transmission network investment : the italian case

29
Transmission network investment the Italian case www.grtn.it Paris, 18 th November 2004 [email protected] Antonio Serrani Grid Director - GRTN

Upload: others

Post on 15-Oct-2021

6 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: Transmission network investment : the Italian case

Transmission network investmentthe Italian case

www.grtn.it Paris, 18th November [email protected]

Antonio SerraniGrid Director - GRTN

Page 2: Transmission network investment : the Italian case

- 2 -

AustriaSwitzerland

France

FIUMESANTO S/E

CODRONGIANOS

SELARGIUS

CAGLIARI SUD

RUMIANCA

SORGENTE

PATERNO’

CHIAROMONTE G.

RIZZICONI

ROSSANOLAINO

MATERA

GALATINA 400 kV dcline

Greece

BRINDISI

TARANTO N.

BARI OVEST

ANDRIAFOGGIA

BENEVENTO

PATRIA

LARINO

TERAMO

CEPRANO

LATINA

VALMONTONEROMA s.

TORVALDALIGA s.

TORVALDALIGA n.MONTALTO c.le

ROSARA

CANDIA

FANO

S.GIACOMO

TAVARNUZZE

CALENZANO

ACCIAIOLOLIVORNO

LA SPEZIA

VADOLIGURE

S.MARTINO xxFORLI’

RAVENNA C..COLUNGAMARTIG.

CARPI

RUBIERA

PARMA

FERRARA

LACASELLA

VIGNOLE

CASTELN.

MAGLIANO

VILLARODIN

CASANOVAPIOSSASCO

LEINI’

PLANAIS

REDIPUGLIAUDINE O.

CORDIGNANO

VEDEL.SANDRIGO

VENEZIA N.

DOLOCAMIN

ADRIA

ALBERTVILLE

LAVORGO

SOAZZA

DIVACCIA

Slovenia

DUGALE

ROCCA

PIASTRA

TRINO N.

TURBIGO

RONCOV.

EDOLO

S:FIORANO

OSTIGLIACAORSO

ROSEN

PORTO TOLLE

P. CORSINI

MONFALCONE

PIOMBINO

VILLAVALLE

PRESENZANO

ISAB

SARLUX

BARGI

200 kV c.c.

F.SANTO carbone

S.Teresa

BONIFACIO

BASTIA

LUCCIANA EDF

SUVERETO

ROMA n.

FEROLETOSCANDALE

PATERNO’

CHIAROMONTE G.

MONTECORVINOSTRIANO

S.SOFIA

GARIGLIANO S.MARIAC.V.

VILLANOVA

PIETRAFITTA

ABBADIAS.BARBARA

MARGINONE

S.DAMASO

PIACENZA

RONDISSONE

TAVAZZ.

Power station

380 kV substationSubstation under construction

Single circuit lineDouble circuit lineLine under construction

dc 200 kV line

220 kV substation

VENAUS

MERCALLO

Italian power system - 380 kV grid

Page 3: Transmission network investment : the Italian case

- 3 -

SLOVENIA

AUSTRIAFRANCE &SWITZERLAND

600÷350

380

2205,700

4,80

0

2,200

300

1,700 ÷ 2,300500

GREECE

Inter-area Transmission Capacities in Winter (MW)

Page 4: Transmission network investment : the Italian case

- 4 -

Energy flows in 2003 (*) (GWh)

EXCHANGE

DEMAND

18,063

124

2,87

1

359

1,104

1,493

1,420

8,155

8,246

1,675

4,4962,164

10,162

6,17

9

19,810

SLOVENIA

SWITZERLAND AUSTRIA

FRANCE

GREECE

FRANCE(Corsica)

4,23

8

Milano

Roma

Venezia

Firenze

Napoli

Palermo

Cagliari

Torino

45,071

20,551

45,514

49,665

46,208

64,251

36,089

12,309

(*) Provisional data

Total Import51 TWh (15.9%)

Total Demand319.7 TWh

Page 5: Transmission network investment : the Italian case

- 5 -

� Load demand supply (+ 2.9% in 2003)

