third parties in moving from conflict management to conflict resolution jonathan wilkenfeld...

25
Third Parties in Moving from Conflict Management to Conflict Resolution Jonathan Wilkenfeld University of Maryland Center for International Development and Conflict Management

Upload: sophia-wood

Post on 25-Dec-2015

215 views

Category:

Documents


1 download

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: Third Parties in Moving from Conflict Management to Conflict Resolution Jonathan Wilkenfeld University of Maryland Center for International Development

Third Parties in Moving from Conflict Management to Conflict Resolution

Jonathan WilkenfeldUniversity of Maryland

Center for International Development and Conflict Management

Page 2: Third Parties in Moving from Conflict Management to Conflict Resolution Jonathan Wilkenfeld University of Maryland Center for International Development

Prescriptions

• Monitoring and early warning• Intervention matching circumstances

Page 3: Third Parties in Moving from Conflict Management to Conflict Resolution Jonathan Wilkenfeld University of Maryland Center for International Development

Peace and Conflict 2010

CIDCMUniversity of Maryland

Page 4: Third Parties in Moving from Conflict Management to Conflict Resolution Jonathan Wilkenfeld University of Maryland Center for International Development

Over the past two years, the risks of instability and conflict have increased significantly in the regions of the world where those dangers were already very high.

Page 5: Third Parties in Moving from Conflict Management to Conflict Resolution Jonathan Wilkenfeld University of Maryland Center for International Development

The most serious current threats to international stability -

the recurrence of armed hostilities in conflicts that have recently come to an end.

Largely a post-Cold War phenomenon

Page 6: Third Parties in Moving from Conflict Management to Conflict Resolution Jonathan Wilkenfeld University of Maryland Center for International Development

Peace and Conflict 2010

• Making cutting edge academic research accessible to the policy community

• Open-source data• Commitment to

transparency• Available from Paradigm

Publishers

Page 7: Third Parties in Moving from Conflict Management to Conflict Resolution Jonathan Wilkenfeld University of Maryland Center for International Development

Peace and Conflict Ledger

• What does the Peace and Conflict Ledger measure?

• The risk of an instability event occurring in a country in the next three years.

Page 8: Third Parties in Moving from Conflict Management to Conflict Resolution Jonathan Wilkenfeld University of Maryland Center for International Development

Some Key Details

• The focus is on how structural attributes of states influence the risk of instability

• Four domains of government activity (economics, politics, security, and social)

• Estimated a statistical model on data from 1950-2003 (training data)

• Obtain country risk estimates by inputting 2007 values for all countries

Page 9: Third Parties in Moving from Conflict Management to Conflict Resolution Jonathan Wilkenfeld University of Maryland Center for International Development

Indicators – The Usual SuspectsEconomics Politics Security Social

GDP per capita Extent of factionalism

State repression of citizens

Male secondary enrollment

GDP annual growth rate

Citizen participation in selecting gov’t

Size of military budget

Infant Mortality

GDP 3-year growth rate

Gov’t revenues as % of GDP

Number of active armed personnel

Access to water supplies/ sanitation

CPI annual change Duration of present regime

Peace Duration Youth literacy rates

Primary commodity dependence

Regime Consistency Conflict in contiguous states

Immunization rates

Ratio of trade to GDP

Level of Democracy Conflict in region Male/female literacy ratio

Poverty rates Executive Constraints

Number of IDPs Cultural or religious discrimination

Change in foreign investment

Legislative Effectiveness

Intensity of internal armed conflicts

Male/female life expectancy ratio

Page 10: Third Parties in Moving from Conflict Management to Conflict Resolution Jonathan Wilkenfeld University of Maryland Center for International Development

Indicators – The Usual Suspects

Economics Politics Security Social

GDP per capita Extent of factionalism

State repression of citizens

Male secondary enrollment

GDP annual growth rate

Citizen participation in selecting gov’t

Size of military budget

Infant Mortality

GDP 3-year growth rate

Gov’t revenues as % of GDP

Number of active armed personnel

Access to water supplies/ sanitation

CPI annual change Duration of present regime

Peace Duration Youth literacy rates

Primary commodity dependence

Regime Consistency Conflict in contiguous states

Immunization rates

Ratio of trade to GDP

Level of Democracy Conflict in region Male/female literacy ratio

Poverty rates Executive Constraints

Number of IDPs Cultural or religious discrimination

Change in foreign investment

Legislative Effectiveness

Intensity of internal armed conflicts

Male/female life expectancy ratio

Page 11: Third Parties in Moving from Conflict Management to Conflict Resolution Jonathan Wilkenfeld University of Maryland Center for International Development

Risks of Instability, 2008-2010

Page 12: Third Parties in Moving from Conflict Management to Conflict Resolution Jonathan Wilkenfeld University of Maryland Center for International Development

Instability Risk: Top 25

Page 13: Third Parties in Moving from Conflict Management to Conflict Resolution Jonathan Wilkenfeld University of Maryland Center for International Development

Instability Risk: Top 25 (cont.)

