tonal exponence in nuer nominal in ection - uni … · tonal exponence in nuer nominal in ection...
TRANSCRIPT
Tonal Exponence in Nuer Nominal inflectionSiri Gjersøe – siri [email protected]
University of Leipzig
Claims
• Nuer is a tone language with H, L and HL tone
• Tone is predominantly grammatical
→H tone marks plural and L marks oblique case
• Nuer has OCP L
• Analysis: Stratal optimization of tones in Extended Stratal
Containment (ESC) (Trommer 2011)
→Epenthetic association lines cannot be alteredacross strata
Nuer language:
• Western Nilotic• Ca. 1 million speakers• Dialect: Eastern Jikany (Gajaak/Gajiok)
Data
• Informants: 2 male speakers (Gajiok and Gajaak)• 52 nouns in nominative and oblique case, sg + pl
(1) h5n1sg
lar-5say.ipfv-1sg
luoñ
lion\plkakEElonce
‘I say ‘lions’ once.’
(2) h5n1sg
c-5pfv-1sg
luoñ
lion\plnEEnsee.inf
‘I saw the lions.’
(3) teehave.3.sg
munsoil\nom.sg
‘he/she has soil’
(4) teehave.3.sg
muOOOnsoil\loc.sg
‘he/she is in the soil’
(5) r5cfish
ji555rriver\gen.sg
/ji55r/
‘fish of river’
< Classes proposed by Frank (1999), Baermann (2012)
(6) Declination classes
cl nom sg obl sg nom pl obl pl gloss
I
é55k é55k-5 é55k-nı é55k-nı¨
‘jug’ke¨eer ke
¨er-5 ke
¨r-ı
¨ke¨er-ı
¨‘line’
dEp dEp-k5 dEp-nı¨
dEp-nı¨
‘butter’
II wOOk wu-k5 wOOOk wOOk-nı¨
‘upp.arm’tet tet-k5 tet tet-nı
¨‘hand’
IIIkeeer ker ker ker-ı
¨‘calabash pl’
do¨oor dooor dUUr dUr-ı
¨‘tribe’
IVdEEl dæææl de
¨t de
¨et ‘sheep’
éOk éOak éiUUk éiUUUk ‘back’
V ba¨ar b5r-5 b5r b55r ‘Anuak’
Nominative Plural
nom sg nom pl gloss
l5k L → H la¨aak ‘dream’
wOOk H → H wOOOk ‘upper arm’keeer HL → H ker ‘calabash plant’
ke¨eer L → L-H ke
¨er-ı
¨‘line’
(7) a. H: [plural]b. ni
¨: [plural, class I]
(8)de
¨tIV
‘sheep/goats’
H L H== (9)
ke¨er-i
¨I
‘lines’
L H(10)
k erIII‘calabash plants’
H L H==
Oblique singular
• L tone marks oblique case→Class I-II: L associates to a toneless suffix→Class III-IV: L tone overrides the stem tone
(11)dooorIII‘tribe’
H L= (12)
d E p -k 5I‘butter’
H L L
Oblique Plural
→Class II-III: L associates to a toneless suffix→Class I, and IV-V: L does not associate
(13)de
¨t
H L H L== (14)
k e¨er-i
¨
L HL(15)
k e r -i¨
H L H L==
Theoretical Assumptions
• ESC based on the Colored Containment Version of OT (Oostendorp 2006; Prince &Smolensky 1993)
→ Stratal evaluation (Kiparsky 2000, Bermudez-Otero 2011)
Proposal
• Strata I: Evaluation of nom sg and pl – Strata II: Evaluation of obl sg and pl
• No ‘Rebirthing’ (Trommer 2011): Epenthetic ass l remain epenthetic across strata
• Lexical Tone: T; pl: H; obl: L
OCP L
Nominative Tone Oblique Tone Gloss
ne¨en L ne
¨n-k5 L-H ‘mirror’
ke¨eer L ke
¨er-5 L-H ‘line’
cOa¨aa L cOOO-k5 L-H bone’
(16)k e
¨e r -5
‘line’
L L H (17) a. mun ‘soil’b. wıii muOOOn
‘on the soil’c. guEEEy muOOOn
‘stone of the soil’
Analysis
(18) Constraints in Containment Trommer 2011 Proposed constraints:
?R σ2? σ T T] σ σ? T|| σσ?
LL
Assign ? to every σ Assign ? to every σ Assign ? to every σ Assign ? to every Pw-final tone Assign ? for every Assign ? towhich is associated to a L which is associated to tones which does not dominate which is not dominated colorless association adjacent L
and a right-adjacent H in P of more than one color in P a tone in I by a σ in I (Trommer 2011) line which is deleted Level-toned σ in I
(19) Stratum I: Plural form in nominative: class I ‘lines’
Input= (a) σσ?
LL
?R σ? T|| σ Tσ2? T] σ Max| Dep|
a.k e
¨er-i
¨
L H
?! ?
b.k e
¨er-i
¨
L H
?! ? ? ?
c.k e
¨er-i
¨
L H= ?! ? ?
d. +k e
¨er-i
¨
L H
?
(20) Stratum II: Plural form in oblique: class III ‘calabash plants’
Input= (a) σσ?
LL
?R σ? T|| σ Tσ2? T] σ Max| Dep|
a.k e r -i
¨
H LH L== ?! ?
b.k e r -i
¨
H L H L== ?! ? ?
c.k e r -i
¨
H L H L=== ?! ? ? ?
d. +k e r -i
¨
H L H L== ?
(21) Stratum II: Plural form in oblique: class I ‘lines’
Input=(a) σσ?
LL
?R σ? T|| σ Tσ2? T] σ Max| Dep|
a. +k e
¨er-i
¨
L HL
?
b.k e
¨er-i
¨
L HL
?! ?
c.k e
¨er-i
¨
L HL= ?! ? ?
(22) Stratum II: Singular form in Oblique: class III (monosyllabic) ‘tribe’
Input=(a) σσ?
LL
?R σ? T|| σ Tσ2? T] σ Max| Dep|
a.
dooor
H L
?!
b.
dooor
H L
?! ?
c. +
dooor
H L= ? ?
Summary
• Nuer is a tone language (!) and tone is highly grammatical• L oblique tones can override the stem tone but not an epenthetic plural
H tone (don’t undo insertion)
Selected References *Baerman, M. (2012). Paradigmatic chaos in Nuer. Language 88(3), 467-494. *Frank, J. W. (1999).
Nuer noun morphology. Master’s thesis, University of New York at Buffalo. *Trommer, J. (2011) Phonological Aspects of Western
Nilotic Mutation Morphology, Habil. Thesis.
Thank you to the speakers for their time, and to Bob Ladd, Bert Remijsen, Jochen Trom-mer, and Eva Zimmermann for feedback.