CONSULTANTS

8, De - Ba ng ler St. P.O. Box 1243,

Gb oko

+ 234-808-080-2046

E-m a il: a n ye b e p e te r @ ya h o o . C o m +234-703-430-2486

The Vagaries of

The Business Environment

By Peter Anyebe

AGAPE

CONSULTANTS

11th

November, 2014

Website

Blog

View

my profile

WordPress

Google Me

Google+

Website:

www.identi

tykit.org

Keywords: Leadership, Productivity, Relationships, Events,

Perspectives, Forms, Objects, Reality, Entropy

Leadership is presented as the capacity to create

opportunities for wealth creation, in the environment

CONSULTANTS

8, De - Ba ng ler St. P.O. Box 1243,

Gb oko

+ 234-808-080-2046

E-m a il: a n ye b e p e te r @ ya h o o . C o m +234-703-430-2486

The Vagaries of

The Business Environment By

Peter Anyebe

The form of the business environment, EB is

defined in this work by the following three, 3

features:

Fine structure constant, α: L

Gravity, G: A

Second, 2nd

law of thermodynamics: F

The factor-L defines the work that the environment is designed to do as the

motivation of intelligence. Recall that without the fine structure constant, α

intelligent life would not survive in the universe. The energy for this project would

be funded by the factor-F, which is represented by the second, 2nd

law of

thermodynamics. By this law, nature is deteriorating, from greater order to lesser

order. The challenge would therefore be to overcome the flood, which requires

optimum intellect. Gravity, G or the factor-A is the exhaust, which is basis to track

the optimization of the intellect. This would be evaluated as the extent to which

reality is reconstructed correctly. Recall that following Einstein’s relativity principle,

the universe is characteristically warped,

due to gravity, which causes the distortion

of the perspectives of reality.

Apart from this definition of the form of

the environment, the two, 2 wave

components include the physical and the

social environments. Recall that to reconstruct perspectives of reality correctly, both

the form and the wave features of the phenomenon need to be derived. Émile Coué

has reduced the mind into the following three, 3 memories:

View my profile Google Me WordPress

Unconscious memory of the will

Sub-Conscious memory of the emotion

Conscious memory of the intellect

Thought takes place in the conscious memory of the intellect, where the procedures

for the responses to stimuli are derived. The procedures are stored in the sub-

conscious memory of the emotion, to be accessed when required, for behavior. The

procedures that are stored in the unconscious memory of the will control the visceral

systems and cannot be accessed directly. They have been derived at the formation of

the person, according to the natural order, N-O. In principle therefore, they provide

the standard against which the procedures that the person has derived are evaluated.

Similarly, the second, 2nd

law of thermodynamics defines a standard, against which

to evaluate the contribution of entropy, F to the environment, EB.

When Plato distinguished between the two, 2 worlds of forms and of objects, he

actually distinguished between spirit, L and matter, A respectively. While spirit

signifies perfection, matter represents corruption; which led to the description of

objects, A as crude replicas of forms, L which would be perfect. Then, relativity

would actually be a rendition of the relationship between the two, 2 worlds by the

model, L = 1/A F2; where forms, L and objects, A are inverses, and the standard

procedure, F is the conversion factor that links both, at optimum performance.

Thus, when forms are reduced into objects by the standard procedure, the objects

would fulfill the required specifications, six sigma, 6σ style. With the deviance from

the standard however, the objects would be mere crude replicas, recording a number

of defective products that exceed the recommended two, 2 accordingly.

At a unity therefore, for F = 1, the perspective, F of events that is presented would

define an entropy, F contribution to the environment, EB that approximates what the

2nd

law of thermodynamics contributes. The perspective would have approximated

the N-O, which defines the origin of the law. And when objects, A satisfy

specifications, the factor-A would return a unity, for A = 1. In this case, entropy does

not cease to exist; rather, it vanishes and is not able to influence the object

significantly. Then, L = F2, for A = 1 and the intellect, F would have been

strengthened, to take charge of the emotion, L.

