titanic's ethical case study

48

Upload: wajahat-sheikh

Post on 15-Jul-2015

3.982 views

Category:

Travel


32 download

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: TITANIC'S ETHICAL CASE STUDY
Page 2: TITANIC'S ETHICAL CASE STUDY

ABSTRACT

Page 3: TITANIC'S ETHICAL CASE STUDY

THE TITANIC

*The Titanic began its maiden voyage to

New York just before noon on April 10,

1912, from Southampton, England.

*Two days later at 11:40 P.M, Greenland

time, it struck an iceberg that was three to

six times larger than its own mass,

damaging

the hull.

* so that the six forward compartments

were ruptured.

*The flooding of these compartments

Was sufficient to cause the ship to sink

within two hours

and 40 minutes

*With a loss of more than 1,500 lives.

Page 4: TITANIC'S ETHICAL CASE STUDY

11:35 p.m.Lookouts spot the iceberg 1/4 mile ahead.

11:40 The Titanic sideswipes the iceberg, damaging nearly 300 feet of the hull.

MidnightWatertight compartments are filling; water begins to spill over the tops of the transverse bulkheads.

1:20 a.m.The bow pitches; water floods through anchor-chain holes.

2:00The bow continues to submerge; propellers lift out of the water.

2:10 The Titanic tilts 45 degrees or more; the upper structure steel disintegrates.

2:12 The stern raises up out of the water; the bow, filling with water, grows heavier.

2:18Weighing 16,000 tons, the bow rips loose; the stern rises to almost vertical.

2:20 The stern slips beneath the surface.

2:29Coasting at about 13 mph, the bow strikes the ocean floor.

2:56Falling at about 4 mph, the stern strikes the ocean floor.

Page 5: TITANIC'S ETHICAL CASE STUDY
Page 6: TITANIC'S ETHICAL CASE STUDY
Page 7: TITANIC'S ETHICAL CASE STUDY

WHY DID

TITANIC SANK?

Page 8: TITANIC'S ETHICAL CASE STUDY

THE MANAGING

CREW

TITANICS ENGINEERING

FLAWS

Page 9: TITANIC'S ETHICAL CASE STUDY

This was Captain E.J. Smith'sretirement trip. All he had todo was get to New York in recordtime. Captain E.J. Smith said yearsbefore the Titanic's voyage,"I cannot imagine any conditionwhich would cause a ship tofounder. Modern shipbuilding hasgone beyond that.”

Page 10: TITANIC'S ETHICAL CASE STUDY

Captain Smith ignored seven iceberg warnings from his crew and other ships. If he had called for the ship to slow down then maybe the Titanic disaster would not have happened.

Page 11: TITANIC'S ETHICAL CASE STUDY

It was Bruce Ismay’sfault

Bruce Ismay was the managing director of the White Star Line and

he was aboard the Titanic. Competition for Atlantic passengers

was fierce and the White Star Line wanted to show that they could

make a six-day crossing.

To meet this schedule the Titanic could not afford to slow down. It is

believed that Ismay put pressure on Captain Smith to maintain the

speed of the ship.

Page 12: TITANIC'S ETHICAL CASE STUDY

The ship continued at a speed of about 21.5 knots.

Each ship had three propellers

Each outboard propeller was driven by a separate four-cylinder, triple expansion, reciprocating steam engine.

The center propeller was driven by a low-pressure steam turbine using the exhaust steam from the two reciprocating engines.

The power plant was rated at 51,000 I.H.P.

Page 13: TITANIC'S ETHICAL CASE STUDY

It was Thomas Andrews' faultThe belief that the ship was

unsinkable was, in part, due to the fact that the Titanic

had sixteen watertight compartments. However, the compartments did not reach as high as they should have

done. The White Star Line did not want them to go all the way up because this would

have reduced living space in first class. If Mr Andrews, the ship's architect, had insisted on making them the correct

height then maybe the Titanic would not have sunk.

Page 14: TITANIC'S ETHICAL CASE STUDY
Page 15: TITANIC'S ETHICAL CASE STUDY

269.1 meters long, 28.2 meters maximum wide, and 18 meters tall from the water line to the boat deck.

a gross weight of 46,000 tons.

The steel plate from the hull of the Titanicwas nominally 1.875 cm thick.

while the bulkhead plate had a thickness of 1.25 cm.

