tonal exponence in nuer nominal in ection - uni … · tonal exponence in nuer nominal in ection...

1
Tonal Exponence in Nuer Nominal inection Siri Gjerse { siri [email protected] University of Leipzig Claims Nuer is a tone language with H, L and HL tone Tone is predominantly grammatical ! H tone marks plural and L marks oblique case Nuer has OCP L Analysis: Stratal optimization of tones in Extended Stratal Containment ( ESC) (Trommer 2011) ! Epenthetic association lines cannot be altered across strata Nuer language: Western Nilotic Ca. 1 million speakers Dialect: Eastern Jikany (Gajaak/Gaji o k) Data Informants: 2 male speakers (Gaji o k and Gajaak) 52 nouns in nominative and oblique case, sg + pl (1) h 5 n 1sg l ^a r-5 say. ipfv-1sg lu^o æ lion n pl k a k EEl once ‘I say ‘lions’ once.’ (2) h 5 n 1sg c- 5 pfv-1sg lu^o æ lion n pl n ^ EE n see. inf ‘I saw the lions.’ (3) t^e e have. 3.sg m u n soil n nom.sg ‘he/she has soil’ (4) t^e e have. 3.sg mu OOO n soil n loc.sg ‘he/she is in the soil’ (5) r 5 c sh ji 555 r river n gen.sg /ji 55 r/ ‘sh of river’ < Classes proposed by Frank (1999), Baermann (2012) (6) Declination classes cl nom sg obl sg nom pl obl pl gloss I Ø55 k Ø55 k- 5 Ø 55 k-n Ø55 k-n ‘jug’ k e eer k e er- 5 k e r- k e er- ‘line’ d E p d E p-k 5 d E p-n d E p-n ‘butter’ II w OO k w u -k 5 w OOO k w OO k-n ‘upp.arm’ t e t t e t-k 5 t e t t e t-n ‘hand’ III k ^e eer k e r k e r k e r- ‘calabash pl’ d o oor d o oor d UU r d U r- ‘tribe’ IV d EEl dl d e t d e et ‘sheep’ ØO k ØO ak Ø i UU k Ø i UUU k ‘back’ V b a ar b 5 r-5 b 5 r b 55 r ‘Anuak’ Nominative Plural nom sg nom pl gloss l 5 k L! H l a aak ‘dream’ w OO k H! H w OOO k ‘upper arm’ k ^e eer HL! H k e r ‘calabash plant’ k e eer L! L-H k e er- ‘line’ (7) a.H: [plural ] b.ni: [plural, class I ] (8) det IV ‘sheep/goats’ HL H = = (9) keer-i I ‘lines’ L H (10) k er III ‘calabash plants’ HL H = = Oblique singular L tone marks oblique case ! Class I-II: L associates to a toneless sux ! Class III-IV: L tone overrides the stem tone (11) door III ‘tribe’ H L = (12) d E p -k 5 I ‘butter’ HL L Oblique Plural ! Class II-III: L associates to a toneless sux ! Class I, and IV-V: L does not associate (13) det HL H L = = (14) k eer-i L HL (15) ker -i HL H L = = Theoretical Assumptions ESC based on the Colored Containment Version of OT (Oostendorp 2006; Prince & Smolensky 1993) ! Stratal evaluation (Kiparsky 2000, Berm u dez-Otero 2011) Proposal Strata I: Evaluation ofnom sg andpl { Strata II: Evaluation ofobl sg and pl No ‘Rebirthing’ (Trommer 2011): Epenthetic ass l remain epenthetic across strata Lexical Tone: T; pl: H; obl : L OCP L Nominative Tone Oblique Tone Gloss n e en L n e n-k 5 L-H ‘mirror’ k e eer L k e er- 5 L-H ‘line’ c O a aa L c OOO -k 5 L-H bone’ (16) kee r- 5 ‘line’ L L H (17) a. m u n ‘soil’ b. w ii mu OOO n ‘on the soil’ c. gu EEE y mu OOO n ‘stone of the soil’ Analysis (18) Constraints in Containment Trommer 2011 Proposed constraints: ? R 2 ? T T] ? T jj ? L L Assign ?to every Assign ?to every Assign ?to every Assign ?to every Pw-nal tone Assign ?for every Assign ?to which is associated to a L which is associated to tones which does not dominate which is not dominated colorless association adjacen and a right-adjacent H in P of more than one color in P a tone in I by a in I (Trommer 2011) line which is deleted Level-toned in I (19) Stratum I: Plural form in nominative: class I ‘lines’ Input= (a) ? L L ? R ? T jj T 2 ? T] Max j Dep j a. k eer-i L H ? ! ? b. k eer-i L H ? ! ? ? ? c. k eer-i L H = ? ! ? ? d. + k eer-i L H ? (20) Stratum II: Plural form in oblique: class III ‘calabash plants’ Input= (a) ? L L ? R ? T jj T 2 ? T] Max j Dep j a. ker -i HL H L = = ? ! ? b. ker -i HL H L = = ? ! ? ? c. ker -i HL H L = = = ? ! ? ? ? d. + ker -i HL H L = = ? (21) Stratum II: Plural form in oblique: class I ‘lines’ Input=(a) ? L L ? R ? T jj T 2 ? T] Max j Dep j a. + k eer-i L HL ? b. k eer-i L HL ? ! ? c. k eer-i L HL = ? ! ? ? (22) Stratum II: Singular form in Oblique: class III (monosyllabic) ‘tribe’ Input=(a) ? L L ? R ? T jj T 2 ? T] Max j Dep j a. dooor H L ? ! b. dooor H L ? ! ? c. + dooor H L = ? ? Summary Nuer is a tone language (!) and tone is highly grammatical L oblique tones can override the stem tone but not an epenthetic plural H tone (don’t undo insertion) Selected References *Baerman, M. (2012). Paradigmatic chaos in Nuer. Language 88(3), 467-494. *Frank, J. W. (1999). Nuer noun morphology. Master’s thesis, University of New York at Bualo. *Trommer, J. (2011) Phonological Aspects of Western Nilotic Mutation Morphology, Habil. Thesis. Thank you to the speakers for their time, and to Bob Ladd, Bert Remijsen, Jochen Trom- mer, and Eva Zimmermann for feedback.

