transbronchial cryobiopsy in diffuse lung disease...
TRANSCRIPT
ACCME/DisclosuresThe USCAP requires that anyone in a position to influence or control the content of CME disclose
any relevant financial relationship WITH COMMERCIAL INTERESTS which they or their
spouse/partner have, or have had, within the past 12 months, which relates to the content of
this educational activity and creates a conflict of interest.
Dr. Thomas V. Colby and Sara Tomassetti declare they have no conflict(s) of interest to
disclose.
Transbronchial Cryobiopsy in Diffuse Lung Disease
Overview and Update
Sara Tomassetti MD
Thomas V. Colby MD
Transbronchial Cryobiopsy 1. Background and Technique
Dr. Tomassetti
Historic Background of Cryobiopsy
• A correct diagnosis of IIPs and particularly Fibrosing Interstitial Lung Diseases (f-ILDs) requires a multidisciplinary approach, and, when appropriate, intergration of CR data with histological findings.
• Surgical lung biopsy is still considered the gold standard to provide lung samples large enough for identification of complex patterns such as usual interstitial pneumonitis (UIP) and other f-ILDs.
• However, this procedure has significant morbidity and mortality and is performed in minority of patients.
From surgery to less invasive biopsy methods.
Surgical Lung Biopsy
Transbronchial Lung Biopsy
Bronchoscopic Lung Cryobiopsy
UIP-pattern can be identified in a small
minority of TBBx with a very high specificity
(92-100%) and pos pred value (86-100%)
Slide courtesy A Cavazza
Why is TBBx not used in fibrotic ILD diagnosis
Very Low Sensitivity (30% for Expert Pathologists)
Low negative predictive value (50%): the presence of TBB findings consistent with alternative diagnosis (ie. DIP, NSIP, ALI) does not rule out UIP.
Higher risks Higher accuracy
Lower risks High accuracy
Lower risks Lower accuracy
Cryobiopsy: the technique.
The gas at the tip expands due to the sudden difference in pressure (Joule-Thomson effect), resulting in a drop in temperature at the tip of the probe.
Courtesy of A Cavazza
Cryoprobe with water iceball
Cryoprobe with tissue-iceball
Cryobiopsy: The equipment is simple
Different sizes of Cryoprobes
Standardization is needed for those performing Cryobiopsy… Deep sedation/Concious sedation? Rigid/Flexible? How many samples? How many segments? Different lobes?
● General anesthesia (Propofol/Remifentanil)
● Spontaneous breathing
● Rigid Tracheochoscope (Storz 14 mm-33 cm)+ fiberoptic bronchoscope (6.2 mm)
● Fogarty balloon
● Fluoroscopic control (+/- radial EBUS)
● Erbokryo CA, ERBE, Tubingen, Germany (CO2)
● Cryoprobe 2.4 mm
● A distance of approximately <= 10 mm from the thoracic wall
● A perpendicular relation between the thoracic wall and the probe
● The probe is cooled for approximately 5-6 s
TRANSBRONCHIAL CRYOBIOPSY (POLETTI’S PROTOCOL)
Cryobiopsy video
Video #1 – The tools.
Video # 2 – Intubation with rigid bronchoscope,
Storz 14.
Video #3 – The insertion of the Fogarty balloon.
Video # 4 – The cryobiopsy.
Transbronchial Cryobiopsy 2. Pathologic Specimens
Dr. Colby
TB
Cryobiopsy TBBx VATS
Slide courtesy A. Cavazza MD
Cryobiopsy:
the specimens
Slide courtesy A. Cavazza MD
Diagn Pathol 2011; 6: 53
Specimen Size
Alveolar Tissue
TBBx
CryoBx
Cryobiopsy: Size of specimens
STUDY # Patients Mean Size (mm2)
Babiak 2009 41 15.1
Fruchter 2013 (Lung Tx) 40 10
Kropski 2013 25 64.2
Casoni 2014 69 43.1
Pajares 2014 39 14.7
Griff 2014 52 30.4
Forli Study (in prep) 310 44.8
BUT….Not all cryobiopsies are created equal. A bad cryobiopsy is no better than a bad TBBx.
Suboptimal Cryobiopsies: Examples
Too small
Bronchial wall only
Procedural Hemorrhage in Smoker
CryoBx Artifacts
Airspace fluid or not?
