to like or not to like - au purepure.au.dk/portal/files/36333087/to_like_or_not_to_like.pdfmarketing...
TRANSCRIPT
TO LIKE OR
NOT TO LIKE
How political communicators could benefit from making it personal
Line Bisgaard Nielsen May 5, 2011 Supervisor: Eva Aas Søndergaard
Total characters of BACHELOR thesis excluding spaces:54,646
Marketing and Management Communication
Department of Language and Business Communication Aarhus School of Business
To like or not to like How political Communicators could benefit from making it personal
Line Bisgaard Nielsen May 5, 2011 2 of 42
Executive Summary
Politicalcommunicationsurroundsuseverywherewego.Itisinthewaterwedrink,thecars
wedriveandtheclotheswewear.Notlongago,politicalcommunicatorsstillhadtosendtheir
messagethroughthebigmassmediamachine,riskingitwouldbetwistedandendupbeing
somethingfarfromwhattheyhadplanned.Today,thetableshaveturnedandpoliticianscan
communicate directly with their voters on social media platforms such as Facebook. An
opportunity like this brings a lot of possibilities but a lot of responsibility aswell. For can
politicianscommunicateonaplatformthatwascreatedwiththeintentionofsocializingand
yetstillemploytheirtraditionalapproachtorhetoricaltoolsandmeans?Aretheypermitted
tochoosewhenandwhattheywanttoshareandcommenton,ordotheyhaveanobligation
toengageineverything?
Thisthesishassetouttogainnewtheoreticalinsightonwhetherornotemployingprinciples
fromstorytellingandsocialnetworkingoptimizationtostatusupdatecommunicationwould
be efficient andmake sense, considering traditional communicative rhetoric. Itwill as such
not seek to explain anything, but base its conclusions on the theoretical framework and
constructedexamples.
Storytelling as a concept is discussed in the third chapter and initiates in the theoretical
approach that all communication canbe storytelling, as longas it is adapted to the specific
situation, audience andpurpose.Anoverall understanding andbasic frameworkhavebeen
provided for the analysis in chapter five and brief sections on the emergence and cultural
importanceofStorytellingandthetextualandstructuralelements,whichcanbeemployedfor
composingastatusupdateforpoliticalcommunicativepurposes,areconsidered.Thechapter
endswith theElaborationLikelihoodModel,whichwill in theanalysisprovideameans for
measuringtheeffectivenessofthestatusupdates.
ChapterfourinvestigatesseveraldifferentconceptsundertheoveralltermSocialNetworking
Optimization. Aaker’s self‐expression model has been incorporated to provide theoretical
supportforthelaterreviewonthelikefeatureonFacebook.Complementingthat,istheoryon
viral marketing, buzz‐worthiness and word of mouth to provide further background for
aspectsintheanalysis.
To like or not to like How political Communicators could benefit from making it personal
Line Bisgaard Nielsen May 5, 2011 3 of 42
Thecollectionoftipstoachievesocialnetworkingoptimizationiscombinedwithasectionon
Aristotle’s art of Rhetoric to provide tangible points to include and analyse on in the later
analysis.ThechapterisconcludedwithMartinJoos’theoryonstyleandlinguistics.Joos’scale
offormalityisanimportantfactorinthelateranalysisandisthereforescrutinized.
The fifth and sixth chapters investigate and analyse status update examples from the
AustralianPrimeMinisterJuliaGillardandtheAmericanPresidentBarackObama.Arguments
fromthetheoreticalbackgroundsectionaredrawninandprovidetheframeworkonwhich
the analysis is conducted. To analyse on the theoretical possibility of achieving effective
communication by incorporating social networking optimization and storytelling, three
examples of successful status update communication have been constructed, based on
recommendationsfromthetheoreticalchapters.
Inordertosupplywell‐foundedtheoreticalconclusions,oneissuehadtobesolved;Successful
statusupdates couldgeneratewordofmouthandensure importantmessageswere spread
via the share function on Facebook but as it has not been possible to uncover any kind of
suitable evaluativemeans to concludewhether status update communication on Facebook
canberegardedsuccessfulornot, thethesishasdevelopeditsown:the likeparameter.The
amountoflikesoneachstatusupdatecanbeproportionallycomparedtothenumberofstatic
followers, and thereby indicate how well the status update has been received. The like
parameterhasestablishedanaveragelikerateandthecircumstancesthatcombinelikesand
effectiveness.Basedontheestablishedtheoreticalframeworkitwillbestronglyadvisedthat
politicians consider incorporating storytelling and social networking optimization and
incorporate them in their communicative strategy to make their status updates more
invigoratingandrelevanttothereaders.
Totalnumberofcharactersexcl.blanks:3645
To like or not to like How political Communicators could benefit from making it personal
Line Bisgaard Nielsen May 5, 2011 4 of 42
TableofContent
1.INTRODUCTION..................................................................................................................................................... 5
1.1THESISSTATEMENT.................................................................................................................................................................51.2STATEMENTOFINTENT ..........................................................................................................................................................61.3SCIENTIFICMETHODOLOGY ...................................................................................................................................................61.4THEORETICALFRAMEWORKANDSTRUCTURE ...................................................................................................................71.5DELIMITATIONS........................................................................................................................................................................8
2.BACKGROUND........................................................................................................................................................ 9
2.1POLITICALCOMMUNICATION .................................................................................................................................................92.2FACEBOOK .............................................................................................................................................................................. 102.2.1Statusupdates ................................................................................................................................................................ 102.2.2Commentsandlikes...................................................................................................................................................... 11
3STORYTELLING:TELLINGTHERIGHTSTORYORTELLINGTHESTORYRIGHT? .......................... 12
3.1STORYTELLINGSTRUCTURE ................................................................................................................................................ 133.2IDIOMSANDSAYINGS ............................................................................................................................................................ 153.3THEFIVELANGUAGESOFSTORYTELLING ......................................................................................................................... 163.4THEELABORATIONLIKELIHOODMODEL......................................................................................................................... 17
4.SOCIALNETWORKINGOPTIMIZATION:THEKNOWLEDGEOFHOWTOCREATECONSENT
WILLALTEREVERYPOLITICALPREMISE ...................................................................................................... 19
4.1THESELF‐EXPRESSIONMODEL ........................................................................................................................................... 194.2WORDOFMOUTHMARKETING‐BUZZITUP! ................................................................................................................ 214.3SOCIALNETWORKINGOPTIMIZATION .............................................................................................................................. 234.4ETHOS,PATHOSANDLOGOS‐ARISTOTLE’SARTOFRHETORIC ................................................................................... 244.5MARTINJOOSANDTHEFIVECLOCKS ............................................................................................................................... 25
5AUSTRALIANPRIMEMINISTERJULIAGILLARDONTHERECENTFLOODINGOFEAST
AUSTRALIA............................................................................................................................................................... 28
6.AMERICANPRESIDENTBARACKOBAMAONTHEARIZONASHOOTINGS ...................................... 34
7.CONCLUSION........................................................................................................................................................ 38
8.BIBLIOGRAPHY................................................................................................................................................... 40
BOOKS: ........................................................................................................................................................................................... 40WEBSITES: ..................................................................................................................................................................................... 41
APPENDIXA:THE“LIKE”PARAMETER...................................... FEJL!BOGMÆRKEERIKKEDEFINERET.
To like or not to like How political Communicators could benefit from making it personal
Line Bisgaard Nielsen May 5, 2011 5 of 42
1.Introduction
In today’s ever changing society, communication is never just communication. As long as
humansandthenotionofpowerhaveexistedsidebyside,communicativeeffortstoacquire
authorityhavebeenmade.WalterLippmannoncesaidthat“theknowledgeofhowtocreate
consentwillaltereverypoliticalpremise1”,anditisbasedonthatclaim,thisreportwilltryto
map out tools for optimizing the results of successful political communication via social
media.
The thesis will investigate political communication on social networks exemplified by
Facebook and analyze this through specific examples from the American president Barack
ObamaandtheAustralianPrimeMinisterJuliaGillard.
The thesis incorporates storytelling principles, self‐staging concepts from the field of
branding and clues for social networkingoptimization. Furthermore, the thesiswill shortly
considerhowonlinemassmediamessagesaremostoftenreceivedandreactedupon.Finally,
aconclusionwillbemadeinregardtowhetherpoliticalcommunicationonsocialmediacan
beconsideredsuccessful.
1.1Thesisstatement
Froma theoreticalpointofview, the thesissetsout todiscuss thepossibilitiesofachieving
effectiveandsuccessfulpoliticalcommunication,whenemployingelementsfromstorytelling
and social networking optimization. The analysis will be made based on the theoretical
framework andwill incorporate points from the specially developed like parameter, which
will be discussed later.With the emergence of overwhelminglymany new communication
platforms,abasicunderstandingforcommunicativepatternscanbedifficulttomaintain.This
hasledtothefollowingthesisstatement:
1 McNair, Brian (1995) An introduction to Political Communication. Page vii
To like or not to like How political Communicators could benefit from making it personal
Line Bisgaard Nielsen May 5, 2011 6 of 42
Basedonthetheoreticalframework,andthediscussedexamples,howcouldpoliticians
theoreticallyimprovetheeffectivenessoftheircommunicationbyemployingprinciplesof
storytellingandsocialnetworkingoptimization?
1.2Statementofintent
Political communication is relevant and important to all of us. It affects us, whether we
acknowledgeitornot,promptsustomakedecisionsprooragainst,approvalordisapproval,
importantorun‐important.Buthowisittheydo,thesepolitical“masterminds”?Aretheyall
equally good at communicating, and which communicative tools can improve the
effectiveness of their efforts? The fields of corporate storytelling and social networking
optimization have increased over the latest years and to create a united platform for
communication from these two would be both relevant, new and interesting. Therefore, a
combinationofelementsfromthesetwosectorshasbeenconstructed,andspecificexamples
fromtherealpoliticalstageonFacebookwillbeanalyzedbasedonthis.Theaimistoendup
in conclusions as towhethermeans of storytelling and social networking optimization can
improvetheeffectivenessofpoliticalcommunication.