Upload: nguyenduong

Post on 06-Oct-2018

227 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: Tonal Exponence in Nuer Nominal in ection - uni … · Tonal Exponence in Nuer Nominal in ection Siri Gjers˝e { siri moen.gjersoe@uni-leipzig.de University of Leipzig Claims •Nuer

Tonal Exponence in Nuer Nominal inflectionSiri Gjersøe – siri [email protected]

University of Leipzig

Claims

• Nuer is a tone language with H, L and HL tone

• Tone is predominantly grammatical

→H tone marks plural and L marks oblique case

• Nuer has OCP L

• Analysis: Stratal optimization of tones in Extended Stratal

Containment (ESC) (Trommer 2011)

→Epenthetic association lines cannot be alteredacross strata

Nuer language:

• Western Nilotic• Ca. 1 million speakers• Dialect: Eastern Jikany (Gajaak/Gajiok)

Data

• Informants: 2 male speakers (Gajiok and Gajaak)• 52 nouns in nominative and oblique case, sg + pl

(1) h5n1sg

lar-5say.ipfv-1sg

luoñ

lion\plkakEElonce

‘I say ‘lions’ once.’

(2) h5n1sg

c-5pfv-1sg

luoñ

lion\plnEEnsee.inf

‘I saw the lions.’

(3) teehave.3.sg

munsoil\nom.sg

‘he/she has soil’

(4) teehave.3.sg

muOOOnsoil\loc.sg

‘he/she is in the soil’

(5) r5cfish

ji555rriver\gen.sg

/ji55r/

‘fish of river’

< Classes proposed by Frank (1999), Baermann (2012)

(6) Declination classes

cl nom sg obl sg nom pl obl pl gloss

I

é55k é55k-5 é55k-nı é55k-nı¨

‘jug’ke¨eer ke

¨er-5 ke

¨r-ı

¨ke¨er-ı

¨‘line’

dEp dEp-k5 dEp-nı¨

dEp-nı¨

‘butter’

II wOOk wu-k5 wOOOk wOOk-nı¨

‘upp.arm’tet tet-k5 tet tet-nı

¨‘hand’

IIIkeeer ker ker ker-ı

¨‘calabash pl’

do¨oor dooor dUUr dUr-ı

¨‘tribe’

IVdEEl dæææl de

¨t de

¨et ‘sheep’

éOk éOak éiUUk éiUUUk ‘back’

V ba¨ar b5r-5 b5r b55r ‘Anuak’

