the use of life cycle assessment (lca) to evaluate ... use of life cycle assessment (lca... · the...

40
The Use of Life Cycle Assessment (LCA) to Evaluate Pavement Choice 2011 Louisiana Transportation Conference Erin Ashley, Ph.D., LEED AP Senior Director of Sustainable Construction National Ready Mixed Concrete Association

Upload: vandien

Post on 21-Sep-2018

217 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

The Use of Life Cycle Assessment (LCA) to Evaluate Pavement Choice

2011 Louisiana Transportation Conference

Erin Ashley, Ph.D., LEED APSenior Director of Sustainable ConstructionNational Ready Mixed Concrete Association

WWW. NRMCA.ORG

Performance

From the perspective of sustainability, “performance” can be measured in many ways:

Carbon Footprint Energy Use LEED Status / Green

Roads/Green Rating System Honor

WWW. NRMCA.ORG

Impacts Measured Prioritize Impacts

WWW. NRMCA.ORG

Life Cycle Assessment

Environmental life cycle assessment (LCA) is the investigation and valuation of the environmental impacts of a given product, process or service.

Use

Recycle Reuse

Production

WWW. NRMCA.ORG

Life Cycle Stages

Source: EPA (2003)

WWW. NRMCA.ORG

Where is LCA

LEED Green Globes IgCC Greenroads

Incorporate partial LCA in some cases

Limited use with policy makers

WWW. NRMCA.ORG

International Standards Organization (ISO)

The procedures of life cycle assessment (LCA) are part of the ISO 14000environmental management standards

ISO 14000 defines four distinct phases

WWW. NRMCA.ORG

Four phases of performing a LCA

1. Goal and Scope2. Life Cycle

Inventory Analysis3. Life Cycle Impact

Assessment4. Interpretation

Source: ISO (1997)

WWW. NRMCA.ORG

LCA System Boundaries

WWW. NRMCA.ORG

Functional Unit

The functional unit is a measure of the function of the studied system and it provides a reference to which the inputs and outputs can be related.

1000 Wash Cycles

1 water bottle

1 m2 painted surface

1 km roadway

WWW. NRMCA.ORG

Case StudiesAthena StudyMIT Study

WWW. NRMCA.ORG

Athena Study:Concrete Road vs. Asphalt Road

Report: A Life Cycle Perspective on Concrete and Asphalt Roadways: Embodied Primary Energy and Global Warming Potential

Conducted by Athena Institute, 2006

WWW. NRMCA.ORG

Goal and Scope

Compare the life cycle impacts of concrete highways vs. asphalt highways

Limited to life cycle inventory analysis of : Embodied primary (fossil) energy Greenhouse gas emissions

Does not include operational considerations Energy use by cars and trucks Lighting in urban areas

WWW. NRMCA.ORG

Goal and Scope (cont’d)

Several road types: Canadian average arterial roads and high volume

freeways Quebec urban freeway Section of Highway 401 freeway in Ontario

WWW. NRMCA.ORG

Boundaries

Sub-grade and finished surface, including asphalt paved shoulders

Excluded clearing, sub-grade, lane divider painting, etc.

AASHTO Guide for Design of Pavement Structures & CAC method for rigid pavements

50 year study period captures major rehabs

WWW. NRMCA.ORG

Functional Unit

Road systems in Canada:

Arterial Road High Volume Highways

WWW. NRMCA.ORG

Functional Unit (cont’d)

Third type of road system: Urban freeways (Quebec and Ontario)

All roads studied included inner and outer shoulders

I will only report on Canadian arterial and high volume highways

WWW. NRMCA.ORG

Definitions

Primary Energy Fossil fuel resources required by system

processes including pre-combustion fossil energy (see pre-combustion energy below).

Pre-combustion Energy Fossil fuel resources used to extract, process and

deliver fossil fuel resources to their point of use (also referred to as “indirect primary energy” or “upstream energy” use).

WWW. NRMCA.ORG

Definitions (cont’d)

Feedstock Energy The gross combustion heat value of any fossil

hydrocarbon material input to a product system which is an energy source, but is not being used as an energy source (e.g, bitumen) including its related pre-combustion energy.

Embodied Primary Energy Sum of primary energy and feedstock energy.

WWW. NRMCA.ORG

Definitions (cont’d)

California Bearing Ratio CBR is a penetration test for evaluation of the

mechanical strength of road sub-grades. It was developed by the Calfiornia highways department to measure the load-bearing capacity of soils supporting roads.

WWW. NRMCA.ORG

Results: Embodied Energy for Canadian Arterial Highway

0

5000

10000

15000

20000

25000

30000

AC CBR 3 PC CBR 3 AC CBR 8 PC CBR 8

GJ

Feedstock EnergyPrimary Energy

WWW. NRMCA.ORG

Results: Embodied Energy for Canadian High Volume Highway

0

5000

10000

15000

20000

25000

30000

35000

AC CBR 3 PC CBR 3 AC CBR 8 PC CBR 8

GJ

Feedstock Energy Primary Energy

WWW. NRMCA.ORG

Results: Global Warming Potential for Canadian Arterial and High Volume Highways

0

100

200

300

400

500

600

700

800

Arterial CBR 3 Arterial CBR 8 H. Vol. CBR 3 H. Vol CBR 8

Tonn

esC

O2

Equi

vale

nt

Asphalt Concrete

WWW. NRMCA.ORG

Discussion

Study does not include: Differences in energy consumption on asphalt and

concrete pavements Right of way and sub-base construction including

width and cuts and fills Shoulder paving alternatives Construction equipment Differences in lighting requirements for different

pavements Differences in sound barrier requirements

WWW. NRMCA.ORG

Truck Energy Use

National Resources Council of Canada Compared fuel consumption and emissions

for major urban arterial highway One paved with asphalt, other with concrete

WWW. NRMCA.ORG

Truck Energy Use (cont’d)

