Do Microcredit Lending Programs Help The Poor? A Comparative Analysis of Programs in Bangladesh and the U.S.A.

Like the right tofood, clothing, shelter, education and health,

credit should also be recognized as afundamental human right.

- Muhammad Yunus

Fahima Aziz

Department of Economics

Hamline University

Paper presented at 2011 Second European Conference on Microfinance,

Groginnen.

June 16-18, 2011

INTRODUCTION

Micro-credit programs were first introduced in developing countries and have grown rapidly in the

United States and in rest of the world. Initially, developing countries began implementing

microenterprise programs to bootstrap the poor out of poverty through entrepreneurship, or self-

employment, and instilling skills for employment, which would then stimulate economic

development in the surrounding communities. The main focus of many microcredit programs is to

break the vicious cycle of poverty. Some argue that welfare programs sometime tend to contribute

to the dependency and despair of the poor, whereas microfinance programs help the poor rise out

of poverty by giving them a sense of dignity and self-respect. Consequently, microenterprise

programs also have a social impact on its borrowers by increasing self-confidence and self-worth,

which further lead to empowering the poor.

The poor are generally unable to obtain credit for working capital. There are approximately over 1

billion people worldwide who have to live on less than $1 a day and over 2 billion people are

malnourished (UNDP report 2010). Therefore, in developing countries, where credit is virtually

nonexistent for the poor, microenterprise programs were created to collateral-free credit to low-

income people who historically have been considered credit risks by conventional banks (Aziz,

2002). Traditional banks will not consider lending to the poor for a variety of reasons. First of all,

traditional banks usually do not make loans to home businesses, which is typically the type of

business operated by microentrepreneurs. Second, the poor are considered to be very high credit

risks because they lack collateral, credit history and/or previous experience operating a business.

Furthermore, microenterprise loans are unattractive to traditional banks because the transactions

costs of a small loan are high relative to the interest and fees the loan generates. In other words, it

2

is not profitable for traditional financial institutions to lend such small amounts because the

transaction costs are essentially the same as they are for larger loans. Consequently, the poor could

only obtain credit from local moneylenders, who charge astronomically high interest rates, leaving

the poor with essentially zero profit from their sales. Therefore, microenterprise programs have

become a viable and much needed alternative for the poor in developing countries to obtain credit.

The estimated market for microloans is an estimated several hundred billion people

Microenterprise programs became a success story for the poor as a result of the Grameen Bank in

Bangladesh, the first to introduce micro-credit lending in 1976. Mohammad Yunus, an economics

professor who was frustrated with large-scale international programs that had little impact on

alleviating poverty, originally established the bank. One of the most phenomenal aspects of

Grameen Bank is that is has proved the theory of conventional banks to be wrong. As mentioned

previously, conventional banks were skeptic of the idea of lending to the poor, who have no

collateral, and many of the poor that Grameen Bank help are illiterate and landless. However,

Grameen Bank has proved that the poor can pay back their loans and increase their income by

providing working capital necessary for business operations.

Grameen Bank has given the poor the opportunity to build an asset base and use the credit to put to

whatever use they choose. The bank not only helps the poor increase their income through self-

employment but also enables the poor to have control over their own lives. The poor with

financial resources at their disposal have the freedom to build their own fate through self-

employment, which gives the poor a sense of empowerment.

Grameen Bank was the first to recognize that the availability of credit is critical for the economic

emancipation of the poor, and as a result, the model of Grameen Bank has received international

3

attention and has been replicated in many countries throughout the world. According to Grameen

Bank, hundreds of micro-lending programs have replicated the Grameen Bank model in different

countries over the last decade (Grameen Bank Dialogue, 2004). Consequently, Grameen Bank has

been able to reach thousands of poor borrowers around the world indirectly through their positive

influence.

As a result of Grameen Bank’s international fame, there have been many studies conducted on the

bank’s micro-lending program. However, there have been very few studies comparing Grameen

Bank to other micro-lending institutions that have emerged in other parts of the world.

Consequently, this research will undertake a comparative analysis between Grameen Bank and

Lakota Fund (LF) in Kyle, South Dakota in the U.S. This research will focus on the similarities

and differences between Grameen Bank and the three micro-lending institutions and how they

have impacted the lives of the poor both socially and financially. The significance of this research

is to determine how successful the a U.S. micro-lending institutions have been in contrast to

Grameen Bank in alleviating poverty in their different socioeconomic environments.

Overall, the methods to be employed in this study are intended to be qualitative rather than

quantitative, and in order to measure how successful the micro-lending institutions have been in

alleviating poverty, the research will examine the following:

Examine how the micro-lending institutions are organized due to their different

cultural and socio-political environment

Examine the primary clientele of the micro-lending institutions by studying the

demographic characteristics, such as race, age, and income level

4

Examine how the loan procedures of the micro-lending institutions differ. The

requirements for obtaining a loan from the different institutions will be

analyzed

Examine the success rate of the micro-lending institutions, which is measured

by the repayment rate

Examine the financial and social impact the different micro-lending institutions

have had on their borrowers, especially the borrowers’ perception of the

management of the microcredit institutions and its role in their financial

success.

GRAMEEN BANK

In 1983, Muhammad Yunus founded Grameen (“of the village”) Bank in Bangladesh, an

innovative lending institution that makes small, unsecured loans to the poorest of the poor. Yunus

made the discovery that rigid collateral requirements, credit guarantees, and inflexible repayment

schedules made it virtually impossible for microenterprise borrowers to obtain credit from

commercial banks, which regard microenterprises as too risky and costly to administer.

Consequently, the poor were trapped in the vicious cycle of poverty because their only source of

credit was from local traders and moneylenders, who would exploit the poor. Since the local

commercial banks were reluctant to lend to the poor and the local moneylenders were taking

advantage of the poor, Yunus requested and was granted permission to set up an independent bank

in 1983, known as Grameen Bank. Yunus has successfully proved his hypothesis that the poor can

lift themselves out of poverty through self-employment as long as they are supplied with the

correct amount of capital. Furthermore, Yunus has proved that the poor pay back their loans

5

because they have a “greater incentive than the rich to repay their debts: it is their only way out of

destitution.” (Yunnus, 2000)

Yunnus established Grameen Bank with the following five objectives in mind:

Extend banking facilities to the poor men and women

Eliminate the exploitation of the poor by money lenders

Create opportunities for self-employment for the vast multitude of unemployed

people in rural Bangladesh

Bring the disadvantaged, traditionally the women from the poorest households,

within the fold of an organizational format, which they can understand and

manage by themselves

Reverse the age-old vicious circle of “low income, low saving, low

investment,” into a virtuous circle of “low income, injection of credit,

investment, more income, more savings, more investment, more income”

( Grameen Bank Reports)

As a result of Grameen Bank’s bold and daring goals, it is currently the “largest rural financial

institution in the country” (Grameen Bank Report, 2010). Grameen Bank is truly an institution for,

and of the poor, because the poor own ninety percent of the shares of the bank, while the

government owns the remaining ten percent.