� Efficiency of the transmission grid

� Connection to the grid of new power plants

� Elimination of grid congestions

� Increase of transmission capacity withforeign countries

� Compliance with environmental constraints

Targets of the Grid Development Plan

Page 6: Transmission network investment : the Italian case

- 6 -

1963

ENERGY

GWh

0

5000

10000

15000

20000

25000

30000

35000

40000

45000

50000

1965

1967

1969

1971

1973

1975

1977

1979

1981

1983

1985

1987

1989

1991

1993

1995

1997

1999

2001

5500020

03

Energy import in Italy (1963-2003)(Import 2003 = 15.9% of load demand)

Page 7: Transmission network investment : the Italian case

- 7 -( ) Net import-export % over country load demand

-60

-40

-20

0

20

40

60

80

E F B NL D A CH I SLO GR

(0,1%)(0,7%)

(14,3% )

(4,3 %)

(15,9% )

(1,2% )

(15,5% )

(11,9% )

(2,9% )

(7,5% )

-1,7

64,5

-6,3

-17,0

-0,6-6,1

1,7

-51,0

0,1

-2,1

Energy exchanges in Europe (2003)(Source UCTE)

Page 8: Transmission network investment : the Italian case

- 8 -

Enel P. – Pietrafitta (PG)170 � 360 MW

Enel P. – Pietrafitta (PG)170 � 360 MW

Enel P. – La Casella (PC)1,200 � 1,500 MW

Enel P. – La Casella (PC)1,200 � 1,500 MW

Enel P. – Priolo (SR)600 � 750 MW

Enel P. – Priolo (SR)600 � 750 MW

Enipower – Ferrera Erbognone (PV)1,040 MW

Enipower – Ferrera Erbognone (PV)1,040 MW

Enel P. – Porto Corsini (RA)300 � 740 MW

Enel P. – Porto Corsini (RA)300 � 740 MW

+ 3,630 MW+ 3,630 MW

Enipower – Ravenna 780 MWEnipower – Ravenna 780 MW

EdipowerChivasso (TO)

410 � 1,140 MW

EdipowerChivasso (TO)

410 � 1,140 MW

New power plants in operation (2002-2004)

Page 9: Transmission network investment : the Italian case

- 9 -

AEM TorinoMoncalieri (TO)

380 MW

AEM TorinoMoncalieri (TO)

380 MW

Enipower – Mantova 800 MWEnipower – Mantova 800 MW

Edison Candela (FG)370 MW

Edison Candela (FG)370 MW

EdisonAltomonte (CS)

800 MW

EdisonAltomonte (CS)

800 MW

+ 7,900 MW+ 7,900 MW

Voghera Energia - Voghera (PV)400 MW

Voghera Energia - Voghera (PV)400 MW

Enipower Brindisi1,170 MW

Enipower Brindisi1,170 MW

(*) Rated power > 300 MW

AEM TO-Moncalieri (TO)170 � 380 MW

AEM TO-Moncalieri (TO)170 � 380 MW

SET - Teverola (CE) 380 MWSET - Teverola (CE) 380 MW

Enel P. - S. Barbara (AR)230 � 390 MW

Enel P. - S. Barbara (AR)230 � 390 MW

Edipower – Piacenza L. (PC)600 � 750 MW

Edipower – Piacenza L. (PC)600 � 750 MW

Edison (Caffaro) – Torviscosa (UD) 760 MWEdison (Caffaro) – Torviscosa (UD) 760 MW

SEF – Ferrara 760 MWSEF – Ferrara 760 MW

Energia Molise – Termoli (CB)760 MW

Energia Molise – Termoli (CB)760 MW

Edison -Simeri Crichi (CZ) 800 MW

Edison -Simeri Crichi (CZ) 800 MW

In advanced stage of construction

New combined cycle plants under construction (*)

Page 10: Transmission network investment : the Italian case

- 10 -

EdisonOrta di Atella (CE)

780 MW

EdisonOrta di Atella (CE)

780 MW

Mirant – S.Severo (FG)380 MW

Mirant – S.Severo (FG)380 MW

+ 3.090 MW+ 3.090 MWEdison - Pianopoli (CS)

800 MWEdison - Pianopoli (CS)

800 MW

Enel P. - Livorno 300 � 660 MWEnel P. - Livorno 300 � 660 MW

Tirreno PowerVado L. (SV)

600 � 750 MW

Tirreno PowerVado L. (SV)