1.3ScientificMethodology
Thethesiswillbewrittentakingintoaccountthescientificmethodologyofhermeneutics.To
specify, the investigative and analytical parts of the thesis will be based on classical
hermeneutics,whichfocusonthemessageandthesenders’partandmeansofconveyingthe
message.ThehermeneuticalmethodologymostoftenreferstotheGermanphilosopherHans‐
GeorgGadamer’swork,whichpresentedtheconceptoftabularasa;nobodyenterstheworld
as a clean slate, we all hold presumptions and prejudices based on our prior gained
knowledge2.Thismeans,thatcontradictingtoforexamplethepositivistictheory,twominds
will never reach the same conclusion; two pairs of eyesmight see the same thing, but the
reasoningpartoftwobrainswillmost likelyneverdrawthesameconclusions,andthereby
differentopinionsarecreated.
2 Warnke, Georgia (1987) Gadamer: Hermeneutics, Tradition, and Reason. Page 76
To like or not to like How political Communicators could benefit from making it personal
Line Bisgaard Nielsen May 5, 2011 7 of 42
The different opinions on a politician’s appearance will therefore also be individually
constructed,and this iswhyahermeneuticalapproach isevident inunderstandingpolitical
communicationonsocialmedia.
As the basic approach to classical hermeneutics is that understanding is created not only
basedonobjectiveexperiencesbutalsobypriorgainedknowledge3, classicalhermeneutics
will serve as a methodological departure for this thesis and supply a basic framework of
understandingastohowthereadersmayindividuallyunderstandandabstractmeaningfrom
thepoliticians’statusupdates.
1.4TheoreticalframeworkandStructure
In order to answer the thesis statement, the thesis has been divided into six chapters and
structured in a background chapter, two theoretical chapters, an analytical chapter and
conclusion,whereallthefindingsfromtheprevioussectionscometogether.
The background sectionwill begin by briefly defining political communication, to supply a
frameofunderstanding so the readers can comprehend the later chapters.Then, the thesis
willturntoFacebookandashortdescriptionofrelevantfeatures.Thisisdonetoestablishthe
basiccircumstancesofcommunicatingonFacebook4.Asithasbeendifficulttoobtainspecific
published sources for the section about Facebook, this sectionhas beenbasedon statistics
fromFacebook’sowninformationpage.
Moving on from the descriptive parts, the thesis has two theoretical chapters, which
scrutinize communicative means of storytelling and social networking optimization, both
fields representing relevant theories to support the following analysis. As it has not been
possibletoobtainanysuitablepublishedsourcesonelectors’receptionandattitudetowards
statusupdatesonFacebook,thethesiswillbelimitedtoothersourcesofinformation,suchas
books thatwill supply the theoretical framework,andonlinesurveys,blogsand interviews,
whichwillprovideinformationaboutstorytellingandsocialnetworkingoptimization.
3 Ibid. 4 http://socialmediatoday.com/index.php?q=soravjain/195917/40-most-popular-social-networking-sites-world
To like or not to like How political Communicators could benefit from making it personal
Line Bisgaard Nielsen May 5, 2011 8 of 42
The analysis is divided into two sections; the first part scrutinizes an example of a status
update from the Australian Prime Minister Julia Gillard and the effectiveness of her
communicativemeans.Thisisfollowedbyananalysisofacomparablestatusupdateexample
fromtheAmericanpresidentBarackObama.Intheconclusion,thedifferentpartsofthethesis
aretiedtogetherandconclusionsontheanalysiswillprovideaframeworkforansweringthe
thesisstatement.
1.5Delimitations
Consideringtherestrictivenatureofthethesisstatement,thethesiswilluseitsfindingsfrom
Facebooktomakespecificassumptionsaboutsocialmediaingeneral.Theconsiderationswill
however not include neither Youtube, LinkedIn, Twitter or the likes but accept that they
possesotherdimensionsofthesamecommunicativeplatformandcouldberelevanthaditnot
beentooextensive.
The analysis will be based on the content of written status updates, thus, not take into
considerationaspectssuchasfont,sizeandcolour,astheseareconsideredirrelevant,given
thatFacebookhas anoverall graphic look.Any considerations aboutoral storytellingor its
endorsingmeansasforexamplebodylanguagehavebeenleftouttoensurethefocusiskept
onthewrittenaspect.Personalexpressionssuchasvisualappearance,profilepicturesetc.are
acknowledgedandacceptedas important factorsof this typeofonline communication, and
will therefore shortly be considered in the initial background section of Facebook, but no
further than that. This is done, as the overall focus is on the possibilities for optimizing
communicationbyemployingalternateviewsontheconstructionofmessages.
Noattentionhasbeenappointed to the risksof thewordofmouthconcept, suchas lossof
controlorbadonlinebehaviourandnoemphasizewillbeputoncrowdsandtheirbehaviour,
asthemethodologicalapproachisclassicalhermeneutics,whichstrictlyfocusesonthesender
ofamessageandthemessageitself.
To like or not to like How political Communicators could benefit from making it personal
Line Bisgaard Nielsen May 5, 2011 9 of 42
2.Background
2.1Politicalcommunication
Politicalcommunicationsurroundsuseverywherewego.Itisinthewaterwedrink,thecars
we drive and the clothes we wear. You cannot go through one day without feeling the
implicationsofpoliticaldecisions.Assuch,politicalcommunicationisanevidentplayerinthe
modernsocietyandshouldthereforebeinvestigatedandconsideredcarefullyandtoaneven
higherextentthanitalreadyis.
Even though most newspapers and broadcasting channels are usually open about which
politicalpartiestheysupport,itisnotalwayseasyfortheeverydayconsumertolookthrough
these somewhat “hidden” layers of opinion creation. Furthermore, it can be hard to
distinguishbetweenthecommunicationandthecommunicator,whichiswhysocialmediais
brilliantforpoliticalcommunication.
Communicationisneverjustaboutthemessage;whatisbeingcommunicated.Farfrom.Toa
higherandhigherdegreemoreemphasisisbeingputonthechoiceofmedium.Gonearethe
dayswhenpoliticalmessageshadtogothroughthebigmediamachinetoreachtheirtarget
audience. The risk of the message being twisted, concluded upon or presented in an
unattractivemannerdoesnotexistinsocialmedia.Here,itisthepoliticiansthemselves(orat
leasttheadministrationbehind)whosendthemessageandgettheresponsedirectlythrown
intotheirinbox.Butthatopensupfornewchallenges,becausewherearetheguidelinesfor
what is feasible and what is wrong?Which tools should be implemented in order for the
communicationtohavetheplannedresults?
Kaidetal.speaksofthreedifferentcategorieswithinthepoliticalreality;theobjectivepolitical
reality, the subjective political reality, and the constructed political reality5. The constructed
political reality is the one peoplemost often learn about politics through;when themedia
coverastory,theywillconstructthatstorytofittheirprogrammeorformerstories,thereby
making conclusions for the audience before they get the change to do so themselves. The
subjective reality is constituted of the opinion making that happens, when people attend
politicalgatheringsandmeetingsandcreatememoriesbasedonpriorgainedknowledge.As
5 Op.cit. 1. Page 11
To like or not to like How political Communicators could benefit from making it personal
Line Bisgaard Nielsen May 5, 2011 10 of 42
the costs of campaigning have increased dramatically over the last decade6, the search for
alternativewaysofpromotionhasincreasedproportionally.Pitfallscanemergewherenoone
thoughtpossible,iftheplayersofthepoliticalgamearenotverycarefultoplaybytherules
and regulations created by a consensus between the three key players; the political
organisations,themediaandthecitizens.Startingout,thepossibilitiesofreachingyourtarget
audiencewith therightmessagecanseemclose to impossible.Findingthesecretrhetorical
weaponsandmasteringthemtoperfectionwouldprobablybeeveryspin‐doctor’sdream,but
theroadis longanddifficult.Thisthesis investigatestheuseofapersonallyangledpolitical
typeofcommunication,primarilydrawingonthesectorsofpersuasivetextualelementsand
storytelling.
2.2Facebook
IfFacebookwereacountry,itwouldbethethird‐largestintheworld7.Morethan500active
users regularly log in to get anupdate on their networks’ social lives, blog, spam, or share
pictures or the latest news from their small part of the world8. The social network has
expanded toadegree that50%of theusershave to log ineveryday9 to checkupon their
average130friendsandspendashockinglyaccumulated700billionminutespermonth10.
2.2.1Statusupdates
AkeyfeatureonFacebookisthatyouareabletopoststatusupdates,tellingyourfriendsor
followers what you are up to, sharing your view on different issues and depicting certain
points in your life. The general tone on Facebook is and has always been very informally
connoted as this “can create a sense of belonging11” rather than other official channels of
communication, which often have a formal manner. The status‐updating feature is
constructedtoresembleabloginmanyways,andis“postedinchronologicalorder,likeadiary
6 Op. cit. 1 Page 37 7 http://www.purchase.com/blog/social-media/if-facebook-were-a-country 8 http://www.facebook.com/press/info.php?statistics 9 http://smedio.com/2011/04/25/now-that-nearly-every-one-is-social-how-do-you-differentiate-yourself/ 10 Op. Cit. 8 11 http://www.docstoc.com/docs/33259476/Formal-and-informal-communication-channels
To like or not to like How political Communicators could benefit from making it personal
Line Bisgaard Nielsen May 5, 2011 11 of 42
or a journal, with the most recent posting appearing at the top of the blog12”. This specific
possibility is great for politicians, as it allows them to share their viewpoints on different
topics and do so in a medium that is traditionally very informal. Should the political
strategistswishtoemploythefullpotentialeffectsofthestatus‐updatingfeature,theyshould
strivetomakethetoneasinformalaspossible,continuingthelaid‐backtone“normal”users
employ. Unfortunately, this is often not the case; a lot of political communication is
constructedratherformally,andpoliticians’Facebookpagesarenoexception;statusupdates
quickly become very reserved and impersonal, working against the original purpose of
Facebookasamedium.
2.2.2Commentsandlikes
Included in the status‐updating feature is a possibility for the followers or peoplewho are
simplyviewingthepagetolikeandcommentonthese.Thisdimensionhasbeeninvestigated
inmoredetail,andwillbeincorporatedintheanalysisinchapter5.Thelikefunctionshould
beincorporatedintoanypoliticalcommunicativestrategyasitcangenerateabuzzandlead
to a word of mouth effect. This happens because the status update will be posted on the
profilesandwallsofthepeoplewhohavelikedit,alongwiththefullamountoflikes,thereby
showingittoentirenetworks,givingthemapossibilitytoread,likeandcommentthemselves.
