thirty-five years of intravesical bacillus calmette-guérin for bladder cancer: where now?
TRANSCRIPT
E U R O P E A N U R O L O G Y 6 0 ( 2 0 1 1 ) 3 7 – 3 8
ava i lable at www.sciencedirect .com
journal homepage: www.europeanurology.com
Platinum Priority – EditorialReferring to the article published on pp. 32–36 of this issue
Thirty-Five Years of Intravesical Bacillus Calmette-Guerin for
Bladder Cancer: Where Now?
James W.F. Catto *
Institute for Cancer Studies and Academic Urology Unit, G Floor, The Medical School, University of Sheffield, Beech Hill Road, Sheffield, S10 2RX, United Kingdom
It is 35 yr since Morales described the use of intravesical
bacillus Calmette-Guerin (BCG) for non–muscle invasive
bladder cancer (BC). In the intervening years we have learned
much about this treatment. Although BCG is one of the most
studied medicines in urology, many questions regarding its
use remain [1]. In this month’s European Urology, Herr
et al report their use of induction BCG for high-risk BC [2].
The authors demonstrate excellent outcomes in BCG
complete responders and suggest the need for a new trial
to reevaluate induction and maintenance BCG. Their findings
and suggestion highlight the gaps in our knowledge and point
to issues that need resolving with BCG in this context.
The current dilemmas with BCG are well illustrated
using a historical perspective. In 1991, Lamm et al reported
that BCG was more effective than intravesical doxorubicin
at reducing BC recurrence [3]. When compared, 20% more
patients were disease free, and the time to recurrence was
around 1 yr longer for BCG-treated patients. In 2000, the
Southwest Oncology Group (SWOG) reported a comparison
of induction and maintenance BCG [4]. In 348 randomised
patients, maintenance BCG reduced the 5-yr recurrence,
worsening disease (including cystectomy), and death rates
by a further 19%, 6%, and 5%, respectively, when compared
with induction BCG. These data were the largest trial
included in key meta-analyses (eg, Sylvester et al [5]),
whose findings are central to our current use of BCG and
require exploration. First, maintenance BCG reduced
progression and death by 4% and 2.1%, respectively, when
compared with induction BCG and other treatments.
Second, the natural history of high- and intermediate-risk
non–muscle-invasive BC appeared relatively indolent. By
2.5 yr (median follow-up), progression to invasive disease
had occurred in only 9.8–13.8% and death from BC in only
DOI of original article: 10.1016/j.eururo.2011.03.051* Tel. +44 0 114 226 1229; Fax: +44 0 114 271 2268.E-mail address: [email protected].
0302-2838/$ – see back matter # 2011 European Association of Urology. Publis
5.6–7.7% of patients. Thus maintenance BCG appeared an
effective treatment for a relatively safe disease. These
findings defined a role for maintenance BCG in the first-line
management of high- and intermediate-risk BC [6].
However, there were weaknesses in the data reported by
these meta-analyses. First, patient follow-up was short
(median: 2.5 yr). Natural history reports clearly show that
progression and BC death rates are directly proportional to
the length of follow-up (reviewed in Kulkarni et al [7]). The
median time to BC mortality from these cancers is 3–5 yr and
was therefore not reached by tumours in the meta-analyses.
Second, few tumours were high risk (8% were grade 3). As
progression rates rise from 10–15% for grade 2 to 25–75% for
grade 3 tumours [8], the meta-analyses potentially under-
estimated the risk of muscle invasion in poorly differentiated
tumours. Third, the benefit of maintenance BCG, over
induction, probably relied on the power generated by a
single trial (the SWOG trial). Other randomised controlled
trials (RCTs) have failed to show a benefit for maintenance
BCG over induction treatment alone (reviewed in Gontero
et al [1]). To address aspects of these concerns, a newer meta-
analysis with longer follow up (median: 4.4 yr) and a higher
proportion of grade 3 tumours (16%) was reported in 2009
[9]. This analysis used individual patient data, which is the
most rigorous method of comparison, but did not include the
SWOG trial cases and so was consequently smaller (n = 2820
[9] versus n = 4863 patients [5]). Maintenance BCG was found
to reduce the frequency but not the timing of recurrence
when compared with induction BCG and intravesical
chemotherapy. When progressions to invasion and BC-
specific death were evaluated, no statistical differences with
either treatment were seen. Proponents for maintenance BCG
could correctly point to trends for improved progression-free
hed by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved. doi:10.1016/j.eururo.2011.04.024
E U R O P E A N U R O L O G Y 6 0 ( 2 0 1 1 ) 3 7 – 3 838
and BC-specific survival with maintenance BCG, and they
suggest that perhaps the low sample size precluded
statistical significance. However, if significance is not
reached with 800 cases, then one wonders if the difference
is of clinical benefit.
The perceived downsides of maintenance BCG are toxicity
and compliance. Around half of treated patients complain of
side effects, which are judged to be serious in up to 5% [1].
