theoretical time travel technology

5/12/2018 Theoretical Time Travel Technology - slidepdf.com

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/theoretical-time-travel-technology 1/34

------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Theoretical Time-Travel Technology

“Pardon Our Progress”------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

T4: an introduction

------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

historical introduction:

------------------------------------------------------------------------------

On June 30, 1908, Nikola Tesla activated his “self-regenerative resonant transformer”

(or, simply, “magnifying transmitter,” for short) for the last time. The WardenclyffeTower facility in Shoreham, Long Island, New York was being foreclosed on as J.P.Morgan and other early enthusiastic investors turned sour. Tesla was desperate tochange the world and earn back the respect stolen from him by Thomas Edison. He

activated the primary and secondary coils of the master oscillator, and finallyswitched on the third, helical-resonator, inductor. He turned the machine to

maximum output voltage, far beyond what the electrode terminal was designed toparse. He knew it would most probably result in his death. What followed, even the

Wizard of Colorado Springs could not have predicted. As the ~8 Hz ELF standing wavesof attuned electrical current pulsed through the desperate, destitute, prodigal geniusand “inventor of the 20th century,” only two words escaped his lips: “I was....” But

then his breath left him before he could invoke the true name of God.

The results of this experiment took three forms:

1) the immediate effect was the airburst of an area only about twenty meters incircumference, about 5 kilometers above (60°55’N, 101°57’E) the PodkamennayaTunguska River in central Russia, causing a roughly 13 megaton implosion that

leveled 2,150 Km of forest and triggered an earthquake measuring 5.0 on the Richterscale.

2) the short-term historical effects were of marginal significance, and for the next

T4: Theoretical Time-Travel Technology © 2007by : Jon Gee

1



35 years, Tesla’s work, though crucial to the emergent, secret, military-industrialcomplex of the day, was publically crucified and left as a footnote in history’s annals.

His public career, if not his continuing contributions as an engineer, was over, andhis reputation was subsequently subsumed into a sea of scientific community

scandals that totally thwarted his financial status.

3) In the long-term historical effects, Nikola Tesla essentially became God. Themolecular amino acids of his genomic telomeres became semi-super conductive, theircovalent electron pair-bonds becoming attuned to the telluric frequencies of earth’s

ionosphere, and his personal morphogenetic field began to become destabilised fromits “temporal lock.” In that moment, the entire fabric of local spacetime warped itself toward the event, and, as history bent up around him, Tesla’s personal electrical aurabecame imprinted on it for as far as he could see. Having memory and precognition,

Tesla’s mind expanded to beyond the limits of light speed, and he became one with thepre-universal tachyonic energy the Buddhists had long called “ylem,” meaning, “theprimary clear light.” In the same manner that the calendar has been manipulated bythe hands of men to revolve, in theoretical concept, around the life-time of Jesus, Sonof Mankind, so too did spacetime fold around the actual person of Nikola Tesla, who

thus became, at the least, the “neo-Seth,” or “Second Coming” of Christ on earth.

In truth, Tesla’s mind separated from his body and remained divided across a series of specific intervals across the whole span of time, at least so far as it can be measuredby the history of mankind. Tesla in the 20th century split into three parts: one self

remained attuned to his body, allowing him to come and go from the others to returnat will to his own life-time; one self separated to become a lesser trans-temporal

sentience, one that was bound to the earth, but that could travel upon it throughoutall its measure of time up until the near future; the third of Tesla’s selves split off tobecome an omnipotent giant whose potential mental capacity could supercede the

electromagnetic temporal field of earth’s gravity well, could come and go fromanywhere at any time in the cosmos, and existed solely as a discorporeal sentient

entity.

The first of these “split” selves of Nikola Tesla became a simple time-traveller, wholived in the body of Tesla until it died, and then moved on to find other bodies inwhich to live, and which continues to exist, now possessing one body here, then

another there, to this day. This single-self that has no temporal lock can come and gofrom and to anywhere and any time, but retains the essential shape of an idealised orperfectly regular 7-knot toroid electromagnetic field. Such was the “genius” of Tesla.

The second of these “twinned” minds of Nikola Tesla became like a shadow of thefirst, and, while Tesla was still physically alive, remained as a strange and unknownvariable, influencing world-wide events by the subtlest whims of Tesla’s ego. This

force would, at the time of the death of Tesla’s physical form, fully divide itself fromthe will of Tesla’s latent soul, and would form an identical, yet inverse and in every

way exactly opposite, pattern of energy. Having, however, been born mentally,without the confines of a flesh and blood body, this second-self soon used its superior

knowledge of past history to dimminish and perturb the “lesser light” of Tesla’simmortal and idealised soul as it moved about from past to future and to, moreover,

doggedly pursue and overturn all attempts by the first and third of Tesla’s thendivided mental selves to reunite and thus transcend the distractions of this trickster.

The third of Tesla’s mind that arose beyond the remainder of the minds of all men,including his own lesser selves’ minds, both then and forever, retreated to the outersphere of the multiverse surrounding our local universe of a three spatial and one-


2



half temporal dimensional continuum. From here he looks down and monitors theentire expanse of all space and time, from the beginning of the cosmos until the

present moment, and has such accurate ability to precognitively predict the futurethat he can control by delimitation from potential into certainity all probabilisiticquantum spin-states and conserve the angular momentum of pure dimensionalityitself. In short, such is the God of Manifestation, he who reigns over all that is real.

In this way, from a distance, he yet can control all things in the universe, from themost monumental to the most microscopic in scale.

In this way, Nikola Tesla became the first human being to travel through time. Whatfollowed from this are the series of experiments I have come to call the “T-4Alternative” for human time-travel. The first of these has come to be called

Einstein’s “grandfather paradox,” and the second a strategy for inducing a mass“pre-destination” or “boot-strap” paradox among a selected group of time-travellers.

In the first series of experiments, a small group of time-travellers were sent back tokill their own pre-time travelling selves in the surrounding parallel temporal

dimensions of the multiverse, ie. the “collapsed” or “unexpanded” super-stringdimensions curled on a sub-quantum level into Calabi-Yau manifold shapes.

In the second set of experiments, a larger group of time-travel candidates was dividedinto two smaller groups: one to be sent into the distant-past, and the other to be sent

into the near-future. The results of this second series of experiments are bestdiscussed at length in a subsequent article. It should suffice to say that the date thetime-travellers of Tesla’s time were sent ahead to in the future is December 21, 2012AD, and this point was chosen for being a conjunction between the near-future and

the distant-past at which both groups of this second set can then meet again, the firstgroup re-emerging from the distant-past at the same time as the second group

emerges from their trip into the near-future.