Grameen Bank now has 2,565 branches and serves in 81,378 villages in the country. It has nearly

8.36 million borrowers and the clients of the bank have been predominantly women (97%), who

took the opportunity of borrowing in a group of four persons with no collateral (Aziz, 2002). As

mentioned previously, Grameen Bank lends out very small amounts of credit to the poor with the

average loan of -----(US). Even though Grameen Bank borrows to clientele without any collateral,

6

they have an outstanding repayment rate of 97.32 percent, a rate envied by most commercial

banks. The commercial banks in Bangladesh have a repayment rate of only seventy percent on

agricultural loans and ninety percent for its industrial loans. Part of the difference in the repayment

rates is a result of the mindset of the borrowers. For example, the rich can avoid the consequences

of non-payment, whereas the poor cannot. The poor value the access to credit so highly because it

gives them the opportunity to rise out of the depths of poverty.

Yunus

believes credit is a fundamental human right, which the poor are deprived of.

Instead of credit, poor are given charity, which does not help eliminate poverty but helps to sustain

poverty. Charity maintains the vicious cycle of poverty because the poor become dependent on it,

eroding their will and capacity to help themselves climb out of poverty. Credit, unlike charity,

gives the poor the tools they need to break the vicious cycle of poverty they are trapped in.

As a result, the goal of Grameen Bank is to target the poorest of the poor, defined as the bottom

twenty-five percent of the population, primarily women because they bear the greatest burden of

poverty. Grameen Bank ensures they reach their target market through a simple test they devised:

anyone wanting to join Grameen Bank needs to “prove that they own less than half an acre of land

and that their total wealth does not exceed the [market] value of one acre of medium-quality land”

(Yunus, 20000).

Currently, of the 8.36 million Grameen Bank borrowers, ninety percent are women because they

are more likely than men to be poor. The United Nations Development Program reported, “[O]f

the 1.3 billion people worldwide who live in extreme poverty, seventy percent our women.

[Furthermore,] women earn only ten percent of the world’s income and own less than ten percent

of the world’s property” (Grameen Dialogue, 2000-2008). The low status of women reported by

7

the United National Development Program is evident in Bangladesh. Yunus says that the

Bangladeshi women experience hunger and poverty more intensely than men. In addition, it is

traditionally the responsibility of the woman to stay home and take care of the family with little to

no resources, and if anyone in the family has to starve as a result of the dire circumstances, there is

an unwritten rule that it has to be the mother.

Yunus also says it is the mother who suffers the traumatic experience of not being able to care for

her children properly. It is the woman who is unable to feed her children during times of famine or

food scarcity. As a result, if poor women are given the opportunity to fight against hunger and

poverty, they are more determined, resourceful, and creative in generating income for the family.

The women have an intense drive to move up in society, which is demonstrated by their hard work

and willingness to make sacrifices to increase the welfare of their children. In other words, the

women are more reliable than men because they not only pay back their loans much more

consistently, but the profits from their income-generating activities are more likely to benefit the

children. The women are less likely to misuse funds, and more likely to use them to improve the

overall welfare of the family or for household and/or capital improvements. According to Yunus,

“If being poor is tough, being a poor woman is toughest” (Grameen Bank, 2010).

Also, Grameen Bank discovered that women use the skills they learn from doing household work

in their income-generating activities. For example, some of the income-generating activities of the

women borrowers involve making handicraft items such as baskets and mats from bamboo and

cane, rearing poultry and raising animals, like cows and goats, and growing vegetables and fruits in

their gardens. Therefore, it is quite common for women to already have the skills necessary to

operate a microenterprise.

8

There is a recognizable difference between the lives of women who belong to Grameen Bank and

those who are non-Grameen Bank members. Independent studies by the World Bank and others

indicate that within five years, about half of Grameen Bank’s million borrowers are able to climb

out of poverty, and a further quarter linger around the poverty line. Another recent study of

Grameen Bank revealed that over fifty percent of the borrowers escaped poverty over a ten-year

period, whereas only five percent of non-Grameen members climbed out of poverty. Furthermore,

women who are members of Grameen Bank feel a sense of empowerment, which has increased

their status within the household. The husband tends to show his wife more respect due to her

involvement with Grameen Bank, resulting in lower divorce rates and birth rates (Aziz, 2002,

2003).

Grameen Bank is able to have a financial and social impact on the lives of the women as a result of

its lending programs, known as peer group lending. The bank requires the women to form a group

of five in order to receive credit. Once the group has been formed, only two group members are

eligible for, and receive, a loan. Usually, the first two members to receive loans are the poorest

among the group members. However, before eligible borrowers receive loan proceeds, they are

required to participate in a one-to-two week intensive training programs on the philosophy of

Grameen Bank and its rules. The borrowers are also educated about money management ad small-

scale economic development.

Typically, the first loans received by the group are no more than $20 (US). Only if the first two

borrowers have repaid the principal and interest over a period of six weeks, do the other members

of the group become eligible for a loan. Consequently, the borrowing prospects of the members

without a loan are contingent upon the timely repayment of the borrowing members. Therefore,

9

the group members exert peer pressure on one another to keep the loans current. If one member

defaults, the entire group will lose its privilege to borrow from Grameen Bank, which is their only

option to receive “inexpensive” credit. As a result, the collective responsibility of the group serves

as collateral on the loan.

Normally, the repayment schedule is based on 50 weekly installments with an interest rate of

sixteen percent. When borrowers of Grameen Bank have repaid their first loan, they become

eligible for larger and larger ones. However, the borrowers are allowed to proceed at their own

pace and not according to the needs of the lender (Aziz, 2002).

When

the members of the group receive their first loans, they meet on a weekly basis to make a loan

payment, which takes place in their own village. Unlike traditional banks, the Grameen staff visits

all 81,378 villages to do banking with the more than 8.36 million borrowers at the doorsteps.

Grameen Bank believes the people should not have to go the bank; instead, the bank should go to

the people.

