trends and issues of ftth and g-pon koichi asatani,...
TRANSCRIPT
2015/2/19
1
Trends and Issues of FTTH and G-PON
Koichi Asatani, PhD Chair Professor, Nankai University
IEEE Distinguished Lecturer
IEEE Com Soc NA Region Distinguished Lecturer Tour
Concordia University, Montreal, Canada 2/18/2015
• What is going on?
• Where are we going to?
• What will be the Next?
Koichi Asatani 2015
2015/2/19
2
What is happening.
Koichi Asatani 2015
Global Internet Penetration
Source: ITU World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators Note: * Estimate
Koichi Asatani 2015
2015/2/19
3
Global Wired Broadband Penetration
Source: ITU World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators Note: * Estimate
Koichi Asatani 2015
Global Mobile Broadband Penetration
Source: ITU World Telecommunication/ICT Indicators Note: * Estimate
Koichi Asatani 2015
2015/2/19
4
Global IP Traffic 2013-2018
Source: CISCO VNI 2014
2013 2018 2017 2015 2016 2014
PB/Month
CAGR
20%
15%
61%
140
120
80
60
40
20
0
100 Mobile data
Managed IP
Fixed Internet
Koichi Asatani 2015
Wired and Wireless Global IP Traffic 2013-2018
Source: CISCO VNI 2014
2013 2018 2017 2015 2016 2014
PB/Month
CAGR
62%
20%
80
60
40
20
0
100
Mobile
Fixed
Koichi Asatani 2015
2015/2/19
5
Koichi Asatani 2015
Introduction to Access Networks
Koichi Asatani 2015
2015/2/19
6
always on access
淺谷 情報通信ネットワーク 2012
Network Evolution toward NGN
Analog Telephone
Network
Digital Telephone
Network ISDN
B-ISDN (ATM)
NGN
dial up access
broadband Internet
broadband access
(ADSL, FTTH Cable)
Triple play
streaming service
integration
QoS control security
Digital Core Network
All IP Circuit-mode
& packet mode integration
-Digital terminals, & media
-Digital Access
Koichi Asatani 2015
On-premises
NW
LAN
On-premises
NW
Basic Network Configuration -Simple Model-
Core NW
LAN
PBX
Access
NW
Home
NW
Local NW Wide Area NW Private NW
Data Center
Local NW
Public NW
Private NW
AP
WAP
PBX
Access
NW
Access
NW
Access
NW
Access
NW
Access
NW
Other
Core NW
Koichi Asatani 2015
2015/2/19
7
Access Evolution Scenario Toward B-ISDN
B-ISDN/ATM
>64kbit/s Switched Circuit Cap
Packet Cap
Permanent Connection Cap
Signaling Cap
Data
Telephone
FAX
Video Telephone
TV
TV Conference
Packet NW
64kbit/s
Switched Circuit NW
Leased Lines
Data
Telephone
TV Conference
Service dedicated NW(~1980s)
NGN(2000s~)
ISDN(1980s~ ) 64kbit/s
Switched Circuit Cap
ISDN
Data(Internet)
Telephone
FAX
TV Conference
Mobile Devices AP/BS AP/BS Mobile Network
Koichi Asatani 2015
Access Evolution Scenario -Real Story-
NGN/
IP Network
>64kbit/s Switched Circuit Cap
Packet Cap
Permanent Connection Cap
Signaling Cap
Data
Telephone
FAX
Video Telephone
TV
TV Conference
Packet NW
64kbit/s
Switched Circuit NW
Leased Lines
Data
Telephone
TV Conference
Service dedicated NW(~1980s)
NGN(2000s~)
ISDN(1980s~ ) 64kbit/s
Switched Circuit Cap
ISDN
Data(Internet)
Telephone
FAX
TV Conference
AP/BS AP/BS
Mobile Devices
Koichi Asatani 2015
2015/2/19
8
Broadband Access Technologies
FTTx Access Network access by using Fiber to the Home,
