ubiq: sound and subversion

Upload: sofiehodara

Post on 03-Jun-2018

238 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

  • 8/12/2019 UBIQ: Sound and Subversion

    1/78

    SOUND&

    SUBVER

    SION

  • 8/12/2019 UBIQ: Sound and Subversion

    2/78

    SOUND AND SUBVERSION

    E i te y S o e E a na H o a

    Dynamic Me ia Institute Pr

    Massachusetts College of

    Boston, MA

    SOUND&

    SUBVERSION

    UBIQ

  • 8/12/2019 UBIQ: Sound and Subversion

    3/78

    Tis catalogue was published on the occasion of the

    exhibition Sound & Subversion, organized and curated

    by Sofie Elana Hodara, Gallery, New York, Oct

    Jan , .

    Generous support was provided by benefactor and

    patron Wendy Richmond, writer, artist, designer,

    educator, and critical thinker, of Brooklyn, .

    Copyright by Te Dynamic Media Press.

    All rights reserved. Tis book may be reproduced, in

    whole or in part, including illustrations, in any form

    (beyond that permitted by Sections and of

    the U.S. Copyright Law and except by reviewers forpublic press), without written permission from the

    publishers.

    Library of Congress Catalog Card Number: -

    ---

    Tis catalogue was produced on the occasion of the

    exhibition Sound & Subversion held at Lite Gallery, New

    York, Oct Jan , .

    Includes bibliographical references.

    ---

    . Sound art . Design research . New Media .

    . Hodara, Sofie Elana, editor of catalog.

    .W

    .. dc

    LITE GALLERY

    Beard Street

    Brooklyn,

    THE DYNAMIC MEDIA PRESS

    Massachusetts College of Art and Design

    Huntington Avenue

    Boston,

    www.dynamicmediainstitute.org

    Tis catalogue was produced by the publications

    department at Te Dynamic Media Press, Boston,

    : Jan Kubasiewicz, editor with assistance by Susan

    Hodara; Sofie Elana Hodara, designer with assistance

    by John Howrey and Robin McDowell; Zachary Kaiser,

    rights and reproductions.

    PROJECT MANAGER

    Sofie Hodara, Jan Kubasiewicz

    DESIGNERS

    Sofie Elana Hodara, John Howrey, Robin McDowell

    EDITORS

    Jan Kubasiewicz, Susan Hodara

    PRODUCTION

    Zachary Kaiser

    PROOFREADERS

    Nathan Tomas Wilson, Ingrid Pimsner

    PREPRESS

    Sofie Hodara

    PRINTING AND BINDING

    Te Dynamic Media Press, Boston, .

    Tis book is typeset in Avenir, Chaparral Pro, , and

    Roboto and is printed on ProLine Uncoated

    # paper. pages.

    Printed in the United States.

    there are rules to follow.

  • 8/12/2019 UBIQ: Sound and Subversion

    4/78

    Foreword xi

    Surveillance, Subversion and Sound 001

    Content Blackout 031

    UBIQ 047

    Public Soundings 055

    The Apple Bomber 059

    Black Friday 067

    Cross Walk 075

    An Intermission 081

    Private Soundings 097

    iTones 103

    iHear 119

    in Conclusion 131

    Works Cited 137

  • 8/12/2019 UBIQ: Sound and Subversion

    5/78

    NOISES ARETOO SIGNIFICANTO BE NOISES.

    DOUGLAS KAHN, NOISE WATER MEAT

  • 8/12/2019 UBIQ: Sound and Subversion

    6/78

    FOREWORD

    On a monitor on my desk at the Dynamic Media Institute

    graduate research center, a Chrome browser sports a little

    box in which a flickering and grainy image of Michael Jackson

    struts across the screen holding a plastic Pepsi cup. Te words

    Pepsi Generation slowly fade as Bonin Bough, V.P. of Global

    Media, Mondelez Intl., appears. He gestures while he speaks

    in an authoritative voice:

    the icons of this generation are the like button, the tweet

    button, the reblog button I mean, this is the biggest transforma-

    tion that weve had in terms of communicating with consumers inour lifetime

    Its true. We worship these buttons not only as icons, but

    as idols, as well.

    Te clip was from Douglas Rushkoffs Frontline documentary

    Generation Like, which explores the culture of likes. owards the

    end of the film, danah boyd, a principal researcher at Microsoft

    Research, makes the point that selling out doesnt even exist

    as a term I dont hear young people talking about selling out,

    Im not sure if they even know what it means.

    Which shouldnt come as a surprise. oday, individuals use

    the same modes of expression as celebrities and corporations.

    If Coca-Cola has a Facebook, witter, and Instagram account

    just like th e rest of us do, why shouldnt our relat ionship to

    such cultural abstractions of authority transform?

    Te Millennials, or Generation , are the first generation to

    grow up with the Internet literally at their fingertips. Te reper-

    cussions of this have led to a restructuring of societys commu-

    nication and information infrastructures. Te Dynamic Media

    Institute, founded in , promotes and enables research

    and design to examine exactly how these new technologiesand media are changing the texture of our lives. More relevantPhotos from UBIQs studio in Brooklyn.

    1 RushkofGenerat

    Frontlin

    Feb 201

  • 8/12/2019 UBIQ: Sound and Subversion

    7/78

    SOUND AND SUBVERSION

    than ever, the work produced at the institute results from an

    understanding not only of how to design for better communica-

    tions, but also of what questions designers should be asking of

    communication media in general.

    By curating an exhibition of s work and producing this

    catalog, I echo the sentiments of Rushkoff and boyd. As Rush-

    koff writes in his blog:

    Young social media users today draw no distinction between art

    and commerce, culture and advertising. While kids engaged with

    social media have the ability to express themselves and their values

    to pretty much the rest of the developed world, they seem unaware

    of the extent to which these platforms shape the values they choose

    to express.

    Tis comment implies a poignant and very new cultural

    phenomenon: the eroding of the distinction between main-

    stream and counterculture. By examining the work of ,

    the Dynamic Media Institute is asking: where is the outlet

    for contemporary subversive and disruptive thought,

    traditionally carried in the legacy of the avant-garde and

    counterculture movements?

    Research at the institute is rooted in the history of design.

    Accordingly, we ca n trace s lineage to the photomonta ges

    of the Dadaists of s, where the images of political and

    commercial infrastructures were repurposed for antitheti-

    cal readings. Where is this tradition of media today? What, if

    anything, can be considered subversive or disruptive besides

    an expansive power failure? We can cite Internet-outlaws like

    the Bitcoin hackers, but how can we know if the mathematical

    geniuses who made off with the digital capital of others are any

    different from those who run Bitcoin itself (Satoshi Nakamoto?

    or the ?)?

    Te work presented in this publication is a rare example of

    st-century subversive media. s anonymity as a indi-vidual, as well as his technological know-how a skill set that

    seems more magical than anything else exemplify his agenda

    2 Rush koff, Douglas,

    Social Media

    and the Perils of

    Looking for Likes,Rushkoff.com,19

    Feb 2014.

    as the Robin Hood of Sound. However, isnt robbing the

    rich and giving to the poor; he is holding a mirror up to society.

    His Soundings are opportunities for us to reconsider our alle-

    giance to our technologies. He borrows a ringtone and returns

    its iconic melody to us as a metaphor of power. Emerging

    from unexpected, often forgotten, and larger-than-life sound

    infrastructures, the tunes, heard anew, loud, and clear, take on

    godlike proportions. Tey dont demand action. Instead, they

    encourage pause and consideration for how to listen to the

    dynamic voices of authority today. is reminding us that

    just because we c hoose to click t he like button does not mean

    we are expressing ourselves freely.

    , though no stranger to press, has been put in the spotlight

    with this catalogue. I appreciate his trust in me and his exten-

    sive input with the manuscript. Im especially grateful to Brian

    Lucid, Gunta Kaza, Jan Kubasiewicz, and Joe Quackenbush

    for their continued support as senior advising faculty at the

    Massachusetts College of Art and Design. For their tremendous

    generosity, Id like to thank Zachary Kaiser and John Howrey

    for encouraging me to compile these ideas into a publication,

    and for offering support at all hours of the day or night. Finally,

    Id like to thank the public institutions and private individuals,

    who have asked to remain anonymous, for graciously support-

    ing this project with either time or funding. May this book

    grace the shelves of the institute and bring future researchers

    information, insight, and delight for years to come.

    Sofie Elana Hodara

  • 8/12/2019 UBIQ: Sound and Subversion

    8/78

    SURVEILLANCE SUBVERSION & SOUNDSOUND AND SUBVERSION

    SURVEILLANC

    SUBVERSION

    & SOUND

  • 8/12/2019 UBIQ: Sound and Subversion

    9/78

    ERIC SATIE

    Nevertheless, we must bring about a music

    which is like furniture a music which will bepart of the noises of the environmentI think

    of it as melodious, softening the noises of the

    knives and forks, not dominating them, not

    imposing itself

    JOHN C AGE

    A time thats just time will let sounds be just

    sounds and if they are folk tunes, unresolved

    ninth chords, or knives and forks, just folk tunes,

    unresolved ninth chords, or knives and fork.

    Reprint from John Cage, Erik Satie, in Silence: Lectures and Writings by JohnCage(Middletown, CT: Wesleyan University Press, 1939), p. 76, 81.

    JOHN CAGE &

    ERIK SATIE

    The text below first appeared in the 1958 Art News Annual. It is animaginary conversation between Satie and myself [John Cage]. Because

    he died over thirty years before, neither of us hears what the other says.

    His remarks are ones he is reported to have made and excerpts from his

    writings.