600 � 750 MW

EdisonSettimo T. (TO)

250 MW

EdisonSettimo T. (TO)

250 MW

Mirant – Portogruaro (VE)370 MW

Mirant – Portogruaro (VE)370 MW

Power plants authorised by end 2003(construction not yet started)

Page 11: Transmission network investment : the Italian case

- 11 -

Piemonte EnergiaLeinì (TO)380 MW

Piemonte EnergiaLeinì (TO)380 MW

E.ON ItaliaLivorno Ferraris (VC)

800 MW

E.ON ItaliaLivorno Ferraris (VC)

800 MW

AEM MI - ASM BSCassano (MI)

390 � 780 MW

AEM MI - ASM BSCassano (MI)

390 � 780 MW

ElectrabelRosignano (LI)

400 MW

ElectrabelRosignano (LI)

400 MW

Abruzzo EnergiaGissi (CH)760 MW

Abruzzo EnergiaGissi (CH)760 MW

Calenia EnergiaSparanise (CE)

800 MW

Calenia EnergiaSparanise (CE)

800 MW

Rizziconi EnergiaRizziconi (RC)

800 MW

Rizziconi EnergiaRizziconi (RC)

800 MW

EurosviluppoScandale (KR)

800 MW

EurosviluppoScandale (KR)

800 MW

+ 6,660 MW+ 6,660 MW

EnergiaModugno (BA)

750 MW

EnergiaModugno (BA)

750 MW

Energy PlusSalerno780 MW

Energy PlusSalerno780 MW

(*) Updated to October 2004

New power plants authorized in 2004 (*)

Page 12: Transmission network investment : the Italian case

- 12 -

Enel P. – Sulcis (CA)225 MW

Enel P. – Sulcis (CA)225 MW

Tirreno PowerVado Ligure (SV)

600 MW

Tirreno PowerVado Ligure (SV)

600 MW

EndesaMonfalcone (TS)

315 MW

EndesaMonfalcone (TS)

315 MW

Enel P. - La Spezia550 MW

Enel P. - La Spezia550 MW

Enel P. – Fusina (VE)915 MW

Enel P. – Fusina (VE)915 MW

Enel P.Torrevaldaliga N. (RM)

1,800 MW

Enel P.Torrevaldaliga N. (RM)

1,800 MW

EndesaFiume Santo (SS)

600 MW

EndesaFiume Santo (SS)

600 MW

Edipower - Brindisi N.600 MW

Edipower - Brindisi N.600 MW

Around 8,500 MW(*)Around 8,500 MW(*)Enel P. – Sulcis (CA)320 MW (L. Fluido)

Enel P. – Sulcis (CA)320 MW (L. Fluido)

Enel P. – Brindisi S.2,400 MW

Enel P. – Brindisi S.2,400 MW

Under refurbishment (*) Including minor plants

Coal-fired power plants

Page 13: Transmission network investment : the Italian case

- 13 -

Calabria4,000 MWCalabria4,000 MW

Puglia2,670 MWPuglia

2,670 MW

Campania2,740 MW

Campania2,740 MW

Molise760 MWMolise760 MW

Abruzzo760 MW

Abruzzo760 MWToscana

920 MWToscana920 MW

Liguria150 MWLiguria150 MW

Piemonte2,020 MWPiemonte2,020 MW

Lombardia1,740 MW

Lombardia1,740 MW

Friuli Venezia Giulia760 MW

Friuli Venezia Giulia760 MW

Veneto370 MWVeneto370 MW

+ 17,650 MW (*)+ 17,650 MW (*)

Emilia Romagna760 MW

Emilia Romagna760 MW

(*) 21.300 MW including 3.630 MW generation in operation during 2002 - 2004

Planned generation capacity increase (2002 - 2010)

Page 14: Transmission network investment : the Italian case

- 14 -

Identified congested areas

#

#

#

DOLO

NAVE

CAMIN

FLERO

VENAUS

DUGALE

DIVACA

BAGGIO

CAORSO

LONATO

SOAZZA

LEINI

SERMIDE

PLANAIS

CREMONA

GORLAGO

RUBIERA

COLUNGA

LAVORGO

OSTIGLIA

SANDRIGO

PIACENZA

MAGLIANO

S. DAMASO

TAVAZZANO

ENTRACQUE

ADRIA SUD

SALGAREDA

FUSINA

PIOSSASCO

REDIPUGLIACORDIGNANO

MONFALCONE

LA CASELLA

VILLARODIN

MARTIGNONE

PORTO TOLLE

UDINE O.