Building, Curb, and Cabinet (FTTH, FTTB,
FTTC, FTTCab)
DSL Access Network access by using twisted pair cables for
telephone(ADSL)
CATV Access Network access by using cables for CATV
including HFC(Hybrid Fiber-Coaxial)
Fixed Wireless Access
(FWA)
Wireless network access for fixed user devices
Broadband Wireless
Access (BWA)
Broadband network access by using WiMAX at
2.5GHz band
4G Access Network access by using 4G Cellular phone
(LTE)
Koichi Asatani 2015
ADSL
(ADSL: Asymmetric Digital Subscriber Line)
Metallic Cable
Access Node
Access Configurations -ADSL & Cables
Cables cable modem
Access Node
Koichi Asatani 2015
2015/2/19
9
Premise
Network
FTTx in Telecom
•FTTP: Fiber-To-The-Premises
•FTTH: Fiber-To-The-Home
•FTTB: Fiber-To-The-Building (Basement)
•FTTC: Fiber-To-The-Curb
•FTTD: Fiber-To-The-Desktop
FTTC
FTTB
FTTH FTTP
Desk Top
FTTD
Service Node Curb Building
Home
Koichi Asatani 2015
FTTC(FTTCab)/VDSL
ONU
Optical fiber
Metallic
Access Node
FTTC: Fiber To The Curb
VDSL: Very High-speed
Digital Subscriber Line)
Access Configurations – FTTC(FTTCab)
Curb/Cabinet
Koichi Asatani 2015
2015/2/19
10
Access Configurations - FTTH & PON
FTTH(SS, PtP)
ONU
Optical fiber Access Node
Optical fiber ONU
Optical splitter ONU
Access Node
ONU
SS: Single Star
PtP: Point to Point
FTTH(PDS, PON) PDS: Passive Double Star
PON : Passive Optical Network
ONU
ONU
Koichi Asatani 2015
Why Fiber (FTTH/PON)?
Koichi Asatani 2015
2015/2/19
11
Because FTTH/PON features
• High-speed and Stable Throughput: Better than ADSL and Cables
• Technical Maturity: Optical access deployments happening worldwide, with regional customized flavors built on generic transmission
• Cost Effective: Most cost effective solution found to be PON – Sharing opto-electronic devices in the central office
– Sharing part of the fiber infrastructure through passive splitters
– Energy efficient
• Better Opex
Koichi Asatani 2015
Transmission loss vs. subscriber line length
Source:http://www.bspeedtest.jp/stat1_1.html
0 5 4 3 2 1
10
60
50
40
30
20
0
tran
smis
sion l
oss
(dB
)
Subscriber Line Length (km)
Koichi Asatani 2015
2015/2/19
12
ADSL Throughput vs subscriber line length
24Mbps
8Mbps
1.5Mbps
1Mbps
10Mbps
0.1Mbps
Line length(km)
0 5 4 3 2 1 6
Thro
ugh
pu
t
Source:http://www.bspeedtest.jp/stat1_1.html Koichi Asatani 2015
ADSL Throughput Variation vs subscriber line length
Source:http://www.bspeedtest.jp/stat1_1.html
24Mbps
1.5Mbps
1Mbps
10Mbps
0.1Mbps
Line length(km)
0 5 4 3 2 1 6
Thro
ugh
pu
t
10% value
90% value
50% value
Koichi Asatani 2015
2015/2/19
13
FTTH/PON Advantages
• Very high speed data up to 10Gbps to home and businesses
• Maintenance cost reduction due to no electronics between CO and customers
• Low cost due to fiber and CO interface shared by multiple customers (32-256)
• Constant data rate regardless of reach/EMC immunity
• Multiple applications supports including data (IP), video and voice (triple play)
Koichi Asatani 2015
Benefits of WDM PON
• Capacity increases of existing networks (sparse WDM) – introducing new 10G systems into existing networks on new
