the total installed generation capacity of tamil nadu as on 30.04.2009

THE TOTAL INSTALLED GENERATION CAPACITY OF THE TOTAL INSTALLED GENERATION CAPACITY OF TAMIL NADU AS ON 30.04.2009 TAMIL NADU AS ON 30.04.2009

TNEB’s own generating stations(Hydel, Thermal, Gas and wind)

5690 MW

Private Sector Power Plants (IPP) 1180 MW

Shares from Central Sector Generating Stations 2825 MW

External Assistance (Eastern Grid) 305 MW

Others ( Captive Power Plants) 214 MW

Total 10214 MW

RENEWABLE RENEWABLE OR OR

NON-CONVENTIONAL ENERGY SOURCESNON-CONVENTIONAL ENERGY SOURCES Wind Mill Private (infirm) 4310.615 MW

Co-Generation 466.100 MW

Bio-mass 109.550 MW

Total (Renewable sources ) 4886.265 MW

INSTALLED CAPACITY AND PERCENTAGE OF INSTALLED CAPACITY AND PERCENTAGE OF INSTALLED CAPACITY AS ON 30.04.09INSTALLED CAPACITY AS ON 30.04.09

Year Central Sector

State Sector

Wind Energy

Merchant Power Plant

Total

2009 – 10 1124 33 500 - 1157

PROPOSED CAPACITY ADDITION PROPOSED CAPACITY ADDITION DURING 2009-10DURING 2009-10

in MW

PROPOSED CAPACITY ADDITION PROPOSED CAPACITY ADDITION DURING NEXT 5 YEARSDURING NEXT 5 YEARS

Year Central Sector

State Sector

Wind Energy


Total

2010 – 11 1174 660 600 - 2434

2011 – 12 717 1200 500 2600 5017

2012 – 13 847 --- 500 5000 6347

2013 – 14 760 600 500 5000 6860

2014 – 15 --- 2200 400 5540 8140

Total 3498 4660 2500 18140 28798

in MW

22

PROPOSED CAPACITY ADDITION PROPOSED CAPACITY ADDITION DURING 2009-10 - DURING 2009-10 - Central SectorCentral Sector

Sl.No Project Name Type Capacity/ Share in

MW

Expected Commissioning

1. Kaiga APP Stage-II Unit-2 (220 MW)

Nuclear (Share)

36 December 2009

2. Neyvel TS-II Expansion Unit-I (250 MW)

Thermal (Share)

163 February 2010

3. Kudankulam APS Unit-1 & 2

Nuclear (Share)

925 December 2009 & March 2010

PROPOSED CAPACITY ADDITION PROPOSED CAPACITY ADDITION DURING 2009-10 - DURING 2009-10 - State SectorState Sector


MW


1. Periyar vaigai SHEP -I (2x2 MW)

Hydel 4 December 2009

2. Periyar vaigai SHEP -II (2x1.25 MW)

Hydel 2.5 December 2009

3. Periyar vaigai SHEP -III toIV(2x2 MW)


4. Periyar vaigai SHEP - IV (2x1.25 MW)

Hydel 2.5 December 2009

5. Bhavani Barrage- I (2x5 MW)

Hydel 10 February 2010

6. Bhavani Barrage- II (2x5 MW)

Hydel 10 February 2010

Total 33

PROPOSED CAPACITY ADDITION PROPOSED CAPACITY ADDITION DURING 2010-11 - DURING 2010-11 - Central SectorCentral Sector


MW


1. NTPC – TNEB at Vallur Stage-I (2X500 MW)

Thermal (Share

750 Unit-1 Aug-2010Unit-2 Jan-2011

2. PFBR Kalpakkam (2 X 250 MW)

Nuclear (Share)

167 2010-2011

3. Simhadri Stage-II (2 X 500 MW)

Thermal (Share)

95 Unit-III Nov-2010

4. Neyveli TS Unit-II (1 X 250 MW)

Thermal (Share)

