tutorial irradiation embrittlement and life management of rpvs
TRANSCRIPT
Znojmo (CZ) 18 October 2010
TutorialIrradiation Embrittlement and
Life Management of RPVs
Structural Integrity IssuesF. Gillemot
http://capture.jrc.ec.europa.eu
Znojmo (CZ) 18 October 2010
What is structural integrity?
No answer in the WEB or in other documents!
Safe operation of passive components in normal andnon-normal conditions. The structural integrity meansthat the sructure, or component not only safe, butsurvives the service and environmetal effects withoutany serious damage.
Structural Integrity Issues
http://capture.jrc.ec.europa.eu
Znojmo (CZ) 18 October 2010
Passive components
Passive components: all pressurized or loadedstructures
Examples:Reactor Pressure Vessel Steam generator PressurizerHouse of main coolant pump PipesCrane structures etc.
Structural Integrity Issues
http://capture.jrc.ec.europa.eu
Znojmo (CZ) 18 October 2010
b
Structural Integrity Issues
Safety – whats that?
Safety means protection of the environment and populations from radioactivecontamination, or from other harness
The deteministic safety assessment methodology uses a technique in with adefence in depth assessment assure success in each level of the defence.Design/safety limits are specified for each level of defence.
The probabilistic safety assessment uses a methodology to calculate the risk offailure, and determines the acceptable risk level. No 100% safety, too high safetyrequirements are damaging the society. Very high responsibility for the engineers.
http://capture.jrc.ec.europa.eu
Znojmo (CZ) 18 October 2010
Structural Integrity Issues
Structures, systems components(SSC) integrity
http://capture.jrc.ec.europa.eu
Znojmo (CZ) 18 October 2010
Structural Integrity Issues
IAEA Safety Standards and Guidelines on PLiM and AM
ProgrammaticGuidelines
ComponentSpecificGuidelines(13)
AMPReviewguideline
SGonAMP
SafetyGuideon PSR
Safety of NPPDesign NS R-1
RPV and PLiM
SafetyGuideon MSI
Safety Guideon PersonalQualification
Human AgeingGuideline
NENPNSNI
SafetyRequirement
Safety Guide
Tech.Guidelines
http://capture.jrc.ec.europa.eu
Znojmo (CZ) 18 October 2010
Steam generators (TECDOC-981)Concrete containment buildings (TECDOC-1025) PWR pressure vessels (TECDOC-1120) PWR vessel internals (TECDOC-1119)Metal components of BWR containment (TECDOC-
1181) In-containment I&C Cables (TECDOC-1188) Volume
I In-containment I&C Cables (TECDOC-1188) Volume
II PWR primary piping (TECDOC-1361) BWR Reactor Pressure Vessel (TECDOC-1470) BWR Rector Pressure Vessel Internals (TECDOC-
1471)
Structural Integrity Issues
http://capture.jrc.ec.europa.eu
Znojmo (CZ) 18 October 2010
Structural Integrity Issues
Operating time
Ageing effects
50% failureprobability
Design safetylevel
Operatingstrategy I
Operating strategy II Operating strategy III
Safe operatinglife I
Safe operatinglife II
http://capture.jrc.ec.europa.eu
Znojmo (CZ) 18 October 2010
Structural Integrity Issues
Ageing mechanism
- Radiation embrittlement- Thermal embrittlement- General corrosion- Stress corrosion cracking- Pitting corrosion- Irradiation assissted corrosion- Hidrogen embrittlement- Liquid metal embrittlement- Wear- Fatigue and low-cycle fatigue- Creep- High temperature rupture- Errosion- Etc...
http://capture.jrc.ec.europa.eu
Znojmo (CZ) 18 October 2010
Event selection (PSA Probabilistic Safety analyses)
Structural Integrity Issues
High pressure, safety valveopen
Safety valve mailfunction,coolant pressure drop
Reactor stop, emergency corecoolant pumps operating
Rapid cooling
PTS
Safety valve closed,normal shut down
Failureprobability isbelow of the
acceptance level
Structural integrityassessment
Probability isbelow of the
acceptance level
No integrity
Event tree
http://capture.jrc.ec.europa.eu
Znojmo (CZ) 18 October 2010
Structural Integrity Issues
Failure Analysis
Failure of a component indicates it has become completely orpartially unusable or has deteriorated to the point that it is
undependable or unsafe for normal sustained service.