The primary focus of the rest of this article will address the geometry and physics of hyperspace time-travel. For the remainder of this document, we will be dealing only

with the “T-4 alternative” as it was applied to the original, small group of time-travellers, sent into parallel time-lines to assassinate themselves. The results of these

experiments are as follows:

------------------------------------------------------------------------------

conceptual introduction:

------------------------------------------------------------------------------

The T4 Program involves sending a person back in time on a mission to assassinatethemselves in the past, prior to their having time-travelled. This leads to what is

traditionally called in the literature on time-travel, Einstein’s “GrandfatherParadox.”

The prevalent solution to any one time-travel paradox is to apply another time-travelparadox to it. In the example of the “grandfather paradox,” the solution is to apply

the “Ontological Paradox.”

The logic follows that: to time-travel back to a time before you time-travelled (orwere even born) and murder your earlier self (or your grandfather, as the example

usually substitutes), you would have to exist, however if you were to kill yourself (or


3



your grandfather) prior to your having time-travelled (or been born), then youwould cease to exist. Thus, if you time-travelled back in time and killed yourself (or

your grandfather) before you had time-travelled, then you would not have been ableto time-travel back and thus to kill yourself (or your grandfather) in the first place:you would (for the duration between your birth and when you killed your prior self,

or grandfather) simultaneously exist and non-exist.

According to the “ontological” paradox, the solution to Einstein’s “grandfather”paradox was to simply say it is statistically impossible, or to concede that the onlyreason we can imagine it is because we can conceptualise “time-loops” that cannot

exist in a linear time-stream, because the creation of such a “parallel universe”would result in the destruction of the prior reality in an effect like matter and anti-

matter colliding to obliterate both in a massive explosion.

According to the “T4 Alternative” to this “self-consistency” principle, in a non-linear time-stream, otherwise apparent “paradoxes” of linear-thinking and logicalreasoning are not the exception, but the rule, and not only natural, but necessary.

Your personal “time-lock” is unique from that of the whole universe in which you

exist. The universal linear time-stream possesses three primary stations in themeasurement of time: A) Past; B) Present; C) Future. Thus, the time-line of a time-traveller will follow in three primary events, correspondent to the three primary

stations of the universal linear time-stream: from A1) birth; to B1) time-travel; to C1)death.

The death of a self (A1, B1 or C1) in any single time-frame (A, B or C) does notcorrespond to the death of the same self in every other time-frame. Just as we areable to exist (A1 and B1) and then non-exist (C1) within the universal linear time-stream (in the order A, B, C), it follows that we not only naturally, but necessarily,

are able to first exist (A1 and B1) and then non-exist (C1) within a looped or distorteduniversal time-stream (any other order of A, B and C) as well.

If you are born (A1), and then time-travel (B1) back to before your birth (A1) andprevent it from occuring (auto-infanticide), or otherwise attempt to prevent yourself

from having time-travelled (B1) in the first place, you will be able to alter theuniversal linear time-stream (A) in which a your past-self exists (A1), however

killing this pre time-travel past-self (A1) would not cause your own past-self (B1) tonot have existed. The result would be that your present-self (B1) would continue to

exist in a past-universe (A) in which you (A1) had died before time-travelling.

To put this into “layman’s” terms: the present-self will become the future-self whether as part of universal linear time, wherein the present-universe becomes the

future-universe, or opposite universal linear time, wherein the present-universewould become the past-universe. Regardless of the continuity of universal-time, self-time proceeds such that: the present-self has a past-self, but to become the future-

self, the present-self must replace its past-self, and the earlier past-self must likewise“cease to exist” by being replaced.

Because we can exist in such a time-loop, therefore we would neither “cease to exist”ourselves, nor cause the entire universe to “blink out of existence,” as the current

public literature on the subject premises.

To state the “grandfather paradox” in these terms:


4



when B1 -> A, and B1 = C1, then A1 = A -> B,and

if A1 = B1, then A -> B -> A

The “T4 Alternative” proposes the following solution to Einstein’s “grandfather”paradox:

If A1 -> B1 = A -> B, and if B1 -> A = C1; then C1 must = A1 and cannot = B1;otherwise stated:

when B1 -> A, and when A1 = C1, then B1 = A -> B;and thus,

if B1 = A -> B, then A -> B -> C.

According to the T4 Hypothesis, a linear “paradox” or “time-loop” would only occur if a time-traveller who travelled backward in time and met themselves prior to their

having time-travelled in the first place actually didn’t kill their own earlier self. Forexample, according to T4, a paradoxical or “impossible” structure in the flowingshape of the time-stream would occur if one were to time-travel back, meet one’spast-self and then give this past-self the capacity to time-travel. The result of this

example would actually create a “time-loop” that could only be avoided or escaped byapplication of the “grandfather paradox.”

In the case of giving one’s own past-self the means to time-travel, the end-resultwould be two present-selves, that is, a self from the past’s future and a self from thatfuture’s past. Both would have time-travel, and so both would exist simultaneosuly.

In the T4 Method, the end-result would be only one present-self, the self thattravelled with universal linear-time past to present, but then opposite universal

linear-time from present to past.

The product of the prior example is known as “twinning”: when one self, bytemporal-displacements, is split or multiplied to result in multiple versions or

“clones” of the original self. The solution to prevent “twining” from occuring is tokill your other-self.

------------------------------------------------------------------------------

conceptual application:

------------------------------------------------------------------------------

According to the T4 premise for time-travel, the universal linear time-stream and theself time-line interact dynamically such that a loop formed in one can, but does notnecessarily always, form a loop in the other. This is because time forms a separate,

though interactive, dimension separate from the other three dimensions of space. Ineffect, the self time-line and the universe time-line can also split into two separatepatterns of shape or form, yet remain dynamically interactive with one another.

From the “natural and necessary” acceptance of “paradoxes” (such as the“grandfather” and “ontological” forms of “time-loop”), it thus follows that, as soon as

anyone time-travels, they will cease to have a temporal reference point to theiroriginal time-line, known in the time-travel literature involving the Philadelphia

Experiment as a "temporal lock." It should be demonstrable to establish that, eachtime anyone travels through time, they will divide their original, unique “temporal


5



signature” in two (this is called "twinning"). The personal energy-field separatesinto multiple patterns that all revolve around the same origin-event, such that thiscentral point remains connected to all the various hyper-shapes surrounding it, at

all their depths of distance in duration, via a unique pattern of attuned, harmoniouswavelengths. This “origin-event” is the moment they first travelled through time. On

every subsequent time-travel trip, the person will pass first and last through this

same focal nexus, their unique electromagnetic or "temporal” singularity, a so-called“wormhole” that connects any one place in space and moment in time to any other.

According to the T4 theory, as "space" (all known matter-energy slower than light)moves "forward" through time in a linear fashion, establishing cosmic and quantum

motion (ie. apparent physical change over time), a "multiverse" of n-potential"alternate" universes comprised of faster-than-light tachyons moves opposite this

linear motion of known matter-energy, causing sub-quantum friction (“zero-point”quantum “foam”) that causes entropy (thus creating physical change over time).

