transnational governance in cross-border regions multilevel participation, influence, and dialogue...

9
Transnational Governance in Cross-Border Regions Multilevel participation, influence, and dialogue Presentation to the EU Cohesion Policy Seminar, University of Strathclyde, December 5th 2008 Elisabetta Nadalutti Department of European Modern Languages, University of Bath [email protected] The Upper Adriatic area

Upload: wendy-murphy

Post on 27-Dec-2015

213 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: Transnational Governance in Cross-Border Regions Multilevel participation, influence, and dialogue Presentation to the EU Cohesion Policy Seminar, University

Transnational Governance in Cross-Border Regions Multilevel participation, influence, and dialogue

Presentation to the EU Cohesion Policy Seminar, University of Strathclyde, December 5th 2008

Elisabetta NadaluttiDepartment of European Modern Languages, University of

[email protected]

The Upper Adriatic area

Page 2: Transnational Governance in Cross-Border Regions Multilevel participation, influence, and dialogue Presentation to the EU Cohesion Policy Seminar, University

Argument

• Cross-Border-Regions are laboratories for the emergence of a new mode of governance which can overcome national, institutional and mental barriers for developing a transnational multi layered network.

Page 3: Transnational Governance in Cross-Border Regions Multilevel participation, influence, and dialogue Presentation to the EU Cohesion Policy Seminar, University

Theories used

• Multi-level-Governance

– Type 1: hierarchical, jurisdictions at a limited number of levels

– Type2: mix of polycentric authorities, complex, fluid patchwork of innumerable, overlapping jurisdictions at numerous territorial levels

• Network– relatively stable, horizontal articulation of interdependent,

operationally autonomous actors who interact with each other

Page 4: Transnational Governance in Cross-Border Regions Multilevel participation, influence, and dialogue Presentation to the EU Cohesion Policy Seminar, University

The Upper Adriatic area

Page 5: Transnational Governance in Cross-Border Regions Multilevel participation, influence, and dialogue Presentation to the EU Cohesion Policy Seminar, University

Slovenian and Italian border

• Slovenia and Italy were separated by the Iron Curtain during WWII

• Their relationship was characterised by animosity and unresolved issues stemming from WWII

• Semifederal vs Centralised state

• The CB territory is characterised by a considerable presence of ethnic minorities

Page 6: Transnational Governance in Cross-Border Regions Multilevel participation, influence, and dialogue Presentation to the EU Cohesion Policy Seminar, University

Role of the EU vis à vis the sub-national level

• the EU vis à vis SNAs.

• The EU and the common management of Interreg IV.

• The EU Commission and the approval of the European Grouping of Territorial Cooperation (EGTC, EU new supra-regional juridical institution)

Page 7: Transnational Governance in Cross-Border Regions Multilevel participation, influence, and dialogue Presentation to the EU Cohesion Policy Seminar, University

• These factors seem to show that

– the EU is trying to empower SNAs and promote new transnational institutions and programmes.

– The actors involved are strongly encouraged to:

• find a common working ground• overcome self-centred territorial issues and

practices• think in terms of a cohesive cross-border area

Page 8: Transnational Governance in Cross-Border Regions Multilevel participation, influence, and dialogue Presentation to the EU Cohesion Policy Seminar, University

Sub-national actors participation: symbolic or effective influence?

• Italian and Slovenian institutional and political configuration

• Italian Regions vis à vis Slovenian municipalities

• Slovenia vis à vis Italian regions

• Italy vis à vis EGTC.

Page 9: Transnational Governance in Cross-Border Regions Multilevel participation, influence, and dialogue Presentation to the EU Cohesion Policy Seminar, University

MLG type 1 or 2?

• MLG type 1: vertical relationship between regional, national and supranational jurisdiction. Asymmetrical

• MLG type 2: horizontal network multi level linkages both visible and symmetrical at micro level