towards productive, sustainable and inclusive agriculture ... · towards productive, sustainable...

Regional workshop for AfricaKigali, Rwanda, 19-21 September 2016

SYNTHESIS REPORT

TOWARDS PRODUCTIVE, SUSTAINABLE AND INCLUSIVE AGRICULTURE, FORESTRY AND FISHERIES IN SUPPORT TO THE 2030 AGENDA FOR SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT

Towards producTive, susTainable and inclusive agriculTure, foresTry and fisheries in supporT To The 2030 agenda for susTainable developmenT

synThesis reporT regional workshop for africa Kigali, rwanda, 19-21 september 2016

food and agriculTure organiZaTion of The uniTed naTionsrome, 2017

The designations employed and the presentation of material in this information product do not imply the expression of any opinion whatsoever on the part of the Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO) concerning the legal or development status of any country, territory, city or area or of its authorities, or concerning the delimitation of its frontiers or boundaries. The mention of specific companies or products of manufacturers, whether or not these have been patented, does not imply that these have been endorsed or recommended by FAO in preference to others of a similar nature that are not mentioned.

The views expressed in this information product are those of the author(s) and do not necessarily reflect the views or policies of FAO.

ISBN 978-92-5-109618-5

© FAO, 2017

FAO encourages the use, reproduction and dissemination of material in this information product. Except where otherwise indicated, material may be copied, downloaded and printed for private study, research and teaching purposes, or for use in non-commercial products or services, provided that appropriate acknowledgement of FAO as the source and copyright holder is given and that FAO’s endorsement of users’ views, products or services is not implied in any way.

All requests for translation and adaptation rights, and for resale and other commercial use rights should be made via www.fao.org/contact-us/licence-request or addressed to [email protected].

FAO information products are available on the FAO website (www.fao.org/publications) and can be purchased through [email protected].

Cover photos: ©FAO/Nicoletta Forlano

iii

acKnowledgemenTs v

execuTive summary vi

inTroducTion 1

Objective 2

Expected outputs 2

Agenda, location and dates 3

Participants 3

day 1: exploring The new governance environmenT 4

Opening session 5

Session 1: setting the scene 6

Session 2: review of country priorities 8

Session 3: engaging in the 2030 agenda 9

Session 4: a review of available tools 11

day 2: inTegraTion: designing concreTe acTions on The ground 12

Field visit to the Rulindo district 13

Session 5: visioning, developing scenarios and addressing trade-offs 13

day 3: focus on counTry planning 14

Session 6: country planning 15

Session 7: shaping FAO support 15

Session 8: the way ahead 16

annex 1: agenda of The worKshop 17

annex 2. lisT of parTicipanTs 20

annex 3: speech by hon. gerardine muKeshimana, minisTer of 23 agriculTure, rwanda

annex 4: speech by aTTaher maiga, fao represenTaTive in rwanda 27

annex 5: The five principles of susTainable food and agriculTure (sfa) 29

conTenTs

iv

annex 6: Tools presenTed aT The marKeT place 32

annex 7: The rulindo disTricT: 37 developing scenarios and addressing Trade-offs

annex 8: deTailed counTry plans 43

annex 9: shaping fao supporT 52

annex 10: counTry commiTmenTs 54

v

acKnowledgemenTs

This workshop report reflects the collaborative work between FAO and its partners in Africa, and efforts towards more integrated, multidisciplinary and effective collaboration in support to the countries’ agriculture agenda. Many colleagues from FAO Regional Office for Africa, Sub-Regional Offices, Country Offices and Headquarters contributed to its success. The organizers thank the Ministries of Agriculture and of Natural Resources of Rwanda and their different units who provided the perfect environment for this workshop, the District of Rulindo for hosting the field visit, and the team of FAO Rwanda for ensuring the logistics of the event and for mobilizing local partners, including during the field visit. Last but not least, the success of the workshop is also in large part due to the active contribution of participants from countries who took on their time to attend and help developing more strategic programmes in support to sustainable agriculture and food systems in their respective countries.

execuTive summary

©FA

O/N

icoletta Forlano

The regional workshop, entitled “engaging agriculture, forestry and fisheries in support to the 2030 agenda for sustainable development,” was held in Kigali, rwanda from 19 to 21 september 2016. This event served as an opportunity for fao to engage more effectively with countries in africa, through its delivery mechanisms, on changes needed to achieve the sdgs. The purpose of the workshop was to identify priorities for action in the context of the africa agricultural Transformation agenda through fao’s regional initiative 2 (ri2) on “sustainable intensification of production and value chain development in africa.” The four areas of focus of the workshop – sustainable intensification, value chain development, poverty reduction, and nutrition – are the pillars around which the discussions were organized.

In the Africa Region, the Malabo Declaration on Accelerated Agricultural Growth and Transformation for Shared Prosperity and Improved Livelihoods and the CAADP Implementation Strategy and Roadmap 2015-2025 provide the framework for agriculture, emphasizing the role of agriculture in contributing to broader strategies for structural economic transformation and inclusive growth. Achieving the SDGs in Africa is closely linked to the implementation of this vision.

The workshop addressed how the principles of Sustainable food and agriculture (SFA) can promote joint action to strengthen the contribution of agriculture, forestry and fisheries to sustainable development, and to identify priorities for FAO’s support in the 9 focus countries of the Regional Initiative (Mali, Democratic Republic of Congo, Côte d’Ivoire, Chad, Cameroon, Rwanda, Mozambique, Kenya and Zambia).

©FA

O/N

icoletta Forlano

viii

The workshop gathered approximately 70 participants, including senior government officials from different ministries – agriculture, forestry, fisheries, trade, finance and economic planning departments – and FAO experts from regional, sub-regional and country Offices and from FAO Headquarters in Rome. Participants from each country had the opportunity to establish new ways of collaborating across ministries to strategize on how to most effectively work together towards achieving the SDGs.

The workshop included a field trip to the Rulindo District, where FAO is experimenting with a more integrated way of supporting local development; and a marketplace to showcase key tools that FAO makes available to countries. Participants from different ministries and FAO experts worked together to identify concrete actions to achieve the SDGs and shaping FAO support.

On the last day, the teams focused on country planning. The purpose was to identify concrete actions in the fields of sustainable intensification; value chain development; poverty reduction and nutrition that participants would consider as priority actions for their country. Special attention was given to inter-sectoral governance mechanisms that foster more integrated and effective action. These actions were then reviewed in order to shape FAO support to countries in the framework of the Regional Initiative in the near future.

1

inTroducTion

©FA

O/N

icoletta Forlano

2 Regional woRkshop foR afRica: synthesis RepoRt

in september 2015, countries adopted the 2030 agenda for sustainable development. This agenda will shape their development programmes in a transformational way for the next 15 years. at the last fao regional conference for africa, held in abidjan in april 2016, many delegates asked the organization to assist countries in their efforts to implement the 2030 agenda in the field of agriculture, forestry and fisheries. The successful achievement of the sdgs is closely associated with countries being able to address sustainable development in a holistic and comprehensive way across sectors, and in their capacity to monitor progress against targets set by the 2030 agenda.

in the african region, the malabo declaration on accelerated agricultural growth and Transformation for shared prosperity and improved livelihoods and the caadp implementation strategy and roadmap 2015-2025 provide a framework for agriculture, emphasizing the role of agriculture in contributing to broader strategies for structural economic transformation and inclusive growth. achieving the sdgs in africa is closely linked to the implementation of this new vision.

fao has developed an approach aimed at enhancing the contributions of agriculture, forestry and fisheries to sustainable development and to address sustainability issues across these sectors. based on a set of principles for sfa, fao promotes policy dialogue and the development of joint and coordinated actions involving governmental bodies of different ministries, the private sector and civil society. at regional and country levels, fao is supporting this primarily through regional initiatives.

objecTive The objective of the workshop was to discuss how the principles for SFA can promote joint action to strengthen the contribution of agriculture, forestry and fisheries to sustainable development, and to identify priorities for FAO's support at national and regional levels to support the 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development and Africa’s agricultural transformation agenda, and to identify priorities for action in the context of FAO’s Regional Initiative 2 (RI2) on “Sustainable Intensification of Production and Value Chain Development in Africa”.

expecTed ouTpuTs • An increased understanding by participants of implications and opportunities

of the 2030 Agenda for the agriculture, forestry and fisheries sectors, in the framework of the Malabo Declaration;

• Elements of action of country-specific road maps aiming to address key efficiency, inclusiveness and sustainability issues in a more systemic way;

3INTRODUCTION

• An increased appreciation of the need for cross-sector and inter-ministerial cooperation in the development of agricultural and food systems;

• Ways to support country-specific actions through FAO’s Regional Initiative RI2 for Africa.

agenda, locaTion and daTesThe workshop took place at the Lemigo Hotel in Kigali, Rwanda, from 19 to 21 September 2016. A field visit took place on 20 September in the Rulindo District. The workshop Agenda is presented in Annex 1.

parTicipanTsAround 70 participants, including senior government officials from agriculture, forestry and fisheries, and associated trade, finance and economic planning departments, FAO Representatives, representatives from civil society and the private sector from the countries of the FAO Regional Initiative RI2 and FAO experts from Regional and Sub-Regional Offices and Headquarters. Participants included the Regional Strategic Programme Coordinator, the Strategic Programme Leaders for Sustainable Agriculture and Inclusive Value Chains, and the Deputy Strategic Programme Leader for Poverty Reduction. The list of participants is available in Annex 2.

The participants of the regional workshop for africa

©FA

O/N

icoletta Forlano


day 1: exploring The new governance environmenT

©FA

O/N

icoletta Forlano

The first session of the workshop offered an overarching framework, which set the scene for the workshop. The session was kicked off with a speech from gerardine mukeshimana, the minister of agriculture and animal resources (annex 3). during her speech, she stressed the importance of having a more comprehensive approach to agriculture. This can be achieved by reaching out to other sectors, including economy, health and natural resources. one of the ways to achieve this will be through the sdgs. The minister’s speech was then followed by introduction on relevant fao programs, and a panel discussion that explained the four areas of focus of the workshop.

opening session This first session was opened by the Minister of Agriculture and Animal Resources, Hon Gerardine Mukeshimana and was facilitated by Otto Muhinda, Assistant FAO Representative in Rwanda, who introduced all delegations represented (Cameroon, Chad, Côte d’Ivoire, Kenya, Mali, Mozambique, DRC, Zambia, Rwanda, Uganda and WTO).

M. Attaher Maiga, FAO Representative in Rwanda, then welcomed all participants (Annex 4). He explained that the objective of the workshop was to exchange ideas, information, knowledge and experience on how a sustainable food and agriculture (SFA) can promote joint action to strengthen the contribution of agriculture, forestry and fisheries to sustainable development. He emphasized that it is important that actors use what is currently available without jeopardizing resources for future generations. He then stated that the workshop would be an opportunity to support of the 2030 Agenda, fostering integrated development where policy dialogue and inclusiveness of all actors can lead to success. The challenge in Africa, however, is its high population growth, which therefore requires thinking differently on sustainability.

Hon. Gerardine Mukeshimana, Minister of Agriculture and Animal Resources, welcomed all participants to the meeting and expressed that it was a great honour and pleasure for her to host the workshop dealing with the commitment on the 2030 Agenda, which has the potential to transform our world and lives. Lessons learnt from the past force a new approach to development. Rwanda has engaged in the Vision 2020 and is now developing a 2050 strategy for agricultural transformation where investment in agriculture, extension services, better control of natural resources and opening door to investors to participate are already underway. She stressed the importance of having a more comprehensive approach to agriculture. This can be achieved by reaching out to other sectors, including economy, health and natural resources. One of the ways to achieve this will be through the SDGs.


session 1: seTTing The scene

food and agriculture in the context of the 2030 agenda and the malabo declaration Jean-Marc Faurès presented on Food and Agriculture in the 2030 Agenda. He emphasized that the main characteristics of the SDGs are that the process is country driven and country owned, universal, indivisible and inclusive. He highlighted the importance of integration and securing local participation, innovative partnership, measuring progress and strengthening monitoring capacity at country level. Because agriculture is essential in the SDGs, country engagement is also critical. Agriculture is not only production, but it must integrate economic, social and environmental dimensions of sustainability. SFA proposes to use five key principles to reach this multiple objectives (Annex 5).

Ruhiza Boroto presented the RI2, linking the initiative with CAADP and the Malabo Declaration. He pointed out that the lowest production and productivity of the continent should be seen as an opportunity. He stressed that the RI2 on sustainable intensification is considering staple food and cash crops, thus learning from the Green Revolution in Asia. The RI encourages integration (crop, aquaculture, livestock production and synergies between all these productions). The initiative uses the benefits of integration to improve household nutrition. After a first phase of seven countries, nine countries are now included in the RI2, of which four are close observation countries. He concluded by inviting countries to own the workshop and to use FAO officers present to support them.

©FA

O/N

icoletta Forlano

7DAY 1: EXPLORING THE NEW GOVERNANCE ENVIRONMENT

panel discussionSustainable intensification, (Clayton Campanhola, SPL, SP2). Campanhola highlighted the challenges of the region as they relate to agriculture, fisheries and forestry, which include population growth, youth unemployment and low productivity now exacerbated by climate change. Agriculture, which will lead to increased food, is key to addressing these challenges.

He stressed that sustainable intensification is not simply increasing use of inputs, but rather to ensure efficiency in use of resources. This means producing more with less, but, at the same time, balancing social, economic and environmental aspects of production. FAO is instrumental in this process by coordinating cross-sectoral initiatives for rural development, promoting access to sustainable practices through farmer field schools and South-South cooperation, and reporting on progress towards international targets such as the SDGs and Malabo Declaration indicators

Value chain development: linking producers to consumers (Jamie Morrison, SPL, SP4). Morrison began by explaining that value chains are defined as the individuals, enterprises and their range of activities that transform agricultural produce from the farm to the consumer, linking the producer to the consumer. He said that, when it comes to value chain development and sustainable intensification, it is often a chicken and egg situation. Without the development of value chains, production will not be increased consistently because the incentives to adopt technologies and practices that increase productivity will not be sustained. Yet, without consistency of supply, there will be less incentive for the private sector along the chain to invest, so value chains are unable to develop. Therefore we need to understand the different incentives along the value chain. And we need to look at the dynamics of a food system that require coordination at national and even global levels, where coordination across ministries is important

Sustainable agriculture for poverty reduction (Maya Takagi, Deputy SPL, SP3). Takagi opened with the link between rural poverty and agriculture, which is evidence that agriculture plays an important role in ending hunger. Farmers often face simultaneous challenges: the need to address productivity and also have access to markets. She stressed the lack of decent rural employment and the importance of recognizing farmers as agents of change. It will be necessary to develop comprehensive packages of interventions to address all of the challenges faced by the rural focus. Then successful initiatives can be selected and scaled up.

