transformation of carbon tetrachloride and chloroform by trichloroethene respiring anaerobic

134

Upload: others

Post on 11-Sep-2021

4 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: Transformation of Carbon Tetrachloride and Chloroform by Trichloroethene Respiring Anaerobic
Page 2: Transformation of Carbon Tetrachloride and Chloroform by Trichloroethene Respiring Anaerobic

AN ABSTRACT OF THE THESIS OF

Kyle E. Vickstrom for the degree of Master of Science in Environmental Engineering presented on June 2, 2016. Title: Transformation of Carbon Tetrachloride and Chloroform by Trichloroethene Respiring Anaerobic Mixed Cultures and Supernatant.

Abstract approved:

______________________________________________________

Lewis Semprini

Carbon tetrachloride (CT) and chloroform (CF) were transformed in batch

reactor experiments conducted with anaerobic dechlorinating cultures and supernatant

(ADC+S) harvested from continuous flow reactors. The Evanite (EV-5L) and

Victoria/Stanford (VS-5L) cultures capable of respiring trichloroethene (TCE), 1,2-cis-

dichloroethene (cDCE), and vinyl chloride (VC) to ethene (ETH) were grown in

continuous flow reactors receiving an influent feed of saturated TCE (10 mM; 60 mEq)

and formate (45 mM; 90 mEq) but no CT or CF. In all experiments, cells and

supernatant were harvested from the chemostats and inoculated into batch reactors.

Transformation of various concentrations of CT (0.86, 2.6, or 8.6 µM), CF (2.1 or 21.1

µM), dichloromethane (DCM; 23.1 µM), and TCE (50 µM) was examined. CT

transformation was complete and exhibited pseudo-first order kinetics with CF as the

primary measured transformation product in all treatments. Lesser amounts of DCM

and carbon disulfide (CS2) were measured leading to an overall mass balance of 20-

40% of the original mass as CT accounted for. An analytical first order solution was

developed to model CT degradation and product formation under multiple conditions.

Cells poisoned with 50 mM sodium azide (NaN3) catalyzed rapid and complete CT

transformation suggesting a greater importance of redox active cofactors than live cells

in the abiotic and cometabolic transformation. DCM and CS2 however were not

produced in the poisoned treatments. TCE and CT simultaneous transformation

Page 3: Transformation of Carbon Tetrachloride and Chloroform by Trichloroethene Respiring Anaerobic

occurred with an approximately two-fold increase in the CT degradation rate while

maintaining complete TCE respiration to ETH. During the initial round of TCE

respiration, the rate limiting step was VC to ETH, which was impacted by the presence

of CT and CF. A subsequent addition of 50 µM TCE showed a substantial decline in

the rates of reductive dechlorination owing to the inhibitory effects of long term

exposure to CF. The results clearly demonstrate that transformation can be promoted

by anaerobic dechlorinating cultures and supernatant not previously acclimated to CT

and CF. However, abiotic reactions account for much of the observed transformation.

The role of CF inhibition on H2 utilization by the culture was also explored.

Sodium formate was provided as a rapid release substrate, providing H2 as an electron

donor. H2 partial pressures were tracked throughout the course of the kinetic

experiments. The rapid transformation of CT to CF made it not possible to determine

if CT inhibited H2 use by the anaerobic dechlorinating cultures. However, the rapid

buildup and subsequent slow transformation of CF was found to reversibly inhibit H2

consumption for homoacetogenesis. It was found that an aqueous CF concentration

above 0.4 µM or 0.6 µM inhibited H2 consumption by the EV-5L and VS-5L cultures,

respectively. This result differed for the VS-5L culture when metabolizing TCE in the

presence of CT and CF. The VS-5L culture consumed H2 at CF concentrations as high

as 1.3 µM. The culture may have been partially inhibited at CF concentrations greater

than 0.6 µM, which is shown by slower consumption of H2 than controls that did not

contain CF. The results demonstrate that CF reversibly inhibits the consumption of H2

by the anaerobic dechlorinating cultures, and that more research is required to

determine if it is through a chemical inhibition or toxicity.

Page 4: Transformation of Carbon Tetrachloride and Chloroform by Trichloroethene Respiring Anaerobic

©Copyright by Kyle E. Vickstrom June 2, 2016

All Rights Reserved

Page 5: Transformation of Carbon Tetrachloride and Chloroform by Trichloroethene Respiring Anaerobic

Transformation of Carbon Tetrachloride and Chloroform by Trichloroethene Respiring Anaerobic Mixed Cultures and Supernatant

by Kyle E. Vickstrom

A THESIS

submitted to

Oregon State University

in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the

degree of

Master of Science

Presented June 2, 2016 Commencement June 2016

Page 6: Transformation of Carbon Tetrachloride and Chloroform by Trichloroethene Respiring Anaerobic

Master of Science thesis of Kyle E. Vickstrom presented on June 2, 2016 APPROVED: Major Professor, representing Environmental Engineering Head of the School of Chemical, Biological, and Environmental Engineering Dean of the Graduate School I understand that my thesis will become part of the permanent collection of Oregon State University libraries. My signature below authorizes release of my thesis to any reader upon request.

Kyle E. Vickstrom, Author

Page 7: Transformation of Carbon Tetrachloride and Chloroform by Trichloroethene Respiring Anaerobic

ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS

I would like to thank my advisor and mentor Dr. Lewis Semprini. Without his

guidance and support this thesis would not be possible. Thank you for creating a

research environment where I was free to ask questions, develop experiments, fail,

succeed, fail again, and ultimately learn from my mistakes. I truly appreciate all of the

time you have devoted to mentoring, meetings, and experimental questions in the lab,

all the while answering numerous emails. I have grown immensely from this

experience, both personally and professionally.

To Dr. Mohammad Azizian, I thank you for your boundless patience, amongst

many other things. You taught me the fickleness of analytical chemistry while also

providing the skills necessary to troubleshoot and anticipate possible problems. Your

guidance and assistance in the lab has been crucial to the success of my experiments

and overall research. Additionally, I would like to thank my committee members Drs.

Tyler Radniecki, Mark Dolan, and Jack Istok. You all have encouraged critical thinking

and deeper analysis in the courses that you teach, which I greatly appreciate.

To CBEE, the Graduate Student Association, and all of its graduate students,

thank you for creating a warm, friendly, and supportive environment. Happy hour

socials, group barbeques, professional development seminars, and goofing off together

have been wonderful experiences the last two years. An extended thanks to Jenny

Green, an outstanding undergraduate CBEE student who initially trained me in the lab

while conducting her own Honors Thesis research.

Lastly, I would like to thank Emma, my family, and my friends both near and

far. Thank you for putting up with me while I struggled through slow bugs, broken

analytical instruments, a long distance relationship, and a relatively snowless winter.

Your love, support, and guidance have been essential to my success as a graduate

student.

Page 8: Transformation of Carbon Tetrachloride and Chloroform by Trichloroethene Respiring Anaerobic

TABLE OF CONTENTS

Page

CHAPTER 1: INTRODUCTION ................................................................................. 1

CHAPTER 2: LITERATURE REVIEW ...................................................................... 4

2.1 Carbon Tetrachloride ........................................................................................... 4

2.2 Chloroform .......................................................................................................... 6

2.3 Transformation of Carbon Tetrachloride ............................................................. 7

2.4 Abiotic Transformation Mechanisms .................................................................. 9

2.4.1 Electrolytic Transformation .......................................................................... 92.4.2 Reduced Iron and Iron Sulfide Compounds ................................................ 112.4.3 Metallo-coenzyme Catalyzed Transformation ............................................ 13

2.5 Microbial Carbon Tetrachloride Transformation .............................................. 17

2.5.1 Methanogenic Environments ....................................................................... 182.5.2 Acetogenic Environments ........................................................................... 202.5.3 Sulfate Reducing Environments .................................................................. 232.5.4 Iron Reducing Environments ...................................................................... 252.5.5 Fermenting and Other Environments .......................................................... 29

2.6 Transformation of Chloroform .......................................................................... 31

2.7 Remediation of Carbon Tetrachloride and Chloroform .................................... 34

2.8 Anaerobic Dechlorinating Cultures ................................................................... 37

CHAPTER 3: MATERIALS AND METHODS ........................................................ 41

3.1 Chemicals .......................................................................................................... 41

3.2 Anaerobic Dechlorinating Cultures ................................................................... 41

3.3 Batch Transformation Studies ........................................................................... 42

3.4 Analytical Methods ............................................................................................ 43

3.5 First Order Rate Analyses and Transformation Model ..................................... 44

Page 9: Transformation of Carbon Tetrachloride and Chloroform by Trichloroethene Respiring Anaerobic

TABLE OF CONTENTS (Continued)

Page

CHAPTER 4: CARBON TETRACHLORIDE AND CHLOROFORM

TRANSFORMATION ................................................................................................ 46

4.1 CT Degradation and Product Formation ........................................................... 46

4.2 Transformation of Chloroform and Dichloromethane ....................................... 49

4.3 Kinetics of Biotic and Abiotic Transformation ................................................. 50

4.4 Simultaneous Transformation of CT and TCE .................................................. 56

CHAPTER 5: CHLOROFORM INHIBTION OF HYDROGEN CONSUMPTION 65

CHAPTER 6: CONCLUSIONS ................................................................................. 79

BIBLIOGRAPHY ....................................................................................................... 80

APPENDIX ................................................................................................................. 97

A.1 Sterile Anaerobic Mineral Media Transformation of Carbon Tetrachloride .... 98

A.2 Observed First Order CT and CF Transformation Rates .................................. 99

A.3 Carbon Tetrachloride Transformation Capacity Experiments ........................ 103

A.4 Transformation of Chloroform by the EV-5L and VS-5L Cultures and

Supernatant ............................................................................................................ 107

A.5 Carbon Tetrachloride Transformation by the Point Mugu Anaerobic Mixed

Cultures and Supernatant ....................................................................................... 114

Page 10: Transformation of Carbon Tetrachloride and Chloroform by Trichloroethene Respiring Anaerobic

LIST OF FIGURES

Figure Page

Figure 2.1: The chemical structure of carbon tetrachloride. ......................................... 4

Figure 2.2: The chemical structure of chloroform ........................................................ 6

Figure 2.3: Proposed pathways for the anaerobic transformation of carbon tetrachloride .................................................................................................................. 9

Figure 3.1: Simplified biochemical pathway representing measured compounds and an unknown fraction (postulated as CO2 based on previous studies) ......................... 45

Figure 4.1: Pseudo-first order CT transformation rates by the EV-5L and VS-5L ADC+S ........................................................................................................................ 47

Figure 4.2: Transformation of 2.6 µM CT by a) EV-5L and live cells, and b) EV-5L and 50 mM NaN3 ........................................................................................................ 53

Figure 4.3: Transformation of 2.6 µM CT by a) VS-5L and live cells, and b) VS-5L and 50 mM NaN3 ........................................................................................................ 54

Figure 4.4: Simultaneous transformation of 2.6 µM CT and 50 µM TCE by the a) EV-5L and b) VS-5L cultures and supernatant ........................................................... 57

Figure 4.5: Transformation of multiple additions of 50 µM TCE by the EV-5L culture in the presence of CT and CF ..................................................................................... 58

Figure 4.6: Transformation of multiple additions of 50 µM TCE by the EV-5L culture without CT or CF ........................................................................................................ 59

Figure 4.7: Transformation of multiple additions of 50 µM TCE by the VS-5L culture in the presence of CT and CF ..................................................................................... 60

Figure 4.8: Transformation of multiple additions of 50 µM TCE by the VS-5L culture without CT or CF ........................................................................................................ 61

Figure 4.9: Zero order transformation rates (kmX) for the reductive dechlorination of 50 µM TCE by the a) EV-5L and b) VS-5L cultures ................................................. 62

Figure 5.1: Biochemical pathway for the reductive dechlorination of PCE ............... 65

Figure 5.2: The formation of 0.3 µM CF from 0.86 µM CT did not inhibit the utilization of 2 mM formate (100 µmol H2/bottle) by the a) EV-5L and b) VS-5L cultures ........................................................................................................................ 67

Page 11: Transformation of Carbon Tetrachloride and Chloroform by Trichloroethene Respiring Anaerobic

LIST OF FIGURES (Continued)

Figure Page

Figure 5.3: The formation of 1.6 µM CF (EV-5L) and 2.2 µM CF (VS-5L) from 2.6 µM CT inhibited the utilization of 2 mM formate (100 µmol H2/bottle) by the a) EV-5L and b) VS-5L cultures ........................................................................................... 68

Figure 5.4: Multiple additions of 0.86 µM CT produced between 0.3 – 0.68 µM CFmax, which was subsequently transformed by the VS-5L culture ........................... 69

Figure 5.5: Transformation of 2.1 µM CF by the a) EV-5L and b) VS-5L ADC+S resulted in the reversible inhibition of H2 use ............................................................. 71

Figure 5.6: Formation and consumption of a) H2 and b) CF during the reductive dechlorination of 50 µM TCE and the simultaneous transformation of 2.6 µM CT and 50 µM TCE ................................................................................................................. 74

Page 12: Transformation of Carbon Tetrachloride and Chloroform by Trichloroethene Respiring Anaerobic

LIST OF TABLES

Table Page

Table 4.1: Comparison of CT first order transformation rate constants for the EV-5L and VS-5L ADC+S ..................................................................................................... 49

Table 4.2: Comparison of CF first order transformation rate constants for the EV-5L and VS-5L ADC+S ..................................................................................................... 49

Table 4.3: First order transformation rates for the EV-5L ADC+S estimated from the analytical solutions predicting CT degradation and product formation ...................... 55

Table 4.4: First order transformation rates for the VS-5L ADC+S estimated from the analytical solutions predicting CT degradation and product formation ...................... 55

Table 5.1: Estimated first order CF transformation rates (kCF,obs) and zero order maximum H2 use rates (kH2,max) for the VS-5L ADC+S ............................................. 70

Table 5.2: Comparison of first order CF transformation rates and zero order maximum H2 use rates for the EV-5L ADC+S ........................................................... 75

Table 5.3: Comparison of first order CF transformation rates and zero order maximum H2 use rates for the VS-5L ADC+S. .......................................................... 76

Page 13: Transformation of Carbon Tetrachloride and Chloroform by Trichloroethene Respiring Anaerobic

LIST OF APPENDIX FIGURES

Figures Page

Figure A.1.1: Controls with a) 2.6 µM and b) 8.6 µM CT were conducted in the sterile anaerobic reduced sulfide media ...................................................................... 98

Figure A.2.1: Estimation of first order CT transformation rates (kCT,obs) using a natural log – linear regression for the a) EV-5L and b) VS-5L cultures and supernatant ................................................................................................................ 100

Figure A.2.2: Estimation of first order CT transformation rates (kCT,obs) using a natural log – linear regression for the a) EV-5L and b) VS-5L cultures and supernatant ................................................................................................................ 101

Figure A.2.3: Estimation of first order CT transformation rates (kCT,obs) using a natural log – linear regression for the a) EV-5L and b) VS-5L cultures and supernatant ................................................................................................................ 102

Figure A.3.1: Transformation of multiple additions of 0.86 µM CT and CF by the a) EV-2L and b) EV-5L ADC+S .................................................................................. 104

Figure A.3.2: Transformation of multiple additions of 0.86 µM CT and CF by the a) VS-2L and b) VS-5L ADC+S ................................................................................... 105

Figure A.3.3: Decreases in a) kCT,obs and b) kCF,obs occurred when reactors were successively spiked with 0.86 µM CT ...................................................................... 106

Figure A.4.1: Transformation of 2.1 µM CF by the a) EV-5L and b) VS-5L ADC+S................................................................................................................................... 109

Figure A.4.2: Analytical solution for the transformation of 2.1 µM CF by the a) EV-5L and b) VS-5L ADC+S ......................................................................................... 110

Figure A.4.3: Estimation of first order CF transformation rates (kCF,obs) using a natural log – linear regression for the a) EV-5L and b) VS-5L cultures and supernatant .... 111

Figure A.4.4: Transformation of a) 21.1 µM CF and b) 23.1 µM DCM by the VS-5L culture and supernatant ............................................................................................. 112

Figure A.4.5: Estimation of first order CF transformation rates (kCF,obs) using a natural log – linear regression for VS-5L culture and supernatant ....................................... 113

Figure A.5.1: Transformation of 0.86 µM CT by the a) PM-2L and b) PM-5L ADC+S................................................................................................................................... 116

Page 14: Transformation of Carbon Tetrachloride and Chloroform by Trichloroethene Respiring Anaerobic

LIST OF APPENDIX FIGURES (Continued)

Figures Page

Figure A.5.2: Transformation of 2.6 µM CT by the a) PM-2L and b) PM-5L ADC+S................................................................................................................................... 117

Figure A.5.3: Pseudo-first order CT transformation rates by the PM-2L and PM-5L ADC+S ...................................................................................................................... 118

Figure A.5.4: H2 was added to the PM-2L and PM-5L reactors as lactate (2 mM) and formate (2 mM) ......................................................................................................... 119

Page 15: Transformation of Carbon Tetrachloride and Chloroform by Trichloroethene Respiring Anaerobic

LIST OF APPENDIX TABLES

Table Page

Table A.4.1: Comparison of CF first order transformation rate constants for the EV-5L and VS-5L ADC+S ............................................................................................. 108

Table A.4.2: First order transformation rates estimated from the analytical solutions predicting CF degradation and product formation .................................................... 108

Table A.5.1: Measurements of total suspended solids (TSS) in the continuous flow reactors containing anaerobic dehalogenating mixed cultures. ................................ 115

Table A.5.2: Comparison of CT first order transformation rate constants for the PM-2L and PM-5L ADC+S ............................................................................................. 115

Table A.5.3: First order transformation rates estimated from the analytical solutions predicting CT degradation and product formation .................................................... 115

Page 16: Transformation of Carbon Tetrachloride and Chloroform by Trichloroethene Respiring Anaerobic

Transformation of Carbon Tetrachloride and Chloroform by Trichloroethene Respiring Anaerobic Mixed Cultures and Supernatant

CHAPTER 1: INTRODUCTION

Carbon tetrachloride (CT) and chloroform (CF) are toxic and recalcitrant

groundwater pollutants with a long history of industrial use and improper disposal

leading to widespread contamination (Doherty, 2000; Knox and Canter, 1996).

Subsurface remediation of these compounds is of interest since they have been shown

to deplete stratospheric ozone and are probable or known carcinogens (US

Environmental Protection Agency, 2016). CT and CF are highest priority groundwater

pollutants and are often found in mixtures with tetrachloroethene (PCE) and

trichloroethene (TCE) due to their successive use as degreasers and dry cleaning agents

(Bagley et al., 2000; Knox and Canter, 1996). Mixtures of chlorinated aliphatic

hydrocarbons (CAHs) complicate bioremediation strategies using the organohalogen

respiring bacteria (OHRB) Dehalococcoides mccartyi due to inhibition exerted by low

concentrations of CT and CF on reductive dehalogenation (Bagley et al., 2000; He et

al., 2005; Maymó-Gatell et al., 2001). This can lead to the buildup of the toxic

metabolite vinyl chloride (VC), a known carcinogen (Agency for Toxic Substances and

Disease Registry, 2006). In order for the bioremediation of mixtures of CT and TCE to

be effective, further understanding of the dynamics of CT and CF transformation by

OHRB needs to be developed.

The transformation of CT and CF in anaerobic environments involves parallel

pathways catalyzed by biotic and abiotic mechanisms leading to the formation of

dichloromethane (DCM), chloromethane (CM), methane (CH4), carbon disulfide

(CS2), carbon monoxide (CO), carbon dioxide (CO2), and formate (Cappelletti et al.,

2012; Criddle and McCarty, 1991; de Best et al., 1998; Hashsham and Freedman,

1999). Reduced iron sulfides (Butler and Hayes, 2000; Kriegman-King and Reinhard,

1994, 1992), biogenic iron minerals (McCormick et al., 2002; McCormick and

Adriaens, 2004), and metallo-coenzymes (Chiu and Reinhard, 1995; Gantzer and

Wackett, 1991; Krone et al., 1989a, 1989b) can catalyze the abiotic transformation of

Page 17: Transformation of Carbon Tetrachloride and Chloroform by Trichloroethene Respiring Anaerobic

2

CT. Additionally, cometabolic CT and CF transformation has been found to occur in

methanogenic (Bouwer and McCarty, 1983; Novak et al., 1998a), acetogenic (Egli et

al., 1988; Hashsham and Freedman, 1999), sulfate reducing (de Best et al., 1998; Egli

et al., 1987), iron reducing (Maithreepala and Doong, 2008; McCormick et al., 2002),

and fermenting (Criddle et al., 1990b; Hashsham et al., 1995) environments. Product

formation and degradation rates are controlled predominantly by the reductant and

coenzymes present in the system. The addition of cofactors such as cobalamins greatly

enhances degradation rates and shifts product formation away from chlorinated

metabolites (Hashsham et al., 1995; Workman et al., 1997). CT and CF have been

found to inhibit numerous anaerobic processes including methanogenesis (Bauchop,

1967a; Yu and Smith, 2000), autotrophy (Egli et al., 1988), acetogenesis (Liu et al.,

2010; Scholten et al., 2000), and reductive dehalogenation (Bagley et al., 2000; He et

al., 2005; Maymó-Gatell et al., 2001).

The ability to couple detoxification of TCE and CT would be advantageous for

the in situ bioremediation of co-contaminated sites, despite that CT transformation is

largely driven by abiotic processes. A recent study examined the transformation of CT

and PCE in a continuous flow column bioaugmented with the Evanite (EV) culture, an

anaerobic dechlorinating mixed culture enriched in D. mccartyi strains (Behrens et al.,

2008; Marshall et al., 2014) that can transform PCE to ethene (ETH) (Yu et al., 2005).

CT (0.015 mM) and PCE (0.1 mM) were transformed simultaneously, but the process

was highly dependent on the electron donor (Azizian and Semprini, in press). When

formate (1.5 mM) was provided, PCE was transformed to VC (20%) and ETH (80%)

along with complete CT transformation to CF (20%) and an unknown fraction (80%).

When the electron donor was switched to the fermenting substrate lactate (1.1 mM),

PCE dehalogenation decreased with the formation of cDCE (48%), VC (36%), and

ETH (7%). Long-term exposure to CF impacted propionate fermentation, thus reducing

the amount of available H2 (Azizian and Semprini, in press).

While CT and CF transformation has been studied in numerous systems, a

rigorous investigation with chlorinated ethene respiring cultures has not been

undertaken owing to their inhibitory effects on reductive dehalogenation. The goals of

the present study were to (1) determine the extent of CT and CF transformation by cells

Page 18: Transformation of Carbon Tetrachloride and Chloroform by Trichloroethene Respiring Anaerobic

3

and reduced media obtained from chemostats containing TCE respiring anaerobic

mixed cultures not previously acclimated to these compounds; (2) develop a kinetic

model for CT degradation and product formation; and (3) explore the dynamics of CT

and TCE simultaneous transformation in highly controlled batch reactor systems.

Page 19: Transformation of Carbon Tetrachloride and Chloroform by Trichloroethene Respiring Anaerobic

4

CHAPTER 2: LITERATURE REVIEW

2.1 Carbon Tetrachloride

Carbon tetrachloride (CT) is an industrial chemical with a long history of use

and environmental contamination. CT is a slightly soluble, semivolatile compound with

a water saturation concentration of 810 mg/L and a dimensionless Henry’s coefficient

(Hcc) of 0.949 at 20 °C (National Center for Biotechnology Information, 2016a;

Staudinger and Roberts, 2001). It is also a lipophilic compound with a moderate

octanol-water partitioning coefficient (log kow = 2.83), which may allow it to cause

damage to cellular membranes (National Center for Biotechnology Information, 2016a;

Penny et al., 2010). CT is regulated under the National Primary Drinking Water

Regulations (NPDWRs) by the United States Environmental Protection Agency (EPA)

with a Maximum Contaminant Level (MCL) of 5 µg/L, and is also considered a

probable human carcinogen (US Environmental Protection Agency, 2016).

Furthermore, CT is fairly recalcitrant with an abiotic hydrolysis half-life of 7000 years

in water at 20 °C (Mabey and Mill, 1978).

Figure 2.1: The chemical structure of carbon tetrachloride (Source: Wikimedia Commons, Public Domain).

Carbon tetrachloride was manufactured and used extensively in the 20th century

for a variety of applications until 1970 when it was officially banned from all United

States consumer goods due to its toxicity and probable animal carcinogenicity

Page 20: Transformation of Carbon Tetrachloride and Chloroform by Trichloroethene Respiring Anaerobic

5

(Doherty, 2000; Kroschwitz and Howe-Grant, 1991). These links have been well

researched and established in numerous animal models, including microorganisms

(Eastmond, 2008; WHO, 2004a). Before being banned in the United States, CT was

used in a variety of ways as an industrial solvent, a dry cleaning agent, a grain fumigant,

and as a component in floor waxes, furniture polishes, paints, and varnishes. However,

after its removal from consumer goods, CT was still used heavily in portable fire

extinguishers and as an intermediate in the production of chlorofluorocarbons (CFCs).

As awareness grew about the larger environmental impacts of carbon tetrachloride and

CFCs through the depletion of stratospheric ozone, CT was phased out under the

Montreal Protocol with a complete ban on its production and use going into effect on

January 1, 2000 (Doherty, 2000; Petrisor and Wells, 2008).

Due to a long history of industrial use and improper disposal, substantial CT

contamination of soil and groundwater has occurred in the United States (Knox and

Canter, 1996). Knox and Canter (1996) have listed CT as a “highest priority”

groundwater contaminant due to its ubiquity at contaminated sites and its human and

environmental toxicity (Knox and Canter, 1996). Contamination of groundwater with

CT occurred most frequently with its use as an industrial degreaser and as a dry

cleaning agent (Doherty, 2000). The high volatility and low solubility of CT generated

an early misconception that the safest method for disposal was to remove the spent

degreasing fluids to an uninhabited area where it was dumped onto dry earth and then

ignited (Petrisor and Wells, 2008). In addition, early dry cleaning facilities were unable

to recover the majority of their spent carbon tetrachloride, which then accumulated in

soils and sediments. CT is a dense non-aqueous-phase liquid (DNAPL) with a density

of 1.59 g/mL, and it will sink into groundwater aquifers where it dissolves slowly and

creates plumes of contaminated water (National Center for Biotechnology Information,

2016a; Penny et al., 2010).

As a greater understanding of the environmental and health impacts of carbon

tetrachloride was developed, CT was replaced predominantly by tetrachloroethene

(PCE) as the chlorinated solvent of choice (Petrisor and Wells, 2008). This led to

further aquifer contamination before proper disposal practices were implemented,

Page 21: Transformation of Carbon Tetrachloride and Chloroform by Trichloroethene Respiring Anaerobic

6

creating complex contaminated sites that require more sophisticated remediation

strategies (Bagley et al., 2000; Koenig et al., 2012).

2.2 Chloroform

Chloroform (CF), or trichloromethane, is a naturally occurring and

synthetically produced chloromethane that is a degradation product of the reductive

dechlorination of carbon tetrachloride. Chloroform is a slightly soluble (8,090 mg/L at

20 °C) DNAPL (1.48 g/mL) that is also semivolatile (Hcc = 0.126) (National Center for

Biotechnology Information, 2016b; Staudinger and Roberts, 2001). Like CT,

chloroform is also lipophilic with a high octanol-water partitioning coefficient (log kow

= 1.97) (National Center for Biotechnology Information, 2016b). It is regulated by the

United States EPA under the NPDWRs as a trihalomethane with an MCL of 80 µg/L,

and is also considered a probable human carcinogen (US Environmental Protection

Agency, 2016). Chloroform differs from carbon tetrachloride in that it is also of natural

origin in addition to being synthetically produced. The total global environmental flux

of chloroform is approximately 600,000 tonnes per year with greater than 90% of the

emissions being natural in origin from marine and terrestrial environments (Gribble,

2004; Laturnus et al., 2002).

Figure 2.2: The chemical structure of chloroform (Source: Wikimedia Commons, Public Domain).

Page 22: Transformation of Carbon Tetrachloride and Chloroform by Trichloroethene Respiring Anaerobic

7

Chloroform has previously been used as an inhaled anesthetic, an extraction

solvent, an intermediate in the production of refrigerants, in fire extinguishers, and as

a fumigant (Agency for Toxic Substances and Disease Registry, 1997; Wawersik,

1997; WHO, 2004b). Currently, the predominant industrial uses of chloroform are its

reaction with hydrogen fluoride in order to produce monochlorodifluoromethane

(CFC-22), which is a precursor in the production of Teflon® (polytetrafluoroethylene),

and as the reagent source of dichlorocarbene (:CCl2) (Rossberg et al., 2000; Srebnik

and Laloë, 2001). The majority of the CF that has entered the environment has been

due to improper handling, storage, and disposal practices in addition to its formation as

a Disinfection Byproduct (DBP) during the chlorination of drinking water and

wastewater (Ivahnenko and Zogorski, 2006; Laturnus et al., 2002; McCulloch, 2003).

Further groundwater contamination has occurred due to the degradation of carbon

tetrachloride and subsequent formation of chloroform in anoxic environments

(Kriegman-King and Reinhard, 1992; Semprini et al., 1992; Vogel et al., 1987). Along

with CT, chloroform has been classified as a highest priority groundwater contaminant

(Knox and Canter, 1996). Sites contaminated with CT usually contain CF as a

transformation product, along with other chlorinated ethenes and ethanes, thus

complicating possible remediation strategies (Semprini et al., 1992; Vogel et al., 1987).