The person, F becomes robust, and self-contained. They are predictable, and can

therefore be trusted. They engage in relationships with other persons at the deepest

level of trust, at which the entropy that is contributed to the social environment

approximates that contributed to the physical environment by the 2nd

law of

thermodynamics. Trust wanes with the deviance from the standard procedure, as the

person becomes less predictable and their contribution of entropy increases. If

relationships are to be sustained for teamwork therefore, the minimum of synergy

needs to exist. In this case, the team members must all be agreed on the standard

procedure for the performance at the required tasks, even if they disagree in other

areas of thought. At this level, the limit of a person’s freedom is defined by the point

at which the other person’s freedom starts. Serially:

This means that the business

environment, EB is influenced by the

two, 2 forces of the physical and

social environments. In general, the

physical environment provides the

standard against which the social

environment is evaluated. But it is

also the physical environment that is

at the root of the deviances observed

in the social environment. Recall that

gravity describes the universe as

curved, which distorts perspectives of

events in space-time. In another twist however, the fine structure constant, α has

been identified as the basis for intelligent life in the universe. This positions the

physical environment to at once give, L and take, A; which is the basis for relativity,

the aperture, through which forms are reduced

into objects. This is necessary, so that energy is

exerted deliberately, to fathom out the

appropriate definition of reality. Then people are

evaluated on the growth model, L = 2F ± 1

according to how much energy has been

generated. This model is the derivative of the relativity model, L = 1/A F2 presented

earlier in this work.

3. Freedom Relationships

2. Trust 6. Companionship

1. Synergy 5. Complementarity

4. Robustness

A physical constant is a physical quantity that is generally believed to be both

universal in nature and constant in time. It can be

contrasted with a mathematical constant, which is a

fixed numerical value, but does not directly involve any

physical measurement. There are many physical

constants in science, some of the most widely recognized

being the speed of light in vacuum c, the gravitational

constant G, Planck's constant h, the electric constant

ε0, and the elementary charge e. Physical constants can

take many dimensional forms. The speed of light for

instance signifies the maximum speed limit of the universe and is expressed

dimensionally as length divided by time. And the fine-structure constant α, which

characterizes the strength of the electromagnetic interaction, is dimensionless.

Whereas the physical quantity indicated by any physical

constant does not depend on the unit system used to

express the quantity, the numerical values of

dimensional physical constants do depend on the unit

used. Therefore, these numerical values, such as

299,792,458 for the constant speed of light, c expressed

in units of meters per second, are not values that a theory

of physics can be expected to predict. But because their

units cancel, ratios of like-dimensioned physical

constants do not depend on unit systems in this way, so

they are pure dimensionless numbers whose values a future theory of physics could

conceivably hope to predict. Additionally, all equations describing laws of physics

can be expressed without dimensional physical constants via a process known as

nondimensionalization, but the dimensionless constants will remain. Thus,

theoretical physicists tend to regard these

dimensionless quantities as fundamental

physical constants. For instance, it is known

that the Universe would be very different, if

these constants took values significantly

different from those that are observed. For

example, change of a few percentages in the

value of the fine structure constant, α would be

enough to eliminate stars like our sun. This has prompted attempts at anthropic

explanations of the values of some of

the dimensionless fundamental

physical constants. Although it is

currently disputed whether any

changes in dimensional physical

constants such as G, c, ħ, or ε0 are

operationally meaningful, a sufficient

change in a dimensionless constant

such as α is generally agreed to be something that would

definitely be noticed. If a measurement indicated that a

dimensional physical constant had changed therefore, this

would be the result or interpretation of a more fundamental

dimensionless constant changing, which is the salient metric.

Following Barrow 2002:

[An] important lesson we learn from the way that pure

numbers like α define the World is what it really

means for worlds to be different. The pure number we

call the fine structure constant and denote by α is a combination of

the electron charge, e, the speed of light, c, and Planck's constant, h.