Furthermore, every week at the group meetings, individuals, no matter how poor, must contribute

to a savings fund. The members can borrow from the fund, although, it is contingent upon the

group’s consent. Also, the group members need to contribute an additional amount of money to an

emergency fund, which serves as an insurance policy. It is important to Grameen Bank to instill

the concept of savings in the borrowers because it empowers them by allowing them to exert

control over their lives (Aziz, 2002).

However, Grameen Bank is not only a financial intermediary, but also a social intermediary. The

members of Grameen Bank have to support an array of moral tenets, called the 16 Decisions

(Appendix A), which they must abide by in order to continue borrowing from the bank. The 16

10

Decisions force the borrowers to promise to keep their families small, drink clean water, keep their

dwelling in good repair, plant vegetables and seedlings, and carry out other good health practices.

In addition, the members pledge to follow the four principles of the Bank: discipline, unity,

courage, and hard work. Grameen Bank along with its loan program, encourages birth control,

sanitation, and a clean environment, and may the only bank that has this unique characteristic as

part of its lending policy. In addition to the 16 Decisions, the bank also holds workshops on health

care, nutrition, family planning, and business opportunities (Aziz, 2002)

The primary factor underlying Grameen Bank’s high repayment rate is the use of solidarity groups

or peer circles. Grameen Bank’s lending program exerts peer pressure on the members for

repayment, but the group also acts like a loan committee and as a monitoring, supervising and

problem-solving body.

When the women form groups of five, they screen each other. The women are very careful about

who they elect to become a part of their group because they are all jointly responsible for

repayment of the loans. In addition, the women create an open environment at the weekly group

meetings in order to prevent lies and corruption, which is prevalent at all levels of the

administration in Bangladesh (Bornstien, 1996, Todd, 1992). During the group meetings, all of the

loan requests are discussed openly in public and individual business plans are scrutinized, which

helps ensure that the enterprises of the women will be well thought out. Consequently, the

women’s businesses are more likely to be successful, which enables them to make a profit and

repay their loan in a timely fashion. Furthermore, at the group meetings, the members make sure

the loan proceeds are being put to proper use by the borrowers. As a result, people are more likely

to run their businesses properly because they will be examined frequently by their fellow members

(Bornstien, 1996, Todd, 1992)).

11

Moreover, the peer group also provides and offers support to their fellow members. The group

will help each other find new customers for their product or service, give advice and lend a helping

hand, and provide moral support and encouragement.

As a result of Grameen Bank’s peer lending program, it has significantly influenced not only the

lives of its borrowers, but also has raised national and international awareness of the poor. The

bank has received international fame because it was the first program created to help the poor,

primarily women, to help themselves; that is, women are helping themselves rise out of poverty

(Aziz, 2002).

The women are able to escape poverty because the peer-lending program allows them to gain the

self-confidence to become self-reliant. Consequently, the women feel more empowered, so they

are able to become more involved in household decisions relating to health care, their children’s

education, and the size of the family. The women have learned to take an active role in fighting for

their rights, and according to Yunus, access to credit is a fundamental human right.

Therefore, microlending has become a well-known strategy for improving the lot of the poor. The

Microcredit Summit, a nonprofit campaign compose of virtually all microcredit organizations

worldwide, has set the goal of 175 million of the world's poorest families, especially the women of

those families, are receiving credit for self-employment and other financial and business services

and the goal of reaching $100 million of the world’s poorest families rise above US $1 per day by

the year 2015.

One of the countries taking part in the Microcredit Summit is the United States because even

though the country is one of the richest countries in the world, poverty still prevails. Therefore,

approximately ------ microenterprise programs have been instituted to provide loans and training to

the poor for microenterprises.

12

POVERTY IN AMERICA

Although the United States is one of the wealthiest countries worldwide, poverty rate is estimated

to be 13.2% of the U.S. population and the estimated number of people in poverty is 39.1 million

in 2008(www.uscensus.gov.acs). The individuals below the poverty line consisted primarily adults

who had not participated in the labor force during the year and included children. In 2008, 8.9

million adults were considered “working poor” ( www.bls.gov) Women who support families are

more than twice as likely than males to be in the ‘working poor’ group. (www.bls.gov) According

to the Bureau of Labor Statistics, the poverty rate for women in the U.S. 6.5 % , with those ages 16

to 24 having the highest poverty rate, which is 27.5 %. In recent decades, the U.S. has seen a

changing labor markets with respect to size and demographic composition (older, women, racial

minorities and immigrants) due to effects of globalization and restructuring of the industrial sector.

Occupations have shifted from agriculture and manufacturing to white collar work. Many of the

manufacturing companies are moving their operations to developing countries to take advantage of

lower wages and less government regulation. Although wages and benefits have also increased

with time, industries are relocating from urban to suburban areas, where many low-income

workers cannot afford to live. The participation of rate of women in the United States has

increased dramatically during the 20th century, increasing to 60 percent in 2007( Lee and Mather,

2008) However, jobs in the manufacturing industry, which provide the best-paying employment

options for low-income, unskilled women have declined drastically over the years. (McKee, 1993)

Many women face obstacles that limit their participation in the labor market.

Furthermore, most of the new jobs available for women are in the service industry, which usually

pays at, or slightly above, the minimum wage. Consequently, it is not surprising to note that

13

women in the United States earn, on average, 80 percent the income of men despite the dramatic

increase in the women’s labor force participation rate.

Despite the disparities in pay, women in the United States are more likely than men to be poor for a

variety of reasons. First of all, women have a “disproportionate level of responsibility for [their]

children and dependents” (McKee, p.6). As a result, women have the burden of locating

employment close to home. Moreover statistics have demonstrated that when couples divorce, the

standard of living of the woman and her children are reduced drastically. Some women have no

legal recourse to child support, but even when the courts have awarded monthly child support

payments to the parent retaining custody of the children, typically the mother, almost forty percent

of the women never receive any child support and an even higher number of women receive

payments sporadically or only partial payments. Another obstacle working mothers face is the lack

of childcare options, resulting from an increasing number of inadequate childcare facilities and the

break down of extended family networks. Furthermore, poor women usually feel a sense of

isolation because they are often single mothers or divorced and lack peer support in times of need

(McKee, 1993).

In addition, the difference between the richest and poorest ten percent of the United States

population is greater than that of many other industrialized countries contributing to high income

inequality (To Our Credit).

Lastly, there are programs funded by the federal, state, and local government such as welfare, food

stamps, and health services, but the actual value of these economic transfers have been steadily

declining due to cuts in the government programs; meanwhile, the actual cost of living has

increased. As a result of the increasing number of women living in poverty in the United States,

microenterprise programs has become a viable option to bootstrap the poor out of poverty.

