ulrika nygren, june 2002 determination of actinides in emergency preparedness using diphonix or...
TRANSCRIPT
Ulrika Nygren, June 2002
Determination of actinides in emergency preparedness using Diphonix or Actinide resin
in combination with gamma spectrometry
Ulrika Nygren and Daniela Stricklin
Ulrika Nygren, June 2002
Emergency Preparedness
• To protect the Swedish population from exposure to ionising radiation produced in the decay of radioactive nuclides– Fallout from nuclear power plant accidents
– Fallout from nuclear weapons explosions
– Terrorism
• Designated laboratory for the Swedish Radiation Protection Authority (SSI)
Ulrika Nygren, June 2002
Transfer of radioactive debris to the environment
Radioactive Cloud
wet deposition
transfer: vegetation to forest floor
root uptake
migration
dry deposition
inhalation
plantproduction
animalproduction
externalradiation
reindeer
fish
radioactive cloud
wet deposition
transfer: vegetation to forest floor
root uptake
migration
dry deposition
inhalation
plantproduction
animalproduction
externalradiation
reindeer
fish
Fast determination of fall-out composition critical
Ulrika Nygren, June 2002
Mobile Measurement Techniques
Backpack
NaI-detector, GPS
Fieldgamma Spectrometry
HPGe
Measurement Vehicle
HPGe, NaI for thyroid measurements
Primarily determination of deposited gamma emitting fission products – actinides and pure beta emitters not determined
Ulrika Nygren, June 2002
Dry, homogenise
LiB-fusionWet ashing
Si-removal
Oxalate precipitation
UTEVA
TRUElectrodep. andα-spectrometry
U
Pu
Standard radioanalytical procedure for actinide determination at FOI- identification of time consuming procedures
VegetationSoil Water
Am (Cm)
Ulrika Nygren, June 2002
– fast preconcentration and partial separation of the actinides
– good spectral resolution provides qualitative and quantitative information
– geometry well suited for gamma spectrometry, facilitates calibration
Issues?– sensitivity– retention of actinides on resin
Determination of actinides by the use of actinide specific resins and low-energy gamma spectrometry
Ulrika Nygren, June 2002
LiB-fusion1100°C, 10 min
5% HNO3, 20 min
Microwave digestionHNO3 and H2O2, 15 min
Surry with resin0.7 g, 1 h.
vegetationsoil
Low-energy γ-spectrometry
water
Adjustment of acid concentration
Elektrodep. andα-spectrometry
Digestion of extractant
Extraction chromatography
Analytical procedure – emergency preparedness
Ulrika Nygren, June 2002
Retention of nuclides from rainwater on Actinide resin
0
20
40
60
80
100
Am-241 Cd-109 Co-57 Ce-139 Sn-113 Sr-85 Cs-137 Mn-54 Y-88 Zn-65 Co-60
No Acid
pH 1.5
5% Nitric Acid
Ulrika Nygren, June 2002
Retention of nuclides from rainwater on Diphonix
0
20
40
60
80
100
Am-241 Cd-109 Co-57 Ce-139 Sn-113 Sr-85 Cs-137 Mn-54 Y-88 Zn-65 Co-60
No Acid
pH 1.5
5% Nitric Acid
Ulrika Nygren, June 2002
Retention of nuclides from vegetation on Actinide resin
5% Nitric Acid99.24
2.57 0.19
79.0274.63
6.78
0.124.73
75.48
0.31 0.140
20
40
60
80
100
Am-241 Cd-109 Co-57 Ce-139 Sn-113 Sr-85 Cs-137 Mn-54 Y-88 Zn-65 Co-60
% R
eten
tion
Ulrika Nygren, June 2002
Separation of 241Am from soil
The sample-solutions were adjusted to 1M HF and 0.125M AA prior to the addition of the resins
97.40 95.8191.50
71.76
0
20
40
60
80
100
Actinide Resin Diphonix
% R
eten
tion
2.5% Nitric Acid
5% Nitric Acid
Ulrika Nygren, June 2002
Detection limits for 241Am
1 Based on 100 min counting time and 95% conf. interval according to L. A. Currie, Anal. Chem., 40 (1968)
2 N. Green, ”An evaluation of rapid methods of radionuclide analysis for use in the aftermath of an accident”, Sci. Total Environ., 130/131 (1993)
Minimum detectable activity concentration
Sample amount
Limiting Activity
Concentration2
Rainwater (Bq / l) 0.6 200 ml 3.7x105
Vegetation (Bq / kg) 65 2 g 3.7x105
Soil (Bq / kg) 130 1 g 1.3x104
Ulrika Nygren, June 2002
Time of analysis
The analysis times are based on a counting time of 100 min
1 N. Green, G. Ham, S. Shaw, Rapid Radioactivity Measurements in Emergency
and Routine Situations, Proceedings, NPL, Teddington, UK, (1997)
Conventional
methods1Lowenergy-
methodConventional
methods1Lowenergy-
method
Rainwater 24 3 29 11Vegetation 24 3.5 31 11.5Soil 24 4 34 12
Total analysis time for 1 sample (h) Total analysis time for 6 samples
Ulrika Nygren, June 2002
Nuclide Energy Intensity Theoretical Detection Limits
(keV) % Water (Bq/l) Grass (Bq/kg) Soil (Bq/kg)
234U 53.1 10.4 1.5 150 300
235U 185.7 54 0.44 44 88
238U 48.0 0.075 210 21000 43000
239Np 103.7 24 0.7 70 140
237Np 86.5 13.1 1.5 150 290
241Am 59.5 36.3 0.65 65 130
238Pu 43.5 0.038 410 41000 83000
239Pu 51.6 0.021 820 82000 160000
240Pu 45.2 0.045 350 35000 71000
241Pu 98.4 0.0022 7500 750000 1500000
242Cm 44.0 0.033 490 49000 99000
244Cm 42.8 0.025 610 61000 120000
Theoretical detection limits for other actinides- complete retention on resin assumed
Based on 100 min counting time and 95% conf. interval according to L. A. Currie, Anal. Chem., 40 (1968)
Ulrika Nygren, June 2002
Destruction of resin/extractant for further separation and analysis
Actinide resin• Removal of extractant with
actinides from resin by isopropanol
• Evaporation till dryness in Ni-crucible
• Fusion with Na2O2 (550ºC, 10 min)
• Leaching of melt by H2O followed by dilute HNO3
Diphonix• 30 ml HNO3 (conc.) added
to resin and evaporated to near dryness at 200ºC
• 10 ml H2O2, ev. to near dryness
• 15 ml H2O2 and 0.35 g FeSO4*7H2O, ev. to near dryness
• 6 ml H2O2, ev. to dryness
Ulrika Nygren, June 2002
Chemical yields in alpha spectrometric analysisDestruction of extractant:
•Fentons reagent for Diphonix
•Na2O2 fusion for Actinide resin
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
90
100
U Pu Am
yie
ld (
%) Diphonix
Actinide resin
Ulrika Nygren, June 2002
Determination of actinides by the use of actinide-specific resins and low-energy gamma spectrometry-
Conclusions
• The method shows good capacity for the separation and determination of 241Am in water, vegetation and soil
• Analysis time is dramatically reduced compared to conventional methods
• The method provides sufficient sensitivity for the determination of several actinide-nuclides in emergency preparedness
• The retention of 241Am is good on both resins, although the Actinide resin is somewhat more selective and provides higher retention at higher acid concentrations
• Possible to process resins for further analysis based on e.g. alpha spectrometry
D. L. Stricklin, Å. Tjärnhage, U. Nygren, J. Radioanal. Nucl. Chem., 251 (2002) 69