thermal performance and reliability of bonded interfacesscrew jack . hot press . 100 cycles . 200...

19
NREL is a national laboratory of the U.S. Department of Energy, Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy, operated by the Alliance for Sustainable Energy, LLC. Thermal Performance and Reliability of Bonded Interfaces PI: Douglas DeVoto National Renewable Energy Laboratory May 15, 2012 Project ID: APE028 This presentation does not contain any proprietary, confidential, or otherwise restricted information.

Upload: others

Post on 07-Mar-2020

2 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

NREL is a national laboratory of the U.S. Department of Energy, Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy, operated by the Alliance for Sustainable Energy, LLC.

Thermal Performance and Reliability of Bonded Interfaces

PI: Douglas DeVoto National Renewable Energy Laboratory May 15, 2012

Project ID: APE028

This presentation does not contain any proprietary, confidential, or otherwise restricted information.

2

Overview

Timeline Project Start Date: FY10 Project End Date: FY12 Percent Complete: 80%

Barriers and Targets • Cost • Weight • Performance and Lifetime

Budget Total Project Funding: DOE Share: $1.4M

Funding Received in FY11: $600K Funding for FY12: $425K

Partners • Interactions / Collaborations

• General Motors, Btech, Semikron, Heraeus, Kyocera, Virginia Tech, Oak Ridge National Laboratory (ORNL)

• Project lead: NREL

3

Silicon die

Metalized substrate

Base plate

BIM

Wire/ribbon bonds

Relevance/Objectives

• Excessive temperature (>150°C for silicon [Si] devices) can degrade the performance, life, and reliability of power electronics components

• Interfaces in the package can pose a major bottleneck to heat removal

• Conventional thermal interface materials (TIMs) do not meet thermal performance and reliability targets—the industry trend is towards bonded interface materials (BIMs)

• Bonded interfaces, such as solder, degrade at higher temperatures and are prone to thermomechanical failure under large temperature cycling

100

110

120

130

140

150

160

0 2 4 6 8 10 12 Distance across the package (mm)

Tem

pera

ture

(°C)

100 mm2K/W 20 mm2K/W 10 mm2K/W 5 mm2K/W

IGBT location

Baseplate back side Heat sink base Glycol-water

temperature

ΔTTIM

Credit: Douglas DeVoto, NREL

4

Relevance/Objectives

• Overall Objective – Investigate the reliability of emerging BIMs (such as silver sinters, lead-free solders, and

thermoplastics with embedded carbon fibers) for power electronics applications to meet the thermal performance target of 5 mm2K/W

– Identify failure modes in emerging BIMs, experimentally characterize their life under known conditions, and develop lifetime estimation models

• Address Targets – High-performance, reliable, low-cost bonded interfaces enable:

o Compact, light-weight, low-cost packaging o High-temperature coolant and/or air cooling

• Uniqueness and Impacts

– Thermal performance and reliability of emerging sintered materials and thermoplastics in large-area attach will be characterized.

5

Milestones

Date Milestone or Go/No-Go Decision

June 2011 Evaluated bond quality of initial samples using nondestructive acoustic imagery (C-SAM). Aluminum nitride (AlN) delamination failures on many samples initiated change to silicon nitride (Si3N4) substrates.

October 2011 Completed initial finite element analysis (FEA) modeling to determine plastic work/strain energy density in lead-based solder BIM while under cycling.

December 2011 Received new Si3N4 substrates and tested for delamination under accelerated temperature cycling profile. New substrates meet reliability requirements for BIM testing.

January 2012 Synthesized second set of samples using revised substrates. Btech HM-2 bonded at NREL and sintered silver bonded at Semikron.

May 2012 Complete double lap shear testing of lead-based solder samples and use stress/strain data to revise viscoplastic properties needed for FEA.

September 2012 Complete experimental temperature cycling of samples to 2,000 cycles or until failure. Develop strain energy density versus cycles-to-failure models for lead-based and lead-free solders.