2.3 Transformation of Carbon Tetrachloride

Despite the recalcitrance and long hydrolytic half-life for CT, it has the potential

to form a broad range of transformation products in anaerobic environments through

numerous biotic and abiotic processes (Fig 2.3). However, since the carbon in CT is

fully oxidized, it is not readily degraded in aerobic environments, and therefore

typically only undergoes transformation in anoxic environments (Criddle and McCarty,

1991; Penny et al., 2010; Semprini et al., 1992; Vogel et al., 1987). CT can be directly

hydrolyzed to carbon dioxide (CO2), and in reduced sulfide environments abiotically

transformed to carbon disulfide (CS2), which is easily mineralized to CO2. While the

direct hydrolysis of CT is possible, the first step in reducing environments is typically

a one-electron reduction catalyzed by redox-active electron shuttles giving a

trichloromethyl radical (.CCl3) and a chloride ion (Criddle and McCarty, 1991; Penny

Page 23: Transformation of Carbon Tetrachloride and Chloroform by Trichloroethene Respiring Anaerobic

8

et al., 2010; Vogel et al., 1987). From here, the trichloromethyl radical can be reduced

to form chloroform, undergo a second one-electron transfer forming dichlorocarbene

(:CCl2), or dimerize and form hexachloroethane (HCE), which is only a minor pathway

(Criddle and McCarty, 1991). Hexachloroethane can undergo dihaloelimination and be

reduced to tetrachloroethene (PCE), which is then reductively dechlorinated by

Dehalococcoides mccartyi sp. to ethene (Criddle et al., 1986; Maymó-Gatell et al.,

1997; Vogel et al., 1987). However, one of the more prevalent biochemical pathways

involve chloroform being reductively dechlorinated to dichloromethane (DCM), which

can then be further reduced to chloromethane (CM) and methane (MET) in highly

reduced environments (Cappelletti et al., 2012; Criddle and McCarty, 1991; de Best et

al., 1998). This reductive pathway is the hydrogenolysis of CT, similar to the reductive

dechlorination of PCE and TCE. Both CF and the trichloromethyl radical can undergo

one-electron transfers in which they are reduced to dichlorocarbene, which rapidly

hydrolyzes to form carbon monoxide (CO) and formic acid (HCOOH), thus forming

CO2 (Cappelletti et al., 2012; Criddle and McCarty, 1991). Carbon dioxide is the most

desirable end product for CT transformation due to the toxicity of the chlorinated

intermediates and CS2.

Page 24: Transformation of Carbon Tetrachloride and Chloroform by Trichloroethene Respiring Anaerobic

9

Figure 2.3: Proposed pathways for the anaerobic transformation of carbon tetrachloride. Adapted from (Cappelletti et al., 2012; Criddle and McCarty, 1991; de Best et al., 1998; Hashsham and Freedman, 1999).

2.4 Abiotic Transformation Mechanisms

2.4.1 Electrolytic Transformation

There are numerous compounds that can facilitate the abiotic transformation of

CT in reducing environments. In addition, it is possible to induce CT transformation

abiotically by creating an electrochemical gradient using an electrolytic cell (Criddle

and McCarty, 1991). Criddle and McCarty (1991) created a highly controlled

Page 25: Transformation of Carbon Tetrachloride and Chloroform by Trichloroethene Respiring Anaerobic

10

electrolysis cell consisting of an anode and cathode separated by a proton permeable

membrane, which balanced the charge in the cell. Water was oxidized at a platinum

diode, releasing molecular oxygen, electrons, and protons. The electrons then traveled

along an external circuit to a silver cathode where they were used in reductive reactions.

A potentiostat controlled the reduction potential at the cathode, which was

deoxygenated by sparging with argon or zero-grade helium.

In order to test CT transformation at varying reduction potentials, Criddle and

McCarty (1991) introduced 16 µmoles CT into the liquid phase of the cathode

compartment and allowed it to equilibrate with the gas phase. A potential of -0.93 V or

-1.15 V (versus the Ag/AgCl/Na2SO4 reference electrode) was applied to the

electrolysis cell for a 6-hour period, and CT transformation was measured. At a

reduction potential of -0.93 V, CT was transformed partially to CF (~15%) via

hydrogenolysis and trace amounts of carbon monoxide. A reduction potential of -1.15

V was then applied over a 16-hour period, and 32 µmol CT were added to the system

in two separate spikes, one at time zero and the second after 6 hours of electrolysis. CT

was transformed again partially to CF and trace amounts of CO. However,

dichloromethane was also detected due to the more reduced nature of the electrolysis

cell. During this phase of the experiment, measurements of formate and released

chloride ion (Cl-) were made in order to quantify the non-chlorinated products of CT

transformation. They found that 23 µmol of CT were removed yielding 1.4 µmol CF,

100 µmol Cl-, and 17 µmol formate. Therefore in the more reduced conditions,

reduction of CF accounted only for ~6% of the transformed CT while the reduction to

formate accounted for ~75% of the CT added to the system (Criddle and McCarty,

1991).

In order to be reduced to formate and CO, CT must undergo a two-electron

transfer to dichlorocarbene, which is thermodynamically favorable when an electron

donor is oxidized that has a reduction potential of +0.2 V or less (Criddle and McCarty,

1991). Furthermore, the formation of the trichloromethyl radical is not favorable unless

it is coupled with an electron donor that is oxidized at a potential less than or equal to

-0.15 V. Thus, in reducing environments the formation of dichlorocarbene may be

competitive with formation of the trichloromethyl radical leading to the presence of

Page 26: Transformation of Carbon Tetrachloride and Chloroform by Trichloroethene Respiring Anaerobic

11

parallel pathways for the reduction of CT (Criddle and McCarty, 1991). While more

highly reduced environments can shift the CT transformation pathway away from CF

production and towards formate and CO, it also allows for the formation of DCM, albeit

in smaller amounts.

2.4.2 Reduced Iron and Iron Sulfide Compounds

Numerous studies have also been conducted to determine the ability of various

reduced iron and iron sulfide compounds to transform CT abiotically. Kriegman-King

and Reinhard (1992) explored the environmental parameters that govern the rate of CT

transformation in heterogeneous environments containing sulfide (calculated as HS-),

biotite, and vermiculite; the latter two are common iron-containing sheet silicate

minerals found in subsurface environments. Previous research found that the

transformation rate of CT would be a function of the mineral surface area (Kriegman-

King and Reinhard, 1991). In their system, the mechanism of CT transformation was

hypothesized to be affected by the sheet silicates and sulfide in three ways: 1) CT will

undergo electron transfer with the ferrous iron in the sheet silicates and the oxidized

iron will then be reduced by sulfide; 2) CT will react with the sulfide that becomes

adsorbed to the sheet silicates; 3) sulfide will react with the dissolved iron released into

solution by mineral dissolution, thus forming iron sulfides which can react with CT.

In order to test these hypotheses, Kriegman-King and Reinhard (1992) created

treatments containing HS- and biotite or vermiculite. CT transformation followed

pseudo-first order kinetics and treatments containing mineral solids catalyzed faster CT

transformation, with biotite being more reactive than vermiculite. From their rate

analyses, the CT half-life with 1 mM HS- was calculated to be 2600, 160, and 50 days

for the homogeneous, vermiculite, and biotite systems, respectively. The

transformation products measured were carbon disulfide (CS2) (81-86%), chloroform

(5-15%), formate (3-6%), and carbon monoxide (1-2%). CT transformation rates were

also dependent on the type of mineral surface present, the solid surface area, and

temperature. Biotite facilitated CT transformation at a higher rate than vermiculite did,

Page 27: Transformation of Carbon Tetrachloride and Chloroform by Trichloroethene Respiring Anaerobic

12

and rates increased with higher mineral surface areas and temperatures. However, CT

transformation rates were independent of pH and [HS-] above 0.5 mM.

This was followed by experiments exploring the capacity for pyrite to transform

CT in aqueous environments (Kriegman-King and Reinhard, 1994). Pyrite (FeS2) is an

iron sulfide mineral that is commonly found in sulfate-reducing environments. Upon

transformation with CT, an iron oxide coating forms on the surface of the mineral

deactivating it. However, sulfide may be able to regenerate the pyrite surface through

a reductive dissolution of the iron oxide coating (Dos Santos Afonso and Stumm, 1992;

Peiffer et al., 1992). Kriegman-King and Reinhard (1994) found that pyrite facilitates

the transformation of CT in both aerobic and anaerobic environments, and that greater

than 90% of the initial CT mass was transformed within 12-36 days in the presence of

1.2-1.4 m2/L pyrite at 25 °C. The anaerobic environment facilitated more rapid CT

transformation than did the aerobic environment, but approximately 50% of the CT

mass was transformed to chloroform anaerobically while >70% was transformed to

CO2 under aerobic conditions. Furthermore, both environments saw small amounts of

CS2 and formate as transformation products. The CT degradation data fit a zero order

model (R2 ~ 0.9) better than a first order model (R2 ~ 0.7) across all treatments, showing

a diminished dependence between transformation and CT concentration. A zero order

dependence on CT concentration is expected when a heterogeneous reaction is

controlled by surface chemistry rather than by diffusion (Goldhaber, 1983), such as

when the pyrite surface is catalyzing the transformation of CT.

Another common soil mineral capable of CT transformation is iron (II) sulfide

(FeS). Butler and Hayes (2000) investigated the transformation kinetics of nine

different halogenated aliphatic compounds including CT by FeS solids in anaerobic

aqueous solutions. A uniform set of experimental conditions were created in order to

control against inconsistent results found by other researchers in which free sulfide and

bound Fe(II) could not catalyze dechlorination (Doong and Wu, 1992). Butler and

Hayes (2000) conducted their kinetic experiments for up to 4 months in 5 mL flame-

sealed glass ampules with 10 g/L FeS (0.005 m2/g), pH of 8.3, and an ionic strength of

0.1 M. CT transformation was complete and followed pseudo-first order kinetics with

an observed rate constant of (6.39 ± 0.79) x 10-2 h-1 with 46% of the mass recovered as

Page 28: Transformation of Carbon Tetrachloride and Chloroform by Trichloroethene Respiring Anaerobic

13

CF. They did not measure any additional products from CT degradation, but

hypothesized that a portion of the unknown mass could be measured as CS2. Devlin

and Müller (1999) also found that freshly precipitated FeS catalyzed the transformation

of CT to CF and CS2 in an approximately 2:1 ratio at a near neutral pH (Butler and

Hayes, 2000; Devlin and Müller, 1999). Additional research has shown that zero valent

iron (ZVI) and nano-scale ZVI (nZVI) can effectively transform CT to less chlorinated

and non-chlorinated products, and has been employed extensively for the remediation

of numerous halogenated aliphatic compounds (Gillham and O’Hannesin, 1994; Huo

et al., 2015; Jiao et al., 2009; Schreier and Reinhard, 1994).

2.4.3 Metallo-coenzyme Catalyzed Transformation

Numerous mammalian and microbial enzymes contain transition-metal

coenzymes as prosthetic groups such as cobalamins (Vitamin B12 derivatives

containing cobalt), heme (an iron porphyrin complex), and cytochrome F430 (nickel-

centered porphinoid found only in methanogens) (Chiu and Reinhard, 1995). These

compounds, along with biomimetic cobalt macrocycles (Ukrainczyk et al., 1995), have

been implicated in the abiotic transformation of CT in anaerobic environments. Gantzer

and Wackett (1991) conducted early research on the transformation of carbon

tetrachloride and polychlorinated ethylenes and benzenes catalyzed by vitamin B12,

coenzyme F430, and hematin in a titanium (III) citrate solution (Gantzer and Wackett,

1991). All three transition metal co-factors are found in anaerobic bacteria cultures, and

previous research with methanogens has suggested that the reduction of CT to methane

is mediated nonspecifically by cobalamin, F430, or by both co-enzymes (Krone et al.,

1989a, 1989b). In order to directly test the role of the metallo-coenzymes in the

transformation of CT, Gantzer and Wackett (1991) established anaerobic reactor vials

containing 2.2 µmol of CT, 27 µmol titanium (III) citrate as the reductant, and 46 nmol

of the tested co-factor at pH 8.2 (Gantzer and Wackett, 1991; Krone et al., 1989a,

1989b). They found that all three co-factors mediated the reductive dechlorination of

CT to chloroform following pseudo-first order kinetics, but they did not track product

distribution beyond the formation of CF. Kinetic analyses determined that coenzyme

F430 mediated the fastest transformation of CT followed by vitamin B12 and hematin

Page 29: Transformation of Carbon Tetrachloride and Chloroform by Trichloroethene Respiring Anaerobic

14

with pseudo-first order rate constants of 100 ± 4 h-1, 74 ± 4 h-1, and 2.4 ± 0 h-1,

respectively.

Furthering the work of Gantzer and Wackett (1991), Chiu and Reinhard (1995)

focused specifically on the transformation of CT catalyzed by vitamin B12 and hematin

in an aqueous titanium (III) citrate solution over a range of pH values (Chiu and

Reinhard, 1995). They found that vitamin B12 was a more stable and effective catalyst

than hematin for CT transformation. Hematin had a fairly low turnover number with

27 CT molecules transformed per molecule of hematin deactivated at pH 8.0 and 42

CT molecules transformed per molecule of hematin deactivated at pH 9.9. This same

deactivation behavior was not observed with vitamin B12, which maintained its

transformation capacity over time. By conducting a spectroscopic analysis of the

vitamin B12 spectrum, Chiu and Reinhard (1995) found that the titanium (III) citrate

solution was able to instantaneously reduce B12a [Co(III)] to B12r [Co(II)] and B12s

[Co(I)]. The more reduced forms of cyanocobalamin are responsible for providing the

reducing power required for CT transformation. As B12s is oxidized to B12r during the

redox process, Ti(III) will instantly reduce it back to B12s thus owing to the high

transformation capacity of vitamin B12 (Chiu and Reinhard, 1995). Increasing

concentrations of vitamin B12 catalyzed faster transformation of CT exhibiting zero

order kinetics with respect to [CCl4]aq and first order kinetics with respect to vitamin

B12. However, chloroform was the primary transformation product ranging from 58%

(pH 7.3) to 95% (pH 10.3), and the presence of vitamin B12 or hematin did not influence

the yield. Instead, CF production was a function of pH, titanium (III) concentration,

and organic content, and increased as these factors increased. The reducing agents

studied here play a significant role in the transformation of CT, but the results obtained

from one reductant system cannot be extrapolated to a system that uses a different

reducing agent due to additional factors that control CT transformation and product

formation.

This was studied in depth by Lewis et al. (1996) who looked at the cobalt corrin-

catalyzed transformation of CT using titanium (III) citrate, dithiothreitol (DTT), and

the S2-/cysteine reducing pair as reductants (Lewis et al., 1996). Cobalt corrins are

heterocyclic compounds that contain the transition metal cobalt in various oxidation

Page 30: Transformation of Carbon Tetrachloride and Chloroform by Trichloroethene Respiring Anaerobic

15

states. The Co-corrins used were vitamin B12 (cyanocobalamin), cobinamide dicyanide

(Cd), and aquocobalamin (AqC). In these reducing systems, the different reductants

produce Co-corrins with Co at different oxidation states. Ti(III) produces the most

reduced corrin [Co(I)] from Co(III) while DTT and S2-/cysteine produce a less reduced

form, Co(II). In the Ti(III)/Co(I) system, CT was transformed completely and

predominantly by hydrogenolysis with the primary products being chloromethane

(CM) and methane (CH4), which differed from previous results with this system (Chiu

and Reinhard, 1995). CM constituted 44-71% of the original CT mass with 7-17%

methane and smaller amounts of CO, CO2, and nonvolatile products. The highly

reduced nature of the Co(I) corrins likely catalyzed the reduction of CT beyond CF and

DCM leading to the accumulation of CM and CH4. The thiol reductants, DTT and S2-

/cysteine, produced more halogenated products, possibly due to the less reduced nature

of the Co(II) in the corrins. DTT and Co(II) also transformed CT completely with the

primary transformation products being DCM (20-31%), carbon monoxide (11-39%),

and nonvolatile products (17-47%). The S2-/cysteine reductants were the least effective

at transforming CT, with AqC unable to fully degrade the initial CT present (16%

remaining). The primary transformation products were CF (0-27%), DCM (0-15%),

CS2 (3-4%) and nonvolatile products (23-62%). It seems that Co(II) is not capable of

catalyzing reductive dehalogenation beyond DCM, or does so very slowly. However,

the most important determining factors in the transformation pathways and products of

CT degradation are the reductants and their interactions in the reducing environment,

shown clearly by the differences between the Ti(III) and thiol environments.

Another example of a transition metal catalyzing CT transformation is the use

of homogeneous and mineral-supported biomimetic cobalt macrocycles in aqueous

solution (Ukrainczyk et al., 1995). A biomimetic Co macrocycle is a cyclic

macromolecule containing cobalt that catalyzes specific biochemical processes such as

reductive dehalogenation. This research is of interest because it explores the use of

mineral substrates for the catalyst to adsorb to, thus more closely representing

groundwater environments for possible in situ remediation. In order to get the Co

macrocycle to adsorb to the mineral surface, the compound must permanently carry a

charge. Two Co macrocycles were used in this study, cobalt tetrakis (N-methyl-4-

Page 31: Transformation of Carbon Tetrachloride and Chloroform by Trichloroethene Respiring Anaerobic

16

pyridiniumyl) porphyrin (CoTMPyP) cation and cobalt tetrasulfophthalocyanine

(CoPcTs) anion in solution and supported on high surface area minerals. In

homogeneous experiments, a Co macrocycle (0.1 mM) was added to an anaerobic

solution containing DTT (0.1 M) and CT (1.0 mM). The heterogeneous experiments

included a silica supported CoTMPyP, a CoPcTs-layered double hydroxide,

CoTMPyP-hectorite and CoTMPyP-fluorohectorite as mineral substrate surfaces for

adsorption. Short-term experiments were conducted over a two-hour time period, in

which CF and DCM accounted for less than 30% of the CT transformed, with the

remaining mass as nonvolatile products. CF was the only detectable product in the

heterogeneous experiments even at reaction times greater than two hours. CoTMPyP

was more active relative to its heterogeneous catalysts, while the supported

(heterogeneous) CoPcTs degraded more CT than the homogeneous catalyst, which was

deactivated due to aggregation. Ukrainczyk et al. (1995) hypothesize that the lack of

DCM formation in the heterogeneous systems is most likely due to a change in the

reduction potential of the Co macrocycles to a more positive value relative to the

aqueous macrocycles, which occurred because of adsorption onto the mineral surfaces.

Long-term experiments were also conducted over a period of three days in order

to test the catalytic activity of the homogeneous versus the mineral bound Co

macrocycles. These experiments were conducted with lower amounts of catalyst (0.002

mM) and higher CT concentrations (2.3 and 4.6 mM) in order to examine catalyst

stability under deactivating conditions. CoPcTs catalyzed the fastest CT transformation

at 2.3 mM CT with a pseudo-first order rate constant 0.75 d-1. The catalysts did begin

to lose activity after one day of the experiment, however it appears this was not due to

adsorption onto the mineral surface. The silica-supported CoTMPyP (kobs = 0.57 d-1)

was more active than the homogeneous catalyst (kobs = 0.49 d-1), suggesting that

adsorption onto the physical substrate helped stabilize the catalyst and provide activity

over longer time scales. It is important to note that CT transformation occurred at very

high concentrations (353 and 706 mg/L), which normally would inhibit microbial

mediated CT degradation. For comparison, the concentrations of carbon tetrachloride

at the Hanford site in Richland, WA, a highly contaminated groundwater site, averages

between 1-5 mg/L CT (Truex et al., 2001).

Page 32: Transformation of Carbon Tetrachloride and Chloroform by Trichloroethene Respiring Anaerobic

17

2.5 Microbial Carbon Tetrachloride Transformation

A multitude of microorganisms have been implicated in the transformation of

carbon tetrachloride in anoxic and anaerobic environments. However, despite the

potential energy to be gained by using CT as a terminal electron acceptor, only

cometabolic transformation has been found to occur and a microbe able to grow on CT

as sole carbon and energy source is yet to be discovered (Penny et al., 2010). The

cometabolic nature of CT degradation and the multitude of biochemical pathways

through which CT is transformed complicate the characterization and understanding of

the transformation mechanisms carried out by different pure and mixed cultures.

Furthermore, CT is a biocidal compound that has been shown to strongly inhibit a

variety of environmentally significant metabolic processes such as methanogenesis (3

µM), reductive dehalogenation (1-10 µM), and autotrophy (80 µM) (Bagley et al.,

2000; Bauchop, 1967a; Egli et al., 1988; He et al., 2005). Since CT is also a lipophilic

compound with a moerate octanol-water partition coefficient (log kow = 2.83), it may

also cause damage to cellular membranes, further impacting the growth of

microorganisms (National Center for Biotechnology Information, 2016a; Penny et al.,

2010). CT degradation can catalyze the formation of intermediate compounds, such as

highly active radicals, that can have inhibitory or toxic effects on cellular processes.

Despite these complications, a large consortium of microbial cultures contributes to the

transformation of CT in methanogenic, acetogenic, sulfate (SO42-) reducing, iron (Fe)

reducing, nitrate (NO3-) reducing, dechlorinating, and fermenting environments.

However, CT transformation solely by cometabolism is relatively slow compared to

degradation catalyzed by abiotic mechanisms. Numerous studies have shown that

microbial cultures help facilitate rapid and complete CT transformation by producing

and excreting small extracellular compounds (Doong et al., 2014; Hashsham et al.,

1995; Hashsham and Freedman, 1999; McCormick et al., 2002; Novak et al., 1998a,

1998b; Workman et al., 1997). As shown by the abiotic transformation experiments,

environmental conditions are a strong determinant of the CT metabolite product

distribution, which continues to hold in microbial systems.

Page 33: Transformation of Carbon Tetrachloride and Chloroform by Trichloroethene Respiring Anaerobic

18

2.5.1 Methanogenic Environments

The first experiments with microorganisms capable of carrying out the

transformation of CT was conducted using a methanogenic mixed culture enriched

from anaerobic digester sludge (Bouwer and McCarty, 1983). Experiments were

conducted in batch reactors and continuous-flow columns packed with 3 mm diameter

glass beads in order to test the biological transformation of low concentrations of

numerous 1- and 2-carbon halogenated aliphatic compounds. Bouwer and McCarty

(1983) also utilized [14C] carbon tetrachloride in order to completely track product

formation by the methanogenic culture. Batch cultures were established with 45 µg/L

CT (0.29 µM), which was completely degraded by the methanogenic culture after 16

days, while sterile controls showed no appreciable decline in CT concentration.

Experiments conducted with [14C] CT found that 99 ± 2% of the radioactivity

associated with the 14CCl4 was recovered as 14CO2.

Experiments were also conducted in a continuous-flow column with a two-day

retention time containing a mixture of chlorinated aliphatic compounds including CF

and CT (Bouwer and McCarty, 1983). Acetate served as the electron donor to the

methanogenic culture, and CT was added at a concentration of 17 µg/L (0.11 µM) in

the column influent. The column did not require an acclimation period to CT, and it

was fully transformed with >99% removal under steady state operating conditions.

Transformation of 14CCl4 resulted in 99 ± 2% of the radioactivity recovered as 14CO2

in the column effluent. The absence of the formation of chlorinated metabolites in this

study is desirable. However, the concentrations examined are an order of magnitude

below the concentration found to be inhibitory to the growth of methanogens (3 µM

CT) (Bauchop, 1967a). Higher concentrations of CT that are inhibitory to methanogens

could possibly shift the transformation pathways to produce chlorinated products (CF

and DCM) in addition to CO2.

CT transformation by pure cultures of the methanogens Methanosarcina

barkeri, Methanosarcina thermophila, and Methanosaeta concillii has also been

studied extensively (Novak et al., 1998a, 1998b). The three species were chosen due to

their differing abilities to grow on hydrogen (H2) and CO2 (hydrogenotrophic

methanogenesis): M. barkeri grows readily on H2-CO2 with no acclimation period; M.

Page 34: Transformation of Carbon Tetrachloride and Chloroform by Trichloroethene Respiring Anaerobic

19

thermophila grows poorly on H2-CO2 after an approximately 9-day lag period; M.

concillii is unable to grow on H2-CO2. Due to the gaseous nature of H2, it is difficult to

add to and control in subsurface environments. However, elemental iron (Fe0) can serve

as an electron donor for the hydrogenolytic transformation of CT to CF (Johnson et al.,

1996), and for the growth of methanogens since it produces H2 through the corrosion

of Fe0 to Fe2+. When incubated in the presence of Fe0, all three species exhibited faster

CT degradation compared to treatments containing cells only, cells and H2, methanol

(MeOH) fed cells, and Fe0 only systems. CF was the primary transformation product,

and in systems that degraded CF, about 50% was transformed to DCM. Despite the

inability of M. thermophila to grow on H2-CO2 during the time frame of these

experiments, it exhibited the most rapid transformation of CT and CF compared to the

other two species.

Due to the enhanced transformation of CT and CF found by treatments

containing cells and Fe0, the researchers hypothesized that an excreted biomolecule

might be responsible for some or all of the enhanced CT and CF transformation. The

supernatant from treatments where organisms were grown in the presence of iron were

exchanged with those where organisms were grown only in media. There was a

significant difference in the rates of CT transformation between treatments that

contained cells and supernatant grown in the presence of Fe0 versus those that did not.

These results prompted the researchers to explore the transformation of CT and CF

solely by the supernatant from M. thermophila grown in the presence and absence of

Fe0 (Novak et al., 1998b). Treatments in which the supernatant was filtered with a 0.22

µm filter did not alter the patterns of CT or CF transformation. Additionally, CT

transformation was rapid and complete in supernatants from cultures grown both in the

presence and absence of Fe0. However, the supernatant from cultures grown without

Fe0 were not able to subsequently catalyze the transformation of CF. There was also no

significant difference in CT transformation in treatments that were autoclaved versus

those that weren’t; however, no CF transformation occurred in autoclaved treatments.

It was hypothesized that the excreted biomolecule catalyzing CT and CF transformation

could possibly be a protein structure with a metal center. The metal center catalyzing

CT transformation would not be affected by heat treatment while the protein would be.

Page 35: Transformation of Carbon Tetrachloride and Chloroform by Trichloroethene Respiring Anaerobic

20

The excreted biomolecule also had a high transformation capacity with no observed

reduction in rates after multiple spikes of CT dechlorination totaling approximately 2.1

µmol/bottle over 12 days.

Characterization of the cellular exudates from M. thermophila showed that they

were from the < 10 kDa (Dalton) molecular weight fraction, which is too small to be

attributed to proteins. Fractionation through a C18 column showed elevated levels of

iron, zinc, and cobalt, which led researchers to hypothesize that the exudates are

porphorinogen-type molecules containing these three transition metals (Koons et al.,

2001). The iron and cobalt containing exudates are likely heme and cobalamins

(vitamin B12 homologs) since the enhanced dechlorination activity of the exudates at

different pH and temperature values matched results found previously with these

compounds (Assaf-Anid et al., 1994; Chiu and Reinhard, 1995; Holliger et al., 1992;

Krone et al., 1989b). Additionally, the zinc-containing exudates could likely be novel

Zn porphorinogens capable of carrying out dechlorination reactions. In order to test

this theory, two Zn porphorinogens and a model quinone were tested for their

dechlorination activity. Both of the Zn porphorinogens catalyzed rapid and complete

CT transformation while the quinone was only capable of very slow transformation.

This confirms the possibility that the unknown Zn-containing cellular exudates from

M. thermophila could be novel Zn porphorinogens. The ability of methanogenic

bacteria to degrade CT and CF through small extracellular molecules demonstrates the

role that microbes play in facilitating CT degradation by abiotic mechanisms.

2.5.2 Acetogenic Environments

Complete and rapid transformation of CT by pure cultures of Acetobacterium

woodii and Clostridium thermoaceticum has also been found to occur. These two

species are acetogenic bacteria that produce acetate from CO2 with fructose (A. woodii)

or glucose (C. thermoaceticum) salts serving as electron donors (Egli et al., 1988). Egli

et al. (1988) found that A. woodii and C. thermoaceticum degraded approximately 80

µM CT completely within three days with CF forming as a transient intermediate

(maximum 20 µM) and 8 µM DCM. Experiments were also conducted with 14CCl4 in

Page 36: Transformation of Carbon Tetrachloride and Chloroform by Trichloroethene Respiring Anaerobic

21

order to track product formation and determine if the radioactivity (14C) introduced into

acetate from 14CCl4 proceeded through 14CO2 or through the more reduced C1

compounds CF and DCM. Growing cultures of A. woodii that were spiked with 40 µM 14CCl4 converted 92% of the initial mass to nonhalogenated products. Ninety-nine

percent of the original radioactivity was recovered with 13% CO2, 38% acetate, 10%

pyruvate, 8% DCM, 6% cellular material, 10% hydrophobic material, and 14% an

unknown fraction. The high percentage of nonhalogenated product formation shows

that the majority of the CT is undergoing a substitutive transformation to CO2, which

is then used for acetate production or is incorporated into cells. Pulse experiments were

conducted to measure the fate of radioactivity from 14CCl4. After 1 minute there was

eight times more 14C label found in CO2 than in acetate and little radioactivity found in

CF. It was hypothesized that CO2 is the first intermediate in CT degradation by A.

woodii and that it is subsequently transformed to acetate via the Acetyl-CoA pathway.

Based on work with two cultures lacking the Acetyl-CoA pathway

(Desulfobacter hydrogenophilus and an autotrophic nitrate-reducing bacterium) that

were unable to transform CT, Egli et al. (1988) hypothesized that a correlation exists

between CT degradation and microbes containing this biochemical pathway. While this

pattern is not definitive, microbes that contain the Acetyl-CoA pathway contain high

levels of corrinoids (e.g. vitamin B12) (Dangel et al., 1987; Krautler, 1988), which have

been shown to catalyze CT transformation independent of microbial culture (Chiu and

Reinhard, 1995; Gantzer and Wackett, 1991; Lewis et al., 1996; Ukrainczyk et al.,

1995). In order to test the mechanisms by which CT is transformed, live cells, cell-free

extracts, and autoclaved cells of A. woodii were tested (Egli et al., 1990). It was found

that CT degradation by cell-free extracts was similar to that by live cells, but the

transformation occurred at a slower rate. Furthermore, when A. woodii cells were

autoclaved, the reductive dechlorination of CT to CF was partly abolished while

substitutive transformation to CO2 was unaffected. It was also found that chloroform

was oxidized by both live and autoclaved A. woodii cells to CO2 at a rate about 20 times

less than the transformation of CT to CO2, showing that CF is not an intermediate in

this step. Since it is likely that CT reductive dehalogenation to CF is catalyzed by

metallo-coenzymes in the presence of A. woodii, it is strange that this pathway would

Page 37: Transformation of Carbon Tetrachloride and Chloroform by Trichloroethene Respiring Anaerobic

22

be partly abolished when cells were autoclaved. It is possible that under these

conditions, reductive dehalogenation depends on protein-mediated electron transport

from H2 rather than on electrons supplied by cysteine and sulfide from the incubation

media.