The "singularity" of our three-spatial dimensional local universe only appears tohave expanded since the big bang due to, essentially, an optical illusion. The red-

shifting of "expansion" is an optical illusion since the singularity of the local

universe never "inflated" following the "big bang" (its origin-event), it only grewmore complex within this initial diameter.

The local universe and the multiverse feed off and redistribute the material of oneanother. In the present, super-massive black-holes are eating up anciently burned-

out galaxies, consuming back toward themselves (and thus red-shifting the radiationaway from us) the photic light which, though showing them alive as it reaches usnow, really left these galaxies billions of light-years ago. The result of this is theconcourse of gravity along the alignments of spiral galactic-core black-holes that

gradually causes the formation of the intergalactic filaments strung across the voids.Along these gravitic, inter-galactic, alignment-reoriented, tachyonic arcs

connecting all the black-hole poles throughout all known space, a single yet diverse"superstring" comprises the expansion of only three-spatial dimensions out of n-

dimensions possible.

You could think of the "garden of forking paths" - that is, the cosmic, intergalacticalignments of filaments across voids - as like nerves inside the universal-brain of amultiversal, trans-dimensional organism. However, though we might be tempted tocall this entity - whose thoughts we are - "God," we cannot deny the nervous systemwithin ourselves is nothing but an evolved, multicellular form of a single-cell virus.

According to the T4 prediction for time-travel, the more one distances and separatesthemselves from association of the self-notion with the physical form of matter andseeks to expand their temporally "locked" aura of energy, the more one becomes

vibrated or attuned to the trans-finite plurality of "alternate" universes with"parallel" dimensions to our own. This is, according to the T4 hypothesis, unavoidable

for someone after passing through a wormhole even once. Once the process of "twinning" begins, the original self has already died, whether we actively (or at leastconsciously) particpate in murdering it or not. Of course, this process is constantlyoccuring through us now, however once we associate ourselves with it, then we will

be moving with time through what we now consider our physical selves.

T4 is basically a description of the single metaform or shape that permeates all spacein the form of the filaments and voids, whose motion - by an effect similar to neuralcathexis - constitutes time itself. But more importantly than for only understanding


6



the shape of the underlying pattern of our local universe and its extra-dimensionalsurrounding multiverse, T4 is a way to use this metaform as a means of transporting

one's self anywhere within the entirety of this system by simple mentation, and,eventually, to transcend physicality’s limitations and to associate our self-concept

with the products of these mentations, and thus to, effectively, travel into the futuremultiverse or the past of our local universe. In short, T4 is Time-Travel.

------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

T4: basic geometry

------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Primary to applying the T-4 model is understanding the patterns of geometryunderlying it. Consider again the idea of representing the single-dimension of timeas a linear or flat plane-space form. The singularity or “Zero-Point” (viewed from180°) and the “standard arrow” (viewed from 90°) of time are both based on this

fundamental concept of a single, half-spatial, dimension of time. Thus, by depicting

the single-dimension of time separately from the other 3-spatial dimensions, we candepict the single, temporal dimension as if it were space-like, and thus deal with it

like a separate, spatial-dimension. By looking at variations on the single-space form,we can arrive at observations regarding the addition of these findings to the regular

dimensionality of 3-space in the form of motions over time.

------------------------------------------------------------------------------

the 1-d model @ 180°

------------------------------------------------------------------------------

To begin with, here is the simplest model of time represented in the linear, singular

dimensional space as its most basic geometrical pattern, the centroid point, the radialline, and the circular circumference, where the centroid = the past, the radius = the

present, and the circumference = the future.

Picture the above circle divided into 12 parts of 30° each and you will arrive at thefamiliar gnomon of the clock-face. As the radius (hand) of the circle (clock) revolves

around the centroid, each of the 12 divisions will be passed in turn. However, theorder in which these divisions are passed by the radial “clock’s hand” will depend on

whether the radius rotates around the centre “clockwise” (beginning rightwardfrom the top), or “counter-clockwise” (beginning leftward from the top). To return

to the standard clock-face, “clockwise” would count 1 -> 12, while “counter-clockwise” would rotate 12 -> 1. It is important to be able to see that, whether the“clock’s hand” is rotating “clockwise” or “counter-clockwise” will also depend on


7



which side of the “clock” one is facing. If you are facing the “front” of the “clock-face,” the “clock’s hand” will move “clockwise,” however, if you are facing the

“back” of the “clock-face,” the same motion of the “hand” rotating around the centrewill be seen as moving in a “counter-clockwise” direction, even though the motion

of the “hand” on the “clock” remains the same either way, and all that is different isyour own perspective on it.

------------------------------------------------------------------------------


------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Consider plotting the “clockwise” motion as one pole on a sphere, and the “counter-clockwise” motion as the opposite pole on the same sphere. Here we see the central-point will be extended into the radial axis of the sphere, connecting the twin poles,

and that the 12 “clock” units can be expressed as lines that spiral ever outward fromone pole and ever inward to the opposite pole. Here, our example is the following 1-d,

plane-space “Mobius-strip” graphed onto the simplest 3-space surface, the sphere.

Note that, as the spiral at one pole rotates one direction, the spiral at the opposite polerotates the opposite direction.

We can conceptualise time, in its simplest form, as a single dimension of movingspace that acts independently, although as an addendum to, the other 3-dimensions of unmoving space. Whether we map this single dimension as a line (or circle) on a flatplane-space, or as a flat plane-space “brane” wrapped around a 3-space form (like asphere), the same geometric-patterned properties will apply to it, even if the form it

takes may be shifted from a flat surface to a measure of depth and volume.

------------------------------------------------------------------------------


------------------------------------------------------------------------------

If we turn the basic “clock-face,” circular circumference sideways, so that we are


8



looking at the flat, 2-d plane-space from along the edge, we can depict the dualnature of the “clockwise” and opposite “counter-clockwise” rotating poles with a

single twist, thus rendering twin “loops” around a central mid-point between them.

The depiction of such an angle on our initial, “clock-face,” model is most familiar asthe symbol for the concept of “infinity.” Thus this symbol, even moreso than thesimple circular model, expresses the “recursive” and “cyclical” nature of time as

both unilinear and auto-correlated, such that the “end” reconnects to the “start.” Inthis manner, the binary (or di-polar) nature of time is expressed in 1-d on a flat, 2-d,

plane-space as a double-loop around a single, central point or node.

------------------------------------------------------------------------------


------------------------------------------------------------------------------

The conceptual equivalent to the basic, flat, “clock-face,” circular model was thesphere in three dimensions comprised of a flat “skin” outer-surface that could be

“peeled” along the same number of divisions in which the flat “clock” was originallydivided. Thus, if the “clock” was divided in 4 quadrants, then, as shown, the “skin” of

the sphere would “peel” into 4 “strips.”