Artifact: “Implanted” Bronchiolar Epith.
Other Tissues found in Cryobx’s
Visceral Pleura
Pulmonary Arteries
Parietal Pleura/Skeletal Muscle
Pleura present in ~30% patients in Forli study
Retrospective review of 524 cryobiopsies in 310 ILD patients
1-6 biopsies for each patient
Pleura in 92 patients (29.7%)
In 33 patients (10.6%) biopsies were inadequate (normal/minimal nonspecific changes)
In 277 patients (89.4%) biopsies were adequate
Cryobiopsies Forlì Hospital (Italy), March 2011-January 2015
Transbronchial Cryobiopsy 3. Complications
Dr. Tomassetti
Complications of Lung Bx
- Pneumothorax - Prolonged air leak (>5 days post procedure) - Post procedure chest pain - Bleeding (severe when require interventions
such as surgery, ICU, transfusion) - Transient Resp. Failure NOS - Fever - Pneumonia/empyema - Acute exacerbation (def. Collard AJRCCM 2007) - Death
Complications of CryoBx
- Pneumothorax - Prolonged air leak (>5 days post procedure) - Post procedure chest pain - Bleeding (severe when require interventions
such as surgery, ICU, transfusion) - Transient Resp. Failure NOS - Fever - Pneumonia/empyema - Acute exacerbation (def. Collard AJRCCM 2007) - Death
Complications of VATS Biopsy
- Pneumothorax
- Prolonged air leak (>5 days post procedure) 3-12%
- Post procedure chest pain 52%
- Bleeding (severe when require interventions such as surgery, ICU, transfusion)
- Transient Resp. Failure NOS
- Fever
- Pneumonia/empyema
- Acute exacerbation (def. Collard AJRCCM 2007)
- Death 2-4%
Acute Exacerbation of IPF after SLB
Kondoh et al., Respiratory Medicine (2006) 100, 1753–1759
Mortality at 90 days 2-4% (mainly IPF pts)
Kreider ME, et al. Ann Thorac Surg 2007 Kondoh Y, et al. Respir Med 2006 Bensard et al., Chest 1993
Safety of CryoBx compared to VATS for the diagnosis of ILDs
Our centre (Forli) experience
Cryo 297, VATS 150
(14 VATS subsequent to non-diagnostic-Cryo).
Cryo vs VATS: our centre data
Surgical Lung Biopsy (VATS) Tranbronchial Lung Cryobiopsy (TBCB) p valuePatients, N 150 297
Age, median (range) 59 (15-74) 60 (21-78) 0,278
Genre, N, %
Male 85 56,7% 172 57,9%0,801
Female 65 43,3% 125 42,1%
Smoking, N, %
current smoker 21 14,0% 40 13,5%
0,968
former smoker 63 42,0% 124 41,8%
non smoker 65 43,3% 133 44,8%
FVC % pred, median (range) 80,0 (20,0 - 136,0) 86,0 (37,0 - 137,0) 0,072
FEV1 % pred, median (range) 83,0 (33,0 - 133,0) 88,0 (36,0 -144,0) 0,034
DLco %pred, median (range) 57,0 (19,0 - 122,0) 58,8 (14,0 -121,0) 0,078
Tiffenau Index, median (range) 86 (62,0 - 105,0) 86 (60,0 -124,0) 0,85
Hystologic pattern, N, %
DIP/RBILD 11 7,3% 12 4,0%
0,013
UIP 74 49,3% 92 31,0%
NSIP 23 15,3% 25 8,4%
DAD 1 0,7% 4 1,3%
OP 8 5,3% 31 10,4%
HP 7 4,7% 24 8,1%
Sarc 8 5,3% 22 7,4%
16 10,7% 36 12,1%
Not diagnostic pattern, N, % 2 1,3% 51 17,2%
Other (neoplasms, eosinophilic pneumonia, follicolar bronchiolitis, alveolar proteinosis, vasculitis, AFOP, DIPNECH, PLCH)
Summarized in the next slide…
Cryo has significantly less complications and shorter hospitalization
compared to VATS
All adverse events, excluding PNX:
• Cryo 6/297 0,2%
• VATS 20/150 13%
Median time of Hospitalization, days:
• Cryo 2.6 (0-17)
• VATS 6.1 (3-48)
P<0.0001
P<0.0001
Cryo: PNX is the most frequent procedure related event
CRYO, N=297
• Pneumothorax, 20% (N=60)
->Chest drainage 15% (46/297), 76%(46/60)
VATS, N=150
• Pneumothorax is part of the procedure,
-> 100% chest drainage
Prolonged air leak
Cryo
0.3%
(1§/297)
VATS
3.3%
(5*/150)
P
0.035
§ prolonged chest tube; * Prolonged chest tube 3/5; 1 emopatch; 1 surgical revision
Cryo: rare complications.