14

Currently, there are over 665 U.S organizations that provide loans and training assistance to

entrepreneurs. It has been estimated that three out of four members of microenterprise programs

are women (Aspen Institute,).

Women entrepreneurs have greatly contributed to the overall growth of the economy. In the

United States, women-owned businesses are the fastest growing business segment with a new

woman-owned business opening every eleven seconds. The increase in microbusinesses has not

only helped improve the overall economy, it has also helped the women owners become more self-

sufficient. A study conducted by the Aspen Institute of several hundred microentrepreneurs in

seven programs across the United States, reported that twenty-five percent were able to climb out

of poverty in three years and almost half had significant increases in both business and personal

assets (To Our Credit).

Therefore, self-employment, or microenterprise, has helped low-income women become

economically dependent in an economy with frequent corporate downsizing, increasing income

inequality, and lower real wages.

THE LAKOTA FUND

In 1974, there was a credit gap of $1.8 billion that existed on the Indian reservations. Since that

time, the availability of credit on reservations has actually declined even further, resulting in the

formation of microenterprise programs on the reservations, such as the Lakota Fund in 1986.

(Mushinski and Pickering, 1996).

The Lakota Fund is a private nonprofit economic development corporation that provides financial

and technical assistance for the Oglala Lakota people in southwestern, in Shannon County, South

Dakota, the second poorest county in the United States. The fund operates out of a village in Kyle,

15

located in the center of the Pine Ridge Indian Reservation. In 1986, the Lakota Fund was created

in “answer to a need for capital and technical assistance to help stimulate the private sector” of the

reservation, an area of approximately two million acres with a population of roughly 22,000

(Lakota Fund Bulletins).

The Pine Ridge Reservation “operates as a centrally controlled economy – a welfare state” (Lakota

Fund Bulletin). The reservation is an isolated area suffering from severe economic depression.

There are very few businesses and jobs that exist on the reservation. At the time the Lakota Fund

was being organized, there were less than forty small businesses operating on the reservation, and

non-Indians owned most of them. Moreover, roughly seventy-four million dollars were flowing

off the reservation yearly to the neighboring communities due to the declining private sector on the

reservation. Consequently, in 1992, the unemployment rate stood at 95 percent, resulting in many

people living below the poverty line. In 1985, the average per capita income was approximately

$2,367, which was primarily composed of welfare transfer payments. In addition, the reservation

has to manage a high rate of alcoholism among the tribal members of the Lakota Nation.

Therefore, the inception of the Lakota Fund was a blessing for the reservation. At the time of the

Lakota Fund’s establishment, there were no banks present, and a couple of the surrounding banks

closest to the reservation were charged with discrimination in their lending practices. The only

credit available for microentrepreneurs was their personal savings, loans from family and friends,

and payments made in advance from their customers ( Mushinski, 1996). Since the Lakota Fund

began operating, the number of storefront business on the reservation has increased from forty to

over one hundred. Most of the businesses that have opened on the reservation have received help

from the Lakota Fund, and the majority of the borrowers have been women (Novogratz 18).

16

Overall, the Fund has lent out over a million dollars in loans through its two lending programs

hundreds tribal members to develop small businesses and microenterprises.

From 1986 to 2009, Lakota Funds (www.lakotafunds.org)

made more than 660 micro- and small-business loans totaling over $4.7 million provided training to over 1,200 aspiring entrepreneurs created over 1,000 permanent jobs provided marketing services to more than 1,600 artists and craftsmen developed the first Native American-owned, tax credit-financed housing project in

America (and now manages a small housing development of thirty homes near Wanblee) developed the Lakota Trade Center in 1997, a 12,000-square-foot small business

incubator and Tribal Business Information Center and, co-founded the first Native American Chamber of Commerce on an Indian reservation in

the United States

Initially the Lakota Fund provides financial and technical assistance through two lending

programs: the Circle Banking Project (CBP) and the Small Business Loans (SBL). The Circle

Banking Project was based on the Grameen Bank model, but the Lakota Fund ended the program

1998 due to a variety of issues, which will be expanded on further later.

Originally, the managers of the Lakota Fund “shunned” the peer group lending model introduced

by Grameen Bank. In 1987, the Lakota Fund made sixty-eight individuals loans, but more than

half of the loan repayments were late and approximately twenty-eight of the money was never

repaid. Therefore, in 1989, the Lakota Fund adapted the peer lending model (Lakota Bulletins)

In 1989, Gerald Sherman, former executive director of the Lakota Fund, founded the CBP lending

program. Sherman was worried about the reservation because the Indian communities had become

accustomed to a grant-like system, particularly the poor. However, charity is not what the

reservation needed to become self-reliant. Therefore, Sherman traveled to Bangladesh to visit

Muhammad Yunus and learn more about the operations of Grameen Bank. He wanted to create a

17

lending program on the reservation that would restore the tribal members’ dignity and help them

become self-sufficient.

Although the CBP lending program had changed somewhat since its inception since 1989, the

underlying purpose of the program had remained intact. The purpose of the CBP was to “provide

an opportunity for both lending and savings to people who otherwise have little access to credit or

savings institutions” (Lakota Fund, p 5). The lending program was primarily for home-based

businesses, also known as microenterprises. Examples of the type of microenterprises created by

the Lakota Fund members are quilting, beadwork, cutting firewood, selling wild fruits, and

repairing cars. Since the majority of the enterprises were home-based, the Lakota Fund followed

Grameen Bank’s method of taking the bank to the people. The employees of the Lakota Fund

would visit the borrowers in their own communities to conduct business. Therefore, the borrowers

never had to leave their communities to be a member of the Lakota Fund (Circle Banking Project).

In order to participate in CBP, four to six members of the same community had to join together to

form a peer-lending group, and the members of the circle could be immediate family members.

The circle members had to attend five training sessions, one training session per week, before they

could apply for, and receive a loan. After the fifth training session, the circle would be certified

and the members decided which two circle members would receive the first loans ranging between

$400-$1,000. The CBP required no collateral to secure the loan, but each group member had to

commit to receive formal training and accept liability for each other’s loans. As a result,

subsequent loans were dependent upon the successful repayment of any outstanding loans.

Moreover, the circle members also had to commit to regular savings deposits to build up their asset

base (Lakota Fund Reports).

