the reliability of copper pillar under the coupling of thermal … · 2017-01-12 · the...
TRANSCRIPT
The reliability of copper pillar under the coupling of thermalcycling and electric current stressing
Hui-Cai Ma1 • Jing-Dong Guo1 • Jian-Qiang Chen1 • Di Wu1 • Zhi-Quan Liu1 •
Qing-Sheng Zhu1 • Li Zhang2 • Hong-Yan Guo2
Received: 22 February 2016 / Accepted: 21 May 2016 / Published online: 27 May 2016
� Springer Science+Business Media New York 2016
Abstract Cu pillar samples were subject to the thermal
cycling test along with current stressing to investigate its
reliability issues under the coupling effect. Analysis of
scanning electron microscopy (SEM) pictures of Cu pillar
bumps showed the evolution of interfacial microstructure.
The finite element analysis pointed out the probable site of
cracks initiation based on the strain and stress distribution.
Three failure modes, electromigration (EM) induced cracks
at Cu6Sn5/Sn interface on cathode, cracking of Cu/Cu3Sn
interface on anode side, and fatigue-creep induced cracks
in Sn solder, took place at the interfaces of copper pillar
interconnect under electric current and thermal cycling. In
addition, EM induced failure increased while fatigue-creep
failure decreased with electric current density. The failure
mechanisms were analyzed from stress concentration,
interfacial morphology and voids formation respects.
1 Introduction
The solder bumps, in the microelectronic devices, play a
significant role in both mechanical support and electrical
connection. The coupling effect of thermo-mechanical
stresses and electric current yields new reliability issues. Its
corresponding failure mechanisms were usually investi-
gated separately for thermo-mechanical stresses or electric
current stress. The coupling effect of these two factors,
however, was rarely under consideration. Under the driving
of higher requirements for multifunctional as well as
portable devices, the miniaturization of solder bumps is
prevailing today. With the decreasing of solder bumps size
and its pitch, dramatic increase occurs in thermo-mechan-
ical stresses [1] and electric current density [2]. Under this
circumstance, the coupling effect is becoming increasingly
critical and indispensable to the reliability of solder joints.
The failure mechanisms for electromigration (EM) and
thermal cycling have already been thoroughly studied
separately, but these mechanisms may not account for the
coupling condition. Under the coupling of thermal cycling
and electric current, both EM and thermal stress induced
creep-fatigue process may cause failure of the bumps
[3–7]. Moreover, EM and creep-fatigue controlling process
usually entangles with each other when the solder joints
undergo electric current and temperature cycling. The
electric current induced void flow weakens the strength of
the solder [8], accelerates the creep strain rate and
decreases the activation energy. Simultaneously, thermo-
mechanical stress also affects EM failure: the tensile stress
enhances EM failure whereas the compressive stress
retards it [9]. In our previous work [10], the lifetime of the
bumps under the coupled condition was much less than that
of thermal cycling and EM, which suggests that the failure
mechanisms under the coupled condition may be different
and more complicated. Zuo et al. and Ma et al. [11, 12]
studied the coupling effect of thermal cycling and high
electric current density on Sn58Bi and SnAgCu (SAC)
solders. The results revealed that cracks had more impact
on the resistance increase than phase segregation. Cracks
were inclined to form and propagate along the interface
between intermetallic compound layers and solder matrix
in SAC solder. In SnBi solder, however, grain boundaries
& Jing-Dong Guo
1 Shenyang National Laboratory for Materials Science,
Institute of Metal Research, Chinese Academy of Sciences,
Shenyang 110016, China
2 Jiangyin Changdian Advanced Packaging Co., Ltd.,
Jiangyin 214431, China
123
J Mater Sci: Mater Electron (2016) 27:9748–9754
DOI 10.1007/s10854-016-5038-8
were regarded as the nucleation sites for micro cracks.
They also reported that high electric current density alle-
viated the deterioration of the solder at the beginning stage
of coupling stressing through Joule heating effect. Laurila
et al. [13]. investigated the failure mechanism of solder
interconnects in power cycling tests, but they suggested
that the failure modes of coupling tests were the same with
that of thermal cycling tests. Although the results are
fruitful, the failure mechanism of solder bumps under
coupling effect is still unclear.
Thus, the present study attempts to probe failure
mechanisms of solder bumps under thermal cycling com-
bined with electric current stressing using copper pillar
with Sn cap structure. Specifically, the effects of electric
current density, temperature, stress and IMCs on the atomic
migration and failure process will be carried on.