162 Jun 2010

PROPOSED CAPACITY ADDITION PROPOSED CAPACITY ADDITION DURING 2010-11 - DURING 2010-11 - State SectorState Sector


MW


1. Bhavani Kattalai Barrage – II (2 X 15 MW)


2. Bhavani Kattalai Barrage – III (2 X 15 MW)

Hydel 30 March 2010

3. North Chennai TPS Stage – II (1 X 600 MW)

Thermal 600 Unit-1 December 2010

Total 660

PROPOSED CAPACITY ADDITION PROPOSED CAPACITY ADDITION DURING 2011-12 - DURING 2011-12 - Central and State Central and State

SectorSectorSl.No Project Name Type Capacity/

Share in MW


1. NTPC – TNEB Vallur Stage –II ( 1 X 500 MW)

Thermal (Share)

375 Unit-3 Jul 2011

2. NLC – TNEB Tuticorin (2X500 MW)

Thermal (Share)

247 Unit-1 Mar 2012

3. Simhadri Stage-II (2X500 MW)

Thermal (Share)

95 Unit-4 May 2011

4. MTPS Stage-III Unit-1 (600 MW)

Thermal 600 Jul 2001

5. NCTPS Stage – II Unit-2 (600 MW)

Thermal 600 Unit-2 Jun 2011

Total 1917



MW


1. NLC-TNEB at Tuticorin Unit-2 (2 X 500MW)

Thermal (Share)

247 Aug 2012

2. TNEB – BHEL at Udangudi Unit- 1(2 X 800 MW)

Thermal (Share)

600 Mar 2013

Total 847



MW


1. TNEB – BHEL at Udangudi Unit - 2 (2 X 800 MW)

Thermal (Share)

600 Unit-2 Sep 2013

2. Krishnapatnam (AP) UMPP ( 5 X 800 MW)

Thermal (Share)

160 Sep 2013

3. Ennore Annexe (1X600MW)

Thermal 600 Sep 2013



MW


1. Kattupalli UMPP(5 X 800 MW)

Thermal 1600 2014-15

2. NCTPS Stage III (1X600MW)

Thermal 600 2014-15

Total 2200

Power Evacuation System 2009-10Power Evacuation System 2009-10

Sl.No Name of Line Approx. Length

(in c. km)

Approx. Cost

(Rs. in lakhs)

1.Kudankulam

a. Kudankulam-Abishekapatty 2 Nos. 400KV DC (Quad) Line)

Executed by PGCIL

b. Abishekapatty-Thrissur 2 Nos. 400 KV DC Line

c. Abhishekapatty-Myvadi 400 KV DC Line

d. Abishekapatty-Edaman

e. LILO of Chekkanurani-Trivandrum at Abhishekapatty 400 KV SS

Commissioned



(in c. km)

Approx. Cost

(Rs. in lakhs)

2.Neyveli TS II – Expansion

a. Neyveli TS II – Pugalur400 KC DC Line

Executed by PGCIL

b. Pugalur – Chekkanurani 400 KV DC Line

Commissioned

c. Arasur-Myvadi 400 KV DC Line

Executed by PGCIL

d. Pugalur 400/230 KV SS Executed by PGCIL



(in c. km)

Approx. Cost

(Rs. in lakhs)

3. Bhavani Barrage PH I (2 X 5 MW) LILO of Pykara – Mettupalayam Bhavani Barrage I 110 KV DC

15 486.90

4. Bhavani Barrage PH II (2 X 5 MW) LILO of Mettupalayam – Irumborai at Bhavani Barrage II 110 KV DC

5 162.30

5. Periyar – Vaigai HEP – I to IV Barrages Gullapa Govindapatty 110/22 KV SS 22 KV link line

Power Evacuation at 22 KV to be executed by O&M



(in c. km)

Approx. Cost

(Rs. in lakhs)

