unapplied cash: eikon dealer compensation joyce darson ne region ccc
TRANSCRIPT
Unapplied Cash:eIKON Dealer Compensation
Joyce Darson NE Region CCC
2
Project Overview
We bill leases and service contracts to IOSC IOSC funds us weekly through the “dealer
compensation report” The 2 systems frequently don’t match up Result = research, rework, added costs to apply cash
at Macon Shared Service Center Project Objective: reduce costs associated with this
research and rework
3
Preliminary Data Overview
As of 08/21/03 eIKON Unapplied Cash
$23.6 million
Dealer Comp Vendor Credit Trade A/R
eIKON
$4.3 M
eIKON
$11.8 M
eIKON
$7.5 M
Top 3 Defects #• Billing Equip.Issue=
46.5 % of errors
• Need service invoice
• Billing service issue
4 6
4
Project Definition
Problem Statement:
Unapplied cash: lease equipment record differences between IOSC and IKON make up an estimated 46.5 % of the unapplied items in the eIKON related dealer compensation as of 08/21/03.
Project Objective:
- 65-70 % reduction in these defects.
Project Benefits:
- Estimated headcount savings of 15 and $525K per year from FY 2004 plan of 34; (reduction in required headcount for reconciliation and research).
- Existing resources will be re-allocated to support future migrations.
- Pending validation with financial analyst.
5
Project Definition, Cont’d
Defect Definition: Any cash transaction that can not be automatically matched.
Leveragability: Project leveragability: additional savings in non-eIKON Regions
6
Project Team
7
Team After 6 hours of Process Mapping!!
8
“Critical To” Tree
CT Satisfaction
Y1 = Cash Applied withoutRework
Critical to QualityCritical to Cost Critical to Delivery
Project # 0307-46-01CT TreeJ.Darson
8/22/2003
Unapplied Cash: eIKONDealer Compensation
Inconsistent Base Rate & Billing Date
Correct BillingDate
Correct BillingAmount
2 systemsmatch exactly
CTQ’s
Reducerework $$ by$550K
CTC’s
Invoicegeneratedtimely
Systemsupdatedtimely
Dealer comp.report rec’dtimely
CTD’s
9
SIPOC
Process:
Cash Application: eIKON Dealer Compensation Process Owners:
Suppliers Inputs Outputs(Providers of the required
information)(Resources required by
the process)(Deliverables from the process)
7 6 8 3 5 4
Requirements START Requirements
Sales Reps Sales Order Complete order Start Valid lease documents No discrepancies Macon Sharedbetween systems Service Center
External Customers Service Contract info Complete contract Validated orderNo need for rework
IOSC Lease info Complete lease 2 eIKON Invoice
MSSC cash apps Lease documents Valid lease IOSC Fundingdepartment Accurate invoice Customer Care
Dealer Comp report Funding for invoices Cash Applied No need for rework CentersCCC Order Mgt
Metrics/tracking Information on whatCCC Cust.Billing was applied
Valid lease IOSC1 Accurate invoiceProcess
Accurate invoice External Customersrec'd timely
Smooth process Sales Repsso get paid
3
End
END
Project # 0307-46-001J.Darson, 8/14/03
Macon Shared Service Center, Donna Wood; CCC's Order Management and Customer Billing Departments
Process(Top level description of activity)
Customers(Anyone w ho receives a deliverable from the
process)
Order Coordinator receives deal
Cash Application:eIKON DealerCompensation
Cash Applied = Amount Invoiced
MSSC Cash Apps
Order Mgt.
10
Detailed Process Map
# 0307-46-001J.Darson
8/23/2003
Unapplied CasheIKON Dealer Compensation
Order CoordinatorReceives Deal
ValidatePaperwork
PaperworkComplete?
VerifyCreditStatus in CLAS
Credit StatusOK?
Enter lease infointo CLAS
ID what’s wrong ¬ify rep &
manager
Place on OracleHold
Escalate to SalesManager after 72
hours
Correction(s)Received
Billing date & amount * Terms (# months) * Cross outs * Bill to/ship to * Buyout amount * PO Std service offering Customer signature PO Tax exempt status Comm.Worksheet Svc Blending Worksheet SOW/NASSD Others as needed
Validated order
No
Yes
List of issues Capp Sheet E-Mail
Oracle Hold Report
Valid paperwork
App # Credit app sheet Deal pkg Customer # IOSC Stipulations Legal Name
Credit approval Stips met
Yes
No
ID what’s wrong ¬ify rep &
manager
Equipment setup Contract setup Funding amount Buyout info Notes
Equipment type Lease type Payment type Cust.bill to/ship to Accessory info Service info Notes as needed
Enter funding intoOracle
Funding enteredin Oracle
Clas App # inOracle
Rep Board Credit Funding Amount Buyout amount Trade in amount CLAS App #
(Continue nextpage)
List of issues E-Mail
(Steps 1 & 2 of 9)
A Miracle Happens somewhere in here!