12 Paxson, Peyton (2010) Mass Communication and Media Studies - An Introduction. Page 154
To like or not to like How political Communicators could benefit from making it personal
Line Bisgaard Nielsen May 5, 2011 12 of 42
3Storytelling:Tellingtherightstoryortellingthestoryright?
“Tomasterpowerfulandeffectivecommunication,toengagepeopleandensuretheyremember
facts, or tobreakdownbarriers of isolationwithinorbetweengroups, telling stories in some
formisessential13.
Asa concept, storytellinghasexisted formany thousandsofyears.It iswidelyknown from
ancientAustralia,China,India,Indonesia,Italy14andGreece15.Oneofthebestgloballyknown
stories inmodernday,arethegreattalesofTheOdysseyandTheIliad,whichit isbelieved
both stem from the great Greek storytelling tradition, andwas onlywritten down by now
famous Homer16. Oral storytelling remains today the primary tool of learning and
understanding values inmany tribal cultures,whichhave low literacy rates17, but is in our
Westernculturetodaymoreconspicuousasacorporatecommunicativetool18.
Storytellingisatool,whichcanbeincorporatedtoshareimportantinformationwith,inthis
case, followers on social media. Instead of providing them with the full picture, the
communicatorgives themmetaphoricalcuesso that theywill reach theirownconclusion19.
Storytellingcanbeverysuccessfulforthecommunicatortoincorporateaseither“atemplate
for creating the future20” or “as part of a sensemaking process21”. The possibilities for
politicians to employ storytelling are obvious; rather than trying to sell new stories in the
sameoldmanner,withtraditionalbroadcastingandlonganddullspeeches,moreandmore
politiciansincorporatestorytellingpractises,whichcan“useverbalpicturestocreateinterest,
(…)andcanhelpbridgethegapbetweendataandknowledge22”.Inshort,storytellingmakesit
13 http://www.timsheppard.co.uk/story/faq.html#Introduction 14 http://www.timsheppard.co.uk/story/faq.html#Books 15 http://www.yourdiscovery.com/greece/entertainment/index.shtml 16 Ibid 17 http://www.leraconteur.scriptmania.com/hints.htm 18 Denning, Stephen (2005) The Leader’s Guide to Storytelling. Page vii 19 Windahl, Sven et al. (2008) Using Communication Theory - an Introduction to Planned Communication. Page 177 20 http://www.12manage.com/description_storytelling.html#userforum 21 Weick, Karl E.: Sensemaking in organisations. Page 172 22 Op. Cit. 20
To like or not to like How political Communicators could benefit from making it personal
Line Bisgaard Nielsen May 5, 2011 13 of 42
easier for thepoliticalcommunicatorstoconnectwiththeaudienceandfortheaudienceto
graspthemessage23.
Storytelling often makes use of improvisation and exaggeration and paints a picture of a
situationthatholdselementsvaluabletothelearningofthepeoplelistening24.Itspurposecan
beeverythingfromsharingmoralvaluestohandlingcrisiscommunication.
Thegeneral ideathatonecouldsitatapersonalcomputerandwritesomethingthatwould
reachandappealtopeopledirectly,invigoratethemandsparkaction,almostsoundstoogood
to be true. The key is to make the message relevant to the receivers, get them to work
togetherthroughaunitedandeasy‐adaptablecause. Itwouldbeobviousthat inanelection
situationmany“followers”onTwitter,Facebookorothersocialmediacouldbegentlypushed
intobeing truespokesmen for thecause; continuouslydoing thebest theycan to reach the
commongoal.
3.1Storytellingstructure
Withinthefieldofstorytellingmanypeopletendtodisagreeontheextentof limitationsfor
structuring a story25. Fog et al. argue that tobe efficient, storytellingneeds tohave certain
parameterstobebuildupwithinandincludespecificelements;message,conflict,characters
andplot26,whereassometheoristsdisagreeandpostulatethatastoryisbasicallyeverything
that canportray adeepermeaning27.Manypractitioners emphasizeoral storytelling as the
bestwaytoreachresultsbutothers,suchastheAfricanpractitionerFenyanNiaferdisagrees
bysayingthatwrittenstorytellingcanbejustasefficient,thestorytellerjustneedstoemploy
other tools and ways to reach the same rate of efficiency28. This thesis will employ a
theoretical platform based on Stephen Denning’s approach, that everything can be
storytelling,aslongasthereisastorytotellandthestoryisadoptedtothesituationathand
23 Op. Cit. 19 page 177. 24 http://www.eldrbarry.net/roos/eest.htm 25 Op. Cit. 13 26 Fog, Klaus et al. (2004) Storytelling - Branding in Practice. Page 33 27 Op. Cit. 18 28 http://www.ancientsites.com/aw/Post/164873
To like or not to like How political Communicators could benefit from making it personal
Line Bisgaard Nielsen May 5, 2011 14 of 42
as this is considered to be the theoretical approach that corresponds best with the thesis
statement29.
So,howcanstorytellingbestructuredthen?Ifnospecificguidelinescanbeagreedupon,the
task of employing successful storytelling can appear immensely difficult, when millions of
messagesarebeingsenteveryday,andyouneedtomakesurepeoplewillrememberyours30.
Luckily, basic principles collected from a broad mix of storytelling practitioners can be
incorporated:
• Concentratethestoryononesimplemessage,tomakesurefocusiskeptandpeopledo
notgetconfusedandremembertohaveanintriguingopening31.
• “Avoid describing feelings. Help your listeners actually experience the emotions of the
story”32.Vividwordsandexpressionscanbeusedtopaintmetaphoricalpicturesand
pleasing sounds, feelings, smells, touches,whichwill support the story’sobjective in
thereaders’mindsandmakethestorycomealive.,therebyenablingthemtorelatetoa
higherdegree33.
• Present characters and settings with expressions that are familiar to the readers,
whichwillmakethemsympathizewiththedisplayedfeelings,whichwillinturngivea
higherrelatednessrate34.Whenpeoplerelatetothestory,itservesasacentralcuein
theELMmodel,whichwillbediscussedlaterinthechapter.
• Thestoryshouldalwaysbewrittensoitisappropriate35,appealingandevocativeand
makessense36totheaudienceyouarewritingto37.
• Besincereandenthusiasticanduseyourown“normal”languagewhenyoutellastory.
Makesureyourreaderswillgraspthatyouwrotethispiece,andnobodyelse‐share
somethingofyourself,alittlepartofyourpersonalityandtheyaremuchmorelikelyto
relate!
29 Op. Cit. 18. Page 7 30 Op. Cit. 19 31 MacDonald, Margaret R. (2006) The Storyteller’s start-up book: finding, learning, performing and using. Page 2432 Kevin, Jim. Scary Stories: Information for Tellers. Page 14 33 Greene, Ellin (1996) Storytelling - Art and Technique. Page 28 34 Op. Cit. 24 35 Vos, Gail de. Storytelling for young adults. A guide to tales for teens. Page 28 36 http://www.sasked.gov.sk.ca/docs/mla/speak014.html 37 Op. Cit. 24
To like or not to like How political Communicators could benefit from making it personal
Line Bisgaard Nielsen May 5, 2011 15 of 42
• Asastoryteller,therearedistincttoolsyoucanemploy;theseareemphasis,repetition,
exaggeration,transition,pauseandproportion38.
• Tellastoryyoulike39andknowbyheart40,andthenemployan“intimate”toneinyour
writing41.Chancesarepeoplewiththesameculturalbackgroundandtherebyframeof
referencewillalsofeelfamiliarityandreachthesameconnotedmessageasyoudid42,
allowingthemtobeabletorelatetothemessagebetter43.
• Roundingupthestory,donotconcludeanythingorgivethereadersasumup.Lettheir
mindshoverandlingeroverit44.Donotexplaineverything45,insteadletthemconsider
thestoriesanddrawtheirownconclusionsfromit46.
3.2Idiomsandsayings
IdiomsandsayingscanoftenbefoundinStorytelling.Theyserveasameansofpresentingthe
do’sanddon’t’sofacompany,corporationorsocialsituation47.Byusingidiomsorsayings,a
communicatorismuchmorelikelytoreachapointwherehisreaderscanrelatetowhatheis
saying, because a new association to something already well‐known is likely to trigger a
stimulus‐responseeffectandtherebycreateaconnectionbetweenthecommunicatorandthe
memory.ShouldBarackObamaforexamplechoosetotellastoryfromtheelectionnightand
use the saying “The eveningwasoneof a kind”, chances are the readerswill automatically
applythissentencetotheirunconsciousboxwithperceptionsofhim,whentheyhearorread
abouthiminthefuture48.
As the functionofemployingstorytelling isprimarilyperipheralandwill as suchnot cause
any long‐termchange, itcanonlybeadvisedtoemploy it inrathersimplecasesor initially,
where the level of response is typically very low49.One scenerywhere it is very successful
38 Op. Cit. 24 39 Op. Cit. 24 40 http://www.timsheppard.co.uk/story/faq.html#Being 41 Op. Cit. 35. Page 53 42 http://www.sasked.gov.sk.ca/docs/mla/speak014.html 43 Op. Cit. 35. Page 23 44 Op. Cit. 35. Page 27 45 Ibid 46 Op. Cit. 24 47 Op. Cit. 20 48 Newsom, Doug & Haynes, Jim (2005) Public Relations Writing - Form and Style. Page 41 49 Ibid
To like or not to like How political Communicators could benefit from making it personal
Line Bisgaard Nielsen May 5, 2011 16 of 42
however, is when politicians are running for an election, and wish to create a connection
between the political brand and a certain buzzword, such as for example the Obama for
Change2008presidencycampaign50.Thereasonwhyusingidiomsandsayingsissoefficient,
isthat“theyrefertooursubconsciousandthey“willwork”inthefutureforaverylongtime51”.