Cryo
(297)
VATS
(150)
p
value
° prolonged Fogarty (3 to 20min); saline+antihaemorr drug.
Resp failure NOS 2§ (0.7%) N/A
Seizures 2§ (0.7%) N/A
Bleeding
(not severe)° 13 (5.5%) N/A
Complications not found with Cryo compared to VATS
Cryo
(297)
VATS
(150)
Persistent fever
0 7 (4.37%)
Pneumonia/empyema 0 3 (2%)
Chest wall paresthesia 0 52%§
(21% at 12 months)
§ Sihoe et al, Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 2004 Jun;25(6):1054-8.
Mortality§ is significantly lower with Cryo compared to VATS
Cryo
(297)
VATS
(150) P value
Mortality§ 1 (0.3%) 4 (2.7%) 0.045
Cause of death was Acute Exacerbation of IPF in all cases
§ at 60days
Safety of CryoBx compared to VATS for the diagnosis of ILDs
Review of literature (Medline & Embase)
from 406 ARTICLES to
15 STUDIES FOR SAFETY ANALYSIS, INCLUDING 994 PATIENTS
Complications of CryoBx for ILD, medline
- Pneumothorax 100*/994, 10% *(70/100 drainage)
- Prolonged air leak 1/994, 0.1%
- Transient Resp. Failure NOS, 0.4%
- Seizure 0.2%
- Death (Acute exacerbation ) 1/994, 0.1%
ESTIMATED DIAGNOSTIC YIELD
CRYOBIOPSY HAS A LOWER DIAGNOSTIC YIELD COMPARED TO SLB (80% vs 98%),
BUT IS SIGNIFICANTLY SAFER.
Including cryo in the diagnostic algorithm of ILD offers advantages in terms of safety: - Mortality for SLB 2% (best possible scenario), - Diagnostic yield of Cryo is 80%, thus performing Cryo before SLB
hypothetically reduces the risk of death to : - 2.1 % for 20% patients (Cryo + SLB) -> 0.42% - 0.1 % for 80% of patients (Cryo only) -> 0.08%
-> The mortality of a combined diagnostic algorithm Cryo+/-VATS appears to be lower than VATS only, even considering the best possible scenario for VATS.
0.5%
Transbronchial Cryobiopsy 4. Pathologic Diagnosis
Dr. Colby
BOTTOM LINE – IT WORKS !!
Intravascular lymphoma
Sarcoidosis
PLCH
?Hypersensitivity pneumonitis
UIP
UIP
UIP
?Collagen Vascular Disease
Smoking Related ILD
Questions You Should Have
How easy are they to interpret ?
Comparison to TTBx ?
Comparison to Surgical Lung Biopsy ?
Diagnostic accuracy
Confidence of diagnosis
TB Cryobiopsy vs. Forceps TBBx
Randomized trial published in 2014*
77 pts randomized
Cryobiopsy clearly superior to traditional Forceps TBBx
(* Pajares et.al. Respirology 2014; 19: 900-906)
Technique Specimen Size mm2
Histologic Dx MMD Dx Complications
Forceps TBBx 3.3 +/- 4.1 74% 51%
TB Cryobiopsy 14.7 +/- 11 34% 29%
1. Bleeding > in Cryobx (NS) 2. PTX similar
Ideally Cryo should be proven against SLBx
But was SLBx ever proven as sueful against a gold standard ? NO
Cryobiopsies (Forli Study 3/11 – 1/15)
524 cryobiopsies in 310 patients with ILD and non- diagnostic clinical-radiologic findings 1-6 Bx’s per patient Biopsies inadequate in 33 pts (10.6%) (Normal tissue or minimal changes) “Adequate” in 277 pts (89.4%)
Here is what we were dealing with: photo of 21 consecutive specimens.