Likewise, for the edge-on view or “infinity” symbol, the conceptually equivalentmodel in the next higher-dimension would be the single “tube-torus,” depicted herein the form of one orbital revolution comprised of 4 “strips” that are “peeling” or

rotating outward around the central circumference of the “tube” torus. Here, we seethese 4, flat, 2-d, plane-spatial “strips,” “peeling” in a circle, to form a round “tube.”

This tube then folds or “auto-correlates” into a circle to form the tube “torus.”


9



Also, just as the plane-space “clock-face” model, when topologically graphed onto asphere, presents the duality of “clockwise” or “counter-clockwise” motion on the flatcircle as opposite rotations at the twin poles of the sphere, so does the “tube” torusdepicted here demonstrate the same type of “recursive” and “cyclical” geometricpattern as the “infinity” symbol, or “clock-face” edge, taken up to the next higher

dimension, as we can see the diameter of the “tube” is perpetually increasing ordecreasing depending on whether one follows the circular “torus” around clockwiseor counter-clockwise. Thus, the “tube” torus, too, is a model of “infinity.”

------------------------------------------------------------------------------


------------------------------------------------------------------------------

The most complex form necessary to be dealt with prior to making a more thoroughinvestigation into the finer complexities of both hyperspace and the time-travel

models that make use of 4-manifolds is the cross-section of a “tube” torus. In flat 2-

space, the diameters of the twin sides of the “tube” torus’ circumference appear oneither side of the ellipse between them which would, in the most basic, 2-space,

“clock” model be measured as the circumference of the “clock-face.”

It should be noted that this flat cross-section of the 3-space torus posesses the samevectors, or directions of motion, as the “tube” torus itself; one “tube” circumferencewill rotate either “clockwise” or “counter-clockwise” in the opposite direction of the“tube” circumference that is on the opposite end of the toroid-circumference. If the“circle” on the right is rotating “clockwise,” the one on the left will rotate “counter-clockwise,” or vice-versa, depending on whether the central circumference of the

ellipse between them is revolving in one direction or the other.

This particular depiction demonstrates this concept by extending along the toroidal

cross-section the original 12 divisions of the circular, “clock-face” model, numberedbeginning at Roman Numeral “4” (IV) on the top of the left circumference.

------------------------------------------------------------------------------


------------------------------------------------------------------------------

The preceding double-twisted cross-section of a tube-torus drops down one dimension


10



to depict the 3-space torus as a flat, 2-d ellipse seen from the edge. If you were toinflate that flat, 2-d cross-section into a 3-space shape itself, the result would be the

“tube” trefoil. The flat, 1-d “infinity” symbol depiction has two loops around acentral crossing point or node and the 2-d, toroidal cross-section has three loops,

separated by two cross-over junctures or nodes. When the two-twisted, three-looped,2-space cross-section of the “tube” torus is expanded, or “fleshed out,” from a single

line into a circumferential “tube” itself, it will retain these essential geometricproperties; that is, the “tube” trefoil has the same geometry as the 2-space cross-section of a 3-space “tube” torus: a double-twist and a triple loop.

The twin “cross-over junctures” or “nodes” may not be so apparent in the “tube”trefoil form; the surface, or “skin” of the “tube” trefoil revolves around twice

between any one point on the “skin” and when, following a vector along the surface,it would revolve around to the same spot. This mimics, at the level of the “tube”

trefoil’s geometry, the same “counter-rotation” perceived all along, throughout allthe other levels, in the form of dual or “di-polar” orientations of interior rotation, as

well as the addition to this at a right angle of the same “duality” of motion in theoverall revolution of the outer circumference.

------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

T4: intermediate geometry

------------------------------------------------------------------------------

geometric manifolds

------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Following are the 4 essential geometric forms corresponding to the three spatial andone temporal dimension.


11



A 2D “auroborus” wormhole (or “time-loop”) manifold with 2-loops and 2-nodes.

A 3D “trefoil” (or 3-twist “brane”) manifold with 3-loops and 3-nodes.

A 4D “tube torus” (or infinite “tube”) manifold with 2-loops (tube) in 2-nodes (torus).

3 “tori” mapped around 1 “trefoil” manifold plus 1 central axis = (5D).


12



------------------------------------------------------------------------------

geometric gnomon

------------------------------------------------------------------------------

According to the Merriem-Webster english dictionary, a “gnomon” is "the remainderof a parallelogram after the removal of a similar parallelogram containing one of its

corners."- source: http://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/gnomon+

Here is a depiction of the square root of two gnomon, which is the basic replicationsequence extrapolatable for the T4 model.

original html context:http://www.benpadiah.com/MISC_diagrams/pages/equations.html#holognomon

------------------------------------------------------------------------------

further gnomonic geometry

------------------------------------------------------------------------------


13



This geometric graph represents the motions involved in the above depicted gnomon.

Space, labeled “S” and Time, labeled “t,” operate at right angles to one another. AsSpace extends from “S1” (red, top center-point) to “S2” (black, upper-most left point)

over “t2” (green, upper left, horizontal line) we see (green, point) “A” marking themid-point. As “t2” (green, horizontal line, upper-left) arcs around (blue semi-circle,left) to connect “S1” (red, above center) to “S3” (red, central nadir-point), the mid-

point “A” (green, point) of “t2” (green, left horizontal line) becomes “B” (red,central-most point), the mid-point of the (red, central vertical) line between “S1”

(above) and S3 (below). The (green, left horizontal) world-line of “t2” as (red) mid-point “B,” the Present, continues to rotate counter-clockwise around S1 (red,

uppermost point), to connect mid-point “B” (red, center point) between S1 (red,

above) and S3 (red, below) to mid-point “C” (blue, right point) of world-line “t1”(blue, right horizontal line).

The lines in black represent the respective lengths, expressed as square-roots, of thedistances and durations involved; the durations AB and BC are equal to the square-

root of 1/2, the distance AC is equal to the square root of 1, and the finalmeasurement, S4 (black, lower-left point) measures the unit distance squared

(expressed as the square root of 2). The “face” of the (red, central) circle (diameter =“1”), expresses the flat, 2D plane-space of 180° line “t” (measured as the square rootof 1), seen from 90°. 1/2 of (red) circle (d = “1”) equals (green, left; or blue, right)

half-circles with radius = sq. rt. 1/2; twice (red) circle (d = “1”) equals (green, right;blue, left) semi-circle arcs, r = “1.”

The entire mechanism of motion for this model measures “t2” or “A” as it progressesthrough a counter-clockwise arc, first from “S2” to “S3” or “B,” and then from there

to “t1” or “C.” As stated, time and space operate perpendicularly to one another, andthe motion of time (duration) acts to conserve (by angular momentum) the squared

(exponential) expansion of space (distance). “A,B,C” = (Past -> Present -> Future).Distance (“S4”) = duration (square root of 1) squared; thus distance “S4” = “1” squared.