Towards nutrition-sensitive agriculture (Dia Sanou, Nutrition Officer, SFE). Sanou introduced nutrition sensitive agriculture as basically integrating nutrition into agriculture programming. It is an approach that seeks to maximize agriculture's contribution to improved nutrition outcomes, meaning that sustainable intensification needs to have a positive impact on nutrition. The entry points for mainstreaming nutrition into SFA is by integrating nutrition objectives and indicators into policies, programmes and strategies; through bio-fortification; ensuring that the crops/foods that are been intensified has high nutritional value; and focusing on staple crops and less invasive crops and integrating with nutrition education.


session 2: review of counTry prioriTiesPrior to the event, participants from the nine countries were requested to come together, across different ministries, to produce a presentation on key issues and what would be necessary to achieve the SDGs in their respective countries. Issues were to be organized around the five principles of SFA used by FAO to organize thinking on SDGs. Countries met in groups of three to present their local situation and analyze commonalities and specificities. Key findings are presented below.

Productivity: Productivity remains low in most countries of the Regional Initiative. Lack of knowledge, infrastructure, access to inputs, credit and markets, poor extension services and poor control of water resources hamper the development of productive farming systems. While land is still abundant in many countries, like in DRC, the number of regions where land or water resources becomes an issue is on the rise. Competition for land, between sectors of activity, is very strong in Rwanda for instance, while countries like Mali have to face increasing constraints due to limited water availability.

Efficient value chains: Market access, and the development of efficient and dynamic markets both at local, national and sub-regional levels, remain an issue in many countries. While some value chains are well developed for some crops, farmers in the countries of the Regional Initiative rarely take advantage of opportunities offered by local markets, including growing cities. Trade barriers limit the opportunities for sub-regional trade, like in Kenya, and the conditions of road, storage, transformation and market infrastructure often reduce opportunities for farmers.

Livelihood and social well-being: Poverty and hunger remain high in rural areas, where the majority of poor people live, in all countries of the region. This indicates an increasing imbalance between conditions of living in rural and in urban areas, with fewer opportunities for decent work, and a high rate of youth unemployment in particular. The opportunities vary between countries, with some having reached limits in their available resources, and others, like Zambia or DRC, still offering substantial potential for growth in agriculture. The lack of off-farm opportunities also limits rural people’s opportunities. The nutritional status of rural populations varies between countries, but is poor in general due to lack of nutritional education and little incentives to diversify production.

Climate change resilience and environmental conservation: Poor agricultural productivity translates into encroachment on natural resources, including forests, in countries like Côte d’Ivoire and DRC, while demographic pressure leads to land degradation and erosion in countries like Rwanda. Climate change is increasingly affecting all countries, in particular those in sub-humid and semi-arid areas like Mozambique, Chad or Mali, where increasingly variable climate affects crop and livestock productivity. Illegal logging and deforestation remain key challenges in countries like Cameroon and DRC.

Governance: Most countries have institutional coordination mechanisms on different issues, but their effectiveness varies from case to case. There is clearly a gap in coordination between environmental and agriculture sectors (the efforts made in Rwanda to close this gap have been highlighted). Much remains to be done in most


countries in better linking agriculture with commerce and trade, and in most cases the linkages between agriculture and nutrition are almost non-existent. Extension and advisory services are weak and rarely include nutrition or conservation in their curriculum.

session 3: engaging in The 2030 agenda

partnershipsAnna Rappazzo gave a presentation on the importance of partnerships in the 2030 Agenda. She stressed that partnerships are the main delivery mechanism for the SDGs and are essential for inclusive multi-stakeholder engagement and integration across sectors. Partnerships help guarantee policy coherence, give a platform for aligning with regional and national priorities, can provide financial resources and, in the end, create an enabling environment for achieving the SDGs. They also provide the venue to scale up commitments.

monitoring the sdgsAmy Heyman then presented on monitoring for results. She informed that, unlike the MDG process, the SDGs have been driven by countries, with the support of international organizations. She explained the role of FAO as custodian of 21 of the 231 indicators. The indicators have been categorized by the IAEG-SDGs based on two criteria: methodology and data availability. Tier I indicators have both an internationally accepted methodology and time series data. Tier II indicators only have a well-developed methodology, and Tier III are new and therefore do not have an internationally recognized methodology or time series data. She concluded with what FAO is doing to support SDG monitoring, which includes collecting data from national

©FA

O/N

icoletta Forlano


sources, validating and harmonizing them, unifying the information into a standard platform, and providing statistical capacity development to countries.

case studiesThe Songhai approach to sustainable agriculture (Ruhiza Boroto). FAO has engaged in a partnership with the non-governmental organization "Songhai", based in Benin, and focusing on development and innovation. With its integrated approach, it aims to systemically addressing multiple challenges (agriculture/food security, demographic transition/youth employment, health and environment) that African countries face in their efforts to achieve a sustainable economy and rural growth. A central tenet of the Songhai initiative is that the only way to effectively fight poverty is to make the poor productive and strengthen individual capacities to do so through tailored training. Socio-economic initiatives are necessary in order to provide a critical mass of young men and women who are capable of providing leadership and have the skills necessary to create wealth through more humane and sustainable businesses. Examples of the Songhai approach to development were illustrated through a video showing some of the many initiatives promoted by Songhai. FAO’s Regional Initiative 2 has funded, with the African Solidary Trust Fund, a study tour of farmers and government officials from Côte d’Ivoire at the Songhai Centre.

An integrated approach to production and conservation in Burundi (Salvatore Ndabirorere). The project is part of FAO’s efforts for a more integrated approach to agriculture in Africa. The purpose of the project is to adopt a multi-disciplinary and catalytic approach to address the degradation of natural resources; loss of agricultural productivity and income; malnutrition and poverty in rural areas of Burundi. Key entry points for action are the watershed, community and farmer field schools. A range of activities are promoted by the project, including sustainable land management (terraces, contour ridges, fodder production, small scale irrigation); crop intensification; diversification (vegetables, fish ponds, piggery); better integration of crop and livestock production, etc. Central to the success of the programme is: 1) the participatory approach from the planning phase to implementation; 2) the capacity development at all levels, from farmers to communities, advisory services and planning capacities at watershed level; 3) the focus on improved livelihood and, income; 4) social cohesion and the development of a common vision; and 5) access to credit, research, innovation and partnership.

The potato value chain: from production to trade in Uganda (Patricia Nsiime). The main objective of the regional project ‘Strengthening linkages between small actors and buyers in the roots and tubers sector’ is to improve the livelihoods of small producers engaged in the roots and tubers value chains in selected countries through the promotion of linkages to domestic and regional markets. The key messages that emerged from the Uganda experience, focusing on potato, include:

• Seed potato is an issue in terms of quantity and quality;

• There is an increasing need to help potato farmers adapting to climate change;


• Market linkages can only be viable when either party is willing to adjust and negotiate the most feasible situation;

• Downscaling market and climate information to the farmer level is essential.

Linking social protection with agriculture in Zambia (George Okech). The presentation addressed two critical questions: 1) why social protection is needed when supporting sustainable agricultural intensification among small family farmers, and 2) how are we strengthening coherence between agriculture and social protection in Zambia. Social protection covers a range of possible interventions, including social assistance (cash transfer, school feeding, public works, etc.), social insurance (health insurance, crop insurance, etc.) or labour market protection. Social protection addresses the needs of smallholder farmers who represent the majority of farmers in Africa. Combating poverty involves increasing agricultural productivity, but these farmers are extremely vulnerable to risks, which makes them risk averse and hampers their capacity to invest in productive agriculture. By reducing risk, social protection allows small family farmers to engage progressively in more productive agricultural activities. Examples from Zambia, Malawi, Lesotho and Ghana show that well designed social protection programmes contribute to increasing agricultural productivity and incomes of smallholder farmers. They also highlight the importance of ensuring more coherence between agriculture and social protection policies.

session 4: a review of available ToolsThis session was devoted to presenting relevant tools for engaging in the 2030 Agenda in food and agriculture through a Marketplace. Ten tools were presented with posters and a brief explanation illustrating each a tool. The topics were first introduced in plenary, and then participants rotated around the room to learn about selected tools. Speakers briefly presented the tool to whomever chose to come and listen, and participants dialogued with the presenters. The presentations were repeated 4 to 5 times. The session concluded with distribution of material for future consultation.

The following tools were presented during the session:

• Cross sectoral policy dialogue: the Sustainable food and agriculture approach (Jean-Marc Faurès)

• Farmer field school approach for sustainable intensification (Joyce Mulila Mitti)

• Rural invest (Gunther Feiler)

• Enhanced Integrated Framework for Trade (Mbaye Ndiaye)

• Building inclusive value chains (Jamie Morrison)

• Nutrition sensitive agriculture (Domitille Kauffmann)

• Tools to supporting family farmers to reduce rural poverty (Maya Takagi)

• SHARP: Self-evaluation of climate resilience at farm level (Amy Heyman)

• Incentives for ecosystem services (Domitille Vallée)

A brief description of each tool is presented in Annex 6.


day 2: inTegraTion: designing concreTe acTions on The ground

©FA

O/N

icoletta Forlano

field visiT To The rulindo disTricTday 2 started with a field visit to the district of rulindo, near Kigali, where the local government and fao are piloting an innovative and integrated approach to support sustainable agricultural and value chain development. participants were welcomed by the vice-mayor and inhabitants of rulindo, and visited the river catchment where they could see and discuss on-going efforts towards sustainable land management, livelihood diversification, public-private partnership, improved access to market, etc.

participants were asked to look at the situation from the different angles of sustainable intensification; value chain development; poverty reduction and nutrition, and assessing these with regard to their own country experience. These insights were then used in session 5 to help the rulindo district understanding its strengths and weaknesses, and identifying elements of an integrated plan for agriculture.

session 5: visioning, developing scenarios and addressing Trade-offsBuilding on the field visit to Rulindo, the goal of this session was to play out a scenario of working towards an integrated plan for agriculture in the District, taking into consideration key trade-offs faced in attempting to address multiple goals.

Each group was asked to review the District’s policies and programmes in order to better align with the 2030 Agenda. They were then asked to discuss constraints that the District faced in order to achieve productive, sustainable and inclusive agriculture across the four dimensions of the workshop. They then proposed actions to be considered in preparing and implementing the District Plan, while taking into account coordination among sectors, actors and partners; financing; investments and technology; institutional capacity; and monitoring and evaluation. The session concluded with possible conflicts and how to address trade-offs. A summary of the results is presented in Annex 7.

©FA

O/N

icoletta Forlano


day 3: focus on counTry planning

©FA

O/N

icoletta Forlano

©FA

O/N

icoletta Forlano

session 6: counTry planningsessions 6 and 7 focused on country planning. The purpose was to identify concrete actions in the fields of sustainable intensification; value chain development; poverty reduction and nutrition, which participants would consider as priority actions for their country. These actions were then reviewed in order to shape fao support to countries in the framework of the regional initiative (session 7).

at first, country groups identified major policies, strategies and programmes in place that are supporting the implementation of the 2030 agenda and are the main promoters of the four themes discussed in the workshop (session 6). They then discussed and listed inter-sectoral governance mechanisms that help coordinate implementation programs across ministries, sectors and different stakeholders, analyzing them in terms of strengths and weaknesses. finally, country groups identified gaps and the potential for improved coordination.

session 7: shaping fao supporT

identifying priorities for actionSession 7 focused on the areas where FAO should concentrate its support to the countries through its Regional Initiative 2. Based on the result of Session 6, country participants worked with the support of their FAO country representative and other colleagues to identify areas of work in the forthcoming future for which FAO support was needed. These actions were organized along the four themes of the workshop (sustainable intensification; value chain development; poverty reduction; and nutrition), and clustered in four categories: cross sectoral coordination; partnership; SDG monitoring; Capacity Development; and Support to investment. Results by country are presented in Annex 8.

Activities were further prioritized to identify, for each category, the 4-5 most urgent activities where FAO support could be requested. They were then clustered into a single table showing activities by country and by theme. The result of this exercise is presented in Annex 9.

resource mobilizationA session on resource mobilization was organized to inform participants about relevant sources of funding for work in sustainable agriculture. Presentations were done through video conference on three themes: 1) the Global Environmental Facility (GEF); 2) South-South Cooperation; 3) the Green Climate Fund.

Jeffrey Griffin and Fritjof Boerstler presented the GEF, a financial mechanism for the major environmental Conventions. As a GEF partner agency, FAO offers experience in


sustainable fisheries, forestry, agriculture and land management. Planning is on-going for the forthcoming GEF cycle (GEF-7), in which the focus will be on multifocal area programmes. Possible areas for interventions include climate smart agriculture; sustainable biomass/woodfuel; and agro-biodiversity.

Festus Akinnifesi made a presentation on South-South cooperation (SSC) as an important tool for promoting development cooperation. It has been used by FAO for the last 30 years for sharing and exchanging development solutions: knowledge information, innovations, technology, experiences, technical capacity, policy and resources. The different SSC modalities were described, with examples of on-going agreements. SSC include short- and long-term arrangements, which comprise training of extension staff; introduction of new crop varieties; demonstrating and adapting new technologies; and the provision of farm machineries and equipment.

Conrad George presented the Green Climate Fund (GCF), an instrument under the UNFCCC Financial Mechanism, supporting the implementation of Intended Nationally Determined Contributions (INDC, contribution to the Climate Paris Agenda). The agricultural sectors are among the highest priorities in developing countries’ INDCs, and there is significant potential for these sectors to deliver within the GCF framework. FAO is exploring three ways to support Member States through the GCF: as a GCF-accredited implementing entity, in supporting the design and implementation of projects led by other accredited entities, and as a delivery partner in the GCF Readiness Programme. FAO Country Offices are encouraged to engage in a discussion with the National Designated Authority (NDA) as a first step to identify possibilities of collaboration under GCF. The GCF readiness programme is a mechanism that provides countries with grants of up to USD 300,000 per project to strengthen NDAs, develop the GCF country programme and accreditation of direct access entities.

session 8: The way aheadSession 8 was the concluding session. It offered participants the opportunity to make ‘commitments’ on what they would do after the workshop to transform findings and recommendations into action at a personal level and within their countries. Results of country commitments have been captured and are presented in Annex 10.