ALBERTVILLE

VENEZIA NORD

NOGAROLE ROCCA

LACCHIARELLA

CASTELNUOVO S.

RAVENNA CANALA

LA SPEZIA

PARMA VIGHEFFIO

FERRARA FOCOMORTO

TRAVAGLIATO

S. FIORANO

#

BULCIAGO

PIAN CAMUNO

CHIARI

BOVISIO

SETTIMO

ROSEN

SUVERETO

ACCIAIOLO

MARGINONE

PIOMBINO

MONTALTO

VALMONTONE

VILLAVALLE

ROMA NORD

PIAN DELLASPERANZA

AURELIA

PORTO CORSINI

ENI RAVENNA

FANO

TORVISCOSAPORTOGRUARO

S. MARTINO IN XX

FORLI’

CALENZANO

TAVARNUZZE

POGGIO A CAIANO

BARGI

MUSIGNANORONCOVALGRANDE

MERCALLO

CAGNO

TRINO

CASANOVA

ROSSINDONE

VIGNOLE

VADO L.

TURBIGO

CHIVASSO VOGHERA

FERRERA E.

MONCALIERI

Present generation constraintsin Turbigo and Roncovalgrande

Present transmissionconstraints

Critical section betweenPiemonte and Lombardia

Future transmissionconstraints between Torino

and Pavia

Page 15: Transmission network investment : the Italian case

- 15 -

SARLUX

RUMIANCA

SELARGIUS

CAGLIARI SUD

FIUME SANTO

CODROGIANOS

SULCIS

#

#

#

#

#

#

#

#

#

RAGUSA

MELILLI

CARACOLI

PARTANNA

FULGATORE

BELLOLAMPO

FAVARA

MISTERBIANCO

CIMINNA

PARTINICO

CHIARAMONTE GULFI

TRAPANI

#

#

#

##

#

PATRIA

FOGGIA

ANDRIA

MATERA

BARI O.

LARINO

ROSSANO

S. SOFIA

BRINDISI

GALATINA

SCANDALE

RIZZICONI

PRESENZANO

BENEVENTO II

ISAB ENERGY

CEPRANO

MONTECORVINO

TARANTO NORD

BRINDISI NORD

PATERNO’

GARIGLIANO

S. MARIA C.V.

BRINDISI SUD

AR

AC

HT

OS

LAINO

LATINA

ALTOMONTE

SIMERI CRICHI

PIANOPOLI

PRIOLO

TERMINI I.

ENI BRINDISI

CANDELA

TEVEROLA

ORTA DI A.

VILLANOVATERMOLI

S.SEVERO

S.FILIPPO

VALMONTONE

ANAPO

SORGENTE

CORRIOLO

Present and futuregeneration constraintsin Brindisi, Rossano

and import constraintsfrom Greece

Future generation constraintsin Calabria generation

Present generation constraintsin Priolo-Melilli

Termini Imerese andTrapani “must run“

power plants

Critical section due togeneration upgrading in

Puglia, Calabria and Molise

Future generationconstraints in

Termoli and Foggia

Sicily and southern Calabriapower systems could split from

the national network

Identified congested areas

Page 16: Transmission network investment : the Italian case

- 16 -

Piemonte Region

VERBANIA

PIASTRA

BIELLA

NOVARA

TORINO

CUNEO

VIGNOLE

BISTAGNO

MAGLIANO

CASANOVAPIOSSASCO

RONDISSONE

ILVA

LEINI’

TRINOTEKSID

TRINO

BALZOLA

VERCELLI

ROSONE

NOVARA SUD

BIELLA EST

MOREL (CH) VERAMPIO

GONDO (CH)

PONTE

PALLANZENO

NOVI L.

AIROLO (CH)

ALBERTVILLE (F)

MONT JOVET

TURBIGO

BAGGIO

VADO LIGURE

VADO L.