2 Experimental
The configuration and dimensions of the cross-section of
flip-chip solder joint samples with a daisy-chained circuit
are illustrated in Fig. 1. The pitch between adjacent pillars
is 400 lm. The heights of copper pillar and Sn solder are
100 and 30 lm, respectively. And their diameters are all
160 lm. The thickness of Cu trace on the chip is 10 lm and
on PCB side, 30 lm.
Multi-field coupling failure tests were conducted using a
series of samples. The electric current densities of 12.4,
17.4, 19.9 and 22.4 kA/cm2 corresponding to constant DC
electric current stressing of 2.5, 3.5, 4.0 and 4.5 A,
respectively, were applied on the samples. For comparison,
tests without electric current, viz., only thermal cycling
tests were also conducted as reference group. Based on the
JEDEC standards, the accelerated temperature cycling
condition was provided by Temperature Cycling Test
Chamber. Figure 2 shows the thermal profile of the
accelerated thermal cycling. A sound cycle would take
50 min. The dwell time at high and low extreme temper-
atures was 10 min, and the heating and cooling rates were
11 �C/min. The resistance and temperature data were
monitored in situ. After multi-field stressing, the interfaces
between solder and substrate were examined by scanning
electron microscopy (SEM).
To understand the crack extension process of copper
pillar joint with voided interface due to EM enhanced
Kirkendall effect, the stress and strain were studied with a
finite element (FE) model of a voided IMC layer with
different thicknesses. Using ANSYS14.0 as the finite ele-
ment analysis tool, Sn cap was meshed using the
VISCO107 elements, whereas all the other package mate-
rials were meshed using SOLID45 elements. To authenti-
cally reflect the nature of creep and fatigue behavior under
thermal cycling, herein, the unified viscoplastic law was
used to describe the material properties in FEM modelling.
Anand constitutive model was applied to solder material
and its detailed data was given is our previous work
[10, 14]. The rest materials are assumed to be linear elastic
and their material data was presented in Table 1. The finite
element analysis contained five heating/cooling cycles
since the stress and strain on joints generally stabilized
after the third cycle during thermal cycling.
3 Results
According to our previous work [10], after experiencing a
long resistance-hardly-increase period which accounts
most part of lifespan of copper pillar interconnects under
thermal cycling and electric current, the resistance of most
samples rose abruptly to an open circuit. Thus, it is
Fig. 1 Cross-sectional view of an as-assembled Cu pillar solder joint
Fig. 2 Accelerated thermal cycle with load steps
Table 1 Material properties
Materials CTE (ppm/k) Poisson’s ratio E (GPa)
Si 2.6 0.28 162
Cu 16.5 0.33 85.56
Sn 23.5 0.2 42
FR4 16 0.28 27.9
J Mater Sci: Mater Electron (2016) 27:9748–9754 9749
123
reasonable to set open failure as the failure criterion for
each sample. For each set of test, the lifetime data of
experiment under the coupled condition were analyzed
statistically by using a two-parameter Weibull distribution
(Fig. 3) [15, 16]. Its scale parameter, g, and shape
parameter, b were used to determine the mean time. The
lifetime data are presented in the third column of Table 2
[10]. From the table, the lifetime drops quickly with the
increase of electric current density. This trend reveals EM
accelerated failure of Cu pillar bump in the coupling tests.
After statistically analyzing the morphologies of cross-
sectioned samples with SEM, three failure modes were
discovered in copper pillar interconnects under the coupled
condition. The first failure mode was EM induced failure
on cathode side. The second was cracking of Cu/Cu3Sn
interface on anode side. And the third was fatigue-creep
failure of solder. The proportion of each kind of failure
mode for each set is tabulated in Table 3. From the table, it
can be noted that EM induced failure increased from 31 to
44 % with electric current density increased from 12.4 to
22.4 kA/cm2, on the other hand, fatigue-creep failure
decreased from 56 to 19 % with electric current density
increased from 12.4 to 22.4 kA/cm2. The failure mecha-
nism shifted from fatigue-creep dominated failure to EM
dominated failure when electric current density increases
from 12.4 to 22.4 kA/cm2.
The first failure mode, EM-induced cracks on the cath-
ode, is presented in Fig. 4. As the arrows indicated, PCB
side is the cathode in Fig. 4a, whereas copper pillar side is
the cathode in Fig. 4b. Cracks appeared on the cathode side
in both Fig. 4a, b. Specifically, cracks appeared at Cu6Sn5/
Sn and Cu3Sn/Cu6Sn5 interfaces. The polarity effect, which
is commonly observed in conventional solder bumps, also
existed in copper pillar interconnects during electric cur-
rent stressing. Cu6Sn5 and Cu3Sn IMC layers formed on
both sides in both joints. Samples failed in such mode
usually have a shorter lifespan.