Page 16: TITANIC'S ETHICAL CASE STUDY
Page 17: TITANIC'S ETHICAL CASE STUDY

On an expedition in 1991 to the Titanic wreck, scientists discovered a chunk of metal lying on the ocean floor that once was a part of the Titanic's hull

The Frisbee sized piece of steel was an inch thick with three rivet holes (each 1.25 inches in diameter)

Page 18: TITANIC'S ETHICAL CASE STUDY

The causes of brittle fracture

Low Temperature

High Impact Loading

High Sulfur Content

Page 19: TITANIC'S ETHICAL CASE STUDY

Titanic disaster came following the recovery of a piece of the hull steel from the Titanic wreck

After cleaning the piece of steel, the scientists noted the condition of the edges

The edges of the piece of steel appeared almost shattered, like broken china

The metal showed no evidence bending or deformation

Page 20: TITANIC'S ETHICAL CASE STUDY
Page 21: TITANIC'S ETHICAL CASE STUDY

Charpy test determines the amount of energyabsorbed by a material during fracture

A piece of modern high-quality steel was tested along with the coupon from the hull steel

Both coupons were placed in a bath of alcohol at -1°C to simulate the conditions on the night of the Titanic disaster

Page 22: TITANIC'S ETHICAL CASE STUDY

Charpy test is run by holding the coupon against a steel backing and striking the coupon with a 67 pound pendulum on a 2.5-foot-long arm

Page 23: TITANIC'S ETHICAL CASE STUDY

Results of the Charpy test for modern steel and Titanic steel [Gannon, 1995]. When a pendulum struck the modern steel, on the left, with a large force, the sample bent without breaking into pieces; it was ductile. Under the same impact loading, the Titanic steel, on the right, was extremely brittle; it broke in two pieces with little deformation.

Page 24: TITANIC'S ETHICAL CASE STUDY
Page 25: TITANIC'S ETHICAL CASE STUDY

How rivets may have contributed to disaster

Page 26: TITANIC'S ETHICAL CASE STUDY

When the iceberg tore through the hull plates

Huge holes were created that allowed water to flood the hull of the ship

The hull plates transferred the inward forces

The rivets were then either elongated or snapped in two, which broke the caulking along the seams and provided another inlet for water to flood the ship

Page 27: TITANIC'S ETHICAL CASE STUDY
Page 28: TITANIC'S ETHICAL CASE STUDY

Vessel Particulars

•LOA: 882 ft 9 in

•Breadth: 92 ft 6 in

•Depth: 64 ft 3 in

•Draft: 34 ft 7 in

•Gross Tonnage: 46,328 GT

•Displacement: 52,310 LT

•Passengers & Crew: 3,547

•Design Speed: 21 knots

•Builder: Harland and Wolff,

Belfast, Ireland

•Year Built: 1912

•Flag: United Kingdom

•Registered Owner: White Star

Line

•Vessel Type: Passenger Liner

•Hull Material: Riveted Steel

Page 29: TITANIC'S ETHICAL CASE STUDY

These type of bulkheads are used nowadays in all most all types of ships.

They provide maximum safety in times of flooding or damage of hull.

They divide the ship into watertight compartments which prevents seeping of water to other parts of the ship incase the hull is broken.

The number of compartments that a particular ship has depends on the type and requirement of the vessel.

Page 30: TITANIC'S ETHICAL CASE STUDY

Correct height of the water tight compartments.

One of Titanic's greatest innovations was the placement of fifteen watertight bulkheads (with electrically operated watertight doors) that extended from the ship's double bottom through four or five of her nine decks and were said to make the ship "unsinkable."

Page 31: TITANIC'S ETHICAL CASE STUDY
Page 32: TITANIC'S ETHICAL CASE STUDY
Page 33: TITANIC'S ETHICAL CASE STUDY

700 survivors among 2235 passengers.

Most of 2nd and 3rd

class passengers came to about sinking of ship when water entered their compartments.

Unethical act

Crew should have treat all passengers equally.

Page 34: TITANIC'S ETHICAL CASE STUDY

Titanic was receiving warnings

from other ships 60 hours

before collision

• uncommon warnings,

• Ship was cruising

with maximum speed

• Difficult for the crews to

spot icebergs

Page 35: TITANIC'S ETHICAL CASE STUDY

• Pride E.J Smith

• Unethical act

• Decision that strongly influenced , as the crews were not emphasizing safety for the passengers. .