FAO Officers in charge of the four themes of the workshop were given the opportunity to provide reflections and insights about the workshop and the way these themes were addressed.

The meeting concluded with reflections from Beth Crawford, FAO Regional Strategic Framework Coordinator on the significance and results of the workshop, their implications for FAO programme in the region in the framework of the Regional Initiative 2, and commitment to support RI2 focus countries in their efforts towards engaging food and agriculture in the 2030 Agenda in a more comprehensive, inclusive and integrated way.

17ANNEX 1: AGENDA OF THE WORKSHOP

annex 1: agenda of The worKshop

SUMMARY

day 1 - exploring the new governance environment

day 2 – integration at local level

day 3 - country planning

Introduction: the big picture Field visit: Concrete actions on the ground

Review of country programmes

Country priorities Developing country plans

Engaging in the 2030 Agenda Shaping FAO support through RI2

A review of tools Addressing trade-offs Conclusions

deTailed agenda

19 september day 1: exploring the new governance environment

08:30-09:00 Registration of participants – meet and greet

09:00-09:20 Words of welcome- Minister of agriculture, Rwanda- FAO Representative in Rwanda

session 1: setting the scene

09:20-10:30 Introduction to the workshop - Food and Agriculture in the 2030 Agenda - FAO’s Regional Initiative 2

Panel discussion: Four areas of focus- Sustainable intensification - Value chain development: linking producers to consumers - Sustainable agriculture for poverty reduction - Towards nutrition-sensitive agriculture

Questions and Answers

10:30-11:00 Group Photo - Coffee/Tea Break

session 2: review of country priorities

08:30-09:00 Group work (3 groups) – country presentations - Group 1: Mali, DR Congo, Côte d’Ivoire - Group 2: Chad, Cameroon, Rwanda - Group 3: Mozambique, Kenya, Zambia


12:00-12:30 Findings from group work and discussions on emerging key issues

12:30-14:00 Lunch

session 3: engaging in the 2030 agenda

14:00-14:30 - The role of partnerships in achieving the SDGs - SDG indicators: monitoring for results

14:30-15:30 Case studies (Room 1)1. The Songhai approach

towards sustainable agriculture, Benin

2. An integrated approach to production and conservation in Burundi

Discussion: Inter-ministerial and inter-disciplinary coordination

Case studies (Room 2)3. The potato value chain: from

production to trade in Uganda 4. Linking social protection with

agriculture in ZambiaDiscussion: Inter-ministerial and inter-disciplinary coordination

15:30-16:00 Coffee/Tea Break

session 4: a review of available tools

16:00-17:00 Marketplace: Presentation of tools to address key issues- Cross-sectoral policy dialogue: the SFA approach - The Farmer field school approach for sustainable intensification - Rural invest - Enhanced Integrated Framework for Trade - Building inclusive value chains - Nutrition sensitive agriculture - Tools to supporting family farmers to reduce rural poverty - SHARP: Self-evaluation of climate resilience at farm level- Incentives for ecosystem services

17:00-17:30 Highlights of the day and preparation for the field trip

17:30 Closure Day 1

18:00-20:00 Reception

20 september day 2: integration: designing concrete actions on the ground

8:00-13:30 Field Trip: Rulindo District (3 groups)Groups will visit different sites in the Rulindo District and discuss development opportunities from the viewpoint of:

- Sustainable intensification- Value chains- Poverty reduction- Nutrition

13:30-15:00 Lunch

19ANNEX 1: AGENDA OF THE WORKSHOP

session 5: visioning: developing scenarios and addressing trade-offs

15:00-16:30 Group work: Groups will discuss possible development scenarios on the basis of the morning experience, identify and discuss trade-offs and synergies between multiple goals and objectives

16:30-17:15 Group reporting

17:15-17:30 Highlights of the day

17:30 Closure Day 2

21 september day 3: focus on country planning

session 6: country planning

8:30-9:00 Introduction to Day 3

9:00-10:30 Group work (by country): Countries review sectoral policies and programmes that contribute to implementing the SDGs in food and agriculture from the perspective of the four areas of focus. Identify gaps and potential for improved coordination


session 7: shaping fao support

11:00-12:30 Group work (by country): Countries identify actions towards implementing the SDGs in food and agriculture for which FAO support would be needed in the fields of governance, partnership, capacity development, and monitoring. Development of country plans.

12:30-14:00 Lunch

14:00-15:00 Presentation of country plans (boards) – Discussion of FAO support and agreement on practical steps

15:00-15:30 Resource mobilization: Funding opportunities and South-South Cooperation (VC)


session 8: The way ahead

16:00-17:00 Commitments by participants


annex 2: lisT of parTicipanTs susTainable food and agriculTure worKshop Kigali, rwanda 19-21 sepTember 2016

cameroon

Valère Genevoix Ella Mba Ministère de l’Agriculture et du développement rural Tel : +237 699548588Email: [email protected]

Mirabeau Foko Kamdem Chef de la Cellule des StatistiquesMinistère du CommerceTel : +237 677760213Email: [email protected]

Atkam HammanConseiller TechniqueMinistère de l’Élevage, des Pêches et des Industries AnimalesTel : +237 679828767Email: [email protected]

chad

Kandje Patcha Directeur General de la productionMinistère de la Production, de l’Irrigation et des Equipements AgricolesTel : +235 66262906Email: [email protected]

Arrachid Ahmat IbrahimDirecteur Général Pêches/Aquaculture Ministère de l’Environnement et des PêchesTel : +235 66232262Email: [email protected]

Djibangar Gueringue Directeur adjoint de l’IndustrieTel : +235 66288554Email: [email protected] Molele Mbaindingatoloum Directeur General ElevageMinistère de l’élevage et des productions animalesTel: +235 66246734Email: [email protected]

coTe d’ivoire

Kouadio Maxime EssoSous-directeurMinistère de l’AgricultureEmail: [email protected]

Kouadjo Georges KouakouChef de projetMinistère de l’Agriculture et des pêchesTel : +225 05074433Email: [email protected]

Kouadio Mathieu KomenanSous-directeurMinistère du CommerceEmail: [email protected]

Aissata SobiaMinistère du planTel: +225 22447960Email: [email protected]

21ANNEX 2: LIST OF PARTICIPANTS

democraTic republic of congo

Marcel Nyombo Kapambwe

Conseiller du Ministre Ministère de l’Agriculture Tel : +243 998910917 Email : [email protected]

David Kiese Matuta Conseiller Ministre du commerceTel : +243 822001933Email: [email protected]

Augustin Bisedia Nlemvo

Chargé de projetMinistère du commerceTel : +243 0813634275Email: [email protected]@gmail.com

Kenya

James Wachiuri Wanjohi

Department of AgricultureTel: +254 613515Email: [email protected]

Jane Mokeira Kibwage

Senior Assistant Director of Fisheries State Department of FisheriesTel: +254 722715517Email: [email protected]

Hannah Muthoni Kiarie

Principal Industrial Development OfficerMinistry of Industrialization and Enterprise DevelopmentTel: +254 0773453591Email: [email protected]

mali

Seydou Keita

Conseiller TechniqueMinistère de l’AgricultureTel : +223 66794617Email: [email protected]

Boureima Traoré

Conseiller Technique Ministère de l’Elevage et de la Pêche Tel : +223 66762289Email: [email protected]

Soussourou Dembélé

Conseiller TechniqueMinistère de l’Economie et des FinancesTel: +223 76349393Email: [email protected]


moZambiQue

Ilidio Francisco Massinga

National Director International Cooperation Department Ministry of Agriculture and Food SecurityTel: +258 821217361Email: [email protected]@gmail.com

Celso Lopes

Deputy National Director Ministry of Sea, Inland Waters and FisheriesTel: +258 825649779Email: [email protected]

Eriksson Anacleto Rodrigues Duarte

TechnicienMinistère du CommerceTel : +258 848020041Email: [email protected]

Julio Filimone

National Director Ministry of Economy and FinanceTel: +258 824891370Email: [email protected]

rwanda

Coleta Ruhamya

Director General, REMATel: +250 788305717Email: [email protected]

Marie-Laetitia Busokeye

Director of researchEnvironmental planning and development Tel: +250 788530999Email: [email protected]

Prosper Mulindwa

Vice Mayor Economic DevelopmentRulindo DistrictTel: +250 788600037Email: [email protected]

Daniel Rwebigo

Seeds Specialist/MINAGRITel: +250 788757897Email: [email protected]

Ossiniel Nshimiyumukiza

Community processing Centers SpecialistMinistry of Trade and Industry (MINICOM)Tel: +250 788616102Email: [email protected] [email protected]

Emmanuel Muriisa

Fisheries and Aquaculture consultantTel: +250784875544Email: [email protected]

Francis Musinguzi

Food products standards OfficerTel: +250 788518703Email: [email protected] [email protected]

Jean Damascene Nyamwasa

USAID Agriculture Productivity Team LeaderTel: +250 788314957Email: [email protected]

Malick Haidara

Director Economic Growth, USAIDTel: +250 788386060Email: [email protected]

Tarik Marc Kabach

Program OfficerEuropean External Action ServiceTel: +250 784371765Email: [email protected]


rwanda (continued)

Liliane Cyakwela

Project Assistant/TTC-SITATel: +250 788308982Email: [email protected]

Jean Pierre de Margemie

WFP MEPTel: +250 788306741Email: [email protected]

Gaspard Habarurema

InterpreterTel: +250 788358243Email: [email protected]

Antoinette Uwamariya


Clancy Muhoza


Vanessa Graciella Giriwanyu

Programme Assistant WFPEmail: [email protected]

Zambia

Mary Chilala

Principal economistMinistry of AgricultureTel: +260 974335151Email: [email protected]

Innocent Liswani Simasiku

Principal Forestry OfficerTel: +260 977789817Email: [email protected]

Ndawambi Daka

Chief Co-operatives OfficerMinistry of commerceTel: +260 97770326Email: [email protected]

David Kaluba

Ministry of economic planningTel: +260 979403037Email: [email protected]

fao headQuarTers

Clayton CampanholaStrategic Programme Leader, SP2Tel: +39 063383497375Email: [email protected]

Jamie MorrisonStrategic Programme Leader, SP4Tel: +39 0657056251Email: [email protected]

Jean-Marc FaurèsSenior Programme Officer, SP2Tel: +39 3494970752Email: [email protected]

Maya TakagiDeputy Strategic Programme Leader, SP3Tel: + 39 3432553694Email: [email protected]

Festus Akinnifesi (by videoconference)Deputy Strategic Programme Leader, SP2Tel : +39 0657054950Email : [email protected]

Domitille ValléeConsultant FAO Sustainable AgricultureTel : +33624080074Email: [email protected]


fao headQuarTers (continued)

Amy HeymanProgramme Officer, SP2Tel: +39 0657055339Email: [email protected]

Wadzanai KatsandeOutcome Coordinator, SP4Tel: +39 0657055378Email: [email protected]

Nicoletta ForlanoCommunication Coordinator, SP2Tel: +39 0657054068Email: [email protected]

Gunther FeilerCapacity Development OfficerTel: +39 0657053621Email: [email protected]

Jeffrey Griffin (by videoconference)Senior Coordinator, GEFTel: +39 0657055680Email: [email protected]

Fritjof Boerstler (by videoconference)Technical Officer, GEFTel: + 39 0657055398Email: [email protected]

Conrad George (by videoconference)Natural Resources Officer Tel: +39 0657054158Email: [email protected]

Anna Rappazzo (by videoconference)Technical Officer (SDG)Tel: +39 0657054266Email: [email protected]

regional office for africa

Beth CrawfordRegional Strategic Programme CoordinatorTel: +233 302610930Email: [email protected]

Ruhiza BorotoSenior Water Development OfficerDelivery Manager, Regional Initiative 2Tel: +233 248440900Email: [email protected]

Dede AmahProgramme Support to RAF Regional InitiativesTel: +233 302610930Email: [email protected]

Cecilia AkitaProgramme SupportTel: +233 302610930Email: [email protected]

Sibyl AdjeiProgramme supportTel: +233 302610930Email: [email protected]

sub-regional offices

Cyprien BiaouLivestock Development OfficerSub-regional Office for Central Africa (SFC)Tel: +241 04413807Email: [email protected]

Mathew AbangCrops production OfficerSub-regional Office for Eastern Africa (SFE)Tel: +251 935986406Email: [email protected]


sub-regional offices (continued)

Dia SanouNutrition OfficerSub-regional Office for Eastern Africa (SFE)Tel: +251 966933066Email: [email protected]

Nomathemba MhlangaAgribusiness OfficerSub-regional Office for Eastern Africa (SFE)Tel: +251 911509530Email: [email protected]

Joyce Mulila MittiPlant production and protection OfficerSub-regional Office for Southern Africa (SFS)Tel: +263 782827198Email: [email protected]

fao counTry offices

Georges OkechFAO Representative ZambiaTel: +260 975533547Email: [email protected]

Fatouma Djama Seid Représentante de la FAO au MaliEmail: [email protected]

Alexis BonteReprésentant de la FAO au Congo a.i.Email : [email protected]

Claudia PereiraAssistant Programme FAO MozambiqueTel: +258 821237101Email: [email protected]

Felicitas Atanga Assistant FAO Representative for CameroonTel: +237 2221242Email: [email protected]

Noudjalbaye Batedjim Chargé de programmes, FAO-TchadTel : +235 66202638Email: [email protected]

Luc GenotChargé d’OperationsFAO Côte d’IvoireTel : +225 06660880Email: [email protected]

Robert AllportFAO KenyaTel : +254 737701441Email: [email protected]


fao rwanda

Attaher MaigaFAO Representative, RwandaEmail: [email protected]

Otto MuhindaAssistant FAO Representative-ProgrammeEmail: [email protected]

J’Arc Matuje MukamwizaAssistant Programmes Tel: +250 788461545Email: [email protected]

Sylvain HabimanaConsultant, FAO-RwandaTel: +250 788909112Email: [email protected]

Joseph Anania BizimaNational Project CoordinatorFAO-SFA/FLRTel: +250 788383040Email: [email protected]

Ahadu TekleConsultantFAO RwandaEmail: [email protected]

Juvenal KabiligiFAO NPM (TSF)Tel : +250 78855805Email: [email protected]

Clare MacMillenNutrition Project AssistantTel: +250 781469464Email: [email protected]

Soter SerubibiNTFP Project CoordinatorTel: +250 788597861Email: [email protected]

Placide Nshuti KanyabujinjaConsultant FAO, RwandaEmail: [email protected]

Teopista MutesiCommunicationTel: +250 788719024 Email: [email protected]

Emmanuel ByiringiroIT Consultant FAO, RwandaTel: +250 785373008Email: [email protected]

Denis RugegeConsultant, FAOTel: +250 788382838Email: [email protected]

Aimable NtukanyagweCountry Programme OfficerIFADTel: +250 788389898Email: [email protected]

oTher resources persons

Patricia NsiimeUganda potato value chain expertTel: +256 779874890Email: [email protected]

Salvatore NdabirorereBurundi integrated production expertTel: +257 70954960Email: [email protected]

Mbaye NdiayeExecutive Secretariat for the Enhanced integrated framework – WTOEmail: [email protected]

27ANNEX 3: SPEECH BY HON. GERARDINE MUKESHIMANA, MINISTER OF AGRICULTURE, RWANDA

annex 3: speech by hon. gerardine muKeshimana, minisTer of agriculTure, rwanda

Dear M. Maiga, Representative of FAO in Rwanda, Distinguished guests,

It is a pleasure and an honour for me to welcome you to Kigali for the Regional Workshop on agriculture in the 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development organized by FAO.