6

Approach/Strategy

BIM Mechanical Characterization

Sample Synthesis

Reliability Calculation

Thermal Testing/ Characterization

Synthesis of samples using stencil printer and hot press

Cycling of samples in a

thermal shock chamber

Characterization of samples via steady-state thermal resistance tester, hipot tester, C-SAM, and

X-ray imaging

Shear tests to extract mechanical characteristics

of BIMs

Number of cycles to crack

initiation/ delamination

Fatigue life prediction

Strain energy density per cycle

Extraction of viscoplastic parameters

Experimental Approach Numerical Approach - FEA/Calculations

7

BIM Finite Element Modeling

-80

-40

0

40

80

120

160

0 2000 4000 6000 8000 10000 12000 14000

Tem

pera

ture

(°C)

Time (s)

Temperature Cycling Profile • Temperature cycling parameters: – Maximum temperature = 150°C

– Minimum temperature = -40°C

– Ramp rate = 10°C

/minute

– Dwell time = 10 minutes • Viscoplastic material model applied to solder

layer • Temperature-dependent elastic material

properties incorporated for baseplate and substrate

Baseplate

Solder layer

Substrate

Quarter Symmetry Model

8

BIM Finite Element Modeling

• Accumulated plastic work per volume distribution in the bonded joint region (63Sn-37Pb solder)

• Plastic work higher in the corner regions—location where failures are likely to originate

• Plastic work/strain energy density versus cycles-to-failure correlation to be obtained for lead-based and lead-free solders

Solder Layer Bottom Surface (Quarter Symmetry Model) Solder Layer Corner View

0.00E+00

2.00E+06

4.00E+06

6.00E+06

8.00E+06

1.00E+07

1.20E+07

0 5000 10000 15000 20000 25000

Plas

tic W

ork

(Pa)

Time (s)

Plastic Work Per Volume

9

BIM Mechanical Characterization • Strain prediction of solder material is dependent on stress,

temperature, and time – A high enough stress will cause the material to plastically deform – Solder has a tendency to creep at room temperature; this increases

as operating (absolute) temperature approaches the melting temperature

– Creep, or time-dependent plasticity, occurs when a material’s absolute temperature is greater than one-half of its melting temperature

• Viscoplasticity models combine plasticity and creep deformations into one equation to properly define solder in FEA

Primary Creep

Secondary Creep

Tertiary Creep

Rupture

Time

Stra

in

Initial Strain (elastic + plastic)

Creep Curve

Strain

Stre

ss

Stress-Strain Curve

Elastic Behavior

Plastic Behavior

Permanent Set

10

BIM Mechanical Characterization Double-Lap Shear Fixture and

Sample

0

20

40

60

80

0 0.02 0.04 0.06

Stre

ss, M

Pa

Strain

Example Stress/Strain Data at Constant Strain Rate (0.02s-1)

-40°C

-20°C

40°C

80°C

Credit: Douglas DeVoto, NREL

• A double-lap shear testing fixture was designed for solder BIM specimens

– Sample testing at various strain rates and temperatures generates the needed data to characterize the viscoplastic nature of solder

• A script was developed to derive viscoplastic parameters from strain rate test data

– This will allow the behavior of new solder materials to be modeled in FEA simulations

11

Sample Assembly • Five samples of each BIM (between substrate/copper base

plate) were synthesized for testing and included: – Silver coating on the substrate and base plate – Substrate based on a Si3N4 active metal bonding process – An interface between 50.8-mm x 50.8-mm footprint

• Samples followed manufacturer-specified reflow profiles, and bonds were inspected for quality

Sample Assembly

Credit: Douglas DeVoto, NREL

Bond Material Type Name Comments

Solder Kester Sn63Pb37 Baseline (lead-based solder)

Solder Henkel Innolot LF318 Lead-free solder

Sintered Silver Heraeus LTS043 Based on micron-size silver particles

Sintered Silver nanoTach® Based on nanoscale silver particles

Adhesive Btech HM-2 Thermoplastic (polyamide) film with embedded carbon fibers

12

Thermal Cycling • Cycle Profile

– Thermal extremes from -40°C to 150°C – Ramp rate of 5°C/minute, with a

dwell/soak time of 10 minutes – Adherence to JEDEC* Standard 22-A104D

for temperature cycling

Shock Chamber

Credit: Douglas DeVoto, NREL -50

0

50

100

150

200

0:00 0:30 1:00 1:30 2:00 2:30 3:00

Tem

pera

ture

(°C)