• According to our perspective , if they would not treated warnings uncommon and could have reduced the speed

‘loss of many lives would not occurred’

Page 36: TITANIC'S ETHICAL CASE STUDY

• Ship was cruising at maximum speed (22 knots), on a moonless night.

• Design speed was 21 knots.

• Unethical act , causes death of so many passengers

Page 37: TITANIC'S ETHICAL CASE STUDY

There was room on deck for twice as many lifeboats.

Carried just over half of passengers and crew.

Unethical act Decision supported

concept of ‘unsinkable ship’

Number of lifeboats were more , more passengers could’ve survived.

Designer shouldn’t approved this change that leads to the death of many passengers.

Page 38: TITANIC'S ETHICAL CASE STUDY

2,235 passengers in Titanic , includes MrIsmay, whose company The White Star Line, owned the Titanic. Loss of 1,522 lives Cause There were not enough life boats.

Mr Ismay aware that capacity of lifeboats was not enough ,Did not bother him

Unethical act.

Had explanations –

The Titanic was unsinkable so there was no risk;

Lifeboats were expensive both in cost and the deck space they occupied.

Page 39: TITANIC'S ETHICAL CASE STUDY

He complied with the law.

Number of lifeboats required by law to carry was measured on the weight of the ship not on the number of passengers.

Page 40: TITANIC'S ETHICAL CASE STUDY
Page 41: TITANIC'S ETHICAL CASE STUDY

Portion of the hull was damaged by filled with water quickly and, water filled the other compartments.

• Design was not watertight, Engineers/designers made clear assumptions of the amount of water they predicted would enter the hull.

• As it would reduce the living space in first class

Said by ‘WHITE STAR LION’.

• Unethical act

• If there were no watertight compartments ,

Titanic could have been afloat for 2 to 3 days.

Page 42: TITANIC'S ETHICAL CASE STUDY

The ice patrol could have informed the captain of the ice fields and surrounding icebergs and instructed him to stop the ship until morning.

Most of the life boards had the capacity of 65 people,held only 27 people.

Unethical act.

By carring equal no of people in each boat,could ‘ve saved the life of many passengers.

The crew stands blameworthy.

Page 43: TITANIC'S ETHICAL CASE STUDY

About three million rivets wereused to hold the sections of theTitanic together. Some rivets havebeen recovered from the wreck andanalysed. The findings show that they were

made of sub- standard iron. When the ship hit the iceberg, the force of the

impact caused the heads of the rivets to break and the sections of the Titanic to come apart. If good quality iron rivets had been used the sections may have stayed together and the ship may not have sunk.

Page 44: TITANIC'S ETHICAL CASE STUDY

Bruce Ismay was the managingdirector of the White Star Lineand he was aboard the Titanic. Competition for Atlantic passengerswas fierce and the White Star Line wanted to

show that they could make a six-day crossing

To meet this schedule the Titanic could not afford to slow down. It is believed that Ismayput pressure on Captain Smith to maintain the speed of the ship.

Page 45: TITANIC'S ETHICAL CASE STUDY

The belief that the ship was

unsinkable was, in part, due

to the fact that the Titanic

had sixteen watertight compartments. However, the compartments did not reach as high as they should have.

The White Star Line did not want them to go all the way up because this would have reduced living space in first class. If Mr Andrews had insisted on making them the correct height then maybe the Titanic would not have sunk.

Page 46: TITANIC'S ETHICAL CASE STUDY

What changes does the titanic design required?

How life of more peoples could have saved? What changes could’ve occurred when

“Women and Children first” policy would not have applied?

What decision Captain Smith could have made , when ship was recieving uncommon warnings?

Why ship was moving with 22 knots speed when design speed was 21 knots?

Page 47: TITANIC'S ETHICAL CASE STUDY

The Titanic tragedy was a warning to all other ships

From that point on ALL ships had enough lifeboats for every single person on the ship and sometimes more

There has been some other big ship crashes after that but usually not as many people died and the ship did not make the same mistakes as the Titanic did

Page 48: TITANIC'S ETHICAL CASE STUDY

There was certainly no such thing as an “unsinkable ship”

The Titanic will most likely continue to lure people for generations to come, since every generation is able to take something different from its historic tragedy.