  • 8/12/2019 UBIQ: Sound and Subversion

    10/78

    SURVEILLANCE, SUBVERSION

    AND SO UND

    Its Sunday, December , . Te three floors of Bostons

    Boylston Street Apple store are filled with Christmas shop-

    pers tis the season of the iPhone , sans Siri, and everyone

    wants one. Sometime between two and three in the after-

    noon, during the post-lunch rush, the not-too-loud overhead

    soundtrack stops. For half a minute, no one notices. Unbe-

    knownst to the shoppers and salespersons, they are about to

    become victims of one of s Soundings. A clear single note,

    similar to a trumpet, pierces the store. Everyone workers,

    customers, technicians alike pauses, in confusion and

    surprise. No one knows what the hell is going on.

    Te sound, the Apple ringtone alert known as Sherwood Forest

    (similar to the call of the shofar on Rosh Hashanah) played

    three times before the sound systems volume dropped and

    Coldplay resumed. Tis was one of the initial documented

    Apple Bombings, a sound inter vention by anonymous a rtist

    : Te Robin Hood of Sound. s interventions, known

    as Public Soundings, are notable for their use of trademarked

    Apple ringtones, i nterrupting audiences , mostly busy consum-

    ers with the surprise of an unusual but harmless interference.

    Tough little is known about , his Public Soundings

    give those who experience them a chance for reflection to

    consider their relationships with the ubiquity of new personal

  • 8/12/2019 UBIQ: Sound and Subversion

    11/78

    SURVEILLANCE SUBVERSION & SOUNDSOUND AND SUBVERSION

    technologies, and just how these devices affect our relation-

    ships with one another, ourselves, and our environments.

    uses the Apple ringtones in both his Public and Private

    Soundings to investigate how we interpret these all-too-famil-

    iar tones. In the Public Soundings, he removes the ringtones

    from the tiny devices they normally inhabit, and changes their

    scale so that they become intrusive and menacing. Instead

    of answer the phone, check e-mail, work-meeting now, the

    melodies, when booming overhead, become mysterious and

    transcendent. Out of context, their function changes; in s

    Soundings, instead of interrupting the moment to pull us into

    our screens, the same sounds create a new kind of moment, oneof renewed awareness of our surroundings.

    Tis is best seen in the rare video footage of the Black

    Friday Sounding at a Wal-Mart in Philadelphia. An anonymous

    bystander (perhaps himself) captured the moment of

    confusion followed by awe that was sparked by the disjointed

    yet recogniz able sound of the Apple ringtone Anticipate. Te

    scale-shift from the smartphone text or email alert to t he

    blasting loudspeakers in the store stunned the chaos of Black

    Friday shopping into an eerie silence. However, the work wasnt

    merely a sensational stunt; it follows a long line of art-based

    musical interventions that resist and subvert the underlying

    and often invisible order of life.

    Subversion, according to its etymology, refers to an act of

    defiance in an attempt to overthrow the established social

    order and its structures of power, authority, and hierarchy.

    Tere is an extensive history of subversive media within the

    arts. Canonically, the trend begins with Marcel Duchamps

    Readymades his placement of everyday objects, like his

    infamous Urinal, in the pristine gallery setting. In doing

    so, Duchamp subverted the role of the artist and the gallery,

    forcing his audience to reconsider the value and meaningof an object when it is labeled as art within four white walls.

    Subversive techniques within the art world are extensive: we

    could discuss the ins and outs beginning with Warhol

    or Sherrie Levine; we could frame a conversation about con-

    temporaries street artist Banksy or the masked girls from

    Pussy Riot. For the purposes of this essay, I place s Public

    Soundings within a lineage of subversive Net Artists whose

    work explores the impact of art rooted in new media platforms.

    Te mechanics of programming and dynamic visual interfaces

    present opportunities for artists to examine what constitutes

    art if it is no longer tied to its traditional physical and spa-

    tial formats. Of particular relevance are works that examine

    identity in relation to data the countless bits of quantified

    information tied to our online accounts, profiles, and devices.

    Tis essay aligns s interventions, as well as his earlier

    project thePerfect Human Application, with the work of contem-

    porary artists investigating the relationship between digital

    technologies and our evolving sense of self. Alongside the

    Public Soundings are, for example, the Preemptive Media col-

    lectives piece (-) and Osman KhansNet Worth

    (), and more recent works by Jacob Bakkila and Tomas

    Bender. All use subversive methods of countersurveillance and

    anonymity to dislodge assumptions about the power dynamics

    between human and technology. As Christiane Paul, curator of

    new media arts at the Whitney Museum of American Art, put

    it, these are works that play with identity, and the fusion of

    human and machine.

    Te Preemptive Media collective is a group of artists, activ-

    ists, and technologists who aim to create new opportunities

    for public discussion and alternative outcomes in the usually

    remote and closed world of technology-based research and

    development. took a form similar to a performance or

    happening. Te group installed and tended functioning bars

    in exhibition spaces across the United States. Along with the

    purchase of a drink, participants were required to swipe their

    s through scanners the same scanners found at hospitals,

    airports, liquor stores, etc. With their beverage, customers

    1 Subvers

    Wikiped

    2 For morinforma

    the Duc

    Readym

    StephenThe Fu

    the Rec

    ReadymEssay o

    and Art

    Practicepublishe

    the leafl

    the exh

    The Futthe Rec

    Readym

    Apexart17 April

    3 Quoted

    Orlean,

    Machinegames o

    Internet

    Yorker,

    Screen grab fromBlack Friday news

    broadcast.

  • 8/12/2019 UBIQ: Sound and Subversion

    12/78

    SURVEILLANCE SUBVERSION & SOUNDSOUND AND SUBVERSION

    received a receipt detailing data culled from the D barcode

    and an online search: tangible evidence of all the information

    attached to the drinkers drivers license.

    Tat receipt highlighted the pervasiveness of existing systems

    of consumer surveillance, with the aim of encouraging dialogue

    about the ensuing power of database infrastructures. As the

    project description states, with public knowledge

    there is a chance for public voices, and ultimately resistance.

    In applying the technologies of data surveillance,

    penetrates the inter-workings of data surveillance systems

    in order to make them public knowledge, as well as the

    centerpiece of critique.

    In a current consideration of , we have to reference the

    communication breaches by the National Security Agency of

    Verizon, and Sprint cu stomers.Te application of algo-

    rithmic surveillance shouldnt come as a surprise, but we are

    left asking questions posed by . In what ways exactly are

    these surveillance activities liberty limiting (an issue trans-

    parency could solve)? And, especially pertinent, what are the

    implied rights to privacy of a consumer acting within these

    communication and information infrastructures?

    On its website discloses how its database information

    is used for marketing campaigns similar to consumer loyalty

    cards, as well as demographic information. However, they note

    that it is currently illegal for them to share or sell the informa-

    tion they collect (the one exception is to law enforcement).

    Te threat the Preemptive collective articulates is that maybe

    someday this data becomes totally free! oday, this state-

    ment appears ironic. Tese data sets have incredible economic

    potential they are recognized as valuable commodities. We

    are forced to consider which is scarier: free circulation of this

    data or assigning to it monetary worth?

    touched on the ability of data to determine value on apersonal level. Te installation offered participants computer

    stations to view the market value of their data, putting a literal

    price on a given participants name. Tis meant that data was

    not only embodied on the receipt and computer screen, but

    alternatively visualized by the socially lubricated (thank you

    alcohol), shiny, receipt-holding crowd.

    Te realization of the social group in forced users to

    reflect on the relationship between the monetary worth of

    their data and their own perceptions of self-worth relative to

    those around them. Every participant was reduced to a set of

    measurable and comparable data. Te piece demonstrated how

    surveillance technologies act as authority in shaping not only

    a system of global fiscal control, but an individual participants

    sense of self. turned humans-at-play, the crowd in the

    bar, into a walking data set. Te data surveillance regime

    may be in question here, but so are the ways that participants

    choose to incorporate (or not) the revealed data into their own

    perceptions of self.

    Similarly, Osman KhansNet Worth () installation

    explored online identity initiated by participants swipes.

    Entering into a more traditional gallery environment, thevisitor was presented with a kiosk and card reader in front

    of monolithic projected image of various names. As in ,

    4 In refere

    ongoing

    in the mcourts r

    NSA su

    U.S. citiactivitie

    5 For mo

    data ma

    well as oand Net

    see Rita

    DataveCounte

    publishe

    Raw D

    OxymorGitelma

    (Cambr

    Press), 2

    Images of SWIPE, above, taken from www.preemptivemedia.net/swipe/.

  • 8/12/2019 UBIQ: Sound and Subversion

    13/78

    SOUND AND SUBVERSION

    the participants swipe of a purchase card triggers a Google

    search of the name contained on the magnetic stripe. Te name

    then floats onto a glowing wall and positions itself vertically

    based on a ranking determined by the number of hits returned

    by the search. Te name sits alongside the names of past ran-

    ked visitors, as well as higher net-worth individuals pre-fed

    into the system by the artist.

    Te luminescent wall of names is a silent and revealing

    presence in the gallery. A users swipe made at a kiosk across

    the room becomes a symbolic (and pathetic) attempt to slice

    down the center of this glowing wall. Tere is a slight delay

    between the gesture and the appearance of the new name,

    which floats into legibility, growing larger and more opaque

    before settling in its position. Tese few seconds create a stir-

    ring moment of suspense: participants appear frozen, eyes held

    on the screen. As soon as the moving text grows legible, there

    is a metaphorical sigh of relief: one man points and smiles to

    himself; another, happy with his high ranking, looks at the

    camera and behind him as if for additional validation. Tisslight delay of computation at work, offers users a chance to

    consider the mysterious prowess of code.

    Images of Net Worthdemonstrating a user glancing back to the crowd forvalidation (above) and the action of swiping (opposite). Both images are

    from www.osmankhan.com/.

