tpb community leadership institute pilot sessions, april 26 & 29, 2006 report to the...
TRANSCRIPT
TPB Community Leadership Institute
Pilot Sessions, April 26 & 29, 2006
Report to The Transportation Planning Board
May 17, 2006
Purpose of the Pilot• Help community leaders learn how to get involved more
effectively in transportation decision making.• Help the TPB reach out to communities and groups that
have not typically been involved in our process• The Institute was designed to educate, not as a vehicle
to get input.
Who came?
• 20 participants• Community leaders representing
organizations• Not already active with the TPB • Participants mostly nominated by TPB
members– “Listening Sessions” were conducted with
TPB members to get support and nominations.
• Represented the region’s diversity
Who organized?
• TPB staff • Consultants
– Academy for Leadership Foundation at the University of Maryland, led by Peter Shapiro
– Fitzgerald & Halliday– Renaissance Planning
Workshop ProgramWednesday, 6-9 pm
“What’s the Problem?”Opening session focusedon the complexity of:
– Regional transportation challenges, and
– The transportation decision-making processes TPB Chair Mike Knapp speaking at
the opening session
• Simulated the complexity of transportation decision-making.
The Pyramid Exercise
• Simulated the complexity of transportation decision-making.
The Pyramid Exercise
– Presentation: Regional transportation and land use challenges
– Participant game: Small groups developed their own scenarios
– Presentation: Scenarios from the Regional Mobility and Accessibility Study
Workshop ProgramSaturday, 9 am – 12 pm
What if…?
The Transportation/Land Use Connection
Land Use/Transportation Game
Participants created their own scenarios to address regional challenges.
• Part I: The Process– Presentation based on
the TPB Citizens Guide
Workshop Program Saturday, 12-2 pm
• Part II: Real-World Examples- Bi-County Transitway- Woodrow Wilson Bridge- New York Avenue Metro Station- Beltway HOT Lanes
Transportation Project Development
Guiding Approach• Interactive/experiential learning methods• Expert facilitation by
Peter Shapiro• Not focused on process or technical details • Used material already developed by TPB staff:
– “What if” scenario presentation– Citizens Guide
Participant Comments• “It made me more aware of how regional decisions
are made and the complex nature of the decisions.”• “Thank you for reaching out to us and empowering
us for action!!!”• “A lot of info was covered… but it didn’t come
across as information overload.”• “Well planned, well run, and informative.”• Some requests for more information on:
– ”parkland, agricultural preserves… places off the radar for development.”
– “how affordable housing will factor into TOD.”– “more interactions with policymakers.”
• Followup requested: – Maintain contact with participants– Conduct workshops in their communities
Lessons Learned
Why was the pilot successful? Good participants Dynamic curriculum
- Right combination of presentations and activities
Extensive preparation Diversity
Next Steps
• Report to the TPB and CAC in May. • Preliminary recommendations:
– Do it again at COG: Repeat next Spring– Take it on the road: Distill materials and
curriculum for use in shorter workshops (3 hours) around the region.
• Maintain and utilize contact with participants.
For more information:
• Visit: www.mwcog.org/transportation/activities/cli/– All the presentations from the Institute are
posted at this site.
• Contact John Swanson at 202-962-3295 or [email protected]