The 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development, to which all our countries have committed, has the potential to transform our world, and our lives. By focusing on people; our planet; prosperity; peace and partnership, it forces us to approach development in a new and transformational way.

For many years now Rwanda has made substantial efforts to transform its agriculture into a modern, productive and successful business. We have invested heavily in crop intensification, in mechanisation and in better control of our natural resources. We have opened our doors to investors in order to promote a business-oriented agriculture, and agriculture that makes the best use of our limited resources, in particular our land.

But this is not enough. We are increasingly aware of the complexity of the many roles that agriculture must play. We expect a vibrant sector that contributes to the country’s economy, but we also expect a sector that helps improve food security and nutrition in Rwanda, that provides decent employment opportunities for its people; a sector that manages the resources in a sustainable way without compromising them for future generations.

This is a tremendous challenge for agriculture in Rwanda, and it is one we cannot address alone. Increasingly we understand the need to take a more comprehensive approach, to build bridges with other parts of the economy, with the health sector, with natural resources and with others in order to more effectively deliver our services.

This is the reason why I would like to thank the FAO for having organised this workshop in Kigali. Your selection of four areas of focus – sustainable intensification; value chain; poverty reduction and nutrition – are perfectly aligned with the priorities that govern the actions of the Ministry of Agriculture in Rwanda. The SDGs will help us look at development issues in a more coordinated way and overcome the complexity of having to address so many objectives. I am sure many countries in Africa share the same concerns.


Dear participants,

I understand that tomorrow you will have a field visit to our Rulindo District, not too far from Kigali. I believe that this is a great opportunity for us and for you: you will be able to have a flavour of the beautiful landscape of Rwanda, and you will see some of the initiatives we are promoting in agriculture. I hope that you will draw inspiration from these, and that you will also use your own experiences to draw new ideas that can help make our agriculture more productive and more sustainable.

I look forward to the results of this important workshop, I wish you a fruitful discussion, and, for those of you who have come from far away, I hope that you will enjoy your stay in Rwanda and appreciate the hospitality of the Rwandan people.

Thank you.

29ANNEX 4: SPEECH BY ATTAHER MAIGA, FAO REPRESENTATIVE IN RWANDA

annex 4: speech by aTTaher maiga, fao represenTaTive in rwanda

Honorable Minister of Agriculture and Animal Resources, Dr. Gerardine Mukeshimana;

Governor of the Northern Province;

Representative from the Ministry of Natural Resources;

Director General of REMA;

Representatives from all Rwandan Government Institutions present;

Delegates from visiting countries (Cameroun, Chad, Côte d’Ivoire, DR Congo, Kenya, Mali, Mozambique & Zambia);

Representatives of Development Partners present;

Representatives of the Civil Society, NGOs, Media;

Colleagues from Rwanda One UN present;

FAO Representatives from Mali, Zambia and DRC;

Colleagues from FAO HQ, RAF, SFE, SFC, FAO Representations from the 8 invited countries & from Rwanda;

Ladies and Gentlemen;

All Protocols Observed

Good morning to you all. Bonjour. Muramutse!

It is my honor and pleasure to welcome you to this Regional Workshop “Towards productive, sustainable and inclusive agriculture, forestry and fisheries in support to the 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development”.

Please allow me to begin by extending my sincere thanks to the Government of Rwanda for allowing us to host this regional event in this Beautiful and Clean city of Kigali. My cordial thanks to the Hon. Minister of Agriculture and Animal Resources, Dr. Gerardine Mukeshimana, for finding the time to be with us this morning despite her busy agenda and for her constant support to FAO’s work in Rwanda. Merci à vous toutes et tous pour votre présence.


Ladies and Gentlemen,

The objectives of this 3-day event will be explained in detail by my colleagues later on. I can however already tell you that we are gathering here to notably exchange ideas, information, knowledge and experiences on how best to collectively support the 2030 Sustainable Development Agenda, with a due consideration to the contribution of agriculture, livestock, forestry, fisheries and environment.

It is in this context that FAO put forward the common vision and approach for Sustainable Food and Agriculture (SFA). Sustainability of food and agriculture is about using what we need to live now, without jeopardizing the potential for people in the future to meet their needs. Farmers need to know that their soil will be able to produce crops as well (or better) in the future as it does now. Livestock producers must be assured that they will have access to sufficient clean water for their animals to drink, and enough feed for them to eat. Fish farmers need to be sure that the water they depend on for their livelihood will remain free of toxic chemicals that might run off of farmland. Communities depending on forest products also want the confidence that the forests will keep producing timber, fruits and other products of nature.

I therefore believe this common vision offers an opportune entry point for more coordinated and effective actions in agriculture, livestock, fisheries and forestry, in support of the 2030 Agenda, thus fostering integrated implementation of the Sustainable Development Goals. The Sustainable Food and Agriculture provides a framework for policy dialogue and the improved governance arrangements and programmes needed for more coherent and integrated development, involving inter-ministerial governmental bodies, private sector and civil society.

Ladies and Gentlemen,

With the world’s highest rates of population growth predicted to occur in areas that are dependent on the agriculture sector for food and nutrition security and livelihoods, the sustainability dimension cannot indeed be over emphasized. This should notably be tackled through sound policies, strategies and targeted interventions, articulated with effective linkages of agriculture to markets and food processing industries, at national and regional levels.

During a recent Africa Ministerial Conference session on Social and Environmental Sustainability in Italy, the FAO Director General remarked, I quote: There will be no sustainable development if agriculture and food security are not central to our policies and programmes. End of quote

It is with this consideration in mind that the sustainable agriculture intensification and value chains development is at the heart of FAO’s strategic framework and programmes.

31ANNEX 4: SPEECH BY ATTAHER MAIGA, FAO REPRESENTATIVE IN RWANDA

In Rwanda, FAO is partnering with Government in piloting the SFA approach in Rulindo District (Northern Province) where a field visit is planned for tomorrow. Though some of the interventions are at an earlier implementation stage I believe this should provide a welcome opportunity for reflection, discussion and experience sharing directly related to the theme and expectations of this regional workshop.

Before concluding my remarks, I wish to renew my sincere thanks to our member countries representatives from the invited countries present with a special thank to our host country, branded as “Remarkable Rwanda”.

To our dear friends Development Partners, let me reiterate that the sustainability agenda can only be achieved through multi-faceted partnership. FAO values your partnership and looks forward to its further impactful strengthening.

Finally, I wish to extend a big thank to my fellow FAO colleagues across the Organization for their hard work, dedication and effective support. I look forward to productive and constructive discussions during the next three days.

Thank you for your attention. Merci pour votre attention. Murakoze Cyane.


annex 5: The five principles of susTainable food and agriculTure (sfa)

The Sustainable Development Goals (SDG) offer a unique opportunity for countries to develop policies and practices that truly integrate short and long term development concerns, stressing the absolute necessity to balance the three dimensions of sustainability: economic, social and environmental. Goal 2 reflects this interconnectedness by focusing on food and nutrition security, and sustainable agriculture.

FAO has recently developed a Common vision and approach on sustainable food and agriculture (SFA). This vision, which aims at operationalising sustainability on the ground, now guides FAO’s efforts in assisting countries in their transition towards sustainable agriculture.

The vision sees agriculture, forestry, fisheries and aquaculture as an extraordinary engine of intensification which has been able to transform natural resources into a rich variety of products and services, and which has succeeded in feeding a fast growing world population. It recognizes, however, that the current trajectory of growth in agricultural production and productivity is unsustainable: most of our production models have major negative impacts on the Earth’s ecosystems, while at the same time not securing decent living conditions for many of those who rely on “natural capital” for their livelihoods. In many places, also, the ‘transformation engine’ is under-performing, with major productivity gaps that affect food security, livelihoods and the environment. It also stresses that today’s weak governance for tenure of natural resources results in their degradation, perpetuates inequalities, and exacerbates conflicts.

In FAO’s vision, sustainability issues are strongly anchored in today’s reality. Sustainability is much more than ensuring protection of the natural resource base. To be sustainable, agriculture must meet the needs of present and future generations for its products and services, while ensuring profitability, environmental health, and social and economic equity. The challenge for sustainable agriculture is to contribute to all four pillars of food security – availability, access, utilization and stability – in a manner that is environmentally, economically and socially responsible over time.

Central to FAO’s vision are five overarching principles: 1. Efficient use of resources; 2. Conservation and enhancement of natural resources; 3. Protection of rural livelihoods, improvement of equity and social well-being; Building resilience of people, communities and ecosystems; and 5. Effective governance. These principles balance the social, economic and environmental dimensions of sustainability and provide a basis for developing adapted policies, strategies, and associated packages of regulations and incentives.

33ANNEX 5: THE FIVE PRINCIPLES OF SUSTAINABLE FOOD AND AGRICULTURE (SFA)

A growing challenge to sustainability is to acknowledge and balance interactions, benefits and trade-offs that result from different configurations of agriculture. Trade-offs occur between the human and natural systems, within both, and over time, and need to be understood and negotiated. At the same time, we are not sufficiently exploiting the potential of cross-sectoral integration and associated synergies. A much more integrated approach to agriculture can help enhancing these synergies.

FAO’s vision for sustainable food and agriculture is therefore that of a process by which agriculture will progressively transition towards more sustainable models. It is a process based on dialogue between stakeholders and between disciplines, and in which solutions are negotiated on the basis of co-constructed evidence and share understanding of the issues at stake.

The five principles of sustainable food and agriculture

Improving efficiency in the use of resources is crucial to sustainable agriculture

1.

Sustainability requires direct action to conserve, protect enhance natural resources

2.

Agriculture that fails to protect and improve rural livelihoods, equity and social well-being is unsustainable

3.

Enhanced resilience of people, communities in ecosystems is key to a sustainable agriculture

4.

Sustainable food and agriculture requires responsible and effective governance mechanisms

5.


annex 6: Tools presenTed aT The marKeTplace

cross-secToral policy dialogue: The susTainable food and agriculTure approach (jean-marc faurès)As the population grows and countries develop, there is increased competition for natural resources (land, water, energy), across agriculture sectors and beyond, and they are progressively intertwined. For achieving the SDGs, a new approach is needed, one that integrates agriculture, forestry and fisheries, and that takes into account trade-offs and synergies across sectors and across sustainability dimensions. FAO has recently developed an approach to address sustainable development in agricultural sectors in a more effective and integrated way. This approach helps support necessary policy dialogues and governance arrangements and to identify sustainable development pathways across the SDGs, across the sectors and along related value chains. An example is provided with on-going efforts to better align natural resources and agriculture policies in Rwanda.

Link: http://www.fao.org/sustainability/en/

farmer field school approach for susTainable inTensificaTion (joyce mulila miTTi)Farmer Field School (FFS) is an extension approach developed by FAO for training farmers to incorporate sustainable natural resource management practices into their farming systems. FFS aims at enhancing farmers’ productivity, reducing costs, building resilience to stress and strengthening their capacity to manage risk. It is a forum for exchanging experiences and expertise, helping farmers to learn by doing, and providing them with the tools needed to analyse their practices and identify solutions to their problems. Main approaches of FFSs include recognizing the knowledge and valuable experiences of farmers, and field oriented and farmer centred programmes. All activities are based on learning-by-doing, participatory and hands-on work. The purpose is to help farmers learn how to organize themselves and their communities.

Link: http://www.fao.org/agriculture/ippm/programme/ffs-approach/en/

rural invesT (gunTher feiler)RuralInvest is a free multilingual methodology and toolkit to prepare investment projects (income and non-income generating) and business plans in a participatory, iterative and decentralized way for the use of communities, cooperatives, entrepreneurs and field technicians of ministries, projects and financial institutions, in support of rural investments and agribusinesses development in the rural sector. FAO supports national

35ANNEX 6: TOOLS PRESENTED AT THE MARKET PLACE

institutions through training and strengthening national capacities in the application of RuralInvest.

Link: http://www.fao.org/investment/ruralinvest/en/

enhanced inTegraTed frameworK for Trade (mbaye ndiaye)The EIF is a multi-donor programme, which supports LDCs to be more active players in the global trading system by helping them tackle supply-side constraints to trade. In this way, the programme works towards a wider goal of promoting economic growth and sustainable development and helping to lift more people out of poverty. The programme is currently helping 51 poorest countries worldwide, supported by a multi-donor trust fund, the EIF Trust Fund, with contributions from 23 donors.

Link: http://www.enhancedif.org/

building inclusive value chains (jamie morrison)The Global Food System diagram was used to explain how value chains, in connecting producers to consumers, operate within a broader set of policies, regulations and norms and that in diagnosing constraints to value chain development, a holistic approach needs to be taken. The FAO Sustainable Food Value Chains knowledge platform was introduced as a tool for accessing relevant handbooks and case studies (Library), finding out about relevant FAO and non-FAO events (News and events), accessing training materials (Training and Learning centre) and sharing experiences (Members’ area).