  • 8/12/2019 UBIQ: Sound and Subversion

    14/78

    SURVEILLANCE SUBVERSION & SOUNDSOUND AND SUBVERSION

    As Rita Ra ley, information sc holar and Assoc iate Professor

    of English and Culture at , notes in her recent Data-

    veillance and Countervailance, the piece draws on the

    familiar practice of ego-surfing, the tracing of ones own

    virtual-physical presence and presumed importance online.

    Validation is encoded i n the database: you dont exist

    unless you appear on Google (). Google is transformed

    into a ranking system embodied by a larger-than-life wall.

    Te swipe, as the point of encounter, reduces its participants,

    if just for a moment, to anonymous consumers.

    Te Perfect Human Application,s early project with

    Content Blackout, follows the tradition of these works. It isa smartphone application, now being developed by Klout, that

    tracks and scores a users various connected interactions to

    create an aggregate score, easily sharable and comparable with

    the scores of other users. Te user is not reduced to a consumer

    per se, but rather to the sum of her interactions: her value is

    informed by quantity not quality. Te exploration of how

    identity and sense-of-self is increasingly shaped by the expan-

    sive amount of data derived from technologies echoes Pauls

    statement above: all are works that play with the fusion of hu-

    man and machine through perception of self. Does the super-

    ficial validation of existence tied to data as evidenced in the

    pleased participants ofNet Worthand the users of the Perfect

    Human Applicationwho compete for higher scores daily indi-

    cate the fusion of man and machine? Or more provocatively, is

    it even appropriate to consider a clear distinction between the

    two in the first place?

    What makesNet Worth and media of subversion are

    their alternative uses of the database to reveal a lack of privacy.

    Te resulting sentiment is an eerie feeling of being watched (by

    whom and for what? asks) and the repressed comfort and

    validation we take in knowing others are watching (as wit-

    nessed by watching the reactions of users of Net Worth).

    By embodying the tactics of database surveillance, both pieces

    unveil a technological infrastructure of information control.

    Tey allow for a role reversal of sorts participants surveil

    the system of surveillance.

    Instead of subverting technological systems to reveal them as

    regimes as control, Jacob Bakkila and Tomas Bender intervene

    in a different manner with their witter project Horse_ebooks

    (-). Like s Public Soundings, Horse_ebooks sub-

    verts social assumptions about the power dynamics between

    technological infrastructures and society.

    Bakkila and Bender, respectively Creative Director at Buzzfeed

    and a freelance consultant, grew up in suburban Pittsburgh.From an early age, both were responsible for interventionist-

    style pranks. In middle school, they modified a radio to

    transmit to passing cars, without anyone realizing where it

    was coming from (Bender quoted in Man and Machine). In

    , they released Hoopsteon a short video describing and

    advertising a fictitious town in Milwaukee. Using footage of

    New York City paired with touristic jargon, the video was a

    success and within three days had more than , views.

    Horse_ebooks (along with its companion piece Pronunciation

    Books, not featured in this essay) was born of a similar desire

    to expose the absurdity of advertising lingo and corporate pro-

    motional babble. Te latter two works, both lasting for a series

    of years, broke the mold for thoughtprovoking Net Art.

    Fears about intelligent technologies overstepping an invis-

    ible dividing line between man and machine are rampant in

    contemporary culture. ake Spike Jonzes recent film Her, in

    which Joaquin Phoenix plays a man who falls in love with his

    (enacted by the voice of Scarlett Johansson can you really

    blame him?), or a host of classic sci-fi flicks includingA.I.,Blade

    Runner, and Te Matrix.Or consider Eliza, a script written by

    Joseph Weizenbaum, professor of computer science at M.I..,

    in the s. Elizawas a text-based program with which userscould converse. She was programmed to respond in the nature

    6 For mo

    Blackou

    Perfect Applica

    content

    Rita Raley

  • 8/12/2019 UBIQ: Sound and Subversion

    15/78

    SURVEILLANCE SUBVERSION & SOUNDSOUND AND SUBVERSION

    of a Rogerian therapist to repeat users phrases back to them

    in the form of questions. Horse_ebooks approaches the issue

    from the opposite direction: a human impersonating a machine

    trying to impersonate a human.

    For over two years ( days), Bakkila posted tweets from

    the Horse_ebooks witter handle every few hours. Originally

    the handle was run by an automated bot created to promote

    e-library.net; in an effort to evade detection it was programmed

    to scrape the Internet for fragmented text to tweet. Bakkilas

    takeover was an active attempt of a man to impersonate a

    program built to appear as a sentient human. His tweets,

    like those of the bots, were created from found text, scrapedfrom the Internet.

    Te prank worked and the account g rew popular no one knew

    it wasnt a bot. It featured tweets like Events developed(Feb ,

    ), in, your phone is ringing, your email is (August , )

    and and embellishments creates a completely (May , ).

    Followers created elaborate fan fiction based on the tweets, and

    a browser-plug-in, featured in the Observer in , trans-

    formed the text of any website into a Horse_ebooks-inspired

    truism.In a gallery performance in September , Bakkila

    revelead that it was himself, not a bot, behind the account,

    the response was excitement as well as anger: the public felt

    betrayed, confused, and maybe a little foolish.

    Te work, which Bakkila refers to as performance mischief,

    is notable for two reasons. First, it raises questions about the

    changing nature of media falling into the genre of art. How do

    digital platforms change the form art takes? How will curators,

    along with the greater institution of art, accommodate newer

    digital forms of media?

    Te Museum of the Moving Image offered an initial response

    to this line of questioning. In , it presented the first#VeryShortFilmFest, featuring twenty-two Vine videos

    looping on a large plasma , under which hung twenty-two

    corresponding drives each awaiting transfer to poten-

    tial col lectors. Tey sold one, for $ its on its on Ikeaby

    Angela Washko to curator and collec tor Myriam Vannesc hi.

    When asked what she intended to do with the piece, she said

    she thought she might let the artist upload it to her own Vine

    account. What does this imply about the value of the content of

    social media profiles and accounts, or the role of such accounts

    within the art world and beyond? Are they commodities with

    which we can adorn our identities in the same way we hang

    art and select furniture to decorate our homes?

    An inherent factor of di fferentiation bet ween art-before-di gital

    interface and art-after is temporality. Te institution of art

    is built on deliverables (paintings, film, sculptures), ready tobe commodified as a form of beauty and entertainment. In

    contrast, digital platforms offer deliverables not in space, but

    rather in time. ake Washkos use of Vine as a platform, or

    Horse_ebooks on witter: these feeds continuously grow, and

    posts disappear into endless digital records. For Bakkila, the

    answer was to post continually for over two years; the piece

    was greater than the sum of the individual tweets. Grando was

    quoted in Man and Machine as saying, I think what they did

    was art to the most modern degree. It was such a long con.

    As in any perfor mance, what happen s to the art when it end s?

    What are the artifacts left behind, by which we remember and

    value the work? Can we liken Bakkilas witter timestamps to

    the chairs Marina Abramovic and audience sat upon in Te Art-

    ist is Present(, March -May , )? What happens

    when witter as a medium becomes obsolete? How will critics

    and fans alike reference this act of performance mischief?

    Second, Horse_ebooks is notable for highlighting the intimate

    and complex relationships users develop with these platforms.

    Tese platforms are more than just modes of expression for

    user entertainment and communication. Tey carry assump-

    tions and expectations about the different roles and functionsplayed by man and machine. Bakkilas prank asks, if a program

    can impersonate a man, can a man perform the job of an

    7 Fan fiction here:

    horseebooks.

    tumblr.com;Browser-plug-in:

    observer.com/

    2012/02/horse_ebooks-takes-over-

    the-internet/.

    8 Gallery reveal

    featured by SusanOrlean, Horse_

    ebooks Is Human

    After All, The NewYorker, 24 Sept

    2013.

    9 To read about the

    #VeryShortFilmFest, visit

    theguardian.com/

    technology/2013/mar/12/vine-

    twitter-moving-

    image-art-fair

    (or work some ofyour own Google

    magic).

    Jaco

    Hors

  • 8/12/2019 UBIQ: Sound and Subversion

    16/78

    SURVEILLANCE SUBVERSION & SOUND

    automated bot? What are social implication if man out-bots the

    bot? Further, is there a clear division of labor between the bot

    and the man, or does that question, in and of itself, imply

    a social construct on the verge of dissipation?

    s Public Soundings address similar questions. At their

    heart, these pieces address issues of control, showcasing the

    power struggle between the device metaphorically, through

    the use of their iconic sounds and the user. Of course, his

    work negotiates the question of how these works can inhabit

    the art world. His answer is one of practicality. First, he uses

    his website to collect public-generated documentation of the

    works. Second, he uses the gallery as a platform to explore hisideas a bit differently, in works he calls Private Sounding s(not

    featured in this essay).

    Key to these works (and, most likely, the reason for his

    anonymity) is s ability to gain control of the semi-public

    audio-infrastructures of commerce. He has infiltrated a Wal-

    Mart in Philadelphia, a rader Joes in San Francisco, and Apple

    retail stores across the world. In one of his initial ventures, in

    , he replaced the beeping that indicates the walk signal of

    the pedestrian crosswalk with the sound of a dial-up modem.

    He later admitted in a video apology published on Vimeo that

    the use of a crosswalk was disruptive to those who relied

    solely on the beeping in order to cross the street, and therefore

    was, much worse than an indulgent expression of art, but a

    shameful and naive piece that endangered a demographic for

    whom society does so little Nevertheless, his crosswalk

    piece foreshadows s interest in subversion. It calls atten-

    tion to societys passive acceptance of the sounds assigned to

    the our social functioning in this case, crossing t he street.

    Te beeping gives a corporeality to this particular action; it

    serves as a universal embodiment of a social cue that works

    in tandem with our footsteps. Te focus isnt the sound itself,

    but rather our unquestioning allegiance to it, as himself

    suggests: We walk like sheep when the white man beeps

    Cant we waltz instead?