wavelengths, coexisting with legacy systems on the same ODN
– 4 x G-PON on parallel wavelengths having 4 times reduced split factor
• Optimized utilization of fiber infrastructure (massive WDM) – parallel operation of many TDM-PONs
– add services
– high speed connections in overlay for select customers (business, FTTB)
– point-to-point links for many users
– flexible reconfiguration of optical links
– suitable wavelength ranges: 1260 – 1360 nm, 1460 -1625 nm
Koichi Asatani 2015
2015/2/19
14
Optical Fiber Loss Attenuations
G.989.1(13)_F8-1Wavelength/nm
1250 1300 1350 1400 1450 1500 1550 1600 1650
–15
–10
–5
0
5
10
15
20
251
0.8
0.6
0.4
0.2
0
Att
enu
atio
n (d
B/k
m)
Ch
rom
atic
dis
per
sion
(ps
/nm
/km
)
S-band C L-band UE-bandO-band
old fibre (pre 1990) new fibre (~ 2000) new fibre (post 2003)
Koichi Asatani 2015
Why GPON
• Standardized by telecom operators and telecom vendors in ITU-T
• Various operation and management capability inherited from conventional proved telecom technologies
• Future-proof bandwidth
– 2.4 G / 64 users = 35 M per user
– 35 M = 6 M (HDTV-MPEG4) x 4 ch + 10 M (Internet)
• Suitable for business users because of various
• QoS and bandwidth management
Koichi Asatani 2015
2015/2/19
15
Requirements to GPON
• Key requirements
• 1 Gb/s capacity minimum
• Full service (including legacy) support
• Oriented towards IP services
• Cost effective and FCAPS manageable
• Key “non-requirements”
• Compatibility with B-PON not required
FCAPS:Fault Management, Configuration Management, Accounting
Management, Performance Management , Security Management Koichi Asatani 2015
Key Elements for Innovation
• meet new requirements
• CAPEX, OPEX
• technical maturity
• forward compatibility
• backward compatibility
• ecology
Koichi Asatani 2015
2015/2/19
16
G.980 series Recs
• G.981: PDH optical line systems for the local network • G.982: Optical access networks to support services up to the ISDN primary rate or equivalent bit rates • G.983.1: Broadband optical access systems based on Passive Optical Networks (PON) • G.983.2: ONT management and control interface specification for B-PON • G.983.3: A broadband optical access system with increased service capability by wavelength allocation • G.983.4: A broadband optical access system with increased service capability using dynamic bandwidth
assignment • G.983.5: A broadband optical access system with enhanced survivability • G.984.1: Gigabit-capable passive optical networks (GPON): General characteristics • G.984.2: Gigabit-capable Passive Optical Networks (G-PON): Physical Media Dependent (PMD) layer specification • G.984.3: Gigabit-capable Passive Optical Networks (G-PON): Transmission convergence layer specification • G.984.4: Gigabit-capable passive optical networks (G-PON): ONT management and control interface specification • G.984.5: Gigabit-capable Passive Optical Networks (G-PON): Enhancement band • G.984.6: Gigabit-capable passive optical networks (GPON): Reach extension • G.984.7: Gigabit-capable passive optical networks (GPON): Long reach • G.985: 100 Mbit/s point-to-point Ethernet based optical access system • G.986: 1 Gbit/s point-to-point Ethernet-based optical access system • G.987: 10-Gigabit-capable passive optical network (XG-PON) systems: Definitions, abbreviations and acronyms • G.987.1: 10-Gigabit-capable passive optical networks (XG-PON): General requirements • G.987.2: 10-Gigabit-capable passive optical networks (XG-PON): Physical media dependent (PMD) layer
specification • G.987.3: 10-Gigabit-capable passive optical networks (XG-PON): Transmission convergence (TC) layer specification • G.987.4: 10-Gigabit-capable passive optical networks (XG-PON): Reach extension • G.988: Optical network unit management and control interface specification • G.989.1: 40-Gigabit-capable passive optical networks (NG-PON2): General requirements
Koichi Asatani 2015
PON Market
Koichi Asatani 2015
2015/2/19
17
0
5,000,000
10,000,000
15,000,000
20,000,000
25,000,000
30,000,000
35,000,000
40,000,000
45,000,00020
04/
6
200
4/9
200
4/12
200
5/3
200
5/6
200
5/9
200
5/12
200
6/3
200
6/6
200
6/9
200
6/12
200
7/3
200
7/6
200
7/9
200
7/12
200
8/3
200
8/6
200
8/9
200
8/12
200
9/3
200
9/6
200
9/9
200
9/12
201
0/3
201
0/6
201
0/9
201
0/12
201
1/3
201
1/6
201
1/9
201
1/12
201
2/3
201
2/6
201
2/9
201
2/12
201
3/3
201
3/6
201
3/9
Broadband Access in Japan
Source: Ministry of Internal Affairs and Communications, Japan
Total
FTTH
DSL
CATV
42.0M (Total)
24.6M (FTTH)
6.0M (CATV)
4.9M (DSL)
Koichi Asatani 2015
0% 1000% 2000% 3000% 4000% 5000% 6000% 7000%
Belgium
Chile
Greece
New Zealand
Ireland
Germany
Austria
Australia
France
Canada
Luxembourg
Finland
Spain
Italy
United Kingdom
Poland
Switzerland
Netherlands
Turkey
United States
Portugal
Hungary
Czech Republic
Denmark
Slovenia
Iceland
Norway
Estonia
Slovak Republic
Sweden
Korea
Japan
FTTH/FTTB Penetration Ranking
http://dx.doi.org/10.1787/888932798506
As of June 2012
Koichi Asatani 2015
2015/2/19
18
Fixed, Mobile and Broadband Access in OECD
0
500
1 000
1 500
2 000
2 500
1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011
Fibre
DSL
Cable
Mobile
ISDN
Analogue
Subscriptions (millions)
Fiber Fiber Fiber Fiber Fiber
Analog
ISDN
Fiber DSL
Mobile
Cable
http://dx.doi.org/10.1787/888932798829
Koichi Asatani 2015
Market Growth of PON Billions USD
Source: Dell’Oro Group
4.5
3
1.5
0
Rev
enu
e
B-PON
G-PON
E-PON
Koichi Asatani 2015
2015/2/19
19
PON Standardization
Year
XG-PON Up 2.5G
Down 10G
10G-EPON Up 1/10G
Down 10G
10G
1G
2000 2005 2010
ITU-T
IEEE
Bit
Ra
te(b
it/s
)
G-PON Up 1.25G
Down 2.5G 1G-EPON Up 1.25G
Down 1.25G
B-PON Up 155/622M
Down 155/622M
NG-PON1
2015
NG-PON2 Up 10G
Down 40G
100G
40G
100M A-PON
Up 155M
Down 155M
1995
NG-PON3 Up 40G
Down 100/250G
2020
Koichi Asatani 2015
Source: Figure 8-2 , ITU-T Rec. G.989.1, March 2013. Table 9-1, Draft new Recommendation ITU-T G.989.2, 40-Gigabit-capable passive optical networks 2 (NG-PON2): Physical media dependent (PMD) layer specification, TD 170 Rev.2 (PLEN/15) , April 2014.
