the vertical boundaries of the firm
DESCRIPTION
TRANSCRIPT
The Vertical Boundaries of the FirmThe Vertical Boundaries of the Firm
(Organization of Economic(Organization of Economic Activity Activity)
Chapter 3Chapter 3
-Raw Inputs(trees, Iron, cows etc.)
-Transportation
-Intermediate Goods Processing(lumber milling, frame fabrication)
-Transportation and Warehousing
-Assemblers(furniture manufacture)
-Transportation and Warehousing
-Retailers (furniture stores)
The Vertical Chain of Production for FurnitureThe Vertical Chain of Production for Furniture
Processing and HandlingProcessing and Handling
Accounting
Finance
Human Resource Management
Legal Support
Marketing
Planning
Other Support Services
Support ServicesSupport Services
In-Bound Logistics
Manufacturing Operations
Outbound Logistics
Marketing and Sales
Customer Service
Value-added
Value-added
Value-added
Value-added
The Value ChainThe Value Chain
Procurement
Technology Development
Human Resource Management
Infrastructure Activities
Primary ActivitiesPrimary Activities
Support ActivitiesSupport Activities
The Make versus Buy Decision The Make versus Buy Decision
Upstream-DownstreamUpstream-Downstream
Make or Buy ContinuumMake or Buy Continuum
Arm’s Length Arm’s Length TransactionTransaction
Long-Term Long-Term ContractsContracts
Strategic Alliances Strategic Alliances and Joint Ventureand Joint Venture
Parent/SubsidiaryParent/Subsidiary RelationshipsRelationships
Perform Activity Perform Activity InternallyInternally
Less IntegratedLess Integrated More IntegratedMore Integrated
Benefits of Using the MarketBenefits of Using the Market
Efficiencies resulting from competitive marketEfficiencies resulting from competitive marketdynamicsdynamics
Market firms can achieve economies of scaleMarket firms can achieve economies of scale
Use of specialized or proprietary technologiesUse of specialized or proprietary technologies
MES versus organizational requirementsMES versus organizational requirements
Intangible benefitsIntangible benefits
Avoidance of agency and influence costsAvoidance of agency and influence costs
Costs of Using the MarketCosts of Using the Market
Poor coordination in the value chainPoor coordination in the value chain
Reluctance of trading partners to share valuableReluctance of trading partners to share valuableinformationinformation
Transaction CostsTransaction Costs
Coordination of Production Flows ThroughCoordination of Production Flows Through the Vertical Chainthe Vertical Chain
Coordination is especially important when designCoordination is especially important when designattributes are presentattributes are present
Design attributesDesign attributes are attributes that need to relate to each are attributes that need to relate to eachother in a precise fashionother in a precise fashion
Timing fitTiming fit
Size fitSize fit
R&D fitR&D fit
Leakage of Private informationLeakage of Private information
Private information can be a major source Private information can be a major source of competitive advantageof competitive advantage
Use of the market can increase the risk of losing Use of the market can increase the risk of losing control of proprietary informationcontrol of proprietary information
The Economic Foundations of ContractsThe Economic Foundations of Contracts
Complete versus Incomplete ContractsComplete versus Incomplete Contracts
Factors that prevent complete contractingFactors that prevent complete contracting
Bounded rationalityBounded rationality
Difficulties in specifying performanceDifficulties in specifying performance
Asymmetric InformationAsymmetric Information
Role of Contract Law – Uniform Commercial CodeRole of Contract Law – Uniform Commercial Code
Transaction CostsTransaction Costs
Inability to write enforceable contracts that cover allInability to write enforceable contracts that cover allcontingencies and penalize shirkingcontingencies and penalize shirking
Transaction:Transaction: An autonomous exchange of goods or An autonomous exchange of goods or services between parties with no formal agreement that the services between parties with no formal agreement that the relationship will continue into the futurerelationship will continue into the future
Transactions CostsTransactions Costs:: the costs arising from organizing the costs arising from organizing and transacting exchangesand transacting exchanges
Key Characteristics of Transaction CostsKey Characteristics of Transaction Costs
Strong mutual reliance by each party after agreementStrong mutual reliance by each party after agreementhas been reachedhas been reached
Efforts by one or more parties to “sweeten” its end of the dealEfforts by one or more parties to “sweeten” its end of the deal
Relationship-Specific AssetsRelationship-Specific Assets
RSA lock parties into a relationship to a RSA lock parties into a relationship to a certain degreecertain degree
Relationship-specific assetsRelationship-specific assets (RSA) (RSA): an : an investment made to support a given investment made to support a given transactiontransaction