Toxicity has an impact on compliance such that, even in the
most enthusiastic hands, only a third of patients complete the
3-yr regimen [4]. Few studies have prospectively evaluated
quality of life on maintenance BCG. The poor compliance,
frequent side effects, and anxiety regarding tumour status
suggest life quality is compromised and support the need for
alternative treatments/schedules. With this in mind, Herr
et al report the long-term outcomes of complete responders
to induction BCG [2]. Induction BCG should avoid some of the
toxicity and compliance issues affecting a maintenance
regimen. Complete responders were defined as those free of
tumour at 6 mo, following reresection and 6 wk of induction
BCG, and they represented 79% of the initial patient cohort. As
detailed within the report, most of these tumours were high
grade, half were invading the lamina propria, and pTis was
present in the majority (62%). With a minimum 5-yr follow-
up, the authors observed recurrence of any tumour in half of
these patients (50% of which occurred within 2 yr) and
progression to muscle invasion in 11%. Radical cystectomy
was performed in 8% of cases, and BC-specific death occurred
in 4%. These data compare favourably with those from
maintenance BCG reports, as detailed within the report’s
discussion. For example, the most recent meta-analysis
reported progression to invasion and BC-related death in 12%
and 8% of patients, respectively [9]. So induction BCG appears
to offer a similar progression-free survival to maintenance
with (presumably) lower toxicity. However, this benefit is
balanced by a higher recurrence rate.
Where does this report now leave us? First, these data
reopen the debate regarding maintenance and induction
BCG. Herr et al have shown good outcomes with induction
BCG, and so we must recognise this is a viable treatment.
Second, we should wonder why this group has produced
outcomes not reliably replicated in multicentred studies.
Although authors and statisticians focus on BCG, this is only
part of the treatment for BC. Of equal or more importance is
the transurethral resection (TUR). It is likely that high-quality
TUR and careful patient selection contributed significantly to
these reported outcomes. TUR should clear all possible
tumour, adequately stage the disease (including detrusor
muscle from the correct region), and assess the urothelium
(including from the prostatic fossa). The differences reported
in residual tumour and upstaging rates demonstrate the wide
variation in TUR quality [10]. A poor quality TUR may not only
leave residual tumour but also fail to obtain sufficient
information to assess the bladder adequately. We should
imagine the difference in outcomes from an RCT comparing
high- and low-quality TUR. This current report suggests we
should also focus our attention on TUR quality. Finally, Herr
et al support the first-line use of BCG for high-risk disease. But
what was the outcome of all patients treated by BCG?
Specifically, did patients within the 21% of nonresponders
lose out by their 3-mo trial of BCG and check cystoscopy? We
know in muscle-invasive disease that a delay of 3 mo can
adversely affect outcome. So, despite numerous RCTs on
these cancers, we still do not know what the maximum
possible survival is for newly diagnosed high-risk disease.
Without this context it is hard to place BCG treatment data.
Retrospective series suggest immediate radical cystectomy
provides a survival benefit over delayed surgery in BCG
failures (reviewed in Kulkarni et al [7]). However, the benefit
is not uniform and so is likely to include selection bias.
In summary, these data suggest that complete respon-
ders to induction BCG have a good prognosis, if managed
carefully. Rather than the need for a new trial, I suggest we
accept these findings and include induction BCG as an
option when counselling patients. Further RCTs are needed,
but these should be aimed at placing BCG in context and
evaluating newer therapies/delivery strategies to reduce
progression and cancer-specific death.
Conflicts of interest: The author has nothing to disclose.
References
[1] Gontero P, Bohle A, Malmstrom P-U, et al. The role of bacillus
Calmette-Guerin in the treatment of non–muscle-invasive bladder
cancer. Eur Urol 2010;57:410–29.
[2] Herr H, Dalbagni G, Donat SM. Bacillus Calmette-Guerin without
maintenance therapy for high-risk non–muscle-invasive bladder
cancer. Eur Urol 2011;60:32–6.
[3] Lamm DL, Blumenstein BA, Crawford ED, et al. A randomized trial of
intravesical doxorubicin and immunotherapy with bacille Calmette-
Guerin for transitional-cell carcinoma of the bladder. N Engl J Med
1991;325:1205–9.
[4] Lamm DL, Blumenstein BA, Crissman JD, et al. Maintenance bacillus
Calmette-Guerin immunotherapy for recurrent TA, T1 and carcino-
ma in situ transitional cell carcinoma of the bladder: a randomized
Southwest Oncology Group Study. J Urol 2000;163:1124–9.
[5] Sylvester RJ, van der MA, Lamm DL. Intravesical bacillus Calmette-
Guerin reduces the risk of progression in patients with superficial
bladder cancer: a meta-analysis of the published results of ran-
domized clinical trials. J Urol 2002;168:1964–70.
[6] Babjuk M, Oosterlinck W, Sylvester R, et al. EAU guidelines on non–
muscle-invasive urothelial carcinoma of the bladder, the 2011
update. Eur Urol 2011;59:997–1008.
[7] Kulkarni GS, Hakenberg OW, Gschwend JE, et al. An updated critical
analysis of the treatment strategy for newly diagnosed high-grade
T1 (previously T1G3) bladder cancer. Eur Urol 2010;57:60–70.
[8] Sylvester RJ, van der Meijden APM, Oosterlinck W, et al. Predicting
recurrence and progression in individual patients with stage Ta T1
bladder cancer using EORTC risk tables: a combined analysis of
2596 patients from seven EORTC trials. Eur Urol 2006;49:466–77,
discussion 475–7.
[9] Malmstrom P-U, Sylvester RJ, Crawford DE, et al. An individual
patient data meta-analysis of the long-term outcome of random-
ised studies comparing intravesical mitomycin C versus bacillus
Calmette-Guerin for non–muscle-invasive bladder cancer. Eur Urol
2009;56:247–56.
[10] Brausi M, Collette L, Kurth K, et al. Variability in the recurrence rate
at first follow-up cystoscopy after TUR in stage Ta T1 transitional
cell carcinoma of the bladder: a combined analysis of seven EORTC
studies. Eur Urol 2002;41:523–31.