1. NTPC-TNEB Joint Venture – North Chennai

a. DC Line Vallur TPS – Alamathi 400 KV Line

Executed by PGCIL

b. DC Line Vallur TPS – Melakottaiyur 400 KV Line

Executed by PGCIL

c. DC Line Tiruvalam – Chittor 400 KV Quad Line

Executed by PGCIL

d. DC Line Tiruvalam – Singarapet 400 KV Quad Line

100 14000.00

e. DC Line Tiruvalam – Alamathi 400 KV Line

70 9880.00

Power Evacuation System 2010-11Power Evacuation System 2010-11Sl.No Name of Line Approx.

Length (in c. km)

Approx. Cost

(Rs. in lakhs)

2. Kalpakkam PFBR

a. DC Line Kalpakkam PFBR-Siruseri Executed by PGCIL

b. DC Line Kalpakkam PFBR-Arni

c. DC Line Kalpakkam PFBR-Kanchi

3. Simhadri Stage-II (2X500MW) Unit-I DC Line LILO Vizag-Vermagiri 400 KV Line

Executed by Central Sector

4. North Chennai TPS Stage II

a. DC Line, NCTPS II- Alamathi 400 KV Line 68 11966.00

b. DC Line, NCTPS II- SV Chatram 400 KV Line 168 18296.00

c. DC Line, NCTPS II- TNEB JV 400 KV Line 8 912.00



(in c. km)

Approx. Cost

(Rs. in lakhs)

5. Bhavani Kattalai Barrage II 110 KV SC Line BKB II –Pallipalayam110 KV SC Line BKB II– Thiruchengod

23 416.30

6. Bhavani Kattalai Barrage III 110 KV SC Line BKB III –Nallur110 KV SC Line BKB III– Kabilarmalai

15 272.70

Wind Evacuation System 2010-11Wind Evacuation System 2010-11


(in c. km)

Approx. Cost

(Rs. in lakhs)

1. Kanarpatty 400/230 KV SS (TNEB) Kanarpatty-Abishekapatty – 400 KV DC Quad Line

30 14335.32

2. 230 KV DC Line Kanarpatty-Maranthy

25 3175.88

3. 230 KV DC LineKanarpatty-Sayamalai

25 3229.00

4. LILO of 230 KV Line Ponnapuram-Palladam at Velarsi Vadamalaipalayam

22 2187.69

Wind Evacuation System 2010-11 - Wind Evacuation System 2010-11 - ContdContd


(in c. km)

Approx. Cost

(Rs. in lakhs)

5. Vannikonandal LILO of one of the circuits of Kayathar Chekkanurani-230 KV Line

100 4181.00

6. Nallamanickenpatti-Vannikonandal 230 KV SC Lin

16 426.00

7 SamugarangapuramKanarpatty-Samugarangapuram 230 KVSC Line

80 2132.00

8 Samugarangapuram-Kayathar 230 KV SS – 230 KV SC Line

100 2665.00

9. KethanurLILO of Palladam – Ingur 230 KV DC Line

40 1672.00

Additional Lines 2010-11Additional Lines 2010-11


(in c. km)

Approx. Cost

(Rs. in lakhs)

1. LILO of Sriperumbudur-Kalivanthapattu400 KV SC Line at SunguvarChatram

11 1100.00

230 KV Lines

2. 230 KV SC Line, Sankaneri – Kanarpatty 80 2132.003. DC Linking of Kudankulam Startup – TTPS 230

KV SC Line at Suitable Location and rearranging in such a way to connect the TTPS end to Kanarpatty SS and Kudankulam Startup bus to Samugarangapuram SS in order to avoid wind power injection at TTPS Bus

80 2132.00

4. BasinBridge (GMR) – TNEB HQ) OCF – 230 KV SC Line UG

24 1723.00

Additional Lines 2010-11 – Additional Lines 2010-11 – Contd.Contd.