NG-PON2 U (Narrow)
NG-PON2 D
RF-Video
1260
1280
1300
1320
1340
1360
1380
1400
1420
1440
1460
1480
1500
1520
1540
1560
1580
1600
1620
1640
Wavelength (nm)
O-Band E-Band S-Band C-Band L-Band U-Band
10GE/XG-PON U/S
GPON U/S
(Narrow/Reduced)B/GPON
GE-PON U/S
B/GPON
GE-PON D/S RF-Video
10GE/XG-PON D/S
Wavelength Allocations for PONs
Koichi Asatani 2015
2015/2/19
20
IEEE PON vs ITU-T PON
Organization IEEE ITU-T
Group IEEE 802.3ah IEEE 802.3av IEEE 802.3bk
ITU-T SG15 Q2
PON Specs 1G-EPON 10G-EPON Extended EPON
B-PON G-PON XG-PON NG-PON2
Management System
SIEPON OMCI
Frame Gbps based Ethernet Frame GEM
Services Ethernet Service Full Service (Ethernet, TDM, POTS)
SIEPON: Service Interoperability in Ethernt Passive Optical Networks
OMCI: ONU Managmeent and Control Interface
GEM: G-PON Encapsulation Method
GTC: G-PON Transmission Convergence
Koichi Asatani 2015
PON Specifications
System B-PON (Broadband PON)
G-PON
(Gigabit-capable PON)
GE-PON
(Gigabit Ethernet PON)
10G-EPON
(10Gigabit Ethernet PON)
XG-PON1
(10Gigabit-capable PON)
Standard ITU-T G.983 (1983/2005)
ITU-T G.984 (2003/2008)
IEEE802.3 ah EFM (2004/2005))
IEEE802.3 av EFM (2009)
ITU-T G.987 (2010)
MAC Service Ether, TDM, POTS Ether, TDM, POTS Ethernet Data Ethernet Data Ether, TDM, POTS
Frame ATM Frame GEM Frame Ethernet Frame Ethernet Frame XGEM Frame
Physical Layer
Distance 10/20km 10/20km
(logical 60km) 10/20km 10/20km 10/20km
Maximum Splitting 64 64 16 or over 16/32 64
Speed Up 156M, 622Mbps
156M, 622M, 1.25G 1.25Gbps 1.25G, 10.3Gbps 2.5Gbps
Down 156M, 622Mbps 1.25G, 2.5Gbps 1.25Gbps 10.3Gbps 10.3Gbps
Code Scrambled NRZ Scrambled NRZ 8B10B 64B66B Scrambled NRZ
Optical Link Budget 25/30dB 15/20/25dB 20/24dB 20/24/29dB 29/31dB
Wavelength Allocation
Up 1260-1360nm 1260-1360nm 1260-1360nm 1260-1280nm(10Gbps) 1260-1360nm(1Gbps)
1260-1280nm(XG-PON1) 1290-1330nm(G-PON)
Down 1480-1500nm 1480-1500nm 1480-1500nm 1575-1580nm(10Gbps) 1480-1500nm(1Gbps)
1575-1580nm(XG-PON1) 1480-1500nm(G-PON)
RF-TV 1550-1560nm 1550-1560nm 1550-1560nm 1550-1560nm 1550-1560nm
Remarks
EFM: Ethernet in the First Mile also called NG-PON1
Koichi Asatani 2015
2015/2/19
21
Requirements for NG-PON2 (1/2)
• Wide Applications:
– Residential, business, mobile backhaul and others
• Base system: 40Gbps downstream, 10Gbps upstream
– 4 channels in each direction
– Compatible with G-PON, XG-PON, and RF video overlay
– 20km @ 1:64 split ratio fully passive plant capable
• Optional extra capabilities
– 8 channels in each direction
– 10Gbps upstream
– DWDM overlay
Koichi Asatani 2015
Requirements for NG-PON2 (2/2)
• Power saving; Sleep modes and eco devices
• Long reach and high splitting ratio
• Synchronization in frequency and time
– Application to support mobile backhaul
• Highly reliability
– Cost effective redundant configuration
• Upgradability and Unbundling; WDM
– Regulators impose an obligation to provide access to third
parties in the European Union
– G-PON/XG-PON coexistence
• Conformance and multi-vendor Interoperability
Koichi Asatani 2015
2015/2/19
22
Wavelength Allocations for PONs
Source: Figure 8-2 , ITU-T Rec. G.989.1, March 2013.
Table 9-1, Draft new Recommendation ITU-T G.989.2, 40-Gigabit-capable
passive optical networks 2 (NG-PON2): Physical media dependent (PMD)
layer specification, TD 170 Rev.2 (PLEN/15) , April 2014.
