trclc 16-11 presentation slides€¦ · 13.2 10 20 30 40 50 60) access density access density vs...

13
TRCLC 16-11 MICROSIMULATIONS OF THE IMPACT OF ACCESS MANAGEMENT PRACTICES ON VEHICLES AND PEDESTRIAN OPERATION PI: Deo Chimba, P.E., PTOE Associate Professor Department of Civil and Architectural Engineering Tennessee State University Research Assistant: Kevin Soloka Department of Civil and Architectural Engineering Tennessee State University

Upload: others

Post on 27-Sep-2020

3 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: TRCLC 16-11 Presentation slides€¦ · 13.2 10 20 30 40 50 60) ACCESS DENSITY Access Density Vs Pedestrians Travel Time 1 signal/mi 2 signal/mi 3 signal/mi 4 signal/mi. Discussion

TRCLC 16-11

MICROSIMULATIONS OF THE IMPACT OF ACCESS MANAGEMENT PRACTICES ON VEHICLES AND

PEDESTRIAN OPERATION

PI: Deo Chimba, P.E., PTOEAssociate Professor

Department of Civil and Architectural Engineering Tennessee State University

Research Assistant: Kevin SolokaDepartment of Civil and Architectural Engineering

Tennessee State University

Page 2: TRCLC 16-11 Presentation slides€¦ · 13.2 10 20 30 40 50 60) ACCESS DENSITY Access Density Vs Pedestrians Travel Time 1 signal/mi 2 signal/mi 3 signal/mi 4 signal/mi. Discussion

AbstractThe study focuses on developing a microsimulation model using VISSIM and VISWALK software to analyze the impact of access management features to the mobility and accessibility of vehicles and pedestrians. The model utilized features of access management such as access density, signal density, and presence of median to create base model for analysis. The effect of access density on speed, delay and travel time was very vivid for the vehicles within the corridors, thus speed decreased with the increase in access density consequently delay increased and number of stops increased. The results suggested vehicle travel times were more affected by signal density as compared to access density. Pedestrian speeds and travel time are also more influenced by signal density. The findings provide useful understanding to state policy maker in implementing Access Management guidelines in Tennessee.

Page 3: TRCLC 16-11 Presentation slides€¦ · 13.2 10 20 30 40 50 60) ACCESS DENSITY Access Density Vs Pedestrians Travel Time 1 signal/mi 2 signal/mi 3 signal/mi 4 signal/mi. Discussion

Introduction

Increase in access points in the roadways and consequently leads to increase in conflict points. The effects on the operations for both vehicles and pedestrians are yet to be fully analyzed on impacts of access features in Nashville. This study aimed to develop a microscopic simulation model using VISSIM to analyze the impact of access features on the mobility and accessibility with respect to both vehicles and pedestrians.

Page 4: TRCLC 16-11 Presentation slides€¦ · 13.2 10 20 30 40 50 60) ACCESS DENSITY Access Density Vs Pedestrians Travel Time 1 signal/mi 2 signal/mi 3 signal/mi 4 signal/mi. Discussion

Objective• Develop a microsimulation model using VISSIM software.• Analyze effects of access density, signal density and median types

on vehicles and pedestrians on speed, delay and travel time.

Page 5: TRCLC 16-11 Presentation slides€¦ · 13.2 10 20 30 40 50 60) ACCESS DENSITY Access Density Vs Pedestrians Travel Time 1 signal/mi 2 signal/mi 3 signal/mi 4 signal/mi. Discussion

Data and Methodology

Page 6: TRCLC 16-11 Presentation slides€¦ · 13.2 10 20 30 40 50 60) ACCESS DENSITY Access Density Vs Pedestrians Travel Time 1 signal/mi 2 signal/mi 3 signal/mi 4 signal/mi. Discussion
Page 7: TRCLC 16-11 Presentation slides€¦ · 13.2 10 20 30 40 50 60) ACCESS DENSITY Access Density Vs Pedestrians Travel Time 1 signal/mi 2 signal/mi 3 signal/mi 4 signal/mi. Discussion

Median types and Access Density

Page 8: TRCLC 16-11 Presentation slides€¦ · 13.2 10 20 30 40 50 60) ACCESS DENSITY Access Density Vs Pedestrians Travel Time 1 signal/mi 2 signal/mi 3 signal/mi 4 signal/mi. Discussion

TWLT and Signal density vs Access Density

Page 9: TRCLC 16-11 Presentation slides€¦ · 13.2 10 20 30 40 50 60) ACCESS DENSITY Access Density Vs Pedestrians Travel Time 1 signal/mi 2 signal/mi 3 signal/mi 4 signal/mi. Discussion

TWLT+ Raised Median and Signal density vs Access Density

Page 10: TRCLC 16-11 Presentation slides€¦ · 13.2 10 20 30 40 50 60) ACCESS DENSITY Access Density Vs Pedestrians Travel Time 1 signal/mi 2 signal/mi 3 signal/mi 4 signal/mi. Discussion

Pedestrian Speed

• Pedestrian speed results show no significant difference in speed with median or access density

Page 11: TRCLC 16-11 Presentation slides€¦ · 13.2 10 20 30 40 50 60) ACCESS DENSITY Access Density Vs Pedestrians Travel Time 1 signal/mi 2 signal/mi 3 signal/mi 4 signal/mi. Discussion

Pedestrian Travel Time

• Pedestrian travel time results show raised median segments have lowest pedestrian travel time

• No significant difference in between access density• Signal density increases travel time.

0

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

Raised Median Undivided TWLT

Pedestrian Travel Time(min)

11.4

11.6

11.8

12

12.2

12.4

12.6

12.8

13

13.2

0 10 20 30 40 50 60

TRAV

EL T

IME

(MIN

S)

ACCESS DENSITY

Access Density Vs Pedestrians Travel Time

1 signal/mi 2 signal/mi 3 signal/mi 4 signal/mi

Page 12: TRCLC 16-11 Presentation slides€¦ · 13.2 10 20 30 40 50 60) ACCESS DENSITY Access Density Vs Pedestrians Travel Time 1 signal/mi 2 signal/mi 3 signal/mi 4 signal/mi. Discussion

DiscussionqUndivided roadways show significant changes in speed as compared to raised median

roadways and TWLT segments.qTWLT and raised median has less number of stops as well as less delay in comparison with

undivided roadways qTravel time variations also shows access density influenced more undivided roadways than

the latter two.qTWLT measurements show that speed decreases as signal density and access densityqThe average delay and number of stops, also increase with the number of signals per mile

and access points.qPedestrian travel time appears low for raised median than undivided roadways and

roadways with two left turns.qAccess density does not affect pedestrian travel times as shown in most of the scenariosqIncrease in signal density appears to influence an increase in pedestrians travel time for

two-way left turn segments and for roadways with a mixture of raised median and two way left turn segments.

Page 13: TRCLC 16-11 Presentation slides€¦ · 13.2 10 20 30 40 50 60) ACCESS DENSITY Access Density Vs Pedestrians Travel Time 1 signal/mi 2 signal/mi 3 signal/mi 4 signal/mi. Discussion

ConclusionsThe study aimed to assess the operation effects of Access Management features on vehicle and pedestrian. The performances measures such as speed, delay, stops and travel time are evaluated through microsimulations modeling. Most of the simulation assessments carried out above involved creating a tailored corridor with traffic reflecting existing conditions. Specific feature related simulations which can provided more understanding to the effects of AM features to both pedestrian and vehicles is highly recommended