18

Normally, the CBP loans had to be repaid within one year, including principle plus fifteen percent

interest. The circle members had to meet every two weeks to make loan payments, discuss each

other’s enterprises, and also approve loans of group members. If the first two circle members

repaid their loans in a timely manner, every two weeks for six weeks, then the remaining members

would become eligible to receive a loan. If one group member failed to make a payment, then the

other circle members would no longer have any borrowing privileges until the account became

current. Furthermore, if any group member defaulted, then the other circle members were

responsible for paying the loan of the delinquent member; otherwise, the circle would lose all its

borrowing privileges from the Lakota Fund (Mushinski, 1996).

Although the CBP program was created to help the poor generate more income, the loan program’s

sole purpose was not to improve the financial lot of the poor; it was also created to foster personal

development. Some of the tribal members “suffer from severe lack of self-esteem and high levels

of welfare dependence”, therefore the program also helped develop the members self-confidence

and social skills enabling them to be an active participant in the community (Lakota Fund

Bulletins).

The second loan program, Small Business Loans, is primarily geared towards individuals who are

operating small formal businesses or start-ups with a feasible business plan. The business must be

located on the Pine Ridge Reservation and the owner must reside on the reservation as well to be

eligible for a small business loan.

The small business loans are lent out to the borrowers in steps. For example, a first time loan will

not exceed $10,000, and the subsequent steps are $15,000 to $20,000 and then to $25,000, which is

the maximum amount allowed. The first loan of $10,000 has to be repaid within three years,

19

whereas the following steps can be paid back between three to five years. The SBLs are largely

used to purchase a building, equipment, inventory and other related business expenses.

If the business is a start-up, then the individual has to attend the Lakota Fund’s seven-week

training course, one session per week, to become eligible for a loan. The purpose of the training

program is to teach the members about business management skills. However, individuals who are

operating an established business do not have to attend the seven-week training course as long as

they can provide business and financial documentation for the previous two years or longer.

Moreover, individuals applying for a small business loan must have the following items to be

considered eligible:

Cashflow Statements – two years with loan repayment amount included, along

with a breakdown of expenses and income

Credit Application – complete with reference names and phone numbers

Debt Ratio – complete with all sources of income verification attached

Project Cost – information sheet, complete

Collateral and Cash Equity – at least fifty percent of the loan amount required

and a cash injection of at least five percent

Credit Consent Form – signed and filled out completely with phone numbers

and names of lenders

Business Bank Account – with the capabilities of being monitored by the

Lakota Fund and a balance of the required five percent loan request in it

Pre-site Visit – collateral inspection with an appraisal form attached and signed

20

Documentation – lease agreements, certified title status reports for mortgages,

proof of ownership of vehicles, buildings, brands or anything else securing the

loan

Therefore, individuals have to submit detailed business plans and offer some form of acceptable

collateral to be eligible for the loan. Some examples of the businesses started or expanded with the

use of a small business loan are: hairdressers, artists, video stores and construction contractors.

In addition, the tribal members have access to the Tribal Business Information Center (TBIC)

housed in the Lakota Trade Center with the Lakota Fund. The TBIC uses state-of-the-art

computers, software, video tapes and library materials to assist tribal members and businesses in

efficiency and productivity. Moreover, there are biweekly workshops held on a variety of topics

such as starting a business, marketing, and bookkeeping. Plus, the community can request

workshops according to their own business needs (Lakota Fund Bulletin).

Overall, the Lakota Fund seems to have been successful in helping to stimulate the economy on the

reservation. As a result of the Lakota Fund’s loan programs, there have been a variety of

businesses set up such as video rental stores, a pawn shop, florist, buffalo ranch, café, convenience

store, building contractors, hair salons, and an automobile repair garage. The Lakota Fund has a

default rate of approximately 10-12 percent, which “compares very favorably with the area banks”,

according to Dani Not Help Him, executive director of the Lakota Fund, 2000.

Lakota Fund has had more than a financial impact on the community; it has also had a social

impact on the lives of the tribal members. Dani Not Help Him said the tribal members on the

reservation have many “safety nets that they can fall back on . . . [and] We have to stop thinking

about we’re entitled to and start thinking of what we can do for ourselves” (Lakota Fund10).

Consequently, the tribal members have an increased sense of self-worth and have more self-

21

confidence in themselves to become self-sufficient as a result of the Lakota Fund. For example,

whether or not the tribal members actually take out a loan, they gain knowledge on personal

finance, credit, assets, liquid assets, and savings through Lakota Fund’s training programs.

In addition, the microentrepreneurs on the reservation have a positive impact on their families and

community members. Many of the Lakota Fund members mentioned that “realizing their potential

to make and sell things was an empowering experience for themselves and the younger members

of their families, and was a first step toward creating self-sufficiency (Mushinski 161). In other

words, the access to credit on the reservation has a positive ripple impact on the children,

grandchildren, and community members. As a result of both the social and financial impact the

Lakota Fund has had on the reservation, it has become a role model for many other Indian and non-

Indian communities (“Fact Sheet,” Lakota Fund).

RESEARCH SURVEY ANALYSIS OFBORROWERS OF GRAMEEN BANK:

A survey at the micro level was conducted in six villages1 where Grameen Bank operated for 205

households of Grameen Bank borrowers and a Control group of 200 households of Non-Grameen

women. The survey data for this study were collected through interviews with household

members from September to December, 1997.

The objective of the survey was to examine the perception of the women borrowers’ perception of

the Grameen Bank and its role in their financial success. In particular, to examine and provide

insights into the economic and social effects that this micro lending program had on borrowers.

The survey addressed the social effects of borrowing from Grameen Bank on individual

borrower’s hope for education, family planning, self-confidence and overall well-being.

Additional questions in the survey were aimed to address the economic effects, such as financial

22

success, change in annual income and self –sufficiency of the borrowers. Also, the survey asked

questions about the borrowers’ perception of the management of the Grameen Bank and if the

participation of the clients and managers in the loan process were important factors for the success

of the repayment of the loans. The survey also asked questions whether the visions and values of

the Grameen Bank were well defined and were clearly understood by the participants. Lastly and

importantly, if the Sixteen Disciplines substantially influenced their lifestyles. Following are some

graphical illustrations of the results. Please see Appendix for the complete survey.

23

24

The

statistical

results

indicate that

most

women

borrowers

felt that Grameen Bank played a dominant role in their financial successes. Over 93% of the

women surveyed indicated that the bank was responsible moderately to very much for their

financial well-being. Also, majority

of the borrowers indicated that the managers were very effective in the operations of the Bank.

Ninety eight percent of the borrowers also asserted that the bank managers supported them in

obtaining loans. The social interventions represented by the Sixteen Disciplines or resolutions on

better social and healthy practices was implemented for awareness and conscious raising of the

members. The results states that thirty nine percent of borrowers felt that the Sixteen Disciplines

substantially affected their lifestyles and fifty six percent felt it influenced them moderately. The

values of the Bank are embedded n their definition of empowerment and participation in the Bank.

