transvaginal 3d hd-flow in diagnosis of uterine arteriovenous malformation
TRANSCRIPT
LETTER TO THE EDITOR
Transvaginal 3D HD-flow in diagnosis of uterine arteriovenousmalformation
Kenji Kanenishi • Masato Mashima •
Hirokazu Tanaka • Hisako Nagasaka •
Yoshihiro Toyama • Toshiyuki Hata
Received: 22 January 2012 / Accepted: 23 February 2012 / Published online: 6 March 2012
� Springer-Verlag 2012
To the Editor,
‘‘Uterine arteriovenous malformation (AVM) is a rare
lesion with a considerable risk potential. The clinical pre-
sentation varies from no signs, to various degrees of
menorrhagia, to massive life-threatening vaginal bleeding;
Clinical suspicion is essential for a prompt diagnosis and
treatment’’ [1]. Conventional two-dimensional (2D) color/
power Doppler sonography is a valuable and noninvasive
modality for the definitive diagnosis of pelvic AVM in
clinical practice [2, 3]. Moreover, three-dimensional (3D)
color/power Doppler sonography has the potential to pro-
vide an improved visualization and recognition of pelvic
AVM [4–6].
‘‘High definition-flow (HD-flow) is a bi-directional
power Doppler technique that delivers high-definition axial
resolution and increased sensitivity for imaging small
vessels. In addition, it reduces the spatial overlap of tissue
signals by the application of small sample volumes, and
provides optimal clutter elimination with adaptive wall
filtering. 3D HD-flow is unique for 3D reconstruction of
fetal vascularities in the whole body’’ [7]. We present our
experience of uterine AVM with heavy vaginal bleeding
following uterine curettage, diagnosed by employing
transvaginal 3D HD-flow with multiplanar and angio-
graphic displays.
A 25-year-old Japanese woman, gravida 5, para 0, was
referred to our university hospital because of an episode of
sudden episodic profuse vaginal bleeding following her
menses. She had undergone dilatation and curettage due to
first-trimester missed abortion 6 weeks previously.
Urine hCG was negative on the visit. Transvaginal 2D
sonography depicted an ill-defined, inhomogeneous lesion
involving the endometrial and subendometrial tissues with
variously sized hypoechoic cysts (Fig. 1). Transvaginal 2D
HD-flow revealed a hypervascular lesion in the myome-
trium involving the endometrial and subendometrial tissues
Fig. 1 Transvaginal two-dimensional sonographic sagittal view of
the uterus. An ill-defined inhomogeneous lesion involving the
endometrial and subendometrial tissues with variously sized hypo-
echoic cysts (arrow) is noted
K. Kanenishi � M. Mashima � H. Tanaka � T. Hata (&)
Department of Perinatology and Gynecology, Kagawa
University School of Medicine, 1750-1 Ikenobe, Miki,
Kagawa 761-0793, Japan
e-mail: [email protected]
H. Nagasaka
Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Yashima General
Hospital, 1857-1 Yashimanishi-machi, Takamatsu,
Kagawa 761-0113, Japan
Y. Toyama
Department of Radiology, Kagawa University School of
Medicine, 1750-1 Ikenobe, Miki, Kagawa 761-0793, Japan
123
Arch Gynecol Obstet (2012) 286:541–544
DOI 10.1007/s00404-012-2284-8
(Fig. 2). Transvaginal 3D HD-flow in multiplanar mode
revealed the exact site, extent, and size of this hypervas-
cular lesion (Fig. 3). 3D HD-flow angiography showed
uterine AVM including its feeding and draining vessels
(Fig. 4). Contrast CT, 3D CT, MRI and angiography
(Fig. 5) confirmed the diagnosis of uterine AVM. The
selective embolization of bilateral uterine arteries was
carried out, resulting in hemostasis. Transvaginal 2D/3D
HD-flow examinations showed no vascular lakes in the
uterus after this procedure (Fig. 6), and the patient has been
doing well.