The second failure mode is cracking of Cu/Cu3Sn
interface on the anode side, as indicated in Fig. 5. This
kind of failure is the unique failure mode for copper pillar
interconnects rather than conventional solder ball inter-
connects. Because the limited Sn cap transformed into
intermetallic compound layers on the anode due to the
polarity effect of EM in copper pillar interconnects. In
addition, this brittle fracture mode often occurred on the
PCB substrate side.
Figure 6 shows third failure mode, that is, fatigue crack
forms in solder. In this case, though the polarity effect also
existed and Kirdendall voids appeared at the interface and
in Cu3Sn phase, cracks were found in solder section instead
of the interface that discussed above. From the picture, Sn
is unexhausted when crack took place. This failure mode is
similar with that of interconnect experiencing only thermal
cycling, but its lifetime has been significantly reduced. The
foremost reason is that EM effect greatly increases the
density of voids and internal defects such as micro cracks
in the solder. As a consequence, the strength of solder
decreased and the failure process was accelerated under the
alternating thermal stress. This failure mode mainly
appears in multi-field tests with low electric current den-
sity, 17.4 kA/cm2 in this study.
4 Discussion
For the first failure mode, cracking of the Cu6Sn5/Sn
interface owes to EM induced voids, fatiguing the serrated
interface and the microcracks in Cu6Sn5 phase. First of all,
due to the effect of electric current, the in-migrating atomic
flux cannot counterbalance the emigrating Cu flux atFig. 3 The Weibull cumulative distribution curve
Table 2 Lifetime statistics of Cu pillar bumps [10]
J (kA/cm2) T (�C) b N (cycles)
0 -40–125 13,390
12.4 -29–154 0.93 5800
17.4 -15–163 1.02 2158
19.9 1–176 1.22 599
22.4 15–190 1.30 118
Table 3 Statistics of each failure mode under different coupling tests
j (kA/cm2) EM (%) Anode crack (%) Fatigue-creep (%)
12.4 31 12 56
17.4 40 20 40
19.9 42 21 37
22.4 44 37 19
9750 J Mater Sci: Mater Electron (2016) 27:9748–9754
123
Cu6Sn5/Sn interface on the cathode side. Therefore, an
increasing number of vacancies accumulated at this inter-
face and gradually condensed into voids with time of EM.
Noticeably, when failure occurred, Sn was unexhausted
(Fig. 4). This differs from EM induced failure of copper
pillar subjecting to only electric current, in which cracks
Fig. 4 Cracks formation on the cathode side a cathode side on the PCB side, b cathode side on the copper pillar side, c close-up of a, d close-up
of b
Fig. 5 Cracking of Cu/Cu3Sn interface a fracture on anode side, b close-up view of a
Fig. 6 Failure in solder
a initiation site of crack,
b extension of crack, c open
failure in solder
J Mater Sci: Mater Electron (2016) 27:9748–9754 9751
123
form at Cu/Cu3Sn interface and all Sn cap has been
transformed to IMCs [17]. Moreover, the lifetime of copper
pillar under the coupled condition is shorter than that under
electric current [10]. This disparity suggests that copper
pillar interconnect is more vulnerable to the coupled con-
dition than single field (electric current stressing). In detail,
in addition to the EM effect on the cathode interface,
thermal cycling also has an effect on the reliability of this
interface under the coupled condition. First, the fatigue
crack accelerates the cracking process of Cu6Sn5/Sn
interface. During thermal cycling, due to the mismatch of
coefficient of thermal expansion between Cu6Sn5(aCu6Sn5 = 16.3 9 10-6) and Sn (aSn = 23.5 9 10-6), a
larger stress builds up at Cu6Sn5/Sn interface (Fig. 8).
Furthermore, the serrated morphology of this interface
provides an easy path for fatigue crack propagation. Thus,
fatigue-creep crack extends along the serrated interface
between Sn and Cu6Sn5 scallops, as marked by the red
wavy line in Fig. 7a. The second factor accelerating the
cracking process of this interface is microcracks in Cu6Sn5,
as shown in Fig. 7b. This kind of microcracks also existed
in samples stressing only with thermal cycling. Thus, the
final failure results from EM induced voids, cracks in
Cu6Sn5 scallops and fatigue crack propagation among these
voids and micro cracks. This failure mode dominates the
lifetime of Cu pillar when the electric current density is
high because high electric current density means more
voids and thicker Cu6Sn5.