------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------


14



T4: advanced geometry

------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Any recursive cycle can be graphed as a knot. A knot is self-referential, ie. “auto-

correlating,” meaning that the ending of the surface re-connects to the beginning,and if one were to follow a vector on the knotted topology, one would eventuallyarrive back where one began. A knot is a closed surface, and usually, although not

necessarily always, is depicted as a pair, cluster, or grouping of topological “handles”that are connecting in such a way as to form one, continuous surface.

When depicting the T4 hypothesis for such relationships as the Einstein“grandfather” paradox, it is necessary to depict the single, extra-dimension of time

not only as its own individual, separate, and autonomous spatial surface, but to depictthis surface as a knot. The optical illusion of overlapping points on a knotted surface

being connected serves the function of creating a “worm-hole,” node or “crossing-over” point where a vector on the continuous surface can break from the continuous

surface’s symmetry to “cross-over” to a different point on the continuous surface.

While this “symmmetry breaking” violates the rules of the continous surface in 3D, itis both natural and necessary for such “symmetry breaking” to occur in 4D.

------------------------------------------------------------------------------

the 1-knot

------------------------------------------------------------------------------

The simplest form of knotted surface is called the “limacon” or “snail” spiral, and is aknot with only one loop inside an otherwise circlular cycle. The lesser-loop insidethe greater-arc acts to conserve the dimensions of the circle into the shape shown

here, with 2-loops and 1-node, or “crossover” juncture.

The “limacon” or “1-knot” is essentially a depiction of the “Infinity” symbol, or 1-


15



node, dual-looped expression of the edge of a flat, circular surface. In the “Infinity”symbol, both loops appear the same size, with the node central between them. In the1-knot, the larger-arc appears closer than the smaller-loop, and the node connecting

them is to one side.

------------------------------------------------------------------------------

the 3-knot

------------------------------------------------------------------------------

The 3-knot is a specific kind of knot that has six loops and six nodes. The followingdepiction of the 3-knot was modeled by Stan Tennan of www.meru.org, and animated

by Vincent Cunetto. Beside the animation (left) is a still frame from it (right), inwhich the shape of the 3-knot can be made out most clearly: it is the green knot,while the red loops meet the green 3-knot at the 6 yellow dots in exactly specific

points where the three different axes of rotation pass through them both.

The fact there are 6 points of intersection indicates that this type of knot has 3 axesof symmetry as well as 3 loops, which is why this configuration is called a “3-knot.”Although the three axes are perpendicular to one another near the central origin

point around which the mechanism can pivot, the same axes of symmetry can all bemapped accurately onto the global coordinates of a sphere and still intersect. When

viewed from an angle along one of these axes of symmetry, the “optical illusory”nature of the 3-knot as a method for expressing the paradoxical “symmetry

breaking” in 4D becomes more apparent.

The next model is based on removing a special case of “tube” torus (seen at a 45°angle) from within the center of the 3-fold knot. Note that there are also 12 stationsof the figure depicted on the loops of the 3-knot (labeled with circled numbers 1 -

12), indicating that a vector-point with 4-fold symmetry will undergo three rotationsas it follows a countour around the 3-knot. The correlation between the 12 stations of

the “clock-face” and the 12 stations of the 4-sided, rotating vector point on the 3-

knot’s loops is not coincidental. It indicates a direct correspondence between the 12stations on the torus (labeled by the 12 houses of the zodiac) and the 12 stations of the3-knot (labeled by the circled numbers) that constitutes a form of “lock” betweenthese conceptual objects. Here is the basic shape of the 3-knot when viewed from

above one of the three axes of symmetry, labeled with the 12 stations of the “clock-face” mapped onto the interior and exterior of the central 45° angle torus.


16



As stated, the two vertical poles and the two perpendicular lines all operate at rightangles to one another, yet all intersect when mapped onto the global coordinates of asphere, indicated by the semi-circular arc on the right. The Roman Numerals (I - IV)indicate the 4-space topology of the central torus as it relates to the overall 3-knot.

The meanings of the terms "gate," "lock" and "portal" (the labels on the left of the

inner-torus) are extremely important for understanding both the astronomicalalignments spanning zodiacal Aeons in our solar system - and thus how to time travel

on earth - as well as the microscopic digital changes in the analog cosmicenvironment - and thus how one moment becomes the next: as digital, physical-changes over a binary, analog duration; in the short-term, some things change,while other things do not. Eventually, given a long enough time-line, everything

will change.


17



The "portal" is the interior ellipse of the 45° angle torus, while the "Gate" is theexterior circumference of the same 4-manifold. In short-hand notation we could say,

"the portal is the interior of the torus, and the gate is the exterior of the torus."

As before, the primary component of this diagram is the dual direction of space andtime, where space moves linearly, and time moves in a higher-dimension opposite it.

This is the nature of the lock. For a lock to occur, you must have an alignmentbetween di-polar opposites. Alignment between dual opposites is called "inversion."

When such an alignment occurs naturally, a temporary wormhole, or "temporalsingularity" forms in nature. When such an alignment is forced upon reality by the

mind, it is not necessarily subject to otherwise naturally occuring checks andbalances. What we are talking about at this point is controlled quantum tunneling.

This means the ability to use the power of the mind alone to directly and immediatelyshape and form any matter imagainable from the existing ambient energy of any

environment or area.

You would be able to sap a small percent of the existing energy and return a


18



transformative process that multiplies that amount of energy. In short, you would beable to manifest. Manifestation is said to occur "negentropically," or negative to the

temporally past -> future flowing timestream of entropy. That is why, in order tomanifest a wormhole, you have to use "inversion," or the ocassional (and sometimes

random) alignments between dual opposites.

------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

T4: creating a wormhole

------------------------------------------------------------------------------

wormhole geometry

------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Modern science regarding the statistical probability of creating a wormhole usuallyattempts to apply technology (such as harnessing “exotic matter”) to stabilise the

“time-tunnel” between point A here and / or now and point B there and / or then.However, the same effect can be accomplished using “operant observer principle”

effecting wave-function collapse from probabilistic “uncertainty” to statistical“certainty,” without making use of any form of artificial technology or matter.

The reason this is possible has been overlooked by modern astro / quantumengineers due to the fact that they are concentrating their attention exclusively onthe interior of the “time-tunnel” inside the worm-hole, at the expense of exploringthe causes for the distortion to the over-all space-time continuum that allow suchevents to occur. In short, by asking only “how” to harness the random event of

quantum-fluctuation, they have neglected to understand fully “why” such randomevents occur in the first place.