Typical Root Cause Failure Mechanisms
1. Fatigue failures
2. Corrosion failures
3. Stress corrosion cracking
4. Ductile and brittle fractures
5. Hydrogen embrittlement
6. Liquid metal embrittlement
7. Creep and stress rupture
http://capture.jrc.ec.europa.eu
Znojmo (CZ) 18 October 2010
Structural Integrity Issues
Fatigue Failures
Metal fatigue is caused by repeatedcycling of of the load. It is aprogressive localized damage due tofluctuating stresses and strains onthe material. Metal fatigue cracksinitiate and propagate in regionswhere the strain is most severe.
The process of fatigue consists ofthree stages:
Initial crack initiation Progressive crack growth
across the part Final sudden fracture of the
remaining cross section
Schematic of S-N Curve, showingincrease in fatigue life withdecreasing stresses.
http://capture.jrc.ec.europa.eu
Znojmo (CZ) 18 October 2010
Structural Integrity Issues
Stress Ratio
The most commonly used stress ratio is R, the ratio of the minimum stress to themaximum stress (Smin/Smax).
1. If the stresses are fully reversed, then R = -1.2. If the stresses are partially reversed, R = a negative number less than 1.3. If the stress is cycled between a maximum stress and no load, R = zero.4. If the stress is cycled between two tensile stresses, R = a positive number
less than 1.
Variations in the stress ratios can significantly affect fatigue life. The presence of amean stress component has a substantial effect on fatigue failure. When a tensilemean stress is added to the alternating stresses, a component will fail at loweralternating stress than it does under a fully reversed stress.
http://capture.jrc.ec.europa.eu
Znojmo (CZ) 18 October 2010
Structural Integrity Issues
Preventing Fatigue Failure
The most effective method of improving fatigue performance is improvementsin design:
1. Eliminate or reduce stress raisers by streamlining the part
2. Avoid sharp surface tears resulting from punching, stamping, shearing,or other processes
3. Prevent the development of surface discontinuities during processing.
4. Reduce or eliminate tensile residual stresses caused by manufacturing.
5. Improve the details of fabrication and fastening procedures
Fatigue Failure Analysis
Metal fatigue is a significant problem because it can occur due to repeatedloads below the static yield strength. This can result in an unexpected andcatastrophic failure in use.
Because most engineering materials contain discontinuities most metal fatiguecracks initiate from discontinuities in highly stressed regions of thecomponent. The failure may be due the discontinuity, design, impropermaintenance or other causes. A failure analysis can determine the cause of thefailure.
http://capture.jrc.ec.europa.eu
Znojmo (CZ) 18 October 2010
Structural Integrity Issues
High Temperature Failure Analysis
Creep occurs under load at high temperature. Boilers, gas turbine engines, andovens are some of the systems that have components that experience creep. Anunderstanding of high temperature materials behavior is beneficial in evaluatingfailures in these types of systems.
Failures involving creep are usually easy to identify due to the deformation thatoccurs. Failures may appear ductile or brittle. Cracking may be either transgranularor intergranular. While creep testing is done at constant temperature and constantload actual components may experience damage at various temperatures andloading conditions.
Creep of Metals
High temperature progressive deformation of a material at constant stress is calledcreep. High temperature is a relative term that is dependent on the materials beingevaluated. A typical creep curve is shown below:
http://capture.jrc.ec.europa.eu
Znojmo (CZ) 18 October 2010
Structural Integrity Issues
In a creep test a constant load is applied to a tensile specimen maintained at aconstant temperature. Strain is then measured over a period of time. The slope ofthe curve, identified in the above figure, is the strain rate of the test during stage II orthe creep rate of the material.
Primary creep, Stage I, is a period of decreasing creep rate. Primary creep is aperiod of primarily transient creep. During this period deformation takes place andthe resistance to creep increases until stage II. Secondary creep, Stage II, is aperiod of roughly constant creep rate. Stage II is referred to as steady state creep.Tertiary creep, Stage III, occurs when there is a reduction in cross sectional area dueto necking or effective reduction in area due to internal void formation.
http://capture.jrc.ec.europa.eu
Znojmo (CZ) 18 October 2010
Structural Integrity Issues
Stress Rupture
Stress rupture testing is similar to creep testing except that thestresses used are higher than in a creep test. Stress rupture testingis always done until failure of the material. In creep testing the maingoal is to determine the minimum creep rate in stage II. Once adesigner knows the materials will creep and has accounted for thisdeformation a primary goal is to avoid failure of the component.
