unilever organisational change & acquisition policy
TRANSCRIPT
-
8/4/2019 UNILEVER ORGANISATIONAL CHANGE & ACQUISITION POLICY
1/12
GROUP 8 : UNILEVER
-
8/4/2019 UNILEVER ORGANISATIONAL CHANGE & ACQUISITION POLICY
2/12
Unilever is a British-Dutch multinational corporationFounded on 1 January 1930 by Antonius Johannes Jurgens, Samuel van den Bergh andWilliam Hulme Lever, 2nd Viscount LeverhulmeProduct Offerings: Personal Care, detergent, food etc
Annual Revenue: In excess of $ 50 billion
Sells more than 1000 products in virtually every country
Detergents account for 25% of the revenue
Omo is one such detergent which is sold in over 50 countries
Personal Care Products account for 15% sales
It includes Calvin Klein Cosmetics, Pepsodent Toothpastes, Vaseline skin care lotion
Food products account for 60% sales
It includes tea, ice cream, frozen foods & bakery products.
In this Unilevers market share in most of the countries exceeds 70%
WHAT IS GIVEN IN THE CASE STUDY
Organization structure mid 80s
Its features, advantages & disadvantages
Transformation in mid 90s
Its features, advantages & disadvantages
ABOUT UNILEVER
-
8/4/2019 UNILEVER ORGANISATIONAL CHANGE & ACQUISITION POLICY
3/12
What was the old decentralized structure of Unilever before1990s
To build a common organizational culture among its managers.
To drive the localization, Unilever recruited local managers to run local
organizations
to alter sales and distribution strategies to fit the prevailing retail systems.
marketing strategy to local tastes and preferences
The structure allowed local managers to match product offerings
Each was a profit center and each was held accountable for its ownperformance.
Subsidiary companies in each major national market were responsible for theproduction, marketing, sales, and distribution of products in that market.
In Europe the company had 17 subsidiaries in the early 1990s,each focusedon a different national market.
Unilever was organized on a decentralized basis.
-
8/4/2019 UNILEVER ORGANISATIONAL CHANGE & ACQUISITION POLICY
4/12
WHY THERE WAS A NEED FOR A NEWORGANIZATIONAL STRUCTURE ?
Early 1990s the competitive environment was changing
Trade barriers between countries were falling
Creation of a single market in 1992 in European Union
This made it possible to manufacture certain items such as detergents and margarine atfavorable central
Locations in order to realize the benefits associated with location and experience curveeconomies
Unilever introduced a new organizational architecture based on regional business
groups, each of which contained product divisions
Also, new products in areas such as frozen foods and margarine were gaining regional oreven global acceptance
Unfortunately for Unilever, some of its global competitors moved more rapidly to exploitthis change in the competitive environment
To reestablish a fit between strategy, architecture, and environment, Unilever had toembrace the difficult process of strategic and organizational change
-
8/4/2019 UNILEVER ORGANISATIONAL CHANGE & ACQUISITION POLICY
5/12
What are the features & advantages of Centralization
First, centralization can facilitate coordination
Second centralization can help ensure that decisions are consistent withorganizational objectives
Third, Concentration of power and authority bring major organizationalchanges
Fourth, centralization can avoid the duplication of activities by varioussubunits
The number of European plants manufacturing soap has been cut from 10to 2
Some new products will be manufactured at only one site
Product sizing and packaging are being harmonized to cut purchasing costsand to pave the way for unified pan-European"advertising.
By taking these steps, Unilever estimated it may save as much as $400million a year in its European operations
-
8/4/2019 UNILEVER ORGANISATIONAL CHANGE & ACQUISITION POLICY
6/12
What was the reason for, the need of frequent restructuring atunilever ??
STRATEGY PERIOD FEATURES ADVANTAGES DISADVANTAGES
Strategically
independent units at
various locations
1930 to 1979 Matrix
Organizational
structure
Localization High cost structure,
duplication of
manufacturing
facilities at various
locations
Focused Growth 1980 to 1995 Concentration on 4industries, 100
acquisitions, 38
companies acquired
in 1995
Concentration onboth Developed &
Emerging markets
Too manyacquisitions,
Accountability &
Responsibility,
Difficulty in decision
making, Complexity
Breakthrough
Restructuring
strategy
1996 to 1999 Variable Pay, 3
member committee
was dissolved, 7
member committee
was appointed, 1st
Non Dutch & British
Chairman appointed
Focus on core
competencies,
Operations were
grouped by product,
Combination of
Global Push & Local
Pull
No fit between
structure &
strategies, Dip in
market share prices,
Too many brands
resulted in Lost
Focus , Big dip inmarket share,
-
8/4/2019 UNILEVER ORGANISATIONAL CHANGE & ACQUISITION POLICY
7/12
STRATEGY PERIOD FEATURES ADVANTAGES DISADVANTAGES
Path to Grow
Strategy
Consolidation
1999 to 2004 Brand portfolio of
1600 became 400
for better focus.