Page 14: Third Parties in Moving from Conflict Management to Conflict Resolution Jonathan Wilkenfeld University of Maryland Center for International Development

Significant Increase in Risk

DEMOCRATIC REPUBLIC OF CONGO• Transition to partial democracy• Poor performance on other indicators

DEMOCRATIC REPUBLIC OF CONGO• Transition to partial democracy• Poor performance on other indicators

BURUNDI• Democratic transition begins in 2005• Renewed fighting in neighboring DRC (2007)

BURUNDI• Democratic transition begins in 2005• Renewed fighting in neighboring DRC (2007)

NIGERIA• Renewed fighting in neighboring Chad (2005) and Niger (2007)

NIGERIA• Renewed fighting in neighboring Chad (2005) and Niger (2007)

MAURITANIA• Tenuous democratic transition begins in 2005• Continued low-intensity violence in Mali and Algeria

MAURITANIA• Tenuous democratic transition begins in 2005• Continued low-intensity violence in Mali and Algeria

Page 15: Third Parties in Moving from Conflict Management to Conflict Resolution Jonathan Wilkenfeld University of Maryland Center for International Development

Sources of Increased Risk?

Democratization

Recurring Armed Conflict

Page 16: Third Parties in Moving from Conflict Management to Conflict Resolution Jonathan Wilkenfeld University of Maryland Center for International Development

New and Recurring Conflict, 1946-2007Number of Conflict Onsets

Page 17: Third Parties in Moving from Conflict Management to Conflict Resolution Jonathan Wilkenfeld University of Maryland Center for International Development

Recently Terminated Conflicts and Prospects for Recurrence, 1946-2007

Number of Recently Terminated Conflicts

Page 18: Third Parties in Moving from Conflict Management to Conflict Resolution Jonathan Wilkenfeld University of Maryland Center for International Development

Costs of State Failure

Global estimated cost of state failure: $270 billion*

* Anke Hoeffler, Peace and Conflict 2010

Page 19: Third Parties in Moving from Conflict Management to Conflict Resolution Jonathan Wilkenfeld University of Maryland Center for International Development

Conclusion

• Devastating costs of state failure• Stay tuned• Diagnostic tools for policy-makers to support

effective policies to mitigate conflict risks

Page 20: Third Parties in Moving from Conflict Management to Conflict Resolution Jonathan Wilkenfeld University of Maryland Center for International Development

Prescriptions

• Monitoring and early warning• Intervention matching circumstances

Page 21: Third Parties in Moving from Conflict Management to Conflict Resolution Jonathan Wilkenfeld University of Maryland Center for International Development

Mediation in Crisis - Styles

• Facilitation: act as a channel– Helps reduce uncertainty– Helps reduce perceptions of mutual hostility

• Formulation: suggest/coordinate solutions– Helps by setting focal points– Helps by highlighting areas of compromise

• Manipulation: offer incentives (+ and -)– In particular: security guarantees– Helps by changing real costs and benefits

Page 22: Third Parties in Moving from Conflict Management to Conflict Resolution Jonathan Wilkenfeld University of Maryland Center for International Development

Mediation in Crisis

• Outcomes of interest:– Mutual compromise– Formal agreement– Post-crisis tension reduction

Page 23: Third Parties in Moving from Conflict Management to Conflict Resolution Jonathan Wilkenfeld University of Maryland Center for International Development

Results: Mediation Style, Compromise, and Agreements

• Manipulation has largest positive effect on crisis termination– Especially when it involves arrangements for or

provision of security guarantees• Formulation has slightly lesser but still

powerful positive effect• Facilitation has little effect

– Pure facilitation has negative effect on compromise

Page 24: Third Parties in Moving from Conflict Management to Conflict Resolution Jonathan Wilkenfeld University of Maryland Center for International Development

Results: Mediation Style and Post-Crisis Tensions

• Formulation has largest positive effect on post-crisis tension reduction

• Facilitation has lesser but still significant positive effect

• Manipulation is ineffective at reducing tensions, post-crisis– Even when security guarantees are involved. This

finding contrasts w/ previous studies.

Page 25: Third Parties in Moving from Conflict Management to Conflict Resolution Jonathan Wilkenfeld University of Maryland Center for International Development

Experimental Approaches to the Study of Mediation

• Mediation and Crisis– Style– Power relations– Zone of agreement

• Cultural factors in mediation– Design of automated mediator