Link: http://www.fao.org/sustainable-food-value-chains/home/en/

nuTriTion sensiTive agriculTure (domiTille Kauffmann)The role of food systems features as a central focus of the Rome Declaration on Nutrition, and political commitment to make agriculture and food security policies and programmes “nutrition-sensitive” are growing. Government ministries are increasing their contribution to multi-sectoral nutrition strategies. On their side, development partners are making nutrition-sensitive agriculture a central feature of their support to agricultural investments. A prominent challenge for transforming this commitment in action, however, is the lack of capacity for designing, implementing, monitoring and evaluating policies and programmes, alongside with the lack of guidelines and tools to assist professionals and policy makers to effectively integrate nutrition in their work. This toolkit and e-learning module address these needs through providing an integrated package of guidance materials, which include key recommendations for improving nutrition through agriculture and food systems, a checklist for programme formulation, a compendium of nutrition-sensitive food and agriculture interventions, and a list of related indicators.

Link: http://www.fao.org/nutrition/policies-programmes/en/


Tools To supporTing family farmers To reduce rural poverTy (maya TaKagi)Despite recent progress, still today 1 billion people are poor and around 800 million are hungry. Extreme poverty is concentrated in rural areas, and the rural poor largely rely on agriculture. In sub-Saharan Africa 66% of the income of poor small family farmers comes from agriculture. FAO works through a multi-dimensional approach to address the challenges that poor family farmers face in their daily lives and increase their income generating capacity with a view to reducing rural poverty. It does so through addressing issues and developing tools related to supporting family farmers to reduce rural poverty, working with youth and agriculture, and by combatting poverty and hunger by bringing together agriculture and social protection.

sharp: self-evaluaTion of climaTe resilience aT farm level (amy heyman)The Self-evaluation and Holistic Assessment of climate Resilience of farmers and Pastoralists (SHARP) tool is designed as an instrument to assess the resilience of farmer and pastoralist households to climate change. Following a survey-based evaluation of households’ climate resilience (Phase 1), gaps and weaknesses in the response of farmers and institutions to climate variability are analyzed (Phase 2). Finally, information gathered through the first two phases is integrated with broader-level climatic data, with the aim of assisting farmers in prioritising actions to build the resilience of their agro-ecosystems – as well as orienting institutions towards the best possible policy approaches in order to strengthen climate resilience (Phase 3).

Link: http://www.fao.org/in-action/sharp/en/

incenTives for ecosysTem services (domiTille vallée)Incentives for Ecosystem Service (IES) are packages of public and private measures that create an umbrella of programmes to support farmers in the adoption of sustainable agricultural practices that will benefit the environment and protect long-term food security. Competing land uses cause reduction of ecosystem services and food security. This has costs to farmers and other sectors of society. Improved sustainable agricultural and conservation practices are required to restore ecosystem services, improve productivity and diversify livelihoods. Without incentives, however, farmers are limited in their ability to invest the time and capital to overcome technical, cultural or financial adoption barriers to implement these best practices. IES creates an enabling environment for the improved coordination of existing public and private co-financing of a spectrum of incentives to support farmers in overcoming these adoption barriers. Public policies to improve farm productivity can be combined with those that reward conservation practices. Both can see its results maximized by partnering with green business strategies such as ecological value-added markets. This brings benefits to farmers and other sectors of society.

Link: http://www.fao.org/in-action/incentives-for-ecosystem-services/en/

37ANNEX 7: THE RULINDO DISTRICT: DEVELOPING SCENARIOS AND ADDRESSING TRADE-OFFS

annex 7: The rulindo disTricT: developing scenarios and addressing Trade-offs

This Annex summarizes participant’s assessment of the situation in the Rulindo District following the Field Visit on 20 September. It is organized in terms of assessment of strengths and constraints and elements to be considered in the framework of a 5-year effort towards more sustainable agriculture in the District. It also reviews issues of conflicts and trade-offs that need to be addressed at the District level.

The rulindo disTricT and The yanZe caTchmenTRulindo is one of 30 districts of Rwanda located in the Northern Province. It is comprised of 17 sectors, 71 cells and 494 villages. Yanze catchment is located in the southern sectors of Ngoma and Mbogo in Rulindo district (about 30 Km from Kigali) with an approximate area of 9 700 hectares. The topography of the area is predominated by very steep hillsides whereby, during the rainy season, the runoff exacerbates land degradation due to soil erosion. Intense human activities, low crop productivity and inappropriate riverbank management lead to soil degradation and erosion.

Farming is the main occupation, including commercial production of vegetables. Some farmers produce flowers, while others generate their income from stevia. Other crops produced include banana, sweet potato and beans. According to a recent Rwanda household survey, livelihood typology in this catchment is characterized by relatively poor farmers.

FAO has previously supported the district through the Kagera Transboundary Agro-Ecosystem Management Project (Kagera TAMP). During the project, various sustainable land management (SLM) activities were implemented in the Karambo micro-catchment. After successful completion of the project, the Rulindo District sought support from FAO to upscale the best practices from the Kagera TAMP catchment, which were also in line with the SFA/FLR project implementation. The scope of the SLM best practices upscaled in the Yanze catchment was broadened and now includes agroforestry, soil and water conservation, integrated soil fertility management, crop-livestock integration, river bank protection, and participatory learning through farmer field schools. Rulindo has recently been identified as a FAO focus area, therefore additional interventions are being considered, including, irrigation, aquaculture, support to non-timber forest products and livestock management, and actions for better value chain development, enhanced nutrition and poverty reduction in the District.


rationale for fao interventions in yanze catchment/rulindo• To complement government efforts in protecting the Yanze river, which supplies

about 70 percent of the water to Kigali;

• Potential partnership with other stakeholders participating in protection of natural resources in this catchment area (FONERWA, STEVIA, REMA/LVEMP, NGOs etc.);

• Strong commitment of the Rulindo District leadership, whose Vice-Mayor in charge of economic affairs is a member of the Cross-Sectoral Task force for supporting sustainable agriculture and natural resources;

• Existing capacity for the catchment to supply vegetables and other food products to the Kigali city market and other potential outlets.

achievemenTs and consTrainTsParticipants identified the following strengths and constraints of the work in the Rulindo District.

strengths• Community understood challenges in the region and need for concerted efforts

• Leadership articulated community needs and the strategies required

• High potential for sustainable integration and inclusive nutrition – good entry points

• Existence of mushroom projects

• The construction of the vegetable collection center;

• Use of land, including terracing to prevent soil erosion

• Stevia plant project it has created job and empowerment of the local communities

• Inclusion of women

• Strong urban rural linkage watershed basin

• Diversification of income and livelihoods

• Strong political will and enthusiasm

• Strong government coordination of interventions

• Strong community buy-in and ownership

• Farmers group dynamics and organization

• Importance of partnerships

• Choice of very targeted tree species, to meet the specific problems (soil conservation, fruit production and good agricultural practices)

• Adaptability of crops to market needs, while improving productivity (school fields)

• Willingness to improve the chain of values by setting up production collection infrastructure


• Diversified integrated system (agriculture, livestock, etc.)

• Integration of a cash crop (stevia, job creation, etc.)

• Irrigation system

• Presence of farmer field schools

Key constraints• Inadequate beneficiary capacity (technical)

• Projects still seem top-down driven and community were basically recipients

• Livelihood options available to be integrated in the projects were not clear to the beneficiaries

• Investment in the housing/structures are not resilient and might drain gains to reconstruct

• Land under stevia looked under-utilised

• Mushroom project lack packing and storage materials

• The milk conservation is a problem

• Extension education services rendered to the community

• Lack of project framework

• Lack of market information towards mushroom harvests

• Market research in terms of quality, type of product, etc. (to understand the necessity of the Rwandan people)

• Lack coordination between ministries

• Provision of highly skilled person to assist in the project

• Low level of education

• Low capacity in farmer field schools and innovation

• Tradeoff between stevia and crops contributing to food security

• Stevia requires arbitration on land tenure in the district to preserve the diversity of farming systems

• Improving access to water for irrigation

• Lack of information on the collection of nutrition data, market demand, access and prices

• Management of water, in particular access during the dry season.

• No breeding activity is developed (poultry that can be used to fertilize vegetables)

• Difficulty to develop nurseries for agroforestry

• Lack of expertise and management tools within the group

• Lack of financial skills to determine charges, costs of production for maximizing gains


elemenTs of 5-year planParticipants proposed to focus attention in the forthcoming years on the following interventions:

coordination among sectors

• Strong community involvement in planning and decision making is critical

• Joint planning to build synergies and avoid duplication

• Each value chain/community project should be accompanied by appropriate technical support

• Borrow the FFS model

• Improve the irrigation system

• Up scaling of the mushroom and vegetables production

• Market survey for the products

• Importance of partnerships

• Capacity building terms of training

• Diversification of dairy products

• Provision of better structures for mushroom grow outs

• Coordination and involvement of key actors, including locals, district leadership, and buyers

• Integration of nutrition

• Strengthen the integration with the sectors of health and education for nutrition issues

• Expand partnerships to improve management and access to water

• Develop areas of the value chain, including marketing and retaining customers (contracts and price);

• Diversifying production by integrating the chain of aquaculture values, small ruminants and poultry.

• Develop umbrella organizations for each value chain

invest and finance• Improve access to markets

• Set-up revolving funds and other financial services.

• Establish a fee system to constitute the working capital

• Promote the creation of agricultural microfinance

• Facilitate access to credit (ODS)

• Strengthening the capacity of cooperatives


Technologies and innovation• A hybrid model of entrepreneur and local knowledge innovations should be

encouraged and promoted

• Communities should be engaged in technology trials and experimentation

• Dry the mushrooms and intensify production

• Drip irrigation systems should be applied

• FAO to facilitate exchange visits for technology transfer and knowledge sharing including South-South cooperation

• Postharvest management: Processing, conservation, etc.

• Develop the processing units, storage infrastructure and storage of agricultural products

• Develop information systems

• Optimize control of water in the dry season

• Expand growth of Moringa

• Explore conservation techniques and processing of fruit, flowers and vegetables

• Intensify agroforestry on the terraces borders (nutritional use plants, household etc.)

• Development of low funds with appropriate irrigation

• Develop seed farms for market gardening

• Exploit fish potentiality, including aquaculture

institutional capacity, capacity development and empowerment• Establish adequate capacity in numbers, technology, expertise, pool of trainers,

community workers and value chain players at the beginning of projects

• Encourage private sector participation to support the value chain commercialization and business incubation

• Develop adequate training

• Support in designing an viable investment model in different value chains

• Improve the identification of vulnerable persons and nutritional problems, and integrate them into agricultural and income-generating activities

• Strengthen agricultural extension

• Strengthen nutrition education and link it more closely to farmer field schools

• Develop the capacity of cooperatives (organizational, administrative and financial management, use of technology, etc.)

• Strengthen coordination skills at the district level

• Strengthen the capacity of communities (leaders ...)


monitoring and evaluation• Invest in record keeping

• Identify key indicators that can reflect growth and improvement of community livelihoods

• Involve community in planning, initiation, implementation, M&E of the projects

• Develop performance framework for the district

• Establish data collection system including information on livelihoods; household incomes and food practices

• Strengthening District capacities in monitoring and evaluation

• Establish an annual monitoring-evaluation platform

• Make M&E tools available to farmers

conflicts• It might take a long time for members of groups to start feeling direct benefits

• Sharing of proceeds amongst community members

• Political

• Competition of cash crop (stevia) and crops for food security

• Conflict between agricultural intensification and environmental conservation

• Access to water and land

Trade-offs• The village leadership if properly engaged and made aware can handle any arising

conflicts

• Community should sign contracts with entrepreneurs to avoid swindling or bleach of agreements

• Have project committees with inclusive representation

• Advocacy to the government for balance between food security and cash crop

• Further development of agroforestry

• Joint management of water resources

• Look for land in in other Districts for projects such as stelvia

43ANNEX 8: DETAILED COUNTRY PLANS

an

nex

8: d

eTa

iled

co

un

Try

pla

ns

CA

MER

OO

N

elém

ent

co

ord

ina

tio

np

art

ena

ria

tsu

ivi e

t év

alu

ati

on

/ o

dd

sr

enfo

rcem

ent

des

ca

pa

cité

sa

pp

ui à

l’

inve

stis

sem

ent

Inte

nsif

icat

ion

dura

ble

Plai

doye

rs e

n vu

e d’

une

mei

lleur

e co

ordi

natio

n de

s pr

ojet

s et

pro

gram

mes

Mis

e en

pla

ce d

’une

pla

te-fo

rme

de

conc

erta

tion

pour

la m

ise

en c

ohér

ence

de

l’ac

tion

gouv

erne

men

tale

sur

les

OD

Ds

/ ca

s de

s 21

indi

cate

urs

colle

ctés

pa

r la

FAO

.

Acc

ompa

gner

le g

ouve

rnem

ent p

our s

’insp

irer d

es b

onne

s pr

atiq

ues

vena

nt d

’aut

res

pays

(sys

tèm

e de

pro

duct

ion

d’al

imen

ts fl

otta

nt p

our p

oiss

on, c

as d

u Be

nin)

Prom

otio

n de

l'aq

uacu

lture

Prom

otio

n de

la p

êche

mar

itim

e et

con

tinen

tale

resp

onsa

ble

App

ui a

u dé

velo

ppem

ent

des

outil

s/et

ou

mis

e en

coh

éren

ce d

e ce

ux

exis

tant

s en

vue

de

colle

cter

l’in

form

atio

n po

ur re

nsei

gner

les

indi

cate

urs

des

OD

Ds

Ass

ista

nce

à la

col

lect

e de

s do

nnée

s

Renf

orce

men

t de

cap

acité

s de

s vu

lgar

isat

eurs

da

ns la

pra

tique

de

l’agr

icul

ture

dur

able

Fina

ncem

ent d

es é

tude

s

App

ui à

la re

cher

che

des

finan

cem

ents

pou

r la

mis

e en

œ

uvre

des

pro

jets

Prog

ram

me

d’am

élio

ratio

n de

la p

rodu

ctio

n ag

ricol

e à

trav

ers

les

TIC

Cha

îne

des

vale

urs

Am

élio

ratio

n du

cad

re d

e tr

avai

l pou

r l’a

mél

iora

tion

de la

pro

tect

ion

soci

ale

Proj

et d

e m

oder

nisa

tion

des

infr

astr

uctu

res

de p

rodu

ctio

n du

m

onde

rura

l et a

mél

iora

tion

de l’

accè

s au

fina

ncem

ent

Prom

otio

n de

pet

ites

et m

oyen

nes

unité

s de

tran

sfor

mat

ion,

de

cons

erva

tion,

de

stoc

kage

agr

o-al

imen

taire

s.