(in c. km)

Approx. Cost

(Rs. in lakhs)

5. Arasur-Karamadai 230 KV SC Line 48 1106.00

6. Arasur-Palladam 230 KV SC Line 35 807.00

7. Arasur 400/230 KV SS – Arasur 230 KV SS 24 376.00

8. LILO of Pugalur – Palladam 230 KV SC Line 50 1332.00

9. LILO of Pugalur – Alandur 230 KV SC Line 120 3198.00

10. Mayvadi-Othakalmandapam and Othakalmandpam 2nd Circuit 230 KV Line

115.60 2327.34



(in c. km)

Approx. Cost

(Rs. in lakhs)

11. Karaikudi 400 KVSS–Sempatty 230 KVSC Line 140 4228.00

12. Tuticorin Sipcot – Chekkanurani 230 KV SC Line 130 3464.5013. Abishekapatty-Udayathur 230 KV SC Line 95 2869.0014. Palladam-Othakalamandapam 230 KV SC Line 50 1332.00

15. Kalivanthapattu-Kadaperi 230 MC/DC Line 99.6 5273.57

16 Kalivanthapattu-Veerapuram 230 KV SC Line 23.4 666.00

17. Valuthur – Paramakudi 230 KV SC Line 50 1133.50

18. Rearrangingof MTPS – Malco line in such a way to form MTPS – Govi and Malco – Pallakapalayam 230 KV SC Line

130 3464.00



(in c. km)

Approx. Cost

(Rs. in lakhs)

19. LILO of one of the Tondiarpet-Mylapore at BasinBridge 230 KV DC

2 84.00

20. Neyveli Zero Unit-Ulundurpet 230 KV SC Line 25 666.00

21. Villupuram-Ulundurpet 230 KV SC Line 52 1385.00

22. LILO of MTPS-Gobi 230 KV SC Line at Anthiyur 230 KV SS

92 2451.80

23. LILO of Sriperumbudur-Koyambedu SC Line at Guindy 230 KV SS

26 692.00

24 LILO of Tondiarpet-BasinBridge at Vyasarpadi SS

2 52.30

25. Alamathi-Vyasarpadi 230 KV SC Line 30 799.50



(in c. km)

Approx. Cost

(Rs. in lakhs)

26 LILO of Kundah III – PUSHEP 230KV DC Line at Karamadai SS

2 83.62

27. LILO of Arasur-Ingur at Karamadai SS 6 250.00

28. LILO of one of the circuits of Amathapuram-Chekkanurani at Nallamanickempatti 230 KV DC Line

16 669.00



(in c. km)

Approx. Cost

(Rs. in lakhs)

1. NTPC – TNEB JV North Chennai Scheme mentioned in Unit I & II (2010-11)

Covered in 2010-11

2. NLC – TNEB JV Project (Tuticorin)400 KV DC Quad Line from JV Project to Chekkanurani

Executed by PGCIL

3. Simhadri Stage II (2 X 500 MW) Unit II Scheme already mentioned in Unit-I


4. North Chennai TPS Stage II Scheme mentioned in Unit I (2010-11)

Covered in 2010-11

Power Evacuation System 2011-12 – Power Evacuation System 2011-12 – Contd.Contd.


(in c. km)

Approx. Cost

(Rs. in lakhs)

5. MTPS Stage III

400 KV (TNEB)

a. 400 KV DC Line MTPS – Arasur 280 17630b. 400 KV DC Line MTPS–Singarpet 400 KVSS 200 12593

230 KV (TNEB)

a. 230 KV DC Line LILO of MTPS –Gobi 230 KV SC Line at MTPS Stage III

85 3554

b. 230 KV DC Line – LILO of Malco – Pallkapalayam 230 KV SC Line at MTPS Stage III

50 2091

Wind Evacuation System 2011-12Wind Evacuation System 2011-12Sl.No Name of Line Approx.

