Abs
ence
of
disa
ster
risk
re
duct
ion
(DR
R) s
trat
e-gi
es in
tegr
ated
in
Loc
al S
elf
Gov
ernm
ents’
(L
SGs)
loca
l de
velo
pmen
t pl
ans
Abs
ence
of
disa
ster
risk
re-
duct
ion
(DR
R)
mon
itorin
g sys
-te
m th
at w
ould
in
form
loca
l le
vel p
lann
ing
Offi
cial
dat
a and
re
port
s by L
ocal
Se
lf-G
over
nmen
ts,
Min
istry
of E
mer
genc
y Si
tuat
ion,
Nat
iona
l A
genc
y for
Loc
al
Self-
Gov
erna
nce,
Stat
e A
genc
y on
Envi
ron-
men
tal P
rote
ctio
n
Com
mun
ities
, esp
ecia
lly th
ose a
t risk
or a
ffect
ed:
Repr
esent
ation
and p
artic
ipat
ion, e
nsur
e inc
lusio
n of
view
s of c
omm
uniti
es an
d most
vu
lnera
ble.
IO/N
GO
s: Re
spon
se co
ordi
natio
n, co
ntin
genc
y pla
nnin
g, ca
pacit
y dev
elopm
ent a
nd
impl
emen
tatio
n.
28
Out
com
esIn
dica
tors
Targ
ets
Base
lines
Mea
ns o
f Ver
ifica
tion
Rol
e of P
artn
ers
Indi
cativ
e Res
ourc
es
(per
Out
com
e)
% o
f disa
ster
pro
ne co
m-
mun
ities
and
inst
itutio
ns
with
redu
ced
vuln
er-
abili
ties
Vuln
erab
ilitie
s red
uced
in
10%
of c
omm
uniti
es
pron
e to
natu
ral d
isast
ers
Res
ilien
ce o
f vul
ner-
able
gro
ups t
o sh
ocks
is
stren
gthe
ned
Cap
aciti
es to
addr
ess
disa
ster
risk
redu
ctio
n (D
RR
) of s
take
hold
ers i
n ed
ucat
ion
stren
gthe
ned
and
educ
atio
n cu
rric
ula
mai
nstr
eam
s disa
ster
risk
re
duct
ion
(DR
R)
70%
of c
om-
mun
ities
in
Kyr
gyzs
tan
are
vuln
erab
le to
na
tura
l disa
ster
s
Inad
equa
te
know
ledg
e and
ca
paci
ties o
f sta
keho
lder
s in
educ
atio
n to
ad
dres
s disa
ster
ris
k re
duct
ion
(DR
R) a
nd
appl
y rel
ated
ex
istin
g pol
i-ci
es; a
bsen
ce o
f di
sast
er ri
sk re
-du
ctio
n (D
RR
) in
educ
atio
n cu
rric
ula
Dat
a and
repo
rts o
f M
inist
ry o
f Em
erge
ncy
Situ
atio
n, M
inist
ry
of E
duca
tion
and
Scie
nce,
Min
istry
of
Soci
al P
rote
ctio
n of
Po
pula
tion,
Loc
al
Self-
Gov
ernm
ents
, Na-
tiona
l Age
ncy f
or L
o-ca
l Sel
f-Gov
erna
nce,
Nat
iona
l Sta
tistic
al
Com
mitt
ee,
UN
(inc
l. Em
erge
ncy
Food
Sec
urity
Ass
ess-
men
t, C
rop
and
Food
Se
curit
y Ass
essm
ent)
an
d pa
rtne
rs’ r
epor
ts
Key
Min
istrie
s and
Gov
ernm
ent A
genc
ies,
espe
cial
ly M
inist
ry o
f So
cial
Pro
tect
ion
of
Popu
latio
n, M
inist
ry o
f Em
erge
ncy S
ituat
ions
, Min
istry
of E
nerg
y, M
oH, M
inist
ry
of E
duca
tion,
KA
E, S
tate
Age
ncy f
or Q
uake
Pro
of C
onstr
uctio
n, lo
cal G
over
nmen
t au
thor
ities
incl
udin
g NG
Os a
nd C
BOs:
Coor
dina
tion,
inno
vatio
n, lo
bbyin
g, aw
aren
ess ra
ising
, poli
cy an
d cur
ricul
um de
-ve
lopm
ent,
revi
sion,
and e
ndor
semen
t; po
licy d
evelo
pmen
t for
plan
ning
educ
ation
in
emer
genc
ies, c
apac
ity bu
ildin
g of e
duca
tion
auth
oriti
es an
d pra
ctitio
ners;
Im
plem
enta
tion
and c
oord
inat
ion, a
dvoc
acy;
Mon
itorin
g and
eval
uatio
n.
Reg
iona
l and
sub-
regi
onal
auth
oriti
es:
Parti
cipat
e in
iden
tifica
tion
of D
RR n
eeds a
nd co
mm
unity
based
DRR
proje
cts.
