the usaid fumigation programmatic environmental assessment: … · 2019. 12. 19. · the usaid...
TRANSCRIPT
The USAID Fumigation Programmatic
Environmental Assessment:
A Four Year Retrospective
Erika Clesceri, PhD, Bureau Environmental Officer, Bureau for
Democracy, Conflict and Humanitarian Assistance, USAID
Integrated Pest Management and Fumigation Safety Training
January 24-26, 2017
Kansas State University, Manhattan, Kansas, USA
Purpose of the Fumigation PEA
• The Problem:
• Stored commodity losses due to insect infestation
• Ineffective fumigation is dangerous, with serious risks
to human health and possible pesticide resistance
• PVOs raised concern about fumigant residues on
fumigated commodity for beneficiaries
• The Solution: The Fumigation PEA
• BEO led, Food for Peace funded under GEMS contract
• Developed guidance, tools and templates for USAID-
funded projects
Content of the Fumigation PEA
• Main Body:
• Purpose, goals and methodology of the PEA
• Environmental and human health risk evaluation
• Mitigation measures for phosphine fumigation
• Annex A: Tools for implementation:
• Guidelines and templates for the fumigation
• Annex B: Background Information:
• Information collected and reports developed during the
elaboration of the Fumigation PEA
Development Timeline
• 2011: Scoping Statement for
Fumigation PEA
• 2013: Original PEA
• 2015: First Update to PEA
(Template Improvements)
• 2016: Second Update to PEA
(Applies to Entire Agency)
PEA Methodology
• PEA Team of experts in Environmental Impact
Assessment, Fumigation, Social Sciences Surveying,
Community Engagement, under GEMS project
• Stakeholder consultation of FACG members,
including USAID staff, PVOs, World Food Program
etc.
• Field Work in the USA (Manhattan, Kansas),
Uganda, Ethiopia and Djibouti
• Human Health Risk Evaluation of phosphine
fumigation for beneficiaries, fumigation service
providers, warehouse workers, and nearby residents
Over 125 stakeholders
consulted from:
Supreme Fumigation Services
Ltd
Star Pest Control
Smayaz Transact International
Zollo Pest Control
Gibe Freight Transporters
Hebret F.T.O.A
Compass Transport
Tared Transport
BMMI Djibouti and many more
Assessing Safety:
Human Health Risk Evaluation (HHRE)
Repeat application by fumigation
providers, multiple acute exposure,
chronic impacts?
PEA Findings: Environmental and
Human Health
• Poor practices can affect the health of fumigant applicators,
warehouse staff, and even nearby residents
• Beneficiary health impacts are not significant
• Poor fumigation will compromise the quality of food
• Solid Waste from Fumigation process + inadequate handling
and disposal of fumigant and waste could present a danger,
water reactive/explosive
• Recent domestic example in Texas where people died (2017)
Has USAID made any changes in
policies and procedures as a result of
this assessment?
Annex A: Tools for Implementation
1. Pesticide Evaluation Report and Safer
Use Action Plan (PERSUAP)
2. Fumigation Management Plan (FMP)
3. Solicitation and Contract Language
…Reduce redundancy globally…Consistent template...
Prepared PER... Focus on the SUAP and implementaion...
Pesticide
Evaluation
Report & Safer Use
Action Plan
Analysis of toxicology,
hazards, EPA registration,
IPM
Identifies actions for
mitigation
Annex A: PERSUAP Template
22 CFR 216.3(b), USAID Pesticide Procedures
Annex A: Fumigation Management
Plan (FMP) Template
• First ever for USAID
• Step by Step for safe, legal
and effective fumigation
• Follow steps assures
success
• Contents:
– Describes commodity and
ownership
– Establishes emergency plan and
safety
– Lists equipment and supplies
– Confirms steps are met for
application and monitoring
– Confirms steps are met for disposal
and cleanup
Annex A: FMP Template
• IPM section added to
original template in 2016
• Increase focus on non-
chemical approaches
• Contents:
– Warehouse Inspection for clean,
sealed warehouse and vacuuming
underneath pallets
– Proper handling of commodity
– Guidelines for infested, damaged
commodities
– Required actions to ensure a clean
yard area surrounding the
warehouse, free of weeds, trash
and water ponds.