Length (in c. km)

Approx. Cost

(Rs. in lakhs)

1. Kayathar 400/230-110 KV SS (TNEB)

i. 400 KV DC Line – Kanarpatty – Kayathar 18 4200

ii. 400 KV Kayathar-Karaikudi DC Quad Line 200 2800

iii. 400 KV Karaikudi-Pugalur DC Quad Line 250 35000230 KV Lines

i. 230 KV DC Line Kayathar 400 KV–Valliyur SS 80 3344ii. 230 KV DC Line, LILO of Kayathar –

Anuppankularm SC Line at Kayathar 400 KVSS5 209

iii. 230 KV DC Line, LILO of Kayathar –Pasumalai SC Line at Kayathar 400 KVSS

5 209

230 KV Lines to be Executed by TNEB 230 KV Lines to be Executed by TNEB for 230/33 KV SS to be Executed by for 230/33 KV SS to be Executed by

MPP -2011-12MPP -2011-12Sl.No Name of Line Approx.

Length (in c. km)

Approx. Cost

(Rs. in lakhs)

1. PanneerkulamLILO of one circuit of Kayathar – Chekkanurani DC Line at Panneerkulam

230 KV SC Line Panneerkulam – Chekkanurani

7

100

332

2665

2. Villiseri LILO of Second Circuit of Kayathar-Chekkanurani DC Line at Villiseri

250 10500

3. PeriyapattyLILO of Myvadi-Othakalamandapam SC Line at Periyapatty

80 3344

230 KV Lines to be Executed by TNEB 230 KV Lines to be Executed by TNEB for 230/33 KV SS to be Executed by for 230/33 KV SS to be Executed by

MPP -2011-12 – MPP -2011-12 – Contd.Contd.Sl.No Name of Line Approx.

Length (in c. km)

Approx. Cost

(Rs. in lakhs)

4. Vagarai230 KV DC Line LILO of Udumalpet-Sempatty SC Line at Vagarai

50 2905

5. Kumarapuram230 KV SC Line Kanarpatty – Kumarapuram 35 1463

6. Vagai Kulam230 KV DC Line Vagaikulam – Sayamalai 15 627

7. Sankaralinkapuram230 KV DC Line Sankaralingapuram-Kumarapuram

30 129

Other Proposed Lines - 2011-12Other Proposed Lines - 2011-12


(in c. km)

Approx. Cost

(Rs. in lakhs)

1. Karamadai 400/230 KV SS (TNEB)

400 KV DC Line, Arasur- Karamadai

LILO of Kundah – Thudialur SC Line at Karamadi

230 KV SC Line Thudialur – Karamadai

80

10

7

11200

418

186

Other Proposed Lines - 2011-12 – Other Proposed Lines - 2011-12 – Contd.Contd.


(in c. km)

Approx. Cost

(Rs. in lakhs)

2. Singarpet 400/230 KV SS (TNEB)

400 KV 400 KV DC Line, Singarapet-Hosur 170 21155

LILO of Pugalur-Ottiambakkam DC Line at Singarapet

16 2240

230 KV DC Line, Singarapet 400 KV SS – Singarapet 230 KV SS

85 3553

SC Line, Singarapet 400 KV SS – Singarapet 230 KV SS

135 3598

SC Line, Singarapet 400 KV SS – Vinnamangalam 230 KV SS

165 4398



(in c. km)

Approx. Cost

(Rs. in lakhs)

1. TNEB – BHEL JV at Udangudi (2 X 800 MW) Unit-1

To be Evacuated by PGCIL at 765 KV

2. NLC – TNEB at Tuticorin To be Evacuated by PGCIL



(in c. km)

Approx. Cost

(Rs. in lakhs)

1. TNEB – BHEL JV at Udangudi (2 X 800 MW) Unit-1

To be Evacuated by PGCIL at 765 KV

2. Krishnapatnam (AP), UMPP (4000 MW)(5 X 800 MW)


3. ETPS Annexe230 KV DC Line on MC Towers, ETPS Annexe-Korattur lake

20 836

Korattur Lake – Ambattur Industrial Estate 230/110 KV SS – DC Korattur lake to Guindy (UG)