Trucks traveling on concrete

Fuel savings average 3.85%

Reductions in GWP Concrete pavement

stiffer than asphalt Less rolling resistance

Average Savings 3.85%

Fuel Savings

18,130 l/ km (7,708 gal/mi)

CO2

Reductions50 t/ km

(88 tons/mi)

WWW. NRMCA.ORG

Car Energy Use

University of Texas at Arlington Study Investigated differences in fuel consumption

and CO2 emissions Operating automobile on asphalt pavement

versus a concrete pavement under city driving conditions

Driving on concrete pavements can reduce fuel consumption by 3% to 17% fuel savings

WWW. NRMCA.ORG

Car Energy Use (cont’d)

Example for Dallas-Fort Worth, Texas If cars travelled at constant speed of 50 km/h

(30 mph) on concrete pavements similar to those in the study

Annual fuel savings 670 million liters (177 million gallons)

Annual CO2 reduction 620,000 tonnes (680,000 tons)

WWW. NRMCA.ORG

Lighting

Concrete pavements can also reduce energy demand for lighting

Concrete is more reflective Fewer lighting fixtures are needed to provide

the same illumination on a roadway built with concrete instead of asphalt.

An report by Richard Stark demonstrated 31% less energy

WWW. NRMCA.ORG

MIT Concrete Sustainability Hub Concrete Science Building Technology Econometrics

WWW. NRMCA.ORG

Life Cycle Analysis (LCA) of Pavements

Construction and maintenance embodied energy

Traffic emissions during maintenance

Fuel efficiency for semi-trucks and passenger vehicles

Material and aggregate consumption

Impact of heat island effect

Fossil fuel consumption

WWW. NRMCA.ORG

Roadway lighting, lane closures, etc.

WWW. NRMCA.ORG

Use Phase

N J Santero and A Horvath

WWW. NRMCA.ORG

High volume road: Route 101 in Oxnard, CA 

(at Route 232 junction) 65 mph highway 3 lanes each direction + 4 

shoulders Daily traffic: 139,000 (Of which trucks: 6,672)

Moderate volume road: Route 67 in Ramona, CA 

(at Route 78 junction) 35 mph urban road 2 lanes in each direction + 

4 shoulders Daily traffic: 23,400

(Of which trucks: 1,357)

Low volume road: Route 178 in Sequoia 

National Forest 35 mph rural road 1 lane in each direction

Daily traffic: 5,200(Of which trucks: 468)

Model Scenarios

WWW. NRMCA.ORG

Full Life Cycle Emissions for Different Traffic Volumes

WWW. NRMCA.ORG

LCA of Pavements – Early Findings Concrete production emissions are higher than asphalt,

but concrete use phase emissions are lower High traffic concrete highways can have up to 90% lower emissions

for the entire life cycle compared to asphalt because of the greater fuel efficiency of vehicles driving on concrete

But no two pavements are alike The total carbon footprint of a pavement can vary by two orders of

magnitude depending on the traffic volume, rehabilitation schedule, and other assumptions

Pavement roughness and deflection are still uncertain No one has accurately quantified their interactive effects, the effect

of each pavement layer, nor the effect of temperature

WWW. NRMCA.ORG

Work for Year Two

Refine fuel consumption models to better account for pavement-vehicle interactions and instill greater confidence in fuel savings due to pavement design

Continue peer review process to have an expert critical review of LCA study

Policy Analysis - Analyze scenarios that quantify the carbon emissions associated with proposed renewal and improved upkeep of the national highway system Combine with life cycle economic costing to understand the

economic impact of reducing greenhouse gas emissions (Econometrics Platform)

WWW. NRMCA.ORG

Future Work• Improve Data Quality• Detailed Scenario Analysis

• 1) Decrease surface roughness by increasing preventive and rehabilitative maintenance

• 2) Leverage albedo effect and include whitening chemicals in LCI• 3) Engineered Cementitious Composite (ECC), etc.• 4) Model fly ash, rice husk ash, etc.

• Life cycle costing• Create tool for engineers to

estimate their pavement’s carbon footprint

WWW. NRMCA.ORG

Selected LCA Literature

Life Cycle Inventory of Portland Cement Concrete –Marceau, Nisbet and Van Geem

Horvath, A. and Hendrickson, C., Comparison of Environmental Implications of Asphalt and Steel-Reinforced Concrete Pavements.

Santero, N.J., Pavements and the Environment: A Life-Cycle Assessment Approach, Doctoral Dissertation in Civil and Environmental Engineering

A Life Cycle Perspective on Concrete and Asphalt Roadways: Embodied Primary Energy And Global Warming Potential – Athena Institute

Thank You.Erin Ashley, Ph.D., LEED [email protected]