Furthermore, this kind of crack is mode I cracking
judging from the stress and strain analysis as indicated in
Fig. 8a. The y-stress distribution shows that the maximum
stress site locates at Cu6Sn5/Sn interface regardless of the
IMC thickness from our calculation. In addition to ther-
momechanical loading, this stress is also attributed to
volume change induced by IMC formation. The y-stress,
perpendicular to the interface, drives the crack to propagate
as a mode I crack. On the other hand, the stress may also
cause Cu6Sn5 cracking as shown in Fig. 7b, which aggra-
vates the mode I cracking propagation.
Meanwhile, accompanying with the IMC decomposition
and atoms emigration at interfaces on cathode, atoms
immigrate and IMC forms at interfaces on anode side.
Especially, the formation of Cu3Sn is always accompanied
by a great number of Kirkendall voids formation at Cu/
Cu3Sn interface, which degrades the strength of intercon-
nect. The mechanism and formation process of these voids
can be found in our previous study [17]. Further, these
voids connects into a crack and propagates along Cu/Cu3Sn
interface, as indicated in Fig. 6, under the larger stress
which can be derived from the result of finite element
simulation, as shown in Fig. 8a. This failure mode is
always combined with the first failure modes because the
large amount of IMC formation on the anode side is always
at the cost of severe IMC decomposition and atoms
migration on cathode side.
The mechanism of cracking of solder Sn is stress con-
centration induced crack rather than recrystallization-as-
sisted crack nucleation and propagation. The
microstructure was inspected by using EBSD technique
after tests, as shown in Fig. 9. It is found that the
microstructure of the interconnection, especially near the
cracks, had not changed after thermal cycling. It is different
from the failure mode of conventional solder balls in which
the cracks extended along the grain boundaries caused by
recrystallization. Tin grains near the cracks still remain the
same morphology and there are no recrystallization grains.
In fact, the crack initiates from the edge of the solder
section, as shown in Fig. 6a, which may be attribute to the
larger stress and strain at this site, as indicated in stress
distribution map of FEA result (Fig. 8b, c). Then it prop-
agates gradually with the number of cycles in solder till
open failure occurs across solder interconnect. This kind of
failure is the mix of mode I and mode II cracking. As
shown in Fig. 6c, there is a relative horizontal displace-
ment between site A and site B which are supposed to be
one site before cracking. The shear stress, as shown in
Fig. 8b, drives the horizontal displacement in solder. At the
same time, the solder also subjects to a perpendicular stress
so that mode I cracking process also contribute to the final
open failure in solder.
These three failure modes exist in each group with
different proportions as listed in Table 2. In each group,
Fig. 7 a Fatigue crack at Cu6Sn5/Sn interface, b microcracks in Cu6Sn5 scallops
9752 J Mater Sci: Mater Electron (2016) 27:9748–9754
123
according to our statistics, the time to failure of the first and
second failure modes is usually shorter than that of the
third failure mode. The orientation of Sn solder may
account for the difference of time to failure. Under current
stressing, the growth of the interfacial intermetallic com-
pound was Sn grain orientation dependant [18]. When the
current flow aligns to the c-axes of most Sn grains it causes
a severe polarity effect, i.e., thicker Cu6Sn5 layer on anode
(Fig. 9a, b). On cathode side, however, IMCs decompose
quickly so that the first failure mode occurs. On the other
hand, along with thicker layers of IMCs formation on
anode, large number of Kirkendall voids form and coa-
lescence at Cu/Cu3Sn interface so that the second mode of
failure occurs. But when the c-axes of the Sn grains deviate
from the current direction, as illustrated in Fig. 9c, d, the
polarity effect became less pronounced, as well as EM
induced failure. Creep-fatigue, instead, dominates the
failure process in such orientated samples. Thus, this kind
of samples is inclined to have longer lifetime and fail in the
third mode.
Thus, the failure modes are more complicated for the
coupled condition, which comprises failure characteristics
of thermal cycling and EM. EM leads to increasing the
density of voids in solder, reducing the strength of solder
joints and accelerating the solder joint failure process under
thermal cycling. The introduction of cyclic thermal stress,
on the other hand, also deteriorates the interface subjecting
to EM. Furthermore, the microstructure of solder joints
also affects its reliability.