1260
1280
1300
1320
1340
1360
1380
1400
1420
1440
1460
1480
1500
1520
1540
1560
1580
1600
1620
1640
Wavelength (nm)
O-Band E-Band S-Band C-Band L-Band U-Band
10GE/XG-PON U/S
GPON U/S
(Narrow/Reduced)B/GPON
GE-PON U/S
B/GPON
GE-PON D/S RF-Video
10GE/XG-PON D/S
NG-PON2 U (Narrow)
NG-PON2 D
RF-Video
Koichi Asatani 2015
NG-PON2(draft) System NG-PON2 (Next Generation PON2)
Standard ITU-T G.989 (2015)
Application BASIC EXTENDED BUSINESS Mobile Backhaul
MAC Service Ether, TDM, POTS
Frame XGEM Frame/TWDM
Physical Layer
Distance 40km(60km)
Maximum Splitting 256 -
Speed Up 10Gbps(2.5Gx4WDM) 20Gbps(2.5Gx8WDM) 40Gps(10Gx4WDM) 1.25G, 2.5G, 10Gbps
Down 40Gbps(10Gx4WDM) 80Gbps(10Gx8WDM) 40Gps(10Gx4WDM) 1.25G, 2.5G, 10Gbps
Code Scrambled NRZ
Optical Link Budget 25/30dB
Wavelength Allocation
Up 1524-1544nm(Wide) 1528-1540nm(Reduced) 1532-1540 (Narrow) 1603-1625nm (shared)
1524-1625nm(expanded)
Down 1596-1603nm 1603-1625nm (shared)
RF-TV 1550-1560nm 1550-1560nm
Remarks XGEM: XG-PON encapsulation method
Koichi Asatani 2015
2015/2/19
23
NG-PON2 standards arrangement
• G.989.1 : Requirements
– Consented at Sep 2012 meeting
• G.989.2 : Physical medium dependent layer
– Draft in progress
• G.989.3 : TC layer
– NG-PON2 specific TC features
• G.987.3 : Transmission convergence layer
– 10Gbps upstream to be added to this base standard
• G.multi : Multiple Wavelength Passive Optical Networks
(MW-PON), wavelength control layer
• G.988 : ONU management and control interface
Koichi Asatani 2015
NG-PON2 Coexistence with Legacy PON
G.989.1 Figure 5-1 Functional reference architecture and points
for NG-PON2 system coexistence with legacy systems Koichi Asatani 2015
2015/2/19
24
TWDM standards arrangement
• G.ngpon2.1 = Requirements – Consented at Sep 2012 meeting
• G.ngpon2.2 = Physical medium dependent layer – Draft in progress
• G.ngpon2.3 = TC layer – NG-PON2 specific TC features
• G.987.3 = Transmission convergence layer – 10G upstream to be added to this base standard
• G.multi = Wavelength control layer – Draft already started in Q2/15
• G.988 = ONU management and control interface – Standard in force, can be easily reused for TWDM
Koichi Asatani 2015
PON Standards related Organizations
IEEE
IEEE Com Soc
802.3ah
1G-EPON
802.3av
10G-EPON
P1904.1
SIEPON
ITU-T
Study Group 15
Broadband Forum
(BBF) FSAN
MOU
Liaison
Joint Work
Contributions
Koichi Asatani 2015
2015/2/19
25
Future Issues
Core Transmission Systems
TDM
WDM
1.3um LD 1.5um LD EDFA
1980 1990 2010 2000
1P
1M
1G
1T
Tran
smis
sio
n B
it R
ate
(bit
/s)
G.652 G.656 G.655
G.654
G.653
2030 2040 2020
Digital Coherent
SDM
G.657
1E
Year
Capacity Limit
Koichi Asatani 2015
2015/2/19
26
Multi-Core Fibers
Koichi Asatani 2015
Multi-Core Fiber with WDM
Lambda Channels multi-core fiber
Koichi Asatani 2015
2015/2/19
27
Summary
• PON is one of the most successful
technologies from view point of economy and
ecology based on global standards developed
by ITU-T and IEEE.
• Further development for higher bandwidth and
lower cost is essential to meet rapidly growing
traffics.
• Regulations?
Koichi Asatani 2015
Koichi Asatani 2010
Merci! Thank you!