Two teams of researchers further explored the role of vitamin B12 homologs in

CT transformation by A. woodii (Hashsham and Freedman, 1999; Stromeyer et al.,

1992). While working with aquocobalamin [Co(II)], Stromeyer et al. (1992) found that

whole cells of A. woodii alone and aquocobalamin alone demonstrated similar CT

transformation rates and products. However, as the concentration of aquocobalamin

was increased, the percentage of chlorinated products decreased. After 20 hours, DCM

was measured at the following amounts (% of initial 14CCl4) in the different treatments:

live cells, 17%; autoclaved cells, <0.5%; 15 nmol aquocobalamin, 10%; 74 nmol

aquocobalamin, 1%. All of the treatments contained less than 3% CF with the major

chlorinated product being DCM. The treatment containing 74 nmol aquocobalamin

also showed the highest percentage of 14CO2 (29%) compared to the cells (8-9%) and

the 15 nmol aquocobalamin (8%). These results show that cellular vitamin B12 could

be responsible for all of the CT reactions that are catalyzed by cells. However, reductive

dechlorination of CF to DCM and CM could be driven by cellular processes. As the

reducing power of a system is increased by higher concentrations of vitamin B12 and

its homologs, two electron transfers and the substitutive transformation of CT to CO2

becomes more thermodynamically favorable, thus shifting the product distribution in

that direction (Criddle and McCarty, 1991).

Hashsham and Freedman (1999) demonstrated that complete transformation of

very high aqueous concentrations of CT (470 µM; 72 mg/L) can be achieved by A.

woodii over a short time span (2.5 days) when the culture was amended with 10 µM

hydroxycobalamin (OH-Cbl; vitamin B12a; Co(III)) and 25.2 mM fructose. The addition

of OH-Cbl and fructose to both live and dead A. woodii cells and medium catalyzed a

30-fold increase in CT transformation over those that did not receive OH-Cbl. In

treatments that received OH-Cbl but were missing either live A. woodii cells or

fructose, a 5-fold increase in CT transformation was still observed. In addition to

increasing the rate of CT transformation, OH-Cbl and fructose also shifted the

Page 38: Transformation of Carbon Tetrachloride and Chloroform by Trichloroethene Respiring Anaerobic

23

transformation products to more non-chlorinated compounds. Treatments containing

live A. woodii along with OH-Cbl and fructose showed only the transient formation of

CF (3.4% after 2.5 days) without the subsequent accumulation of DCM. In this

treatment, 31% of the original 14CCl4 was recovered as 14CO2 produced through the

carbon monoxide (CO) pathway. However, the abiotic formation of carbon disulfide

(CS2) was observed due to the reduced sulfide media. This observation differed from

previous research conducted with A. woodii and could explain some of the unaccounted

mass (Egli et al., 1990, 1988; Stromeyer et al., 1992). These results suggest that live

cells play an important role in shaping the product distribution from CT. Treatments

with live A. woodii, fructose and OH-Cbl produced only 13% CS2 while the other

treatments containing OH-Cbl but lacking either live cells or fructose produced

approximately 30% CS2. In contrast, live A. woodii without both OH-Cbl and fructose

catalyzed incomplete CT transformation after 13 days but produced only 1.9% CS2. It

is clear that OH-Cbl is an important component in catalyzing the transformation of CT,

but in order to maximize the percentage of desirable end products an additional electron

donor such as fructose is required.

2.5.3 Sulfate Reducing Environments

Sulfate (SO42-) reducing bacteria (SRB) are commonly found in groundwater

systems due to the high occurrence of SO42- in the environment. The reduced sulfide

(HS- and S2-) produced by SRB can catalyze the transformation of CT and CF (Butler

and Hayes, 2000; Kriegman-King and Reinhard, 1994, 1992). Pure culture studies

conducted with Desulfobacterium autotrophicum showed that complete CT

transformation (80 µM) could occur within 18 days with approximately 70% of the

mass measured as CF and DCM (Egli et al., 1988, 1987), with the remainder as

unidentified water-soluble products (Egli et al., 1990). The accumulation of such high

percentages of CF and DCM is undesirable. Heterotrophic growth of D. autotrophicum

was unaffected by the presence of CT and CF, but completely inhibited autotrophic

growth of the culture. Furthermore, autoclaving D. autotrophicum cells abolished

dechlorination activity suggesting the importance of heat labile compounds, such as

cytochromes, that can catalyze CT transformation. Cytochromes, which consist of

Page 39: Transformation of Carbon Tetrachloride and Chloroform by Trichloroethene Respiring Anaerobic

24

heme bonded to a protein group, of the b and C type have been reported in D.

autotrophicum (Widdel, 1987).

In order to study the transformation of CT in a system that more closely

replicated groundwater environments, de Best et al. (1998) constructed a continuous

flow sulfate reducing anaerobic packed-bed reactor and operated it under different

conditions of electron donor, CT, and SO42- (de Best et al., 1998). The packed bed

reactor was inoculated with digested sludge (20% v/v) from a wastewater treatment

plant and initially fed 510 µM SO42-, 2.5 µM CT, and 1 mM acetate as electron donor.

CT was completely transformed with 51.8% as CF (1.3 µM), 15.9% as DCM (0.44

µM), and the remainder unknown (32.3%; 0.77 µM). After 23 weeks of operation

methane was detected in the reactor at 672 µM and SO42- reduction was reduced to 350

µM (68.6%). CT transformation (2.5 µM) was still complete, but a dramatic shift in the

product distribution coincided with the onset of methanogenesis. CT was no longer

reductively dechlorinated to CF and DCM and instead was completely mineralized to

CO2, which had been found previously in a methanogenic culture but only at very low

(0.11 µM) CT concentrations (Bouwer and McCarty, 1983). When sulfate

concentrations were increased to 5 mM, methanogenesis ceased and CT transformation

continued to be complete, but the product distribution shifted back to chlorinated

compounds (CF, 46.0%; DCM, 13.1%). The results suggest that high concentrations of

SO42- don’t impact the transformation of 2.5 µM CT, but the chemical dynamics play

a large role in the formation of products.

Further experiments were conducted in the reactor with 1 mM SO42- and acetate,

and various CT concentrations (2.5, 11.8, 10.9, 29.6, and 56.6 µM). At all

concentrations except 56.6 µM, CT transformation was complete and formed between

34-46% CF and 3-21% DCM. At concentrations above 11.8 µM CT, DCM formation

was partially inhibited due likely to the higher concentration of CF formed. At 56.6 µM

CT, sulfate reduction was inhibited and 42% (23.5 µM) of the original CT was

measured in the reactor effluent with no formation of CF and DCM. However, 114 µM

chloride (Cl-) was measured, suggesting that the transformed CT was completely

dechlorinated either to CS2 or CO2. In order to test the role of the sulfate reducing

bacteria, selective inhibitors were introduced to culture harvested from the packed bed

Page 40: Transformation of Carbon Tetrachloride and Chloroform by Trichloroethene Respiring Anaerobic

25

reactor and inoculated into batch systems. Molybdate and vancomycin, which

selectively inhibit sulfate reduction and gram-positive bacteria, respectively, were both

found to completely inhibit CT transformation, showing that the SO42- reducing

bacteria play an important role in CT degradation. Further inhibition experiments were

conducted in order to test the inhibition of CT on sulfate reduction. Sulfate reduction

was not impacted up to 18.2 µM CT, was partially inhibited from 20-38.2 µM CT, and

was completely inhibited above 38.2 µM CT. This is approximately half of the CT

concentration found to inhibit the autotrophic growth of D. autotrophicum (Egli et al.,

1988). At CT concentrations where partial or full inhibition of SO42- reduction

occurred, CT transformation was substantially impacted with no degradation occurring

at 76.3 µM CT. These results show the high sensitivity of SRB to increasing

concentrations of CT, but also confirm the ability of these subsurface microbes to

readily transform CT to less chlorinated products.

2.5.4 Iron Reducing Environments

Iron (III) oxides are ubiquitous in subsurface environments where their

reduction to Fe(II) by dissimilatory iron-reducing bacteria (DIRB) such as Geobacter

metallireducens, G. sulfurreducens, G. lovleyi, Shewanella putrefaciens, S. alga, and

Klebsiella pneumoniae can be coupled to the oxidation of organic matter (Bae and Lee,

2012; Caccavo et al., 1994; Li et al., 2009; Lovley et al., 1987; Sung et al., 2006). The

DIRB form biogenic iron compounds such as magnetite (Fe3O4), maghemite (γ-Fe2O3),

goethite (α-FeO(OH)), and dissolved Fe(II) which can catalyze the subsequent

transformation of CT and is enhanced by the addition of quinones such as

anthraquinone-2,6-disulfonate (AQDS) (Amonette et al., 2000; Doong et al., 2014;

McCormick et al., 2002).

McCormick et al. (2002) examined the relative kinetics of the biotic (G.

metallireducens) and abiotic (magnetite) transformation of CT under iron reducing

conditions (McCormick et al., 2002). Biogenic magnetite produced by G.

metallireducens was collected magnetically, and was washed and sonicated in order to

remove cells and cell debris. Kinetic experiments revealed that the primary

Page 41: Transformation of Carbon Tetrachloride and Chloroform by Trichloroethene Respiring Anaerobic

26

transformation product of CT was CF ranging from 15-30% and 35-45% in the biotic

and abiotic experiments, respectively; DCM and CM formation was not observed in

either system. In the biotic systems containing G. metallireducens, CT transformation

was pseudo-first order. The observed CT transformation rates (k,obs) decreased as the

initial aqueous CT concentration increased. Additionally, as G. metallireducens

biomass (mg-protein/L) increased, kCT,obs increased as well. The abiotic experiments

with the biogenic magnetite found that a linear relationship existed between the surface

area loading (m2/L) of the solids and observed pseudo-first order rates with a

concomitant increase in rates as magnetite loading increased. This suggests a strong

dependence on available particle surfaces for CT transformation. In order to assess the

relative contribution of biotic and abiotic mechanisms, experiments were conducted

with cells and magnetite present together. The yield of total protein and magnetite

surface area formed during G. metallireducens growth were used as a comparison for

the biotic/abiotic contributions, leading to the estimate that the mineral-mediated CT

transformation was 60-260 fold faster than the biotic reaction.

Characterization of the biogenic magnetite particles by transmission electron

microscopy (TEM), selected area electron diffraction (SAED), and X-ray diffraction

(XRD) found that they consisted predominantly of ultra-fine particles ranging in size

from 5-30 nm in diameter with rings and spots consistent with randomly oriented

magnetite crystals. Further experimentation was conducted with the biogenic magnetite

focusing on the product formation and reaction mechanisms in sulfide-free, purely

abiotic systems (McCormick and Adriaens, 2004). Once again, CF (46%) was the main

transformation product of CT, but CO (38%), CH4 (9%) and trace amounts of PCE

(0.1%) were also measured. In order to determine if free radical or carbene

intermediates were formed during CT transformation, a radical trapping experiment

was conducted using 2,3-dimethyl-2-butene (DMB) as a radical/carbene trap (Choi and

Hoffmann, 1996). Mass spectra from this experiment confirm that both the

trichloromethyl free radical and dichlorocarbene intermediates are formed in the

magnetite catalyzed transformation of CT. This finding helps explain the parallel

pathways observed in CT transformation. The measured CF and CO are products of the

hydrogenolysis of the trichloromethyl free radical and hydrolysis of dichlorocarbene,

Page 42: Transformation of Carbon Tetrachloride and Chloroform by Trichloroethene Respiring Anaerobic

27

respectively. Through the radical analysis it was also determined that the formation of

methane (9% of initial CT) was not due to complete reductive dechlorination of CT,

but rather was a product of the reduction of dichlorocarbene. The absence of DCM and

CM coupled with the linearity found between CF and CH4 in a differential plot analysis

points to CH4 formation occurring as a parallel pathway alongside CF and CO

formation.

As shown previously, vitamin B12 is an important extracellular molecule

capable of catalyzing rapid transformation of CT, even at high concentrations (Chiu

and Reinhard, 1995; Gantzer and Wackett, 1991; Hashsham et al., 1995; Hashsham

and Freedman, 1999; Lewis et al., 1996; Stromeyer et al., 1992). It has been

hypothesized that the most rapid CT transformation, which produced lower

concentrations of the chlorinated intermediates CF, DCM, and CM, occurs when the

cobalt present in cobalamins is reduced to either Co(II) or Co(I) (Chiu and Reinhard,

1995; Lewis et al., 1996). When enough reducing power is provided to the system, CT

will undergo a two electron transfer to dichlorocarbene which then hydrolyzes to CO

and formate (Criddle and McCarty, 1991; McCormick and Adriaens, 2004). The DIRB

Shewanella alga strain BrY is a metal reducing microbe that also has the ability to

reduce B12a to B12r (Workman et al., 1997). When B12a was incubated in PIPES buffered

media alone, with lactate, with H2, or with strain BrY, only modest amounts of B12r

were formed (3-14%). However, in the presence of BrY and lactate or H2, 85% and

84% of the B12a was reduced to B12r, respectively. In treatments containing B12, BrY,

and lactate, CT transformation was measured over a period of 20 days with 91.9% of

the mass recovered as CO and 1.43% CF. The B12 and dithiothreitol (DTT) treatment

transformed CT substantially (55% CO and 20% DCM), while the others did not (B12

and lactate; BrY and lactate; B12 and BrY). The formation of >90% CO in this system

demonstrates the ability to control the oxidation state of B12 using a DIRB and shift the

pathway away from hydrogenolysis in iron reducing environments.

Geobacter sulfurreducens is another common DIRB found in subsurface

environments that is also capable of reducing sulfur and using either hydrogen (H2) or

acetate as the sole electron donor (Caccavo et al., 1994). It is closely related to G.

metallireducens, and is therefore likely capable of mediating the transformation of CT

Page 43: Transformation of Carbon Tetrachloride and Chloroform by Trichloroethene Respiring Anaerobic

28

through the production of biogenic iron species. The degradation of CT in the presence

of G. sulfurreducens, biogenic iron species, copper ions, ferrihydrite, and naturally

occurring quinones was examined in depth (Doong et al., 2014; Maithreepala and

Doong, 2008). In all treatments, CT was transformed predominantly to CF and DCM

with a carbon mass balance of 42-56% of the original CT (Doong et al., 2014). The

percentage of CF and DCM formed agrees with other studies in iron reducing

environments, and the unknown carbon is likely in nonvolatile products, CO, CH4 or

cell material (Bae and Lee, 2012; McCormick and Adriaens, 2004; Penny et al., 2010).

The results show that CT transformation was primarily driven by G. sulfurreducens

through the formation of biogenic surface-bound iron species produced during the

reductive dissolution of Fe(III) ferrihydrite. The dissolution of ferrihydrite was

enhanced with 10 µM AQDS, which served as a surrogate for natural organic matter

(NOM) and as an electron shuttling compound. CT transformation in the presence of

ferrihydrite and AQDS was three times faster than with G. sulfurreducens alone.

Interestingly, when 0.3-0.5 mM Cu(II) was introduced to the system with ferrihydrite,

it slightly inhibited the growth of G. sulfurreducens and decreased Fe(II) formation.

However, the rate of CT degradation increased by 2.1-4.2 fold over the system without

Cu(II). It was hypothesized that the reduction of Cu(II) to Cu(I) was facilitated by

AQDS and was linked to the oxidation of Fe(II), thus forming secondary iron minerals

(e.g. goethite), and different compositions of iron (III) oxides that accelerated the

reduction of CT.

In order to enhance the transformation of CT in iron reducing environments

with G. sulfurreducens, four different naturally occurring quinones were investigated

for their ability to increase degradation rates through an increased dissolution of

ferrihydrite and subsequent formation of Fe(II) (Doong et al., 2014). Quinones are a

component of NOM and act as electron shuttling compounds. AQDS was used as a

model compound for comparison with the naturally occurring quinones lawsone (LQ),

ubiquinone (UQ), juglone (JQ), and 1,4-napthoquinone (NQ). It was found that AQDS,

NQ and LQ enhanced Fe(II) production while UQ and JQ had little effect. This in turn

led to an accelerated rate of CT transformation in systems containing AQDS, NQ, or

LQ over those without quinones. Relatively low concentrations (10 µM) of the

Page 44: Transformation of Carbon Tetrachloride and Chloroform by Trichloroethene Respiring Anaerobic

29

quinones were sufficient to stimulate enhanced ferrihydrite dissolution which in turn

catalyzed CT transformation. The Fe(II) species in this system appear to be only

moderately successful at transforming CT. However, the addition of these naturally

occurring quinones to iron reducing environments seem to sustain long term

ferrihydrite dissolution, which could be coupled with other processes in order to

achieve complete CT dechlorination.

2.5.5 Fermenting and Other Environments

Additional microbial species and reducing environments have also been

implicated in the transformation of CT. Gälli & McCarty (1989) isolated Clostridium

sp. TCAIIB from two anaerobic suspended-growth bioreactors that were known to

biotransform TCE to vinyl chloride (VC) and trichloroethane (TCA) to dichloroethane

(DCA) and chloroethane (Gälli and McCarty, 1989). After enriching strain TCAIIB, it

was found to readily degrade small amounts of CT (100 µg/L; 0.65 µM) to CF (55%)

and DCM (8%). It was also capable of catalyzing the transformation of CF (100 µg/L;

0.84 µM) to DCM (20%) which was not degraded further. However, the mineral

medium in which it was grown contained Fe(II) porphyrins and ions in solution which

both catalyze CT transformation, therefore making it difficult to separate the biotic and

abiotic contributions in this system.

Another anaerobic enrichment culture capable of CT transformation was grown

on dichloromethane as the sole carbon and energy source (Hashsham et al., 1995). The

enrichment culture oxidized a portion of the DCM to CO2 and H2, with the remainder

being fermented to acetate. The acetate, CO2, and H2 were then converted to CH4 by

acetoclastic and hydrogenotrophic methanogens. This DCM respiring and fermenting

culture was able to completely transform 20 µM CT (3.1 mg/L) within 20 days forming

CF (17%), CS2 (21%) and CO2 (21%). When 2 µM cyanocobalamin (CN-Cbl) was

added to the reactors, the 20 µM CT was completely degraded within 2 days, an

approximate 10-fold rate increase, and the product distribution shifted to 59% CO2,

11% CS2, and less than 1% CF. These results agree with multiple other studies

conducted with vitamin B12 homologs, and thus confirm the high transformation

Page 45: Transformation of Carbon Tetrachloride and Chloroform by Trichloroethene Respiring Anaerobic

30

capacity in a number of reducing environments. Rapid transformation of multiple

additions of CT as high as 340 µM were sustained with CN-Cbl concentrations as low

as 10 µM and 200 µM additions of H2 over a period of 200 days with less than a 1%

accumulation of CF and DCM.

The nitrate reducing Pseudomonas stutzeri KC isolated from groundwater

aquifer solids was capable of completely transforming 14CCl4 to 14CO2 and an

unidentified water soluble fraction (Criddle et al., 1990a). Additionally, pure cultures

of Escherichia coli K-12 were grown in different environments in order to determine

the role that electron acceptor conditions played in CT transformation with the same

organism. E. coli K-12 was grown under aerobic, low oxygen (~1%), nitrate respiring,

fumarate respiring, and fumarate fermenting conditions. No CT degradation occurred

under aerobic or NO3- respiring conditions, while significant transformation was

observed in the other three electron acceptor environments. The low oxygen acceptor

environment transformed CT with the following distribution: CT, 51%; CF, 3.9%; CO2,

17.4%; nonvolatile fraction, 4.6%; cell fraction, 21.8%. The fumarate respiring and

fumarate fermenting conditions fully transformed CT but did so with an accumulation

of CF (16% and 37.5%) and less CO2 (11.1% and 2.1%).

Due to the prevalence of CT as a high priority groundwater contaminant and

the numerous environments, microorganisms, and extracellular factors that can

catalyze its transformation, there are a plethora of studies examining its degradation.

These studies look at strictly abiotic, purely biotic, and a spectrum of biotic/abiotic

interactions that run the gamut of reducing environments implicated in CT

transformation. Due to the large number of CT degradation studies to date examining

a wide range of concentrations and conditions, it is difficult to compare kinetic

parameters across systems. While CT transformation rates vary substantially under

different reducing conditions, the addition of extracellular factors such as corrins,

porphyrins, and quinones enhance the degradation rates above those mediated solely

by cometabolic transformation and reduced sulfide mineral media. Furthermore, the

reducing conditions of an environment greatly impact the product distribution, and

cobalamins have been shown repeatedly to shift the pathway away from hydrogenolysis

(CF and DCM) to dichlorocarbene hydrolysis (CO and formate). In order to develop

Page 46: Transformation of Carbon Tetrachloride and Chloroform by Trichloroethene Respiring Anaerobic

31

effective remediation strategies, the complexities of CT transformation needs to be

understood and manipulated in order to limit the formation of undesirable products.

2.6 Transformation of Chloroform

Chloroform is the first hydrogenolytic product of CT reductive dechlorination

in anaerobic systems, and frequently comprises a large portion of the transformed CT

mass. However, CF behaves differently in the environment due to the reduced nature

of the carbon atom (+2) in chloroform compared to the completely oxidized carbon

(+4) in CT. Unlike CT, chloroform can be biologically transformed by cometabolism

in aerobic environments as well as anaerobic. CF is cometabolized in aerobic

environments primarily by monooxygenase (MO) enzymes, which introduce one

oxygen atom to CF forming CO, which is subsequently mineralized to CO2 (Cappelletti

et al., 2012). The primary products of CF cometabolism in aerobic environments are

CO2 and free chloride (Cl-). A wide range of MO enzymes can cooxidize CF and many

other chlorinated aliphatic hydrocarbons (CAHs) due to the nonspecificity of the

enzymes (Cappelletti et al., 2012). However, the same MO can exhibit variable

activities for different chlorinated compounds (Chang and Alvarez-Cohen, 1996; Colby

et al., 1977; Kim et al., 2000). CF cometabolism has been found to be mediated by the

following monooxygenase enzymes: methane (Aziz et al., 1999; Chang and Alvarez-

Cohen, 1996; Oldenhuis et al., 1989; Speitel et al., 1993; Speitel and Leonard, 1992;

van Hylckama et al., 1996), propane (Aziz et al., 1999; Frascari et al., 2008, 2003;

Malachowsky et al., 1994), butane (Ciavarelli et al., 2011; Frascari et al., 2012, 2007,

2006; Hamamura et al., 1997), hexane (Frascari et al., 2006), toluene (Chauhan et al.,

1998; McClay et al., 1996), and ammonia (Ely et al., 1997; Wahman et al., 2007, 2006,

2005).

However, in anaerobic environments CF is more recalcitrant and transformation

can typically stall at lower chlorinated methanes unless sufficient reducing power is

provided to the system (Mikesell and Boyd, 1990). There are three main pathways for

anaerobic CF transformation (Fig. 2.3): hydrolysis and subsequent oxidation,

cometabolic reductive dechlorination, and dehalorespiration (Cappelletti et al., 2012).

Page 47: Transformation of Carbon Tetrachloride and Chloroform by Trichloroethene Respiring Anaerobic

32

CF can undergo a direct hydrolysis to CO, which will then be oxidized by H2O to form

CO2. The half-life for CF hydrolysis under purely hydrolytic conditions is 3100 years

(Mabey and Mill, 1978). Chloroform can also be dechlorinated to form the unstable

dichlorocarbene and chlorocarbene radicals, which will rapidly hydrolyze to CO with

a subsequent oxidation to CO2 (Cappelletti et al., 2012). Methanogens, sulfate reducing

bacteria, fermenting bacteria such as Clostridium sp. and Enterobacter sp., and one

species of homoacetogen (Acetobacterium woodii) have been found to cometabolically

degrade CF under anaerobic conditions (Bouwer and McCarty, 1983; Egli et al., 1988;

Guerrero-Barajas and Field, 2005; Shan et al., 2010a; Yu and Smith, 2000). The

cometabolic transformation of CF often resulted in the accumulation of DCM with

small amounts of chloromethane (CM) and methane (CH4) detected as well (Egli et al.,

1988; Krone et al., 1989a, 1989b; Mikesell and Boyd, 1990). The reductive

dechlorination of DCM to CM and CH4 occurred at very slow rates due to the less

favorable thermodynamics of the lower chlorinated compounds.

To date, two mixed cultures have been found that are capable of transforming

CF via dehalorespiration using it as a terminal electron acceptor (Grostern et al., 2010;

Lee et al., 2012). The first was a highly enriched anaerobic mixed culture originating

from contaminated sediment containing greater than 60% Dehalobacter sp. (Grostern

et al., 2010). The culture (Dhb-TCA) was found to grow via the reductive

dechlorination of trichloroethane (TCA) to chloroethane (CA) via 1,1-dichloroethane

(1,1-DCA). When experiments were conducted attempting to quantify the inhibitory

effect of CF on the TCA respiring culture, it was found that Dhb-TCA immediately

began to reductively dechlorinate the CF to DCM. The culture metabolized CF to DCM

as rapidly as or faster than TCA, with a maximum rate of 360 µM/d when maintained

on 1 mM CF. A second anaerobic mixed culture enriched from subsurface soil was

found to completely dechlorinate CF via two metabolic processes (Lee et al., 2012).

CF was respired to DCM via dehalorespiration with a subsequent fermentation to H2,

CO2, and acetate. Complete CF dechlorination of at least 360 µM was achieved at rates

of 40 µM/d. Pyrosequencing of the separated CF respiring culture and the DCM

fermenting culture revealed that both were also enriched in Dehalobacter species.

Subsequent growth experiments revealed that the growth of Dehalobacter lineages was

Page 48: Transformation of Carbon Tetrachloride and Chloroform by Trichloroethene Respiring Anaerobic

33

linked directly to the dehalorespiration of CF and the dehalofermentation of DCM. The

complete dechlorination of CF by metabolic processes proves promising for the

remediation of contaminated sites. For both anaerobic mixed cultures, the

transformation of CF to DCM followed a 1:1 stoichiometry with further dechlorination

of DCM by the second culture (Lee et al., 2012).

Similar to carbon tetrachloride, the rates and products of CF transformation are

dependent on the type of reducing environment, growth substrates, microorganisms,

CF concentration, and coenzymes present (Freedman et al., 1995; Guerrero-Barajas

and Field, 2005; Gupta et al., 1996a, 1996b). Furthermore, the addition of small

extracellular compounds such as cobalamins (vitamin B12 homologs) (Egli et al., 1988;

Krone et al., 1989a, 1989b), coenzyme F430 (Gantzer and Wackett, 1991; Krone et al.,

1989a), iron-containing porphyrins such as heme (Klečka and Gonsior, 1984), and

zinc-containing porphorinogen-type cell exudates (Koons et al., 2001; Novak et al.,

1998b) can catalyze the cometabolic and abiotic transformation of CF. Analogous to

systems with CT, the addition of vitamin B12 homologs significantly increased the rate

of CF transformation and shifted the pathway from DCM formation to CO formation

in methanogens, sulfate reducers, and Acetobacterium woodii (Becker and Freedman,

1994; Freedman et al., 1995; Guerrero-Barajas and Field, 2005; Hashsham and

Freedman, 1999).

However, CF is a highly inhibitory compound exerting complete yet reversible

inhibition of numerous microbial processes in anaerobic environments (Hickey et al.,

1987; Rhee and Speece, 1992). Yu and Smith (2000) found that low levels of CF (0.09

mg/L; 0.76 µM) completely inhibited methanogenesis in an enrichment culture from a

wastewater anaerobic digester (Yu and Smith, 2000). Additionally, while corrinoids

catalyze CF reductive dechlorination, they also appear to be the target moieties by

which CF inhibits methanogenesis (Yu and Smith, 1997). It’s been suggested that this

occurs by a competitive inhibition of the corrinoids due to the structural similarity of

CF with the methyl groups that bind the transition metal co-factors during

methanogenesis (Bauchop, 1967a). CF has also been found to inhibit homoacetogens

and acetate-consuming, sulfate-reducing bacteria that use the Acetyl-CoA pathway

(Liu et al., 2010; Scholten et al., 2000). The Acetyl-CoA pathway has been implicated

Page 49: Transformation of Carbon Tetrachloride and Chloroform by Trichloroethene Respiring Anaerobic

34

in the transformation of CT and CF, and involves a cobalamin-containing enzyme as a

carrier for methyl groups (Egli et al., 1988). Therefore the addition of vitamin B12 was

supposed to mitigate the toxic effects of CF on the cobalamin-containing enzymes in

this pathway (Hashsham and Freedman, 1999; Stromeyer et al., 1992). An

Enterobacter sp. lacking the Acetyl-CoA pathway was able to catalyze the

transformation of high concentrations of CF (500 mg/L) when vitamin B12 was added

forming CO, CO2, and organic acids. In order to deal with the toxicity associated with

high concentrations of CF, the Enterobacter sp. was found to alter its membrane

fluidity (Shan et al., 2010a).

Low concentrations of chloroform have also been shown to inhibit microbes

that respire chlorinated ethenes. PCE degradation was completely inhibited by 4 µM

CF in an anaerobic ethanol enrichment culture (Bagley et al., 2000). PCE

dehalogenases isolated from Dehalospirillum multivorans were found to be 50%

inhibited at 25 µM CF (Neumann et al., 1996). PCE and 1,2-cis-DCE dechlorination

by Dehalococcoides ethenogenes were completely inhibited by 8.4 µM and 1.6 µM

CF, respectively (Maymó-Gatell et al., 2001). CF may inhibit dechlorinating organisms

directly through enzyme competition (Neumann et al., 1996) or through a general

inhibition of important metabolic processes (Cappelletti et al., 2012).