ERZELLI

MORIGALLO

LA SPEZIA

ERZELLI S.COLOMBANO

MAGENTA

TURBIGO

MAGENTA

FIATCRESCENTINO

LACCHIARELLAVERCELLI

VILLA

AVISE

GRAND’ILE (F)

VENAUS

VILLARODIN (F)

ALESSANDRIA

CASTELNUOVOASTI

EDIPOWERCHIVASSO

Substation inAlessandria or Asti

380 kV Double circuit linePiossasco-Grand’Ilê

380 kV LineTrino - Lacchiarella

Page 17: Transmission network investment : the Italian case

- 17 -

Lombardia Region

380 kV lineTrino - Lacchiarella

380 kV lineVoghera – La Casella

380 kV Double circuit lineS.Fiorano – Robbia (CH)

GROSIO

PREMADIO

ROBBIA (CH)

COMO

CREMONA

MANTOVAPAVIA

LODI

CAMPO MORO

LANZADA

EDOLO

CEDEGOLO

S.FIORANO

VENINA

SONDRIO

PIANCAMUNO

GARGNANO

TRAVAGLIATO

RIC.OVEST FLERO

LONATO

CREMONA MARCARIAACC.ISP

CAORSOLACASELLA

MANTOVA

OSTIGLIA SERMIDEPIACENZA

S.ROCCO

BAGGIO

OSPIATE

BRUGHERIOTURBIGO

MERCALLO

CAGNO

RONCOV.

MESE

NAVE

VARESE

BUSSOLENGO

COLA’

NOGAROLE

SANDRA’

COLORNOMARTIGNONE

S. DAMASO

SARMATOCASTELNUOVO

LAVORGO (CH)

GORDUNO (CH)

SOAZZA (CH)

TAIO

CIMEGO S.MASSENZA

FERRARACOLUNGA

GLORENZA

PARMA V.

TORBOLE

BUSSOLENGO

ENIPOWERFerrera E.

VOGHERA ENERGIAVoghera

ENIPOWERMantova

CISERANO

VERDERIOBERGAMOBULCIAGO

CISLAGO

GORLAGO

CHIARI

LACCHIARELLA

TAVAZZANO

VOGHERAmessa incontinuità

GANDA

SONDRIO

BRESCIA

BOVISIO

BELVISO

LECCO

TAVAZZ.EDISON

ASMMincio

TRINO

MILANO

380 kV lineTurbigo – (Rho) Bovisio

Page 18: Transmission network investment : the Italian case

- 18 -

Emilia-Romagna Region

VOGHERACAORSO

COLORNO

PARMA

S.DAMASO

COLUNGA

MARTIGNONE

BARGI

S. BENEDETTODEL QUERCETO(in classe 380 kV)

FORLI’

PORTOCORSINI

FERRARAFOCOMORTO

FERRARAEDISON

PIACENZA

PIACENZA

LACCHIARELLA

TAVAZZANO

TAVAZZANO CREMONA

APUANIA

PARMAREGGIOEMILIA

MARCARIA

LA SPEZIA

MODENA

RUBIERA

BOLOGNA

CALENZANO

FORLI’

RAVENNA

CANDIA

FANO

S.MARTINO IN XX

FERRARA

PORTO TOLLE

ESTEOSTIGLIA

COLA’SERMIDECAORSO OSTIGLIA

RIMINI

SARMATO

S.DAMASO

LA SPEZIA

LA CASELLA

RAVENNA C.

CARPIFOSSOLI

ENIPOWER RAVENNA

SETFERRARA

380 kV lineLa Casella – Nord Emila

380/132 kV substation inCarpi Fossoli (MO)

Page 19: Transmission network investment : the Italian case

- 19 -

Regions: Veneto and Friuli Venezia Giulia

���������

RAVENNA C.

LONATO

TREVISO

VENEZIA

VERONA

ROVIGO

SOVERZENE

BELLUNO

FADALTO

CONEGLIANO

ODERZO

TREVISO S.CITTADELLA

ARSIE

MOLINE

BELTRAMERFX

SCORZE’

DOLO

VENEZIA N.

ALUMIXFUSINA

P.MARGHERAMALCONT.

ESTE

CAMINPADOVA

ADRIA

NOGAROLEROCCA

GALTAROSSA

BUSSOL.