5 Conclusion
Failure mechanisms in copper pillar bumps during multi-
field coupling tests are examined. The result shows that
there are three failure mechanisms: (a) EM induced cracks
formation on the cathode side under high electric current
density, (b) cracking of Cu/Cu3Sn interface on anode side,
and (c) fatigue crack formation in the solder tending to
appear under low electric current density. The first and
second failure modes are mainly caused by EM which is
related to the electric current density and the orientation of
solder Sn. The third failure mode is attributed to fatigue-
creep of solder Sn with crack initiating at the middle brim
of solder Sn part because of stress concentration. In each
test set, these failure modes mingle the characteristics of
EM and thermal cycling together with different propor-
tions. Thermal stress and potential failure sites of copper
pillar interconnect are investigated by FEA. The results
reveal that the maximum y-stress locates at the interface
Fig. 8 FEA simulated deformation and stress a y-stress, b xz-stress, c xz-strain
Fig. 9 EBSD map of solder Sn with a crack a SEM picture of Sn
grains with c-axes long current direction, b EBSD map of a, c SEM
picture of Sn grains with c-axes deviate from current direction,
d EBSD map of c
J Mater Sci: Mater Electron (2016) 27:9748–9754 9753
123
between Cu pad on the PCB side and solder Sn, the max-
imum shear stress, whereas, locates at the middle brim of
solder Sn. These places are potential to crack under cou-
pling of thermal cycling and electric current tests.
Acknowledgments This work was supported by the Natural Science
Foundation of China, Grant Nos. 51171191 and 51471180, the Major
National Science and Technology Program of China, Grant No.
2011ZX02602.
References
1. C.T. Lin, Y.C. Chuang, S.J. Wang, C.Y. Liu, Appl. Phys. Lett.
89(10), 101906 (2006)
2. K.M. Chen, T.S. Lin, J. Mater. Sci. Mater. Electron. 21(3), 278(2009)
3. K.N. Subramanian, J.G. Lee, J. Mater. Sci. Mater. Electron.
15(4), 235 (2004)
4. R. An, Y.H. Tian, R. Zhang, C.Q. Wang, J. Mater. Sci. Mater.
Electron. 26(5), 2674 (2015)
5. C.J. Lee, W.Y. Chen, T.T. Chou, T.K. Lee, Y.C. Wu, T.C. Chang,
J.G. Duh, J. Mater. Sci. Mater. Electron. 26(12), 10055 (2015)
6. C.M. Chen, L.T. Chen, Y.S. Lin, J. Electron. Mater. 36(2), 168(2007)
7. J. Hokka, T.T. Mattila, H.B. Xu, M. Paulasto-Krockel, J. Elec-
tron. Mater. 42(6), 1171 (2013)
8. B.H. Kwak, M.H. Jeong, J.W. Kim, B. Lee, H.J. Lee, Y.B. Park,
Microelectron. Eng. 89, 65 (2012)
9. H. Gan, K.N. Tu, J. Appl. Phys. 97(6), 063514 (2005)
10. H.C. Ma, J.D. Guo, J.Q. Chen, D. Wu, Z.Q. Liu, Q.S. Zhu, J.K.
Shang, L. Zhang, H.Y. Guo, J. Mater. Sci. Mater. Electron. 27(2),1184 (2015)
11. Y. Zuo, L.M. Ma, S.H. Liu, T. Wang, F. Guo, X. Wang, J. Mater.
Sci. 48(6), 2318 (2012)
12. L.M. Ma, Y. Zuo, S.H. Liu, F. Guo, X.T. Wang, J. Appl. Phys.
113(4), 044904 (2013)
13. T. Laurila, T. Mattila, V. Vuorinen, J. Karppinen, J. Li, M.
Sippola, J.K. Kivilahti, Microelectron. Reliab. 47(7), 1135 (2007)
14. L. Anand, J. Eng. Mater. Tech. 104(1), 12 (1982). doi:10.1115/1.
3225028
15. W. Weibull, J. Appl. Mech-T. ASME. 18(3), 293 (1951)
16. W. Weibull, The Phenomenon of Rupture in Solids, Ingeniors
Vetenskaps Akademien, Handlingar, Nr 153 (Generalstabens
Litografiska Anstalts Forlag, Stockholm, 1939)
17. H.C. Ma, J.D. Guo, J.Q. Chen, D. Wu, Z.Q. Liu, Q.S. Zhu, J.K.
Shang, L. Zhang, H.Y. Guo, J. Mater. Sci. Mater. Electron.
26(10), 7690 (2015)
18. J.Q. Chen, J.D. Guo, K.L. Liu, J.K. Shang, J. Appl. Phys.
114(15), 153509 (2013)
9754 J Mater Sci: Mater Electron (2016) 27:9748–9754
123