2.7 Remediation of Carbon Tetrachloride and Chloroform

The remediation of carbon tetrachloride and chloroform is complicated by the

diverse range of metabolites that can be formed during their transformation. Typically,

remediation strategies comprise physical and chemical approaches such as soil

excavation, pump and treat groundwater stripping, and venting. However, these

approaches are typically energy and cost intensive, are usually only somewhat

effective, and can have undesirable environmental consequences such as mobilizing

CT and CF in the atmosphere where they can deplete stratospheric ozone

(Schwarzenbach et al., 2006; US Environmental Protection Agency, 2008). An

alternative strategy has been natural attenuation in which a contaminated groundwater

site is not manipulated and instead relies on natural processes and long-term monitoring

Page 50: Transformation of Carbon Tetrachloride and Chloroform by Trichloroethene Respiring Anaerobic

35

in order to track contaminant depletion. Natural attenuation of contaminated sites

leverages processes such as dispersion, sorption, and biotic and abiotic degradation

occurring due to the intrinsic physical, chemical, and biological characteristics of an

environment (Wiedemeier et al., 1999). In a strongly reducing groundwater

environment, a CT DNAPL was found to be 90% degraded to CF, DCM, and CS2 over

an 11-year period without any stimulation of the groundwater environment (Davis et

al., 2003). While the reduction of CT observed is substantial, a secondary remediation

strategy needs to be employed for the removal of CF and DCM.

Bioremediation affords the possibility of transforming contaminants in situ with

two different strategies, biostimulation and bioaugmentation. Biostimulation is the

injection of amendments into contaminated environments in order to stimulate

contaminant degradation by the indigenous microbial community whereas

bioaugmentation is the injection of native or non-native microbes to a contaminated

area to encourage degradation (US Environmental Protection Agency, 2010).

Bioaugmentation strategies typically also involve the biostimulation of the

contaminated area in order to create favorable conditions for the growth of the injected

culture. In anaerobic systems, carbon and energy-rich compounds such as vegetable oil

or molasses are injected to promote the growth of anaerobic microbes. Semprini et al.

(1992) demonstrated how biostimulation could effectively degrade CT and other

halogenated compounds in a model sandy aquifer system (Semprini et al., 1992).

Acetate (as a growth substrate and electron donor) along with nitrate and sulfate

(electron acceptors) were injected into the aquifer, which stimulated the native

microbial community to degrade 95% of the initial CT within 2 m of travel in the test

zone. When the NO3- amendment was ceased, CT degradation increased, with 30-60%

of the CT transformed to CF. Devlin and Müller (1999) also conducted a successful

field demonstration of biostimulation in order to degrade CT (Devlin and Müller,

1999). A sandy aquifer was injected with acetate in order to stimulate the growth of

sulfate reducing bacteria. CT was added to the test aquifer at approximately 1 mg/L

and was completely transformed to CF and CS2 in a 2:1 ratio.

Remediation strategies and pilot tests that couple bioaugmentation with

biostimulation have been more successful at completely dechlorinating CT. Most pilot

Page 51: Transformation of Carbon Tetrachloride and Chloroform by Trichloroethene Respiring Anaerobic

36

scale and field demonstrations of bioaugmentation have used the denitrifying bacteria

Pseudomonas stutzeri KC, which is capable of completely transforming CT to CO2 and

nonvolatile organic acids under anoxic conditions (Criddle et al., 1990a; Dybas et al.,

2002, 1998; Mayotte et al., 1996; Pfiffner et al., 2000). A CT (2.3-46.5 µg/L) and nitrate

(1.87-63.7 mg/L) contaminated aquifer in Schoolcraft, MI was successfully remediated

by the deployment of a full-scale biocurtain containing P. stutzeri KC and the addition

of acetate, nitrate, and phosphate as growth supporters. Approximately 18,600 m3 of

contaminated groundwater was treated with a 98% average reduction of CT with only

transient formation of CF (< 20 µg/L) and CS2 (< 2 mg/L). The remediation of CT in

this system was sustained efficiently over a four year period with intermittent addition

of substrate in closely spaced wells (Dybas et al., 2002).

Additionally, bioremediation potential was examined for a contaminated site in

California with concentrations of CT (8.8 mg/L), CF (500 mg/L), and

trichlorofluoromethane (CFC-11; 26 mg/L) generally deemed too high for biological

treatment (Shan et al., 2010b). Pilot scale tests in continuous flow columns explored

the possibility of employing different biostimulation and bioaugmentation treatments

at the contaminated site. Biostimulation alone (injection of corn syrup, emulsified

vegetable oil, and lactate), biostimulation (corn syrup) with addition of

cyanocobalamin (vitamin B12), and bioaugmentation with catalytic levels of

cyanocobalamin were studied for CT transformation potential. The bioaugmentation

cultures were lactate-grown sulfate reducers, ethanol-grown sulfate-reducers, and a

corn syrup-grown fermenting culture. Complete transformation of the three compounds

was achieved by the biostimulation with B12 and bioaugmentation treatments, with the

lactate-grown sulfate reducers and the fermenting culture being the most effective.

Additionally, the vitamin B12 catalyzed the transformation to produce CO, CO2 and

organic acids even at the high concentrations of halogenated compounds.

Due to differences in the transformation of carbon tetrachloride versus the lesser

chlorinated methanes (CF and DCM), multiple remediation strategies can be applied in

concert to achieve complete dechlorination in contaminated groundwater. Zero valent

iron (ZVI; Fe0), has been found to transform CT and CF to DCM, CH4, formate, CO,

and CO2 when installed as a permeable reactive barrier in the flow path of contaminated

Page 52: Transformation of Carbon Tetrachloride and Chloroform by Trichloroethene Respiring Anaerobic

37

groundwater (Gillham et al., 2010; Gillham and O’Hannesin, 1994; Johnson et al.,

1996; Matheson and Tratnyek, 1994; TÁmara and Butler, 2004). However, CT has

been found to strongly inhibit Dehalobacter sp. capable of transforming CF and DCM

via dehalorespiration and dehalofermentation (Justicia-Leon et al., 2014). Therefore, it

would be feasible to install a ZVI permeable reactive barrier near the source of CT

contamination followed by a subsequent biostimulation and bioaugmentation of

Dehalobacter sp. capable of transforming CF and DCM. Justicia-Leon et al. (2014)

conducted a pilot test treatability study in order to determine the value of biostimulation

and bioaugmentation using CF contaminated sediment (Justicia-Leon et al., 2014).

When microcosms were inoculated with a CF respiring culture (Dhb-CF) and a DCM

degrading consortium (RM), complete dechlorination of CF and DCM occurred with

HCO3- serving as the only amendment required. Additionally, Lee et al. (2015) found

that Fe0 in the presence of a Dehalobacter sp. was able to degrade CF and form DCM

at 8-fold faster rates and 14 times higher amounts, respectively, compared to systems

with Fe0 alone (Lee et al., 2015). The DCM was subsequently fermented to CO2, H2,

and acetate, thus completely dechlorinating the original CF. Sustainable and effective

long term remediation applications will require the use of multiple strategies that

leverage both biological and chemical transformation mechanisms.

2.8 Anaerobic Dechlorinating Cultures

The Evanite (EV), Victoria/Stanford (VS), and Point Mugu (PM) anaerobic

mixed cultures are enrichment cultures capable of respiring TCE and PCE to ethene.

The EV and PM cultures were enriched from contaminated sediment and groundwater

at the Evanite Corporation site in Corvallis, OR and Point Mugu Naval Weapons

Facility, CA, respectively (Yu et al., 2005). The VS culture was enriched from aquifer

material at a PCE-contaminated site in Victoria, TX (Cupples et al., 2003). The three

cultures were enriched under batch conditions for 10 years and subsequently inoculated

into continuous flow reactors (chemostat) with a 2 L and 5 L size (Berggren et al., 2013;

Cupples et al., 2003; Marshall et al., 2014; Yu et al., 2005). The anaerobic

dechlorinating cultures were inoculated into chemostat reactors in September 2007

(EV-2L), July 2007 (EV-5L), July 2008 (VS-2L), July 2009 (VS-5L), February 2008

Page 53: Transformation of Carbon Tetrachloride and Chloroform by Trichloroethene Respiring Anaerobic

38

(PM-2L), and July 2009 (PM-5L) and have a hydraulic retention time of approximately

50 days. They are grown in a basal anoxic mineral media (Yang and McCarty, 1998)

modified to double the buffering capacity of the system (1 g/L K2HPO4 and 3 g/L

Na2CO3) (Yu et al., 2005). The EV and VS cultures receive an influent solution

containing saturated TCE (10 mM) and 45 mM formate as electron acceptor and donor,

respectively (Marshall et al., 2014). The PM cultures receive an influent of saturated

PCE (1.12 mM) as electron acceptor and lactate (4.3 mM) as a fermenting electron

donor, while the PM-2L chemostat also receives 1.0 mM SO42- as a competing electron

acceptor for dehalogenation (Berggren et al., 2013).

Molecular analyses of the continuous flow reactors have shown that the cultures

are highly enriched in Dehalococcoides mccartyi, which comprises 90% of the

microbial community (Berggren et al., 2013; Marshall et al., 2014). Other

microorganisms present in the reactors are Geobacter sp., and microbes of the orders

Desulfuromonodales, Selenomonadales, and Spirochaetales (Semprini, unpublished

data). Recent work by Semprini (unpublished data) has shown that the EV and VS

chemostats contain roughly equal amounts of the 16s rRNA transcripts encoding for D.

mccartyi strain tceA and D. mccartyi strain vcrA whose relative abundance can change

based on the concentration of electron donor present in the system. The enzymes tceA

and vcrA are reductive dehalogenases capable of catalyzing the transformation of

TCE/DCE (Magnuson et al., 2000) and DCE/VC, respectively (Müller et al., 2004).

When the culture is enriched in strain vcrA, VC is completely transformed to ethene

while an enrichment in strain tceA allows for the accumulation of VC to occur

(Marshall et al., 2014).

A previous study showed that the bioaugmentation of the EV culture into a

continuous flow column packed with Ottawa quartz sand could achieve simultaneous

transformation of PCE and CT (Azizian and Semprini, in press). However, the amount

and type of electron donor provided dramatically affected the transformation of both

compounds. When sufficient formate (1.5 mM) or lactate (1.1 mM) was provided as an

electron donor, PCE (0.1 mM) was transformed to VC (11-17%) and ethene (81-85%).

At lower lactate concentrations (0.67 mM), chlorinated ethene transformation was

impacted shown by the accumulation of cDCE (100%) at pseudo-steady state. When

Page 54: Transformation of Carbon Tetrachloride and Chloroform by Trichloroethene Respiring Anaerobic

39

CT was introduced to the column at a concentration of 0.015 mM, its transformation

was complete with 20% found as CF and trace amounts of DCM and CM. Ethene

production and SO42- reduction were not impacted, but formate (1.5 mM) utilization

and acetate production were inhibited by the presence of CT and CF. Additionally,

when the electron donor was switched to lactate, a fermenting substrate, propionate

buildup occurred along with a drop in H2 concentrations. Propionate was not an

effective electron donor, which affected PCE dehalogenation leading to cDCE (48%)

and VC (36%) accumulation. It is likely that the long term exposure to CF impacted

the microbes responsible for fermenting propionate to H2.

The column was reaugmented with the EV culture after 1950 days and supplied

with 0.1 mM PCE and 1.1 mM lactate in the absence of CT in order to encourage the

growth of the fermenting population once again. Under these conditions, PCE

transformation proceeded completely to ethene (98%) with only a small amount of VC

(2%). The addition of CT (0.015 mM) did not impact chlorinated ethene

transformation, lactate fermentation, or acetate formation. CT was completely

transformed, and resulted in a transient buildup of approximately 20% CF which then

disappeared. Increasing concentrations of CT (0.03, 0.06, and 0.1 mM) demonstrated

similar behavior in the column. The use of 13CCl4 showed that under lactate fermenting

conditions CT was transformed to 13CO2 (80%) and non-volatile products (9%) with

trace amounts of CF (Azizian and Semprini, 2016). Decreasing lactate concentrations

(0.67 mM) affected PCE and CT transformation, acetate formation and H2 production.

CF was observed to be the main transformation product under these conditions.

There are numerous sites in the United States co-contaminated with chlorinated

ethenes and methanes, thus creating a need for a better understanding of the

biochemical dynamics of complex mixtures (Knox and Canter, 1996; Petrisor and

Wells, 2008). In the present study, CT transformation by the PCE and TCE respiring

anaerobic mixed cultures was studied extensively in batch reactor systems in order to

elucidate the pathways and kinetics of the transformation process. Modeling analyses

were also conducted in order to predict the degradation of CT and subsequent product

formation under multiple treatments. Transformations followed first order kinetics

Page 55: Transformation of Carbon Tetrachloride and Chloroform by Trichloroethene Respiring Anaerobic

40

leading to the development of five analytical first order solutions that were solved

simultaneously using a nonlinear least squares method.

As shown by this literature review, CT transformation has been studied in depth

for a number of different reducing systems involving both biotic and abiotic

mechanisms. However, CT transformation by chlorinated ethene respiring cultures has

not been thoroughly examined owing to the inhibitory effects of CT and CF on

dehalogenation. Inhibition of H2 consumption by the mixed cultures due to the presence

of CF was also quantified in order to attempt to analyze the complex electron donor

dynamics characteristic of anaerobic dechlorinating cultures. These facts, along with

the complicated nature of the dynamics between chlorinated ethenes, methanes, and

dehalogenating microbes make this research of interest.

Page 56: Transformation of Carbon Tetrachloride and Chloroform by Trichloroethene Respiring Anaerobic

41

CHAPTER 3: MATERIALS AND METHODS

3.1 Chemicals

All chemicals used in the transformation studies or for external standards were

analytical grade: CT, 99.9% (Sigma-Aldrich); CF, 99.9% (OmniSolv); DCM, 99.9%

(Fisher Chemical); CS2, 99.9% (Alfa Aesar); CM, 99.5% (Sigma-Aldrich); CH4, 99.9%

(Air Liquide); CO, 99.0% (Sigma-Aldrich); TCE, 99.9% (Macron Fine Chemicals);

cDCE, 99.0% (TCI America); VC, 99.5% (Sigma-Aldrich); ETH, 99.5% (Airgas);

formate, 99.0% (Alfa Aesar); lactate, 60% w/w syrup (J.T. Baker).

3.2 Anaerobic Dechlorinating Cultures

Experiments were conducted with the Evanite (EV) and Victoria/Stanford (VS)

mixed anaerobic dechlorinating cultures that are grown in continuous flow reactors and

contain at least two strains (tceA and vcrA) of Dehalococcoides mccartyi (Marshall et

al., 2014). The two cultures are capable of respiring PCE to ETH (Yu et al., 2005) and

are grown in a 2 liter and a 5 liter replicate chemostat (Marshall et al., 2014) in a basal

anaerobic mineral media (Yang and McCarty, 1998) modified to double the buffering

capacity of the system (1 g/L K2HPO4 and 3 g/L Na2CO3). The EV and VS 5 liter

chemostats (designated EV-5L and VS-5L) have been growing under chemostat

conditions since July 2007 and July 2009, respectively with a hydraulic retention time

of approximately 50 days (Marshall et al., 2014). They receive an influent feed of

saturated TCE (10 mM; 60 mEq) as electron acceptor and formate (45 mM; 90 mEq)

as electron donor. Previous molecular characterization has found that the EV-5L and

VS-5L chemostats are highly enriched (approximately 90%) in D. mccartyi strains

containing the reductive dehalogenase (rdhA) enzymes tceA, vcrA, and bvcA (Marshall

et al., 2014), which are responsible for the respiration of TCE/DCE (Magnuson et al.,

2000) and DCE/VC (Krajmalnik-Brown et al., 2004; Müller et al., 2004) to ETH.

Additionally, the EV-5L and VS-5L cultures contain operational transcription units

(OTUs) for Geobacter and Desulfitobacterium strains (Marshall et al., 2014; Mayer-

Blackwell et al., 2014). Neither culture has been previously acclimated to CT, CF, or

their transformation products.

Page 57: Transformation of Carbon Tetrachloride and Chloroform by Trichloroethene Respiring Anaerobic

42

3.3 Batch Transformation Studies

Saturated solutions of CT, CF, DCM, CS2, and cDCE were prepared in

anaerobic mineral media (Yu et al., 2005) and used in the batch transformation studies

or for analytical standards. Saturated TCE was anaerobically transferred from the

chemostat influent media for the same purposes (Marshall et al., 2014). Cells and

supernatant from the EV-5L or VS-5L chemostat were transferred to anaerobically-

prepared 125 mL Wheaton Type I media bottles sealed with butyl rubber septa and

plastic screw caps. The batch reactors comprised a two phase system with a headspace

gas phase (108 mL) and a liquid phase (50 mL). Residual chlorinated ethenes were

sparged from the batch reactors with a furnace treated mixed gas (75% N2; 25% CO2)

prior to the onset of an experiment. Varying initial concentrations of CT (0.86, 2.6, or

8.6 µM) and CF (2.1 or 21.1 µM) along with DCM (23.2 µM) and TCE (50 µM) were

added individually as slug inputs to the batch reactors. Controls were conducted in the

sterile anaerobic mineral media in the absence of cells. In all experiments, formate (2

mM) was provided in excess as an electron donor. Reactors were incubated in the dark

at 20 °C and 200 rpm with 30 minutes equilibration before the initial measurement

assuming Henry’s Law equilibrium. Dimensionless Henry’s Law coefficients were

used to track chemical transformation in both compartments over time (Sander, 2015;

Staudinger and Roberts, 2001).

The relative importance of live cells in the transformation of CT and CF was

tested in batch reactors poisoned with an anaerobically-prepared sodium azide (NaN3)

solution, a known biocide (Lichstein and Soule, 1944). Since CT and CF can both

undergo abiotic transformation, the appropriate dose of NaN3 required to poison the

microbial culture was determined using the dehalorespiration of TCE as a marker of

cell integrity. Reductive dechlorination of TCE is a predominantly biotic process when

catalyzed by D. mccartyi in anaerobic environments (Maymó-Gatell et al., 1997). It

was found that 50 mM NaN3 was a sufficient dose to kill the cells and stop TCE

reductive dechlorination. In the NaN3 treatment, batch reactors established with 2.6 µM

CT were poisoned with 50 mM NaN3.

Simultaneous transformation of TCE and CT was also examined. Kinetic tests

were conducted in batch reactors established with 2.6 µM CT and 50 µM TCE. Control

Page 58: Transformation of Carbon Tetrachloride and Chloroform by Trichloroethene Respiring Anaerobic

43

reactors received TCE but no CT in order to measure the impact of CT and CF on TCE

reductive dehalogenation. The TCE batch kinetic tests were analyzed using a numerical

model described previously (Berggren et al., 2013). A subsequent slug addition of TCE

was added after 14 days in order to test the effects of long-term exposure to CF on the

culture. Unless otherwise specified, all experiments were carried out in triplicate.

3.4 Analytical Methods

All compounds were quantified by headspace analysis in the two phase batch

reactor systems. Hamilton gas tight syringes (1700 series) were used to extract 100 µL

headspace samples which were manually injected onto gas chromatographs (GC). CT,

CF, DCM, and CS2 were measured on an HP-6890 GC equipped with an electron

capture detector (ECD), a capillary column (Agilent 30 m x 0.32 mm GS-Q), and with

helium (He) as the carrier gas (8.0 mL/min). Detection limits were as follows: CT, 10

nM; CF, 30 nM; DCM, 140 nM; CS2, 20 nM. Higher concentrations of CT were

measured by injecting 10 µL headspace samples under the same conditions. CM and

CH4 were quantified on an HP-6890 GC equipped with a flame ionization detector

(FID), a capillary column (Agilent 30 m x 0.53 mm GS-Q+PT), He carrier gas (1.0

mL/min), and with detection limits of 95 nM (CM) and 20 nM (CH4). CO was measured

on an HP-5890 GC with a thermal conductivity detector (TCD), a packed column

(Supelco 15’ x 1/8” SS support 60/80 Carboxen 1000), He carrier gas (30 mL/min),

and with a detection limit of 20 nM. TCE, cDCE, VC, and ETH were quantified on an

HP-6890 GC FID with a capillary column (Agilent 30 m x 0.53 mm GS-Q), He carrier

gas (15 mL/min), and with detection limits as follows: TCE, 270 nM; cDCE, 270 nM;

VC, 80 nM; ETH, 10 nM. Electron donor concentrations were tracked by measuring

hydrogen (H2) produced from formate. H2 was quantified on an HP-5890 GC TCD with

a packed column (Supelco 15’ x 1/8” SS support 60/80 Carboxen 1000), argon (Ar)

carrier gas (20 mL/min), and with a detection limit of 20 nM.

Page 59: Transformation of Carbon Tetrachloride and Chloroform by Trichloroethene Respiring Anaerobic

44

3.5 First Order Rate Analyses and Transformation Model

Rate coefficients were estimated for CT and CF degradation from experimental

data using a first order transformation model and a natural log-linear regression.

Pseudo-first order kinetics were applied based on experimental results and previous

studies (Butler and Hayes, 2000; Kriegman-King and Reinhard, 1992; McCormick et

al., 2002; Novak et al., 1998a; Vogel et al., 1987). A subsequent analytical model was

developed to simultaneously estimate the rate of transformation for CT and its

metabolites by varying the rate coefficients (k1–k6) and fitting data from the batch

kinetic experiments (Figure 3.1). CT degradation and product formation was modeled

using a series of first order analytical solutions derived from the following ordinary

differential equations:

𝑑𝑀CT

𝑑𝑡 = − 𝑘1 + 𝑘3 + 𝑘4 𝑀CT

𝑑𝑀CF

𝑑𝑡 = 𝑘1𝑀CT − 𝑘2 + 𝑘5 𝑀CF

𝑑𝑀DCM

𝑑𝑡 = 𝑘2𝑀CF

𝑑𝑀CS2

𝑑𝑡 = 𝑘3𝑀CT − 𝑘6𝑀CS2

𝑑𝑀CO2

𝑑𝑡 = 𝑘4𝑀CT + 𝑘5𝑀CF + 𝑘6𝑀CS2

Transformation rate coefficients were estimated by a non-linear least squares

regression performed using the Solver Tool Pack (Microsoft Excel, 2016). Model

validity was confirmed by comparing the observed CT transformation rates (kCT,obs)

with those generated by the analytical solution (kCT,model = k1+k3+k4). Due to the

complex nature of the mixed culture, the differences between treatments, and the

inability to separate the relative biotic and abiotic contributions to CT degradation, a

more complicated transformation rate model would not necessarily facilitate a better

kinetic analysis. For these reasons, a first order model was employed to examine the

differences between treatments.

(1)

(2)

(3)

(4)

(5)

Page 60: Transformation of Carbon Tetrachloride and Chloroform by Trichloroethene Respiring Anaerobic

45

The use of [13C]-labeled 13CCl4 in transformation experiments was attempted

in order to measure 13CO2 and quantify the complete product distribution of CT

degradation. However, this was unsuccessful due to the high background concentration

of 13CO2 (390 µM) present in the anaerobic mineral media compared to the maximum

CT concentration (30 µM) tested. Despite this, numerous sources have confirmed the

formation of CO2 from CT degradation as shown in Figure 2.3 (Bouwer and McCarty,

1983; Cappelletti et al., 2012; Criddle and McCarty, 1991; Hashsham and Freedman,

1999). Therefore, the kinetic model incorporates a mass balance approach and assumes

that the observed unknown fraction is MCO2 = MCT,0 – (MCT + MCF + MDCM + MCS2) at

any given time.

Figure 3.1: Simplified biochemical pathway representing measured compounds and an unknown fraction (postulated as CO2 based on previous studies). Arrow weights represent relative proportion of product formed.

Page 61: Transformation of Carbon Tetrachloride and Chloroform by Trichloroethene Respiring Anaerobic

46

CHAPTER 4: CARBON TETRACHLORIDE AND CHLOROFORM TRANSFORMATION

4.1 CT Degradation and Product Formation

CT transformation by the EV-5L and VS-5L cultures and supernatant was

complete (below 10 nM analytical detection limit) and followed pseudo-first order

kinetics in all experimental treatments (Figures 4.1, A.2.1, A.2.2, and A.2.3).

Additionally, the sterile anaerobic mineral media (CT Control) catalyzed partial CT

transformation in the absence of cells, albeit at substantially slower rates (Figure

A.1.1). This was likely due to the presence of precipitated iron sulfides (FeS) in the

reduced sulfide media (Butler and Hayes, 2000; Devlin and Müller, 1999). Due to the

comparatively rapid transformation of CT in the presence of the anaerobic

dechlorinating cultures and supernatant (ADC+S), further analyses of the CT Control

treatments were not conducted. As the initial aqueous CT concentration ([CT0]aq)

increased, first order transformation rates (kCT,obs) showed a non-linear decrease, which

has been reported previously (McCormick et al., 2002). When working with the DIRB

G. metallireducens, McCormick et al. (2002) found that protein-normalized pseudo-

first order rate constants were dependent on [CT0]aq and that the kinetics fit a two-site

Michaelis-Menten kinetic model. However, they do state that no mechanistic

interpretation should be made from the analysis. While this analysis was not conducted

with the ADC+S, kCT,obs decreased as [CT0]aq increased in a qualitatively similar

manner. When multiple additions of 0.86 µM CT were added to the ADC+S, kCT,obs

and kCF,obs decreased with each subsequent addition (Figures A.3.1, A.3.2, and A.3.3).

This confirms that CT transformation by the ADC+S is abiotic and cometabolic, and

the system has a transformation capacity that depletes over time.

Page 62: Transformation of Carbon Tetrachloride and Chloroform by Trichloroethene Respiring Anaerobic

47

Figure 4.1: Pseudo-first order CT transformation rates by the EV-5L and VS-5L ADC+S. As [CT0]aq increased the observed degradation rates (kCT,obs) decreased in a non-linear manner. Error bars represent one standard deviation.

CF was the predominant transformation product measured in all treatments,

with lesser amounts of DCM and CS2 also detected (Figures 4.2, 4.3 and 4.4). CF,

DCM, and CS2 are undesirable end products due to their status as probable carcinogens,

and the potential for CS2 neurotoxicity in humans (US Environmental Protection

Agency, 2016, 2000). CF and CS2 were subsequently transformed while no appreciable

degradation of DCM occurred. CM, CH4, and CO were not detected throughout any of

the experiments. Mass balance analyses revealed that only 20-40% of the original CT

mass was detected as volatile products. It is likely the unknown mass is being

transformed to CO2. This result is in agreement with previous research conducted with

CT and the Evanite culture in a continuous flow column (Azizian and Semprini, in

press). However, the absence of CM and the presence of DCM and CS2 in the batch

reactor systems differs from the results of Azizian and Semprini (in press). The absence

of CS2 in the column is likely due to the low iron content (28.7 mg/kg solids) of the

Ottawa quartz sand (Azizian and Semprini, in press) compared to the anaerobic media

(Yang and McCarty, 1998), thus preventing the formation of FeS solids which can

0

1

2

3

4

5

6

EV-5L VS-5L

k CT,o

bs(d

-1)

0.86µM 2.6µM 8.6µM

Page 63: Transformation of Carbon Tetrachloride and Chloroform by Trichloroethene Respiring Anaerobic

48

catalyze CS2 formation from CT (Butler and Hayes, 2000; Devlin and Müller, 1999).

Changes in the microbial cultures could also be responsible for the observed

differences. The Evanite culture inoculated into the continuous flow column was grown

on PCE in sequential batch mode with butanol as a fermenting substrate (Azizian and

Semprini, in press). Furthermore, a shift in the microbial community occurred in the

EV and VS cultures when they were inoculated into chemostat systems under different

electron donor and acceptor conditions from their previous batch incubation (Behrens

et al., 2008; Marshall et al., 2014).

The VS-5L ADC+S catalyzed faster CT transformation than the EV-5L ADC+S

in all treatments (Figure 4.1; Table 4.1). The observed differences in CT transformation

rates cannot be explained by experimental differences nor due to differing electron

donor or acceptor conditions. The microbial community structure of the two cultures

could be responsible for the differences in CT transformation rates. Previous analyses

have shown that the EV-5L and VS-5L cultures contain roughly equal relative

abundances of D. mccartyi strains containing the reductive dehalogenase enzymes tceA

and vcrA (Marshall et al., 2014). Despite this, there are additional microbes such as

Geobacter species present in the chemostats that could be contributing to this

phenomenon (Mayer-Blackwell et al., 2014). Early work with CT and CF in acetate-

grown biofilms (Bouwer and McCarty, 1985) and in an anoxic biofilm column (Bouwer

and Wright, 1988) found that the fastest rates of CT and CF dechlorination occurred in

the most reduced cultures. Additionally, CT transformation in an electrolysis cell was

also more rapid at lower reduction potentials (Criddle and McCarty, 1991). One

possibility is that CT transformation rates, and the subsequent degradation of CF, are

likely higher in the VS-5L ADC+S compared to the EV-5L ADC+S due to a difference

in reduction potentials, with VS-5L being more reduced.

Page 64: Transformation of Carbon Tetrachloride and Chloroform by Trichloroethene Respiring Anaerobic

49

Table 4.1: Comparison of CT first order transformation rate constants for the EV-5L and VS-5L ADC+S. Rates were calculated from experimental CT data (kCT,obs) and from an analytical first order model (kCT,model). All treatments initially contained 2.6 µM CT. Error estimate calculated as one standard deviation.

EV-5L VS-5L

Treatment kCT,obs (d-1) kCT,model (d-1)a kCT,obs (d-1) kCT,model (d-1)a

CT Only 0.59 ± 0.06 0.57 ± 0.02 0.81 ± 0.09 0.79 ± 0.07

50 mM NaN3 0.40 ± 0.01 0.39 ± 0.0004 1.05 ± 0.15 1.06 ± 0.10

50 µM TCE 1.05 ± 0.13 1.58 ± 0.12 1.73 ± 0.36 2.52 ± 0.65 a kCT,model = k1 + k3 + k4 from the first order analytical solution

4.2 Transformation of Chloroform and Dichloromethane

The VS-5L ADC+S also catalyzed faster transformation of biogenic CF than

the EV-5L ADC+S in all treatments (Table 4.2). Transformation of CF was only

complete when low concentrations (0.3 µM) were formed from the degradation of 0.86

µM CT (Figures A.3.1 and A.3.2). All other treatments did not catalyze complete CF

transformation, even at long time scales (Figures 4.2, 4.3, and 4.4). It is possible that

the VS-5L ADC+S is less susceptible to the inhibitory effects of CF leading to faster

transformation. Additionally, it is possible that the VS-5L ADC+S is a more reduced

system compared with the EV-5L ADC+S.