3.3Thefivelanguagesofstorytelling
In the renowned storyteller Donald Davis’ book Telling your own stories, discusses five
differentcommunicationplatformstermedlanguagesthatareallaspectsofStorytelling.Davis
argues that storytelling shouldalwaysbe constructedwith “the suggestionofactions rather
thantheactingoutofanactionitself52.Theflowofthestoryshouldbenaturalandfluid,and
will, if perfectlyperformed, serveas a tool tokeep the audience’s attentionalluredat your
words53. An important point to consider is the variation in cultural non‐verbal
communication. Should your audience have a notably different cultural background and
therebyreactionparameter,itisevidenttoinvestigatethisbeforeyouconstructyourstory54
and adapt it to their relational pattern.Feedback is the reactions of the readers,which the
storytellershouldbeabletofocuson, inbetweencreatingdifferentstories.IntheFacebook
regime,feedbackwouldbethelikeorcommentfunction,earlierdescribedinthisthesis.Any
expression, however small, that people show an interest in what you are trying to
communicate, shouldbe incorporated into thenext story. It is important to consider every
expression of interest as something positive, it means that people are engaging in your
messageandcanrelatetoit,onewayoranother‐beitpositiveornegative55.Wordsarethe
mostimportantpartofstorytelling.Forthestorytocomealive,thestorytellerneedstofind
appropriatewordsandexpressionsthatcomenaturaltohisnormalstyleofcommunication56,
andwhichtheaudiencecanrelateto.
50 Op. cit. 12. Page 154 51 Op. cit. 20 52 Davis, Donald (2005) Telling your own stories. Page 56 53 http://www.boddunan.com/education/61-english-language/9560-the-art-of-story-writing-and-story-telling.html 54 Op.cit. 35 Page 20 55 Op. Cit. 35 Page 21 56 Op. Cit. 52 page 80-81
To like or not to like How political Communicators could benefit from making it personal
Line Bisgaard Nielsen May 5, 2011 17 of 42
3.4TheElaborationLikelihoodModel
TheElaborationLikelihoodModelofpersuasionwasfirst
coined in1986byRichardPettyand JohnCacioppo,but
remainsasimportanttodayasbackthen.Itpresentstwo
different routes of processing information, and focuses
ontheextenttowhichanindividualneedstodevelopand
refine informationnecessary fordecisionmakingtooccur
given the circumstances the information is acquired
through. The possibility of achieving long‐term attitude
changedependsonanadoptionandelaborationprocess
ofthepresentedarguments.
Themodelpresentstwocognitiveroutes,thecentraland
the peripheral. Each route will end up in an attitude
change, but with different durations; is it achieved
throughuseofperipheralcues,theresultwillaccordingtothemodelbeshort‐term,whereas
the central processing sends the receiver into thorough engagement and involvement, and
therebycausespermanentresults57.Twofactorsareimportanttoconsiderinone’splanning
process:whetherthereceiversaremotivatedandabletoengageincentralprocessing.AsGass
andSeiterputit:“Becausecentralprocessingrequiresmorementaleffort,apersonwithgreater
motivationismorelikelytorelyoncentralprocessing(…)but(…)mustnotonlybewillingbut
alsoabletoprocessinformation”58.
Central processing focuses on the rational, compelling and logical angles of argumentation,
suchasforexamplethevalidity(qualitativeratherthanquantitative)ofthepointspresented,
acomparisontopriorgainedknowledgeetc,whereastheperipheralrouteisconcentratedon
superficialcharacteristics“thataren’tdirectlyrelatedtothesubstanceofthemessage59”such
ashumour, thespeaker’sappearance, titlesor formalityandhowappealinghe isperceived,
57 Source: http://changingminds.org/explanations/theories/elaboration_likelihood.htm 58 Gass, Robert H. & Seiter, John S. (2003) Persuasion - Social Influence and Compliance gaining. Page 34 59 Ibid
Figure1:TheElaborationLikelihoodModel
To like or not to like How political Communicators could benefit from making it personal
Line Bisgaard Nielsen May 5, 2011 18 of 42
eye contact or use of “credibility boosters” (e.g. leading statements such as “Dr. Med. said
this”,celebrityendorsersetc.).
TheElaborationLikelihoodModel’sdepictionofthecentralprocessingrouteisconsequently
the one any communication planner aims to achieve, as this will ensure lasting results, a
betterrecognitionofthepresentedsubjectinthefutureandahigherrateofattitudechange
andcompliancegaininginnon‐interpersonalrelationships60.Inthepoliticalcommunications
context considered in this thesis, the relevance should be obvious. If the political
communicatorcanfigureoutwhichcentralcuestofocusoninanyspeech,statementorstatus
update success is almost guaranteed for obtaining permanent results in terms of support,
loyalty, consistent election behaviour and involvement. To what extent the effects are
obtaineddependsontheeffectivenessandsuccessofthecommunicativemeansemployed.
60 Ibid Page 225-33
To like or not to like How political Communicators could benefit from making it personal
Line Bisgaard Nielsen May 5, 2011 19 of 42
4.SocialNetworkingOptimization:Theknowledgeofhowtocreateconsentwillaltereverypoliticalpremise61
In this section the thesis will investigate what means the political communicator should
engageintoachievesocialnetworkingoptimizationincommunicationstrategies.Inorderto
be able to communicate a brand strongly, it is necessary to knowdifferent techniques and
skills and which values should be emphasized. In the following section the thesis will
investigatethedifferentpossibilitiesofdifferentiatingabrand,andhowtocreateasuccessful
brandingstrategy.
4.1Theself‐expressionmodel
David Aaker describes what he calls the self‐expression model in his 1996 book Building
StrongBrands,amodelthattriestoexplainwhypeopleengageinbuzzmarketingorwordof
mouth,whichwillbedealtwithlaterinthischapter.Themainideais,that“peopleusegoods
andpossessionsnotonlytosatisfyfunctionalneedsbuttoprovidemeaningandorganisationto
their lives62”. We all define and express our personalities and lifestyles by the choices we
make, the brands we promote, and the ways we choose to endorse these choices. Our
promotionalattributescanbewhatwewear,wherewelive,whomweloveandwhatweeat
andwemayactuallyexperiencediscomfort if theyarenotsustained63.Besidesthe fact that
vegansdonoteatmeat,thehopeistoconnotethemessagethattheywillnotexploitanimals
forfood,clothingandanyotherpurpose64thusbeingabetterpersonintheirterminology65.
By pressing “like” or sharing a status update promoting vegan ideology, a practitionerwill
showhissocialnetworkthathepromotestheseideas,therebyexpressinghisactualidentity
tohisentourage66.
61 Lippmann, Walter (1946) Public Opinion. Page 248. 62 Aaker, David A. (1996) Building Strong Brands. Page 153 63 Ibid 64 http://www.vegansociety.com/about/who-we-are.aspx 65 http://skreened.com/veganshopforvegans/vegans-are-better-people 66 Op. cit. 62
To like or not to like How political Communicators could benefit from making it personal
Line Bisgaard Nielsen May 5, 2011 20 of 42
Tosomepeople“brandsbecomevehiclestoexpressapartoftheirselfidentity67”andtheywill
incorporate aspirational brand attributes to construct, sustain and express their ideal self
picture68.This isespeciallyobviousonthesocialnetworkingplatform,wherepeoplerepost
andcommentonpostingstheylikeandrelateto,andthesepostingsarethenpostedontheir
ownprofile in a thumbnail version.The followers alsohave thepossibility to share a liked
postwithdistinctmembersoftheirownnetworkviagroupmessages69.Thiswordofmouth
effect,whichwillbedealtwith later in thechapter, canbeachieved if thebrand is cleverly
communicated, and people regard the brand values as relevant to themselves, or even an
extensionoftheirownpersonality.
Acompetentandskilledbrandmanagermaybeabletocreateabrandstrategythatiscredible
enoughtobecomeagreatsuccesstotheextentthatthebrands“therebyserveasvehiclesfor
selfexpression70” for the followers. This can be achieved if the brand is cleverly
communicated,andpeoplecanrelatetothebrandvaluesasrelevanttothemselves,oreven
anextensionoftheirownpersonality.
Brand awareness is the intensity of a brand’s recollection, the extent towhich peoplewill
rememberaformerexposuretothebrand.Aaker’sresearchfromthe1996editionofBuilding
StrongBrandsconcludedthatpeoplewouldalwayspreferabrand“”theyhavepreviouslyseen
toonethatisnewtothem71”.Ifthatistrue,theprimaryeffortofanycommunicatorshouldbe
in the initial phase; tomake a lasting first impression.On the socialmedia platform, fonts,
colours and layout are typically fixed, but there is some obvious places to differentiate
yourself andmakea lasting impressing; the firstone is topromoteyourbrandbyhavinga
differentprofilepicture.Researchhaslongindicatedthatapicturesaysmorethanathousand
wordsandspeakstoapersononanentirelydifferentlevelthanwordscan72.Consideringthat
pictures in combination with text will most often function as peripheral cues73, a radical
picturecandoagreatjobatgainingthefirstattention,leavingthemessagestopushpeople
throughtothecentralroute.Theprofilepicturewillbeshowneverytimesomeonereadsan67 Ibid 68 Op. cit. 58 page 53 69 http://www.webanalyticsworld.net/2007/09/successful-facebook-groups.html 70 Op. cit. 58 page 53 71 Op. cit. 58 page 10 72 Kensinger, Elizabeth A. & Corkin, Suzanne (2003) Memory enhancement for emotional words: Are emotional words more vividly remembered than neutral words? Page 1177 73 Pagani, Margherita (2005) Encyclopedia of Multimedia Technology and Networking. Page 268
To like or not to like How political Communicators could benefit from making it personal
Line Bisgaard Nielsen May 5, 2011 21 of 42
update fromyou,whenyoucommentonotherpeople’sstatusesorwhentheycommenton
yoursanditisshownintheirnewsfeed.Oneshouldnotgoforatoodifferentlayoutorpose,
as thiscouldbeperceivedasweird74,but therearesomebasic thingsyoucando, themost
dominant being colours. If you choose a profile picture with different and limit‐breaking
colouring, chances are it is more likely to stick around in
people’sminds.
This portrait of Barack Obama from the 2008 presidential
campaignwouldbegreatasaprofilepictureduetothedifferent
colour pattern ‐ which at the same time connotes patriotic
valueswiththecoloursoftheAmericanflag.Apicturelikethis
would be a lot more effective at gaining that first important
attention than his current, which is charismatic but still looks
likeatypicalpoliticalportrait.
4.2WordOfMouthMarketing‐Buzzitup!