SANDRA’

COLA’

PORTOTOLLE

VERONA. VICENZA

PORDENONE

CORDIGNANO UDINE OVEST

VAL NOANA

BORGO VAL SUGANA

ALA

S.MASSENZA

COLUNGA

OSTIGLIA

MANTOVA

ACC.VICENTINE

PORTOGRUARO

MIRANT

VILLABONA

LONGARE SUD

da declassarea 132 kV

SALGAREDA

CAVILLA

MONTEVIALE

VELLAI

SANDRIGO

DUGALE

to be dismantled

EDISONFERRARA

OCCHIOBELLO

SAFAU

MONFALCONE

UDINENORD EST

FERR.NORD

BUIA

UDINEOVEST

REDIPUGLIA

DIVACCIA (SLOVENIA)

PLANAIS

PADRICIANO

SOMPLAGO

PORDENONE

TRIESTE

UDINE

GORIZIA

SALGAREDADIVACCIA (SLOVENIA)

SALGAREDACAFAFRO ENERGIATORVISCOSA

POZZUOLO

OKROGLO (SLOVENIA)

to bedismantl

ed

380/132 kV substation inVedelago (TV)

380 kV lineDolo - Camin

380 kV lineVenezia Nord-Cordignano

380 kV double circuit lineCordignano-Lienz

380 kV double circuit lineUdine O.-Okroglo

380 kV lineRedipuglia-Udine Ovest

380/132 kV substation inMontecchio (VI)

Page 20: Transmission network investment : the Italian case

- 20 -

Regions:Sardegna, Toscana, Marche, Umbria, Lazio, Abruzzo and Molise

é

#

#

#

#

#

#

#

#

#

#

#

#

##

#

#

# #

SA RL U X

LA R N O

AU R EL A

S LU C I A

S U V E R E T O

RU M IA NC A

ROMA SUD

MO N TA L T O

RO M A ES T

SE L AR G I US

RO M A N O R D

VI LL A N O V A

PR ES E NZ AN O

ROSARA

VA L M O N T O N E

CE PR A N O

CA G L A R I SU D

M O N T A L TO C . L E

T O R R EV AL D A LI G A

FIUME SANTO

PIOMBINO

T O R R EV AL D A L G A N O R D

CODROGIANOS

S G IA C O M O

LATINA

LUCCIANA EDF

#

#

#

##

#TAVARNUZZE

CALENZANOPOGGIO A CAIANO

S. BARBARA

ACCIAIOLO

LA SPEZIA

ROSEN

BARGI

ROMA OVEST

CANDIA

LIVORNO

ENERGIA MOLISE

120 -> 132 kV

380 kV by-passGrosseto

SAPEI: Sardinia-Mainland cable

380/132 kV substation inAbbadia (MC)

Page 21: Transmission network investment : the Italian case

- 21 -

Regions: Campania, Puglia and Basilicata

380 kV lineFoggia - Benevento

é

#

#

BARI OVEST

LAINO

MONTECORVINO

LARINO

GALATINA

TARANTO NORD

BRINDISIPATRIA

PRESENZANO

GARIGLIANO

S.M. CAPUA V.

BRINDISI NORD

BRINDISI SUD

ANDRIA

MIRANT S. SEVERO 400 MW

ENERGIA TERMOLI 800 MW

ENIPOWER BRINDISI 1170 MW

FOGGIA

BENEVENTO

MATERA

CANDELA

380 kV lineMatera – S.Sofia

380/150 kV substation in Bari

380/220/150 kV substationin Striano (NA)

380 kV line betweenSalerno and Benevento

S. SOFIA

Page 22: Transmission network investment : the Italian case

- 22 -

Regions: Calabria and Sicilia

380 kV lineSorgente-Rizziconi

380 kV lineChiaramonte - Ciminna

380 kV lineRizziconi-Feroleto-Laino

PARTANNA

BELLOLAMPO

PARTINICOTERMINI I.

CARACOLI

AGRIGENTO FAVARA

PATERNO’

ANAPO

CORRIOLO

MISTERBIANCO

CATANIA

PRIOLO

SIRACUSA

MELILLI

RAGUSA

PALERMO

TRAPANI

TRAPANI

RAGUSA

S.FILIPPODEL MELA

ENNA

POLIMERI

CALTANISSETTA

DUFERDOFIN

ISAB

CIMINNA

CHIAROMONTE G.