Table 4.2: Comparison of CF first order transformation rate constants for the EV-5L and VS-5L ADC+S. Rates were calculated from experimental CF data (kCF,obs) and from an analytical first order model (kCF,model). All treatments initially contained 2.6 µM CT. Error estimate calculated as one standard deviation.

EV-5L VS-5L

Treatment kCF,obs (d-1) kCF,model (d-1)a kCF,obs (d-1) kCF,model (d-1)a

CT Only 0.029 ± 0.009 0.019 ± 0.003 0.045 ± 0.002 0.045 ± 0.004

50 mM NaN3 0.017 ± 0.003 0.005 ± 0.001 0.021 ± 0.003 0.015 ± 0.001

50 µM TCE 0.028 ± 0.002 0.032 ± 0.005 0.043 ± 0.008 0.045 ± 0.010 a kCF,model = k2 + k5 from the first order analytical solution

Page 65: Transformation of Carbon Tetrachloride and Chloroform by Trichloroethene Respiring Anaerobic

50

The ability of the ADC+S to transform CF and DCM not of biogenic origin was

also tested. CF (2.1 µM) was significantly transformed by the EV-5L (97%

degradation) and VS-5L (98% degradation) ADC+S (Figures A.4.1 and A.4.2). DCM

was the measurable transformation product, amounting for 42-60% of the original mass

as CF. When DCM is formed from 2.6 µM CT, it accounts for only 6-11% of the

original mass as CT. It is likely that the remainder of the CF mass is being mineralized

to CO2 (Cappelletti et al., 2012). Transformation of CF followed first order kinetics,

with the two ADC+S catalyzing CF degradation at similar rates (EV-5L, 0.073±0.023

d-1; VS-5L, 0.072±0.007 d-1) (Tables A.4.1 and A.4.2; Figure A.4.3).

Subsequent experiments were conducted with VS-5L at higher concentrations

of CF (21.1 µM) and DCM (23.2 µM) to test the potential for transformation, and to

determine if Dehalobacter species capable of CF respiration and DCM fermentation

(Grostern et al., 2010; Justicia-Leon et al., 2012) were present in the D. mccartyi

enriched mixed culture system. Partial CF transformation was observed after 100 days

with 27% of the original CF mass remaining while DCM was not substantially

transformed during the same time period (Figure A.4.4). In this experiment, the CF first

order transformation rate was 0.014 ± 0.0004 d-1 (Figure A.4.5). When compared to

cultures capable of direct metabolism (Grostern et al., 2010; Justicia-Leon et al., 2012),

the inability of the EV-5L and VS-5L ADC+S to rapidly degrade CF or DCM in the

absence of CT suggests that transformation is cometabolic or not possible (DCM). The

longer term exposures without achieving an accelerated rate of transformation indicate

a Dehalobacter species was not stimulated.

4.3 Kinetics of Biotic and Abiotic Transformation

In the presence of 50 mM NaN3, CT Transformation rates were not substantially

affected in either the EV-5L or VS-5L ADC+S (Table 4.1). The VS-5L culture

catalyzed slightly faster CT transformation when poisoned with 50 mM NaN3

compared to a control group containing live cells. The opposite occurred in the EV-5L

ADC+S, which catalyzed slightly slower CT transformation when poisoned with 50

mM NaN3 compared to its control group. Due to numerous mechanisms that catalyze

Page 66: Transformation of Carbon Tetrachloride and Chloroform by Trichloroethene Respiring Anaerobic

51

abiotic CT degradation, the presence of live cells appears to not be critical to achieve

high transformation rates in the anaerobic dechlorinating cultures and supernatant.

McCormick et al. (2002) found that CT transformation catalyzed by biogenic magnetite

was 60-260 fold faster than that by the DIRB G. metallireducens alone. Additionally,

an anaerobic enrichment culture grown on DCM experienced a 10-fold increase in CT

transformation rates when amended with cyanocobalamin, pointing to the importance

of enzymatic cofactors in catalyzing CT degradation (Hashsham et al., 1995).

Numerous redox-active cofactors and microbial metal chelators exist that have been

shown to catalyze CT transformation and enhance degradation rates (Penny et al.,

2010), which are likely responsible for the transformation of CT in the NaN3 poisoned

anaerobic dechlorinating cultures.

While CT transformation rates were relatively unaffected, the product

distribution was significantly impacted in the poisoned cells treatment (Figures 4.2 and

4.3). CS2 formation was not observed in batch reactors poisoned with 50 mM NaN3.

Trace amounts of transient CS2 were measured at the onset of the experiments, but

disappeared within the first few hours. The initial CS2 in these treatments was likely

due to its presence as an impurity in the CT stock solution, rather than through

formation from CT during the experiment. To confirm this, analytical CT standards

were prepared in autoclaved Nanopure DI water (Barnstead NANOPure II; 16.5

megohm). The CT standards contained trace amounts of CS2 comparable to the levels

detected during the onset of the 2.6 µM CT and 50 mM NaN3 treatment.

The absence of CS2 in the poisoned cells treatment is unusual since numerous

studies have confirmed CS2 as an abiotic CT transformation product in reduced sulfide

media (Hashsham et al., 1995; Hashsham and Freedman, 1999; Kriegman-King and

Reinhard, 1992). It is possible that the formation of CS2 occurred, but was not

measurable due to the high concentration of NaN3 present and the potential

condensation reaction between CS2 and the azide anion (Lieber et al., 1963). The use

of an anaerobically-prepared formaldehyde solution (1% v/v) as a biocide was also

attempted. Formaldehyde successfully shut down TCE reductive dehalogenation, but

irreversibly bonded with the redox indicator (resazurin) in the media, thus creating a

false positive for the presence of oxygen. Therefore, it was not possible to completely

Page 67: Transformation of Carbon Tetrachloride and Chloroform by Trichloroethene Respiring Anaerobic

52

confirm the anaerobic nature of the reactors with formaldehyde. Additionally, cells and

supernatant were anaerobically centrifuged and filtered (0.22 µm filter) under glovebox

conditions (95% N2/5% H2) to create cell-free extracts. However, the presence of FeS

solids successively clogged the filters making it unfeasible to filter 50 mL of

supernatant and completely confirm the absence of cells.

Trace DCM was detected after approximately 80 days (EV-5L) and 90 days

(VS-5L) of incubation with NaN3 (Figures 4.2 and 4.3). In the live cells treatment,

DCM was detected as a transformation product as CT was nearing complete

degradation. The live cells also subsequently catalyzed more rapid CF transformation

than the poisoned treatment (Tables 4.2). The decrease in the CF transformation rate is

likely driven by the absence of DCM, which is shown by an approximate order of

magnitude reduction in the CF à DCM rate coefficient (k2) for both ADC+S (Tables

4.3 and 4.4). It is possible that the live cells facilitate CF degradation by creating redox-

active cofactors that drive transformation (Cappelletti et al., 2012). This mechanism

was likely shut down due to effects of the biocide, and any CF degradation and

subsequent DCM formation occurred from the residual transformation capacity of the

system after complete CT degradation.

Page 68: Transformation of Carbon Tetrachloride and Chloroform by Trichloroethene Respiring Anaerobic

53

Figure 4.2: Transformation of 2.6 µM CT by a) EV-5L and live cells, and b) EV-5L and 50 mM NaN3. Application of biocide greatly diminished formation of CS2 and DCM. Error bars represent one standard deviation.

0

0.05

0.1

0.15

0.2

0.25

0.3

0.35

0.4

0.45

0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100

µmol/bottle

Time(d)

CS2 DCM CF CT Unknown (CO2) MassTot

0

0.05

0.1

0.15

0.2

0.25

0.3

0.35

0.4

0.45

0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100

µmol/bottle

Time(d)

CS2 DCM CF CT Unknown (CO2) MassTot

b)

a)

Page 69: Transformation of Carbon Tetrachloride and Chloroform by Trichloroethene Respiring Anaerobic

54

Figure 4.3: Transformation of 2.6 µM CT by a) VS-5L and live cells, and b) VS-5L and 50 mM NaN3. Application of biocide greatly diminished formation of CS2 and DCM. Error bars represent one standard deviation.

0

0.05

0.1

0.15

0.2

0.25

0.3

0.35

0.4

0.45

0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100

µmol/bottle

Time(d)

CS2 DCM CF CT Unknown (CO2) MassTot

0

0.05

0.1

0.15

0.2

0.25

0.3

0.35

0.4

0.45

0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100

µmol/bottle

Time(d)

CS2 DCM CF CT Unknown (CO2) MassTot

a)

b)

Page 70: Transformation of Carbon Tetrachloride and Chloroform by Trichloroethene Respiring Anaerobic

55

Table 4.3: First order transformation rates for the EV-5L ADC+S estimated from the analytical solutions predicting CT degradation and product formation (Figure 3.1). All treatments contained 2.6 µM CT. Error estimate calculated as one standard deviation.

Pathway CCl4 à CHCl3

CHCl3 à CH2Cl2

CCl4 à

CS2

CCl4 à CO2

CHCl3 à

CO2

CS2 à CO2

Treatment k1 (d-1)a k2 (d-1)b

k3 (d-1)a k4 (d-1)a k5 (d-1)b k6 (d-1)

CT Only 0.18 ± 0.008

0.009 ± 0.0006

0.053 ± 0.005

0.34 ± 0.009

0.01 ± 0.002

0.049 ± 0.02

50 mM NaN3

0.12 ± 0.001

0.0007 ± 0.0005

0 ± 0 0.27 ± 0.001

0.004 ± 0.002

0 ± 0

50 µM TCE

0.40 ± 0.048

0.015 ± 0.004

0.18 ± 0.016

0.99 ± 0.074

0.017 ± 0.008

0.041 ± 0.007

a kCT,model = k1 + k3 + k4 b kCF,model = k2 + k5 Table 4.4: First order transformation rates for the VS-5L ADC+S estimated from the analytical solutions predicting CT degradation and product formation (Figure 3.1). All treatments contained 2.6 µM CT. Error estimate calculated as one standard deviation.

Pathway CCl4 à CHCl3

CHCl3 à CH2Cl2

CCl4 à CS2

CCl4 à CO2

CHCl3 à CO2

CS2 à CO2

Treatment k1 (d-1)a k2 (d-1)b k3 (d-1)a k4 (d-1)a k5 (d-1)b k6 (d-1)

CT Only 0.31 ± 0.008

0.013 ± 0.002

0.094 ± 0.009

0.39 ± 0.066

0.032 ± 0.004

0.017 ± 0.004

50 mM NaN3

0.42 ± 0.008

0.0009 ± 0.0004

0 ± 0 0.64 ± 0.093

0.014 ± 0.001

0 ± 0

50 µM TCE

0.58 ± 0.051

0.028 ± 0.006

0.31 ± 0.069

1.63 ± 0.544

0.017 ± 0.005

0.026 ± 0.003

a kCT,model = k1 + k3 + k4 b kCF,model = k2 + k5

Page 71: Transformation of Carbon Tetrachloride and Chloroform by Trichloroethene Respiring Anaerobic

56

4.4 Simultaneous Transformation of CT and TCE

TCE (50 µM) and CT (2.6 µM) were rapidly and completely simultaneously

transformed by the EV-5L and VS-5L cultures and supernatant. The primary CT

transformation product measured was CF with lesser amounts of DCM and CS2 formed,

while TCE was completely respired to ETH (Figures 4.4, 4.5, and 4.7). In the presence

of TCE, CT was transformed at an approximately 2-fold faster rate compared with the

other treatments (Table 4.1). However, the faster CT transformation rate was not

coupled to a faster CF transformation rate (Table 4.2). Instead, the CF transformation

rates for both ADC+S were the same in the CT Only and the CT and 50 µM TCE

treatments. Additionally, during the CT and TCE treatment the EV-5L ADC+S

produced 15% (CT Only) and 27% (50 mM NaN3) less CF while VS-5L ADC+S

produced 41% (CT Only) and 53% (50 mM NaN3) less CF. It was observed that the

CT à CO2 rate coefficient (k4) estimated from the analytical model increased 3-fold

(EV-5L ADC+S) and 4-fold (VS-5L ADC+S) during the CT and TCE treatment when

compared to the CT Only treatment (Tables 4.3 and 4.4). This is suggesting that when

cells are metabolizing TCE while CT is being abiotically transformed, the cells are

shifting the abiotic CT product distribution. It is possible that the growing cells are

exuding coenzymes such as vitamin B12 capable of CT transformation, and are

increasing the reducing power of the abiotic system leading to the formation of less CF

and more CO2 (Hashsham et al., 1995).

TCE Control reactors (50 µM TCE) without CT and CF saw complete, rapid

respiration of multiple additions of TCE to ETH (Figures 4.6 and 4.8). Zero order TCE

and cDCE dehalogenation rates (kmX) were not substantially impacted by the presence

of 2.6 µM CT (Figure 4.9). However, CT and the subsequent formation of CF resulted

in a decrease in the VC to ETH transformation rate, which was reduced by 32% (EV-

5L) and 58% (VS-5L). It should be noted that TCE and cDCE transformation occurred

before the buildup of CF.

Page 72: Transformation of Carbon Tetrachloride and Chloroform by Trichloroethene Respiring Anaerobic

57

Figure 4.4: Simultaneous transformation of 2.6 µM CT and 50 µM TCE by the a) EV-5L and b) VS-5L cultures and supernatant. The presence of 50 µM TCE increased CT transformation rates and produced less CF in both cultures. Error bars represent one standard deviation.

0

0.05

0.1

0.15

0.2

0.25

0.3

0.35

0.4

0.45

0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16 18 20 22 24 26 28 30

µmol/bottle

Time(d)

CS2 DCM CF CT Unknown (CO2) MassTot

0

0.05

0.1

0.15

0.2

0.25

0.3

0.35

0.4

0.45

0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16 18 20 22 24 26 28 30

µmol/bottle

Time(d)

CS2 DCM CF CT Unknown (CO2) MassTot

a)

b)

Page 73: Transformation of Carbon Tetrachloride and Chloroform by Trichloroethene Respiring Anaerobic

58

Figure 4.5: Transformation of multiple additions of 50 µM TCE by the EV-5L culture. The initial dose was delivered at a) t = 0 d along with 2.6 µM CT. The subsequent dose was delivered at b) t = 14 d after long-term exposure to a maximum CF concentration of 1.4 µM. Figures show one replicate of triplicate batch reactors. Note the different time scales of the x axis.

0

1

2

3

4

5

0.0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1.0 1.2 1.4

µmol/bottle

Time(d)ETH VC DCE TCE

0

1

2

3

4

5

6

0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15

µmol/bottle

Time(d)ETH VC DCE TCE

a)

b)

Page 74: Transformation of Carbon Tetrachloride and Chloroform by Trichloroethene Respiring Anaerobic

59

Figure 4.6: Transformation of multiple additions of 50 µM TCE by the EV-5L culture without CT or CF. The two doses were delivered at a) t = 0 d and b) t = 14 d. Zero order CAH transformation rates from the second TCE addition exhibited minor reductions when compared to reactors exposed to CT and CF. Figures show one replicate of triplicate batch reactors. Note the different time scales of the x axis.

0

1

2

3

4

5

0.00 0.05 0.10 0.15 0.20 0.25 0.30 0.35 0.40 0.45 0.50

µmol/bottle

Time(days)

ETH VC DCE TCE

0

1

2

3

4

5

0.0 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.4 0.5 0.6 0.7 0.8

µmol/bottle

Time(days)

ETH VC DCE TCE

a)

b)

Page 75: Transformation of Carbon Tetrachloride and Chloroform by Trichloroethene Respiring Anaerobic

60

Figure 4.7: Transformation of multiple additions of 50 µM TCE by the VS-5L culture. The initial dose was delivered at a) t = 0 d along with 2.6 µM CT. The subsequent dose was delivered at b) t = 14 d after long-term exposure to a maximum CF concentration of 1.3 µM. Figures show one replicate of triplicate batch reactors. Note the different time scales of the x axis.

0

1

2

3

4

5

0.0 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.4 0.5 0.6

µmol/bottle

Time(d)

ETH VC DCE TCE

0

1

2

3

4

5

0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10

µmol/bottle

Time(d)

ETH VC DCE TCE

a)

b)

Page 76: Transformation of Carbon Tetrachloride and Chloroform by Trichloroethene Respiring Anaerobic

61

Figure 4.8: Transformation of multiple additions of 50 µM TCE by the VS-5L culture without CT or CF. The two doses were delivered at a) t = 0 d and b) t = 14 d. Zero order CAH transformation rates from the second TCE addition exhibited minor reductions when compared to reactors exposed to CT and CF. Figures show one replicate of triplicate batch reactors. Note the different time scales of the x axis.

0

1

2

3

4

5

0.00 0.05 0.10 0.15 0.20 0.25 0.30 0.35 0.40

µmol/bottle

Time(days)ETH VC DCE TCE

0

1

2

3

4

5

0.0 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.4 0.5 0.6

µmol/bottle

Time(days)ETH VC DCE TCE

a)

b)

Page 77: Transformation of Carbon Tetrachloride and Chloroform by Trichloroethene Respiring Anaerobic

62

Figure 4.9: Zero order transformation rates (kmX) for the reductive dechlorination of 50 µM TCE by the a) EV-5L and b) VS-5L cultures. Lighter colored bars represent rates from a second addition at t = 14 d after the initial dose. Treatments only containing TCE (TCE Control) did not see a large decrease in rates over time. However, long-term exposure to CF (2.6 µM CT treatment) dramatically decreased transformation rates due to the inhibitory and possibly toxic effects of CF on the anaerobic dechlorinating cultures.

0

200

400

600

800

1000

1200

1400

1600

1800

TCE cDCE VC

k mX(µmol/L/d)

TCEControl 2.6µMCT

0

200

400

600

800

1000

1200

1400

1600

1800

TCE cDCE VC

k mX(µmol/L/d)

TCEControl 2.6µMCT

b)

a)

Page 78: Transformation of Carbon Tetrachloride and Chloroform by Trichloroethene Respiring Anaerobic

63

A subsequent addition of 50 µM TCE and 2 mM formate were added to the

reactors in order to assess the impacts of long-term exposure to CF on the anaerobic

dechlorinating cultures. Furthermore, the ability of growing cells to catalyze CF

degradation was also explored through this additional dose of TCE. Zero order

transformation rates for the chlorinated ethenes were drastically reduced by the 14-day

exposure to CFmax of 1.4 µM (EV-5L) and 1.3 µM (VS-5L) before the second addition

of TCE (Figure 4.9). The EV-5L culture saw a 94% (TCE), 93% (cDCE), and 98%

(VC) decrease in kmX rates while VS-5L saw 96% (TCE), 91% (cDCE), and 95% (VC)

rate reductions. CF exhibited an inhibitory or possibly toxic effect on the dechlorinating

cultures. Despite this, VC reduction to ETH was complete by VS-5L (Figure 4.7b) and

nearly complete by EV-5L (Figure 4.5b) during the experimental timeframe.

In comparison, the observed reduction in kmX rates for a second addition of 50

µM TCE to the TCE Control reactors was not as drastic. EV-5L saw a 38% (TCE),

20% (cDCE), and 20% (VC) reduction in rates. VS-5L had decreased rates of 16%

(TCE) and 19% (cDCE), while the estimated VC rate slightly increased (1%). The

observed reduction in rates in the TCE Control group is likely due to endogenous decay

of the cells over a 14-day period in which they were not receiving their growth

substrates. The presence of growing cells metabolizing TCE from the second dose did

not catalyze more rapid CF transformation in either culture. It is possible that the

transformation capacity of the reducing system increased during the transformation of

the second dose of TCE, but this was not reflected by an increase in CF degradation.

The ability to increase CT transformation rates and decrease the amount of CF

formed while simultaneously degrading TCE and its metabolites is promising. The CT

and CF transformation rates measured in this study fall within the range of pseudo-first

order rates found in other systems. Reduced sulfide media containing HS- and biotite

or vermiculite found that 1 µM CT was transformed at rates between 0.02-0.12 d-1

(Kriegman-King and Reinhard, 1992). It was also found that G. metallireducens alone

(4 µM CT) and biogenic magnetite alone (18.7 µM CT) catalyzed CT transformation

at rates between 0.24-3.12 d-1 and 0.24-1.68 d-1 (McCormick et al., 2002). Pure cultures

of the methanogens Methanosarcina barkeri and M. thermophila catalyzed

transformation of 5-10 µM CT in the presence of Fe0 at rates between 2.1-18.6 d-1, with

Page 79: Transformation of Carbon Tetrachloride and Chloroform by Trichloroethene Respiring Anaerobic

64

faster rates in treatments containing cells and Fe0 (Novak et al., 1998a). Additionally,

5-10 µM CF was transformed in this system at rates of 0.21-16.2 d-1, which is 1-3 orders

of magnitude higher than observed with the ADC+S. The addition of vitamin B12

homologs has been shown in numerous systems to dramatically increase the rate of CT

degradation and decrease CF formation, shifting the pathway to the formation of CO,

CO2, and nonvolatile products (Hashsham et al., 1995; Hashsham and Freedman, 1999;

Stromeyer et al., 1992; Workman et al., 1997).

Complex mixtures of contaminants complicate environmental cleanups and

generally lead to less effective remediation (Bagley et al., 2000; Devlin and Müller,

1999; Justicia-Leon et al., 2014). These results suggest that the degradation of complex

mixtures by D. mccartyi cultures and/or the associated abiotic conditions created by its

growth deserve further exploration. While CT and CF exert inhibitory and possibly

toxic effects on reductive dehalogenation (Bagley et al., 2000; He et al., 2005; Maymó-

Gatell et al., 2001), the simultaneous transformation of chlorinated methanes and

ethenes is desirable when designing bioremediation applications. A continuous flow

column bioaugmented with the Evanite culture was capable of simultaneous

transformation of PCE to VC (20%) and ETH (80%), and CT to CF (20%) and

unknown products (80%) (Azizian and Semprini, in press). The inhibition of VC

transformation observed in the batch tests was not observed in the column study. It is

possible that the increase in H2 concentration observed in the column study

counteracted the inhibition of VC transformation. Additionally, the denitrifying

organism Pseudomonas stutzeri KC degrades CT to CO2 with little CF formation

(Criddle et al., 1990a). By reducing or eliminating the formation of CF from CT

degradation, it would be possible to simultaneously transform TCE and CT without

exerting inhibitory or toxic effects on a reductive dechlorinating culture, thus

decreasing the formation of undesirable metabolites and improving remediation

efficiency.

Page 80: Transformation of Carbon Tetrachloride and Chloroform by Trichloroethene Respiring Anaerobic

65

CHAPTER 5: CHLOROFORM INHIBTION OF HYDROGEN CONSUMPTION

During the CT and CF transformation experiments, H2 formation from formate

and its subsequent consumption by the anaerobic mixed cultures was tracked over time.

Formate is converted to H2 by the following reaction: HCOO- + H2O à HCO3- + H2.

Dissolved hydrogen is subsequently utilized by the EV-5L and VS-5L cultures for

reductive dechlorination (Figure 5.1) (Marshall et al., 2014) and homoacetogenesis:

2CO2 + 4H2 à CH3COOH + 2H2O (Diekert and Wohlfarth, 1994; Drake et al., 2006).

Previous transformation experiments and molecular analyses have confirmed the

presence of acetate-producing microbes in the anaerobic dechlorinating cultures

(Azizian and Semprini, in press; Marshall et al., 2014). The initial batch inhibition

experiments were conducted in the absence of chlorinated ethenes in order to control

for CF inhibition of CAH dehalorespiration.

Figure 5.1: Biochemical pathway for the reductive dechlorination of PCE. Each reductive transformation requires two electrons from H2. Source: US EPA Contaminated Site Clean-Up Information (CLU-IN).

A slug input of 2 mM formate (100 µmol H2/bottle) was provided as electron

donor at the onset of all of the batch transformation studies. Formate was provided in

excess in order to ensure that limited H2 was not a confounding factor during the

transformation experiments. Additionally, when excess formate was provided, enough

H2 was created in order to track its consumption over time throughout the experiments.

Zero order maximum H2 utilization rates were calculated for the EV-5L and VS-5L

cultures to determine the impacts that CF had on H2 consumption. In the presence of

CF, H2 buildup amounted to 70-100% of the expected H2 to be produced (100

Page 81: Transformation of Carbon Tetrachloride and Chloroform by Trichloroethene Respiring Anaerobic

66

µmol/bottle) from 2 mM formate. Control experiments conducted with 50 µM TCE in

the absence of CF saw H2 buildup to lower levels (50-80 µmol H2/bottle) as the cultures

were able to use it more rapidly (Figure 5.6).

Experiments conducted with 0.86 µM CT led to the formation of approximately

0.3 µM CF, which did not inhibit H2 consumption by either the EV-5L or VS-5L culture

(Figure 5.2). However, H2 consumption was slower than in the complete absence of

CT (Tables 5.2 and 5.3; Figure 5.6). After a buildup of H2 occurred, it was rapidly

consumed. When the cultures were dosed with 2.6 µM CT, 1.6 µM CF (EV-5L) and

2.2 µM CF (VS-5L) were measured as the maximum transient CF concentrations

(CFmax) (Figure 5.3). This led to essentially complete inhibition of H2 consumption,

which remained at high partial pressures in the batch reactor systems for 80 days (EV-

5L) and 50 days (VS-5L). The consumption of H2 occurred in the VS-5L culture

sometime after 50 days of CF exposure, but was not analytically captured.

Approximately 80% of the formate added accumulated as H2. The VS-5L anaerobic

dechlorinating culture and supernatant (ADC+S) was also observed to transform CF

more rapidly than the EV-5L ADC+S.

It has been shown previously that low levels of CF can inhibit numerous

anaerobic processes including reductive dechlorination (Bagley et al., 2000; He et al.,

2005; Maymó-Gatell et al., 2001; Neumann et al., 1996) and homoacetogenesis (Liu et

al., 2010; Scholten et al., 2000). It is therefore important to determine the CF threshold

concentration for inhibition of H2 consumption in the EV-5L and VS-5L cultures. It is

unclear if CF is exerting a chemical inhibition on the homoacetogenic community in

EV-5L and VS-5L, or if it is toxic to their cellular functions. Previous research has

shown a connection between electron donor compounds, H2 levels, and efficiency of

reductive dechlorination (Azizian et al., 2010, 2008; Azizian and Semprini, in press;

Behrens et al., 2008; Marshall et al., 2014).

Page 82: Transformation of Carbon Tetrachloride and Chloroform by Trichloroethene Respiring Anaerobic

67

Figure 5.2: The formation of 0.3 µM CF from 0.86 µM CT did not inhibit the utilization of 2 mM formate (100 µmol H2/bottle) by the a) EV-5L and b) VS-5L cultures. CF was subsequently transformed. Error bars represent one standard deviation.

0

20

40

60

80

100

120

0

0.05

0.1

0.15

0.2

0.25

0.3

0.35

0.4

0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14

µmolH

2/bottle

[CF]

aq(µM)

Time(d)

CF Hydrogen

0

20

40

60

80

100

120

0

0.05

0.1

0.15

0.2

0.25

0.3

0.35

0.4

0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14

µmolH2/bottle

[CF]

aq(µM)

Time(d)

CF Hydrogen

a)

b)

Page 83: Transformation of Carbon Tetrachloride and Chloroform by Trichloroethene Respiring Anaerobic

68

Figure 5.3: The formation of 1.6 µM CF (EV-5L) and 2.2 µM CF (VS-5L) from 2.6 µM CT inhibited the utilization of 2 mM formate (100 µmol H2/bottle) by the a) EV-5L and b) VS-5L cultures. CF was slowly transformed. CF concentrations dropped below 0.6 µM in VS-5L, but H2 consumption was not captured. Note the longer time scale compared to Figure 5.2. Error bars represent one standard deviation.

0

20

40

60

80

100

120

0

0.5

1

1.5

2

2.5

0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100

µmolH

2/bottle

[CF]

aq(µM)

Time(d)

CF Threshold Hydrogen

0

20

40

60

80

100

120

0

0.5

1

1.5

2

2.5

0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100µm

olH

2/bottle

[CF]

aq(µM)

Time(d)

CF Threshold Hydrogen

b)

a)

Page 84: Transformation of Carbon Tetrachloride and Chloroform by Trichloroethene Respiring Anaerobic

69

Multiple additions of 0.86 µM CT were added to the VS-5L culture in order to

determine the CF threshold concentration for inhibition of H2 consumption. As CF was

produced from CT degradation, its transformation was tracked along with H2 levels in

the batch reactors (Figure 5.4). As H2 was completely consumed, additional doses of 2

mM formate were added to the batch reactors with doses at t = 0 d, 27 d, and 56 d

occurring simultaneously with an addition of 0.86 µM CT. H2 consumption was not

inhibited in the VS-5L culture by the transient buildup of less than 0.6 µM CF. When

CF concentrations reached 0.6 µM from the second and third additions of 0.86 µM CT,

H2 partial pressures were transiently held static, and then rapidly declined as CF

dropped below this level. The estimated zero order maximum H2 use rates decreased

with each subsequent addition of CF (Table 5.1). This is potentially due to endogenous

decay of the cells when they were not receiving there growth substrates in addition to

the effects of CF. It should also be noted that the rate of CF transformation decreased

with each exposure.

Figure 5.4: Multiple additions of 0.86 µM CT produced between 0.3 – 0.68 µM CFmax, which was subsequently transformed by the VS-5L culture. H2 was produced from multiple additions of 2 mM formate to the batch reactor systems. H2 consumption was correlated with CF concentrations less than 0.6 µM. Error bars represent one standard deviation.

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

80

90

100

0

0.1

0.2

0.3

0.4

0.5

0.6

0.7

0.8

0.9

0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100

µmolH

2/bottle

[CF]

aq(µM)

Time(d)

CF Threshold Hydrogen FormateAddition(2mM)

Page 85: Transformation of Carbon Tetrachloride and Chloroform by Trichloroethene Respiring Anaerobic

70

Table 5.1: Estimated first order CF transformation rates (kCF,obs) and zero order maximum H2 use rates (kH2,max) for the VS-5L ADC+S during the 0.86 µM CT multiple addition experiment. With each successive addition of 0.86 µM CT, CF transformation and H2 consumption rates declined. Error estimate calculated as one standard deviation.