Time (h:mm)

Shock Chamber Testing

Sample Profile

Temperature Profile

* JEDEC: Joint Electron Device Engineering Council

13

Thermally Conductive Adhesive Film • Btech HM-2 (Carbon Fibers within Polymer

Matrix) – Bonding

o HM-2 was cut to the base plate dimensions. The sample assembly was placed in the hot press and raised to 195°C, then ~1 MPa (150 psi) of pressure was applied.

– Reliability Results o C-SAM images show less contrast with thermoplastics, but

uniform bonds were obtained. o After 200 cycles, the bonded interface remained defect-free.

Credit: Douglas DeVoto, NREL (all photos)

0 Cycles

100 Cycles

Cold Plate

Sample Hot Plates

Cold Plate

Screw Jack

Hot Press

100 Cycles 200 Cycles

14

Silver Sinter • Semikron Silver Sinter

– Bonding o Corners of the Si3N4 were rounded off to match the 2-mm

radius of copper layers. The sample assembly was placed in a hot press and raised to its processing temperature, then pressure was applied.

o Independent compression testing of substrates at ORNL showed cracking of substrates required between 30 MPa to 50 MPa of pressure.

– Reliability Results o Uniform bonds were obtained. o After 200 cycles, the bonded interface remained defect-free.

Credit: Douglas DeVoto, NREL (all photos)

0 Cycles

100 Cycles

100 Cycles 200 Cycles

15

Collaboration and Coordination

• Partners – General Motors (Industry): technical guidance – Virginia Tech (Academic): collaboration on synthesis of samples using

silver sintered material – ORNL (Federal): collaboration to determine maximum pressure that

Si3N4 substrates could withstand – Btech (Industry): collaboration on optimizing thermoplastic BIM for

large area attach – Semikron (Industry): provided bonded samples to NREL using

company’s silver sintering process – Heraeus (Industry): collaboration on using low pressure silver

sintered materials before products are commercially available – Kyocera (Industry): provided insight on Si3N4 substrate bonding

process and advantages over AlN substrates

16

Proposed Future Work (FY12)

• Derive viscoplastic parameters for lead-based and lead-free solders from double-lap shear test experiments

• Expand strain energy density versus cycles-to-failure models to lead-free solders

• Complete 2,000 thermal cycles on all selected materials using Si3N4 based substrates

• Report on reliability of each BIM under specified accelerated test conditions

17

Summary • DOE Mission Support

– BIMs are a key enabling technology for compact, light-weight, low-cost, reliable packaging and for high-temperature coolant and air-cooling technical pathways.

• Approach – Synthesis of various joints between substrates and baseplate, thermal

shock/temperature cycling, high-potential test and joint inspection (C-SAM), and strain energy density versus cycles-to-failure models.

• Accomplishments – Synthesized a number of bonded interfaces between substrate and copper

baseplate based on different BIM technologies

o Lead-based and lead-free solder, sintered silver (micron-size and nanosilver), thermoplastic.

– Initiated FEA for solder bonded interface geometries.

18

Summary • Collaborations

– General Motors, Virginia Tech, ORNL, Btech, Semikron, Heraeus, Kyocera

• Future Work – Derive viscoplastic parameters for lead-based and lead-free solders from

double-lap shear test experiments – Expand strain energy density versus cycles-to-failure models to lead-free

solders – Complete 2,000 thermal cycles on all selected materials using Si3N4 based

substrates – Report on reliability of each BIM under specified accelerated test conditions

For more information contact:

Principal Investigator Douglas DeVoto [email protected] Phone: (303)-275-4256 APEEM Task Leader

Sreekant Narumanchi [email protected] Phone: (303)-275-4062

Acknowledgments:

Susan Rogers and Steven Boyd, U.S. Department of Energy Team Members:

Mark Mihalic Paul Paret