http://capture.jrc.ec.europa.eu
Znojmo (CZ) 18 October 2010
Structural Integrity Issues
Corrosion Failures
Corrosion is chemically induced damage to amaterial that results in deterioration of thematerial and its properties. This may result infailure of the component. Several factorsshould be considered during a failure analysisto determine the affect corrosion played in afailure. Examples are listed below:
Type of corrosion Corrosion rate The extent of the corrosion Interaction between corrosion and other
failure mechanisms
Corrosion is is a normal, natural process.Corrosion can seldom be totally prevented, butit can be minimized or controlled by properchoice of material, design, coatings, andoccasionally by changing the environment.Various types of metallic and nonmetalliccoatings are regularly used to protect metalparts from corrosion.
http://capture.jrc.ec.europa.eu
Znojmo (CZ) 18 October 2010
Structural Integrity Issues
Stress Corrosion Cracking
Stress corrosion cracking is a failure mechanism that is caused by environment,susceptible material, and tensile stress. Temperature is a significantenvironmental factor affecting cracking.
For stress corrosion cracking to occur all threeconditions must be met simultaneously. Thecomponent needs to be in a particular crackpromoting environment, the component must bemade of a susceptible material, and there must betensile stresses above some minimum thresholdvalue. An externally applied load is not required asthe tensile stresses may be due to residual stressesin the material. The threshold stresses arecommonly below the yield stress of the material.
Stress Corrosion Cracking Failures
Stress corrosion cracking is an insidious type offailure as it can occur without an externally appliedload or at loads significantly below yield stress.Thus, catastrophic failure can occur withoutsignificant deformation or obvious deterioration ofthe component. Pitting is commonly associatedwith stress corrosion cracking phenomena.
http://capture.jrc.ec.europa.eu
Znojmo (CZ) 18 October 2010
Structural Integrity Issues
Pitting CorrosionPitting is a localized form of corrosive attack. Pitting corrosion is typified by theformation of holes or pits on the metal surface. Pitting can cause failure due toperforation while the total corrosion, as measured by weight loss, might be ratherminimal. The rate of penetration may be 10 to 100 times that by general corrosion.Pits may be rather small and difficult to detect. In some cases pits may be maskeddue to general corrosion. Pitting may take some time to initiate and develop to aneasily viewable size.
Pitting occurs more readily in a stagnantenvironment. The aggressiveness of the corrodentwill affect the rate of pitting. Some methods forreducing the effects of pitting corrosion are listedbelow:
Reduce the aggressiveness of theenvironment
Use more pitting resistant materials Improve the design of the system
http://capture.jrc.ec.europa.eu
Znojmo (CZ) 18 October 2010
Structural Integrity Issues
Mihamaaccident
Orifice
http://capture.jrc.ec.europa.eu
Znojmo (CZ) 18 October 2010
Structural Integrity Issues
http://capture.jrc.ec.europa.eu
Znojmo (CZ) 18 October 2010
Davies-Besse NPP
Structural Integrity Issues
http://capture.jrc.ec.europa.eu
Znojmo (CZ) 18 October 2010
Structural Integrity Issues
Fracture Analysis
1. sizes of flaws which must be detected during nondestructiveexaminations of components
2. needs to replace or repair structures and components which arefound to have flaws present.
3. remaining years of operating life of degraded components.
http://capture.jrc.ec.europa.eu
Znojmo (CZ) 18 October 2010
Structural Integrity Issues
Ductile and Brittle Metal CharacteristicsDuctile metals experience observable plastic deformation prior to fracture. Brittlemetals experience little or no plastic deformation prior to fracture. At times metalsbehave in a transitional manner - partially ductile/brittle.Ductile fracture has dimpled, cup and cone fracture appearance. The dimples canbecome elongated by a lateral shearing force, or if the crack is in the opening(tearing) mode.Brittle fracture displays either cleavage (transgranular) or intergranular fracture.This depends upon whether the grain boundaries are stronger or weaker than thegrains.The fracture modes (dimples, cleavage, or intergranular fracture) may be seen onthe fracture surface and it is possible all three modes will be present of a givenfracture face.
Schematics of typical tensile test fractures are displayed above .
http://capture.jrc.ec.europa.eu
Znojmo (CZ) 18 October 2010
Structural Integrity Issues
Brittle FracturesBrittle fracture is characterized by rapid crack propagation with low energy releaseand without significant plastic deformation. The fracture may have a brightgranular appearance. The fractures are generally of the flat type and chevronpatterns may be present.
Ductile FracturesDuctile fracture is characterized by tearing of metal and significant plastic
deformation. The ductile fracture may have a gray, fibrous appearance. Ductilefractures are associated with overload of the structure or large discontinuities
http://capture.jrc.ec.europa.eu
Znojmo (CZ) 18 October 2010
No defectless material, or at least we cannot prove that it existWe have to live with it.