At first we might be tempted to think that a world in which the speed

of light was slower would be a different world. But this would be a

mistake. If c, h, and e were all changed so that the values they have in

metric (or any other) units were different when we looked them up in

our tables of physical constants, but the value of α remained the same,

this new world would be observationally indistinguishable from our

World. The only things that count in the definition of worlds are the

values of the dimensionless constants of Nature. If all masses were

doubled in value you cannot tell, because all the pure numbers defined

by the ratios of any pair of masses are unchanged.

Barrow, John D. (2002), The Constants of Nature; From Alpha to Omega - The Numbers that Encode the

Deepest Secrets of the Universe, Pantheon Books, ISBN 0-375-42221-8.

Like Barrow, some physicists have explored the notion that if the dimensionless

physical constants had sufficiently different values, the universe would be so

radically different that intelligent life would probably not exist, and that the universe

therefore seems to be fine-tuned for intelligent

life. The anthropic principle mentioned above

states a logical truism. Thus the fact of our

existence as intelligent beings who can

measure physical constants requires those

constants to be such that beings like us can

exist. Using dimensional analysis, it is also

possible to combine dimensional universal

physical constants to define a system of units of

measurement that has no reference to any

human construct. Depending on the choice and

arrangement of constants used, the resulting

natural units may have useful physical meaning.

For instance, Planck units, shown below, use c, G, ħ, ε0 and kB in such a manner to

derive units relevant to unified theories such as quantum gravity.

These same principles have been applied in the derivation, and the attempt at the

establishment of the value creation model. Factors have been derived as ratios that

are dimensionless, like F = Rn / √n and L = 1/A F2, for S = 1 / √L. And others have

been derived from the combination of measures like Pc, for intuition; Rn, for

rationality; and √n, for the performance at task by the standard procedure. The

factor-A for instance has been derived

from a complex combination of the

factors Pc and Rn. And given the

relation, Ldp = 1/C ROI2, the factor-

C would be a ratio of ROI on Ldp;

which puts the minimum acceptable

value of this factor at C ≤ 3, for ROI

→ 2 and Ldp → 1.3333. This

combinatorial relation summarizes the organizational value, ROI. To

summarize the people value, C the combinatorial relation is S = 1 / C F2. In this

case, the factor-S is predicted by S’ = 1/10 (27S + 1). This puts the minimum

acceptable value of the factor-S at 0.3333. Then, S’ = 1 for 1/10 (27 x .3333 + 1).

Reference the data below:

The factors S, F, and C are presented as fundamental dimensionless constants,

which determine the human capacities for productivity and leadership; both of

which determine the contributions that people make to the environment. Then,

leadership would define the capability to create opportunities for wealth creation in

the environment. This would motivate the people to optimize the capacity for

productivity. And both these features sustain the environment, against the odds of

the second, 2nd

law of thermodynamics: http://www.identitykit.org/identitykit_wp

Selected Bibliography 1. Aaron, Raymond (1967) Main Currents in

Sociological Thought, 1

Penguine Books;

Auguste Comte: pp63-109

2. Aaron, Raymond (1967) Main Currents in

Sociological Thought, 2

Penguine Books;

Emile Durheim: pp 21-117

Max Werber: pp 185-258

3. Brooks, Harry C (1922) The Practice of

Autosuggestion by the Method

of Emile Coue.

Dodd, Mead & Co.

4. Carpenter, Harry W. (2005) The Power of your

Sub-Conscious Mind:

How it works, and how to use it.

Anaphase Publishing

2739 Wightman Street

Sandiego CA 92104-3526

5. Carroll, H.A. (1969) Mental Hygiene The

Dynamics of Adjustment

Prentice – Hall Inc.