CT Additiona [CF]aq,max

(µM) kCF,obs

(d-1) kH2,max

(µmol*bottle-1*d-1) 1 0.30 0.35 ± 0.059 12.97 ± 3.33 2 0.65 0.11 ± 0.015 8.63 ± 2.26 3 0.68 0.04 ± 0.007 5.05 ± 0.28

a Each addition represented a slug input of 0.86 µM CT and 2mM formate (100 µmol H2/bottle)

To further explore this phenomenon, batch reactors were established with the

EV-5L and VS-5L cultures inoculated with 2.1 µM CF, which is representative of the

approximate CFmax from the degradation of 2.6 µM CT. An initial dose of 2 mM

formate (100 µmol H2/bottle) was added at the start of the experiment with no

subsequent additions. H2 production was rapid and temporarily held static due to CF

concentrations above the threshold inhibitory levels for the EV-5L (0.4 µM CF) and

VS-5L (0.6 µM CF) cultures. However, H2 partial pressures slowly declined above

these levels, which differed from experiments conducted with 2.6 µM CT (Figure 5.3).

This observed difference could be due to the longer exposure time to CFmax when CF

is biogenic versus when added directly. As CF dropped to the threshold inhibitory

concentration, H2 was rapidly consumed to near completion (Figure 5.5).

Page 86: Transformation of Carbon Tetrachloride and Chloroform by Trichloroethene Respiring Anaerobic

71

Figure 5.5: Transformation of 2.1 µM CF by the a) EV-5L and b) VS-5L ADC+S resulted in the reversible inhibition of H2 use. As CF was degraded, H2 consumption occurred to near completion in both cultures. Error bars represent one standard deviation of duplicate (EV-5L) and triplicate (VS-5L) reactors.

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

80

0

0.2

0.4

0.6

0.8

1

1.2

1.4

1.6

1.8

2

2.2

0 5 10 15 20 25 30

µmolH

2/bottle

[CF]

aq(µM)

Time(d)

CF Threshold Hydrogen

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

80

0

0.2

0.4

0.6

0.8

1

1.2

1.4

1.6

1.8

2

2.2

0 5 10 15 20 25 30µm

olH

2/bottle

[CF]

aq(µM)

Time(d)

CF Threshold Hydrogen

b)

a)

Page 87: Transformation of Carbon Tetrachloride and Chloroform by Trichloroethene Respiring Anaerobic

72

Inhibition of H2 consumption for acetate production appears to be reversible at

CF concentrations of 0.4 µM and 0.6 µM for the EV-5L and VS-5L cultures,

respectively. This threshold differs between the cultures for undetermined reasons.

Differences in the community composition and reduction potential of the cultures could

be partly responsible for the differing abilities to tolerate exposure to CF. Experiments

conducted with the acetogens Acetobacterium woodii and Sporomosa ovata found that

20 µM CF inhibited cell growth (Scholten et al., 2000). Although CF concentrations

less than 20 µM were not examined, the researchers found that inhibition by CF was

correlated with microorganisms that operate the Acetyl-CoA pathway. This pathway

contains a corrinoid enzyme that serves as a carrier for methyl groups and is known to

be inhibited by CF (Egli et al., 1988; Oremland and Capone, 1988). The Acetyl-CoA

pathway has also been implicated in the transformation of CT and CF (Egli et al., 1988).

Microbes in EV-5L and VS-5L could be utilizing the Acetyl-CoA pathway for

homoacetogenesis, thus explaining CF inhibition of the cultures (Ferry, 1992; Thauer

et al., 1989).

Experiments were conducted with 2.6 µM CT and 50 µM TCE in the EV-5L

and VS-5L cultures in order to explore the possibility of simultaneous transformation

and determine the inhibitory effects of CT and CF on the ADC+S (Section 4.4). H2

levels were tracked throughout the course of the experiments to examine H2 utilization

by the cultures during chlorinated ethene (CAH) respiration in the presence and

absence of CF. The following treatments were established: EV-5L & TCE (Figure 4.6);

EV-5L, TCE, & CT (Figures 4.4a and 4.5); VS-5L & TCE (Figure 4.8); VS-5L, TCE,

& CT (Figures 4.4b and 4.7). Formate (2 mM) was provided in excess (100 µmol

H2/bottle) in all treatments. The complete reduction of 50 µM TCE (4.2 µmol/bottle)

to ETH requires 12.6 µmol H2/bottle, which represents only 12.6% of the H2 in the

system. TCE was completely respired to ETH except for the second TCE addition in

the EV-5L, TCE, & CT treatment, which resulted in approximately 40% VC and 60%

ETH after 14 days (Figure 4.5b).

The TCE Control treatments experienced a transient buildup of H2 followed by

a subsequent rapid decrease as it was used by the cultures for reductive dechlorination

and homoacetogenesis (Figure 5.6a). Maximum H2 use rates are reported in Tables 5.2

Page 88: Transformation of Carbon Tetrachloride and Chloroform by Trichloroethene Respiring Anaerobic

73

and 5.3. The EV-5L, TCE, & CT treatment experienced a slow release of H2 from

formate, which remained at a high level due to the presence of CF greater than its

threshold level of 0.4 µM (Figure 5.6b). The VS-5L, TCE, & CT treatment behaved

differently from previous CT and CF experiments, and also exhibited H2 dynamics

different from the EV-5L culture under the same conditions. Despite VS-5L being

exposed to a CF concentration greater than its apparent threshold inhibition level of 0.6

µM CF, H2 was consumed over a 10-day period after complete TCE respiration to ETH

had occurred (Figures 4.7a and 5.6a). A subsequent addition of 50 µM TCE and 2 mM

formate were added to all reactors at t = 14 d. The EV-5L & TCE and VS-5L & TCE

treatments experienced rapid formation of H2 and subsequent consumption similar to

the first addition, albeit at slower rates. The EV-5L, TCE, & CT treatment again

showed a slow release of H2 which then remained static at a high H2 partial pressure.

The VS-5L, TCE, & CT treatment once again catalyzed rapid formation of H2, which

was then consumed before CF dropped to 0.6 µM at t = 20 d.

The fastest zero order maximum H2 use rates (kH2,max) for the EV-5L and VS-

5L cultures occurred in the absence of CT and CF while respiring TCE and daughter

products. Maximum H2 consumption rates decreased due to CF exposure and

endogenous decay when the cultures were not provided their growth substrates. A

second addition of 50 µM TCE and 2 mM formate saw kH2,max decrease by 55% (EV-

5L) and 70% (VS-5L) in the TCE Control treatments. The observed reduction in kH2,max

in the TCE Control group is likely due to endogenous decay of the cells over a 14-day

period in which they were not receiving TCE and formate. The opposite trend was

observed in the VS-5L, TCE, & CT treatment, with kH2,max from the second 2 mM

formate addition increasing by 1.5-fold over the first addition. This occurred as CFmax

decreased from 1.3 µM to 0.86 µM during H2 consumption of the first and second

additions of formate, respectively. It is possible that the lower CFmax concentration was

less inhibitory to the VS-5L culture, thus allowing it to consume H2 at a more rapid

rate. When a culture was exposed to CF, kH2,max never reached the maximum rate

achieved by the TCE Control reactors. From these data and analyses, it is unclear

whether CF is exerting a chemical inhibition, toxicity, or both on the H2 consuming

community in the anaerobic cultures. However, the increase in kH2,max during the

Page 89: Transformation of Carbon Tetrachloride and Chloroform by Trichloroethene Respiring Anaerobic

74

second addition of TCE (50 µM) and formate (2 mM) in the VS-5L, TCE, & CT

treatment suggests that long-term exposure to CF is not toxic to the H2 utilizers.

Figure 5.6: Formation and consumption of a) H2 and b) CF during the reductive dechlorination of 50 µM TCE and the simultaneous transformation of 2.6 µM CT and 50 µM TCE. H2 consumption by the EV-5L culture was inhibited by 1.4 µM CF while 1.3 µM CF partially inhibited H2 use by the VS-5L culture. This is shown by differences in kH2,max in Tables 5.2 and 5.3. Error bars represent one standard deviation.

0

20

40

60

80

100

120

140

160

180

0 5 10 15 20 25 30

µmolH

2/bottle

Time(d)

EV-5L,TCE,&CT EV-5L&TCE VS-5L,TCE,&CT

VS-5L&TCE FormateAddition(2mM)

0

0.2

0.4

0.6

0.8

1

1.2

1.4

1.6

1.8

0 5 10 15 20 25 30

[CF]

aq(µM)

Time(d)

EV-5L VS-5L EV-5LThreshold VS-5LThreshold Formate(2mM)&TCE(50µM)

a)

b)

Page 90: Transformation of Carbon Tetrachloride and Chloroform by Trichloroethene Respiring Anaerobic

75

Table 5.2: Comparison of first order CF transformation rates and zero order maximum H2 use rates for the EV-5L ADC+S. H2 consumption was fastest in the absence of CF and reversibly inhibited above 0.4 µM CF. Error estimate calculated as one standard deviation.

Treatment CT, CF, or

TCE Additiona

[CF]aq,max (µM)

kCF,obs (d-1)

kH2,max (µmol*bottle-

1*day-1) 0.86 µM CT 1 0.3 0.38 ± 0.14 17.99 ± 1.49

2.6 µM CT 1 1.65 0.029 ± 0.009

0.126 ± 0.009

2.1 µM CF 1 2.1 0.074 ± 0.022

7.25 ± 0.86

50 µM TCE & 2.6 µM CT

1 1.4 0.028 ± 0.002

-1.04 ± 0.39b

50 µM TCE & 2.6 µM CT

2c 0.87 0.028 ± 0.002c

0.55 ± 1.48

50 µM TCEd 1 0d 0d 36.86 ± 1.96 50 µM TCEd 2c 0d 0d 16.47 ± 2.92

a Slug inputs of CT, CF, or TCE to the batch reactors were accompanied by an addition of 2 mM formate (100 µmol H2/bottle). b H2 partial pressures slowly increased throughout the CF exposure, which is represented by a negative H2 maximum use rate. c The second addition consisted of 50 µM TCE and 2 mM formate. No additional CT or CF was added. d TCE and H2 Control experiments conducted in the absence of CT and CF.

Page 91: Transformation of Carbon Tetrachloride and Chloroform by Trichloroethene Respiring Anaerobic

76

Table 5.3: Comparison of first order CF transformation rates and zero order maximum H2 use rates for the VS-5L ADC+S. H2 consumption was fastest in the absence of CF and reversibly inhibited above 0.6 µM CF. H2 was slightly inhibited in the 50 µM TCE & 2.6 µM CT treatment. Error estimate calculated as one standard deviation.

Treatment CT, CF, or

TCE Additiona

[CF]aq,max (µM)

kCF,obs (d-1)

kH2,max (µmol*bottle-

1*day-1) 0.86 µM CT 1 0.3 0.35 ± 0.058 16.95 ± 1.28

2.6 µM CT 1 2.25 0.045 ± 0.002

NDb

2.1 µM CF 1 2.1 0.072 ± 0.07 4.74 ± 0.33 50 µM TCE

& 2.6 µM CT 1 1.3

0.043 ± 0.008

7.73 ± 1.16

50 µM TCE & 2.6 µM CT

2c 0.86 0.043 ± 0.008c

11.34 ± 1.71

50 µM TCEd 1 0d 0d 49.82 ± 7.94 50 µM TCEd 2c 0d 0d 15.11 ± 1.75

a Slug inputs of CT, CF, or TCE to the batch reactors were accompanied by an addition of 2 mM formate (100 µmol H2/bottle). b H2 use rate not determined due to insufficient data. c The second addition consisted of 50 µM TCE and 2 mM formate. No additional CT or CF was added. d TCE and H2 Control experiments conducted in the absence of CT and CF.

Page 92: Transformation of Carbon Tetrachloride and Chloroform by Trichloroethene Respiring Anaerobic

77

Since complete TCE respiration to ETH only requires 12.6 µmol H2/bottle, and

ETH was the only detectable metabolite in VS-5L (Figure 4.7) from 0.5 days after the

first addition and from 6 days after the second TCE addition (t = 20 d), the possibility

that H2 consumption occurred solely due to CAH reductive dechlorination is unlikely.

Additionally, the reductive dechlorination of 2.6 µM CT to 1.3 µM CF and 0.58 µM

DCM would not be responsible for the consumption of 200 µmol H2/bottle created from

two 2 mM doses of formate (Figure 4.4b). Therefore, it is likely that the consumption

of H2 was being driven by homoacetogenesis, despite CF being higher than the apparent

threshold inhibition concentration (0.6 µM CF).

It is possible that the VS-5L culture is more resilient against CF inhibition when

initially stimulated with TCE and H2. CF is a known inhibitor of methanogenesis

(Bauchop, 1967b) and is used for this purpose when studying different methanogenic

cultures. Previous research has found that H2 consumption in lake or sediment

environments (Conrad et al., 1989; Lovley and Klug, 1983) and in anaerobic digesters

(Chen et al., 2008; Hu and Chen, 2007; Saady, 2013; Xu et al., 2010) has been partially

or not inhibited by low levels of CF while methanogenesis has been completely

inhibited. First order H2 consumption rates in anoxic enrichment cultures from lake or

sediment environments decreased by 60-75% (Conrad et al., 1989) and 26% (Lovley

and Klug, 1983) when inhibited by 100 µM CF and 0.003% v/v CF, respectively. This

points to the ability of homoacetogenic cultures to be able to tolerate low concentrations

of CF, although this does not explain the differences between the EV-5L and VS-5L

cultures. It also does not provide an explanation as to why VS-5L would consume H2

after metabolizing TCE when CF concentrations are greater than 0.6 µM (Figure 5.6)

but not when transforming CT and CF alone (Figure 5.3b). It is likely that the duration

of CF exposure and the presence of growth substrates are important determining factors

for CF inhibition of H2 consumption.

Additionally, H2 consumption in VS-5L could be driven by Geobacter species,

which have been previously identified by molecular analysis in the EV-5L and VS-5L

chemostats (Mayer-Blackwell et al., 2014). In anaerobic digester sludge inhibited with

CF, Geobacter hydrogenophilus was found to grow on elevated levels of acetate and

H2, which it can oxidize for growth (Xu et al., 2010). Xu et al. (2010) also found that

Page 93: Transformation of Carbon Tetrachloride and Chloroform by Trichloroethene Respiring Anaerobic

78

the consumption of H2 and production of acetate was possibly syntrophic and

proceeded through the formation of propionate and butyrate. It was proposed that these

fatty acids were used syntrophically by acetogenic Syntrophomonas and

Syntrophobacter species along with homoacetogenic bacteria to form acetate. It is

therefore possible that a complex bacterial community is present in the EV-5L and VS-

5L cultures in addition to D. mccartyi, and these lower abundance species are driving

the consumption of H2 under CF inhibition conditions. The increase in kH2,max during

the second addition of TCE (50 µM) and formate (2 mM) in the VS-5L, TCE, & CT

treatment suggests that long-term exposure to CF is not toxic to the H2 utilizers. Instead,

CF might be exerting a reversible chemical inhibition which can be minimized by

providing growth substrates to the culture. Molecular characterization of the low

abundance species in the anaerobic dechlorinating cultures would help to elucidate the

complex dynamics of H2 formation and subsequent consumption under different

electron donor and CAH conditions. Furthermore, studies aimed at determining the

mechanism driving CF inhibition for H2 consumption would probe the role of H2 and

the complex cast of characters competing for it in the anaerobic dechlorinating cultures.

Page 94: Transformation of Carbon Tetrachloride and Chloroform by Trichloroethene Respiring Anaerobic

79

CHAPTER 6: CONCLUSIONS

CT was completely and rapidly transformed by cells and the supernatant

harvested from chemostats that dehalogenate TCE to ETH. The primary transformation

products measured were CF, DCM, and CS2, with CF and CS2 being subsequently

transformed. Treatments conducted with live cells, poisoned cells, and cells growing

on TCE and H2 showed variable CT transformation rates with the fastest rates catalyzed

by cells that were concurrently metabolizing TCE and its reduction products. CT (2.6

µM) was not inhibitory to TCE and cDCE dehalorespiration, but CF production

inhibited the VC to ETH step. Long-term exposure to CF dramatically impacted TCE

and daughter product metabolism. It is not known why enhanced CT and CF rates

occurred during TCE dehalogenation, but it may be associated with the cometabolic

nature of the transformations, thus more studies are warranted. Understanding the

complex dynamics of co-contaminants, inhibition, and different transformation

mechanisms is important to improve the efficiency of in situ remediation applications.

Low concentrations of CF appear to reversibly inhibit the consumption of H2

by anaerobic dechlorinating cultures. In the absence of growth substrates, H2

consumption by the anaerobic dechlorinating cultures was inhibited by CF

concentrations greater than 0.4 µM (EV-5L) and 0.6 µM CF (VS-5L). When CF was

transformed below these concentrations, H2 consumption was rapid and near complete.

However, the VS-5L culture displayed some resilience to CF inhibition and was able

to use H2 at CF concentrations as high as 1.3 µM after metabolizing an initial 50µM

dose of TCE to ETH (Figure 4.7). It is likely that H2 consumption in these cultures is

being driven by reductive dechlorination and homoacetogenesis, which has been

measured previously (Marshall et al., 2014). It is not yet possible to explain the role

different microbes play in H2 consumption and the mechanism by which CF inhibits

the complex anaerobic mixed cultures. However, an increase in kH2,max during

respiration of a second dose of 50 µM TCE in the presence of 0.86 µM CF suggests

that CF is exerting a chemical inhibition rather than toxicity to the H2 consuming

species. More research that probes deeper into the molecular composition of the

cultures is needed to explain how different electron donors and H2 influence

community structure.

Page 95: Transformation of Carbon Tetrachloride and Chloroform by Trichloroethene Respiring Anaerobic

80

BIBLIOGRAPHY

Agency for Toxic Substances and Disease Registry, 2006. Public Health Statement: Vinyl Chloride (No. 75-01–4). Centers for Disease Control.

Agency for Toxic Substances and Disease Registry, 1997. Toxicological Profile for Chloroform. U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Atlanta, GA.

Amonette, J.E., Workman, D.J., Kennedy, D.W., Fruchter, J.S., Gorby, Y.A., 2000. Dechlorination of Carbon Tetrachloride by Fe(II) Associated with Goethite. Environ. Sci. Technol. 34, 4606–4613. doi:10.1021/es9913582

Assaf-Anid, N., Hayes, K.F., Vogel, T.M., 1994. Reduction dechlorination of carbon tetrachloride by cobalamin(II) in the presence of dithiothreitol: mechanistic study, effect of redox potential and pH. Environ. Sci. Technol. 28, 246–252. doi:10.1021/es00051a010

Aziz, C. e., Georgiou, G., Speitel, G.E., 1999. Cometabolism of chlorinated solvents and binary chlorinated solvent mixtures using M. trichosporium OB3b PP358. Biotechnol. Bioeng. 65, 100–107. doi:10.1002/(SICI)1097-0290(19991005)65:1<100::AID-BIT12>3.0.CO;2-1

Azizian, M.F., Behrens, S., Sabalowsky, A., Dolan, M.E., Spormann, A.M., Semprini, L., 2008. Continuous-flow column study of reductive dehalogenation of PCE upon bioaugmentation with the Evanite enrichment culture. J. Contam. Hydrol. 100, 11–21. doi:10.1016/j.jconhyd.2008.04.006

Azizian, M.F., Marshall, I.P.G., Behrens, S., Spormann, A.M., Semprini, L., 2010. Comparison of lactate, formate, and propionate as hydrogen donors for the reductive dehalogenation of trichloroethene in a continuous-flow column. J. Contam. Hydrol. 113, 77–92. doi:10.1016/j.jconhyd.2010.02.004

Azizian, M.F., Semprini, L., 2016. Use of 13C Labeled Carbon Tetrachloride to Demonstrate Transformation to Carbon Dioxide Under Anaerobic Conditions in a Continuous Flow Column Using Lactate as a Fermenting Electron Donor.

Azizian, M.F., Semprini, L., in press. Simultaneous anaerobic transformation of tetrachloroethene and carbon tetrachloride in a continuous flow column. J. Contam. Hydrol. doi:10.1016/j.jconhyd.2016.04.002

Bae, S., Lee, W., 2012. Enhanced reductive degradation of carbon tetrachloride by biogenic vivianite and Fe(II). Geochim. Cosmochim. Acta 85, 170–186. doi:10.1016/j.gca.2012.02.023

Page 96: Transformation of Carbon Tetrachloride and Chloroform by Trichloroethene Respiring Anaerobic

81

BIBLIOGRAPHY (Continued)

Bagley, D.M., Lalonde, M., Kaseros, V., Stasiuk, K.E., Sleep, B.E., 2000. Acclimation of anaerobic systems to biodegrade tetrachloroethene in the presence of carbon tetrachloride and chloroform. Water Res. 34, 171–178. doi:10.1016/S0043-1354(99)00121-9

Bauchop, T., 1967a. Inhibition of Rumen Methanogenesis by Methane Analogues. J. Bacteriol. 94, 171–175.

Bauchop, T., 1967b. Inhibition of Rumen Methanogenesis by Methane Analogues. J. Bacteriol. 94, 171–175.

Becker, J.G., Freedman, D.L., 1994. Use of Cyanocobalamin To Enhance Anaerobic Biodegradation of Chloroform. Environ. Sci. Technol. 28, 1942–1949. doi:10.1021/es00060a027

Behrens, S., Azizian, M.F., McMurdie, P.J., Sabalowsky, A., Dolan, M.E., Semprini, L., Spormann, A.M., 2008. Monitoring abundance and expression of “Dehalococcoides” species chloroethene-reductive dehalogenases in a tetrachloroethene-dechlorinating flow column. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 74, 5695–5703. doi:10.1128/AEM.00926-08

Berggren, D.R.V., Marshall, I.P.G., Azizian, M.F., Spormann, A.M., Semprini, L., 2013. Effects of sulfate reduction on the bacterial community and kinetic parameters of a dechlorinating culture under chemostat growth conditions. Environ. Sci. Technol. 47, 1879–1886.

Bouwer, E.J., McCarty, P.L., 1985. Utilization rates of trace halogenated organic compounds in acetate-grown biofilms. Biotechnol. Bioeng. 27, 1564–1571. doi:10.1002/bit.260271107

Bouwer, E.J., McCarty, P.L., 1983. Transformations of 1- and 2-carbon halogenated aliphatic organic compounds under methanogenic conditions. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 45, 1286–1294.

Bouwer, E.J., Wright, J.P., 1988. Transformations of trace halogenated aliphatics in anoxic biofilm columns. J. Contam. Hydrol. 2, 155–169. doi:10.1016/0169-7722(88)90005-8

Butler, E.C., Hayes, K.F., 2000. Kinetics of the Transformation of Halogenated Aliphatic Compounds by Iron Sulfide. Environ. Sci. Technol. 34, 422–429. doi:10.1021/es980946x

Caccavo, F., Lonergan, D., Lovley, D., Davis, M., Stolz, J., Mcinerney, M., 1994. Geobacter Sulfurreducens Sp-Nov, a Hydrogen-Oxidizing and Acetate-Oxidizing Dissimilatory Metal-Reducing Microorganism. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 60, 3752–3759.

Page 97: Transformation of Carbon Tetrachloride and Chloroform by Trichloroethene Respiring Anaerobic

82

BIBLIOGRAPHY (Continued)

Cappelletti, M., Frascari, D., Zannoni, D., Fedi, S., 2012. Microbial degradation of chloroform. Appl. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 96, 1395–409. doi:10.1007/s00253-012-4494-1

Chang, H.L., Alvarez-Cohen, L., 1996. Biodegradation of individual and multiple chlorinated aliphatic hydrocarbons by methane-oxidizing cultures. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 62, 3371–3377.

Chauhan, S., Barbieri, P., Wood, T.K., 1998. Oxidation of Trichloroethylene, 1,1-Dichloroethylene, and Chloroform by Toluene/o-Xylene Monooxygenase from Pseudomonas stutzeri OX1. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 64, 3023–3024.

Chen, Y., Cheng, J.J., Creamer, K.S., 2008. Inhibition of anaerobic digestion process: A review. Bioresour. Technol. 99, 4044–4064. doi:10.1016/j.biortech.2007.01.057

Chiu, P.-C., Reinhard, M., 1995. Metallocoenzyme-Mediated Reductive Transformation of Carbon Tetrachloride in Titanium(III) Citrate Aqueous Solution. Environ. Sci. Technol. 29, 595–603. doi:10.1021/es00003a006

Choi, W., Hoffmann, M.R., 1996. Photoreductive Mechanism of CCl4 Degradation on TiO2 Particles and Effects of Electron Donors. Environ. Sci. Technol. 29, 1646–1654. doi:10.1021/es00006a031

Ciavarelli, R., Cappelletti, M., Fedi, S., Pinelli, D., Frascari, D., 2011. Chloroform aerobic cometabolism by butane-growing Rhodococcus aetherovorans BCP1 in continuous-flow biofilm reactors. Bioprocess Biosyst. Eng. 35, 667–681. doi:10.1007/s00449-011-0647-3

Colby, J., Stirling, D.I., Dalton, H., 1977. The soluble methane mono-oxygenase of Methylococcus capsulatus (Bath). Its ability to oxygenate n-alkanes, n-alkenes, ethers, and alicyclic, aromatic and heterocyclic compounds. Biochem. J. 165, 395–402. doi:10.1042/bj1650395

Conrad, R., Bak, F., Seitz, H. j., Thebrath, B., Mayer, H. p., Schütz, H., 1989. Hydrogen turnover by psychrotrophic homoacetogenic and mesophilic methanogenic bacteria in anoxic paddy soil and lake sediment. FEMS Microbiol. Lett. 62, 285–293. doi:10.1111/j.1574-6968.1989.tb03382.x

Criddle, C.S., DeWitt, J.T., Grbić-Galić, D., McCarty, P.L., 1990a. Transformation of carbon tetrachloride by Pseudomonas sp. strain KC under denitrification conditions. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 56, 3240–3246.

Criddle, C.S., DeWitt, J.T., McCarty, P.L., 1990b. Reductive dehalogenation of carbon tetrachloride by Escherichia coli K-12. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 56, 3247–3254.

Page 98: Transformation of Carbon Tetrachloride and Chloroform by Trichloroethene Respiring Anaerobic

83

BIBLIOGRAPHY (Continued)

Criddle, C.S., McCarty, P.L., 1991. Electrolytic model system for reductive dehalogenation in aqueous environments. Environ. Sci. Technol. 25, 973–978. doi:10.1021/es00017a022

Criddle, C.S., McCarty, P.L., Claire Elliott, M., Barker, J.F., 1986. Reduction of hexachloroethane to tetrachloroethylene in groundwater. J. Contam. Hydrol., Transport and Transformations of Organic Contaminants 1, 133–142. doi:10.1016/0169-7722(86)90012-4

Cupples, A.M., Spormann, A.M., McCarty, P.L., 2003. Growth of a Dehalococcoides-Like Microorganism on Vinyl Chloride and cis-Dichloroethene as Electron Acceptors as Determined by Competitive PCR. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 69, 953–959. doi:10.1128/AEM.69.2.953-959.2003

Dangel, W., Schulz, H., Diekert, G., König, H., Fuchs, G., 1987. Occurrence of corrinoid-containing membrane proteins in anaerobic bacteria. Arch. Microbiol. 148, 52–56. doi:10.1007/BF00429647

Davis, A., Fennemore, G.G., Peck, C., Walker, C.R., McIlwraith, J., Thomas, S., 2003. Degradation of carbon tetrachloride in a reducing groundwater environment: implications for natural attenuation. Appl. Geochem. 18, 503–525. doi:10.1016/S0883-2927(02)00102-6

de Best, J.H., Salminen, E., Doddema, H.J., Janssen, D.B., Harder, W., 1998. Transformation of carbon tetrachloride under sulfate reducing conditions. Biodegradation 8, 429–436. doi:10.1023/A:1008262225760

Devlin, J.F., Müller, D., 1999. Field and Laboratory Studies of Carbon Tetrachloride Transformation in a Sandy Aquifer under Sulfate Reducing Conditions. Environ. Sci. Technol. 33, 1021–1027. doi:10.1021/es9806884

Diekert, G., Wohlfarth, G., 1994. Metabolism of homoacetogens. Antonie Van Leeuwenhoek 66, 209–221. doi:10.1007/BF00871640

Doherty, R.E., 2000. A History of the Production and Use of Carbon Tetrachloride, Tetrachloroethylene, Trichloroethylene and 1,1,1-Trichloroethane in the United States: Part 1–Historical Background; Carbon Tetrachloride and Tetrachloroethylene. Environ. Forensics 1, 69–81. doi:10.1006/enfo.2000.0010

Doong, R.-A., Wu, S.-C., 1992. Reductive dechlorination of chlorinated hydrocarbons in aqueous solutions containing ferrous and sulfide ions. Chemosphere 24, 1063–1075. doi:10.1016/0045-6535(92)90197-Y

Page 99: Transformation of Carbon Tetrachloride and Chloroform by Trichloroethene Respiring Anaerobic

84

BIBLIOGRAPHY (Continued)

Doong, R., Lee, C.C., Lien, C.M., 2014. Enhanced dechlorination of carbon tetrachloride by Geobacter sulfurreducens in the presence of naturally occurring quinones and ferrihydrite. Chemosphere 97, 54–63. doi:10.1016/j.chemosphere.2013.11.004

Dos Santos Afonso, M., Stumm, W., 1992. Reductive dissolution of iron(III) (hydr)oxides by hydrogen sulfide. Langmuir 8, 1671–1675. doi:10.1021/la00042a030

Drake, H.L., Küsel, K., Matthies, C., 2006. Acetogenic Prokaryotes, in: Dr, M.D.P., Falkow, S., Rosenberg, E., Schleifer, K.-H., Stackebrandt, E. (Eds.), The Prokaryotes. Springer New York, pp. 354–420.