Start
11
DPMO and other Statistics
Y 1 = Cash Interfaced not automatically applied(eIKON dealer compensation only)
DPMO Zst St.Dev. MeanBaseline: 196,500 .855 8.7 22.4 %
Target: 1.1 6 %(70 % reduction,includes allowance for shift)
12
Pareto Chart of Defects
22 25 45 64 65 71 86329 3.1 3.5 6.4 9.1 9.210.012.246.5
100.0 96.9 93.4 87.0 77.9 68.7 58.7 46.5
700
600
500
400
300
200
100
0
100
80
60
40
20
0
Defect
CountPercentCum %
Perc
ent
Cou
ntUnapplied Cash Defects: eIKON Dealer Comp, SED
Note: 46.5 % of defects relate to a billing equipment issue
13
Voice of the Process: Defect %May – August 2003
% Unapplied by MontheIKON Dealer Compensation
0.0%
20.0%
40.0%
60.0%
80.0%
May-03 Jun-03 Jul-03 Aug-03
Month
Note: high defect rate in May/June due to Oracle conversion; these data points were excluded from the analysis of the current process.
14
Process Capability @ 8/03
50403020100
USLUSL
Process Capability Analysis for % Unapplied
PPM Total
PPM > USL
PPM < LSL
PPM Total
PPM > USL
PPM < LSL
PPM Total
PPM > USL
PPM < LSL
Ppk
PPL
PPU
Pp
Cpm
Cpk
CPL
CPU
Cp
StDev (Overall)
StDev (Within)
Sample N
Mean
LSL
Target
USL
942624.56
942624.56
*
997159.49
997159.49
*
1000000.00
1000000.00
*
-0.53
*
-0.53
*
*
-0.92
*
-0.92
*
9.14071
5.21277
6
22.4167
*
*
8.0000
Exp. "Overall" PerformanceExp. "Within" PerformanceObserved PerformanceOverall Capability
Potential (Within) Capability
Process Data
Within
Overall
Process Entitlement
@8/03, 100 % of process is outside of target
15
Data Collection Plan
What to Measure? Type of Measure Type of Data Data Collection Form Sampling Baseline Measure
% of Items Unapplied Items Continuous
Existing Excel tracking spreadsheet by week
Population, by week, by reason, by pathname 20%
Reason Codes for Unapplied Items Count Discrete
Existing Excel tracking spreadsheet by week
By reason, by week, by pathname
46.5 % relate to billing equipment
discrepancies
Detailed reasons for equipment billing issues Detailed count Discrete
Modification of # 2 above, tracked weekly in Excel
By week, by detailed reason, by pathname t.b.d.
# hours spent on research & reconciliation Hours Continuous
Job responsibility analysis, starting 9/1/03
By department, by site, by week t.b.d.
16
Red Flags
Paperwork validated multiple times in process, yet errors continue.
“The cart is before the horse”: validation of Oracle funding with IOSC funding happens after Oracle invoice is generated
Funding changes by IOSC were not communicated to the CCC’s for Oracle update; note: recent leasing announcement refers to new report available, needs research/validation.
Oracle “glitches” with multiple invoice number generation for one deal adding to defects in cash application.
Poor communication throughout process.
17
Recommendations
Need to get inside detail of “equipment billing issue” reason code (see data collection plan)
Process mapping addressed only initial set-up of Oracle & CLAS records; need to evaluate possible X’s related to changes to equipment records after initial set-up
Evaluate impact of “lease details” enhancement due with Oracle release IKON 1.4, Nov/Dec. timeframe
18
Next Steps
Validate measurement system Collect detailed data on “equipment billing issue” reason
code Collect data on # hours spent on research/reconciliation Evaluate possible X’s related to changes to equipment
records after initial setup Evaluate impact of “lease details” enhancement on the
process Make it through Week 2 training (without valium)
19
Martini time!!