tjh aehs amherst 10_16_16
TRANSCRIPT
Tim Havranek, MBA, PMP
October 18, 2016
Practical Methods for Applying Multi-Criteria Decision
Analysis on Environmental Projects to Improve
Stakeholder Communications
Greatest Benefits of MCDA
Provides a singular, comprehensive
analytical framework
2
Communicates the totality of consequences
associated with each alternativeMCDA
FS
ERAHHRA
Factors limiting the use of MCDA in remediation
Many assume that MCDA does not fit with established
regulatory processes
3
Perception that MCDA is black box
Stakeholders’ preconceived notions of the best alternative
Analytical silos
Desire to reserve MCDA for largest, most difficult projects
Most Significant Limiting Factor
4
Uncertainties regarding when and how to seek
external stakeholder involvement
Decision Analysis Process
5
Communicate Insights
Evaluation
Frame the Decision
Craft the Objectives
Design theAlternatives
Quantify Uncertainties
Structure the Model
Perform ProbabilisticAnalysis
Develop Results Graphics
Commit to Implement
When to Communicate with
Stakeholders
At the beginning and end of each major CERCLA process
– Remedial Investigation
– Human Health Risk Assessment
– Ecological Risk Assessment
– Feasibility Study
– Remedial Design
– Natural Resource Damage Assessment
6
Methods of Communication
• Up-front educational webinar or meetings
• Online surveys
• Individual interviews
• Facilitated Framing Sessions
• Town Hall Meetings using audience response
systems
7
Decision Maker Alignment
State Regulators
Environmental Protection
Save Greenfields
Brownfield Beneficial Reuse
Reduced GHG
EPA
Environmental Protection
Save Greenfields
Brownfields Beneficial Reuse
Corporate Owner
Technology Demonstration
Cost Savings
Enhance Corporate Image
Enhanced negotiations with
regulators
Local Mine
Leverage with Power Company
Revenue for Electricity
Positive Messaging
Power for Remediation
System
Local Town
Economic Development
Jobs
Habitat Protection
10
Stakeholders May Agree on Same Alternative but for Different Reasons