Annex A: Solicitation and Contracts
Language
Fumigation Service
Quotation Request
Model Contract
Partners select better-
qualified service
providers
What are the gaps observed…?
…are we correcting them?
Common Issues found in
USAID Fumigation: PPE
“Painters Mask” will not stop gas
Big Obvious: • No canister masks
• Bare hands (and feet)
More Nuanced: • Only one mask
• Expired canister masks
Correcting.
Common Issues from
Fumigation: Gas Monitoring
Direct Read-out Meter
Color-Metric Tube
Detectors
Draeger Tube
Detectors
Gas Monitoring Equipment:
• Efficacy (under tarps)
• Safety (outside of tarps)
• No gas equipment found in
the entire country
• Imported from US, EU
• Custom Issues
Procured, but still
use problems.
Common Issues Found:
Siting of Warehouse
Safety of staff and nearby residents
– Warehouses not always sited at least 100m from
nearest residential/human habitation/businesses
– Warehouse not always sealed during fumigation
– Nearby resident not always alerted before every
fumigation
• Must have placard/post signs in English and
local language,
• Drawings especially among illiterate
populations or populations unfamiliar with
fumigants
Correcting.
Common Fumigation Issue: Tarps
• Procurement of Tarps that are too thin, not for
phosphine
• Reuse of tarps for too long, damages
• Culture of Mending the tarps, challenges
FAO, 2000
In Progress.
Common Issues, Gas Exposure:
Duration and Concentration
:
• Range of Standards and Practices
– PEA Recommendation:
• 5 days for 150ppm or 7 days for 100pm
– WFP Standard:
• 5 days at or above 150ppm
– Some PVOs, asked for shorter time periods, like 3
days due to program operations, without “any sign
of resistance”
Requirement: follow fumigant label instructions!
In Progress.
Follow On Activities as a
Result of PEA*
• Allocation of FFP ITSH funds for fumigant equipment
• >25 FFP programs with approved PERSUAPs
• Integration of PEA findings in:
• Nine (9) TOPS Commodity Management Workshops
• TOPS Warehouse Safety Handbooks and Posters
• TOPs Commodity Guide
• TOPs IPM & Fumigation Training and Webinar
• FFP required performance indicator for commodity
*(as of August 2016)
Country Examples:
Zimbabwe
• Coordination with WFP,
Harare
• Zimbabwean PhD
Entomologist heading
FSP, Entomon
• Resistance monitoring
• FFP using same FSP
Uganda
• Karamoja secondary
warehouse
• High praise for the FMP
• Including the FMP in
solicitation, used
template language
• Avoided hiring a
problematic FSP as a
result, Shared with
Mission and WFP
Other Impacts of the
Fumigation PEA?
• As baseline for bagging technology research by MIT
(Cambridge, MA) Higher Education Support Network
(HESN) Comprehensive Initiative for Technology
Evaluation (CITE)
• Interest by hermetically-sealed bags private industry and
the Wall Street Journal commodities editor
• Agency resource for food security programs, esp.
USAID’s Bureau for Food Security (BFS)
• Ability for USAID to speak authoritatively with scientific-
evidence basis to justify, Leadership
• Spill over improvements in-country warehousing and
market standards
With a special thanks to Dr. Bhadriraju
Subramanyam (Subi) for his fumigation expertise!
USAID Programmatic Environmental Assessment for Commodity
Fumigation located at:
http://www.usaidgems.org/fumigationpea.htm
Erika Clesceri
DCHA Bureau Environmental Officer (BEO)