Participation entails being a part of the decision making process of the Bank. Empowerment

25

means sharing control and ability to influence decision-making in the allocation of resources.

(Holcombe, 1995) Fifty eight percent indicated that the participation of managers and clients in

the loan process strongly contributed to the repayment success. Over thirty eight percent felt to a

great extent that the bank’s vision and values were well defined and practiced by its members., and

fifty nine percent felt this was true and affecting them moderately.

I was also interested in knowing if he borrowing experiences have had any negative social impact

on relationships within the family and in the community. The following charts illustrate

respondents’ experiences and do not indicate that borrowing from Grameen Bank has led to

adversarial relationships for the borrowers.

26

Overall, the survey results were very favorable toward the bank and the practices of the managers.

These survey results further adds to the body of literature and evidence that the poverty goals of

the bank along with the values of participation and empowerment have led to its success in one of

the poorest countries of the world.

SURVEY RESULTS AND ANALYSIS: BORROWERS AND THE LAKOTA FUND

The researcher wanted to measure both the financial and social impact the Lakota Fund has had on

its women borrowers. The survey, slightly modified, that was based upon a survey conducted by

Aziz (1997-98) with members of Grameen Bank in Bangladesh (Appendix B). In 2000, the

surveys were mailed out and only three completed and mailed back the survey. Consequently, the

researchers traveled to Kyle, South Dakota, to visit and interview members of the Lakota Fund

from 2000 to 2007. Some of the interviews lasted for an hour or more in some cases, which helped

the researcher to gain insight and knowledge which were very meaningful in terms of how

borrowing from the Lakota Fund impact their lives both financially and socially. As a result, we

27

had a total of 76 surveys and the surveys have been used to perform a qualitative analysis for this

research. Please see appendix for the survey.

The survey gathered demographic information from the borrowers, some of which is revealed in

graphs below. The survey also asked the borrowers about their marital status and living

arrangements, their level of education and whether or not they were currently involved in an

education program. The borrowers were asked whether or not their interest in further education

was a direct result of their involvement with the Lakota Fund.

In addition, the researcher wanted to examine the financial impact on the women borrowers of the

Lakota Fund. As a result, the survey respondents were asked questions in regards to their income

and the results are reproduced in graphs. First, the borrowers were asked whether or not their

income has changed as a result of borrowing from the Lakota Fund. Seventy eight percent of the

borrowers asserted that their income increased after borrowing from the Lakota Fund. The

borrowers were also asked if they received any form of support from others. Moreover, the

borrowers were asked if they believe their wealth or assets have increased after becoming a

member of the Lakota Fund. The ones who responded to the question said their assets have

increased due to a variety of reasons. Some of the reasons are:

Learned business skills

Expanded business, resulting in more customers

Able to purchase materials for business

Able to pay living expenses and afford a larger house

Following are the graphs illustrating the borrowers’ responses.

28

The survey also asked questions about the lending program the women were participating within

the Lakota Fund. Borrowers were asked if they were currently in peer, or circle lending. About

eight respondents stated that they thought that they were still with the Circle Lending program.

Next, the borrowers who were not involved in circle lending were asked whether or not they had

29

dropped out of a peer group. According to the Lakota Fund and some of the women borrowers, the

Circle Banking Project was suspended as a result of a lack of trust and bonding among the group

members and the burden of others’ loans. Then, the borrowers were also asked if they had

borrowed from another bank other than the Lakota Fund. Surprisingly, over half of the borrowers

had borrowed from another bank. Some of them who borrowed from another bank other than the

Lakota Fund used the loan money to invest in income generating activities, such as a tanning bed,

bookkeeping/tax preparation business, a vehicle used for business purposes and a machine for the

business. Others who borrowed from a bank other than the Lakota Fund used the loan proceeds

primarily for personal and household expenses.

In addition, the survey asked the women borrowers questions specifically aimed at identifying their

feelings about the Lakota Fund. First, the women were asked if the Lakota Fund played a

dominant role in their overall financial success. Of the respondents, 40% borrowers believed that

the Lakota Fund played a strong role in their financial success, whereas about 32% felt the

organization played only a moderately role to their overall financial success. Second, they were

asked if the managers of the Lakota Fund were effective in running the bank’s operations. Over 70

% of the borrowers who responded to the question indicated that managers were moderately to

very effective in running the organization. Next, when they were asked if the Lakota Fund

managers supported them in getting a loan, 68% said they received a great deal of support. Finally,

they were asked if the Lakota Fund’s vision and values are well defined and practice by its

members. Of the respondents, 50% believed the vision and values of the organization were very

well defined and practiced by its members, whereas 13% believe that the vision and values are not

very well defined and practiced by its members and 9% believe the vision and values of the Lakota

Fund are not defined at all and thus not practiced by its members. 50% of the borrowers felt that

30

the participation of clients and borrowers in the loan process contributed to their repayment

success.

31

32

Lastly, the researcher wanted to examine the overall empowerment impact the Lakota Fund has

had on the borrowers. The borrowers were asked if the Lakota Fund has improved their overall

well-being. Of the 77 who responded to the question, 77.6-% believed their well-being has

increased as a result of their involvement in the Lakota Fund. The borrowers indicated that their

self-esteem (64%) has improved and that they have more confidence (75%) in themselves due to

their participation in the Lakota Fund. Regarding more aspirations and ambitions in life after

becoming a member, 67% indicated that they have set higher goals for themselves in life, which is

being passed down to their children. The borrowers in general, have higher educational goals for

their children that they did for themselves.

33

Finally, the borrowers were asked questions about the response their family members, friends, and

community has had to their involvement with the Lakota Fund. Similar to Grameen women, there

were no significantly adverse relationship issues after borrowing from Lakota Funds.

34

35

5.3

24.6

1.8 0.0

43.9

24.6

0

10

20

30

40

50

1 Much More

2 More 3 Less 4 Much Less

5 Same 6 No Answer

Perc

ent

Spouse's Respect and Affection

Conclusion:

The future for the microenterprise field is enormous with more than 2 million low-income

microentrepreneurs just in the United States alone. Microenterprise programs are especially

important for women, whose businesses account for roughly forty percent of all American firms.

Although women-owned businesses usually have fewer than ten employees, they are fueling

economic growth. According to a study conducted on entrepreneurs worldwide by the Kaufman

Center for Entrepreneurial Leadership in Kansas City, countries with high business start ups rates

were enjoying the fruits of prosperity. Moreover, a high start up rate is dependent upon the

participation of women entrepreneurs, who start their own businesses at twice the rate of men.