There have been numerous reports of uterine AVM
acquired following uterine curettage [8–10]. The time
between uterine curettage and the diagnosis was 2–8 weeks
[10]. In the present case, it was 6 weeks. The most
important issue is to differentiate it from diagnoses of
retained products of conception and gestational tropho-
blastic disease. However, those conditions are readily dis-
tinguished by increased levels of hCG, while uterine AVM
is associated with undetectable or low hCG levels. In our
case, urine hCG was negative at the time of the diagnosis
before treatment. The differential diagnosis among these
three entities is crucial because the treatment modalities are
Fig. 2 Transvaginal two-dimensional HD-flow feature of uterine
arteriovenous malformation
Fig. 4 Transvaginal three-dimensional HD-flow angiographic dis-
play of uterine arteriovenous malformation (*). DV draining vessel,
FV feeding vessel
Fig. 3 Transvaginal three-dimensional HD-flow multiplanar view of uterine arteriovenous malformation (AVM). The exact site, extent, and size
of the AVM in the uterus are clearly identified
542 Arch Gynecol Obstet (2012) 286:541–544
123
completely different: uterine curettage for retained con-
ceptional products, chemotherapy for gestational tropho-
blastic disease, and selective uterine embolization for
uterine AVM [10]. ‘‘Moreover, uterine curettage is con-
traindicated in uterine AVM’’ [10].
Based on our search of the literature, we identified
three investigations that described the use of 3D color/
power Doppler sonography for the visualization of uterine
AVM [4–6]. ‘‘The advantage of 3D reconstruction of
color/power Doppler sonographic images is that this can
enable us to understand the spatial relationships of vessels
in areas where complex structures are present’’ [4].
Moreover, 3D color/power Doppler sonography can pro-
vide additional information useful to the clinician, such as
identification of the vascular connections including its
feeding and draining vessels [5]. In the present report,
transvaginal scanning was used, and very clear 3D
HD-flow images could be obtained for a better under-
standing of uterine AVM. Especially, the power of
transvaginal 3D HD-flow to identify the exact site, extent,
and size of uterine AVM was marked. The site and size
of uterine AVM are clinically important in considering
the treatment modalities [1]. The role of 3D HD-flow is
more to assist the treatment of choice rather than altering
the diagnosis in the pre-treatment period.
Conflict of interest The authors declare no conflict of interest.
Fig. 6 Transvaginal three-dimensional HD-flow multiplanar view of the uterus 4 days after uterine artery embolization. Uterine arteriovenous
malformation has almost disappeared
Fig. 5 Right uterine arteriographic image of uterine arteriovenous
malformation (arrow)
Arch Gynecol Obstet (2012) 286:541–544 543
123
References
1. Renu A, Achla B, Pinkee S, Purba G, Bharti M (2004) Arterio-
venous malformations of the uterus. N Z Med J 117:U1182
2. Timmerman D, Wauters J, Van Calenbergh S, Van Schoubroech
D, Maleux G, Van den Bosch T, Spitz B (2003) Color Doppler
imaging is a valuable tool for the diagnosis and management of
uterine vascular malformations. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol
21:570–577
3. Kelly SM, Belli AM, Campbell S (2003) Arteriovenous malfor-
mation of the uterus associated with secondary postpartum
hemorrhage. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 21:602–605
4. Shih JC, Shyu MK, Cheng WF, Lee CN, Jou HJ, Wang RM,
Hsieh FJ (1999) Arteriovenous malformation of mesosalpinx
associated with a ‘vanishing’ ectopic pregnancy: diagnosis with
three-dimensional color power angiography. Ultrasound Obstet
Gynecol 13:63–66
5. Hata T, Inubashiri E, Kanenishi K, Tanaka H, Shiota A, Ohno M
(2004) Three-dimensional power Doppler sonographic features of
uterine vascular malformation. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol
24:806–808
6. Syla BH, Fetiu SS, Tafarshiku SS (2011) Transabdominal two-
and three-dimensional color Doppler imaging of a uterine arte-
riovenous malformation. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 37:376–378
7. Hata T (2006) Modern 3D/4D sonographic studies on fetal heart.
Ultrasound Rev Obstet Gynecol 6:115–122
8. Schiller VL, Raft E, Linden R (1998) Uterine arteriovenous
malformation. Am J Roentgenol 170:219–220
9. Elia G, Counsell C, Siner SJ (2001) Uterine artery malformation
as a hidden cause of severe uterine bleeding: a case report.
J Reprod Med 46:398–400
10. Halperin R, Schneider D, Maymon R, Peer A, Pansky M, Herman
A (2007) Arteriovenous malformation after uterine curettage:
a report of 3 cases. J Reprod Med 52:445–449
544 Arch Gynecol Obstet (2012) 286:541–544
123