Intoday’ssociety,peopleconstantlyevaluateandcomment
ontheirexperiencesasconsumers‐goodorbad75.Wordof
mouthis,initsmostbasicform,theoralorwrittenpassing
of stories, reviews, and evaluations from one consumer to
another. Ithasgrown from theneedofnewways to reach
peoplesince today’sgreatestchallengewithinmarketing is
that modern consumers “no longer trust traditional
marketing76”duetoageneraladvertisingoverloadandscepticism.Traditionalmarketingno
longer has the same influence, but research has shown that people trust their friends and
families’ evaluations over anything else77. To accomplish a WOM effect, viral marketing
techniques could be employed. Using pre‐existing online social networks to make people74 http://www.wikihow.com/Get-More-Followers-on-Twitter 75 http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/online_mobile/friending-the-social-consumer/ 76 Op.cit. 58 Page 5 77 Op.cit. 117
Picture1&2:http://www.facebook.com/barackobama
To like or not to like How political Communicators could benefit from making it personal
Line Bisgaard Nielsen May 5, 2011 22 of 42
share a certain message, a message is spread from one person’s entire social network to
another’s, somewhat resembling the approach of a physical or technical virus, hence the
name.
AnimportantaspectofWOMisthatitis100%unpaid78,aspeoplewhodonotgainanything
personallyrisktheirnametoshareanexperience.Somewhatresemblingtheself‐expressive
modeldiscussed inthe formersection,WOMtheorysuggests that“people liketosharetheir
experiences(…)andwhenthoseexperiencesarefavorable,therecommendationscansnowball,
resulting in runaway
success”79.
One example could be
when Australian Prime
Minister Julia Gillard was
running for office in
August2010.Sheposteda
status update to her
Facebook page informing
peoplethattheycouldget
a twibbon sticker80 added to theirprofilepicture toproudly show theirpolitical conviction.
Theideafromherpointofviewisobvious;whenpeoplewereexpressingtheiropinionsand
stagingtheir idealized identity81asdiscussed in the formersection, theywouldat thesame
timebepromotingherpoliticalcampaigningtofriendsandfamily,resultinginaWOMeffect
as “consumers trust family and friends significantly more than other sources82” This would
naturallygenerateabuzzandpeoplewoulddrawattentiontoherpagebythemselves.
The goal of the communications planner is to create viral messages with high social
networkingappeal. If thegoal is successful, abuzzwill emerge ‐ tremendousattentionwill
surround and amplify the message, so the advertising efforts will become a self‐
78 http://webdesignerwall.com/general/word-of-mouth-marketing 79 http://hbswk.hbs.edu/archive/1956.html 80 http://www.facebook.com/juliagillard 81 Op.cit. 62 82 http://heidicohen.com/consumer-trust/
StatusUpdate1http://www.facebook.com/juliagillardasofJanuary3rd2011
To like or not to like How political Communicators could benefit from making it personal
Line Bisgaard Nielsen May 5, 2011 23 of 42
augmentative83.Theidealbuzzeffectmakespeoplesokeentobethefirsttoknowandnotthe
leastsharesomethingthatacompetitivegroupwillwillinglyspreadalmostanythingtotheir
social networks. Whether or not the campaign will be a success, relies on the peoplespreadingthemessage’sinfluencewithintheirownsocialnetwork84.
4.3SocialNetworkingOptimization
• Updateregularlyandoften85, tokeepyourpage freshandnewsworthy86.Remember
thatwhensomeoneinteractsonyourpostingsitappearsonthatperson’snewsfeed,
promotingyou to their friends87.Avoid“spamming”people toomuch ‐ find theright
balance, which will typically be nomore than two updates a day (more for special
occasions)88.
• Catchuponfollowers’orfellowpoliticians’relevantpostsandcommentorre‐postone
ormore.Shareinterestinglinks,involveyourfollowers,asktheiropinion89andanswer
the followers commenting on your postings Make them feel like their opinion
matters!
• “Do something unexpected and worth talking about!90” and differentiate yourself
throughapersonalandpassionateapproach91.
• Share personal news about your life92 by posting photos and videos of friends and
family93on a regular basis94. This will give your followers a reason to relate and
connect with you95 and share your postsmore often; “the oddmindless post can be
entertainingandendearyouasahumanbeingtoyourfollowers96”.
• Adjust static all‐text postings to incorporate viral elements such as pictures, videos,
83 Op.cit. 62 84 http://searchcrm.techtarget.com/definition/buzz-marketing 85 http://robmaguire.com/2008/12/13-ways-promote-your-facebook-page/ 86 Owyang, Jeremiah (2010) The 8 success criteria for Facebook Page Marketing. Page 6 87 Op.cit. 75 88 http://ezinearticles.com/?Social-Network-Marketing-Strategies-and-Techniques&id=5499700 89 http://seanseo.com/social-media/social-media-optimisation-broadcasting-vs-connecting/ 90 Sernovitz, Andy (2009) Word of Mouth Marketing: How Smart Companies Get People Talking. Page 181 91 http://www.stephaniesammons.com/marketing-for-professionals/differentiate-yourself-with-the-new-ps/ 92 Op.cit. 74 93 http://EzineArticles.com/5499700 94 http://marketing.about.com//od/marketingmethods/tp/wordofmouth.htm 95 Op.cit 81 96 http://seanseo.com/twitter/interacting-with-your-tweeps/
To like or not to like How political Communicators could benefit from making it personal
Line Bisgaard Nielsen May 5, 2011 24 of 42
andevensoundclipsor linkyourcontent toablogorpress releasewithelaborated
information97.• Ask,“Isthisbuzzworthy?”beforeeverypost98.
• Engage a vitalizing and varied language with a verb driven sentence structure99 to
avoidmonotony100andbecarefultomakethestatusupdatesneithertoolongnortoo
short,asitcanbeconfusingtoreadatextlikethat101.
4.4Ethos,pathosandlogos‐Aristotle’sartofRhetoric
Aristotle’sArtofRhetoricisanancientGreekworkbymanybelievedtobethecornerstonein
anylaterworkonpersuasivemeansandthemostimportantsingleworkonpersuasionever
written. It has often been accused of holding certain manipulative means102, but is, in its
original form, a guide to persuade for example a political audience to comply with the
speaker’sopinionandholdsassuchnoevilagenda103.ThemainessenceofAristotle’stheory
is, that persuasive appeals can be divided into three different categories; ethos (credibility
appeal),pathos (emotional appeal) and logos (logical appeal). This division is still relevant
today, and is employedbymanypoliticians tohelpmakepersuasivemessages104. Lateron,
the thesis will investigate the effects of a combination of the communicative tool of
storytellingandanemploymentofpathos.
Aritstotle’sapproachisinbynomeanstheonlyworkonmotivationalappeals.Accordingto
Gass and Seiter argue that a text constructed on warmth appeals will play primarily on
emotionalbenefits.Warmthappealsemphasizefamily,friendsandasenseofbelonging105and
willoftenspeaktoself‐efficacyandemotionalmeans.However,eventhoughtheirdescription
of a warmth corresponds well with Aristotle’s term pathos, the question his reasoning in
sayingthatwhen“peopleagreewithamessage,theytendtoperceiveitasbeingmorelogicalor
97http://www.carinafranco.com/blog/online-marketing/becoming-a-leader/how-to-differentiate-yourself-in-network-marketing-and-create-influence-in-your-audience/ 98 Op. Cit. 83 99 Op.cit 19 page 181 100 Op.cit 19 page 181 101 Op.cit 19 page 181 102 Garver, Eugene (1995) Aristotle’s Rhetoric: An art of Character. Page 83. 103 Ibid Page 78. 104 http://www.philosophypages.com/hype/2t.htm 105 Op.cit. 58 Page 283
To like or not to like How political Communicators could benefit from making it personal
Line Bisgaard Nielsen May 5, 2011 25 of 42
rational innature.When theydisagreewithamessage, they tend to thinkof itasbeingmore
emotional in nature106” and by that question the enormous impact, stated by others to be
everlasting.Itisnotpossibletoreachafinalconclusiononthematter,asitdependsonwhich
theoreticalapproachoneemploysasascholar.
4.5MartinJoosandTheFiveClocks
Inordertounderstandwhypeoplecommunicatethewaytheydoandhowtheychoosefrom
thedifferentgrammaticalforms,stylisticsmustbetakenintoaccount.Followinguponearly
linguisticpapersontheusageoftheBritishlanguage,MartinJoosdecidedtomakeafullstop
attherightorwrongpractisethatruledinthebeginningofthepastcentury107.Joosargued
thatatoosimplifiedviewontheuseoflanguagecouldnevergiveafullandadequatepicture
for an analysis and should therefore be discarded. In order to set up sufficient tools and
guidelinesforcompetentandcorrectprofessionalcommunication,MartinJoospresentedhis
workTheFiveClocksin1962,arguingthatthenativeEnglishlanguageholdsmanydistinctive
usage scales and presenting the four he found most important; age, style, breath and
responsibility108.Intheworkitisbyfarthestylisticsthatareemphasized,anditwillalsobe
this section the thesis will employ. According to Joos, formality could be fitted into five
distinct stylistic categories; frozen, formal, consultative, casual and intimate109. These terms
havelaterbecomewidelyknownasJoos’scaleofformality.
Frozen serves as theextreme110 formal and isusuallyonly employed in staticwritten texts
suchastheoretical,biblicalandlegalworksanddeclamations111.Itisastaticstyleunchained
by all intonation, listeners’ engagement and is employed in texts that provides information
anddatatothereaderandnothingmore.MartinJoossaysitveryclearly:“Thefrozenstyleis
forpeoplewhoaretoremainsocialstrangers112”.
106 Op.cit. 58 Page 271. 107 Joos, Martin (1962) The Five Clocks. Page viii 108 Ibid page 11 109 Ibid 110 Albrecht, Lone (2000) Textual Analysis and the Production of texts. Page 109 111 Op.cit. 97 Page 39 112 Op.cit. 97 Page 41
To like or not to like How political Communicators could benefit from making it personal
Line Bisgaard Nielsen May 5, 2011 26 of 42
Formal is one step down on the scale of formality, but it is still restricted in terms of
effectiveness. This is due to the fact that the intention is to inform ‐ not communicate ‐ as
listeners’participationisstructurallynotapartofit113.Thiswouldtypicallyhappenwhenthe
numberofpeoplehasgottentoobig tocommunicatewithonapersonal level. “Background
informationiswovenintothetextincomplexsentences114.Thestructureisstrictlydividedinto
speakerandlistener;speakingtimeispermittedandappointedandassuchnotaninteractive
form of communication115. Formal stylistics will typically be employed when elucidating
complexdataorperformingspeeches116andhaveageneralabsenceofpersonalpronouns117.