Proj

et d

e D

ével

oppe

men

t des

nor

mes

et c

ertif

icat

ion

des

mat

érie

ls, p

rodu

its e

t int

rant

s ag

ricol

es

Réd

uctio

n de

la

pauv

reté

Am

élio

ratio

n de

la c

ouve

rtur

e sa

nita

ire d

es c

hept

els

Am

élio

ratio

n de

la p

rodu

ctiv

ité e

t de

la c

ompé

titiv

ité d

es

filiè

res

anim

ales

Prom

otio

n de

l’ag

ricul

ture

inté

grée

Agr

icul

ture

se

nsib

le à

la

nutr

ition

Div

ersi

ficat

ion

des

prod

uctio

ns v

égét

ales

et a

nim

ales

(soj

a,

cavi

acul

ture

, avi

cultu

re, e

tc.)

Proj

et d

e re

nfor

cem

ent d

u sy

stèm

e d’

info

rmat

ion

et d

’ale

rte

préc

oce

sur l

a sé

curit

é al

imen

taire

Prom

otio

n de

l’éd

ucat

ion

nutr

ition

nelle

Envi

ronn

emen

tPr

ojet

de

régé

néra

tion

des

man

grov

es


cô

Te d

’iv

oir

e

elém

ent

co

ord

ina

tio

n cr

oss

-se

cteu

rsp

art

ena

ria

tsu

ivi e

t év

alu

ati

on/

o

dd

sr

enfo

rcem

ent

des

ca

pa

cité

sa

pp

ui à

l’in

vest

isse

men

t

Inte

nsif

icat

ion

dura

ble

App

ui à

la fo

rmul

atio

n du

PN

IA2

Renf

orce

men

t des

pa

rten

aria

ts S

/S d

ans

la

pêch

e co

ntin

enta

le

App

ui à

la re

stru

ctur

atio

n de

s or

gani

smes

d’

enca

drem

ent

Form

er le

s pr

oduc

teur

s au

x BP

A/F

FS

Form

er le

s ag

ents

, enc

adre

men

ts e

t Rec

herc

hes

aux

BPA

Eten

dre

le p

roje

t pilo

te d

’am

énag

emen

t du

rabl

e de

s ba

s-fo

nds

à d’

autr

es R

égio

ns

App

ui à

la m

ise

en p

lace

/ré

hab

de s

tatio

n d’

alev

inag

e +

alim

ents

App

ui à

la p

etite

méc

anis

atio

n

Cha

îne

des

vale

urs

App

ui à

la c

oord

inat

ion

des

diffé

rent

s pr

ojet

s su

r les

fil

ière

s vi

vriè

res

Mob

ilisa

tion

fond

s po

ur

élar

giss

emen

t pro

jet e

mpl

oi/

jeun

es e

t fili

ères

man

ioc,

aq

uacu

lture

et S

ND

R

Mis

e en

pla

ce d

’un

syst

ème

de s

uivi

éva

luat

ion

de la

SN

DR

Form

atio

n ac

teur

s fil

ière

s riz

(tra

nsfo

rmat

ion)

da

ns la

SN

DR

Form

atio

n de

s pr

oduc

teur

s au

x te

chni

ques

de

cons

erva

tion

post

-réc

olte

s

Form

er le

s tr

ansf

orm

ateu

rs e

t les

ven

deur

s d’

alim

ents

au

SSA

Renf

orce

r les

cap

acité

s de

s ac

teur

s de

sui

vi d

e m

arch

é

Elar

giss

emen

t pro

jet F

TT/P

ost C

aptu

re

App

ui à

la m

obili

satio

n de

fond

s po

ur la

co

nstr

uctio

n et

la ré

habi

litat

ion

des

mar

chés

de

gro

s

Stat

ion

d’al

evin

age

et a

limen

ts

Réd

uctio

n de

la

pauv

reté

App

ui à

la fo

rmul

atio

n du

PN

IA2

App

ui a

u re

nfor

cem

ent d

u sy

stèm

e d’

aler

te p

réco

ce à

tr

aver

s le

DIS

SA

Form

atio

n de

s m

énag

es v

ulné

rabl

es à

la g

estio

n de

s st

ocks

et d

u bu

dget

fam

ilial

Dév

elop

pem

ent d

’AG

R po

ur e

mpl

oi je

unes

et

fem

mes

ave

c re

venu

s dé

cent

s

Proj

et p

ilote

“ca

isse

de

rési

lienc

e”

Agr

icul

ture

se

nsib

le à

la

nutr

ition

Prom

ouvo

ir l’a

gric

ultu

re

sens

ible

à la

nut

ritio

n au

se

in d

u C

omité

Nat

iona

l de

Nut

ritio

n

Initi

er p

arte

naria

t ave

c la

BA

D/B

MEn

quêt

e nu

triti

on

avec

PA

M/U

NIC

EF e

t G

ouve

rnem

ent

Sens

ibili

satio

n, é

duca

tion

nutr

ition

nelle

Form

atio

n au

x bo

nnes

pra

tique

s ag

ricol

es

(mar

aîch

age)

Form

atio

n de

s ve

ndeu

rs d

e pr

odui

ts

alim

enta

ires

en S

SA

Mis

e en

œuv

re d

u pr

ogra

mm

e co

njoi

nt

PAM

/UN

ICEF

/FA

O d

ans

le c

adre

PN

MN

(Div

ersi

ficat

ion,

sen

sibi

lisat

ion

nutr

ition

nelle

)

Initi

er u

n pr

ojet

de

dive

rsifi

catio

n de

s pr

odui

ts v

ivrie

rs à

hau

t pot

entie

l nu

triti

onne

l


Ken

ya

elem

ent

cro

ss s

ecto

ral c

oo

rdin

ati

on

pa

rtne

rshi

pm

&e

rela

ted

to

sd

gs

ca

pa

city

dev

elo

pm

ent

sup

po

rt t

o in

vest

men

t

Sust

aina

ble

inte

nsif

icat

ion

Supp

ort c

ross

sec

tor /

inte

r cou

nty

coor

dina

tion

Supp

ort r

egul

atio

ns fo

r sus

tain

abili

ty

of n

ew in

tens

ifica

tion

initi

ativ

es (e

.g.

cage

fish

farm

ing)

REC

s, Re

sear

ch C

entr

es, G

ovt.,

C

ivil

Soci

ety

Dat

a m

anag

emen

t and

st

atis

tics

Ag.

Cen

sus

Cap

acity

to c

ompl

y w

ith S

PS s

tand

ards

Cap

acity

to u

tiliz

e m

ultim

edia

for

exte

nsio

n

Supp

ort t

o th

e de

velo

pmen

t of s

ecto

r an

d pr

iorit

y co

mm

odity

inve

stm

ent

plan

s

Valu

e ch

ains

Scal

e up

bus

ines

s in

cuba

tion

cent

ers

thro

ugh

spec

ific

pilo

ts a

nd a

naly

ze

oppo

rtun

ities

for r

egio

nal t

rade

AU

/ IG

AD

/ p

rivat

e se

ctor

Nat

iona

l / C

ount

y go

vt.

NG

Os,

Priv

ate

sect

or

Esta

blis

h ba

selin

es

Mon

itor c

hang

e in

Nut

ritio

n an

d Po

vert

y

Shar

ing

glob

al b

est p

ract

ice

and

build

ing

capa

city

for v

alue

add

ition

Onl

ine

agrib

usin

ess

port

al

Impr

ove

post

-har

vest

han

dlin

g an

d pr

oces

sing

Build

ing

capa

city

to a

cces

s fin

ance

and

lu

crat

ive

mar

kets

(eg.

Rur

al In

vest

)

Cro

p an

d liv

esto

ck in

sura

nce

Pove

rty

redu

ctio

nSu

ppor

t bia

nnua

l foo

d se

curit

y as

sess

men

ts a

nd e

arly

war

ning

sys

tem

sN

DM

A, W

FP, U

NIC

EF,

MoA

LF, C

ount

y G

ovts

, CSO

s.

Pilo

t par

tner

ship

with

fert

ilize

r fr

om h

uman

was

te

Esta

blis

h ba

selin

es

Mon

itor c

hang

e in

Pov

erty

us

ing

tear

1 in

dica

tors

Yout

h en

gage

men

t in

ag. V

alue

cha

ins

Cap

acity

for d

isse

min

atio

n of

ear

ly

war

ning

info

rmat

ion

Early

Act

ion

finan

cing

Nut

ritio

n se

nsiti

ve

agri

cultu

re

Supp

ort r

ollo

ut o

f the

Foo

d an

d N

utrit

ion

Secu

rity

Impl

emen

tatio

n Pl

an

Scal

e up

pilo

ts in

div

ersi

fied

prod

uctio

n of

hig

hly

nutr

itive

pro

duce

(in

Urb

an s

ettin

gs)

MoA

LF, M

oH, C

ount

y G

ovts

. U

NIC

EFM

onito

r cha

nge

in N

utrit

ion

usin

g te

ar 1

indi

cato

rsA

dvoc

ate

for t

he in

corp

orat

ion

of th

e 10

N

utrit

ion

prin

cipl

es to

pro

gram

min

g

Impr

ove

capa

city

for f

ood

safe

ty (e

sp. i

n ur

ban

setti

ngs)

Adv

ocat

ing

for s

uppo

rt to

urb

an

farm

ing


ma

li

elém

ent

co

ord

ina

tio

n cr

oss

-sec

teu

rsp

art

ena

ria

tsu

ivi/

eva

lua

tio

n re

lati

ve

au

x o

dd

ren

forc

emen

t d

es c

ap

aci

tés

sup

po

rt à

inve

stis

sem

ent

Inte

nsif

icat

ion

dura

ble

App

ui à

la m

ise

en p

lace

et a

u fo

nctio

nnem

ent d

’une

Cel

lule

ra

ttach

ée a

u M

A c

harg

ée d

u su

ivi

des

Prog

ram

mes

et P

roje

ts a

gric

oles

.

Diff

usio

n de

s in

dica

teur

s de

s O

DD

aux

diff

éren

ts a

cteu

rs

conc

erné

s et

inté

grat

ion

aux

plan

s se

ctor

iels

d’é

valu

atio

n.

Cha

îne

des

vale

urs

Etab

lir u

n pa

rten

aria

t Com

ité

Nat

iona

l de

pilo

tage

du

cadr

e st

raté

giqu

e

Idem

App

ui à

la s

truc

tura

tion

des

filiè

res

port

euse

s (v

iand

e, la

it, s

emen

ces,…

)A

ppui

à la

str

uctu

ratio

n de

s fil

ière

s po

rteu

ses

(via

nde,

lait,

se

men

ce, …

)

Réd

uctio

n de

la

pauv

reté

App

ui à

la m

ise

plac

e d’

un s

ystè

me

de fi

nanc

emen

t adé

quat

Plai

doye

r pou

r le

méc

anis

me

de

finan

cem

ent d

es in

itiat

ives

de

rédu

ctio

n de

la p

auvr

eté

Idem

Agr

icul

ture

se

nsib

le à

la

nutr

ition

App

ui à

la m

ise

en p

lace

et a

u fo

nctio

nnem

ent d

’une

Cel

lule

ra

ttach

ée a

u M

.S c

harg

ée d

es

ques

tions

nut

ritio

nnel

les.

Idem

App

ui a

u re

nfor

cem

ent d

es c

apac

ités

pour

la p

rise

en c

harg

e de

s qu

estio

ns

nutr

ition

nelle

s da

ns l’

agric

ultu

re,

l’éle

vage

et l

a pê

che.


mo

Za

mb

iQu

e

elem

ent

cro

ss s

ecto

ral c

oo

rdin

ati

on

pa

rtne

rshi

pm

&e

rela

ted

to

sd

gs

ca

pa

city

dev

elo

pm

ent

sup

po

rt t

o in

vest

men

t

Sust

aina

ble

inte

nsif

icat

ion

Supp

ort t

o cr

oss

sect

or c

oord

inat

ion

– st

reng

then

exi

stin

g m

echa

nism

s

Supp

ort t

o se

a po

licy

and

its

impl

emen

tatio

n st

rate

gy

Revi

ew o

f sea

law

For

estr

y Fo

rum

Supp

ort m

appi

ng a

nd

mon

itorin

g of

rele

vant

SD

Gs

Incl

usiv

e an

d in

tegr

ated

pla

n at

3 le

vel:

dist

rict,

prov

ince

and

cen

tral

FFS

eval

uatio

n

Supp

ort o

f int

rodu

ctio

n to

FFS

for a

quac

ultu

re

Impl

emen

tatio

n of

Agr

aria

n St

atis

tics

Mas

ter P

lan

Valu

e ch

ains

Com

mer

cial

Pol

icy

and

Stra

tegy

Stre

ngth

en s

eed

plat

form

Dev

elop

men

t of “

Polít

ica

e Es

trat

égia

Com

erci

al’

Agr

icul

ture

law

Aqu

acul

ture

regu

latio

n

Supp

ort t

o de

sign

a s

trat

egy

for a

nim

al

feed

ing

Supp

ort t

o po

st-h

arve

st a

nd s

mal

l pr

oces

sing

alo

ng h

ortic

ultu

re v

alue

ch

ain

with

incl

usio

n of

you

th

Pove

rty

redu

ctio

nSu

ppor

t to

deve

lop

NA

MA

Trad

e ag

reem

ents

/neg

otia

tions

Prom

otin

g of

you

ng fa

rmer

s (in

cuba

tion)

Nut

ritio

n se

nsiti

ve

agri

cultu

re

Supp

ort t

o re

view

and

fina

lize

“Pla

no

de A

cção

par

a o

Des

envo

lvim

ento

da

Aqu

acul

tura

Link

ages

bet

wee

n ag

ricul

ture

and

fish

erie

s nu

triti

on


rd

c

elem

ent

co

ord

ina

tio

n cr

oss

-se

cteu

rsp

art

ena

ria

tm

&e

po

ur

les

om

dr

enfo

rcem

ent

des

ca

pa

cité

ssu

pp

ort

à in

vest

isse

men

t

Inte

nsif

icat

ion

dura

ble

redy

nam

iser

la c

oord

inat

ion

inte

rsec

torie

lle (a

gri,

envi

r,dvp

t ru

ral,T

P, in

fras

truc

ture

s.