Nominative Plural

nom sg nom pl gloss

l5k L → H la¨aak ‘dream’

wOOk H → H wOOOk ‘upper arm’keeer HL → H ker ‘calabash plant’

ke¨eer L → L-H ke

¨er-ı

¨‘line’

(7) a. H: [plural]b. ni

¨: [plural, class I]

(8)de

¨tIV

‘sheep/goats’

H L H== (9)

ke¨er-i

¨I

‘lines’

L H(10)

k erIII‘calabash plants’

H L H==

Oblique singular

• L tone marks oblique case→Class I-II: L associates to a toneless suffix→Class III-IV: L tone overrides the stem tone

(11)dooorIII‘tribe’

H L= (12)

d E p -k 5I‘butter’

H L L

Oblique Plural

→Class II-III: L associates to a toneless suffix→Class I, and IV-V: L does not associate

(13)de

¨t

H L H L== (14)

k e¨er-i

¨

L HL(15)

k e r -i¨

H L H L==

Theoretical Assumptions

• ESC based on the Colored Containment Version of OT (Oostendorp 2006; Prince &Smolensky 1993)

→ Stratal evaluation (Kiparsky 2000, Bermudez-Otero 2011)

Proposal

• Strata I: Evaluation of nom sg and pl – Strata II: Evaluation of obl sg and pl

• No ‘Rebirthing’ (Trommer 2011): Epenthetic ass l remain epenthetic across strata

• Lexical Tone: T; pl: H; obl: L

OCP L

Nominative Tone Oblique Tone Gloss

ne¨en L ne

¨n-k5 L-H ‘mirror’

ke¨eer L ke

¨er-5 L-H ‘line’

cOa¨aa L cOOO-k5 L-H bone’

(16)k e

¨e r -5

‘line’

L L H (17) a. mun ‘soil’b. wıii muOOOn

‘on the soil’c. guEEEy muOOOn

‘stone of the soil’

Analysis

(18) Constraints in Containment Trommer 2011 Proposed constraints:

?R σ2? σ T T] σ σ? T|| σσ?

LL

Assign ? to every σ Assign ? to every σ Assign ? to every σ Assign ? to every Pw-final tone Assign ? for every Assign ? towhich is associated to a L which is associated to tones which does not dominate which is not dominated colorless association adjacent L

and a right-adjacent H in P of more than one color in P a tone in I by a σ in I (Trommer 2011) line which is deleted Level-toned σ in I

(19) Stratum I: Plural form in nominative: class I ‘lines’

Input= (a) σσ?

LL

?R σ? T|| σ Tσ2? T] σ Max| Dep|

a.k e

¨er-i

¨

L H

?! ?

b.k e

¨er-i

¨

L H

?! ? ? ?

c.k e

¨er-i

¨

L H= ?! ? ?

d. +k e

¨er-i

¨

L H

?

(20) Stratum II: Plural form in oblique: class III ‘calabash plants’

Input= (a) σσ?

LL

?R σ? T|| σ Tσ2? T] σ Max| Dep|

a.k e r -i

¨

H LH L== ?! ?

b.k e r -i

¨

H L H L== ?! ? ?

c.k e r -i

¨

H L H L=== ?! ? ? ?

d. +k e r -i

¨

H L H L== ?

(21) Stratum II: Plural form in oblique: class I ‘lines’

Input=(a) σσ?

LL

?R σ? T|| σ Tσ2? T] σ Max| Dep|

a. +k e

¨er-i

¨

L HL

?

b.k e

¨er-i

¨

L HL

?! ?

c.k e

¨er-i

¨

L HL= ?! ? ?

(22) Stratum II: Singular form in Oblique: class III (monosyllabic) ‘tribe’

Input=(a) σσ?

LL

?R σ? T|| σ Tσ2? T] σ Max| Dep|

a.

dooor

H L

?!

b.

dooor

H L

?! ?

c. +

dooor

H L= ? ?

Summary

• Nuer is a tone language (!) and tone is highly grammatical• L oblique tones can override the stem tone but not an epenthetic plural

H tone (don’t undo insertion)

Selected References *Baerman, M. (2012). Paradigmatic chaos in Nuer. Language 88(3), 467-494. *Frank, J. W. (1999).

Nuer noun morphology. Master’s thesis, University of New York at Buffalo. *Trommer, J. (2011) Phonological Aspects of Western

Nilotic Mutation Morphology, Habil. Thesis.

Thank you to the speakers for their time, and to Bob Ladd, Bert Remijsen, Jochen Trom-mer, and Eva Zimmermann for feedback.