144 2340



(in c. km)

Approx. Cost

(Rs. in lakhs)

1. Kattupalli – UMPP (5 X 800 MW) Unit-1

Evacuation Scheme to be finalised

2. NCTPS Stage III (600 MW) Environmental Clearance under

study

Investment Required for Investment Required for Power Evacuation SystemPower Evacuation SystemDuring Next Five Years During Next Five Years

Rs CrRs CrYear Cental

SectorState Sector

Wind Energy


Total

2010-11 To be evacuted by PGCIL at 400 /765 KV

1015.13 569.32 To be evacuted by PGCIL at 765 KV

1584.75

2011-12 826.16 565.79 1391.95

2012-13 31.76 141.63 173.39

2013-14 -- 141.63 141.63

2014-15 700.00 141.63 841.63

Total 2573.35 1560.00 4133.35

Investment Required for Investment Required for Transmission SchemesTransmission Schemes

For Next Five YearsFor Next Five YearsYear Investment tp be

made by TNEB for new Power

Evacuation Lines (Rs. In crores)

Investment proposed for other T&D

Schemes(Rs. in crores)

Total Investment required

2010-11 1584.75 1200.00 2784.75

2011-12 1391.95 1440.00 2831.95

2012-13 173.39 1728.00 1901.39

2013-14 141.63 2074.00 2215.63

2014-15 841.63 2489.00 3330.63

Total 4133.35 8931.00 13064.35

TRANSMISSION FIXED ASSETS TRANSMISSION FIXED ASSETS VALUE AS ON 31.03.2008 (Rs.in VALUE AS ON 31.03.2008 (Rs.in

Crores)Crores)

GROSS ASSETS : Rs. 6017.42GROSS ASSETS : Rs. 6017.42

DEPRICIATION : Rs. 2333.38DEPRICIATION : Rs. 2333.38

NET VALUE : Rs. 3684.04NET VALUE : Rs. 3684.04

AVENUES FOR INVESTMENTS

Permitting private operator on “Build, Own Operate and Maintain” basis

Joint venture with private operators

Joint venture with financial institutions

Funding by financial institutions

Permitting private operator

ADVANTAGES

Selection through competitive bidding

Total risk of completion/execution of project rests with the operator

Total risk of availability lies with the operator

Deployment of technology and expertise possible

PROCEDURES FOR SELECTION OF PROCEDURES FOR SELECTION OF PRIVATE OPERATORSPRIVATE OPERATORS

Identify the projectIdentify the project Selection of developers thro’ Tariff Selection of developers thro’ Tariff

based competitive bidding.based competitive bidding. Appoinment of BPCAppoinment of BPC Short listing thro’ RFQShort listing thro’ RFQ Signing of TSASigning of TSA

• Monthly transmission charges – Monthly transmission charges – Escalable Escalable charges and non – escalable charges and non – escalable chargescharges

•Incentive - For availability of above Incentive - For availability of above 98%98%

•Penalty - For availability of less than Penalty - For availability of less than 95%95%

PROCEDURES FOR SELECTIONPROCEDURES FOR SELECTION OF PRIVATE OPERATORS- Cont.OF PRIVATE OPERATORS- Cont.