Cannot be redeployed to another transaction Cannot be redeployed to another transaction without some loss in productivity or adjustment without some loss in productivity or adjustment costcost
Forms of Asset FixityForms of Asset Fixity
Site SpecificitySite Specificity
Physical Asset SpecificityPhysical Asset Specificity
Dedicated AssetsDedicated Assets
Human Asset SpecificityHuman Asset Specificity
Rents and Quasi-RentsRents and Quasi-Rents
Rents and Quasi-Rents are associated with opportunity Rents and Quasi-Rents are associated with opportunity cost cost beforebefore (ex ante(ex ante) and ) and afterafter ( (ex postex post) the fundamental ) the fundamental transformationtransformation
Rent:Rent: the difference between the revenue the firm receives the difference between the revenue the firm receives and that which it must receive to enter into a given and that which it must receive to enter into a given relationshiprelationship
Quasi-RentQuasi-Rent:: the difference between (a) the revenue the the difference between (a) the revenue the seller would seller would actuallyactually receive if the deal were completed receive if the deal were completed according to the original terms of a contract; and (b) the according to the original terms of a contract; and (b) the revenue it revenue it must must receive to be induced to not exit the receive to be induced to not exit the relationship after a relationship-specific investment has relationship after a relationship-specific investment has been madebeen made
Rent = pQ-TVC-IRent = pQ-TVC-I
Quasi-Rent = pQ-TVC-SQuasi-Rent = pQ-TVC-S
where:where:
p = pricep = priceQ = quantity producedQ = quantity producedTVC = total variable costTVC = total variable cost I = I = ex anteex ante opportunity cost of investment opportunity cost of investmentS = S = ex postex post opportunity cost of investment opportunity cost of investment
Rents and Quasi-RentsRents and Quasi-Rents
Example: Rents and Quasi-RentsExample: Rents and Quasi-Rents
(1) Total variable cost(1) Total variable cost
(2) (2) Ex anteEx ante opportunity cost opportunity cost
(3) Minimum revenue (3) Minimum revenue
required to enter the required to enter the
relationship (1)+(2)relationship (1)+(2)
(4) Actual revenue(4) Actual revenue
(5) Sellers rent(5) Sellers rent
(6) (6) Ex postEx post opportunity cost opportunity cost
(7) Minimum revenue require(7) Minimum revenue require
to prevent exit (1)+(6)to prevent exit (1)+(6)
(8) Quasi-rent (4)-(7)(8) Quasi-rent (4)-(7)
$3,000,000/year$3,000,000/year
$2,000,000/year$2,000,000/year
$5,000,000/year$5,000,000/year
$5,000,000/year$5,000,000/year
$0/year$0/year
$500,000/year$500,000/year
$3,500,000/year$3,500,000/year
$1,500,000/year$1,500,000/year
The Holdup ProblemThe Holdup Problem
The The holdup problemholdup problem arises when a party to a arises when a party to a contractual relationship exploits the other party’s contractual relationship exploits the other party’s vulnerability due to a relationship-specific asset.vulnerability due to a relationship-specific asset.
Manifest in the redistribution of quasi rents through:Manifest in the redistribution of quasi rents through:
contractual negotiationcontractual negotiation
unilateral actions by one party at the expense of unilateral actions by one party at the expense of anotheranother
The Holdup Problem and Transactions costsThe Holdup Problem and Transactions costs
The holdup problem increases transaction The holdup problem increases transaction costs in four wayscosts in four ways::
Increased difficulty in contract negotiations and Increased difficulty in contract negotiations and more frequent renegotiationsmore frequent renegotiations
Investment to improve Investment to improve ex postex post bargaining positions bargaining positions
DistrustDistrust
Reduced investment in relationship-specific investmentsReduced investment in relationship-specific investments
Are there existing Are there existing suppliers that cansuppliers that canattain economiesattain economiesof scale that anof scale that anin-house unitin-house unitCannot? Do they Cannot? Do they possess executionpossess executioncapabilities that ancapabilities that anin house unit in house unit would not?would not?
Would “intermediate”Would “intermediate”arrangements (alliancesarrangements (alliancesetc.) suffice?etc.) suffice?
Are thereAre theresignificantsignificantrelationshiprelationship-specific assets?-specific assets?are thereare theresignificantsignificantcoordinationcoordinationproblemsproblemsinvolved in involved in leakage ofleakage ofprivateprivateinformation?information?
Is detailedIs detailedcontractingcontractinginfeasibleinfeasibleor tooor toocostly? costly?
Is commonIs commonownershipownershipneeded to needed to mitigate mitigate contractingcontractingproblems?problems?
Use theUse themarketmarket
VerticalVerticalintegrationintegration
Alliances,Alliances,joint venturesjoint ventures
Or otherOr otherclose-knitclose-knit
non-ownership non-ownership arrangementsarrangements
VerticalVerticalintegrationintegration
NoNo
NoNo
NoNoNoNo
NoNo
NoNo
YesYes YesYesYesYesYesYes
YesYes
Issue TreeIssue Tree