    WE WALK LIKE

    SHEEP WHEN THE

    WHITE MAN BEEPS

    CANT WE WALTZ INSTEAD?

    UBIQ

  • 8/12/2019 UBIQ: Sound and Subversion

    17/78

    SURVEILLANCE SUBVERSION & SOUNDSOUND AND SUBVERSION

    Te move from the specific beep of the crosswalk to the

    soundscapes of commerce, targeting with special attention

    Apple stores and products, reflects a more pointed disapproval

    of our religious fervency towards popular corporations. When

    usurps the audio systems of Apple stores, he urges us to

    question the authority and power we give to the brands. His

    Soundings are less the gloried genius of a snickering prankster

    than anonymous and seemingly effortless gestures: an invisible

    wave of the hand that transforms the barely noticed Bieber-

    playing speakers into a brief yet unsettling and omnipotent

    force of sound. When he breaks through the monotony of pop

    music, he breaks through the status quo. As inNet Worth,

    calls on our role as consumers though not through the pur-

    chasing card, but rather unnoticed icons of consumption: the

    ringtone. He forefronts our blindness as willing consumers in

    the free-market global capitalism, as well as, our unawareness

    of the very sound infrastructures that are pumping the affirm-

    ing monotony of ideology into the air.

    However, the primary similarity between the Public Sound-

    ingsand Horse_ebooks is how they both subvert the assumed

    roles and functions of technologies. Just as Horse-ebooks

    inverts the role of human and machine, inverts the call

    and response of the device. In his Apple Bombings, instead of the

    ringtone Sherwood Forest calling to users from their pockets,

    the musical melodies (as refers to them) call from above.

    And instead of drawi ng us into our private person al worlds of

    email and texting, we are lured into a shared moment of won-

    der and awe. shifts the role of our mobile technologies.

    Tese sharedinterruptions highlight the power we have given

    to our personal mobile devices. Te Sounding is an attempt to

    reclaim such power.

    s anonymity transforms him from a belittled hacker to a

    technical savant. He acts within our existing sound structure,

    but also from above it. In this way, he subverts the use of these

    infrastructures, as did and Net Worth, to embody an al-

    ternate perspective: one that forces us to confront exactly what

    kind of relationship and power dynamic we want to have with

    these, at times awe-i nspiring technologies.

    Further, acknowledges that our selection of cell phone

    ringtones, like the imagery which we choose to wallpaper our

    screens or the cases we handpick to protect our phones, allows

    us to personalize our otherwise mass-produced devices. Yet it

    is this very ability that encourages our absurd attachment to

    these devices. Whether we choose the more familiar of these

    sounds, an echo of our public soundscape, or create our own vi-

    bration, the resulting sounds have a specific meaning to us and

    power over us. By de-contextualizing these noises, ripsthem from their meaning, forcing us, his audience, whether

    passive bystanders or active users, to listen to the tones as mu-

    sic. When we do, we are reminded of the physical presence of

    the devices in our hands. Teir cries are made of the same stuff

    as ours according to Jonathan Sterne, in Te Audible Past, all

    sound is a little piece of the vibrating world.

    InA ack in the Shoe: Neutralizing and Resisting the New Surveil-

    lance, an essay by Gary . Marx, the professor emeri-

    tus surveys eleven prominent types of responses to newer

    technologies of surveillance and dataveillance. Tough this

    essay is not the place to go into detail about his ideas regarding

    resistance opportunities, Marxs well-crafted introduction pres-

    ents two timeless points about the suppositions we make about

    technologies and infrastructures of control.

    First, he writes, just because there is potential of a technol-

    ogy for harmdoes not mean that it must happen. Te threat

    of harmful control, the fear that technology and data will sub-

    sume and flatten certain abstract aspects of humanity needs

    to be kept distinct from its realization.

    Second, he suggests that the mysterious workings of techno-logical power cause fears about an authoritative data-regime

    and vulnerable populace. We only see the tip of the iceberg in

    10 Jonatha

    The Aud

    (DurhamPress, 2

    11 Gary T.

    Tack in

    NeutralResistin

    Surveilla

    Journal Issues , v

    May 200

  • 8/12/2019 UBIQ: Sound and Subversion

    18/78

    SOUND AND SUBVERSION

    terms of how these technological infrastructures are applied,

    yet it is import ant to not blame the tec hnologies, but t he

    infrastructure created by the people who apply them; it is how

    we implement them: they become enmeshed in complex

    pre-existing systems. Tey are as likely to be altered as to alter,

    Marx writes. s Public Soundings embody a microcosm

    of these dynamics of control between the smartphone and

    user, as opposed to technological infrastructures and justice in

    society. Tese concepts are at the core of s work.

    As Marx puts it , Te Sky Isnt Fall ing At Least Not Yet.

    s Public Soundings echo that sentiment. If he can make

    Marimba stream from a metaphorical sky, there is hope. Tecontrol systems may not be predictable, but they are not im-

    penetrable either. Let us decide the role they play in our lives,

    in shaping our sense of self, and in determining our, as well

    as their, value in society.

    DE

  • 8/12/2019 UBIQ: Sound and Subversion

    19/78

    IGN So its no surprise that one of the majorselling points of Apples i operat-ing system was its new ringtones andalerts. Tey are as familiar as the latestBeyonce hit a new ki nd of pop. Whodoesnt recognize and respond intui-tively to the start-up beep of a laptop?But the difference between Beyonceand our iPhone ringtone is that while

    Beyonces songs bring us pleasure, our

    ringtone carries weight beyond its

    form. It is always tied to a use a new

    email, Dad calling, etc.

    In the summer of , I took my

    Buick Le Sabre to the local repair shop.

    I knew something was wrong because

    my brakes were squeaking. When I took

    the mechanic for a drive and he heard

    the specific squeak I was referringto, he laughed and told me to get ne w

    brake pads.

    My moms new car beeps when some-

    one doesnt buckle her seatbelt. What

    if, instead, it made the sound of a dog

    barking? Where we wouldnt hesitate to

    understand the beep as an indicator of

    pay attention, do something,we might be

    confused by the bark. Te squeaking of

    brakes is part of a language a mechanic

    knows intimately. But what happens

    when sound is no longer a direct result

    of its function? How do we design

    sounds to successfully communicate

    a specific function? What enables a

    sound to retain a common meaning?

    Aesthetics? aste? Humor? History?

    Te ringtone is a relatively new genre

    of designed sound, one that has its own

    history of development tied to technol-

    ogy, pop culture, and musical influenc-

    es. By de-contextualizing the iPhone

    ringtones, calls attention to howarbitrary these sounds are as indicators

    of functioning. With his Soundings, he

    asks us to forget the sounds intentions,

    and to experience them in the moment.

    JIM MCK EE

    I was working with this guy at

    the advanced product group at

    Apple, and he had a ca se for a

    Walkman, and he opened it up

    and he closed it, and you heard

    it clickand he said, Somebody

    worked really hard to make that

    click sound that way That wasan acoustical element on

    a mechanical device

    ROMAN MARS

    Well, there arent a lot of moving

    parts and moving bits in todays

    devices but Jim McKee still has

    to make them sound right.

    THE SOUND OF THE ARTIFICIAL WORLDEPISODE 15, 99% INVISIBLE: A TINY RADIO SHOW ABOUT DESIGN WITH ROMAN MARS, 11 FEB, 2011

    Tough responsive visuals are integral

    in our interactive interfaces, sonic

    feedback is just as important. With the

    advent of new technologies, the sound

    designer, like the visual designer, plays

    an evermore important role in develop-

    ing and shaping the digital platforms

    of the computer, the browser, and the

    smartphone.

    From alerts to start-up tones, these

    sounds act as way-finding points, allow-

    ing users to navigate complex systems

    with efficiency and ease. In Te Sound

    of the Artificial World, % Invisibles

    Roman Mars interviews Jim McKee, of

    Earwax Productions, who sums it up

    nicely: ry using your telephone with-out the beeps and its really confusing

    In the physical world, the sounds of our

    objects all the different components

    and little pieces are a direct result of

    the materials and mechanics behind

    them. Tink about the distinct sounds

    of different motorcycles: a Harley

    Davidson, say, compared to a riumph.

    Each bike makes a unique noise, and

    to a trained mechanic, these sounds

    hold a wealth of information about t he

    mechanics of the engine hidden behind

    the casing.

    Tough many of our digital experiences

    lack the audio quality of the mechani-

    cal world, we rely on sonic feedback to

    successfully integrate these systems into

    our world. McKee explains:

    .without all the beeps and chimes,

    without sonic feedback, all of your

    modern conveniences would be very

    hard to use. If a device and its soundsare designed correctly, it creates a

    special theater of the mind that users

    completely buy into. Electronic things

    are made to feel mechanical. Its the

    feeling of movement, texture, and

    articulation where none exists.

  • 8/12/2019 UBIQ: Sound and Subversion

    20/78

    AVIARI UM

    TERRY ADKINS, B. 1953 WASHINGTON, DC D. 2014 BKLYN, NY

    ForAviarium, Adkins devised a sound-based installation that is entirely silent. Using

    aluminum rods and multiple sizes of stacked cymbals, he rendered wave rectors of

    birdsong in three dimensions, making visible the diverse sonic patterns inherent

    to the songs of each (unidentified) species. Cantilevered delicately overhead, these

    sculpted songs hover in place and answer the artists call to find a way to make music

    as physical as sculpture might be, and sculpture as ethereal as music is .

    Terry Adkins, Aviarium, 2014. Steel, brass, aluminum, and silver; dimensions variable (installation

    view, Whitney Museum of American Art, New York). Estate of Terry Adkins; courtesy of Salon 94,New York. Photograph by Bill Orcutt. Text adapted from show catalogue.