As the microenterprise field has bloomed in the United States, many of the programs have

attempted to adapt the Grameen Bank model to their own socio-economic conditions.

Some microenterprise programs, including the Lakota Fund, have concluded that peer circle is not

the most efficient mechanism for lending in the U.S. Many participants who have joined peer

group are not ready to take out a loan; instead, they are seeking the emotional support of other

women who are facing similar problems. However, if the women do not borrow money, then the

microenterprise program is not receiving any interest income to support it. Furthermore, the

lending process involved in peer group lending is very cumbersome. For example, the first two

members of the group who receive loans have to make timely payments for a specified amount of

time even before other members of the group can become eligible for a loan. Then, if any of the

group members miss a payment or drop out, the lending process is suspended until the account

becomes current again. In addition, the group members have to share very private financial

information with each other and not everyone is comfortable with that idea.

36

As a result, there is a trend in the United States is to phase out peer lending in favor of direct loans.

The concept of microfinance has adhered closely with novel concept of group lending or circle

lending and some of Grameen Bank’s practices still survive in some of the U.S. microenterprise

programs. Some microlending programs use Grameen Bank’s practice of “stepping,” which

means that microentrepreneurs receive very small loans in the beginning, but those who pay back

their loans in a timely fashion are eligible for larger and larger amounts. In addition, U.S.

microenterprise programs provide peer support programs for their microentrepreneurs and they

accept nontraditional items as collateral such as old car titles and dining room tables.

Furthermore, the market economy in the U.S. is very complex, which calls for “more elaborate and

costly training and technical assistance than the Grameen model” (Bonavoglia, 2000). The future

for the microenterprise field is enormous with more than 2 million low-income microentrepreneurs

just in the United States alone. Microenterprise programs are especially important for women,

whose businesses account for roughly forty percent of all American firms. Although women-

owned businesses are growing twice as fast as all businesses, usually have fewer employees (10 or

fewer), they are fueling economic growth. According to a study conducted on entrepreneurs

worldwide by the Kaufman Center for Entrepreneurial Leadership in Kansas City, countries with

high business start ups rates were enjoying the fruits of prosperity. Moreover, a high start up rate

is dependent upon the participation of women entrepreneurs, who start their own businesses at

twice the rate of men.

According to the Aspen Institute (2009), there are approximately 696 microenterprise programs to

assist the more than 116,944 low-income microentrepreneurs. As the microenterprise field has

bloomed in the United States, many of the programs have attempted to adapt the Grameen Bank

model to their own socio-economic conditions.

37

The Lakota Fund concluded that peer circle is not the most efficient mechanism for lending to low-

income men and women. Many participants who had joined peer group are not ready to take out a

loan; instead, they are seeking the emotional support of other women who are facing similar

problems. However, if the women do not borrow money, then the microenterprise program is not

receiving any interest income to support it. Furthermore, the lending process involved in peer

group lending was perceived as cumbersome. For example, the first two members of the group

who receive loans have to make timely payments for a specified amount of time even before other

members of the group can become eligible for a loan. Then, if any of the group members miss a

payment or drop out, the lending process is suspended until the account becomes current again. In

addition, the group members have to share very private financial information with each other and

not everyone was comfortable with that idea.

As a result, the trend in the United States is to phase out peer lending in favor of direct loans.

However some of Grameen Bank’s practices still survive in some of the U.S. microenterprise

programs. For example, some microlending programs use Grameen Bank’s practice of “stepping,”

which means that microentrepreneurs receive very small loans in the beginning, but those who pay

back their loans in a timely fashion are eligible for larger and larger amounts. In addition, U.S.

microenterprise programs provide peer support programs for their microentrepreneurs and they

accept nontraditional items as collateral such as old car titles and dining room tables.

Furthermore, the market economy in the U.S. is very complex, and needs more elaborate and

costly training and technical assistance than the Grameen model. For example, low-income

microentrepreneurs are competing against large corporations and firms that are very well

established and have a dominant presence in the market economy. Furthermore, government

38

regulations, taxes, licensing, and welfare laws also complicate the process of helping low-income

microentrepreneurs become economically self-sufficient in America.

However, microentrepreneurs help stimulate economic development within their communities by

building a stronger economy and encouraging communities to help themselves. Even though

starting a small business should not be considered a quick rich scheme because it takes endless

hours and years of dedication and hard work and typically provides an income at the low end of

middle class. Furthermore, microentrepreneurs who participate in a lending program, particular

women, become more confident in themselves and have more self-esteem, so even if their business

does not succeed, then they move on to bigger and better things rather than falling back on welfare.

Women will take advantage of microenterprise programs because low-income are have very

limited choices and opportunities. “They tend to be put in low-wage, low-advancement jobs where

their talents and skills are not considered” (Bonavoglia, 2000).

Moreover, microenterprise programs are helping benefit the children of microentrepreneurs. The

children, who have lived a life in poverty and dependence on the government, are growing up in a

different environment, learning about the concept of business, and some of them are even talking

about starting their own businesses eventually.

Overall, microenterprise programs are a viable alternative to welfare to help low-income

individuals, particularly women, climb out of the vicious cycle of poverty (Aziz 2002).

Microenterprise programs help women become financially independent, which also helps stimulate

economic development within their communities because the micro-enterprises create jobs for

other residents in the neighborhood. Obviously, more research and government funding is needed

in order to examine the sustainability of microenterprise programs as well as set guidelines for

39

these lending programs, but in the meantime, it is important to note these program have had a

positive impact on women and children and have given them the courage and strength to help

themselves become self-sufficient.

40

BIBLIOGRAPHY

Aspen Institute, http://www.aspeninstitute.org/program

Aziz, Fahima. “Managing to Empower: The Success Story of Grameen Bank of Bangladesh”, Unpublished book manuscript 2005.

Aziz, Fahima. “Analysis of Grameen Bank’s Unique Management Style, Paper under revision and review for publication, 2010.

Bailey, Scott. “Winners’ Circles: Chicago’s Experiment in Low-Income Enterprise.” Policy Review Winter 1993: 82-86.

Bonavoglia, Angela. “Women’s Work.” Ford Foundation Report Winter 2000: 10-14.

Bornstein, David. The Price of a Dream. New York: Simon and Schuster, 1996.

Burton, Michael. “Small Loan, Big Help.” Hispanic Business May 1997: 14.