150 units closeddown for cost
control, 55000
employees laying
off
Focus on core
competencies. 400
brands contributed
93%. Salesincreased by 30%,,
Focus on brands &
decision making,
Profit increased by
4-5%
LOSSSales
dropped by 15%,
Profits fell by 13%,
Top Line Growthreduced to 3%,
Share prices fell by
7%, Earnings per
share affected, Due
to loss liquidity
affected, High cost
& advertising
budget formaintaining non
performing 1200
brands.
Growth to vitality
strategy
2005 to 2010 High concentration
on Emerging
markets. Company
simplified itsmanagement
structure, 20000
job cuts in Europe.
Target 3to 5%
organic growth
41% revenues were
generated in
developing
countries. Focus onadvertising and
promotion
-
8/4/2019 UNILEVER ORGANISATIONAL CHANGE & ACQUISITION POLICY
8/12
HOW CONSTANT ACQUISITIONS MERGERS HELPED
UNILEVER ? OR TOO MANY ACQUISITIONS ???
Filling theproduct gap in
business
Increased distributionnetwork
Brand Extension & diverseproduct range
Brings increase in sales & profits
No interdependence on any product or entity
BIG ACQUISITIONS OF UNILEVER: Best foods, Chesebrough-Pond's (Vaseline), Naarden International, Brooke Bond, Calvin
Klein, Empire of Carolina Inc., Chicago-based Helene Curtis
Industries,
-
8/4/2019 UNILEVER ORGANISATIONAL CHANGE & ACQUISITION POLICY
9/12
WHAT IS HUL Current Structure ?
The day to day operations are supervised by the NationalManagement comprising the Vice Chairman, Managing Director(HPC), Managing Director (Foods) and the Finance Director.
Each division is self-sufficient with dedicated resources andassets in sales, marketing, commercial, and manufacturing.
For managing sales operations, HUL has divided the country intofour regions, Delhi, Kolkata, Chennai and Mumbai. Headed by aRegional Manager.
In Marketing, each category has a Marketing Manager who
heads a team of Brand Managers dedicated to each or a group ofbrands.
Each Division has a nationwide manufacturing base, with eachfactory peopled by teams of Production, Engineering, QualityAssurance, Commercial and Personnel Managers.
HUL's Central Functions are Finance, Human Resources,Technology and Research
Unilever grouped its worldwide operations into 2 global divisions-Foods and Home and Personal Care. It uses the worldwidegeographic area structure.
For the foods division regional presidents are responsible foroperations in the region i.e. Asia, Europe, Turkey, North America,Africa , Middle east and Latin America.
Unilever strengths lies in Best foods because of which they areable to tailor the products according to different markets as wellas to anticipate consumer demands and trends.
LATIN
AMERICA
UNITED
STATES
MULTINATIONAL
HEADQUARTERS
AUSTRAL
IA
AFRICA
EUROPE
-
8/4/2019 UNILEVER ORGANISATIONAL CHANGE & ACQUISITION POLICY
10/12
HOW HUL OPERATES IN INDIA?
In 1931, Unilever set up its first Indian
subsidiary, Hindustan Vanaspati
Manufacturing Company, followed by
Lever Brothers India Limited (1933) and
United Traders Limited (1935). These
three companies merged to form HUL in
November 1956.
HUL's BRANDS- like Lifebuoy, Lux, Surf
Excel, Rin, Wheel, Fair & Lovely, Pond's,Sunsilk, Clinic, Pepsodent, Close-up,
Lakme, Brooke Bond, Kissan, Knorr-
Annapurna, Kwality Wall's are household
names across the country .They are
manufactured over 40 factories across
India.
The operations involve over 2,000
suppliers and associates. HUL's
distribution network, comprising about
4,000 redistribution stockists, covering 6.3
million retail outlets reaching the entire
urban population, and about 250 millionrural consumers
-
8/4/2019 UNILEVER ORGANISATIONAL CHANGE & ACQUISITION POLICY
11/12
Shakti Programme.
In 2001, the company embarked
on an ambitious programme,
Shakti. Through Shakti, HUL is
creating micro-enterprise
opportunities for rural women.
Improving their livelihood and
the standard of living in ruralcommunities.
Shakti also includes health and
hygiene education through the
Shakti Vani Programme
Shakti has 100,000 Shakti
entrepreneurs covering 500,000
villages, touching the lives of
over 600 million people.
-
8/4/2019 UNILEVER ORGANISATIONAL CHANGE & ACQUISITION POLICY
12/12
CHALLENGES OF UNILEVER & OUR LEARNING
CHALLENGES IN 21 CENTURY DIVESTMENT/REDUCE NUMBER OF
TARGETS
COST CUTTING & IMPROVINGMARGINS
STREAMLINE THE MANAGEMENT &LEADERSHIP TO FIGHT RISK &COMPETITION
CONCENTRATION OF 400 BRANDS
ACQUISITIONS
CONCENTRATION ON ASIAN GIANTS
OUR KEY LEARNINGS IMPORTANCE OF ORGANISATION
STRUCTURE IN GLOBAL COMPETITIVEMARKET
IMPORTANCE ON ACQUISITION ASSTRATEGY
ADAPTABILITY OF UNILEVER INGLOBAL MARKET
DYNAMICS OF CHANGINGINTERNATIONAL MARKET
IMPORTANCE OF EMPLOYEETRAINING