Aca
dem
ic in
stitu
tions
: Rese
arch
.
IOs/
NG
Os:
Supp
ort t
o inn
ovat
ion an
d dev
elopm
ent,
capa
city d
evelo
pmen
t and
impl
e-m
enta
tion
supp
ort.
Com
mun
ities
: Com
mun
ities,
espe
cially
child
ren
parti
cipat
ion an
d im
plem
enta
tion.
Med
ia: I
nfor
mat
ion an
d awa
rene
ss ra
ising
cam
paign
s, go
vern
men
t pro
gram
mes.
OU
TC
OM
E 3
TO
TAL
US$
8,6
57,9
66
UN
DA
F PI
LLA
R C
TO
TAL
US$
63,
261,
125
UN
DA
F T
OTA
LU
S$ 1
86,0
99,2
62
*WFP
and
OH
CH
R re
sour
ces f
or 2
year
per
iod
only
**U
NV
: “gr
atis”
cont
ribut
ions
of i
ndiv
idua
ls an
d or
gani
zatio
ns
29
UN
DA
F M
&E
Cal
enda
r K
yrgy
z Rep
ublic
20
1220
1320
1420
1520
16
UNCT M&E Activities
Surv
eys/
Stud
ies
KA
P (K
now
ledg
e, A
ttitu
des a
nd P
ract
ices
) ba
selin
e sur
vey o
n pe
rcep
tions
of d
iver
sity
Base
line S
tudy
on
Yout
h En
gage
men
t in
Pea
ce-b
uild
ing –
(UN
ICEF
/UN
DP/
UN
HC
R as
par
t of I
RF
Peac
e-bu
ildin
g pr
opos
al)
Dem
ogra
phic
and
Hea
lth S
urve
y co
nduc
t-ed
(DH
S) (U
SAID
)D
ange
rous
sign
s of p
regn
ancy
surv
ey
(UN
FPA
)3r
d N
atio
nal C
omm
unic
atio
n on
Clim
ate
Cha
nge (
UN
DP)
Surv
ey o
n C
ivil
Soci
ety E
ngag
emen
t in
Polic
y Mak
ing (
UN
DP)
NH
DR
(the
me t
bd)
UN
GA
SS su
rvey
(UN
-A
IDS,
WH
O)
Educ
atio
n Pe
rfor
man
ce
Stud
y (PI
SA)
resu
lts
Dem
ogra
phic
and
Hea
lth
Surv
ey (D
HS)
resu
lts
rele
ased
MIC
S co
nduc
ted
(UN
ICEF
)C
ase s
tudi
es d
ocum
ente
d (a
ll)
Mon
itorin
g Sys
tem
sU
N M
&E
team
to b
e esta
blish
ed
Eval
uatio
nsM
id T
erm
Eva
luat
ion
Rev
iew
sYe
sYe
sYe
sYe
sYe
s
Planning Reference
UN
DA
F Ev
al. M
ilest
ones
U
ND
AF
Prog
ress
Rep
ort
UN
DA
F Pr
ogre
ss R
epor
tU
ND
AF
Prog
ress
Rep
ort
UN
DA
F Pr
ogre
ss R
epor
t
UN
DA
F Ev
alua
tion
UN
DA
F Pr
ogre
ss R
epor
t
Cap
acity
Dev
elop
men
tSt
atist
ical
Lite
racy
(col
lect
ion,
anal
ysis
and
use o
f dat
a)
Col
lect
ion
of d
ata b
elow
the o
blas
t lev
el to
de
term
ine v
ulne
rabl
e poc
kets
Use
of i
nfo
Stra
tegi
c Ass
essm
ent o
f Unw
ante
d Pr
eg-
nanc
y (U
NFP
A)
Cro
p an
d Fo
od A
sses
smen
t Stu
dy (F
AO
) Em
erge
ncy F
ood
Secu
rity A
sses
smen
t EF
SA (F
AO
/WFP
)
Emer
genc
y Foo
d Se
curit
y A
sses
smen
t EFS
A (F
AO
/W
FP)
Dem
ogra
phic
and
Hea
lth
Surv
ey (D
HS)
Emer
genc
y Foo
d Se
curit
y A
sses
smen
t EFS
A (F
AO
/W
FP)
Dem
ogra
phic
and
Hea
lth
Surv
ey (D
HS)
Emer
genc
y Foo
d Se
curit
y A
sses
smen
t EFS
A (F
AO
/W
FP)
Dem
ogra
phic
and
Hea
lth
Surv
ey (D
HS)
Emer
genc
y Foo
d Se
curit
y A
sses
smen
t EFS
A (F
AO
/W
FP)
Part
ner M
&E
Act
iviti
es
TBD
TBD
TBD
TBD
TBD
Ann
ex B
: UN
DA
F M
onito
ring
and
Eval
uatio
n C
alen
dar