Consultativeis“normal”language,themostusedandisoftenemployedwhencommunicating
withpeopleyouarenotfamiliarwith118.Itisimportanttoemphasizethatasufficientamount
of background knowledge should be applied, but that the listener’s active “participation
insuresthatthereshallbeneithertoolittle,nortoomuchbackgroundgiven119”.Itwilltherefore
beargued,thatinemployingtheconsultativestyle,thespeakercan,bylimitingtheamountof
background information given, engage the listeners to a stage where they are somewhat
“forced”intobecomingavividpartoftheconversation.
Casual style is fortherelationshipswithpeopleyouknow,butwhoyoudomaybenothave
theintimacywithtohaveajargonwithimplicitmeanings.Itcanhowever,bequiteuseful if
onewishestoestablishanothertypeofrelationshipwithanewacquaintance;“Casualstyleis
for friends, acquaintances, insiders; addressed to a stranger, it serves tomake himan insider
simply by treating as an insider120.” It is also important tonote that this stylemakesuse of
simple sentence structure121 and relies heavily on listeners’ participation and involvement,
and can be termed dialogue over information sharing. Contradicting the frozen style, the
speaker’sandlisteners’“personalitiescomplementeachotherinsteadofclashing122”.
113 Op.cit. 97 Page 37 114 Op.cit. 97 Page 37 115 Op.cit. 97 Page 36 116 Op.cit. 97 Page 34 117 Op.cit. 97 Page 37 118 Op.cit. 97 Page 23 119 Op.cit. 97 Page 33 120 Op.cit. 97 Page 23 121 Op.cit. 100 Page 110 122 Op.cit. 97 Page 40
To like or not to like How political Communicators could benefit from making it personal
Line Bisgaard Nielsen May 5, 2011 27 of 42
The intimatestyleprimarilyconsistsof jargonand isonlyemployed inwell‐knownsettings
wherenoonecandoubttheimplicitconnotation123.Thetypicalintimatestylewillconsistof
extractions of words from sentences, where the focus is put on intonation and facial
expressions rather than explanatory sentence structure and thereby rely on the
listener/receiver’sabilitytoabstracttheintendedmeaning124.Joosemphasiseshowever,that
it is not due to rudeness, but simply because there is an implicit understanding between
peopleengaginginanintimateconversationalpattern.Thismeansthat“eachintimategroup
mustinventitsowncode”125.
Martin Joos andhisworkTheFiveClocks from1962 iswidely respectedandwell‐known in
areasof linguisticprofoundness, andhas servedas themeansof successful communication
formality‐wise formany people throughout the years. Critique on his works could be that
differentformalpatternsfollowdifferentculturesanditisassuchnotpossibletocreateever‐
relevant guidelines, and that “Joos’ particular gradation may not always be workable in
practicalanalysis126”asLoneAlbrechtputit,stipulatingthatasabasicframework,Joos’works
aregreat,butthatthecommunicationsplannershouldalwaysbearthedifferencesofculture,
socialclassetc.inmindtodefinethesituationalcontext127.
123 Op.cit. 97 Page 30 124 Op.cit. 97 Page 31 125 Op.cit. 97 Page 32 126 Op.cit. 100 Page 111 127 Op.cit. 100 Page 107
To like or not to like How political Communicators could benefit from making it personal
Line Bisgaard Nielsen May 5, 2011 28 of 42
5AustralianPrimeMinister JuliaGillardon the recent floodingofEast
Australia
DuringlateDecember2010andearlyJanuary2011,theAustralianEastcoastwashithardby
flooding,whichdeclared75%of thestatedisasterzone128.WhileAustralianPrimeMinister
Julia Gillard (who will in the following analysis be referred to as JG) was holding press
conferences, giving statements to news broadcasting and setting up emergencywebpages,
therewas one field she neglected in particular; Facebook. Below is her first status update
sincethecatastrophe,fromDecember292010.
128 http://www.qld.gov.au/floods/
StatusUpdate1:http://www.facebook.com/juliagillardasofFebruary192011
To like or not to like How political Communicators could benefit from making it personal
Line Bisgaard Nielsen May 5, 2011 29 of 42
Toachievesuccessfulcommunicationonsocialmedia,ithasbeenfoundthatitisimportantto
update often129, and this status update has clearly been down‐prioritized over the other
media, as they have seemedmore urgent to deal with. The problem is that if JG does not
prioritizeherfollowersonthismediumaswell,theyarelikelytosimplystopfollowingher130.
Ideally, she should update on Facebook every time she presents new information on other
media, so people were assured that this page and her followers there, were equally
important131. If that were the case, she would quickly get more followers, because a) her
followerswouldgetabroaderselectionofstatusupdates,andwouldtherebybemorelikely
toshareahigherpercentageandb)themagazinesandnewspaperswoulddiscoverthatshe
was in fact using this medium for personal communication and start quoting her from
Facebook,whichwouldensurethatc)newpeoplewhohavenotbeenfollowersbeforewould
realizeshehadaFacebookpageandbegintofollowher.
As thisstatusupdate is JG’s initialresponseto thecatastropheonFacebook, it issurprising
howsimpleitis;infact,itcanalmostnotbecalledastatusupdate,butratherastatement.If
anybodyhadhopedforalittlepersonality,theydidnotgetit.WhatJGistryingtodohere,is
toimposeauthorityandcredibilitytoherstatement,connotinganoverallsignificanceof“We
canhandlethis!”Shedoesthisbytryingtoemphasizetheextentofthefundsandauthorityin
herchoiceof“TheCommonwealthGovernment”insteadof“we”and“communities”insteadof
Australians.
InMartinJoos’terminology,thestylisticmethodemployedtoconstructthistextistheformal
style,astheintentionisstrictlyinformative132.Theevidentchoiceofstyleinacaselikethis
wouldbeconsultative,maybeevenincludingelementsfromthecasualstyle,asitwouldthen
have appeared as if JG was in fact trying to communicate with her followers, and was
interestedintheirresponsestoherpostings,duetothemorepersonaltone.Theformaltone
shouldactuallynotevenbe foundonasocialnetworkingpage,as thisdoesnotcorrespond
with theoverall purposeof this typeofpersonal communicationsplatform.Theabsenceof
129 Op.cit. 76 130 Op.cit. 86 131 Op.cit. 76 132 Op.cit. 97 Page 37
To like or not to like How political Communicators could benefit from making it personal
Line Bisgaard Nielsen May 5, 2011 30 of 42
personal pronouns, emotional appeals and a simple sentence structure makes it far less
efficientthanitcouldhavebeen133.
Consider insteadthisconstructedexample,drawingonpreciselypersonalpronouns,simple
sentencestructureandanemotionalappeal:
“IamdeeplyaffectedbytheterribletragediesinQueenslandoverChristmas.Intimeslikethese
itbecomesobvioustomewhatitreallymeanstobeanAustralianIamproudtobeoneofmany
peoplecontinuouslyworkingsidebysidetohelpwherehelpisneededandshowthesuffering
peopleandtherestoftheworldthatweAustraliansstandtogether!”
The personal pronouns support the warmth appeal and Aristotle’s principles of pathos,
ensuringthatpeopleconsiderthemessagerelevant.Whatunfortunatelyoftenhappenswhen
politicians have social network pages is an over intentional structuring of status updates.
Ratherthanemployingtheformaltonethemostpoliticalprofilesuse,theintentionshouldbe
focussed on making it personal. This is probably because the politicians rarely make the
statusupdates themselves.Theyareratherput togetherbyagroupofstaff,whose job is to
makeitasflawlessaspossible.Asideaitcanworkbutinreallife,thelanguagegetstoostiff
andnotasrelevanttothepeoplefollowingthepoliticianasitcouldhavebeen.Therefore,it
shouldbe evident to consider thepersonal aspect as anything elsewill potentiallybackfire
and appear less trustworthy, thereby clashing with the original intentions of having the
profileatall.
Writing froma frameofreferencethatwillbe familiar tomostAustralians, it ismuchmore
likelythatpeoplewillsympathizewiththemessage,presslikeandshareittotheirnetwork.It
wouldbeavehicleofself‐expression134,sopeoplecouldshowtheirnetworkthatIcareaswell
thesecouldjustaswellbemywords.
IfJGcannotfindthetimeandefforttoupdateherpagesondifferentplatformscontinuously,
she could add applications thatdraw the content fromone social networkingplatformand133 http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov 134 Op.cit 62
To like or not to like How political Communicators could benefit from making it personal
Line Bisgaard Nielsen May 5, 2011 31 of 42
sharesitwiththeothers.Thatwillbringnewcontenttoalltheplatforms,withouthavingto
updateoneachone,whilepromotingyourpresenceonothersitesatthesametime135.
In a crisis situation like this, it should be obvious to draw on some of the elements from
storytelling.Ashasbeendescribedinanearlierchapter,storytellingisallaboutinvigorating
pictures,smells,soundsandfeelingsinthereaders’minds,makethemcomealiveandenable
thereadertoexperienceamemoryinsteadoflistentoastory.WhenJGmakesastatusupdate
like the one shown above, she is in no way relying on listener participation136, and will
thereforenotbeawardedwithpermanentsupport137,whichwouldbetheobjectiveinacase
likethis.
EngaginginStorytellingtools,JG’sfirstpostafterthefloodingcouldhavesoundedlikethis:
“Icanonlyimaginehowitmusthavefelttostandthereandseethosebigwavesclaimour
coasts.Totastethesaltyairandseemyhousemyhomebeirreparabledestroyedintheblink
ofaneye.ThenervebreakingsoundofsolidwallsbeingtorndownandnothingIcandoexcept
fearingformylife.Helpmetohelptheheroesofthebigtragedybydonatingwhatyoucan.Ican
onlypraythatintimewecangivebackwhatthewatertook”.