Dybas, M.J., Barcelona, M., Bezborodnikov, S., Davies, S., Forney, L., Heuer, H., Kawka, O., Mayotte, T., Sepúlveda-Torres, L., Smalla, K., Sneathen, M., Tiedje, J., Voice, T., Wiggert, D.C., Witt, M.E., Criddle, C.S., 1998. Pilot-Scale Evaluation of Bioaugmentation for In-Situ Remediation of a Carbon Tetrachloride-Contaminated Aquifer. Environ. Sci. Technol. 32, 3598–3611. doi:10.1021/es980200z

Dybas, M.J., Hyndman, D.W., Heine, R., Tiedje, J., Linning, K., Wiggert, D., Voice, T., Zhao, X., Dybas, L., Criddle, C.S., 2002. Development, Operation, and Long-Term Performance of a Full-Scale Biocurtain Utilizing Bioaugmentation. Environ. Sci. Technol. 36, 3635–3644. doi:10.1021/es0114557

Eastmond, D.A., 2008. Evaluating genotoxicity data to identify a mode of action and its application in estimating cancer risk at low doses: A case study involving carbon tetrachloride. Environ. Mol. Mutagen. 49, 132–141. doi:10.1002/em.20368

Egli, C., Scholtz, R., Cook, A.M., Leisinger, T., 1987. Anaerobic dechlorination of tetrachloromethane and 1,2-dichloroethane to degradable products by pure cultures of Desulfobacterium sp. and Methanobacterium sp. FEMS Microbiol. Lett. 43, 257–261. doi:10.1111/j.1574-6968.1987.tb02154.x

Egli, C., Stromeyer, S., Cook, A.M., Leisinger, T., 1990. Transformation of tetra- and trichloromethane to CO2 by anaerobic bacteria is a non-enzymic process. FEMS Microbiol. Lett. 68, 207–212. doi:10.1111/j.1574-6968.1990.tb04150.x

Egli, C., Tschan, T., Scholtz, R., Cook, A.M., Leisinger, T., 1988. Transformation of tetrachloromethane to dichloromethane and carbon dioxide by Acetobacterium woodii. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 54, 2819–2824.

Page 100: Transformation of Carbon Tetrachloride and Chloroform by Trichloroethene Respiring Anaerobic

85

BIBLIOGRAPHY (Continued)

Ely, R.L., Williamson, K.J., Hyman, M.R., Arp, D.J., 1997. Cometabolism of chlorinated solvents by nitrifying bacteria: Kinetics, substrate interactions, toxicity effects, and bacterial response. Biotechnol. Bioeng. 54, 520–534. doi:10.1002/(SICI)1097-0290(19970620)54:6<520::AID-BIT3>3.0.CO;2-L

Ferry, J.G., 1992. Methane from acetate. J. Bacteriol. 174, 5489–5495.

Frascari, D., Cappelletti, M., Fedi, S., Verboschi, A., Ciavarelli, R., Nocentini, M., Pinelli, D., 2012. Application of the growth substrate pulsed feeding technique to a process of chloroform aerobic cometabolism in a continuous-flow sand-filled reactor. Process Biochem., ACB 2011+ Bioenergy+Env. Biotech+Ind. Biotech 47, 1656–1664. doi:10.1016/j.procbio.2011.08.019

Frascari, D., Kim, Y., Dolan, M.E., Semprini, L., 2003. A Kinetic Study of Aerobic Propane Uptake and Cometabolic Degradation of Chloroform, cis-Dichloroethylene and Trichloroetylene in Microcosms with Groundwater/Aquifer Solids. Water Air Soil Pollut. Focus 3, 285–298. doi:10.1023/A:1023909229768

Frascari, D., Pinelli, D., Nocentini, M., Baleani, E., Cappelletti, M., Fedi, S., 2008. A kinetic study of chlorinated solvent cometabolic biodegradation by propane-grown Rhodococcus sp PB1. Biochem. Eng. J. 42, 139–147. doi:10.1016/j.bej.2008.06.011

Frascari, D., Pinelli, D., Nocentini, M., Fedi, S., Pii, Y., Zannoni, D., 2006. Chloroform degradation by butane-grown cells of Rhodococcus aetherovorans BCP1. Appl. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 73, 421–428. doi:10.1007/s00253-006-0433-3

Frascari, D., Zannoni, A., Pinelli, D., Nocentini, M., 2007. Chloroform aerobic cometabolism by butane-utilizing bacteria in bioaugmented and non-bioaugmented soil/groundwater microcosms. Process Biochem. 42, 1218–1228. doi:10.1016/j.procbio.2007.05.018

Freedman, D.L., Hashsham, S., Lasecki, M., Scholze, R., 1995. Accelerated Biotransformation of Carbon Tetrachloride and Chloroform by Sulfate-Reducing Enrichment Cultures, in: Bioremediation of Chlorinated Solvents. Presented at the International in situ and on-site bioreclamation symposium, Battelle Press, San Diego, CA.

Gälli, R., McCarty, P.L., 1989. Biotransformation of 1,1,1-trichloroethane, trichloromethane, and tetrachloromethane by a Clostridium sp. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 55, 837–844.

Page 101: Transformation of Carbon Tetrachloride and Chloroform by Trichloroethene Respiring Anaerobic

86

BIBLIOGRAPHY (Continued)

Gantzer, C.J., Wackett, L.P., 1991. Reductive dechlorination catalyzed by bacterial transition-metal coenzymes. Environ. Sci. Technol. 25, 715–722. doi:10.1021/es00016a017

Gillham, R.W., O’Hannesin, S.F., 1994. Enhanced Degradation of Halogenated Aliphatics by Zero-Valent Iron. Ground Water 32, 958–967. doi:10.1111/j.1745-6584.1994.tb00935.x

Gillham, R.W., Vogan, J., Gui, L., Duchene, M., Son, J., 2010. Iron Barrier Walls for Chlorinated Solvent Remediation, in: Stroo, H.F., Ward, C.H. (Eds.), In Situ Remediation of Chlorinated Solvent Plumes, SERDP/ESTCP Environmental Remediation Technology. Springer New York, pp. 537–571.

Goldhaber, M.B., 1983. Experimental study of metastable sulfur oxyanion formation during pyrite oxidation at pH 6-9 and 30oC. Am. J. Sci. 283, 25.

Gribble, G.W., 2004. Natural Organohalogens: A New Frontier for Medicinal Agents? J. Chem. Educ. 81, 1441. doi:10.1021/ed081p1441

Grostern, A., Duhamel, M., Dworatzek, S., Edwards, E.A., 2010. Chloroform respiration to dichloromethane by a Dehalobacter population. Environ. Microbiol. 12, 1053–1060. doi:10.1111/j.1462-2920.2009.02150.x

Guerrero-Barajas, C., Field, J.A., 2005. Riboflavin- and cobalamin-mediated biodegradation of chloroform in a methanogenic consortium. Biotechnol. Bioeng. 89, 539–550. doi:10.1002/bit.20379

Gupta, M., Gupta, A., Suidan, M.T., Sayles, G.D., 1996a. Biotransformation rates of chloroform under anaerobic conditions—II. Sulfate reduction. Water Res. 30, 1387–1394. doi:10.1016/0043-1354(96)00006-1

Gupta, M., Sharma, D., Suidan, M.T., Sayles, G.D., 1996b. Biotransformation rates of chloroform under anaerobic conditions—I. Methanogenesis. Water Res. 30, 1377–1385. doi:10.1016/0043-1354(96)00005-X

Hamamura, N., Page, C., Long, T., Semprini, L., Arp, D.J., 1997. Chloroform Cometabolism by Butane-Grown CF8, Pseudomonas butanovora, and Mycobacterium vaccae JOB5 and Methane-Grown Methylosinus trichosporium OB3b. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 63, 3607–3613.

Hashsham, S.A., Freedman, D.L., 1999. Enhanced Biotransformation of Carbon Tetrachloride by Acetobacterium woodii upon Addition of Hydroxocobalamin and Fructose. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 65, 4537–4542.

Page 102: Transformation of Carbon Tetrachloride and Chloroform by Trichloroethene Respiring Anaerobic

87

BIBLIOGRAPHY (Continued)

Hashsham, S.A., Scholze, R., Feedman, D.L., 1995. Cobalamin-enhanced anaerobic biotransformation of carbon tetrachloride. Environ. Sci. Technol. 29, 2856–2863. doi:10.1021/es00011a023

He, J., Sung, Y., Krajmalnik-Brown, R., Ritalahti, K.M., Löffler, F.E., 2005. Isolation and characterization of Dehalococcoides sp. strain FL2, a trichloroethene (TCE)- and 1,2-dichloroethene-respiring anaerobe. Environ. Microbiol. 7, 1442–1450. doi:10.1111/j.1462-2920.2005.00830.x

Hickey, R.F., Vanderwielen, J., Switzenbaum, M.S., 1987. The effects of organic toxicants on methane production and hydrogen gas levels during the anaerobic digestion of waste activated sludge. Water Res. 21, 1417–1427. doi:10.1016/0043-1354(87)90018-2

Holliger, C., Schraa, G., Stupperich, E., Stams, A.J., Zehnder, A.J., 1992. Evidence for the involvement of corrinoids and factor F430 in the reductive dechlorination of 1,2-dichloroethane by Methanosarcina barkeri. J. Bacteriol. 174, 4427–4434.

Hu, B., Chen, S., 2007. Pretreatment of methanogenic granules for immobilized hydrogen fermentation. Int. J. Hydrog. Energy, International Symposium on Solar-Hydrogen-Fuel Cells 2005 32, 3266–3273. doi:10.1016/j.ijhydene.2007.03.005

Huo, Y.-C., Li, W.-W., Min, D., Wang, D.-D., Liu, H.-Q., Kong, Q., Lau, T.-C., Zeng, R.J., 2015. Zero-valent iron nanoparticles with sustained high reductive activity for carbon tetrachloride dechlorination. Rsc Adv. 5, 54497–54504. doi:10.1039/c5ra07052j

Ivahnenko, T., Zogorski, J.S., 2006. Sources and Occurrence of Chloroform and Other Trihalomethanes in Drinking-Water Supply Wells in the United States, 1986–2001 (No. 2006–5015). United States Geological Survey, Reston, VA.

Jiao, Y., Qiu, C., Huang, L., Wu, K., Ma, H., Chen, S., Ma, L., Wu, D., 2009. Reductive dechlorination of carbon tetrachloride by zero-valent iron and related iron corrosion. Appl. Catal. B Environ. 91, 434–440. doi:10.1016/j.apcatb.2009.06.012

Johnson, T.L., Scherer, M.M., Tratnyek, P.G., 1996. Kinetics of Halogenated Organic Compound Degradation by Iron Metal. Environ. Sci. Technol. 30, 2634–2640. doi:10.1021/es9600901

Justicia-Leon, S.D., Higgins, S., Mack, E.E., Griffiths, D.R., Tang, S., Edwards, E.A., Löffler, F.E., 2014. Bioaugmentation with Distinct Dehalobacter Strains Achieves Chloroform Detoxification in Microcosms. Environ. Sci. Technol. 48, 1851–1858. doi:10.1021/es403582f

Page 103: Transformation of Carbon Tetrachloride and Chloroform by Trichloroethene Respiring Anaerobic

88

BIBLIOGRAPHY (Continued)

Justicia-Leon, S.D., Ritalahti, K.M., Mack, E.E., Löffler, F.E., 2012. Dichloromethane Fermentation by a Dehalobacter sp. in an Enrichment Culture Derived from Pristine River Sediment. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 78, 1288–1291. doi:10.1128/AEM.07325-11

Kim, Y., Arp, D.J., Semprini, L., 2000. Chlorinated Solvent Cometabolism by Butane-Grown Mixed Culture. J. Environ. Eng. 126, 934–942. doi:10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9372(2000)126:10(934)

Klečka, G.M., Gonsior, S.J., 1984. Reductive dechlorination of chlorinated methanes and ethanes by reduced iron (II) porphyrins. Chemosphere 13, 391–402. doi:10.1016/0045-6535(84)90097-3

Knox, R.C., Canter, L.W., 1996. Prioritization of ground water contaminants and sources. Water. Air. Soil Pollut. 88, 205–226. doi:10.1007/BF00294102

Koenig, J.C., Lee, M.J., Manefield, M., 2012. Successful microcosm demonstration of a strategy for biodegradation of a mixture of carbon tetrachloride and perchloroethene harnessing sulfate reducing and dehalorespiring bacteria. J. Hazard. Mater. 219–220, 169–175. doi:10.1016/j.jhazmat.2012.03.076

Koons, B.W., Baeseman, J.L., Novak, P.J., 2001. Investigation of cell exudates active in carbon tetrachloride and chloroform degradation. Biotechnol. Bioeng. 74, 12–17. doi:10.1002/bit.1090

Krajmalnik-Brown, R., Hölscher, T., Thomson, I.N., Saunders, F.M., Ritalahti, K.M., Löffler, F.E., 2004. Genetic Identification of a Putative Vinyl Chloride Reductase in Dehalococcoides sp. Strain BAV1. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 70, 6347–6351. doi:10.1128/AEM.70.10.6347-6351.2004

Krautler, B., 1988. Corrins and the Acetyl-Coa Path of Autotrophic Fixation of Carbon-Dioxide in Bacteria. Chimia 42, 91–94.

Kriegman-King, M.R., Reinhard, M., 1994. Transformation of Carbon Tetrachloride by Pyrite in Aqueous Solution. Environ. Sci. Technol. 28, 692–700. doi:10.1021/es00053a025

Kriegman-King, M.R., Reinhard, M., 1992. Transformation of carbon tetrachloride in the presence of sulfide, biotite, and vermiculite. Environ. Sci. Technol. 26, 2198–2206. doi:10.1021/es00035a019

Kriegman-King, M.R., Reinhard, M., 1991. Reduction of Hexachloroethane and Carbon Tetrachloride at Surfaces of Biotite, Vermiculite, Pyrite and Marcasite, in: Organic Substances and Sediments in Water. CRC Press.

Page 104: Transformation of Carbon Tetrachloride and Chloroform by Trichloroethene Respiring Anaerobic

89

BIBLIOGRAPHY (Continued)

Krone, U.E., Laufer, K., Thauer, R.K., Hogenkamp, H.P.C., 1989a. Coenzyme F430 as a possible catalyst for the reductive dehalogenation of chlorinated C1 hydrocarbons in methanogenic bacteria. Biochemistry (Mosc.) 28, 10061–10065. doi:10.1021/bi00452a027

Krone, U.E., Thauer, R.K., Hogenkamp, H.P.C., 1989b. Reductive dehalogenation of chlorinated C1-hydrocarbons mediated by corrinoids. Biochemistry (Mosc.) 28, 4908–4914. doi:10.1021/bi00437a057

Kroschwitz, J., Howe-Grant, M., 1991. Kirk-Othmer Encyclopedia of Chemical Technology, 4th Edition. ed. Wiley & Sons, New York.

Laturnus, F., Haselmann, K.F., Borch, T., Grøn, C., 2002. Terrestrial natural sources of trichloromethane (chloroform, CHCl3) – An overview. Biogeochemistry 60, 121–139. doi:10.1023/A:1019887505651

Lee, M., Low, A., Zemb, O., Koenig, J., Michaelsen, A., Manefield, M., 2012. Complete chloroform dechlorination by organochlorine respiration and fermentation. Environ. Microbiol. 14, 883–894. doi:10.1111/j.1462-2920.2011.02656.x

Lee, M., Wells, E., Wong, Y.K., Koenig, J., Adrian, L., Richnow, H.H., Manefield, M., 2015. Relative contributions of Dehalobacter and zerovalent iron in the degradation of chlorinated methanes. Environ. Sci. Technol. 49, 4481–4489. doi:10.1021/es5052364

Lewis, T.A., Morra, M.J., Brown, P.D., 1996. Comparative Product Analysis of Carbon Tetrachloride Dehalogenation Catalyzed by Cobalt Corrins in the Presence of Thiol or Titanium(III) Reducing Agents. Environ. Sci. Technol. 30, 292–300. doi:10.1021/es950327d

Li, X. m., Zhou, S. g., Li, F. b., Wu, C. y., Zhuang, L., Xu, W., Liu, L., 2009. Fe(III) oxide reduction and carbon tetrachloride dechlorination by a newly isolated Klebsiella pneumoniae strain L17. J. Appl. Microbiol. 106, 130–139. doi:10.1111/j.1365-2672.2008.03985.x

Lichstein, H.C., Soule, M.H., 1944. Studies of the Effect of Sodium Azide on Microbic Growth and Respiration. J. Bacteriol. 47, 221–230.

Lieber, E., Oftedahl, E., Rao, C.N.R., 1963. Reaction of Carbon Disulfide with Azide Ion. J. Org. Chem. 28, 194–199. doi:10.1021/jo01036a046

Liu, H., Wang, J., Wang, A., Chen, J., 2010. Chemical inhibitors of methanogenesis and putative applications. Appl. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 89, 1333–1340. doi:10.1007/s00253-010-3066-5

Page 105: Transformation of Carbon Tetrachloride and Chloroform by Trichloroethene Respiring Anaerobic

90

BIBLIOGRAPHY (Continued)

Lovley, D.R., Klug, M.J., 1983. Sulfate Reducers Can Outcompete Methanogens at Freshwater Sulfate Concentrations. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 45, 187–192.

Lovley, D.R., Stolz, J.F., Nord, G.L., Phillips, E.J.P., 1987. Anaerobic production of magnetite by a dissimilatory iron-reducing microorganism. Nature 330, 252–254. doi:10.1038/330252a0

Mabey, W., Mill, T., 1978. Critical review of hydrolysis of organic compounds in water under environmental conditions. J. Phys. Chem. Ref. Data 7, 383–415. doi:10.1063/1.555572

Magnuson, J.K., Romine, M.F., Burris, D.R., Kingsley, M.T., 2000. Trichloroethene Reductive Dehalogenase fromDehalococcoides ethenogenes: Sequence of tceA and Substrate Range Characterization. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 66, 5141–5147. doi:10.1128/AEM.66.12.5141-5147.2000

Maithreepala, R.A., Doong, R., 2008. Effect of biogenic iron species and copper ions on the reduction of carbon tetrachloride under iron-reducing conditions. Chemosphere 70, 1405–1413. doi:10.1016/j.chemosphere.2007.09.021

Malachowsky, K.J., Phelps, T.J., Teboli, A.B., Minnikin, D.E., White, D.C., 1994. Aerobic Mineralization of Trichloroethylene, Vinyl Chloride, and Aromatic Compounds by Rhodococcus Species. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 60, 542–548.

Marshall, I.P.G., Azizian, M.F., Semprini, L., Spormann, A.M., 2014. Inferring community dynamics of organohalide-respiring bacteria in chemostats by covariance of rdhA gene abundance. FEMS Microbiol. Ecol. 87, 428–440. doi:10.1111/1574-6941.12235

Matheson, L.J., Tratnyek, P.G., 1994. Reductive Dehalogenation of Chlorinated Methanes by Iron Metal. Environ. Sci. Technol. 28, 2045–2053. doi:10.1021/es00061a012

Mayer-Blackwell, K., Azizian, M.F., Machak, C., Vitale, E., Carpani, G., Ferra, F.D., Semprini, L., Spormann, A.M., 2014. Nanoliter qPCR Platform for Highly Parallel , Quantitative Assessment of Reductive Dehalogenase Genes and Populations of Dehalogenating Microorganisms in Complex Environments. Environ. Sci. Technol. 48, 9659–9667.

Maymó-Gatell, X., Chien, Y., Gossett, J.M., Zinder, S.H., 1997. Isolation of a bacterium that reductively dechlorinates tetrachloroethene to ethene. Science 276, 1568–1571. doi:10.1126/science.276.5318.1568

Maymó-Gatell, X., Nijenhuis, I., Zinder, S.H., 2001. Reductive Dechlorination of cis-1,2-Dichloroethene and Vinyl Chloride by “Dehalococcoides ethenogenes.” Environ. Sci. Technol. 35, 516–521. doi:10.1021/es001285i

Page 106: Transformation of Carbon Tetrachloride and Chloroform by Trichloroethene Respiring Anaerobic

91

BIBLIOGRAPHY (Continued)

Mayotte, T.J., Dybas, M.J., Criddle, C.S., 1996. Bench-Scale Evaluation of Bioaugmentation to Remediate Carbon Tetrachloride-Contaminated Aquifer Materials. Ground Water 34, 358–367. doi:10.1111/j.1745-6584.1996.tb01896.x

McClay, K., Fox, B.G., Steffan, R.J., 1996. Chloroform mineralization by toluene-oxidizing bacteria. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 62, 2716–2722.

McCormick, M.L., Adriaens, P., 2004. Carbon Tetrachloride Transformation on the Surface of Nanoscale Biogenic Magnetite Particles. Environ. Sci. Technol. 38, 1045–1053. doi:10.1021/es030487m

McCormick, M.L., Bouwer, E.J., Adriaens, P., 2002. Carbon Tetrachloride Transformation in a Model Iron-Reducing Culture:  Relative Kinetics of Biotic and Abiotic Reactions. Environ. Sci. Technol. 36, 403–410. doi:10.1021/es010923+

McCulloch, A., 2003. Chloroform in the environment: occurrence, sources, sinks and effects. Chemosphere 50, 1291–1308. doi:10.1016/S0045-6535(02)00697-5

Mikesell, M.D., Boyd, S.A., 1990. Dechlorination of Chloroform by Methanosarcina Strains. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 56, 1198–1201.

Müller, J.A., Rosner, B.M., Abendroth, G. von, Meshulam-Simon, G., McCarty, P.L., Spormann, A.M., 2004. Molecular Identification of the Catabolic Vinyl Chloride Reductase from Dehalococcoides sp. Strain VS and Its Environmental Distribution. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 70, 4880–4888. doi:10.1128/AEM.70.8.4880-4888.2004

National Center for Biotechnology Information, 2016a. Carbon Tetrachloride [WWW Document]. URL https://pubchem.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/compound/carbon_tetrachloride (accessed 3.4.16).

National Center for Biotechnology Information, 2016b. Chloroform [WWW Document]. URL https://pubchem.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/compound/chloroform#section=Top (accessed 3.8.16).

Neumann, A., Wohlfarth, G., Diekert, G., 1996. Purification and Characterization of Tetrachloroethene Reductive Dehalogenase from Dehalospirillum multivorans. J. Biol. Chem. 271, 16515–16519.

Page 107: Transformation of Carbon Tetrachloride and Chloroform by Trichloroethene Respiring Anaerobic

92

BIBLIOGRAPHY (Continued)

Novak, P.J., Daniels, L., Parkin, G.F., 1998a. Enhanced Dechlorination of Carbon Tetrachloride and Chloroform in the Presence of Elemental Iron and Methanosarcina barkeri, Methanosarcina thermophila, or Methanosaeta concillii. Environ. Sci. Technol. 32, 1438–1443. doi:10.1021/es970785h

Novak, P.J., Daniels, L., Parkin, G.F., 1998b. Rapid Dechlorination of Carbon Tetrachloride and Chloroform by Extracellular Agents in Cultures of Methanosarcina thermophila. Environ. Sci. Technol. 32, 3132–3136. doi:10.1021/es971069i

Oldenhuis, R., Vink, R.L., Janssen, D.B., Witholt, B., 1989. Degradation of chlorinated aliphatic hydrocarbons by Methylosinus trichosporium OB3b expressing soluble methane monooxygenase. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 55, 2819–2826.

Oremland, R.S., Capone, D.G., 1988. Use of “Specific” Inhibitors in Biogeochemistry and Microbial Ecology, in: Marshall, K.C. (Ed.), Advances in Microbial Ecology, Advances in Microbial Ecology. Springer US, pp. 285–383.

Peiffer, S., Dos Santos Afonso, M., Wehrli, B., Gaechter, R., 1992. Kinetics and mechanism of the reaction of hydrogen sulfide with lepidocrocite. Environ. Sci. Technol. 26, 2408–2413. doi:10.1021/es00036a011

Penny, C., Vuilleumier, S., Bringel, F., 2010. Microbial degradation of tetrachloromethane: Mechanisms and perspectives for bioremediation. FEMS Microbiol. Ecol. 74, 257–275. doi:10.1111/j.1574-6941.2010.00935.x

Petrisor, I.G., Wells, J.T., 2008. Tracking Chlorinated Solvents in the Environment. Issues Environ. Sci. Technol. 26, 130–152.

Pfiffner, S.M., Phelps, T.J., Palumbo, A.V., 2000. Bioaugmentation Potential at a Carbon Tetrachloride Contaminated Site. Presented at the 2nd International Conference on Remediation of Chlorinated and Recalcitrant Compounds, Monterrey, CA, pp. 389–394.

Rhee, E., Speece, R.E., 1992. Maximal Biodegradation Rates of Chloroform and Trichloroethylene in Anaerobic Treatment. Water Sci. Technol. 25, 121–130.

Rossberg, M., Lendle, W., Pfleiderer, G., Tögel, A., Dreher, E.-L., Langer, E., Rassaerts, H., Kleinschmidt, P., Strack, H., Cook, R., Beck, U., Lipper, K.-A., Torkelson, T.R., Löser, E., Beutel, K.K., Mann, T., 2000. Chlorinated Hydrocarbons, in: Ullmann’s Encyclopedia of Industrial Chemistry. Wiley-VCH Verlag GmbH & Co. KGaA.

Page 108: Transformation of Carbon Tetrachloride and Chloroform by Trichloroethene Respiring Anaerobic

93

BIBLIOGRAPHY (Continued)

Saady, N.M.C., 2013. Homoacetogenesis during hydrogen production by mixed cultures dark fermentation: Unresolved challenge. Int. J. Hydrog. Energy 38, 13172–13191. doi:10.1016/j.ijhydene.2013.07.122

Sander, R., 2015. Compilation of Henry’s law constants (version 4.0) for water as solvent. Atmos Chem Phys 15, 4399–4981. doi:10.5194/acp-15-4399-2015

Scholten, J.C.M., Conrad, R., Stams, A.J.M., 2000. Effect of 2-bromo-ethane sulfonate, molybdate and chloroform on acetate consumption by methanogenic and sulfate-reducing populations in freshwater sediment. FEMS Microbiol. Ecol. 32, 35–42. doi:10.1111/j.1574-6941.2000.tb00696.x

Schreier, C.G., Reinhard, M., 1994. Transformation of chlorinated organic compounds by iron and manganese powders in buffered water and in landfill leachate. Chemosphere 29, 1743–1753. doi:10.1016/0045-6535(94)90320-4

Schwarzenbach, R.P., Escher, B.I., Fenner, K., Hofstetter, T.B., Johnson, C.A., Gunten, U. von, Wehrli, B., 2006. The Challenge of Micropollutants in Aquatic Systems. Science 313, 1072–1077. doi:10.1126/science.1127291

Semprini, L., Hopkins, G.D., McCarty, P.L., Roberts, P.V., 1992. In-situ transformation of carbon tetrachloride and other halogenated compounds resulting from biostimulation under anoxic conditions. Environ. Sci. Technol. 26, 2454–2461.

Shan, H., Kurtz, H.D., Mykytczuk, N., Trevors, J.T., Freedman, D.L., 2010a. Anaerobic Biotransformation of High Concentrations of Chloroform by an Enrichment Culture and Two Bacterial Isolates. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 76, 6463–6469. doi:10.1128/AEM.01191-10

Shan, H., Kurtz Jr., H.D., Freedman, D.L., 2010b. Evaluation of strategies for anaerobic bioremediation of high concentrations of halomethanes. Water Res. 44, 1317–1328. doi:10.1016/j.watres.2009.10.035

Speitel, G.E., Leonard, J.M., 1992. A Sequencing Biofilm Reactor for the Treatment of Chlorinated Solvents Using Methanotrophs. Water Environ. Res. 64, 712–719.

Speitel, G.E., Thompson, R.C., Weissman, D., 1993. Biodegradation kinetics of Methylosinus trichosporium OB3b at low concentrations of chloroform in the presence and absence of enzyme competition by methane. Water Res. 27, 15–24. doi:10.1016/0043-1354(93)90190-S

Srebnik, M., Laloë, E., 2001. Chloroform. E-EROS Encycl. Reag. Org. Synth.

Page 109: Transformation of Carbon Tetrachloride and Chloroform by Trichloroethene Respiring Anaerobic

94

BIBLIOGRAPHY (Continued)

Staudinger, J., Roberts, P.V., 2001. A critical compilation of Henry’s law constant temperature dependence relations for organic compounds in dilute aqueous solutions. Chemosphere 44, 561–576.

Stromeyer, S.A., Stumpf, K., Cook, A.M., Leisinger, T., 1992. Anaerobic degradation of tetrachloromethane by Acetobacterium woodii: separation of dechlorinative activities in cell extracts and roles for vitamin B12 and other factors. Biodegradation 3, 113–123. doi:10.1007/BF00189639

Sung, Y., Fletcher, K.E., Ritalahti, K.M., Apkarian, R.P., Ramos-Hernández, N., Sanford, R. a., Mesbah, N.M., Löffler, F.E., 2006. Geobacter lovleyi sp. nov. strain SZ, a novel metal-reducing and tetrachloroethene-dechlorinating bacterium. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 72, 2775–2782. doi:10.1128/AEM.72.4.2775

TÁmara, M.L., Butler, E.C., 2004. Effects of Iron Purity and Groundwater Characteristics on Rates and Products in the Degradation of Carbon Tetrachloride by Iron Metal. Environ. Sci. Technol. 38, 1866–1876. doi:10.1021/es0305508

Thauer, R.K., Moller-Zinkhan, D., Spormann, A.M., 1989. Biochemistry of Acetate Catabolism in Anaerobic Chemotrophic Bacteria. Annu. Rev. Microbiol. 43, 43–67. doi:10.1146/annurev.mi.43.100189.000355

Truex, M.J., Murray, C.J., Cole, C.R., Cameron, R.J., Skeen, R.S., Johnson, C.D., 2001. Assessment of Carbon Tetrachloride Groundwater Transport in Support of the Hanford Carbon Tetrachloride Innovative Technology Demonstration Program (No. PNNL-13560). Pacific Northwest National Laboratory.

Ukrainczyk, L., Chibwe, M., Pinnavaia, T.J., Boyd, S.A., 1995. Reductive Dechlorination of Carbon Tetrachloride In Water Catalyzed by Mineral-Supported Biomimetic Cobalt Macrocycles. Environ. Sci. Technol. 29, 439–445. doi:10.1021/es00002a021

US Environmental Protection Agency, 2016. Table of Regulated Drinking Water Contaminants [WWW Document]. URL http://www.epa.gov/your-drinking-water/table-regulated-drinking-water-contaminants (accessed 3.8.16).