    FIND A WAY TO MAKE MUSIC

    AS PHYSICAL AS SCULPTURE

    MIGHT BE, AND SCULPTURE AS

    ETHEREAL AS MUSIC IS.

    TERRY ADKINS

  • 8/12/2019 UBIQ: Sound and Subversion

    21/78

    SOUND IS A LITTLE PIECE

    OF THE VIBRATING WORLD.

    JONATHAN STERNE

  • 8/12/2019 UBIQ: Sound and Subversion

    22/78

    JONATH AN S TERN ETHE AUDIBLE PAST: CULTURAL ORIGINS OF SOUND REPRODUCTION

    Generally, when writers invoke a binary coupling between culture and

    nature, it is with the idea that culture changes over time and nature is

    permanent, timeless, and unchanging. Te nature-culture binary offers

    a thin view of nature

    In the case of sound, the appeal to something static is also a trick of the

    language. We treat sound as a natura l phenomenon exterior to people,

    but its very definition is a nthropocentric. Te physiologist Johannes

    Mller wrote over years ago, that, wit hout the organ of hearing

    with its vital endowments, there would be no such thing as sound in

    the world, but merely vibrations.

    As Mller pointed out, our other sense can also perceive vibration.

    Sound is a very particular perception of vibrations. You can take the

    sound out of the human, but can take the human out of the sound only

    through an exercise in imagination. Sounds are defined as that class of

    vibrations perceived and, in a more exact sense, sympathetically pro-

    duced by the functioning ear when they travel through a medium that

    can convey changes in pressure (such as air). Te numbers for the range

    of human hearing (which absolutely do not matter for the purposes of

    this study) are twenty to twenty thousand cycles per second, although

    in practice most adults in industrial society cannot hear either end that

    range. We are thus presented with a choice in our definition: we can say

    either that sound is a class of vibration that might be heard or that it is

    a class of vibration that is heard, but, in either case, the hearing of the

    sound is what makes it.

    My point is that human beings reside at t he center of any meaningful

    definition of sound. When the hearing of other animals comes up, it is

    usually contrasted with human hearing (as in sounds that only a dog

    can hear). As par t of a larger physica l phenomenon of vibration, sound

    is a product of the human senses and not a thi ng in the world apart f rom

    humans. Sound is a little piece of the vibrating world.

    Adapted from John Sterne, The Audible Past(London: Duke University Press, 2003), 11.

    YOU CAN TAKE THE SOUND OUT

    OF THE HUMAN, BUT CAN TAKE

    THE HUMAN OUT OF THE SOUND

    ONLY THROUGH AN E XERCISE IN

    IMAGINATION.

  • 8/12/2019 UBIQ: Sound and Subversion

    23/78

    CONTENT BLACKOUT

    CONTENT

    BLACKOUT

  • 8/12/2019 UBIQ: Sound and Subversion

    24/78

    View from the original of fice of Content Blackou t, Bklyn, NY.

    Photo from personal records of Isaac Weinstein, taken on the occasion of signing the lease, 2009.

    Content Blackout began as a small tech startup based

    in Brooklyn, , from to . Tough most prominent

    for their social media application the Perfect Human Application,

    the company moonlighted as audio engineers and consultants

    for the performing arts venue Brooklyn Academy of Music.

    Tey were acquired by Klout in , and are currently con-

    tinuing their research and development on the Perfect Human

    Application as a subsidiary of the corporation.

  • 8/12/2019 UBIQ: Sound and Subversion

    25/78

    CONTENT BLACKOUT

    The original Content Blackout team: Jeremy Berger, Sam Heartfield, and Isaac Weinstein ( Lto R).

    THE STORY

    In , Isaac Weinstein, Sam Heartfield, and Jeremy Berger

    decided to turn their drunken laments into a profitable ven-

    ture. Te group had met during their freshman year at ,

    where all three studied sound engineering. After graduation,

    they founded Content Blackout, a small company devoted to

    creating new media tools that aimed to inject critical discourse

    into function. In , Klout saw the endeavors of Content

    Blackout as a potential threat to their social media application

    and in an attempt to thwart competition acquired the company.

    Isaac now works as senior engineer at Klouts Content Blackout

    group, but the other two men are nowhere to be found. It is as

    if they have fallen off the face of the traceable universe.

  • 8/12/2019 UBIQ: Sound and Subversion

    26/78

    CONTENT BLACKOUT

    The Perfect Human Application.

    THE PERFECT HUMAN APPLICATION

    Te Perfect Human Applicationis a social networking

    application that tracks and aggregates the quantity of user

    interactions made on smart devices and social media accounts

    in order to generate real-time statistical information on a users

    functioning, or perfection. Te application puts an emphasis

    on the quantification of information, behaviors, and interac-

    tions, thereby identifying a prevalent theme in contemporary

    media of emphasizing quantity over quality.

    Trough an algorithmically calculated Perfect Human Score,

    the application stresses the ease and importance of sharingand comparing these numbers with a greater community of

    users. Te numerical scoring allows a user to track his or her

    progress toward perfection, i.e., a greater (or lesser) quantity

    than yesterday, as well as metaphorically turning each user

    into a dynamic set of data. By assessing ideals of success

    and perfection as numbers, the application boasts that

    users dont just see how perfect they are, and how perfect

    they can become.

    What is believed to have driven the interest of Klout is the

    way the application divvied up user interactions into six

    distinct categories known as the Anatomy of Perfection.

    Each category represented a different grouping of online

    actions made by the user throughout a -hour period. Te

    Content Blackout team jokingly named these categories

    after the offl ine goals of their colleg iate friends. For example,

    Communication Skills: exting is the New Hugging was an

    aggregate of all the minutes users spent talking on their phone,

    as well as any text or voice mail they sent using their phone.

    Looks: Its Whats on the Outside that Counts measured the

    number of photos a user was posted in online, referencing the

    misleading belief that a flattering angle and good lighting can

    produce beauty. Te overall process reflec ted the offl ine impor-tance of the networking and interviewing skills the creators

    and their peers needed to hone as recent college alums.

  • 8/12/2019 UBIQ: Sound and Subversion

    27/78

    SOUND AND SUBVERSION

    Inspired by Jorgen Leths short film Te Perfect Human,

    the App is a facetious comment on the ritual of coping with

    societal ideals in constructing images of self-worth in a land-

    scape evermore drastically shaped by digital media. It reveals

    an ideal user whose focus is on quantity not quality, on scoring

    rather than experiencing, thereby conflating companionship

    and solitude. Te Perfect Human Applicationuser in an at-

    tempt to understand herself relative to others, in an attempt

    to define her identity in society focuses only on the numbers,

    in particular, her score. Te application mocks our pleasure as

    we receive more and more comfort from the number of friends

    we collect and curate on Facebook and other social media sites.

    Photo of Perfect Human Applicationbrochures, Septa Car, Philadelphia, PA.

    Te

    PERFEC

    HUMANAN APP FOR YOUR

    Publicity materials for the Perfect Human A

  • 8/12/2019 UBIQ: Sound and Subversion

    28/78

    CONTENT BLACKOUT

    Video still from Loser Synd rome, Weeping iPhone.

    THE WEEPING IPHONE

    When Content Blackout was acquired by Klout in , they

    had just begun to prototype the Weeping iPhone, a series of vid-

    eo alerts that would update users of their poor scoring. After

    much user testing of the Perfect Human Application, it became

    clear that users were put off by the complex matrix of scoring

    (presented through a series of pie charts and graphs). Had it

    been released, theWeeping iPhonewould have been a notifica-

    tion system consisting of -second animations triggered by

    extreme scores from the Perfect Human Application.

    According to Weinst ein in a interview in Wi red magazine,In an era when we expect our smartphones to take responsibil-

    ity for so much of our responsibilities, why should users have to

    check the application to retrieve their results? So the Content

    Blackout crew decided to let the smartphone be responsible for

    monitoring and updating users of their ever-changing scores.

    Tough this update never reached the public, it both embraced

    and mocked our fear of expressing emotional vulnerability. We

    expect too much from our iPhones, it suggests. Can we really

    expect them to take on the role of identifying and expressing

    emotion? Especially when we ourselves have such a hard time

    with that task?

    Characterized by their disruptive nature, the Weeping iPhone

    notification videos were intended to interrupt the users

    ability to use his or her phone. For example, if a users Perfect

    Human Score dropped below the th percentile, the phone

    would assume its user was feeling imperfect, unloved, and

    worthless: like a loser. It would automatically play a -second

    video in which a womans voice tauntingly chanted: Loser,

    loooooser, who do you think you are? You are nothing but one

    big fat loser. Meanwhile a collection of Apple x-in-a-bubble

    icons would accumulate in mounting piles at the bottom of

    the screen. If low scores persisted over several days, the phonewould take on the burden of expressing the depression caused

  • 8/12/2019 UBIQ: Sound and Subversion

    29/78

    CONTENT BLACKOUT

    IN AN ERA WHEN WE

    HOLD OUR SMARTPHONES

    ACCOUNTABLE FOR SO MANY

    OF OUR RESPONSIBILITIES, WHY

    SHOULD USERS HAVE TO CHECK

    THE APPLICATION TO RETRIEVE

    THEIR RESULTS?ISAAC WEINSTEIN

    by the isolation of imperfection. No longer able to function

    normally, the phone would play the sound of a human wail in

    tandem with adjusting its brightness, as if sending out an

    to its (hopefully nearby) owner.

    If triggered, these videos would have to play through to

    completion, thereby imposing on the surrounding environ-

    ment the emotional distress coming out of the machine, most

    likely to the dismay and embarrassment of its owner. On the

    surface, the Weeping iPhoneturned the phone into an object

    with needs, prompting the owner to attend to it and to his or

    her perfection. On a deeper level, the Weeping iPhonesshort

    videos ridiculed the fervency with which we attend to our cellphones, and the reliance that ensues.