As I have said, the primary component of the worm-hole is the “inversion” betweenthe temporal “locks” at either end of the interior “time-tunnel” itself. However, what

has been failed to be recognised thus far is that, when these “locks” occur (or arecaused), it is reflected as a distortion to the entire surrounding space-time

continuum.

Here is a depiction of the standard concept of a “stabilized” worm-hole as it isexpressed currently by astro-physicist John Gribbin:


19



The “time-tunnel” component of the wormhole (the tube connecting the upper-brane-surface to the lower brane-surface, on the left) is, however, only half of the

important components of the wormhole in this diagram. While most modernengineers focus only on the formation and stabilisation of the “time-tunnel” (on theleft), they neglect to understand why the space-time continuum brane is also warped

(on the right) to form a single surface, allowing the “time-tunnel” to connect one

event in the space-time continuum with another in the same brane-surface.

Nevertheless, this pattern for expression of the (so-called) “intra-universal,” stablewormhole has become part of the relative “collective unconscious” of modern

culture to the extent that it is even replicated in modern “op-art” furniture designs.Consider this depiction of the same surface as a coffee-table:

Here, then, is the T4 Alternative version of this model of the “intra-universal”wormhole:

In the T4 wormhole model, the distortion to spacetime geometry interior to the “time-


20



tunnel” portion of the wormhole is caused by an alignment of the poles of a black-hole (C) between two distant events in spacetime (A and B). The gravity of the black-hole’s poles warps quantum subspace to create a deep-space Gamma Ray burst, ie. a“temporary” (naturally occuring) wormhole. This effect generally only occurs when

the poles of one black-hole (such as at the center of any given spiral galaxy,including our own Milky Way) align with the poles of another black-hole. The

exchange between the poles of these black-holes is gravitic and constitutes the re-orientation of one black-hole to another in a process, similar to neural cathexis, thatforms the gravitic super-string conjoining all the filaments of galaxies. Wormholes

that form from these re-alignments do not occur nearby the black-holes whose polesalign with one another, but instead occur in the depths of the void between galaxies,

and last only so long as the poles of one black-hole remain aligned with another.Thus, this kind of “temporary” wormhole differ from their (relatively) “permanent”

counter-parts that form the surface of a black-hole’s exterior surface.

The black-hole’s poles act as a lens, focusing gravity on a point mid-way between tworandom events where, while the black-holes’ poles align, a Gamma Ray portal opens,

connecting one event to the other at an angle asymptotically approaching 90°.

------------------------------------------------------------------------------

wormhole mathematics

------------------------------------------------------------------------------

There are two kinds of wormholes: 1) the non-charged or un-moving temporal-singularities that cover the surface of a galactic-core black-hole; 2) the charged andmoving, apparently random Gamma ray bursts in pairs at different locations (and

often different times) in the intergalactic void.

To measure either type of wormhole you must use the concept of statistical doubling,whereby each (present) event can yield no fewer than two possible (future) results;

but we must apply the governing dynamics of “statistics” to each form of wormholedifferently.

To measure the type of statistical doubling that occurs for the first kind of wormhole,we can construct a 3-space model of 6 co-ordinate pair vectors, then measure the

multiplication of re-combinations of these when we move them in a fourth direction.

To measure the type of statistical doubling that occurs for the second kind of wormhole, we construct a 2-space model of 4 co-ordinate pair vectors, then measure

their different re-combinations as they would occur individually.

------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Stationary Gravitational Wormholes

------------------------------------------------------------------------------

The first type of wormhole to consider is the type that forms on the surface, or“event horizon” of a black-hole, like those at the core of any spiral galaxy, such as

our own Milky Way. This form of wormhole serves as an inter-universal tunnel,connecting our own local spacetime continuum to the parallel dimensionality of the

“baby” universe inside the singularity at the core of the black-hole. This type of


21



wormhole is created due to the light-speed surface of the black-hole being coiled uparound its equator by the rotation of its polar axis. The same process that causes sun-spots to form in pairs in opposite hemispheres on a star also applies to a black-hole.

There are also black-holes that occur in deep-space that do not exert super-gravityand accumulate a spiral galactic accretion disc around their equator. This type of

black-hole is often called a “hairless” black-hole, and should not be confused withthe deep-space, Gamma ray type of wormhole. The difference between the “hairless”black-hole and the Gamma ray wormhole is that the deep-space black hole has noelectrical charge. Also, unlike the other type of black-hole, which accumulates aspiral galactic accretion disc and forms a “baby” universe of “inverted” matter-

energy (ie. anti-matter and “dark” energy), the “hairless” black-hole does not rotatearound a polar axis. Because “hairless” black-holes do not have worm-holes on their

surface, we will not cover this type in discussing wormholes.

The type of wormhole that forms on the surface of a rotating black-hole has twocomponents: an exterior and an interior. These act similarly to the “looking glass”that allowed Alice to return from “Wonderland” at the end of the fable by Lewis

Carrol: on the surface, it appears to reflect the world exterior to it, however it also

acts as a window or door that one can pass through into a world interior to it. Thus, if you enter a wormhole on the external surface of a gravitational black-hole, you canconnect either intra-universally to a deep space, Gamma ray wormhole, or you can

connect inter-universally to the interior of the black-hole.

Thus, to measure this type of womhole, we include 6 vectors (each representing a co-ordinate pair) to represent the destination, either in local space-time or in themultiverse of baby universes beyond, as well as another direction of motion torepresent the origin-point, the stationary black-hole itself. Thus, we depict this

model in 3-space, with 6 co-ordinate vectors, and then add a 4th-dimension of motion.

The following diagram expresses the mathematics of such a model and is labeledaccording to ratios of space / time as distance^2 = duration^3 at light-speed.

As with previous models expressing these ratios of space relative to time, we depict


22



these two primary components as opertaing at right-angles to one another, such thatthe plane of 3D space, line AB, would be seen to move in the direction of time, line AC.Thus, the relationship between point A and the relativity of point B to point C, will beused to measure a single unit, called an “event,” in the spacetime continuum. Thereare, then, three primary components of any given “event” in spacetime: point A) thebeginning of the event, expressed here as 00:00; line BC) the semi-circular arc that

connects the future of the event in space to the “future” in time, expressed here asthe radii expanding outward from the origin-point A connecting B to C; line CB) the“squared” ratio of twin linear extensions from points B (the “end” of space) and C(the future of time), connecting at a point (C^2) beyond the circumferential arc

describing the singularity of the event-horizon. The difference between the“squared” peramter of the “event” and the “event-horizon” perimeter of the “event”

measures the “squared” area of the “circle,” such that the intersection of linesconnecting space (horizontal line AB) to time (vertical line AC), would form a square

with equal area to the semi-circlular arc describing the connection of B to C at thesquare-root point between the arc BC and the corner of C^2.