JOINT VENTURE WITH PRIVATE OPERATORS

ADVANTAGES Increased requirement of equity can be met

through the investor

Possible to get technology and expertise DISADVANTAGES Finding a private operator - cumbersome

process

Possibility of mutual conflict

Cost of capital likely to be high

DISADVANTAGES

Likely to be a costlier option

Utilities continue to pay for 25 years at the escalated rate

No buy back

Flexibility for transmission utility absent

JOINT VENTURE WITH FINANCIAL INSTITUTIONS

ADVANTAGES

Increased requirement of equity can be met through the investor

Easy to find partner

DISADVANTAGES

Possibility of mutual conflict

Cost of capital likely to be high

Likely conditionalities

FUNDING BY FINANCIAL INSTITUTIONS

ADVANTAGES The cost of capital is the least

Less conditionalities

Full exploitation of available expertise

Ensure continuous growth of utility

DISADVANTAGES Mustering equity

Ability to complete the project on time

Ability to maintain availability

FEASIBILITY OF EXECUTION BY THE UTILITY

PREREQUISITES

Financial Capability

Technical Capability

Administrative Capability

FINANCIAL CAPABILITY

Assumptions

Gross asset as on 31/03/08 : Rs 6017 Crs

Equity (30%) : Rs 1805 Crs

Outstanding Loan : Rs 1878 Crs

ROE (17.48%) : Rs 315 Crs

Investment from 2009-10 taken separately

Study of financial capability

2009-10 2010-11Investment 972 2784.75

Capital cost 6017.42 Crs 972 6017.42 3700.18

Notional Equity 1805.22 Crs 291.6 1805.22 658.15

Notional loan 4212.19 Crs 680.4 1521.84 2447.36

Cumulative Depreciation 2333.38 Crs 56.57 2553.25 218.64

Outstanding Loan 1690.93 Crs 680.4 1521.84 2447.36

Repayment 169.09 Crs 68.04 152.18 244.73

Closing Loan 1521.84 Crs 612.36 1369.65 2202.62

average Loan 1606.38 Crs 646.38 1445.74 2447.36

debt/equity ratio 0.62

Return on Equity 17.481% 50.97 315.57 115.05

Study of financial capability

2011-12 2012-13 2013-14

Investment 2831.95 1901.39 2215.63

Capital cost 6017.42 6313.48 6017.42 7831.41 6017.42 9609.49

Notional Equity 1805.23 1088.77 1805.23 1594.67 1805.23 2189

Notional loan 1369.65 4603.96 1232.69 5539.05 1109.42 6606.44

Cum. Depreciation 2773.13 383.46 2993.01 437.55 3212.87 566.5

Outstanding Loan 1369.65 4603.96 1232.69 5539.05 1109.44 6606.44

Repayment 136.97 460.39 123.27 553.9 110.94 660.64

Closing Loan 1232.69 4143.56 1109.42 4985.15 998.50 5945.8

debt/equity ratio 0.48 0.5 0.52

Return on Equity 315.570 190.326 315.570 278.77 315.570 382.66

INFERENCE

Debt / Equity ratio remains above 43%

Assured O & M Charges sufficient to cover other expenses.

TECHNICAL CAPABILITY

ADVANTAGES

Rich experience in executing 400 KV Sub Station and lines.

Availability of qualified professionals .

DIS ADVANTAGES

Not well suitable for project management

Difficult to bring in outside expertise

ADMINISTRATIVE CAPABILITY

ADVANTAGES

Well Structured

Proven system

Committed Work Force

DISADVANTAGES

Tedious Time consuming Procedures

Resistance to change with time

Frequently changing leadership

COMPARISON OF OTHER TRANSMISSION UTILITIES

S.No

DESCRIPTION TNEB PGCIL KPTCL APTRANSCO

1 Total Sub Stations

694 120 382 367

2 Total EHT lines in circuit KM

21000 71500 36553 30450

3 Total employees 12500 7500 4000

4 Total revenue from operation Rs.in Crs.

6676

5 Employee cost Rs in Crs

375 644 223

6 Equity Rs in Crs. As on 31/03/08

315 420

7 Debt Equity ratio 38 : 62 66 : 24

the total installed generation capacity of tamil nadu as on 30.04.2009

Documents

mwexpected commissioning

mwinstalled capacity

tuticorin unit

udangudi unit

expansion unit

simhadri stage

mwthermal share163february

mwthermal share247aug