Forli Study: Slide Review
Two reviewers: T Colby, A Cavazza Blinded to clinical and other pathologist Histologic criteria: As for a SLBx* First, second, third choice diagnoses Confidence (Hi vs Lo) of primary diagnosis
* Some SLBx’s are no larger than a cryobiopsy
UIP Hi Confidence
Pathologist #1 (AC)
DIAGNOSIS Hi Conf (%) Lo Conf (%) TOTAL (%)
UIP 23 17 40
NSIP/OP 0 13 13
HP 4 7.5 11.5
Rb/DIP 1 4 5
PLCH 1.5 2 3.5
Sarcoid 5.5 2 (grans NOS) 7.5
AC Diagnoses after MDD
Histologic Diagnosis
Diagnosis after MDD
Comments
UIP Hi Conf 58 IPF 6 other diagnoses
UIP Lo Conf 27 IPF 19 other diagnoses
NSIP/OP Lo Conf 14 NSIP/OP 22 other diagnoses
AC vs TVC Diagnoses
AC Diagnoses TVC Diagnoses
UIP Hi - 64 UIP Hi and Lo – 57 7 other Dx’s
UIP Lo - 46 UIP Hi and Lo – 35 11 other Dx’s
NSIP Lo - 36 NSIP – 24 UIP Hi and Lo – 6 6 other Dx’s
TVC and AC Agreement for UIP vs non-UIP Kappa = 0.72
Transbronchial Cryobiopsy 5. Clinical management implications
Dr. Tomassetti
Bronchoscopic Lung Cryobiopsy
(BLC) and MultiDiscplinaryDiagnosis
of fibrotic ILD key questions
Does BLC impact the multidisciplinary diagnosis of IPF?
and
How do BLC and VATS compare in the scenario of the dynamic interactions between clinicians, radiologists and pathologists?
Flowchart for inclusion of patients in the prospective database and in this study.
Study Population
117 f-ILDs cases with cryobiopsy or SLB biopsy
BLIND pathologic revision (TV Colby, A Cavazza, G
Rossi) and pathologic consensus.
Sequential addition of standardized clinical data at
diagnosis (SCD-D), HRCT, BAL, cryobiopsy or SLB,
standardized clinical data at follow-up (SCD-FU)
PHASE ONE
PHASE TWO
PHASE I
BLIND pathologic revision (A Cavazza, G Rossi and TV
Colby) and pathologic consensus.
Pathologists’ blind impressions
PHASE II
Sequential addition of standardized clinical data at
diagnosis (SCD-D), HRCT, BAL, cryobiopsy or SLB,
standardized clinical data at follow-up (SCD-FU)
Phase II – organizational scheme
FROM PATHOLOGISTS’ IMPRESSIONS TO MDD
MDD (STEP 6)
Interobserver agreement
0.74
0.84
STEP 5 BIOPSY
MDD: Change of diagnostic impression after Bx
Change in participants’ self reported confidence level
Conclusions
BLC is a new biopsy method that has a meaningful impact on diagnostic confidence in the multidisciplinary diagnosis of ILDs, and may prove useful in the diagnosis of IPF.
This study provides a robust rationale for future studies investigating the diagnostic accuracy of BLC compared to SLB, and the prognostic significance of BLC.
CryoBx Prognostic correlations
- 310 cases …. In progress
References Babiak A, Hetzel J, Krishna G, Fritz P, Moeller P, Balli T, Hetzel M. Transbronchial cryobiopsy: a new tool for lung biopsies. Respiration. 2009;78(2):203-8. Carbonelli C, Rossi G, Cavazza A. Cryobiopsy and multidisciplinary diagnosis of idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis. Respirology. 2015 May;20(4):685. Casoni GL, Tomassetti S, Cavazza A, Colby TV, Dubini A, Ryu JH, Carretta E, Tantalocco P, Piciucchi S, Ravaglia C, Gurioli C, Romagnoli M, Gurioli C, Chilosi M, Poletti V. Transbronchial lung cryobiopsy in the diagnosis of fibrotic interstitial lung diseases. PLoS One. 2014 Feb 28;9(2):e86716. Fruchter O, Fridel L, Rosengarten D, Rahman NA, Kramer MR. Transbronchial cryobiopsy in immunocompromised patients with pulmonary infiltrates: a pilot study. Lung. 2013 Dec;191(6):619-24 Fruchter O, Fridel L, Rosengarten D, Raviv Y, Rosanov V, Kramer MR. Transbronchial cryo-biopsy in lung transplantation patients: first report. Respirology. 2013 May;18(4):669-73.