Thisfictitiousstatusupdateisconstructedwithasimpleconnotedmeaning138,sothemessage
is emphasized. An emotional departure is taken in well‐known environments and vivid
descriptions,whichusedasrecognitionofscenerysparksrelatedness139andinvigoratesthe
message.Ratherthantellingthereaderswhattothinkorfeelbysupplyingexcessivedetailor
conclusions,individualscancontemplatefreely140andaretherebylikelytoengage;itwillno
longerjustbewordsandsentences,butpicturesandfeelingsinsidetheirmind,connotingthe
135 http://robmaguire.com/2008/12/13-ways-promote-your-facebook-page/ 136 Op.cit. 97 Page 23 137 Op.cit. 97 Page 35 138 Op.cit. 31 139 http://www.eldrbarry.net/roos/eest.htm 140 Op.cit. 35
To like or not to like How political Communicators could benefit from making it personal
Line Bisgaard Nielsen May 5, 2011 32 of 42
perceptionofapersonalmemory141.Thelinguisticstyleissincere,openandnottooformal,so
thereadersarelikelytobelieveJGhasactuallywrittenitherself.
Byusingthesayingintheblinkofaneye,theintentionistocreateaconnectionbetweenthis
metaphorical expression and the readers’ own experiences of having something turned
aroundveryquickly142.Again, the incorporationofpersonalpronounsmakes the textmore
relatableandportraysJGassomebodywhoispersonallyinvolved143.
ThefloodingisrelevanttoallAustralians,andwiththecorrectlystructuredstatusupdate,JG
wouldbeabletoshowpeopletherelevancetothem,therebyensuringtheyengageincentral
processing, which will in turn make sure the efforts will be long lasting. Furthermore,
potentialdangersshouldalwaysbecommunicatedtomakesurepeopleareawareoftherisk
andthefactthatsheasarepresentativeofthegovernmentisawareofit144.
Duringtheresearchperiod,itwasnotpossibletofindsuitableevaluativemeanstoconclude
whether status update communication on Facebook can be regarded successful. Therefore,
thethesishasconstructed itsownparameter,hereafterreferredtoas the likeparameter145.
The methodology is that the amount of likes on a status upgrade can be proportionally
comparedtothefixedamountofpeople,whohavepressedlikeonthepage,andtherebygets
informed every time a new status update is posted. Analyzing the numbers from the like
parameter146,thisspecificstatusupdatefromJGisoneoftheleastsuccessful.Withageneral
averageof508,34likesperupdate,thisstatus,whichonlyachieved315,isinthelowpartof
theparameter.ConsideringthatJGactuallyhas99.472peoplefollowingheronFacebook,this
numberisshockinglylow.
Based on the theoretical framework it will be argued that the suggestions made in the
conductedanalysiscouldmakethestatusupdateappealingandrelevant,sopeoplearemore
likely to findthat theyarebothableandpersonallymotivatedtoelaborateandprocess the
141 Op.cit. 32 142 Op.cit. 48 143 http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/17005211 144 Op.cit. 58 Page 351 145 See Appendix A 146 See Appendix A
To like or not to like How political Communicators could benefit from making it personal
Line Bisgaard Nielsen May 5, 2011 33 of 42
presented message147. If they take on this adoption process, they will engage in central
processing,whichwillcausepermanentresults.
147 Petty, R. E. & Cacioppo, J. T. (1986) Communication and Persuasion: Central and peripheral routes to attitude change.
To like or not to like How political Communicators could benefit from making it personal
Line Bisgaard Nielsen May 5, 2011 34 of 42
6.AmericanPresidentBarackObamaontheArizonashootings
OnJanuary8th2011,Americawitnessedaterribletragedy,whentwentypeoplewereshotin
Arizona, among others the US Representative Gabrielle Giffords148. Crises call for crisis
communication, and the President of the United States Barack Obama (who will in the
followinganalysisbereferredtoasBO)wasquicktoupdateonthesocialnetworkingpages.
Hisstatusupdateread:
StatusUpdate2:http://www.facebook.com/barackobamaasofJanuary102011
BO has rightly seen that Facebook is a great opportunity “to connectwith people at a time
whensomanycitizenstendtofeeldisconnectedfromthepoliticalprocess”149andjumpswisely
at itwith a statusupdate almost immediately after the incident150.Theuseof thepersonal
pronounme shows that he is personally affected and cares151 and in mentioning his wife
Michelle Obama he emphasizes a connoted message of warmth, family and a sense of
belonging, which are all cues to an emotional appeal according to Artistotle152. The
mentioning of prayers, which is a religious cue153, supports the emotional appeal and
148 http://www.time.com/time/nation/article/0,8599,2041465,00.html 149 http://www.nbcbayarea.com/blogs/press-here/Obama-Facebook-and-2012-119569954.html 150 Op.cit. 76 151 http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/17005211 152 http://www.philosophypage.com/hype/2.htm 153 http://changingminds.org/explanations/theories/ultimate_terms.htm
To like or not to like How political Communicators could benefit from making it personal
Line Bisgaard Nielsen May 5, 2011 35 of 42
establishes a connectionbetween the establishedunited goal (of fighting injustice) and the
president.
By incorporating the saying154has no place in a free societyBO draws onpatriotic cues to
connoteafeelingoftogethernessandasenseofsharedbeliefs.Indoingso,hecleverlydepicts
anenemyofbasicAmericanbeliefsandvalues,stronglyemphasizingtothereadersthatthis
issomethingrelevanttothecoreofbeingAmerican;toallofthem.Furthermore,itshouldbe
noted that BO does not describe a personified villain, but instead focuses on the act and
feelingsofinjustice,therebycreatingalinguisticframeperfectforthemessagewecanhandle
thistogether!
WhatBOdoes in thestatusupdate is todepictaunited feelingofgriefyetstill connote the
message of a world leader who has authority. Had BO enhanced the sense‐approach and
includedrelevantandappealingfeaturesfromstorytelling,themessagewasmuchmorelikely
toinvolvehisaudience,andtherebycausingthemtogodownacentralrouteofprocessing155.
Today,IamnotthePresidentoftheUnitedStatestodayIamanAmerican.WhenIheardthe
terriblenewsIfeltthefearslipundermyskinandheardthescreamsforhelpechointhehallsof
theWhiteHouse.Today,Americahasbeenhurt!Todaywehavebeenhurt!
Letsusnolongertolerateinjusticeorfear,letusmakesuretodaywillbethefirstdayonthe
journeytoabettersociety.
Inthisfictitiousexample,BOemployssuccessfulrhetoricaltoolstogaincompliancefromhis
audience;theoverallmessageisdepictingfeelingsofempathyandtogethernessinjointgrief,
tostandupforcorevaluesandfightforacommongoal156.
The stylistic tone has moved down on the scale of formality and would by Martin Joos’
definition be consultative, as opposed to the original status update, but casual. By
incorporatinganewmoreintimatelinguisticstyleandemploythepersonalpronounsweand154 Op.cit. 58 page 145 155 Op.cit. 18 page 162 156 Op.cit. 31
To like or not to like How political Communicators could benefit from making it personal
Line Bisgaard Nielsen May 5, 2011 36 of 42
us,BOautomaticallyportraysacloserandmorepersonalrelationshipbetweenhimassender
and the readers157. This corresponds well with the emotional appeal, the simple sentence
structureandtheuseofrepetitionandemphasisasrhetoricalcues158.
The statusupdatehasbeen constructed enhancing the resemblance to other great political
speeches,suchastheformerBritishPrimeMinisterWinstonChurchill’sWeshallfightonthe
Beaches159from1940.ThisincombinationwiththementioningoftheWhiteHouseisdoneto
createa familiar, safe andwell‐known frameof referenceand to remind the readersof the
valuesnormallycombinedwithpatrioticsymbolslikethese.
Byincorporatingmeansofstorytellingsuchasvividlydescriptivelanguageanddetailedsense
enhancements,BO guides the readers to experience the feelings themselves160, rather than
telling them what to feel161, which will trigger reader participation and initiate central
processing162.
Consideringthe likeparameter forBO, thisexactstatusupdateby farexceededBO’s typical
likelevel.Theaverageof15.549,41ofhis19.537.102followerswasovertakenbythe59.287
likes,anobviousexampleofasuccessfulself‐expressivechannel163.Peoplesharedthisstatus
updatemorethantheyusuallywould,becauseitwassuccessful inbeingrelevanttoagreat
amountofpeopleandObamadescribedthefeelingseverybodywasfightingtoputwordson.
Basedontheanalysis’findings,itwillbearguedthatthesuggestionssuppliedcouldenhance
theeffectivenessand increase the levelofbuzz‐worthiness forBO tonewheights.Theself‐
expressivemodel inchapter4, suggested thatpeoplearemore likely topromoteandshare
messages they find personally relevant. When they feel the a status update’s message
correspondswiththeirpersonallyconstructedself‐identityandatthesametimeenhancesthe
connectiontotheperceivedimage164theywillbemoremotivatedtoengageinadoptionand
157 Op.cit. 97 page 23 158 eldrbarry.net 159 http://www.putlearningfirst.com/language/20rhet/chill.html 160 Op.cit. 32 161 Op.cit. 35 162 Op.cit. 58 163 Op.cit. 62 Page 154 164 Op.cit. 26 Page 80
To like or not to like How political Communicators could benefit from making it personal
Line Bisgaard Nielsen May 5, 2011 37 of 42
elaboration165. If they become involved, they will engage in central processing, which will
triggerpermanentresults166.
165 Op.cit. 58 166 Op.cit. 147
To like or not to like How political Communicators could benefit from making it personal
Line Bisgaard Nielsen May 5, 2011 38 of 42
7.Conclusion
This thesis set out to gain new theoretical insight onwhether or not employing principles
fromstorytellingandsocialnetworkingoptimizationtostatusupdatecommunicationwould
be efficient. As the thesis objectives are strictly theoretical, a great amount of different
theories have been scrutinized to create a theoretical framework suitable for hypothetical
conclusionstobemade.
Theory from the field of Storytelling has created a framework for understanding how
narratives can help to convey feelings or events and depict a sense of personality and
relatedness,whichmightotherwisebedifficulttocommunicatebytraditionalpoliticalmeans.