PPP

PTF

OP

Mis

e à

jour

du

PPP

Com

ité d

e su

ivi

App

ui in

stitu

tionn

el s

ur P

PP

Renf

orce

r des

cap

acité

s su

r les

out

ils

d’in

vest

isse

men

ts

Renf

orce

r les

cap

acité

s de

coo

rdin

atio

n te

chni

ques

et d

’inte

nsifi

catio

n du

rabl

es

Mob

ilisa

tion

des

Ress

ourc

es

Plai

doye

r en

fave

ur d

e PN

IA

Cha

îne

des

vale

urs

Impl

icat

ion

sect

eur p

rivé

et

coor

dina

tion

avec

les

Min

istè

res

de C

omm

erce

et f

inan

ces

PPP

PTF

OP

Con

som

mat

eurs

Mis

e en

pla

ce d

es m

écan

ism

es d

e Su

ivi e

t éva

luat

ion

Cap

acité

s te

chni

ques

Cap

acité

s or

gani

satio

nnel

les

des

OP

Idem

Réd

uctio

n de

la p

auvr

eté

Eten

dre

la p

rote

ctio

n so

cial

au

nive

au n

atio

nal

PTF

OP

Gen

re

Idem

Stru

ctur

er le

s O

P

Renf

orce

r les

cap

acité

s du

Gou

vern

emen

t en

pro

tect

ion

soci

ale

Idem

Agr

icul

ture

sen

sibl

e à

la

nutr

ition

Sout

enir

le S

ISA

N (S

ystè

me

Inté

gré

Sécu

rité

alim

enta

ire e

t nu

triti

onne

lle)

PTF

OP

PPP

Gen

re

Idem

Educ

atio

n nu

triti

onne

lle

Idem


rw

an

da

elem

ent

cro

ss s

ecto

ral

coo

rdin

ati

on

pa

rtne

rshi

pm

&e

rela

ted

to

sd

gs

ca

pa

city

dev

elo

pm

ent

sup

po

rt t

o in

vest

men

t

Sust

aina

ble

inte

nsif

icat

ion

Cap

acita

te th

e FA

O-R

wan

da o

ffice

to

con

tinue

act

ing

as s

ecre

taria

t in

cros

s-se

ctor

al c

oord

inat

ion

Refin

ing

ToR

of e

xist

ing

cros

s-se

ctor

al w

orki

ng g

roup

Dev

elop

co-

finan

cing

m

echa

nism

s an

d jo

int

prog

ram

min

g fo

r res

ourc

e m

obili

zatio

n (G

EF, G

reen

C

limat

e Fu

nd)

Cap

acita

te w

orki

ng g

roup

s on

cu

stom

izin

g SD

G in

dica

tors

(dat

a co

llect

ion

and

repo

rtin

g)

Supp

ort k

now

ledg

e sh

arin

g an

d kn

owle

dge

build

ing

(Age

nda

2030

of c

ross

-se

ctor

al g

roup

Envi

ronm

enta

l sus

tain

abili

ty a

nd

man

agem

ent

Dev

elop

a c

ompr

ehen

sive

pro

gram

on

gree

n an

d cl

imat

e re

silie

nt a

gric

ultu

re

(incl

udin

g gr

een

land

and

wat

er

husb

andr

y, s

mal

l sca

le ir

rigat

ion,

m

ains

trea

min

g ag

roec

olog

y

Valu

e ch

ains

Mod

el p

rogr

am

deve

lopm

ent i

n pa

rtne

rshi

p w

ith m

inis

try

repr

esen

tativ

es

Iden

tific

atio

n of

min

istr

ies

resp

onsi

ble

for S

DG

dat

a co

llect

ion

and

repa

ratio

n

Supp

ort t

he lo

cal,

hybr

id s

eed

prod

uctio

n an

d se

ed v

alue

cha

in d

evel

opm

ent

Supp

ort f

ood

safe

ty m

anag

emen

t sys

tem

an

d ce

rtifi

catio

n

Supp

ort t

he c

entr

aliz

ed v

illag

e ba

sed

proc

essi

ng c

ente

rs in

rice

, mai

ze,

vege

tabl

es, f

ruit

tree

s, ca

ssav

a, h

oney

, an

d m

ushr

oom

s; su

ppor

t to

agrib

usin

ess

deve

lopm

ent a

cros

s al

l val

ue c

hain

s

Supp

ort t

o in

crea

se s

eed

and

feed

pr

oduc

tion

in a

quac

ultu

re a

nd p

oultr

y

Pove

rty

redu

ctio

nSt

reng

then

mul

ti-le

vel c

oord

inat

ion

of fi

nanc

ial s

ervi

ces

and

finan

cial

in

stitu

tions

Part

ners

hip

with

Cen

ter

for E

xcel

lenc

e fo

r SD

G

mon

itorin

g in

Afr

ica

Map

ping

of m

inis

try

indi

cato

rs

with

SD

G in

dica

tors

Supp

ort k

now

ledg

e sh

arin

g an

d kn

owle

dge

build

ing

(on

Age

nda

2030

) of

cros

s se

ctor

al g

roup

Agr

icul

ture

Sec

tor I

nves

tmen

t Pla

n

Nut

ritio

n se

nsiti

ve

agri

cultu

re

Supp

ort i

n op

erat

iona

lizin

g th

e N

atio

nal N

utrit

ion

Secr

etar

iat

(ens

urin

g co

ordi

natio

n m

anda

te)

Invo

lvin

g N

atio

nal W

omen

’s Co

unci

l in

nutr

ition

effo

rts

Dev

elop

ing

link

with

M

INED

UC

for s

choo

l ga

rden

s, fe

edin

gs, n

utrit

ion

educ

atio

n

Cap

acita

te w

orki

ng g

roup

s on

cu

stom

izin

g SD

G in

dica

tors

(dat

a co

llect

ion

and

repo

rtin

g)

Adv

ocat

e fo

r nut

ritio

n ed

ucat

ion

to b

e m

ains

trea

med

in p

rogr

amm

ing

Cap

acity

bui

ldin

g of

sec

reta

riat i

n up

date

d m

appi

ng o

f exi

stin

g nu

triti

on a

ctiv

ities

an

d ga

ps

Ass

ist i

n cr

eatin

g m

odel

pro

gram

me

of

kitc

hen

gard

en im

plem

enta

tion

Ups

calin

g ex

istin

g jo

int p

rogr

amm

ing

on n

utrit

ion,

inco

rpor

atio

n va

lue

chai

n de

velo

pmen

t


Tch

ad

elem

ent

co

ord

ina

tio

n cr

oss

-se

cteu

rsp

art

ena

ria

tm

&e

po

ur

les

om

dr

enfo

rcem

ent

des

ca

pa

cité

ssu

pp

ort

à

inve

stis

sem

ent

Inte

nsif

icat

ion

dura

ble

Voya

ges

d’éc

hang

e d’

expé

rienc

es

dans

pay

s af

ricai

nO

rgan

isat

ion

des

atel

iers

d’

info

rmat

ion

et d

e se

nsib

ilisa

tion

des

part

ies

pren

ante

s au

x ni

veau

x ré

gion

al, n

atio

nal

App

ui à

la m

ise

en œ

uvre

d’u

n m

écan

ism

e fo

nctio

nnel

en

colla

bora

tion

avec

le M

inis

tère

du

Pla

n av

ec d

es in

dica

teur

s co

mpa

tible

s

Ass

ista

nce

tech

niqu

e Fo

rmat

ion

des

Equi

pes

en é

labo

ratio

n et

ges

tion

de p

roje

ts

du P

NIS

R

Cha

mps

éco

les

pays

ans

Cha

mps

éco

les

agro

-syl

vo-p

asto

raux

et

halie

utiq

ues

App

ui à

l’or

gani

satio

n du

Bu

sine

ss m

eetin

g du

PN

ISR

Cha

îne

des

vale

urs

Plai

doye

r pou

r la

pére

nnité

des

ac

tivité

s (P

TFs)

Id

emA

ssis

tanc

e te

chni

que

Form

atio

n de

s Eq

uipe

s en

éla

bora

tion

et g

estio

n de

pro

jets

pr

iorit

aire

s de

l’ED

IC II

et S

ND

C

Réd

uctio

n de

la p

auvr

eté

Idem

Ass

ista

nce

tech

niqu

e

App

ui à

l’él

abor

atio

n du

Pla

n d’

actio

n de

la

SN

PS

Agr

icul

ture

sen

sibl

e à

la

nutr

ition

App

ui te

chni

que

l’org

anis

atio

n de

ses

sion

de

coor

dina

tion

entr

e le

s m

inis

tère

s co

ncer

nés

(Dév

elop

pem

ent R

ural

, San

té,

éduc

atio

n et

Affa

ires

Soci

ales

) co

ordi

natio

n en

tre

le P

NIS

R et

au

tres

App

ui à

l’ut

ilisa

tion

du

cadr

e de

con

cert

atio

n pa

rten

aire

s ex

ista

nt (y

co

mpr

is le

s O

NG

)

Idem

A

ssis

tanc

e te

chni

que

à la

mis

e en

œuv

re d

u Pl

an d

’Act

ion

Inte

r sec

torie

l sur

la N

utrit

ion

et l’

Alim

enta

tion

App

ui te

chni

que

à la

m

obili

satio

n de

s re

ssou

rces

Envi

ronn

emen

t et

chan

gem

ents

clim

atiq

ues

Idem

Ass

ista

nce

tech

niqu

e à

la m

ise

en œ

uvre

du

Plan

d’A

ctio

n et

à l’

élab

orat

ion

des

proj

ets

prio

ritai

res

en a

quac

ultu

re 2

016-

2020

App

ui te

chni

que

à la

m

obili

satio

n de

s re

ssou

rces

fin

anci

ères


Za

mb

ia

elem

ent

cro

ss s

ecto

ral c

oo

rdin

ati

on

pa

rtne

rshi

pm

&e

rela

ted

to

sd

gs

ca

pa

city

dev

elo

pm

ent

sup

po

rt t

o in

vest

men

t

Sust

aina

ble

inte

nsif

icat

ion

Supp

ort f

ield

leve

l im

plem

enta

tion

of in

tegr

ated

pro

gram

mes

(cro

ps,

lives

tock

, fis

herie

s an

d fo

rest

)

Stre

ngth

en N

atio

nal S

PSs

Com

mitt

ees

Stre

ngth

en M

ultil

ater

al

Dev

elop

men

t ban

ks, p

rivat

e se

ctor

, Aca

dem

ia, C

ivil

Soci

ety

Org

aniz

atio

ns, E

xten

sion

and

re

sear

ch in

stitu

tion

Supp

ort C

ount

ry -w

ide

M&

E fr

amew

ork

bein

g de

velo

ped

by

the

Gov

ernm

ent

Adv

ocac

y fo

r Pol

icy

tow

ards

In

tegr

ated

str

ateg

ic p

rogr

amm

ing

Cap

acity

dev

elop

men

t on

FFS

App

roac

h

Iden

tify

and

enga

ges

entr

y po

ints

of

inve

stm

ents

Valu

e ch

ains

Stre

ngth

en N

atio

nal S

PSs

Com

mitt

eeSt

reng

then

Mul

tilat

eral

D

evel

opm

ent b

anks

, priv

ate

sect

or, A

cade

mia

, Civ

il So

ciet

y O

rgan

izat

ions

,

Exte

nsio

n an

d re

sear

ch in

stitu

tion

Adv

ocac

y fo

r Pol

icy

tow

ards

In

tegr

ated

str

ateg

ic p

rogr

amm

ing

Trai

ning

in a

pplic

atio

n of

rura

l in

vest

men

t too

l

Stre

ngth

enin

g pr

oduc

er

orga

niza

tions

in v

alue

cha

in

appr

oach

es

Trai

ning

val

ue c

hain

act

ors

in s

anita

ry a

nd p

hyto

sani

tary

m

easu

res

Iden

tify

and

enga

ges

entr

y po

ints

of

inve

stm

ents

Pove

rty

redu

ctio

nPo

licy

dial

ogue

on

dive

rsifi

ed

livel

ihoo

d op

tions

Stre

ngth

en M

ultil

ater

al

Dev

elop

men

t ban

ks, p

rivat

e se

ctor

, Aca

dem

ia, C

ivil

Soci

ety

Org

aniz

atio

ns, E

xten

sion

and

re

sear

ch in

stitu

tion

Adv

ocac

y fo

r Pol

icy

tow

ards

In

tegr

ated

str

ateg

ic p

rogr

amm

ing

Iden

tify

and

enga

ges

entr

y po

ints

of

inve

stm

ents

Nut

ritio

n se

nsiti

ve

agri

cultu

re

Stre

ngth

enin

g of

fora

on

nutr

ition

Stre

ngth

en M

ultil

ater

al

Dev

elop

men

t ban

ks, p

rivat

e se

ctor

, Aca

dem

ia, C

ivil

Soci

ety

Org

aniz

atio

ns, E

xten

sion

and

re

sear

ch in

stitu

tion

Adv

ocac

y fo

r Pol

icy

tow

ards

In

tegr

ated

str

ateg

ic p

rogr

amm

ing

Cre

ate

awar

enes

s on

nut

ritio

n se

nsiti

ve a

gric

ultu

re

Iden

tify

and

enga

ges

entr

y po

ints

of

inve

stm

ents


elem

ent

cro

ss s

ecto

ral c

oo

rdin

ati

on

pa

rtne

rshi

pm

&e

rela

ted

to

sd

gs

ca

pa

city

dev

elo

pm

ent

sup

po

rt t

o in

vest

men

t

Sust

aina

ble

inte

nsif

icat

ion

Zam

bia:

Sup

port

fiel

d le

vel

impl

emen

tatio

n of

inte

grat

ed

prog

ram

mes

Moz

ambi

que:

Pol

icy

supp

ort

to fi

sher

ies

sect

or, i

n pa

rtic

ular

fo

rmul

atio

n of

the

sea

law

, sea

pol

icy

and

its im

plem

enta

tion

stra

tegy

Cam

eroo

n: E

tude

de

mis

e en

pla

ce d

’un

méc

anis

me

inte

rsec

torie

l de

coor

dina

tion

de

la m

ise

en œ

uvre

des

OD

Ds

Mal

i : D

iffus

ion

des

indi

cate

urs

des

OD

Ds

aux

diffé

rent

s ac

teur

s et

inté

grat

ion

dans

les

plan

s se

ctor

iels

Ken

ya :

Supp

ort o

n da

ta

man

agem

ent/

stat

istic

s

Moz

ambi

que:

Sup

port

to

map

ping

and

mon

itorin

g of

re

leva

nt S

DG

s

Rw

anda

: Dev

elop

a c

ompr

ehen

sive

pro

gram

on

gree

n an

d cl

imat

e re

silie

nt a

gric

ultu

re (i

nclu

ding

gr

een

land

and

wat

er h

usba

ndry

, dev

elop

ing

smal

l sca

le ir

rigat

ion,

mai

nstr

eam

ing

agro

ecol

ogy,

an

d im

plem

entin

g er

osio

n m

itiga

tion

tech

niqu

es).