Fruchter O, Fridel L, El Raouf BA, Abdel-Rahman N, Rosengarten D, Kramer MR. Histological diagnosis of interstitial lung diseases by cryo-transbronchial biopsy. Respirology. 2014 Jul;19(5):683-8. Griff S, Ammenwerth W, Schönfeld N, Bauer TT, Mairinger T, Blum TG, Kollmeier J, Grüning W. Morphometrical analysis of transbronchial cryobiopsies. Diagn Pathol. 2011 Jun 16;6:53. Griff S, Schönfeld N, Ammenwerth W, Blum TG, Grah C, Bauer TT, Grüning W, Mairinger T, Wurps H. Diagnostic yield of transbronchial cryobiopsy in non-neoplastic lung disease: a retrospective case series. BMC Pulm Med. 2014 Nov 3;14:171. Hagmeyer L, Theegarten D, Wohlschläger J, Treml M, Matthes S, Priegnitz C, Randerath WJ. The role of transbronchial cryobiopsy and surgical lung biopsy in the diagnostic algorithm of interstitial lung disease. Clin Respir J. 2015 Jan 26. Hernández-González F, Lucena CM, Ramírez J, Sánchez M, Jimenez MJ, Xaubet A, Sellares J, Agustí C. Cryobiopsy in the diagnosis of diffuse interstitial lung disease: yield and cost-effectiveness analysis. Arch Bronconeumol. 2015 Jun;51(6):261-7.
Hetzel J, Eberhardt R, Herth FJ, Petermann C, Reichle G, Freitag L, Dobbertin I, Franke KJ, Stanzel F, Beyer T, Möller P, Fritz P, Ott G, Schnabel PA, Kastendieck H, Lang W, Morresi-Hauf AT, Szyrach MN, Muche R, Shah PL, Babiak A, Hetzel M. Cryobiopsy increases the diagnostic yield of endobronchial biopsy: a multicentre trial. Eur Respir J. 2012 Mar;39(3):685-90. Mikolasch TA, Porter JC. Transbronchial cryobiopsy in the diagnosis of interstitial lung disease: a cool new approach. Respirology. 2014 Jul;19(5):623-4. doi: 10.1111/resp.12320. Epub 2014 May 25. Montero Fernández MÁ. Transbronchial cryobiopsy in interstitial lung disease: advantageous costs to benefits ratio. Arch Bronconeumol. 2015 Jun;51(6):257-8. doi: 10.1016/j.arbres.2015.02.006. Epub 2015 Apr 28. Pajares V, Puzo C, Castillo D, Lerma E, Montero MA, Ramos-Barbón D, Amor-Carro O, Gil de Bernabé A, Franquet T, Plaza V, Hetzel J, Sanchis J, Torrego A. Diagnostic yield of transbronchial cryobiopsy in interstitial lung disease: a randomized trial. Respirology. 2014 Aug;19(6):900-6. Poletti V, Casoni GL, Gurioli C, Ryu JH, Tomassetti S. Lung cryobiopsies: a paradigm shift in diagnostic bronchoscopy? Respirology. 2014 Jul;19(5):645-54. doi: 10.1111/resp.12309. Epub 2014 May 26.
Poletti V, Hetzel J. Transbronchial Cryobiopsy in Diffuse Parenchymal Lung Disease: Need for Procedural Standardization. Respiration. 2015 Sep 19. [Epub ahead of print] Roden AC, Kern RM, Aubry MC, Jenkins SM, Yi ES, Scott JP, Maldonado F. Transbronchial Cryobiopsies in the Evaluation of Lung Allografts: Do the Benefits Outweigh the Risks? Arch Pathol Lab Med. 2015 Oct 21. [Epub ahead of print] Romagnoli M, Bourdin A. Transbronchial cryobiopsy in the evaluation of interstitial lung diseases: Time for a positioning in the diagnostic work-up approach? Respirology. 2015 May;20(4):684.