  • 8/12/2019 UBIQ: Sound and Subversion

    30/78

    CONTENT BLACKOUT

    Omar Cuniga, Shruti Ganguly, James Franco, UBIQ, and Alexis Gambis, at Tar after-party in NYC, August 5, 2013.

    THE AFTERMATH

    In retrospect, it is clear that the ventures of Content Blackout

    into new media technologies were meant to mock our social

    entanglement with the digital. Ideally, the Perfect Human

    Application, with its complex matrix of scoring, would encour-

    age users to critically consider the importance they gave their

    iPhone and the interactions and relationships it enabled. Te

    Weeping iPhonealerts would have literally interrupted and pre-

    vented phone use by poor-scoring users, driving the recipients

    of the alerts to turn away from their devices, whether by rolling

    their eyes or shamefully laughing, as they were forced to wait

    for their wailing devices to quiet themselves. Smartphoneshave unexpectedly finagled their way into the most personal

    and intimate moments of our lives. Tese videos, in conjunc-

    tion with the , rather ridiculously suggest that if we have

    given away so many of our parameters of self-worth to social

    media and our connected actions, we may as well give over our

    ability to express our most vulnerable emotional states as well.

    oday, Isaac manages the Content Blackout eam at Klout, but

    Jeremy and Sam have disappeared; they seem to have fallen

    off the face of the traceable both connected and disconnect-

    ed universe. Tough many believe they moved to Vietnam to

    live well off their profits from the buyout by Klout, the popular

    mythology is that they have collectively become an anonymous

    sound artist called : Te Robin Hood of Sound. In popu-

    lar vernacular, , short for ubiquitous, is referred to as a

    singular male. He has been known to appear as a masked at

    late night raves alongside the likes of James Franco. He posts

    documentations of his public sound interventions, known as

    Soundings, on his website. Because his identity remains un-

    known and his performances always occur unannounced, he is

    often likened to street artist Banksy.

  • 8/12/2019 UBIQ: Sound and Subversion

    31/78

    UBIQ

    UBIQ

  • 8/12/2019 UBIQ: Sound and Subversion

    32/78

    CRITERIA FORA SUCCESSFULSOUNDINGACCORDING TO UBIQ

  • 8/12/2019 UBIQ: Sound and Subversion

    33/78

    DISPLACEtheFUNCTION

    Te sounds of our new media technologies are heard

    not as music but as alerts for the functions they imply.

    Each Sounding must shake free or loosen the featured

    ringtone or familiar sound-symbol from its preexisting

    autonomous reading carried by its recognizable melody.

    By transforming the context through which we

    encounter these sounds, their original meaning and

    their implied function are displaced.

    HARMONIZEwithFORM

    When a ringtone is distanced from its existing

    meaning, the experience of the Sounding offers an

    antithetical reading of the sounds original function.

    Te sound is no longer a service of technology; instead

    it exists as a corporal embodiment of media as form.

    Te co-existence of these readings, sound-as-function

    and sound-as-form, gives the audience the ability to

    harmonize these two meanings as they see fit.

  • 8/12/2019 UBIQ: Sound and Subversion

    34/78

    EMPOWERtheUSER

    As bystanders a nd audience members assume t he role of

    critical listeners, they become empowered. Tey are not passive

    onlookers, but reflective and active individuals. By hearing

    these sounds in the new light offered to them by the Sound-

    ing (whether as music or as a metaphor of our relationships

    with our new media devices) they become engaged in a critical

    dialogue. Tey are reminded of their own agency in how they

    choose to interpret the world.

  • 8/12/2019 UBIQ: Sound and Subversion

    35/78

    PUBLIC SOUNDINGS

    PUBLIC

    SOUNDING

  • 8/12/2019 UBIQ: Sound and Subversion

    36/78

    Is there such a thing as silence?

    Even if I get away from people, do

    I still have to listen to something?

    Say Im off in the woods, do I have

    to listen to a stream babbling?

    Is there always something to hear,

    never any peace and quiet?

    If my head is full of harmony, melody,

    and rhythm, what happens to me whenthe telephone rings, to my piece [sic]

    and quiet, I mean?

    Are we getting anywhere asking questions?

    Where are we going?

    JOHN CAGE SILENCE

    WHEREVER WE ARE, WHAT WE HEAR IS MOSTLY

    NOISE. WHEN WE IGNORE IT, IT DISTURBS US. WHEN

    WE LISTEN TO IT, WE FIND IT FASCINATING.

    JOHN C AGE

    s Public Soundings, documented in the following

    pages, can be seen in two distinct lights. First, the Soundings

    comment on the absurdity of our intimacy with our personal

    technologies, especially the Apple iPhone. By using Apple retail

    stores as his performance venues, subverts and undercuts

    Apple as a corporation, as well as our almo st religious fer vency

    for their products.

    Second, optimists and humanists, who receive his work with

    joy and wonder, experience t hese Soundings as e xamples of

    the beauty that new technology can bring into our lives. Spon-

    taneous and loud, they offer viewers a rare chance to hear the

    sounds of their devices in a different context one that inter-

    rupts the group at large and entices individuals to be silent,

    to listen together.

    is asking us to recognize and accept these sounds as

    symbols of our growing e`ntwinement with technology. He is

    urging us to pause together, as group alongside machine, to

    listen, and celebrate, and consider how we can better harmo-

    nize with our devices.

    Further, he wants us to assess our agent role in the modern

    soundscape. Our cell phones, whether they vibrate or ring,

    create a chaotic, unregulated, and novel chorus from our pock-

    ets and purses and the palms of our hands. Tis is a brand new

    sound infrastructure, created solely by us and for us. In keeping

    with John Cage, let us hear it as fascinating.

  • 8/12/2019 UBIQ: Sound and Subversion

    37/78

    THE APPLE BOMBER

  • 8/12/2019 UBIQ: Sound and Subversion

    38/78

    PUBLIC SOUNDINGS

    SHERWOODFOREST

    Sherwood Forest, a royal forest in Nottinghamshire, England, is the legendary

    home of heroic outlaw Robin Hood and his band of Merry Men. It is also the name

    of a ringtone in Apples iPhone operating system one UBIQ uses often in his

    Public Soundings.

    , though known as the Robin Hood of Sound, is also

    referred to as the Apple Bomber, because of his works

    involving the Apple retail stores.

    His first attack happened in December , during the

    Christmas rush at Bostons Boylston Street Apple retail store.

    Trough unknown measures, he was able to gain control of the

    stores speaker system for seconds and played the Apple

    ringtone Sherwood Forest three times in a row.

    At the time, t he event was met with security concerns, but

    over the years s Soundings his short concerts using

    Apple store speakers and the pre-made sou nds from the

    iPhone have increased in frequency. He has proven himself

    to be a globetrotter, with impromptu Soundings in major cities

    including New York, Berlin, and Paris, as well as in suburban

    malls in the middle of Iowa and Kansas. It is generally consid-

    ered good luck to be present during one of his Soundings.

  • 8/12/2019 UBIQ: Sound and Subversion

    39/78

  • 8/12/2019 UBIQ: Sound and Subversion

    40/78

    UNITED STATES

    BOYLSTON STREET

    Boylston St,

    Boston,

    BRIDGE STREET

    Te Bridge St,Huntsville,

    BILTMORE

    E. Camelback Rd,

    Phoenix,

    COUNTRY CLUB PLAZA

    4712 Broadway St,

    Kansas City, MO 64112

    FIFTH AVENUE

    Fifth Ave,New York,

    GRAND CENTRAL

    Grand Central rmnl,

    New York,

    JORDAN CREEK

    Jordan Creek Pkwy,

    W. Des Moines,

    SAN FRANCISCO

    One Stockton St,San Francisco,

    THE FORUM SHOPS

    Las Vegas Blvd S,

    Caesars PalaceLas Vegas,

    INTERNATIONAL

    KURFRSTENDAMM

    Kurfrstendamm ,

    Berlin

    CARROUSEL DU LOUVRE

    rue de Rivoli,

    Paris

    SITES OF REPORTED APPLE BOMBINGS

  • 8/12/2019 UBIQ: Sound and Subversion

    41/78

    BLACK FRIDAY

  • 8/12/2019 UBIQ: Sound and Subversion

    42/78

    PUBLIC SOUNDINGS

    Fight between two shoppers Franklin Mills Mall, Philadelphia PA, 2013.

    Black Friday refers to the Friday following Tanksgiving,

    which falls on the fourth Tursday of November. Tough not

    a national holiday, Black Friday is known as one of the busiest

    shopping days of year and considered the commencement

    of the Christmas shopping season. Te day is a testament to

    American c onsumer societ y, notorious for major discounts

    and price-slashing, drawing shoppers to line up in front of

    stores and malls hours before they open. Te infamously

    raucous and vicious nature of Black Friday shoppers was

    mocked in Season of South Park. Devoting three consecu-

    tive episodesto the topic in the fall of , rey Parker

    likened consumers fervor and brand loyalty to the factions

    in the series Game of Trones.

    s choice of the South Philadelphia Wal-Mart is no coinci-

    dence. Coined in an article about worker absenteeism in ,

    the term Black Friday came to refer specifically to the shopping

    rush and heavy pedestrian and vehicul ar traffi c in Philadelphia.

    In an email to the American Dialect Society, Bonnie aylor-

    Blake cited a article that stated:

    For downtown merchants throughout the nation, the biggest

    shopping days normally are the two following Tanksgiving Day.

    Resulting traffi c jams are an irksome problem to the police and, in

    Philadelphia, it became customar y for offi cers to refer to the post-

    Tanksgiving days as Black Friday and Black Saturday.

    Philadelphia cops, who were required to work -hour

    Black Friday shifts, picked up the term and popularized it.