Taking apart the primary components of this 3D model (that is, this depiction in 2-space of 3, paired, co-ordinate directions of vector: point A, arc BC, and square CB),

and applying a 4th co-ordinate pair of directions for an additional vector, we cangenerate a base-16 grouping of statistical double outcomes. Here is a depiction of 14 of these 16 re-combinations (the pair of first and last examples being merely stationary

A or simultaneously motive BC and CB):

The blue horizon from Past (P) to Future (F) represents the forward momentum of aplane-space through time. The red arc connecting P to F measures clockwise (+) or

counter-clockwise (-) rotation of the plane-space in a semi-spherical direction,representing combined temporal momentum and spatial inertia. The green diaganol

from the top of the red arc measures the motion from space toward time or timetoward space as the revolution of the plane-space in an elliptical orbit, representing

temporal inertia. The black line represents the motion of a vector on the blue,


23



horizontal plane-space, as either AB: in the same direction of motion of the plane-space through time; or as BA: opposite the direction of this motion. The interiornumerical ratios represent the # per combination of these vectors that originate

either on the left or right side. We can see here that the two primary orientations of the model (4:0 and 0:4, above) represent the standard-arrow motion of spacetime,

from 4-past toward zero-future (on the left), and the opposite of this, the negentroy

of timespace, from 4-future toward zero-past (on the right). From these two mainmodels follow the two on the left and the two on the right of the next row down. Allthe black-line vectors from the past to the future follow from the “standard” modelon the left, while all those vectors that move opposite the “standard” arrow model

follow from the model on the right. As explained, the models depicting “zero-point”motion (or space) and motion in all co-ordinate directions at once (or time) are not

depicted, however it should be noted the total # of these statistical doubles is 16, thatis 4^2; or the # of co-ordinate pairs per 3-space and 1-time dimensions (the directions

for motion of a vector) twice, that is 8 X 2.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------------

Moving Electromagnetic Wormholes

------------------------------------------------------------------------------

When the poles of a black hole (such as the one in the middle of spiral galaxies likeour own Milky Way) align with the poles of another black hole, no matter how faraway these two are from one another, a pair of Gamma ray burst wormholes will

appear in deep space between the galactic filaments at a distance equal to both oneanother and to both the pole-aligned black-holes.

In plotting a graph of the relevant components involved in the T4 model for a Gammaray wormhole in deep space, we thus plot a point for each black-hole, and between

these and opposite one another a point for each wormhole. Thus, we can graph theseco-ordinates in the same manner as we can for a hyperspace co-ordinate system

connecting any one point in spacetime (here, now) to any other point in spacetime(there, then). The graph for a dual co-ordinate pair (2 black-holes, 2 wormholes) isequivalent to the graph connecting any two points in space (x, y) at two points in

time (P, F). What we see here, then, is the graph for the various connections between2 points in space (xP = black-hole A, yP = black-hole B) and 2 points in time (yF =

wormhole A, xF = wormhole B).

Each of these 4 “corner” points or “nodes” corresponds to an arc formed between itand its opposite “corner” by a semi-circle with the given point as its origin. Thus, to

calculate a course through hyperspace, that is, to travel through sub-space fasterthan light by entering the multiverse of n-dimensions parallel to our local universallinear time-stream, we take into account the influence on our course of those objectspossessing gravity (black-holes) or electro-magnetivity (wormholes) that would tend

to distort the vector of any object moving between them. We use the relationshipbetween each “corner” point and its opposite arc to trace the mid-point of

intersection between the plane of space and the linear motion of time, and plot ourcourse through hyperspace around this central origin.


24



Here, as usual, we see two points in space (x, y) as forming two parallel vectors whenapplied to the direction of motion of time (P, F), which also form two parallel lines

(time) that operate at a 90° angle to the first two (space).

To plot out the hyperspace charts for each possible type of re-combination betweenany two points in space (x, y) at any two points in time (P, F), we would use statisticaldoubling to break apart the above graph into its constituent components. To look ateach possible course in hyperspace one could take between these 4 points, we wouldgraph the arc connecting them and its angle from the central intersection point. The

following charts represent only motion with the forward-flowing linear motion of spacetime (depicted progressing from left to right). A second set of exactly invertedcharts is applicable for travel through hyperspace to an earlier point in time as well.

In the same way that the graphs for a black-hole’s event horizon surface wormholefunction to relate three spatial vectors with a fourth direction of motion, so we see

here too that the graphs for a Gamma ray wormhole in deep space function to relatetwo points in space over a linear direction of time. Both, however, make use of the

process of statistical doubling to extrapolate various potential outcomes from any onegiven present event.

Here are the hyperspace charts for the standard, forward-flowing, arrow of entropy:


25




26



------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

T4: cosmology

------------------------------------------------------------------------------

the combined Reimann / De Sitter metric tensor

------------------------------------------------------------------------------

In flat “Minkowski space” (special relativity conditions), the Lorentzian metrictensor proposed by Einstein for “general relativity,” with co-ordinates,

r^u -> (x^0, x^1, x^2, x^3) = (ct, x, y, z), is expressed here:

the same Lorentzian metric solves for flat, Minkowski spacetime “n,” covering R^4with co-ordinates (t, x, y, z), and the metric: ds^2 = -dt^2 + dx^2 + dy^2 + dz^2.

According to Michio Kaku, in his work, “Hyperspace,” Einstein’s “general relativity”Reimann metric tensor (top left, above) with added dimensions yields “super-

symmetry.”

According to Kaku’s model in this work, “Super-gravity” can fulfill the key position,substituted for the Einstein “general relativity” equations. The complete diagram


27



describes the expansion of all four elemental universal forces: gravity, electro-magnetic (photic), weak nuclear and strong nuclear (quarks and leptons).

Until now, to my knowledge, nobody other than me has proposed the followingsolution to the blank squares in the “scalar” vector of the initial “matrix.” If we wereto apply the four elemental forces of matter-energy in our local universal spacetime

continuum to the initial Reimann metric, as Kaku proposes, the result still leavesempty square spaces at the corners of intersection between the vertical columns and

horizontal rows attributed to each of the elements. These “empty squares” can be“filled” by substituting a hyperbolic geometry for the flat, 2D geometry of

Minkowski space. Specifically, we would refer to the static De Sitter metric forasymptotically curved spacetime, such as Stephen Hawking and Roger Penrose

propose would be found inside the event horizon of a black-hole.


28



- source: "Stephen Hawking, Roger Penrose: the Nature of Space and Time"http://www.benpadiah.com/otherstuff/elib/HawkingNatureOfSpaceTime.pdf

(368 KB), page 49 of the .pdf

The combination of the “super” Reimann metric tensor and the static De Sitter tensoryielded the following diagram from very early on in my research.