Despite the limitations in the rather fixed layout, Storytelling enablesnewpossibilities and
allowsthestatusupdatetoappealtoreadersonanentirenewlevel,duetothenewcontext
and the comparison to other theories. The Elaboration Likelihood Model has been
incorporated into this field as well, offering other ways to “measure” effectiveness of the
statusupdatecommunicationbyfocussingonlimitedaspectsofreceptionanalysis.
Thechapteronsocialnetworkingoptimizationisamixtureofdifferentrhetoricaltools,which
united represent a well‐arranged and instructive theoretical platform to guide the textual
constructionofstatusupdatesandprovidemeansforexplainingtheeffectivenessintermsof
motivationalappeals,grammaticalelementssuchasformalityandtheviralmarketingterms
word of mouth and buzz worthiness. The analysis has showed that incorporating these
elements into the communications strategy can hypothetically be very efficient to make a
statement appear more personally relevant to the readers and invigorate communication,
whichwouldotherwisehavebeendullandstatic.
Successful status updates could generate a word of mouth effect; ensuring important
messages were spread via the share function on Facebook. As it has not been possible to
uncover any kind of suitable evaluative means to conclude whether status update
communication on Facebook can be regarded successful, the thesis has developed its own.
The amount of likes on each status update proportionally compared to the number of
followers, indicate how well the status update has been received. The like parameter has
establishedanaveragelikerateandthecircumstancesthatcombinelikesandeffectiveness.
To like or not to like How political Communicators could benefit from making it personal
Line Bisgaard Nielsen May 5, 2011 39 of 42
Finally, the thesis has, based on the newly obtained theoretical insight, presented specific
criteria for achieving greater effectiveness in political status update communication. These
criteria or guidelines for Storytelling and Social Networking Optimization can, if correctly
implemented, increase the amount of likes and followers and from a theoretical viewpoint
engage thereadersbysupplyingcentral cues toelaboration,ensuring long termresultsare
achieved.
To justify the argument of how important narrative, emotional clues and vivid expressions
are,theemploymentofthesefeaturesintheconstructedexampleshasbeenexaggerated.The
thesis acknowledges that it might at first appear too extreme compared to what political
Facebook pages would normally contain, but it is fully intentional and has been done to
emphasizethetheoreticalarguments.
Basedontheanalysisandthethoroughandevidenttheoreticalfoundations,itwillbeargued
that the basis for achieving effective status update communication by the means of the
presented recommendations is theoretically likely. The thesis contends further that only a
verysmallpartofthepeoplewhofollowpoliticiansonFacebookactuallyengageintheposted
status updates and show their opinions or commitment by commenting or pressing like so
thereisroomforimprovement.
Thefinalnotemustbethatitisnotaquestionastowhetheritispossibletoincorporatethe
principles of storytelling and social networking optimization, it is whether politicians are
willingandabletoacceptthatanewmediumcallsfornewrules.
Wouldyoulikeonthat…?
To like or not to like How political Communicators could benefit from making it personal
Line Bisgaard Nielsen May 5, 2011 40 of 42
8.Bibliography
Books:Aaker,DavidA.(1996)BuildingStrongBrands.SimonandSchuster,firstpaperbackedition.
Albrecht,Lone(2000)TextualAnalysisandtheProductionoftexts.Samfundslitteratur,firstedition
Davis,Donald(2005)Tellingyourownstories.AugustHouse,firstedition
Denning,Stephen(2005)TheLeader’sGuidetoStorytelling.Jossey‐Bass,firstedition
Fog,Klausetal.(2004)StorytellingBrandinginPractice.SamfundslitteraturPress,secondedition
Garver,Eugene(1995)Aristotle’sRhetoric:AnartofCharacter.UniversityofChicagoPress,firstedition
Gass,RobertH.&Seiter,JohnS.(2003)PersuasionSocialInfluenceandCompliancegaining.Pearson,fourthedition.
Greene,Ellin(1996)StorytellingArtandTechnique.LibrariesUnlimited,thirdsubedition.
Joos,Martin(1962)TheFiveClocks.Hardinger,secondedition
Kensinger,ElizabethA.&Corkin,Suzanne(2003)Memoryenhancementforemotionalwords:Areemotionalwordsmore
vividlyrememberedthanneutralwords?MassachusettsInstituteofTechnology,Cambridge,Massachusetts
Kevin,Jim(1999)ScaryStories:InformationforTellers.StorytellingWorld16‐Summer/fall
Lippmann,Walter(1946)PublicOpinion.PenguinBooks,firstedition.
MacDonald,MargaretR.(2006)TheStoryteller’sstartupbook:finding,learning,performingandusing.AugustHouse
Publishers,firstedition
McNair,Brian(1995)AnintroductiontoPoliticalCommunication.Routledge,fourthedition.
Newsom,Doug&Haynes,Jim(2005)PublicRelationsWritingFormandStyle.ThomsonWadsworth,eightedition.
Owyang,Jeremiah(2010)The8successcriteriaforFacebookPageMarketing.AltimeterGroup
Pagani,Margherita(2005)EncyclopediaofMultimediaTechnologyandNetworking.IdeaGroupPublishing,firstedition.
Paxson,Peyton(2010)MassCommunicationandMediaStudiesAnIntroduction.Continuum
Pette,R.E.&Cacioppo,J.T.(1986)CommunicationandPersuasion:Centralandperipheralroutestoattitudechange.Springer‐
Verlag,firstedition
Sernovitz,Andy(2009)WordofMouthMarketing:HowSmartCompaniesGetPeopleTalking.KaplanPress,revisededition
Vos,Gailde.(2003)Storytellingforyoungadults.Aguidetotalesforteens.LibrariesUnlimited,secondedition
To like or not to like How political Communicators could benefit from making it personal
Line Bisgaard Nielsen May 5, 2011 41 of 42
Weick,KarlE.(1995)Sensemakinginorganisations(FoundationsforOrganisationalScience.SagePublications,firstedition
Windahl,Svenetal.(2008)UsingCommunicationTheoryanIntroductiontoPlannedCommunication.SagePublicationsLmt,
secondedition
Websites:http://www.12manage.com/description_storytelling.html#userforum asofApril172011
http://www.ancientsites.com/aw/Post/164873 asofApril22011
http://blog.nielsen.com/nielsenwire/online_mobile/friending‐the‐social‐consumer/ AsofApril172011
http://hbswk.hbs.edu/archive/1956.html AsofApril10,2011
http://heidicohen.com/consumer‐trust/ AsofApril10,2011
http://www.carinafranco.com/blog/online‐marketing/becoming‐a‐leader/ AsofApril22,2011
how‐to‐differentiate‐yourself‐in‐network‐marketing‐and‐create‐influence‐in‐your‐audience/
http://www.boddunan.com/education/61‐english‐language/9560‐the‐art‐of‐story‐writing AsofMarch172011‐and‐story‐telling.html
http://changingminds.org/explanations/theories/elaboration_likelihood.htm AsofOctober22010
http://changingminds.org/explanations/theories/ultimate_terms.htm AsofAugust232010
http://www.docstoc.com/docs/33259476/Formal‐and‐informal‐communication‐channels AsofApril22011
http://www.eldrbarry.net/roos/eest.htm AsofApril142011
http://EzineArticles.com/5499700 AsofMarch172011
http://ezinearticles.com/?Social‐Netw AsofMarch172011
http://www.facebook.com/barackobama AsofApril232011
http://www.facebook.com/juliagillard AsofApril232011
http://www.facebook.com/press/info.php?statistics AsofApril292011
http://www.kommunikationsforum.dk/lars‐sjoestroem‐nielsen/blog/word‐of‐mouth‐marketing‐womm AsofMay312009
http://www.leraconteur.scriptmania.com/hints.htm AsofApril252011
http://marketing.about.com//od/marketingmethods/tp/wordofmouth.htm AsofMarch42011
http://www.ork‐Marketing‐Strategies‐and‐Techniques&id=5499700 AsofApril122011
http://www.nbcbayarea.com/blogs/press‐here/Obama‐Facebook‐and‐2012‐119569954.html AsofApril112011
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/17005211 AsofFebruary22011
http://www.philosophypages.com/hype/2t.htm AsofApril162011
http://www.purchase.com/blog/social‐media/if‐facebook‐were‐a‐country AsofFebruary82010
To like or not to like How political Communicators could benefit from making it personal
Line Bisgaard Nielsen May 5, 2011 42 of 42
http://www.qld.gov.au/floods/ AsofMarch62011
http://robmaguire.com/2008/12/13‐ways‐promote‐your‐facebook‐page/ AsofApril82011
http://www.sasked.gov.sk.ca/docs/mla/speak014.html AsofJanuary212011
http://seanseo.com/twitter/interacting‐with‐your‐tweeps/ AsofApril162011
http://seanseo.com/social‐media/social‐media‐optimisation‐broadcasting‐vs‐connecting/ AsofMarch182011
http://searchcrm.techtarget.com/definition/buzz‐marketing AsofFebruary162011
http://skreened.com/veganshopforvegans/vegans‐are‐better‐people AsofMarch12011
http://smedio.com/2011/04/25/now‐that‐nearly‐every‐one‐is‐social‐how‐do‐you‐differentiate‐yourself/ AsofApril32011
http://socialmediatoday.com/index.php?q=soravjain/195917/40‐most‐popular‐social‐networking‐sites‐world AsofApril162011
http://www.stephaniesammons.com/marketing‐for‐professionals/differentiate‐yourself‐with‐the‐new‐ps/ AsofApril292011
http://www.time.com/time/nation/article/0,8599,2041465,00.html AsofJanuary102011
http://www.timsheppard.co.uk/story/faq.html#Being AsofOctober102010
http://www.timsheppard.co.uk/story/faq.html#Books AsofOctober102010
http://www.timsheppard.co.uk/story/faq.html#Introduction AsofOctober102010
http://www.vegansociety.com/about/who‐we‐are.aspx AsofApril222010
http://www.webanalyticsworld.net/2007/09/successful‐facebook‐groups.html AsofMarch232011
http://webdesignerwall.com/general/word‐of‐mouth‐marketing AsofApril12011
http://www.wikihow.com/Get‐More‐Followers‐on‐Twitter AsofApril252011
http://www.yourdiscovery.com/greece/entertainment/index.shtml AsofApril162011