Chandler, Dale and Andreas Fuglesang. Participation as Process - Process as Growth. Dhaka: Grameen Trust Mirpur Two, 1993.

Counts, Alex. Give Us Credit: How Small Loans Today Can Shape Our Tomorrow. New Delhi: Perfect Print, 1996.

Counts, Alex. Small Loans a, Big Dreams. John Wiley & Sons, Inc., New Jersey. 2009

Dowla, A., Barua, B., “The Poor Always Pay Back: The Grameen II Story”, Kumarian press, Connecticut., U.S.A., 2006.

Duggan, Patrice. “Do-Gooders Who Really do Good.” Forbes 30 November 1987: 117-119.

Ghai, Dharam. An Evaluation of the Impact of the Grameen Bank Project. Wiseghat Road, Dhaka: Monowara Art Press, 1985.

Gibbs, Nancy. “Boosting Cottage Capitalism: Borrowing an Idea from Bangladesh, U.S. Community Lending Programs are Helping the Poor to Help Themselves.” Time 5 November 1990: 36.

Grameen Bank. www.grameen.org

Grameen Bank Annual Reports and Documents, 2000 to 2010.

41

Hamid, Shamin. Women’s Non-Market Work and GDP Accounting: The Case of Bangladesh.Research Report No. 116. Dhaka: Bangladesh Institute of Development Studies, December 1989.

Holcombe, Susan. Managing to Empower: The Grameen Bank’s Experience of Poverty Alleviation. Dhaka University Press Limited, Dhaka, 1995.Hossain, H. Credit for Alleviation of Rural Poverty: The Grameen Bank in Bangladesh.

Research Report No. 65. Washington D.C.: International Food Policy Research Institute, 1988.

Holcombe, Susan. Managing to Empower. Dhaka: University Press; Zed Books, 1995.

Islam, Mahmuda. Women Heads of Households in Rural Bangladesh: Strategies for Survival.Dhaka: Narigrantha Prabartana, 1991.

Kelly, Patricia. “The Real Profits of Village Banking.” Americas Nov-Dec 1996:38-42.

Khandker, Shahidur R., Baqui Khalily, and Zahed Khan. “Grameen Bank, Performance andSustainability,” World Bank Discussion Papers, October 1995.

Kandker, Shahidur R. and Mark M. Pitt. “Household and Intrahousehold Impact of the Grameen Bank and Similar Targeted Credit Programs in Bangladesh,” World Bank Discussion Papers, May 1996.

Kandker, Shahidur R..“Fighting Poverty with Microcredit: Experience in Bnagladesh, Oxford University Press, New York, New York, 1998.

Lakota Fund Bulletins and Document, 2000 to 2010.

Lakota Fund. http://www.lakotafund.org .

Lee, Marlene A., Mather, Mark., “U.S. Labor force Trends”.” Population Bulletin, Vol. 63, No.2, 2008.

Mckee, Katherine, Sara Gould, and Ann Leonard. “Self Employment as a Means to Women’s Economic Self Sufficiency,” Womens Venture., Number 15, 1993.

Mahmud, Simeen and Shamin Hamid. Women and Employment in Bangladesh. Dhaka:Institute of Development Studies, October, 1990.

McGuigan, James R., R. Charles Moyer, and Frederick H. Harris. Managerial Economics. St. Paul, MN: West Publishing Company, 1996.

Mizan, Ainon N. Rural Women’s Economic Participation and Decision-Making Power in the Family: A Study on Grameen Bank in Bangladesh. Thesis (Ph. D.), Southern Illinois

42

University at Carbondale, 1992.

Mizan, Ainon N. In Quest of Empowerment. Dhaka: University Press. 1994.

Mushinski, David and Kathleen Pickering. “Micro-Enterprise Credit in Indian Country,” Research in Human Capital and Development, vol 10. 1996.

Nyrop, Richard F. Bangladesh: A County Study. Washington D.C.: Headquarters, Departmentof the Army, 1989.

O’Riley, Peggy. “The Buck Starts Here.” Ms. Magazine June-July 1999: 43-46.

Rahman, Atiur. Factors Contributing to the Excellent Repayment Performance of Grameen Bank. Working Paper No. 6, Dhaka: Bangladesh Institute of Development Studies,December 1986.

Rahman, Atiur. Impact of Grameen Bank Intervention on the Rural Power Structure. ResearchReport No. 61, Dhaka: Bangladesh Institute of Development Studies, August 1987.

Rahman, Atiur and Shahabuddin Mosherraf Hossain. Impact of Grameen Bank on the Level, Composition and Distribution of Income and Expenditure of the Rural Poor. Working Paper No. 5, Dhaka: Bangladesh Institute of Development Studies, November 1986.

Rahman, Rushidan Islam. The Impact of Grameen Bank on the Situation of Poor Rural Women.Working Paper No. 1, Grameen Bank Evaluation Project, BIDS, 1986.

Rahman, Rushidan Islam. Poor Women’s Access to Economic Gain from Grameen Bank Loans.Working Paper No. 91/2, Canberra, Australia: National Centre for Development Studies,1991.

Ray, Jayanta Kumar. To Chase a Miracle: A Study of the Grameen Bank of Bangladesh. Dhaka: University Pres. 1987.

Shehabuddin, Rahnuma. Empowering Rural Women: The Impact of Grameen Bank in Bangladesh. Chittagong, Bangladesh: Packages Corporation Limited. 1992.

To Our Credit http://www.pbs.org/toourcredit/

Todd, Helen. Women at the Center: Grameen Bank Women Ten Years On. A Cashpor Pre-Publication, 1992.

Tweedie, Jack. “Building a Better Bootstrap: A Successful Way to Get Some WelfareRecipients to Work Is to Help Them Become Their Own Bosses.” State Legislatures May 1997: 30-32.

43

http://www.bls.gov/ ‘A Profile of the Working Poor”, 2008., U..S. Department of labpr and U.S> Bureau of Labor Statistics.

http://www.census.gov

White, Sarah, C. Arguing with the Crocodile: Gender and Class in Bangladesh. Dhaka:University Press. 1992.

World Bank Reports, 2000, 2001, 2002.

Wood, G., R. Palmer-Jones and O.S. Annency. “Social Entrepreneurialism in Bangladesh;Waterselling by the Landless.” Proshika, Dhaka. 1988.

Yunnus, Mohammad, “Poverty Alleviation, Grameen Bank Dialogue, Dhaka, Bangldesh. 2000.________________, “Is Economics Any Help”, Grameen Bank Dialogue, Dhaka, Bangldesh. 2005.

44

4