    Ben Zimmer, language columnist for the Wall Street Jour-

    nal, reported that Philadelphia merchants disliked the title

    and tried to enforce the more positive term, Big Friday, in

    an attempt to encourage consumerism. But the darker term

    persisted and spread. Zimmer noted that shops and advertis-

    ers, somewhat successfully, rebranded the title by introducing

    campaigns using black to refer to retail profits, and referenced

    the Back to Black campaign of the s.

    1 Black FrSong of A

    Fire, and

    and DragPark,Seas

    2013.

    2 Friday a

    ThanksgivM.J. Mu

    to Good

    Relations

    ExecutiveManagem

    Maintena

    Nov 1951cited by B

    Taylor-Bla

    to AmericSociety,4

    3Ben Zimm

    Origins of B

    25 Nov 20

  • 8/12/2019 UBIQ: Sound and Subversion

    43/78

    Footage aired onFox Philly, Oct 29, 2013

    ACK FRIDAY SOUNDING

    ber 29, 2013, Wal-Mart Supercenter

    S. Christopher Columbus Blvd

    delphia, PA 19148

  • 8/12/2019 UBIQ: Sound and Subversion

    44/78

    Te term Black Friday came

    out of the old Philadelphia Police

    Departments traffi c squad. Te

    cops used it to describe the worst

    traffi c jams which annually occur red

    in Center City on the Friday after

    Tanksgiving.

    It was the day that Santa Claus took

    his chair in the department stores

    and every kid in the city wanted to

    see him. It was the first day of the

    Christmas shopping season.

    Schools were closed. Late in the day,

    out-of-town visitors began arriving

    for the Army-Navy football game.

    Every Black Friday, no traffi c

    policeman was permitted to take the

    day off. Te division was placed on

    tours of duty, and even the police

    band was ordered to Center Cit y.

    It was not unusual to see a trombone

    player directing t raffi c.

    wo offi cers were as signe d to

    intersections along Market Street

    to control the throngs of pedestrians.

    Te department also placed police

    offi cers outside parking garages

    because the lot filled signs failed

    to deter motorists from lining up on

    the curb lane outside the garage. Tis

    reduced street size from two lanes

    to one. Tis caused traffi c to back up

    and block traffi c at the next i ntersec-

    tion. Tis caused massive gridlock.

    In , the old Evening Bulletin

    assigned me to police administration,

    working out of City Hall. Nathan

    Kleger was the police reporter who

    covered Center City for the Bulletin.

    THIS FRIDAY WAS BLACK WITH TRAFFIC

    Joseph P. BarrettPhiladelphia Inquirer,Nov 25, 1994

    e from Shopping Madness: 5 iOS Apps to Help You Survive Black Friday, mactrast.com, 2012.

    In the early s, Kleger and I

    put together a front-page story for

    Tanksgiving and we appropriated

    the police term Black Friday to de-

    scribe the terrible traffi c conditions.

    Center City merchants complained

    loudly to Police Commissioner

    Albert N. Brown that drawing at-

    tention to traffi c deterred custom-

    ers from coming downtown. I was

    worried that maybe Kleger and I had

    made a mistake in using such a term,

    so I went to Chief Inspector Albert

    rimmer to get him to verify it.

    rimmer, tongue in cheek, would

    say only that Black Friday was used

    to describe the Valentines Day

    massacre of mobsters in Chicago.

    Te following year, Brown put out

    a press release describing the day

    as Big Friday. But Kleger and I held

    our ground, and once more said it

    was Black Friday. And of course

    we used it year after year. Ten

    television picked it up.

    oday the term seems lost in

    antiquity, but it was a traffi c cop

    who started it, the guy who directed

    traffi c with a semaphore while stand-

    ing on a small wooden platform, in

    the days before traffi c lights. But

    that was a long time ago.

    Reprinted from philly.com.

  • 8/12/2019 UBIQ: Sound and Subversion

    45/78

    CROSS WALK

  • 8/12/2019 UBIQ: Sound and Subversion

    46/78

    ORIGINAL INTERVENTION

    Monday, April , , - am

    Footage uploaded to youtube.com by geographyuberalles.

    Te pedestrian footage documents s intervention at

    the crossing from Seventh to Eighth Avenue on West rd

    Street in Manhattan. For five hours during the Monday rush,

    he gained control of the existing sound structure that beeps

    to indicate pedestrian crossing, and played the sound of adial-up modem instead.

    echnicians and authorities arrived at the scene around

    : am, and despite their best efforts, could not disable the

    sound. Te following day, formally apologized via his

    Vimeo channel for any disservice he had caused to the

    hearing-impaired.

  • 8/12/2019 UBIQ: Sound and Subversion

    47/78

    All images taken from footage uploaded to UBIQs vimeo channel: https://vimeo.com/85220672.

    UBIQ REPLACED THE

    CROSSWALK BEEP

    WITH SOUND FROM

    A DIAL-UP MODEM.

    THE NEW YORKERS

    SEEM UNAMUSED.

  • 8/12/2019 UBIQ: Sound and Subversion

    48/78

    AN INTERMISSIONSOUND AND SUBVERSION

    AN

    INTERMISSIO

  • 8/12/2019 UBIQ: Sound and Subversion

    49/78

  • 8/12/2019 UBIQ: Sound and Subversion

    50/78

  • 8/12/2019 UBIQ: Sound and Subversion

    51/78

  • 8/12/2019 UBIQ: Sound and Subversion

    52/78

  • 8/12/2019 UBIQ: Sound and Subversion

    53/78

  • 8/12/2019 UBIQ: Sound and Subversion

    54/78

  • 8/12/2019 UBIQ: Sound and Subversion

    55/78

  • 8/12/2019 UBIQ: Sound and Subversion

    56/78

    PRIVATE SOUNDINGSSOUND AND SUBVERSION

    PRIVATE

    SOUNDING

  • 8/12/2019 UBIQ: Sound and Subversion

    57/78

    SOUND AND SUBVERSION

    User testing with UBIQ, 2013.

    Once I was visiting my Aunt Marge.

    She was doing her laundry.

    She turned to me and said,

    You know? I love this machine

    much more than I do your Uncle Walter.

    JOHN CAGE SILENCE

    1Stei

    The

    Pol

    Car

    Mag

    201

    oday, we live in a world where our online interactions are

    reproduced for purposes we never intended. Modern computa-

    tional advancements that allow increasingly large sets of data

    to be quickly processed and analyzed have transformed our

    most mundane decisions and everyday clicks into priceless

    (or very valuable, depending on where you stand) data.

    ake, for example, the media-streaming epicenter Netflix. In

    his recentNew York imes Magazinearticle, Te Post-Hope Poli-

    tics of House of Cards,Adam Steinbergh wrote,

    Netflix knows a lot about what you watch. Not just generally, but in

    a granular, data-driven, clicks-and-duration-of-viewing time way.

    It knows what everyone on Netflix watches, and how much theywatch it, and how all of this might translate into what people want

    to watch next.

    Te key here is that Netflix not only collects all this data,

    but through its specialized algorithms knows how to turn

    our information (number after number) into something truly

    valuable (in this case, the series House of Cards).

    As users, our usa ge is used in the ser vice of the success of

    the corporation. Tough many frame this as a problem of free

    labor, a symptom of the digital economy, wants us to per-

    ceive our role not solely as used user, but as agent user. Trough

    awareness, users have the ability to question and influence this

    power dynamic. Within the privacy of our own homes, when

    we commune with our personal mobile devices, we must be

    aware and willing participants in this economic relationship.

    If not, he asks, how else can we move forward with the hope

    of harmonizing?

    In his Private Soundings, the gallery pieces iHearand iones,

    aims to redefine our relationships with the sounds of

    our ringtones and alerts. Both pieces utilize participant-based

    gestural interactive systems which transform the familiar

    sounds of the iPhone by manipulating their pitch and frequen-

    cy. Giving these iconic noises yet another context, asks a

    user to hear them differently, not with their cultural meaning,

  • 8/12/2019 UBIQ: Sound and Subversion

    58/78

  • 8/12/2019 UBIQ: Sound and Subversion

    59/78

    iTONES

  • 8/12/2019 UBIQ: Sound and Subversion

    60/78

    PRIVATE SOUNDINGS

    iones is an interactive gallery piece that transforms a user,

    and her smartphone, into a musical instrument. A user is con-

    fronted with a minimal set up: a simple black set of earphones

    hanging on the wall next to a repurposed iPhone armband. A

    drawing, done directly on the gallery wall and labeled iones,

    demonstrates how the piece is worn.

    Te user is required to use her own personal smartphone,

    which she inserts in the wristband and plugs into the ear-

    phones. At the moment of plugging in, the user initiates code

    on a hidden chip in the headphones, which discovers the pre-

    assigned sound she has set on her smartphone. Te earphones,

    however, are not wired to the audio-jack of the smartphone;instead they connect wirelessly via bluetooth to a Macbook

    Pro (mid-) hidden in the gallery. Te gestures of connect-

    ing the phone into the earphones, the act of plugging in, and

    putting on the earphones are together an important initiation

    into the experience. Te act of plugging in imitates the inser-

    tion of an or a lifeline, yet simultaneously suggests the

    injection of intravenous drugs, a gesture of escape, denial, and

    self-destruction. Tough the act of hooking up references users

    reliance on their smartphones, it also enables them to give the

    sounds of their personal data a new, audible life.

    iTones, Tower Gallery, 2014.

  • 8/12/2019 UBIQ: Sound and Subversion

    61/78

    PRIVATE SOUNDINGS

    iTones, Tower Gallery, 2014.

  • 8/12/2019 UBIQ: Sound and Subversion

    62/78

    iTones, Tower Gallery, 2014.