-original context:http://www.benpadiah.com/MISC_diagrams/pages/originalMISC.html#MISC3

In this model, the De Sitter static metric appears as the squares arranged diaganollyfrom the upper left to the lower right. We see the De Sitter static metric itself stands

in for the “fifth element” (the pentagram); followed by Einstein’s “general

relativity” equations describing the force of gravity; followed by the Maxwellequations for photic electro-magnetic radiation; followed by the Yang-Millsequations for the weak nuclear force; followed by the (at the time unsolved)

equations governing the strong nuclear force of quarks and leptons; followed at lastby my own notion of universal “critical mass,” the maximum expansion of spacetimebefore it begins to bubble into the n-dimensional “baby” universe of the multiverse.

At each dimensional layer of matter-energy vibrational frequency, graphed as theDe Sitter static tensors at the intersections of each pair of vertical column and


29



horizontal row per each of the 4 universally elemental forces, the manifold surfaceof spacetime should assume a different form. Each universal elemental force assumes

its own geometric topology governing its particles in spacetime.

Here is a brief synopsis of the application of the T4 model to any and every (known)level of matter-enegy, thus allowing any form of matter-energy to time-travel and

be able to become materially manifest out of other, lighter forms of energy.

The 2-knot expresses the dimensions of spacetime on the geometrical levelequivalent to the physical level of matter-energy comprised of the quarks and

leptons of the strong nuclear force. The trefoil expresses the geometry of spacetimefor the Yang-Mills equations, governing the weak nuclear force (radioactive particledecay). The Maxwell equations governing photic electromagnetic light are graphedas a 4-manifold “tube” torus. The (as of yet only theoretical) particle form of the

force of gravity would, thus, be attributed the triple tori around a trefoil geoemtry of a 5-space manifold.


30



The geometry of the square-root of 2 gnomon is the skeletal framework upon whichthe physics of the combined DeSitter/Reiman metric-tensor is based:

This basically ties the physics model on the right to the geometric pattern on the leftby describing the relationship between “e = M” (the “inversion” between matter and

energy at the border of the local universe in “general” relativity) and “c^2” (the"inverse square law" of the propagation of photons at the speed of light in a perfect

vacuum). In other words, what we are looking at in both the "e = M" model on theright and the "c^2" model on the left is the same. The "e = M" model renders aquantum or asymptotically auto-terminating finitude. The "c^2" model renders a

cosmological or asymptotically expanding infinitude.

Again we see that space (the 45° diaganol extending from the upper center to thelower right corner) and time (the 45° diaganol extending from the upper center tothe lower left corner) operate at 90° to one another, and that while, in space, there

are three possible directions, in addition to the “speed of light squared” expressed asthe edge of the multiverse beyond the local spacetime continuum, there remain only

the 3 primary stations of the separate dimension of time (past, present, future).

------------------------------------------------------------------------------

------------------------------------------------------------------------------

T4: conclusion and further implications

------------------------------------------------------------------------------

original graphic context:http://www.benpadiah.com/MISC_diagrams/time_diagrams.jpg

original html context:


31



http://www.benpadiah.com/MISC_diagrams/pages/time_diagrams.html#TIME

Here is a diagram that introduces a basic hypothesis of the natural law upon whichT4 is based. According to this diagram, the (x,y,z) axes are all perpendicular to one

another (as representing the three, intersecting planes of a three-dimensionalCartesian co-ordinate system) and are seen from above a 45° angle between them. At

their origin point, representing any given point of intersection in 3-space, is afourth axis, “t,” representing time, perpendicular to all the other three of localspace. “t” conserves the set (x,y,z) past -> future in 3-D, and future -> past in 4D, with

an infinitely divisible velocity asymptotically approaching the inertial variable “K.”

It should also be noted that the trefoil idea (on the right, below) is merely anotherexpression of the binding of time inside the three dimensions of space, only, in away, turned inside-out from the previous expression (above, right). The trefoil

expresses time as a single, spatial dimension and the 3 spatial dimensions as events,or locations in 4-D time.

The geometric graph on the left depicts the skeletal frame-work of the trefoilmanifold on the right. The label of this graph asserts the essential T4 time-travelhypothesis, expressed: "in 4D, X4 operates at right angles to t, with inertia K." 4D

refers here to the three spatial and additional temporal dimensions of localspacetime. X1, X2 & X3 are “events,” or locations in space-time, along a single time-

line. X4 refers to a given nadir or “perigee” event in another time-line that isparallel to X1 and X3, but is perpendicular to X2.

As "t" (time) moves forward linearly [(L) -> (R) = (p) -> (f)] (alike the ground under a


32



wheel), X4 (like a spoke on the wheel) revolves around and, at the point of utmostperigee, rotates “clockwise,” yet opposite the motion of time. Thus we can say that X4operates "at right angles" to 4D world-line “t” at point X2, and we can further premisethat X4 operates parellel to the 3D world-set of (x,y,z), conserved into line “t,” as the

velocity of line “t,” that is, as inertia “K.”

In the final T4 paradigm we see that X1 (spacetime = the local universe) and X3(timepsace = the multiverse) act like event-horizons, each tapering off toward 1D ateither end of the 2D time-line between past and the future. Therefore, we associate X2

with space, and X4 with time.

Here we see the final model of the initial X4 premise, now called the T4 model. We seethat past for space is future for time, and that future for space is past for time,

because time and space move opposite one another, the linear motion of matteracting to conserve gravitic entropy, and the simultaneous friction of the n-

dimensional multiverse invisibly overlapping our own local universe in the form of sub-quantum, superluminal superstrings acting to increase entropy.

The red arcs represent the “standard arrow” or “forward-flowing” of time as theoverlapping exchange between future and past. The green circle between the

alternating realities of space and time connects a lock in space (X2) to a lock in time(X4). X2 is where we actually exist, physically, in the here and now. X4 thenrepresents our "higher self," which recedes higher and higher the more we

mentally associate ourselves with it. The goal of this model is to show how to reversespace (below) and time (above) by the motion of gravitic "torsion” between them.

The last model we will consider here will be the complete T4 world-model.


33



The final T4 world-model is an attempt to express solely temporal components as a flat2-space graph representing a 3D form. The exterior sphere has an exterior andinterior surface. Its exterior surface is timespace (tS), and its interior surface is

spacetime (St). The interior toroid has event “x” on one side of the centralintersection of (horizontal) space and (vertical) time, and on the opposite side event

“y” that can be thought of as operating at 90° and in the opposite direction as its di-polar dual statistical double, eg. “x.” The three circumferences of the 4-manifold

“tube” torus represent, from below to above: Past, Present and Future. As “x” and “y”move opposite one another, it conserves the angular momentum of the events of

these circumferences to result in counter-rotation from one to the next. Thus,plotting a vector on the revolving and rotating event as it changes pereptually fromthe future to the present, and from the present to the past, results in an arc oppositethe “corner” point. The entire model combines Past, Present and Future in one event.


34

theoretical time travel technology

Documents