6. Catell, R. B. (1965) The Scientific Analysis of

Personality. Penguine Books

7. Coombs, C. et al (1970) Mathematical

Psychology, An Elementary

Introduction. Prentice Hall Inc.

8. Cosgrove, M. P. (1977) The Essence of Human

Nature. Zondervan Publishers

9. Coué, E (1920) Self Mastery Through Conscious

Autosuggestion PSI TEK edition

10. De La Cruz, A. et al (1981) Physiological Basis

of Human Behaviour KEN

inc. Quezon City Philippines

11. Gladwell, Malcolm (2008) OUTLIERS The Story

of Success. Little, Brown and

Company New York •

Boston • London

12. Fitz-enz, Jac (2,000) The ROI of Human Capital:

Measuring the Economic Value of Employee Performance.

American Management Association; AMACOM

13. Freud, Sigmund (1924) A General Introduction to

Psycho-Analysis

Washington Square Press Inc.

N.Y. June 1966.

14. Hume, D. (1740). A Treatise of Human Nature

(1967, edition).

Oxford University Press, Oxford.

15. Kant, Immanuel (1963) Critique of Pure Reason

(1781; rev. ed. 1787),

trans. N. K. Smith (London:

MacMillan & Co.).

16. Maltz, Maxwell (1960) Psycho-Cybernetics: A

New Approach for using your

Subconscious Power.

Prentice-Hall, Inc.

Englewood Cliffs, N.J

17. Niven, David (2000) THE 100 SIMPLE

SECRETS OF Happy People:

What Scientists Have Learned

And How You Can Use It.

Harper San Francisco; A Division

of Harper Co Ums Publisbers

18. Pickering, W. S. F. (1975) Durkheime on

Religion, A Selection of Readings.

RKP

19. Rae Alastair (1986) Quantum Physics, Illusion or

Reality? Cambridge University

Press, NY

20. St. Augustine (1950) The City of God. Edited by

Vernon J Bourke Image Books,

1958 Garden City, N.Y.

21. Wann, T. W. (1964) Behaviourism and

Phenomenology, Constrasting

Bases for Modern Psychology.

University of Chicago Press.

Contributors: Sigmund Kock,

R. B. Macleod,

Nroman Malcolm,

Carl Rogers,

Micheal Scriven,

B. F. Skinner.

My Links: Literature

1. The Character Model; An Approach to put a Value on People uniquely, according to their Capacity

for Productivity, Leadership, and therefore Self Containment and Sustainability

2. Niche:

A Model of Energy Transfer

3. Thought Systems

4. The Identity Kit:

A Measure of Personal Development

5. The Mind:

A Perception Model

6. The Model Human:

A Thinker and a Learner

7. The Natural Order:

Globalisation of HR Metrics to Optimise People Value for Sustained Organisational Growth and a

Liquefied Business Environment

8. The Identity Kit:

Toward a Cultural Revolution, Driven by a Precise HR

9. Performance Appraisal:

A Talent Management Platform for Sustainability and a Stable Society

10. The Standard Procedure Series:

A Phenomenology Model of Being that is the Basis for Performance Appraisal by the Sustainability

Model

11. The Hourglass:

The Shape of the Human Form

12. Endorsements, Consciousness, Productivity, and the Creation of Value

13. Environmental Determinism:

Toward a Work Culture that is the Secret Plan Nature has worked out via a Universal History

14. A Model Of Learning

15. The Value Creation Model

16. God:

The Breath that Fires the Equations that Describe the Universe

17. Philosophy in the 3rd Millennium:

The Meeting Point of Physics and Psychology

18. Precision:

Making the Best of the Information Revolution

E-Book: The Path to Soul: Toward a Value Creation Paradigm, An alternative to The

Profit and Loss Paradigm in the determination of the ROI.pdf

Instruments 1. The Productivity Model

2. The Leadership Model

3. Bill of Health Index

4. Sustainability

5. Pc Recommend

6. Recommendations