  • 8/12/2019 UBIQ: Sound and Subversion

    63/78

    PRIVATE SOUNDINGS

    THE ORIGINALTe Personal Instrument,

    As the shows curat or, I approached with a proposa l to

    update TePersonal Instrument(), an early piece by Polish-

    born artist Krzysztof Wodiczko. Tis interactive, wearable

    artwork addresses the faade of freedom of speech in the state

    socialism of Poland during the s. In his piece, the sound

    of public space becomes the contested ground where citizens

    and government metaphorically negotiate freedom.

    His Personal Instrumentwas the first in a series of public inter-

    ventions that aimed to metaphorically define the situation

    of a human being as citizen in a totally controlled environ-

    ment a public space dominated by a repressive Polish

    state. As a young industrial designer, Wodiczko found himself

    making mass-media products to broadcast propaganda for

    the government. In response, he wanted to create a critical

    and ironic dialogue with a real and monstrous designer the

    communist state itself who was in total control of the entire

    society and treated it as a single work of art or design.For

    Wodiczko, TePersonal Instrumentwas an articulation of the

    boundaries of freedom and of the ways of practicing it, as well

    as of the individual Polish citizens reserves of power in relation

    to the use of space. His goal was to articulate the voicelessness

    of the citizen who was forced to listen to repressive state direc-

    tives, but unable to make himself heard:

    Under the conditions of life in existing public space, democracy is

    the practice of making oneself heard (instead of passively listening

    to someone elses voice) How is one to treat such a c rowded space

    as an instrument of democracy when this instrument is not in our

    hands and when public space is barricaded and sealed off by the

    colossal bodies of the great speakers (demagogues), ringing with

    the choirs of advertisements, and occupied by armies of heroic

    memorials?

    Wodiczkos Personal Instrument was an otherworldly costume.

    Te headpiece consisted of an oversized pair of metallic head-

    phones and a microphone, perched on the forehead in lieu of

    1 Wo

    A

    M

    C(C

    M

    p.

    2 W

    Kr

    Th

    InC

    p.

    3 WKr

    A

    M

    Cp.

    The Personal Instrument, Krysztof Wodiczko, 1969

  • 8/12/2019 UBIQ: Sound and Subversion

    64/78

    PRIVATE SOUNDINGSSOUND AND SUBVERSION

    a third eye. Tis bizarre contraption was wired to a simple pair

    of black gloves, with discrete photocells sewn into them. Te

    microphone captured the ambient noises of public space an

    outdoor plaza, park, or busy street. Tose sounds were filtered

    through the photocells in the gloves the left hand control-

    ling a high-pitch filter, the right hand a low-pitch filter, so by

    waving both hands the wearer could create a glissando sound

    effect. Te transformed noises returned to the helmet, playing

    in the private space of the wearers enormous headphones.

    A description from states th at the instr ument is for

    the exclusive use of the artist who created it.Te images of

    Wodiczko wearing the costume in public, altering the ambientsounds of public space or making artwork out of the art of

    listening depict a man embodying the haunting silence of

    the citizen. According to Wodiczko, Te Personal Instrument

    relies on a socially active environment it needs a passerby

    to observe its silence. Yet that same bystander is also witness

    to a public-private exaltation of the citizens freedom. It is

    an art of private countercensorship. By performing in public,

    Wodiczko fought censorship through his ability to orchestrate

    the contested sounds of public space privately. As he explained:

    I am an artist in the listening, not in the speaking, and though

    I do not have the right to say what I really want to say let me at

    least be allowed to listen to what I want to hear

    On one hand, the citizen, represented by Wodiczko as wearer

    or performer, is emancipated as free to listen. However, the

    silence of the performance exposes the inability of this same

    citizen to be heard. So in an elegant double-entendre, Wodicz-

    ko empowers the citizen by revealing his situation as controlled

    by the state.

    Te piece is an expression of the need to challenge a repressive

    sociopolitical situation. Te metaphor of turning the noise and

    chatter of everyday life into a private chorus for the wearersenjoyment is inspirational. However, at its heart, Te Personal

    Instrumentis a piece of critical reflection necessary in only the

    most dire of circumstances. oday, in the new digital spaces of

    our dynamic media society, we can find ourselves in a situation

    of similar duress.

    and I agreed that TePersonal Instrument needed to

    be updated to reflect this new power struggle, not between

    government and citizen, but between algorithm and user as

    reproducer. In our version, the sounds of public space, which

    represent freedom, are replaced with the pre-programmed cell

    phone ringtone of a user, to represent the users personal data

    repurposed by the algorithmic systems of dataveillance for

    ulterior means. Just as Wodiczko revealed the dominated citi-zen by empowering him as a conductor of the sounds of public

    space, our update, iones, reveals the user as a used user, by al-

    lowing her to transform her ringtone through gesture. Te goal

    is to offer users of ionesa means to metaphorically negotiate

    agency in the face of algorithmic control.

    4 Wodiczko,

    Krzysztof,

    The PersonalInstrument,

    Critical Vehicles,

    p 102.

    5 Wodiczko,Krzysztof, A

    Response to Maria

    Morzuch, CriticalVehicles, p 142.

    iTones, user testing in Tower Gallery, 2014.

  • 8/12/2019 UBIQ: Sound and Subversion

    65/78

    AMBIENT NOISES FROM PUBLIC SPACE = METAPHOR FOR FREEDOM

    THE INSTRUMENT EMPOWERS DOMINATED CITIZEN

    GOVERNMENT

    CITIZEN

    PERSONAL RINGTONE FROM MOBILE DEVICE = METAPHOR FOR FREEDOM

    TRANSFORMED TONES EMPOWER USED USER

    ALGORITHM

    USER

    SOUND AND LIGHT FROM OUTSPACE

    PHOTORECEIVER PHOTORECEIVERMICROPHONE

    FILTERS

    EARPHONES

    ARTIST

    Original description published as Instrument Osobisty/Personal Instrument, in Autoportret/Self-Portrait, exhibitioncatalogue (Warsaw: Galeria Foksal, 1973).

    The instrument transforms the sounds of the environment.

    The instrument functions in response to hand movements.

    The instrument reacts to sunlight.

    The instrument is portable.The instrument can be used in any place and in any time.

    The instrument is for the exclusive use of the artist who created it.

    The instrument permits him to attain virtuosity.

    PERSONAL DATA FROM INFRASTRUCTURE

    OF ALGORITHMIC CONTROL

    RINGTONE GESTUREGESTURE

    FILTERS

    EARPHONES

    USER

    The instrument transforms the sounds of the users personaliz

    The instrument functions in response to hand movements.

    The instrument can be used in the gallery.

    The instrument is for smartphone users, exclusively.The instrument permits users to attain virtuosity.

    Compatible with iPhone 4, 4s, 5, 5s, and Samsung Galaxy S4, S

    THEPERSONALINSTRUMENTKrzysztof Wodiczko,

    iTONES and Sofie Elana Hodara,

  • 8/12/2019 UBIQ: Sound and Subversion

    66/78

    SOUND AND SUBVERSION

    I AM AN ARTIST IN THE LISTENING,

    NOT IN THE SPEAKING, AND THOUGH

    I DO NOT HAVE THE RIGHT TO SAY

    WHAT I REALLY WANT TO SAY

    LET ME AT LEAST BE ALLOWED TO

    LISTEN TO WHAT I WANT TO HEAR.

    KRZYSZTOF WODICZKO

  • 8/12/2019 UBIQ: Sound and Subversion

    67/78

    iHEAR

    iHear, Nave Gallery, 2014.

  • 8/12/2019 UBIQ: Sound and Subversion

    68/78

    AS TECHNOLOGICAL INNOVATIONS ARE

    INTEGRATED INTO SOCIETY IN EVER MORE

    FRUITFUL WAYS, OUR RELATIONSHIPS

    WITH OUR MOBILE DEVICES HAVE

    BECOME EVER MORE INTIMATE.

    OUR PHONES HAVE BECOME LIKE SHINY

    NEW APPENDAGES, BUT LIKE THE ITCH

    OF A PHANTOM LIMB, THE RECOGNIZABLE

    SOUNDS AND VIBRATIONS OF OUR MOBILE

    PHONES EXERT A POWER OVER US FROM

    OUR POCKETS AND PURSES.

    UBIQ

  • 8/12/2019 UBIQ: Sound and Subversion

    69/78

  • 8/12/2019 UBIQ: Sound and Subversion

    70/78

    PRIVATE SOUNDINGS

    A small elect ronic instru ment resembling a therem in, iHear

    plays cell phone ringtones in order to highlight the pervasive-

    ness of our mobile technologies and the familiar sounds they

    produce. By interacting with iHear, in the gallery setting, the

    user manipulates the frequency of ubiquitous and iconic cell

    phone ringtones. By playing the little black box, the audience

    can transforming these nagging musical melodies into some-

    thing different something, perhaps, resembling music.

    iHear, Cyber Arts Gallery, 2014.

  • 8/12/2019 UBIQ: Sound and Subversion

    71/78

    LEARNING TO RE-HEARa note from the curator

    What makesiHearsuch a profound experience, is that the piece,

    in its innocence, asks its users: isnt it you who is supposed to be

    in charge?

    Despite being a printmaker and painter, I came to Boston to

    respond to questions about how our new technologies and our

    subsequent constant connectivity to both others and informa-

    tion are shaping the texture of our lives. When I met UBIQ, on an

    overnight in Brooklyn, I was stirred by iHear by the simplicity of

    putting our ringtones, which are literally at our fingertips, on public

    display. I couldnt stop thinking about the piece, then called the

    Mobile Music Box, and I featured it in my spring keynote at the

    Dynamic Media Institute.

    I returned to UBIQs studio to discuss the potency of mobile

    melodies, as UBIQ calls them. Though we spoke about these

    melodies as annoying and often unwanted interruptions, UBIQ

    always seemed more interested in them as catalysts for intimacy.

    He spoke about the personal connection we develop with these

    sounds when we set them to specific contacts