MESSINA

CROTONE

EDISONSimeri Crichi (CZ) – 800 MW

EDISONAltomonte (CS) – 800 MW

MONTECORVINO

da declassare a150 kV

PISTICCI

tratto dademolire

SCANDALE

FEROLETO 380 kV

MUCONE 1 2

COSENZA

CATANZAROVIBOVALENTIA

REGGIOCALABRIA

MATERA

ROTONDA

ROSSANO – 1600 MW

MERCURE

LAINO

RIZZICONI

EDISON Pianopoli (CZ) – 800 MW

SORGENTE

Page 23: Transmission network investment : the Italian case

- 23 -

Grid Development Plan 2004

New Lines (km) 1,920

New Substations (No.) 51

New Transformers (MVA) 12,700

short-term estimated investment (2004-2006):

450 milions €

long-term estimated investment (after 2006):

1,250 milions €

Main figures

Page 24: Transmission network investment : the Italian case

- 24 -

Difficulties in building new high voltage lines due toauthorisation problems

Authorization problems

�People opposition linked to increased (excessive)environmental sensitivity, often connected to EMF

�Difficulties in identifying new feasible routes due tointense human territorial penetration

�Constraints in urban and territorial development dueto corridors for electrical lines

�Lack of integration between electrical andterritorial/environmental planning

�Unsatisfactory results and uncertain timetable ofpresent authorization procedures (EIA)

Page 25: Transmission network investment : the Italian case

- 25 -

SEA – Strategic Environmental AssessmentA new tool

EC Directive 42/01 introduced the publicevaluation of developments plans,including electricity infrastructure plans

The SEA in the power sector allows the assessmentof environmental compatibility of planning tools andevaluation of global impact on the territory of thedevelopment plan

The SEA addresses problems at an early stage andallows introducing alternative plans in a flexible way

Page 26: Transmission network investment : the Italian case

- 26 -

� Support in the definition of macro-alternatives for theplacement of electrical facilities

� Integration between territorial/environmental andelectrical planning

� Preliminary check of environmental and territorialfeasibility of network developments

� Increased involvement in the process for localadministrations

� Potential to manage/modify draft alternative projectplans at an early stage

� Open the way to obtain public acceptance for newelectricity facilities

� Introduction of corridors in the territorial planning tools

Targets of SEA applied to the Development Plan

Page 27: Transmission network investment : the Italian case

- 27 -

� Trial period ongoing with Piemonte, Lombardia, Emilia

Romagna, Calabria and Sicilia

� Agreements in draft stage with Friuli V.G., Marche,

Umbria, Abruzzo, Campania and Sardegna

� Agreement signed with the Conference of Presidents

of Regions and Autonomous Provinces

� Agreement under definition with Unified Conference

(Ministries, Regions, Province and Municipalities)

� Trial period ongoing with Environment Ministry at

National level

Cartographic data exchange at National & Regional level

SEA implementation in Italy

Page 28: Transmission network investment : the Italian case

- 28 -

SEA – Exclusion/Repulsion/Attraction Criteria(ERA Criteria)

Legend and examples

E1 = Exclusion - Law constraints (military areas, airports)

E2 = Exclusion - Constraints due to Social, Environmental and Physicalfactors (i.e. urban areas, lakes, archaeological areas)

E3 = Exclusion – Hydro-geological constraints (landslide areas, other hydro-geologicalconstraints)

E4 = Exclusion - Other environmental constraints (i.e. regional and national parkareas can evolve in R1 in absence of alternatives and if the project isconsidered strategic)

R1 = Repulsion – Constraints which may be overcome in absence of alternatives (SpecialEU points of interests (SIC), special protected areas (wildlife)

R2 = Repulsion - Constraints which may be overcome by implementing technicalprescriptions (wine production areas, river sides)

A1 = Attraction – Presence of natural elements which hide the new construction

A2 = Attraction – Preferential areas (Infrastructure corridors, industrial areas)

N = Neutral areas – No influence on localization

Page 29: Transmission network investment : the Italian case

- 29 -

SEA – Preferential corridors and routes

le 1

2

Preferential Route 1

Preferential Route 2

Repulsion Area

Exclusion Area

Station A

Station B