Tcha

d: M

ise

en œ

uvre

pla

n dé

velo

ppem

ent

agric

ultu

re

Côt

e d’

Ivoi

re :

Renf

orce

men

t des

cap

acité

s de

s ac

teur

s da

ns le

s pr

inci

pale

s fil

ière

s vi

vriè

res

et a

nim

ales

(pro

duct

ion,

tran

sfor

mat

ion,

co

nser

vatio

n)

Moz

ambi

que:

Intr

oduc

tion

of F

FS fo

r aqu

acul

ture

an

d FF

S ev

alua

tion

Ken

ya: S

uppo

rt to

sec

tor p

riorit

y co

mm

unity

inve

stm

ent p

lan

DR

Con

go: A

ppui

à l’

inst

alla

tion

des

ferm

es s

emen

cièr

es p

our l

es

cultu

res

vivr

ière

s et

mar

aich

ères

Valu

e ch

ains

Moz

ambi

que:

Cap

acity

dev

elop

men

t on

trad

e an

d ag

ricul

ture

, tra

de

nego

tiatio

ns/a

gree

men

ts

Ken

ya: s

cale

up

busi

ness

op

port

uniti

es

Ken

ya: A

naly

se o

ppor

tuni

ties

for

regi

onal

trad

e

Mal

i: A

ppui

à la

st

ruct

urat

ion

des

filiè

res

port

euse

s (s

emen

ces,

pois

ons,

lait,

via

nde,

etc

.)

DR

Con

go: A

ppui

à la

cr

éatio

n de

s pa

rcs

agro

-in

dust

riels

Idem

Rw

anda

: Sup

port

loca

l, hy

brid

see

d pr

oduc

tion

and

seed

val

ue c

hain

dev

elop

men

t

Moz

ambi

que:

Cap

acity

dev

elop

men

t on

trad

e an

d ag

ricul

ture

, tra

de n

egot

iatio

ns/a

gree

men

ts

Cam

eroo

n: P

rom

otio

n de

s pe

tites

et m

oyen

nes

unité

s de

tran

sfor

mat

ion,

de

cons

erva

tion

de

séch

age,

de

stoc

kage

et d

e co

mm

erci

alis

atio

n

Côt

e d’

Ivoi

re :

Renf

orce

men

t des

cap

acité

s de

s ac

teur

s de

sui

vi d

es m

arch

és

Moz

ambi

que

: Sup

port

to p

ost-h

arve

st a

nd s

mal

l pr

oces

sing

(hou

seho

ld le

vel)

alon

g ho

rtic

ultu

re

and

frui

t val

ue c

hain

s, w

ith in

clus

ion

of y

outh

Zam

bia:

Tra

inin

g in

the

appl

icat

ion

of ru

ral

inve

stm

ent t

ool

Rw

anda

: Sup

port

to th

e ce

ntra

lized

vi

llage

bas

ed p

roce

ssin

g ce

ntre

s in

rice

, mai

ze, v

eget

able

s, fr

uits

, ca

ssav

a, h

oney

, and

mus

hroo

ms;

supp

ort i

n ag

ribus

ines

s de

velo

pmen

t alo

ng a

ll va

lue

chai

ns

Zam

bia:

Iden

tify

entr

y po

ints

for

inve

stm

ent i

nflo

ws/

oppo

rtun

ities

(r

esou

rce

mob

ilisa

tion)

Moz

ambi

que:

Sup

port

to p

ost-

harv

est a

nd s

mal

l pro

cess

ing

(hou

seho

ld le

vel)

alon

g ho

rtic

ultu

re

and

frui

t val

ue c

hain

s, w

ith

incl

usio

n of

you

th

an

nex

9:

sha

pin

g f

ao

su

ppo

rT

The

Tabl

e be

low

sum

mar

izes

the

actio

ns th

at c

ount

ry te

ams

have

iden

tifie

d as

prio

rity

for F

AO

sup

port

thro

ugh

the

Regi

onal

Initi

ativ

e 2.

The

y ar

e or

gani

zed

alon

g th

e fo

ur th

emes

of t

he w

orks

hop

and

are

clus

tere

d in

to fi

ve ty

pes

of a

ctio

ns. T

his

tabl

e w

ill b

e us

ed a

s a

star

ting

poin

t for

FA

O s

uppo

rt in

th

e fr

amew

ork

of th

e 20

30 A

gend

a an

d re

flect

ed in

FA

O’s

Cou

ntry

Pro

gram

min

g Fr

amew

orks

.

53ANNEX 9: SHAPING FAO SUPPORT

Pove

rty

redu

ctio

n

C

amer

oon:

Etu

de d

e m

ise

en p

lace

d’u

n m

écan

ism

e in

ters

ecto

riel d

e co

ordi

natio

n de

la

mis

e en

œuv

re d

es O

DD

s

Moz

ambi

que:

Sup

port

to

map

ping

and

mon

itorin

g of

re

leva

nt S

DG

s

Tcha

d: A

ppui

à la

mis

e en

œuv

re p

lan

actio

n pr

otec

tion

soci

al

Mal

i: Pl

aido

yer p

our l

e m

écan

ism

e de

fin

ance

men

t des

initi

ativ

es in

nova

tric

es d

e ré

duct

ion

de la

pau

vret

é

DR

Con

go: A

ppui

à re

nfor

cer l

es c

apac

ités

des

OP

Cam

eroo

n: A

ppui

à la

str

uctu

ratio

n de

s in

terp

rofe

ssio

ns

Cam

eroo

n: P

roje

t de

dive

rsifi

catio

n de

s pr

oduc

tions

Ani

mal

es à

trav

ers

la v

ulga

risat

ion

de la

cav

iacu

lture

Côt

e d’

Ivoi

re: M

ise

en p

lace

d’u

n pr

ojet

em

ploi

jeun

e à

trav

ers

l’aqu

acul

ture

, la

chai

ne d

e va

leur

s du

rabl

es d

u m

anio

c in

tégr

ant

l’int

ensi

ficat

ion

dura

ble

des

bas-

fond

s et

le p

roje

t FTT

Nut

ritio

n se

nsiti

ve

agri

cultu

re

Ken

ya: S

uppo

rt ro

llout

of t

he fo

od

and

nutr

ition

sec

urity

impl

emen

tatio

n pl

an

Rw

anda

: Sup

port

in o

pera

tiona

lizin

g th

e N

atio

nal n

utrit

ion

Secr

etar

iat

(ens

urin

g co

ordi

natio

n m

anda

te)

DR

Con

go: a

ppui

à

l’édu

catio

n nu

triti

onne

l en

par

tena

riat a

vec

le

Min

istè

re d

e la

san

té e

t de

l’édu

catio

n

Cam

eroo

n: E

tude

de

mis

e en

pla

ce d

’un

méc

anis

me

inte

rsec

torie

l de

coor

dina

tion

de

la m

ise

en œ

uvre

des

OD

Ds

Mal

i: A

ppui

au

renf

orce

men

t des

cap

acité

s de

s pa

rten

aire

s m

inis

térie

ls (A

gric

ultu

re-E

leva

ge-

pêch

e) p

our l

es q

uest

ions

de

nutr

ition

Côt

e d’

Ivoi

re: M

ise

en Œ

uvre

du

prog

ram

me

conj

oint

PA

M/U

NIC

EF/F

AO

dan

s le

cad

re d

u PN

MN

(Div

ersi

ficat

ion

agric

oles

, sen

sibi

lisat

ion

nutr

ition

nelle

)

Tcha

d: A

ppui

éla

bora

tion

plan

act

ion

nutr

ition

Zam

bia:

Cre

atio

n of

aw

aren

ess

of n

utrit

ion

sens

itive

agr

icul

ture


annex 10: counTry commiTmenTs

At the end of the workshop, participants were asked to indicate immediate actions they plan to take upon returning to their country in order to start applying the results of the workshop. Commitments are presented here, organized by country.

cameroun• Alignement de toutes les activités menées par les projets et programmes en cours

d’exécution, sur les objectifs du développement durables; élaboration des notes conceptuelles des projets identifiés lors de l’atelier et soumission au financement de la FAO (Cameroun)

côTe d’ivoire• Appuyer le développement de la chaine de valeur de la pêche et l’aquaculture par

ce que j’ai appris

• Intensification durable de la production par le développement de la petite irrigation (Côte d’ivoire)

• Faire un compte rendu de l’atelier et des principales décisions/recommandations prises, demander des rencontres régulières avec la FAO Côte d’Ivoire et les Ministères présents à cet atelier - agriculture, commerce (Côte d’Ivoire)

Kenya• Plan to work more closely with FAO and Ministry of Agriculture, Livestock and

Fisheries in Kenya to work on the four priority areas. I am especially interested in business incubation to get more of the agriculture produce go through value addition and to be marketed in Kenya and the region

• Will embark on working closely with FAO-Kenya to include priority issues in the onward programme activities; will also try to align the issues of concern to be supported under the 3 financing mechanisms i.e. GEF, SSC & GCF

mali• Contribuer à mieux partager la nécessité d’appuyer les activités de développement

du secteur agricole par le Ministère des Finances (Mali)

• Restitution au département du Ministère de l’Elevage et pêche les différents points débattus et les idées retenues pour une meilleure contribution du Ministère ; je suis vraiment ravis des éléments vus et des discussions ; j’orienterais le département dans le sens de prendre en compte l’intensification, la chaine de valeur, la lutte contre la pauvreté et la nutrition (Mali)

• Après 3 jours d’information, d’intenses activités par rapport à l’agriculture durable,

55ANNEX 10: COUNTRY COMMITMENTS

agenda 2030, la priorité au retour serait de partager les grandes conclusions avec mon département, faire une séance de travail avec la FAO pour le suivi, enfin confirmer davantage l’engagement de la FAO pour l’atteinte des ODDs dans un cadre de partenariat et de dialogue (Mali)

moZambiQue• Share the workshop proceedings with colleagues; communicate the 4 priorities

support areas proposed to FAO, to the relevant staff for planning, follow-up and monitoring; identify the potential stakeholders for roll out of SDGs related to agriculture and for prioritized elements forming the workshop themes

• Share this experience with my colleagues; follow up the meeting with the trade sector and arrange a meeting with FAO Representative/Advisor of Ministry (Mozambique)

• Share the experience with the Direction of MASA (Ministry of Agriculture and Food Security); Follow up all the priorities for agriculture close to FAO Representation in Maputo; Keep in contact with the consultant in order to address well in my country the topics of the workshop

• Share important outcomes with Representative, programme and project teams; follow up with government, the finalization/confirmation of priorities identified, prepare visit from RI2 to Mozambique

rdc• Mettre à jour les données de cet atelier et vous l’envoyer incessamment (RDC)

rwanda• Contribution to help in development of honey and mushrooms value chains

towards poverty reduction and better nutrition

• Focus on value chain, poverty reduction and nutrition. To build the capacity of state of food quality safety management system to all food players

• Follow up on the nutrition actions mapping activity conducted in Rwanda. Updating this mapping will be a key preliminary task for the office of the nutrition secretariat and supporting capacity development to the secretariat in nutrition mapping will likely be a priority for FAO

• Share the resolutions and areas of common focus in terms of a shared agenda for agriculture development; advocating for joint planning, action plan setting and partnership in the implementation of the different agriculture interventions

• Start implementing the improved measures towards addressing the problems related to climate change effects based on different & interesting discussions that we have had during this three-day workshop. This will be done through workshops and trainings

• Revisit the priorities set on sustainable intensification and value chain and develop an action plan for Rwanda; sort out what is applicable for Rulindo district/focus area for Rwanda and integrate that into Rulindo implementation framework


Tchad• Séance de travail avec la FAO pour affiner les priorités d’appui (coordination,

partenariat, renforcement des capacités) ; suivre les démarches avec la FAO pour le cadre de suivi évaluation en rapport avec les ODDs

Zambia• Continue engaging the Ministry of Agriculture, Ministry of Fisheries and Livestock

to embrace the importance of linking social protection to agriculture (FAO Zambia)

• Communicate the deliberations & recommendations of the workshop, support any multi-sectoral initiatives in the four focus/priority areas of the contribution of agriculture to SDGs

• Review the agriculture chapter of the draft seventh national development plan (7NDP) 2017-2021 and possibly incorporate elements of intensification, value chains, poverty reduction and nutrition if they have not adequately been addressed (Zambia)

57ANNEX 10: COUNTRY COMMITMENTSThe purpose of the regional workshop “Engaging agriculture, forestry and fisheries in support to the 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development” was to initiate a dialogue between FAO and countries in Africa on how to place food and agriculture in the SDGs on the national planning agenda; and to identify priorities for action through FAO’s Regional Initiative on “Sustainable Intensification of Production and Value Chain Development in Africa”. The four areas of focus of the workshop – sustainable intensification; value chain development; poverty reduction; and nutrition – are the pillars around which the discussions were organized.

The workshop addressed how the principles of Sustainable food and agriculture (SFA) can promote joint action to strengthen the contribution of agriculture, forestry and fisheries to sustainable development. It identified a set of concrete actions in the nine focus countries of the Regional Initiative (Mali, Democratic Republic of Congo, Côte d’Ivoire, Chad, Cameroon, Rwanda, Mozambique, Kenya and Zambia), that participants would consider as priority for their country. Special attention was given to inter-sectoral governance mechanisms in order to foster more integrated and effective action. The findings of the workshop are expected to shape FAO support to countries in the framework of the Regional Initiative, as they embark on the implementation of the 2030 Agenda.

I6766EN/1/01.17

ISBN 978-92-5-109618-5

9 7 8 9 2 5 1 0 9 6 1 8 5

towards productive, sustainable and inclusive agriculture ... · towards productive, sustainable...

Documents