topographic effects on remotely sensed imagery

12
Changes in topography result in irregularly illuminated areas and in variations in light reflection geometry. Remotely sensed data should be corrected for topographic opographic Effects on Remotely Sensed Image Z = sun zenith angle I = angle of incidence Surface Normal

Upload: dawson

Post on 19-Jan-2016

51 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

DESCRIPTION

Topographic Effects on Remotely Sensed Imagery. Changes in topography result in irregularly illuminated areas and in variations in light reflection geometry. Remotely sensed data should be corrected for topographic effects, accounting for actual incidence angles. Surface Normal. - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: Topographic Effects on Remotely Sensed Imagery

• Changes in topography result in irregularly illuminated areas and in variations in light reflection geometry.

• Remotely sensed data should be corrected for topographic effects, accounting for actual incidence angles.

Topographic Effects on Remotely Sensed Imagery

Z = sun zenith angleI = angle of incidence

Surface Normal

Page 2: Topographic Effects on Remotely Sensed Imagery

Statistical-Empirical Correction for Topographic Effects

Illumination: cos(i) = cos(e) cos (z) + sin(e) sin (z) cos (Øs - Øn)

i = angle of incidencee = surface slopez = solar zenith angleØs = solar azimuth angleØn = surface aspect

Observed radiance: LOBS = b + m cos(i)

Corrected radiance: LCOR = LOBS - m cos(i) - b + LOBS, avrg

LOBS = observed radiance (actual terrain)

LCOR = corrected radiance (normalized, horizontal surface)

m, b = regression coefficients

} at time of satellite overpass

Page 3: Topographic Effects on Remotely Sensed Imagery

10715 ground referencepoints (natural forest)

b = 74.9m = 54.1(band 4)

Observed Radiance: LOBS = b + m cos(i)

0.0 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.4 0.5 0.6 0.7 0.8 0.9 1.0

120

110

100

90

80

70

60

50

40

30

20 cos(i)

Page 4: Topographic Effects on Remotely Sensed Imagery

Corrected Radiance: LCOR = LOBS - b - m cos(i) + LOBS,avrg

10715 ground referencepoints (natural forest)

b = 74.9m = 54.1(band 4)

cos(i)

0.0 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.4 0.5 0.6 0.7 0.8 0.9 1.0

120

110

100

90

80

70

60

50

40

30

20

Page 5: Topographic Effects on Remotely Sensed Imagery

Digital Elevation Model

1200-12501250-13001300-13501350-14001400-14501450-15001500-15501550-16001600-16501650-17001700-17501750-18001800-18501850-19001900-19501950-20002000-20502050-21002100-21502150-22002200-22502250-23002300-2350

(m.a.s.l.)

Page 6: Topographic Effects on Remotely Sensed Imagery

DEM-based aspect (degrees.) DEM-based slope (degrees.)

Page 7: Topographic Effects on Remotely Sensed Imagery

Color composite original bands 742 Color composite corrected bands 742

Page 8: Topographic Effects on Remotely Sensed Imagery

USC Original Composite 742 USC Corrected Composite 742

Page 9: Topographic Effects on Remotely Sensed Imagery

Mitch Langford’sclassification

Unknown clusters

Page 10: Topographic Effects on Remotely Sensed Imagery

BNBPPNBPBDPCPNMSCCCTFQCNCIYUPRQPNCMRMCRAPNE

Cluster 1Cluster 2Cluster 3Cluster 4Cluster 5Cluster 6Cluster 7

Airphotography-based land use USC corrected composite 453

Page 11: Topographic Effects on Remotely Sensed Imagery

Cluster 1Cluster 2Cluster 3Cluster 4Cluster 5Cluster 6Cluster 7

Mitch Langford’s classification USC corrected composite 453

Page 12: Topographic Effects on Remotely Sensed Imagery

Conclusions

1 Satellite imagery of mountainous regions should be corrected for topographic effects before using any further.

2 The statistical-empirical correction method using DEM-derived information proved to be effective and easy.

3 The spatial resolution of imagery (30 m) may be insufficient to identify many small plots with different land cover.

4 Image correction and classification can be further improved by using better ground reference information.