Structural Integrity Issues
Material behaviour
Depends on the three state facors:
-Temperature
- Stress state
- Strain rate
Brittle Ductile
Temperature
Toughness
Static load Dynamic load
http://capture.jrc.ec.europa.eu
Znojmo (CZ) 18 October 2010
Structural Integrity Issues
Fracturetoughness
Thickness
Plain strainPlain stress
http://capture.jrc.ec.europa.eu
Znojmo (CZ) 18 October 2010
Stress intensity: ratio of the stress at crack tip/normal stressDenoted with K (K1 tensile K2 shear stress)
Structural Integrity Issues
Crack tip
Stress atcrack tip
Normal stress
http://capture.jrc.ec.europa.eu
Znojmo (CZ) 18 October 2010
Structural Integrity Issues
K1c = fracture toughness that is the K1 value where crack start topropagate in an absolute brittle material
No or negligable plasticdeformation =valid K1c
Limited plasticzone= J integral
General yielding, nofracture mechanics,leak before break
Jc=Je+Jp
Kjc=(E*Jc)/(1-ν)2)1/2
MPa√m
E=Young modulus
V=Poissons ratio
http://capture.jrc.ec.europa.eu
Znojmo (CZ) 18 October 2010
Structural Integrity Issues
Stress Intensity Factor and Crack Tip Stresses
Crack tips produce a singularity.The stress fields near a crack tip of anisotropic linear elastic material can be
expressed as a product of and afunction of with a scaling factor K
where the superscripts and subscripts I, II, and III denote the three different modes thatdifferent loadings may be applied to a crack. The factor K is called the Stress IntensityFactor.
http://capture.jrc.ec.europa.eu
Znojmo (CZ) 18 October 2010
Structural Integrity Issues
Infinite Plate with a CenterThrough Crack under Tension
Infinite Plate with a Hole and SymmetricDouble Through Cracks under Tension
http://capture.jrc.ec.europa.eu
Znojmo (CZ) 18 October 2010
b
Structural Integrity Issues
Semi-infinite Plate with anEdge Through Crack under Tension
or
Infinite Stripe with a CenterThrough Crack under Tension
http://capture.jrc.ec.europa.eu
Znojmo (CZ) 18 October 2010
Structural Integrity Issues
Charpy testing
http://capture.jrc.ec.europa.eu
Znojmo (CZ) 18 October 2010
Structural Integrity Issues
LARGE SPECIMENS
SMALL SPECIMENS
95 %
5 %
95 %
5 %KJC
[MP
am
]
T [0C]
TYPICAL RAW DATA
STATISTICAL THICKNESS
ADJUSTMENT
LARGE SPECIMENS
SMALL SPECIMENS
95 %
5 %
95 %
5 %
KJC
[MP
am
]T [
0C]
MASTER CURVE ANALYSIS
“THE MASTER CURVE APPROACH”
THEORETICAL SCATTER DESCRIPTIONSTATISTICAL SIZE ADJUSTMENT
UNIFIED TEMPERATURE DEPENDENCE
http://capture.jrc.ec.europa.eu
Znojmo (CZ) 18 October 2010
Structural Integrity Issues
PROBABILITY OF INITIATION(WEAKEST LINK)
CUMULATIVE FAILURE PROBABILITYOF A VOLUME ELEMENT
Pf
1 1 Pr I / ON
Pr{I/O} = Pr{I} (1- Pr{V/O})= Cleavage initiation without
prior void initiation
Pr{I/O} = (d, D, T, …. etc.). .
http://capture.jrc.ec.europa.eu
Znojmo (CZ) 18 October 2010
Structural Integrity Issues
Master Curve
Kjc= 30+70*exp[0.019(T-T0)] Median
Kjc(5%) =25,4+37.8*exp[0.019*(T-T0)] Lower bound
Measurement: three point bend (precracked Charpy) or CTspecimens (8-10 pc minimum) at low temperature.
ASTM 1921-05 Evaluation T0 Margin=10-16 °C
Size adjustment included, small specimens can be used
Guidelines for Application of the Master Curve Approach to Reactor PressureVessel Integrity in Nuclear Power Plants Details Technical Reports Series No. 4292005,English, Full Text, (File Size: 1377 KB). 39.00 Euro. Date of Issue: 22 April 2005.
http://www-pub.iaea.org/MTCD/publications/ResultsPage.asp?p=2
Free download, 39Euro in printed form