US Environmental Protection Agency, 2010. Green Remediation Best Management Practices: Bioremediation (No. EPA 542-F-10-006). Environmental Protection Agency.

US Environmental Protection Agency, 2008. Green Remediation: Best Management Practices for Excavation and Surface Restoration (No. EPA 542-F-08-012). Environmental Protection Agency.

Page 110: Transformation of Carbon Tetrachloride and Chloroform by Trichloroethene Respiring Anaerobic

95

BIBLIOGRAPHY (Continued)

US Environmental Protection Agency, 2000. Carbon Disulfide (No. 75-15–0), Technology Transfer Network -- Air Toxics Web Site.

van Hylckama, V.J., Koning, W. de, Janssen, D.B., 1996. Transformation Kinetics of Chlorinated Ethenes by Methylosinus trichosporium OB3b and Detection of Unstable Epoxides by On-Line Gas Chromatography. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 62, 3304–3312.

Vogel, T.M., Criddle, C.S., McCarty, P.L., 1987. ES Critical Reviews: Transformations of halogenated aliphatic compounds. Environ. Sci. Technol. 21, 722–736. doi:10.1021/es00162a001

Wahman, D.G., Henry, A.E., Katz, L.E., Speitel Jr., G.E., 2006. Cometabolism of trihalomethanes by mixed culture nitrifiers. Water Res. 40, 3349–3358. doi:10.1016/j.watres.2006.07.033

Wahman, D.G., Katz, L.E., Speitel, G.E., 2005. Cometabolism of Trihalomethanes by Nitrosomonas europaea. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 71, 7980–7986. doi:10.1128/AEM.71.12.7980-7986.2005

Wahman, D.G., Katz, L.E., Speitel Jr., G.E., 2007. Modeling of trihalomethane cometabolism in nitrifying biofilters. Water Res. 41, 449–457. doi:10.1016/j.watres.2006.10.015

Wawersik, J., 1997. History of chloroform anesthesia. Anaesthesiol. Reanim. 22, 144–152.

WHO, 2004a. Carbon Tetrachloride in Drinking-water.

WHO, 2004b. Chloroform.

Widdel, F., 1987. New types of acetate-oxidizing, sulfate-reducing Desulfobacter species, D. hydrogenophilus sp. nov., D. latus sp. nov., and D. curvatus sp. nov. Arch. Microbiol. 148, 286–291. doi:10.1007/BF00456706

Wiedemeier, T.H., Rifai, H.S., Newell, C.J., Wilson, J.T., 1999. Natural Attenuation of Fuels and Chlorinated Solvents in the Subsurface. John Wiley & Sons.

Workman, D.J., Woods, S.L., Gorby, Y.A., Fredrickson, J.K., Truex, M.J., 1997. Microbial Reduction of Vitamin B12 by Shewanella alga Strain BrY with Subsequent Transformation of Carbon Tetrachloride. Environ. Sci. Technol. 31, 2292–2297. doi:10.1021/es960880a

Page 111: Transformation of Carbon Tetrachloride and Chloroform by Trichloroethene Respiring Anaerobic

96

BIBLIOGRAPHY (Continued)

Xu, K., Liu, H., Li, X., Chen, J., Wang, A., 2010. Typical methanogenic inhibitors can considerably alter bacterial populations and affect the interaction between fatty acid degraders and homoacetogens. Appl. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 87, 2267–2279. doi:10.1007/s00253-010-2708-y

Yang, Y., McCarty, P.L., 1998. Competition for Hydrogen within a Chlorinated Solvent Dehalogenating Anaerobic Mixed Culture. Environ. Sci. Technol. 32, 3591–3597. doi:10.1021/es980363n

Yu, S., Dolan, M.E., Semprini, L., 2005. Kinetics and Inhibition of Reductive Dechlorination of Chlorinated Ethylenes by Two Different Mixed Cultures. Environ. Sci. Technol. 39, 195–205. doi:10.1021/es0496773

Yu, Z., Smith, G.B., 2000. Inhibition of methanogenesis by C1- and C2-polychlorinated aliphatic hydrocarbons. Environ. Toxicol. Chem. 19, 2212–2217. doi:10.1002/etc.5620190910

Yu, Z., Smith, G.B., 1997. Chloroform dechlorination by a wastewater methanogenic consortium and cell extracts of Methanosarcina barkeri. Water Res. 31, 1879–1886. doi:10.1016/S0043-1354(97)00019-5

Page 112: Transformation of Carbon Tetrachloride and Chloroform by Trichloroethene Respiring Anaerobic

97

APPENDIX

Page 113: Transformation of Carbon Tetrachloride and Chloroform by Trichloroethene Respiring Anaerobic

98

A.1 Sterile Anaerobic Mineral Media Transformation of Carbon Tetrachloride

Figure A.1.1: Controls with a) 2.6 µM and b) 8.6 µM CT were conducted in the sterile anaerobic reduced sulfide media. The anaerobic media did not contain any chlorinated compounds, and its preparation has been described previously (Yang and McCarty, 1998). Partial CT transformation occurred, but was substantially slower when compared with the anaerobic dechlorinating cultures and supernatant. Further analyses were not conducted. Error bars represent one standard deviation.

0

0.05

0.1

0.15

0.2

0.25

0.3

0.35

0.4

0.45

0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8

µmol/bottle

Time(d)

CS2 DCM CF CT

0

0.2

0.4

0.6

0.8

1

1.2

1.4

1.6

1.8

0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35

µmol/bottle

Time(d)

CS2 DCM CF CT

a)

b)

Page 114: Transformation of Carbon Tetrachloride and Chloroform by Trichloroethene Respiring Anaerobic

99

A.2 Observed First Order CT and CF Transformation Rates

Rate coefficients were calculated for CT and CF degradation from experimental

data using a first order transformation model and a natural log-linear regression. CT

and CF degradation were calculated as follows:

𝑑𝑀CT

𝑑𝑡 = − 𝑘CT,obs 𝑀CT

ln 𝑀CT =− 𝑘CT,obs 𝑡 + ln 𝑀CT,0

𝑑𝑀CF

𝑑𝑡 = − 𝑘CF,obs 𝑀CF

ln 𝑀CF =− 𝑘CF,obs 𝑡 + ln 𝑀CF,0

where MCT and MCF are the number of µmol/bottle in a batch reactor at any given time,

kCT,obs and kCF,obs are the experimental CT and CF transformation rates, t is time, and

MCT,0 and MCF,0 are the initial amounts of CT or CF introduced to the system at t=0.

Observed CF rates were also calculated from the maximum CF concentration formed

from CT, which represented MCF,0 in the analysis. First order kinetics were applied

based on experimental results and previous studies (Butler and Hayes, 2000; Kriegman-

King and Reinhard, 1992; McCormick et al., 2002; Novak et al., 1998a; Vogel et al.,

1987).

(1)

(2)

(3)

(4)

Page 115: Transformation of Carbon Tetrachloride and Chloroform by Trichloroethene Respiring Anaerobic

100

Figure A.2.1: Estimation of first order CT transformation rates (kCT,obs) using a natural log – linear regression for the a) EV-5L and b) VS-5L cultures and supernatant. The initial aqueous CT concentration was 0.86 µM.

Reactor1=-2.9477x- 2.3568R²=0.99813

Reactor2=-2.8534x- 2.3247R²=0.99467

Reactor3=-2.4281x- 2.188R²=0.99536

-6

-5

-4

-3

-2

-1

00 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.4 0.5 0.6 0.7 0.8 0.9 1

ln[C

T(µmol/bottle

)]

Time(d)

Reactor1 Reactor2 Reactor3

Reactor1=-4.4668x- 2.0735R²=0.99806

Reactor2=-5.598x- 1.8823R²=0.9867

Reactor3=-3.8259x- 2.0452R²=0.99907

-8

-7

-6

-5

-4

-3

-2

-1

00 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.4 0.5 0.6 0.7 0.8 0.9 1

ln[C

T(µmol/bottle

)]

Time(d)

Reactor1 Reactor2 Reactor3

a)

b)

Page 116: Transformation of Carbon Tetrachloride and Chloroform by Trichloroethene Respiring Anaerobic

101

Figure A.2.2: Estimation of first order CT transformation rates (kCT,obs) using a natural log – linear regression for the a) EV-5L and b) VS-5L cultures and supernatant. The initial aqueous CT concentration was 2.6 µM.

Reactor1=-0.6366x- 1.2211R²=0.97988

Reactor2=-0.5887x- 1.1463R²=0.99319

Reactor3=-0.6345x- 1.1349R²=0.99017

-4.5

-4

-3.5

-3

-2.5

-2

-1.5

-1

-0.5

00 0.5 1 1.5 2 2.5 3 3.5 4 4.5

ln[C

T(µmol/bottle

)]

Time(d)

Reactor1 Reactor2 Reactor3

Reactor1=-0.9299x- 1.0133R²=0.99123

Reactor2=-0.9462x- 0.9734R²=0.98828

Reactor3=-0.818x- 1.0552R²=0.99618

-6

-5

-4

-3

-2

-1

00 0.5 1 1.5 2 2.5 3 3.5 4 4.5

ln[C

T(µmol/bottle

)]

Time(d)

Reactor1 Reactor2 Reactor3

a)

b)

Page 117: Transformation of Carbon Tetrachloride and Chloroform by Trichloroethene Respiring Anaerobic

102

Figure A.2.3: Estimation of first order CT transformation rates (kCT,obs) using a natural log – linear regression for the a) EV-5L and b) VS-5L cultures and supernatant. The initial aqueous CT concentration was 8.6 µM.

Reactor1=-0.2059x+0.2123R²=0.99403

Reactor2=-0.2032x+0.229R²=0.99848

Reactor3=-0.2463x+0.069R²=0.99602

-5

-4

-3

-2

-1

0

10 5 10 15 20 25

ln[C

T(µmol/bottle

)]

Time(d)

Reactor1 Reactor2 Reactor3

Reactor1=-0.3134x+0.3814R²=0.9877

Reactor2=-0.2974x+0.1715R²=0.99365

Reactor3=-0.361x+0.0285R²=0.99863

-6

-5

-4

-3

-2

-1

0

10 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16 18

ln[C

T(µmol/bottle

)]

Time(d)

Reactor1 Reactor2 Reactor3

a)

b)

Page 118: Transformation of Carbon Tetrachloride and Chloroform by Trichloroethene Respiring Anaerobic

103

A.3 Carbon Tetrachloride Transformation Capacity Experiments

Experiments were conducted to examine the transformation capacity of the

anaerobic cultures. Multiple additions of 0.86 µM CT were added to triplicate batch

reactors containing cells and supernatant from the EV-2L (Figure A.2.1a), EV-5L

(Figure A.2.1b), VS-2L (Figure A.2.2a), or VS-5L (Figure A.2.2b) chemostats as

described in Chapter 3. Additions of 0.86 µM CT occurred after complete

transformation of the previous dose of CT and after CF was partially transformed.

Subsequent additions of formate were added when H2 levels dropped below 10

µmol/bottle. Only CT and CF were measured during these experiments due to

analytical limitations. First order CT (kCT,obs) and CF (kCF,obs) transformation rate

constants were calculated for each CT addition.

A non-linear decrease in kCT,obs and kCF,obs occurred with each subsequent CT

addition for all cultures (Figure A.3.3). This is due to the cometabolic and abiotic

mechanisms that catalyze CT and CF transformation. CF transformation rates were 1-

2 orders of magnitude less than the observed CT transformation rate. The VS cultures

catalyzed faster CT transformation than the EV cultures.

Page 119: Transformation of Carbon Tetrachloride and Chloroform by Trichloroethene Respiring Anaerobic

104

Figure A.3.1: Transformation of multiple additions of 0.86 µM CT and CF by the a) EV-2L and b) EV-5L ADC+S. Error bars represent one standard deviation.

0

0.02

0.04

0.06

0.08

0.1

0.12

0.14

0.16

0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 110 120 130

µmol/bottle

Time(d)

CF CT

0

0.02

0.04

0.06

0.08

0.1

0.12

0.14

0.16

0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90

µmol/bottle

Time(d)

CF CT

a)

b)

Page 120: Transformation of Carbon Tetrachloride and Chloroform by Trichloroethene Respiring Anaerobic

105

Figure A.3.2: Transformation of multiple additions of 0.86 µM CT and CF by the a) VS-2L and b) VS-5L ADC+S. Error bars represent one standard deviation.

0

0.02

0.04

0.06

0.08

0.1

0.12

0.14

0.16

0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 110 120 130

µmol/bottle

Time(d)

CF CT

0

0.02

0.04

0.06

0.08

0.1

0.12

0.14

0.16

0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90

µmol/bottle

Time(d)

CF CT

a)

b)

Page 121: Transformation of Carbon Tetrachloride and Chloroform by Trichloroethene Respiring Anaerobic

106

Figure A.3.3: Decreases in a) kCT,obs and b) kCF,obs occurred when reactors were successively spiked with 0.86 µM CT after complete transformation of the previous addition. Error bars represent one standard deviation.

0

2

4

6

8

10

12

EV-2L EV-5L VS-2L VS-5L

k CT,o

bs(d

-1)

1stAddition 2ndAddition 3rdAddition

0

0.1

0.2

0.3

0.4

0.5

0.6

EV-2L EV-5L VS-2L VS-5L

k CF,o

bs(d

-1)

1stAddition 2ndAdditon 3rdAddition

a)

b)

Page 122: Transformation of Carbon Tetrachloride and Chloroform by Trichloroethene Respiring Anaerobic

107

A.4 Transformation of Chloroform by the EV-5L and VS-5L Cultures and Supernatant

The transformation of biogenic CF was observed in the EV and VS ADC+S

(Chapter 4). Experiments were conducted in order to determine the extent to which CF

could be transformed when added to the EV-5L and VS-5L ADC+S in the absence of

CT. An initial CF concentration of 2.1 µM was chosen because it was the approximate

maximum CF concentration (CFmax) produced by the reduction of 2.6 µM CT. CF

transformation was not complete, with DCM measured as the transformation product

(Figures A.4.1 and A.4.2). Formate (2 mM) was added as an electron donor to the

system. H2 was completely consumed when CF concentrations dropped below 0.4 µM

(EV-5L) and 0.6 µM (VS-5L) (Chapter 5). A subsequent addition of 2.1 µM CF was

added to the system without an addition of formate. CF transformation did continue to

occur, albeit slowly. This is likely due to the toxicity exerted by long exposure to CF

on anaerobic microbial processes (Bagley et al., 2000; He et al., 2005) and a reduced

transformation capacity in the system.

An analytical first order solution was developed to simultaneously estimate the

rate of transformation for CF and its degradation products by fitting data from the batch

kinetic experiments. The model was developed by isolating CF and its transformation

products from within the larger CT kinetic model (Figure 3.1). CF degradation and

product formation was modeled using a series of first order analytical solutions

developed from the following ordinary differential equations:

𝑑𝑀CF

𝑑𝑡 = − 𝑘2 + 𝑘5 𝑀CF

𝑑𝑀DCM

𝑑𝑡 = 𝑘2𝑀CF

𝑑𝑀CO2

𝑑𝑡 = 𝑘5𝑀CF

Transformation rate coefficients were estimated by a non-linear least squares

regression performed using the Solver Tool Pack (Microsoft Excel 2016). Model

validity was confirmed by comparing the observed CF transformation rates (kCF,obs)

with those generated by the analytical solution (kCF,model = k2+k5). The formation of

(7)

(6)

(5)

Page 123: Transformation of Carbon Tetrachloride and Chloroform by Trichloroethene Respiring Anaerobic

108

CO2 from CF has been previously confirmed (Cappelletti et al., 2012). Therefore, the

kinetic model incorporates a mass balance approach and assumes that the unknown

fraction is MCO2 = MCF,0 – (MCF + MDCM) at any given time.

Observed CF (2.1 µM) transformation rates were comparable for the EV-5L

and VS-5L ADC+S (Table A.4.1). However, more variability occurred during the CF

transformation experiments compared with the CT studies, especially in the EV-5L

ADC+S (Table A.4.2). The analytical solution overestimated the rate of CF

transformation when compared to the observed CF rate. The strong inhibitory and/or

toxic effects of CF seem to affect the kinetics of its transformation. Additionally, it

appears that transformation of CF by the ADC+S is very sensitive to small changes in

CF concentration, indicating a possible self-inhibition.

Table A.4.1: Comparison of CF first order transformation rate constants for the EV-5L and VS-5L ADC+S. Rates were calculated from experimental CF data (kCF,obs) and from an analytical first order model (kCF,model). Error estimate calculated as one standard deviation.

EV-5L VS-5L

Treatment kCF,obs (d-1) kCF,model (d-1)a kCF,obs (d-1) kCF,model (d-1)a

2.1 µM CF 0.074 ± 0.023 0.168 ± 0.082 0.072 ± 0.007 0.107 ± 0.002 a kCF,model = k2 + k5 from the first order analytical solution

Table A.4.2: First order transformation rates estimated from the analytical solutions predicting CF degradation and product formation. Comparison of CF rate constants for the EV-5L and VS-5L ADC+S. Error estimate calculated as one standard deviation.

EV-5L VS-5L

Pathway CHCl3 à CH2Cl2

CHCl3 à CO2 CHCl3 à CH2Cl2

CHCl3 à CO2

Treatment k2 (d-1) k5 (d-1) k2 (d-1) k5 (d-1)

2.1 µM CF 0.062 ± 0.027 0.106 ± 0.056 0.063 ± 0.003 0.044 ± 0.002

Page 124: Transformation of Carbon Tetrachloride and Chloroform by Trichloroethene Respiring Anaerobic

109

Figure A.4.1: Transformation of 2.1 µM CF by the a) EV-5L and b) VS-5L ADC+S. A second addition of 2.1 µM CF was partially transformed after a near complete transformation of the initial addition. DCM was the measured transformation product. Duplicate and triplicate reactors were measured for the EV-5L and VS-5L cultures, respectively. Error bars represent one standard deviation.

0

0.02

0.04

0.06

0.08

0.1

0.12

0.14

0.16

0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80

µmol/bottle

Time(d)DCM CF

0

0.02

0.04

0.06

0.08

0.1

0.12

0.14

0.16

0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80

µmol/bottle

Time(d)DCM CF

a)

b)

Page 125: Transformation of Carbon Tetrachloride and Chloroform by Trichloroethene Respiring Anaerobic

110

Figure A.4.2: Analytical solution for the transformation of 2.1 µM CF by the a) EV-5L and b) VS-5L ADC+S. The first order model overestimated CF transformation. In this analysis, triplicate reactors were included for both of the ADC+S systems. Error bars represent one standard deviation.

0

0.02

0.04

0.06

0.08

0.1

0.12

0.14

0 10 20 30 40 50 60

µmol/bottle

Time(d)

DCM CF Unknown (CO2) MassTot

0

0.02

0.04

0.06

0.08

0.1

0.12

0.14

0 10 20 30 40 50 60

µmol/bottle

Time(d)

DCM CF Unknown (CO2) MassTot

b)

a)

Page 126: Transformation of Carbon Tetrachloride and Chloroform by Trichloroethene Respiring Anaerobic

111

Figure A.4.3: Estimation of first order CF transformation rates (kCF,obs) using a natural log – linear regression for the a) EV-5L and b) VS-5L cultures and supernatant. The initial aqueous CF concentration was 2.1 µM.

Reactor1=-0.0967x- 2.6353R²=0.97318

Reactor2=-0.0811x- 2.6293R²=0.95718

Reactor3=-0.0427x- 2.1543R²=0.95569

-6

-5

-4

-3

-2

-1

00 5 10 15 20 25 30 35

ln[C

F(µmol/bottle

)]

Time(d)

Reactor1 Reactor2 Reactor3

Reactor1=-0.079x- 2.444R²=0.99121

Reactor2=-0.0758x- 2.4654R²=0.98791

Reactor3=-0.0624x- 2.2139R²=0.98615

-8

-7

-6

-5

-4

-3

-2

-1

00 10 20 30 40 50 60

ln[C

F(µmol/bottle

)]

Time(d)

Reactor1 Reactor2 Reactor3

a)

b)

Page 127: Transformation of Carbon Tetrachloride and Chloroform by Trichloroethene Respiring Anaerobic

112

Figure A.4.4: Transformation of a) 21.1 µM CF and b) 23.1 µM DCM by the VS-5L culture and supernatant. Partial CF transformation and an insubstantial amount of DCM transformation occurred during a 100-day period. Error bars represent one standard deviation.

0

0.2

0.4

0.6

0.8

1

1.2

1.4

1.6

1.8

0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 110

µmol/bottle

Time(d)

DCM CF

0

0.2

0.4

0.6

0.8

1

1.2

1.4

0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 110

µmol/bottle

Time(d)

DCM

a)

b)

Page 128: Transformation of Carbon Tetrachloride and Chloroform by Trichloroethene Respiring Anaerobic

113

Figure A.4.5: Estimation of first order CF transformation rates (kCF,obs) using a natural log – linear regression for VS-5L culture and supernatant. The initial aqueous CF concentration was 21.1 µM.

Reactor1=-0.0143x+0.1357R²=0.94711

Reactor2=-0.0137x+0.2743R²=0.89046

Reactor3=-0.0134x+0.2788R²=0.91737

-1.4

-1.2

-1

-0.8

-0.6

-0.4

-0.2

0

0.2

0.4

0.60 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 110

ln[C

F(µm

ol/bottle

)]

Time(d)

Reactor1 Reactor2 Reactor3

Page 129: Transformation of Carbon Tetrachloride and Chloroform by Trichloroethene Respiring Anaerobic

114

A.5 Carbon Tetrachloride Transformation by the Point Mugu Anaerobic Mixed Cultures and Supernatant The PM-2L and PM-5L anaerobic mixed cultures are PCE-respiring,

chemostat-grown cultures enriched in D. mccartyi species. The cultures use PCE (1.12

mM) as an electron acceptor and H2 as an electron donor, which is created from the

fermentation of 4.3 mM lactate (CH3-HCOH-COO-) through the following reactions:

1. Lactate + 2H2O à Acetate (CH3COO-) + HCO3- + H+ + 2H2

2. Lactate à 1/3 Acetate + 2/3 Propionate (CH3-CH2-COO-) + 1/3 HCO3- + 1/3

H+

3. Propionate + 3H2O à Acetate + HCO3- + H+ +3H2

Additionally, PM-2L contains 1.0 mM SO42- as a competing electron acceptor, which

is completely reduced in the continuous flow reactor. A thorough investigation of the

chemical and molecular dynamics of the PM-2L and PM-5L chemostat systems has

been done previously (Berggren et al., 2013).

The PM-2L and PM-5L ADC+S have the capability to transform low

concentrations of CT at slow rates to CF (29-40%), CS2 (5-10%), and an unknown

fraction (46-71%). CF was not subsequently transformed (Figures A.5.1 and A.5.2).

The PM-2L and PM-5L ADC+S do not catalyze CT transformation rapidly due to lower

biomass concentrations than the EV and VS cultures (Table A.5.1) (Berggren et al.,

2013; Marshall et al., 2014; Mayer-Blackwell et al., 2014). Biomass concentration has

been shown previously to be a determining factor in CT transformation rates

(McCormick et al., 2002). The PM-2L and PM-5L cultures contain less biomass than

the EV and VS cultures due to an influent feed containing saturated PCE (1.12 mM)

compared to TCE (10 mM), thus allowing for less cell growth. CT transformation by

PM-2L and PM-5L followed pseudo-first order kinetics (Figure A.5.3) with

transformation rates being 1-2 orders of magnitude less than the EV and VS ADC+S.

An analytical solution found that modeled transformation rates were overestimated

based on the estimated observed rates (Tables A.5.2 and A.5.3).

Page 130: Transformation of Carbon Tetrachloride and Chloroform by Trichloroethene Respiring Anaerobic

115

Table A.5.1: Measurements of total suspended solids (TSS) in the continuous flow reactors containing anaerobic dehalogenating mixed cultures. The EV and VS chemostats contain higher biomass concentrations due to the higher solubility of their electron acceptor TCE (10 mM) compared to that of the PM cultures (PCE; 1.12 mM).

EV-2Lb EV-5Lb VS-2Lb VS-5Lb PM-2Lb PM-5Lb

TSSa (mg/L) 46.1 35 49.4 38.5 26.1 21.9

a TSS serves as a proxy measurement for biomass with approximately 50% of TSS being cellular protein b Most recent biomass measurements reported were taken on 02/16/2016 Table A.5.2: Comparison of CT first order transformation rate constants for the PM-2L and PM-5L ADC+S. Rates were calculated from experimental CT data (kCT,obs) and from an analytical first order model (kCT,model). Error estimate calculated as one standard deviation.

PM-2L PM-5L

Treatment kCT,obs (d-1) kCT,model (d-1)a kCT,obs (d-1) kCT,model (d-1)a

2.6 µM CT 0.036 ± 0.005 0.073 ± 0.016 0.062 ± 0.022 0.158 ± 0.05 a kCT,model = k1 + k3 + k4 from the first order analytical solution

Table A.5.3: First order transformation rates estimated from the analytical solutions predicting CT degradation and product formation. Comparison of CT rate constants for the PM-2L and PM-5L ADC+S. Error estimate calculated as one standard deviation.

Pathway CCl4 à CHCl3 CCl4 à CS2 CCl4 à CO2

ADC+S k1 (d-1) k3 (d-1) k4 (d-1)

PM-2L 0.029 ± 0.006 0.008 ± 0.002 0.036 ± 0.008

PM-5L 0.051 ± 0.014 0.011 ± 0.003 0.096 ± 0.033 a kCT,model = k1 + k3 + k4 from the first order analytical solution

Page 131: Transformation of Carbon Tetrachloride and Chloroform by Trichloroethene Respiring Anaerobic

116

Figure A.5.1: Transformation of 0.86 µM CT by the a) PM-2L and b) PM-5L ADC+S. No appreciable CF transformation occurred in these systems. Error bars represent one standard deviation.

0

0.02

0.04

0.06

0.08

0.1

0.12

0.14

0.16

0.18

0 10 20 30 40 50 60

µmol/bottle

Time(d)

CF CT

0

0.02

0.04

0.06

0.08

0.1

0.12

0.14

0.16

0 10 20 30 40 50 60

µmol/bottle

Time(d)

CF CT

a)

b)

Page 132: Transformation of Carbon Tetrachloride and Chloroform by Trichloroethene Respiring Anaerobic

117

Figure A.5.2: Transformation of 2.6 µM CT by the a) PM-2L and b) PM-5L ADC+S. No appreciable CF transformation occurred in these systems. Error bars represent one standard deviation.

0

0.05

0.1

0.15

0.2

0.25

0.3

0.35

0.4

0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80

µmol/bottle

Time(d)

MassTot CS2 CF CT Unknown (CO2)

0

0.05

0.1

0.15

0.2

0.25

0.3

0.35

0.4

0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80

µmol/bottle

Time(d)

MassTot CS2 CF CT Unknown (CO2)

b)

a)

Page 133: Transformation of Carbon Tetrachloride and Chloroform by Trichloroethene Respiring Anaerobic

118

Figure A.5.3: Pseudo-first order CT transformation rates by the PM-2L and PM-5L ADC+S. As [CT0]aq increased kCT,obs decreased in a non-linear manner. Error bars represent one standard deviation. The PM-2L and PM-5L ADC+S receive lactate as a fermenting electron donor

in the continuous flow reactors, and were dosed with 2 mM lactate at the start of the

batch transformation studies. Based on the fermentation of lactate from the equations

above, 2 mM lactate should yield 267 µmol H2/bottle, making it a more effective

electron donor than formate where 2 mM formate yields 100 µmol H2/bottle. However,

it appears that the complete fermentation of lactate to H2 is inhibited by the presence

of CF in the batch reactor systems. When batch reactors were inoculated with either the

PM-2L or PM-5L ADC+S, 2.6 µM CT, and 2 mM lactate, only 7.5% (20 µmol

H2/bottle) of the possible H2 (267 µmol H2/bottle) formed, based on the stoichiometry

of lactate fermentation (Figure A.5.4). If the fermentation of propionate to H2 is

inhibited, 67 µmol H2/bottle should still form from the fermentation of lactate to acetate

and H2. The low levels of H2 formed show that multiple lactate fermentation reactions

are inhibited by the presence of CF.

This was explored further when the PM-2L and PM-5L ADC+S were dosed

with 0.86 µM CT, 2 mM lactate, and 2 mM formate. The lower CF concentrations

0

0.05

0.1

0.15

0.2

0.25

0.3

0.35

0.4

0.45

0.5

PM-2L PM-5L

k CT,o

bs(d

-1)

0.86µMCT 2.6µMCT

Page 134: Transformation of Carbon Tetrachloride and Chloroform by Trichloroethene Respiring Anaerobic

119

formed from the transformation of 0.86 µM CT should not be as inhibitory to the

cultures. It was found that the addition of 2 mM formate and 2 mM lactate did allow

for H2 levels to accumulate to a higher level when compared to batch reactors that were

dosed only with 2 mM lactate. However, H2 levels only reached maxima of 68 µmol

H2/bottle (PM-2L) and 96 µmol H2/bottle (PM-5L). The remaining possible H2 not

formed was either consumed by a competing electron acceptor reaction and not

measured, or did not occur due to the inhibition of CF. More research is needed to

elucidate the complex dynamics of CF inhibition of fermentation reactions in the

anaerobic dechlorinating cultures.

Figure A.5.4: H2 was added to the PM-2L and PM-5L reactors as lactate (2 mM) and formate (2 mM). The PM-2L and PM-5L reactors spiked with 0.86 µM CT received 2 mM formate and 2 mM lactate, while the 2.6 µM CT treatment received only 2 mM lactate. H2 consumption by the cultures was inhibited by the presence of CF (Chapter 5). Error bars represent one standard deviation.

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

80

90

100

110

0 10 20 30 40 50 60

µmolH2/bottle

Time(d)

PM-2L&0.86µMCT PM-5L&0.86µMCT PM-2L&2.6µMCT PM-5L&2.6µMCT